eComments During Meetings: When available, click here to submit eComments during a live meeting | Attendees must register here to attend all virtual meetings.

File #: 16-316    Version: 1 Name: 2016 Prop. 57 Criminal Sentences
Type: Resolution Status: Action Item
File created: 10/11/2016 In control: City Council Meeting Agenda
On agenda: 10/24/2016 Final action:
Title: CC - (1) Discussion of a Position on Proposition 57: Criminal Sentences. Juvenile Criminal Proceedings and Sentencing. Initiative Constitutional Amendment and Statute, Appearing on the November 8, 2016 Statewide Ballot; and (2) Adoption of a Resolution Opposing Proposition 57; or (3) Direction to Send a Letter Supporting Proposition 57; or (4) Take no Position on Proposition 57; and (5) Direction to the City Manager as Deemed Appropriate.
Attachments: 1. November 2016 text-proposed-law - Prop 57.pdf, 2. RESO prop 57 Opposition 10-24-16.pdf
title
CC - (1) Discussion of a Position on Proposition 57: Criminal Sentences. Juvenile Criminal Proceedings and Sentencing. Initiative Constitutional Amendment and Statute, Appearing on the November 8, 2016 Statewide Ballot; and (2) Adoption of a Resolution Opposing Proposition 57; or (3) Direction to Send a Letter Supporting Proposition 57; or (4) Take no Position on Proposition 57; and (5) Direction to the City Manager as Deemed Appropriate.

body
Meeting Date: October 24, 2016

Contact Person/Dept: Shelly Wolfberg/City Manager's Office
Phone Number: 310-253-6000

Fiscal Impact: Yes [] No [X] General Fund: Yes [] No [X]

Public Hearing: [] Action Item: [X] Attachments: [X]

Commission Action Required: Yes [] No [X] Date:

Public Notification: (E-Mail) Meetings and Agendas - City Council (10/19/16);

Department Approval: John M. Nachbar, City Manager (10/18/16)
______________________________________________________________________


RECOMMENDATION

Staff recommends the City Council:

1. Discuss a position on Proposition 57: Criminal Sentences. Juvenile Criminal Proceedings and Sentencing. Initiative Constitutional Amendment and Statute, appearing on the November 8, 2016 statewide ballot; and

2. Adopt a Resolution opposing Proposition 57; or

3. Direct staff to draft a letter from the City Council supporting Proposition 57 and transmit the letter to the Yes on 57 organization; or

4. Take no position on Proposition 57; and

5. Provide direction to the City Manager as deemed appropriate.


BACKGROUND

At the September 24, 2016 City Council Meeting, Council Member Eriksson discussed Proposition 57 and opposition by law enforcement and prison associations. He received consensus from the City Council to agendize a discussion of the item for tonight's City Council Meeting.


DISCUSSION

The Proposition 57 initiative measure (Attachment 1) adds a section to the California Constitution and amends sections...

Click here for full text