Legislation Details

File #: HIST-1485    Version: 1 Subject:
Type: Historical Status: Consent Agenda
In control: City Council Meeting Agenda
On agenda: 12/12/2005 Final action: 12/12/2005
Title: Ordinance amending the Culver City Municipal Code pertaining to the processing and permitting of signs.
Attachments: 1. Sign Ord C-4.pdf, 2. C-4 Ordinance Permitting Signs.pdf
City of Culver City, California City Council Agenda Item Report Meeting Date:12/12/05 Item Number: C-6 AGENDA ITEM: Adoption of an Ordinance Amending Chapter 17.330 of the Culver City Municipal Code Pertaining to Processing and Permitting of Signs Contact Person/Dept.: Carol Schwab and Heather Iker/City Attorney Phone Number: (310) 253-5660 Fiscal Impact: Yes [] No [X] General Fund: Yes [] No [X] Public Hearing: [] Action Item: [X] Attachments: [X] Public Notification: Master Notification List (12/07/05) Department Approval: Carol Schwab, City Attorney (12/02/05) CAO Approval: Martin Cole for Jerry Fulwood (12/05/05) City Controller Approval: N/A RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the City Council adopt an Ordinance amending Chapter 17.330 of the CCMC pertaining to the processing and permitting of signs (Attachment 1). BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION: At the City Council meeting of November 28, 2005, the Council introduced the Ordinance by a unanimous vote (5-0). The Ordinance is brought back tonight for adoption. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Proposed Ordinance MOTION: That the City Council: Adopt an Ordinance Amending Chapter 17.330 of the Culver City Municipal Code pertaining to processing and permitting of signs. MEETING DATE 12/12/05 AGENDA ITEM Adoption of an Ordinance Amending Chapter 17 330 of the Culver City Municipal Code Pertaining to Processing and Permittmg of Signs ATTACHMENTS Pages 1 Ordinance Amending Chapter 17 330 pertaining to processing and permitting of signs 1-19Ar rr Acm m 6Pris ORDINANCE NO 2005- AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CULVER CITY, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING CHAPTER 17 330 OF THE CULVER CITY MUNICIPAL CODE PERTAINING TO PROCESSING AND PERMITTING OF SIGNS The City Council of the City of Culver DOES HEREBY ORDAIN as follows SECTION 1 FINDINGS The City Council of the City of Culver City (the City ) hereby finds, determines, and declares that A It is necessary and appropriate to amend Chapter 17 330 of the Culver City Municipal Code titled Signs" to refine and update its regulations of the time, place, and manner of the placement of signs The City has an overriding interest in planning and regulating the placement of signs on both public and private property within City in order to (1) protect the free speech rights of individuals and organizations, (2) regulate signs in a constitutional manner, (3) serve the interest of community aesthetics, (4) preserve vehicular and pedestrian traffic safety (5) protect and preserve property values, (6) improve the visual environment of the City, and (7) ensure the overall quality of life for persons living, working and visiting within Culver City Without a revised and effective sign ordinance residential, commercial, industrial and other sections of the City can quickly deteriorate, with detrimental consequences to social environmental, and economic values B This Ordinance is necessary for the preservation of the public peace health and safety The need for the Ordinance is based in part on the fact that (1) there is an ever-increasing and evolving body of case law governing the regulation of signs and billboards, (2) billboard interests have recently challenged sign ordinances in several jurisdictions within southern California as demonstrated by the decisions of the United States District Court in Honzon Outdoor, LLC v City of Industry 228 F Supp 2d 1113 (C D Cal 2002), Outdoor Media Group, Inc v City of|1010|I|1010101010101010 10 10|11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 2828 7/1/* I|1010101010101010 10 10|11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 Beaumont, 374 F Supp 2d 881 (C D Cal 2005), Covenant Media of Cal ,LLC v City of Huntington Park 377 F Supp 2d 828 (C D Cal 2005) Get Outdoors II, LLC v City of San Diego, 381 F Supp 2d 1250 (S D Cal 2005), Get Outdoors II, L L C v City of Lemon Grove, 378 F Supp 2d 1232 (S D Cal 2005), (3) some billboard companies have made it their practice to erect billboards in the middle of the night without a permit or in a manner that is illegal or frustrates safety inspections, as detailed in the case of City of Riverside v Valley Outdoor, Inc , 2005 WL 2233617 (Cal App 4 01st) and by Ted Rohrlich, Big Sign Firm Accused of Corruption, Los Angeles Times October 23, 2005 at Al and (4) it would be detrimental to the City, its residents, and its business community if during the process of updating its sign regulations parties seeking to either evade the implementation of the new regulations or challenge the City's existing regulations were able to place or install signs without limitation or in a manner that would cause some or all of the very threats to the public health, safety, and welfare that the City seeks to prevent by regulating signs C In developing this Ordinance, the City Council is mindful of legal principles relating to content-neutral time, place, and manner regulations of signs, billboards, and postings, and the City Council declares it does not intend to suppress or infringe upon expressive activities protected by the United States and California Constitutions Rather the City Council intends to enact reasonable content-neutral time place and manner regulations that are narrowly tailored to serve its substantial and legitimate interests in protecting the public health, safety and welfare and leave ample alternative avenues for protected expression The City Council takes legislative notice of various court decisions including the United States Supreme Court decisions regarding local regulation of signs billboards, and postings in Metromedia, Inc v City of San Diego, 453 U S 490, 101 S Ct 2992,69 L Ed 2d 800 (1981), and Members of the City Council v Taxpayers for Vincent, -2-466 U S 789 104 S Ct 2118 80 L Ed 3d 772 (1984) the decisions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit in Gerntsen v City of Los Angeles 994 F 2d 570 (9th Cir 1993) Clear Channel Outdoor, Inc v City of Los Angeles, 340 F 3d 810 (9th Cir 2003) and the state court of appeal decision in City and County of San Francisco v Eller Outdoor Advertising, 192 Cal App 3d 643 (1987) D The City finds and declares that it has a substantial and legitimate interest in regulating signs in the interest of the public health, safety and welfare of the City and its residents in order to preserve, protect, and promote the (1) constitutionally protected free speech rights of individuals and organizations, (2) safety of vehicles, bicyclists and pedestrians, (3) commercial and residential property values, (4) community aesthetics and the visual environment of the City so as to promote commerce investment, tourism and visitation and (5) the overall quality of living for persons residing or doing business in, or visiting the City Off site signs including but not limited to billboard and large supergraphic signs, threaten serious harms to Culver City's aesthetics, as well as the safe and efficient flow of vehicular and pedestrian traffic and property values Further, the very massive size of billboards and supergraphics threaten visibility and light impairment Any new or additional off site signs would threaten the public health safety and welfare of the City by negatively impacting community aesthetics and the safe and efficient flow of vehicular and pedestrian traffic It is a fundamental land use policy of Culver City to prohibit the construction, erection or use of any off site signs, other than those which legally exist in the City when the prohibition was first adopted in 1995, or for which a valid permit has been issued E Ample alternative avenues of communication exist for the dissemination of both commercial and non-commercial messages Alternative avenues include but are not limited to personal communication, pamphleting direct mail television radio and Internet communications With regard to the Internet the -3- '3 I|1010101010101010 10 10|11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28It|101010101010101010 10 10|11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 City Council further finds and declares that (1) the United States Supreme Court has recognized that 'From the publishers' point of view [the Internet] constitutes a vast platform from which to address and hear from a worldwide audience of millions of readers viewers, researchers, and buyers" Reno v Amencan Civil Liberties Union, 521 U S 844, 853, 117 S Ct 2329, 138 L Ed 2d 874 (1997) and (2) the California Court of Appeal has found that 63% of adults in the United States were using the Internet as of 2003 and that, "the average computer blogger has in effect, his or her own printing press to reach the world" In re Stevens, 119 Cal App 4th 1228, 1235- 1236 (2004) The City Council therefore finds as the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit did, that the Internet is an ample alternative avenue of communication when other mediums are subject to reasonable content-neutral time, place, or manner restrictions Anheuser Busch v Schmoke, 101 F 3d 325 (4th Cir 1996), cart denied 520 U S 1204 (1997) F A proper balancing of individual rights to free expression and the substantial public interest protecting the public health, safety, and welfare requires the prompt hearing and judicial review as to any requests to erect signs that are denied The time allowances for appeal and judicial review of denials of sign permit applications in this Ordinance are the shortest fixed periods compatible with the balancing of sound land use planning and the protection of First Amendment freedoms The City Council finds that these time frames are reasonable, in that the City is granting or denying a sign permit within thirty (30) days of the filing of a completed application for such permit After the filing of an appeal the Planning Commission or City Council conducts a public hearing on such appeal and renders a decision within thirty (30) days of the filing of the appeal These time frames are reasonably required based on facts that include but are not limited to (1) public hearings are required for certain land use decisions and require ten (10) days advance notice under Sections 65091 and 65905 of the California Government -4-Code, (2) the City Hall for Culver City is closed to the public on various Fridays, (3) publication of a notice to the public regarding a hearing requires sufficient lead time after request by the City for publication in a newspaper and (4) Culver City is a small jurisdiction and has a very limited staff These time allowances are necessary to protect the free speech and due process rights of the applicant and the public to speak regarding the issuance or denial of a sign permit G Judicial review of an appeal relating to a First Amendment permit or entitlement decision is available pursuant to Section 1094 8 of the California Code of Civil Procedure, on an expedited basis H The regulation of signs is a matter of City-wide importance and is neither directed towards nor targeted at any particular parcel of property, person, or organization SECTION 2 AMENDMENT Section 17 330 005 of the Culver City Municipal Code is hereby repealed and replaced as follows 17 330 005 — Intent This Chapter is a comprehensive system for the regulation of signs in the City Sign regulation is enacted to serve the interests of community aesthetics, vehicular and pedestrian safety, to protect and preserve property values, to improve the visual environment of the City so as to promote commerce, investment, tourism, and visitation, and the overall quality of life for persons living in doing business in, or visiting the City The provisions of this Chapter are also intended to promote the public health, safety and general welfare of persons driving parking, biking, walking, residing or conducting business within the City by reducing visual distractions to motorists, by making signs and advertising displays more attractive, aesthetically pleasing and more effective It is the further purpose of this Chapter that every use of property within the City receives adequate identification The City intends to -5- S I|1010101010101010 10 10|11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28to|101010101010101010 10 10|11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 create a comprehensive balanced system of signs that is aesthetically pleasing and compatible with the environment The regulations of this Chapter are not intended to permit any violations of the provisions of any other lawful ordinance, nor to prohibit the use of any sign required by any law superior to that of this Ordinance A Regulatory Interpretations All regulatory interpretations of this Chapter are to be exercised in light of the City s message neutrality policy Where a particular type of sign is proposed in a permit application, and the type is neither expressly allowed nor prohibited nor restricted by this Chapter, or whenever a sign does not qualify as a 'structure" as defined in the Uniform Building Code, then the Director shall approve, conditionally approve or disapprove the application based on the most similar sign type that is expressly regulated by this Chapter Architectural compatibility shall be analyzed on the basis of size, location, color, construction materials and design of the sign structure, without consideration of the message to be displayed on a sign, other than the distinction between on-site and off-site commercial messages B Discretionary Approvals Whenever a sign or proposed sign is subject to any discretionary approval process, including but not limited to variance, conditional use permit or administrative use permit, then no consideration will be given to sign copy or message to be displayed, other than a determination as to whether the message will constitute off-site commercial copy This principle applies equally at all levels of approval, from the Director to the City Council C Non-communicative Aspects of Signs All rules and regulations concerning the non-communicative aspects of signs, such as location, size, height illumination spacing orientation, and so forth stand enforceable independently of any permit or approval process -6-SECTION 3 AMENDMENT Section 17 330 020 B of the Culver City Municipal Code, Table 3-5 titled Sign Standards for Non-Residential Zoning Districts, Row Heading of Directional Signs (row 4), Column Heading of Maximum Number of Signs (column 4) The text of this cell is hereby amended to read as follows Shall be approved by the Director based on issues of safety, line of site and site conditions to ensure safe pedestrian and vehicular movement SECTION 4 AMENDMENT Section 17 330 025 E 2 of the Culver City Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows|109| An application for deviation from the size, location, height or number restrictions contained in Table 3-5 may be submitted to the Director and said deviation request shall be granted when the applicant establishes the presence of unusual needs circumstances, or conditions relative to restricted visibility, the size of the property, or the number of access points that make the deviation necessary SECTION 5 AMENDMENT Section 17 330 025 F 1 of the Culver City Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows|109| An electronic message sign shall be displayed only if the information displayed is public information SECTION 6 AMENDMENT Section 17 330 025 H 1 d is hereby amended to read as follows d An application for additional or larger gasoline station price signs may be submitted to the Director and shall be granted if the applicant establishes that such is necessary to meet the minimum requirements established by County, State or Federal law SECTION 7 AMENDMENT Section 17 330 025 K of the Culver City Municipal Code, Table 3-6A Standards for Temporary Signs Row Heading of Event Signs -7- I I|1010101010101010 10 10|11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 2846 I|1010101010101010 10 10|11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 (row 4) Column Heading of Maximum Sign Area (column 2) The text of this cell is hereby amended to read as follows Sign area shall be in keeping with the regulations in place for permanent signs allowed by this Chapter and without consideration of the message to be displayed on the temporary event sign SECTION 8 AMENDMENT Section 17 330 025 K of the Culver City Municipal Code Table 3-6A Standards for Temporary Signs Row Heading of Event Signs (row 4) Column Heading of Maximum Sign Height (column 3) The text of this cell is hereby amended to read as follows Sign height shall be in keeping with the regulations in place for permanent signs allowed by this Chapter and without consideration of the message to be displayed on the temporary event sign SECTION 9 AMENDMENT Section 17 330 025 K of the Culver City Municipal Code Table 3-6A Standards for Temporary Signs Row Heading of Event Signs (row 4), Column Heading of Maximum Number of Signs (column 4) The text of this cell is hereby amended to read as follows Number of signs shall be in keeping with the regulations in place for permanent signs allowed by this Chapter based on the size and lot configuration and ensuring no access or site impairment and without consideration of the message to be displayed on the temporary holiday sign SECTION 10 AMENDMENT Section 17 330 025 K of the Culver City Municipal Code, Table 3-6A Standards for Temporary Signs Row Heading of Event Signs (row 4), Column Heading of Additional Requirements (column 6) The text of this cell is hereby amended to read as follows Additional, more stringent regulations may be placed on special event signs through any discretionary land use approval or business tax certificate approval process required for special events by this Code based on issues of size, -8-1 location color, construction materials and design of the sign without consideration of|109| the message to be displayed on the special events sign|109| SECTION 11 AMENDMENT Section 17 330 025 K of the Culver City 4 Municipal Code, Table 3-6A Standards for Temporary Signs Row Heading of Holiday 5 Signs (row 7) Column Heading of Maximum Sign Area (column 2) The text of this cell is 6 hereby amended to read as follows|109| Sign area shall be in keeping with the regulations in place for 8 permanent signs allowed by this Chapter and without consideration of the 9 message to be displayed on the temporary holiday sign 10 SECTION 12 AMENDMENT Section 17 330 025 K of the Culver City 11 Municipal Code, Table 3-6A Standards for Temporary Signs Row Heading of Holiday 12 Signs (row 7) Column Heading of Maximum Sign Height (column 3) The text of this cell 13 is hereby amended to read as follows 14 Sign height shall be in keeping with the regulations in place for 15 permanent signs allowed by this Chapter and without consideration of the 16 message to be displayed on the temporary holiday sign 17 SECTION 13 AMENDMENT Section 17 330 025 K of the Culver City 18 Municipal Code, Table 3-6A Standards for Temporary Signs, Row Heading of Holiday 19 Signs (row 7) Column Heading of Maximum Number of Signs (column 4) The text of 20 this cell is hereby amended to read as follows 21 Number of signs shall be in keeping with the regulations in place for 22 permanent signs allowed by this Chapter based on the size and lot 23 configuration and ensuring no access or site impairment and without 24 consideration of the message to be displayed on the temporary holiday sign 25 SECTION 14 AMENDMENT Section 17 330 025 L 2 a is hereby 26 amended to replace the word encouraged" with "allowed 27 28 -9- 1SECTION 15 AMENDMENT Section 17 330 035 B 4 is hereby amended to read as follows Freeway-oriented signs As used herein are on-site signs that are directed essentially to be visible only from a freeway and are prohibited without a permit issued by the Director pursuant to master sign program SECTION 16 AMENDMENT Section 17 330 035 B is hereby amended to delete the words 'or through the approval of a master sign program" from the first sentence SECTION 17 AMENDMENT Section 17 330 050 is hereby repealed and replaced as follows 17 330 050 — Review Process and Appeals A Permits shall be required for the following sign types 1 All signs meeting the definition of 'structure" within the Uniform Building Code are subject to the structural requirements of that Code, and may be mounted, erected or displayed only when a valid building permit has been issued,|109| Signs included in the master sign program and multiple business sign program as provided for in this Chapter,|109| Signs requiring a conditional use permit, variance, or modification as provided under this Chapter and|109| Temporary banners as provided under this Chapter B Sign Related Decisions and Appeals|109| Administrative Authority It is the responsibility of the Director to enforce all provisions of this Chapter Notwithstanding any other provisions of this Title, sign related decisions shall be governed by the procedures outlined in this Chapter|101010101010101010 10 10|11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -10- I02 Sign Related Decisions Sign related decisions include decisions on applications for sign permits master sign programs repair or removal orders, abatement orders, amortization schedules, requests for interpretations, and all other sign related matters requiring decision by the City|109| Incomplete Applications If the Director finds that any application for a sign permit is incomplete, the applicant shall be so notified not more than fifteen (15) calendar days after the application is received The notice shall detail all known points of incompleteness Such writing shall be deposited in U S mail, postage prepaid, immediately upon determination that the application is incomplete Within fifteen (15) business days following the receipt of an amended application or supplemental information, the Director shall again determine whether the application is complete in accordance with the procedures set forth above Evaluation and notification shall occur as provided above until such time as the application is found to be complete If the Director fails to provide notice of incompleteness within fifteen (15) business days, then the application shall be deemed complete|109| Review/Standard All matters of enforcement, interpretation and application of this Chapter, including all sign related decisions shall be made initially by the Director as an administrative matter, with no public hearing required Any effected person may appeal the Director s sign related decisions to the Planning Commission for public hearing and decision Any decision of the Planning Commission except appeals of an incompleteness determination may be appealed to the City Council for public hearing The City Council s decision is final as to the City, but is subject to judicial review In reaching a decision neither the Director, Planning Commission nor City Council shall be bound by the formal rules of evidence I I I|1010101010101010 10 10|11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 281|1010101010101010 10 10|11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27|109| Perfecting Appeal, Time Limit for Appeal An appeal is effective when delivered to the City Clerk within the required time, on a form prescribed by the Director accompanied by any applicable appeal fee (in an amount set by Resolution of the City Council) signed by the appellant identifying the matter or decision appealed from and stating the grounds of appeal All notices of appeal on all sign related decisions, must be filed with the City Clerk within ten (10) calendar days of when the appeal right arises|109| When Appeal Right Arises, Finality The right to appeal a sign related decision arises at the earliest of when written notice of the Director's administrative decision is deposited in the U S mail, postage prepaid, when an appellate decision is made by vote of the appellate body in a duly noticed hearing on the matter when written notice of the decision is delivered or deposited in the U S mail, postage prepaid to the applicant or appellant or at the expiration of the time in which the Director or appellate body is required to make a decision (unless timeliness of decision is waived by the applicant or appellant) Any sign related decision which is not properly appealed within the required time is final At each level of review, written notice of any sign related decision shall be sent via United States mail to the applicant within five (5) calendar days of the decision|109| Timeliness of Decision, Waiver of Time At each level of review all sign related decisions (which includes any hearing when procedurally required) shall be made within thirty (30) calendar days of when the permit application is complete the request for interpretation has been received, or when the appeal has been timely and properly filed The timeliness requirements may be waived by the applicant or appellant The failure of the Director, Planning Commission or City Council to render any decision within the time frames established in any part of this section shall be deemed to constitute a denial and the applicant or appellant shall have the immediate right to appeal 0:8 -12- 8 Maintenance of Status Quo While a sign related decision is pending, the status quo shall be maintained until the review or appeal has run its full course unless the subject sign is in such physical condition that it presents a serious or immediate threat to the public health and safety, in which case it may be abated as a public nuisance No building, electrical, plumbing, mechanical or grading permit shall be issued for a proposed sign until the appeal process has run its full course 9 Appeals The filing of an appeal within the time limit shall stay the effective date of the decision appealed from When any related decision is timely appealed to the Planning Commission or City Council the appellate body shall hold a hearing on the matter and decide the matter within the required time period unless the applicant or appellant waives time The decision shall be in writing and shall state facts from the record which support any findings made 10 Judicial Review Following exhaustion of all available appellate procedures within the City, any applicant or appellant may seek judicial review of the City's final decision pursuant to California Code of Civil Procedure § 1094 8 This provision does not limit an applicant's or appellant's ability to seek judicial review by other means 11 Conduct Constituting a Public Nuisance The construction maintenance, or placement of any sign within the City in violation of any of the terms of this Chapter is hereby found and declared to be a public nuisance and the City Attorney or the District Attorney may, in addition or in lieu of prosecuting a criminal action hereunder, commence an action or proceeding for the abatement, removal and enjoyment thereof, in the manner provided by law and shall take other steps and shall apply to such courts as may have jurisdiction to grant such relief as will abate or remove such illegal sign and to restrain and enjoin -13- '3 I|1010101010101010 10 10|11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28any person(s) from conducting operating or maintaining a sign contrary to the provisions of this Article C Hardship Exemptions|109| Where the owner/user of a proposed or existing sign believes that compliance with the provisions of this Chapter coupled with unusual geographic or building design and configuration conditions pertaining to the site or contractual conditions limiting the use thereof, would create an undue economic hardship on the use of property (s)he may apply to the Director for a hardship exemption The Directors decision in such cases shall be based on one or more of the following criteria a The site is unusual in size, shape or topography b Improvements on the site or on adjoining public or private properties cause a visual obstruction c The site is improved with a multiple business development and is encumbered by an existing contractual obligation that precludes the modification of one or more other existing signs for other businesses at the same time as the installation of a new sign or a modification to an existing sign on the same sign structure is proposed for a business on the premises|109| Approval of a hardship exemption may be subject to time, place and manner conditions based on issues of size location, color, construction materials and design of the sign without consideration or restriction as to the message to be displayed on the sign -14-3 The applicant has the burden of proof to establish that a hardship exists based on the criteria found above D Comprehensive Sign Programs|109| Multiple Business Sign Programs a The purpose of a multiple business sign program is to achieve design compatibility amongst all signs displayed on a single ownership parcel that is occupied by two or more separate businesses b The submittal of a multiple business sign program shall be required for each multi-tenant development that is occupied by two or more separate businesses at the time the first new permanent sign or first modification to an existing permanent sign on the premises is proposed, except that a multiple business sign program is not required for a project with an approved master sign program c A multiple business sign program, or the equivalent approved prior to the effective date of this Chapter or any amendment to this Chapter, shall be revised, if necessary, to conform to this Chapter at the time the first new permanent sign or modification to an existing permanent sign is proposed on the premises d A multiple business sign program shall be submitted by or with the consent of the property owner or master lessor e A multiple business sign program shall consist of plans and text describing the details of all signs, existing-to- '3 -15-remain modified, and new signs, that are and that may be displayed on the premises f Only the types of signs allowed by the regulations of this Chapter shall be approved under a multiple business sign program g The Director shall approve, conditionally approve, or disapprove any application for a multiple business sign program|109| Master Sign Programs a The purpose of a master sign program is to provide a mechanism by which the sign regulations established in this Chapter can be modified to ensure that signs for a uniquely planned or designed development or area are most appropriate for that particular development or area b A master sign program may be i Required by the Director for any development that requires a Site Plan Review in compliance with Chapter 17 540, or a similar discretionary review or ii Requested by the owner or master lessor of a development or iii Initiated by the City or the Culver City Redevelopment Agency for a particular area in furtherance of a specific plan revitalization program, overlay zone or other area wide planning tool -16-|101010101010101010 10 10|11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 09 28c A master sign program may include provisions that are more and/or less restrictive than the regulations established in this Chapter as related to issues of size, location color, construction materials and design of the sign but without consideration as to the message to be displayed on the sign based on the particular unique features of the development d Each master sign program applicant shall show why the modifications requested are warranted and how the total sign proposal for the development meets, on balance the general purpose and intent of this Chapter e A master sign program, or the equivalent, that was approved by the City or Redevelopment Agency prior to the effective date of this Chapter or any amendment to this Chapter, shall be deemed to conform to this Chapter f The Director shall approve, conditionally approve, or disapprove any application for a master sign program g A new master sign program approval shall be obtained for substantial revisions to the original approval, as determined by the Director SECTION 18 ENVIRONMENTAL FINDINGS Adoption of this Ordinance is not subject to the California Environmental Quality Act ('CEQA ), Public Resources Code § 21000 et seq The effect of the Ordinance will be to preserve the status quo with respect to the time place, and manner in which signs may be erected in the City because the Ordinance neither allows any sign that is currently prohibited by the Culver City Municipal Code, nor prohibits any sign that is currently allowed by the Culver City Municipal Code The City Council therefore finds that the Ordinance does not qualify as a project' subject ii I|1010101010101010 10 10|11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -1 7-I|101010101010101010 10 10|11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 to CEQA under Public Resources Code § 21065 because it will not result in either a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment Independent of this determination, the City Council also finds that the Ordinance qualifies for exemption from CEQA under 14 Cal Code Regs § 15061(b)(3) because it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the Ordinance will have a significant effect on the environment In accordance with Public Resources Code § 21152(b), the City will issue a Notice of Exemption after the Ordinance is adopted The Notice of Exemption will be filed with the County Clerk of the County of Los Angeles where it will be available for public inspection pursuant to Public Resources Code § 21152(b)-(c) SECTION 19 SEVERABILITY If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or word of this Ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid by a court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance The City Council hereby declares that it would have passed and adopted this Ordinance, and each and all provisions hereof, irrespective of the fact that one or more provisions may be declared invalid Further, in the event of the invalidation of any provision of this Ordinance, it is the intention of the City Council that any person seeking to erect a sign in the City should be nonetheless subject to all remaining requirements of the Ordinance or the City s Municipal Code, including, but not limited to, location design and building requirements and the revocation violation, and penalty provisions, which the City Council has already or would have adopted independent of any other provision in this Ordinance SECTION 20 PUBLICATION Pursuant to Section 514 of the City Charter this Ordinance shall take effect thirty (30) days after the date of its adoption Pursuant to Sections 512 and 517 of the City Charter prior to the expiration of fifteen (15) days after the adoption, the City Clerk shall cause this Ordinance or a summary thereof to be published in the Culver City News and shall post this Ordinance or a summary thereof in at least three places within the City -18-APPROVED AND ADOPTED this day of 2005 ALBERT M VERA, Mayor City of Culver City, California ATTEST APPROVED AS TO FORM 11 -19-|101010101010101010 10 10|11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 CHRISTOPHER ARMENTA, City Clerk