Legislation Details

File #: 26-763    Version: 1 Name: ACTION ITEM: (1) Consideration of the CAC Public Art Subcommittee's Recommendation of the Architecture as Art Concept at 9810-9814 Washington Boulevard by Brooks Scarpa Huber on Behalf of Rethink Culver, LLC.
Type: Minute Order Status: Action Item
File created: 4/10/2026 In control: CULTURAL AFFAIRS COMMISSION
On agenda: 4/21/2026 Final action:
Title: CAC - ACTION ITEM: (1) Consideration of the CAC Public Art Subcommittee's Recommendation Regarding an "Architecture as Art" Proposal at 9810-9814 Washington Boulevard by Brooks Scarpa Huber on Behalf of Rethink Culver, LLC.; (2) Review, Discuss, and Provide Comments; and, (3) Make a Motion to Accept the CAC Public Art Subcommittee's Recommendation.
title
CAC - ACTION ITEM: (1) Consideration of the CAC Public Art Subcommittee's Recommendation Regarding an "Architecture as Art" Proposal at 9810-9814 Washington Boulevard by Brooks Scarpa Huber on Behalf of Rethink Culver, LLC.; (2) Review, Discuss, and Provide Comments; and, (3) Make a Motion to Accept the CAC Public Art Subcommittee's Recommendation.

body
Meeting Date: April 21, 2026

Contact Person/Dept: Sam Lee / Office of Economic and Cultural Development

Phone Number: (310) 253-6001

Fiscal Impact: Yes [] No [X] General Fund: Yes [] No [X]

Public Hearing: [] Action Item: [X] Attachments: Yes [] No [X]

Public Notification: Meetings and Agendas - Cultural Affairs Commission (04/16/26)

Department Approval: Sally Unsworth, Cultural Affairs Manager (04/16/26)
______________________________________________________________________

RECOMMENDATION

Staff recommends that the Cultural Affairs Commission (1) Considers the CAC Public Art Subcommittee's Recommendation Regarding an "Architecture as Art" proposal at 9810-9814 Washington Boulevard by Brooks Scarpa Huber on Behalf of Rethink Culver, LLC.; (2) Review, Discuss, and Provide Comments; (3) Make a Motion to Accept the CAC Public Art Subcommittee's Recommendation.

BACKGROUND

"Architecture as Art" was approved by the City Council in 1995 as an option in fulfilling the City's public art requirement for tenant improvement projects (exceeding $250,000) and new development projects (in excess of $500,000). Specific language was added under Sections ?15.06.165 and ?15.06.170 of the City's Public Art Ordinance #2013-003 to include this component. In summary, these criteria state that the architect shall be substantially recognized in the art world; the underlying concept of the architecture shall be expressive of high artistic merit and extend beyond the utilitarian; the materials and craftsmanship shall be of high quality; and, the architecture sha...

Click here for full text