Legislation Details

File #: HIST-2017    Version: 1 Subject:
Type: Historical Status: Action Item
In control: City Council Meeting Agenda
On agenda: 3/13/2006 Final action: 3/13/2006
Title: Discussion of Options for Regulating Smoking in Public Parks.
Attachments: 1. A-5__03_13_06_CA_ParkSmokingRegulations.pdf, 2. A-5 Smoking in Public Parks.pdf
Discussion of Options for Regulating Smoking in Public Parks. Item Number: A 5 City of Culver City California City Council Agenda Item Report Phone Number: (310) 253 5660 Meeting Date: 03/13/06 AGENDA ITEM: Discussion of Options for Regulating Smoking in Public Parks. Contact Person/Dept.: Heather Iker/City Attorney General Fund: Yes No X Fiscal Impact: Yes No X Public Hearing: Attachments: X Public Notification: Published in Culver City News on March 2 2006 (Attachment 1); Via e mail on February 28 2006: County of Los Angeles Department of Health Services; Via e mail on March 8 2006: Master Notification List (03/09/06); Parks and Recreation Commission. Department Approval: Carol Schwab City Attorney (by H. Iker 03/07/06) City Controller Approval: CAO Approval: Martin R. Cole for Jerry B. Fulwood (03/09/06) Action Item: X RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council discuss options for regulating smoking in public parks and provide direction to staff. BACKGROUND: Over the past few years the City has been reviewing its park regulations to determine whether any revisions or additions to the Culver City Municipal Code ( CCMC ) are appropriate to further ensure the public s enjoyment of the City s parks. During this process there has been discussion on the issue of smoking in the City s parks in light of current State law which prohibits smoking within 25 feet of a playground or tot lot sandbox area (Health and Safety Code 104495 Attachment 2). At the City Council s direction this issue was presented to the Parks and Recreation Commission for discussion at its meeting of May 4 2004. The options that were presented to the Commission for consideration and recommendation to the Council included: 1) enforcement of the State law only; 2) adoption of stricter regulations (i.e. increasing the distance within which smoking is prohibited imposing stricter penalties etc.); and 3) adoption of a total ban on smoking in the City s parks. After discussion of the issue there was a motion to ...

Click here for full text