City of Culver City, California
Agenda Item Report
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the City Council 1) determine that no new information has
become available and no changes in the proposed project have been made since
the Planning Commission’s adoption of a Mitigated Negative Declaration related to
the project and, therefore, no additional environmental analysis is required; and, 2)
introduce the proposed Ordinance (Attachment No. 1), amending the Culver City
Zoning Map, as referenced in Title 17, Zoning, of the Culver City Municipal Code,
Section 17.200.015, establishing Planned Development Zone No. 12 (Zoning Code
Map Amendment, ZCMA-P2012118) and approving a Comprehensive Plan (CP P-
2012116) for a mixed use development consisting of approximately 31,240 square
feet of commercial uses and 115 residential units located at 8770 Washington
Boulevard.
Meeting Date: 1/28/13 Item Number: PH-1
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM: PUBLIC HEARING – Introduction of an Ordinance
Amending the Culver City Zoning Map, as Referenced in Title 17, Zoning, of the
Culver City Municipal Code, Section 17.200.015, Establishing Planned Development
Zone No. 12 Zoning Code Map Amendment (ZCMA P-2012118) and Approving a
Comprehensive Plan (CP P-2012116) to Allow a Mixed Used Development
Consisting of Approximately 31,240 Square Feet of Commercial Uses and 115
Residential Units Located at 8770 Washington Boulevard.
Contact Person/Dept.:
Susan Yun, CDD
Thomas Gorham, CDD
Phone Number:
(310) 253-5755
(310) 253-5727
Fiscal Impact: Yes [] No [x] General Fund: [ ] No: [x]
Public Hearing: [X] Action Item: [] Attachments: [X]
Commission Action Required: Yes [X] No [] Date: 12/10/12
Planning Commission
Public Notification: On December 21, 2012, a notice was mailed to all the property owners
and occupants beyond a 1,000-foot radius of the project site and emailed to the Master
Notification List. The notice was mailed to East Culver City Neighborhood Alliance
Homeowners Association, the Chamber of Commerce and Downtown Business
Association. On December 21, 2012, the site was posted. The notice was also
published in the Culver City News on January 10
th
and 17
th
, 2013; Meetings and Agendas
– City Council (01/23/13)
Department Approval:
Sol Blumenfeld: (01/17/13)
City Attorney Approval:
Carol Schwab (by H. Baker) (01/22/13)
Chief Financial Officer Approval:
Jeff Muir (by M. Noller) (01/23/13)
City Manager Approval:
John M. Nachbar (01/23/13) City of Culver City, California
Agenda Item Report
PROCEDURE:
1. Mayor seeks motion to receive and file the affidavit of mailing and posting of
public notice.
2. Mayor calls on staff for a brief staff report and City Council poses questions to
staff as desired.
3. Mayor seeks motion to declare the public hearing open, providing the applicant
the first opportunity to speak, followed by the general public.
4. Mayor seeks a motion to close the public hearing after all testimony has been
presented.
5. City Council discusses the matter and arrives at its decision.
BACKGROUND:
The proposed request is to establish a Planned Development (PD) Zone through a
Zoning Code Map Amendment (ZCMA) and a Comprehensive Plan (CP) to allow the
construction of a 5-story, 56 foot high maximum, mixed-use development consisting
of approximately 31,240 square feet of ground floor commercial uses (retail and
restaurant) and 115 residential units above with a total of 344 parking spaces
provided at the ground level and in two levels of subterranean parking (the Project).
The Project site is located near the recently completed Exposition Light Rail Transit
(Expo LRT) line, Culver City Expo Station, and the City’s Washington National
Transit Oriented Development (TOD) at 8770 Washington Boulevard.
In order to facilitate the proposed Project, a Zoning Code Map Amendment and
Comprehensive Plan are required pursuant to Zoning Code Section 17.240, Planned
Development Zoning Districts and Section 17.560, Comprehensive Plans. The
proposed Zoning Code Map Amendment includes re-zoning the project site from
East Washington Overlay (EWO), Industrial General (IG) and Commercial General
(CG) Zones to Planned Development (PD). The proposed Comprehensive Plan
implements the PD zoning with specific development standards and permitted land
uses. The Comprehensive Plan is intended to allow flexibility in the application of the
Zoning Code standards for larger scaled proposed developments and considers
innovation in site planning in order to more effectively respond to site features, uses
on adjoining properties, and other impacts where the Zoning Code alone may not
provide such flexibility.
At its December 12, 2012 meeting, after considering the staff report, the application
materials, and applicant presentation, the Planning Commission unanimously
adopted a Resolution (Attachment No. 2) recommending City Council approval of
the Project zoning and development permit ZCMA-P2012118 establishing PD Zone
No. 12 and Comprehensive Plan (CP P-2012116). The Planning Commission
recommended a condition of approval (Condition No. 108, Exhibit B, Attachment
No.1) requiring the applicant to offer free of charge one annual Metro pass to each City of Culver City, California
Agenda Item Report
of the residential tenants in the project as a way to encourage use of the Expo LRT
and as a leasing incentive.
Please see Attachment Nos. 3 through 6 (Comprehensive Plan document, Planning
Commission Staff Report, Environmental Analysis, and Traffic Study) for a detailed
review of the Project.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Proposed Ordinance and Exhibit A, Zone Change Map and Exhibit B,
Conditions of Approval.
2. Planning Commission Resolution No. 2012-P013 (without attachments).
3. December 12, 2012, Planning Commission Staff Report (without attachments).
4. Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration dated October 24, 2012.
5. Traffic Analysis prepared by Hirsch/Green Transportation Consulting, Inc. dated
July 10, 2010 and supplemented on June 19, 2012.
6. Proposed Comprehensive Plan dated January 28, 2013.
FISCAL ANALYSIS:
There is no fiscal impact associated with the introduction of the Proposed
Ordinance.
MOTION:
That the City Council:
1. Determine that there is no new information or substantial changes to the Project
since the Planning Commission’s adoption of the Mitigated Negative Declaration
and, therefore, no additional environmental analysis is required; and
2. Introduce the proposed Ordinance, amending the Culver City Zoning Map, as
referenced in Title 17, Zoning, of the Culver City Municipal Code, Section
17.200.015, establishing Planned Development Zone No. 12 (Zoning Code Map
Amendment, ZCMA-P2012118) and approving a Comprehensive Plan (CP P-
2012116).
MEETING DATE: 1/28/13
AGENDA ITEM: Introduction of an Ordinance Amending the Culver City
Zoning Map, as Referenced in Title 17, Zoning, of the Culver City Municipal
Code, Section 17.200.015, Establishing Planned Development Zone No. 12
Zoning Code Map Amendment (ZCMA P-2012118) and Approving a
Comprehensive Plan (CP P-2012116) to Allow a Mixed Used Development
Consisting of Approximately 31,240 Square Feet of Commercial Uses and
115 Residential Units Located at 8770 Washington Boulevard.
ATTACHMENTS
Pages
1. Proposed Ordinance and Exhibit A, Zone Change Map
and Exhibit B, Conditions of Approval. 1- 47
2. Planning Commission Resolution No. 2012-P013
(without attachments). 48-55
3. December 12, 2012, Planning Commission Staff Report
(without attachments). 56-74
4. Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration dated
October 24, 2012. 75-118
5. Traffic Analysis prepared by Hirsch/Green Transportation
Consulting, Inc. dated July 10, 2010 and supplemented
on June 19, 2012. 119-731
6. Proposed Comprehensive Plan dated January 28, 2013. 732-802
ORDINANCE NO. 2013-_______
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CULVER CITY, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING
THE CULVER CITY ZONING MAP, AS REFERENCED IN TITLE 17, ZONING,
OF THE CULVER CITY MUNICIPAL CODE, SECTION 17.200.015,
ESTABLISHING PLANNED DEVELOPMENT ZONE NO. 12 AND APPROVING
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, CP-P2012116, CONSISTING OF A MIXED USE
DEVELOPMENT CONSISTING OF APPROXIMATELY 31,240 SQUARE FEET
OF RETAIL AND RESTAURANT USES AND 115 RESIDENTIAL DWELLING
UNITS LOCATED AT 8770 WASHINGTON BOULEVARD IN THE EAST
WASHINGTON OVERLAY (EWO), COMMERCIAL GENERAL (CG) AND
INDUSTRIAL GENERAL (IG) ZONE, AND RELATED ZONING CODE MAP
AMENDMENT, ZCMA P-2012118.
(ZCMA P-2012118 AND CP-P2012116)
WHEREAS, on August 9, 2012, Legado Companies and Legado Crossing, LP, as the
applicant and property owner (the “Applicant”) of 8770 Washington Boulevard, filed an
application for a Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Code Map Amendment for Planned
Development District No. 12, consisting of a 5-story mixed use transit oriented development
of approximately 31,240 square feet of ground floor commercial uses, and 115 residential
dwelling units, providing a total of 344 parking spaces in two levels of subterranean parking
(the “Project”), the Project site described more fully as Lots 2 through 15 of Tract No. 3772,
in the City of Culver City, County of Los Angeles, State of California; and,
WHEREAS, in order to implement the proposed Project, approval of the following
applications is required:
1. Zoning Code Map Amendment: For consistency between land use designation
and zoning, specifically the zone change of the Project site from the East Washington
Overlay (EWO), Commercial General (CG) Zone, and Industrial General (IG) Zone to a
Planned Development (PD) Zone: and
ATTACHMENT 1
12. Comprehensive Plan: To ensure the Project is in compliance with all required
standards and City ordinances and establish all onsite and offsite conditions of approval to
reflect the site features and compatibility of the proposed Project with the uses on adjoining
properties.
WHEREAS, on December 12, 2012, after conducting a duly noticed public hearing on
the subject applications, including full consideration of the application, plans, staff report,
environmental information and all testimony presented, the Planning Commission (i) adopted
a Mitigated Negative Declaration, in accordance with the California Environmental Quality
Act (CEQA), finding the Project, as mitigated, will not result in significant adverse
environmental impacts; and (ii) adopted Resolution No. 2012-P013 recommending to the
City Council, approval of Zoning Code Map Amendment, ZCMA P-2012118 and
Comprehensive Plan, CP-P2012116, (the adopted Mitigated Negative Declaration and
Resolution No. 2012-P013 are incorporated by this reference as though fully set forth
herein); and,
WHEREAS, on January 28, 2013, after conducting a duly noticed public hearing on
the subject application, including full consideration of the application, plans, staff report,
environmental information, Planning Commission recommendation, and all testimony
presented, the City Council (i) by a vote of ___ to ___, determined that no new information
has become available and no changes in the proposed Project have been made since the
Planning Commission adopted the Mitigated Negative Declaration and, therefore, no
additional environmental analysis is required; and (ii) by a vote of ___ to ____ approved
Zoning Code Map Amendment, ZCMA P-2012118, for Planned Development Zone No. 12,
and Comprehensive Plan, CP-P2012116, as set forth herein below.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CULVER CITY,
CALIFORNIA, RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS:
ATTACHMENT 1
2
SECTION 1. Pursuant to the foregoing recitations and the provisions of Culver City
Municipal Code (CCMC), the following findings are hereby made:
Zoning Code Map Amendment for Planned Development Zone No. 12:
As outlined in CCMC Title 17, Section 17.620.030.A, the following required findings for a
Zoning Code Map Amendment are hereby made:
1. The proposed amendment ensures and maintains internal consistency with the
goals, policies and strategies of all elements of the General Plan and will not
create any inconsistencies with this Title, in the case of a Zoning Code
Amendment.
The proposed Zoning Code Map Amendment ensures and maintains internal
consistency with the goals, policies and strategies of the General Plan. Specifically,
the Zoning Code Map Amendment will change the zoning of the Site from the EWO,
CG and IG zones to a PD zone and will make the Site consistent with the General
Plan Land Use “General Corridor” designation.
The proposed zone change will allow for the development of the Site for a Transit
Oriented Development (TOD) comprised of a mix of compatible land uses including
retail, restaurant, and residential, adjacent to the Expo Transit Station. The proposed
zone change furthers Objectives 2, 4, 5, 6, 8, 10 and 12 of the General Plan Land Use
Element by establishing development standards that would provide additional
housing, quality living and pedestrian environments, promote economic vitality with
neighborhood serving retail and restaurants, revitalize the commercial corridors
adjacent to the TOD area which are currently undeveloped or vacant, and enhance
visual quality by utilizing sustainable urban design principles and provide streetscape
improvements along commercial corridors. The proposed Zoning Code Map
Amendment will not result in inconsistency with the General Plan.
2. The proposed amendment would not be detrimental to the public interest,
health, safety, convenience or welfare of the City.
The proposed Zoning Code Map Amendment is not detrimental to the public interest,
health, safety, convenience or welfare of the City. The proposed zone change from
EWO, CG, and IG to Planned Development Zone No. 12 with related development
and land use standards, will implement a mixed used TOD on the Site through a
Comprehensive Plan while mitigating any potentially significant development impacts.
The PD zoning designation will create a unique, pedestrian oriented development that
fits within surrounding commercial and residential neighborhoods and is consistent
with redevelopment goals for the area. Further, the PD zoning is intended to ensure
harmonious Site development within Culver City as well as nearby Los Angeles as a
ATTACHMENT 1
3sustainable mixed use project that effectively brings housing, shopping and
employment together with transit in order to promote important goals of improved air
quality, regional mobility, and multi-modal approaches to transit. The PD zoning will
focus the types of uses and development standards consistent with the goals and
objectives of a mixed use TOD area. No health or safety hazards have been
identified in the review of the proposed zone change.
3. The proposed amendment is in compliance with the provisions of the California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).
The proposed Zoning Code Map Amendment is in compliance with CEQA as more
fully detailed in the Project’s environmental documentation, including, but not limited
to, the Initial Study, Mitigated Negative Declaration and Project traffic study. Potential
impacts to various environmental factors such as cultural resources, geology and
soils, noise, traffic, and utilities, as reviewed in the Initial Study will be mitigated.
Further mitigation of Project impacts will be achieved through various green building
methods that include, where feasible, use of local manufactured products, high rated
building insulation, and filtration of rain water from the roof into planters prior to
discharging into the public storm drain system to reduce storm water run-off. Other
sustainable development practices will include photovoltaic electricity generation, low
flow fixtures and low consumption urinals, drought tolerant vegetation, dual low
emissivity glazing, and façade shading elements to reduce solar heat gain. In
accordance with CEQA, the Project’s greenhouse gas emission impacts were
reviewed and found to have a less than significant environmental impact on the
surrounding area. Carbon emission reduction procedures have been incorporated
into the Project, which include bicycle racks spread throughout the site and bicycle
facilities including lockable areas, and preferred parking for low emission vehicles,
and sourcing products from local manufacturers when possible.
As outlined in CCMC Title 17, Section 17.620.030.B, the following additional required finding
for a Zoning Code Map Amendment is hereby made:
4. The sites are physically suitable (including access, provision of utilities,
compatibility with adjoining land uses and absence of physical constraints) for
the requested zoning designation(s) and anticipated land use development.
A complete review by City staff has determined that the Project site as conditioned, is
in compliance with all applicable design standards and all public services can be
provided; therefore, the site is physically suitable (including access, provision of
utilities, compatibility with adjoining land uses and absence of physical constraints) for
the requested zoning designation and anticipated land use development as outlined in
the Comprehensive Plan.
The mixed use development project has been sited and designed to be integral to the
TOD area and will create a transition from the Exposition Light Rail Transit station,
other planned TOD projects nearby and commercial retail and restaurant uses further
ATTACHMENT 1
4east toward the Helms Bakery Complex and Arts District area. Commercial retail and
restaurant uses are located on Washington Boulevard while commercial service and
creative office uses are located along Wesley Street. Residential neighborhoods are
east of the Site both south and north of Washington Boulevard. The proposed mixed
use development will fit within this fabric of multiple and varied types of land uses
while providing local market, retail, and restaurant opportunities for local residents
that will be a part of this and other planned TOD mixed use projects nearby. The
height of the proposed structures and existing structures to remain do not exceed the
56 foot height limit and comply with Zoning Code setback and parking requirements.
Vehicular access to the Project site has been located at physically suitable locations
on Washington Boulevard and Wesley Street.
In sum, the proposed use of residential, retail, and restaurants is compatible with
existing land uses. The site occupies corner to corner parcels with frontages on
Washington Boulevard as well as National Boulevard and Wesley Street. The
Washington Boulevard frontage makes the site ideal for a pedestrian facing retail
project. The existing and proposed utility services such as water, sewer, and gas line
are adequate for the proposed uses.
Comprehensive Plan for Planned Development Zoning District No. 12:
As outlined in CCMC Title 17, Section 17.560.020, the following required findings for a
Comprehensive Plan are hereby made:
A. The proposed Comprehensive Plan can be substantially completed within four
years.
According to the Applicant, the proposed Project is planned and scheduled to be
complete within four years (most likely within two years). The Applicant owns the land
and has the capital to build the entire Project at one time and not in phases.
Construction is expected to begin in mid/end-2013 with substantial completion by
mid/end 2014, provided approval of the requested entitlement is granted.
B. The proposed development is capable of creating an environment of sustained
desirability and stability or adequate assurance will be provided such objective
will be attained.
The proposed development will create an environment of sustained desirability and
stability by providing the neighborhood with residential and commercial uses that will
serve the surrounding business and residential neighbors. The Hayden Tract, Helms
Bakery Complex, and East Washington areas have flourishing office and retail
populations, residential communities and dynamic art, food, and design
establishments. The proposed Project, consisting of residential, retail, and dining and
a community public open space area tie all of these various uses together assuring
this area’s continued success. The proposed Project will enhance and sustain the
desirability and stability of the entire neighborhood. Further, Project amenities such
ATTACHMENT 1
5as public parking and open space; private open spaces for the residential component;
and proximity to multi transit opportunities such as the Expo Light Rail line, local bus
lines, bike lanes, and conventional street and freeway infrastructures will assist in
establishing a stable commercial and residential neighborhood.
C. The proposed uses will not be substantially detrimental to present and potential
surrounding uses but will have a beneficial effect.
A mix of transportation, light industrial and commercial uses currently surround the
Project site, including the Exposition Light Rail Transit station, Helms Bakery
Complex, restaurant supply store, warehousing and distribution facilities, and various
retail and office establishments. The proposed Project uses of residential, retail, and
restaurants will be compatible with the surrounding areas. The Project site is
currently vacant and empty with a paved surface parking lot previously occupied by a
lumber supply company. The proposed Project will have a beneficial effect by
developing the site with active uses, new housing, retail and restaurant opportunities,
pedestrian friendly public open spaces and a vibrant and enhanced streetscape.
D. The streets and thoroughfares serving the development are suitable and
adequate to carry anticipated traffic and the development will not generate
traffic that will overload the adjacent street network.
A comprehensive traffic study for the Project was prepared in 2010 and updated in
2012. The traffic study identified improvements to be made in order to limit traffic
impacts to less than significant. Sufficient improvements to the roadways and other
public rights-of-way have been included in the Project design and incorporated into
the conditions of approval for the Project, ensuring that the surrounding roadways will
be suitable and adequate to carry the anticipated traffic created by the Project.
E. The proposed development is compatible with the surrounding area.
The surrounding area is comprised of commercial, retail and light industrial buildings.
Residential neighborhoods are located further south and east of the Project site. The
proposed development is a mixed use development containing both residential and
commercial retail and restaurant uses and is therefore compatible with the
surrounding uses.
F. The types and locations of any proposed commercial development can be
economically justified.
The Project incorporates 31,240 square feet of leasable commercial (retail and
restaurant) space. The commercial uses are designed to serve the residents of the
residential units within the Project itself, as well as the surrounding existing and
proposed office, residential and commercial development. The proposed
development density of the area along with existing adjacent commercial and
ATTACHMENT 1
6residential areas will provide an adequate consumer base for the proposed
commercial uses.
G. The Comprehensive Plan is in conformance with the General Plan, or a
concurrent General Plan amendment is in process.
The proposed Comprehensive Plan is in conformance with the goals, policies and
strategies of the General Plan. Specifically, the Comprehensive Plan will make the
site consistent with its General Plan Land Use “General Corridor” commercial
designation. The proposed mix of uses proposed as part of the Comprehensive Plan
are more consistent with the site’s general plan commercial designation than with the
current East Washington Overlay and Industrial General zoning. The Comprehensive
Plan will allow for a mixed use TOD consisting of pedestrian oriented ground floor
retail and restaurants with outdoor dining; residential uses above the retail and/or
restaurant spaces; and pedestrian friendly public open space; as well as
enhancements to the streetscape along Washington Boulevard, National Boulevard
and Wesley Street, and will further the goals and objectives as outlined in Objectives
2, 5 through 8, 10, and 12 of the General Plan Land Use Element. The proposed
Project will provide new housing supply consistent with the City Mixed Use
Development Standards and encourage reinvestment in this area thereby improving
economic vitality, visual quality, and the pedestrian environment.
H. Any exception from the standards and requirements of this Title is warranted by
the design and amenities incorporated in the Comprehensive Plan and is
desired by the Council.
No exceptions to the standards and requirements of the City’s Zoning Code have
been requested for this Project. The increase in residential density is in compliance
with the Mixed Use Development Standards and Community Benefit required by the
City, represented by the public open space area being provided at the intersection of
Washington Boulevard and National Boulevard.
I. Existing and proposed utility services are adequate for the proposed uses.
Review of the Project by the City’s Public Works Department has determined that the
proposed utility services and existing utilities that will serve the site are adequate for
the proposed uses.
J. The Comprehensive Plan has complied with all applicable City requirements.
The Comprehensive Plan has been prepared in conformance with the Culver City
Municipal Code, including the Zoning and Building Codes. This includes submission
and review of a proposed site plan and uses; preliminary building plans; landscaping,
and lighting; and civil engineering plans. Review by City departments of these plans
has determined that the Comprehensive Plan is in compliance with all applicable City
requirements.
ATTACHMENT 1
7
SECTION 2. Pursuant to the foregoing recitations and findings, the City Council of
the City of Culver City, California, hereby adopts Comprehensive Plan, CP-P2012116 and
Zoning Code Map Amendment, ZCMA P-2012118, establishing Planned Development Zone
No. 12, as set forth in Exhibit A, Zone Change Map, attached hereto, and subject to the
conditions of approval as set forth in Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated herein by
this reference.
SECTION 3. Pursuant to Section 619 of the City Charter, this Ordinance shall take
effect thirty (30) days after the date of its adoption. Pursuant to Sections 616 and 621 of the
City Charter, prior to the expiration of fifteen days after the adoption, the City Clerk shall
cause this Ordinance, or a summary thereof, to be published in the Culver City News and
shall post this Ordinance or a summary thereof in at least three places within the City.
SECTION 4. The City Council hereby declares that, if any provision, section,
subsection, paragraph, sentence, phrase or word of this ordinance is rendered or declared
invalid or unconstitutional by any final action in a court of competent jurisdiction or by reason
of any preemptive legislation, then the City Council would have independently adopted the
remaining provisions, sections, subsections, paragraphs, sentences, phrases or words of
this ordinance and as such they shall remain in full force and effect.
/ / /
/ / /
/ / /
/ / /
ATTACHMENT 1
8/ / /
APPROVED and ADOPTED this ______ day of __________________, 2013.
ANDREW WEISSMAN, MAYOR
City of Culver City, California
ATTESTED BY: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
________________________
MARTIN R. COLE, City Clerk CAROL A. SCHWAB, City Attorney
A13-00003
ATTACHMENT 1
9Or di nance No.
ATTACHMENT 1
10NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Agency Source
Compliance
Verification
GENERAL
1. These Conditions of Approval are being
imposed on Legado Planned Development and
Comprehensive Plan, a mixed use development
of 31,240 square feet of retail and restaurant
floor area, 115 residential units, and two levels
of subterranean parking providing a total of 344
parking spaces and a 7,198 square foot Public
Open Space area in exchange for increased
residential density of an additional 53 units (the
“Project”), for the property located at 8770
Washington Boulevard (the “Property”).
All Standard
2. A copy of the Resolution approving the Project,
and a copy of these Conditions of Approval,
shall be printed on the plans submitted as part of
any building permit application for the Project.
Planning Standard
3. All building permit applications for the Project
shall include sufficient information and detail to
clearly reflect compliance with all applicable
requirements of the Culver City Municipal Code
(the “CCMC”) and with these Conditions of
Approval.
Planning Standard
4. The land use permit to which these Conditions
of Approval apply (the “Land Use Permit’) shall
expire four years from the date of final approval
of said Land Use Permit, if the use has not been
exercised. As provided in CCMC Section
15.595.030 –“Time Limits and Extensions”, an
applicant may request an extension of said
expiration date by filing a written request with
the Planning Division prior to the expiration of
the land use permit.
Planning Standard
ATTACHMENT 1
11NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Agency Source
Compliance
Verification
GENERAL
5. Pursuant to CCMC Section 17.630.010.C.4 –
“Posted Notice”, the public notification sign(s)
installed in accordance with the public
notification requirements for the Land Use
Permit shall be removed within ten days after
the end of the appeal period or the final decision
by the City Council on the Land Use Permit,
whichever occurs last.
Planning Standard
6. The Project shall be developed pursuant to
CCMC Chapter 17.300 – “General Property
Development and Use Standards”.
Planning Standard
7. All planted areas on the Property shall be
landscaped and irrigated pursuant to CCMC
Chapter 17.310 - “Landscaping”.
Planning Standard
8. All parking areas on the Property shall be
developed pursuant to CCMC Chapter 17.320 -
“Off-Street Parking and Loading”.
Planning Standard
9. Signs proposed for the Project shall meet all
applicable requirements of CCMC Chapter
17.330 - “Signs”. All signs require a separate
permit and approval.
Planning Standard
10. All permits and licenses required in connection
with the development or use of the Project shall
be applied for and obtained separately.
All Standard
11. All work within the public right-of-way (including
but not limited to curb, gutter, sidewalk, and
driveways) shall be designed and completed to
the satisfaction of the City Engineer.
Public
Works
Standard
12. Drainage devices, concrete curbs and gutters,
sidewalks, drive approaches, and roadway
pavement shall be designed in conformity with
all provisions of the latest edition of the
American Public Works Association Standard
Plans (“APWA Standards”).
Public
Works
Standard
ATTACHMENT 1
12NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Agency Source
Compliance
Verification
GENERAL
13. At the sole cost and expense of the Property
Owner, any broken or damaged curbs, gutters,
sidewalks, and street pavement resulting from
construction of the Project shall be repaired and
reconstructed in conformity with APWA
Standards.
Public
Works
Standard
14. Trash enclosures shall be provided and shall
each have a minimum inside dimension of 10
feet x 12 feet, a gated opening that is at least 8
feet wide, and a 6 inch high by 6 inch wide
concrete curb along the inside perimeter wall.
Each enclosure shall also have at least a 6 inch
thick concrete slab that drains at a one percent
gradient out of the enclosure. Final approval for
the size, location, and type of equipment needed
for the adequate storage and disposal of all solid
and recyclable waste generated by the Project
shall be obtained from the City’s Environmental
Programs and Operations Manager. A fire
suppression sprinkler system shall be provided
within any covered trash enclosure area as
required by the Fire Marshal. All refuse
containers assigned to or otherwise used by the
Project shall be stored on-site in the trash
enclosures.
Public
Works/
Fire/
Planning
Standard
15. All Project related solid and recyclable waste
material handling shall be in accordance with
CCMC Section 5.01.010 – “Solid Waste
Management”, which outlines the Sanitation
Division’s exclusive franchise for this service.
Public
Works
Standard
16. The Project shall meet all provisions of CCMC
Section 7.05.015 -”Transportation Demand and
Trip Reduction Measures”.
Trans. Standard
17. All buildings and structures to be constructed as
part of the Project shall be designed and
constructed in accordance with all applicable
regulations and standards of the City’s Building
Code, Fire Code and any related codes as
determined by the Building Official and Fire
Marshal; and all other applicable provisions of
the CCMC which are adopted and in effect at
the time of issuance of a building permit.
Building/
Fire
Standard
ATTACHMENT 1
13NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Agency Source
Compliance
Verification
GENERAL
18. Any new utilities shall be placed underground or
enclosed within the building construction; no
new overhead utilities shall be permitted.
Building/
Planning
Standard
19. The Project shall comply with all applicable
requirement of the Culver City Green Building
Program as set forth in CCMC Section
15.02.1100, et.seq.
Building Standard
20. The Project shall comply with the all applicable
requirements relating to solar photovoltaic
requirements as set forth in CCMC Section
15.02.100, et. seq.
Building Standard
21. Changes to the Project or use approved as part
of the Land Use Permit may only be made in
accordance with the provisions of CCMC
Section 17.595.035 – “Changes to an Approved
Project”.
Planning Standard
22. The Project shall comply with CCMC Section
17.400.065 - “Mixed Use Development
Standards”.
Planning Special
ATTACHMENT 1
14NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Agency Source
Compliance
Verification
PRIOR TO BUILDING PERMIT ISSUANCE
23. A covenant and agreement, on a form provided
by the Planning Division and in form and
substance acceptable to the City Attorney,
acknowledging and agreeing to comply with all
terms and conditions established herein, shall
be signed by the Property Owner and recorded
in the County Recorder’s Office. The covenant
and agreement shall run with the land and shall
be binding on any subsequent owners, and
tenants or occupants of the Property. After
recordation, a certified copy bearing the
Recorder’s number and date shall be provided
to the Planning Division.
Planning/
City
Attorney
Standard
24. The Applicant and Property Owner shall
indemnify and agree to defend (at the
Applicant’s and Property Owner’s sole expense,
with legal counsel approved by the City) and
hold harmless the City, and its elected and
appointed officials, officers, employees, agents,
contractors and consultants from and against
any and all loss, damages, injuries, costs,
expenses, liabilities, claims, demands, lawsuits,
attorneys’ fees and judgments, arising from or in
any manner connected to any third party
challenge to the City's approval of the Project.
The obligations required by this Condition shall
be set forth in a written instrument in form and
substance acceptable to the City Attorney and
signed by the Applicant and the Property Owner.
City
Attorney
Standard
25. A minimum of three sets of final landscaping and
irrigation plans (separate from the plans
submitted for the building permit) shall be
submitted to the Planning Division for review
and approval.
Planning/
Parks &
Rec.
Standard
26. Payment of New Development Impact Fees
pursuant to CCMC Section 15.06.005 et. seq.
shall be submitted.
Planning/
Building
Standard
ATTACHMENT 1
15NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Agency Source
Compliance
Verification
PRIOR TO BUILDING PERMIT ISSUANCE
27. A Construction Management Plan prepared by
the construction contractor, which identifies the
areas of construction staging, temporary power,
portable toilet, and trash and material storage
locations, shall be submitted to and approved
by the Building Official. Prior to commencement
of work the construction contractor shall advise
the Public Works Inspector and the Building
Inspector (‘Inspectors”) of the construction
schedule and shall meet with the Inspectors.
Building/
Public
Works
Standard
28. A Pedestrian Protection Plan shall be submitted
to and approved by the Building Official. Such
plan shall identify all areas of pedestrian
protection and indicate the method of pedestrian
protection or pedestrian diversion when
required. When pedestrian diversion is required,
the Pedestrian Protection Plan must also be
approved by the Public Works Director.
Building/
Public
Works
Standard
29. Plans submitted as part of the building permit
application shall include a schedule of the
special inspections anticipated, the firm
proposed for the special inspections, and the
resumes of all proposed special inspectors. The
Building Official reserves the right to reject any
special inspector at any time for the duration of
the Project. All special inspection reports shall
be made available to the Building Official and to
any Culver City Building Safety inspector as
required by the Building Official No work shall
be covered without a Culver City Building Safety
inspection, whether or not a special inspection
was performed on such work.
Building Standard
ATTACHMENT 1
16
NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Agency Source
Compliance
Verification
PRIOR TO BUILDING PERMIT ISSUANCE
30. A Construction Traffic Management Plan shall
be prepared by a traffic or civil engineer
registered in the State of California. The
Construction Traffic Management Plan shall be
submitted to the City Engineer and Planning
Manager for review and approval prior to the
issuance of any Project demolition, grading, or
excavation permit. The Construction Traffic
Management Plan shall also be reviewed and
approved by the City’s Fire and Police
Departments. The City Engineer and Planning
Manager reserve the right to reject any engineer
at any time and to require that the Plan be
prepared by a different engineer. The
Construction Traffic Management Plan shall
contain, but not be limited to, the following:
A. The name and telephone number of a
contact person who can be reached 24 hours
a day regarding construction traffic
complaints or emergency situations.
B. An up-to-date list of local police, fire, and
emergency response organizations and
procedures for the continuous coordination of
construction activity, potential delays, and
any alerts related to unanticipated road
conditions or delays, with local police, fire,
and emergency response agencies.
Coordination shall include the assessment of
any alternative access routes that might be
required through the Property, and maps
showing access to and within the Property
and to adjacent properties.
C. Procedures for the training and certification of
the flag persons used in implementation of
the Construction Traffic Management Plan.
D. The location, times, and estimated duration
of any roadway closures, traffic detours, use
of protective devices, warning signs, and
staging or queuing areas.
E. The location and travel routes of off-site
staging and parking locations.
Planning/
Public
Works
Standard
ATTACHMENT 1
17NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Agency Source
Compliance
Verification
PRIOR TO BUILDING PERMIT ISSUANCE
31. Reasonable efforts shall be used to reuse and
recycle construction and demolition debris, to
use environmentally friendly materials, and to
provide energy efficient buildings, equipment
and systems. A Demolition Debris Recycling
Plan that indicates where select demolition
debris is to be sent shall be provided to the
Building Official prior to the issuance of a
demolition permit. The Plan shall list the
material to be recycled and the name, address,
and phone number of the facility of organization
accepting the materials.
Building Standard
32. A vector/pest control abatement plan prepared
by a pest control specialist licensed or certified
by the State of California shall be submitted for
review and approval by the Planning Manager
and the Building Official. Said plan shall outline
all steps to be taken prior to the commencement
of any demolition or construction activity in order
to ensure that any and all pests (including, but
not limited to, rodents, bees, ants and
mosquitoes) that may populate the Property do
not relocate to or impact adjoining properties.
Building/
Planning
Standard
33. Prior to issuance of a building permit, notice of
the Project construction schedule shall be
provided to all abutting property owners and
occupants. Evidence of such notification shall
be provided to the Building Division. The notice
shall identify the commencement date and
proposed timing for all construction phases
(demolition, grading, excavation/shoring,
foundation, rough frame, plumbing, roofing,
mechanical and electrical, and exterior finish).
Building Standard
ATTACHMENT 1
18
NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Agency Source
Compliance
Verification
PRIOR TO BUILDING PERMIT ISSUANCE
34. An Archaeologist and Paleontologist
professional approved by the City shall
monitor all phases of excavation for the
project site in order to identify and recover
where feasible, the presence of
archaeological and/or paleontological
resources. Should such resources be
identified established Federal and State rules
and guidelines for the cataloging and final
disposition of such resources shall be
applied and followed. This shall include but
not be limited to halting of construction
activities in the work area where the
resources are identified, notifying the Los
Angeles County Coroner and the appropriate
Native American organization of such
resources, and notifying the Los Angeles
County Natural History and Page museums.
Final disposition of Native American remains
shall follow Federal and State rules and
guidelines for such remains. Identified
paleontological resources shall be donated
to the Los Angeles County Natural
History/Page museums or some other
museum as deemed appropriate by the
Paleontologist. A final report or reports
cataloging all findings shall be submitted to
the City by the Archaeologist and/or
Paleontologist professional within one year
of issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy.
Planning/
Building
Mitigation
Measure
ATTACHMENT 1
19
NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Agency Source
Compliance
Verification
PRIOR TO BUILDING PERMIT ISSUANCE
35. A Lot Assembly Covenant and Agreement,
on a form provided by the Planning Division
and in form and substance acceptable to the
City Attorney, agreeing to hold lot numbers 2
through 15 of Track No. 3772 as one parcel,
shall be executed by the Property Owner and
recorded in the County Recorder’s office.
After recordation, a certified copy bearing
the Recorder’s number and date shall be
provided to the Planning Division.
Planning/
Public
Works/
City
Attorney
Special
36. A Public Open Space Covenant and
Agreement, on a form provided by the
Planning Division and in form and substance
acceptable to the City Attorney and
Community Development Director, requiring
the Project Community Benefit public open
space to be maintained in a clean and
sanitary condition and open and available to
the public during normal public park
operation hours as determined by the City
for the life of the Project shall be executed by
the Applicant/Property Owner and recorded
in the County Recorder’s office. After
recordation, a certified copy bearing the
Recorder’s number and date shall be
provided to the Planning Division.
Planning/
City
Attorney
Special
ATTACHMENT 1
20NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Agency Source
Compliance
Verification
PRIOR TO BUILDING PERMIT ISSUANCE
37. A Public Replacement Parking Easement
Agreement, on a form provided by the
Planning Division and in form and substance
acceptable to the City Attorney and
Community Development Director, by which
the Applicant/Property Owner shall grant the
City an easement for 15 public parking
spaces available during normal Project
business hours (minimum 10 hours per day)
in the Project’s Public Parking area,
providing ingress and egress for parking
enforcement, parking meter maintenance
and revenue collection shall be executed by
the Applicant/Property Owner and recorded
in the County Recorder’s office. After
recordation, a certified copy bearing the
Recorder’s number and date shall be
provided to the Planning Division.
Planning/
City
Attorney
Special
ATTACHMENT 1
21
NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Agency Source
Compliance
Verification
PRIOR TO BUILDING PERMIT ISSUANCE
38. An Affidavit for Acceptance of Community
Benefit Conditions, on a form provided by
the Planning Division and in form and
substance acceptable to the City Attorney
and Community Development Director, shall
be signed by the Applicant/Property Owner
certifying agreement to provide the required
Community Benefit as part of the Project
approval. Project approval shall not be
effective if the Applicant/Property Owner
fails to sign the affidavit and the Land Use
Permit granting increased density shall be
null and void. By signing the Affidavit, the
Applicant/Property Owner agrees to
construct the public open space pursuant to
Project plans approved by the Planning
Commission on December 12, 2012. Minor
changes to the public open space plan may
be approved by the Community Development
Director relative to the placement of public
art and benches. If the Applicant/Property
Owner fails to provide or maintain the
required Community Benefit pursuant to the
Affidavit, then the Land Use Permit granted
by the City as part of the Project shall be
referred to the Planning Commission for
revocation pursuant to Chapter 17.660 of the
Zoning Code and the matter may be referred
to the City Attorney for enforcement
pursuant to Chapter 17.650 of the Zoning
Code.
Planning/
City
Attorney
Special
39. Two (2) sets of on-site improvement plans
prepared by a civil engineer registered in the
State of California shall be submitted to the
Engineering Division for review, approval
and permitting. Among other things, the on-
site improvement plans shall include detailed
on-site drainage and grading of the site
indicated by topographical lines and spot
elevations. This plan shall be approved for
on-site construction only.
Public
Works
Special
ATTACHMENT 1
22NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Agency Source
Compliance
Verification
PRIOR TO BUILDING PERMIT ISSUANCE
40. Two (2) sets of off-site improvement plans
prepared by a civil engineer registered in the
State of California shall be submitted to the
Engineering Division for review, approval
and permitting for all proposed
improvements within the public right-of-way.
Separate plans for street improvements,
street light improvements, and sewer
improvements shall be prepared. Landscape
plans for the public parkway area and storm
drain plans for the relocation of existing
catch basins shall be included in the street
improvement plans.
Public
Works
Special
41. The off-site improvement plans shall
demonstrate streetscape improvements in
accordance with the City’s Transit Oriented
Development District Streetscape Plan
including but not limited to street trees and
other landscaping, concrete sidewalks, and
street furniture (benches, trash receptacles,
and bicycle racks.) These streetscape
improvements shall be installed along the
project’s Washington Boulevard, National
Boulevard and Wesley Street frontage as
determined by the Community Development
Director and Public Works Director.
Public
Works
Special
42. Prior to the issuance of Grading or Building
Permits, the Applicant shall obtain a General
Construction Activities NPDES Permit from
the State Water Resources Control Board via
a Waste Discharger Identification (WDID)
number. This will include the filing of a
Notice of Intent (NOI) and Stormwater
Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) with the
State. A copy of the SWPPP and WDID shall
be provided to the Engineering Division prior
to the approval of the Local Stormwater
Pollution Prevention Plan (LSWPPP).
Public
Works
Special
ATTACHMENT 1
23NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Agency Source
Compliance
Verification
PRIOR TO BUILDING PERMIT ISSUANCE
43. Concurrent with the submittal of the on-site
improvement plan, a Standard Urban
Stormwater Mitigation Plan (SUSMP) shall be
submitted for review and approval by the
City Engineer as outlined in CCMC Chapter
5.05. The SUSMP shall be developed and
implemented in accordance with the
requirements of the Los Angeles County
Municipal Stormwater National Pollution
Discharge Elimination System (NPDES)
Permit No. CAS614001 (Order No. 01-182).
The SUSMP shall provide Best Management
Practices (BMP’s) that adequately address
the pollutants generated during the post-
construction stage and shall be designed for
filtration, infiltration and retention for the
first three-quarter inch (3/4”) of rainfall. The
site improvement plans shall note the
contractor shall comply with the “California
Stormwater Best Management Practice
Handbooks”. The Site Improvement Plans
shall not be accepted for review unless the
SUSMP is included in the submittal package,
including the plan check fee associated with
the SUSMP. Said SUSMP shall be used to
guide the “Conceptual – Not For
Construction” Post Development Hydrology /
SUSMP Map. The approval of the SUSMP is
required prior to issuance of the Site
Improvement Plan. The SUSMP shall cover
the new building and parking lot. The Site
Improvement Plans shall not be accepted for
review unless the SUSMP is included in the
submittal package, including the plan check
fee associated with the SUSMP.
Public
Works
Special
ATTACHMENT 1
24NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Agency Source
Compliance
Verification
PRIOR TO BUILDING PERMIT ISSUANCE
44. Concurrent with the submittal of the on-site
improvement plan, a Local Storm Water
Pollution Prevention Plan (LSWPPP) shall be
submitted for review and approval by the
City Engineer. The erosion control plan shall
be developed and implemented in
accordance with the requirements of the Los
Angeles County Stormwater Quality
Management Program, NPDES Permit No.
CAS614001. The plan shall include the
design and placement of recommended Best
Management Practices (BMPs) to effectively
prohibit the entry of pollutants from the
construction site into the public street or
storm drain system. The improvement plans
shall note that the contractor shall comply
with the "California Storm Water Best
Management Practice Handbooks." Prior to
the start of design of these plans and of
necessary reports, the applicant’s Civil
Engineer shall meet with the City’s
Stormwater Program Manager to obtain
information on the City-specific and LSWPPP
requirements. The Storm Water Pollution
Prevention Plan shall be submitted to the
Engineering Division prior to any permit
issuance. The Site Improvement Plans shall
not be accepted for review unless the
LSWPPP is included in the submittal
package, including the plan check fee
associated with the LSWPPP.
Public
Works
Special
45. Foundation design shall follow the
recommendations of the project’s
geotechnical report, which include, but are
not limited to a mat foundation design,
continuous and/or pad footings, and a
reinforced foundation. Final foundation
design and inspection shall be determined
and approved by the structural and
geotechnical engineer.
Building Mitigation
Measure
ATTACHMENT 1
25NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Agency Source
Compliance
Verification
PRIOR TO BUILDING PERMIT ISSUANCE
46. The following mitigation package has been
designed to ensure that the City’s 45 dBA interior
noise standard is not exceeded in the Project.
These or equivalent measures shall be
implemented at the Applicants expense and
provided to the satisfaction of the Building
Official prior to issuance of building permits
and/or final inspection, as appropriate.
(A) Roof ceiling construction shall be roofing on
plywood. Batt insulation shall be installed in
joist spaces. The ceilings shall be one layer of
gypboard nailed direct.
(B) All exterior walls shall be 2x4 studs 16” on
center with batt insulation in the stud spaces.
Exteriors shall be exterior plaster or stucco.
The interiors shall be gypboard.
(C) The following window design and glazing shall
be incorporated into the design of the building
with the applicable Sound Transmission Class
(STC) rating and verified by the City Building
Official prior to building permit issuance and
final inspection. These requirements are only
applicable to windows facing the perimeter of
the project site and not windows facing the
interior of the project site. The glazing
supplier shall be required to submit a test
report documenting the required STC rating for
windows required to be STC 32 or greater,
which shall be prepared in an independent,
accredited testing laboratory in accordance
with ASTM E-90.
o STC rating of 34 on the south side of the
building
o STC rating of 32 on the northwest side of
the building
o STC rating of 22 on the northeast side of
the building
o STC rating of 32 on the southeast side of
the building.
(D) All entry doors shall be 1-¾” solid core flush
wood doors with vinyl bulb weather stripping
on the sides and top.
(E) There shall be no mail slots in the entry doors.
(F) There shall be no ventilation openings in the
exterior walls or roof/ceilings without
approved acoustical baffles.
Building/
Planning
Mitigation
Measure
ATTACHMENT 1
26NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Agency Source
Compliance
Verification
PRIOR TO BUILDING PERMIT ISSUANCE
47. The Project plans shall be submitted to the
Southern California Gas Company for review
and approval prior to excavation and
shoring.
Building Special
DURING CONSTRUCTION
48. During all phases of construction, a
“Construction Rules Sign” that includes contact
names and telephone numbers of the Applicant,
Property Owner, construction contractor(s), and
the City, shall be posted on the Property in a
location that is visible to the public. These
names and telephone numbers shall also be
made available to adjacent property owners and
occupants to the satisfaction of the Planning
Manager and Building Official.
Building/
Planning
Standard
49. The Property shall be maintained daily so that it
is free of trash and litter.
Building Standard
50. During construction, dust shall be controlled by
regular watering or other methods as
determined by the Building inspector.
Building Standard
51. The Building Division may apply administrative
assessments and/ or post general stop work
notices for any violations of the Conditions of
Approval for the Project, and any violations of
the CCMC.
Building Standard
52. During all phases of construction, best efforts
shall be used to ensure that all construction
workers, contractors and others involved with
the Project park on the Property or at designated
offsite locations approved by the City, and not in
the surrounding neighborhood.
Building Standard
ATTACHMENT 1
27NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Agency Source
Compliance
Verification
DURING CONSTRUCTION
53. When foundation shoring and/or foundation piles
will be part of the Project, the engineer of record
shall use noise dampening measures such as
the drilling of shoring supports and piles as
determined by the Building Official and Planning
Manager.
Building/
Planning
Standard
54. Prior to the commencement of any excavation, a
temporary construction fence shall be installed
around the site. The height and fence material
is subject to approval by the City Engineer and
the Planning Manager.
Building/
Planning/
Public
Works
Standard
55. Hours of construction shall be limited to the
following: 8:00 AM to 8:00 PM Monday through
Friday; 9:00 AM to 7:00 PM Saturday; and 10:00
AM to 7:00 PM Sunday and National holidays.
Dirt hauling and construction material deliveries
or removal are prohibited during the morning
(7:00 AM to 9:00 AM) and afternoon (4:00 PM to
6:00 PM) peak traffic periods. All construction
workers shall be respectful of the surrounding
neighborhood and keep non-construction related
noise to a minimum prior to, during, and after
permissible construction hours.
Building/
Public
Works
Standard
56. All staging and storage of construction
equipment and materials, including the
construction dumpster, shall be on-site only.
The Property Owner must obtain written
permission from adjacent property owners for
any construction staging occurring on adjacent
property.
Building/
Public
Works
Standard
ATTACHMENT 1
28NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Agency Source
Compliance
Verification
DURING CONSTRUCTION
57. Compliance with the following noise standards
shall be required with at all times:
A. No construction equipment shall be
operated without an exhaust muffler, and
all such equipment shall have mufflers
and sound control devices (i.e., intake
silencers and noise shrouds) that are no
less effective than those provided on
the original equipment;
B. All construction equipment shall be
properly maintained to minimize noise
emissions;
C. If any construction vehicles are serviced
at a location onsite, the vehicle(s) shall be
setback from any street and other
property lines so as to maintain the
greatest distance from the public right-of-
way and from Noise Sensitive Receptors;
D. Noise impacts from stationary sources
(i.e., mechanical equipment, ventilators,
and air conditioning units) shall be
minimized by proper selection of
equipment and the installation of
acoustical shielding as approved by the
Planning Manager and the Building
Official in order to comply with the City’s
Noise Regulations and Standards as set
forth in CCMC Chapter 9.07; and
E. Stationary source equipment (i.e.,
compressors) shall be located so as to
maintain the greatest distance from the
public right-of-way and from Noise
Sensitive Receptors.
Building/
Planning
Standard
ATTACHMENT 1
29
NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Agency Source
Compliance
Verification
DURING CONSTRUCTION
58. In the event three citations are issued in
connection with the Project for violations of
these Conditions of Approval or for other
violations of the CCMC, Project construction
shall be stopped until such time that it is
determined to the satisfaction of the Community
Development Director, that causes of such
violations have been eliminated or corrected and
that the Project will be able to proceed in full
compliance with these Conditions of Approval
and the CCMC.
Building/
Planning
Standard
59. Flag persons with certified training shall be
provided for work site traffic control to minimize
impacts to traffic flow and to ensure the safe
movement of vehicles into and out of the
Property.
Building/
Public
Works
Standard
60. ` During construction, trucks and other vehicles in
loading and unloading queues must be parked
with their engines off to reduce vehicle
emissions. Construction deliveries shall be
phased and scheduled to avoid emissions peaks
as determined by the Building Official and
discontinued during second-stage smog alerts.
Building Standard
61. Construction vehicles shall not be permitted to
stage or queue where they would interfere with
vehicular and pedestrian traffic or block access
to adjacent properties. Off-site staging shall be
at locations approved by the City Engineer and
shall be of sufficient length to accommodate
large trucks without being unduly disruptive to
traffic operations. The drivers of these trucks
shall be in radio or phone communication with
on-site personnel who shall advise the drivers
when to proceed from the staging location to the
Property. Construction-related vehicles shall not
be permitted to park on public streets.
Building/
Public
Works
Standard
62. Project shoring piles shall be bored, not
driven.
Building Special
ATTACHMENT 1
30
NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Agency Source
Compliance
Verification
PRIOR TO CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY OR FINAL INSPECTION
63. All provisions, and requirements set forth in
these Conditions of Approval, in the Resolution
approving the project, in the CCMC, or in any
applicable written comments as provided by City
representatives at the September 27, 2012
Project Review Committee meeting (or from
updates from the City thereafter) on the Land
Use Permit application, shall be fulfilled and
satisfied to the satisfaction of all City
departments before the use may be established
or the Project occupied.
All Standard
64. All requirements of the City’s Residential
Development Park Dedication and In Lieu
Parkland Fees, as set forth in CCMC Section
15.06.300, et. seq., shall be fully satisfied prior
to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy;
provided, that if such requirements will be
satisfied by the payment of the in-lieu parkland
fee, the same shall be paid prior to the issuance
of a building permit.
Planning/
Parks
Standard
65. All requirements of the City’s Art in Public
Places Program, as set forth in CCMC Section
15.06.100, et. seq., shall be fully satisfied prior
to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy;
provided, that if such requirements will be
satisfied by the payment of the public art in-lieu
fee, the same shall be paid prior to the issuance
of a building permit.
Cultural
Affairs
Standard
ATTACHMENT 1
31NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Agency Source
Compliance
Verification
PRIOR TO CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY OR FINAL INSPECTION
66. All onsite and offsite improvements and all
conditions of approval except those which are
deferred pursuant to a bond or letter of credit as
determined and approved by the Building
Official, Fire Marshal, Planning Manager, and/or
City Engineer shall be completed prior to
issuance of any certificate of occupancy. Prior
to issuance of any certificate of occupancy the
following shall be provided to and approved by
the City:
A. Five full sets of as-built plans that shall
include at a minimum the site plan,
grading and utility plan, landscape and
irrigation plan, floor plan for each level of
the Project, parking structure plan, roof
plan with all mechanical equipment
identified as to purpose and source and
all offsite improvements; and
B. One set of as-built plans as described
above in a digital format compatible with
the City’s computer system.
All Standard
67. A Mixed Use Covenant and Agreement, on a
form provided by the Planning Division and
in form and substance acceptable to the City
Attorney, related to the occupancy by
residents of a mixed use development
pursuant to Culver City Municipal Code
Section 17.400.065.D.4 shall be executed by
the Property Owner and recorded in the
County Recorder’s office. The covenant and
agreement shall run with the land and shall
be binding on any subsequent owners, and
tenants or occupants of the Property. After
recordation, a certified copy bearing the
Recorder’s number and date shall be
provided to the Planning Division. The
Property Owner shall provide a copy of the
recorded Mixed Use Covenant and
Agreement to each residential occupant of
the Project.
Planning Special
ATTACHMENT 1
32NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Agency Source
Compliance
Verification
PRIOR TO CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY OR FINAL INSPECTION
68. Transit Oriented Development Streetscape
Plan (TODSP) - Street trees, tree wells, tree
grates, planters, special paving, landscape
irrigation, way finding signs and other
streetscape improvements shall be installed
along the Project frontage of Washington
Boulevard, National Boulevard and Wesley
Street in accordance with the TODSP. The
Applicant shall submit a separate landscape
and irrigation plan coordinated with the
TODSP to the Planning Division and
Engineering Division for review, approval,
and permitting. Irrigation within the public
right-of-way shall be connected to the private
on-site irrigation system. All existing street
trees along the project’s frontage, including
both sides of Wesley Street, shall be
removed. The tree surrounds on
Washington Boulevard shall be salvaged and
delivered to the City’s maintenance yard.
Planning
/ Public
Works
Special
69. Secure bicycle parking shall be provided to
accommodate fifty (50) bicycles. The bicycle
parking shall be provided to accommodate
twenty-four (24) long-term and twenty-six
(26) short-term parking positions. The long-
term spaces shall be provided in individual
bike lockers or bike racks in a secure locking
fenced enclosure, accessible only to
residential bike owners, on the lower level of
the project’s parking garage. The short-term
spaces shall be provided at grade both on-
site and on the adjacent public sidewalk
right-of-way, using thirteen (13) City
approved “Inverted - U” Bicycle Racks
meeting the minimum standards specified in
the City’s Bicycle and Pedestrian Master
Plan Design Guide, Section 1.8.2., page 34.
Each inverted U-Shape rack provides 2
spaces. Exact location of the Bicycle Racks
in the public right-of-way shall be approved
by the City Engineer.
Public
Works
Special
ATTACHMENT 1
33NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Agency Source
Compliance
Verification
PRIOR TO CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY OR FINAL INSPECTION
70. Wesley Street shall be widened to provide a
curb-to-curb width of thirty-six (36) feet. This
widening shall be accomplished within the
existing street right-of-way by narrowing the
existing sidewalks from ten feet to seven feet
and shall extend from Washington Boulevard
southerly to the reconstructed cul-de-sac.
Public
Works
Special
71. Wesley Street shall be fully reconstructed
within the required area to be widened. This
reconstruction shall include, but not be
limited to, new sidewalks, curbs and gutters,
drive approaches, street trees, tree wells,
and the full replacement of the existing
asphaltic concrete (AC) pavement and base.
The new pavement structural section shall
be based on an R-Value test and a Traffic
Index of ten as performed and recommended
by the applicant’s geotechnical engineer and
as approved by the City Engineer. The
minimum structural section shall be 4-inches
of AC pavement on 6-inches of crushed
aggregate base (CAB).
Public
Works
Special
72. Wesley Street shall be striped to provide for
a 12-foot wide southbound lane, a 12-foot
wide northbound left turn lane, and a 12-foot
wide northbound right turn lane at the
intersection with Washington Boulevard.
During final design of the construction plans,
City Traffic Engineering staff will thoroughly
review the restriping of this street and
determine the number of parking spaces that
can be retained. All other non-parking areas
along Wesley Street shall be signed as “No
Parking” or be provided with red curb. This
striping shall be designed to the satisfaction
of the City Engineer.
Public
Works
Special
ATTACHMENT 1
34NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Agency Source
Compliance
Verification
PRIOR TO CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY OR FINAL INSPECTION
73. The drive approach on Washington
Boulevard shall be designed per the City’s
High Speed Drive Approach Standard or a
curb return type drive approach having an
adequate curb radius as determined by the
City Engineer. All proposed drive
approaches shall be ADA accessible.
Public
Works
Special
74. The existing curb and gutter and sidewalk of
Washington Boulevard along the project’s
frontage shall be removed and
reconstructed. The new curb height shall
match existing, but not be less than 6-
inches.
Public
Works
Special
75. The existing asphalt paving of Washington
Boulevard shall be reconstructed by milling
a minimum of two-inches and inlaying with
new asphalt pavement. The limits of the new
paving shall be from the southerly edge of
gutter to the centerline of the street and
extend from the westerly edge of the
crosswalk at National Boulevard to just
easterly of Wesley Street to the join of any
new work caused by the reconstruction of
the southeasterly curb return at this
intersection. Any striping removed by this
work shall be replaced with thermoplastic
paint to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.
Public
Works
Special
76. Existing parking along the Washington
Boulevard frontage shall be eliminated and
the existing parking meter heads and posts
shall be salvaged and delivered to the City
maintenance yard. Red curb shall be painted
along this reach of Washington Boulevard.
Public
Works
Special
77. A dedication to the City for the necessary
street right-of-way along Washington
between National Boulevard and Wesley
Street to create a uniform 100 foot street
right-of-way and a twelve-foot wide sidewalk
shall be provided.
Public
Works
Special
ATTACHMENT 1
35NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Agency Source
Compliance
Verification
PRIOR TO CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY OR FINAL INSPECTION
78. The north and south side of Washington
Boulevard shall be restriped to provide for a
five foot bike lane between National
Boulevard and Wesley Street. The existing
parking along the north side of Washington
Boulevard shall be maintained. The required
striping and signage shall be reflected in the
signing and striping plan as part of the
project’s street improvement plans.
Public
Works
Special
79. The proposed driveway on Washington
Boulevard shall be signed and restricted to
right turns in and right turns out.
Public
Works
Special
80. A 12-foot wide sidewalk shall be installed
along the project’s frontage with National
Boulevard.
Public
Works
Special
81. The existing asphalt paving of National
Boulevard shall be reconstructed by milling
a minimum of two-inches and inlaying with
new asphalt pavement. The limits of the new
paving shall be from the easterly edge of
gutter to the centerline of the street and
extend from the northerly edge of the
crosswalk at National Boulevard southerly to
the new asphalt paving recently installed by
the MTA. The crosswalk across National
Boulevard at this side of the intersection
shall be restriped and any traffic loops
removed due to the pavement reconstruction
shall be replaced. All striping and pavement
markers that are required for this portion of
National Boulevard shall be installed with
thermoplastic paint. This work shall be
designed and installed to the satisfaction of
the City Engineer.
Public
Works
Special
ATTACHMENT 1
36NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Agency Source
Compliance
Verification
PRIOR TO CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY OR FINAL INSPECTION
82. All concrete used in the public right-of-way
shall have a minimum strength of 3250 psi.
Public
Works
Special
83. A signing and striping plan for National
Boulevard, Washington Boulevard, and
Wesley Street shall be submitted to the
Engineering Division for review, approval,
and permitting. All signs, striping, legends,
and markers shall conform to the current
edition of the California Manual on Uniform
Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) and as
approved by the City Engineer. All striping
and legends shall be installed with
thermoplastic paint.
Public
Works
Special
84. The existing street light system along the
project’s frontage with National Boulevard
and Washington Boulevard shall be
converted to low voltage induction type
lighting. The existing street light on the east
side of Wesley Street shall be removed and
new street lights shall be installed on the
west side of the street from Washington
Boulevard southerly to the cul-de-sac. New
street light conduit, wiring, pull boxes, light
fixtures, and ballast shall be required. A
separate street lighting plan shall be
submitted to the Engineering Division for
review, approval, and permitting.
Public
Works
Special
ATTACHMENT 1
37NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Agency Source
Compliance
Verification
PRIOR TO CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY OR FINAL INSPECTION
85. A new minimum 10-inch diameter sewer
main shall be constructed to accommodate
the project’s sewerage discharge. This main
shall also be designed to allow for the
collection of the future sewerage discharge
from the approximate 5 acre Washington
National TOD project located at the
northwest corner of the Washington National
Boulevard intersection. A diversion manhole
shall be installed in the existing 10-inch
sewer main located on the north side of
Washington Boulevard at Wesley Street.
This manhole shall be designed to divert the
future sewerage discharge volume from the
Washington/National TOD project south in
Wesley Street. The new 10-inch diameter
sewer main shall extend from the diversion
manhole in Washington Boulevard south in
Wesley Street across the MTA right-of-way
and National Boulevard and connect to the
first manhole in Wesley Street south of
National Boulevard. Prior to the issuance of
a building permit, a separate offsite sewer
plan shall be submitted to the Engineering
Division for review, approval, and permitting.
Public
Works
Mitigation
Measure
86. The westbound approach of Venice
Boulevard to Robertson Boulevard shall be
restriped to provide for an exclusive right
turn only lane. The design and installation of
this work shall be completed to the
satisfaction of the City of Los Angeles.
Public
Works
Mitigation
Measure
87. The southbound approach of National
Boulevard to Venice Boulevard shall be
restriped to provide for an exclusive right
turn only lane. The design and installation of
this work shall be completed to the
satisfaction of the City of Los Angeles.
Public
Works
Mitigation
Measure
ATTACHMENT 1
38
NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Agency Source
Compliance
Verification
PRIOR TO CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY OR FINAL INSPECTION
88. An 11-foot wide right turn lane shall be
installed on National Boulevard for the
northbound approach to Washington
Boulevard. The right turn lane shall be 60
feet in length and have a 40-foot transition
for a total length of 100 feet. Minor
modifications to the width of the northbound
through lanes on National Boulevard may be
made in order to reduce the amount of street
dedication needed to install this right turn
lane. These modifications shall require the
approval of the City Engineer.
Public
Works
Mitigation
Measure
89. A traffic signal shall be installed at the
intersection of Washington Boulevard and
Wesley Street. A new crosswalk across
Washington Boulevard shall be installed,
consistent with the City’s Transit Oriented
Development Streetscape Plan, at the east
side of this intersection. Audible signal
devices, LED countdown pedestrian heads,
and “Bulldog” type pedestrian push buttons
shall be installed on all signal poles that
control pedestrian crosswalks at this
intersection. A westbound left-turn signal
phase on Washington Boulevard shall also
be required. This new signal shall be
synchronized with the adjacent signals on
Washington Boulevard. Any other ancillary
work required to accomplish the above
described work, including but not limited to
installation of new signal poles, mast arms,
fire preemption, street lights, new service
and controller cabinets shall be included.
New signal poles shall be designed for 100
mph winds per CALTRANS standards. This
work shall be shown on a traffic signal plan
prepared by a civil or traffic engineer
registered in the State of California and shall
be submitted to the Engineering Division for
review, approval, and permitting. Separate
Public
Works
Mitigation
Measure
ATTACHMENT 1
39signal timing charts shall be submitted for
review.
NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Agency Source
Compliance
Verification
PRIOR TO CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY OR FINAL INSPECTION
90. City of Los Angeles Department of
Transportation (LADOT) requires additional
improvements at several intersections within
the City of Los Angeles to augment the
intersection restriping improvements. As
required by the City of Los Angeles
Department of Transportation (LADOT),
installation of closed circuit traffic
monitoring cameras at the intersections of
Cadillac Avenue and La Cienega Boulevard,
and at Fairfax Avenue and Venice Boulevard;
and installation of traffic signal controller
upgrades at the following eight intersections
identified by LADOT, shall be designed and
approved to the satisfaction of the City of
Los Angeles:
1. Exposition Blvd., Robertson Blvd., and
Venice Blvd.;
2. Helms Ave. and Venice Blvd.;
3. Cattaraugus Ave and Venice Blvd.;
4. Cadillac Ave and Robertson Blvd.;
5. Kincardine Ave, I-10 Fwy Westbound Off-
Ramp and Robertson Blvd.;
6. National Blvd., and Robertson Blvd.;
7. Culver Blvd., and Venice Blvd.; and
8. Fairfax Ave and Venice Blvd.
Public
Works
Mitigation
Measure
ATTACHMENT 1
40
NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Agency Source
Compliance
Verification
PRIOR TO CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY OR FINAL INSPECTION
91. The existing raised median on Washington
Boulevard at Cattaragus Avenue shall be
modified to provide an east bound left turn
lane, designed and installed to the
satisfaction of the City Engineer. The raised
median shall maintain as much landscaping
as feasible while accommodating left turn
auto storage. The median shall be re-
landscaped to the satisfaction of the City’s
Landscape Architect.
Public
Works
Mitigation
Measure
92. A new traffic signal shall be designed at the
intersection of Washington Boulevard and
Cattaragus Avenue. The applicant shall be
responsible for 100% of the cost of this
design and shall contribute 25% of the cost
of the installation of this signal. This
contribution shall be in the form of the
installation of the required underground
conduits or other ancillary work that will
offset the required 25% cost. This work shall
be performed at the same time as the new
left turn lane is installed. The design and
installation of this work shall be to the
satisfaction of the City Engineer.
Public
Works
Mitigation
Measure
93. The existing curb return at the intersection of
Washington Boulevard and National
Boulevard, adjacent to the project site, shall
be reconstructed to a curb return radius of
35 feet. The new curb return shall have a
curb ramp designed to current APWA
standards and shall include truncated domes
(red brick in color). The existing cross walk
serving this side of the intersection shall be
restriped to match the new location of the
curb ramp. The existing traffic signal poles
at this corner shall be upgraded and
relocated to an approved location based on
the reconstructed curb return. If new signal
poles are required due to longer mast arms,
the new poles shall be designed for 100 mph
Public
Works
Special
ATTACHMENT 1
41winds per CALTRANS standards. A corner
cut-off shall be dedicated to the City for
street purposes to the satisfaction of the City
Engineer.
NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Agency Source
Compliance
Verification
PRIOR TO CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY OR FINAL INSPECTION
94. The existing curb return at the southwest
corner of Washington Boulevard and Wesley
Street, adjacent to the project site, shall be
reconstructed to a curb return radius of 35
feet. The new curb return shall have a curb
ramp designed to current APWA standards
and shall include truncated domes (red brick
in color). A corner cut-off shall be dedicated
to the City for street purposes to the
satisfaction of the City Engineer.
Public
Works
Special
95. At the southeast corner of Washington
Boulevard and Wesley Street the Applicant
shall be required to acquire, dedicate and
construct a curb return with a 25-foot radius
and curb ramp designed to current APWA
standards which shall include truncated
domes (red brick in color). Adequate street
right-of-way shall be obtained from the
adjacent owner of this corner to provide for
the installation of this new curb return and
curb ramp.
Public
Works
Special
ATTACHMENT 1
42NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Agency Source
Compliance
Verification
ON-GOING
96. The use and development of the Property shall
be in substantial conformance with the plans
and materials submitted with the application for
the Land Use Permit as reviewed by the
Planning Commission at its meeting on
December 12, 2012, and the City Council at its
meeting on January 28, 2013, excepted as
modified by these Conditions of Approval.
Planning Standard
97. Pursuant to CCMC Section 17.650.020 -
“Inspection”, the Property Owner and Applicant
shall allow authorized City officials, or their
designees, access to the Property where there
is reasonable cause to believe the Property is
not in compliance with these Conditions of
Approval or other requirements of the CCMC.
All Standard
98. The use and development of the Property shall
comply with these Conditions of Approval and all
applicable local, special district or authority,
county, state and federal statutes, codes,
standards, and regulations including, but not
limited to, Building Division, Fire Department,
Planning Division and Public Works Department
requirements, and shall comply with all
applicable CCMC requirements and all
comments made during the City’s building
permit plan check review process. Failure to
comply with said Conditions, statutes, codes,
standards, and regulations may result in
reconstruction work, demolition, stop work
orders, withholding of certificate of occupancy,
revocation of land use permit approval and/or
any other lawful action the City might deem
reasonable and appropriate to bring about
compliance.
All Standard
99. All graffiti shall be removed from the Property
within 48 hours of its application.
Building/
Planning/
Public
Works
Standard
ATTACHMENT 1
43NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Agency Source
Compliance
Verification
ON-GOING
100. The Property Owner shall maintain all street
trees along the property frontage at his/her sole
cost and expense.
Public
Works
Standard
101. All mitigation measures set forth in any
environmental document relating to the Project
(including any reports of the type contemplated
by the California Environmental Quality Act)
shall be completed as specified therein.
Planning Standard
102. Follow-up Inspection After Project
Commencement - Six months after full
operation of the Project has commenced, as
set forth in this Condition, the Director, or
his or her designee, shall conduct follow-up
inspections on the design, operation and
maintenance of the Project. A report on the
Project traffic mitigations, on-site circulation,
parking, project design, maintenance and
operation shall be reviewed by the Planning
Commission one year after occupancy of the
Project. In the event the Project is not in full
compliance with the approved Project plans,
conditions of approval and approved
Comprehensive Plan, the matter shall be set
for public hearing pursuant to CCMC Chapter
17.660 – Revocations and Modifications.
Planning Special
103. Changes or Alterations to the
Comprehensive Plan – Changes to approved
plans shall be considered major (and
therefore shall not be subject to
administrative approval pursuant to CCMC
Section 17.560.025) if they will:
a) Alter the exterior appearance of the
project;
b) Alter the materials being used on the
exterior of the project unless, as determined
by the Director, the new materials are of
equal or better quality to the materials on the
approved Project materials board; or
c) Alter the floor plans in any material way,
or increase the size of any one or more of the
following areas: retail, restaurant, and/or
outdoor dining.
Planning Special
ATTACHMENT 1
44NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Agency Source
Compliance
Verification
ON-GOING
104. Total Retail and Restaurant Floor Area - The
total floor area of retail and restaurant
(including bars and nightclubs) uses shall
not exceed 31,240 square feet. Restaurants
(including bars and nightclubs) shall not
exceed 25% of the overall retail/restaurant
floor area.
Planning Special
105. On-Site Parking Requirements – (Residential
Parking) - A total of 199 spaces are required
for the 115 residential units. The parking for
residential uses shall include 24 spaces (19
spaces for the residential units and 5
residential guest spaces) in the upper
subterranean level and 177 spaces (154 for
the residential units and 23 residential guest
spaces) located in the second subterranean
level. Six accessible spaces parking shall be
provided in two subterranean parking levels.
(Commercial Parking) – A total of 143 spaces
shall be provided for the commercial uses
including the outdoor dining square footage.
Planning Special
ATTACHMENT 1
45NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Agency Source
Compliance
Verification
ON-GOING
106. Follow-up Parking Operations Inspections -
Inspections of the on-site parking operations
shall be conducted by the Director or his or
her designee and the City’s Traffic Engineer
at 6-month, 12-month, and 24-month periods
after full operation of the Project. Thereafter,
follow-up inspections shall be conducted as
necessary by the City. If the follow-up
parking operation inspections determine (i)
that the number of on-site parking spaces is
insufficient to satisfy parking demand; or (ii)
that the Project’s parking facilities or
operations are in any other way not fully and
adequately serving the customers, patrons,
residents, employees, suppliers and
contractors of the Project then additional
methods to provide adequate on-site parking
shall be devised. Such additional parking
supply shall be identified in a revised on-site
parking plan acceptable to the City and said
plan shall be promptly and fully
implemented. If adequate parking cannot be
provided by the above methods or
consistent with the Alternative Parking
Provisions of Section 17.320.025 of the
Zoning Code, the demand for parking at the
Project shall be reduced in a manner
considered acceptable to the City (e.g.
reducing the amount of outdoor dining area
or other uses commensurate with the
parking need).
Planning
/Public
Works
Special
ATTACHMENT 1
46NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Agency Source
Compliance
Verification
ON-GOING
107. Community Benefit Contribution - The
Applicant is requesting to exceed the base
density for the property (35 units per acre)
and has elected to provide public open
space as the Community Benefit for the
Project in order to qualify for a base density
of 65 units per acre. Pursuant to Community
Benefit Resolution No. 2008-R015 the
minimum required open space is 5,000 sq. ft.
The Applicant has chosen to provide public
open space totaling 7,198 square feet (4,304
square feet on the ground level and a second
level open space comprised of benches,
fountain, and landscape planters (2,894
square feet) which also serves as a
commercial plaza for a small café with
outdoor dining not to exceed 500 square feet
and access to an adjacent private pool deck.
The Community Benefit contribution is
$1,311,574 consistent with the allocation
formula established in Community Benefit
Resolution No. 2008-R015. The use and
operation of the public open space shall be
governed by all applicable covenant
requirements contained herein.
Planning Special
108. Upon 85% occupancy of the Project’s residential
units, the Property Owner shall purchase a 1-year
Metro pass pursuant Metro’s Pass Program as
follows: one pass required per each studio and
one bedroom unit; two passes required for each
two or three bedroom units. The passes shall be
offered free of charge to residential tenants as
outlined above. Unused passes shall be made
available to residential tenants who have asked
for additional passes, pursuant to Metro’s Pass
Program. The Property Owner shall provide a
written affidavit to the Planning Division
certifying that Metro Passes have been
distributed as required by this condition. In
addition, the Property Owner shall encourage the
Project’s commercial tenants to participate
Metro’s Business Transit Access Pass (B-Tap)
Program.
Planning Special
ATTACHMENT 1
47
December 12, 2012 Page 1 2012-P013
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
RESOLUTION NO. 2012-P013
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
CULVER CITY, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL
APPROVAL OF AN AMENDMENT TO THE CULVER CITY ZONING MAP, AS
REFERENCED IN TITLE 17, ZONING, OF THE CULVER CITY MUNICIPAL
CODE, SECTION 17.200.015, ESTABLISHING PLANNED DEVELOPMENT
ZONE NO. 12, ZONING CODE MAP AMENDMENT, ZCMA P-2012118 AND
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, CP-P2012116, FOR PLANNED DEVELOPMENT
ZONE NO. 12, CONSISTING OF A MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT OF
APPROXIMATELY 31,240 SQUARE FEET OF GROUND FLOOR RETAIL AND
RESTAURANT USES AND 115 RESIDENTIAL UNITS LOCATED AT 8770
WASHINGTON BOULEVARD
(CP-P2012116 AND ZCMA P-2012118)
WHEREAS, on August 9, 2012, Legado Companies and Legado Crossing, LP, as the
applicant and property owner (the “Applicant”) of 8770 Washington Boulevard, filed an
application for a Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Code Map Amendment for Planned
Development District No. 12, consisting of a 5-story mixed use transit oriented development
of approximately 31,240 square feet of ground floor commercial uses, and 115 residential
dwelling units, providing a total of 344 parking spaces in two levels of subterranean parking
(the “Project”), the Project site described more fully as Lots 2 through 15 of Tract No. 3772,
in the City of Culver City, County of Los Angeles, State of California; and,
WHEREAS, in order to implement the proposed Project, approval of the following
applications are required:
1. Zoning Code Map Amendment: For consistency between land use designation
and zoning, specifically the zone change of the Project site from the East Washington
Overlay (EWO), Commercial General (CG), and Industrial General (IG) Zone to a Planned
Development (PD) Zone: and
2. Comprehensive Plan: To ensure the Project is in compliance with all required
standards and City ordinances and establish all onsite and offsite conditions of approval to
ATTACHMENT 2
48
December 12, 2012 Page 2 2012-P013
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
reflect the site features and compatibility of the proposed Project with the uses on adjoining
properties.
WHEREAS, on December 12, 2012, after conducting a duly noticed public hearing
on the subject applications, including full consideration of the applications, plans, staff report,
environmental information and all testimony presented, the Planning Commission (i) by a
vote of ___ to ____, adopted a Mitigated Negative Declaration, in accordance with the
California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), finding the Project, as mitigated, will not result
in significant adverse environmental impacts; and (ii) by a vote of ___ to ____,
recommended to the City Council approval of Comprehensive Plan, CP-P2012116 and
Zoning Code Map Amendment, ZCMA P-2012118, for Planned Development Zone No. 12,
as set forth herein below.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CULVER
CITY, CALIFORNIA, RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. Pursuant to the foregoing recitations and the provisions of Culver City
Municipal Code (CCMC), the following findings are hereby made:
Zoning Code Map Amendment for Planned Development Zone No. 12:
As outlined in CCMC Title 17, Section 17.620.030.A, the following required findings for a
Zoning Code Map Amendment are hereby made:
1. The proposed amendment ensures and maintains internal consistency with the
goals, policies and strategies of all elements of the General Plan and will not
create any inconsistencies with this Title, in the case of a Zoning Code
Amendment.
The proposed Zoning Code Map Amendment ensures and maintains internal
consistency with the goals, policies and strategies of the General Plan. Specifically,
the Zoning Code Map Amendment will change the zoning of the Site from the EWO,
CG and IG zones to a PD zone and will make the Site consistent with the General
Plan Land Use “General Corridor” designation.
ATTACHMENT 2
49
December 12, 2012 Page 3 2012-P013
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
The proposed zone change will allow for the development of the Site for a Transit
Oriented Development (TOD) comprised of a mix of compatible land uses including
retail, restaurant, and residential, adjacent to the Expo Transit Station. The proposed
zone change furthers Objectives 2, 4, 5, 6, 8, 10 and 12 of the General Plan Land Use
Element by establishing development standards that would provide additional housing,
quality living and pedestrian environments, promote economic vitality with
neighborhood serving retail and restaurants, revitalize the commercial corridors
adjacent to the TOD area which are currently undeveloped or vacant, and enhance
visual quality by utilizing sustainable urban design principles and provide streetscape
improvements along commercial corridors. The proposed Zoning Code Map
Amendment will not result in inconsistency with the General Plan.
2. The proposed amendment would not be detrimental to the public interest,
health, safety, convenience or welfare of the City.
The proposed Zoning Code Map Amendment is not detrimental to the public interest,
health, safety, convenience or welfare of the City. The proposed zone change from
EWO, CG, and IG to Planned Development Zone No. 12 with related development
and land use standards, will implement a mixed used TOD on the Site through a
Comprehensive Plan while mitigating any potentially significant development impacts.
The PD zoning designation will create a unique, pedestrian oriented development that
fits within surrounding commercial and residential neighborhoods and is consistent
with redevelopment goals for the area. Further, the PD zoning is intended to ensure
harmonious Site development within Culver City as well as nearby Los Angeles as a
sustainable mixed use project that effectively brings housing, shopping and
employment together with transit in order to promote important goals of improved air
quality, regional mobility, and multi-modal approaches to transit. The PD zoning will
focus the types of uses and development standards consistent with the goals and
objectives of a mixed use TOD area. No health or safety hazards have been identified
in the review of the proposed zone change.
3. The proposed amendment is in compliance with the provisions of the California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).
The proposed Zoning Code Map Amendment is in compliance with CEQA as more
fully detailed in the Project’s environmental documentation, including, but not limited
to, the Initial Study, Mitigated Negative Declaration and Project traffic study. Potential
impacts to various environmental factors such as cultural resources, geology and
soils, noise, traffic, and utilities, as reviewed in the Initial Study will be mitigated.
Further mitigation of Project impacts will be achieved through various green building
methods that include, where feasible, use of local manufactured products, high rated
building insulation, and filtration of rain water from the roof into planters prior to
discharging into the public storm drain system to reduce storm water run-off. Other
sustainable development practices will include photovoltaic electricity generation, low
flow fixtures and low consumption urinals, drought tolerant vegetation, dual low
emissivity glazing, and façade shading elements to reduce solar heat gain. In
ATTACHMENT 2
50
December 12, 2012 Page 4 2012-P013
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
accordance with CEQA, the Project’s greenhouse gas emission impacts were
reviewed and found to have a less than significant environmental impact on the
surrounding area. Carbon emission reduction procedures have been incorporated into
the Project, which include bicycle racks spread throughout the site and bicycle
facilities including lockable areas, and preferred parking for low emission vehicles, and
sourcing products from local manufacturers when possible.
As outlined in CCMC Title 17, Section 17.620.030.B, the following additional required finding
for a Zoning Code Map Amendment is hereby made:
4. The sites are physically suitable (including access, provision of utilities,
compatibility with adjoining land uses and absence of physical constraints) for
the requested zoning designation(s) and anticipated land use development.
A complete review by City staff has determined that the Project site as conditioned, is
in compliance with all applicable design standards and all public services can be
provided; therefore, the site is physically suitable (including access, provision of
utilities, compatibility with adjoining land uses and absence of physical constraints) for
the requested zoning designation and anticipated land use development as outlined in
the Comprehensive Plan.
The mixed use development project has been sited and designed to be integral to the
TOD area and will create a transition from the Exposition Light Rail Transit station,
other planned TOD projects nearby and commercial retail and restaurant uses further
east toward the Helms Bakery Complex and Arts District area. Commercial retail and
restaurant uses are located on Washington Boulevard while commercial service and
creative office uses are located along Wesley Street. Residential neighborhoods are
east of the Site both south and north of Washington Boulevard. The proposed mixed
use development will fit within this fabric of multiple and varied types of land uses
while providing local market, retail, and restaurant opportunities for local residents that
will be a part of this and other planned TOD mixed use projects nearby. The height of
the proposed structures and existing structures to remain do not exceed the 56 foot
height limit and comply with Zoning Code setback and parking requirements.
Vehicular access to the Project site has been located at physically suitable locations
on Washington Boulevard and Wesley Street.
In sum, the proposed use of residential, retail, and restaurants is compatible with
existing land uses. The site occupies corner to corner parcels with frontages on
Washington Boulevard as well as National Boulevard and Wesley Street. The
Washington Boulevard frontage makes the site ideal for a pedestrian facing retail
project. The existing and proposed utility services such as water, sewer, and gas line
are adequate for the proposed uses.
ATTACHMENT 2
51
December 12, 2012 Page 5 2012-P013
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
Comprehensive Plan for Planned Development Zoning District No. 12:
As outlined in CCMC Title 17, Section 17.560.020, the following required findings for a
Comprehensive Plan are hereby made:
A. The proposed Comprehensive Plan can be substantially completed within four
years.
According to the Applicant, the proposed Project is planned and scheduled to be
complete within four years (most likely within two years). The Applicant owns the land
and has the capital to build the entire Project at one time and not in phases.
Construction is expected to begin in mid/end-2013 with substantial completion by
mid/end 2014, provided approval of the requested entitlement is granted.
B. The proposed development is capable of creating an environment of sustained
desirability and stability or adequate assurance will be provided such objective
will be attained.
The proposed development will create an environment of sustained desirability and
stability by providing the neighborhood with residential and commercial uses that will
serve the surrounding business and residential neighbors. The Hayden Tract, Helms
Bakery Complex, and East Washington areas have flourishing office and retail
populations, residential communities and dynamic art, food, and design
establishments. The proposed Project, consisting of residential, retail, and dining and
a community public open space area tie all of these various uses together assuring
this area’s continued success. The proposed Project will enhance and sustain the
desirability and stability of the entire neighborhood. Further, Project amenities such as
public parking and open space; private open spaces for the residential component;
and proximity to multi transit opportunities such as the Expo Light Rail line, local bus
lines, bike lanes, and conventional street and freeway infrastructures will assist in
establishing a stable commercial and residential neighborhood.
C. The proposed uses will not be substantially detrimental to present and potential
surrounding uses but will have a beneficial effect.
A mix of transportation, light industrial and commercial uses currently surround the
Project site, including the Exposition Light Rail Transit station, Helms Bakery Complex,
restaurant supply store, warehousing and distribution facilities, and various retail and
office establishments. The proposed Project uses of residential, retail, and
restaurants will be compatible with the surrounding areas. The Project site is currently
vacant and empty with a paved surface parking lot previously occupied by a lumber
supply company. The proposed Project will have a beneficial effect by developing the
site with active uses, new housing, retail and restaurant opportunities, pedestrian
friendly public open spaces and a vibrant and enhanced streetscape.
ATTACHMENT 2
52
December 12, 2012 Page 6 2012-P013
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
D. The streets and thoroughfares serving the development are suitable and
adequate to carry anticipated traffic and the development will not generate
traffic that will overload the adjacent street network.
A comprehensive traffic study for the Project was prepared in 2010 and updated in
2012. The traffic study identified improvements to be made in order to limit traffic
impacts to less than significant. Sufficient improvements to the roadways and other
public rights-of-way have been included in the Project design and incorporated into the
conditions of approval for the Project, ensuring that the surrounding roadways will be
suitable and adequate to carry the anticipated traffic created by the Project.
E. The proposed development is compatible with the surrounding area.
The surrounding area is comprised of commercial, retail and light industrial buildings.
Residential neighborhoods are located further south and east of the Project site. The
proposed development is a mixed use development containing both residential and
commercial retail and restaurant uses and is therefore compatible with the
surrounding uses.
F. The types and locations of any proposed commercial development can be
economically justified.
The Project incorporates 31,240 square feet of leasable commercial (retail and
restaurant) space. The commercial uses are designed to serve the residents of the
residential units within the Project itself, as well as the surrounding existing and
proposed office, residential and commercial development. The proposed
development density of the area along with existing adjacent commercial and
residential areas will provide an adequate consumer base for the proposed
commercial uses.
G. The Comprehensive Plan is in conformance with the General Plan, or a
concurrent General Plan amendment is in process.
The proposed Comprehensive Plan is in conformance with the goals, policies and
strategies of the General Plan. Specifically, the Comprehensive Plan will make the
site consistent with its General Plan Land Use “General Corridor” commercial
designation. The proposed mix of uses proposed as part of the Comprehensive Plan
are more consistent with the site’s general plan commercial designation than with the
current East Washington Overlay and Industrial General zoning. The Comprehensive
Plan will allow for a mixed use TOD consisting of pedestrian oriented ground floor
retail and restaurants with outdoor dining; residential uses above the retail and/or
restaurant spaces; and pedestrian friendly public open space; as well as
enhancements to the streetscape along Washington Boulevard, National Boulevard
and Wesley Street, and will further the goals and objectives as outlined in Objectives
2, 5 through 8, 10, and 12 of the General Plan Land Use Element. The proposed
Project will provide new housing supply consistent with the City Mixed Use
ATTACHMENT 2
53
December 12, 2012 Page 7 2012-P013
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
Development Standards and encourage reinvestment in this area thereby improving
economic vitality, visual quality, and the pedestrian environment.
H. Any exception from the standards and requirements of this Title is warranted by
the design and amenities incorporated in the Comprehensive Plan and is
desired by the Council.
No exceptions to the standards and requirements of the City’s Zoning Code have
been requested for this Project. The increase in residential density is in compliance
with the Mixed Use Development Standards and Community Benefit required by the
City, represented by the public open space area being provided at the intersection of
Washington Boulevard and National Boulevard.
I. Existing and proposed utility services are adequate for the proposed uses.
Review of the Project by the City’s Public Works Department has determined that the
proposed utility services and existing utilities that will serve the site are adequate for
the proposed uses.
J. The Comprehensive Plan has complied with all applicable City requirements.
The Comprehensive Plan has been prepared in conformance with the Culver City
Municipal Code, including the Zoning and Building Codes. This includes submission
and review of a proposed site plan and uses; preliminary building plans; landscaping,
and lighting; and civil engineering plans. Review by City departments of these plans
has determined that the Comprehensive Plan is in compliance with all applicable City
requirements.
/ / /
/ / /
/ / /
/ / /
/ / /
/ / /
/ / /
/ / /
/ / /
ATTACHMENT 2
54
December 12, 2012 Page 8 2012-P013
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
SECTION 2. Pursuant to the foregoing recitations and findings, the Planning
Commission of the City of Culver City, California, hereby recommends to the City Council
approval of Comprehensive Plan, CP-P2012116, and Zoning Code Map Amendment, ZCMA
P-2012118, Planned Development No. 12, as set forth as Exhibit “A”, Zone Change Map
attached hereto, and subject to the conditions of approval as set forth in Exhibit B attached
hereto and incorporated herein by this reference.
APPROVED and ADOPTED this 12th
day of December 2012.
SCOTT WYANT, CHAIRPERSON
PLANNING COMMISSION
CITY OF CULVER CITY, CALIFORNIA
Attested by:
________________________
Yvonne Hunt
Administrative Secretary
ATTACHMENT 2
55 City of Culver City, California
Planning Commission Agenda Item Report
Page 1 of 19
RECOMMENDATION:
That the Planning Commission:
1. Adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) based on the Initial Study
finding that the project, with mitigation measures incorporated, will not
have a significant adverse impact on the environment (Attachment No. 2 );
and
2. Recommend Approval to the City Council of Zoning Code Map
Amendment, ZCMA P-2012118, and Comprehensive Plan, CP P-
2012116, subject to the Conditions of Approval as stated in Resolution No.
2012-P013 (Attachment No. 1).
PROCEDURES:
1. Chair calls on staff for a staff report and Commission poses questions to
staff as desired.
2. Chair opens the public hearing, providing the applicant the first opportunity
to speak, followed by the general public.
3. Chair seeks a motion to close the public hearing after all testimony has
been presented.
4. Commission discusses the matter and arrives at its decision.
Meeting Date: December 12, 2012 Item Number: PH-1
AGENDA ITEM: Proposed Zoning Code Map Amendment (ZCMA- P2012118) to
establish a Planned Development Zone and a Comprehensive Plan (CP-
P2012116) to allow a mixed use development consisting of 31,240 square feet of
commercial uses and 115 residential dwelling units located at 8770 Washington
Boulevard.
Contact Person/Dept.: Susan Yun,
Senior Planner
Phone Number: (310) 253-5755
Public Hearing: [X] Action Item: [] Attachments: [X]
Public Notification: On November 20, 2012, a notice was posted on the site and was
mailed to all the property owners and occupants beyond a 1,000 foot radius of the site
(approximately 1,900 recipients) and emailed to the Master Notification List. The notice
was mailed to East Culver City Neighborhood Alliance Homeowners Association, the
Chamber of Commerce and Downtown Business Association. The notice was also
published in the Culver City News on November 23
rd
and November 29
th
, 2012.
Planning Approval:
Thomas Gorham, Planning Manager
Department Approval:
Sol Blumenfeld,
Community Development Director
ATTACHMENT 3
56 City of Culver City, California
Planning Commission Agenda Item Report
Page 2 of 19
BACKGROUND:
Request
The proposed request is to establish a Planned Development (PD) Zone
through a Zoning Code Map Amendment (ZCMA) and a Comprehensive Plan
(CP) to develop a 5-story, 56 foot high maximum, mixed-use project
consisting of approximately 31,240 square feet of ground floor commercial
space (retail and restaurant) and a total of 115 residential dwelling units
above (the Project). The project site (the “Site”) is located at southeast corner
of Washington Boulevard and National Boulevard at 8770 Washington
Boulevard, near the recently completed Exposition Light Rail Transit (Expo
LRT) line, Culver City Expo LRT station and within the City’s Washington
National Transit Oriented Development (TOD) District.
Existing Conditions
The 1.78 acre Site was previously occupied by a roofing supply company that
contained warehousing and storage structures. The Site was cleared in April
2012 and is currently vacant and secured with perimeter fencing.
The surrounding area is characterized by light industrial/warehouse,
commercial service and retail uses. The Expo LRT abuts the Site and the
Culver City Expo LRT station is located to the northwest. The Expo LRT bike
path terminates at the Site near National Boulevard. A City owned parkette is
located directly across National Boulevard, west of the project site. Further
west, along Washington Boulevard is the proposed Platform commercial
development project (currently a vacated car dealership). Immediately to the
northwest is the City owned property currently used as a temporary Expo
parking lot which is to be developed with a 5.2 acre transit oriented
development project. Directly north of the Site are commercial retail uses,
including the Helms Bakery complex and the Surfas restaurant supply store.
To the east, along Wesley Street are light industrial, service and creative
office uses that include an auto body / repair shop, dog kennel, architecture
office and photography studio.
The Site is located within the East Washington Overlay (EWO) Zone with
underlying zoning of Commercial General (CG) and Industrial General (IG).
The General Plan land use designation is General Corridor.
ATTACHMENT 3
57 City of Culver City, California
Planning Commission Agenda Item Report
Page 3 of 19
Project Description
The Project is one of several new TODs that are proposed for the area
surrounding the Culver City Expo LRT station. The proposed 5-story, 56-foot
high maximum, mixed use development contains 31,240 square feet of
ground floor commercial space and a total of 115 rental residential units on
the second through fifth stories.
A total of 344 parking spaces will be provided for the Project. 31 spaces will
be provided at ground level, 136 spaces in the upper level garage, and 177
spaces in the lower level garage. 15 public parking spaces are provided as
part of the overall parking provided on-site. Access will be provided for
residential and commercial uses on Washington Boulevard and on Wesley
Street. Truck access for onsite loading and unloading will utilize a separate
service driveway on Wesley Street.
The residential component is proposed as apartments varying in size and
number of bedrooms. The Project includes 3 studio units and 56 one
bedroom units ranging from 607 square feet to 762 square feet, 46 two
bedroom units ranging from 1,104 square feet to 1,289 square feet and 10
three bedroom units ranging from 1,758 square feet to 1,844 square feet.
Several two-story units are proposed with the two and three bedroom unit
types.
The Project will provide a number of on-site amenities for residential tenants
including a recreation room and fitness center, and a large interior central
courtyard with a swimming pool, shade structures, BBQ area, and bench
seating and tables. Private balconies are provided on some of the units. All
of the residential units include a laundry area.
The project offsite improvements include new sidewalks, street furniture and
street trees adjacent to the site as well as various operational and circulation
improvements at the adjacent intersections of Washington Boulevard,
National Boulevard and Wesley Street. New crosswalks are proposed on
Washington and National Boulevards and at Washington Boulevard and
Wesley Street. These improvements must comport with a TOD District
Streetscape Plan that will be prepared for the area. Installation of a bike lane
along the project’s Washington Boulevard street frontage as well as the north
side of Washington Boulevard is also included as part of the Project.
The Project is designed to be a pedestrian friendly and sustainable mixed-use
TOD by providing ample open plazas, pedestrian setbacks and pedestrian
serving uses. The Project includes outdoor dining along the 15 foot
pedestrian setback on Washington Boulevard and a public open space area
ATTACHMENT 3
58 City of Culver City, California
Planning Commission Agenda Item Report
Page 4 of 19
at the corner of Washington and National Boulevards that communicates
directly with the emerging TOD neighborhood.
The mix of commercial spaces proposed includes a 13,900 square foot retail
space and an 11,800 square foot retail space; a 2,300 square foot restaurant
space and 3,240 square foot restaurant space. The retail and restaurant
components are designed for direct street and sidewalk access. Potential
Project tenants will be transit and neighborhood serving and may include a
grocery store, pharmacy and restaurants.
ANALYSIS:
A Zoning Code Map Amendment and Comprehensive Plan are required for
the Project pursuant to Zoning Code Section 17.240, Planned Development
Zoning Districts and Section 17.560, Comprehensive Plans. The proposed
Zoning Code Map Amendment includes re-zoning the project site from East
Washington Overlay, Commercial General (CG) and Industrial General (IG) to
Planned Development (PD) (see Attachment No. 1, Exhibit A). The proposed
Comprehensive Plan includes the development standards and allowed land
uses established for the PD Zone which has been refined to reflect the transit
related character of the Project. The intent of a Comprehensive Plan is to
allow for flexibility in the application of the Zoning Code standards for large
scaled developments. A Comprehensive Plan considers innovation in site
planning in order to more effectively respond to site features, uses on
adjoining properties, and other impacts that the Zoning Code may not be able
to adequately address. The PD zoning district is implemented with the
Comprehensive Plan.
Comprehensive Plan
The project has been designed to conform to all applicable Zoning Code
provisions of the Comprehensive Plan. The Comprehensive Plan document
(Attachment No. 7) includes all the relevant land use and development
standards for the Project including setbacks, height, parking, and permitted
uses; as well as the site plan, floor plans, building elevations and renderings,
building materials and colors, landscaping, public open space, infrastructure,
and sustainability provisions.
1. TOD/Mixed Use Development Standards: The Site is developed as a
vertically integrated mixed use transit oriented development. The
proposed development is consistent with the maximum applicable density
permitted under Zoning Code Section 17.400.065–Mixed Use
ATTACHMENT 3
59 City of Culver City, California
Planning Commission Agenda Item Report
Page 5 of 19
Development Standards with a Community Benefit, the requirements of
the height district and the development standards defined therein|1010|.
The base density of 35 dwelling units per acre permits 62 dwelling units
on the site. The proposed 115 residential dwelling units conforms to the
maximum applicable density of 65 dwelling units per acre allowed with a
Community Benefit pursuant to density requirements of the Mixed Use
Development Standards Zoning Code Section 17.400.065.E.3. An
extensive public open space area, totaling a minimum of 5,000 square
feet is provided as the project’s Community Benefit contribution.|1010| (See
below Section 8, Community Benefit Contribution).
Consistent with the Mixed Use Development Standards and the
pedestrian orientation of the Transit Oriented Development District, the
project includes significant retail, restaurant and café space primarily
located on the ground floor. A small 240 square foot café is located at the
second level where additional public open space is located. The
commercial uses front Washington Boulevard and Wesley Street.
Pedestrian access to the commercial uses is primarily from Washington
Boulevard and from the at-grade parking located at the interior behind
ground level retail use. The Project meets the minimum 30 foot
commercial depth and the commercial floor area requirements of the
Mixed Use Development Standards.|1010|
Residential units are accessed by elevators and stairs located in the
subterranean residential parking levels or through the lobby area off of the
Washington Boulevard sidewalk entrance. Vehicular access for
commercial and residential uses is provided from Washington Boulevard
and Wesley Street. Residential tenant parking and guest parking are
separated from commercial parking in the upper level and in the lower
level garage with security access.
2. Height: The PD Zone as well as the Commercial General Zone (Chapter
17.220 and 17.240 of the Zoning Code) allows a maximum 56’ foot
building height. The proposed building height varies to 5-stories with a
stepped roof line; however no part of the building, excluding roof mounted
building equipment and screening, exceeds 56 feet.
3. Setbacks: Building setbacks are consistent with the applicable setback
requirements of the Zoning Code Section 17.400.065 – Mixed Use
Development Standards. The project design incorporates a stepped
building elevation at the second and third levels along the Washington
Boulevard street frontage.
ATTACHMENT 3
60 City of Culver City, California
Planning Commission Agenda Item Report
Page 6 of 19
4. Pedestrian Setbacks: The Comprehensive Plan requires a 15 foot
Pedestrian Setback at grade along the Washington Boulevard street
frontage in order to accommodate pedestrian improvements (outdoor
dining, landscaped planters, benches, building canopies, trellises and
other similar improvements).
5. General Land Use Provisions: The permitted commercial uses in the
Comprehensive Plan are primarily retail, restaurant and personal service
uses that reflect the General Plan, General Corridor Land Use designation
and the emerging transit orientation of the area. The recommended uses
support community serving needs that are compatible with adjacent
residential neighborhoods and the TOD area. Certain uses permitted
under the EWO and CG zoning district such as auto related or auto repair
facilities, warehousing or distributing facilities, offices have been
eliminated in the proposed PD zone since they are inconsistent with a
pedestrian orientation.
a. Restaurant Uses
In order to encourage more retail and broaden the types of project
uses, the Comprehensive Plan contains a provision to limit
restaurant uses to no more than 25% of the commercial floor area.
6. Architectural Design: The architectural design of the Project was
inspired by Culver City’s Hayden Tract where industrial warehouses have
transitioned into uniquely designed creative office facilities. The Project
building materials, forms and colors reflect this industrial image. Metal
canopy roofs, metal cladding, rectangular forms and large windows are
part of the industrial metaphor in the project and are intended to
complement the surrounding area. The buildings are comprised primarily
of metal and stucco finishes in seven different colors accented by standing
seam metal siding in two colors and corrugated metal siding. Signage will
be provided to identify ground floor commercial uses as well as for
directional and other identification purposes.
7. Sustainability and Green Building: Sustainable building design is
integrated into the building layout and through the selection of materials,
landscape design, and use of energy efficient building and mechanical
systems. Green building features include natural lighting, heating and
cooling. Proximity to the Expo Station and a pedestrian orientation is
expected encourage walkability and alternative modes of transit to help
reduce Project Global Greenhouse Gas Emissions. The Project will also
meet the City’s Green Building requirements as set forth in the Culver City
Municipal Code and Cal Green requirements. Further, the project aims to
ATTACHMENT 3
61 City of Culver City, California
Planning Commission Agenda Item Report
Page 7 of 19
obtain Gold Certification under the provisions of the Leadership in Energy
and Environmental Design (LEED) program.
In addition, the developer is considering offering one annual metro pass
for the residential leases in the project as a way to encourage use of the
Expo Line and as a marketing incentive.
8. Community Benefit Contribution – (Open Space Design, Operation
and Maintenance): The intent of the Community Benefit provision of the
Mixed Use Development Standards is to help mitigate project impacts
consistent with expressed community needs. Resolution No. 2008-R015
(Attachment No. 3) establishes the requirements for providing Community
Benefits under the Mixed Use Development Standards and provides that
each community benefit is approved on an area wide basis by Council
resolution. On July 28, 2008, the City Council conducted a Community
Benefit hearing for the Washington National TOD District and approved
Resolution No. 2008-R053 with the following as eligible community
benefits (Attachment No. 4, Community Benefits for Washington National
Area):
? Public Parking;
? Pocket Parks and Public Open Space;
? Streetscape Improvements;
? Funding for a City Shuttle Service.
The developer has elected to provide public open space as the community
benefit. Pursuant to Community Benefit Resolution No. 2008-R015 the
minimum required open space is 5,000 sq. ft. The developer has elected
to provide public open space totaling 7,198 square feet (4,304 square feet
on the ground level and 2,894 square feet at the second level.) The
second level open space is comprised of benches, a fountain and
landscape planters, and also serves as a commercial plaza with small
café and outdoor dining and provides access to an adjacent private pool
deck. The Community Benefit contribution is $1,311,574, consistent with
the allocation formula identified in the Community Benefit Incentive
Program (Attachment No. 3, Community Benefit Incentive Program,
Resolution No.2008-R015).
Design
The developer originally submitted three design options for the Project
Community Benefit ground level open space plan and selected one that
contained a central fountain with a circular design, more hardscape and
less landscape and functioned more like a commercial plaza than a small
ATTACHMENT 3
62 City of Culver City, California
Planning Commission Agenda Item Report
Page 8 of 19
park. Working with staff, the developer has refined the ground level open
space to be more park-like (consistent with the Community Benefit
requirements) and less like a commercial plaza. The revised plan
includes more usable open space, a water feature (which is proposed for
the project public art piece as required under the Art in Public Places
Ordinance), more planting (including large trees planted on grade) and
stylized bench seating. The elevation of the park at Washington and
National Boulevards is resolved at the building line with a series stepped
plazas and planters. Overall, the redesigned public open space
community benefit will provide an attractive and much needed park
amenity for the area with little capital cost to the City.
The second level open space overlooks the park below and is comprised
of benches, a water feature and landscape planters and includes an
outdoor dining area adjacent to the second level café space.
Operation & Maintenance
The City will require a covenant stipulating that the required public open
space is open and available for public use during public park operating
hours. Prior to issuance building permit, the City will require that the
developer record the covenant and enter into a license agreement to
ensure public access and use of the dedicated public open space. The
covenant and license agreement will require maintenance of the space by
the developer consistent with the City’s standards for public parks.
9. TOD District Streetscape Plan: The City is developing a streetscape
plan for the TOD District (see Attachment No. 5, TOD Area Map). The
project is required to comply with the streetscape program for the area
which is to be funded on a pro rata basis by area developments.
Streetscape improvements will include new street trees, planters, tree
grates, way-finding signs, benches, trash receptacles, bicycle racks, and
other street furniture. The confluence of City property and new TOD
developments proposed around the intersection of Washington and
National Boulevards provides a unique opportunity to develop that
intersection with special design features that may include special
crosswalk and street paving, lighting and/or public art. The City will work
with area developers on planning, design, construction and maintenance
of the streetscape improvements.
10. Public Art: The project will comply with the requirements in the City’s Art
in Public Places Ordinance incorporating a proposed water feature in the
public open space at Washington and National Boulevards.
ATTACHMENT 3
63 City of Culver City, California
Planning Commission Agenda Item Report
Page 9 of 19
11. Parking: The project will provide a total of 344 parking spaces (31
surface parking spaces for the commercial uses and public parking, 136
spaces in the first subterranean level for the commercial and residential
uses, and 177 parking spaces in the second subterranean level for the
residential use). A total of 342 parking spaces are required for both the
commercial and residential components of the Project. The applicant is
providing two additional spaces beyond Code requirements. Commercial
patrons who park on the ground floor will enter through a garage ticket
entry gate and pay for parking via a garage pay station. Those parking on
the ground level or subterranean level will either receive a validation from
a merchant or pay a charge for using the parking.
Restaurant, Retail and Outdoor Dining Parking
Numerical Parking Requirements: Parking for the project site is provided
at a ratio of 1 stall per 250 square feet of retail and restaurant floor area
consistent with the Zoning Code parking requirements for shopping
centers. The total restaurant space (18%) proposed is under the 25%
limit of combined retail and restaurant floor area (31,240 square feet).
The Zoning Code provides that the first 250 square feet of outdoor dining
is permitted without requiring parking. The Project proposes an additional
credit of 250 square feet (500 square feet total). Without the additional
parking credit six additional parking spaces are required. The parking
requirements are summarized in the following table:
Land Use Parking Factor
Retail Shopping center) 1 stall per 250 sf
Restaurant
(Up to 25% combined retail /restaurant floor area.)
1 stall per 250 sf
Outdoor Dining Areas
(Area in excess of 500 square feet per restaurant
space.)
1 stall per 250 sf
The Project contains a total of 25,700 square feet of retail spaces and
5,540 square feet of restaurant spaces. The Project Summary Table on
Page 15 of the Comprehensive Plan provides detailed building square
footage breakdown for each of the proposed uses.
Outdoor Dining Parking
The Project proposes a total of 2,220 square feet of outdoor dining. This
includes area identified along public sidewalks adjacent to Washington
Boulevard (one area totals 900 square feet and another area totals 900
ATTACHMENT 3
64 City of Culver City, California
Planning Commission Agenda Item Report
Page 10 of 19
square feet) and in the open space on the 2
nd
floor level (420 square feet).
This parking has been calculated in the project parking supply table on
Page 14 of the Comprehensive Plan. The Project also includes an
outdoor dining parking credit as noted above.
The outdoor dining parking credit is justified by the proximity of the Project
to transit as part of the Transit Oriented Development (TOD) district.
There will not be a significant parking impact as result of outdoor dining
given that project is expected to be draw customers and will generally
include local office workers from the site and employees and residents
from the adjacent Hayden Tract and other nearby TODs planned within
the area. It is expected that many site users will be arriving by alternative
modes of travel such as walking, bicycling, or by taking the bus or train to
the site. Further, the project does not take any parking credit or discount
as could be allowed as a TOD project.
Commercial Parking
Based on the proposed commercial uses (including the outdoor dining
square footage) and parking ratios the following summarizes the Project
commercial parking requirements:
Land Use Area s.f. Parking
Ratio
Total
Parking
Retail 25,700 1:250 sf 103
Restaurant 5,540 1:250 sf 22
Outdoor Dining
(Area in excess of 500
square feet per restaurant
space.)
800 sf 1:250 sf 3
Total 143
Residential Parking
A total of 199 spaces are required for the 115 residential units as follows:
Residential Unit No. Units Stalls/Unit Parking
Stalls
Studio 3 1 3
One Bedroom 56 1 56
Two Bedroom 46 2 92
Three Bedroom 10 2 20
Residential Guest 115 units 1 per every 4 units 28
Total 199
ATTACHMENT 3
65 City of Culver City, California
Planning Commission Agenda Item Report
Page 11 of 19
The parking for the residential component includes 24 spaces (19 spaces
for the residential units and 5 residential guest spaces) in the upper
subterranean level and 177 spaces (154 for the residential units and 23
residential guest spaces) located in the second subterranean level. Six
accessible spaces parking are provided in two subterranean parking
levels.
Bicycle parking is also provided both on-site and along the sidewalk.
Long term bicycle parking (24 stalls) is being provided on-site at the lower
level garage within a secured fenced area. These bicycle spaces are for
the residential tenants. In addition, short term bike racks (14 stalls) are
provided along Washington Boulevard in the public right of way.
Additional short term bicycle parking (12 stalls) is provided on-site in the
ground level parking area.
Public Replacement Parking
In addition to the required commercial parking described above 15
additional, un-gated public replacement parking spaces will be provided at
the ground level to offset the parking eliminated along Wesley Street as a
result of the Project.|1010| The replacement parking will be subject to a public
parking easement for use, operation and enforcement purposes
5
and must
be open and available to the public during the parking garage operating
hours. A pay-station system will be installed in the garage for payment
and revenue collection by the City. The City’s Parking Enforcement will
enforce posted parking regulations.|1010|
Access: The project provides direct vehicular access from both
Washington Boulevard and Wesley Street. Access from Washington
Boulevard will be provided by a 24 feet 9 inches wide driveway, providing
both ingress and egress for the public, commercial and residential spaces,
and includes a short raised median to separate ingress and egress traffic.
There will be a sentry gate/ticket dispenser located approximately 30 feet
into the parking garage, allowing for automobile queuing. East or west
bound traffic on Washington Boulevard will be able to turn onto Wesley
Street at a new signalized intersection for vehicular access into the
Project’s second driveway off of Wesley Street. This driveway is 30 feet 6
inches wide, with a raised median. A sentry gate/ticket dispenser will be
located beyond the public parking spaces providing access to the
commercial parking and residential parking (see Page 15 of the
Comprehensive Plan, Ground Level Parking Plan). Access to the
residential parking will be provided through a sentry gate on the upper
ATTACHMENT 3
66 City of Culver City, California
Planning Commission Agenda Item Report
Page 12 of 19
level garage (P1 level) which will provide access to residential parking for
tenants and their guests on the P1 and P2 levels.
Commercial deliveries will be provided via a truck loading dock along the
south property line of the site. This dock has access from Wesley Street,
allowing trucks access whether traveling east or west on Washington
Boulevard. The dock is designed to allow for trucks with one full size
trailer, as well as for smaller vans, panel trucks or other delivery vehicles.
Drivers will have direct access to the retail on the ground level from the
dock through appropriate corridors. Large commercial moving vans
loading and unloading furniture and goods for residents as they move in or
out will access the residential units through the truck dock. Residents who
use small residential vans, pickup trucks and panel trucks for moving in or
out will either use the truck dock or have access to the units from the
secured residential parking areas on either the upper or lower levels.
Because all residential move-in and out deliveries will be from either the
truck dock or the secured residential parking areas, these vehicles will not
block access to the commercial parking areas or access to any
commercial or public parking spaces.
12. Traffic and Circulation: A traffic study prepared for the Project, dated
July 10, 2010, and supplemented on June 19, 2012, by Hirsch Green
Transportation Consulting, Inc. was reviewed and accepted by the City’s
Traffic Engineer. The traffic study indicated that with required mitigation
measures there would be no adverse impact from the proposed Project.
The traffic analysis evaluated thirty-four (34) intersections in the vicinity of
the Site during both the AM and PM peak hours. Of the 34 intersections,
17 are located within the City of Culver City and 17 intersections within
City of Los Angeles.
In order to assess the potential impact of the Project on the local street
system, and using the City’s significance criteria, the traffic study
compared the volume to capacity (V/C) ratio, which is a numerical
measure of traffic congestion, at each study location to determine the
incremental difference in V/C ratios caused by the Project. The “Critical
Movement Analysis-Planning” method of intersection capacity analysis
was used to determine the intersection V/C ratio and corresponding level
of service (LOS), which is a letter-grade measure of traffic congestion, at
each of the signalized intersections.
Using the threshold criteria for determining significance of impacts of a
Project at a specific location, the traffic analysis concluded five (5) out the
ATTACHMENT 3
67 City of Culver City, California
Planning Commission Agenda Item Report
Page 13 of 19
thirty four (34) analyzed intersection locations would be impacted by traffic
generated by the Project unless mitigation is incorporated.
In order to address the Project’s impact, the following traffic mitigations
are required to improve and enhance the vehicular capacity at various
intersections:
• Venice Boulevard and Robertson Boulevard: The westbound
approach of Venice Boulevard at Robertson Boulevard, which is
located within the City of Los Angeles, is required to be re-striped to
provide an exclusive right-turn only lane, in addition to one left-turn
lane and three through lanes.
• Venice Boulevard and National Boulevard: The southbound approach
of National Boulevard at Venice Boulevard, which is within the City of
Los Angeles, is required to be re-striped to install an exclusive right-
turn only lane, in addition to one left-turn lane and two through lanes.
• Washington Boulevard and National Boulevard: The Project is
required to construct a new 11-foot wide right-turn only lane for
northbound National Boulevard. This improvement will require the
project to dedicate and widen approximately 100 feet of its National
Boulevard frontage by approximately nine feet to install the new right-
turn lane.
• Washington Boulevard and Wesley Street: The Project will widen each
side of Wesley Street by three feet within the existing right-of-way
(resulting in sidewalk width on both sides to seven feet) to provide a
total roadway width of 36 feet, and restripe the northbound approach
to Washington Boulevard to provide an exclusive left-turn lane plus an
exclusive right-turn only lane, plus one southbound lane. Further, the
Project will install a new traffic signal at this location, to be
interconnected and coordinated with the nearby signal at Washington
Boulevard and National Boulevard and will be equipped with the City’s
current traffic signal coordination software in order to minimize traffic
flow disruptions.
• Washington Boulevard and Cattaraugus Avenue: The Project is
required to modify the existing raised median island on Washington
Boulevard to provide a dedicated new eastbound left-turn lane at this
location, in addition to one through lane and one shared through/right-
turn lane. The Project will fund 100 percent of the cost of the design
and installation of the proposed left-turn lane. Further, the project will
ATTACHMENT 3
68 City of Culver City, California
Planning Commission Agenda Item Report
Page 14 of 19
be responsible for 100% of the cost to design a new traffic signal at
this location and shall contribute 25% of the cost of the installation of
the signal.
• Traffic Signal Cameras and Controllers: In addition to the restriping
mitigation improvements at Venice Boulevard and Robertson
Boulevard, and Venice Boulevard and National Boulevard, City of Los
Angeles Department of Transportation (LADOT), requires additional
improvements at several intersections within the City of Los Angeles to
augment the intersection restriping improvements. These traffic signal-
related improvements will further reduce the potential impacts of the
proposed Project and enhance general traffic flow operations within
the study area. The requested additional improvements include:
installation of closed circuit traffic monitoring cameras at the
intersections of Cadillac Avenue and La Cienega Boulevard, and at
Fairfax Avenue and Venice Boulevard; and installation of traffic signal
controller upgrades at eight additional intersections to be identified by
LADOT.
There will also be various pedestrian and vehicular operational
improvements at and near the adjacent signalized intersections of
Washington Boulevard and Wesley Street and Washington Boulevard and
National Boulevard (i.e., new crosswalks, larger curb radius, wider
sidewalks).
• Sidewalks and Crosswalks: The Project is required to install a new 7’
wide sidewalk along both sides of Wesley Street. The sidewalk along
Washington Boulevard will be reconstructed to a 12 foot width. Also,
at the new Washington/Wesley signalized intersection, a new
crosswalk across Washington Boulevard at the east side of the
intersection will be installed.
• Curb Returns: The curb return at the southeast corner of the
intersection of Washington Boulevard and National Boulevard (along
the project’s frontage) is required to be improved to provide a minimum
35-foot radius. The curb at the southwest and southeast corner of
Wesley Street and Washington Boulevard will be reconstructed to
provide a larger radius and minimize the impact of the existing acute
angle experienced by motorists eastbound on Washington Boulevard
turning onto Wesley Street. The above changes will enhance
ingress/egress for motorists on Wesley Street, particularly for larger
trucks and emergency vehicle access.
ATTACHMENT 3
69 City of Culver City, California
Planning Commission Agenda Item Report
Page 15 of 19
13. Infrastructure and Community Facilities District: Based upon the
proposed development described in the Comprehensive Plan, the Site will
require sewer service improvements. It will not require major upgrades to
water or gas infrastructure however, some utility relocation as well as
various street and streetscape improvements will be required. The
property owner/developer is responsible for all project related public
improvements.
The precise extent and costs for the infrastructure improvements will be
determined prior to issuance of a building permit. These costs will
generally be shared on a pro rata basis with other TOD developments,
and may potentially be funded through formation of a community facilities
district (CFD). CFD’s provide one financial tool for commercial property
owners within the TOD District to help fund public improvements through
private property assessment and bond finance. Required off-site
improvements which may be funded through a CFD include:
• New Infrastructure
• Utility Relocations
• Streetscape Improvements
• On-going maintenance
Establishment of a CFD can ensure timely completion of all necessary
pubic improvements. An infrastructure report has been prepared to
identify the necessary improvements to support formation of the CFD
consistent with Section 15.12.035 of the Culver City Municipal Code.
14. Community Meeting: Pursuant to the City’s Community Outreach
Guidelines, the applicant hosted community meetings on February 10,
2011 and October 23, 2012. In addition to the community meetings,
Legado Companies presented their conceptual plans to various
organizations such as the Culver City Chamber of Commerce and the
Downtown Business Association. Further, upon the request of the East
Culver City Neighborhood Alliance HOA, Legado presented their plans at
their Homeowners Association meeting of March 8, 2012.
Several questions were received during the neighborhood meetings
regarding project impacts upon neighborhood traffic and parking,
particularly the availability of street parking and truck operations on
Wesley Street. The development addresses these issues with off-site
improvements, traffic mitigations required in the Comprehensive Plan and
the replacement of metered public parking on-site. Some attendees
commented on the project’s connection to the Expo LRT station, project
size, massing and project schedule. In general the Project was well
ATTACHMENT 3
70 City of Culver City, California
Planning Commission Agenda Item Report
Page 16 of 19
received by the neighborhood and community groups that attended the
meetings.
CONCLUSION:
Legado Crossing is one of several Transit Oriented Developments served by
the Culver City Expo LRT station. Staff has worked closely with the applicant
on the Legado Crossing Comprehensive Plan in order to ensure that is fitting
for the area. Toward that end, the proposed PD zoning and Comprehensive
plan will help advance the goals good planning for the site and achieve the
City’s goals for transit oriented development.
Based on the analysis contained herein staff believes the findings for a
Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Code Map Amendment can be made as
outlined in proposed Resolution No. 2012-P013 (Attachment No. 1) and
recommends project approval.
ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION:
The proposed Zoning Code Map Amendment is in compliance with CEQA as
more fully detailed in the Project’s environmental documentation, including,
but not limited to, the Initial Study, Mitigated Negative Declaration and Project
traffic study. Potential impacts to various environmental factors such as
cultural resources, geology and soils, noise, traffic, and utilities, as reviewed
in the Initial Study will be mitigated. Further mitigation of Project impacts will
be achieved through various green building methods that include, where
feasible, use of local manufactured products, high rated building insulation,
and filtration of rain water from the roof into planters prior to discharging into
the public storm drain system to reduce storm water run-off. Other
sustainable development practices will include photovoltaic electricity
generation, low flow fixtures and low consumption urinals, drought tolerant
vegetation, dual low emissivity glazing, and façade shading elements to
reduce solar heat gain. In accordance with CEQA, the Project’s greenhouse
gas emission impacts were reviewed and found to have a less than significant
environmental impact on the surrounding area. Carbon emission reduction
procedures have been incorporated into the Project, which include bicycle
racks spread throughout the site and bicycle facilities including lockable
areas, and preferred parking for low emission vehicles, and sourcing products
from local manufacturers when possible.
Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) guidelines a
Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) has been prepared; the project has
ATTACHMENT 3
71 City of Culver City, California
Planning Commission Agenda Item Report
Page 17 of 19
been determined that with mitigation measures incorporated, it will have less
than significant impacts on the community.
ALTERNATIVE OPTIONS:
The following alternative actions may be considered by the Planning
Commission:
1. Approve the application with the recommended conditions of approval
if the application is deemed to meet the required findings.
2. Approve the application with additional or different conditions of
approval, if deemed necessary to meet the required findings and
mitigate any new project impacts identified at the meeting.
3. Disapprove the application if it does not meet the required findings.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Draft Resolution No. 2012-P013; Exhibit A, Zone Change Map and Exhibit
B, Conditions of Approval.
2. Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration dated October 24, 2012.
3. Community Benefit Incentive Program, Resolution No.2008-R015
4. Community Benefit for the Washington National Area, Resolution
No.2008-R053.
5. Transit Oriented Development District Map
6. Traffic Analysis prepared by Hirsch/Green Transportation Consulting, Inc.
dated July 10, 2010 and supplemented on June 19, 2012.
7. Comprehensive Plans dated December 12, 2012.
NOTES:
1. The Mixed Use Development Standards prescribes various mitigations to ensure
compatibility between commercial and residential uses on site. Further compatibility will be
achieved in the Project through the mixed use performance standards. These standards
require walls, floors, and ceilings to be insulated to protect the project’s residential users from
potential noise impacts created by the ground floor commercial uses. The performance
standards do not allow commercial uses to be operated in such a manner that they produce
noise and vibrations that are detrimental to both the residential and commercial uses. Other
aspects of the performance standards include security code access for elevators or separate
commercial and residential elevators, cross ventilation and high quality HVAC systems for
ATTACHMENT 3
72 City of Culver City, California
Planning Commission Agenda Item Report
Page 18 of 19
residential units, illumination of parking areas, residential protection from commercial loading
areas, and adequate sidewalk pedestrian lighting.
2. Mixed Use Community Benefit Requirements:
(A) Density Allowances:
35 units per acre base density, and up to 65 units per acre where the property is
located within a Transit Oriented Development area.
(B) Specific Benefits Required:
? Streetscape improvements serving the immediate commercial area and a
contribution toward related maintenance costs.
? Pocket Parks and Public Open Space (Minimum 5,000 sq. ft.)
? Metered Public parking serving the immediate commercial area (Minimum 10
spaces) and in excess of Code requirements.
? Other benefits serving the neighborhood as determined by Council.
(C) Calculating Community Benefit Contribution:
The method for establishing the developer’s contribution must be based on the
proportionality of the benefit relative to the developer’s profit. Unless there is
proportionality, the system will be ineffective as there will be no reason to provide
the benefit if the cost of providing it exceeds the revenue for the project.
The community benefit contribution is the proportional share (50%) of the
community benefit value. The community benefit is calculated as:
Additional No. of DU’s Allowed x Market Value Sales Price x .15 (Developer’s
Assumed Profit)
= Total Benefit Value
For example:
If 10 additional new units could be developed and the market value was
$700,000, the calculation would be $700,000 x 10 = $7,000,000 x .15
= $1,050,000
The contribution is ½ of the benefit value or $525,000.
The community benefit contribution is met by providing it on-site. Alternately, when
the project is located within a specified improvement area improvement with
scheduled streetscape or utility improvements the contribution may be provided
through an in-lieu payment in an amount equivalent to the required community
benefit contribution.
3. The mixed use development standards require overall commercial floor area to be 10%
of the projects total gross floor area or 30% of the project lot size, whichever is greater.
The total gross residential and commercial floor area of the Project is 181,670 s.f. The
project lot size is 77,537 s.f. 10% of the gross floor area = 18,167 s.f.; 30% of project lot
size = 23,261 s.f. The project provides 31,240 s.f. of commercial floor area.
4. There are 20 legal parking spaces on both sides of Wesley Street. Based on staff’s
analysis, 15 out of the 20 parking spaces on both sides of Wesley Street will need to be
removed by the new striping required by the project. Wesley Street will be 36 feet wide.
Three 12-foot lanes are needed on Wesley Street approaching Washington Boulevard,
ATTACHMENT 3
73 City of Culver City, California
Planning Commission Agenda Item Report
Page 19 of 19
one in southbound and two out northbound. There will be a staging area on Wesley
Street that is needed to allow a truck to back into the project site’s loading dock. It would
be striped in the middle of the street and leave enough roadway width for one 12-foot
travel lane in each direction. The staging area would eliminate parking on the remaining
portion of Wesley Street south of the project’s driveway. Five metered street parking
spaces will be retained. In order to replace the loss of street parking on Wesley Street,
the project will provide 15 public (metered/pay station) parking spaces on the project’s
site. It is noted that the City has a program to install parking meters on all commercial
streets in the City. Wesley Street is included in the program.
It is noted that there are five metered parking spaces and one unmetered parking space
along Washington Boulevard between National Boulevard and Wesley Street. These six
spaces would be eliminated as part of the City’s approved Bicycle and Pedestrian Master
Plan which shows bike lanes planned on Washington Boulevard along the project’s
frontage. The bike lanes will be installed as part of the Project’s off-site improvement.
Staff observations indicate these parking spaces are lightly utilized.
5. The Easement Agreement will set out the terms and conditions under which the developer
will grant the easement for ingress and egress for public parking spaces which except for
parking meter pay stations, must be maintained by the developer.
6. The City’s parking meters currently operate from 8 a.m. to 6 p.m., Monday – Saturday.
On January 23, 2012, Council approved extending the hours/days in the downtown area
to 8am-11pm every day. However, they suspended this change on April 2, 2012, and it
has not yet been reinstated. As with all public parking in Culver City, the maximum hours
and the rate to be charged are set by City Council Resolution pursuant to Section
7.03.520 of the Culver City Municipal Code. There are several types of meters in use in
the City; ten hour maximum meters for long term parking, and 30-minute meters, one hour
meters and two hour meters for short term parking. Some meters are operated through a
remote pay station. The current rate for meters is $1.50 per hour in the downtown area
and $1.00 per hour in the rest of the City.
The Project’s ground level parking area will contain designated public parking (15 spaces)
which will have ten hour maximum metered parking operated through a pay station. The
spaces will be signed to indicate long-term use and enforcement provisions. The City will
manage and retain parking meter revenue from the public parking spaces.
In order to ensure enforcement of the meters and security in the parking garage the
developer will be required to provide security in the parking garage as follows:
? Legado security personnel for the garage parking to be available during business
hours.
? Legado security personnel required to help monitor the public parking in the garage
and to contact PD (Business Line) during the day to identify violators until regular
enforcement for the Washington National TOD district is established.
ATTACHMENT 3
74ATTACHMENT 4
75ATTACHMENT 4
76ATTACHMENT 4
77ATTACHMENT 4
78ATTACHMENT 4
79ATTACHMENT 4
80ATTACHMENT 4
81ATTACHMENT 4
82ATTACHMENT 4
83ATTACHMENT 4
84ATTACHMENT 4
85ATTACHMENT 4
86ATTACHMENT 4
87ATTACHMENT 4
88ATTACHMENT 4
89ATTACHMENT 4
90ATTACHMENT 4
91ATTACHMENT 4
92ATTACHMENT 4
93ATTACHMENT 4
94ATTACHMENT 4
95ATTACHMENT 4
96ATTACHMENT 4
97ATTACHMENT 4
98ATTACHMENT 4
99ATTACHMENT 4
100ATTACHMENT 4
101ATTACHMENT 4
102ATTACHMENT 4
103ATTACHMENT 4
104ATTACHMENT 4
105ATTACHMENT 4
106ATTACHMENT 4
107ATTACHMENT 4
108ATTACHMENT 4
109ATTACHMENT 4
110ATTACHMENT 4
111ATTACHMENT 4
112ATTACHMENT 4
113ATTACHMENT 4
114ATTACHMENT 4
115ATTACHMENT 4
116ATTACHMENT 4
117ATTACHMENT 4
118ATTACHMENT 5
119
i
8770 WASHINGTON BOULEVARD MIXED-USE HIRSCH/GREEN TRANSPORTATION CONSULTING, INC.
REVISED JULY 2010
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The project under consideration is a new mixed-use residential and retail/commercial mixed-use
development located at 8770 Washington Boulevard, along the south side of the street between
National Boulevard and Wesley Street, in the northeastern portion of the City of Culver City.
The proposed project will contain a total of approximately 115 residential condominium units
and 31,240 square feet of retail/commercial uses, including a 13,900 square foot supermarket,
an 11,800 square foot drugstore/pharmacy, a 2,300 square foot restaurant, and a total of
approximately 3,240 square feet of café area. An approximately 356-space multi-level on-site
parking garage (one semi-subterranean and two subterranean levels) is also proposed as part
of the project. The project site is currently developed with a number of structures formerly
housing the Spartan Roofing Supply Company and its associated equipment and supply storage
areas. However, these facilities have been vacant since April 2008, and the site’s surface
parking areas are currently utilized as long-term parking for trucks, trailers, and construction
equipment, and for leased daily parking for faculty and staff of the nearby Turning Point School.
The developer retained Hirsch/Green Transportation Consulting, Inc. to prepare a traffic and
parking analysis for the project. The scope of this study was discussed with City of Culver City
Public Works Department and City Traffic Engineer to assure that appropriate study
methodologies and assumptions were utilized. Based on those discussions, the study
evaluated the existing and forecast future conditions at a total of 34 intersections in the vicinity
of the project during both the AM and PM peak hours, as well as an investigation of potential
project traffic impacts to eight local/residential streets adjacent to or near the project that could
be anticipated to be used by project traffic as access routes to the site.
The results of the analyses contained in this report indicate that once the new development is
completed and occupied, the project is expected to result in a net increase in site-related traffic
of approximately 2,914 daily trips, including 154 net trips (69 in, 85 out) during the AM peak
hour, and 275 net trips (150 in, 125 out) during the PM peak hour. Based on this level of net
new traffic generation, the proposed project could significantly impact a total of five (5) of the 34
study intersections during one or both of the peak hours. These significantly impacted
locations, all located within the immediate project vicinity, occur at Venice Boulevard and
Robertson Boulevard, Venice Boulevard and National Boulevard, Washington Boulevard and
National Boulevard, Washington Boulevard and Wesley Street, and Washington Boulevard and
Cattaraugus Avenue. It should be noted that two of the significant impacts, at Venice Boulevard
ATTACHMENT 5
120
ii
8770 WASHINGTON BOULEVARD MIXED-USE HIRSCH/GREEN TRANSPORTATION CONSULTING, INC.
REVISED JULY 2010
and Robertson Boulevard, and at Venice Boulevard and National Boulevard, occur within the
neighboring jurisdiction of the City of Los Angeles, which utilizes a different and more restrictive
definition of “significance” regarding potential traffic impacts than the City of Culver City. If the
City of Culver City impact criteria were applied to all intersections evaluated in this study, the
project’s impact at Venice Boulevard and National Boulevard would not be considered
significant, although the impacts at Venice Boulevard and Robertson Boulevard continue to be
significant during both peak hours. Conversely, if the City of Los Angeles significant impact
criteria were utilized for all of the study intersections, a “new” significant impact would occur
during the PM peak hour at Washington Boulevard and National Boulevard (an AM peak hour
impact is already identified), and a previously unidentified significant impact would be identified
at Washington Boulevard and La Cienega Boulevard during the PM peak hour.
Therefore, in order to address the project-specific traffic impacts identified in this report, the
following roadway system improvements are recommended:
Venice Boulevard and Robertson Boulevard – Venice Boulevard at this location (generally
from approximately 500 feet west of Robertson Boulevard to Ivy Street, two blocks east of
National Boulevard) is already programmed for improvements associated with the
Metropolitan Transportation Authority’s (“Metro”) Expo Line light rail transit station near
Venice Boulevard and National Boulevard; these improvements are unrelated to the
proposed Washington/National mixed-use project. The Metro Expo Line project roadway
improvements will widen both sides of Venice Boulevard along the eastbound and
westbound approaches to Robertson Boulevard, although the Venice Boulevard lane
configurations will remain unchanged from their current conditions and operations. The
proposed Washington/National project should modify the Metro Expo Line improvements by
restriping the westbound approach of Venice Boulevard at Robertson Boulevard to provide
an exclusive right-turn only lane, in addition to one left-turn lane and three through lanes.
This measure will require the removal of approximately six unstriped/unmetered on-street
parking spaces along the north side of Venice Boulevard between Robertson Boulevard and
Ellis Avenue, in order to maintain the existing westbound bicycle lane. However, current
utilization surveys indicate that these on-street parking spaces are not heavily utilized, and
further, parking along the subject segment is already prohibited during the PM peak period
on weekdays (“Tow Away No Stopping 4 – 7 PM”). As a result, the removal of these spaces
is not expected to create significant “secondary” impacts to local area parking. The
proposed new right-turn only lane will also require buses using the existing westbound bus
ATTACHMENT 5
121
iii
8770 WASHINGTON BOULEVARD MIXED-USE HIRSCH/GREEN TRANSPORTATION CONSULTING, INC.
REVISED JULY 2010
stop at Venice Boulevard and Robertson Boulevard to load and unload passengers within
the new right-turn only lane. However, this condition is not unique, and it is recommended
that new “Right Turn Only – Buses Exempt” signage be installed to permit such activity. The
use of the new right-turn only lane to load/unload passengers is not expected to significantly
affect on the operations of either the buses or the new right-turn lanes. It is important to
note that, although the proposed restriping improvements occur along Venice Boulevard,
which is under the jurisdiction of the City of Los Angeles, the City of Los Angeles
Department of Transportation (“LADOT”) has reviewed the proposed mitigation measure,
and indicated that it is acceptable.
Venice Boulevard and National Boulevard – This intersection is already programmed for
several improvements unrelated to the proposed Washington/National mixed-use project,
including measures associated with the Metro Expo Line light rail transit station located near
this intersection, as well as recommended improvements identified by the City of Culver City
as part of it’s ongoing redevelopment of a transit-oriented project on its “Triangle Site”,
located on the west side of National Boulevard between Venice Boulevard and Washington
Boulevard. The Metro Expo Line project roadway improvements will widen and restripe
Venice Boulevard to provide dual left-turn lanes, three through lanes, and a right-turn only
lane on both the eastbound and westbound approaches. Additionally, the City of Culver City
has indicated its intent to dedicate and widen the west side of National Boulevard between
Venice Boulevard and Washington Boulevard by 10 feet, and to restripe National Boulevard
to remove all existing on-street parking in order to accommodate the installation of new
bicycle lanes along both sides of the street. In addition to these anticipated roadway
improvements, the proposed Washington/National project should restripe the southbound
approach of National Boulevard at this intersection (within the adjacent City of Los Angeles)
to install an exclusive right-turn only lane, in addition to one left-turn lane and two through
lanes. This proposed improvement will require the removal of approximately six existing
unmarked/unmetered on-street parking spaces on the east side of National Boulevard north
of Venice Boulevard to accommodate the new lane. However, it does not affect any of the
other approaches of the intersection, and as such, is compatible with the anticipated Metro
Expo Line/City of Culver City striping proposals, including maintaining the proposed new
bicycle lanes. It is important to note that, although the proposed restriping improvements
occur along Robertson Boulevard within the City of Los Angeles, LADOT has reviewed the
proposed mitigation measure, and indicated that it is acceptable.
ATTACHMENT 5
122
iv
8770 WASHINGTON BOULEVARD MIXED-USE HIRSCH/GREEN TRANSPORTATION CONSULTING, INC.
REVISED JULY 2010
Washington Boulevard and National Boulevard – This intersection is also programmed for a
series of improvements as part of the Metro’s Expo Line light rail transit facility, including
converting the existing westbound Washington Boulevard right-turn only lane to a shared
through/right-turn lane, associated new dedications and widenings along the north side of
Washington Boulevard west of National Boulevard to provide a new “receiving” lane for the
additional westbound through traffic lane, and a new nine-foot dedication along the east side
of National Boulevard between Washington Boulevard and the Expo Line right-of-way to
accommodate the City’s request for a 12-foot sidewalk in this area. Other programmed
improvements to this intersection include the previously-described roadway dedications and
widenings along the west side of National Boulevard as part of the City’s “Triangle Site”
project. In addition to these programmed Expo Line/City of Culver City roadway
improvements, the project should construct a new 11-foot wide right-turn only lane for
northbound National Boulevard. This improvement will require the project to dedicate and
widen approximately 100 feet of its National Boulevard frontage by approximately nine feet
to install the new right-turn lane; all other existing lane widths on the south approach of
National Boulevard shall be maintained. This project-specific dedication, in addition to the
nine-foot Expo Line dedication, will provide adequate roadway width for the recommended
new right-turn only lane, and will maintain the City’s requested 12-foot sidewalk. Finally, the
curb return at the southeast corner of the intersection of Washington Boulevard and National
Boulevard (along the project’s frontage) should also be improved to provide a 35-foot radius.
Washington Boulevard and Wesley Street – The proposed project should widen both sides
of Wesley Street by three feet within the existing right-of-way (resulting in a reduction in
sidewalk width on both sides of seven feet) to provide a total roadway width of 36 feet, and
restripe the northbound approach to Washington Boulevard to provide an exclusive left-turn
lane plus an exclusive right-turn only lane, plus one southbound lane. The City has
requested that the curb returns at both the southwest and southeast corners of Washington
Boulevard and Wesley Street be improved to exhibit a 35-foot radius. However, a review of
the existing rights-of-way/property lines for the southeast corner of Washington Boulevard
and Wesley Street (opposite the project site) indicates that insufficient existing right-of-way
exists to provide the requested 35-foot curb return radius and still maintain adequate public
sidewalk widths. As such, it is recommended that the curb return at this location be
improved with either a 15-foot or 25-foot radius, as deemed acceptable to the City. The
existing on-street parking along both sides of Wesley Street should be removed, and a new
ATTACHMENT 5
123
v
8770 WASHINGTON BOULEVARD MIXED-USE HIRSCH/GREEN TRANSPORTATION CONSULTING, INC.
REVISED JULY 2010
on-street project-related loading zone (for use both by project residents and by the proposed
pharmacy) should be provided along the west side of Wesley Street, north of the proposed
project driveways. Additionally, a new striped “median” island south of the project’s
commercial driveway should be provided as a “staging” location for inbound delivery trucks
waiting to back into the supermarket loading dock on the semi-subterranean parking level, in
order to minimize any traffic disruptions to Wesley Street operations.
Further, the project should install a new traffic signal at this location, which should be
interconnected and coordinated with the nearby signal at Washington Boulevard and
National Boulevard to minimize traffic flow disruptions, and be equipped with the City’s
current traffic signal coordination software; a detailed traffic signal warrant analysis for this
location indicates that the intersection would meet traffic signal warrant requirements for
installation of a new traffic signal once the proposed project is developed. Additionally, in
order to provide adequate operational access to and from the project site, and to avoid
having much of the project’s exiting traffic turn right (onto eastbound Washington
Boulevard), thereby creating a “around the block” travel pattern for westbound-oriented
exiting vehicles and potentially “overburdening” intersections along Washington Boulevard
east of the project site, the installation of a new traffic signal is considered appropriate for
this project-access intersection.
Washington Boulevard and Cattaraugus Avenue – The project should modify the existing
raised median island on Washington Boulevard to provide a new eastbound left-turn lane at
this location, in addition to one through lane and one shared through/right-turn lane. The
project shall be responsible for 100 percent of the cost of the design and installation of the
proposed left-turn lane. The installation of a new traffic signal at this location was also
considered as a potential measure to mitigate the 8770 Washington project’s significant
impacts, and a detailed analysis of the intersection indicated that it is forecast to meet the
requirements for signal installation (traffic signal warrant analysis) for both the future
“Without Project” and “With Project” conditions. The City has previously determined that a
new traffic signal is appropriate for this location, and the analyses summarized in this report
indicates that the proposed project will exacerbate the need for signalization of this
intersection. As a result, a new traffic signal should be installed at this location, and the
project shall be responsible for 100 percent of the cost to design the new traffic signal, and
shall contribute 25 percent of the cost of installation of the signal.
ATTACHMENT 5
124
vi
8770 WASHINGTON BOULEVARD MIXED-USE HIRSCH/GREEN TRANSPORTATION CONSULTING, INC.
REVISED JULY 2010
In addition to the recommended restriping mitigation improvements at Venice Boulevard and
Robertson Boulevard/Exposition Boulevard, and Venice Boulevard and National Boulevard,
LADOT, in their preliminary review of those proposed mitigation measures, requested that the
City of Culver City consider additional improvements at several intersections within the City of
Los Angeles to augment the proposed intersection restriping improvements. These traffic
signal-related improvements would further reduce the potential impacts of the proposed project
(both significant and non-significant impacts) and enhance general traffic flow operations within
the study area. The requested additional improvements include: installation of closed circuit
traffic monitoring cameras at the intersections of Cadillac Avenue and La Cienega Boulevard,
and at Venice Boulevard and Robertson Boulevard/Exposition Boulevard; and installation of
traffic signal controller upgrades at eight additional as-yet identified intersections.
The installation of a new traffic signal at the site-adjacent intersection of Washington Boulevard
and Wesley Street, along with the proposed widening and restriping of Wesley Street to provide
a left-turn and right-turn lane, will reduce the impacts of the proposed project at that location to
less than significant levels. Additionally, this new traffic signal is expected to result in the
redistribution of project-related traffic at this intersection and at several intersections in close
proximity to the project site. The current STOP sign controlled approach of Wesley Street,
combined with the unimpeded traffic flow of both eastbound and westbound Washington
Boulevard at this location, make the exiting left-turn movement from Wesley Street to
westbound Washington Boulevard difficult during peak traffic periods. As such, it is assumed
that much of the project’s outbound traffic would turn right at this intersection onto eastbound
Washington Boulevard rather than wait for a “break” in traffic to accommodate the left-turn.
However, signalization of the intersection will facilitate this currently difficult move, resulting in
more left-turning vehicles and the elimination of “around the block” travel patterns (eastbound
on Washington Boulevard, north on Cattaraugus Avenue to Venice Boulevard, then west on
Venice Boulevard) to reach westbound Venice Boulevard or Washington Boulevard, or
northbound Robertson Boulevard. This redistribution of project traffic will also reduce, but not
fully mitigate, the project’s potential impacts at several of the other study intersections, including
some that are not significantly impacted.
The implementation of the recommended mitigation measures at the remaining four significantly
impacted locations (Venice Boulevard and Robertson Boulevard, Venice Boulevard and
National Boulevard, Washington Boulevard and National Boulevard, and Washington Boulevard
ATTACHMENT 5
125
vii
8770 WASHINGTON BOULEVARD MIXED-USE HIRSCH/GREEN TRANSPORTATION CONSULTING, INC.
REVISED JULY 2010
and Cattaraugus Avenue) will reduce the potential traffic impacts of the proposed project to less
than significant levels at each of these intersections. However, it should be noted that the
recommended installation of a new northbound right-turn lane on National Boulevard at
Washington Boulevard will require the project to dedicate and widen an approximately 100-foot
portion of its National Boulevard frontage south of Washington Boulevard by a minimum of
approximately nine feet; this dedication is in addition to an anticipated nine-foot dedication
required as part of the Expo Line project’s roadway improvements. If the additional dedication
and widening cannot be accommodated by the project, or if for any reason the recommended
right-turn lane is not installed, the project’s impacts at this location would remain significant and
unavoidable, unless an alternative and similarly effective improvement were to be identified.
Similarly, as noted earlier, two of the projects’ significant impacts occur at intersections under
the jurisdiction of the City of Los Angeles, Venice Boulevard and Robertson Boulevard, and
Venice Boulevard and National Boulevard. As such, while LADOT has agreed that the
proposed mitigation improvements at these locations are acceptable, the City of Culver City
cannot guarantee their implementation, and therefore, if the City of Los Angeles does not
implement the recommended at one or both of these intersections, the project-related traffic
impacts at those locations would remain significant and unavoidable.
The analyses summarized in this report also show that the proposed project would not generate
sufficient net new traffic to create significant impacts to any of the adjacent local/residential
streets examined in this study, nor would the project be expected to significantly impact any of
the regional arterial roadways of freeways in the vicinity. As a result, no further off-site traffic
mitigation measures beyond those described above are warranted for the project.
The proposed project will provide a total of approximately 356 on-site parking spaces, located
within a multi-level (one semi-subterranean and two subterranean levels) parking garage,
including 341 project-related spaces, plus an additional 15 public parking spaces provided as
replacement for existing on-street spaces along the project’s Wesley Street frontage removed
as part of the development. A total of approximately 129 retail/commercial parking spaces are
located on the semi-subterranean (23 spaces) and B-1 (106 spaces) parking levels, as are the
15 public parking replacement spaces (semi-subterranean level only). Additionally, a total of
approximately 212 residential spaces (179 resident-only spaces on the B-2 level, plus 4 resident
and 29 residential guest spaces located on the B-1 level) are also provided. This proposed
parking supply exceeds the current City parking requirements for the development by a total of
ATTACHMENT 5
126
viii
8770 WASHINGTON BOULEVARD MIXED-USE HIRSCH/GREEN TRANSPORTATION CONSULTING, INC.
REVISED JULY 2010
18 spaces (not including the 15 public parking replacement spaces). As a result, no significant
parking-related impacts resulting from on-site parking shortages or “overflow” parking onto
nearby residential or commercial streets by project employees or visitors are anticipated.
All of the on-site parking stalls will be standard sized spaces (18 feet by nine feet) as required
by the City of Culver City Zoning Code. Further, all of the proposed retail/commercial spaces
and residential guest spaces, as well as the 15 public parking replacement spaces, will be direct
access (no tandem or valet assist) spaces. However, a total of 46 of the 183 resident-only
parking spaces (approximately 25 percent), all on the B-2 level, will be configured as tandem
spaces. These spaces will be assigned exclusively to the two- and three-bedroom units, as
required by the City Zoning Code, with one “pair” of tandem spaces assigned to a single two- or
three-bedroom unit. The current Zoning Code states that individual spaces within a tandem
parking “pair” cannot be assigned to different units, nor can they be assigned as guest parking
spaces. The proposed project exhibits a sufficient number of two- and three-bedroom units (a
total of 56 units, including 46 two-bedroom and 10 three-bedroom) such that the 46 pairs of
tandem resident-only parking spaces can be fully assigned to such units. Therefore, this
arrangement of residential parking spaces is considered to be acceptable, and no operational
impacts associated with the proposed resident-only tandem spaces are anticipated.
The project’s on-site parking facilities are accessed by two driveways; one located along the
site’s Washington Boulevard frontage, approximately mid-block between National Boulevard
and Wesley Street, and the second located along Wesley Street near the southeastern edge of
the project site. Both driveways provide direct access to the approximately 23 retail/commercial
parking spaces and 15 public parking replacement spaces on the semi-subterranean level of the
parking garage, as well as to an internal garage access ramp, located near the center of the
garage, to the subterranean parking levels, which contain the remaining 106 retail/commercial,
4 resident-only, and 29 residential guest parking spaces located on the B-1 parking level, and to
the 179 resident-only spaces located on the B-2 level of the garage. Both driveways will be
controlled via ticket-dispenser/access card readers and gate arms located internal to the site
near the driveway entrances to the garage. Additionally, although the retail/commercial spaces
and residential guest spaces are proposed to be shared within the B-1 level parking field,
access to the B-2 level resident-only parking spaces is controlled via an internal gate at the
ramp between the B-1 and B-2 levels, and is therefore available only to project residents.
ATTACHMENT 5
127
ix
8770 WASHINGTON BOULEVARD MIXED-USE HIRSCH/GREEN TRANSPORTATION CONSULTING, INC.
REVISED JULY 2010
Due to physical constraints at both of the site’s driveways, it is anticipated that the exiting
movements at these locations will utilize a “pre-pay” format, and thereby not require an
attendant and associated kiosk at either driveway. Typical pre-pay exit operations require that
visitors to the site take their parking tickets with them as they patronize the project, and pay at a
parking payment kiosk or parking office located on-site before returning to their vehicles. Upon
payment, visitors are issued a ticket to operate the exit gate arms at the driveways. This type of
pre-pay parking operation is common, and is currently in place at a number of developments
throughout the region. Such pre-pay exit requirements do not affect the operations of the
automated entry ticket dispensers at either of the site’s driveways, and as such, will not result in
any reduction in entering capacity at the driveways or create disruption of the traffic flows along
Washington Boulevard adjacent to the project site.
A review of the project’s proposed retail/commercial and residential parking and access plans
indicates that the internal vehicular circulation and parking layout is acceptable. However, it is
recommended that the project’s Washington Boulevard driveway be limited to right-turn
entry/right-turn exit operations due to its location adjacent to the existing westbound left-turn
lane on Washington Boulevard, as well as its proximity to the intersection of Washington
Boulevard and National Boulevard.
In addition to the retail/commercial and residential parking facilities described previously, the
project will also provide an on-site loading dock for the supermarket component of the site,
located at the southeastern corner of the site, designed to accommodate full-size semi-trailer
trucks, and accessed via an additional driveway on Wesley Street, just south of the proposed
retail/commercial and residential access driveway. Since no on-site “turnaround” facilities can
be provided for the loading dock due to the limited site size, “inbound” delivery trucks will drive
past (south of) the project’s Wesley Street driveway and back into the loading dock. While
backing into a loading dock from an adjacent street is not typically the preferred access method,
this maneuver will not create any significant traffic or access impacts to Wesley Street
operations, since this street is a limited-use cul-de-sac facility in the immediate project vicinity.
Further, as described in the discussion of the proposed mitigation improvements for Wesley
Street, it is recommended that a new striped “median” island be provided south of the project’s
parking garage driveway as a “staging” location for inbound delivery trucks waiting to back into
the loading dock, in order to further minimize any potential traffic disruptions to Wesley Street
operations. It is also recommended that all deliveries to the on-site loading dock be limited to
ATTACHMENT 5
128
x
8770 WASHINGTON BOULEVARD MIXED-USE HIRSCH/GREEN TRANSPORTATION CONSULTING, INC.
REVISED JULY 2010
times when the operations of the retail/commercial components of the site are minimal (such as
before or after the retail/commercial uses’ typical hours of operation), and that on-site personnel
be designated to assist with such loading dock “backing” maneuvers to prevent conflicts with
any vehicles using Wesley Street or accessing the project’s adjacent Wesley Street parking
garage access driveway. With the provision of parking assist personnel and off-peak period
scheduling of deliveries, the truck “backing” maneuver is not anticipated to create any significant
traffic or access impacts to the project’s on-site or adjacent street vehicular circulation.
Upon leaving the on-site loading dock, trucks will simply exit the parking garage via a left-turn to
travel to Washington Boulevard; no significant effects of this maneuver are anticipated, although
due to the limited roadway width along Wesley Street adjacent to the project site, the trucks will
temporarily cross over both travel lanes on this street as they exit the site. These conditions are
typical of commercial vehicle loading dock operations throughout the City, and as noted before,
due to the limited number of deliveries and relatively low traffic volumes along Wesley Street in
the immediate project vicinity, the proposed location, configuration, and operations of the on-site
supermarket loading dock are acceptable.
Finally, in addition to the on-site supermarket loading dock, a short-term loading zone
accommodating up to two 30-foot long single-unit trucks or one 55-foot long semi-trailer truck is
proposed along the project frontage of Wesley Street, between Washington Boulevard and the
proposed parking garage access driveway; this loading zone is anticipated to be used as
loading spaces for the proposed drugstore/pharmacy and other retail/commercial uses, and/or
for residential loading/unloading activities. On-street loading spaces such as those proposed
are permitted through approval by the City Engineer or Traffic Committee. It is recommended
that any on-street loading areas should be located sufficiently distant from the project’s Wesley
Street parking garage access driveway such that site distance for exiting driveway traffic
(looking toward Washington Boulevard) is not impaired, but adequately distant from Washington
Boulevard such that no sight distance issues for eastbound right-turns at Wesley Street are
created. However, due to the limited amount of traffic on Wesley Street (even with development
of the proposed project and other future developments) and other factors, no significant
operational or access issues associated with the on-street loading area are anticipated
Additionally, as described earlier, it is recommended that all on-street parking on Wesley Street
be removed (with the exception of the proposed new curbside loading zone), in order to
facilitate the operations of the on-street loading area without creating conflicts with vehicles
ATTACHMENT 5
129
xi
8770 WASHINGTON BOULEVARD MIXED-USE HIRSCH/GREEN TRANSPORTATION CONSULTING, INC.
REVISED JULY 2010
attempting to access the existing on-street spaces. A total of approximately 20 spaces are
currently provided along Wesley Street in the immediate project vicinity, including 10 spaces on
the east side of the street (opposite the project site), and 10 spaces on the west side of the
street, including eight spaces adjacent to the project’s frontage. The project will provide a total
of 15 on-site public parking spaces as replacement for the 12 total removed existing spaces that
are not immediately adjacent to the project frontage; the eight existing on-street spaces along
the project frontage of Wesley Street are considered to be site-serving spaces, and their
replacement is appropriately assumed to be accommodated within the project’s code parking
requirements. As a result, the removal of the existing on-street public parking spaces on
Wesley Street is adequately compensated by the proposed project, and no secondary
significant impacts are anticipated.
With the implementation of the recommended intersection and roadway mitigation
improvements, along with the operational modifications described above, all of the project’s
potential traffic, access, and vehicular circulation impacts will be reduced to less than significant
levels, and no further mitigation measures are required.
ATTACHMENT 5
130
xii
8770 WASHINGTON BOULEVARD MIXED-USE HIRSCH/GREEN TRANSPORTATION CONSULTING, INC.
REVISED JULY 2010
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................. 1
PROJECT DESCRIPTION ................................................................................................. 6
Project Traffic Generation .............................................................................................. 6
Project Geographic Trip Distribution .............................................................................. 12
Project Traffic Assignment ............................................................................................... 12
Project Parking and Access ............................................................................................. 16
Parking Requirements................................................................................................... 25
Site Vehicular Access and Parking Operations............................................................. 27
Project Roadway Improvements ......................................................................................... 35
TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS STUDY AREA ................................................................ 37
Environmental Setting.................................................................................................... 37
Area Transportation Facilities ........................................................................................ 37
Public Transportation ....................................................................................................... 45
ANALYSIS OF AREA TRAFFIC CONDITIONS................................................................. 49
Existing (Year 2010) Traffic Volumes............................................................................... 49
Analysis of Existing (Year 2010) Traffic Conditions ......................................................... 49
Future (Year 2013) Traffic Volumes................................................................................. 61
Without Project Traffic Forecasts................................................................................ 61
Ambient Traffic Growth................................................................................................. 62
Related Projects.......................................................................................................... 62
Highway System Improvements....................................................................................... 73
Analysis of Future (2013) Traffic Conditions.................................................................. 76
Impact Significance Criteria ............................................................................................. 84
Local/Residential Street Traffic Impact Analysis............................................................ 86
Project Impacts on Regional Transportation System....................................................... 94
CMP Monitoring Intersection Impacts........................................................................... 94
CMP Freeway Segment Impacts................................................................................ 96
MITIGATION MEASURES ................................................................................................. 98
APPENDICES
A – Related Projects Trip Generation Rates/Equations
B – Intersection Geometrics/Controls and Traffic Count Data Sheets
C – Project Local/Neighborhood Street Trips Calculations
D – Conceptual Traffic Mitigation Improvements and Supporting Information
E – CMA Calculation Worksheets
ATTACHMENT 5
131
xiii
8770 WASHINGTON BOULEVARD MIXED-USE HIRSCH/GREEN TRANSPORTATION CONSULTING, INC.
REVISED JULY 2010
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure No. Page
1 Site Vicinity Map................................................................................................... 2
2 Study Intersection and Street Segment Locations ............................................... 5
3 Project Site Plan................................................................................................... 7
4 Project Geographic Traffic Distribution Percentages ........................................... 14
5 Project Component Traffic Assignment Percentages........................................... 17
6 Project Component Traffic Volumes – AM Peak Hour ......................................... 19
7 Project Component Traffic Volumes – PM Peak Hour ......................................... 21
8 Project Traffic Volumes - Total............................................................................. 23
9 Project Driveway Volumes ................................................................................... 33
10 Project Area Transit Service Map......................................................................... 46
11 Existing (2010) Peak Hour Traffic Volumes ......................................................... 50
12 Related Projects Locations Map........................................................................... 64
13 Related Projects Traffic Volumes......................................................................... 71
14 Future (2013) Peak Hour "Without Project" Traffic Volumes.............................. 77
15 Future (2013) Peak Hour "With Project" Traffic Volumes..................................... 79
16 Net Project Trip Redistributions Due to Traffic Signal Installation...................... 104
ATTACHMENT 5
132
xiv
8770 WASHINGTON BOULEVARD MIXED-USE HIRSCH/GREEN TRANSPORTATION CONSULTING, INC.
REVISED JULY 2010
LIST OF TABLES
Table No. Page
1 Project Trip Generation Rates............................................................................ 9
2 Project Trip Generation...................................................................................... 11
3 Geographic Project Directional Trip Distribution ................................................ 12
4 Project Parking Requirements............................................................................ 26
5 Critical Movement Analysis Volume Ranges per Level of Service....................... 54
6 Level of Service as a Function of CMA Value.................................................... 55
7 HCM Level of Service as a Function of Approach Delay ..................................... 56
8 Critical Movement Analysis Summary – Existing (2010) Conditions.................. 57
9 Related Projects Descriptions ............................................................................ 65
10 Related Projects Trip Generation......................................................................... 68
11 Critical Movement Analysis Summary – Future (2013) Conditions.................... 81
12 City of Culver City Significant Impact Criteria....................................................... 85
13 City of Los Angeles Significant Impact Criteria .................................................. 85
14 Local/Residential Traffic Impact Analysis Summary .......................................... 88
15 City of Culver City Local/Residential Traffic Impact Significance Criteria .......... 93
16 Critical Movement Analysis Summary – Future (2013) With
Mitigation Conditions........................................................................................... 106
ATTACHMENT 5
133
1
8770 WASHINGTON BOULEVARD MIXED-USE HIRSCH/GREEN TRANSPORTATION CONSULTING, INC.
REVISED JULY 2010
INTRODUCTION
This report summarizes the results of a traffic and parking impact analysis for a proposed new
mixed-use residential and retail/commercial project at 8770 Washington Boulevard, along the
south side of the street between National Boulevard and Wesley Street, in the northeastern
portion of the City of Culver City. The project will contain a total of approximately 115 residential
condominium units, and a total of approximately 31,240 square feet of retail/commercial uses,
including a 13,900 square foot supermarket, an 11,800 square foot drugstore/pharmacy, a
2,300 square foot restaurant, and a total of 3,240 square feet of café area. The development
will also provide a total of approximately 356 total on-site parking spaces, including
approximately 129 retail/commercial spaces, 212 resident and guest spaces, and 15 public
parking spaces (replacement of existing on-street parking removed along the site’s Wesley
Street frontage), located in a multi-level, semi-subterranean and subterranean parking garage.
The project site is developed with a number of structures formerly housing the Spartan Roofing
Supply company and its associated equipment and supply storage facilities, although this
business vacated the site in April 2008. The site is currently utilized as long-term parking for
trucks, trailers, and construction equipment, and for daily parking for faculty and staff of the
nearby Turning Point School. The project site and surrounding vicinity are shown in Figure 1.
Hirsch/Green Transportation Consulting, Inc. (“Hirsch/Green”) was retained by the project
applicant to study the potential impacts of the proposed development on the operations of the
streets and intersections surrounding the project site. The scope of the study was reviewed by
the City of Culver City Public Works Department traffic engineering staff to ensure that
appropriate analysis methodologies and assumptions were utilized. Based on those scoping
discussions and City recommendations, this study evaluates the existing (year 2010) and
forecast future (year 2013) conditions at a total of 34 intersections adjacent to or in close
proximity to the project site during both the AM and PM peak hours. These intersections, listed
below, represent the locations most likely to be affected by project-generated traffic.
1. Robertson Boulevard and Cattaraugus Avenue
[1]
2. Robertson Boulevard and WB I-10 Freeway Off-Ramp/Kincardine Avenue
[1]
3. Robertson Boulevard and National Boulevard
[1]
4. National Boulevard and I-10 EB On-Ramp
[1]
5. Venice Boulevard and Hughes Avenue
[1]
6. Venice Boulevard and Bagley Avenue
[1]
ATTACHMENT 5
134ATTACHMENT 5
135
3
8770 WASHINGTON BOULEVARD MIXED-USE HIRSCH/GREEN TRANSPORTATION CONSULTING, INC.
REVISED JULY 2010
7. Venice Boulevard and Culver Boulevard
[1]
8. Venice Boulevard and Robertson Boulevard
[1]
9. Venice Boulevard and National Boulevard
[1]
10. Venice Boulevard and Helms Avenue
[1]
11. Venice Boulevard and Cattaraugus Avenue
[1]
12. Venice Boulevard and La Cienega Boulevard
[1]
13. Washington Boulevard and Hughes Avenue
14. Culver Boulevard and Duquesne Avenue
15. Washington Boulevard, Culver Boulevard and Irving Place
16. Washington Boulevard and Main Street
17. Washington Boulevard and Culver Boulevard
18. Washington Boulevard and Robertson Boulevard/Higuera Street
19. Washington Boulevard and Landmark Street
20. Washington Boulevard and National Boulevard
21. Washington Boulevard and Wesley Street
22. Washington Boulevard and Helms Avenue
23. Washington Boulevard and Cattaraugus Avenue
24. Washington Boulevard and La Cienega Boulevard
25. La Cienega Boulevard and Fairfax Avenue
[2]
26. National Boulevard and Wesley Street
27. National Boulevard and Hayden Avenue
28. National Boulevard and Jefferson Boulevard
[1]
29. National Boulevard and La Cienega Boulevard
[1]
30. Higuera Street/Rodeo Road and Jefferson Boulevard
[1]
31. Rodeo Road and La Cienega Boulevard
[1]
32. Hughes Avenue and Braddock Drive
33. Hughes Avenue and Lucerne Avenue
34. Hughes Avenue and Jefferson Boulevard
Notes:
[1]
Intersection under jurisdiction of City of Los Angeles
[2]
Intersection under jurisdiction of City of Culver City, but traffic signal maintained by City of Los Angeles
ATTACHMENT 5
136
4
8770 WASHINGTON BOULEVARD MIXED-USE HIRSCH/GREEN TRANSPORTATION CONSULTING, INC.
REVISED JULY 2010
In addition to these 34 study intersections, the potential project impacts were also investigated
on eight local/residential access roadways adjacent to the project site, as listed below.
a. Lucerne Avenue, between Ince Boulevard and Duquesne Avenue
b. Lucerne Avenue, south of Higuera Street
c. Wesley Street, between Higuera Street and National Boulevard
d. Helms Avenue, between Higuera Street and National Boulevard
e. Schaefer Street, between Higuera Street and National Boulevard
f. Higuera Street, between Washington Boulevard and Lucerne Avenue
g. Higuera Street, between Lucerne Avenue and Wesley Street
h. Higuera Street, between Wesley Street and Jefferson Boulevard
These roadway segments were selected because they each exhibit the potential for use by
project-related traffic as access routes between the project site and the surrounding arterial
roadway network. The locations of the selected study intersections and local/residential street
segments in relation to the project site are shown in Figure 2.
ATTACHMENT 5
137ATTACHMENT 5
138
6
8770 WASHINGTON BOULEVARD MIXED-USE HIRSCH/GREEN TRANSPORTATION CONSULTING, INC.
REVISED JULY 2010
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The project under consideration is a new mixed-use residential and retail/commercial
development located at 8770 Washington Boulevard, along the south side of the street between
National Boulevard and Wesley Street, in the northeastern portion of the City of Culver City.
The proposed project will contain approximately 115 residential condominium units and a total
of approximately 31,240 square feet of retail/commercial uses, including a 13,900 square foot
supermarket, an 11,800 square foot drugstore/pharmacy, a 2,300 square foot restaurant, and a
total of 3,240 square feet of café area. An approximately 356-space multi-level on-site parking
garage (one semi-subterranean and two subterranean levels) is also proposed as part of the
project. The parking facilities are accessed by two driveways; one located along the site’s
Washington Boulevard frontage, approximately mid-block between National Boulevard and
Wesley Street, and the second located along Wesley Street near the southeastern edge of the
project site. The project’s first floor (and semi-subterranean parking level) layout is shown in
Figure 3(a), while the parking configurations of the two subterranean parking levels are shown
in Figure 3(b). The project site is currently developed with a number of structures formerly
housing the Spartan Roofing Supply company, including a large surface parking lot. However,
the on-site buildings have been vacant since April 2008, and the existing parking lot is currently
used as long-term parking for trucks, trailers, and construction equipment, and for daily parking
for faculty and staff of the nearby Turning Point School.
Project Traffic Generation
Traffic-generating characteristics of many land uses, including the residential condominium, and
retail/commercial (supermarket, drugstore/pharmacy, and restaurant/café) uses comprising the
proposed project, have been extensively surveyed and documented in studies conducted under
the auspices of the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE). The most recent information is
available in the ITE 8
th
Edition Trip Generation manual.|1010| The trip generation data contained in
the ITE manual are nationally recognized, and are used as the basis for most traffic studies
conducted in the City of Culver City; the City’s traffic engineering staff recommended the use of
the ITE rates in the preparation of this study. The trip generation rates utilized to estimate the
amount of new traffic resulting from the development of the proposed project, including the
residential condominium, supermarket and drugstore/pharmacy uses, general retail space, and
café component, are summarized in Table 1.
|1010| Trip Generation, 8
th
Edition, Institute of Transportation Engineers, Washington, D.C., 2008.
ATTACHMENT 5
139ATTACHMENT 5
140ATTACHMENT 5
141
9
8770 WASHINGTON BOULEVARD MIXED-USE HIRSCH/GREEN TRANSPORTATION CONSULTING, INC.
REVISED JULY 2010
Condominium/Townhome - per dwelling unit (ITE Land Use 230)
Daily Trips: T = 5.81 (A)
AM Peak Hour: T = 0.44 (A); I/B = 17%, O/B = 83%
PM Peak Hour: T = 0.52 (A); I/B = 67%, O/B = 33%
Supermarket - per 1,000 gross square feet of floor area (ITE Land Use 850)
Daily Trips: T = 102.24 (A)
AM Peak Hour: T = 3.59 (A); I/B = 61%, O/B = 39%
PM Peak Hour: T = 10.50 (A); I/B = 51%, O/B = 49%
Pharmacy/Drugstore without Drive-Through - per 1,000 gross square feet of floor area (ITE Land Use 880)
Daily Trips: T = 90.06 (A)
AM Peak Hour: T = 3.20 (A); I/B = 59%, O/B = 41%
PM Peak Hour: T = 8.42 (A); I/B = 50%, O/B = 50%
Specialty Retail Center - per 1,000 gross square feet of floor area (ITE Land Use 814)
Daily Trips: T = 44.32 (A)
AM Peak Hour: T = 1.33 (A); I/B = 60%, O/B = 40% (3% of Daily trips, per SanDAG data)
PM Peak Hour: T = 2.71 (A); I/B = 44%, O/B = 56%
High-Turnover (Sit-Down) Restaurant - per 1,000 gross square feet of floor area (ITE Land Use 932)
Daily Trips: T = 127.15 (A)
AM Peak Hour: T = 11.52 (A); I/B = 52%, O/B = 48%
PM Peak Hour: T = 11.15 (A); I/B = 59%, O/B = 41%
T = Trip Ends I/B = Inbound Trip Percentage
A = Building Area in 1,000 sq. ft. O/B = Outbound Trip Percentage
U = Number of Residential Units
* Note:
All trip generation rates 8th Ed. ITE Trip Generation.
Table 1
Project Trip Generation Rates*
It should be noted that the trip generation estimates derived using the trip generation rates
summarized in Table 1 generally represent a “worst case” calculation; the ITE data typically
reflect the traffic generation characteristics of suburban, “stand alone” developments that do not
exhibit any significant transit service or pedestrian patronage. These factors can reduce the
number of trips generated by developments in close proximity to effective transit service, or
located so as to serve an existing community through pedestrian friendly and accessible design.
Based on the project’s mix of on-site residential and retail/commercial components, and a
review of data provided in the ITE Trip Generation publication for other studied mixed-use
developments, it was determined that an approximately 10 percent reduction in the
ATTACHMENT 5
142
10
8770 WASHINGTON BOULEVARD MIXED-USE HIRSCH/GREEN TRANSPORTATION CONSULTING, INC.
REVISED JULY 2010
retail/commercial component (supermarket, drugstore/pharmacy, and restaurant/café) trips to
and from the project site would be realized through use of these convenient retail facilities by
project residents, who would no longer need to drive to other off-site facilities in order to shop
for goods or services provided by these on-site amenities.
Additionally, based on the project’s location at the intersection of Washington Boulevard and
National Boulevard, both of which are key public transit corridors through the City and the
general project vicinity, and the location of the future Los Angeles County Metropolitan
Transportation Authority (“Metro”) Expo Line light rail station being constructed near the
southwest corner of Venice Boulevard and National Boulevard, approximately adjacent to the
project site (as described later in this study), the City Traffic Engineer noted that the project’s
residential component would exhibit at least a modest degree of public transit utilization. An
examination of the capacities and service routes for the existing bus lines in the area, along with
the operations and station locations for the proposed Expo Line light rail transit facilities
determined that an approximately 7.5 percent reduction in residential-related project trips could
result from the use of these conveniently located bus lines and future public transit facilities.
Further, in addition to these “on-site” and “transit” related trip reducing factors, the effects of
“pass-by trips” on the project’s net new traffic additions to the vicinity may be considerable. The
concept of pass-by traffic adjustments involves the “capture” of an existing trip passing by the
project site. These existing trips are already on the area roadway network for other purposes,
such as a trip to or from work, or perhaps to or from other shopping destinations. As these trips
pass by the project site, the specific convenient facilities provided by the project, or other factors
produces a stop at the site. Such activity is considered to be an interim stop along a trip which
existed without the development of the project, and therefore vehicles making these stops are
not considered to be newly generated project-related traffic.
As such, based on information contained in the ITE data as well as from LADOT and San Diego
Association of Governments (SanDAG) data, and consultation with the City Traffic Engineer, the
project’s proposed supermarket, drugstore/pharmacy, and restaurant/café components are
expected to exhibit approximately 20 percent of their patronage as pass-by traffic. These are
considered to be highly conservative assumptions, as the ITE data indicates that land uses
similar to those anticipated within the proposed project routinely experience between 40 percent
(supermarket, and restaurant/café) and 60 percent (pharmacy/drugstore) of their peak hour
patronage from pass-by trips.
ATTACHMENT 5
143
11
8770 WASHINGTON BOULEVARD MIXED-USE HIRSCH/GREEN TRANSPORTATION CONSULTING, INC.
REVISED JULY 2010
Therefore, using the “baseline” ITE trip generation rates shown in Table 1, adjusted to account
for the trip reductions resulting from the mixed-use nature of the project itself, the use of the
convenient public transit facilities, and nominal pass-by traffic effects, the amount of net new
traffic generated by the proposed project was estimated. Note that, since the existing uses on
the project site are currently vacant, no adjustments for removal of existing site-related traffic
were assumed. The results of the project trip generation calculations are shown in Table 2.
Daily In Out Total In Out Total
Proposed Project
115 unit Condominium 668 9 42 51 40 20 60
(Less 7.5% Transit Use) (50) (1) (3) (4) (3) (2) (5)
Net Condominium Trips 618 8 39 47 37 18 55
13,900 sq. ft. Supermarket 1,421 31 19 50 74 72 146
(Less 10% Internal Project Capture) (142) (3) (2) (5) (8) (7) (15)
(Less 20% Pass-by Trips) (256) (5) (4) (9) (13) (13) (26)
Net Supermarket Trips 1,023 23 13 36 53 52 105
11,800 sq. ft. Pharmacy/Drugstore 1,063 22 16 38 49 50 99
(Less 10% Internal Project Capture) (106) (2) (2) (4) (5) (5) (10)
(Less 20% Pass-by Trips) (191) (4) (3) (7) (9) (9) (18)
Net Pharmacy/Drugstore Trips 766 16 11 27 35 36 71
2,300 sq. ft. Restaurant 292 14 12 26 15 11 26
(Less 10% Internal Project Capture) (29) (2) (1) (3) (2) (1) (3)
(Less 20% Pass-by Trips) (53) (3) (2) (5) (3) (2) (5)
Net Retail Trips 210 9 9 18 10 8 18
3,240 sq. ft. Café 412 19 18 37 21 15 36
(Less 10% Internal Project Capture) (41) (2) (2) (4) (2) (2) (4)
(Less 20% Pass-by Trips) (74) (4) (3) (7) (4) (2) (6)
Net Cafe Trips 297 13 13 26 15 11 26
2,914 69 85 154 150 125 275
Less Existing Uses (Removed)
Spartan Roofing Supply Company (vacant) ---- --- --- --- --- --- ---
Net New Site Trips 2,914 69 85 154 150 125 275
Total Project Trips
Size/Use
Table 2
Project Trip Generation
AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
ATTACHMENT 5
144
12
8770 WASHINGTON BOULEVARD MIXED-USE HIRSCH/GREEN TRANSPORTATION CONSULTING, INC.
REVISED JULY 2010
As shown in Table 2, once the new development is completed and occupied, the project is
expected to result in a net increase in site-related trips of approximately 2,914 net new daily
trips, including a net increase of approximately 154 net new trips (69 inbound, 85 outbound)
during the AM peak hour, and approximately 275 net new trips (150 inbound, 125 outbound)
during the PM peak hour. This net level of project traffic was used to evaluate the proposed
project’s potential impacts at the 34 study intersections and on the eight local/residential access
roadways identified earlier in this report.
Project Geographic Trip Distribution
Next, the general geographic distribution of the project trips was identified, based on several
factors, including the relative distribution of employment opportunities, shopping and
entertainment venues, locations of other services, and other factors for the proposed residential
uses, and employee residential locations, and locations of potential patronage generators for
the commercial components of the site. Local and regional demographic information was also
reviewed, and the existing traffic patterns and land uses in the project area were analyzed to
estimate the overall geographic distribution of project trips throughout the local area and
surrounding region. Trip distribution percentages were developed separately for the residential
and commercial components of the project, as summarized in Table 3.
Direction Residential Commercial Residential Commercial Residential Commercial
North 18% 20% n/a n/a 18% 20%
South 11% 15% n/a n/a 11% 15%
East 18% 25% 15% 10% 33% 35%
West 23% 20% 15% 10% 38% 30%
Totals 70% 80% 30% 20% 100% 100%
Geographic Project Trip Distribution Percentages
Table 3
Surface Streets Freeways Totals
Project Traffic Assignment
Using the general geographic directional distribution percentages shown in Table 3, the
anticipated roadway and freeway network utilization percentages were determined. Differences
in trip-making characteristics, as well as in origin/destination locations and other factors, were
incorporated into the assumptions for the various land uses proposed for the project, and as a
ATTACHMENT 5
145
13
8770 WASHINGTON BOULEVARD MIXED-USE HIRSCH/GREEN TRANSPORTATION CONSULTING, INC.
REVISED JULY 2010
result, the different geographic directional distributions and trip-making characteristics assigned
to each type of land use resulted in different trip assignments for the “residential” and
“retail/commercial” components of the project. The resulting project trip assignment
percentages along the key travel facilities in the study area are shown in Figure 4(a) for the
residential uses, and in Figure 4(b) for the project’s retail/commercial components. This
process identified the approximate percentages of project traffic expected to utilize each of the
key streets and freeway facilities in the vicinity.
The general project traffic travel patterns noted in Table 3 and shown in Figures 4(a) and 4(b)
were then further refined to produce the intersection-level detail necessary to assess the
project’s traffic effects on the selected study intersections and local access roadways. This step
involved the identification of specific turning movements for project traffic at each of the study
intersections as vehicles travel to and from the project site, and considered many factors
influencing the project traffic’s access routes to and from the site, including turn restrictions at
various intersections, and the locations and intended uses and operations of the project’s
driveways along both Washington Boulevard (right-turn in/right-turn out) and Wesley Street.
Consideration was also given to current traffic conditions and travel patterns on the key streets
and at intersections near the project site; high traffic volumes and/or traffic congestion at some
locations make some moves, such as exiting left-turns from Wesley Street across heavy traffic
to access westbound Washington Boulevard, difficult and time consuming, resulting in more
circuitous “around the block” travel patterns for some access routes. Observations of current
traffic patterns were noted for such delays, and their effects were incorporated into the
development of the project traffic assignments. In particular, due to high cross traffic volumes
during the peak hours, many of the exiting (northbound) left-turns from Wesley Street to
westbound Washington Boulevard were assumed to instead turn right onto eastbound
Washington Boulevard, then travel north on Cattaraugus Avenue (Helms Avenue, the nearest
north-south street to the west of the project site connecting Washington Boulevard and Venice
Boulevard, is closed to through traffic) to westbound Venice Boulevard (and ultimately back to
westbound Washington Boulevard) or to northbound National Boulevard.
Again, separate travel patterns were identified for both the residential and retail/commercial
components of the proposed project, taking into account the differences in trip-making
characteristics and in the general geographic distributions of trips for each of the project
components described above. These differences are ultimately reflected in the percentages of
ATTACHMENT 5
146ATTACHMENT 5
147ATTACHMENT 5
148
16
8770 WASHINGTON BOULEVARD MIXED-USE HIRSCH/GREEN TRANSPORTATION CONSULTING, INC.
REVISED JULY 2010
traffic utilizing the area roadways for each of the individual project components, and in the
discrete turning movement assignments of project component trips at the study intersections.
The resulting project traffic assignment percentages are shown in Figure 5(a) for the residential
component and in Figure 5(b) for the retail/commercial uses proposed for the site.
The final step was to calculate the number of net new “residential” and “retail/commercial”
component trips using the identified travel routes, and their specific movements when traveling
through each of the study intersections; the individual trip assignments from the “residential” and
“retail/commercial” components were then combined to identify the total project traffic for each
of the phases at each study intersection. The results of the project traffic assignment process
provide the necessary level of detail to conduct the traffic analysis and to identify incremental
project traffic impacts at the study intersections.
The net project traffic additions to each of the 34 study intersections are shown for the AM peak
hour in Figure 6(a) for the residential project components, and in Figure 6(b) for the
retail/commercial uses, while the PM peak hour residential and retail/commercial component
traffic volumes are shown in Figures 7(a) and 7(b), respectively. Finally, the total net project
trips, representing the sum of the residential and retail/commercial component trips, are shown
for each of the study intersections in Figure 8(a) for the AM peak hour and in Figure 8(b) for the
PM peak hour. The values shown in Figures 8(a) and 8(b) represent the anticipated increases
in peak hour traffic at each of the study intersections attributable to the project, and provide the
level of detail necessary to identify the potential incremental project traffic impacts at each of the
selected study intersections and roadway segments identified in this report.
Project Parking and Access
The proposed project will provide a total of approximately 341 on-site parking spaces, including
a total of approximately 212 residential spaces (183 resident and 29 guest spaces), and a total
of 139 commercial (retail/restaurant/café) spaces, plus an additional 15 public parking spaces
for the replacement of existing on-street unmetered parking removed along the Wesley Street
frontage of the site as part of the project’s development|1010|. These parking spaces are located
within a multi-level (one semi-subterranean level plus two full subterranean levels) parking
garage beneath the site. The semi-subterranean parking level contains 23 of the retail parking
|1010| Five metered and one unmetered on-street spaces are also present along the site’s Washington Boulevard
frontage. These spaces will also be removed, although not as part of the proposed project. The City has indicated
that the Washington Boulevard spaces are underutilized, and that it is desirable to remove these spaces (without
replacement) in order to accommodate a new bicycle lane along Washington Boulevard, as identified in the City’s
approved Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan.
ATTACHMENT 5
149ATTACHMENT 5
150ATTACHMENT 5
151ATTACHMENT 5
152ATTACHMENT 5
153ATTACHMENT 5
154ATTACHMENT 5
155ATTACHMENT 5
156ATTACHMENT 5
157
25
8770 WASHINGTON BOULEVARD MIXED-USE HIRSCH/GREEN TRANSPORTATION CONSULTING, INC.
REVISED JULY 2010
spaces and the 15 street parking replacement spaces. The B-1 (first subterranean) parking
level contains the remaining 106 commercial parking spaces, plus 4 of the resident-only and all
29 of the residential guest parking spaces. The remaining 179 resident-only parking spaces are
located on the B-2 level of the garage.
Parking Requirements
The City of Culver City Zoning Code identifies off-street parking requirements for both
residential (condominium) developments as well as for various commercial businesses,
including supermarket, drugstore/pharmacy, and restaurant/café uses such as those proposed
for the subject project. Residential developments are typically required to provide parking on a
variable scale, dependent on the number of bedrooms and/or size of the units; for studio and
one-bedroom units of less than 900 square feet, only 1.0 parking space per unit is required, for
studio and one-bedroom units greater than 900 square feet, and for two- and three-bedroom
units, 2.0 parking spaces per unit are required. For four-bedroom units and larger, a minimum
of 3.0 spaces per unit are required, plus one space for each bedroom over four bedrooms.
Finally, in addition to the specific resident parking space requirements, the City also requires
that residential guest parking be provided at a ratio of 1.0 space for every four (4) total units
within the development, regardless of the size or number of bedrooms.
The City’s current standard parking requirements for “commercial” uses call for the provision of
a minimum of 1.0 space for every 350 square feet of gross floor area. The Zoning Code does
not make any specific distinctions for either supermarket use or drugstore/pharmacy use in its
definition of “general retail”, and as such, this default retail parking ratio is considered applicable
to both types of facilities. Lastly, restaurant uses, such as the ground floor restaurant and
separate ground floor/second floor cafés proposed for the project site, are required to provide a
minimum of 9.0 spaces per 1,000 square feet of floor space, inclusive of any outdoor dining
area, although the parking code allows that no parking is required for the first 250 square feet of
any outdoor dining areas associated with the restaurant use.
As described earlier, the project proposes to develop a total of approximately 115 residential
units, including 59 studio and one-bedroom units (900 square feet or less), 46 two-bedroom
units, and 10 three-bedroom units. Additionally, the 31,240 total square foot “commercial”
component of the site is proposed to contain an approximately 13,900 square foot supermarket
(including approximately 3,200 square feet of back-of-house areas), an 11,800 square foot
drugstore/pharmacy, a 2,300 square foot restaurant, and a total of approximately 3,240 square
ATTACHMENT 5
158
26
8770 WASHINGTON BOULEVARD MIXED-USE HIRSCH/GREEN TRANSPORTATION CONSULTING, INC.
REVISED JULY 2010
feet of café area. Based on these current City Zoning Code parking requirements and the
project’s anticipated component uses and sizes, the amount of parking required for the project
was calculated, as summarized in Table 4.
Component
Residential
Studio/1-BR (> 900 sq. ft.) 59 units 1.00 /unit 59 spaces
Studio/1-BR (> 900 sq. ft.), and 2- and 3-BR 56 units 2.00 /unit 112 spaces
and 2- and 3- BR
Guest Parking 115 units 0.25 /unit 29 spaces
Total Residential Parking Required 200 spaces
Commercial
Retail
[1]
25,700 sq. ft 1.00 /350 sq. ft. 73 spaces
Restaurant 2,300 sq. ft 9.00 /1,000 sq. ft. 21 spaces
Café
[2]
3,240 sq. ft 9.00 /1,000 sq. ft. 29 spaces
Total Commercial Parking Required 123 spaces
Total Project Parking Required 323 spaces
Note:
[1] Includes 13,900 sq. ft. supermarket, 11,800 sq. ft. drugstore/pharmacy.
[2] Includes total 3,000 sq. ft. ground floor café area, plus 240 sq. ft. 2nd floor cafe.
Table 4
Project Parking Requirements
Parking
Required Parking Ratio No. Units/Size
As shown in Table 4, the project will be required to provide a total of 323 parking spaces,
including 200 residential spaces (171 resident and 29 guest spaces), and 123 commercial
parking spaces (73 supermarket and drugstore/pharmacy spaces, and 50 restaurant/café
spaces). The project will provide a total of 212 residential spaces (183 resident and 29 guest
spaces), and 129 commercial spaces (not including the 15 street parking replacement spaces),
or 341 total project-use parking spaces. This parking supply exceeds the current City parking
requirements for the entire development by 18 spaces (not including the 15 public parking
replacement spaces), including 12 spaces more than the required amount of residential parking
for residents and the required amount of parking for residential guests, and six (6) more than the
required number of commercial/retail spaces. As a result, no significant off-site parking-related
impacts or “overflow” parking in adjacent residential neighborhoods or commercial areas by
project employees or visitors due to on-site parking shortages are anticipated.
ATTACHMENT 5
159
27
8770 WASHINGTON BOULEVARD MIXED-USE HIRSCH/GREEN TRANSPORTATION CONSULTING, INC.
REVISED JULY 2010
All of the parking spaces provided are standard stalls, at 18 feet long by nine feet wide (as
required for a 90-degree stall angle); no compact spaces are proposed. All parking for the
commercial components and residential guest uses of the project will be direct-access spaces
(no tandem or valet assist spaces). However, a total of 46 of the 183 resident-only parking
spaces (approximately 25 percent) will be configured as tandem spaces; these spaces would be
assigned to the two- and three-bedroom units, as required by the City Zoning Code, with one
“pair” of tandem spaces assigned to a single unit. Tandem spaces cannot be assigned to
different units, nor can they be assigned as guest parking spaces. The project exhibits a
sufficient number of two- and three-bedroom units (a total of 56 units) such that the 46 pairs of
tandem spaces can be fully assigned to such units, and therefore, this arrangement of
residential parking spaces is considered acceptable, and no operational impacts associated with
the proposed residential tandem spaces is anticipated.
In addition to the vehicle parking space requirements, the current City Zoning Code requires
that the development provide bicycle parking spaces equal to a minimum of 10 percent of the
required number of residential vehicle parking spaces, and/or a minimum of five (5) percent of
the required number of retail and non-residential vehicle parking spaces. As shown in Table 4,
the project requires a total of 200 residential and 123 commercial/non-residential vehicle parking
spaces, and is therefore required to provide a minimum of approximately 20 residential-related
and six (6) commercial/non-residential-related bicycle parking spaces, for a total project
requirement of 26 bicycle spaces. The project will provide a total of 39 bicycle parking spaces,
13 more than are required; 24 resident bicycle spaces are located on the on the B-1 parking
level, with the remaining 15 commercial bicycle spaces provided at street level along the
Washington Boulevard frontage of the site. As such, the project will exceed the City’s minimum
requirements for the provision of bicycle parking by 50 percent, and no additional requirements
in this regard are warranted.
Site Vehicular Access and Parking Operations
Access to the project’s on-site parking garage will be provided via two driveways, one located
along the site’s Washington Boulevard frontage, approximately mid-block between National
Boulevard and Wesley Street, and the second located along Wesley Street near the
southeastern edge of the project site. Both driveways provide direct access to the
approximately 23 retail/commercial parking spaces and 15 public parking replacement spaces
on the semi-subterranean level of the parking garage, as well as to an internal garage access
ATTACHMENT 5
160
28
8770 WASHINGTON BOULEVARD MIXED-USE HIRSCH/GREEN TRANSPORTATION CONSULTING, INC.
REVISED JULY 2010
ramp, located near the center of the garage, to the subterranean parking levels, which contain
the remaining 106 retail/commercial, 4 resident-only, and 29 residential guest parking spaces
located on the B-1 parking level, and to the 179 resident-only spaces located on the B-2 level of
the garage. Both driveways will be controlled via ticket-dispenser/access card readers and gate
arms located internal to the garage. Additionally, although the retail/commercial spaces and
residential guest spaces are proposed to be shared within the B-1 level parking field, access to
the B-2 level resident-only parking spaces is controlled via an internal gate at the ramp between
the B-1 and B-2 levels, and is therefore available only to project residents.
A review of the proposed parking and access plans indicates that the site’s proposed internal
vehicular circulation plan and parking layout scheme is acceptable. However, although internal
circulation within the semi-subterranean parking level will provide two-way travel into and out of
the Washington Boulevard driveway, it is recommended that the operations of this access
location be limited to right-turn entry/right-turn exit due to its location adjacent to the existing
westbound left-turn lane on Washington Boulevard, as well as its proximity to the intersection of
Washington Boulevard and National Boulevard.
In addition to the retail/commercial and residential parking facilities, the project will also provide
an on-site loading dock for the supermarket component of the site, located at the southeastern
corner of the site, designed to accommodate full-size semi-trailer trucks, and accessed via an
additional driveway on Wesley Street, just south of the proposed retail/commercial and
residential access driveway. Since no on-site “turnaround” facilities can be provided for the
loading dock due to the limited site size, “inbound” delivery trucks will drive past (south of) the
project’s Wesley Street commercial/residential driveway, and then back into the loading dock
driveway. While backing into a loading dock from an adjacent street is not typically the
preferred access method, this maneuver will not create any significant traffic or access impacts
to Wesley Street operations, since this street is a limited-use cul-de-sac facility in the immediate
project vicinity, terminating just south of the project site.
Further, as described in more detail later in the “Mitigation” section of this report regarding the
proposed mitigation improvements for Wesley Street, it is recommended that a new striped
“median” island be provided south of the project’s parking garage driveway as a “staging”
location for inbound delivery trucks waiting to back into the loading dock, in order to further
minimize any potential traffic disruptions to Wesley Street operations. It is also recommended
that all deliveries to the on-site loading dock be limited to times when traffic from the
ATTACHMENT 5
161
29
8770 WASHINGTON BOULEVARD MIXED-USE HIRSCH/GREEN TRANSPORTATION CONSULTING, INC.
REVISED JULY 2010
retail/commercial and residential components of the site are minimal (such as before or after the
retail/commercial uses’ typical hours of operation), and that on-site personnel be designated to
assist with such loading dock “backing” maneuvers, to prevent conflicts with any vehicles using
Wesley Street or accessing the project’s adjacent Wesley Street parking garage access
driveway. With the provision of parking assist personnel and off-peak period scheduling of
deliveries, the truck “backing” maneuver is not anticipated to create any significant traffic or
access impacts to the project’s on-site or adjacent street vehicular circulation.
Upon leaving the on-site loading dock, trucks will simply exit the parking garage via a left-turn to
travel to Washington Boulevard; no significant effects of this maneuver are anticipated, although
due to the limited roadway width along Wesley Street adjacent to the project site, the trucks will
temporarily cross over both travel lanes on this street as they exit the site. These conditions are
typical of commercial vehicle loading dock operations throughout the City, and as noted before,
due to the limited number of deliveries and relatively low traffic volumes along Wesley Street in
the immediate project vicinity, the proposed location, configuration, and operations of the on-site
supermarket loading dock are acceptable.
Finally, in addition to the on-site supermarket loading dock, a short-term loading zone
accommodating up to two 30-foot long “single unit” trucks (or a single 55-foot long semi-trailer
truck) is proposed along the project frontage of Wesley Street, between Washington Boulevard
and the proposed parking garage access driveway; this loading zone is anticipated to be used
as loading spaces for the proposed drugstore/pharmacy and other on-site retail/commercial
uses, and/or for residential loading/unloading activities. On-street loading spaces such as those
proposed are permitted through approval by the City Engineer or Traffic Committee.
As described previously, it is recommended that all on-street parking on Wesley Street be
removed (with the exception of the proposed new curbside loading spaces), in order to facilitate
the operations of these on-street loading areas without creating conflicts with vehicles
attempting to access the existing on-street spaces. Further, any loading areas should be
located sufficiently distant from the project’s Wesley Street parking garage access driveway
such that site distance for exiting driveway traffic (looking toward Washington Boulevard) is not
impaired, but adequately distant from Washington Boulevard such that no sight distance issues
for eastbound right-turns at Wesley Street are created. In order to assure that adequate sight
distance is provided for vehicles exiting the site’s Wesley Street driveway, a supplemental
evaluation of this issue was prepared. Current American Association of State Highway and
ATTACHMENT 5
162
30
8770 WASHINGTON BOULEVARD MIXED-USE HIRSCH/GREEN TRANSPORTATION CONSULTING, INC.
REVISED JULY 2010
Transportation Officials (“AASHTO”) design standards for stopping sight visibility|1010| recommend
that driveways along local (or low volume) roadways provide a sight distance of between
approximately 80 feet (for speed limits of 15 miles per hour or less) and 155 feet (for speed
limits up to 25 miles per hour). Based on the current project design and anticipated location of
the on-street loading zone, the sight distance for vehicles exiting the Wesley Street driveway
was evaluated for three conditions; a) one single-unit truck parked at the northernmost end of
the loading zone, b) one semi-trailer truck parked at the northernmost end of the loading zone,
and c) two single-unit trucks parked in the loading zone.
The results of these evaluations, which are contained in Appendix D of this report, indicate that
scenario “a” (one single-unit truck) provides approximately 104 feet of sight distance from the
exit lane of the project’s Wesley Street driveway. Scenario “b” (one semi-trailer truck) reduces
the sight distance to approximately 82 feet, while scenario “c” (two single-unit trucks) further
reduces the sight distance to approximately 55 feet. Although both scenarios “a” and “b” meet
the minimum sight distances for roadways exhibiting speed limits of 15 miles per hour or less,
scenario “c” would not; if the speed limit on Wesley Street is assumed to be the typical de facto
local street speed limit of 25 miles per hour, none of the three loading zone scenarios would
provide the recommended sight distances. However, despite these results, it should be noted
that the AASHTO sight distance recommendations are general guidelines provided to assist in
the design of relatively generic driveway/street interface locations; the project site exhibits a
number of factors which act to reduce the amount of sight distance actually required from these
general guidelines, as discussed below.
First, vehicles southbound on Wesley Street from Washington Boulevard passing the on-street
loading zone and approaching the project driveway will be travelling at relatively reduced
speeds due to “side friction” from the vehicles parked in the loading zone and from oncoming
vehicles, as well as the curvilinear alignment of the southbound travel lane at this location.
Additionally, as a result of the cul-de-sac configuration and limited development along the street
immediately south of the project site, most of the southbound traffic on Wesley Street will be
turning into the project driveway, thereby posing no conflict with project-exiting vehicles. As a
result of these project-specific geometric conditions, the proposed on-street loading zone
location is not expected to pose any significant sight visibility issues. Further, the removal of the
existing street parking along Wesley Street will not create any secondary significant impacts to
|1010| Exhibit 5-2, page 381, A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets, American Association of State
Highway and Transportation Officials, 5
th
Edition, Washington D.C., 2004.
ATTACHMENT 5
163
31
8770 WASHINGTON BOULEVARD MIXED-USE HIRSCH/GREEN TRANSPORTATION CONSULTING, INC.
REVISED JULY 2010
area parking operations; a total of approximately 20 spaces are currently provided along Wesley
Street in the immediate project vicinity, including 10 spaces on the east side of the street
(opposite the project site), and 10 spaces on the west side of the street, including eight spaces
adjacent to the project’s frontage. The project will provide a total of 15 on-site public parking
spaces as replacement for the 12 total removed existing spaces that are not immediately
adjacent to the project frontage; the eight existing on-street spaces along the project frontage of
Wesley Street are considered to be site-serving spaces, and their replacement is appropriately
assumed to be accommodated within the project’s code parking requirements. As a result, the
removal of the existing on-street public parking spaces on Wesley Street is adequately
compensated by the proposed project.
It should also be noted that, although the side-by-side design concept for the Wesley Street
commercial/residential driveway and supermarket loading dock driveway is generally not
recommended, the unique characteristics of this site will permit this configuration to operate
adequately. This is because Wesley Street is a dead-end facility slightly to the southeast of the
project site. As such, access movements at both of these driveways will be generally limited to
right-turn entry and left-turn exit; right-turns entering the commercial/residential driveway and
left-turns exiting the loading dock driveway will not produce any conflicting moves. Additionally,
trucks entering the loading dock driveway will actually drive past the commercial/residential
driveway to back into the site, and will not conflict with either entering or exiting traffic from that
driveway. The only potential conflict will arise as trucks exit the loading driveway and pass in
front of the commercial/residential driveway, although the limited use of the loading dock
driveway and the recommended scheduling of truck loading activities will minimize the incidence
of this occurrence during peak activity at the commercial/residential driveway.
Finally, the anticipated typical operations of the project’s driveways (unrelated to the loading
dock operations) were also examined, to assure that safe operations and adequate capacity are
provided to accommodate the anticipated vehicular access demands of the project. The total
traffic volumes at each of the project’s driveways were determined using the project traffic
assignment percentages shown previously in Figures 5(a) and 5(b), along with the project trip
generation estimates shown in Table 2. Note that the driveway volumes are slightly higher than
the net project trip additions identified previously for the selected study intersections and area
roadways. This is because the pass-by trip reductions for the project’s “commercial” component
traffic volumes are not considered in the calculation of the project’s driveway volumes, since
pass-by trips, while not necessarily new project trips on the streets and intersections in the
ATTACHMENT 5
164
32
8770 WASHINGTON BOULEVARD MIXED-USE HIRSCH/GREEN TRANSPORTATION CONSULTING, INC.
REVISED JULY 2010
general area, will actually access the project site’s driveways and are therefore part of the
project’s overall driveway activity. However, the “internal interaction” and “transit utilization” trip
discounts discussed earlier remain applicable in the calculation of driveway trips, since these
factors are intrinsic to the site’s traffic generation, and actually remove trips from both the area
roadway network as well as from the project’s driveway access locations.
Therefore, based on these modifications to the previous trip generation calculations, the
project’s total driveway volumes, including both the retail/commercial and residential component
trips, which will share the two site driveways, are expected to be approximately 3,488 daily trips
(adding the 574 daily pass-by trips to the “net” intersection volumes shown earlier in Table 2),
including 182 (85 inbound, 97 outbound) trips during the AM peak hour (adding 28 pass-by
trips), and 330 (179 inbound, 151 outbound) trips during the PM peak hour (adding 55 pass-by
trips). These trips were assigned to the project’s driveways based on the access assumptions
described earlier in this report, including consideration of the right-turn in/right-turn out
restriction at the Washington Boulevard driveway, and the operations of the Wesley Street
access location. The results of these driveway trip assignments are shown in Figure 9 for both
the AM and PM peak hour conditions.
As shown in Figure 9, the Washington Boulevard driveway, which provides direct access to the
23 retail and 15 public parking replacement parking spaces on the semi-subterranean level as
well as internal site access to the subterranean commercial/retail and residential parking levels),
is anticipated to accommodate approximately 1,862 trips per day, including 97 trips (44 inbound,
53 outbound) during the AM peak hour, and about 176 trips (93 inbound, 83 outbound) during
the PM peak hour. The commercial/residential access driveway on Wesley Street, which also
provides access to both the semi-subterranean and subterranean parking levels, will
accommodate the remaining approximately 1,626 daily trips, including approximately 85 trips
(41 inbound, 44 outbound) during the AM peak hour, and approximately 154 trips (86 inbound,
68 outbound) during the PM peak hour. These values represent the actual number of vehicles
expected to enter and exit the project’s driveways during the typical weekday peak hour periods.
As indicated in the ground-floor project site plans shown previously in Figure 3(a), the project
will provide vehicular access control and monitoring operations for the project (such as driveway
control arms activated by card keys or ticket dispensers), at both the Washington Boulevard and
Wesley Street driveways. Ticket dispenser/gate arm access controls such as those anticipated
at the Washington Boulevard and Wesley Street driveways generally accommodate between
600 and 700 entering vehicles per hour per lane, and between 200 and 500 exiting vehicles per
ATTACHMENT 5
165ATTACHMENT 5
166
34
8770 WASHINGTON BOULEVARD MIXED-USE HIRSCH/GREEN TRANSPORTATION CONSULTING, INC.
REVISED JULY 2010
hour per lane, depending primarily on the payment method (variable rate versus flat rate, pay at
gate versus pre-pay, etc.) and on the amount of traffic/congestion on the frontage streets, which
may limit the number of vehicles that can exit the site into the traffic flow on the site adjacent
streets. Forecast future traffic volumes and congestion conditions along Washington Boulevard
adjacent to the project site are expected to limit the exit capacity at this location to between
approximately 350 and 400 vehicles per hour per lane, although the recommended right-turn
only egress restrictions will tend to allow for exit capacities at the higher end of this range. On
the other hand, the relatively uncongested traffic conditions on Wesley Street are expected to
permit exit capacities of between 450 and 500 vehicles per hour at that driveway location.
Both the Washington Boulevard and Wesley Street site driveways are currently configured as
one entry and one exit lane, and as such, the “per lane” driveway capacity values identified
above for the driveway/access control combinations represent the entire capacities of each of
the applicable driveways. A review of the peak project driveway volumes shown in Figure 9
indicates that the vehicular demand at the project driveways for both inbound and outbound
traffic will be substantially below the expected access control capacity levels at both driveways.
Therefore, the project driveways will provide more than sufficient capacity to accommodate the
expected peak hour vehicular demands of the development, and will operate adequately with no
external vehicular queuing along either Washington Boulevard or Wesley Street fronting the
site, and no significant internal queuing within the parking structures.
Due to physical constraints at both of the project site’s driveways, it is anticipated that the
exiting movements at these locations will utilize a “pre-pay” format, and thereby not require an
attendant and associated kiosk at either driveway. Typical pre-pay exit operations require that
visitors to the site take their parking tickets with them as they patronize the project, and pay at a
parking payment kiosk or parking office located on-site before returning to their vehicles. Upon
payment, visitors are issued a ticket to operate the exit gate arms at the driveways. This type of
pre-pay parking operation is common, and is currently in place at a number of developments
throughout the region. Such pre-pay exit requirements do not affect the operations of the
automated entry ticket dispensers at either of the site’s driveways, and as such, will not result in
any reduction in entering capacity at the driveways or create disruption of the traffic flows along
Washington Boulevard adjacent to the project site.
In addition to the access controls at the entrances to the project’s parking facilities, access to
the resident-only parking level of the garage will be equipped with security gates (internal to the
garage) operated via card key or vehicle transponders that automatically open the gates for
ATTACHMENT 5
167
35
8770 WASHINGTON BOULEVARD MIXED-USE HIRSCH/GREEN TRANSPORTATION CONSULTING, INC.
REVISED JULY 2010
vehicles so equipped (such as for project residents) to prevent commercial or residential guest
parking use of these spaces. Automated or card key activated security gates such as those
anticipated to separate the resident-only parking spaces from the guest and retail/commercial
parking spaces (internal to the site, and located on ramp between the B-1 and B-2 parking
levels) typically provide entry and exit capacities of between 400 and 500 vehicles per hour.
Since the residential component of the proposed project will generate substantially less than this
amount of traffic even during the peak periods, with a total of approximately 47 trips (8 inbound,
39 outbound) during the AM peak hour and 55 trips (37 inbound, 18 outbound) during the PM
peak hour as shown earlier in Table 2, the residential parking security gates are anticipated to
easily accommodate the expected demands without creating any significant internal delays or
vehicular queuing for either the retail/commercial and residential guests using the B-1 parking
level, or for the residents themselves as they enter and leave the B-2 parking level.
Therefore, as described in the preceding section, no significant site access or internal vehicular
circulation impacts, or significant operational concerns are anticipated for the proposed project.
However, as described earlier in the discussion of the site’s on-street loading zone operations, it
is recommended that all existing on-street parking on both sides of Wesley Street be removed
(with the exception of the proposed new on-street project loading spaces), and that any loading
areas be located such that sight distance for exiting driveway traffic from the project site or for
eastbound right-turns from Washington Boulevard on to Wesley Street is not impaired.
Project Roadway Improvements
The City of Culver City Public Works Department and City Engineer has indicated that no
roadway widening is required along either the Washington Boulevard or National Boulevard
frontages of the project site, although the curb return radius at the southeast corner of
Washington Boulevard and National Boulevard (along the project frontage) should be improved
to a 35-foot radius. However, the project will be required to widen both sides of Wesley Street
(along and opposite the frontages of the project site) by three feet, in order to provide a total
curb-to-curb roadway width of 36 feet; this improvement will reduce the sidewalk widths along
both the west and east sides of Wesley Street from the existing 10 feet to seven (7) feet. The
project will also be required to repair or replace any damaged curb and gutter and/or sidewalks
along each of the three roadways fronting the site.
ATTACHMENT 5
168
36
8770 WASHINGTON BOULEVARD MIXED-USE HIRSCH/GREEN TRANSPORTATION CONSULTING, INC.
REVISED JULY 2010
Additionally, the City has requested that the project improve the curb return radii at both the
southwest corner (adjacent to the project site) and the southeast corner (opposite the project
site) of Washington Boulevard and Wesley Street from the existing 10-foot radii to 35 feet, and
to dedicate the necessary rights-of-way for implementation of these improvements (at the
southwest corner only). These improvements will allow for easier “inbound” turns from
Washington Boulevard into Wesley Street and “outbound” turns from Wesley Street to
Washington Boulevard, and will help improve general traffic flow in the project vicinity.
However, a review of the existing rights-of-way/property lines for the southeast corner of
Washington Boulevard and Wesley Street (opposite the project site) indicates that there is
insufficient existing right-of-way to provide the requested 35-foot curb return radius and still
maintain adequate public sidewalk widths. As such, it is recommended that the curb return at
this location be improved with either a 15-foot or 25-foot radius, as deemed acceptable by the
City. Additional improvements to Wesley Street, including new roadway striping to address
project truck loading dock access issues (as discussed earlier) and potential significant project
traffic-related impacts to the intersection of Washington Boulevard and Wesley Street, are
identified and discussed in detail later in the “Mitigation” section of this document.
ATTACHMENT 5
169
37
8770 WASHINGTON BOULEVARD MIXED-USE HIRSCH/GREEN TRANSPORTATION CONSULTING, INC.
REVISED JULY 2010
TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS STUDY AREA
Environmental Setting
The proposed project site is located along the south side of Washington Boulevard between
National Boulevard and Wesley Street, in the eastern portion of the City of Culver City. The
area surrounding the site is developed predominantly with single and multi-family residential
uses, although the frontages of Washington Boulevard and other key roadways in the area
exhibit primarily commercial and retail development. Additionally, a number of educational
facilities are present in the study area, most notably the West Los Angeles Community College
located approximately one and one-half miles to the southwest near Jefferson Boulevard and
Overland Avenue, and Hamilton High School located approximately one-half mile to the north of
the project site along Robertson Boulevard. Culver City Park is also nearby, on the east side of
Jefferson Boulevard opposite Duquesne Avenue, about one mile south of the project.
Area Transportation Facilities
The study area is relatively well served by a variety of transportation facilities, including
freeways, arterials, and local streets. Although direct access to the project site itself is not
provided, the Santa Monica (I-10) Freeway is located just north of the project and is easily
accessible for access to and from the area, while the San Diego Freeway (I-405) is located
approximately two and one-half miles west of the project site. In addition to these regional
transportation facilities, the area is also served by a number of major and secondary arterials,
along with a well-developed local and residential street grid. The key transportation facilities in
the project vicinity are identified and described in more detail in the following pages.
Freeways
Santa Monica Freeway (I-10) – The primary east-west transportation facility in the project
vicinity, the Santa Monica Freeway (I-10) is located approximately one-quarter mile north of the
project site. This freeway connects to the Pacific Coast Highway (SR-1) along the western edge
of the City of Santa Monica and continues eastward into San Bernardino County and beyond.
In the project vicinity, the Santa Monica Freeway is generally an eight-lane facility, providing
four through travel lanes in each direction, plus additional auxiliary lanes near ramp or
interchange locations. The closest surface street ramp connections providing access to and
from the project site are located at Robertson Boulevard/National Boulevard just north of the
project site, with additional ramps provided at La Cienega Boulevard/Venice Boulevard, and at
ATTACHMENT 5
170
38
8770 WASHINGTON BOULEVARD MIXED-USE HIRSCH/GREEN TRANSPORTATION CONSULTING, INC.
REVISED JULY 2010
Fairfax Avenue/Washington Boulevard, approximately one mile east of the site, at National
Boulevard/Manning Avenue (westbound off- and eastbound on-ramps only) about one mile west
of the project, and at Overland Avenue/National Place, and about one and three-quarter miles
west the project site. Additionally, a full interchange with the San Diego (I-405) Freeway is
located approximately two and one-half miles west of the project.
San Diego Freeway (I-405) – The key north-south transportation facility in the area, this freeway
generally provides five travel lanes per direction, plus additional or auxiliary lanes at ramps or
interchanges. This facility serves the entire western portion of the Los Angeles basin, including
the Los Angeles International Airport (LAX), from its departure from the Golden State Freeway
(I-5) in the Sylmar community to the north to its merge back into the Golden State Freeway in
the City of Irvine in Orange County. In the project vicinity, the San Diego Freeway provides
surface street access at both Culver Boulevard and Washington Boulevard/Venice Boulevard.
Primary (Major) and Secondary Arterial Highways
The City of Culver City designates key regional and sub-regional roadways within its boundaries
as “Primary Arterials” and “Secondary Arterials”, while the adjacent City of Los Angeles assigns
roadway designations to these facilities as “Major Highways” and “Secondary Highways”,
respectively. Although the two sets of roadway designations are generally interchangeable, for
purposes of this report, the city-appropriate designations have been utilized to avoid confusion.
Washington Boulevard – This east-west oriented facility is designated as a Primary Arterial
within the City of Culver City, and a Major Highway within the City of Los Angeles, and provides
the northern frontage of the project site. Washington Boulevard is an important transportation
facility throughout the study area, providing uninterrupted service between the Pacific Ocean to
the west and the City of Whittier to the east, passing through the Venice community of the City
of Los Angeles, the City of Culver City, the Mid-City and Harvard Heights communities of the
City of Los Angeles, the southern portion of downtown Los Angeles, and the Cities of Vernon,
Commerce, Pico Rivera along the route. In the study area, Washington Boulevard typically
provides two through lanes in each direction, plus a median two-way left-turn lane that converts
to exclusive left-turn channelization at most cross streets. On-street parking is generally
allowed along most segments of Washington Boulevard within the study area.
National Boulevard – A generally east-west oriented Secondary Arterial/Secondary Highway,
National Boulevard provides a continuous route from its western terminus at the Santa Monica
Municipal Airport (at Bundy Drive/Centinela Avenue near the Santa Monica/Los Angeles city
ATTACHMENT 5
171
39
8770 WASHINGTON BOULEVARD MIXED-USE HIRSCH/GREEN TRANSPORTATION CONSULTING, INC.
REVISED JULY 2010
boundary) through the West Los Angeles area to Overland Avenue, where it continues
eastward, roughly paralleling the Santa Monica (I-10) Freeway through the eastern portion of
the City of Culver City to its terminus at Jefferson Boulevard, southeast of the project site.
Within the study area, National Boulevard is located along the western boundary of the project
site, and is typically striped to provide two through lanes in each direction with left-turn
channelization at key intersections. On-street parking is generally allowed on both sides of the
street throughout the project vicinity.
Culver Boulevard – This generally east-west oriented facility provides a connection between its
western terminus at Pacific Avenue/Trolleyway in the Playa del Rey beach community of the
City of Los Angeles and its eastern terminus in the City of Culver City at Venice Boulevard
approximately one-quarter mile northwest of the project site. Culver Boulevard provides the
primary thoroughfare through the Culver City downtown and business districts, and is classified
as a Primary Arterial throughout the City of Culver City and a Major Highway within much of the
City of Los Angeles, although it is downgraded to a Secondary Highway west of Lincoln
Boulevard, and ultimately to Local Street status for its final few blocks west of Vista del Mar.
Within the study area, Culver Boulevard exhibits a variety of lane configurations, but is generally
developed to provide at least two travel lanes in each direction plus left-turn channelization at
most intersections; raised median islands are prevalent, particularly through the downtown
Culver City segments. Culver Boulevard also exhibits a minor, local-access frontage road
counterpart between McConnell Avenue in the Del Rey community of the City of Los Angeles
and Elenda Street in the City of Culver City; this frontage road is highly discontinuous, and
generally provides a single travel lane in each direction. Most segments of Culver Boulevard,
including the minor frontage road facility, permit on-street parking.
Fairfax Avenue – Making up the eastern limit of the northeast portion of the City of Culver City,
Fairfax Avenue serves as a key transportation connection between Hollywood Boulevard on the
north and its southern terminus La Cienega Boulevard, just south of Washington Boulevard.
Fairfax Avenue is designated as a Primary Arterial/Major Highway throughout most of its length,
with the exception of the segment between Rosewood Avenue (south of Melrose Avenue) and
18
th
Street (north of Venice Boulevard), where it is downgraded to Secondary Highway status.
Within the general study area, Fairfax Avenue is typically striped to provide two travel lanes in
each direction, with left-turn and/or right-turn channelization provided at most key intersections.
On-street on Fairfax Avenue is generally prohibited throughout the study area, although some
limited, time-restricted parking is allowed.
ATTACHMENT 5
172
40
8770 WASHINGTON BOULEVARD MIXED-USE HIRSCH/GREEN TRANSPORTATION CONSULTING, INC.
REVISED JULY 2010
Jefferson Boulevard – This generally east-west oriented roadway begins at Culver Boulevard,
west of Lincoln Boulevard, in the Del Rey area of the City of Los Angeles, and provides a
continuous connection through the southern and eastern portions of the City of Culver City
where it intersects with Sepulveda Boulevard near the San Diego (I-405) and Marina (SR-90)
Freeway interchange. At Sepulveda Boulevard, Jefferson Boulevard turns north and continues
as Sepulveda Boulevard for several blocks until it diverges again near Sawtelle Boulevard.
Continuing northward through the southeastern portions of Culver City, Jefferson Boulevard
intersects with National Boulevard approximately three-quarters of a mile to the east of the
project site, turning east to travel past the University of Southern California campus south of
downtown Los Angeles, and ultimately terminating at Central Avenue in the South Central area
of Los Angeles. Jefferson Boulevard is designated as a Primary Arterial/Major Highway along
the portions west of La Cienega Boulevard, but is downgraded to Secondary Highway status to
the east of that intersection. In the vicinity of the project, Jefferson Boulevard generally provides
two travel lanes in each direction plus a median two-way left-turn lane that converts to exclusive
left-turn channelization at most cross streets. On-street parking generally allowed along most
portions of this facility throughout the study area.
La Cienega Boulevard – This generally north-south oriented Primary Arterial/Major Highway
facility provides a key travel route though the study area between Sunset Boulevard in the City
of West Hollywood on the north and its southern terminus at El Segundo Boulevard in the
unincorporated area of Los Angeles County between the cities of El Segundo and Hawthorne.
La Cienega Boulevard serves the cities of Beverly Hills, Culver City, and Inglewood, as well as a
number of communities of the City of Los Angeles, and the Ballwin Hills area of Los Angeles
County. Within the immediate project vicinity, this roadway is typically improved to provide three
travel lanes in each direction, plus a median two-way left-turn lane or left-turn channelization at
key intersections. On-street parking is generally prohibited on both sides of La Cienega
Boulevard throughout the study area.
Venice Boulevard – This generally east-west oriented roadway travels through the northern
portion of the study area, and provides a key transportation connection between Pacific Avenue
in the Venice community of the City of Los Angeles on the west through the Mar Vista, Palms,
Mid-City, and Harvard Heights communities of Los Angeles, through the southern portion of
downtown Los Angeles to approximately Main Street, where it turns into 16
th
Street and
continues to its eastern terminus at Hooper Avenue. Venice Boulevard is classified as a
Primary Arterial/Major Highway west of Crenshaw Boulevard and as a Secondary Highway to
ATTACHMENT 5
173
41
8770 WASHINGTON BOULEVARD MIXED-USE HIRSCH/GREEN TRANSPORTATION CONSULTING, INC.
REVISED JULY 2010
the east of that location. Within the study area, Venice Boulevard generally provides three
through lanes in each direction with left-turn channelization at major intersections; a large raised
median island prohibits left-turns into or out of minor roadways through much of the project
vicinity. On-street parking is typically permitted along both sides of Venice Boulevard
throughout the project study area.
Robertson Boulevard – This roadway is designated as a Primary Arterial within the City of
Culver City, but is identified only as a Secondary Highway within the City of Los Angeles.
Robertson Boulevard provides a north-south connection from just north of Santa Monica
Boulevard in the City of West Hollywood, through the eastern portion of the City of Beverly Hills
and parts of Los Angeles, continuing into the City of Culver City, where it terminates at
Washington Boulevard opposite Higuera Street. Within the study area, Robertson Boulevard
typically exhibits two travel lanes in each direction, plus left-turn channelization at key
intersections. On-street parking is generally permitted along both sides of the roadway
throughout the length of Robertson Boulevard, although some segments of the roadway exhibit
parking prohibitions and/or restrictions in one or both directions.
Rodeo Road – An east-west oriented roadway, Rodeo Road is designated as a Major Highway
between its western terminus at Jefferson Boulevard (opposite Higuera Street) and its eastern
terminus at Martin Luther King, Jr. Boulevard in the Baldwin Village/Crenshaw community of the
City of Los Angeles, where it then becomes a Secondary Highway. Rodeo Road continues
eastward to approximately Gramercy Place, where the roadway merges with and becomes
Exposition Boulevard, continuing east along the southern portion of the University of Southern
California campus before terminating at Flower Street near the Harbor (I-110) Freeway. In the
project vicinity, Rodeo Road exhibits variable configurations, but generally provides two
westbound and three eastbound lanes between Jefferson Boulevard and Martin Luther King, Jr.
Boulevard, plus a median two-way left-turn lane that converts to exclusive left-turn lanes at most
intersections; right-turn lanes are also present at selected locations. East of Martin Luther King,
Jr. Boulevard, Rodeo Road generally is striped for two travel lanes per direction plus left-turn
channelization at most intersections. On-street parking is generally permitted on the north side
of the roadway west of Martin Luther King, Jr. Boulevard, but is typically allowed on both sides
of the roadway east of this location.
Duquesne Avenue – This northwest-to-southeast oriented roadway, located to the south of the
project site, is designated as a Secondary Arterial within the City of Culver City. Duquesne
Avenue connects Venice Boulevard on the north, where provides the southern leg of the
ATTACHMENT 5
174
42
8770 WASHINGTON BOULEVARD MIXED-USE HIRSCH/GREEN TRANSPORTATION CONSULTING, INC.
REVISED JULY 2010
intersection opposite Hughes Avenue, with Jefferson Boulevard on the south, where it continues
southeastward to permit access to Culver City Park. Within the study area, Duquesne Avenue
typically provides a single travel lane in each direction, with left-turn and/or right-turn
channelization provided at some intersections. On-street parking is generally permitted
throughout the study area on both sides of Duquesne Avenue.
Hayden Avenue – A short Secondary Arterial, Hayden Avenue provides north-south access
through a generally light industrial/commercial area of the City of Culver City between Higuera
Street and National Boulevard, although the roadway continues south of Higuera Street for a
short distance as Hayden Place before terminating in a cul-de-sac northeast of Ince Boulevard.
Hayden Avenue is striped to provide only a single lane in each direction, and on-street parking
is generally prohibited or restricted throughout its length, although a number of off-street parking
areas directly abut the roadway on both sides.
Higuera Street – Approximately three-quarters of a mile in length, this roadway generally
connects Washington Boulevard on the west with Jefferson Boulevard on the east; at
Washington Boulevard, Higuera Street intersects opposite Robertson Boulevard, while near
Jefferson Boulevard, Higuera Street becomes Rodeo Road at Eastham Drive, just across the
Ballona Creek channel from Jefferson Boulevard. Through the study area, Higuera Street is
designated as a Neighborhood Feeder street and typically exhibits one travel lane in each
direction with only limited on-street parking between Washington Boulevard and Hayden
Avenue/Hayden Place; east of this location, Higuera Street is upgraded to Secondary Arterial
status, and provides two travel lanes per direction plus left-turn and/or right-turn channelization
at its intersections with Hayden Avenue/Hayden Place, Eastham Drive, and Jefferson
Boulevard. At the intersection of Hayden Avenue/Hayden Place, “through” traffic movements
are prohibited, all traffic in either the eastbound or westbound direction must turn onto Hayden
Avenue to continue to National Boulevard or onto the cul-de-sac’ed Hayden Place.
Neighborhood Feeders (Collector and Local Streets)
Similar to the different designations for the Primary/Major and Secondary Arterials/Highway
facilities described previously, the City of Culver City and City of Los Angeles also identify
different designations for the feeder/collector and local-serving roadways within their respective
jurisdictions. Therefore, as before, each of the following roadways is identified with the
appropriate, city-specific designation.
ATTACHMENT 5
175
43
8770 WASHINGTON BOULEVARD MIXED-USE HIRSCH/GREEN TRANSPORTATION CONSULTING, INC.
REVISED JULY 2010
Wesley Street – This generally north-south oriented Local Street serves a primarily residential
area of Culver City to the southeast of the project site, connecting Higuera Street on the south
with National Boulevard on the north, although a short, discontinuous segment of Wesley Street
also extends south from Washington Boulevard, terminating in a cul-de-sac just north of
National Boulevard; this portion of the roadway provides the eastern boundary of the project
site. Wesley Street provides one travel lane per direction, and on-street parking is generally
permitted throughout most of its length, including along the project frontage.
Landmark Street – This short, north-south oriented Local Street extends about 700 feet
southward from Washington Boulevard, providing access to a number of commercial
developments before terminating in a cul-de-sac. Landmark Street is not striped, but provides
one travel lane in each direction plus on-street parking along both sides of the street.
Cattaraugus Avenue – This short facility, designated as a Local Street within the City of Culver
City, but exhibiting Collector Street status within the City of Los Angeles, generally connects
Castle Heights Avenue/Beverwil Drive in West Los Angeles with Washington Boulevard in the
City of Culver City, although the roadway is offset to the east at Washington Boulevard and
continues southerly for two blocks to its cul-de-sac termination just north of Jefferson Boulevard.
Throughout the study area, Cattaraugus Avenue is generally striped to provide a single travel
lane in each direction, with on-street parking typically permitted along both sides of the street.
No left-turn channelization is provided at any of the intersections along Cattaraugus Avenue.
Helms Avenue – Designated as Local Street facility within both the City of Culver City and the
City of Los Angeles, Helms Avenue provides a generally north-south travel path through the
study area between Regent Street in the City of Los Angeles on the north, just south of the
Santa Monica (I-10) Freeway, and its southern terminus at Higuera Street in Culver City.
However, this roadway is discontinuous at National Boulevard, with only the southern approach
of Helms Avenue intersecting with National Boulevard; the northern segment of Helms Avenue
terminates in a cul-de-sac north of National Boulevard. Throughout most of its length, Helms
Avenue primarily serves as a local access facility for the surrounding residential neighborhoods,
and provides a single travel lane in each direction. Within the study area, on-street parking is
generally permitted along both sides of the street.
Hughes Avenue – This short north-south oriented roadway is designated as a Collector Street
within the City of Los Angeles, and provides a connection between Exposition Boulevard (near
the intersection of National Boulevard and Palms Avenue) on the north and Washington
ATTACHMENT 5
176
44
8770 WASHINGTON BOULEVARD MIXED-USE HIRSCH/GREEN TRANSPORTATION CONSULTING, INC.
REVISED JULY 2010
Boulevard on the south; at Washington Boulevard, Hughes Avenue is renamed to become
Duquesne Avenue within the City of Culver City. Throughout the immediate project vicinity,
Hughes Avenue provides a single lane in each direction, and on-street parking is generally
permitted, although no parking is allowed on either side of the street in the segment between
Venice Boulevard and Washington Boulevard.
Irving Place – This short northwest-to-southeast oriented Local Street only exists for a few
blocks within the City of Culver City, from its northern terminus at Culver Boulevard near the
intersection with Washington Boulevard to its southern terminus at Lucerne Avenue just west of
the Ballona Creek channel. The segment between A Street (one block south of Culver
Boulevard) and Farragut Drive is configured as a one-way northbound facility (providing a
couplet with one-way southbound Van Buren Place one block to the east), although the
remaining segments of the roadway exhibit typical two direction operations providing a single
lane in each direction. On-street parking is permitted along most segments of Irving Place.
Lucerne Avenue – A short Neighborhood Feeder roadway, Lucerne Avenue provides a
generally local access connection between Duquesne Avenue and Higuera Street, through the
primarily residential neighborhoods south of the project site. Lucerne Avenue is striped to
provide a single travel lane in each direction, and on-street parking is generally permitted on
both sides of the street throughout its length.
Bagley Avenue – A north-south oriented Local Street located to the southwest of the project site
within the City of Los Angeles, Bagley Avenue connects Airdrome Street (approximately four
blocks south of Pico Boulevard) in the South Robertson community of the City of Los Angeles
on the north with Venice Boulevard on the south, where the roadway is renamed to become
Main Street in the City of Culver City. Bagley Avenue is typically configured to provide one
travel lane in each direction, plus on-street parking throughout its length.
Main Street – Another north-south oriented Local Street, Main Street provides a one-block long
connection between Venice Boulevard, where it forms the southern extension of Bagley Avenue
(a Collector Street in the City of Los Angeles), and Culver Boulevard. Main Street is generally
striped to provide only a single travel lane in each direction, although an additional left-turn lane
is provided on the northbound approach to Venice Boulevard, while an additional right-turn only
lane is provided on the southbound approach at Culver Boulevard. On-street parking is
permitted along both sides of Main Street throughout its short length.
ATTACHMENT 5
177
45
8770 WASHINGTON BOULEVARD MIXED-USE HIRSCH/GREEN TRANSPORTATION CONSULTING, INC.
REVISED JULY 2010
Canfield Avenue – This generally north-south oriented Local Street serves primarily as a local
access facility from its northern terminus at Sawyer Street in the South Robertson community of
the City of Los Angeles on the north and Culver Boulevard on the south, where it intersects
opposite the recently realigned Washington Boulevard (along the prior Ince Boulevard
alignment). At its southern terminus, Canfield Avenue provides only a right-turn only lane to
westbound Culver Boulevard; no through traffic is permitted to continue onto eastbound
Washington Boulevard. Canfield Avenue is also discontinuous at several locations along its
length, most notably between Harlow Avenue and Exposition Boulevard on either side of the
Santa Monica (I-10) Freeway right-of-way, and at Venice Boulevard, where the existing raised
median on Venice Boulevard prevents north-south through movements along Canfield Avenue.
In the immediate project vicinity between Venice Boulevard and Culver Boulevard, Canfield
Avenue provides one travel lane per direction and on-street parking on both sides of the street.
Public Transportation
The general project vicinity is currently served by a number of public transit service providers,
including the City of Culver City Municipal Bus, the Los Angeles County Metropolitan
Transportation Authority (“Metro”), and the Santa Monica Big Blue Bus (SMBBB), as shown by
the map of the available transit service in the project vicinity in Figure 10. These existing public
transit services consist primarily of local-serving bus lines with multiple stops throughout the
general study area, as well as providing convenient access to shopping, museums, colleges,
and public service building destinations. However, as also indicated in Figure 10, the project
site itself is not particularly well served by the area’s transit providers, with only the Culver
CityBus Line 1 providing direct access to the site, as described below.
Culver City Line 1 – This bus line runs between Windward Circle, at the intersection of main
Street, Grand Boulevard, and Windward Street at the western edge of the Venice community of
the City of Los Angeles and the West Los Angeles Transit Center at Washington Boulevard and
Fairfax Avenue, near the Santa Monica Freeway (I-10). Line 1 travels between Windward
Avenue along Pacific Avenue to Washington Boulevard, then continues along Washington
Boulevard through the Venice and Mar Vista communities of the City of Los Angeles, past the
project site and through the City of Culver City to its eastern terminus at the Transit Center.
Line 1 does not provide a stop directly at the project site at either National Boulevard or Wesley
Street; the nearest bus stops are located on Washington Boulevard at Exposition Boulevard
(west of National Boulevard, about 250 feet east of the project site) and at Helms Avenue (about
ATTACHMENT 5
178ATTACHMENT 5
179
47
8770 WASHINGTON BOULEVARD MIXED-USE HIRSCH/GREEN TRANSPORTATION CONSULTING, INC.
REVISED JULY 2010
600 feet west of the project) for both eastbound and westbound travel. Line 1 provides two-way
service along its route generally between about 5:30 AM and 11:30 PM on weekdays, with
headways through the project vicinity of 10 to 15 minutes in both directions throughout the day.
Weekend (Saturday and Sunday) and holiday service is also provided by Line 1, with service
between approximately 6:00 AM and 12:00 midnight, with mid-day headways of approximately
15 minutes in both directions, although headways during the early morning and later evening
(before 9:00 AM and after 6:30 PM) can be between 30 minutes to over one hour.
However, in addition to this lone site-serving transit line, a number of other bus routes pass
within approximately one-quarter mile of the project site, and could be considered to be within
“convenient” walking distance for project residents, visitors, employees and/or patrons. These
nearby bus route include Metro’s Route 33/333 (Venice Boulevard) and Route 220 (Robertson
Boulevard); Culver City’s CityBus Line 5 (Braddock Drive/Culver Boulevard/Higuera Street) and
Line 7 (Culver Boulevard); LADOT’s Commuter Express Route 437 (Marina del Rey to
downtown Los Angeles via Culver Boulevard and Washington Boulevard through the project
vicinity); and Santa Monica’s Big Blue Bus Line 12 (Venice Boulevard/National
Boulevard/Robertson Boulevard), Super 12 (Westwood Boulevard/National Boulevard/Venice
Boulevard), and Line 6 (Ocean Park Boulevard/Bundy Drive/Venice Boulevard).
Each of these transit services, while not serving the project site directly, offer multiple transfer
opportunities to expanded regional transit services to all areas of the metropolitan Los Angeles
and surrounding region. As a result, it is likely that some of the proposed project’s residents,
visitors, and employees would utilize these services for travel to and from the site on both local
and regional/commute trips. However, in order to present the most conservative analysis of the
potential traffic impacts of the project, only nominal use of these existing public transportation
facilities by the project’s residents and commercial employees/patrons was assumed, as
described earlier in the discussion of project trip generation.
It should also be noted that, in addition to these existing transit facilities, the proposed project is
directly adjacent to the proposed western terminus station of the Phase 1 portion of Metro’s
Expo Line light rail transit project, providing future transit availability between the project site
and downtown Los Angeles; the Expo Line project is proposed to ultimately extend westward to
and through the City of Santa Monica. Further, the proposed 8770 Washington Boulevard
project analyzed herein is one of a number of projects proposed for development within the
Washington Boulevard/National Boulevard Transit Oriented Development District, which is
ATTACHMENT 5
180
48
8770 WASHINGTON BOULEVARD MIXED-USE HIRSCH/GREEN TRANSPORTATION CONSULTING, INC.
REVISED JULY 2010
proposed by the City of Culver City to enhance public transportation facilities and reduce traffic
throughout the City and the region. The western terminus station for the Phase 1 portion of the
Expo Line will be located at Venice Boulevard/Robertson Boulevard, immediately to the
northwest (across the intersection of Washington Boulevard and National Boulevard) of the
proposed Washington/Landmark project.
The proposed Metro Expo Line transit improvements are described in detail in the Final EIS/EIR
document prepared for the project|1010|. As identified in that document, the Expo Line will provide a
full transit station along the Exposition Boulevard right-of-way near the southwest corner of
Venice Boulevard and National Boulevard. The Expo Line Phase 1 project will provide surface
light rail public transportation between the 7
th
Street/Metro Center station near Wilshire
Boulevard and Figueroa Street in downtown Los Angeles southward along Flower Street to
Washington Boulevard, where it moves to Hill Street and continues southward to Exposition
Boulevard, which it generally parallels throughout the remainder of its route to the western
terminus of the Phase 1 portion of the project at Venice Boulevard and National Boulevard in
the City of Culver City. Within the vicinity of the proposed project, the Expo Line is anticipated
to operate with approximately 12 trains per hour to and from the Venice Boulevard/National
Boulevard station, resulting in headways of approximately five (5) minutes between trains;
parking for a total of approximately 600 vehicles is also proposed to be provided throughout the
immediate area of the proposed station, along Washington Boulevard and National Boulevard,
within several surface parking lots. Additionally, although no details are as yet available, it is
anticipated that the development of the Expo Line station at Venice Boulevard and National
Boulevard will result in an expansion of the existing bus service in and through the immediate
project vicinity, as Metro and other transit providers improve overall localized connections to
provide support for the Expo Line operations.
The Phase 1 portion of the Expo Line project is currently under construction, and is expected to
be operational by sometime in late 2010. Phase 2 of the Expo Line will extend transit service
westward into the City of Santa Monica with its ultimate western terminus near the intersection
of 4
th
Street and Colorado Avenue. This final portion of the Expo Line is still in the
environmental evaluation and analysis phase, with construction anticipated to begin sometime
in 2010 and operations commencing in 2014 or 2015.
|1010| Mid-City/Exposition LRT Project Final EIS/EIR, Los Angeles Metropolitan Transportation Authority/U. S.
Department of Transportation, Federal Transit Administration, October 2005.
ATTACHMENT 5
181
49
8770 WASHINGTON BOULEVARD MIXED-USE HIRSCH/GREEN TRANSPORTATION CONSULTING, INC.
REVISED JULY 2010
ANALYSIS OF AREA TRAFFIC CONDITIONS
Existing (Year 2010) Traffic Volumes
Traffic volume data for this study were obtained primarily from counts performed at the selected
study intersections during the morning (7:00 to 10:00 AM) and afternoon (3:00 to 6:00 PM)
commute traffic periods in early September 2008, although some additional counts were
performed in April 2010; all data collected prior to 2010 was adjusted using a traffic growth
factor (discussed in detail later in this report) to reflect current (year 2010) conditions. The
count days represent typical midweek conditions during weeks with no holidays, with all area
schools in full session and businesses in normal operation. The “peak hour” volumes utilized in
this analysis were identified as the highest four consecutive 15-minute periods within the larger
three-hour count windows; peak hour traffic volumes were determined individually for each of
the study intersections, assuring that the “worst case” operational conditions at each location
were analyzed in this study. The existing year 2010 AM and PM peak hour traffic volumes at
each of the 34 study intersections are shown in Figures 11(a) and 11(b), respectively.
Analysis of Existing (Year 2010) Traffic Conditions
Detailed traffic analyses of existing conditions were performed at the following 34 intersections:
1. Robertson Boulevard and Cattaraugus Avenue
[1]
2. Robertson Boulevard and WB I-10 Freeway Off-Ramp/Kincardine Avenue
[1]
3. Robertson Boulevard and National Boulevard
[1]
4. National Boulevard and I-10 EB On-Ramp
[1]
5. Venice Boulevard and Hughes Avenue
[1]
6. Venice Boulevard and Bagley Avenue
[1]
7. Venice Boulevard and Culver Boulevard
[1]
8. Venice Boulevard and Robertson Boulevard
[1]
9. Venice Boulevard and National Boulevard
[1]
10. Venice Boulevard and Helms Avenue
[1]
11. Venice Boulevard and Cattaraugus Avenue
[1]
12. Venice Boulevard and La Cienega Boulevard
[1]
13. Washington Boulevard and Hughes Avenue
14. Culver Boulevard and Duquesne Avenue
ATTACHMENT 5
182ATTACHMENT 5
183ATTACHMENT 5
184
52
8770 WASHINGTON BOULEVARD MIXED-USE HIRSCH/GREEN TRANSPORTATION CONSULTING, INC.
REVISED JULY 2010
15. Washington Boulevard, Culver Boulevard and Irving Place
16. Washington Boulevard and Main Street
17. Washington Boulevard and Culver Boulevard
18. Washington Boulevard and Robertson Boulevard/Higuera Street
19. Washington Boulevard and Landmark Street
20. Washington Boulevard and National Boulevard
21. Washington Boulevard and Wesley Street
22. Washington Boulevard and Helms Avenue
23. Washington Boulevard and Cattaraugus Avenue
24. Washington Boulevard and La Cienega Boulevard
25. La Cienega Boulevard and Fairfax Avenue
[2]
26. National Boulevard and Wesley Street
27. National Boulevard and Hayden Avenue
28. National Boulevard and Jefferson Boulevard
[1]
29. National Boulevard and La Cienega Boulevard
[1]
30. Higuera Street/Rodeo Road and Jefferson Boulevard
[1]
31. Rodeo Road and La Cienega Boulevard
[1]
32. Hughes Avenue and Braddock Drive
33. Hughes Avenue and Lucerne Avenue
34. Hughes Avenue and Jefferson Boulevard
Notes:
[1]
Indicates intersection under jurisdiction of City of Los Angeles
[2]
Intersection under jurisdiction of City of Culver City, but traffic signal maintained by City of Los Angeles
All of the study intersections are currently signalized, with the exception of the following four
locations; Washington Boulevard and Wesley Street, a three-approach “tee” intersection that is
STOP sign controlled along the Wesley Street approach; Washington Boulevard and
Cattaraugus Avenue, which is actually comprised of two adjacent three-approach “tee”
intersections STOP sign controlled along both Cattaraugus Avenue approaches; and Duquesne
Avenue and Braddock Drive (four approaches), and Duquesne Avenue and Lucerne Avenue
(three-approach “tee” intersection), both of which are all-way STOP sign controlled
intersections. Of the 30 signalized study intersection locations, most exhibit multiple phasing
operations, with separate or “lead/lag” left-turn phases, and/or right-turn indication or “overlap”
phases to maximize capacity.
ATTACHMENT 5
185
53
8770 WASHINGTON BOULEVARD MIXED-USE HIRSCH/GREEN TRANSPORTATION CONSULTING, INC.
REVISED JULY 2010
A number of the study intersections, including those along Venice Boulevard and Robertson
Boulevard (intersections 1 through 12), and the intersections of National Boulevard/Jefferson
Boulevard, Jefferson Boulevard/La Cienega Boulevard, Higuera Street/Rodeo Road/Jefferson
Boulevard, and Rodeo Road/La Cienega Boulevard (intersections 28 through 31), are within the
City of Los Angeles, and are part of the Los Angeles Department of Transportation’s (LADOT)
signal enhancement project, currently operating with that city’s Automated Traffic Surveillance
and Control (ATSAC) and next-generation Adaptive Traffic Control System (ATCS) signal
synchronization protocols. These programs monitor traffic flows from other similarly-equipped
intersections and adjust signal timing and phasing in real time to maximize vehicular throughput
and minimize delay. The remaining signalized study intersections along Washington Boulevard,
National Boulevard, and Jefferson Boulevard, all under the jurisdiction of the City of Culver City,
also operate using a signal coordination system similar to ATSAC, but have not been fitted with
ATCS-type upgrades. The City of Culver City is completing installation of a City-wide signal
coordination system, which is anticipated to be in place by the study year of 2013.
This study uses the Critical Movement Analysis methodology for the analysis and evaluation of
traffic operations at signalized intersections, as detailed in Circular Number 212 published by
the Transportation Research Board.|1010| This methodology describes the operating characteristics
of an intersection in terms of the "Level of Service", based on intersection traffic volume and
other variables such as number and type of signal phasing, lane geometries, and other factors
which determine both the quantity of traffic that can move through an intersection (“Capacity”)
and the quality of that traffic flow ("Level of Service").
"Capacity" represents the maximum total hourly volume of vehicles in the critical lanes which
has a reasonable expectation of passing through an intersection under prevailing roadway and
traffic conditions. Critical lanes are defined generally as those intersection movement or groups
of movements which exhibit the highest “per lane” volumes, thus defining the maximum amount
of vehicles attempting to travel through the intersection during a specific time period. The
capacity of an intersection also varies based on the number of signal phases for the location;
more signal phases generally result in more “lost” or “start up” time, as vehicles exhibit slight
driver reaction delays when signal indications change from “red” to “green”. Thus, additional
signal indication changes create more opportunities for lost time during the signal cycle, and
reduce the efficiency and thus the capacity of an intersection. The intersection capacities for
various levels of service, based on the number of traffic signal phases, are shown in Table 5.
|1010| Interim Materials on Highway Capacity, Circular Number 212, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 1980.
ATTACHMENT 5
186
54
8770 WASHINGTON BOULEVARD MIXED-USE HIRSCH/GREEN TRANSPORTATION CONSULTING, INC.
REVISED JULY 2010
Level of Two Three Four or More
Service Phases Phases Phases
A 900 855 825
B 1,050 1,000 965
C 1,200 1,140 1,100
D 1,350 1,275 1,225
E 1,500 1,425 1,375
F
* For planning applications only. Not appropriate for operations/design applications.
- - - - - - - - - - Not Applicable - - - - - - - - - -
Maximum Sum of Critical Volumes (VPH)
vs. Number of Signal Phases
Table 5
Critical Movement Analysis
Volume Ranges per Level of Service *
For intersection evaluation and planning purposes, the capacity of an intersection equates to the
value of Level of Service (LOS) E, which represents the highest level of traffic through urban
area intersections that can be adequately accommodated without a breakdown in operation
resulting in stop-and-go conditions. The “Critical Movement” indices at an intersection are
determined by first identifying the sum of all critical movement volumes at that intersection. This
value is then divided by the appropriate capacity value for the type of signal control at the study
intersection to arrive at the ”CMA value” for the intersection, which is roughly equivalent to the
volume-to-capacity ratio for the location.
“Level of Service” describes the quality of traffic flow through the intersection. LOS A through
LOS C provide good traffic flow characteristics, with little or no congestion or vehicle delay.
LOS D typically is the level for which a metropolitan area street system is designed, and
represents the highest level of smooth traffic flow. LOS E represents volumes at or near the
capacity of the intersection and can result in stoppages of momentary duration and unstable
traffic flow at the upper reaches of this condition. LOS F occurs when a facility is overloaded
and is characterized by stop-and-go traffic with stoppages of long duration.
For signalized intersection analyses, the City of Culver City utilizes the CMA methodology to
determine the level of service at the subject location. Note that the LOS definitions described
above do not represent a single intersection operation condition, but rather correspond to a
range of CMA values, as shown in Table 6.
ATTACHMENT 5
187
55
8770 WASHINGTON BOULEVARD MIXED-USE HIRSCH/GREEN TRANSPORTATION CONSULTING, INC.
REVISED JULY 2010
Level of
CMA Value Service Intersection Operation/Traffic Flow Characteristics
< 0.600 A No congestion; all vehicles clear in a single cycle.
> 0.600 < 0.700 B Minimal congestion; all vehicles still clear in a single cycle.
> 0.700 < 0.800 C No major congestion; most vehicles clear in a single cycle.
> 0.800 < 0.900 D
>0.900 < 1.000 E
> 1.000 F
Increased congestion on critical approaches; long duration
queues form at higher end of range.
Over capacity; forced flow with long periods of congestion;
substantial queues form.
Table 6
Level of Service as a Function of CMA Value
Generally uncongested, but vehicles may wait through more
than one cycle; short duration queues may form on critical
approaches.
Note that, as described previously, the ATSAC traffic signal coordination system has been
implemented at all of the signalized intersections in the study area, with the ATCS upgrades
installed at those locations under the operational jurisdiction of the City of Los Angeles. LADOT
has determined that intersections connected to the ATSAC system experience an approximate
seven percent increase in capacity as compared to non-ATSAC locations, while locations
equipped with the ATCS upgrades experience an approximate ten percent increase in capacity
compared to non-ATSAC/ATCS locations. Therefore, per LADOT policy, the basic CMA value
calculated using the standard methodology described earlier was reduced by 0.070 for
intersections equipped with ATSAC, and by 0.100 for locations improved with ATSAC/ATCS, in
order to estimate the effectiveness of the resulting increases in intersection capacity. Although
these adjustments in intersection capacity have been identified specifically for intersections
under the jurisdiction of the City of Los Angeles, the ATSAC operational improvements are
considered applicable to any traffic signal system so equipped, and as such, the ATSAC-related
CMA reduction was applied to the appropriate intersections within the City of Culver City.
For unsignalized intersections, the City of Culver City uses a somewhat different operational
assessment methodology. First, the critical traffic flows and operational parameters of the
intersection are identified through the CMA analysis procedures described above. These values
are used to provide a numerical baseline for the determination of the incremental effects of
potential traffic increases, including project traffic, at the intersection. However, the evaluation
of the intersection level of service is based on the unsignalized intersection analysis
ATTACHMENT 5
188
56
8770 WASHINGTON BOULEVARD MIXED-USE HIRSCH/GREEN TRANSPORTATION CONSULTING, INC.
REVISED JULY 2010
methodologies described in the Highway Capacity Manual (HCM)|1010|. This document, published
by the Transportation Research Board, provides analysis techniques applicable to the unique
traffic flows and interactions that occur at unsignalized intersections.
These methodologies utilize much of the same intersection information regarding traffic volumes
and lane geometries and configurations as the CMA methodology, but base the level of service
assessments on vehicle delays rather than on the percentage of available capacity. This
approach is useful when evaluating locations where high volumes of unimpeded “through” traffic
on a major street may hinder traffic moves to and from minor street approaches, potentially
resulting in long delays for these side street vehicles. The LOS definitions applicable to the
HCM unsignalized intersection analysis methodologies are summarized in Table 7.
Delay Value Level of
(sec/veh) Service
0 - 10 A
10 - 15 B
15 - 25 C
25 - 35 D
35 - 50 E
> 50 F
Table 7
HCM Level of Service as a Function of Approach Delay
STOP-sign Controlled Intersections
Note that the LOS and delay values for the all-way STOP sign controlled intersections, such as
the four-approach Duquesne Avenue and Braddock Drive, and the three-approach “tee”
intersection of Duquesne Avenue and Lucerne Avenue, represent the average delays and levels
of service for the intersection as a whole, while the LOS and delay values for two-way STOP
sign controlled “tee” intersections such as Washington Boulevard and Wesley Street, and
Washington Boulevard and Cattaraugus Avenue represent the highest individual intersection
approach delay and level of service.
Finally, it should be noted that the intersections of National Boulevard and Hayden Avenue
(intersection 27), and National Boulevard and Jefferson Boulevard (intersection 28) are currently
under construction as part of ongoing upgrades to the area roadway infrastructure as part of the
Metro’s Expo Line light rail project, or, independently by the City of Los Angeles. While the
|1010| Highway Capacity Manual, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2000.
ATTACHMENT 5
189
57
8770 WASHINGTON BOULEVARD MIXED-USE HIRSCH/GREEN TRANSPORTATION CONSULTING, INC.
REVISED JULY 2010
construction activities do not prohibit any of the allowable traffic movements at these locations, it
does reduce the number of travel lanes on National Boulevard generally between about Wesley
Street and Jefferson Boulevard (including at Hayden Avenue), and along Jefferson Boulevard in
the vicinity of National Boulevard. However, a review of the existing traffic volumes at these and
adjacent intersections indicates that the overall “throughput” of traffic at the affected
intersections is not significantly impaired, and as such, the CMA calculations of the operations
of the intersections is considered to accurately represent typical conditions, although it is noted
that the subject lane closures can result in temporary and transient increases in delays for
vehicles at these locations during periods of heavy demand.
By applying the appropriate analysis procedures, calculation methodologies, and operational
adjustments described in the preceding pages to each of the 34 study intersections, the
intersection CMA value and corresponding LOS for the “Existing” year 2010 traffic conditions
were calculated, as summarized in Table 8.
Int. Peak
No. Intersection Hour CMA LOS
1 Robertson Boulevard and AM 0.831 D
Cattaraugus Avenue
[1]
PM 0.823 D
2 Robertson Boulevard and AM 0.594 A
I-10 WB Off-Ramp/Kincardine Avenue
[1]
PM 0.676 B
3 Robertson Boulevard and AM 0.888 D
National Boulevard
[1]
PM 0.884 D
4 National Boulevard and AM 0.359 A
I-10 EB On-Ramp
[1]
PM 0.279 A
5 Venice Boulevard and AM 0.698 B
Hughes Avenue
[1]
PM 0.632 B
6 Venice Boulevard and AM 0.702 C
Bagley Avenue
[1]
PM 0.670 B
7 Venice Boulevard and AM 0.652 B
Culver Boulevard
[1]
PM 0.747 C
8 Venice Boulevard and AM 1.380 F
Robertson Boulevard
[1]
PM 1.322 F
Table 8
Critical Movement Analysis Summary
Existing (2010) Conditions
ATTACHMENT 5
190
58
8770 WASHINGTON BOULEVARD MIXED-USE HIRSCH/GREEN TRANSPORTATION CONSULTING, INC.
REVISED JULY 2010
Int. Peak
No. Intersection Hour CMA LOS
9 Venice Boulevard and AM 0.960 E
National Boulevard
[1]
PM 0.943 E
10 Venice Boulevard and AM 0.452 A
Helms Avenue
[1]
PM 0.475 A
11 Venice Boulevard and AM 0.733 C
Cattaraugus Avenue
[1]
PM 0.615 B
12 Venice Boulevard and AM 0.981 E
La Cienega Boulevard
[1]
PM 0.995 E
13 Washington Boulevard and AM 0.527 A
Hughes Avenue/Duquesne Avenue PM 0.571 A
14 Culver Boulevard and AM 0.563 A
Duquesne Avenue PM 0.643 B
15 Washington Boulevard and AM 0.492 A
Culver Boulevard, and Irving Place PM 0.526 A
16 Culver Boulevard and AM 0.494 A
Main Street PM 0.508 A
17 Washington Boulevard/Canfield Avenue and AM 0.561 A
Culver Boulevard PM 0.534 A
18 Washington Boulevard and AM 0.624 B
Robertson Boulevard/Higuera Street PM 0.525 A
19 Washington Boulevard and AM 0.557 A
Landmark Street PM 0.402 A
20 Washington Boulevard and AM 0.780 C
National Boulevard PM 0.714 C
21 Washington Boulevard and AM 0.649 B
[2]
Wesley Street PM 0.506 D
[2]
22 Washington Boulevard and AM 0.486 A
Helms Avenue PM 0.363 A
23 Washington Boulevard and AM 0.903 F
[2]
Cattaraugus Avenue PM 0.601 F
[2]
24 Washington Boulevard and AM 1.036 F
La Cienega Boulevard PM 0.871 D
Table 8 (continued)
Critical Movement Analysis Summary
Existing (2010) Conditions
ATTACHMENT 5
191
59
8770 WASHINGTON BOULEVARD MIXED-USE HIRSCH/GREEN TRANSPORTATION CONSULTING, INC.
REVISED JULY 2010
Int. Peak
No. Intersection Hour CMA LOS
25 La Cienega Boulevard and AM 0.950 E
Fairfax Avenue PM 0.802 D
26 National Boulevard and AM 0.580 A
Wesley Street PM 0.350 A
27 National Boulevard and AM 0.817 D
Hayden Avenue PM 0.608 B
28 National Boulevard and AM 0.689 B
Jefferson Boulevard
[1]
PM 1.025 F
29 Jefferson Boulevard and AM 1.069 F
La Cienega Boulevard
[1]
PM 1.048 F
30 Higuera Street/Rodeo Road and AM 0.731 C
Jefferson Boulevard
[1]
PM 0.669 B
31 Rodeo Road and AM 1.056 F
La Cienega Boulevard
[1]
PM 1.189 F
32 Duquesne Avenue and AM 1.056 F
[2]
Braddock Drive PM 1.182 F
[2]
33 Duquesne Avenue and AM 0.833 D
[2]
Lucerne Avenue PM 0.962 F
[2]
34 Hughes Avenue and AM 0.940 E
Jefferson Boulevard PM 0.823 D
Notes:
[1] City of Los Angeles intersection.
[2] Unsignalized intersection. LOS value determined using HCM methodology.
Table 8 (continued)
Critical Movement Analysis Summary
Existing (2010) Conditions
As shown in Table 8, most of the 34 study intersections currently operate at acceptable levels of
service for urban conditions (LOS A through LOS D), although 12 locations exhibit unacceptable
LOS E or LOS F operations during one or both of the peak hours (indicated in bold text). Of
those 12 locations, four intersections exhibit LOS E as the worst operating level (one peak hour
operates at LOS E, the other peak hour operates at LOS E or acceptable levels of service D or
better), while the eight remaining intersections show LOS F conditions during at least one of the
peak periods, five of which operate at LOS F conditions during both the AM and PM peak hours.
ATTACHMENT 5
192
60
8770 WASHINGTON BOULEVARD MIXED-USE HIRSCH/GREEN TRANSPORTATION CONSULTING, INC.
REVISED JULY 2010
The 12 intersections currently exhibiting LOS E or LOS F conditions are listed below:
o Venice Boulevard and Robertson Boulevard (LOS F AM and PM)
o Venice Boulevard and National Boulevard (LOS E AM and PM)
o Venice Boulevard and La Cienega Boulevard (LOS E AM and PM)
o Washington Boulevard and Cattaraugus Avenue (LOS F AM and PM)
o Washington Boulevard and La Cienega Boulevard (LOS E AM, LOS D PM)
o La Cienega Boulevard and Fairfax Avenue (LOS E AM, LOS D PM)
o National Boulevard and Jefferson Boulevard (LOS B AM, LOS F PM)
o Jefferson Boulevard and La Cienega Boulevard (LOS F AM and PM)
o Rodeo Road and La Cienega Boulevard (LOS F AM and PM)
o Duquesne Avenue and Braddock Drive (LOS F AM and PM)
o Duquesne Avenue and Lucerne Avenue(LOS D AM, LOS F PM)
o Duquesne Avenue and Jefferson Boulevard (LOS E AM, LOS D PM)
Most of these congested intersections are located along key transportation corridors through the
area, and as such, exhibit high traffic demands not only during the peak hours but throughout
much of the day as well. It is of note that three of the “LOS F” intersections are STOP sign
controlled locations, potentially indicating a need for installation of a traffic signal or additional
lanes to add capacity to one or more approaches to address the rather substantial delays
encountered at these intersections. This is particularly true of the two all-way STOP sign
controlled intersections along Duquesne Avenue; at Braddock Drive, and Lucerne Avenue.
These two locations generally provide only one lane per approach, but carry substantial
commute period traffic in both directions between Culver Boulevard and Jefferson Boulevard,
resulting in long vehicle queues and delays for each of the intersection approaches.
However, the third STOP sign controlled location exhibiting LOS F operations is the intersection
of Washington Boulevard and Cattaraugus Avenue, which consists of two somewhat offset “tee”
intersections, each STOP sign controlled only along the Cattaraugus Avenue approaches.
Unlike the all-way STOP sign controlled intersections along Duquesne Avenue, the LOS F
conditions at Washington Boulevard and Cattaraugus are the result of vehicular delays along
the northbound and southbound STOP sign controlled approaches of Cattaraugus Avenue, as
vehicles attempt to turn left or cross through relatively heavy Washington Boulevard traffic,
which does not stop at this intersection. A review of the intersection operations evaluation
ATTACHMENT 5
193
61
8770 WASHINGTON BOULEVARD MIXED-USE HIRSCH/GREEN TRANSPORTATION CONSULTING, INC.
REVISED JULY 2010
worksheets contained in Appendix E of this report indicates that no substantial delays are
encountered by the east-west Washington Boulevard through traffic at this location, and the
levels of service for both of the Washington Boulevard approaches are LOS A or LOS B during
both the AM and PM peak hours. As a result, the overall assessment of LOS F conditions for
this intersection is somewhat misleading.
Future (Year 2013) Traffic Conditions
Future (year 2013) traffic volumes in the project vicinity, and indeed throughout the region, are
anticipated to increase as a result of a number of factors, although two factors contribute most
significantly to area traffic growth. The first of these factors is simply ambient increases in the
number of vehicles on the roadway system. Ambient traffic growth occurs for a number of
reasons; increasing population (not tied to specific developments), additional vehicles for
existing households (as children become driving age, or new multi-vehicle status for current
single-vehicle families), economic factors such as new jobs creating new worker trips, and other
factors. The second factor is new traffic resulting from on going and continued development. A
number of other projects are currently either under construction or planned for development in
the project vicinity which will likely contribute to future traffic volumes in the study area.
Therefore, since the project is not expected to be built and occupied immediately, its traffic, and
consequently, the impacts of that traffic, will occur on a roadway system that is accommodating
more traffic than indicated in the discussion of “Existing (2010)” conditions. For this reason, the
analysis of future traffic conditions has been expanded to include potential traffic volume
increases expected from both ambient growth and from traffic generated by projects that have
not yet been developed. These “Future (2013) Without Project” volumes represent the forecast
traffic conditions in the study area at the time the project is expected to be completed, but prior
to its occupancy, and form the “baseline” conditions against which the project’s incremental
traffic additions (calculated earlier) are assessed.
Without Project Traffic Forecasts
Briefly, the methodology for estimating future traffic volumes was as follows: First, as described
in a preceding section of this report, the current (year 2010) traffic volumes were determined by
traffic counts. These existing volumes were then used to estimate future conditions (year 2013)
through the application of an “ambient traffic growth factor”. This growth factor, compounded
annually, was applied to all of the turning movement volumes at the study intersections to form
ATTACHMENT 5
194
62
8770 WASHINGTON BOULEVARD MIXED-USE HIRSCH/GREEN TRANSPORTATION CONSULTING, INC.
REVISED JULY 2010
the "baseline" traffic volume conditions for the future study year 2013. Although the annual
growth factor is expected to fully represent all potential area traffic increases, for the purposes
of conservative analysis, traffic generated from nearby “related projects” was also added to
these future baseline traffic volumes, to form the basis for the “Without Project” conditions.
Ambient Traffic Growth
Based on analyses of the trends in traffic growth in the study area over the last several years,
the City Traffic Engineer has determined that an annual traffic growth factor of 1.0 percent is
reasonable. In fact, as documented in the Los Angeles County Congestion Management
Program (CMP), actual anticipated traffic growth in the “Westside” area encompassing and
surrounding the study vicinity, is forecast to be approximately 0.80 to 0.85 percent annually,
inclusive of both ambient growth and traffic from cumulative area development, and as such, the
assumed 1.0 percent annual growth factor is expected to be quite conservative. This “ambient
traffic growth factor” is used to account for expected increases in traffic resulting from general
ambient traffic growth in the study vicinity due to ongoing regional population growth, or from
potential development projects not yet proposed or outside of the study area. The ambient
growth factor, compounded annually, was applied to the 2010 traffic volumes to develop
estimates of the future traffic volumes for the future year 2013 conditions.
Related Projects
In addition to the 1.0 percent annual traffic growth rate used for this study, a listing of specific
projects located within the study area – an approximately 1.5-mile radius from the project site –
was obtained from the Culver City Planning Department, the City of Los Angeles Planning
Department, Los Angeles County Department of Regional Planning, LADOT files, and various
other sources including recently prepared or approved traffic studies of other developments in
the project vicinity and field surveys of the area. Additionally, a field survey of the study area
was conducted to identify any other potential developments not on the list. As noted previously,
the 1.0 percent annual ambient traffic growth factor is expected to adequately represent all area
traffic growth within the study period, and as such, the inclusion of traffic due to specific projects
in the study area in addition to the assumed ambient background traffic growth may tend to
overstate cumulative conditions. However, the methodology applied in this study includes all
foreseeable traffic increases in the area during the forecast period, and the “worst case” future
intersection conditions resulting from this approach assure that any potential intersection
capacity or travel corridor deficiencies are identified and addressed.
ATTACHMENT 5
195
63
8770 WASHINGTON BOULEVARD MIXED-USE HIRSCH/GREEN TRANSPORTATION CONSULTING, INC.
REVISED JULY 2010
Using these assumptions as guidelines, a review of the various project lists, plus the field survey
information, indicated that a total of 42 individual projects near the project site might produce
additional traffic at study intersections. Potential traffic generated by these other prospective
area developments was added to the assumed 1.0 percent annual ambient traffic growth to
produce the estimates of the future 2013 study year traffic volumes. The locations of the 42
identified related projects identified in this analysis are shown in Figure 12, and each project is
individually listed and described in Table 9.
Estimates of the traffic expected to be generated by these related projects were determined by
applying the appropriate trip generation rates and equations from the same 8
th
Edition ITE Trip
Generation publication used to estimate project traffic, or were obtained from specific related
project records or studies. The related project trip estimates are summarized in Table 10, while
the trip generation rates and equations used in the calculations contained in Table 10 (where
specific trip generation information was not available) are contained in Appendix A.
The related projects’ traffic volumes shown in Table 10 were then distributed through the study
area and assigned to the roadway and freeway network using assumptions and methodologies
similar to those used to assign the proposed project’s trips. The results of the related projects’
trip assignments through each of the 34 study intersections are shown in Figure 13(a) for the
AM peak hour conditions and in Figure 13(b) for the PM peak hour conditions.
It should be noted that a review of the anticipated related projects’ traffic shown in Figures 13(a)
and 13(b) reveals that several of the study intersections are expected to exhibit reductions in
traffic volumes for one or more intersection movements; these reductions are noted as negative
numbers in the graphics. The reductions in traffic movement volumes are the result of the
expected future operations of the Expo Line project in the study area. Based on a comparison
of the forecast “without” and “with” Expo Line project traffic conditions contained in that project’s
DEIR and FEIR documents, the actual incremental effects of the proposed Expo Line project on
the area streets and study intersections were determined. These results indicated that the
proposed Expo Line project is expected to result in both additional trips within the study area, as
well as a redistribution of existing trips on the area roadway system. The “new” trips to the area
are the result of park-and-ride or kiss-and-ride Expo Line passengers traveling into and out of
the study area to and from the new station locations, although the effects of these new trips are
expected to be localized near the stations and their associated parking lots.
ATTACHMENT 5
196ATTACHMENT 5
197
65
8770 WASHINGTON BOULEVARD MIXED-USE HIRSCH/GREEN TRANSPORTATION CONSULTING, INC.
REVISED JULY 2010
Map
No. Land Use/Description Address
1. Office/Post Production
[1]
100,000 sq. ft. 10202 Washington Boulevard
2. Gas Station 10638 Culver Boulevard
Car Wash 1 bay
Convenience Store 1,500 sq. ft.
Gas Station w/Convenience Mart
3. Live/Work Lofts 3 units 10839 Washington Boulevard
4. Mixed-Use 11281 Washington Boulevard
Apartments and Retail 17,500 sq. ft.
5. Warehouse 7,014 sq. ft. 3434 Wesley Street
Office 3,528 sq. ft.
6. Townhomes 15 units 3823 - 3833 Huron Avenue
Townhomes 3 units
7. Condominium 4 units 3846 Bentley Avenue
8. Condominium 5 units 3862 Huron Avenue
9. Condominium 2 units 3873 Bentley Avenue
10. School 43,950 sq. ft. 3939 Landmark Street
Studio 37,200 sq. ft.
11. Hotel 77 room 3954 Sepulveda Boulevard
12. Condominium 4 units 3972 Tilden Avenue
13. Condoninium 4 units 4014 Van Buren Place
14. Apartment 26 units 4043 Irving Place
Office 3,380 sq. ft.
15. Condominium 3 units 4048 Lincoln Avenue
16. Condominium 4 units 4058 Madison Avenue
17. Apartment 6 units 4139 and 4145 Duquesne Avenue
18. Condominium 6 units 4227 Ince Boulevard
19. Condominium 2 units 4228 Madison Avenue
n/a
n/a
Size/Units
Table 9
Related Projects Descriptions
ATTACHMENT 5
198
66
8770 WASHINGTON BOULEVARD MIXED-USE HIRSCH/GREEN TRANSPORTATION CONSULTING, INC.
REVISED JULY 2010
Map
No. Land Use/Description Address
20. Mixed-Use 8511 Warner Drive
Retail 41,520 sq. ft
Restaurant 10,000 sq. ft
21. Office 63,679 sq. ft. 8665 Hayden Place
22. School Remodel/Addition 9,000 sq. ft. 8794 National
23. Mixed-Use 9300 Culver Boulevard
Office 65,335 sq. ft.
Restaurant 23,580 sq. ft.
Retail 23,580 sq. ft.
24. Condominium 5 units 9650 Lucerne Avenue
25. Office 5,457 sq. ft. 9900 Culver Boulevard
Condominium 18 units
26. Office 113,467 sq. ft. 9919 Jefferson Boulevard
27. Mixed-Use (Triangle Site) NWC Washington Boulevard and
Apartment 200 units National Boulevard
Hotel 149 room
Office 200,000 sq. ft.
Retail 51,500 sq. ft.
Restaurant 20,000 sq. ft.
28. Baldwin Hills Scenic Overlook Park 58 acres Hetzler Road
29. West LA Community College 9000 Overland Avenue
30. Mixed-Use 9901 Washington Boulevard
Apartment 131 units
Retail 12,178 sq. ft.
31. Le Lycee Francais High School 340 students 10309 W. National Boulevard
32. Expo Light Rail Station
[1],[2]
Venice Boulevard/National Boulevard
33. Apartments 85 units 3417 Motor Avenue
Retail 2,000 sq. ft.
34. Apartments 20 units 10329 Palms Boulevard
Retail 9,000 sq. ft.
Master Plan
Size/Units
Table 9 (continued)
Related Projects Descriptions
ATTACHMENT 5
199
67
8770 WASHINGTON BOULEVARD MIXED-USE HIRSCH/GREEN TRANSPORTATION CONSULTING, INC.
REVISED JULY 2010
Map
No. Land Use/Description Address
35. Apartments 36 units 3707 Motor Avenue
Single Family Dwelling 1 units
36. Apartments 40 units 3706 Overland Avenue
37. Apartments 118 units 10001 Venice Boulevard
38. Mixed-Use
[3]
8810 - 8850 Washington Boulevard
Apartment 134 units
Retail 27,000 sq. ft.
39. Mixed-Use ("The Palms")
[4]
10601 Washington Boulevard
Apartment 132 units
Office 26,000 sq. ft.
Retail 18,000 sq. ft.
Office 11,108 sq. ft.
40. Auto Repair Shop 1,196 sq. ft 11167 Washington Place
41. Bus Maintenance Facility
[5]
175 buses 5848 Jefferson Boulevard
42. Mixed-Use
[6]
SEC Jefferson Boulevard and
Office 69,688 sq. ft. National Boulevard
Light Industrial 162,607 sq. ft.
Warehouse 3,285 sq. ft.
Note:
Uses identified in italics are to be removed.
Sources:
[1]
Draft Traffic Impact Study for Washington-National Specific Plan, Culver City, California , March 23, 2007, Katz, Okitsu & Associates.
[2]
Mid-City/Exposition LRT Project Final EIS/EIR , Los Angeles Metropolitan Transportation Authority/U.S. Department of Transportation,
Federal Transit Administration, October 2005.
[3]
Per Draft Memorandum of Understanding with the City of Culver City, August 2008, Hirsch/Green Transportation Consulting, Inc.
[4]
Per LADOT Site Plan Review Memorandum, October 27, 2008.
[5]
Traffic Impact Study for Bus Maintenance Facility, July 2004, Overland Traffic Consultants, Inc.
yp
[6]
Traffic Study for the Samitaur Development, October 1998, Kaku Associates, Inc. (Phases B through E only)
Table 9 (continued)
Related Projects Descriptions
Size/Units
ATTACHMENT 5
200
68
8770 WASHINGTON BOULEVARD MIXED-USE HIRSCH/GREEN TRANSPORTATION CONSULTING, INC.
REVISED JULY 2010
Map
No. Land Use/Description Daily In Out In Out
1. Office/Post Production 100,000 sq. ft. 11,401 1,412 193 262 1,281
2. Gas Station 125 55 00
Car Wash 1 bay
Convenience Store 1,500 sq. ft.
Gas Station w/Convenience Mart
3. Live/Work Lofts 3 units 18 0 1 1 1
4. Mixed-Use
Apartments and Retail 17,500 sq. ft. 751 11 7 32 34
5. Warehouse 7,014 sq. ft. 35 2 1 1 2
Office 3,528 sq. ft. 39 4 1 1 4
74 62 26
6. Townhomes 15 units 88 1 6 5 3
Townhomes 3 units 18 0 1 1 1
70 15 42
7. Condominium 4 units 23 0 2 1 1
8. Condominium 5 units 29 0 2 2 1
9. Condominium 2 units 12 0 1 1 0
10. School 43,950 sq. ft. 531 105 85 9 11
Studio 37,200 sq. ft.
11. Hotel 77 room 629 26 17 24 21
12. Condominium 4 units 23 0 2 1 1
13. Condoninium 4 units 23 0 2 1 1
14. Apartment 26 units 175 3 10 10 6
Office 3,380 sq. ft. 37 4 1 1 4
212 7 11 11 10
15. Condominium 3 units 18 0 1 1 1
16. Condominium 4 units 23 0 2 1 1
17. Apartment 6 units 40 1 2 3 1
18. Condominium 6 units 35 1 2 2 1
n/a
n/a
Size/Units
AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
Table 10
Related Projects Trip Generation Estimates
ATTACHMENT 5
201
69
8770 WASHINGTON BOULEVARD MIXED-USE HIRSCH/GREEN TRANSPORTATION CONSULTING, INC.
REVISED JULY 2010
Map
No. Land Use/Description Daily In Out In Out
19. Condominium 2 units 12 0 1 1 0
20. Mixed-Use
Retail 41,520 sq. ft 1,840 33 22 50 63
Restaurant 10,000 sq. ft 1,272 60 55 66 43
3,112 93 77 116 106
21. Office 63,679 sq. ft. 701 87 12 16 79
22. School Remodel/Addition 9,000 sq. ft. 130 23 19 12 16
23. Mixed-Use
Office 65,335 sq. ft. 719 89 12 16 81
Restaurant 23,580 sq. ft. 2,998 141 131 157 100
Retail 23,580 sq. ft. 1,045 19 12 28 36
4,762 249 155 201 217
24. Condominium 5 units 29 0 2 2 1
25. Office 5,457 sq. ft. 60 7 1 1 7
Condominium 18 units 105 1 7 6 3
165 8 8 7 10
26. Office 113,467 sq. ft. 1,249 155 21 29 140
27. Mixed-Use (Triangle Site)
Apartment 200 units 1,344 20 82 81 43
Hotel 149 room 1,217 51 32 47 41
Office 200,000 sq. ft. 2,202 273 37 51 247
Retail 51,500 sq. ft. 2,282 41 27 62 78
Restaurant 20,000 sq. ft. 1,799 9 7 101 49
8,844 394 185 342 458
28. Baldwin Hills Scenic Overlook Park 58 acres 446 8 60
29. West LA Community College 6,785 436 45 300 133
30. Mixed-Use
Apartment 131 units 880 13 54 53 28
Retail 12,178 sq. ft. 540 10 6 15 18
1,420 2360 6846
Table 10 (continued)
Related Projects Trip Generation Estimates
Size/Units
AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
---- nominal ----
Master Plan
ATTACHMENT 5
202
70
8770 WASHINGTON BOULEVARD MIXED-USE HIRSCH/GREEN TRANSPORTATION CONSULTING, INC.
REVISED JULY 2010
Map
No. Land Use/Description Daily In Out In Out
31. Le Lycee Francais High School 340 students 722 122 55 23 25
32. Expo Light Rail Station 1,500 243 27 21 189
33. Apartments 85 units 571 9 34 34 19
Retail 2,000 sq. ft. 89 1 1 2 3
660 10 35 36 22
34. Apartments 20 units 134 2 8 8 4
Retail 9,000 sq. ft. 399 7 4 11 13
533 9 12 19 17
35. Apartments 36 units 242 4 14 14 8
Single Family Dwelling 1 units 10 0 1 1 0
232 4 13 13 8
36. Apartments 40 units 269 4 16 16 9
37. Apartments 118 units 793 12 48 47 26
38. Mixed-Use 1,771 2659 8970
Apartment 134 units
Retail 27,000 sq. ft.
39. Mixed-Use ("The Palms") 2,050 81 69 103 148
Apartment 132 units
Office 26,000 sq. ft.
Retail 18,000 sq. ft.
Office 11,108 sq. ft.
40. Auto Repair Shop 1,196 sq. ft 42 3 1 2 2
41. Bus Maintenance Facility 175 buses 1,666 67 40 77 26
42. Mixed-Use 2,494 293 38 53 308
Office 69,688 sq. ft.
Light Industrial 162,607 sq. ft.
Warehouse 3,285 sq. ft.
Note:
Uses identified in italics are to be removed.
Size/Units
AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
Table 10 (continued)
Related Projects Trip Generation Estimates
ATTACHMENT 5
203ATTACHMENT 5
204ATTACHMENT 5
205
73
8770 WASHINGTON BOULEVARD MIXED-USE HIRSCH/GREEN TRANSPORTATION CONSULTING, INC.
REVISED JULY 2010
The development of the Expo Line is also expected to produce a change in travel habits for
some residents of the surrounding community, as current drivers switch from travel modes from
automobile use to the newly-constructed light rail facilities. This change of travel mode will likely
eliminate some vehicle trips altogether. However, besides changes in the number of actual
vehicles traveling to the Expo Line station and parking facilities, the availability of this new
transit service is also expected to result in a change in travel patterns of some area drivers, as
former (existing) typical commute traffic vehicles change destinations to use the new Expo Line
stations’ associated parking and/or drop-off/pick-up areas. Therefore, although the Expo Line
project is not expected to result in overall reductions in area trips, the anticipated reassignment
in destination locations for some vehicles is expected to result in reductions in the existing and
forecast traffic volumes for some moves at some of the study intersections, as indicated in
Figures 13(a) and 13(b). These reductions represent vehicle trips which currently exhibit typical
commute travel patterns diverting from their existing travel routes to access the nearby Expo
Line facilities, or are representative of actual reductions in vehicle trips as a result of drivers
switching travel modes from automobile to light rail transit service.
Highway System Improvements
A number of significant highway improvements within the immediate study area were identified
by the City of Culver City Traffic Engineer, generally connected with the development of the
Metro’s Expo Line light rail project and its planned local station near Venice Boulevard and
Robertson Boulevard (related project number 32). These improvements are identified in the
Final EIS/EIR for the Expo Line project|1010| either as part of the project itself (necessary roadway
realignments/improvements to accommodate the new light rail tracks and/or stations), or as
mitigation measures to address the anticipated impacts of the project’s traffic.
The Metro Expo Line area roadway improvements identified in that project’s EIS/EIR, and
confirmed by the City of Culver City Traffic Engineer, are as follows:
o La Cienega Boulevard and Jefferson Boulevard – Modify the existing eastbound-
westbound traffic signal operations at this intersection to provide permissive left-turn
phasing (no changes to the intersection lane configurations are anticipated).
o La Cienega Boulevard and Rodeo Road – Reconfigure westbound Rodeo Road to
provide dual left-turn lanes, two through lanes, and an exclusive right-turn only lane.
|1010| Mid-City/Exposition LRT Project Final EIS/EIR, Los Angeles Metropolitan Transportation Authority/U. S. Department
of Transportation, Federal Transit Administration, October 2005.
ATTACHMENT 5
206
74
8770 WASHINGTON BOULEVARD MIXED-USE HIRSCH/GREEN TRANSPORTATION CONSULTING, INC.
REVISED JULY 2010
o Jefferson Boulevard and National Boulevard – Reconstruct the existing intersection to
provide a new northbound left-turn lane from Jefferson Boulevard to westbound National
Boulevard (this move is currently prohibited) along with two northbound through lanes,
and one new exclusive right-turn only lane (to a private driveway); reconfigure the
southbound (westbound) approach of Jefferson Boulevard to provide one left-turn lane
(to the private driveway), one through lane, and one exclusive right-turn lane (from
Jefferson Boulevard to westbound National Boulevard); and reconfigure eastbound
National Boulevard to provide two “through” lanes (to eastbound/northbound Jefferson
Boulevard, including access to the private driveway opposite National Boulevard), and
one exclusive right-turn only lane (to southbound Jefferson Boulevard).
o Washington Boulevard and National Boulevard – Reconfigure the westbound approach
of Washington Boulevard to convert the existing right-turn only lane to a shared
through/right-turn lane, in addition to the existing left-turn lane and two through lanes.
o Venice Boulevard between Robertson Boulevard/Exposition Boulevard and Ivy Street –
Widen the north side of Venice Boulevard from approximately 500 feet west of
Robertson Boulevard/Exposition Boulevard to Ivy Street (two blocks east of National
Boulevard), and widen the south side of Venice Boulevard from approximately 500 feet
west of Robertson Boulevard/Exposition Boulevard to Exposition Boulevard, including
reconfiguration of the median islands. The programmed widenings do not result in any
substantial changes in lane configurations/operations from the existing conditions at the
intersection of Venice Boulevard and Robertson Boulevard/Exposition Boulevard.
o Venice Boulevard and National Boulevard – In addition to the Venice Boulevard
widenings described above, reconfigure both the eastbound and westbound approaches
of Venice Boulevard at National Boulevard to provide dual left-turn lanes, three through
lanes, and an exclusive right-turn only lane (the addition of a second left-turn lane and a
right-turn lane in both directions).
o National Boulevard and Hayden Avenue – To compliment the improvements to National
Boulevard between Hayden Avenue and Jefferson Boulevard, modify the existing raised
median along National Boulevard to install a new eastbound right-turn only lane.
In addition to these Metro Expo Line-related improvements, the City of Culver City is also
planning several general traffic circulation roadway improvements within the study area; these
additional City-sponsored improvements are described in the following paragraphs.
ATTACHMENT 5
207
75
8770 WASHINGTON BOULEVARD MIXED-USE HIRSCH/GREEN TRANSPORTATION CONSULTING, INC.
REVISED JULY 2010
o Washington Boulevard and Higuera Street/Robertson Boulevard – The City has
identified an improvement to restripe northbound Higuera Street at this intersection to
convert the existing shared through/right-turn lane to an exclusive right-turn only lane, in
addition to the existing left-turn lane and remaining (one) through lane on this approach;
the north leg of this intersection will also be restriped to remove the northbound lane line.
o National Boulevard between Venice Boulevard and Washington Boulevard – As part of
its proposed “Triangle Site” transit-oriented development project, located along the west
side of National Boulevard between Venice Boulevard and Washington Boulevard, the
City intends dedicate and widen the west side of National Boulevard along this segment
of the roadway by 10 feet, to provide a future 72-foot wide roadway. Additionally, this
portion of National Boulevard will be restriped to remove all existing on-street parking in
order to accommodate the installation of new bicycle lanes along both sides of the
street, although no changes to the existing number of travel lanes is proposed.
The roadway/intersection improvements described above will improve the overall capacity of the
existing roadway network in the study area, but are not, in general, expected to substantially
alter the current travel patterns through the area. However, the construction of the new
northbound left-turn lane at National Boulevard and Jefferson Boulevard, and the anticipated
closure of Helms Avenue between Venice Boulevard and Washington Boulevard, will result in
localized changes to area circulation patterns. The effect of the provision of a new northbound
left-turn lane from Jefferson Boulevard to westbound National Boulevard are included in the
“net” traffic changes associated with the construction of the Expo Line, and are described in
detail in the EIS/EIR for that project. The analyses of “related projects” contained in this
document takes the net Expo Line traffic effects directly from the EIS/EIR, and as such, the
associated diversions in traffic are intrinsically included in the traffic volumes and assignments
for the Expo Line project (related project number 32) used in this report.
In addition to these near-term improvements, all of which are anticipated to be completed by the
2013 study year, there are several other regional improvements being evaluated for the project
vicinity, including improvements to the Santa Monica (I-10) Freeway ramps at Robertson
Boulevard/Exposition Boulevard, auxiliary lane improvements to the Santa Monica Freeway
itself, and improvements to the nearby Santa Monica/San Diego (I-405) Freeway interchange.
However, these improvements are currently only in the preliminary stages, and as such, are not
anticipated to be completed within the study timeline, and were therefore not assumed as future
conditions. It should also be noted that some or all of the related projects identified in this
ATTACHMENT 5
208
76
8770 WASHINGTON BOULEVARD MIXED-USE HIRSCH/GREEN TRANSPORTATION CONSULTING, INC.
REVISED JULY 2010
analysis may be required to implement localized roadway and/or intersection improvements to
mitigate specific traffic impacts from those individual projects, although since many of these
projects are currently only in the conceptual stage and, specific traffic impacts for these projects
have not been identified, no such cumulative “mitigation” improvements are assumed.
Therefore, the “Future (2013) Without Project” condition traffic volumes for this analysis were
estimated by combining the assumed 1.0 percent annual ambient traffic growth in the area with
new traffic generated by the potential cumulative development in the vicinity of the project site.
This process also included adjustments to the future area traffic patterns and volumes to
account for the effects of the new northbound left-turn capability at Jefferson Boulevard and
National Boulevard (as described earlier), and for the anticipated redistribution of some existing
traffic from its normal “commute” path to the proposed Expo Line stations and parking facilities
in the vicinity, as drivers change travel modes from single-occupancy vehicles to use the new
Expo Line transit facilities, as identified in the Expo Line Final EIS/EIR traffic analyses. Note,
however, that no specific adjustments were incorporated to account for any potential reduction
in areawide traffic as a result of the new Expo Line ridership.
The resulting AM and PM peak hour traffic estimates for the forecast “Future (2013) Without
Project” conditions are shown in Figures 14(a) and 14(b), respectively. These pre-project
condition traffic estimates form the "benchmark" values for determining the proposed project’s
potential traffic impacts at the nearby intersections and on the surrounding street system.
Finally, the net traffic volumes generated by the proposed project, calculated earlier in this
report, and shown in Figures 8(a) and 8(b), for the AM and PM peak hours, respectively, were
then combined with these benchmark “Without Project” traffic volumes to produce the forecast
“Future (2013) With Project" traffic volume estimates, which are shown Figure 15(a) for the AM
peak hour and Figure 15(b) for the PM peak hour conditions.
Analysis of Future (Year 2013) Traffic Conditions
The future year 2013 “Without Project” traffic volumes shown in Figures 14(a) and 14(b), and
the “With Project” traffic volumes shown in Figures 15(a) and 15(b) were then evaluated using
the same CMA analysis procedures described earlier in this report. As described earlier, the
analysis of these forecast future conditions assumed that the area roadway network would be
modified with the ongoing or proposed intersection improvements at the locations identified in
the preceding pages (La Cienega Boulevard and Jefferson Boulevard; La Cienega Boulevard
ATTACHMENT 5
209ATTACHMENT 5
210ATTACHMENT 5
211ATTACHMENT 5
212ATTACHMENT 5
213
81
8770 WASHINGTON BOULEVARD MIXED-USE HIRSCH/GREEN TRANSPORTATION CONSULTING, INC.
REVISED JULY 2010
and Rodeo Road; Jefferson Boulevard and National Boulevard; Washington Boulevard and
National Boulevard; Venice Boulevard and Robertson Boulevard/Exposition Boulevard, Venice
Boulevard and National Boulevard; National Boulevard and Hayden Avenue; Washington
Boulevard and Higuera Street/Robertson Boulevard, and National Boulevard between Venice
Boulevard and Washington Boulevard), although the existing intersection geometries and signal
operations at the remaining study intersections and area streets were assumed to remain
unchanged from the “existing” conditions.
The result of the analysis of the forecast future traffic conditions in the study area are
summarized in Table 11. The intersection CMA and LOS values shown in Table 11 for the
“With Project” conditions were then compared against the “Without Project” conditions to
determine the locations, time periods, and magnitudes of any incremental traffic impacts directly
attributable to the proposed project, as described in detail later in this report.
Int. Peak
No. Intersection Hour CMA LOS CMA LOS
1 Robertson Boulevard and AM 0.936 E 0.938 E 0.002
Cattaraugus Avenue
[1]
PM 0.883 D 0.887 D 0.004
2 Robertson Boulevard and AM 0.947 E 0.949 E 0.002
I-10 WB Off-Ramp/Kincardine Avenue
[1]
PM 0.855 D 0.859 D 0.004
3 Robertson Boulevard and AM 1.072 F 1.072 F 0.000
National Boulevard
[1]
PM 1.066 F 1.071 F 0.005
4 National Boulevard and AM 0.461 A 0.461 A 0.000
I-10 EB On-Ramp
[1]
PM 0.526 A 0.526 A 0.000
5 Venice Boulevard and AM 0.807 D 0.809 D 0.002
Hughes Avenue
[1]
PM 0.710 C 0.715 C 0.005
6 Venice Boulevard and AM 0.763 C 0.766 C 0.003
Bagley Avenue
[1]
PM 0.749 C 0.754 C 0.005
7 Venice Boulevard and AM 0.966 E 0.969 E 0.003
Culver Boulevard
[1]
PM 1.019 F 1.024 F 0.005
8 Venice Boulevard and AM 1.647 F 1.659 F 0.012 *
Robertson Boulevard
[1]
PM 1.673 F 1.693 F 0.020 *
Impact
With Project
Table 11
Critical Movement Analysis Summary
Future (2013) Without and With Project Conditions
Project
Without
ATTACHMENT 5
214
82
8770 WASHINGTON BOULEVARD MIXED-USE HIRSCH/GREEN TRANSPORTATION CONSULTING, INC.
REVISED JULY 2010
Int. Peak
No. Intersection Hour CMA LOS CMA LOS
9 Venice Boulevard and AM 1.069 F 1.083 F 0.014 *
National Boulevard
[1]
PM 1.281 F 1.293 F 0.012 *
10 Venice Boulevard and AM 0.545 A 0.549 A 0.004
Helms Avenue
[1]
PM 0.559 A 0.559 A 0.000
11 Venice Boulevard and AM 0.835 D 0.853 D 0.018
Cattaraugus Avenue
[1]
PM 0.704 C 0.734 C 0.030
12 Venice Boulevard and AM 1.105 F 1.107 F 0.002
La Cienega Boulevard
[1]
PM 1.091 F 1.099 F 0.008
13 Washington Boulevard and AM 0.769 C 0.771 C 0.002
Hughes Avenue/Duquesne Avenue PM 0.807 D 0.810 D 0.003
14 Culver Boulevard and AM 0.686 B 0.688 B 0.002
Duquesne Avenue PM 0.727 C 0.731 C 0.004
15 Washington Boulevard and AM 0.723 C 0.726 C 0.003
Culver Boulevard, and Irving Place PM 0.787 C 0.792 C 0.005
16 Culver Boulevard and AM 0.674 B 0.676 B 0.002
Main Street PM 0.670 B 0.675 B 0.005
17 Washington Boulevard/Canfield Avenue and AM 0.790 C 0.792 C 0.002
Culver Boulevard PM 0.875 D 0.879 D 0.004
18 Washington Boulevard and AM 0.832 D 0.835 D 0.003
Robertson Boulevard/Higuera Street PM 0.681 B 0.685 B 0.004
19 Washington Boulevard and AM 0.769 C 0.772 C 0.003
Landmark Street PM 0.554 A 0.562 A 0.008
20 Washington Boulevard and AM 0.940 E 0.962 E 0.022 *
National Boulevard PM 0.904 E 0.921 E 0.017
21 Washington Boulevard and AM 0.722 F
[2]
0.754 F
[2]
0.032 *
Wesley Street PM 0.579 F
[2]
0.703 F
[2]
0.124 *
22 Washington Boulevard and AM 0.536 A 0.543 A 0.007
Helms Avenue PM 0.409 A 0.439 A 0.030
23 Washington Boulevard and AM 0.973 F
[2]
1.006 F
[2]
0.033 *
Cattaraugus Avenue PM 0.669 F
[2]
0.800 F
[2]
0.131 *
24 Washington Boulevard and AM 1.110 F 1.117 F 0.007
La Cienega Boulevard PM 0.945 E 0.955 E 0.010
Impact
With Project
Table 11 (continued)
Critical Movement Analysis Summary
Future (2013) Without and With Project Conditions
Project
Without
ATTACHMENT 5
215
83
8770 WASHINGTON BOULEVARD MIXED-USE HIRSCH/GREEN TRANSPORTATION CONSULTING, INC.
REVISED JULY 2010
Int. Peak
No. Intersection Hour CMA LOS CMA LOS
25 La Cienega Boulevard and AM 1.090 F 1.090 F 0.000
Fairfax Avenue PM 0.911 E 0.911 E 0.000
26 National Boulevard and AM 0.622 B 0.627 B 0.005
Wesley Street PM 0.430 A 0.440 A 0.010
27 National Boulevard and AM 0.647 B 0.651 B 0.004
Hayden Avenue PM 0.702 C 0.709 C 0.007
28 National Boulevard and AM 1.012 F 1.020 F 0.008
Jefferson Boulevard
[1]
PM 0.912 E 0.914 E 0.002
29 Jefferson Boulevard and AM 1.222 F 1.227 F 0.005
La Cienega Boulevard
[1]
PM 1.171 F 1.178 F 0.007
30 Higuera Street/Rodeo Road and AM 0.814 D 0.814 D 0.000
Jefferson Boulevard
[1]
PM 0.727 C 0.732 C 0.005
31 Rodeo Road and AM 1.185 F 1.187 F 0.002
La Cienega Boulevard
[1]
PM 1.220 F 1.223 F 0.003
32 Duquesne Avenue and AM 1.147 F
[2]
1.148 F
[2]
0.001
Braddock Drive PM 1.268 F
[2]
1.270 F
[2]
0.002
33 Duquesne Avenue and AM 0.921 F
[2]
0.924 F
[2]
0.003
Lucerne Avenue PM 1.051 F
[2]
1.055 F
[2]
0.004
34 Hughes Avenue and AM 1.081 F 1.085 F 0.004
Jefferson Boulevard PM 0.985 E 0.989 E 0.004
Notes:
[1] City of Los Angeles intersection.
[2] Unsignalized intersection. LOS value determined using HCM methodology.
"*" Indicates significant impact per City of Culver City criteria.
"*" Indicates significant impact per City of Los Angeles (LADOT) criteria.
Impact
With Project
Table 11 (continued)
Critical Movement Analysis Summary
Future (2013) Without and With Project Conditions
Project
Without
As indicated by the “Without Project” values shown in Table 11, ambient traffic growth and
expected traffic increases from other ongoing or proposed development in and around the study
area will result in a general worsening of traffic conditions throughout the study area by the year
2013, and although many of the study intersections will continue to operate at acceptable levels
of service (LOS A through LOS D), a total of 18 of the 34 study locations are forecast to exhibit
LOS E or LOS F operations during one or both of the peak hours (again indicated by bold type),
ATTACHMENT 5
216
84
8770 WASHINGTON BOULEVARD MIXED-USE HIRSCH/GREEN TRANSPORTATION CONSULTING, INC.
REVISED JULY 2010
six more than under existing (year 2010) conditions; Robertson Boulevard and Cattaraugus
Avenue, Robertson Boulevard and the I-10 Freeway Westbound Off-Ramp/Kincardine Avenue,
Robertson Boulevard and National Boulevard, Venice Boulevard and Culver Boulevard,
Washington Boulevard and National Boulevard, and Washington Boulevard and Wesley Street.
Further, of the 18 LOS E/LOS F intersections, 10 are forecast to exhibit LOS F conditions during
both the AM and PM peak hours, five more than currently operate under such conditions;
Robertson Boulevard and National Boulevard, Venice Boulevard and Culver Boulevard, Venice
Boulevard and National Boulevard, Venice Boulevard and La Cienega Boulevard, Washington
Boulevard and Wesley Street, and Duquesne Avenue and Lucerne Avenue. However, it is
important to reiterate that this deterioration in level of service is primarily due to new traffic
generated by ongoing and/or proposed development within and near the study area, and is not
associated with or the result of the proposed Washington/National project.
Nonetheless, traffic generated by the proposed project will also have an effect on the operations
of the study intersections, although as shown in Table 11, project traffic will generally result in
only nominal incremental increases in area intersection operations. These relatively nominal
increases will not result in changes to the forecast future year 2013 “Without Project” levels of
service at any of the 34 study intersections.
Impact Significance Criteria
However, project traffic-related changes to the level of service at an intersection, which although
useful as an indicator of the potential for noticeable effects on the area transportation network,
are not the standard used by either the City of Culver City or the City of Los Angeles for
evaluating the potential “significance” of a project’s incremental traffic impacts on the area
roadway network, as described in more detail in the following pages.
The City of Culver City defines a significant traffic impact attributable to a project based on a
“stepped scale”, with intersections at high volume-to-capacity ratios being more sensitive to
additional traffic than those operating with available surplus capacity. A significant impact is
identified as an increase in the CMA value, due to project-related traffic, of 0.020 or more when
the final (“With Project”) Level of Service is E or F, or a CMA increase of 0.040 or more when
the final Level of Service is LOS D, as summarized in Table 12. No significant impacts are
deemed to occur at LOS A, B, or C, as these operating conditions exhibit sufficient surplus
capacities to accommodate traffic increases with little effect on traffic delays.
ATTACHMENT 5
217
85
8770 WASHINGTON BOULEVARD MIXED-USE HIRSCH/GREEN TRANSPORTATION CONSULTING, INC.
REVISED JULY 2010
Project-Related Increase
LOS CMA Value in CMA Value
A , B, or C < 0.800 No Impacts
D > 0.800 < 0.900 > 0.040
E or F > 0.900 > 0.020
City of Culver City Significant Traffic Impact Criteria
Table 12
Final (With Project) Condition
However, as noted previously in this report, several of the study intersections (numbers 1
through 12, and 28 through 31) are operated under the jurisdiction of the City of Los Angeles
Department of Transportation (LADOT), and as such, the LADOT criteria was used to identify
potential project significant impacts at these 16 locations. As with the City of Culver City criteria,
LADOT also defines significant project-related traffic impacts using a variable scale based on
final “With Project” levels of service, although the City of Los Angeles criteria is somewhat more
stringent than the City of Culver City criteria shown in Table 12. The LADOT intersection impact
significance criteria are summarized in Table 13.
Project-Related Increase
LOS CMA Value in CMA Value
A or B < 0.700 No Impacts
C > 0.700 < 0.800 > 0.040
D > 0.800 < 0.900 > 0.020
E or F > 0.900 > 0.010
City of Los Angeles Significant Traffic Impact Criteria
Table 13
Final (With Project) Condition
Using the appropriate impact evaluation criteria shown in the preceding tables, the incremental
project traffic impacts summarized in Table 11 were evaluated. Based on the applicable City of
Culver City or LADOT impact criteria, the proposed project could result in significant traffic
impacts at up to five of the 34 study intersections, prior to any mitigation, during one or both of
the peak hours. These significant impacts are all located within the immediate vicinity of the
project, and occur at the following intersections during the indicated peak periods:
o Venice Boulevard and Robertson Boulevard (AM and PM)
o Venice Boulevard and National Boulevard (AM and PM)
ATTACHMENT 5
218
86
8770 WASHINGTON BOULEVARD MIXED-USE HIRSCH/GREEN TRANSPORTATION CONSULTING, INC.
REVISED JULY 2010
o Washington Boulevard and National Boulevard (AM Only)
o Washington Boulevard and Wesley Street (AM and PM)
o Washington Boulevard and Cattaraugus Avenue (AM and PM)
Two of the significantly impacted locations, Venice Boulevard and Robertson Boulevard, and
Venice Boulevard and National Boulevard, are located within the City of Los Angeles, which as
discussed previously, utilizes a more restrictive definition of “significance” regarding traffic
impacts than does the City of Culver City. For comparative purposes, if the Culver City
significance criteria shown in Table 12 were applied to all 34 of the intersections evaluated in
this study, the project’s impacts at Venice Boulevard and National Boulevard would not be
considered significant, and the impacts at Venice Boulevard and Robertson Boulevard would be
considered significant only during the PM peak hour. Conversely, if the City of Los Angeles
significant impact definition were to be utilized for all of the study intersections, one additional
intersection, Washington Boulevard and La Cienega Boulevard, would be identified as
significantly impacted (during the PM peak hour). Additionally, the site-adjacent intersection of
Washington Boulevard and National Boulevard would exhibit a new PM peak hour impact,
although the AM peak hour at this location is already identified as significantly impacted.
Recommended roadway improvements and/or other traffic capacity-enhancing measures to
address these potential significant project-related traffic impacts are recommended, and their
effectiveness analyzed, later in the “Mitigation Measures” section of this report.
Local/Residential Street Traffic Impact Analysis
In addition to the intersection impacts summarized in the preceding section, an examination of
the location of the proposed project and a review of the general traffic circulation patterns within
the study area indicate that it is likely that some of the project traffic could utilize the local streets
located to the south and east of the project to access the site. Further, assuming that at least
some of the proposed retail components of the development will provide local-serving
amenities, it is also likely that some of the project traffic will actually be generated within these
nearby residential neighborhoods, and would naturally use the local streets to access the
project site. While such locally-generated trips would not necessarily produce additional traffic
on these roadways – such trips are likely already occurring to other more distant facilities, and
would simply redirect to the project – for purposes of this study, these locally-originating trips
were considered to be potential new trips to and from the proposed project, resulting in
increased traffic volumes on some of the local access streets.
ATTACHMENT 5
219
87
8770 WASHINGTON BOULEVARD MIXED-USE HIRSCH/GREEN TRANSPORTATION CONSULTING, INC.
REVISED JULY 2010
Therefore, an additional analysis was conducted to determine the potential for project impacts
on several of the key local streets providing access to the project site. The local area street
segments listed below were selected by the City Traffic Engineer for analysis based on their
proximity to the project sites and the likelihood of project residents, visitors, and patrons using
these roadways to access the project site.
a. Lucerne Avenue, between Ince Boulevard and Duquesne Avenue
b. Lucerne Avenue, south of Higuera Street
c. Wesley Street, between Higuera Street and National Boulevard
d. Helms Avenue, between Higuera Street and National Boulevard
e. Schaefer Street, between Higuera Street and National Boulevard
f. Higuera Street, between Washington Boulevard and Lucerne Avenue
g. Higuera Street, between Lucerne Avenue and Wesley Street
h. Higuera Street, between Wesley Street and Jefferson Boulevard
Existing (year 2010) traffic conditions on the selected local/residential street segments were
identified through new 24-hour traffic counts performed for this study, or were obtained from
data provided by the City of Culver City; note that the City data was collected in 2004, and these
counts were “growth factored” by 1.0 percent per year to estimate year 2010 conditions. Future
year (2013) traffic volumes for these facilities were estimated using the same procedures and
assumptions described previously in the development of future intersection volumes, including
the application of the 1.0 percent annual “ambient” traffic growth factor, and the addition of
traffic generated by the 42 related projects in calculating the “Without Project” traffic volumes.
Net daily project traffic volumes were based on the traffic assignment percentages shown earlier
in Figures 5(a) and 5(b), and were added to the “Without Project” conditions to form the future
forecast “With Project” traffic estimates. The existing traffic volumes and future forecast traffic
estimates for the selected local/residential street segments are summarized in Table 14.
As shown in Table 14, both segments of Lucerne Avenue (covering the stretch between
Duquesne Avenue and Higuera Street) exhibit relatively high traffic volumes for local-serving
facilities, with the southern portion of the roadway, south of Ince Boulevard, currently
accommodating approximately 5,400 vehicle trips per day (total of both directions), including
approximately 600 vehicles per hour during the AM and about 500 vehicles per hour during the
PM peak hour. The portion of Lucerne Avenue between Ince Boulevard and Higuera Street
exhibits somewhat lower daily traffic volumes of about 3,450 vehicles per day, including about
ATTACHMENT 5
220
88
8770 WASHINGTON BOULEVARD MIXED-USE HIRSCH/GREEN TRANSPORTATION CONSULTING, INC.
REVISED JULY 2010
Time Existing Without Project With
Street/Segment Period (2010) Project Traffic * Project Increase
Lucerne Avenue
Between Ince Boulevard and Daily 5,402 6,103 58 6,161 1.0%
Duquesne Avenue AM Peak Hour 604 666 3 669 0.5%
PM Peak Hour 506 568 5 573 0.9%
South of Higuera Street Daily 3,448 3,650 58 3,708 1.6%
AM Peak Hour 424 448 3 451 0.7%
PM Peak Hour 349 370 5 375 1.4%
Wesley Street
Between Higuera Street and Daily 485 510 26 536 26 vpd
National Boulevard AM Peak Hour 55 58 1 59 1 vph
PM Peak Hour 56 59 2 61 2 vph
Helms Avenue
Between Higuera Street and Daily 640 673 nominal 673 nominal
National Boulevard AM Peak Hour 97 102 0 102 0 vph
PM Peak Hour 56 59 0 59 0 vph
Schaefer Street
Between Higuera Street and Daily 690 725 nominal 725 nominal
National Boulevard AM Peak Hour 78 82 0 82 0 vph
PM Peak Hour 71 75 0 75 0 vph
Higuera Street
Between Washington Boulevard and Daily 5,928 8,470 32 8,502 0.4%
Lucerne Avenue AM Peak Hour 534 718 2 720 0.3%
PM Peak Hour 542 728 3 731 0.4%
Between Lucerne Avenue and Daily 4,618 7,068 26 7,094 0.4%
Wesley Street AM Peak Hour 471 650 2 652 0.3%
PM Peak Hour 433 610 2 612 0.3%
Between Wesley Street and Daily 4,618 5,891 55 5,946 0.9%
Jefferson Boulevard AM Peak Hour 471 581 3 584 0.5%
PM Peak Hour 433 611 6 617 1.0%
* Note:
Project trip calculations are contained in Appendix C.
Table 14
Local/Residential Street Traffic Impact Analysis Summary
Existing and Future Average Daily and Peak Hour Traffic Volumes (Total Both Directions)
Future (2013)
ATTACHMENT 5
221
89
8770 WASHINGTON BOULEVARD MIXED-USE HIRSCH/GREEN TRANSPORTATION CONSULTING, INC.
REVISED JULY 2010
425 vehicles per hour during the AM peak hour and 350 vehicles per hour during the PM peak
hour. These higher-than-typical local/residential street traffic volumes are primarily due to the
fact that Lucerne Avenue provides a convenient “cut-through” connection between Jefferson
Boulevard and Culver Boulevard/Washington Boulevard to and from the downtown area of
Culver City. Note that approximately one-third of the existing daily traffic using the southern
portion of Lucerne Avenue travel to or from Ince Boulevard, in the middle of the study segment,
and do not travel along the northern segment of Lucerne Avenue to and from Higuera Street.
Similar traffic volume conditions are also present along Higuera Street throughout the study
area between Washington Boulevard and Jefferson Boulevard. This street accommodates
much of the “cut-through” traffic occurring along Lucerne Avenue, as it provides a convenient
travel route between Lucerne Avenue and the downtown Culver City area via its connection with
Washington Boulevard. Higuera Street, between Washington Boulevard and Lucerne Avenue,
currently exhibits approximately 5,930 vehicles per day, including about 530 vehicles per hour
during the AM peak hour and 540 vehicles per hour during the PM peak hour.
However, the portion of Higuera Street between Lucerne Avenue and Jefferson Boulevard,
including the short (one-block) segment between Lucerne Avenue and Wesley Street providing
a connection for through traffic between Duquesne Avenue and National Boulevard via Lucerne
Avenue south of Higuera Street and Wesley Street to the north, exhibits slightly lower traffic
volumes, accommodating a total of approximately 4,620 vehicles per day, including
approximately 470 vehicles per hour during the AM peak hour and 430 vehicles per hour during
the PM peak hour. These lower volumes are likely due to the discontinuity of “through” traffic
flow along Higuera Street at Hayden Avenue; all vehicles traveling either eastbound or
westbound on Higuera Street are required to turn at Hayden Avenue, and therefore, traffic
traveling from Washington Boulevard cannot directly access Jefferson Boulevard, or vice versa.
As such, traffic using the segment of Higuera Street between Jefferson Boulevard and Hayden
Avenue can only access local uses, or connect to National Boulevard via Hayden Avenue.
Conversely, Wesley Street, which acts essentially as the northern extension of Lucerne Avenue
between Higuera Street and National Boulevard (although the intersection of Lucerne
Avenue/Wesley Street is slightly offset at National Boulevard), Helms Avenue, and Schaefer
Street each exhibit substantially lower traffic volumes than either of the study segments of
Lucerne Avenue or along Higuera Street, most likely because these roadways provide a much
more limited “through” connection between the major highways in the project area, and
ATTACHMENT 5
222
90
8770 WASHINGTON BOULEVARD MIXED-USE HIRSCH/GREEN TRANSPORTATION CONSULTING, INC.
REVISED JULY 2010
therefore serve primarily as a local residential access street. Wesley Street, between Higuera
Street and National Boulevard, currently carries fewer than 500 vehicles per day, with between
50 and 60 vehicles per hour during both the AM and PM peak hours, while Helms Avenue
carries approximately 650 vehicles per day, with about 100 vehicles per hour during the AM and
60 vehicles per hour during the PM peak hour. Finally, Schaefer Street currently
accommodates approximately 700 vehicles per day, with about 80 vehicles per hour during the
AM peak hour and about 70 vehicles per hour during the PM peak hour
Anticipated future traffic growth in the study area is expected to increase the daily traffic
utilization on each of these street segments. Based on the assumed ambient traffic growth,
coupled with new traffic generated by other ongoing or proposed developments within the study
area, traffic along Lucerne Avenue between Duquesne Avenue and Ince Boulevard, is expected
to increase by about 13 percent by the forecast future year (2013), with anticipated daily traffic
volumes of about 6,100 vehicles per day, including about 670 vehicles per hour during the AM
and about 570 vehicles per hour during the PM peak hour. These increases in traffic volumes
along this segment of the roadway are due to several ongoing or proposed development
projects in the study area (see Figure 12, and Tables 9 and 10) that are expected to utilize this
segment of Lucerne Avenue to travel to and from Duquesne Avenue to the south in order to
access their respective sites. However, traffic volumes along the northern study segment of
Lucerne Avenue between Ince Boulevard and Higuera Street, which does not provide the same
level of access to Duquesne Avenue or other key arterial roadways, are anticipated to
experience a relatively nominal traffic increase of only about six percent by the year 2013, to a
total of about 3,650 vehicles per day, including approximately 450 vehicles per hour during the
AM peak hour and 370 vehicles per hour during the PM peak hour.
Daily traffic volumes along Higuera Street, however, are anticipated to experience rather
substantial traffic increases in the future due to ongoing development within the study area
(prior to construction of the proposed project). Traffic on the segment east of Lucerne Street is
expected to increase by about 43 percent from the existing conditions, to over 8,450 vehicles
per day, with AM and PM peak hour traffic volumes anticipated to be slightly more than about
700 vehicles per hour during both periods. The short segment of Higuera Street between
Lucerne Avenue and Wesley Street is also anticipated to experience similar increases in traffic
(approximately 53 percent growth), with forecast future volumes of approximately 7,100 vehicles
per day, including between 600 and 650 vehicles per hour during both the AM and PM peak
hours. Finally, the easternmost study segment of Higuera Street, between Wesley Street and
ATTACHMENT 5
223
91
8770 WASHINGTON BOULEVARD MIXED-USE HIRSCH/GREEN TRANSPORTATION CONSULTING, INC.
REVISED JULY 2010
Jefferson Boulevard, would be expected to experience pre-project traffic growth of
approximately 28 percent, to approximately 5,900 vehicles per day, including about 600 vehicles
per hour during both the AM and PM peak hours.
Traffic volumes on Wesley Street, Helms Avenue, and Schaefer Street are also expected to
increase, although not as substantially, with forecast year 2013 traffic volumes of slightly more
than 500 vehicles per day on Wesley Street, about 675 vehicles per day on Helms Avenue, and
about 725 vehicles per day on Schaefer Street. Each of these roadways will exhibit between
about 60 and 100 vehicles per hour during both the AM and PM peak hours. As with the
intersection traffic forecasts and future conditions described earlier in this report, these traffic
increases are expected due to ongoing and forecast ambient growth in the area and region, and
will occur whether or not the proposed project itself is constructed.
Finally, project traffic additions to the selected local/residential street segments were identified,
and added to the “Without Project” traffic forecasts described above. A review of the project trip
assignment percentages shown previously in Figures 5(a) and 5(b) indicates that approximately
two percent (2%) of the trips associated with both the residential and commercial/retail
components of the proposed project are expected to utilize Lucerne Avenue between Duquesne
Avenue and Higuera Street to travel between Washington Boulevard and Jefferson Boulevard to
access the project site. At Higuera Street, about half of this project-related traffic is expected to
utilize Higuera Street to travel to and from Washington Boulevard, and ultimately, to and from
the project site, while the remainder of the project-trips are expected to travel on Wesley Street,
which is roughly the northward continuation of Lucerne Avenue, to access National Boulevard,
traveling to and from the site via this facility to access the site.
It is also expected that approximately one percent (2%) of the inbound and one percent (1%) of
the outbound project residential component traffic will utilize Higuera Street, while about one
percent (1%) of the total commercial component trips are anticipated to travel along this
roadway to and from the site. No significant project-related traffic utilization of either Helms
Avenue or Schaefer Street between Higuera Street and National Boulevard is expected, since
neither of these roadways provide convenient short-cuts between the major roadways and the
project site, and would generally require drivers to travel out of their way, unless such trips
originate within the local residential or commercial areas served by these facilities.
Based on these travel pattern assumptions in concert with the project’s “daily” trip generation
values for both the residential and commercial/retail components shown previously in Table 2,
the number of new project-related trips on each of the selected local/residential street segments
ATTACHMENT 5
224
92
8770 WASHINGTON BOULEVARD MIXED-USE HIRSCH/GREEN TRANSPORTATION CONSULTING, INC.
REVISED JULY 2010
was calculated, and is also shown in Table 14; the detailed project trip calculations for each of
the selected local/residential street segments analyzed in this report are provided in Table C-1
in Appendix C. Due to the relatively low percentages of project traffic anticipated to use the
subject local streets, the proposed project is expected to add only minimally to the forecast
future traffic volumes in the project vicinity.
As shown in Table 14, both of the study segments of Lucerne Avenue between Duquesne
Avenue and Higuera Street are expected to experience a net increase in project-related traffic of
approximately 58 net new trips per day (total of traffic in both directions), including about three
vehicles per hour during the AM and five vehicles per hour during the PM peak hour.
Incremental project traffic additions to Higuera Street are expected to be somewhat lower, with
a total of approximately 32 net new trips per day, including two net new trips during the AM peak
hour and three net new trips during the PM peak hour on the segment between Lucerne Avenue
and Washington Boulevard, while the short segment between Lucerne Avenue and Wesley
Street carries the remainder of the traffic identified along Lucerne Avenue, at about 26 net trips
per day, including two net new trips during both the AM and PM peak hours. Net project-related
traffic additions to the eastern segment of Higuera Street between Wesley Street and Jefferson
Boulevard, which as noted earlier, does not allow a “through” traffic connection to the portions of
Higuera Street east of Hayden Avenue, are expected to be approximately 55 net new trips per
day, including about three net new trips during the AM peak hour and six net new trips during
the PM peak hour.
Finally, project traffic additions to Wesley Street between Higuera Street and National Boulevard
are expected to be of a similar magnitude, at about 26 net new trips per day, including the
addition of about one net new AM and two net new PM peak hour trips. Net project trip
additions to both Helms Avenue and Schaefer Street are expected to be nominal, with no
measurable increases, on average, during either the AM or PM peak hours.
The City of Culver City guidelines for the evaluation of project traffic impacts on local streets
utilize a variable scale to determine the significance of potential traffic additions. Impacts are
generally determined to be “significant” if the project’s incremental traffic meets or exceeds an
identified percentage of the total future (With Project) average daily traffic (“ADT”) volumes with
the exception of very low-volume roadways (less than 1,000 vehicles per day), potential project
traffic impacts for such roadways are deemed to be “significant” if the project adds 120 or more
daily trips to that facility. Note that the AM and PM peak hour volumes shown in Table 14 are
ATTACHMENT 5
225
93
8770 WASHINGTON BOULEVARD MIXED-USE HIRSCH/GREEN TRANSPORTATION CONSULTING, INC.
REVISED JULY 2010
provided for informational purposes only, and are not used to determine the significance of the
project’s incremental traffic on these local/residential roadways. These City of Culver City
local/residential street impact criteria utilized in this analysis are summarized in Table 15.
Projected Future ADT Project-Related Increase in
(With Project) Average Daily Traffic Volume
999 or less 120 or more trips per day
1,000 to 1,999 12 percent or more of final ADT
2,000 to 2,999 10 percent or more of final ADT
3,000 or more 8 percent or more of final ADT
Note:
* Per City of Culver City Department of Public Works.
Table 15
Local/Residential Street Significant Impact Criteria *
City of Culver City
As shown previously in Table 14, the net project traffic additions to each of the selected
local/residential street segments will be well below the applicable levels of significance shown in
Table 15. Project traffic additions to any segment of Lucerne Avenue will result in a maximum
impact of approximately 1.6 percent, while potential project-related impacts to any of the study
segments of Higuera Street between Washington Boulevard and Jefferson Boulevard are
expected to be less than 1.0 percent, substantially below the 8.0 percent “significance”
threshold for these streets (for roadways carrying more than 3,000 vehicles per day).
Additionally, project-related traffic increases on Wesley Street between Higuera Street and
National Boulevard are also expected to be less than significant, with approximately 26 net new
project trips per day, well below the applicable significance threshold of 120 net new trips per
day for facilities carrying less than 1,000 total vehicles per day. Finally, as described previously,
only nominal project-related traffic is expected to utilize either Helms Avenue or Schaefer Street
between Higuera Street and National Boulevard, and as a result, potential project-related traffic
impacts to either of these two facilities will be essentially zero.
Therefore, based on this analysis, while the proposed project could be expected to add some
level of additional traffic along several of the local/residential streets in the project vicinity, this
additional traffic will be relatively nominal, and will not create any significant impacts to any of
these facilities. As a result, no local/residential street mitigation measures are warranted.
ATTACHMENT 5
226
94
8770 WASHINGTON BOULEVARD MIXED-USE HIRSCH/GREEN TRANSPORTATION CONSULTING, INC.
REVISED JULY 2010
Project Impacts on Regional Transportation System
To address the increasing public concern that traffic congestion was impacting the quality of life
and economic vitality of the State of California, the Los Angeles County Congestion
Management Program (CMP)|1010| was enacted to provide the analytical basis for transportation
decisions through the State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) process. A
countywide approach has been established by the Metropolitan Transportation Authority, the
local CMP agency, to implement the statutory requirements of the CMP.
The countywide approach includes designating a highway network that includes all state
highways and principal arterials within the County and monitoring the network's Level of Service
standards. The CMP project traffic impact analysis (TIA) guidelines require analyses of all CMP
monitoring intersections where the project could add a total of 50 or more trips during either
peak hour. Additionally, all freeway segments where a project could add 150 or more trips in
either direction during the peak hours must be analyzed.
CMP Monitoring Intersection Impacts
As noted in the preceding discussion, the CMP requires that detailed analyses be conducted for
any of these locations where the proposed project is anticipated to add 50 or more total trips
during either the AM or PM peak hours. The current CMP (2004) identifies seven arterial
monitoring intersections within an approximately three-mile radius of the project site. All but two
of these CMP monitoring intersection locations, Venice Boulevard and La Cienega Boulevard;
and La Cienega Boulevard and Jefferson Boulevard, are outside the immediate study area, and
are expected to be beyond the range of identifiable project traffic impacts. The CMP
intersections closest to the project site are located within the City or County of Los Angeles, the
City of Beverly Hills, or the City of Culver City, as listed below.
o Santa Monica Boulevard and Wilshire Boulevard (Beverly Hills)
o Wilshire Boulevard and La Cienega Boulevard (Beverly Hills)
o Venice Boulevard and Overland Avenue (Culver City)
o La Cienega Boulevard and Jefferson Boulevard (City of Los Angeles)
o Venice Boulevard and La Cienega Boulevard (City of Los Angeles)
o Venice Boulevard and Centinela Avenue (City of Los Angeles)
o La Cienega Boulevard and Stocker Street (Los Angeles County)
|1010| 2004 Congestion Management Program for Los Angeles County, Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation
Authority, Los Angeles, 2004.
ATTACHMENT 5
227
95
8770 WASHINGTON BOULEVARD MIXED-USE HIRSCH/GREEN TRANSPORTATION CONSULTING, INC.
REVISED JULY 2010
Two of the CMP intersections identified above, La Cienega Boulevard and Jefferson Boulevard,
and Venice Boulevard and La Cienega Boulevard, are specifically examined as intersections
number 29 and 12, respectively, of the 34 study intersections already included in the detailed
analyses of project impacts, and as such, the potential project traffic impacts to this CMP
monitoring intersection has already been assessed. However, the remaining five CMP locations
have not been previously analyzed in this study, and therefore, a supplemental evaluation of the
proposed project’s net trip additions and potential for impacts at these locations was conducted.
A review of the project’s trip generation summarized previously in Table 2 reveals that the
project would be expected to produce more than 50 net new trips during both the AM and PM
peak hours (154 AM, 275 PM), although the project’s anticipated traffic travel patterns into, out
of, and through the study vicinity, shown previously in Figures 5(a) and 5(b), indicate that project
traffic will disperse throughout the area roadway network outside the immediate study vicinity,
and that project traffic volume additions to any of the CMP monitoring intersections are
expected to be substantially less than the 50-trip threshold.
Based on the estimated project net traffic volumes shown in Figures 8(a) and 8(b), it is
estimated that project -related trips traveling to and from the south along La Cienega Boulevard
through the CMP intersection of La Cienega Boulevard and Stocker Street are expected to be
about seven AM and 14 PM peak hour trips, while net project traffic traveling to and from the
west along Venice Boulevard through the CMP intersections of Venice Boulevard and Centinela
Avenue and Venice Boulevard and Overland Avenue are expected to be approximately 24 net
new trips during the AM and about 42 net new trips during the PM peak hour.
Project traffic traveling outside the immediate study area to and from the north, potentially
affecting the two CMP intersections of Wilshire Boulevard and Santa Monica Boulevard, and
Wilshire Boulevard and La Cienega Boulevard, is expected to be about 12 net new trips (eight
trips on Robertson Boulevard and four trips on La Cienega Boulevard) during the AM peak hour,
and about 22 net new trips during the PM peak hour (14 trips on Robertson Boulevard and eight
trips on La Cienega Boulevard). As such, total net project traffic actually traveling outside the
immediate study area to or from any of these more remote CMP intersections is generally well
below the CMP’s 50-peak hour trip impact threshold at the study area boundaries, and as these
trips disperse along other roadways and into communities in the intervening distances between
the study area and the CMP arterial monitoring intersection locations themselves, these already
nominal volumes are expected to further diminish. As a result, the project does not meet the
minimum CMP thresholds, and therefore will not create any significant impacts to the CMP
arterial roadway network, and no further detailed analysis is warranted.
ATTACHMENT 5
228
96
8770 WASHINGTON BOULEVARD MIXED-USE HIRSCH/GREEN TRANSPORTATION CONSULTING, INC.
REVISED JULY 2010
CMP Freeway Segment Impacts
An examination was also made of the potential for project-related freeway impacts within the
study area; as noted earlier, any freeway segments where a proposed project could add 150 or
more new peak hour trips in either direction must be analyzed. The project site is located within
an area that is directly served by only freeway, the Santa Monica (I-10) Freeway, although
areawide access is also provided by the San Diego (I-405) Freeway, which interchanges with
the I-10 Freeway approximately two and one-half miles to the west of the project site. A review
of the project’s net trip generation, shown previously in Table 2, shows that the project is
expected to generate far fewer than 150 directional vehicles per hour during the AM peak hour,
with approximately 69 inbound and 85 outbound trips. During the PM peak hour, the project
would just meet the CMP freeway directional trip threshold in one direction, with 150 inbound
trips, although outbound trips would be below the threshold at only 125 outbound trips.
However, as described earlier in this report, only a small percentage of the project’s trips are
expected to utilize the area freeways in their travel paths to and from the site, with
approximately 15 percent of the project’s residential component trips and 10 percent of the
commercial/retail component trips using the Santa Monica Freeway both to the east and to the
west of the site; most of the project trips using the Santa Monica Freeway west of the site
transition onto the northbound or southbound San Diego Freeway to continue their travel route
through the rest of the Los Angeles region. Based on these trip distribution assumptions, the
proposed project would be expected to add a total of approximately 10 eastbound and seven
westbound trips to the I-10 Freeway east of the project site, and about 11 westbound and seven
eastbound trips to the I-10 Freeway west of the project site during the AM peak hour. During
the PM peak hour, the project could add about 17 westbound and 14 eastbound trips to the
Santa Monica Freeway east of the site, and about 17 eastbound and 14 westbound trips west of
the site. These values are not only substantially less than the 150-trip analysis threshold at
which a detailed analysis is required, as described below, they are also well below levels at
which measurable impacts to these area regional transportation facilities would occur.
A significant freeway impact under CMP analysis guidelines is defined to occur when there is an
increase in the directional demand-to-capacity (d/c) ratio of two percent (0.020) or more and the
final (“With Project”) conditions are at Level of Service F. The I-10 Freeway through the study
area generally provides four mainline travel lanes in each direction; based on an assumed
mainline lane capacity of approximately 2,000 vehicles per hour|10 10|, the freeway thus provides a
|10 10| Highway Capacity Manual, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2000.
ATTACHMENT 5
229
97
8770 WASHINGTON BOULEVARD MIXED-USE HIRSCH/GREEN TRANSPORTATION CONSULTING, INC.
REVISED JULY 2010
total directional capacity of approximately 8,000 vehicles per hour throughout the project vicinity.
As noted above, the maximum 17-trip net project traffic additions to the freeway would result in
an approximate 0.21 percent (17 directional project trips per hour traffic/8,000 vehicles per hour
directional mainline capacity = 0.0021) increase in the mainline d/c value, or only one-tenth of
the potential “significant” impact level. Therefore, regardless of the existing or future level of
service or d/c ratio of the selected freeway segment, the highest anticipated peak hour project
traffic incremental additions to the area freeway system would not approach levels resulting in a
significant impact, and as such, no further CMP freeway mainline impact analysis is warranted.
Note that only the Santa Monica Freeway mainline facilities are included in the above analyses;
freeway ramps were not specifically analyzed as a component of the freeway impact evaluation,
since the CMP is primarily designed to address “mainline” operations. However, the key
surface street access ramps within the immediate project vicinity expected to be utilized by
project traffic are included in the analysis of the 34 study intersections. The operations of these
freeway ramps, including the westbound on- and eastbound off-ramps at and near the
intersection of Robertson Boulevard/Exposition Boulevard and Venice Boulevard (study
intersection number 8), the eastbound on-ramp at Robertson Boulevard (intersection number 4),
and the westbound off-ramp at Robertson Boulevard and Kincardine Avenue (intersection
number 2), are generally controlled by the terminus intersections examined in the preceding
analyses, and therefore, potential project-related impacts to the Santa Monica Freeway ramps
most likely to be affected by project traffic are already identified.
ATTACHMENT 5
230
98
8770 WASHINGTON BOULEVARD MIXED-USE HIRSCH/GREEN TRANSPORTATION CONSULTING, INC.
REVISED JULY 2010
MITIGATION MEASURES
The results of the traffic impact analyses contained in this report indicate that the proposed
mixed-use project at 8770 Washington Boulevard, which will contain a total of approximately
115 residential condominium units and approximately 31,240 square feet of retail/commercial
uses, including a 13,900 square foot supermarket, an 11,800 square foot drugstore/pharmacy, a
2,300 square foot restaurant, and a total of approximately 3,240 square feet of café area, could
result in significant traffic impacts at up to five of the 34 study intersections during one or both of
the peak hours. The significant impacts are all located within the immediate vicinity of the
project, and occur at the following intersections during the indicated peak periods:
o Venice Boulevard and Robertson Boulevard (AM and PM)
o Venice Boulevard and National Boulevard (AM and PM)
o Washington Boulevard and National Boulevard (AM Only)
o Washington Boulevard and Wesley Street (AM and PM)
o Washington Boulevard and Cattaraugus Avenue (AM and PM)
In order to address these project-specific traffic impacts, the following intersection and/or
roadway system improvements are recommended:
Venice Boulevard and Robertson Boulevard – Venice Boulevard at this location (generally
from approximately 500 feet west of Robertson Boulevard to Ivy Street, two blocks east of
National Boulevard) is already programmed for improvements associated with the
Metropolitan Transportation Authority’s (“Metro”) Expo Line light rail transit station near
Venice Boulevard and National Boulevard; these improvements are unrelated to the
proposed Washington/National mixed-use project. The Metro Expo Line project roadway
improvements will widen both sides of Venice Boulevard along the eastbound and
westbound approaches to Robertson Boulevard, although the Venice Boulevard lane
configurations will remain unchanged from their current conditions and operations. The
proposed Washington/National project should modify the Metro Expo Line improvements by
restriping the westbound approach of Venice Boulevard at Robertson Boulevard to provide
an exclusive right-turn only lane, in addition to one left-turn lane and three through lanes.
This measure will require the removal of approximately six unstriped/unmetered on-street
parking spaces along the north side of Venice Boulevard between Robertson Boulevard and
Ellis Avenue, in order to maintain the existing westbound bicycle lane. However, current
ATTACHMENT 5
231
99
8770 WASHINGTON BOULEVARD MIXED-USE HIRSCH/GREEN TRANSPORTATION CONSULTING, INC.
REVISED JULY 2010
utilization surveys indicate that these on-street parking spaces are not heavily utilized, and
further, parking along the subject segment is already prohibited during the PM peak period
on weekdays (“Tow Away No Stopping 4 – 7 PM”). As a result, the removal of these spaces
is not expected to create significant “secondary” impacts to local area parking. The
proposed new right-turn only lane will also require buses using the existing westbound bus
stop at Venice Boulevard and Robertson Boulevard to load and unload passengers within
the new right-turn only lane. However, this condition is not unique, and it is recommended
that new “Right Turn Only – Buses Exempt” signage be installed to permit such activity. The
use of the new right-turn only lane to load/unload passengers is not expected to significantly
affect on the operations of either the buses or the new right-turn lanes. It is important to
note that, although the proposed restriping improvements occur along Venice Boulevard,
which is under the jurisdiction of the City of Los Angeles, the City of Los Angeles
Department of Transportation (“LADOT”) has reviewed the proposed mitigation measure,
and indicated that it is acceptable. A conceptual drawing of the proposed improvement,
including its compatibility with the programmed Expo Line improvements at this intersection,
is shown in Figure D-1 in Appendix D of this report, as are the results of the on-street
parking utilization surveys for the north side of Venice Boulevard east of the intersection.
Venice Boulevard and National Boulevard – This intersection is already programmed for
several improvements unrelated to the proposed Washington/National mixed-use project,
including measures associated with the Metro Expo Line light rail transit station located near
this intersection, as well as recommended improvements identified by the City of Culver City
as part of it’s ongoing redevelopment of a transit-oriented project on its “Triangle Site”,
located on the west side of National Boulevard between Venice Boulevard and Washington
Boulevard. The Metro Expo Line project roadway improvements will widen and restripe
Venice Boulevard to provide dual left-turn lanes, three through lanes, and a right-turn only
lane on both the eastbound and westbound approaches. Additionally, the City of Culver City
has indicated its intent to dedicate and widen the west side of National Boulevard between
Venice Boulevard and Washington Boulevard by 10 feet, and to restripe National Boulevard
to remove all existing on-street parking in order to accommodate the installation of new
bicycle lanes along both sides of the street. In addition to these anticipated roadway
improvements, the proposed Washington/National project should restripe the southbound
approach of National Boulevard at this intersection (within the adjacent City of Los Angeles)
to install an exclusive right-turn only lane, in addition to one left-turn lane and two through
lanes. This proposed improvement will require the removal of approximately six existing
ATTACHMENT 5
232
100
8770 WASHINGTON BOULEVARD MIXED-USE HIRSCH/GREEN TRANSPORTATION CONSULTING, INC.
REVISED JULY 2010
unmarked/unmetered on-street parking spaces on the east side of National Boulevard north
of Venice Boulevard to accommodate the new lane. However, it does not affect any of the
other approaches of the intersection, and as such, is compatible with the anticipated Metro
Expo Line/City of Culver City striping proposals, including maintaining the proposed new
bicycle lanes. It is important to note that, although the proposed restriping improvements
occur along Robertson Boulevard within the City of Los Angeles, LADOT has reviewed the
proposed mitigation measure, and indicated that it is acceptable. A conceptual drawing of
the proposed improvement, including its compatibility with the programmed Expo Line and
City of Culver City improvements at this intersection, is shown in Figure D-2 in Appendix D
of this report, along with the results of the on-street parking utilization surveys for the east
side of National Boulevard north of Venice Boulevard.
Washington Boulevard and National Boulevard – This intersection is also programmed for a
series of improvements as part of the Metro’s Expo Line light rail transit facility, including
converting the existing westbound Washington Boulevard right-turn only lane to a shared
through/right-turn lane, associated new dedications and widenings along the north side of
Washington Boulevard west of National Boulevard to provide a new “receiving” lane for the
additional westbound through traffic lane, and a new nine-foot dedication along the east side
of National Boulevard between Washington Boulevard and the Expo Line right-of-way to
accommodate the City’s request for a 12-foot sidewalk in this area. Other programmed
improvements to this intersection include the previously-described roadway dedications and
widenings along the west side of National Boulevard as part of the City’s “Triangle Site”
project. In addition to these programmed Expo Line/City of Culver City roadway
improvements, the project should construct a new 11-foot wide right-turn only lane for
northbound National Boulevard. This improvement will require the project to dedicate and
widen approximately 100 feet of its National Boulevard frontage by approximately nine feet
to install the new right-turn lane; all other existing lane widths on the south approach of
National Boulevard shall be maintained. This project-specific dedication, in addition to the
nine-foot Expo Line dedication, will provide adequate roadway width for the recommended
new right-turn only lane, and will maintain the City’s requested 12-foot sidewalk. Finally, the
curb return at the southeast corner of the intersection of Washington Boulevard and National
Boulevard (along the project’s frontage) should also be improved to provide a 35-foot radius.
A conceptual drawing of the proposed improvement in relation to the project site, and
including its compatibility with the programmed Expo Line and City of Culver City roadway
improvements, is shown in Figure D-3 in Appendix D.
ATTACHMENT 5
233
101
8770 WASHINGTON BOULEVARD MIXED-USE HIRSCH/GREEN TRANSPORTATION CONSULTING, INC.
REVISED JULY 2010
Washington Boulevard and Wesley Street – The proposed project should widen both sides
of Wesley Street by three feet within the existing right-of-way (resulting in a reduction in
sidewalk width on both sides of seven feet) to provide a total roadway width of 36 feet, and
restripe the northbound approach to Washington Boulevard to provide an exclusive left-turn
lane plus an exclusive right-turn only lane, plus one southbound lane. The City has
requested that the curb returns at both the southwest and southeast corners of Washington
Boulevard and Wesley Street be improved to exhibit a 35-foot radius. However, a review of
the existing rights-of-way/property lines for the southeast corner of Washington Boulevard
and Wesley Street (opposite the project site) indicates that insufficient existing right-of-way
exists to provide the requested 35-foot curb return radius and still maintain adequate public
sidewalk widths. As such, it is recommended that the curb return at this location be
improved with either a 15-foot or 25-foot radius, as deemed acceptable to the City. The
existing on-street parking along both sides of Wesley Street should be removed, and a new
on-street project-related loading zone (for use both by project residents and by the proposed
pharmacy) should be provided along the west side of Wesley Street, north of the proposed
project. Additionally, a new striped “median” island south of the project’s commercial
driveway should be provided as a “staging” location for inbound delivery trucks waiting to
back into the supermarket loading dock on the semi-subterranean parking level, in order to
minimize any traffic disruptions to Wesley Street operations.
Further, the project should install a new traffic signal at this location, which should be
interconnected and coordinated with the nearby signal at Washington Boulevard and
National Boulevard to minimize traffic flow disruptions, and be equipped with the City’s
current traffic signal coordination software; a detailed traffic signal warrant analysis for this
location (provided in Appendix D) indicates that the intersection would meet traffic signal
warrant requirements for installation of a new traffic signal once the proposed project is
developed. Additionally, in order to provide adequate operational access to and from the
project site, and to avoid having much of the project’s exiting traffic turn right (onto
eastbound Washington Boulevard), thereby creating a “around the block” travel pattern for
westbound-oriented exiting vehicles and potentially “overburdening” intersections along
Washington Boulevard east of the project site, the installation of a new traffic signal is
considered appropriate for this project-access intersection. A conceptual drawing of the
proposed Wesley Street improvements, along with the previously described improvement at
Washington Boulevard and National Boulevard, is shown in Figure D-3 in Appendix D.
ATTACHMENT 5
234
102
8770 WASHINGTON BOULEVARD MIXED-USE HIRSCH/GREEN TRANSPORTATION CONSULTING, INC.
REVISED JULY 2010
Washington Boulevard and Cattaraugus Avenue – The project should modify the existing
raised median island on Washington Boulevard to provide a new eastbound left-turn lane at
this location, in addition to one through lane and one shared through/right-turn lane. The
project shall be responsible for 100 percent of the cost of the design and installation of the
proposed left-turn lane. The installation of a new traffic signal at this location was also
considered as a potential measure to mitigate the 8770 Washington project’s significant
impacts; a detailed analysis of the intersection indicated that it is forecast to meet the
requirements for signal installation (traffic signal warrant analysis, contained in Appendix D)
for both the future “Without Project” and “With Project” conditions. The City has previously
determined that a new traffic signal is appropriate for this location, and the analyses
summarized in this report indicates that the proposed project will exacerbate the need for
signalization of this intersection. As a result, a new traffic signal should be installed at this
location, and the project shall be responsible for 100 percent of the cost to design the new
traffic signal, and shall contribute 25 percent of the cost of installation of the signal. The
recommended median island modification (to provide a new eastbound left-turn pocket at
this intersection) and cross walk striping improvements due to the installation of the new
traffic signal are shown conceptually in Figure D-4 in Appendix D of this report.
In addition to the recommended restriping mitigation improvements at Venice Boulevard and
Robertson Boulevard/Exposition Boulevard, and Venice Boulevard and National Boulevard,
LADOT, in their preliminary review of those proposed mitigation measures, requested that the
City of Culver City consider additional improvements at several intersections within the City of
Los Angeles to augment the proposed intersection restriping improvements. These traffic
signal-related improvements would further reduce the potential impacts of the proposed project
(both significant and non-significant impacts) and enhance general traffic flow operations within
the study area. The requested additional improvements include: installation of closed circuit
traffic monitoring cameras at the intersections of Cadillac Avenue and La Cienega Boulevard,
and at Venice Boulevard and Robertson Boulevard/Exposition Boulevard; and installation of
traffic signal controller upgrades at eight additional as-yet identified intersections.
The installation of a new traffic signal at the site-adjacent intersection of Washington Boulevard
and Wesley Street, in conjunction with the proposed widening and restriping of Wesley Street to
provide a left-turn and right-turn lane, will provide greater traffic control and capacity, and will
reduce the project’s impacts at this intersection to less than significant levels. Additionally, this
new traffic signal is expected to produce the secondary affect of redistribution of project-related
ATTACHMENT 5
235
103
8770 WASHINGTON BOULEVARD MIXED-USE HIRSCH/GREEN TRANSPORTATION CONSULTING, INC.
REVISED JULY 2010
traffic at this intersection and at several intersections in close proximity to the project site. As
described earlier in this report, the current STOP sign controlled approach of Wesley Street,
combined with the unimpeded traffic flow of both eastbound and westbound Washington
Boulevard at this location, make the exiting left-turn movement from Wesley Street to
westbound Washington Boulevard difficult during peak traffic periods. As such, and as
indicated by the project trip assignment percentages shown previously in Figures 5(a) and 5(b),
much of the project’s outbound traffic was initially assumed to turn right at this intersection onto
eastbound Washington Boulevard rather than wait for a “break” in traffic to accommodate the
left-turn. These vehicles were then assumed to turn left on Cattaraugus Avenue and travel
north to Venice Boulevard, where they would then turn left to ultimately travel westbound along
Venice Boulevard or to access northbound Robertson Boulevard.
However, the proposed signalization of the site-adjacent intersection of Washington Boulevard
and Wesley Street will facilitate this currently difficult exiting (northbound) left-turn move,
resulting in more left-turning vehicles and the elimination of the need for the currently assumed
“around the block” travel patterns described above. The net effects of the redistribution of
project trips due to the recommended installation of a new traffic signal at this intersection are
shown in Figure 16(a) for the AM peak hour and Figure 16(b) for the PM peak hour conditions.
The effectiveness of the recommended traffic mitigation measures, including the anticipated
redistribution of project trips due to the new signal at Washington Boulevard/Wesley Avenue,
was evaluated using the same CMA methodologies and procedures described earlier in this
report, with the exception that the proposed improvements were assumed to be “in place”. The
results of the supplemental “With Project Plus Mitigation” analysis are summarized in Table 16.
Note that Table 16 contains an assessment of the proposed mitigation measure(s) at the
intersection of Washington Boulevard and Cattaraugus Avenue for (a) the installation of an
eastbound left-turn lane only, and (b) for a new left-turn lane plus a new traffic signal.
Table 16 also includes a summary of the effectiveness of the proposed mitigation not only for
the five significantly impacted study intersections, but also for three additional intersections
(Venice Boulevard and Helms Avenue, Venice Boulevard and Cattaraugus Avenue, and
Washington Boulevard and Helms Avenue) that are not significantly impacted by the project
itself, but are expected to be affected by the anticipated project traffic redistributions resulting
from the installation of the proposed traffic signal at Washington Boulevard and Wesley Street.
ATTACHMENT 5
236ATTACHMENT 5
237ATTACHMENT 5
238
106
8770 WASHINGTON BOULEVARD MIXED-USE HIRSCH/GREEN TRANSPORTATION CONSULTING, INC.
REVISED JULY 2010
Int. Peak
No. Intersection Hour CMA LOS CMA LOS CMA LOS
8 Venice Boulevard and AM 1.647 F 1.659 F 0.012 * 1.566 F -0.081
Robertson Boulevard
[1]
PM 1.673 F 1.693 F 0.020 * 1.629 F -0.044
9 Venice Boulevard and AM 1.069 F 1.083 F 0.014 * 1.053 F -0.016
National Boulevard
[1]
PM 1.281 F 1.293 F 0.012 * 1.279 F -0.002
10 Venice Boulevard and AM 0.545 A 0.549 A 0.004 0.545 A 0.000
Helms Avenue
[1]
PM 0.559 A 0.559 A 0.000 0.559 A 0.000
11 Venice Boulevard and AM 0.835 D 0.853 D 0.018 0.840 D 0.005
Cattaraugus Avenue
[1]
PM 0.704 C 0.734 C 0.030 0.711 C 0.007
20 Washington Boulevard and AM 0.940 E 0.962 E 0.022 * 0.910 E -0.030
National Boulevard PM 0.904 E 0.921 E 0.017 0.921 E 0.017
21 Washington Boulevard and AM 0.722 F
[2]
0.754 F
[2]
0.032 * 0.539 A -0.183
Wesley Street PM 0.579 F
[2]
0.703 F
[2]
0.124 * 0.485 A -0.094
22 Washington Boulevard and AM 0.536 A 0.543 A 0.007 0.543 A 0.007
Helms Avenue PM 0.409 A 0.439 A 0.030 0.427 A 0.018
23 Washington Boulevard and AM 0.973 F
[2]
1.006 F
[2]
0.033 * 0.989
[a]
F
[2]
0.016
Cattaraugus Avenue PM 0.669 F
[2]
0.800 F
[2]
0.131 * 0.650
[a]
F
[2]
-0.019
0.763
[b]
C-0.210
0.477
[b]
A-0.192
[1] City of Los Angeles intersection.
[2] Unsignalized intersection. LOS value determined using HCM methodology.
"*" Indicates significant impact per City of Culver City criteria.
"*" Indicates significant impact per City of Los Angeles (LADOT) criteria.
[a] Assumes installation of EB left-turn lane only.
[b] Assumes installation of EB left-turn lane plus new 3-phase traffic signal.
Table 16
Critical Movement Analysis Summary
Future (2013) With Project Plus Recommended Mitigation Conditions
Plus Mitigation Project
Without
Impact
With Project
Impact
With Project
As shown in Table 16, implementation of the recommended mitigation measures will reduce the
potential impacts of the proposed project to less than significant levels at each of the five
significantly impacted intersections. Further, the anticipated redistribution of project traffic as a
secondary effect of the new traffic signal at Washington Boulevard and Wesley Street will also
reduce the project’s impacts at several nearby intersections that are not significantly impacted.
It should be noted, however, that although the recommended roadway improvements will
reduce the project’s incremental traffic impacts to less than significant levels, and will, in fact,
improve operating conditions at several of the study intersections to better than forecast
ATTACHMENT 5
239
107
8770 WASHINGTON BOULEVARD MIXED-USE HIRSCH/GREEN TRANSPORTATION CONSULTING, INC.
REVISED JULY 2010
“Without Project” conditions, the proposed measures are not expected to improve the overall
levels of service at any of the subject intersections, with the exception of Washington Boulevard
and Wesley Street, which will improve from LOS F to LOS A as a result of the installation of the
new traffic signal at this location, and the intersection of Washington Boulevard and Cattaraugus
Avenue, which would improve to LOS C or better if the new traffic signal is installed.
It should also be noted that the recommended installation of a new northbound right-turn lane
on National Boulevard at Washington Boulevard will require the project to dedicate and widen
an approximately 100-foot portion of its National Boulevard frontage south of Washington
Boulevard by approximately nine feet, in addition to an anticipated nine-foot dedication required
as part of the Expo Line project’s roadway improvements. If this additional dedication cannot be
accommodated by the project, or if for any reason the recommended right-turn lane is not
installed, the project’s impacts at this location would remain significant and unavoidable, unless
an alternative and similarly effective improvement were to be identified.
Similarly, as described previously, two of the projects’ significant impacts occur at intersections
under the jurisdiction of the City of Los Angeles; Venice Boulevard and Robertson Boulevard,
and Venice Boulevard and National Boulevard. As such, while LADOT has agreed that the
proposed mitigation improvements at these locations are acceptable, the City of Culver City
cannot guarantee their implementation, and therefore, if the City of Los Angeles does not
implement the recommended at one or both of these intersections, the project-related traffic
impacts at those locations would remain significant and unavoidable.
Although the proposed project could significantly impact up to five intersections in the immediate
project vicinity, the traffic analyses summarized in this report also show that the project would
not generate sufficient net new traffic to produce significant impacts along any of the adjacent
local/residential streets examined in this study, nor would the traffic generated by the project be
expected to significantly impact any of the regional arterial roadways or freeways within the
project vicinity identified in the Los Angeles County CMP. As a result, no further off-site traffic
mitigation measures beyond those improvements described above are warranted for the project.
The proposed project will provide a total of approximately 341 on-site project-specific parking
spaces, including approximately 212 residential spaces (183 resident and 29 guest spaces),
and 129 commercial (office and retail) spaces, plus an additional 15 public parking spaces, to
replace on-street parking removed along Wesley Street as part of the project’s development, for
a total parking supply of 356 spaces. The proposed parking supply exceeds the current City
ATTACHMENT 5
240
108
8770 WASHINGTON BOULEVARD MIXED-USE HIRSCH/GREEN TRANSPORTATION CONSULTING, INC.
REVISED JULY 2010
parking requirements for the development as a whole by a total of 18 spaces (not counting the
15 public parking replacement spaces), including 12 spaces more than the required amount of
residential parking for residents and the required amount of parking for residential guests, and
six (6) more than the required number of commercial/retail spaces. As a result, no significant
on-site parking-related impacts due to parking supply shortages or “overflow” parking in the
adjacent residential neighborhoods or commercial areas by project employees or visitors due to
on-site parking shortages are anticipated.
The project’s proposed vehicular access and internal circulation plan is adequate and is
expected to operate acceptably, and the proposed parking layout is acceptable, as described in
detail earlier in this report. However, while it is acceptable for the project’s proposed
Washington Boulevard driveway to provide two-way (entry and exit) access for the site, it is
recommended that this driveway be limited to right-turn entry/right-turn exit to avoid conflicts
with the existing left-turn lane on westbound Washington Boulevard and the nearby intersection
of Washington Boulevard and National Boulevard.
Additionally, the proposed on-site truck loading dock for the supermarket component of the
project, located at the southeastern corner of the site, will require “inbound” delivery trucks to
drive past (south of) the project’s Wesley Street commercial and residential driveway and then
back into the loading dock. While backing into a loading dock from an adjacent street is not
typically the preferred access method, this maneuver will not create any significant traffic or
access impacts to Wesley Street operations, since this street is a limited-use cul-de-sac facility
in the immediate project vicinity. However, in order to further minimize any potential access or
circulation conflicts, it is recommended that a new striped “median” island be provided on
Wesley Street south of the project’s parking garage driveway as a “staging” location for inbound
delivery trucks waiting to back into the loading dock (as described earlier in the discussion as
part of the recommend intersection/roadway improvements at Washington Boulevard and
Wesley Street). It is also recommended that all deliveries to the on-site loading dock be limited
to times when the operations of the retail/commercial components of the site are minimal (such
as before or after the retail/commercial uses’ typical hours of operation), and that on-site
personnel be designated to assist with loading dock “backing” maneuvers to prevent conflicts
with any vehicles using Wesley Street or accessing the project’s adjacent Wesley Street parking
garage access driveway. With the provision of parking assist personnel and off-peak period
scheduling of deliveries, the truck “backing” maneuver is not anticipated to create any significant
traffic or access impacts to the project’s on-site or adjacent street vehicular circulation.
ATTACHMENT 5
241
109
8770 WASHINGTON BOULEVARD MIXED-USE HIRSCH/GREEN TRANSPORTATION CONSULTING, INC.
REVISED JULY 2010
Finally, in addition to the on-site supermarket loading dock, a short-term loading zone is
proposed along the project frontage of Wesley Street, between Washington Boulevard and the
proposed parking garage access driveway. This loading area is anticipated to be used by the
proposed drugstore/pharmacy and other on-site retail/commercial uses, and/or for residential
loading/unloading activities. On-street loading spaces are permitted through approval by the
City Engineer or Traffic Committee. As detailed in the preceding analyses, due to the limited
amount of traffic on Wesley Street (even with development of the proposed project and other
future developments) and other factors, no significant operational or access issues associated
with the on-street loading area are anticipated.
Therefore, as summarized in the preceding report, with the implementation of the recommended
intersection and roadway mitigation improvements, along with the operational modifications
described above, all of the project’s potential traffic, access, and vehicular circulation impacts
will be reduced to less than significant levels, and no further mitigation measures are required.
ATTACHMENT 5
242
APPENDICES
(Contained in Separate Document)
ATTACHMENT 5
243ATTACHMENT 5
244
I-i
8770 WASHINGTON BOULEVARD MIXED-USE HIRSCH/GREEN TRANSPORTATION CONSULTING, INC.
REVISED JULY 2010
APPENDICES
TABLE OF CONTENTS
VOLUME I
A – Related Projects Trip Generation Rates/Equations
B – Intersection Geometrics/Controls and Traffic Count Data Sheets
C – Project Local/Residential Street Trip Calculations
D – Conceptual Traffic Mitigation Improvements and Supporting Analyses
VOLUME II
E – CMA Calculation Worksheets
Existing (2010) Conditions
Future (2013) Without Project Conditions
VOLUME III
E – CMA Calculation Worksheets
Future (2013) With Project Conditions
Future (2013) With Project Plus Mitigation Conditions
ATTACHMENT 5
245
APPENDIX A
RELATED PROJECTS TRIP GENERATION RATES/EQUATIONS
ATTACHMENT 5
246
A-1
8770 WASHINGTON BOULEVARD MIXED-USE HIRSCH/GREEN TRANSPORTATION CONSULTING, INC.
REVISED JULY 2010
Single-Family Detached Housing - per dwelling unit (ITE Land Use 210)
Daily Trips: T = 9.57 (U)
AM Peak Hour: T = 0.75 (U); I/B = 25%, O/B = 75%
PM Peak Hour: T = 1.01 (U); I/B = 63%, O/B = 37%
Apartment - per dwelling unit (ITE Land Use 220)
Daily Trips: T = 6.65 (U)
AM Peak Hour: T = 0.51 (U); I/B = 20%, O/B = 80%
PM Peak Hour: T = 0.62 (U); I/B = 65%, O/B = 35%
Condominium/Townhome - per dwelling unit (ITE Land Use 230)
Daily Trips: T = 5.81 (U)
AM Peak Hour: T = 0.44 (U); I/B = 17%, O/B = 83%
PM Peak Hour: T = 0.52 (U); I/B = 67%, O/B = 33%
Hotel - per room (ITE Land Use 310)
Daily Trips: T = 8.17 (R)
AM Peak Hour: T = 0.56 (R); I/B = 61%, O/B = 39%
PM Peak Hour: T = 0.59 (R); I/B = 53%, O/B = 47%
High School - per student (ITE Land Use 530)
Daily Trips: T = 1.71 (S)
AM Peak Hour: T = 0.42 (S); I/B = 68%, O/B = 32%
PM Peak Hour: T = 0.13 (S); I/B = 47%, O/B = 53%
Private School (K - 12) - per student (ITE Land Use 536)
Daily Trips: T = 2.48 (S)
AM Peak Hour: T = 0.81 (S); I/B = 61%, O/B = 39%
PM Peak Hour: T = 0.17 (S); I/B = 43%, O/B = 57%
General Office - per 1,000 gross square feet of floor area (ITE Land Use 710)
Daily Trips: T = 11.01 (A)
AM Peak Hour: T = 1.55 (A); I/B = 88%, O/B = 12%
PM Peak Hour: T = 1.49 (A); I/B = 17%, O/B = 83%
Specialty Retail Center - per 1,000 gross square feet of floor area (ITE Land Use 814)
Daily Trips: T = 44.32 (A)
AM Peak Hour: T = 1.33 (A); I/B = 60%, O/B = 40% (Assumed as 3% of Daily, per SanDAG)
PM Peak Hour: T = 2.71 (A); I/B = 44%, O/B = 56%
Shopping Center - per 1,000 gross square feet of floor area (ITE Land Use 820)
Daily Trips: T = 42.94 (A)
AM Peak Hour: T = 1.00 (A); I/B = 61%, O/B = 39%
PM Peak Hour: T = 3.73 (A); I/B = 49%, O/B = 51%
Table A-1
Related Projects Trip Generation Rates and Equations
ITE 8th Edition Data
ATTACHMENT 5
247
A-2
8770 WASHINGTON BOULEVARD MIXED-USE HIRSCH/GREEN TRANSPORTATION CONSULTING, INC.
REVISED JULY 2010
Supermarket - per 1,000 gross square feet of floor area (ITE Land Use 850)
Daily Trips: T = 102.24 (A)
AM Peak Hour: T = 3.59 (A)2; I/B = 61%, O/B = 39%
PM Peak Hour: T = 10.50 (A); I/B = 51%, O/B = 49%
Convenience Market (24-Hour) - per 1,000 gross square feet of floor area (ITE Land Use 851)
Daily Trips: T = 737.99 (A)
AM Peak Hour: T = 67.03 (A); I/B = 50%, O/B = 50%
PM Peak Hour: T = 52.41 (A); I/B = 51%, O/B = 49%
Pharmacy/Drugstore without Drive-Through - per 1,000 gross square feet of floor area (ITE Land Use 880)
Daily Trips: T = 90.06 (A)
AM Peak Hour: T = 3.20 (A); I/B = 59%, O/B = 41%
PM Peak Hour: T = 8.42 (A); I/B = 50%, O/B = 50%
High-Turnover (Sit-Down) Restaurant - per 1,000 gross square feet of floor area (ITE Land Use 932)
Daily Trips: T = 127.15 (A)
AM Peak Hour: T = 11.52 (A); I/B = 52%, O/B = 48%
PM Peak Hour: T = 11.15 (A); I/B = 59%, O/B = 41%
Gasoline/Service Station with Convenience Market - per 1,000 gross square feet of floor area (ITE Land Use 945)
Daily Trips: T = 1,224.90 (A) [estimated]
AM Peak Hour: T = 79.30 (A); I/B = 51%, O/B = 49%
PM Peak Hour: T = 97.08 (A); I/B = 50%, O/B = 50%
Self Service Car Wash - per wash stall (ITE Land Use 947)
Daily Trips: T = 108.00 (WS)
AM Peak Hour: T = 8.00 (WS); I/B = 50%, O/B = 50% (peak of generator)
PM Peak Hour: T = 5.54 (WS); I/B = 51%, O/B = 49%
Where: A = Building Area in 1,000 sq. ft. I/B = Inbound Trip Percentage
U = Dwelling Units O/B = Outbound Trip Percentage
S = Students
R = Rooms
WS = Wash Stalls
Table A-1 (continued)
Related Projects Trip Generation Rates and Equations
ITE 8th Edition Data
ATTACHMENT 5
248
APPENDIX B
INTERSECTION GEOMETRICS/CONTROLS
AND TRAFFIC COUNT DATA SHEETS
ATTACHMENT 5
249ATTACHMENT 5
250ATTACHMENT 5
251
Intersection Counts
ATTACHMENT 5
252INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT SUMMARY
CLIENT: HIRSCH/GREEN TRANSPORTATION CONSULTING, INC.
PROJECT: WASHINGTON - NATIONAL EMC / CULVER CITY
DATE: WEDNESDAY, MARCH 11, 2009
PERIOD: 07:00 AM TO 10:00 AM
INTERSECTION N/S ROBERTSON BOULEVARD
E/W CATTARAGUS AVENUE
FILE NUMBER: 1-AM
15 MINUTE 123456789 10 11 12
TOTALS SBRT SBTH SBLT WBRT WBTH WBLT NBRT NBTH NBLT EBRT EBTH EBLT
0700-0715 10 242 3 11 28 18 0 186 10 11 5 5
0715-0730 18 279 4 12 39 39 1 228 19 19 11 10
0730-0745 26 355 4 10 43 47 1 261 16 20 19 22
0745-0800 29 395 8 18 63 30 2 296 19 32 26 31
0800-0815 19 353 9 17 53 20 2 291 20 29 39 26
0815-0830 11 385 8 17 65 19 1 321 19 28 39 24
0830-0845 11 437 12 17 50 13 0 324 18 19 29 24
0845-0900 8 362 8 22 58 7 1 316 23 17 24 32
0900-0915 12 342 13 16 40 13 1 324 19 14 22 26
0915-0930 12 366 11 21 31 10 2 328 19 13 17 24
0930-0945 12 326 14 16 20 8 2 289 21 14 16 16
0940-1000 9 338 15 19 17 10 1 284 22 10 16 17
1 HOUR 123456789 10 11 12
TOTALS SBRT SBTH SBLT WBRT WBTH WBLT NBRT NBTH NBLT EBRT EBTH EBLT TOTALS
0700-0800 83 1271 19 51 173 134 4 971 64 82 61 68 2981
0715-0815 92 1382 25 57 198 136 6 1076 74 100 95 89 3330
0730-0830 85 1488 29 62 224 116 6 1169 74 109 123 103 3588
0745-0845 70 1570 37 69 231 82 5 1232 76 108 133 105 3718
0800-0900 49 1537 37 73 226 59 4 1252 80 93 131 106 3647
0815-0915 42 1526 41 72 213 52 3 1285 79 78 114 106 3611
0830-0930 43 1507 44 76 179 43 4 1292 79 63 92 106 3528
0845-0945 44 1396 46 75 149 38 6 1257 82 58 79 98 3328
0900-1000 45 1372 53 72 108 41 6 1225 81 51 71 83 3208
A.M. PEAK HOUR 70 1570 37
0745-0845
105 69
133 231
108 82
761232 5
ROBERTSON BOULEVARD
CATTARAGUS AVENUE
THE TRAFFIC SOLUTION
329 DIAMOND STREET
ARCADIA, CALIFORNIA 91006
626.446.7978
ATTACHMENT 5
253INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT SUMMARY
CLIENT: HIRSCH/GREEN TRANSPORTATION CONSULTING, INC.
PROJECT: WASHINGTON - NATIONAL EMC / CULVER CITY
DATE: WEDNESDAY, MARCH 11, 2009
PERIOD: 03:00 PM TO 06:00 PM
INTERSECTION N/S ROBERTSON BOULEVARD
E/W CATTARAGUS AVENUE
FILE NUMBER: 1-PM
15 MINUTE 123456789 10 11 12
TOTALS SBRT SBTH SBLT WBRT WBTH WBLT NBRT NBTH NBLT EBRT EBTH EBLT
0300-0315 17 365 19 15 33 15 4 346 19 26 25 7
0315-0330 12 344 19 11 31 14 3 349 14 34 31 13
0330-0345 15 407 17 9 20 11 2 374 12 27 49 17
0345-0400 14 346 11 14 14 11 2 349 16 20 42 16
0400-0415 17 405 14 11 16 11 2 355 19 26 41 16
0415-0430 12 383 18 10 16 8 4 361 17 21 40 20
0430-0445 10 381 14 14 26 16 3 362 16 17 39 20
0445-0500 10 320 16 13 20 11 2 380 15 17 41 24
0500-0515 17 358 11 13 22 16 3 388 15 24 44 20
0515-0530 16 441 15 8 13 10 5 378 16 25 59 20
0530-0545 15 384 17 9 18 18 4 385 19 33 61 29
0545-0600 14 399 10 10 23 15 3 367 15 27 55 27
1 HOUR 123456789 10 11 12
TOTALS SBRT SBTH SBLT WBRT WBTH WBLT NBRT NBTH NBLT EBRT EBTH EBLT TOTALS
0300-0400 58 1462 66 49 98 51 11 1418 61 107 147 53 3581
0315-0415 58 1502 61 45 81 47 9 1427 61 107 163 62 3623
0330-0430 58 1541 60 44 66 41 10 1439 64 94 172 69 3658
0345-0445 53 1515 57 49 72 46 11 1427 68 84 162 72 3616
0400-0500 49 1489 62 48 78 46 11 1458 67 81 161 80 3630
0415-0515 49 1442 59 50 84 51 12 1491 63 79 164 84 3628
0430-0530 53 1500 56 48 81 53 13 1508 62 83 183 84 3724
0445-0545 58 1503 59 43 73 55 14 1531 65 99 205 93 3798
0500-0600 62 1582 53 40 76 59 15 1518 65 109 219 96 3894
P.M. PEAK HOUR 62 1582 53
0500-0600
96 40
219 76
109 59
65151815
ROBERTSON BOULEVARD
CATTARAGUS AVENUE
THE TRAFFIC SOLUTION
329 DIAMOND STREET
ARCADIA, CALIFORNIA 91006
626.446.7978
ATTACHMENT 5
254WILTEC Phone: (626) 564-1944 Fax: (626) 564-0969
INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT SUMMARY
CLIENT: HIRSCH/GREEN TRANSPORTATION CONSULTING, INC.
PROJECT: CULVER CITY TRAFFIC COUNTS
DATE: TUESDAY SEPTEMBER 9, 2008
PERIOD: 7:00 AM TO 10:00 AM
INTERSECTION: 2 N/S ROBERTSON BOULEVARD
E/W I-10 WB OFF-RAMP / KINCARDINE AVENUE
15 MIN COUNTS
123456789 10 11 12
PERIOD SBRT SBTH SBLT WBRT WBTH WBLT NBRT NBTH NBLT EBRT EBTH EBLT TOTAL
700-715 4 282 0 38 6 14 0 218 15 5 0 6 588
715-730 22 346 0 29 13 21 0 263 22 17 0 18 751
730-745 32 333 0 29 20 11 0 247 17 32 0 6 727
745-800 21 336 0 26 17 23 0 258 9 37 0 28 755
800-815 24 386 0 42 6 18 0 280 11 16 0 30 813
815-830 15 326 0 36 1 11 0 207 8 10 0 27 641
830-845 12 365 0 36 2 13 0 282 9 7 0 25 751
845-900 20 387 0 51 4 20 0 313 8 11 0 30 844
900-915 10 304 0 65 0 24 0 281 9 7 0 13 713
915-930 6 262 0 50 4 24 0 303 6509 669
930-945 5 267 0 45 4 34 0 301 2 2 0 14 674
945-1000 9 279 0 124 7 38 0 260 8807 740
HOUR TOTALS
123456789 10 11 12
TIME SBRT SBTH SBLT WBRT WBTH WBLT NBRT NBTH NBLT EBRT EBTH EBLT TOTAL
700-800 79 1297 0 122 56 69 0 986 63 91 0 58 2821
715-815 99 1401 0 126 56 73 0 1048 59 102 0 82 3046
730-830 92 1381 0 133 44 63 0 992 45 95 0 91 2936
745-845 72 1413 0 140 26 65 0 1027 37 70 0 110 2960
800-900 71 1464 0 165 13 62 0 1082 36 44 0 112 3049
815-815 57 1382 0 188 7 68 0 1083 34 35 0 95 2949
830-930 48 1318 0 202 10 81 0 1179 32 30 0 77 2977
845-945 41 1220 0 211 12 102 0 1198 25 25 0 66 2900
900-1000 30 1112 0 284 15 120 0 1145 25 22 0 43 2796
A.M. PEAK HOUR
800-900 165
71 1464 0 13
62
112
I-10 WB OFF-RAMP / 0 36 1082 0
KINCARDINE AVENUE
44
ROBERTSON BOULEVARD
ATTACHMENT 5
255WILTEC Phone: (626) 564-1944 Fax: (626) 564-0969
INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT SUMMARY
CLIENT: HIRSCH/GREEN TRANSPORTATION CONSULTING, INC.
PROJECT: CULVER CITY TRAFFIC COUNTS
DATE: TUESDAY SEPTEMBER 9, 2008
PERIOD: 3:00 PM TO 6:00 PM
INTERSECTION: 2 N/S ROBERTSON BOULEVARD
E/W I-10 WB OFF-RAMP / KINCARDINE AVENUE
15 MIN COUNTS
123456789 10 11 12
PERIOD SBRT SBTH SBLT WBRT WBTH WBLT NBRT NBTH NBLT EBRT EBTH EBLT TOTAL
300-315 12 252 0 135 15 60 0 299 9 31 0 16 829
315-330 11 308 0 127 12 62 0 293 9 38 0 18 878
330-345 8 298 0 139 9 48 0 257 3 18 0 22 802
345-400 7 311 0 126 8 73 0 261 12 7 0 19 824
400-415 8 324 0 117 10 74 0 219 8 15 0 21 796
415-430 7 236 0 140 6 92 0 222 11 4 0 16 734
430-445 11 288 0 117 3 70 0 261 4 12 0 23 789
445-500 8 333 0 153 3 92 0 274 2 7 0 23 895
500-515 4 276 0 144 5 82 0 282 3 6 0 16 818
515-530 6 232 0 118 8 98 0 309 1 16 0 20 808
530-545 9 280 0 126 2 87 0 331 4 35 0 17 891
545-600 14 390 0 141 6 95 0 264 6 25 0 20 961
HOUR TOTALS
123456789 10 11 12
TIME SBRT SBTH SBLT WBRT WBTH WBLT NBRT NBTH NBLT EBRT EBTH EBLT TOTAL
300-400 38 1169 0 527 44 243 0 1110 33 94 0 75 3333
315-415 34 1241 0 509 39 257 0 1030 32 78 0 80 3300
330-430 30 1169 0 522 33 287 0 959 34 44 0 78 3156
345-445 33 1159 0 500 27 309 0 963 35 38 0 79 3143
400-500 34 1181 0 527 22 328 0 976 25 38 0 83 3214
415-515 30 1133 0 554 17 336 0 1039 20 29 0 78 3236
430-530 29 1129 0 532 19 342 0 1126 10 41 0 82 3310
445-545 27 1121 0 541 18 359 0 1196 10 64 0 76 3412
500-600 33 1178 0 529 21 362 0 1186 14 82 0 73 3478
P.M. PEAK HOUR
500-600 529
33 1178 0 21
362
73
I-10 WB OFF-RAMP / 0 14 1186 0
KINCARDINE AVENUE
82
ROBERTSON BOULEVARD
ATTACHMENT 5
256WILTEC Phone: (626) 564-1944 Fax: (626) 564-0969
INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT SUMMARY
CLIENT: HIRSCH/GREEN TRANSPORTATION CONSULTING, INC.
PROJECT: CULVER CITY TRAFFIC COUNTS
DATE: TUESDAY SEPTEMBER 9, 2008
PERIOD: 7:00 AM TO 10:00 AM
INTERSECTION: 3 N/S ROBERTSON BOULEVARD
E/W NATIONAL BOULEVARD
15 MIN COUNTS
123456789 10 11 12
PERIOD SBRT SBTH SBLT WBRT WBTH WBLT NBRT NBTH NBLT EBRT EBTH EBLT TOTAL
700-715 31 146 105 66 87 35 6 84 8 57 92 30 747
715-730 63 174 102 84 127 44 16 124 22 54 114 35 959
730-745 47 200 136 120 154 35 7 177 31 70 146 40 1163
745-800 63 179 122 110 131 53 13 141 20 40 168 43 1083
800-815 44 199 162 96 124 22 8 145 33 68 166 36 1103
815-830 40 212 158 118 148 31 15 112 24 69 140 29 1096
830-845 39 171 146 135 157 46 20 122 19 79 112 41 1087
845-900 43 191 120 110 159 28 14 130 16 73 142 41 1067
900-915 47 172 130 141 136 29 6 148 13 47 130 42 1041
915-930 38 146 106 129 157 30 14 147 13 57 108 37 982
930-945 33 174 116 116 127 36 19 165 19 40 92 29 966
945-1000 59 116 97 81 138 42 11 144 16 32 75 26 837
HOUR TOTALS
123456789 10 11 12
TIME SBRT SBTH SBLT WBRT WBTH WBLT NBRT NBTH NBLT EBRT EBTH EBLT TOTAL
700-800 204 699 465 380 499 167 42 526 81 221 520 148 3952
715-815 217 752 522 410 536 154 44 587 106 232 594 154 4308
730-830 194 790 578 444 557 141 43 575 108 247 620 148 4445
745-845 186 761 588 459 560 152 56 520 96 256 586 149 4369
800-900 166 773 586 459 588 127 57 509 92 289 560 147 4353
815-815 169 746 554 504 600 134 55 512 72 268 524 153 4291
830-930 167 680 502 515 609 133 54 547 61 256 492 161 4177
845-945 161 683 472 496 579 123 53 590 61 217 472 149 4056
900-1000 177 608 449 467 558 137 50 604 61 176 405 134 3826
A.M. PEAK HOUR
730-830 444
194 790 578 557
141
148
NATIONAL BOULEVARD 620 108 575 43
247
ROBERTSON BOULEVARD
ATTACHMENT 5
257WILTEC Phone: (626) 564-1944 Fax: (626) 564-0969
INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT SUMMARY
CLIENT: HIRSCH/GREEN TRANSPORTATION CONSULTING, INC.
PROJECT: CULVER CITY TRAFFIC COUNTS
DATE: TUESDAY SEPTEMBER 9, 2008
PERIOD: 3:00 PM TO 6:00 PM
INTERSECTION: 3 N/S ROBERTSON BOULEVARD
E/W NATIONAL BOULEVARD
15 MIN COUNTS
123456789 10 11 12
PERIOD SBRT SBTH SBLT WBRT WBTH WBLT NBRT NBTH NBLT EBRT EBTH EBLT TOTAL
300-315 68 202 128 64 86 16 25 219 23 23 191 34 1079
315-330 32 188 116 41 76 12 19 181 13 25 186 29 918
330-345 55 215 138 68 92 29 30 202 28 34 205 40 1136
345-400 46 181 129 47 70 14 19 152 20 23 182 39 922
400-415 24 190 97 50 74 19 32 144 20 36 183 37 906
415-430 38 222 111 44 86 21 27 171 16 57 150 29 972
430-445 64 261 132 49 95 34 25 191 14 35 204 50 1154
445-500 52 222 112 60 112 22 24 162 12 29 211 29 1047
500-515 70 229 129 60 103 35 40 200 19 32 209 44 1170
515-530 37 212 129 38 79 24 23 180 16 22 182 31 973
530-545 51 241 158 65 67 30 39 219 27 49 231 53 1230
545-600 28 227 121 42 87 23 17 187 20 30 181 37 1000
HOUR TOTALS
123456789 10 11 12
TIME SBRT SBTH SBLT WBRT WBTH WBLT NBRT NBTH NBLT EBRT EBTH EBLT TOTAL
300-400 201 786 511 220 324 71 93 754 84 105 764 142 4055
315-415 157 774 480 206 312 74 100 679 81 118 756 145 3882
330-430 163 808 475 209 322 83 108 669 84 150 720 145 3936
345-445 172 854 469 190 325 88 103 658 70 151 719 155 3954
400-500 178 895 452 203 367 96 108 668 62 157 748 145 4079
415-515 224 934 484 213 396 112 116 724 61 153 774 152 4343
430-530 223 924 502 207 389 115 112 733 61 118 806 154 4344
445-545 210 904 528 223 361 111 126 761 74 132 833 157 4420
500-600 186 909 537 205 336 112 119 786 82 133 803 165 4373
P.M. PEAK HOUR
445-545 223
210 904 528 361
111
157
NATIONAL BOULEVARD 833 74 761 126
132
ROBERTSON BOULEVARD
ATTACHMENT 5
258WILTEC Phone: (626) 564-1944 Fax: (626) 564-0969
INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT SUMMARY
CLIENT: HIRSCH/GREEN TRANSPORTATION CONSULTING, INC.
PROJECT: CULVER CITY TRAFFIC COUNTS
DATE: TUESDAY SEPTEMBER 9, 2008
PERIOD: 7:00 AM TO 10:00 AM
INTERSECTION: 4 N/S NATIONAL BOULEVARD
E/W I-10 EB ON RAMP
15 MIN COUNTS
123456789 10 11 12
PERIOD SBRT SBTH SBLT WBRT WBTH WBLT NBRT NBTH NBLT EBRT EBTH EBLT TOTAL
700-715 119 87 00000 213 27 000 446
715-730 169 104 00000 224 14 000 511
730-745 121 152 00000 260 18 000 551
745-800 159 217 00000 303 25 000 704
800-815 167 199 00000 275 17 000 658
815-830 118 176 00000 246 22 000 562
830-845 134 156 00000 266 32 000 588
845-900 128 169 00000 214 23 000 534
900-915 153 127 00000 209 18 000 507
915-930 126 112 00000 180 18 000 436
930-945 107 93 00000 173 13 000 386
945-1000 130 86 00000 188 28 000 432
HOUR TOTALS
123456789 10 11 12
TIME SBRT SBTH SBLT WBRT WBTH WBLT NBRT NBTH NBLT EBRT EBTH EBLT TOTAL
700-800 568 560 00000 1000 84 0 0 0 2212
715-815 616 672 00000 1062 74 0 0 0 2424
730-830 565 744 00000 1084 82 0 0 0 2475
745-845 578 748 00000 1090 96 0 0 0 2512
800-900 547 700 00000 1001 94 0 0 0 2342
815-815 533 628 00000 935 95 000 2191
830-930 541 564 00000 869 91 000 2065
845-945 514 501 00000 776 72 000 1863
900-1000 516 418 00000 750 77 000 1761
A.M. PEAK HOUR
745-845 0
578 748 0 0|10 10 10|I-10 EB ON RAMP 0 96 1090 0
|10 10|NATIONAL BOULEVARD
ATTACHMENT 5
259WILTEC Phone: (626) 564-1944 Fax: (626) 564-0969
INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT SUMMARY
CLIENT: HIRSCH/GREEN TRANSPORTATION CONSULTING, INC.
PROJECT: CULVER CITY TRAFFIC COUNTS
DATE: TUESDAY SEPTEMBER 9, 2008
PERIOD: 3:00 PM TO 6:00 PM
INTERSECTION: 4 N/S I-10 EB ON RAMP
E/W NATIONAL BOULEVARD
15 MIN COUNTS
123456789 10 11 12
PERIOD SBRT SBTH SBLT WBRT WBTH WBLT NBRT NBTH NBLT EBRT EBTH EBLT TOTAL
300-315 163 204 00000 168 41 000 576
315-330 156 199 00000 144 30 000 529
330-345 153 197 00000 153 28 000 531
345-400 160 153 00000 134 28 000 475
400-415 145 171 00000 144 14 000 474
415-430 126 190 00000 145 24 000 485
430-445 133 223 00000 184 19 000 559
445-500 123 211 00000 162 13 000 509
500-515 104 237 00000 166 27 000 534
515-530 121 230 00000 149 20 000 520
530-545 112 227 00000 143 11 000 493
545-600 132 258 00000 179 23 000 592
HOUR TOTALS
123456789 10 11 12
TIME SBRT SBTH SBLT WBRT WBTH WBLT NBRT NBTH NBLT EBRT EBTH EBLT TOTAL
300-400 632 753 00000 599 127 000 2111
315-415 614 720 00000 575 100 000 2009
330-430 584 711 00000 576 94 000 1965
345-445 564 737 00000 607 85 000 1993
400-500 527 795 00000 635 70 000 2027
415-515 486 861 00000 657 83 000 2087
430-530 481 901 00000 661 79 000 2122
445-545 460 905 00000 620 71 000 2056
500-600 469 952 00000 637 81 000 2139
P.M. PEAK HOUR
500-600 0
469 952 0 0|10 10 10|NATIONAL BOULEVARD 0 81 637 0|10 10|I-10 EB ON RAMP
ATTACHMENT 5
260INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT SUMMARY
CLIENT: HIRSCH/GREEN TRANSPORTATION CONSULTING, INC.
PROJECT: WASHINGTON - NATIONAL EMC / CULVER CITY
DATE: WEDNESDAY, MARCH 11, 2009
PERIOD: 07:00 AM TO 10:00 AM
INTERSECTION N/S HUGHES AVENUE
E/W VENICE BOULEVARD
FILE NUMBER: 5-AM
15 MINUTE 123456789 10 11 12
TOTALS SBRT SBTH SBLT WBRT WBTH WBLT NBRT NBTH NBLT EBRT EBTH EBLT
0700-0715 14 18 10 9 338 38 12 17 13 17 244 5
0715-0730 13 20 8 8 387 31 13 22 25 24 300 8
0730-0745 16 27 11 7 498 43 11 30 26 22 390 15
0745-0800 12 41 17 10 441 43 7 33 29 22 413 10
0800-0815 8 39 18 12 483 35 10 39 22 20 436 8
0815-0830 8 55 12 12 411 34 15 52 21 26 447 10
0830-0845 12 50 18 8 440 44 11 44 21 31 464 11
0845-0900 17 51 15 10 434 58 12 43 27 38 378 11
0900-0915 14 50 11 12 415 59 19 46 22 24 418 12
0915-0930 12 42 14 8 358 43 16 30 17 28 354 17
0930-0945 10 30 11 9 378 38 19 37 21 27 357 11
0940-1000 9 28 7 7 344 30 14 26 17 20 308 10
1 HOUR 123456789 10 11 12
TOTALS SBRT SBTH SBLT WBRT WBTH WBLT NBRT NBTH NBLT EBRT EBTH EBLT TOTALS
0700-0800 55 106 46 34 1664 155 43 102 93 85 1347 38 3768
0715-0815 49 127 54 37 1809 152 41 124 102 88 1539 41 4163
0730-0830 44 162 58 41 1833 155 43 154 98 90 1686 43 4407
0745-0845 40 185 65 42 1775 156 43 168 93 99 1760 39 4465
0800-0900 45 195 63 42 1768 171 48 178 91 115 1725 40 4481
0815-0915 51 206 56 42 1700 195 57 185 91 119 1707 44 4453
0830-0930 55 193 58 38 1647 204 58 163 87 121 1614 51 4289
0845-0945 53 173 51 39 1585 198 66 156 87 117 1507 51 4083
0900-1000 45 150 43 36 1495 170 68 139 77 99 1437 50 3809
A.M. PEAK HOUR 45 195 63
0800-0900
40 42
1725 1768
115 171
9117848
HUGHES AVENUE
VENICE BOULEVARD
THE TRAFFIC SOLUTION
329 DIAMOND STREET
ARCADIA, CALIFORNIA 91006
626.446.7978
ATTACHMENT 5
261INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT SUMMARY
CLIENT: HIRSCH/GREEN TRANSPORTATION CONSULTING, INC.
PROJECT: WASHINGTON - NATIONAL EMC / CULVER CITY
DATE: WEDNESDAY, MARCH 11, 2009
PERIOD: 03:00 PM TO 06:00 PM
INTERSECTION N/S HUGHES AVENUE
E/W VENICE BOULEVARD
FILE NUMBER: 5-PM
15 MINUTE 123456789 10 11 12
TOTALS SBRT SBTH SBLT WBRT WBTH WBLT NBRT NBTH NBLT EBRT EBTH EBLT
0300-0315 12 29 7 16 342 26 25 23 29 27 395 19
0315-0330 11 32 10 12 383 29 21 27 22 21 417 17
0330-0345 9 36 10 12 353 20 18 24 19 29 401 15
0345-0400 14 45 12 10 353 25 15 37 16 30 424 12
0400-0415 16 36 7 11 320 24 20 38 25 27 412 13
0415-0430 13 45 5 12 356 39 24 30 20 21 400 16
0430-0445 10 60 8 7 350 33 19 37 22 22 422 12
0445-0500 13 40 8 7 355 22 17 32 23 29 415 19
0500-0515 12 47 7 11 372 33 20 48 27 26 373 17
0515-0530 14 50 11 10 354 25 15 37 30 23 402 12
0530-0545 11 44 10 12 382 30 21 41 26 17 412 16
0545-0600 14 33 11 10 405 29 20 43 19 28 431 11
1 HOUR 123456789 10 11 12
TOTALS SBRT SBTH SBLT WBRT WBTH WBLT NBRT NBTH NBLT EBRT EBTH EBLT TOTALS
0300-0400 46 142 39 50 1431 100 79 111 86 107 1637 63 3891
0315-0415 50 149 39 45 1409 98 74 126 82 107 1654 57 3890
0330-0430 52 162 34 45 1382 108 77 129 80 107 1637 56 3869
0345-0445 53 186 32 40 1379 121 78 142 83 100 1658 53 3925
0400-0500 52 181 28 37 1381 118 80 137 90 99 1649 60 3912
0415-0515 48 192 28 37 1433 127 80 147 92 98 1610 64 3956
0430-0530 49 197 34 35 1431 113 71 154 102 100 1612 60 3958
0445-0545 50 181 36 40 1463 110 73 158 106 95 1602 64 3978
0500-0600 51 174 39 43 1513 117 76 169 102 94 1618 56 4052
P.M. PEAK HOUR 51 174 39
0500-0600
56 43
1618 1513
94 117
10216976
HUGHES AVENUE
VENICE BOULEVARD
THE TRAFFIC SOLUTION
329 DIAMOND STREET
ARCADIA, CALIFORNIA 91006
626.446.7978
ATTACHMENT 5
262INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT SUMMARY
CLIENT: HIRSCH/GREEN TRANSPORTATION CONSULTING, INC.
PROJECT: WASHINGTON - NATIONAL EMC / CULVER CITY
DATE: WEDNESDAY, MARCH 11, 2009
PERIOD: 07:00 AM TO 10:00 AM
INTERSECTION N/S BAGLEY AVENUE
E/W VENICE BOULEVARD
FILE NUMBER: 6-AM
15 MINUTE 123456789 10 11 12
TOTALS SBRT SBTH SBLT WBRT WBTH WBLT NBRT NBTH NBLT EBRT EBTH EBLT
0700-0715 7 11 9 2 341 8 9 19 10 2 281 8
0715-0730 10 16 10 6 419 8 7 20 9 3 334 9
0730-0745 10 22 14 7 497 9 7 30 7 5 381 14
0745-0800 15 39 19 9 483 9 10 39 10 13 409 19
0800-0815 19 42 18 10 473 10 13 28 11 10 444 19
0815-0830 16 42 20 10 451 16 10 36 14 14 459 15
0830-0845 16 44 16 10 481 23 9 44 12 12 469 15
0845-0900 14 39 22 13 440 20 8 33 12 13 411 15
0900-0915 14 33 17 11 432 23 10 20 7 15 399 13
0915-0930 14 26 16 9 401 18 8 20 10 17 364 13
0930-0945 16 28 18 8 399 25 10 20 12 12 371 14
0940-1000 13 26 16 8 347 29 9 10 9 12 340 15
1 HOUR 123456789 10 11 12
TOTALS SBRT SBTH SBLT WBRT WBTH WBLT NBRT NBTH NBLT EBRT EBTH EBLT TOTALS
0700-0800 42 88 52 24 1740 34 33 108 36 23 1405 50 3635
0715-0815 54 119 61 32 1872 36 37 117 37 31 1568 61 4025
0730-0830 60 145 71 36 1904 44 40 133 42 42 1693 67 4277
0745-0845 66 167 73 39 1888 58 42 147 47 49 1781 68 4425
0800-0900 65 167 76 43 1845 69 40 141 49 49 1783 64 4391
0815-0915 60 158 75 44 1804 82 37 133 45 54 1738 58 4288
0830-0930 58 142 71 43 1754 84 35 117 41 57 1643 56 4101
0845-0945 58 126 73 41 1672 86 36 93 41 57 1545 55 3883
0900-1000 57 113 67 36 1579 95 37 70 38 56 1474 55 3677
A.M. PEAK HOUR 66 167 73
0745-0845
68 39
1781 1888
49 58
4714742
BAGLEY AVENUE
VENICE BOULEVARD
THE TRAFFIC SOLUTION
329 DIAMOND STREET
ARCADIA, CALIFORNIA 91006
626.446.7978
ATTACHMENT 5
263INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT SUMMARY
CLIENT: HIRSCH/GREEN TRANSPORTATION CONSULTING, INC.
PROJECT: WASHINGTON - NATIONAL EMC / CULVER CITY
DATE: WEDNESDAY, MARCH 11, 2009
PERIOD: 03:00 PM TO 06:00 PM
INTERSECTION N/S BAGLEY AVENUE
E/W VENICE BOULEVARD
FILE NUMBER: 6-PM
15 MINUTE 123456789 10 11 12
TOTALS SBRT SBTH SBLT WBRT WBTH WBLT NBRT NBTH NBLT EBRT EBTH EBLT
0300-0315 15 31 12 9 369 16 7 10 6 16 380 23
0315-0330 14 33 16 14 374 19 6 14 4 19 425 18
0330-0345 20 29 11 12 355 15 11 14 7 23 404 15
0345-0400 20 28 12 12 353 18 6 15 9 17 437 15
0400-0415 16 35 15 15 331 18 7 13 10 22 397 16
0415-0430 23 24 19 19 355 17 9 18 9 28 394 18
0430-0445 26 29 17 11 352 15 7 18 5 31 408 23
0445-0500 19 31 17 14 353 19 6 22 9 29 397 20
0500-0515 20 37 21 15 377 15 9 27 9 25 358 24
0515-0530 24 45 19 20 348 18 10 21 11 26 384 27
0530-0545 22 41 23 19 379 24 10 26 7 28 411 26
0545-0600 26 39 24 15 404 19 11 25 11 26 400 31
1 HOUR 123456789 10 11 12
TOTALS SBRT SBTH SBLT WBRT WBTH WBLT NBRT NBTH NBLT EBRT EBTH EBLT TOTALS
0300-0400 69 121 51 47 1451 68 30 53 26 75 1646 71 3708
0315-0415 70 125 54 53 1413 70 30 56 30 81 1663 64 3709
0330-0430 79 116 57 58 1394 68 33 60 35 90 1632 64 3686
0345-0445 85 116 63 57 1391 68 29 64 33 98 1636 72 3712
0400-0500 84 119 68 59 1391 69 29 71 33 110 1596 77 3706
0415-0515 88 121 74 59 1437 66 31 85 32 113 1557 85 3748
0430-0530 89 142 74 60 1430 67 32 88 34 111 1547 94 3768
0445-0545 85 154 80 68 1457 76 35 96 36 108 1550 97 3842
0500-0600 92 162 87 69 1508 76 40 99 38 105 1553 108 3937
P.M. PEAK HOUR 92 162 87
0500-0600
108 69
1553 1508
105 76
389940
BAGLEY AVENUE
VENICE BOULEVARD
THE TRAFFIC SOLUTION
329 DIAMOND STREET
ARCADIA, CALIFORNIA 91006
626.446.7978
ATTACHMENT 5
264WILTEC Phone: (626) 564-1944 Fax: (626) 564-0969
INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT SUMMARY
CLIENT: HIRSCH/GREEN TRANSPORTATION CONSULTING, INC.
PROJECT: CULVER CITY TRAFFIC COUNTS
DATE: TUESDAY SEPTEMBER 9, 2008
PERIOD: 7:00 AM TO 10:00 AM
INTERSECTION: 7 N/S CULVER BOULEVARD
E/W VENICE BOULEVARD
15 MIN COUNTS
123456789 10 11 12
PERIOD SBRT SBTH SBLT WBRT WBTH WBLT NBRT NBTH NBLT EBRT EBTH EBLT TOTAL
700-715 12 6 37 39 350 52 124 3 5 3 249 2 882
715-730 8 11 28 20 409 75 156 8 3 1 318 4 1041
730-745 4 5 42 22 431 99 135 5 6 4 356 5 1114
745-800 10 3 52 33 395 108 165 12 11 5 398 9 1201
800-815 13 11 60 59 434 96 185 17 6 2 424 9 1316
815-830 2 8 43 35 399 86 150 29 9 5 408 2 1176
830-845 10 12 40 37 425 88 128 25 10 8 438 9 1230
845-900 6 9 49 33 450 99 151 19 11 4 465 8 1304
900-915 13 14 41 39 493 111 160 9 8 8 455 9 1360
915-930 11 9 26 29 405 91 127 7 10 5 433 10 1163
930-945 7 7 45 44 395 82 130 8 21 8 406 9 1162
945-1000 7 7 36 48 367 80 106 13 13 3 315 7 1002
HOUR TOTALS
123456789 10 11 12
TIME SBRT SBTH SBLT WBRT WBTH WBLT NBRT NBTH NBLT EBRT EBTH EBLT TOTAL
700-800 34 25 159 114 1585 334 580 28 25 13 1321 20 4238
715-815 35 30 182 134 1669 378 641 42 26 12 1496 27 4672
730-830 29 27 197 149 1659 389 635 63 32 16 1586 25 4807
745-845 35 34 195 164 1653 378 628 83 36 20 1668 29 4923
800-900 31 40 192 164 1708 369 614 90 36 19 1735 28 5026
815-815 31 43 173 144 1767 384 589 82 38 25 1766 28 5070
830-930 40 44 156 138 1773 389 566 60 39 25 1791 36 5057
845-945 37 39 161 145 1743 383 568 43 50 25 1759 36 4989
900-1000 38 37 148 160 1660 364 523 37 52 24 1609 35 4687
A.M. PEAK HOUR
815-815 144
31 43 173 1767
384
28
VENICE BOULEVARD 1766 38 82 589
25
CULVER BOULEVARD
ATTACHMENT 5
265WILTEC Phone: (626) 564-1944 Fax: (626) 564-0969
INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT SUMMARY
CLIENT: HIRSCH/GREEN TRANSPORTATION CONSULTING, INC.
PROJECT: CULVER CITY TRAFFIC COUNTS
DATE: TUESDAY SEPTEMBER 9, 2008
PERIOD: 3:00 PM TO 6:00 PM
INTERSECTION: 7 N/S CULVER BOULEVARD
E/W VENICE BOULEVARD
15 MIN COUNTS
123456789 10 11 12
PERIOD SBRT SBTH SBLT WBRT WBTH WBLT NBRT NBTH NBLT EBRT EBTH EBLT TOTAL
300-315 14 8 62 47 223 76 149 11 10 13 365 8 986
315-330 13 7 64 54 235 85 138 15 16 19 399 21 1066
330-345 6 12 71 56 251 94 158 17 21 20 394 5 1105
345-400 16 23 89 71 299 85 171 34 20 21 422 11 1262
400-415 7 11 62 41 296 91 130 23 13 12 391 11 1088
415-430 15 22 66 55 259 100 175 16 31 16 403 8 1166
430-445 11 13 72 60 273 122 182 20 21 19 427 8 1228
445-500 10 28 77 39 308 100 167 37 16 17 391 10 1200
500-515 15 19 73 43 361 100 206 18 19 14 429 12 1309
515-530 7 19 73 53 405 88 172 21 23 14 438 10 1323
530-545 12 16 60 46 394 86 169 16 18 18 402 17 1254
545-600 13 16 84 60 444 107 167 24 22 14 415 11 1377
HOUR TOTALS
123456789 10 11 12
TIME SBRT SBTH SBLT WBRT WBTH WBLT NBRT NBTH NBLT EBRT EBTH EBLT TOTAL
300-400 49 50 286 228 1008 340 616 77 67 73 1580 45 4419
315-415 42 53 286 222 1081 355 597 89 70 72 1606 48 4521
330-430 44 68 288 223 1105 370 634 90 85 69 1610 35 4621
345-445 49 69 289 227 1127 398 658 93 85 68 1643 38 4744
400-500 43 74 277 195 1136 413 654 96 81 64 1612 37 4682
415-515 51 82 288 197 1201 422 730 91 87 66 1650 38 4903
430-530 43 79 295 195 1347 410 727 96 79 64 1685 40 5060
445-545 44 82 283 181 1468 374 714 92 76 63 1660 49 5086
500-600 47 70 290 202 1604 381 714 79 82 60 1684 50 5263
P.M. PEAK HOUR
500-600 202
47 70 290 1604
381
50
VENICE BOULEVARD 1684 82 79 714
60
CULVER BOULEVARD
ATTACHMENT 5
266WILTEC Phone: (626) 564-1944 Fax: (626) 564-0969
INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT SUMMARY
CLIENT: HIRSCH/GREEN TRANSPORTATION CONSULTING, INC.
PROJECT: CULVER CITY TRAFFIC COUNTS
DATE: TUESDAY SEPTEMBER 9, 2008
PERIOD: 7:00 AM TO 10:00 AM
INTERSECTION: 8 N/S ROBERTSON BOULEVARD
E/W VENICE BOULEVARD
15 MIN COUNTS
123456789 10 11 12
PERIOD SBRT SBTH SBLT WBRT WBTH WBLT NBRT NBTH NBLT EBRT EBTH EBLT TOTAL
700-715 21 43 69 53 379 5 1 89 16 14 347 83 1120
715-730 12 53 94 85 410 2 9 103 24 17 391 82 1282
730-745 29 60 114 100 467 9 2 105 36 16 459 84 1481
745-800 35 73 137 93 519 20 7 122 50 22 444 126 1648
800-815 29 67 128 88 453 9 6 96 31 23 489 103 1522
815-830 44 63 154 100 480 6 13 109 44 22 534 94 1663
830-845 31 74 131 83 479 11 11 111 35 25 482 122 1595
845-900 32 81 116 74 503 21 10 95 36 34 507 161 1670
900-915 31 97 97 67 573 39 12 107 58 47 502 148 1778
915-930 26 106 73 51 557 33 30 105 32 44 482 119 1658
930-945 39 89 85 40 470 27 16 82 24 24 439 97 1432
945-1000 53 62 95 46 387 19 9 63 21 17 354 86 1212
HOUR TOTALS
123456789 10 11 12
TIME SBRT SBTH SBLT WBRT WBTH WBLT NBRT NBTH NBLT EBRT EBTH EBLT TOTAL
700-800 97 229 414 331 1775 36 19 419 126 69 1641 375 5531
715-815 105 253 473 366 1849 40 24 426 141 78 1783 395 5933
730-830 137 263 533 381 1919 44 28 432 161 83 1926 407 6314
745-845 139 277 550 364 1931 46 37 438 160 92 1949 445 6428
800-900 136 285 529 345 1915 47 40 411 146 104 2012 480 6450
815-815 138 315 498 324 2035 77 46 422 173 128 2025 525 6706
830-930 120 358 417 275 2112 104 63 418 161 150 1973 550 6701
845-945 128 373 371 232 2103 120 68 389 150 149 1930 525 6538
900-1000 149 354 350 204 1987 118 67 357 135 132 1777 450 6080
A.M. PEAK HOUR
815-815 324
138 315 498 2035
77
525
VENICE BOULEVARD 2025 173 422 46
128
ROBERTSON BOULEVARD
ATTACHMENT 5
267WILTEC Phone: (626) 564-1944 Fax: (626) 564-0969
INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT SUMMARY
CLIENT: HIRSCH/GREEN TRANSPORTATION CONSULTING, INC.
PROJECT: CULVER CITY TRAFFIC COUNTS
DATE: TUESDAY SEPTEMBER 9, 2008
PERIOD: 3:00 PM TO 6:00 PM
INTERSECTION: 8 N/S ROBERTSON BOULEVARD
E/W VENICE BOULEVARD
15 MIN COUNTS
123456789 10 11 12
PERIOD SBRT SBTH SBLT WBRT WBTH WBLT NBRT NBTH NBLT EBRT EBTH EBLT TOTAL
300-315 22 84 157 36 353 19 16 78 13 38 437 110 1363
315-330 20 65 136 22 341 11 9 98 21 25 458 96 1302
330-345 25 67 164 35 334 29 14 102 26 33 499 110 1438
345-400 17 79 156 29 353 26 11 88 18 43 493 87 1400
400-415 13 70 161 36 381 18 11 77 24 33 484 106 1414
415-430 15 70 149 25 363 21 17 89 20 37 509 108 1423
430-445 25 69 145 27 380 22 13 82 16 41 475 94 1389
445-500 31 70 165 27 427 20 18 101 18 45 520 113 1555
500-515 24 74 120 36 442 15 12 113 29 35 523 119 1542
515-530 49 77 135 27 480 27 22 137 29 33 461 92 1569
530-545 44 65 100 35 506 26 13 127 36 41 488 119 1600
545-600 39 82 167 23 466 34 10 98 26 42 472 121 1580
HOUR TOTALS
123456789 10 11 12
TIME SBRT SBTH SBLT WBRT WBTH WBLT NBRT NBTH NBLT EBRT EBTH EBLT TOTAL
300-400 84 295 613 122 1381 85 50 366 78 139 1887 403 5503
315-415 75 281 617 122 1409 84 45 365 89 134 1934 399 5554
330-430 70 286 630 125 1431 94 53 356 88 146 1985 411 5675
345-445 70 288 611 117 1477 87 52 336 78 154 1961 395 5626
400-500 84 279 620 115 1551 81 59 349 78 156 1988 421 5781
415-515 95 283 579 115 1612 78 60 385 83 158 2027 434 5909
430-530 129 290 565 117 1729 84 65 433 92 154 1979 418 6055
445-545 148 286 520 125 1855 88 65 478 112 154 1992 443 6266
500-600 156 298 522 121 1894 102 57 475 120 151 1944 451 6291
P.M. PEAK HOUR
500-600 121
156 298 522 1894
102
451
VENICE BOULEVARD 1944 120 475 57
151
ROBERTSON BOULEVARD
ATTACHMENT 5
268INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT SUMMARY
CLIENT: HIRSCH/GREEN TRANSPORTATION CONSULTING, INC.
PROJECT: WASHINGTON / NATIONAL EMC
DATE: WEDNESDAY, APRIL 28, 2010
PERIOD: 07:00 AM TO 10:00 AM
INTERSECTION N/S NATIONAL BOULEVARD
E/W VENICE BOULEVARD
FILE NUMBER: 9-AM
15 MINUTE 123456789 10 11 12
TOTALS SBRT SBTH SBLT WBRT WBTH WBLT NBRT NBTH NBLT EBRT EBTH EBLT
0700-0715 9 65 10 14 355 8 4 200 69 19 225 37
0715-0730 13 73 13 23 375 10 6 218 78 26 334 25
0730-0745 17 100 15 21 475 9 3 240 69 49 399 33
0745-0800 26 126 27 25 555 16 4 255 60 68 444 40
0800-0815 25 150 29 30 480 23 5 240 50 75 475 41
0815-0830 23 137 33 27 450 27 3 240 49 80 520 42
0830-0845 30 132 35 28 476 20 7 207 47 57 514 47
0845-0900 22 142 33 30 514 19 7 210 50 73 540 50
0900-0915 27 137 30 26 463 16 8 226 43 62 440 40
0915-0930 31 155 34 28 392 15 8 230 37 65 421 34
0930-0945 24 132 40 31 352 19 5 219 38 58 345 37
0945-1000 26 158 36 32 399 14 7 217 41 49 315 41
1 HOUR 123456789 10 11 12
TOTALS SBRT SBTH SBLT WBRT WBTH WBLT NBRT NBTH NBLT EBRT EBTH EBLT TOTALS
0700-0800 65 364 65 83 1760 43 17 913 276 162 1402 135 5285
0715-0815 81 449 84 99 1885 58 18 953 257 218 1652 139 5893
0730-0830 91 513 104 103 1960 75 15 975 228 272 1838 156 6330
0745-0845 104 545 124 110 1961 86 19 942 206 280 1953 170 6500
0800-0900 100 561 130 115 1920 89 22 897 196 285 2049 180 6544
0815-0915 102 548 131 111 1903 82 25 883 189 272 2014 179 6439
0830-0930 110 566 132 112 1845 70 30 873 177 257 1915 171 6258
0845-0945 104 566 137 115 1721 69 28 885 168 258 1746 161 5958
0900-1000 108 582 140 117 1606 64 28 892 159 234 1521 152 5603
A.M. PEAK HOUR 100 561 130
0800-0900
180 115
2049 1920
285 89
19689722
NATIONAL BOULEVARD
VENICE BOULEVARD
THE TRAFFIC SOLUTION
329 DIAMOND STREET
ARCADIA, CALIFORNIA 91006
626.446.7978
ATTACHMENT 5
269INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT SUMMARY
CLIENT: HIRSCH/GREEN TRANSPORTATION CONSULTING, INC.
PROJECT: WASHINGTON / NATIONAL EMC
DATE: WEDNESDAY, APRIL 28, 2010
PERIOD: 03:00 PM TO 06:00 PM
INTERSECTION N/S NATIONAL BOULEVARD
E/W VENICE BOULEVARD
FILE NUMBER: 9-PM
15 MINUTE 123456789 10 11 12
TOTALS SBRT SBTH SBLT WBRT WBTH WBLT NBRT NBTH NBLT EBRT EBTH EBLT
0300-0315 14 137 34 24 338 19 20 166 51 90 405 53
0315-0330 17 130 24 20 283 17 20 134 41 93 371 36
0330-0345 19 134 39 16 359 19 18 133 47 86 449 40
0345-0400 23 120 32 18 315 25 21 108 43 103 434 51
0400-0415 22 146 42 22 338 18 29 107 49 82 466 48
0415-0430 26 144 49 19 324 12 35 133 52 109 490 33
0430-0445 34 145 32 16 319 16 24 148 56 79 411 31
0445-0500 23 131 32 17 308 15 20 116 61 87 471 35
0500-0515 23 151 44 17 372 19 28 114 47 98 512 39
0515-0530 31 194 47 13 385 15 21 120 53 66 464 47
0530-0545 20 180 40 14 323 18 24 123 52 75 496 46
0545-0600 23 170 50 15 399 15 25 145 61 65 499 34
1 HOUR 123456789 10 11 12
TOTALS SBRT SBTH SBLT WBRT WBTH WBLT NBRT NBTH NBLT EBRT EBTH EBLT TOTALS
0300-0400 73 521 129 78 1295 80 79 541 182 372 1659 180 5189
0315-0415 81 530 137 76 1295 79 88 482 180 364 1720 175 5207
0330-0430 90 544 162 75 1336 74 103 481 191 380 1839 172 5447
0345-0445 105 555 155 75 1296 71 109 496 200 373 1801 163 5399
0400-0500 105 566 155 74 1289 61 108 504 218 357 1838 147 5422
0415-0515 106 571 157 69 1323 62 107 511 216 373 1884 138 5517
0430-0530 111 621 155 63 1384 65 93 498 217 330 1858 152 5547
0445-0545 97 656 163 61 1388 67 93 473 213 326 1943 167 5647
0500-0600 97 695 181 59 1479 67 98 502 213 304 1971 166 5832
P.M. PEAK HOUR 97 695 181
0500-0600
166 59
1971 1479
304 67
21350298
NATIONAL BOULEVARD
VENICE BOULEVARD
THE TRAFFIC SOLUTION
329 DIAMOND STREET
ARCADIA, CALIFORNIA 91006
626.446.7978
ATTACHMENT 5
270INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT SUMMARY
CLIENT: HIRSCH/GREEN TRANSPORTATION CONSULTING, INC.
PROJECT: WASHINGTON / NATIONAL EMC
DATE: WEDNESDAY, APRIL 28, 2010
PERIOD: 07:00 AM TO 10:00 AM
INTERSECTION N/S HELMS AVENUE
E/W VENICE BOULEVARD
FILE NUMBER: 10-AM
15 MINUTE 123456789 10 11 12
TOTALS SBRT SBTH SBLT WBRT WBTH WBLT NBRT NBTH NBLT EBRT EBTH EBLT
0700-0715 5113 314 32001 236 8
0715-0730 5244 461 51001 319 10
0730-0745 6134 526 40022 413 11
0745-0800 11 1 6 2 531 70153 438 14
0800-0815 5124 502 61056 537 16
0815-0830 5043 549 30423 517 16
0830-0845 6045 522 50227 512 18
0845-0900 8 1 2 10 520 83325 546 24
0900-0915 4 1 2 10 478 8114 10 475 22
0915-0930 2125 461 71065 419 22
0930-0945 2126 422 32235 345 17
0945-1000 4 2 2 10 414 51233 331 12
1 HOUR 123456789 10 11 12
TOTALS SBRT SBTH SBLT WBRT WBTH WBLT NBRT NBTH NBLT EBRT EBTH EBLT TOTALS
0700-0800 27 5 14 13 1832 19 3177 1406 43 3377
0715-0815 27 5 15 14 2020 22 2 1 12 12 1707 51 3888
0730-0830 27 3 15 13 2108 20 1 5 14 14 1905 57 4182
0745-0845 27 2 16 14 2104 21 1 7 14 19 2004 64 4293
0800-0900 24 2 12 22 2093 22 4 9 11 21 2112 74 4406
0815-0915 23 2 12 28 2069 24 4 10 10 25 2050 80 4337
0830-0930 20 3 10 30 1981 28 5 6 14 27 1952 86 4162
0845-0945 16 4 8 31 1881 26 7 6 15 25 1785 85 3889
0900-1000 12 5 8 31 1775 23 5 5 16 23 1570 73 3546
A.M. PEAK HOUR 24 2 12
0800-0900
74 22
2112 2093
21 22
11 9 4
HELMS AVENUE
VENICE BOULEVARD
THE TRAFFIC SOLUTION
329 DIAMOND STREET
ARCADIA, CALIFORNIA 91006
626.446.7978
ATTACHMENT 5
271INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT SUMMARY
CLIENT: HIRSCH/GREEN TRANSPORTATION CONSULTING, INC.
PROJECT: WASHINGTON / NATIONAL EMC
DATE: WEDNESDAY, APRIL 28, 2010
PERIOD: 03:00 PM TO 06:00 PM
INTERSECTION N/S HELMS AVENUE
E/W VENICE BOULEVARD
FILE NUMBER: 10-PM
15 MINUTE 123456789 10 11 12
TOTALS SBRT SBTH SBLT WBRT WBTH WBLT NBRT NBTH NBLT EBRT EBTH EBLT
0300-0315 7222 344 92166 393 13
0315-0330 3241 339 11 324 10 457 14
0330-0345 6131 326 6235 16 492 17
0345-0400 5251 341 5419 12 508 20
0400-0415 8052 337 68259 475 16
0415-0430 8043 354 45055 590 19
0430-0445 8021 385 73178 478 19
0445-0500 4142 340 82187 577 19
0500-0515 4265 389 9405 10 504 19
0515-0530 6262 442 7202 11 520 19
0530-0545 8270 370 81147 582 16
0545-0600 8391 417 82055 613 18
1 HOUR 123456789 10 11 12
TOTALS SBRT SBTH SBLT WBRT WBTH WBLT NBRT NBTH NBLT EBRT EBTH EBLT TOTALS
0300-0400 21 7 14 5 1350 31 11 7 24 44 1850 64 3428
0315-0415 22 5 17 5 1343 28 17 8 23 47 1932 67 3514
0330-0430 27 3 17 7 1358 21 19 6 24 42 2065 72 3661
0345-0445 29 2 16 7 1417 22 20 4 26 34 2051 74 3702
0400-0500 28 1 15 8 1416 25 18 4 25 29 2120 73 3762
0415-0515 24 3 16 11 1468 28 14 2 25 30 2149 76 3846
0430-0530 22 5 18 10 1556 31 11 2 22 36 2079 76 3868
0445-0545 22 7 23 9 1541 32 9 2 19 35 2183 73 3955
0500-0600 26 9 28 8 1618 32 9 1 16 33 2219 72 4071
P.M. PEAK HOUR 26 9 28
0500-0600
72 8
2219 1618
33 32
16 1 9
HELMS AVENUE
VENICE BOULEVARD
THE TRAFFIC SOLUTION
329 DIAMOND STREET
ARCADIA, CALIFORNIA 91006
626.446.7978
ATTACHMENT 5
272INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT SUMMARY
CLIENT: HIRSCH/GREEN TRANSPORTATION CONSULTING, INC.
PROJECT: WASHINGTON / NATIONAL EMC
DATE: WEDNESDAY, APRIL 28, 2010
PERIOD: 07:00 AM TO 10:00 AM
INTERSECTION N/S CATTARAUGUS AVENUE
E/W VENICE BOULEVARD
FILE NUMBER: 11-AM
15 MINUTE 123456789 10 11 12
TOTALS SBRT SBTH SBLT WBRT WBTH WBLT NBRT NBTH NBLT EBRT EBTH EBLT
0700-0715 3 5 15 23 302 11 1 30 6 2 239 7
0715-0730 2 10 26 41 438 11 3 52 9 2 321 8
0730-0745 3 15 33 47 518 18 7 87 12 1 388 8
0745-0800 6 24 45 39 537 17 4 77 12 2 432 14
0800-0815 4 29 46 26 468 19 5 60 12 4 529 15
0815-0830 5 20 31 16 470 19 7 56 13 3 441 19
0830-0845 2 10 36 19 545 13 10 50 10 2 509 21
0845-0900 4 7 22 18 527 17 6 30 11 3 491 21
0900-0915 7 5 22 11 463 12 4 39 7 6 473 17
0915-0930 6 4 25 13 436 17 5 26 6 2 409 21
0930-0945 3 6 17 9 462 22 3 22 5 3 333 12
0945-1000 3 9 18 10 441 15 5 13 3 1 300 15
1 HOUR 12345 6A 789 10 11 12A
TOTALS SBRT SBTH SBLT WBRT WBTH WBLT NBRT NBTH NBLT EBRT EBTH EBLT TOTALS
0700-0800 14 54 119 150 1795 57 15 246 39 7 1380 37 3913
0715-0815 15 78 150 153 1961 65 19 276 45 9 1670 45 4486
0730-0830 18 88 155 128 1993 73 23 280 49 10 1790 56 4663
0745-0845 17 83 158 100 2020 68 26 243 47 11 1911 69 4753
0800-0900 15 66 135 79 2010 68 28 196 46 12 1970 76 4701
0815-0915 18 42 111 64 2005 61 27 175 41 14 1914 78 4550
0830-0930 19 26 105 61 1971 59 25 145 34 13 1882 80 4420
0845-0945 20 22 86 51 1888 68 18 117 29 14 1706 71 4090
0900-1000 19 24 82 43 1802 66 17 100 21 12 1515 65 3766
A.M. PEAK HOUR 17 83 158
0745-0845
69 100
1911 2020
11 68
4724326
CATTARAUGUS AVENUE
VENICE BOULEVARD
THE TRAFFIC SOLUTION
329 DIAMOND STREET
ARCADIA, CALIFORNIA 91006
626.446.7978
ATTACHMENT 5
273INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT SUMMARY
CLIENT: HIRSCH/GREEN TRANSPORTATION CONSULTING, INC.
PROJECT: WASHINGTON / NATIONAL EMC
DATE: WEDNESDAY, APRIL 28, 2010
PERIOD: 03:00 PM TO 06:00 PM
INTERSECTION N/S CATTARAUGUS AVENUE
E/W VENICE BOULEVARD
FILE NUMBER: 11-PM
15 MINUTE 123456789 10 11 12
TOTALS SBRT SBTH SBLT WBRT WBTH WBLT NBRT NBTH NBLT EBRT EBTH EBLT
0300-0315 4 28 43 19 334 17 7 23 2 5 370 21
0315-0330 6 18 63 14 285 17 9 17 5 6 426 24
0330-0345 5 22 40 19 387 25 5 13 3 5 488 24
0345-0400 4 17 39 15 276 16 3 12 3 3 445 20
0400-0415 5 15 35 11 313 21 4 19 6 2 421 25
0415-0430 3 19 44 18 302 18 2 17 4 7 477 23
0430-0445 2 19 56 13 431 22 2 21 4 8 507 15
0445-0500 6 15 33 14 315 18 2 12 3 5 562 21
0500-0515 8 22 50 18 362 18 5 19 3 3 471 30
0515-0530 8 16 37 17 343 18 2 17 2 2 511 26
0530-0545 9 19 48 19 446 20 2 15 4 3 569 30
0545-0600 6 15 48 21 381 21 2 10 4 5 527 24
1 HOUR 12345 6A 789 10 11 12A
TOTALS SBRT SBTH SBLT WBRT WBTH WBLT NBRT NBTH NBLT EBRT EBTH EBLT TOTALS
0300-0400 19 85 185 67 1282 75 24 65 13 19 1729 89 3633
0315-0415 20 72 177 59 1261 79 21 61 17 16 1780 93 3636
0330-0430 17 73 158 63 1278 80 14 61 16 17 1831 92 3683
0345-0445 14 70 174 57 1322 77 11 69 17 20 1850 83 3750
0400-0500 16 68 168 56 1361 79 10 69 17 22 1967 84 3901
0415-0515 19 75 183 63 1410 76 11 69 14 23 2017 89 4030
0430-0530 24 72 176 62 1451 76 11 69 12 18 2051 92 4090
0445-0545 31 72 168 68 1466 74 11 63 12 13 2113 107 4167
0500-0600 31 72 183 75 1532 77 11 61 13 13 2078 110 4225
P.M. PEAK HOUR 31 72 183
0500-0600
110 75
2078 1532
13 77
136111
CATTARAUGUS AVENUE
VENICE BOULEVARD
THE TRAFFIC SOLUTION
329 DIAMOND STREET
ARCADIA, CALIFORNIA 91006
626.446.7978
ATTACHMENT 5
274INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT SUMMARY
CLIENT: HIRSCH/GREEN TRANSPORTATION CONSULTING, INC.
PROJECT: WASHINGTON / NATIONAL EMC
DATE: THURSDAY, APRIL 29, 2010
PERIOD: 07:00 AM TO 10:00 AM
INTERSECTION N/S LA CIENEGA BOULEVARD
E/W VENICE BOULEVARD
FILE NUMBER: 12-AM
15 MINUTE 123456789 10 11 12
TOTALS SBRT SBTH SBLT WBRT WBTH WBLT NBRT NBTH NBLT EBRT EBTH EBLT
0700-0715 54 221 3 4 292 21 12 400 22 13 206 47
0715-0730 62 222 4 4 370 22 9 390 37 20 300 60
0730-0745 66 265 6 7 469 30 7 401 40 31 321 66
0745-0800 81 315 7 4 436 34 13 455 36 39 333 88
0800-0815 86 395 9 3 455 31 14 443 33 49 444 82
0815-0830 92 304 9 5 405 39 8 409 24 36 442 87
0830-0845 86 298 10 3 445 22 10 446 30 31 455 88
0845-0900 112 301 16 7 390 34 6 427 25 24 399 55
0900-0915 113 279 10 6 401 28 7 372 24 22 395 81
0915-0930 108 258 10 4 333 31 6 305 18 24 351 67
0930-0945 72 259 11 6 351 33 5 289 18 24 325 51
0945-1000 99 266 15 3 322 29 8 298 22 21 230 44
1 HOUR 123456789 10 11 12
TOTALS SBRT SBTH SBLT WBRT WBTH WBLT NBRT NBTH NBLT EBRT EBTH EBLT TOTALS
0700-0800 263 1023 20 19 1567 107 41 1646 135 103 1160 261 6345
0715-0815 295 1197 26 18 1730 117 43 1689 146 139 1398 296 7094
0730-0830 325 1279 31 19 1765 134 42 1708 133 155 1540 323 7454
0745-0845 345 1312 35 15 1741 126 45 1753 123 155 1674 345 7669
0800-0900 376 1298 44 18 1695 126 38 1725 112 140 1740 312 7624
0815-0915 403 1182 45 21 1641 123 31 1654 103 113 1691 311 7318
0830-0930 419 1136 46 20 1569 115 29 1550 97 101 1600 291 6973
0845-0945 405 1097 47 23 1475 126 24 1393 85 94 1470 254 6493
0900-1000 392 1062 46 19 1407 121 26 1264 82 91 1301 243 6054
A.M. PEAK HOUR 345 1312 35
0745-0845
345 15
1674 1741
155 126
123175345
LA CIENEGA BOULEVARD
VENICE BOULEVARD
THE TRAFFIC SOLUTION
329 DIAMOND STREET
ARCADIA, CALIFORNIA 91006
626.446.7978
ATTACHMENT 5
275INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT SUMMARY
CLIENT: HIRSCH/GREEN TRANSPORTATION CONSULTING, INC.
PROJECT: WASHINGTON / NATIONAL EMC
DATE: THURSDAY, APRIL 29, 2010
PERIOD: 03:00 PM TO 06:00 PM
INTERSECTION N/S LA CIENEGA BOULEVARD
E/W VENICE BOULEVARD
FILE NUMBER: 12-PM
15 MINUTE 123456789 10 11 12
TOTALS SBRT SBTH SBLT WBRT WBTH WBLT NBRT NBTH NBLT EBRT EBTH EBLT
0300-0315 92 318 7 8 247 35 5 242 28 48 298 86
0315-0330 86 344 11 12 249 55 10 242 22 76 330 72
0330-0345 61 305 13 7 238 43 7 251 17 52 364 53
0345-0400 71 316 18 8 271 37 8 255 17 65 391 56
0400-0415 70 332 11 6 239 59 6 248 22 55 382 74
0415-0430 72 390 8 8 284 56 8 279 15 40 367 74
0430-0445 86 404 13 6 262 42 5 280 21 66 380 60
0445-0500 90 386 9 5 259 48 7 261 20 53 449 63
0500-0515 67 370 8 5 293 39 10 268 15 69 400 63
0515-0530 82 410 12 6 328 54 5 277 21 52 446 71
0530-0545 78 387 10 10 290 52 3 275 29 54 431 71
0545-0600 76 331 6 13 339 52 2 273 28 60 444 69
1 HOUR 123456789 10 11 12
TOTALS SBRT SBTH SBLT WBRT WBTH WBLT NBRT NBTH NBLT EBRT EBTH EBLT TOTALS
0300-0400 310 1283 49 35 1005 170 30 990 84 241 1383 267 5847
0315-0415 288 1297 53 33 997 194 31 996 78 248 1467 255 5937
0330-0430 274 1343 50 29 1032 195 29 1033 71 212 1504 257 6029
0345-0445 299 1442 50 28 1056 194 27 1062 75 226 1520 264 6243
0400-0500 318 1512 41 25 1044 205 26 1068 78 214 1578 271 6380
0415-0515 315 1550 38 24 1098 185 30 1088 71 228 1596 260 6483
0430-0530 325 1570 42 22 1142 183 27 1086 77 240 1675 257 6646
0445-0545 317 1553 39 26 1170 193 25 1081 85 228 1726 268 6711
0500-0600 303 1498 36 34 1250 197 20 1093 93 235 1721 274 6754
P.M. PEAK HOUR 303 1498 36
0500-0600
274 34
1721 1250
235 197
93109320
LA CIENEGA BOULEVARD
VENICE BOULEVARD
THE TRAFFIC SOLUTION
329 DIAMOND STREET
ARCADIA, CALIFORNIA 91006
626.446.7978
ATTACHMENT 5
276WILTEC Phone: (626) 564-1944 Fax: (626) 564-0969
INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT SUMMARY
CLIENT: HIRSCH/GREEN TRANSPORTATION CONSULTING, INC.
PROJECT: CULVER CITY TRAFFIC COUNTS
DATE: THURSDAY SEPTEMBER 11, 2008
PERIOD: 7:00 AM TO 10:00 AM
INTERSECTION: 13 N/S HUGHES AVENUE / DUQUESNE AVENUE
E/W WASHINGTON BOULEVARD
15 MIN COUNTS
123456789 10 11 12
PERIOD SBRT SBTH SBLT WBRT WBTH WBLT NBRT NBTH NBLT EBRT EBTH EBLT TOTAL
700-715 15 49 1 1 140 3 2 52 27 11 77 9 387
715-730 12 57 1 3 167 5 3 62 31 18 80 10 449
730-745 13 66 1 3 173 6 1 69 38 21 98 12 501
745-800 4 74 2 2 168 6 7 74 35 27 113 9 521
800-815 18 70 2 3 167 9 5 66 35 33 109 7 524
815-830 13 55 5 11 157 3 14 69 38 39 127 15 546
830-845 9 71 2 16 180 14 6 84 41 35 103 7 568
845-900 11 86 4 8 167 15 9 77 40 45 118 5 585
900-915 12 69 1 9 160 20 9 67 40 54 131 12 584
915-930 8 59 2 9 144 17 3 61 37 43 100 12 495
930-945 12 43 3 3 129 10 3 38 30 38 83 8 400
945-1000 7 58 3 4 130 13 8 47 34 26 62 6 398
HOUR TOTALS
123456789 10 11 12
TIME SBRT SBTH SBLT WBRT WBTH WBLT NBRT NBTH NBLT EBRT EBTH EBLT TOTAL
700-800 44 246 5 9 648 20 13 257 131 77 368 40 1858
715-815 47 267 6 11 675 26 16 271 139 99 400 38 1995
730-830 48 265 10 19 665 24 27 278 146 120 447 43 2092
745-845 44 270 11 32 672 32 32 293 149 134 452 38 2159
800-900 51 282 13 38 671 41 34 296 154 152 457 34 2223
815-815 45 281 12 44 664 52 38 297 159 173 479 39 2283
830-930 40 285 9 42 651 66 27 289 158 177 452 36 2232
845-945 43 257 10 29 600 62 24 243 147 180 432 37 2064
900-1000 39 229 9 25 563 60 23 213 141 161 376 38 1877
A.M. PEAK HOUR
815-815 44
45 281 12 664
52
39
WASHINGTON BOULEVARD 479 159 297 38
173
HUGHES AVENUE / DUQUESNE AVENUE
ATTACHMENT 5
277WILTEC Phone: (626) 564-1944 Fax: (626) 564-0969
INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT SUMMARY
CLIENT: HIRSCH/GREEN TRANSPORTATION CONSULTING, INC.
PROJECT: CULVER CITY TRAFFIC COUNTS
DATE: THURSDAY SEPTEMBER 11, 2008
PERIOD: 3:00 PM TO 6:00 PM
INTERSECTION: 13 N/S HUGHES AVENUE / DUQUESNE AVENUE
E/W WASHINGTON BOULEVARD
15 MIN COUNTS
123456789 10 11 12
PERIOD SBRT SBTH SBLT WBRT WBTH WBLT NBRT NBTH NBLT EBRT EBTH EBLT TOTAL
300-315 11 56 3 9 89 8 5 66 18 47 149 15 476
315-330 7 60 1 9 91 14 6 55 14 47 108 8 420
330-345 10 69 1 1 82 9 4 71 17 48 138 9 459
345-400 8 47 6 1 97 13 4 58 14 45 153 12 458
400-415 17 63 5 6 101 11 3 76 5 54 165 12 518
415-430 8 79 2 8 84 26 4 75 16 46 133 3 484
430-445 17 60 7 15 87 28 5 80 11 49 129 14 502
445-500 21 77 6 7 97 18 3 87 13 50 155 20 554
500-515 14 83 9 7 75 24 9 87 15 53 191 11 578
515-530 10 71 8 9 91 19 5 74 21 63 153 6 530
530-545 13 82 5 13 86 15 2 66 9 58 152 8 509
545-600 23 93 12 16 95 14 8 82 13 54 127 7 544
HOUR TOTALS
123456789 10 11 12
TIME SBRT SBTH SBLT WBRT WBTH WBLT NBRT NBTH NBLT EBRT EBTH EBLT TOTAL
300-400 36 232 11 20 359 44 19 250 63 187 548 44 1813
315-415 42 239 13 17 371 47 17 260 50 194 564 41 1855
330-430 43 258 14 16 364 59 15 280 52 193 589 36 1919
345-445 50 249 20 30 369 78 16 289 46 194 580 41 1962
400-500 63 279 20 36 369 83 15 318 45 199 582 49 2058
415-515 60 299 24 37 343 96 21 329 55 198 608 48 2118
430-530 62 291 30 38 350 89 22 328 60 215 628 51 2164
445-545 58 313 28 36 349 76 19 314 58 224 651 45 2171
500-600 60 329 34 45 347 72 24 309 58 228 623 32 2161
P.M. PEAK HOUR
445-545 36
58 313 28 349
76
45
WASHINGTON BOULEVARD 651 58 314 19
224
HUGHES AVENUE / DUQUESNE AVENUE
ATTACHMENT 5
278WILTEC Phone: (626) 564-1944 Fax: (626) 564-0969
INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT SUMMARY
CLIENT: HIRSCH/GREEN TRANSPORTATION CONSULTING, INC.
PROJECT: CULVER CITY TRAFFIC COUNTS
DATE: THURSDAY SEPTEMBER 11, 2008
PERIOD: 7:00 AM TO 10:00 AM
INTERSECTION: 14 N/S DUQUESNE AVENUE
E/W CULVER BOULEVARD
15 MIN COUNTS
123456789 10 11 12
PERIOD SBRT SBTH SBLT WBRT WBTH WBLT NBRT NBTH NBLT EBRT EBTH EBLT TOTAL
700-715 19 37 15 7 133 15 21 47 24 16 98 21 453
715-730 25 49 12 19 146 20 33 65 32 18 111 27 557
730-745 22 68 17 12 140 38 42 82 28 10 125 35 619
745-800 11 54 8 10 117 28 15 72 22 11 133 20 501
800-815 16 80 5 11 131 21 19 90 27 13 149 17 579
815-830 20 97 7 5 164 21 15 91 23 6 169 18 636
830-845 19 88 21 16 178 30 40 72 26 5 188 26 709
845-900 10 83 9 16 161 16 25 101 19 11 191 29 671
900-915 17 92 12 16 154 21 17 78 20 13 164 28 632
915-930 14 87 17 5 136 26 19 65 34 3 139 17 562
930-945 12 84 16 6 132 20 26 74 20 7 116 7 520
945-1000 16 68 14 2 104 16 15 70 26 5 108 12 456
HOUR TOTALS
123456789 10 11 12
TIME SBRT SBTH SBLT WBRT WBTH WBLT NBRT NBTH NBLT EBRT EBTH EBLT TOTAL
700-800 77 208 52 48 536 101 111 266 106 55 467 103 2130
715-815 74 251 42 52 534 107 109 309 109 52 518 99 2256
730-830 69 299 37 38 552 108 91 335 100 40 576 90 2335
745-845 66 319 41 42 590 100 89 325 98 35 639 81 2425
800-900 65 348 42 48 634 88 99 354 95 35 697 90 2595
815-815 66 360 49 53 657 88 97 342 88 35 712 101 2648
830-930 60 350 59 53 629 93 101 316 99 32 682 100 2574
845-945 53 346 54 43 583 83 87 318 93 34 610 81 2385
900-1000 59 331 59 29 526 83 77 287 100 28 527 64 2170
A.M. PEAK HOUR
815-815 53
66 360 49 657
88
101
CULVER BOULEVARD 712 88 342 97
35
DUQUESNE AVENUE
ATTACHMENT 5
279WILTEC Phone: (626) 564-1944 Fax: (626) 564-0969
INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT SUMMARY
CLIENT: HIRSCH/GREEN TRANSPORTATION CONSULTING, INC.
PROJECT: CULVER CITY TRAFFIC COUNTS
DATE: THURSDAY SEPTEMBER 11, 2008
PERIOD: 3:00 PM TO 6:00 PM
INTERSECTION: 14 N/S DUQUESNE AVENUE
E/W CULVER BOULEVARD
15 MIN COUNTS
123456789 10 11 12
PERIOD SBRT SBTH SBLT WBRT WBTH WBLT NBRT NBTH NBLT EBRT EBTH EBLT TOTAL
300-315 19 73 21 12 115 32 39 51 20 19 123 13 537
315-330 16 82 26 10 138 45 47 62 37 24 144 9 640
330-345 14 70 23 11 158 27 34 42 21 19 163 16 598
345-400 12 91 18 13 152 34 37 49 26 17 170 14 633
400-415 14 111 13 8 162 19 25 58 16 12 207 13 658
415-430 18 115 25 4 155 31 36 65 20 29 174 10 682
430-445 9 104 16 4 136 18 26 72 15 11 190 10 611
445-500 11 92 21 3 156 19 32 89 19 14 211 14 681
500-515 14 125 15 9 183 29 34 79 26 15 248 12 789
515-530 19 105 38 3 172 17 26 66 20 25 192 22 705
530-545 25 114 34 4 199 25 42 70 30 23 185 11 762
545-600 13 113 29 5 172 30 42 65 29 21 219 21 759
HOUR TOTALS
123456789 10 11 12
TIME SBRT SBTH SBLT WBRT WBTH WBLT NBRT NBTH NBLT EBRT EBTH EBLT TOTAL
300-400 61 316 88 46 563 138 157 204 104 79 600 52 2408
315-415 56 354 80 42 610 125 143 211 100 72 684 52 2529
330-430 58 387 79 36 627 111 132 214 83 77 714 53 2571
345-445 53 421 72 29 605 102 124 244 77 69 741 47 2584
400-500 52 422 75 19 609 87 119 284 70 66 782 47 2632
415-515 52 436 77 20 630 97 128 305 80 69 823 46 2763
430-530 53 426 90 19 647 83 118 306 80 65 841 58 2786
445-545 69 436 108 19 710 90 134 304 95 77 836 59 2937
500-600 71 457 116 21 726 101 144 280 105 84 844 66 3015
P.M. PEAK HOUR
500-600 21
71 457 116 726
101
66
CULVER BOULEVARD 844 105 280 144
84
DUQUESNE AVENUE
ATTACHMENT 5
280WILTEC Phone: (626) 564-1944 Fax: (626) 564-0969
INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT SUMMARY
CLIENT: HIRSCH/GREEN TRANSPORTATION CONSULTING, INC.
PROJECT: CULVER CITY TRAFFIC COUNTS
DATE: THURSDAY SEPTEMBER 11, 2008
PERIOD: 7:00 AM TO 10:00 AM
INTERSECTION: 15 N/S CULVER BOULEVARD
E/W WASHINGTON BOULEVARD / IRVING PLACE
15 MIN COUNTS
123456789 10 11 12
PERIOD SBRT SBTH SBLT WBRT WBTH WBLT NBRT NBTH NBLT EBRT EBTH EBLT TOTAL
700-715 145 126 6 15 3 6 1 122 0 1 0 78 503
715-730 154 151 3 18 7 3 7 146 0 3 1 84 577
730-745 194 161 9 16 7 9 3 181 0 0 3 103 686
745-800 169 195 14 17 5 14 9 199 0 6 9 119 756
800-815 186 188 17 26 14 17 16 221 0 2 7 101 795
815-830 170 151 29 32 20 29 11 197 0 11 7 114 771
830-845 189 186 5 36 14 5 5 212 0 3 0 129 784
845-900 181 169 87483 193 043 119 699
900-915 184 180 6 17 6 6 5 202 0 3 3 119 731
915-930 146 141 13 10 12 13 1 185 0 5 2 103 631
930-945 135 120 6 14 4 6 2 169 0 2 0 96 554
945-1000 137 139 15 5 5 15 0 122 0 2 3 82 525
HOUR TOTALS
123456789 10 11 12
TIME SBRT SBTH SBLT WBRT WBTH WBLT NBRT NBTH NBLT EBRT EBTH EBLT TOTAL
700-800 662 633 32 66 22 32 20 648 0 10 13 384 2522
715-815 703 695 43 77 33 43 35 747 0 11 20 407 2814
730-830 719 695 69 91 46 69 39 798 0 19 26 437 3008
745-845 714 720 65 111 53 65 41 829 0 22 23 463 3106
800-900 726 694 59 101 52 59 35 823 0 20 17 463 3049
815-815 724 686 48 92 44 48 24 804 0 21 13 481 2985
830-930 700 676 32 70 36 32 14 792 0 15 8 470 2845
845-945 646 610 33 48 26 33 11 749 0 14 8 437 2615
900-1000 602 580 40 46 27 40 8 678 0 12 8 400 2441
A.M. PEAK HOUR
745-845 111
714 720 65 53
65
463
WASHINGTON BOULEVARD / 23 0 829 41
IRVING PLACE
22
CULVER BOULEVARD
ATTACHMENT 5
281WILTEC Phone: (626) 564-1944 Fax: (626) 564-0969
INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT SUMMARY
CLIENT: HIRSCH/GREEN TRANSPORTATION CONSULTING, INC.
PROJECT: CULVER CITY TRAFFIC COUNTS
DATE: THURSDAY OCTOBER 2, 2008
PERIOD: 3:00 PM TO 6:00 PM
INTERSECTION: 15 N/S CULVER BOULEVARD
E/W WASHINGTON BOULEVARD / IRVING PLACE
15 MIN COUNTS
123456789 10 11 12
PERIOD SBRT SBTH SBLT WBRT WBTH WBLT NBRT NBTH NBLT EBRT EBTH EBLT TOTAL
300-315 88 156 11 29 18 6 16 186 0 1 2 132 645
315-330 107 192 14 19 14 3 7 198 0 4 3 160 721
330-345 97 179 9 23 10 6 7 189 0 1 1 126 648
345-400 82 157 14 15 8 5 7 202 0 2 6 139 637
400-415 109 166 11 11 6 4 12 233 0 1 5 138 696
415-430 122 171 14 6245 220 006 147 697
430-445 113 183 17 18 17 5 7 234 0 3 2 175 774
445-500 123 192 17 10 4 1 13 240 0 0 3 158 761
500-515 102 221 9 12 11 2 18 250 0 1 6 154 786
515-530 110 190 21 12 5 8 12 288 0 5 6 161 818
530-545 121 212 30 18 4 2 11 245 0 0 4 169 816
545-600 100 190 17 14 5 3 8 238 0 2 3 179 759
HOUR TOTALS
123456789 10 11 12
TIME SBRT SBTH SBLT WBRT WBTH WBLT NBRT NBTH NBLT EBRT EBTH EBLT TOTAL
300-400 374 684 48 86 50 20 37 775 0 8 12 557 2651
315-415 395 694 48 68 38 18 33 822 0 8 15 563 2702
330-430 410 673 48 55 26 19 31 844 0 4 18 550 2678
345-445 426 677 56 50 33 18 31 889 0 6 19 599 2804
400-500 467 712 59 45 29 14 37 927 0 4 16 618 2928
415-515 460 767 57 46 34 12 43 944 0 4 17 634 3018
430-530 448 786 64 52 37 16 50 1012 0 9 17 648 3139
445-545 456 815 77 52 24 13 54 1023 0 6 19 642 3181
500-600 433 813 77 56 25 15 49 1021 0 8 19 663 3179
P.M. PEAK HOUR
445-545 52
456 815 77 24
13
642
WASHINGTON BOULEVARD / 19 0 1023 54
IRVING PLACE|1010|CULVER BOULEVARD
ATTACHMENT 5
282ATTACHMENT 5
283ATTACHMENT 5
284WILTEC Phone: (626) 564-1944 Fax: (626) 564-0969
INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT SUMMARY
CLIENT: HIRSCH/GREEN TRANSPORTATION CONSULTING, INC.
PROJECT: CULVER CITY TRAFFIC COUNTS
DATE: THURSDAY SEPTEMBER 11, 2008
PERIOD: 7:00 AM TO 10:00 AM
INTERSECTION: 17 N/S CULVER BOULEVARD
E/W WASHINGTON BOULEVARD / CANFIELD AVENUE
15 MIN COUNTS
123456789 10 11 12
PERIOD SBRT SBTH SBLT WBRT WBTH WBLT NBRT NBTH NBLT EBRT EBTH EBLT TOTAL
700-715 1 70 5 9 2 192 97 105 2022 487
715-730 0 85 1 8 2 241 100 129 0000 566
730-745 0 100 5 12 3 277 154 130 4000 685
745-800 1 106 8 11 2 239 151 134 5000 657
800-815 0 109 9 18 8 249 170 154 2000 719
815-830 1 90 8 18 5 255 162 169 1000 709
830-845 2 103 9 25 9 246 215 164 5000 778
845-900 1 95 9 10 12 253 188 167 4600 745
900-915 0 100 12 9 7 234 161 149 2000 674
915-930 4 85 11 13 11 201 131 166 6100 629
930-945 4 72 13 19 2 239 117 149 4200 621
945-1000 2 88 8 6 3 199 112 114 1101 535
HOUR TOTALS
123456789 10 11 12
TIME SBRT SBTH SBLT WBRT WBTH WBLT NBRT NBTH NBLT EBRT EBTH EBLT TOTAL
700-800 2 361 19 40 9 949 502 498 11 0 2 2 2395
715-815 1 400 23 49 15 1006 575 547 11 0 0 0 2627
730-830 2 405 30 59 18 1020 637 587 12 0 0 0 2770
745-845 4 408 34 72 24 989 698 621 13 0 0 0 2863
800-900 4 397 35 71 34 1003 735 654 12 6 0 0 2951
815-815 4 388 38 62 33 988 726 649 12 6 0 0 2906
830-930 7 383 41 57 39 934 695 646 17 7 0 0 2826
845-945 9 352 45 51 32 927 597 631 16 9 0 0 2669
900-1000 10 345 44 47 23 873 521 578 13 4 0 1 2459
A.M. PEAK HOUR
800-900 71
4 397 35 34
1003|10 10|CANFIELD AVENUE 0 12 654 735 WASHINGTON BOULEVARD
|1010|CULVER BOULEVARD
ATTACHMENT 5
285WILTEC Phone: (626) 564-1944 Fax: (626) 564-0969
INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT SUMMARY
CLIENT: HIRSCH/GREEN TRANSPORTATION CONSULTING, INC.
PROJECT: CULVER CITY TRAFFIC COUNTS
DATE: THURSDAY SEPTEMBER 11, 2008
PERIOD: 3:00 PM TO 6:00 PM
INTERSECTION: 17 N/S CULVER BOULEVARD
E/W WASHINGTON BOULEVARD / CANFIELD AVENUE
15 MIN COUNTS
123456789 10 11 12
PERIOD SBRT SBTH SBLT WBRT WBTH WBLT NBRT NBTH NBLT EBRT EBTH EBLT TOTAL
300-315 10 99 19 19 7 170 162 143 4300 636
315-330 3 101 9 20 8 160 181 179 7100 669
330-345 3 113 10 16 7 153 207 158 2300 672
345-400 1 109 9 13 7 147 228 173 1200 690
400-415 4 109 7 13 5 150 206 168 3300 668
415-430 5 131 12 18 6 186 228 200 6200 794
430-445 5 121 9 23 5 170 212 177 3200 727
445-500 3 132 9 12 7 199 207 198 4 10 0 0 781
500-515 1 125 4 21 7 180 213 199 4600 760
515-530 4 120 12 13 8 195 242 178 3200 777
530-545 3 128 11 14 5 191 235 212 3200 804
545-600 1 106 7 26 8 219 252 205 4900 837
HOUR TOTALS
123456789 10 11 12
TIME SBRT SBTH SBLT WBRT WBTH WBLT NBRT NBTH NBLT EBRT EBTH EBLT TOTAL
300-400 17 422 47 68 29 630 778 653 14 9 0 0 2667
315-415 11 432 35 62 27 610 822 678 13 9 0 0 2699
330-430 13 462 38 60 25 636 869 699 12 10 0 0 2824
345-445 15 470 37 67 23 653 874 718 13 9 0 0 2879
400-500 17 493 37 66 23 705 853 743 16 17 0 0 2970
415-515 14 509 34 74 25 735 860 774 17 20 0 0 3062
430-530 13 498 34 69 27 744 874 752 14 20 0 0 3045
445-545 11 505 36 60 27 765 897 787 14 20 0 0 3122
500-600 9 479 34 74 28 785 942 794 14 19 0 0 3178
P.M. PEAK HOUR
500-600 74
9 479 34 28
785|10 10|CANFIELD AVENUE 0 14 794 942 WASHINGTON BOULEVARD
19
CULVER BOULEVARD
ATTACHMENT 5
286WILTEC Phone: (626) 564-1944 Fax: (626) 564-0969
INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT SUMMARY
CLIENT: HIRSCH/GREEN TRANSPORTATION CONSULTING, INC.
PROJECT: CULVER CITY TRAFFIC COUNTS
DATE: THURSDAY SEPTEMBER 11, 2008
PERIOD: 7:00 AM TO 10:00 AM
INTERSECTION: 18 N/S ROBERTSON BOULEVARD / HIGUERA STREET
E/W WASHINGTON BOULEVARD
15 MIN COUNTS
123456789 10 11 12
PERIOD SBRT SBTH SBLT WBRT WBTH WBLT NBRT NBTH NBLT EBRT EBTH EBLT TOTAL
700-715 15 27 9 60 230 12 10 46 4 6 94 16 529
715-730 16 23 11 68 265 14 18 58 5 8 115 8 609
730-745 22 44 25 71 281 14 13 76 5 9 106 11 677
745-800 33 30 26 46 257 23 9 46 2 9 144 6 631
800-815 29 44 35 71 249 18 16 68 8 13 178 6 735
815-830 38 57 29 50 271 21 7 55 5 19 183 7 742
830-845 52 74 41 30 282 14 10 59 4 16 169 13 764
845-900 31 93 21 52 278 10 14 45 7 15 161 11 738
900-915 45 101 22 52 231 22 10 59 11 13 129 18 713
915-930 31 85 20 42 219 28 6 46 9 24 103 4 617
930-945 39 75 21 37 197 18 6 37 4 10 94 13 551
945-1000 21 56 24 28 210 12 10 22 8 21 88 17 517
HOUR TOTALS
123456789 10 11 12
TIME SBRT SBTH SBLT WBRT WBTH WBLT NBRT NBTH NBLT EBRT EBTH EBLT TOTAL
700-800 86 124 71 245 1033 63 50 226 16 32 459 41 2446
715-815 100 141 97 256 1052 69 56 248 20 39 543 31 2652
730-830 122 175 115 238 1058 76 45 245 20 50 611 30 2785
745-845 152 205 131 197 1059 76 42 228 19 57 674 32 2872
800-900 150 268 126 203 1080 63 47 227 24 63 691 37 2979
815-815 166 325 113 184 1062 67 41 218 27 63 642 49 2957
830-930 159 353 104 176 1010 74 40 209 31 68 562 46 2832
845-945 146 354 84 183 925 78 36 187 31 62 487 46 2619
900-1000 136 317 87 159 857 80 32 164 32 68 414 52 2398
A.M. PEAK HOUR
800-900 203
150 268 126 1080
63
37
WASHINGTON BOULEVARD 691 24 227 47
63
ROBERTSON BOULEVARD / HIGUERA STREET
ATTACHMENT 5
287WILTEC Phone: (626) 564-1944 Fax: (626) 564-0969
INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT SUMMARY
CLIENT: HIRSCH/GREEN TRANSPORTATION CONSULTING, INC.
PROJECT: CULVER CITY TRAFFIC COUNTS
DATE: THURSDAY SEPTEMBER 11, 2008
PERIOD: 3:00 PM TO 6:00 PM
INTERSECTION: 18 N/S ROBERTSON BOULEVARD / HIGUERA STREET
E/W WASHINGTON BOULEVARD
15 MIN COUNTS
123456789 10 11 12
PERIOD SBRT SBTH SBLT WBRT WBTH WBLT NBRT NBTH NBLT EBRT EBTH EBLT TOTAL
300-315 24 52 33 26 138 12 9 35 8 13 135 13 498
315-330 18 55 22 37 143 14 15 40 13 16 173 15 561
330-345 24 59 37 34 152 8 7 47 16 9 196 17 606
345-400 10 54 52 34 163 6 11 36 16 13 185 14 594
400-415 18 62 41 25 173 13 3 36 10 12 161 13 567
415-430 22 39 60 37 179 12 3 38 3 9 201 12 615
430-445 14 47 43 32 166 7 6 31 7 6 191 18 568
445-500 22 61 49 21 182 8 6 38 11 9 218 17 642
500-515 8 46 41 39 203 19 13 53 14 11 193 20 660
515-530 18 57 38 20 187 19 10 49 6 20 212 24 660
530-545 12 58 27 35 196 23 5 44 10 39 177 25 651
545-600 15 81 37 33 192 14 2 19 14 8 209 23 647
HOUR TOTALS
123456789 10 11 12
TIME SBRT SBTH SBLT WBRT WBTH WBLT NBRT NBTH NBLT EBRT EBTH EBLT TOTAL
300-400 76 220 144 131 596 40 42 158 53 51 689 59 2259
315-415 70 230 152 130 631 41 36 159 55 50 715 59 2328
330-430 74 214 190 130 667 39 24 157 45 43 743 56 2382
345-445 64 202 196 128 681 38 23 141 36 40 738 57 2344
400-500 76 209 193 115 700 40 18 143 31 36 771 60 2392
415-515 66 193 193 129 730 46 28 160 35 35 803 67 2485
430-530 62 211 171 112 738 53 35 171 38 46 814 79 2530
445-545 60 222 155 115 768 69 34 184 41 79 800 86 2613
500-600 53 242 143 127 778 75 30 165 44 78 791 92 2618
P.M. PEAK HOUR
500-600 127
53 242 143 778
75
92
WASHINGTON BOULEVARD 791 44 165 30
78
ROBERTSON BOULEVARD / HIGUERA STREET
ATTACHMENT 5
288INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT SUMMARY
CLIENT: HIRSCH/GREEN TRANSPORTATION CONSULTING, INC.
PROJECT: WASHINGTON - NATIONAL EMC / CULVER CITY
DATE: TUESDAY, OCTOBER 07, 2008
PERIOD: 07:00 AM TO 10:00 AM
INTERSECTION N/S LANDMARK STREET
E/W WASHINGTON BOULEVARD
FILE NUMBER: 19-AM
15 MINUTE 123456789 10 11 12
TOTALS SBRT SBTH SBLT WBRT WBTH WBLT NBRT NBTH NBLT EBRT EBTH EBLT
0700-0715 0000 243 11 4015 62 0
0715-0730 0000 307 17 7025 100 0
0730-0745 0000 300 22 7058 125 0
0745-0800 0000 330 14 304 11 146 0
0800-0815 0000 420 14 405 17 182 0
0815-0830 0000 357 14 707 22 215 0
0830-0845 0000 358 19 12 0 11 21 200 0
0845-0900 0000 385 12 605 16 220 0
0900-0915 0000 344 10 706 12 160 0
0915-0930 0000 266 10 407 10 185 0
0930-0945 0000 350 7504 10 151 0
0940-1000 0000 300 64078 135 0
1 HOUR 123456789 10 11 12
TOTALS SBRT SBTH SBLT WBRT WBTH WBLT NBRT NBTH NBLT EBRT EBTH EBLT TOTALS
0700-0800 0000 1180 64 21 0 12 29 433 0 1739
0715-0815 0000 1357 67 21 0 16 41 553 0 2055
0730-0830 0000 1407 64 21 0 21 58 668 0 2239
0745-0845 0000 1465 61 26 0 27 71 743 0 2393
0800-0900 0000 1520 59 29 0 28 76 817 0 2529
0815-0915 0000 1444 55 32 0 29 71 795 0 2426
0830-0930 0000 1353 51 29 0 29 59 765 0 2286
0845-0945 0000 1345 39 22 0 22 48 716 0 2192
0900-1000 0000 1260 33 20 0 24 40 631 0 2008
A.M. PEAK HOUR 0 0 0
0800-0900
0 0
817 1520
76 59
28 029
LANDMARK STREET
WASHINGTON BOULEVARD
THE TRAFFIC SOLUTION
329 DIAMOND STREET
ARCADIA, CALIFORNIA 91006
626.446.7978
ATTACHMENT 5
289INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT SUMMARY
CLIENT: HIRSCH/GREEN TRANSPORTATION CONSULTING, INC.
PROJECT: WASHINGTON - NATIONAL EMC / CULVER CITY
DATE: THURSDAY, OCTOBER 02, 2008
PERIOD: 03:00 PM TO 06:00 PM
INTERSECTION N/S LANDMARK STREET
E/W WASHINGTON BOULEVARD
FILE NUMBER: 19-PM
15 MINUTE 123456789 10 11 12
TOTALS SBRT SBTH SBLT WBRT WBTH WBLT NBRT NBTH NBLT EBRT EBTH EBLT
0300-0315 0000 134 4 19 0 16 9 219 0
0315-0330 0000 144 5 13 0 10 7 245 0
0330-0345 0000 168 8 11 085 247 0
0345-0400 0000 161 10 22 0 10 5 223 0
0400-0415 0000 182 8 26 0 11 3 292 0
0415-0430 0000 160 6 15 083 237 0
0430-0445 0000 193 4 22 0 15 4 268 0
0445-0500 0000 167 2 13 082 212 0
0500-0515 0000 210 5 17 084 263 0
0515-0530 0000 225 2 13 072 356 0
0530-0545 0000 251 5 16 063 342 0
0545-0600 0000 228 2 12 041 288 0
1 HOUR 123456789 10 11 12
TOTALS SBRT SBTH SBLT WBRT WBTH WBLT NBRT NBTH NBLT EBRT EBTH EBLT TOTALS
0300-0400 0000 607 27 65 0 44 26 934 0 1703
0315-0415 0000 655 31 72 0 39 20 1007 0 1824
0330-0430 0000 671 32 74 0 37 16 999 0 1829
0345-0445 0000 696 28 85 0 44 15 1020 0 1888
0400-0500 0000 702 20 76 0 42 12 1009 0 1861
0415-0515 0000 730 17 67 0 39 13 980 0 1846
0430-0530 0000 795 13 65 0 38 12 1099 0 2022
0445-0545 0000 853 14 59 0 29 11 1173 0 2139
0500-0600 0000 914 14 58 0 25 10 1249 0 2270
P.M. PEAK HOUR 0 0 0
0500-0600
0 0
1249 914
10 14
25 058
LANDMARK STREET
WASHINGTON BOULEVARD
THE TRAFFIC SOLUTION
329 DIAMOND STREET
ARCADIA, CALIFORNIA 91006
626.446.7978
ATTACHMENT 5
290INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT SUMMARY
CLIENT: HIRSCH/GREEN TRANSPORTATION CONSULTING, INC.
PROJECT: WASHINGTON / NATIONAL EMC
DATE: THURSDAY, APRIL 29, 2010
PERIOD: 07:00 AM TO 10:00 AM
INTERSECTION N/S NATIONAL BOULEVARD
E/W WASHINGTON BOULEVARD
FILE NUMBER: 20-AM
15 MINUTE 123456789 10 11 12
TOTALS SBRT SBTH SBLT WBRT WBTH WBLT NBRT NBTH NBLT EBRT EBTH EBLT
0700-0715 5 75 10 76 233 9 9 190 55 10 99 9
0715-0730 10 80 13 101 250 9 11 201 62 11 100 10
0730-0745 9 134 27 85 296 13 13 227 50 10 121 11
0745-0800 13 154 30 72 302 15 27 212 53 19 141 12
0800-0815 14 204 30 83 308 20 22 192 57 27 191 19
0815-0830 17 189 35 85 271 23 31 194 60 31 202 19
0830-0845 16 183 41 70 273 18 24 186 49 32 173 23
0845-0900 14 173 33 67 245 22 22 173 43 26 162 17
0900-0915 14 173 32 69 271 28 21 180 42 27 123 16
0915-0930 15 191 25 54 251 23 15 199 39 25 125 17
0930-0945 13 188 23 53 251 21 19 201 33 23 105 18
0945-1000 10 166 22 51 244 22 20 198 31 17 101 14
1 HOUR 123456789 10 11 12
TOTALS SBRT SBTH SBLT WBRT WBTH WBLT NBRT NBTH NBLT EBRT EBTH EBLT TOTALS
0700-0800 37 443 80 334 1081 46 60 830 220 50 461 42 3684
0715-0815 46 572 100 341 1156 57 73 832 222 67 553 52 4071
0730-0830 53 681 122 325 1177 71 93 825 220 87 655 61 4370
0745-0845 60 730 136 310 1154 76 104 784 219 109 707 73 4462
0800-0900 61 749 139 305 1097 83 99 745 209 116 728 78 4409
0815-0915 61 718 141 291 1060 91 98 733 194 116 660 75 4238
0830-0930 59 720 131 260 1040 91 82 738 173 110 583 73 4060
0845-0945 56 725 113 243 1018 94 77 753 157 101 515 68 3920
0900-1000 52 718 102 227 1017 94 75 778 145 92 454 65 3819
A.M. PEAK HOUR 60 730 136
0745-0845
73 310
707 1154
109 76
219784104
NATIONAL BOULEVARD
WASHINGTON BOULEVARD
THE TRAFFIC SOLUTION
329 DIAMOND STREET
ARCADIA, CALIFORNIA 91006
626.446.7978
ATTACHMENT 5
291INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT SUMMARY
CLIENT: HIRSCH/GREEN TRANSPORTATION CONSULTING, INC.
PROJECT: WASHINGTON / NATIONAL EMC
DATE: THURSDAY, APRIL 29, 2010
PERIOD: 03:00 PM TO 06:00 PM
INTERSECTION N/S NATIONAL BOULEVARD
E/W WASHINGTON BOULEVARD
FILE NUMBER: 20-PM
15 MINUTE 123456789 10 11 12
TOTALS SBRT SBTH SBLT WBRT WBTH WBLT NBRT NBTH NBLT EBRT EBTH EBLT
0300-0315 11 181 41 52 139 14 10 131 46 40 130 17
0315-0330 10 193 63 42 141 17 19 140 54 50 181 13
0330-0345 10 171 62 59 155 12 22 142 31 57 180 14
0345-0400 14 202 58 49 140 13 15 120 38 35 173 11
0400-0415 11 186 41 41 142 18 17 133 44 51 194 9
0415-0430 9 188 65 58 159 21 14 145 39 38 208 9
0430-0445 9 195 53 36 183 16 18 153 35 46 209 11
0445-0500 10 192 53 36 201 14 13 158 43 30 180 11
0500-0515 16 197 50 39 194 13 20 147 31 50 222 8
0515-0530 14 206 47 37 181 18 25 130 41 43 220 10
0530-0545 10 223 56 56 206 21 25 168 49 54 261 14
0545-0600 13 214 50 43 172 16 16 183 50 43 236 9
1 HOUR 123456789 10 11 12
TOTALS SBRT SBTH SBLT WBRT WBTH WBLT NBRT NBTH NBLT EBRT EBTH EBLT TOTALS
0300-0400 45 747 224 202 575 56 66 533 169 182 664 55 3518
0315-0415 45 752 224 191 578 60 73 535 167 193 728 47 3593
0330-0430 44 747 226 207 596 64 68 540 152 181 755 43 3623
0345-0445 43 771 217 184 624 68 64 551 156 170 784 40 3672
0400-0500 39 761 212 171 685 69 62 589 161 165 791 40 3745
0415-0515 44 772 221 169 737 64 65 603 148 164 819 39 3845
0430-0530 49 790 203 148 759 61 76 588 150 169 831 40 3864
0445-0545 50 818 206 168 782 66 83 603 164 177 883 43 4043
0500-0600 53 840 203 175 753 68 86 628 171 190 939 41 4147
P.M. PEAK HOUR 53 840 203
0500-0600
41 175
939 753
190 68
17162886
NATIONAL BOULEVARD
WASHINGTON BOULEVARD
THE TRAFFIC SOLUTION
329 DIAMOND STREET
ARCADIA, CALIFORNIA 91006
626.446.7978
ATTACHMENT 5
292INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT SUMMARY
CLIENT: HIRSCH/GREEN TRANSPORTATION CONSULTING, INC.
PROJECT: WASHINGTON / NATIONAL EMC
DATE: THURSDAY, APRIL 29, 2010
PERIOD: 07:00 AM TO 10:00 AM
INTERSECTION N/S WESLEY AVENUE / DRIVEWAY
E/W WASHINGTON BOULEVARD
FILE NUMBER: 21-AM
15 MINUTE 123456789 10 11 12
TOTALS SBRT SBTH SBLT WBRT WBTH WBLT NBRT NBTH NBLT EBRT EBTH EBLT
0700-0715 0000 238 10003 81 0
0715-0730 0000 384 30002 144 0
0730-0745 0000 441 00000 175 0
0745-0800 0000 421 20001 179 0
0800-0815 0000 333 10001 220 0
0815-0830 0000 392 01000 266 0
0830-0845 0000 409 00002 248 0
0845-0900 0000 355 41011 200 0
0900-0915 0000 311 21013 135 0
0915-0930 0000 321 01023 158 0
0930-0945 0000 377 21003 148 0
0945-1000 0000 329 10015 122 0
1 HOUR 123456789 10 11 12
TOTALS SBRT SBTH SBLT WBRT WBTH WBLT NBRT NBTH NBLT EBRT EBTH EBLT TOTALS
0700-0800 0000 1484 60006 579 0 2075
0715-0815 0000 1579 60004 718 0 2307
0730-0830 0000 1587 31002 840 0 2433
0745-0845 0000 1555 31004 913 0 2476
0800-0900 0000 1489 52014 934 0 2435
0815-0915 0000 1467 63026 849 0 2333
0830-0930 0000 1396 63049 741 0 2159
0845-0945 0000 1364 8404 10 641 0 2031
0900-1000 0000 1338 5304 14 563 0 1927
A.M. PEAK HOUR 0 0 0
0745-0845
0 0
913 1555
4 3
001
WESLEY AVENUE / DRIVEWAY
WASHINGTON BOULEVARD
THE TRAFFIC SOLUTION
329 DIAMOND STREET
ARCADIA, CALIFORNIA 91006
626.446.7978
ATTACHMENT 5
293INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT SUMMARY
CLIENT: HIRSCH/GREEN TRANSPORTATION CONSULTING, INC.
PROJECT: WASHINGTON / NATIONAL EMC
DATE: THURSDAY, APRIL 29, 2010
PERIOD: 03:00 PM TO 06:00 PM
INTERSECTION N/S WESLEY STREET / DRIVEWAY
E/W WASHINGTON BOULEVARD
FILE NUMBER: 21-PM
15 MINUTE 123456789 10 11 12
TOTALS SBRT SBTH SBLT WBRT WBTH WBLT NBRT NBTH NBLT EBRT EBTH EBLT
0300-0315 0000 222 44032 212 0
0315-0330 0000 195 23020 238 0
0330-0345 0000 170 05050 241 0
0345-0400 0000 175 03051 204 0
0400-0415 0000 199 04032 251 0
0415-0430 0000 228 14061 265 0
0430-0445 0000 207 02032 255 0
0445-0500 0000 236 22032 235 0
0500-0515 0000 240 04020 295 0
0515-0530 0000 244 03030 327 0
0530-0545 0000 230 10000 279 0
0545-0600 0000 216 00001 286 0
1 HOUR 123456789 10 11 12
TOTALS SBRT SBTH SBLT WBRT WBTH WBLT NBRT NBTH NBLT EBRT EBTH EBLT TOTALS
0300-0400 0000 762 6 15 0 15 3 895 0 1696
0315-0415 0000 739 2 15 0 15 3 934 0 1708
0330-0430 0000 772 1 16 0 19 4 961 0 1773
0345-0445 0000 809 1 13 0 17 6 975 0 1821
0400-0500 0000 870 3 12 0 15 7 1006 0 1913
0415-0515 0000 911 3 12 0 14 5 1050 0 1995
0430-0530 0000 927 2 11 0 11 4 1112 0 2067
0445-0545 0000 950 39082 1136 0 2108
0500-0600 0000 930 17051 1187 0 2131
P.M. PEAK HOUR 0 0 0
0500-0600
0 0
1187 930
1 1
507
WESLEY STREET / DRIVEWAY
WASHINGTON BOULEVARD
THE TRAFFIC SOLUTION
329 DIAMOND STREET
ARCADIA, CALIFORNIA 91006
626.446.7978
ATTACHMENT 5
294INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT SUMMARY
CLIENT: HIRSCH/GREEN TRANSPORTATION CONSULTING, INC.
PROJECT: WASHINGTON / NATIONAL EMC
DATE: THURSDAY, APRIL 29, 2010
PERIOD: 07:00 AM TO 10:00 AM
INTERSECTION N/S HELMS AVENUE
E/W WASHINGTON BOULEVARD
FILE NUMBER: 22-AM
15 MINUTE 123456789 10 11 12
TOTALS SBRT SBTH SBLT WBRT WBTH WBLT NBRT NBTH NBLT EBRT EBTH EBLT
0700-0715 0000 270 220 11 2 115 0
0715-0730 0000 362 530 13 1 129 0
0730-0745 0000 365 440 19 2 133 0
0745-0800 0000 423 620 16 4 175 0
0800-0815 0000 357 11 40 19 7 257 0
0815-0830 0000 374 550 22 16 257 0
0830-0845 0000 339 860 14 11 200 0
0845-0900 0000 354 65087 169 0
0900-0915 0000 348 950 10 6 169 0
0915-0930 0000 312 63084 166 0
0930-0945 0000 350 360 14 6 125 0
0945-1000 0000 324 55082 96 0
1 HOUR 123456789 10 11 12
TOTALS SBRT SBTH SBLT WBRT WBTH WBLT NBRT NBTH NBLT EBRT EBTH EBLT TOTALS
0700-0800 0000 1420 17 11 0 59 9 552 0 2068
0715-0815 0000 1507 26 13 0 67 14 694 0 2321
0730-0830 0000 1519 26 15 0 76 29 822 0 2487
0745-0845 0000 1493 30 17 0 71 38 889 0 2538
0800-0900 0000 1424 30 20 0 63 41 883 0 2461
0815-0915 0000 1415 28 21 0 54 40 795 0 2353
0830-0930 0000 1353 29 19 0 40 28 704 0 2173
0845-0945 0000 1364 24 19 0 40 23 629 0 2099
0900-1000 0000 1334 23 19 0 40 18 556 0 1990
A.M. PEAK HOUR 0 0 0
0745-0845
0 0
889 1493
38 30
71 017
HELMS AVENUE
WASHINGTON BOULEVARD
THE TRAFFIC SOLUTION
329 DIAMOND STREET
ARCADIA, CALIFORNIA 91006
626.446.7978
ATTACHMENT 5
295INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT SUMMARY
CLIENT: HIRSCH/GREEN TRANSPORTATION CONSULTING, INC.
PROJECT: WASHINGTON / NATIONAL EMC
DATE: THURSDAY, APRIL 29, 2010
PERIOD: 03:00 PM TO 06:00 PM
INTERSECTION N/S HELMS AVENUE
E/W WASHINGTON BOULEVARD
FILE NUMBER: 22-PM
15 MINUTE 123456789 10 11 12
TOTALS SBRT SBTH SBLT WBRT WBTH WBLT NBRT NBTH NBLT EBRT EBTH EBLT
0300-0315 0000 162 530 19 2 192 0
0315-0330 0000 199 340 19 6 248 0
0330-0345 0000 207 730 15 4 262 0
0345-0400 0000 177 560 15 2 246 0
0400-0415 0000 166 340 10 6 228 0
0415-0430 0000 204 240 14 9 281 0
0430-0445 0000 237 320 19 6 274 0
0445-0500 0000 261 630 10 9 250 0
0500-0515 0000 213 3208 11 255 0
0515-0530 0000 203 540 14 5 276 0
0530-0545 0000 258 340 13 6 292 0
0545-0600 0000 244 330 13 7 295 0
1 HOUR 123456789 10 11 12
TOTALS SBRT SBTH SBLT WBRT WBTH WBLT NBRT NBTH NBLT EBRT EBTH EBLT TOTALS
0300-0400 0000 745 20 16 0 68 14 948 0 1811
0315-0415 0000 749 18 17 0 59 18 984 0 1845
0330-0430 0000 754 17 17 0 54 21 1017 0 1880
0345-0445 0000 784 13 16 0 58 23 1029 0 1923
0400-0500 0000 868 14 13 0 53 30 1033 0 2011
0415-0515 0000 915 14 11 0 51 35 1060 0 2086
0430-0530 0000 914 17 11 0 51 31 1055 0 2079
0445-0545 0000 935 17 13 0 45 31 1073 0 2114
0500-0600 0000 918 14 13 0 48 29 1118 0 2140
P.M. PEAK HOUR 0 0 0
0500-0600
0 0
1118 918
29 14
48 013
HELMS AVENUE
WASHINGTON BOULEVARD
THE TRAFFIC SOLUTION
329 DIAMOND STREET
ARCADIA, CALIFORNIA 91006
626.446.7978
ATTACHMENT 5
296INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT SUMMARY
CLIENT: HIRSCH/GREEN TRANSPORTATION CONSULTING, INC.
PROJECT: WASHINGTON / NATIONAL EMC
DATE: TUESDAY, MAY 04, 2010
PERIOD: 07:00 AM TO 10:00 AM
INTERSECTION N/S CATTARAUGUS AVENUE
E/W WASHINGTON BOULEVARD
FILE NUMBER: 23-AM
15 MINUTE 123456789 10 11 12
TOTALS SBRT SBTH SBLT WBRT WBTH WBLT NBRT NBTH NBLT EBRT EBTH EBLT
0700-0715 5 0 7 35 254 01011 82 4
0715-0730 6 2 10 65 369 31010 122 5
0730-0745 7 1 15 95 407 10121 174 3
0745-0800 10 1 16 78 389 11231 190 4
0800-0815 17 1 25 69 341 11122 212 6
0815-0830 11 3 29 75 366 01122 228 9
0830-0845 7 1 15 73 367 01120 227 9
0845-0900 6 1 7 55 322 12040 182 7
0900-0915 5 1 3 35 345 22144 150 3
0915-0930 8 0 7 30 300 12043 150 2
0930-0945 10 0 8 21 341 12020 124 3
0945-1000 12 0 5 21 302 02100 115 3
1 HOUR 123456789 10 11 12
TOTALS SBRT SBTH SBLT WBRT WBTH WBLT NBRT NBTH NBLT EBRT EBTH EBLT TOTALS
0700-0800 28 4 48 273 1419 53373 568 16 2377
0715-0815 40 5 66 307 1506 63484 698 18 2665
0730-0830 45 6 85 317 1503 33596 804 22 2808
0745-0845 45 6 85 295 1463 24595 857 28 2804
0800-0900 41 6 76 272 1396 2 5 3 10 4 849 31 2695
0815-0915 29 6 54 238 1400 3 6 3 12 6 787 28 2572
0830-0930 26 3 32 193 1334 4 7 2 14 7 709 21 2352
0845-0945 29 2 25 141 1308 5 8 1 14 7 606 15 2161
0900-1000 35 1 23 107 1288 4 8 2 10 7 539 11 2035
A.M. PEAK HOUR 45 6 85
0730-0830
22 317
804 1503
6 3
953
CATTARAUGUS AVENUE
WASHINGTON BOULEVARD
THE TRAFFIC SOLUTION
329 DIAMOND STREET
ARCADIA, CALIFORNIA 91006
626.446.7978
ATTACHMENT 5
297INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT SUMMARY
CLIENT: HIRSCH/GREEN TRANSPORTATION CONSULTING, INC.
PROJECT: WASHINGTON / NATIONAL EMC
DATE: TUESDAY, MAY 04, 2010
PERIOD: 03:00 PM TO 06:00 PM
INTERSECTION N/S CATTARAUGUS AVENUE
E/W WASHINGTON BOULEVARD
FILE NUMBER: 23-PM
15 MINUTE 123456789 10 11 12
TOTALS SBRT SBTH SBLT WBRT WBTH WBLT NBRT NBTH NBLT EBRT EBTH EBLT
0300-0315 8 0 18 25 189 00012 193 8
0315-0330 6 2 19 21 170 01202 224 4
0330-0345 5 0 19 17 173 30123 221 4
0345-0400 8 0 14 20 181 21012 229 5
0400-0415 6 0 15 16 175 32003 219 2
0415-0430 11 1 19 20 183 11105 250 4
0430-0445 10 1 20 22 208 23113 248 2
0445-0500 9 1 19 17 211 33011 263 2
0500-0515 10 0 15 21 220 20111 264 5
0515-0530 12 0 13 21 209 30002 304 4
0530-0545 7 2 17 19 219 23123 267 4
0545-0600 7 0 12 13 223 40013 288 6
1 HOUR 123456789 10 11 12
TOTALS SBRT SBTH SBLT WBRT WBTH WBLT NBRT NBTH NBLT EBRT EBTH EBLT TOTALS
0300-0400 27 2 70 83 713 52349 867 21 1806
0315-0415 25 2 67 74 699 8433 10 893 15 1803
0330-0430 30 1 67 73 712 9423 13 919 15 1848
0345-0445 35 2 68 78 747 8722 13 946 13 1921
0400-0500 36 3 73 75 777 9922 12 980 10 1988
0415-0515 40 3 73 80 822 8733 10 1025 13 2087
0430-0530 41 2 67 81 848 10 6237 1079 13 2159
0445-0545 38 3 64 78 859 10 6247 1098 15 2184
0500-0600 36 2 57 74 871 11 3249 1123 19 2211
P.M. PEAK HOUR 36 2 57
0500-0600
19 74
1123 871
9 11
423
CATTARAUGUS AVENUE
WASHINGTON BOULEVARD
THE TRAFFIC SOLUTION
329 DIAMOND STREET
ARCADIA, CALIFORNIA 91006
626.446.7978
ATTACHMENT 5
298INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT SUMMARY
CLIENT: HIRSCH/GREEN TRANSPORTATION CONSULTING, INC.
PROJECT: HELMS AVENUE CLOSURE PROJECT
DATE: TUESDAY, MAY 04, 2010
PERIOD: 07:00 AM TO 10:00 AM
INTERSECTION N/S LA CIENEGA BOULEVARD
E/W WASHINGTON BOULEVARD
FILE NUMBER: 24-AM
15 MINUTE 123456789 10 11 12
TOTALS SBRT SBTH SBLT WBRT WBTH WBLT NBRT NBTH NBLT EBRT EBTH EBLT
0700-0715 4 215 28 37 301 9 5 355 39 11 87 7
0715-0730 4 245 33 57 325 10 5 365 63 13 127 8
0730-0745 6 291 36 68 366 11 3 404 70 19 139 10
0745-0800 10 328 39 75 425 13 5 435 67 20 178 11
0800-0815 7 402 48 50 422 17 6 385 50 21 203 9
0815-0830 6 351 49 60 345 15 4 390 65 36 202 13
0830-0845 5 321 44 58 301 10 5 411 67 28 191 15
0845-0900 5 288 56 55 345 9 7 400 52 20 161 16
0900-0915 10 250 44 30 374 10 12 331 47 23 142 15
0915-0930 3 271 46 41 260 13 6 311 50 26 121 10
0930-0945 3 289 39 33 261 12 5 272 34 21 99 9
0945-1000 7 288 30 30 287 9 3 302 36 19 98 7
1 HOUR 123456789 10 11 12
TOTALS SBRT SBTH SBLT WBRT WBTH WBLT NBRT NBTH NBLT EBRT EBTH EBLT TOTALS
0700-0800 24 1079 136 237 1417 43 18 1559 239 63 531 36 5382
0715-0815 27 1266 156 250 1538 51 19 1589 250 73 647 38 5904
0730-0830 29 1372 172 253 1558 56 18 1614 252 96 722 43 6185
0745-0845 28 1402 180 243 1493 55 20 1621 249 105 774 48 6218
0800-0900 23 1362 197 223 1413 51 22 1586 234 105 757 53 6026
0815-0915 26 1210 193 203 1365 44 28 1532 231 107 696 59 5694
0830-0930 23 1130 190 184 1280 42 30 1453 216 97 615 56 5316
0845-0945 21 1098 185 159 1240 44 30 1314 183 90 523 50 4937
0900-1000 23 1098 159 134 1182 44 26 1216 167 89 460 41 4639
A.M. PEAK HOUR 28 1402 180
0745-0845
48 243
774 1493
105 55
249162120
LA CIENEGA BOULEVARD
WASHINGTON BOULEVARD
THE TRAFFIC SOLUTION
329 DIAMOND STREET
ARCADIA, CALIFORNIA 91006
626.446.7978
ATTACHMENT 5
299INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT SUMMARY
CLIENT: HIRSCH/GREEN TRANSPORTATION CONSULTING, INC.
PROJECT: WASHINGTON / NATIONAL EMC
DATE: TUESDAY, MAY 04, 2010
PERIOD: 03:00 PM TO 06:00 PM
INTERSECTION N/S LA CIENEGA BOULEVARD
E/W WASHINGTON BOULEVARD
FILE NUMBER: 24-PM
15 MINUTE 123456789 10 11 12
TOTALS SBRT SBTH SBLT WBRT WBTH WBLT NBRT NBTH NBLT EBRT EBTH EBLT
0300-0315 10 345 45 13 137 12 10 264 28 29 199 13
0315-0330 11 350 50 15 128 12 9 250 30 30 222 11
0330-0345 9 342 51 20 141 15 13 259 32 37 227 11
0345-0400 11 361 44 16 132 17 11 265 37 34 230 9
0400-0415 13 376 53 19 141 18 10 273 33 31 225 12
0415-0430 10 401 58 23 137 13 8 268 30 38 214 15
0430-0445 9 423 61 26 163 13 13 274 32 41 238 18
0445-0500 10 411 72 29 160 11 15 256 26 42 234 20
0500-0515 8 408 65 34 173 19 14 261 31 34 249 21
0515-0530 12 430 59 28 164 19 16 264 40 30 257 17
0530-0545 11 388 51 30 169 15 12 270 41 37 268 18
0545-0600 10 401 43 30 171 14 13 280 31 33 283 15
1 HOUR 123456789 10 11 12
TOTALS SBRT SBTH SBLT WBRT WBTH WBLT NBRT NBTH NBLT EBRT EBTH EBLT TOTALS
0300-0400 41 1398 190 64 538 56 43 1038 127 130 878 44 4547
0315-0415 44 1429 198 70 542 62 43 1047 132 132 904 43 4646
0330-0430 43 1480 206 78 551 63 42 1065 132 140 896 47 4743
0345-0445 43 1561 216 84 573 61 42 1080 132 144 907 54 4897
0400-0500 42 1611 244 97 601 55 46 1071 121 152 911 65 5016
0415-0515 37 1643 256 112 633 56 50 1059 119 155 935 74 5129
0430-0530 39 1672 257 117 660 62 58 1055 129 147 978 76 5250
0445-0545 41 1637 247 121 666 64 57 1051 138 143 1008 76 5249
0500-0600 41 1627 218 122 677 67 55 1075 143 134 1057 71 5287
P.M. PEAK HOUR 41 1627 218
0500-0600
71 122
1057 677
134 67
143107555
LA CIENEGA BOULEVARD
WASHINGTON BOULEVARD
THE TRAFFIC SOLUTION
329 DIAMOND STREET
ARCADIA, CALIFORNIA 91006
626.446.7978
ATTACHMENT 5
300WILTEC Phone: (626) 564-1944 Fax: (626) 564-0969
INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT SUMMARY
CLIENT: HIRSCH/GREEN TRANSPORTATION CONSULTING, INC.
PROJECT: CULVER CITY TRAFFIC COUNTS
DATE: WEDNESDAY SEPTEMBER 10, 2008
PERIOD: 7:00 AM TO 10:00 AM
INTERSECTION: 25 N/S LA CIENEGA BOULEVARD
E/W FAIRFAX AVENUE
15 MIN COUNTS
123456789 10 11 12
PERIOD SBRT SBTH SBLT WBRT WBTH WBLT NBRT NBTH NBLT EBRT EBTH EBLT TOTAL
700-715 4 238 0 1 6 236 272 422 2101 1183
715-730 5 286 0 1 3 226 298 446 3002 1270
730-745 2 324 0 5 6 259 228 404 4100 1233
745-800 5 278 0 4 8 271 253 419 6303 1250
800-815 7 317 0 2 8 279 209 413 8102 1246
815-830 6 340 0 0 7 242 219 446 8301 1272
830-845 5 333 0 2 4 264 201 423 10 1 0 4 1247
845-900 6 297 0 15 9 276 251 436 2303 1298
900-915 3 322 0 12 4 275 229 424 3105 1278
915-930 5 308 0 0 4 248 224 380 5001 1175
930-945 3 278 0 1 6 235 210 379 4303 1122
945-1000 4 315 0 4 3 228 191 378 2001 1126
HOUR TOTALS
123456789 10 11 12
TIME SBRT SBTH SBLT WBRT WBTH WBLT NBRT NBTH NBLT EBRT EBTH EBLT TOTAL
700-800 16 1126 0 11 23 992 1051 1691 15 5 0 6 4936
715-815 19 1205 0 12 25 1035 988 1682 21 5 0 7 4999
730-830 20 1259 0 11 29 1051 909 1682 26 8 0 6 5001
745-845 23 1268 0 8 27 1056 882 1701 32 8 0 10 5015
800-900 24 1287 0 19 28 1061 880 1718 28 8 0 10 5063
815-815 20 1292 0 29 24 1057 900 1729 23 8 0 13 5095
830-930 19 1260 0 29 21 1063 905 1663 20 5 0 13 4998
845-945 17 1205 0 28 23 1034 914 1619 14 7 0 12 4873
900-1000 15 1223 0 17 17 986 854 1561 14 4 0 10 4701
A.M. PEAK HOUR
815-815 29
20 1292 0 24
1057
13
FAIRFAX AVENUE 0 23 1729 900
|1010|LA CIENEGA BOULEVARD
ATTACHMENT 5
301WILTEC Phone: (626) 564-1944 Fax: (626) 564-0969
INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT SUMMARY
CLIENT: HIRSCH/GREEN TRANSPORTATION CONSULTING, INC.
PROJECT: CULVER CITY TRAFFIC COUNTS
DATE: WEDNESDAY SEPTEMBER 10, 2008
PERIOD: 3:00 PM TO 6:00 PM
INTERSECTION: 25 N/S LA CIENEGA BOULEVARD
E/W FAIRFAX AVENUE
15 MIN COUNTS
123456789 10 11 12
PERIOD SBRT SBTH SBLT WBRT WBTH WBLT NBRT NBTH NBLT EBRT EBTH EBLT TOTAL
300-315 2 278 0 0 2 281 246 289 3407 1112
315-330 1 296 0 2 3 271 264 323 4508 1177
330-345 2 284 0 5 1 204 276 338 1 2 0 12 1125
345-400 3 318 0 4 3 211 389 351 3406 1292
400-415 1 337 0 2 4 229 362 356 2608 1307
415-430 4 385 0 0 2 202 320 347 2 2 0 22 1286
430-445 2 328 0 2 1 174 316 308 6 4 0 15 1156
445-500 5 312 0 15 2 201 285 338 4403 1169
500-515 7 342 0 12 4 235 312 352 1 4 0 15 1284
515-530 4 338 0 0 3 208 340 381 3 6 0 11 1294
530-545 2 298 0 1 1 185 360 416 0205 1270
545-600 1 325 0 4 4 198 322 362 4404 1228
HOUR TOTALS
123456789 10 11 12
TIME SBRT SBTH SBLT WBRT WBTH WBLT NBRT NBTH NBLT EBRT EBTH EBLT TOTAL
300-400 8 1176 0 11 9 967 1175 1301 11 15 0 33 4706
315-415 7 1235 0 13 11 915 1291 1368 10 17 0 34 4901
330-430 10 1324 0 11 10 846 1347 1392 8 14 0 48 5010
345-445 10 1368 0 8 10 816 1387 1362 13 16 0 51 5041
400-500 12 1362 0 19 9 806 1283 1349 14 16 0 48 4918
415-515 18 1367 0 29 9 812 1233 1345 13 14 0 55 4895
430-530 18 1320 0 29 10 818 1253 1379 14 18 0 44 4903
445-545 18 1290 0 28 10 829 1297 1487 8 16 0 34 5017
500-600 14 1303 0 17 12 826 1334 1511 8 16 0 35 5076
P.M. PEAK HOUR
500-600 17
14 1303 0 12
826
35
FAIRFAX AVENUE 0 8 1511 1334
16
LA CIENEGA BOULEVARD
ATTACHMENT 5
302WILTEC Phone: (626) 564-1944 Fax: (626) 564-0969
INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT SUMMARY
CLIENT: HIRSCH/GREEN TRANSPORTATION CONSULTING, INC.
PROJECT: CULVER CITY TRAFFIC COUNTS
DATE: WEDNESDAY SEPTEMBER 10, 2008
PERIOD: 7:00 AM TO 10:00 AM
INTERSECTION: 26 N/S WESLEY STREET
E/W NATIONAL BOULEVARD
15 MIN COUNTS
123456789 10 11 12
PERIOD SBRT SBTH SBLT WBRT WBTH WBLT NBRT NBTH NBLT EBRT EBTH EBLT TOTAL
700-715 0000 383 26002 108 0 501
715-730 0000 419 88046 133 0 578
730-745 0000 420 5 15 05 34 177 0 656
745-800 0000 353 8 23 0 33 29 182 0 628
800-815 0000 385 7 34 0 46 12 216 0 700
815-830 0000 343 18 24 0 25 6 210 0 626
830-845 0000 311 2 10 0 10 6 196 0 535
845-900 0000 271 10 20 021 184 0 488
900-915 0000 266 10 15 022 159 0 454
915-930 0000 239 38022 150 0 404
930-945 0000 196 11 8001 140 0 356
945-1000 0000 174 69012 145 0 337
HOUR TOTALS
123456789 10 11 12
TIME SBRT SBTH SBLT WBRT WBTH WBLT NBRT NBTH NBLT EBRT EBTH EBLT TOTAL
700-800 0000 1575 23 52 0 42 71 600 0 2363
715-815 0000 1577 28 80 0 88 81 708 0 2562
730-830 0000 1501 38 96 0 109 81 785 0 2610
745-845 0000 1392 35 91 0 114 53 804 0 2489
800-900 0000 1310 37 88 0 83 25 806 0 2349
815-815 0000 1191 40 69 0 39 15 749 0 2103
830-930 0000 1087 25 53 0 16 11 689 0 1881
845-945 0000 972 34 51 066 633 0 1702
900-1000 0000 875 30 40 057 594 0 1551
A.M. PEAK HOUR
730-830 0
0 0 0 1501
38|10 10|NATIONAL BOULEVARD 785 109 0 96
81
WESLEY STREET
ATTACHMENT 5
303WILTEC Phone: (626) 564-1944 Fax: (626) 564-0969
INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT SUMMARY
CLIENT: HIRSCH/GREEN TRANSPORTATION CONSULTING, INC.
PROJECT: CULVER CITY TRAFFIC COUNTS
DATE: WEDNESDAY SEPTEMBER 10, 2008
PERIOD: 3:00 PM TO 6:00 PM
INTERSECTION: 26 N/S WESLEY STREET
E/W NATIONAL BOULEVARD
15 MIN COUNTS
123456789 10 11 12
PERIOD SBRT SBTH SBLT WBRT WBTH WBLT NBRT NBTH NBLT EBRT EBTH EBLT TOTAL
300-315 0000 174 2 48 0 20 2 209 0 455
315-330 0000 150 0 40 0 16 1 189 0 396
330-345 0000 184 3 44 0 14 3 206 0 454
345-400 0000 146 4 22 092 204 0 387
400-415 0000 174 0 35 0 11 3 217 0 440
415-430 0000 191 0 20 041 235 0 451
430-445 0000 174 4 39 0 11 0 216 0 444
445-500 0000 187 0 44 0 10 2 201 0 444
500-515 0000 196 1 35 051 214 0 452
515-530 0000 226 1 33 042 236 0 502
530-545 0000 234 1 26 080 240 0 509
545-600 0000 212 2 18 061 266 0 505
HOUR TOTALS
123456789 10 11 12
TIME SBRT SBTH SBLT WBRT WBTH WBLT NBRT NBTH NBLT EBRT EBTH EBLT TOTAL
300-400 0000 654 9 154 0 59 8 808 0 1692
315-415 0000 654 7 141 0 50 9 816 0 1677
330-430 0000 695 7 121 0 38 9 862 0 1732
345-445 0000 685 8 116 0 35 6 872 0 1722
400-500 0000 726 4 138 0 36 6 869 0 1779
415-515 0000 748 5 138 0 30 4 866 0 1791
430-530 0000 783 6 151 0 30 5 867 0 1842
445-545 0000 843 3 138 0 27 5 891 0 1907
500-600 0000 868 5 112 0 23 4 956 0 1968
P.M. PEAK HOUR
500-600 0
000 868|1010 10|NATIONAL BOULEVARD 956 23 0 112|1010|WESLEY STREET
ATTACHMENT 5
304WILTEC Phone: (626) 564-1944 Fax: (626) 564-0969
INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT SUMMARY
CLIENT: HIRSCH/GREEN TRANSPORTATION CONSULTING, INC.
PROJECT: CULVER CITY TRAFFIC COUNTS
DATE: WEDNESDAY SEPTEMBER 10, 2008
PERIOD: 7:00 AM TO 10:00 AM
INTERSECTION: 27 N/S HAYDEN AVENUE
E/W NATIONAL BOULEVARD
15 MIN COUNTS
123456789 10 11 12
PERIOD SBRT SBTH SBLT WBRT WBTH WBLT NBRT NBTH NBLT EBRT EBTH EBLT TOTAL
700-715 0000 254 31 60 113 21 99 0 524
715-730 0000 264 26 20 144 33 110 0 579
730-745 0000 284 31 11 0 147 42 143 0 658
745-800 0000 233 50 18 0 141 62 181 0 685
800-815 0000 200 35 20 0 146 57 145 0 603
815-830 0000 197 52 12 0 156 59 186 0 662
830-845 0000 166 52 13 0 148 67 180 0 626
845-900 0000 176 49 11 0 142 77 148 0 603
900-915 0000 140 69 12 0 119 66 136 0 542
915-930 0000 115 33 90 114 59 110 0 440
930-945 0000 93 41 90 103 41 100 0 387
945-1000 0000 89 27 20 0 94 47 90 0 367
HOUR TOTALS
123456789 10 11 12
TIME SBRT SBTH SBLT WBRT WBTH WBLT NBRT NBTH NBLT EBRT EBTH EBLT TOTAL
700-800 0000 1035 138 37 0 545 158 533 0 2446
715-815 0000 981 142 51 0 578 194 579 0 2525
730-830 0000 914 168 61 0 590 220 655 0 2608
745-845 0000 796 189 63 0 591 245 692 0 2576
800-900 0000 739 188 56 0 592 260 659 0 2494
815-815 0000 679 222 48 0 565 269 650 0 2433
830-930 0000 597 203 45 0 523 269 574 0 2211
845-945 0000 524 192 41 0 478 243 494 0 1972
900-1000 0000 437 170 50 0 430 213 436 0 1736
A.M. PEAK HOUR
730-830 0
000 914
168|10 10|NATIONAL BOULEVARD 655 590 0 61
220
HAYDEN AVENUE
ATTACHMENT 5
305WILTEC Phone: (626) 564-1944 Fax: (626) 564-0969
INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT SUMMARY
CLIENT: HIRSCH/GREEN TRANSPORTATION CONSULTING, INC.
PROJECT: CULVER CITY TRAFFIC COUNTS
DATE: WEDNESDAY SEPTEMBER 10, 2008
PERIOD: 3:00 PM TO 6:00 PM
INTERSECTION: 27 N/S HAYDEN AVENUE
E/W NATIONAL BOULEVARD
15 MIN COUNTS
123456789 10 11 12
PERIOD SBRT SBTH SBLT WBRT WBTH WBLT NBRT NBTH NBLT EBRT EBTH EBLT TOTAL
300-315 0000 59 6 26 0 84 34 157 0 366
315-330 0000 56 17 23 0 112 30 194 0 432
330-345 0000 78 11 17 0 103 31 206 0 446
345-400 0000 65 10 24 0 90 54 241 0 484
400-415 0000 53 13 24 0 112 48 205 0 455
415-430 0000 69 12 24 0 106 48 243 0 502
430-445 0000 66 11 49 0 134 41 251 0 552
445-500 0000 80 7 21 0 116 29 196 0 449
500-515 0000 77 8 37 0 142 42 245 0 551
515-530 0000 55 7 38 0 133 30 264 0 527
530-545 0000 78 12 36 0 166 32 232 0 556
545-600 0000 61 6 29 0 151 27 222 0 496
HOUR TOTALS
123456789 10 11 12
TIME SBRT SBTH SBLT WBRT WBTH WBLT NBRT NBTH NBLT EBRT EBTH EBLT TOTAL
300-400 0000 258 44 90 0 389 149 798 0 1728
315-415 0000 252 51 88 0 417 163 846 0 1817
330-430 0000 265 46 89 0 411 181 895 0 1887
345-445 0000 253 46 121 0 442 191 940 0 1993
400-500 0000 268 43 118 0 468 166 895 0 1958
415-515 0000 292 38 131 0 498 160 935 0 2054
430-530 0000 278 33 145 0 525 142 956 0 2079
445-545 0000 290 34 132 0 557 133 937 0 2083
500-600 0000 271 33 140 0 592 131 963 0 2130
P.M. PEAK HOUR
500-600 0
000 271
33|10 10|NATIONAL BOULEVARD 963 592 0 140
131
HAYDEN AVENUE
ATTACHMENT 5
306WILTEC Phone: (626) 564-1944 Fax: (626) 564-0969
INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT SUMMARY
CLIENT: HIRSCH/GREEN TRANSPORTATION CONSULTING, INC.
PROJECT: CULVER CITY TRAFFIC COUNTS
DATE: WEDNESDAY SEPTEMBER 10, 2008
PERIOD: 7:00 AM TO 10:00 AM
INTERSECTION: 28 N/S JEFFERSON BOULEVARD
E/W NATIONAL BOULEVARD
15 MIN COUNTS
123456789 10 11 12
PERIOD SBRT SBTH SBLT WBRT WBTH WBLT NBRT NBTH NBLT EBRT EBTH EBLT TOTAL
700-715 283 142 00000 118 0 20 74 0 637
715-730 292 161 00000 137 0 28 97 0 715
730-745 279 141 00000 130 0 40 89 0 679
745-800 318 161 00000 110 0 25 106 0 720
800-815 280 177 00000 162 0 26 139 0 784
815-830 248 165 00000 157 0 39 138 0 747
830-845 223 139 00000 144 0 27 110 0 643
845-900 193 119 00000 117 0 21 91 0 541
900-915 164 143 00000 110 0 28 97 0 542
915-930 154 133 00000 96 0 31 74 0 488
930-945 146 118 00000 92 0 24 54 0 434
945-1000 134 113 00000 86 0 18 49 0 400
HOUR TOTALS
123456789 10 11 12
TIME SBRT SBTH SBLT WBRT WBTH WBLT NBRT NBTH NBLT EBRT EBTH EBLT TOTAL
700-800 1172 605 00000 495 0 113 366 0 2751
715-815 1169 640 00000 539 0 119 431 0 2898
730-830 1125 644 00000 559 0 130 472 0 2930
745-845 1069 642 00000 573 0 117 493 0 2894
800-900 944 600 00000 580 0 113 478 0 2715
815-815 828 566 00000 528 0 115 436 0 2473
830-930 734 534 00000 467 0 107 372 0 2214
845-945 657 513 00000 415 0 104 316 0 2005
900-1000 598 507 00000 384 0 101 274 0 1864
A.M. PEAK HOUR
730-830 0
1125 644 0 0|10 10 10|NATIONAL BOULEVARD 472 0 559 0
130
JEFFERSON BOULEVARD
ATTACHMENT 5
307WILTEC Phone: (626) 564-1944 Fax: (626) 564-0969
INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT SUMMARY
CLIENT: HIRSCH/GREEN TRANSPORTATION CONSULTING, INC.
PROJECT: CULVER CITY TRAFFIC COUNTS
DATE: WEDNESDAY SEPTEMBER 10, 2008
PERIOD: 3:00 PM TO 6:00 PM
INTERSECTION: 28 N/S JEFFERSON BOULEVARD
E/W NATIONAL BOULEVARD
15 MIN COUNTS
123456789 10 11 12
PERIOD SBRT SBTH SBLT WBRT WBTH WBLT NBRT NBTH NBLT EBRT EBTH EBLT TOTAL
300-315 86 101 00000 133 07 185 0 512
315-330 67 95 00000 150 0 18 135 0 465
330-345 86 80 00000 140 0 21 158 0 485
345-400 74 111 00000 162 01 174 0 522
400-415 90 140 00000 177 0 17 207 0 631
415-430 81 138 00000 168 07 170 0 564
430-445 70 141 00000 184 09 184 0 588
445-500 88 151 00000 207 01 178 0 625
500-515 94 126 00000 227 08 195 0 650
515-530 85 119 00000 216 07 184 0 611
530-545 76 136 00000 195 05 191 0 603
545-600 81 147 00000 205 07 214 0 654
HOUR TOTALS
123456789 10 11 12
TIME SBRT SBTH SBLT WBRT WBTH WBLT NBRT NBTH NBLT EBRT EBTH EBLT TOTAL
300-400 313 387 00000 585 0 47 652 0 1984
315-415 317 426 00000 629 0 57 674 0 2103
330-430 331 469 00000 647 0 46 709 0 2202
345-445 315 530 00000 691 0 34 735 0 2305
400-500 329 570 00000 736 0 34 739 0 2408
415-515 333 556 00000 786 0 25 727 0 2427
430-530 337 537 00000 834 0 25 741 0 2474
445-545 343 532 00000 845 0 21 748 0 2489
500-600 336 528 00000 843 0 27 784 0 2518
P.M. PEAK HOUR
500-600 0
336 528 0 0|10 10 10|NATIONAL BOULEVARD 784 0 843 0
27
JEFFERSON BOULEVARD
ATTACHMENT 5
308WILTEC Phone: (626) 564-1944 Fax: (626) 564-0969
INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT SUMMARY
CLIENT: HIRSCH/GREEN TRANSPORTATION CONSULTING, INC.
PROJECT: CULVER CITY TRAFFIC COUNTS
DATE: WEDNESDAY SEPTEMBER 10, 2008
PERIOD: 7:00 AM TO 10:00 AM
INTERSECTION: 29 N/S LA CIENEGA BOUELVARD
E/W NATIONAL BOULEVARD
15 MIN COUNTS
123456789 10 11 12
PERIOD SBRT SBTH SBLT WBRT WBTH WBLT NBRT NBTH NBLT EBRT EBTH EBLT TOTAL
700-715 141 318 14 28 275 129 30 530 28 21 84 87 1685
715-730 134 350 18 35 298 169 31 512 18 21 92 75 1753
730-745 179 386 23 29 268 152 24 540 31 30 116 92 1870
745-800 147 428 19 28 247 170 31 574 19 28 131 95 1917
800-815 116 453 10 33 292 133 23 549 20 25 163 105 1922
815-830 121 508 17 25 259 100 32 520 26 23 165 90 1886
830-845 121 455 9 17 231 86 36 505 17 29 146 87 1739
845-900 117 443 8 28 219 68 43 557 26 33 138 82 1762
900-915 102 508 8 19 162 58 25 557 28 22 83 76 1648
915-930 83 466 5 15 147 49 38 521 19 18 76 78 1515
930-945 75 491 4 17 137 57 46 473 26 23 61 75 1485
945-1000 60 415 6 23 160 80 32 439 15 20 52 63 1365
HOUR TOTALS
123456789 10 11 12
TIME SBRT SBTH SBLT WBRT WBTH WBLT NBRT NBTH NBLT EBRT EBTH EBLT TOTAL
700-800 601 1482 74 120 1088 620 116 2156 96 100 423 349 7225
715-815 576 1617 70 125 1105 624 109 2175 88 104 502 367 7462
730-830 563 1775 69 115 1066 555 110 2183 96 106 575 382 7595
745-845 505 1844 55 103 1029 489 122 2148 82 105 605 377 7464
800-900 475 1859 44 103 1001 387 134 2131 89 110 612 364 7309
815-815 461 1914 42 89 871 312 136 2139 97 107 532 335 7035
830-930 423 1872 30 79 759 261 142 2140 90 102 443 323 6664
845-945 377 1908 25 79 665 232 152 2108 99 96 358 311 6410
900-1000 320 1880 23 74 606 244 141 1990 88 83 272 292 6013
A.M. PEAK HOUR
730-830 115
563 1775 69 1066
555
382
NATIONAL BOULEVARD 575 96 2183 110
106
LA CIENEGA BOUELVARD
ATTACHMENT 5
309WILTEC Phone: (626) 564-1944 Fax: (626) 564-0969
INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT SUMMARY
CLIENT: HIRSCH/GREEN TRANSPORTATION CONSULTING, INC.
PROJECT: CULVER CITY TRAFFIC COUNTS
DATE: WEDNESDAY SEPTEMBER 10, 2008
PERIOD: 3:00 PM TO 6:00 PM
INTERSECTION: 29 N/S LA CIENEGA BOUELVARD
E/W NATIONAL BOULEVARD
15 MIN COUNTS
123456789 10 11 12
PERIOD SBRT SBTH SBLT WBRT WBTH WBLT NBRT NBTH NBLT EBRT EBTH EBLT TOTAL
300-315 55 475 19 15 86 61 71 519 14 27 142 87 1571
315-330 41 446 18 15 107 64 67 483 13 45 173 92 1564
330-345 47 482 20 7 94 42 72 509 26 34 166 92 1591
345-400 54 472 22 24 133 52 65 528 18 49 186 110 1713
400-415 34 451 12 12 141 47 71 497 17 38 187 92 1599
415-430 58 497 12 15 163 73 69 525 15 57 215 105 1804
430-445 43 469 8 13 157 49 58 510 15 41 197 137 1697
445-500 49 524 10 7 193 66 86 567 16 42 211 111 1882
500-515 52 498 6 11 173 63 60 504 13 51 210 149 1790
515-530 52 504 9 22 141 69 79 572 19 73 230 136 1906
530-545 56 525 8 22 131 82 72 524 14 51 210 123 1818
545-600 40 440 13 17 150 61 69 595 10 57 199 146 1797
HOUR TOTALS
123456789 10 11 12
TIME SBRT SBTH SBLT WBRT WBTH WBLT NBRT NBTH NBLT EBRT EBTH EBLT TOTAL
300-400 197 1875 79 61 420 219 275 2039 71 155 667 381 6439
315-415 176 1851 72 58 475 205 275 2017 74 166 712 386 6467
330-430 193 1902 66 58 531 214 277 2059 76 178 754 399 6707
345-445 189 1889 54 64 594 221 263 2060 65 185 785 444 6813
400-500 184 1941 42 47 654 235 284 2099 63 178 810 445 6982
415-515 202 1988 36 46 686 251 273 2106 59 191 833 502 7173
430-530 196 1995 33 53 664 247 283 2153 63 207 848 533 7275
445-545 209 2051 33 62 638 280 297 2167 62 217 861 519 7396
500-600 200 1967 36 72 595 275 280 2195 56 232 849 554 7311
P.M. PEAK HOUR
445-545 62
209 2051 33 638
280
519
NATIONAL BOULEVARD 861 62 2167 297
217
LA CIENEGA BOUELVARD
ATTACHMENT 5
310WILTEC Phone: (626) 564-1944 Fax: (626) 564-0969
INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT SUMMARY
CLIENT: HIRSCH/GREEN TRANSPORTATION CONSULTING, INC.
PROJECT: CULVER CITY TRAFFIC COUNTS
DATE: WEDNESDAY SEPTEMBER 10, 2008
PERIOD: 7:00 AM TO 10:00 AM
INTERSECTION: 30 N/S JEFFERSON BOULEVARD
E/W HIGUERA STREET / RODEO ROAD
15 MIN COUNTS
123456789 10 11 12
PERIOD SBRT SBTH SBLT WBRT WBTH WBLT NBRT NBTH NBLT EBRT EBTH EBLT TOTAL
700-715 7 113 9 3 99 171 91 84 37 5 15 4 638
715-730 12 138 7 3 121 203 125 106 51 3 19 2 790
730-745 5 163 6 5 100 193 152 123 64 10 25 3 849
745-800 28 186 10 9 128 212 192 148 74 15 47 9 1058
800-815 15 156 22 11 118 190 196 133 81 8 21 3 954
815-830 16 137 25 20 133 158 164 154 55 13 39 10 924
830-845 15 132 17 15 160 183 145 126 37 4 30 3 867
845-900 15 168 11 12 164 203 187 114 65 5 21 6 971
900-915 13 148 8 27 135 186 150 100 98 6 16 4 891
915-930 9 155 7 9 122 143 134 77 74 9 18 12 769
930-945 11 126 7 19 140 159 117 66 66 11 28 9 759
945-1000 8 103 4 11 123 121 100 47 65 13 16 12 623
HOUR TOTALS
123456789 10 11 12
TIME SBRT SBTH SBLT WBRT WBTH WBLT NBRT NBTH NBLT EBRT EBTH EBLT TOTAL
700-800 52 600 32 20 448 779 560 461 226 33 106 18 3335
715-815 60 643 45 28 467 798 665 510 270 36 112 17 3651
730-830 64 642 63 45 479 753 704 558 274 46 132 25 3785
745-845 74 611 74 55 539 743 697 561 247 40 137 25 3803
800-900 61 593 75 58 575 734 692 527 238 30 111 22 3716
815-815 59 585 61 74 592 730 646 494 255 28 106 23 3653
830-930 52 603 43 63 581 715 616 417 274 24 85 25 3498
845-945 48 597 33 67 561 691 588 357 303 31 83 31 3390
900-1000 41 532 26 66 520 609 501 290 303 39 78 37 3042
A.M. PEAK HOUR
745-845 55
74 611 74 539
743
25
HIGUERA STREET 137 247 561 697 RODEO ROAD
40
JEFFERSON BOULEVARD
ATTACHMENT 5
311WILTEC Phone: (626) 564-1944 Fax: (626) 564-0969
INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT SUMMARY
CLIENT: HIRSCH/GREEN TRANSPORTATION CONSULTING, INC.
PROJECT: CULVER CITY TRAFFIC COUNTS
DATE: WEDNESDAY SEPTEMBER 10, 2008
PERIOD: 3:00 PM TO 6:00 PM
INTERSECTION: 30 N/S JEFFERSON BOULEVARD
E/W HIGUERA STREET / RODEO ROAD
15 MIN COUNTS
123456789 10 11 12
PERIOD SBRT SBTH SBLT WBRT WBTH WBLT NBRT NBTH NBLT EBRT EBTH EBLT TOTAL
300-315 11 81 19 8 42 74 158 120 13 15 85 8 634
315-330 7 65 7 1 69 98 183 138 11 12 109 7 707
330-345 16 68 19 3 76 107 219 146 8 27 128 15 832
345-400 2 97 26 2 82 105 202 157 4 17 112 6 812
400-415 6 93 16 8 88 118 225 170 8 19 99 8 858
415-430 4 122 23 3 89 111 188 156 5 27 108 14 850
430-445 9 139 18 1 67 97 204 172 9 23 121 9 869
445-500 7 129 21 4 83 96 196 204 11 29 140 10 930
500-515 9 116 36 2 79 108 215 212 4 45 157 21 1004
515-530 12 91 23 1 83 129 235 196 9 48 127 14 968
530-545 8 87 19 4 71 101 209 179 8 40 116 12 854
545-600 10 112 17 2 56 90 240 194 12 22 98 7 860
HOUR TOTALS
123456789 10 11 12
TIME SBRT SBTH SBLT WBRT WBTH WBLT NBRT NBTH NBLT EBRT EBTH EBLT TOTAL
300-400 36 311 71 14 269 384 762 561 36 71 434 36 2985
315-415 31 323 68 14 315 428 829 611 31 75 448 36 3209
330-430 28 380 84 16 335 441 834 629 25 90 447 43 3352
345-445 21 451 83 14 326 431 819 655 26 86 440 37 3389
400-500 26 483 78 16 327 422 813 702 33 98 468 41 3507
415-515 29 506 98 10 318 412 803 744 29 124 526 54 3653
430-530 37 475 98 8 312 430 850 784 33 145 545 54 3771
445-545 36 423 99 11 316 434 855 791 32 162 540 57 3756
500-600 39 406 95 9 289 428 899 781 33 155 498 54 3686
P.M. PEAK HOUR
430-530 8
37 475 98 312
430
54
HIGUERA STREET 545 33 784 850 RODEO ROAD
145
JEFFERSON BOULEVARD
ATTACHMENT 5
312WILTEC Phone: (626) 564-1944 Fax: (626) 564-0969
INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT SUMMARY
CLIENT: HIRSCH/GREEN TRANSPORTATION CONSULTING, INC.
PROJECT: CULVER CITY TRAFFIC COUNTS
DATE: THURSDAY SEPTEMBER 11, 2008
PERIOD: 7:00 AM TO 10:00 AM
INTERSECTION: 31 N/S LA CIENEGA BOULEVARD
E/W RODEO ROAD
15 MIN COUNTS
123456789 10 11 12
PERIOD SBRT SBTH SBLT WBRT WBTH WBLT NBRT NBTH NBLT EBRT EBTH EBLT TOTAL
700-715 33 400 35 61 111 51 24 497 105 14 70 58 1459
715-730 51 452 72 79 141 67 17 535 136 20 92 38 1700
730-745 71 546 73 61 150 65 22 511 109 37 100 33 1778
745-800 33 405 46 87 172 76 18 521 134 56 128 44 1720
800-815 32 567 72 73 196 72 30 533 148 60 156 63 2002
815-830 42 468 41 83 175 84 19 464 130 42 122 32 1702
830-845 36 436 51 66 138 68 22 470 125 46 113 44 1615
845-900 81 475 36 46 153 72 16 455 112 23 112 56 1637
900-915 30 441 42 39 168 62 19 494 140 31 103 34 1603
915-930 25 483 39 45 142 58 19 472 128 25 86 39 1561
930-945 46 490 64 70 174 80 19 517 108 20 67 66 1721
945-1000 47 433 51 86 116 90 20 460 91 15 79 36 1524
HOUR TOTALS
123456789 10 11 12
TIME SBRT SBTH SBLT WBRT WBTH WBLT NBRT NBTH NBLT EBRT EBTH EBLT TOTAL
700-800 188 1803 226 288 574 259 81 2064 484 127 390 173 6657
715-815 187 1970 263 300 659 280 87 2100 527 173 476 178 7200
730-830 178 1986 232 304 693 297 89 2029 521 195 506 172 7202
745-845 143 1876 210 309 681 300 89 1988 537 204 519 183 7039
800-900 191 1946 200 268 662 296 87 1922 515 171 503 195 6956
815-815 189 1820 170 234 634 286 76 1883 507 142 450 166 6557
830-930 172 1835 168 196 601 260 76 1891 505 125 414 173 6416
845-945 182 1889 181 200 637 272 73 1938 488 99 368 195 6522
900-1000 148 1847 196 240 600 290 77 1943 467 91 335 175 6409
A.M. PEAK HOUR
730-830 304
178 1986 232 693
297
172
RODEO ROAD 506 521 2029 89
195
LA CIENEGA BOULEVARD
ATTACHMENT 5
313WILTEC Phone: (626) 564-1944 Fax: (626) 564-0969
INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT SUMMARY
CLIENT: HIRSCH/GREEN TRANSPORTATION CONSULTING, INC.
PROJECT: CULVER CITY TRAFFIC COUNTS
DATE: THURSDAY SEPTEMBER 11, 2008
PERIOD: 3:00 PM TO 6:00 PM
INTERSECTION: 31 N/S LA CIENEGA BOULEVARD
E/W RODEO ROAD
15 MIN COUNTS
123456789 10 11 12
PERIOD SBRT SBTH SBLT WBRT WBTH WBLT NBRT NBTH NBLT EBRT EBTH EBLT TOTAL
300-315 20 462 109 60 110 53 42 449 36 55 222 51 1669
315-330 25 446 89 30 143 39 40 488 34 64 210 50 1658
330-345 15 454 98 44 132 55 29 493 40 52 193 47 1652
345-400 29 443 97 34 113 32 44 511 59 62 201 66 1691
400-415 26 455 106 46 128 34 35 475 66 82 205 42 1700
415-430 16 482 105 24 121 29 31 500 53 90 221 57 1729
430-445 18 510 100 45 105 33 49 532 67 76 233 34 1802
445-500 12 504 99 36 111 45 50 560 80 101 240 60 1898
500-515 13 536 106 29 123 57 70 510 78 98 260 82 1962
515-530 10 490 95 45 99 62 59 549 85 77 278 58 1907
530-545 17 498 100 30 100 35 51 516 73 78 252 62 1812
545-600 23 544 106 25 120 46 43 559 74 60 269 42 1911
HOUR TOTALS
123456789 10 11 12
TIME SBRT SBTH SBLT WBRT WBTH WBLT NBRT NBTH NBLT EBRT EBTH EBLT TOTAL
300-400 89 1805 393 168 498 179 155 1941 169 233 826 214 6670
315-415 95 1798 390 154 516 160 148 1967 199 260 809 205 6701
330-430 86 1834 406 148 494 150 139 1979 218 286 820 212 6772
345-445 89 1890 408 149 467 128 159 2018 245 310 860 199 6922
400-500 72 1951 410 151 465 141 165 2067 266 349 899 193 7129
415-515 59 2032 410 134 460 164 200 2102 278 365 954 233 7391
430-530 53 2040 400 155 438 197 228 2151 310 352 1011 234 7569
445-545 52 2028 400 140 433 199 230 2135 316 354 1030 262 7579
500-600 63 2068 407 129 442 200 223 2134 310 313 1059 244 7592
P.M. PEAK HOUR
500-600 129
63 2068 407 442
200
244
RODEO ROAD 1059 310 2134 223
313
LA CIENEGA BOULEVARD
ATTACHMENT 5
314WILTEC Phone: (626) 564-1944 Fax: (626) 564-0969
INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT SUMMARY
CLIENT: HIRSCH/GREEN TRANSPORTATION CONSULTING, INC.
PROJECT: CULVER CITY TRAFFIC COUNTS
DATE: THURSDAY SEPTEMBER 11, 2008
PERIOD: 7:00 AM TO 10:00 AM
INTERSECTION: 32 N/S BRADDOCK DRIVE
E/W DUQUESNE AVENUE
15 MIN COUNTS
123456789 10 11 12
PERIOD SBRT SBTH SBLT WBRT WBTH WBLT NBRT NBTH NBLT EBRT EBTH EBLT TOTAL
700-715 4 23 2 3 102 8 14 21 7 6 47 4 241
715-730 5 27 1 5 91 7 18 20 13 2 64 6 259
730-745 10 38 2 5 101 16 25 31 15 4 73 9 329
745-800 6 54 5 7 112 10 32 44 16 5 99 16 406
800-815 5 78 3 13 127 9 37 43 27 10 115 12 479
815-830 13 87 13 11 110 15 39 56 15 15 110 9 493
830-845 7 83 5 6 123 7 23 44 26 6 87 4 421
845-900 5 52 3 2 101 8 22 33 16 5 75 4 326
900-915 6 68 4 1 102 2 38 47 27 10 86 9 400
915-930 12 73 3 6 90 6 24 50 26 13 97 14 414
930-945 6 53 5 1 68 1 16 43 19 5 75 9 301
945-1000 9 60 1 1 82 1 24 38 30 13 90 13 362
HOUR TOTALS
123456789 10 11 12
TIME SBRT SBTH SBLT WBRT WBTH WBLT NBRT NBTH NBLT EBRT EBTH EBLT TOTAL
700-800 25 142 10 20 406 41 89 116 51 17 283 35 1235
715-815 26 197 11 30 431 42 112 138 71 21 351 43 1473
730-830 34 257 23 36 450 50 133 174 73 34 397 46 1707
745-845 31 302 26 37 472 41 131 187 84 36 411 41 1799
800-900 30 300 24 32 461 39 121 176 84 36 387 29 1719
815-815 31 290 25 20 436 32 122 180 84 36 358 26 1640
830-930 30 276 15 15 416 23 107 174 95 34 345 31 1561
845-945 29 246 15 10 361 17 100 173 88 33 333 36 1441
900-1000 33 254 13 9 342 10 102 178 102 41 348 45 1477
A.M. PEAK HOUR
745-845 37
31 302 26 472
41
41
DUQUESNE AVENUE 411 84 187 131
36
BRADDOCK DRIVE
ATTACHMENT 5
315WILTEC Phone: (626) 564-1944 Fax: (626) 564-0969
INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT SUMMARY
CLIENT: HIRSCH/GREEN TRANSPORTATION CONSULTING, INC.
PROJECT: CULVER CITY TRAFFIC COUNTS
DATE: THURSDAY SEPTEMBER 11, 2008
PERIOD: 3:00 PM TO 6:00 PM
INTERSECTION: 32 N/S BRADDOCK DRIVE
E/W DUQUESNE AVENUE
15 MIN COUNTS
123456789 10 11 12
PERIOD SBRT SBTH SBLT WBRT WBTH WBLT NBRT NBTH NBLT EBRT EBTH EBLT TOTAL
300-315 3 15 5 5 83 6 18 32 17 30 78 24 316
315-330 6 23 8 4 74 5 23 22 20 21 73 21 300
330-345 8 20 9 8 89 8 27 19 16 24 82 27 337
345-400 3 10 3 5 99 3 31 13 30 28 101 10 336
400-415 5884 87 4 37 21 23 19 87 22 325
415-430 5434 84 6 32 18 27 32 84 32 331
430-445 7 11 4 7 103 2 46 31 37 40 103 39 430
445-500 4 12 2 6 82 11 32 21 24 26 91 25 336
500-515 3 10 4 1 100 7 42 32 35 39 90 35 398
515-530 3611 80 4 35 38 30 43 100 26 367
530-545 1514 93 2 47 43 42 39 109 33 419
545-600 6 13 1 10 103 3 42 51 39 29 93 25 415
HOUR TOTALS
123456789 10 11 12
TIME SBRT SBTH SBLT WBRT WBTH WBLT NBRT NBTH NBLT EBRT EBTH EBLT TOTAL
300-400 20 68 25 22 345 22 99 86 83 103 334 82 1289
315-415 22 61 28 21 349 20 118 75 89 92 343 80 1298
330-430 21 42 23 21 359 21 127 71 96 103 354 91 1329
345-445 20 33 18 20 373 15 146 83 117 119 375 103 1422
400-500 21 35 17 21 356 23 147 91 111 117 365 118 1422
415-515 19 37 13 18 369 26 152 102 123 137 368 131 1495
430-530 17 39 11 15 365 24 155 122 126 148 384 125 1531
445-545 11 33 8 12 355 24 156 134 131 147 390 119 1520
500-600 13 34 7 16 376 16 166 164 146 150 392 119 1599
P.M. PEAK HOUR
500-600 16
13 34 7 376
16
119
DUQUESNE AVENUE 392 146 164 166
150
BRADDOCK DRIVE
ATTACHMENT 5
316WILTEC Phone: (626) 564-1944 Fax: (626) 564-0969
INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT SUMMARY
CLIENT: HIRSCH/GREEN TRANSPORTATION CONSULTING, INC.
PROJECT: CULVER CITY TRAFFIC COUNTS
DATE: THURSDAY SEPTEMBER 11, 2008
PERIOD: 7:00 AM TO 10:00 AM
INTERSECTION: 33 N/S LUCERNE AVENUE
E/W DUQUESNE AVENUE
15 MIN COUNTS
123456789 10 11 12
PERIOD SBRT SBTH SBLT WBRT WBTH WBLT NBRT NBTH NBLT EBRT EBTH EBLT TOTAL
700-715 7 0 32 52 98 00000 63 3 255
715-730 16 0 44 61 110 00000 80 5 316
730-745 21 0 29 71 96 00000 81 11 309
745-800 26 0 32 67 103 00000 94 9 331
800-815 13 0 45 90 113 00000 87 14 362
815-830 20 0 46 98 141 00000 103 28 436
830-845 14 0 38 54 114 00000 121 26 367
845-900 12 0 41 77 134 00000 93 18 375
900-915 9 0 35 70 107 00000 95 23 339
915-930 11 0 36 53 94 00000 86 14 294
930-945 18 0 24 43 88 00000 106 19 298
945-1000 10 0 23 36 60 00000 78 22 229
HOUR TOTALS
123456789 10 11 12
TIME SBRT SBTH SBLT WBRT WBTH WBLT NBRT NBTH NBLT EBRT EBTH EBLT TOTAL
700-800 70 0 137 251 407 00000 318 28 1211
715-815 76 0 150 289 422 00000 342 39 1318
730-830 80 0 152 326 453 00000 365 62 1438
745-845 73 0 161 309 471 00000 405 77 1496
800-900 59 0 170 319 502 00000 404 86 1540
815-815 55 0 160 299 496 00000 412 95 1517
830-930 46 0 150 254 449 00000 395 81 1375
845-945 50 0 136 243 423 00000 380 74 1306
900-1000 48 0 118 202 349 00000 365 78 1160
A.M. PEAK HOUR
800-900 319
59 0 170 502|10 10|86
DUQUESNE AVENUE 404 0 0 0
|10 10|LUCERNE AVENUE
ATTACHMENT 5
317WILTEC Phone: (626) 564-1944 Fax: (626) 564-0969
INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT SUMMARY
CLIENT: HIRSCH/GREEN TRANSPORTATION CONSULTING, INC.
PROJECT: CULVER CITY TRAFFIC COUNTS
DATE: THURSDAY SEPTEMBER 11, 2008
PERIOD: 3:00 PM TO 6:00 PM
INTERSECTION: 33 N/S LUCERNE AVENUE
E/W DUQUESNE AVENUE
15 MIN COUNTS
123456789 10 11 12
PERIOD SBRT SBTH SBLT WBRT WBTH WBLT NBRT NBTH NBLT EBRT EBTH EBLT TOTAL
300-315 14 0 65 42 90 00000 129 23 363
315-330 11 0 49 28 84 00000 112 26 310
330-345 6 0 40 35 95 00000 107 10 293
345-400 11 0 38 23 71 00000 118 13 274
400-415 10 0 47 21 69 00000 112 15 274
415-430 6 0 53 51 85 00000 126 15 336
430-445 7 0 62 44 105 00000 148 18 384
445-500 13 0 46 41 85 00000 141 8 334
500-515 16 0 66 34 81 00000 155 6 358
515-530 13 0 67 43 92 00000 128 11 354
530-545 15 0 73 59 101 00000 135 13 396
545-600 18 0 58 48 85 00000 141 29 379
HOUR TOTALS
123456789 10 11 12
TIME SBRT SBTH SBLT WBRT WBTH WBLT NBRT NBTH NBLT EBRT EBTH EBLT TOTAL
300-400 42 0 192 128 340 00000 466 72 1240
315-415 38 0 174 107 319 00000 449 64 1151
330-430 33 0 178 130 320 00000 463 53 1177
345-445 34 0 200 139 330 00000 504 61 1268
400-500 36 0 208 157 344 00000 527 56 1328
415-515 42 0 227 170 356 00000 570 47 1412
430-530 49 0 241 162 363 00000 572 43 1430
445-545 57 0 252 177 359 00000 559 38 1442
500-600 62 0 264 184 359 00000 559 59 1487
P.M. PEAK HOUR
500-600 184
62 0 264 359|10 10|59
DUQUESNE AVENUE 559 0 0 0|10 10|LUCERNE AVENUE
ATTACHMENT 5
318WILTEC Phone: (626) 564-1944 Fax: (626) 564-0969
INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT SUMMARY
CLIENT: HIRSCH/GREEN TRANSPORTATION CONSULTING, INC.
PROJECT: CULVER CITY TRAFFIC COUNTS
DATE: THURSDAY SEPTEMBER 11, 2008
PERIOD: 7:00 AM TO 10:00 AM
INTERSECTION: 34 N/S JEFFERSON BOUELVARD
E/W DUQUESNE AVENUE
15 MIN COUNTS
123456789 10 11 12
PERIOD SBRT SBTH SBLT WBRT WBTH WBLT NBRT NBTH NBLT EBRT EBTH EBLT TOTAL
700-715 75 242 40025 170 61 40 6 35 640
715-730 73 295 22003 223 81 52 2 40 773
730-745 82 322 01432 194 75 73 4 56 816
745-800 94 337 10213 225 95 64 5 70 897
800-815 100 329 71737 267 103 89 7 65 985
815-830 92 271 6 3 13 2 10 224 98 71 5 73 868
830-845 113 291 32926 285 113 77 13 73 987
845-900 92 218 3 1 10 1 13 194 97 47 3 54 733
900-915 83 292 5 5 12 3 6 185 86 62 11 65 815
915-930 60 238 21232 175 71 53 7 43 657
930-945 56 215 20101 163 68 52 5 49 612
945-1000 44 196 60202 144 60 59 9 49 571
HOUR TOTALS
123456789 10 11 12
TIME SBRT SBTH SBLT WBRT WBTH WBLT NBRT NBTH NBLT EBRT EBTH EBLT TOTAL
700-800 324 1196 7366 13 812 312 229 17 201 3126
715-815 349 1283 10 4 13 7 15 909 354 278 18 231 3471
730-830 368 1259 14 5 26 9 22 910 371 297 21 264 3566
745-845 399 1228 17 6 31 8 26 1001 409 301 30 281 3737
800-900 397 1109 19 7 39 8 36 970 411 284 28 265 3573
815-815 380 1072 17 11 44 8 35 888 394 257 32 265 3403
830-930 348 1039 13 9 33 9 27 839 367 239 34 235 3192
845-945 291 963 12 7 25 7 22 717 322 214 26 211 2817
900-1000 243 941 15 6 17 6 11 667 285 226 32 206 2655
A.M. PEAK HOUR
745-845 6
399 1228 17 31|1010|281
DUQUESNE AVENUE 30 409 1001 26
301
JEFFERSON BOUELVARD
ATTACHMENT 5
319WILTEC Phone: (626) 564-1944 Fax: (626) 564-0969
INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT SUMMARY
CLIENT: HIRSCH/GREEN TRANSPORTATION CONSULTING, INC.
PROJECT: CULVER CITY TRAFFIC COUNTS
DATE: THURSDAY SEPTEMBER 11, 2008
PERIOD: 3:00 PM TO 6:00 PM
INTERSECTION: 34 N/S JEFFERSON BOUELVARD
E/W DUQUESNE AVENUE
15 MIN COUNTS
123456789 10 11 12
PERIOD SBRT SBTH SBLT WBRT WBTH WBLT NBRT NBTH NBLT EBRT EBTH EBLT TOTAL
300-315 55 192 22214 297 66 66 3 90 780
315-330 35 174 20105 285 70 60 5 77 714
330-345 31 165 11101 327 79 66 7 99 778
345-400 39 176 14304 303 93 71 4 103 801
400-415 35 188 81107 272 85 63 3 102 765
415-430 52 172 52102 291 65 56 8 93 747
430-445 33 173 21273 284 89 69 15 117 795
445-500 49 197 19 7558 302 91 69 17 110 879
500-515 51 209 11 4675 336 76 91 18 97 911
515-530 34 192 12 4 18 8 12 340 89 82 12 113 916
530-545 49 215 8 4 11 7 8 318 83 80 13 99 895
545-600 35 224 12 1 5 6 10 214 94 90 15 99 805
HOUR TOTALS
123456789 10 11 12
TIME SBRT SBTH SBLT WBRT WBTH WBLT NBRT NBTH NBLT EBRT EBTH EBLT TOTAL
300-400 160 707 6771 14 1212 308 263 19 369 3073
315-415 140 703 12 6 6 0 17 1187 327 260 19 381 3058
330-430 157 701 15 8 6 0 14 1193 322 256 22 397 3091
345-445 159 709 16 8 7 7 16 1150 332 259 30 415 3108
400-500 169 730 34 11 9 12 20 1149 330 257 43 422 3186
415-515 185 751 37 14 14 19 18 1213 321 285 58 417 3332
430-530 167 771 44 16 31 27 28 1262 345 311 62 437 3501
445-545 183 813 50 19 40 27 33 1296 339 322 60 419 3601
500-600 169 840 43 13 40 28 35 1208 342 343 58 408 3527
P.M. PEAK HOUR
445-545 19
183 813 50 40
27
419
DUQUESNE AVENUE 60 339 1296 33
322
JEFFERSON BOUELVARD
ATTACHMENT 5
320
24-Hour Residential Street Counts
ATTACHMENT 5
321CITY OF CULVER CITY - ADT WORKSHEET
LOCATION: LUCERNE AVENUE BETWEEN DUQUESNE AVENUE AND INCE BOULEVARD
DATE: THURSDAY MAY 13, 2004
DIRECTION: DIRECTION:
TIME 00-15 15-30 30-45 45-60 HOUR TIME 00-15 15-30 30-45 45-60 HOUR
TOTALS TOTALS
00:00 23128 00:00 21317
01:00 00033 01:00 13318
02:00 11013 02:00 15017
03:00 01001 03:00 11204
04:00 02013 04:00 23229
05:00 2 2 10 5 19 05:00 3499 25
06:00 8 9 18 16 51 06:00 13 20 20 23 76
07:00 35 42 66 69 212 07:00 32 54 53 98 237
08:00 72 55 68 56 251 08:00 106 58 54 53 271
09:00 42 34 31 32 139 09:00 46 27 37 39 149
10:00 19 13 21 24 77 10:00 30 29 25 45 129
11:00 14 22 33 35 104 11:00 41 38 36 56 171
12:00 24 33 27 30 114 12:00 38 45 31 42 156
13:00 37 26 39 28 130 13:00 50 49 41 40 180
14:00 39 34 33 43 149 14:00 47 47 51 66 211
15:00 29 49 42 49 169 15:00 62 48 48 68 226
16:00 37 44 30 40 151 16:00 45 64 56 73 238
17:00 49 38 54 37 178 17:00 71 91 63 76 301
18:00 48 53 38 29 168 18:00 79 55 52 45 231
19:00 24 16 18 21 79 19:00 50 32 32 25 139
20:00 16 16 17 18 67 20:00 43 28 21 19 111
21:00 19 10 8 18 55 21:00 21 18 17 10 66
22:00 9 10 8 8 35 22:00 8 15 6 3 32
23:00 5622 15 23:00 10 11 3 2 26
TOTAL 2181 TOTAL 3010
AM PEAK HOUR 07:45-8:45 AM PEAK HOUR 07:45-8:45
VOLUME 264 VOLUME 316
PM PEAK HOUR 17:30-18:30 PM PEAK HOUR 17:15-18:15
VOLUME 192 VOLUME 309
TOTAL BI-DIRECTIONAL VOLUME 5191
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND
ATTACHMENT 5
322CITY OF CULVER CITY - ADT WORKSHEET
LOCATION: LUCERNE AVENUE BETWEEN INCE BOULEVARD AND HIGUERA STREET
DATE: TUESDAY MAY 25, 2004
DIRECTION: DIRECTION:
TIME 00-15 15-30 30-45 45-60 HOUR TIME 00-15 15-30 30-45 45-60 HOUR
TOTALS TOTALS
00:00 11013 00:00 12104
01:00 00000 01:00 00011
02:00 01001 02:00 10102
03:00 00011 03:00 00000
04:00 10023 04:00 00101
05:00 1227 12 05:00 5042 11
06:00 8 11 7 9 35 06:00 3839 23
07:00 17 27 36 47 127 07:00 7 26 32 31 96
08:00 55 57 58 49 219 08:00 67 57 30 34 188
09:00 35 35 20 21 111 09:00 38 18 21 23 100
10:00 23 13 8 12 56 10:00 14 14 10 20 58
11:00 32 15 21 31 99 11:00 19 18 25 18 80
12:00 27 26 23 29 105 12:00 18 20 20 20 78
13:00 32 20 34 21 107 13:00 13 28 18 23 82
14:00 29 20 33 33 115 14:00 22 18 19 34 93
15:00 37 32 34 38 141 15:00 41 28 24 33 126
16:00 43 34 38 44 159 16:00 40 28 34 33 135
17:00 47 38 36 35 156 17:00 44 37 54 44 179
18:00 38 46 30 27 141 18:00 34 33 35 26 128
19:00 18 22 11 13 64 19:00 27 14 13 11 65
20:00 10 12 7 9 38 20:00 12 5 17 6 40
21:00 14 13 10 5 42 21:00 16 3 9 7 35
22:00 6325 16 22:00 4632 15
23:00 9232 16 23:00 04206
TOTAL 1767 TOTAL 1546
AM PEAK HOUR 08:00-9:00 AM PEAK HOUR 08:00-9:00
VOLUME 219 VOLUME 188
PM PEAK HOUR 16:30-17:30 PM PEAK HOUR 17:00-18:00
VOLUME 167 VOLUME 179
TOTAL BI-DIRECTIONAL VOLUME 3313
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND
ATTACHMENT 5
323WILTEC Phone: (626) 564-1944 Fax: (626) 564-0969
24-HOUR ADT COUNT SUMMARY
CLIENT: HIRSCH/GREEN TRANSPORTATION CONSULTANTS
PROJECT: CULVER CITY TRAFFIC COUNTS
LOCATION: WESLEY STREET NORTH OF
HIGUERA STREET
DATE: WEDNESDAY SEPTEMBER 10, 2008
DIRECTION: NB DIRECTION: SB
TIME 00-15 15-30 30-45 45-60 HOUR TIME 00-15 15-30 30-45 45-60 HOUR
TOTALS TOTALS
0:00 1000 1 0:00 1201 4
1:00 0001 1 1:00 1010 2
2:00 0000 0 2:00 0000 0
3:00 0002 2 3:00 0001 1
4:00 0000 0 4:00 0000 0
5:00 1010 2 5:00 1111 4
6:00 3002 5 6:00 0111 3
7:00 0234 9 7:00 5 2 9 14 30
8:00 4521 12 8:00 9 4 10 11 34
9:00 2513 11 9:00 12 12 2 5 31
10:00 3254 14 10:00 2321 8
11:00 3316 13 11:00 6424 16
12:00 3131 8 12:00 1558 19
13:00 5232 12 13:00 4223 11
14:00 3335 14 14:00 4512 12
15:00 3231 9 15:00 2259 18
16:00 4646 20 16:00 3746 20
17:00 4445 17 17:00 8 12 12 2 34
18:00 5242 13 18:00 4 10 0 3 17
19:00 1422 9 19:00 6352 16
20:00 2301 6 20:00 0302 5
21:00 3011 5 21:00 3101 5
22:00 4300 7 22:00 0110 2
23:00 0100 1 23:00 1001 2
TOTAL 191 TOTAL 294
AM PEAK HOUR 0730-0830 AM PEAK HOUR 0830-0930
VOLUME 16 VOLUME 45
PM PEAK HOUR 1600-1700 PM PEAK HOUR 1645-1745
VOLUME 20 VOLUME 38
TOTAL BI-DIRECTIONAL VOLUME 485
ATTACHMENT 5
324THE TRAFFIC SOLUTION - ADT WORKSHEET
CLIENT: HIRSCH/GREEN TRANSPORTATION CONSULTING, INC.
PROJECT: WASHINGTON - NATIONAL EMC / CULVER CITY
LOCATION: HELMS AVENUE BETWEEN NATIONAL BOULEVARD & HIGUERA STREET
DATE: WEDNESDAY NOVEMBER 12, 2008
DIRECTION: DIRECTION:
TIME 00-15 15-30 30-45 45-60 HOUR TIME 00-15 15-30 30-45 45-60 HOUR
TOTALS TOTALS
00:00 02002 00:00 01001
01:00 00000 01:00 00000
02:00 00000 02:00 00101
03:00 00000 03:00 00000
04:00 00000 04:00 01102
05:00 10001 05:00 02305
06:00 00011 06:00 01012
07:00 1445 14 07:00 10 9 11 15 45
08:00 4242 12 08:00 27 21 19 7 74
09:00 6384 21 09:00 7637 23
10:00 4253 14 10:00 3352 13
11:00 04026 11:00 0536 14
12:00 5132 11 12:00 3267 18
13:00 4495 22 13:00 5766 24
14:00 5 10 8 5 28 14:00 4687 25
15:00 3223 10 15:00 9 11 7 5 32
16:00 5545 19 16:00 4636 19
17:00 6874 25 17:00 18 2 1 6 27
18:00 2572 16 18:00 3472 16
19:00 8344 19 19:00 7442 17
20:00 12216 20:00 3154 13
21:00 2253 12 21:00 4235 14
22:00 31015 22:00 01203
23:00 11215 23:00 12003
TOTAL 249 TOTAL 391
AM PEAK HOUR 09:00-10:00 AM PEAK HOUR 07:45-08:45
VOLUME 21 VOLUME 82
PM PEAK HOUR 13:30-14:30 PM PEAK HOUR 14:30-15:30
VOLUME 29 VOLUME 35
TOTAL BI-DIRECTIONAL VOLUME 640
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND
ATTACHMENT 5
325THE TRAFFIC SOLUTION - ADT WORKSHEET
CLIENT: HIRSCH/GREEN TRANSPORTATION CONSULTING, INC.
PROJECT: WASHINGTON - NATIONAL EMC / CULVER CITY
LOCATION: SCHAEFFER STREET BETWEEN NATIONAL BOULEVARD & HIGUERA STREET
DATE: WEDNESDAY NOVEMBER 12, 2008
DIRECTION: DIRECTION:
TIME 00-15 15-30 30-45 45-60 HOUR TIME 00-15 15-30 30-45 45-60 HOUR
TOTALS TOTALS
00:00 03025 00:00 22004
01:00 40004 01:00 00000
02:00 00011 02:00 00000
03:00 00000 03:00 00000
04:00 01012 04:00 01001
05:00 00000 05:00 11002
06:00 03126 06:00 0447 15
07:00 1432 10 07:00 7 6 10 9 32
08:00 3 6 10 5 24 08:00 12 18 12 12 54
09:00 3722 14 09:00 5 12 13 14 44
10:00 4322 11 10:00 5945 23
11:00 20305 11:00 5652 18
12:00 5251 13 12:00 11 5 4 2 22
13:00 6125 14 13:00 4 13 9 3 29
14:00 4256 17 14:00 5697 27
15:00 6721 16 15:00 8626 22
16:00 11 9 5 2 27 16:00 9 10 2 8 29
17:00 6878 29 17:00 8 14 9 11 42
18:00 8 10 3 9 30 18:00 4495 22
19:00 8221 13 19:00 2245 13
20:00 6031 10 20:00 32128
21:00 3251 11 21:00 21003
22:00 10124 22:00 34029
23:00 12014 23:00 00011
TOTAL 270 TOTAL 420
AM PEAK HOUR 08:00-09:00 AM PEAK HOUR 08:00-09:00
VOLUME 24 VOLUME 54
PM PEAK HOUR 17:15-18:15 PM PEAK HOUR 17:00-18:00
VOLUME 33 VOLUME 42
TOTAL BI-DIRECTIONAL VOLUME 690
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND
ATTACHMENT 5
326CITY OF CULVER CITY - ADT WORKSHEET
LOCATION: HIGUERA STREET BETWEEN WASHINGTON BOULEVARD AND LUCERNE AVENUE
DATE: THURSDAY MAY 13, 2004
DIRECTION: DIRECTION:
TIME 00-15 15-30 30-45 45-60 HOUR TIME 00-15 15-30 30-45 45-60 HOUR
TOTALS TOTALS
00:00 22329 00:00 24118
01:00 62008 01:00 3842 17
02:00 31217 02:00 02114
03:00 20002 03:00 21205
04:00 11046 04:00 1136 11
05:00 11 8 7 5 31 05:00 5 2 7 13 27
06:00 8 11 33 38 90 06:00 4 19 11 21 55
07:00 45 69 72 72 258 07:00 19 27 45 51 142
08:00 84 74 59 69 286 08:00 54 61 44 56 215
09:00 51 26 48 36 161 09:00 67 42 44 42 195
10:00 39 46 34 35 154 10:00 31 41 35 40 147
11:00 32 36 59 39 166 11:00 30 42 34 36 142
12:00 50 40 36 53 179 12:00 37 49 47 59 192
13:00 44 41 35 41 161 13:00 75 54 54 49 232
14:00 46 44 39 47 176 14:00 42 34 45 56 177
15:00 54 32 52 54 192 15:00 40 43 56 61 200
16:00 52 41 52 40 185 16:00 73 54 67 73 267
17:00 62 42 52 54 210 17:00 76 75 83 77 311
18:00 57 48 52 38 195 18:00 70 48 63 45 226
19:00 21 28 23 22 94 19:00 37 40 28 33 138
20:00 24 28 15 15 82 20:00 24 23 14 16 77
21:00 22 11 17 13 63 21:00 19 17 18 18 72
22:00 13 5 5 5 28 22:00 19 10 12 7 48
23:00 3623 14 23:00 11 12 4 5 32
TOTAL 2757 TOTAL 2940
AM PEAK HOUR 07:30-08:30 AM PEAK HOUR 08:15-09:15
VOLUME 302 VOLUME 228
PM PEAK HOUR 17:30-18:30 PM PEAK HOUR 17:00-18:00
VOLUME 211 VOLUME 311
TOTAL BI-DIRECTIONAL VOLUME 5697
WESTBOUND EASTBOUND
ATTACHMENT 5
327CITY OF CULVER CITY - ADT WORKSHEET
LOCATION: HIGUERA STREET BETWEEN LUCERNE AVENUE AND HAYDEN AVENUE
DATE: TUESDAY MAY 25, 2004
DIRECTION: DIRECTION:
TIME 00-15 15-30 30-45 45-60 HOUR TIME 00-15 15-30 30-45 45-60 HOUR
TOTALS TOTALS
00:00 12115 00:00 31228
01:00 01034 01:00 00415
02:00 02204 02:00 21317
03:00 11226 03:00 00011
04:00 00000 04:00 1019 11
05:00 5333 14 05:00 2 5 8 15 30
06:00 1 9 12 12 34 06:00 12 7 17 18 54
07:00 18 33 35 42 128 07:00 25 19 29 50 123
08:00 36 45 65 38 184 08:00 64 46 56 77 243
09:00 35 14 26 17 92 09:00 91 52 45 54 242
10:00 21 18 13 17 69 10:00 56 33 26 25 140
11:00 15 17 28 24 84 11:00 34 35 25 25 119
12:00 33 32 30 31 126 12:00 41 38 61 69 209
13:00 34 35 34 25 128 13:00 49 40 56 43 188
14:00 33 29 34 38 134 14:00 52 36 43 51 182
15:00 41 32 45 47 165 15:00 49 44 50 60 203
16:00 46 29 36 26 137 16:00 50 52 74 58 234
17:00 48 26 42 47 163 17:00 60 56 73 64 253
18:00 38 36 41 16 131 18:00 61 45 32 38 176
19:00 22 19 20 16 77 19:00 30 19 14 18 81
20:00 18 10 15 9 52 20:00 11 11 9 4 35
21:00 15 8 10 9 42 21:00 19 8 9 11 47
22:00 7244 17 22:00 7287 24
23:00 42129 23:00 3375 18
TOTAL 1805 TOTAL 2633
AM PEAK HOUR 07:45-08:45 AM PEAK HOUR 08:30-09:30
VOLUME 188 VOLUME 276
PM PEAK HOUR 15:15-16:15 PM PEAK HOUR 17:15-18:15
VOLUME 170 VOLUME 254
TOTAL BI-DIRECTIONAL VOLUME 4438
WESTBOUND EASTBOUND
ATTACHMENT 5
328
APPENDIX C
PROJECT LOCAL/NEIGHBORHOOD STREET TRIP CALCULATIONS
ATTACHMENT 5
329
C-1
8770 WASHINGTON BOULEVARD MIXED-USE HIRSCH/GREEN TRANSPORTATION CONSULTING, INC.
REVISED JULY 2010
Total
Time Time Net New
Street/Segment In Out In Out Period In Out Total In Out Total Period In Out Total In Out Total Project Trips
Lucerne Avenue
Between Ince Boulevard and 2% 2% 2% 2% Daily 309 309 618 1,148 1,148 2,296 Daily 6 6 12 23 23 46 58
Duquesne Avenue AM Peak Hour 8 39 47 61 46 107 AM Peak Hour 0 1 1 1 1 23
PM Peak Hour 37 18 55 113 107 220 PM Peak Hour 1 0 1 2 2 45
South of Higuera Street 2% 2% 2% 2% Daily 6 6 12 23 23 46 58
AM Peak Hour 0 1 1 1 1 23
PM Peak Hour 1 0 1 2 2 45
Wesley Street
Between Higuera Street and 0% 1% 1% 1% Daily 0 3 3 12 11 23 26
National Boulevard AM Peak Hour 0 1 1 0 0 01
PM Peak Hour 0 0 0 1 1 22
Helms Avenue
Between Higuera Street and 0% 0% 0% 0% Daily 0 0 0 0 0 00
National Boulevard AM Peak Hour 0 0 0 0 0 00
PM Peak Hour 0 0 0 0 0 00
Schaefer Street
Between Higuera Street and 0% 0% 0% 0% Daily 0 0 0 0 0 00
National Boulevard AM Peak Hour 0 0 0 0 0 00
PM Peak Hour 0 0 0 0 0 00
Higuera Street
Between Washington Boulevard an 2% 1% 1% 1% Daily 6 3 9 11 12 23 32
Lucerne Avenue AM Peak Hour 0 0 0 1 1 22
PM Peak Hour 1 0 1 1 1 23
Between Lucerne Avenue and 0% 1% 1% 1% Daily 0 3 3 12 11 23 26
Wesley Street AM Peak Hour 0 1 1 1 0 12
PM Peak Hour 0 0 0 1 1 22
Between Wesley Street and 3% 0% 4% 0% Daily 9 0 9 46 0 46 55
Jefferson Boulevard AM Peak Hour 0 0 0 3 0 33
PM Peak Hour 1 0 1 5 0 56
Column Number [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17]
Column Formula (if applicable) = [5] + [6] = [8] + [9] = [1] x [5] = [2] x [6] = [11] + [12] = [3] x [8] = [4] x [9] = [14] + [15] = [13] + [16]
Table C-1
Local/Residential Street Traffic Impact Analysis Summary
Net Project Average Daily and Peak Hour Traffic Volume Calculations
Residential Commercial
Trip Distribution Percent
on Local/Residential Street Segments Net Project Component Trips (See Table 2)
Project Component Net New Trips
Project Component
[See Figure 5(a)] [See Figure 5(b)] Residential Commercial (Total) Residential Commercial (Total)
ATTACHMENT 5
330
APPENDIX D
CONCEPTUAL TRAFFIC MITIGATION IMPROVEMENTS
AND SUPPORTING INFORMATION
Includes:
Washington Boulevard/Wesley Street Traffic Signal Warrant Analysis
Washington Boulevard/Cattaraugus Avenue Traffic Signal Warrant Analysis
Wesley Street Project Driveway Truck Turning Movement Analysis
Wesley Street Project On-Street Loading Zone Sight Distance Analysis
Venice Boulevard and National Boulevard On-Street Parking Utilization Summaries
Wesley Street Existing On-Street Parking Layout
ATTACHMENT 5
331ATTACHMENT 5
332ATTACHMENT 5
333ATTACHMENT 5
334ATTACHMENT 5
335
Washington Boulevard/Wesley Street
and
Washington Boulevard/Cattaraugus Avenue
Traffic Signal Warrant Analysis
ATTACHMENT 5
336
Washington Boulevard/Wesley Street
(With Project Conditions)
ATTACHMENT 5
337ATTACHMENT 5
338CAMUTCD Traffic Signal Warrant 3 Analysis Worksheet
Washington Boulevard and Wesley Street
AM Peak Hour (With Project Conditions)
WARRANT 3 – Peak Hour SATISFIED YES NO
(Part A or Part B must be satisfied)
PART A SATISFIED YES NO
(All parts 1, 2 and 3 below must be satisfied for the same
one hour, for any four consecutive 15-minute periods)
1. The total delay experienced for traffic on one minor street approach (one direction only)
controlled by a STOP sign equals or exceeds four vehicle-hours for a one-lane
approach, or five vehicle-hours for a two-lane approach; AND
Yes No
2. The volume on the same minor street approach (one direction only) equals or exceeds
100 vph for one moving lane of traffic or 150 vph for two moving lanes; AND
Yes No
3. The total entering volume serviced during the hour equals or exceeds 800 vph
for intersections with four or more approaches or 650 vph for intersections with
three approaches.
Yes No
PART B SATISFIED YES NO
2 or Hour
APPROACH LANES One More 7:45 – 8:45 AM
Both Approaches – Major Street 3,082
Higher Approach – Minor Street 42
The plotted point falls above the curve in Figure 4C-3. Yes No
OR, The plotted point falls above the curve in Figure 4C-4. (Not Applicable) Yes No
The satisfaction of a traffic signal warrant or warrants shall not in itself require the installation of a traffic control signal.
ATTACHMENT 5
339CAMUTCD Traffic Signal Warrant 3 Analysis Worksheet
Washington Boulevard and Wesley Street
PM Peak Hour (With Project Conditions)
WARRANT 3 – Peak Hour SATISFIED YES NO
(Part A or Part B must be satisfied)
PART A SATISFIED YES NO
(All parts 1, 2 and 3 below must be satisfied for the same
one hour, for any four consecutive 15-minute periods)
1. The total delay experienced for traffic on one minor street approach (one direction only)
controlled by a STOP sign equals or exceeds four vehicle-hours for a one-lane
approach, or five vehicle-hours for a two-lane approach; AND
Yes No
2. The volume on the same minor street approach (one direction only) equals or exceeds
100 vph for one moving lane of traffic or 150 vph for two moving lanes; AND
Yes No
3. The total entering volume serviced during the hour equals or exceeds 800 vph
for intersections with four or more approaches or 650 vph for intersections with
three approaches.
Yes No
PART B SATISFIED YES NO
2 or Hour
APPROACH LANES One More 5:00 - 6:00 PM
Both Approaches – Major Street 2,732
Higher Approach – Minor Street 74
The plotted point falls above the curve in Figure 4C-3. Yes No
OR, The plotted point falls above the curve in Figure 4C-4. (Not Applicable) Yes No
The satisfaction of a traffic signal warrant or warrants shall not in itself require the installation of a traffic control signal.
ATTACHMENT 5
340ATTACHMENT 5
341
Note: Daily traffic volume estimates for both Washington Boulevard and Wesley Street are
based on the existing three-hour AM and PM intersection peak period counts performed
for that location. These counts were factored to estimate 24-hour traffic volumes using
adjustment factors identified by the Los Angeles County Public Works Department, as
provided by the City of Culver City. The volumes used in the Estimated Average Daily
Traffic Warrant are derived as noted below:
Washington Boulevard
Existing (2010) Total Two-way Traffic Volumes - from April 29, 2010 counts
AM (7:00 - 10:00) = 6,427
PM (3:00 - 6:00) = 5,671
12,098 = 39.50% of ADT (per LACo DPW Traffic & Lighting)
12,098
0.3950
Forecast (2013) Total Two-way Traffic Volumes
30,628
"With Project" vehicles per day
Wesley Street
Existing (2010) Total Northbound Approach Traffic Volumes - from April 29, 2010 counts
AM (7:00 - 10:00) = 10
PM (3:00 - 6:00) = 69
79 = 38.12% of ADT (per LACo DPW Traffic & Lighting)
79
0.3812
Forecast (2013) Total Two-way Traffic Volumes
207 *
(northbound volumes using potential signal)
"With Project" vehicles per day
* For EADT Traffic Signal Warrant, only northbound Wesley Street approach volume (traveling toward signal) is used.
x 1.01% ambient growth for 3 years =
= Estimated 2010 ADT =
Estimated 2010 ADT = =
plus related projects daily traffic = 2,821
plus traffic from proposed project = 1,462
35,839
vehicles per day (total both directions) 30,628
31,556
207 vehicles per day (northbound approach)
x 1.01% ambient growth for 3 years = 213
869
plus related projects daily traffic = 0
plus traffic from proposed project = 656
ATTACHMENT 5
342INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT SUMMARY
CLIENT: HIRSCH GREEN TRANSPORTATION CONSULTANTS, INC.
PROJECT: WASHINGTON / NATIONAL EMC
DATE: THURSDAY, APRIL 29, 2010
PERIOD: 07:00 AM TO 10:00 AM
INTERSECTION N/S WESLEY AVENUE / DRIVEWAY
E/W WASHINGTON BOULEVARD
FILE NUMBER: 21-AM
15 MINUTE 123456789 10 11 12
TOTALS SBRT SBTH SBLT WBRT WBTH WBLT NBRT NBTH NBLT EBRT EBTH EBLT
0700-0715 0000 238 10003 81 0
0715-0730 0000 384 30002 144 0
0730-0745 0000 441 00000 175 0
0745-0800 0000 421 20001 179 0
0800-0815 1000 333 10001 220 0
0815-0830 3010 392 01000 266 0
0830-0845 1010 409 00002 248 0
0845-0900 1000 355 41011 200 0
0900-0915 1000 311 21013 135 0
0915-0930 3000 321 01023 158 0
0930-0945 2000 377 21003 148 0
0945-1000 4020 329 10015 122 0
4311 16 5 5 24 2076
1 HOUR 123456789 10 11 12
TOTALS SBRT SBTH SBLT WBRT WBTH WBLT NBRT NBTH NBLT EBRT EBTH EBLT TOTALS
0700-0800 0000 1484 60006 579 0 2075
0715-0815 1000 1579 60004 718 0 2308
0730-0830 4010 1587 31002 840 0 2438
0745-0845 5020 1555 31004 913 0 2483
0800-0900 6020 1489 52014 934 0 2443
0815-0915 6020 1467 63026 849 0 2341
0830-0930 6010 1396 63049 741 0 2166
0845-0945 7000 1364 8404 10 641 0 2038
0900-1000 10 0 2 0 1338 5304 14 563 0 1939
Washington Blvd. Washington Blvd. Wesley St.
4327 2100 10
THE TRAFFIC SOLUTION
329 DIAMOND STREET
ARCADIA, CALIFORNIA 91006
626.446.7978
ATTACHMENT 5
343INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT SUMMARY
CLIENT: HIRSCH GREEN TRANSPORTATION CONSULTANTS, INC.
PROJECT: WASHINGTON / NATIONAL EMC
DATE: THURSDAY, APRIL 29, 2010
PERIOD: 03:00 PM TO 06:00 PM
INTERSECTION N/S WESLEY STREET / DRIVEWAY
E/W WASHINGTON BOULEVARD
FILE NUMBER: 21-PM
15 MINUTE 123456789 10 11 12
TOTALS SBRT SBTH SBLT WBRT WBTH WBLT NBRT NBTH NBLT EBRT EBTH EBLT
0300-0315 4000 222 44032 212 0
0315-0330 6010 195 23020 238 0
0330-0345 8020 170 05050 241 0
0345-0400 5020 175 03051 204 0
0400-0415 8030 199 04032 251 0
0415-0430 4010 228 14061 265 0
0430-0445 4020 207 02032 255 0
0445-0500 2030 236 22032 235 0
0500-0515 4020 240 04020 295 0
0515-0530 4000 244 03030 327 0
0530-0545 4020 230 10000 279 0
0545-0600 4000 216 00001 286 0
2562 10 34 35 11 3088
1 HOUR 123456789 10 11 12
TOTALS SBRT SBTH SBLT WBRT WBTH WBLT NBRT NBTH NBLT EBRT EBTH EBLT TOTALS
0300-0400 23 0 5 0 762 6 15 0 15 3 895 0 1724
0315-0415 27 0 8 0 739 2 15 0 15 3 934 0 1743
0330-0430 25 0 8 0 772 1 16 0 19 4 961 0 1806
0345-0445 21 0 8 0 809 1 13 0 17 6 975 0 1850
0400-0500 18 0 9 0 870 3 12 0 15 7 1006 0 1940
0415-0515 14 0 8 0 911 3 12 0 14 5 1050 0 2017
0430-0530 14 0 7 0 927 2 11 0 11 4 1112 0 2088
0445-0545 14 0 7 0 950 39082 1136 0 2129
0500-0600 16 0 4 0 930 17051 1187 0 2151
Washington Blvd. Washington Blvd. Wesley St.
2572 3099 69
THE TRAFFIC SOLUTION
329 DIAMOND STREET
ARCADIA, CALIFORNIA 91006
626.446.7978
ATTACHMENT 5
344ATTACHMENT 5
345
Washington Boulevard/Cattaraugus Avenue
(Without Project Conditions)
ATTACHMENT 5
346ATTACHMENT 5
347CAMUTCD Traffic Signal Warrant 3 Analysis Worksheet
Washington Boulevard and Cattaraugus Avenue
AM Peak Hour (Without Project Conditions)
WARRANT 3 – Peak Hour SATISFIED YES NO
(Part A or Part B must be satisfied)
PART A SATISFIED YES NO
(All parts 1, 2 and 3 below must be satisfied for the same
one hour, for any four consecutive 15-minute periods)
1. The total delay experienced for traffic on one minor street approach (one direction only)
controlled by a STOP sign equals or exceeds four vehicle-hours for a one-lane
approach, or five vehicle-hours for a two-lane approach; AND
Yes No
2. The volume on the same minor street approach (one direction only) equals or exceeds
100 vph for one moving lane of traffic or 150 vph for two moving lanes; AND
Yes No
3. The total entering volume serviced during the hour equals or exceeds 800 vph
for intersections with four or more approaches or 650 vph for intersections with
three approaches.
Yes No
PART B SATISFIED YES NO
2 or Hour
APPROACH LANES One More 7:30 – 8:30 AM
Both Approaches – Major Street 2,877
Higher Approach – Minor Street 141
The plotted point falls above the curve in Figure 4C-3. Yes No
OR, The plotted point falls above the curve in Figure 4C-4. (Not Applicable) Yes No
The satisfaction of a traffic signal warrant or warrants shall not in itself require the installation of a traffic control signal.
ATTACHMENT 5
348CAMUTCD Traffic Signal Warrant 3 Analysis Worksheet
Washington Boulevard and Cattaraugus Avenue
PM Peak Hour (Without Project Conditions)
WARRANT 3 – Peak Hour SATISFIED YES NO
(Part A or Part B must be satisfied)
PART A SATISFIED YES NO
(All parts 1, 2 and 3 below must be satisfied for the same
one hour, for any four consecutive 15-minute periods)
1. The total delay experienced for traffic on one minor street approach (one direction only)
controlled by a STOP sign equals or exceeds four vehicle-hours for a one-lane
approach, or five vehicle-hours for a two-lane approach; AND
Yes No
2. The volume on the same minor street approach (one direction only) equals or exceeds
100 vph for one moving lane of traffic or 150 vph for two moving lanes; AND
Yes No
3. The total entering volume serviced during the hour equals or exceeds 800 vph
for intersections with four or more approaches or 650 vph for intersections with
three approaches.
Yes No
PART B SATISFIED YES NO
2 or Hour
APPROACH LANES One More 5:00 - 6:00 PM
Both Approaches – Major Street 2,326
Higher Approach – Minor Street 98
The plotted point falls above the curve in Figure 4C-3. Yes No
OR, The plotted point falls above the curve in Figure 4C-4. (Not Applicable) Yes No
The satisfaction of a traffic signal warrant or warrants shall not in itself require the installation of a traffic control signal.
ATTACHMENT 5
349
Washington Boulevard/Cattaraugus Avenue
(With Project Conditions)
ATTACHMENT 5
350ATTACHMENT 5
351CAMUTCD Traffic Signal Warrant 3 Analysis Worksheet
Washington Boulevard and Cattaraugus Avenue
AM Peak Hour (With Project Conditions)
WARRANT 3 – Peak Hour SATISFIED YES NO
(Part A or Part B must be satisfied)
PART A SATISFIED YES NO
(All parts 1, 2 and 3 below must be satisfied for the same
one hour, for any four consecutive 15-minute periods)
1. The total delay experienced for traffic on one minor street approach (one direction only)
controlled by a STOP sign equals or exceeds four vehicle-hours for a one-lane
approach, or five vehicle-hours for a two-lane approach; AND
Yes No
2. The volume on the same minor street approach (one direction only) equals or exceeds
100 vph for one moving lane of traffic or 150 vph for two moving lanes; AND
Yes No
3. The total entering volume serviced during the hour equals or exceeds 800 vph
for intersections with four or more approaches or 650 vph for intersections with
three approaches.
Yes No
PART B SATISFIED YES NO
2 or Hour
APPROACH LANES One More 7:30 – 8:30 AM
Both Approaches – Major Street 2,948
Higher Approach – Minor Street 146
The plotted point falls above the curve in Figure 4C-3. Yes No
OR, The plotted point falls above the curve in Figure 4C-4. (Not Applicable) Yes No
The satisfaction of a traffic signal warrant or warrants shall not in itself require the installation of a traffic control signal.
ATTACHMENT 5
352CAMUTCD Traffic Signal Warrant 3 Analysis Worksheet
Washington Boulevard and Cattaraugus Avenue
PM Peak Hour (With Project Conditions)
WARRANT 3 – Peak Hour SATISFIED YES NO
(Part A or Part B must be satisfied)
PART A SATISFIED YES NO
(All parts 1, 2 and 3 below must be satisfied for the same
one hour, for any four consecutive 15-minute periods)
1. The total delay experienced for traffic on one minor street approach (one direction only)
controlled by a STOP sign equals or exceeds four vehicle-hours for a one-lane
approach, or five vehicle-hours for a two-lane approach; AND
Yes No
2. The volume on the same minor street approach (one direction only) equals or exceeds
100 vph for one moving lane of traffic or 150 vph for two moving lanes; AND
Yes No
3. The total entering volume serviced during the hour equals or exceeds 800 vph
for intersections with four or more approaches or 650 vph for intersections with
three approaches.
Yes No
PART B SATISFIED YES NO
2 or Hour
APPROACH LANES One More 5:00 - 6:00 PM
Both Approaches – Major Street 2,448
Higher Approach – Minor Street 109
The plotted point falls above the curve in Figure 4C-3. Yes No
OR, The plotted point falls above the curve in Figure 4C-4. (Not Applicable) Yes No
The satisfaction of a traffic signal warrant or warrants shall not in itself require the installation of a traffic control signal.
ATTACHMENT 5
353
Washington Boulevard/Cattaraugus Avenue
(With Project Traffic Redistribution Conditions)
ATTACHMENT 5
354ATTACHMENT 5
355CAMUTCD Traffic Signal Warrant 3 Analysis Worksheet
Washington Boulevard and Cattaraugus Avenue
AM Peak Hour (With Project Traffic Redistribution Conditions)
WARRANT 3 – Peak Hour SATISFIED YES NO
(Part A or Part B must be satisfied)
PART A SATISFIED YES NO
(All parts 1, 2 and 3 below must be satisfied for the same
one hour, for any four consecutive 15-minute periods)
1. The total delay experienced for traffic on one minor street approach (one direction only)
controlled by a STOP sign equals or exceeds four vehicle-hours for a one-lane
approach, or five vehicle-hours for a two-lane approach; AND
Yes No
2. The volume on the same minor street approach (one direction only) equals or exceeds
100 vph for one moving lane of traffic or 150 vph for two moving lanes; AND
Yes No
3. The total entering volume serviced during the hour equals or exceeds 800 vph
for intersections with four or more approaches or 650 vph for intersections with
three approaches.
Yes No
PART B SATISFIED YES NO
2 or Hour
APPROACH LANES One More 7:30 – 8:30 AM
Both Approaches – Major Street 2,928
Higher Approach – Minor Street 146
The plotted point falls above the curve in Figure 4C-3. Yes No
OR, The plotted point falls above the curve in Figure 4C-4. (Not Applicable) Yes No
The satisfaction of a traffic signal warrant or warrants shall not in itself require the installation of a traffic control signal.
ATTACHMENT 5
356CAMUTCD Traffic Signal Warrant 3 Analysis Worksheet
Washington Boulevard and Cattaraugus Avenue
PM Peak Hour (With Project Traffic Redistribution Conditions)
WARRANT 3 – Peak Hour SATISFIED YES NO
(Part A or Part B must be satisfied)
PART A SATISFIED YES NO
(All parts 1, 2 and 3 below must be satisfied for the same
one hour, for any four consecutive 15-minute periods)
1. The total delay experienced for traffic on one minor street approach (one direction only)
controlled by a STOP sign equals or exceeds four vehicle-hours for a one-lane
approach, or five vehicle-hours for a two-lane approach; AND
Yes No
2. The volume on the same minor street approach (one direction only) equals or exceeds
100 vph for one moving lane of traffic or 150 vph for two moving lanes; AND
Yes No
3. The total entering volume serviced during the hour equals or exceeds 800 vph
for intersections with four or more approaches or 650 vph for intersections with
three approaches.
Yes No
PART B SATISFIED YES NO
2 or Hour
APPROACH LANES One More 5:00 - 6:00 PM
Both Approaches – Major Street 2,414
Higher Approach – Minor Street 109
The plotted point falls above the curve in Figure 4C-3. Yes No
OR, The plotted point falls above the curve in Figure 4C-4. (Not Applicable) Yes No
The satisfaction of a traffic signal warrant or warrants shall not in itself require the installation of a traffic control signal.
ATTACHMENT 5
357
Wesley Street Project Driveway Truck Turning Movement Analysis
ATTACHMENT 5
358ATTACHMENT 5
359ATTACHMENT 5
360
Wesley Street Project On-Street Loading Zone Sight Distance Analysis
ATTACHMENT 5
361ATTACHMENT 5
362ATTACHMENT 5
363ATTACHMENT 5
364
Venice Boulevard (at Robertson Boulevard)
and
National Boulevard (north of Venice Boulevard)
On-Street Parking Utilization Summaries
ATTACHMENT 5
365Time Spaces Spaces
of Day Available
[1]
Utilized
8:30 AM 6 1
9:00 AM 6 4
9:30 AM 6 3
10:00 AM 6 4
10:30 AM 6 3
11:00 AM 6 4
11:30 AM 6 4
12:00 PM 6 4
12:30 PM 6 5
1:00 PM 6 2
1:30 PM 6 2
2:00 PM 6 2
2:30 PM 6 2
3:00 PM 6 2
3:30 PM 6 3
4:00 PM 0
[2]|10 10|4:30 PM 0
[2]|10 10|5:00 PM 0
[2]|10 10|5:30 PM 0
[2]|10 10|6:00 PM 0
[2]|10 10|Notes:
[1] "Spaces Available" refers to maximum number of parking spaces potentially removed
by recommended project mitigation. Number of available spaces estimated; parking
spaces are unstriped.
[2] "Tow Away No Parking 4 - 7 PM" restrictions in effect.
Table D-1
Westbound Approach (North Side of Venice Boulevard) at Robertson Boulevard/Exposition Boulevard
Venice Boulevard On-Street Parking Utilizations
Thursday September 9, 2009
ATTACHMENT 5
366South
Segment Net
Time Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces
of Day Occupied Available Occupied Available *
7:00 AM 0 11 0 11
7:30 AM 0 11 0 11
8:00 AM 0 11 0 11
8:30 AM 1 10 0 10
9:00 AM 1 10 0 10
9:30 AM 1 10 0 10
10:00 AM 1 10 1 9
10:30 AM 0 11 0 11
11:00 AM 2 9 0 9
11:30 AM 5 6 0 6
12:00 PM 5 6 2 4
12:30 PM 3 8 1 7
1:00 PM 3 8 0 8
1:30 PM 3 8 2 6
2:00 PM 4 7 1 6
2:30 PM 3 8 1 7
3:00 PM 3 8 1 7
3:30 PM 3 8 0 8
4:00 PM 3 8 0 8
4:30 PM 4 7 0 7
5:00 PM 3 8 0 8
5:30 PM 0 11 0 11
6:00 PM 0 11 0 11
* Net unused spaces following proposed removal of south segment parking.
East Side of National Boulevard North of Venice Boulevard
Tuesday June 8, 2010
North Segment
Table D-2
National Boulevard On-Street Parking Utilizations
ATTACHMENT 5
367
Wesley Street Existing On-Street Parking Layout
ATTACHMENT 5
36810 PARKING SPACES
PROPOSED PROJECT SITE
10 PARKING SPACES
15' F.H.
CLEARANCE
EXISTING ON-STREET PARKING
WESLEY STREET SOUTH OF WASHINGTON BOULEVARD
FIGURE D-9
WASHINGTON-NATIONAL EMC (CULVER CITY) \ WESLEY EXISTING PARKING
++PAGENO
9/26/2012
N
Hirsch/Green Transportation Consulting, Inc.
TOTAL EXISTING PARKING = 20 SPACES
BASED ON 18' PER VEHICLE
ATTACHMENT 5
369ATTACHMENT 5
370
II-i
8770 WASHINGTON BOULEVARD MIXED-USE HIRSCH/GREEN TRANSPORTATION CONSULTING, INC.
REVISED JULY 2010
APPENDICES
TABLE OF CONTENTS
VOLUME I
A – Related Projects Trip Generation Rates/Equations
B – Intersection Geometrics/Controls and Traffic Count Data Sheets
C – Project Local/Residential Street Trip Calculations
D – Conceptual Traffic Mitigation Improvements and Supporting Analyses
VOLUME II
E – CMA Calculation Worksheets
Existing (2010) Conditions
Future (2013) Without Project Conditions
VOLUME III
E – CMA Calculation Worksheets
Future (2013) With Project Conditions
Future (2013) With Project Plus Mitigation Conditions
ATTACHMENT 5
371
APPENDIX E
CRITICAL MOVEMENT ANALYSIS/HIGHWAY CAPACITY MANUAL
INTERSECTION OPERATIONS CALCULATION WORKSHEETS
ATTACHMENT 5
372
Existing (2010)
AM Peak Hour
ATTACHMENT 5
3738770 Washington Mixed-Use
Existing (2010)
Assigned
No. of Approach Right-Turn Lane Critical
Lanes Volumes on Red Volumes Moves
1 77 77 77
0 -1
1 1,244 624
1 624
0 5 0 -1 |1010|1 37 37
0 -1
1 1,586 828 828
1 828
0 71 0 -1 |1010|905
0 106 -1 106
0 -1
1 134 349
0 -1
0 109 0 -1 |1010|0 83 -1
0 -1
1 233 386 386
0 -1
0 70 0 -1 |1010|492
1,397
Number of Clearance Intervals 1,500
0.931
Signal Coordination -0.100
0.831
D
Hirsch/Green Transportation Consulting, Inc.
Critical Movement Analysis (CMA) Worksheet
Final CMA
Sum of East/West Critical Volumes
Total Intersection Critical Volumes
Through
Left
Left/Through
Through/Right
Sum of North/South Critical Volumes
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Northbound
Base CMA
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Left/Through
Total Lanes
Left/Through/Right
Right
Eastbound
Right
Southbound
Left/Through
Left/Through/Right
Through/Right
Right
Intersection Capacity
Date
Robertson Boulevard
East/West:|1010|North/South:
July 26, 2010
Cattaraugus Avenue
Left
Westbound
Total Lanes
Total Lanes
Project Name|1010|ATSAC + ATCS
AM Peak Hour
Intersection Number
Intersection Name
Analysis Period
Total Lanes
Analysis Scenario
Intersection Control
Signal Coordination Adjustment
Level of Service (LOS)
Lane Type
Approach
Direction
Signalized
Through/Right
Right
Through/Right
Left
Left
Left/Through
Through
ATTACHMENT 5
3748770 Washington Mixed-Use
Existing (2010)
Assigned
No. of Approach Right-Turn Lane Critical
Lanes Volumes on Red Volumes Moves
1 37 37 37
0 -1
2 1,104 552
0 -1
0 0 0 -1 |1010|0 0 -1
0 -1
1 1,493 782 782
1 782
0 72 0 -1 |1010|819
0 114 -1
0 -1
1 0 159 159
0 -1
0 45 0 -1 |1010|0 63 63
0
1 13 76
0
1 168 134 34 |1010|222
1,041
Number of Clearance Intervals 1,500
0.694
Signal Coordination -0.100
0.594
A
Total Lanes
Signalized
Through/Right
Total Lanes
Through
Left/Through
Northbound
Through/Right
Right
Left/Through
Left/Through/Right
Through/Right
Right
Direction
Intersection Control
Lane Type
Analysis Scenario
Left
Left/Through
Through
Approach
Project Name|1010|ATSAC + ATCS
AM Peak Hour
Intersection Number
Intersection Name
Analysis Period
Date
Robertson Boulevard
East/West:|1010|North/South:
July 26, 2010
I-405 WB Off-Ramp/Kincardine Avenue
Left
Signal Coordination Adjustment
Intersection Capacity
Sum of North/South Critical Volumes
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Eastbound
Right
Through/Right
Westbound
Total Lanes
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Lanes
Left/Through/Right
Right
Left
Left/Through
Southbound
Hirsch/Green Transportation Consulting, Inc.
Critical Movement Analysis (CMA) Worksheet
Sum of East/West Critical Volumes
Total Intersection Critical Volumes
Left
Base CMA
Final CMA
Level of Service (LOS)
ATTACHMENT 5
3758770 Washington Mixed-Use
Existing (2010)
Assigned
No. of Approach Right-Turn Lane Critical
Lanes Volumes on Red Volumes Moves
1 110 110
0 -1
1 587 316 316
1 316
0 44 0 -1 |1010|2 590 324 324
0 -1
1 806 502
1 502
0 198 0 -1 |1010|640
1 151 151 151
0 -1
1 632 442
1 442
0 252 0 -1 |1010|1 144 144
0 -1
1 568 568 568
0 -1
1 453 324 129 |1010|719
1,359
Number of Clearance Intervals 1,375
0.988
Signal Coordination -0.100
0.888
D
Hirsch/Green Transportation Consulting, Inc.
Critical Movement Analysis (CMA) Worksheet
Right
Date
Robertson Boulevard|1010|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Northbound
July 26, 2010
Through
Through/Right
Left
Left/Through
National Boulevard
Right
East/West:
Eastbound
Analysis Scenario
Southbound Through
Left
Left/Through
Signalized
AM Peak Hour
Total Lanes
Lane Type
Signal Coordination Adjustment
Sum of North/South Critical Volumes
Left
ATSAC + ATCS
Total Lanes
Sum of East/West Critical Volumes
Total Intersection Critical Volumes
Intersection Capacity
Total Lanes
Through
Base CMA
Left/Through
Through
Through/Right
WB Rt. Turn Overlap with SB Left
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|1010|North/South:
Westbound
Right
Through/Right
Left
Left/Through
Total Lanes
Through/Right
Right
Project Name
Approach
Direction
Intersection Number
Intersection Name
Analysis Period
Intersection Control
Level of Service (LOS)
Final CMA
ATTACHMENT 5
3768770 Washington Mixed-Use
Existing (2010)
Assigned
No. of Approach Right-Turn Lane Critical
Lanes Volumes on Red Volumes Moves
1 98 98 98
0 -1
2 1,112 556
0 -1
0 0 0 -1 |1010|0 0 -1
0 -1
2 763 382
0 -1
1 590 0 590 590|1010|688
0 0 -1
0 -1
0 0 -1
0 -1
0 0 0 -1 |10 10|0 0 -1
0 -1
0 0 -1
0 -1
0 0 0 -1 |10 10 10|688
Number of Clearance Intervals 1,500
0.459
Signal Coordination -0.100
0.359
A
Hirsch/Green Transportation Consulting, Inc.
Critical Movement Analysis (CMA) Worksheet
Right
Date
National Boulevard|1010|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Northbound
July 26, 2010
Through
Through/Right
Left
Left/Through
I-405 EB On-Ramp
Right
East/West:
Eastbound
Analysis Scenario
Southbound Through
Left
Left/Through
Signalized
AM Peak Hour
Total Lanes
Lane Type
Signal Coordination Adjustment
Sum of North/South Critical Volumes
Left
ATSAC + ATCS
Total Lanes
Sum of East/West Critical Volumes
Total Intersection Critical Volumes
Intersection Capacity
Total Lanes
Through
Base CMA
Left/Through
Through
Through/Right
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|1010|North/South:
Westbound
Right
Through/Right
Left
Left/Through
Total Lanes
Through/Right
Right
Project Name
Approach
Direction
Intersection Number
Intersection Name
Analysis Period
Intersection Control
Level of Service (LOS)
Final CMA
ATTACHMENT 5
3778770 Washington Mixed-Use
Existing (2010)
Assigned
No. of Approach Right-Turn Lane Critical
Lanes Volumes on Red Volumes Moves
0 92 -1 92
0 -1
1 180 320
0 -1
0 48 0 -1 |1010|0 64 -1
0 -1
1 197 306 306
0 -1
0 45 0 -1 |1010|398
1 40 40
0 -1
3 1,742 581 581
0 -1
1 116 46 70 |1010|1 173 173 173
0 -1
3 1,786 595
0 -1
1 42 39 3 |1010|754
1,152
Number of Clearance Intervals 1,500
0.768
Signal Coordination -0.070
0.698
B
Sum of East/West Critical Volumes
Total Intersection Critical Volumes|1010|ATSAC
Final CMA
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Northbound
Hirsch/Green Transportation Consulting, Inc.
Critical Movement Analysis (CMA) Worksheet
Project Name
AM Peak Hour
Intersection Number
Intersection Name
Analysis Period
Analysis Scenario
Eastbound
Right
Left/Through/Right
Left
Left/Through
Through/Right
Sum of North/South Critical Volumes
Total Lanes
Intersection Capacity
Left
Left/Through
Through
Through/Right
Right
Date
Hughes Avenue
East/West:|1010|North/South:
July 26, 2010
Level of Service (LOS)
Southbound
Westbound
Total Lanes
Total Lanes
Through
Right
Through/Right
Left
Base CMA
Signal Coordination Adjustment
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Left/Through
Total Lanes
Intersection Control
Lane Type
Approach
Direction
Signalized
Left
Left/Through
Left/Through/Right
Through/Right
Right
Venice Boulevard
ATTACHMENT 5
3788770 Washington Mixed-Use
Existing (2010)
Assigned
No. of Approach Right-Turn Lane Critical
Lanes Volumes on Red Volumes Moves
1 47 47 47
0 -1
0 148 -1
1 190
0 42 0 -1 |1010|0 74 -1
0 -1
1 169 310 310
0 -1
0 67 0 -1 |1010|357
1 69 69 69
0 -1
2 1,799 616
1 616
0 49 0 -1 |1010|1 59 59
0 -1
3 1,907 636 636
0 -1
1 39 39 0 |1010|705
1,062
Number of Clearance Intervals 1,375
0.772
Signal Coordination -0.070
0.702
C
Sum of East/West Critical Volumes
Total Intersection Critical Volumes|1010|ATSAC
Final CMA
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Northbound
Hirsch/Green Transportation Consulting, Inc.
Critical Movement Analysis (CMA) Worksheet
Project Name
AM Peak Hour
Intersection Number
Intersection Name
Analysis Period
Analysis Scenario
Eastbound
Right
Left/Through/Right
Left
Left/Through
Through/Right
Sum of North/South Critical Volumes
Total Lanes
Intersection Capacity
Left
Left/Through
Through
Through/Right
Right
Date
Bagley Avenue/Main Street
East/West:|1010|North/South:
July 26, 2010
Level of Service (LOS)
Southbound
Westbound
Total Lanes
Total Lanes
Through
Right
Through/Right
Left
Base CMA
Signal Coordination Adjustment
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Left/Through
Total Lanes
Intersection Control
Lane Type
Approach
Direction
Signalized
Left
Left/Through
Through
Through/Right
Right
Venice Boulevard
ATTACHMENT 5
3798770 Washington Mixed-Use
Existing (2010)
Assigned
No. of Approach Right-Turn Lane Critical
Lanes Volumes on Red Volumes Moves
1 39 39
0 -1
1 84 84 84
0 -1
2 601 432 84 |1010|1 176 126
0 -1
1 44 126 126
0 -1
0 32 0 -1 |1010|210
1 29 29
0 -1
2 1,801 609 609
1 609
0 26 0 -1 |1010|2 392 216 216
0 -1
2 1,803 650
1 650
0 147 0 -1 |1010|824
1,034
Number of Clearance Intervals 1,375
0.752
Signal Coordination -0.100
0.652
B
Total Lanes
Signalized
Through/Right
Total Lanes
Left/Through/Right
Left/Through
Northbound
Through/Right
North/South Opposed Phasing
Right
Left/Through
Through
Through/Right
Right
Direction
Intersection Control
Lane Type
Analysis Scenario
Left
Left/Through
Through
Approach
Project Name|1010|ATSAC + ATCS
AM Peak Hour
Intersection Number
Intersection Name
Analysis Period
Date
Culver Boulevard
East/West:|1010|North/South:
July 26, 2010
Venice Boulevard
Left
Signal Coordination Adjustment
Intersection Capacity
Sum of North/South Critical Volumes
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Eastbound
Right
Through/Right
Westbound
Total Lanes
NB Rt. Turn Overlap with WB Left
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Lanes
Through
Right
Left
Left/Through
Southbound
Hirsch/Green Transportation Consulting, Inc.
Critical Movement Analysis (CMA) Worksheet
Sum of East/West Critical Volumes
Total Intersection Critical Volumes
Left
Base CMA
Final CMA
Level of Service (LOS)
ATTACHMENT 5
3808770 Washington Mixed-Use
Existing (2010)
Assigned
No. of Approach Right-Turn Lane Critical
Lanes Volumes on Red Volumes Moves
1 176 176
0 -1
1 430 430 430
0 -1
1 47 47 0 |1010|0 508 -1
1 508 508
1 321 321
0 -1
1 141 141 0 |1010|938
2 536 295 295
0 -1
2 2,066 732
1 732
0 131 0 -1 |1010|1 79 79
0 -1
2 2,076 802 802
1 802
0 331 0 -1 |1010|1,097
2,035
Number of Clearance Intervals 1,375
1.480
Signal Coordination -0.100
1.380
F
Hirsch/Green Transportation Consulting, Inc.
Critical Movement Analysis (CMA) Worksheet
Right
Date
Robertson Boulevard/Exposition Boulevard|1010|NB Rt. Turn Overlap with WB Left
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Northbound
July 26, 2010
Through
Through/Right
Left
Left/Through
Venice Boulevard
North/South Opposed Phasing
Right
East/West:
Eastbound
Analysis Scenario
Southbound Through
Left
Left/Through
Signalized
AM Peak Hour
Total Lanes
Lane Type
Signal Coordination Adjustment
Sum of North/South Critical Volumes
Left
ATSAC + ATCS
Total Lanes
Sum of East/West Critical Volumes
Total Intersection Critical Volumes
Intersection Capacity
Total Lanes
Through
Base CMA
Left/Through
Through
Through/Right
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|1010|North/South:
Westbound
Right
Through/Right
Left
Left/Through
Total Lanes
Through/Right
Right
Project Name
Approach
Direction
Intersection Number
Intersection Name
Analysis Period
Intersection Control
Level of Service (LOS)
Final CMA
ATTACHMENT 5
3818770 Washington Mixed-Use
Existing (2010)
Assigned
No. of Approach Right-Turn Lane Critical
Lanes Volumes on Red Volumes Moves
1 196 196
0 -1
1 897 460 460
1 460
0 22 0 -1 |1010|1 130 130 130
0 -1
1 561 330
1 330
0 100 0 -1 |1010|590
1 180 180
0 -1
2 2,049 778 778
1 778
0 285 0 -1 |1010|1 89 89 89
0 -1
2 1,920 678
1 678
0 115 0 -1 |1010|867
1,457
Number of Clearance Intervals 1,375
1.060
Signal Coordination -0.100
0.960
E
Left
Left/Through
Right
Through/Right
Analysis Scenario
Intersection Control
Lane Type
Approach
Direction
Signalized
Final CMA
Level of Service (LOS)
Project Name|1010|ATSAC + ATCS
AM Peak Hour
Intersection Number
Intersection Name
Analysis Period
Southbound
Westbound
Northbound
Date
National Boulevard
East/West:|10 10|North/South:
July 26, 2010
Venice Boulevard
Right
Total Lanes
Through
Through/Right
Left
Left/Through
Total Lanes
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Through/Right
Right
Left
Left/Through
Through
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Left
Left/Through
Through/Right
Eastbound
Hirsch/Green Transportation Consulting, Inc.
Critical Movement Analysis (CMA) Worksheet
Total Lanes
Through
Right
Sum of North/South Critical Volumes
Through
Sum of East/West Critical Volumes
Intersection Capacity
Total Intersection Critical Volumes
Base CMA
Signal Coordination Adjustment
Total Lanes
ATTACHMENT 5
3828770 Washington Mixed-Use
Existing (2010)
Assigned
No. of Approach Right-Turn Lane Critical
Lanes Volumes on Red Volumes Moves
0 11 -1 11
120
0 9 -1
0 -1
1 4 40 |1010|0 12 -1
0 -1
1 2 38 38
0 -1
0 24 0 -1 |1010|49
1 74 74 74
0 -1
2 2,112 711
1 711
0 21 0 -1 |1010|1 22 22
0 -1
2 2,093 705 705
1 705
0 22 0 -1 |1010|779
828
Number of Clearance Intervals 1,500
0.552
Signal Coordination -0.100
0.452
A
Total Lanes
Signalized
Through/Right
Total Lanes
Left/Through/Right
Left/Through
Northbound
Through/Right
Right
Left/Through
Through
Through/Right
Right
Direction
Intersection Control
Lane Type
Analysis Scenario
Left
Left/Through
Through
Approach
Project Name|1010|ATSAC + ATCS
AM Peak Hour
Intersection Number
Intersection Name
Analysis Period
Date
Helms Avenue
East/West:
10
North/South:
July 26, 2010
Venice Boulevard
Left
Signal Coordination Adjustment
Intersection Capacity
Sum of North/South Critical Volumes
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Eastbound
Right
Through/Right
Westbound
Total Lanes
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Lanes
Through
Right
Left
Left/Through
Southbound
Hirsch/Green Transportation Consulting, Inc.
Critical Movement Analysis (CMA) Worksheet
Sum of East/West Critical Volumes
Total Intersection Critical Volumes
Left
Base CMA
Final CMA
Level of Service (LOS)
ATTACHMENT 5
3838770 Washington Mixed-Use
Existing (2010)
Assigned
No. of Approach Right-Turn Lane Critical
Lanes Volumes on Red Volumes Moves
0 47 -1
0 -1
1 243 316 316
0 -1
0 26 0 -1 |1010|0 158 -1 158
0 -1
1 83 258
0 -1
0 17 0 -1 |1010|474
1 69 69 69
0 -1
2 1,911 641
1 641
0 11 0 -1 |1010|1 68 68
0 -1
2 2,020 707 707
1 707
0 100 0 -1 |1010|776
1,250
Number of Clearance Intervals 1,500
0.833
Signal Coordination -0.100
0.733
C
Hirsch/Green Transportation Consulting, Inc.
Critical Movement Analysis (CMA) Worksheet
Right
Date
Cattaraugus Avenue
11
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Northbound
July 26, 2010
Left/Through/Right
Through/Right
Left
Left/Through
Venice Boulevard
Right
East/West:
Eastbound
Analysis Scenario
Southbound Left/Through/Right
Left
Left/Through
Signalized
AM Peak Hour
Total Lanes
Lane Type
Signal Coordination Adjustment
Sum of North/South Critical Volumes
Left
ATSAC + ATCS
Total Lanes
Sum of East/West Critical Volumes
Total Intersection Critical Volumes
Intersection Capacity
Total Lanes
Through
Base CMA
Left/Through
Through
Through/Right
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|1010|North/South:
Westbound
Right
Through/Right
Left
Left/Through
Total Lanes
Through/Right
Right
Project Name
Approach
Direction
Intersection Number
Intersection Name
Analysis Period
Intersection Control
Level of Service (LOS)
Final CMA
ATTACHMENT 5
3848770 Washington Mixed-Use
Existing (2010)
Assigned
No. of Approach Right-Turn Lane Critical
Lanes Volumes on Red Volumes Moves
1 123 123 123
0 -1
2 1,753 599
1 599
0 45 0 -1 |1010|1 35 35
0 -1
2 1,312 552 552
1 552
0 345 0 -1 |1010|675
2 345 190 190
0 -1
3 1,674 558
0 -1
1 155 62 93 |1010|1 126 126
0 -1
3 1,741 580 580
0 -1
1 15 15 0 |1010|770
1,445
Number of Clearance Intervals 1,375
1.051
Signal Coordination -0.070
0.981
E
Venice Boulevard
Right
Through/Right
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Left
ATSAC
Total Lanes
Sum of East/West Critical Volumes
Total Intersection Critical Volumes
Left/Through
Signal Coordination Adjustment
Level of Service (LOS)
Final CMA
Project Name|1010|AM Peak Hour
Intersection Number
Intersection Name
Analysis Period
Southbound
Westbound
Base CMA
Intersection Capacity
Right
Left/Through
Through
Through/Right
Analysis Scenario
Intersection Control
Lane Type
Sum of North/South Critical Volumes
Total Lanes
Direction
Approach
Total Lanes
Left
Total Lanes
Eastbound
Left
Left/Through
Through
Through/Right
Right
North/South:
July 26, 2010
Through
Through/Right
Left
Left/Through
East/West:
Signalized
Hirsch/Green Transportation Consulting, Inc.
Critical Movement Analysis (CMA) Worksheet
Right
Date
La Cienega Boulevard
12
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Northbound
Through
ATTACHMENT 5
3858770 Washington Mixed-Use
Existing (2010)
Assigned
No. of Approach Right-Turn Lane Critical
Lanes Volumes on Red Volumes Moves
1 162 162 162
0 -1
0 303 -1
1 342
0 39 0 -1 |1010|1 12 12
0 -1
0 287 -1
1 333 333
0 46 0 -1 |1010|495
1 40 40 40
0 -1
1 489 332
1 332
0 176 0 -1 |1010|1 53 53
0 -1
1 677 361 361
1 361
0 45 0 -1 |1010|401
896
Number of Clearance Intervals 1,500
0.597
Signal Coordination -0.070
0.527
A
Hirsch/Green Transportation Consulting, Inc.
Critical Movement Analysis (CMA) Worksheet
Right
Date
Hughes Avenue/Duquesne Avenue
13
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Northbound
July 26, 2010
Through
Through/Right
Left
Left/Through
Washington Boulevard
Right
East/West:
Eastbound
Analysis Scenario
Southbound Through
Left
Left/Through
Signalized
AM Peak Hour
Total Lanes
Lane Type
Signal Coordination Adjustment
Sum of North/South Critical Volumes
Left
ATSAC
Total Lanes
Sum of East/West Critical Volumes
Total Intersection Critical Volumes
Intersection Capacity
Total Lanes
Through
Base CMA
Left/Through
Through
Through/Right
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|1010|North/South:
Westbound
Right
Through/Right
Left
Left/Through
Total Lanes
Through/Right
Right
Project Name
Approach
Direction
Intersection Number
Intersection Name
Analysis Period
Intersection Control
Level of Service (LOS)
Final CMA
ATTACHMENT 5
3868770 Washington Mixed-Use
Existing (2010)
Assigned
No. of Approach Right-Turn Lane Critical
Lanes Volumes on Red Volumes Moves
1 90 90
0 -1
1 349 349 349
0 -1
1 99 45 54 |1010|1 50 50 50
0 -1
1 367 217
1 217
0 67 0 -1 |1010|399
1 103 103
0 -1
1 726 381 381
1 381
0 36 0 -1 |1010|1 90 90 90
0 -1
1 670 362
1 362
0 54 0 -1 |1010|471
870
Number of Clearance Intervals 1,375
0.633
Signal Coordination -0.070
0.563
A
Total Lanes
Signalized
Through/Right
Total Lanes
Through
Left/Through
Northbound
Through/Right
Right
Left/Through
Through
Through/Right
Right
Direction
Intersection Control
Lane Type
Analysis Scenario
Left
Left/Through
Through
Approach
Project Name|1010|ATSAC
AM Peak Hour
Intersection Number
Intersection Name
Analysis Period
Date
Duquesne Avenue
East/West:
14
North/South:
July 26, 2010
Culver Boulevard
Left
Signal Coordination Adjustment
Intersection Capacity
Sum of North/South Critical Volumes
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Eastbound
Right
Through/Right
Westbound
Total Lanes
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Lanes
Through
Right
Left
Left/Through
Southbound
Hirsch/Green Transportation Consulting, Inc.
Critical Movement Analysis (CMA) Worksheet
Sum of East/West Critical Volumes
Total Intersection Critical Volumes
Left
Base CMA
Final CMA
Level of Service (LOS)
ATTACHMENT 5
3878770 Washington Mixed-Use
Existing (2010)
Assigned
No. of Approach Right-Turn Lane Critical
Lanes Volumes on Red Volumes Moves
0 0 -1
0 -1
2 846 296
1 296
0 42 0 -1 |1010|1 66 66
0 -1
1 734 405 405
1 405
1 728 248 405 |1010|405
1 472 248 248
1 248
0 23 -1
0 -1
1 22 022 |1010|0 66 -1
1 120 120
0 54 -1
0 -1
1 113 54 59 |1010|368
773
Number of Clearance Intervals 1,375
0.562
Signal Coordination -0.070
0.492
A
Total Lanes
Signalized
Through/Right
Total Lanes
Through
Left/Through
Northbound
Through/Right
Right
Left/Through
Through
Through/Right
Right
Direction
Intersection Control
Lane Type
Analysis Scenario
Left
Left/Through
Through
Approach
Project Name|1010|ATSAC
AM Peak Hour
Intersection Number
Intersection Name
Analysis Period
Date
Culver Boulevard
East/West:
15
North/South:
July 26, 2010
Washington Boulevard/Irving Place
Left
Signal Coordination Adjustment
Intersection Capacity
East/West Opposed Phasing
Sum of North/South Critical Volumes
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Eastbound
Right
Through/Right
Westbound
Total Lanes
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Lanes
Through
Right
Left
Left/Through
Southbound
Hirsch/Green Transportation Consulting, Inc.
Critical Movement Analysis (CMA) Worksheet
Sum of East/West Critical Volumes
Total Intersection Critical Volumes
Left
Base CMA
Final CMA
Level of Service (LOS)
ATTACHMENT 5
3888770 Washington Mixed-Use
Existing (2010)
Assigned
No. of Approach Right-Turn Lane Critical
Lanes Volumes on Red Volumes Moves
1 159 159 159
0 -1
3 1,277 426
0 -1
0 0 0 -1 |1010|0 0 -1
0 -1
2 1,339 498 498
1 498
0 155 0 -1 |1010|657
1 146 146 146
0 -1
0 0 -1
0 -1
1 129 80 49 |1010|0 0 -1
0 -1
0 0 -1
0 -1
0 0 0 -1 |10 10|146
803
Number of Clearance Intervals 1,425
0.564
Signal Coordination -0.070
0.494
A
Hirsch/Green Transportation Consulting, Inc.
Critical Movement Analysis (CMA) Worksheet
Right
Date
Culver Boulevard
16
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Northbound
July 26, 2010
Through
Through/Right
Left
Left/Through
Main Street
Right
East/West:
Eastbound
Analysis Scenario
Southbound Through
Left
Left/Through
Signalized
AM Peak Hour
Total Lanes
Lane Type
Signal Coordination Adjustment
Sum of North/South Critical Volumes
Left
ATSAC
Total Lanes
Sum of East/West Critical Volumes
Total Intersection Critical Volumes
Intersection Capacity
Total Lanes
Through
Base CMA
Left/Through
Through
Through/Right
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|1010|North/South:
Westbound
Right
Through/Right
Left
Left/Through
Total Lanes
Through/Right
Right
Project Name
Approach
Direction
Intersection Number
Intersection Name
Analysis Period
Intersection Control
Level of Service (LOS)
Final CMA
ATTACHMENT 5
3898770 Washington Mixed-Use
Existing (2010)
Assigned
No. of Approach Right-Turn Lane Critical
Lanes Volumes on Red Volumes Moves
1 12 12
0 -1
2 667 334 334
0 -1
2 750 750 0 |1010|1 36 36 36
0 -1
1 405 204
1 204
0 4 0 -1 |1010|370
0 0 -1
0 -1
0 0 -1
0 -1
1 6 60 |1010|1 1,023 529 529
1 529
0 35 -1
0 -1
1 72 18 54 |1010|529
899
Number of Clearance Intervals 1,425
0.631
Signal Coordination -0.070
0.561
A
Total Lanes
Signalized
Through/Right
Total Lanes
Through
Left/Through
Northbound
Through/Right
Right
Left/Through
Through
Through/Right
Right
Direction
Intersection Control
Lane Type
Analysis Scenario
Left
Left/Through
Through
Approach
Project Name|1010|ATSAC
AM Peak Hour
Intersection Number
Intersection Name
Analysis Period
Date
Culver Boulevard
East/West:
17
North/South:
July 26, 2010
Washington Boulevard/Canfield Avenue
Left
Signal Coordination Adjustment
Intersection Capacity
EB Rt. Turn Overlap with NB Left
East/West Opposed Phasing
Sum of North/South Critical Volumes
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Eastbound
Right
Through/Right
Westbound
Total Lanes
NB Rt. Turn Overlap with WB Left
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Lanes
Through
Right
Left
Left/Through
Southbound
Hirsch/Green Transportation Consulting, Inc.
Critical Movement Analysis (CMA) Worksheet
Sum of East/West Critical Volumes
Total Intersection Critical Volumes
Left
Base CMA
Final CMA
Level of Service (LOS)
ATTACHMENT 5
3908770 Washington Mixed-Use
Existing (2010)
Assigned
No. of Approach Right-Turn Lane Critical
Lanes Volumes on Red Volumes Moves
1 24 24 24
0 -1
1 232 140
1 140
0 48 0 -1 |1010|1 129 129
0 -1
1 273 273 273
0 -1
1 153 0 153 |1010|297
1 38 38 38
0 -1
1 705 384
1 384
0 64 0 -1 |1010|1 64 64
0 -1
1 1,102 654 654
1 654
0 207 0 -1 |1010|692
989
Number of Clearance Intervals 1,425
0.694
Signal Coordination -0.070
0.624
B
Washington Boulevard
Intersection Control
Lane Type
Approach
Direction
Signalized
Analysis Scenario
Right
Through/Right
Left
Left
Left/Through
Through
Sum of East/West Critical Volumes
Total Intersection Critical Volumes
Level of Service (LOS)
North/South:
July 26, 2010|1010|AM Peak Hour
Intersection Number
Intersection Name
Analysis Period
Southbound
Left/Through
Through
Through/Right
Right
Intersection Capacity
Final CMA
ATSAC
Base CMA
Signal Coordination Adjustment
Through
Left
Left/Through
Through/Right
Left
Sum of North/South Critical Volumes
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Lanes
Hirsch/Green Transportation Consulting, Inc.
Critical Movement Analysis (CMA) Worksheet
Right
Date
Robertson Boulevard/Higuera Street
East/West:
18
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Project Name
Northbound
Westbound
Total Lanes
Left/Through
Total Lanes
Through
Total Lanes
Eastbound
Right
Through/Right
ATTACHMENT 5
3918770 Washington Mixed-Use
Existing (2010)
Assigned
No. of Approach Right-Turn Lane Critical
Lanes Volumes on Red Volumes Moves
1 29 29 29
0 -1
0 0 -1
0 -1
1 30 30 0 |1010|0 0 -1
0 -1
0 0 -1
0 -1
0 0 0 -1 |10 10|29
0 0 -1
0 -1
1 833 456
1 456
0 78 0 -1 |1010|0 60 -1
1 699
1 1,551 912 912
0 -1
0 0 0 -1 |1010|912
941
Number of Clearance Intervals 1,500
0.627
Signal Coordination -0.070
0.557
A
Hirsch/Green Transportation Consulting, Inc.
Critical Movement Analysis (CMA) Worksheet
Right
Date
Landmark Street
19
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Northbound
July 26, 2010
Through
Through/Right
Left
Left/Through
Washington Boulevard
Right
East/West:
Eastbound
Analysis Scenario
Southbound Through
Left
Left/Through
Signalized
AM Peak Hour
Total Lanes
Lane Type
Signal Coordination Adjustment
Sum of North/South Critical Volumes
Left
ATSAC
Total Lanes
Sum of East/West Critical Volumes
Total Intersection Critical Volumes
Intersection Capacity
Total Lanes
Through
Base CMA
Left/Through
Through
Through/Right
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|1010|North/South:
Westbound
Right
Through/Right
Left
Left/Through
Total Lanes
Through/Right
Right
Project Name
Approach
Direction
Intersection Number
Intersection Name
Analysis Period
Intersection Control
Level of Service (LOS)
Final CMA
ATTACHMENT 5
3928770 Washington Mixed-Use
Existing (2010)
Assigned
No. of Approach Right-Turn Lane Critical
Lanes Volumes on Red Volumes Moves
2 219 120
0 -1
1 784 444 444
1 444
0 104 0 -1 |1010|2 136 75 75
0 -1
1 730 395
1 395
0 60 0 -1 |1010|519
1 73 73 73
0 -1
2 707 354
0 -1
1 109 62 47 |1010|1 76 76
0 -1
2 1,154 577 577
0 -1
1 310 0 310 |1010|650
1,169
Number of Clearance Intervals 1,375
0.850
Signal Coordination -0.070
0.780
C
Hirsch/Green Transportation Consulting, Inc.
Critical Movement Analysis (CMA) Worksheet
Final CMA
Sum of East/West Critical Volumes
Total Intersection Critical Volumes
Through
Left
Left/Through
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Eastbound
Sum of North/South Critical Volumes
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Northbound
Right
Total Lanes
Total Lanes
Total Lanes
Through
Through/Right
Left
Right
Intersection Capacity
Level of Service (LOS)
Right
Left/Through
Through
Through/Right
Date
National Boulevard
East/West:
20
North/South:
July 26, 2010
Washington Boulevard
Project Name|1010|ATSAC
AM Peak Hour
Intersection Number
Intersection Name
Analysis Period
Southbound
Westbound
Base CMA
Signal Coordination Adjustment
Through
Through/Right
Right
Through/Right
Left
Left/Through
Total Lanes
Signalized
Left
Left/Through
Analysis Scenario
Intersection Control
Lane Type
Approach
Direction
ATTACHMENT 5
3938770 Washington Mixed-Use
Existing (2010)
Assigned
No. of Approach Right-Turn Lane Critical
Lanes Volumes on Red Volumes Moves
0 0 -1
0 -1
1 0 1 1
0 -1
0 1 0 -1 |1010|0 0 -1
0 -1
0 0 -1
0 -1
0 0 0 -1 |10 1010|0 0 -1
0 -1
1 913 458
1 458
0 4 0 -1 |1010|1 3 3
0 -1
2 1,555 778 778
0 -1
0 0 0 -1 |1010|778
779
Number of Clearance Intervals 1,200
0.649
Signal Coordination 0.000
0.649
B
Left
Left/Through
Right
Through/Right
Analysis Scenario
Intersection Control
Lane Type
Approach
Direction
Two-Way STOP
Final CMA
Level of Service (LOS)
Project Name|10 10|None
AM Peak Hour
Intersection Number
Intersection Name
Analysis Period
Southbound
Westbound
Northbound
Date
Wesley Street
East/West:
21
North/South:
July 26, 2010
Washington Boulevard
Right
Total Lanes
Left/Through/Right
Through/Right
Left
Left/Through
Total Lanes
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Through/Right
Right
Left
Left/Through
Through
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Left
Left/Through
Through/Right
Eastbound
Hirsch/Green Transportation Consulting, Inc.
Critical Movement Analysis (CMA) Worksheet
Total Lanes
Through
Right
Sum of North/South Critical Volumes
Through
Sum of East/West Critical Volumes
Intersection Capacity
Total Intersection Critical Volumes
Base CMA
Signal Coordination Adjustment
Total Lanes
ATTACHMENT 5
394TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY
General Information Site Information
Analyst RRH
Agency/Co. Hirsch/Green
Date Performed 7/26/2010
Analysis Time Period AM Peak Hour - Existing
Intersection 21
Jurisdiction Culver City
Analysis Year 2010
Project Description 8770 Washington Mixed-Use
East/West Street: Washington Boulevard North/South Street: Wesley Street
Intersection Orientation: East-West Study Period (hrs): 1.00
Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments
Major Street Eastbound Westbound
Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6
L T R L T R
Volume (veh/h) 913 4 3 1555
Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Hourly Flow Rate, HFR
(veh/h)
0 913 4 3 1555 0
Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 -- -- 0 -- --
Median Type Undivided
RT Channelized 0 0
Lanes 0 2 0 1 2 0
Configuration T TR L T
Upstream Signal 0 0
Minor Street Northbound Southbound
Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12
L T R L T R
Volume (veh/h) 0 0 1
Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Hourly Flow Rate, HFR
(veh/h)
0 0 1 0 0 0
Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0
Percent Grade (%) 0 0
Flared Approach N N
Storage 0 0
RT Channelized 0 0
Lanes 0 1 0 0 0 0
Configuration LTR
Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service
Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound
Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12
Lane Configuration L LTR
v (veh/h) 3 1
C (m) (veh/h) 752 607
v/c 0.00 0.00
95% queue length 0.01 0.00
Control Delay (s/veh) 9.8 10.9
LOS A B
Approach Delay (s/veh) -- -- 10.9
Approach LOS -- -- B
Copyright © 2007 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved
HCS+
TM
Version 5.3
Generated: 8/3/2010 7:37 PM
ATTACHMENT 5
3958770 Washington Mixed-Use
Existing (2010)
Assigned
No. of Approach Right-Turn Lane Critical
Lanes Volumes on Red Volumes Moves
0 71 -1
0 -1
1 0 88 88
0 -1
0 17 0 -1 |1010|0 0 -1
0 -1
0 0 -1
0 -1
0 0 0 -1 |10 10|88
0 0 -1
0 -1
1 889 464
1 464
0 38 0 -1 |1010|1 30 30
0 -1
2 1,493 746 746
0 -1
0 0 0 -1 |1010|746
834
Number of Clearance Intervals 1,500
0.556
Signal Coordination -0.070
0.486
A
Hirsch/Green Transportation Consulting, Inc.
Critical Movement Analysis (CMA) Worksheet
Right
Date
Helms Avenue
22
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Northbound
Through
North/South:
July 26, 2010
Left/Through/Right
Through/Right
Left
Left/Through
Washington Boulevard
Total Lanes
Total Lanes
Eastbound
East/West:
Left
Left/Through
Signalized
Analysis Scenario
Intersection Control
Lane Type
Sum of North/South Critical Volumes
Left
ATSAC
Total Lanes
Sum of East/West Critical Volumes
Total Intersection Critical Volumes
Intersection Capacity
Right
Through
Through/Right
Right
Left/Through
Through
Through/Right
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Base CMA
Project Name|1010|AM Peak Hour
Intersection Number
Intersection Name
Analysis Period
Southbound
Westbound
Signal Coordination Adjustment
Level of Service (LOS)
Final CMA
Through/Right
Left
Left/Through
Total Lanes
Approach
Direction
Right
ATTACHMENT 5
3968770 Washington Mixed-Use
Existing (2010)
Assigned
No. of Approach Right-Turn Lane Critical
Lanes Volumes on Red Volumes Moves
0 9 -1 9
0 -1
1 5 17
0 -1
0 3 0 -1 |1010|0 85 -1
0 -1
1 6 136 136
0 -1
0 45 0 -1 |1010|145
0 22 -1 22
1 361
0 804 -1
1 471
0 6 0 -1 |1010|0 3 -1
1 907
0 1,503 -1
1 916 916
0 317 0 -1 |1010|938
1,083
Number of Clearance Intervals 1,200
0.903
Signal Coordination 0.000
0.903
E
Total Lanes
Two-Way STOP
Through/Right
Total Lanes
Left/Through/Right
Left/Through
Northbound
Through/Right
Right
Left/Through
Through
Through/Right
Right
Direction
Intersection Control
Lane Type
Analysis Scenario
Left
Left/Through
Left/Through/Right
Approach
Project Name|10 10|None
AM Peak Hour
Intersection Number
Intersection Name
Analysis Period
Date
Cattaraugus Avenue
East/West:
23
North/South:
July 26, 2010
Washington Boulevard
Left
Signal Coordination Adjustment
Intersection Capacity
Sum of North/South Critical Volumes
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Eastbound
Right
Through/Right
Westbound
Total Lanes
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Lanes
Through
Right
Left
Left/Through
Southbound
Hirsch/Green Transportation Consulting, Inc.
Critical Movement Analysis (CMA) Worksheet
Sum of East/West Critical Volumes
Total Intersection Critical Volumes
Left
Base CMA
Final CMA
Level of Service (LOS)
ATTACHMENT 5
397TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY
General Information Site Information
Analyst RRH
Agency/Co. Hirsch/Green
Date Performed 7/26/2010
Analysis Time Period AM Peak Hour - Existing
Intersection 23
Jurisdiction Culver City
Analysis Year 2010
Project Description 8770 Washington Mixed-Use
East/West Street: Washington Boulevard North/South Street: Cattaraugus Avenue
Intersection Orientation: East-West Study Period (hrs): 1.00
Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments
Major Street Eastbound Westbound
Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6
L T R L T R
Volume (veh/h) 22 804 6 3 1503 317
Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Hourly Flow Rate, HFR
(veh/h)
22 804 6 3 1503 317
Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 -- -- 0 -- --
Median Type Undivided
RT Channelized 0 0
Lanes 0 2 0 0 2 0
Configuration LT TR LT TR
Upstream Signal 0 0
Minor Street Northbound Southbound
Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12
L T R L T R
Volume (veh/h) 9 5 3 85 6 45
Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Hourly Flow Rate, HFR
(veh/h)
9 5 3 85 6 45
Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0
Percent Grade (%) 0 0
Flared Approach N N
Storage 0 0
RT Channelized 0 0
Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0
Configuration LTR LTR
Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service
Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound
Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12
Lane Configuration LT LT LTR LTR
v (veh/h) 22 3 17 136
C (m) (veh/h) 341 825 40 33
v/c 0.06 0.00 0.43 4.12
95% queue length 0.21 0.01 1.90 55.20
Control Delay (s/veh) 16.3 9.4 157.7 5873
LOS C A F F
Approach Delay (s/veh) -- -- 157.7 5873
Approach LOS -- -- F F
Copyright © 2007 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved
HCS+
TM
Version 5.3
Generated: 8/3/2010 7:41 PM
ATTACHMENT 5
3988770 Washington Mixed-Use
Existing (2010)
Assigned
No. of Approach Right-Turn Lane Critical
Lanes Volumes on Red Volumes Moves
1 249 249
0 -1
2 1,621 547 547
1 547
0 20 0 -1 |1010|1 180 180 180
0 -1
2 1,402 477
1 477
0 28 0 -1 |1010|727
1 48 48 48
0 -1
2 774 387
0 -1
1 105 105 0 |1010|1 55 55
0 -1
2 1,493 746 746
0 -1
1 243 90 153 |1010|794
1,521
Number of Clearance Intervals 1,375
1.106
Signal Coordination -0.070
1.036
F
Total Lanes
Signalized
Through/Right
Total Lanes
Through
Left/Through
Northbound
Through/Right
Right
Left/Through
Through
Through/Right
Right
Direction
Intersection Control
Lane Type
Analysis Scenario
Left
Left/Through
Through
Approach
Project Name|1010|ATSAC
AM Peak Hour
Intersection Number
Intersection Name
Analysis Period
Date
La Cienega Boulevard
East/West:
24
North/South:
July 26, 2010
Washington Boulevard
Left
Signal Coordination Adjustment
Intersection Capacity
Sum of North/South Critical Volumes
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Eastbound
Right
Through/Right
Westbound
Total Lanes
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Lanes
Through
Right
Left
Left/Through
Southbound
Hirsch/Green Transportation Consulting, Inc.
Critical Movement Analysis (CMA) Worksheet
Sum of East/West Critical Volumes
Total Intersection Critical Volumes
Left
Base CMA
Final CMA
Level of Service (LOS)
ATTACHMENT 5
3998770 Washington Mixed-Use
Existing (2010)
Assigned
No. of Approach Right-Turn Lane Critical
Lanes Volumes on Red Volumes Moves
1 23 23
0 -1
1 1,764 882 882
1 882
1 918 918 0 |1010|0 0 -1
0 -1
2 1,318 446
1 446
0 20 0 -1 |1010|882
0 13 -1
0 -1
1 0 21 21
0 -1
0 8 0 -1 |1010|2 1,078 593
0 -1
0 24 -1
154 54
0 30 0 -1 |1010|614
1,496
Number of Clearance Intervals 1,425
1.050
Signal Coordination -0.100
0.950
E
Hirsch/Green Transportation Consulting, Inc.
Critical Movement Analysis (CMA) Worksheet
Final CMA
Sum of East/West Critical Volumes
Northbound
Total Lanes
Left/Through/Right
Left
Total Lanes
Total Intersection Critical Volumes
Eastbound
Left/Through
Intersection Capacity
Right
Left/Through
Through
Through/Right
East/West Opposed Phasing
Through
Left
Sum of North/South Critical Volumes
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Right
Through/Right
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Date
La Cienega Boulevard
East/West:
25
North/South:
July 26, 2010
Total Lanes
Project Name|1010|ATSAC + ATCS
AM Peak Hour
Intersection Number
Intersection Name
Analysis Period
Southbound
Westbound
Base CMA
Signal Coordination Adjustment
Level of Service (LOS)
Through
Through/Right
Right
Through/Right
Left
Left/Through
Total Lanes
Right
Signalized
Left
Left/Through
Analysis Scenario
Intersection Control
Lane Type
Approach
Direction
Fairfax Avenue
ATTACHMENT 5
4008770 Washington Mixed-Use
Existing (2010)
Assigned
No. of Approach Right-Turn Lane Critical
Lanes Volumes on Red Volumes Moves
0 111 -1
0 -1
1 0 209 209
0 -1
0 98 0 -1 |1010|0 0 -1
0 -1
0 0 -1
0 -1
0 0 0 -1 |10 10|209
0 0 -1
0 -1
2 801 400
0 -1
1 83 83 0 |1010|1 39 39
0 -1
2 1,531 766 766
0 -1
0 0 0 -1 |1010|766
975
Number of Clearance Intervals 1,500
0.650
Signal Coordination -0.070
0.580
A
Total Lanes
Signalized
Through/Right
Total Lanes
Through
Left/Through
Northbound
Through/Right
Right
Left/Through
Through
Through/Right
Right
Direction
Intersection Control
Lane Type
Analysis Scenario
Left
Left/Through
Left/Through/Right
Approach
Project Name|1010|ATSAC
AM Peak Hour
Intersection Number
Intersection Name
Analysis Period
Date
Wesley Street
East/West:
26
North/South:
July 26, 2010
National Boulevard
Left
Signal Coordination Adjustment
Intersection Capacity
Sum of North/South Critical Volumes
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Eastbound
Right
Through/Right
Westbound
Total Lanes
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Lanes
Through
Right
Left
Left/Through
Southbound
Hirsch/Green Transportation Consulting, Inc.
Critical Movement Analysis (CMA) Worksheet
Sum of East/West Critical Volumes
Total Intersection Critical Volumes
Left
Base CMA
Final CMA
Level of Service (LOS)
ATTACHMENT 5
4018770 Washington Mixed-Use
Existing (2010)
Assigned
No. of Approach Right-Turn Lane Critical
Lanes Volumes on Red Volumes Moves
1 602 332
0 -1
1 0 332 332
0 -1
0 62 0 -1 |1010|0 0 -1
0 -1
0 0 -1
0 -1
0 0 0 -1 |10 10|332
0 0 -1
0 -1
1 668 446
1 446
0 224 0 -1 |1010|1 171 171
0 -1
1 932 932 932
0 -1
0 0 0 -1 |1010|932
1,264
Number of Clearance Intervals 1,425
0.887
Signal Coordination -0.070
Note: Intersection Currently Under Construction 0.817
D
Hirsch/Green Transportation Consulting, Inc.
Critical Movement Analysis (CMA) Worksheet
Final CMA
Sum of East/West Critical Volumes
Northbound
Total Lanes
Through
Left
Total Lanes
Total Intersection Critical Volumes
Eastbound
Left/Through
Intersection Capacity
Right
Left/Through
Through
Through/Right
Through
Left
Sum of North/South Critical Volumes
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Right
Through/Right
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Date
Hayden Avenue
East/West:
27
North/South:
July 26, 2010
Total Lanes
Project Name|1010|ATSAC
AM Peak Hour
Intersection Number
Intersection Name
Analysis Period
Southbound
Westbound
Base CMA
Signal Coordination Adjustment
Level of Service (LOS)
Left/Through/Right
Through/Right
Right
Through/Right
Left
Left/Through
Total Lanes
Right
Signalized
Left
Left/Through
Analysis Scenario
Intersection Control
Lane Type
Approach
Direction
National Boulevard
ATTACHMENT 5
4028770 Washington Mixed-Use
Existing (2010)
Assigned
No. of Approach Right-Turn Lane Critical
Lanes Volumes on Red Volumes Moves
0 0 -1
0 -1
1 570 570 570
0 -1
0 0 0 -1 |1010|0 0 -1
0 -1
2 657 328
0 -1
1 1,148 1,148 0 |1010|570
0 481 -1
0 -1
1 0 614 614
0 -1
0 133 0 -1 |1010|0 0 -1
0 -1
0 0 -1
0 -1
0 0 0 -1 |10 10|614
1,184
Number of Clearance Intervals 1,500
0.789
Signal Coordination -0.100
Note: Intersection Currently Under Construction 0.689
B
Hirsch/Green Transportation Consulting, Inc.
Critical Movement Analysis (CMA) Worksheet
Final CMA
Sum of East/West Critical Volumes
Northbound
Total Lanes
Left/Through/Right
Left
Total Lanes
Total Intersection Critical Volumes
Eastbound
Left/Through
Intersection Capacity
Right
Left/Through
Through
Through/Right
Through
Left
Sum of North/South Critical Volumes
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Right
Through/Right
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Date
Jefferson Boulevard
East/West:
28
North/South:
July 26, 2010
Total Lanes
Project Name|1010|ATSAC + ATCS
AM Peak Hour
Intersection Number
Intersection Name
Analysis Period
Southbound
Westbound
Base CMA
Signal Coordination Adjustment
Level of Service (LOS)
Through
Through/Right
Right
Through/Right
Left
Left/Through
Total Lanes
Right
Signalized
Left
Left/Through
Analysis Scenario
Intersection Control
Lane Type
Approach
Direction
National Boulevard
ATTACHMENT 5
4038770 Washington Mixed-Use
Existing (2010)
Assigned
No. of Approach Right-Turn Lane Critical
Lanes Volumes on Red Volumes Moves
1 98 98
0 -1
2 2,227 780 780
1 780
0 112 0 -1 |1010|1 70 70 70
0 -1
3 1,811 604
0 -1
1 574 214 360 |1010|850
2 390 214 214
0 -1
1 587 348
1 348
0 108 0 -1 |1010|2 566 311
0 -1
2 1,087 544 544
0 -1
1 117 0 117 |1010|758
1,608
Number of Clearance Intervals 1,375
1.169
Signal Coordination -0.100
1.069
F
Total Lanes
Signalized
Through/Right
Total Lanes
Through
Left/Through
Northbound
Through/Right
Right
Left/Through
Through
Through/Right
Right
Direction
Intersection Control
Lane Type
Analysis Scenario
Left
Left/Through
Through
Approach
Project Name|1010|ATSAC + ATCS
AM Peak Hour
Intersection Number
Intersection Name
Analysis Period
Date
La Cienega Boulevard
East/West:
29
North/South:
July 26, 2010
Jefferson Boulevard
Left
Signal Coordination Adjustment
Intersection Capacity
Sum of North/South Critical Volumes
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Eastbound
Right
Through/Right
Westbound
Total Lanes
SB Rt. Turn Overlap with EB Left
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Lanes
Through
Right
Left
Left/Through
Southbound
Hirsch/Green Transportation Consulting, Inc.
Critical Movement Analysis (CMA) Worksheet
Sum of East/West Critical Volumes
Total Intersection Critical Volumes
Left
Base CMA
Final CMA
Level of Service (LOS)
ATTACHMENT 5
4048770 Washington Mixed-Use
Existing (2010)
Assigned
No. of Approach Right-Turn Lane Critical
Lanes Volumes on Red Volumes Moves
1 252 252 252
0 -1
2 572 286
0 -1
1 711 711 0 |1010|1 75 75
0 -1
2 623 312 312
0 -1
1 75 35 40 |1010|564
1 26 26
0 -1
2 140 70 70
0 -1
1 41 41 0 |1010|2 758 417
0 -1
1 550 550 550
0 -1
1 56 56 0 |1010|620
1,184
Number of Clearance Intervals 1,425
0.831
Signal Coordination -0.100
0.731
C
Total Lanes
Signalized
Through/Right
Total Lanes
Through
Left/Through
Northbound
Through/Right
Right
Left/Through
Through
Through/Right
Right
Direction
Intersection Control
Lane Type
Analysis Scenario
Left
Left/Through
Through
Approach
Project Name|1010|ATSAC + ATCS
AM Peak Hour
Intersection Number
Intersection Name
Analysis Period
Date
Jefferson Boulevard
East/West:
30
North/South:
July 26, 2010
Higuera Street/Rodeo Road
Left
Signal Coordination Adjustment
Intersection Capacity
East/West Opposed Phasing
Sum of North/South Critical Volumes
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Eastbound
Right
Through/Right
Westbound
Total Lanes
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Lanes
Through
Right
Left
Left/Through
Southbound
Hirsch/Green Transportation Consulting, Inc.
Critical Movement Analysis (CMA) Worksheet
Sum of East/West Critical Volumes
Total Intersection Critical Volumes
Left
Base CMA
Final CMA
Level of Service (LOS)
ATTACHMENT 5
4058770 Washington Mixed-Use
Existing (2010)
Assigned
No. of Approach Right-Turn Lane Critical
Lanes Volumes on Red Volumes Moves
2 531 292 292
0 -1
2 2,070 720
1 720
0 91 0 -1 |1010|2 237 130
0 -1
2 2,026 736 736
1 736
0 182 0 -1 |1010|1,028
1 175 175
0 -1
2 516 258 258
0 -1
1 199 199 0 |1010|1 303 303 303
0 -1
2 707 354
0 -1
1 310 130 180 |1010|561
1,589
Number of Clearance Intervals 1,375
1.156
Signal Coordination -0.100
1.056
F
Hirsch/Green Transportation Consulting, Inc.
Critical Movement Analysis (CMA) Worksheet
Final CMA
Sum of East/West Critical Volumes
Total Intersection Critical Volumes
EB/WB Rt. Turn Overlap With NB/SB Lefts
Through
Left
Left/Through
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Eastbound
Sum of North/South Critical Volumes
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Northbound
Right
Total Lanes
Total Lanes
Total Lanes
Through
Through/Right
Left
Right
Intersection Capacity
Level of Service (LOS)
Right
Left/Through
Through
Through/Right
Date
La Cienega Boulevard
East/West:
31
North/South:
July 26, 2010
Rodeo Road
Project Name|1010|ATSAC + ATCS
AM Peak Hour
Intersection Number
Intersection Name
Analysis Period
Southbound
Westbound
Base CMA
Signal Coordination Adjustment
Through
Through/Right
Right
Through/Right
Left
Left/Through
Total Lanes
Signalized
Left
Left/Through
Analysis Scenario
Intersection Control
Lane Type
Approach
Direction
ATTACHMENT 5
4068770 Washington Mixed-Use
Existing (2010)
Assigned
No. of Approach Right-Turn Lane Critical
Lanes Volumes on Red Volumes Moves
0 86 -1 86
0 -1
1 191 411
0 -1
0 134 0 -1 |1010|0 27 -1
0 -1
1 308 367 367
0 -1
0 32 0 -1 |1010|453
0 42 -1 42
0 -1
1 419 498
0 -1
0 37 0 -1 |1010|0 42 -1
0 -1
1 481 561 561
0 -1
0 38 0 -1 |1010|603
1,056
Number of Clearance Intervals 1,000
1.056
Signal Coordination 0.000
1.056
F
Hirsch/Green Transportation Consulting, Inc.
Critical Movement Analysis (CMA) Worksheet
Right
Date
Braddock Drive
32
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Northbound
July 26, 2010
Left/Through/Right
Through/Right
Left
Left/Through
Duquesne Avenue
Right
East/West:
Eastbound
Analysis Scenario
Southbound Left/Through/Right
Left
Left/Through
Four-Way STOP
AM Peak Hour
Total Lanes
Lane Type
Signal Coordination Adjustment
Sum of North/South Critical Volumes
Left
None
Total Lanes
Sum of East/West Critical Volumes
Total Intersection Critical Volumes
Intersection Capacity
Total Lanes
Left/Through/Right
Base CMA
Left/Through
Left/Through/Right
Through/Right
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|10 10|North/South:
Westbound
Right
Through/Right
Left
Left/Through
Total Lanes
Through/Right
Right
Project Name
Approach
Direction
Intersection Number
Intersection Name
Analysis Period
Intersection Control
Level of Service (LOS)
Final CMA
ATTACHMENT 5
407ALL-WAY STOP CONTROL ANALYSIS
General Information Site Information
Analyst RRH
Agency/Co. Hirsch/Green
Date Performed 7/26/2010
Analysis Time Period AM Peak Hour - Existing
Intersection 32
Jurisdiction Culver City
Analysis Year 2010
Project ID 8770 Washington Mixed-Use
East/West Street: Duquesne Avenue North/South Street: Braddock Drive
Volume Adjustments and Site Characteristics
Approach Eastbound Westbound
Movement L T R L T R
Volume (veh/h) 42 419 37 42 481 38
%Thrus Left Lane
Approach Northbound Southbound
Movement L T R L T R
Volume (veh/h) 86 191 134 27 308 32
%Thrus Left Lane
Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound
L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2
Configuration LTR LTR LTR LTR
PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Flow Rate (veh/h) 498 561 411 367
% Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0
No. Lanes 1 1 1 1
Geometry Group 1 1 1 1
Duration, T 1.00
Saturation Headway Adjustment Worksheet
Prop. Left-Turns 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.1
Prop. Right-Turns 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.1
Prop. Heavy Vehicle 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
hLT-adj 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2
hRT-adj -0.6 -0.6 -0.6 -0.6 -0.6 -0.6 -0.6 -0.6
hHV-adj 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7
hadj, computed -0.0 -0.0 -0.2 -0.0
Departure Headway and Service Time
hd, initial value (s) 3.20 3.20 3.20 3.20
x, initial 0.44 0.50 0.37 0.33
hd, final value (s) 9.78 9.78 9.64 9.77
x, final value 1.35 1.52 1.10 1.00
Move-up time, m (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0
Service Time, t
s
(s) 7.8 7.8 7.6 7.8
Capacity and Level of Service
Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound
L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2
Capacity (veh/h) 498 561 411 369
Delay (s/veh) 682.30 982.93 268.72 142.01
LOS F F F F
Approach: Delay (s/veh)
682.30 982.93 268.72 142.01
LOS
F F F F
Intersection Delay (s/veh) 573.64
Intersection LOS F
Copyright © 2007 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved
HCS+
TM
Version 5.3
Generated: 8/3/2010 7:54 PM
ATTACHMENT 5
4088770 Washington Mixed-Use
Existing (2010)
Assigned
No. of Approach Right-Turn Lane Critical
Lanes Volumes on Red Volumes Moves
0 0 -1
0 -1
0 0 -1
0 -1
0 0 0 -1 |10 10|0 173 -1
0 -1
1 0 233 233
0 -1
0 60 0 -1 |1010|233
0 88 -1 88
1 500
0 412 -1
0 -1
0 0 0 -1 |1010|0 0 -1
0 -1
1 512 512 512
0 -1
1 325 116 209 |1010|600
833
Number of Clearance Intervals 1,000
0.833
Signal Coordination 0.000
0.833
D
Total Lanes
Four-Way STOP
Through/Right
Total Lanes
Left/Through/Right
Left/Through
Northbound
Through/Right
Right
Left/Through
Through
Through/Right
Right
Direction
Intersection Control
Lane Type
Analysis Scenario
Left
Left/Through
Through
Approach
Project Name|10 10|None
AM Peak Hour
Intersection Number
Intersection Name
Analysis Period
Date
Lucerne Avenue
East/West:
33
North/South:
July 26, 2010
Duquesne Avenue
Left
Signal Coordination Adjustment
Intersection Capacity
Sum of North/South Critical Volumes
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Eastbound
Right
Through/Right
Westbound
Total Lanes
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Lanes
Through
Right
Left
Left/Through
Southbound
Hirsch/Green Transportation Consulting, Inc.
Critical Movement Analysis (CMA) Worksheet
Sum of East/West Critical Volumes
Total Intersection Critical Volumes
Left
Base CMA
Final CMA
Level of Service (LOS)
ATTACHMENT 5
409ALL-WAY STOP CONTROL ANALYSIS
General Information Site Information
Analyst RRH
Agency/Co. Hirsch/Green
Date Performed 7/26/2010
Analysis Time Period AM Peak Hour - Existing
Intersection 33
Jurisdiction Culver City
Analysis Year 2010
Project ID 8770 Washington Mixed-Use
East/West Street: Duquesne Avenue North/South Street: Lucerne Avenue
Volume Adjustments and Site Characteristics
Approach Eastbound Westbound
Movement L T R L T R
Volume (veh/h) 88 412 0 0 512 325
%Thrus Left Lane
Approach Northbound Southbound
Movement L T R L T R
Volume (veh/h) 0 0 0 173 0 60
%Thrus Left Lane
Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound
L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2
Configuration LT T R LTR
PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Flow Rate (veh/h) 500 512 325 233
% Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0
No. Lanes 1 2 0 1
Geometry Group 3a 5 1
Duration, T 1.00
Saturation Headway Adjustment Worksheet
Prop. Left-Turns 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.7
Prop. Right-Turns 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.3
Prop. Heavy Vehicle 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
hLT-adj 0.2 0.2 0.5 0.5 0.2 0.2
hRT-adj -0.6 -0.6 -0.7 -0.7 -0.6 -0.6
hHV-adj 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7
hadj, computed 0.0 0.0 -0.7 -0.0
Departure Headway and Service Time
hd, initial value (s) 3.20 3.20 3.20 3.20
x, initial 0.44 0.46 0.29 0.21
hd, final value (s) 5.84 6.06 5.35 6.74
x, final value 0.81 0.86 0.48 0.44
Move-up time, m (s) 2.0 2.3 2.0
Service Time, t
s
(s) 3.8 3.8 3.0 4.7
Capacity and Level of Service
Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound
L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2
Capacity (veh/h) 610 592 575 483
Delay (s/veh) 32.30 42.02 13.01 14.94
LOS D E B B
Approach: Delay (s/veh)
32.30 30.75 14.94
LOS
D D B
Intersection Delay (s/veh) 28.90
Intersection LOS D
Copyright © 2007 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved
HCS+
TM
Version 5.3
Generated: 8/3/2010 7:59 PM
ATTACHMENT 5
4108770 Washington Mixed-Use
Existing (2010)
Assigned
No. of Approach Right-Turn Lane Critical
Lanes Volumes on Red Volumes Moves
1 417 417 417
0 -1
1 1,021 524
1 524
0 27 0 -1 |1010|1 17 17
0 -1
2 1,253 626 626
0 -1
1 407 157 250 |1010|1,043
1 287 287
0 -1
0 31 -1
1 338 338
0 307 0 -1 |1010|1 8 8 8
0 -1
1 32 32
0 -1
1 6 60 |1010|346
1,389
Number of Clearance Intervals 1,375
1.010
Signal Coordination -0.070
0.940
E
Hirsch/Green Transportation Consulting, Inc.
Critical Movement Analysis (CMA) Worksheet
Right
Date
Jefferson Boulevard
34
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Northbound
July 26, 2010
Through
Through/Right
Left
Left/Through
Duquesne Avenue
Right
East/West:
Eastbound
Analysis Scenario
Southbound Through
Left
Left/Through
Signalized
AM Peak Hour
Total Lanes
Lane Type
Signal Coordination Adjustment
Sum of North/South Critical Volumes
Left
ATSAC
Total Lanes
Sum of East/West Critical Volumes
Total Intersection Critical Volumes
Intersection Capacity
Total Lanes
Through
Base CMA
Left/Through
Through
Through/Right
EB/WB Rt. Turn Overlap With NB/SB Lefts
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|1010|North/South:
Westbound
Right
Through/Right
Left
Left/Through
Total Lanes
Through/Right
Right
Project Name
Approach
Direction
Intersection Number
Intersection Name
Analysis Period
Intersection Control
Level of Service (LOS)
Final CMA
ATTACHMENT 5
411
Existing (2010)
PM Peak Hour
ATTACHMENT 5
4128770 Washington Mixed-Use
Existing (2010)
Assigned
No. of Approach Right-Turn Lane Critical
Lanes Volumes on Red Volumes Moves
1 66 66 66
0 -1
1 1,533 774
1 774
0 15 0 -1 |1010|1 54 54
0 -1
1 1,598 830 830
1 830
0 63 0 -1 |1010|896
0 97 -1
0 -1
1 221 428 428
0 -1
0 110 0 -1 |1010|0 60 -1 60
0 -1
1 77 177
0 -1
0 40 0 -1 |1010|488
1,384
Number of Clearance Intervals 1,500
0.923
Signal Coordination -0.100
0.823
D
Cattaraugus Avenue
Signalized
Left
Left/Through
Through
Through/Right
Right
Through/Right
Left
Analysis Scenario
Intersection Control
Lane Type
Approach
Direction
Left/Through
Total Lanes
Base CMA
Signal Coordination Adjustment
North/South:
July 26, 2010
Project Name|1010|PM Peak Hour
Intersection Number
Intersection Name
Analysis Period
Southbound
Westbound
Intersection Capacity
Level of Service (LOS)
Left/Through/Right
Through/Right
Sum of East/West Critical Volumes
Total Intersection Critical Volumes
Final CMA
Left
ATSAC + ATCS
Right
Left/Through/Right
Through/Right
Right
Total Lanes
Left/Through
Through
Left
Left/Through
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sum of North/South Critical Volumes
Total Lanes
Total Lanes
Eastbound
Hirsch/Green Transportation Consulting, Inc.
Critical Movement Analysis (CMA) Worksheet
Right
Date
Robertson Boulevard
East/West:|1010|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Northbound
ATTACHMENT 5
4138770 Washington Mixed-Use
Existing (2010)
Assigned
No. of Approach Right-Turn Lane Critical
Lanes Volumes on Red Volumes Moves
1 14 14 14
0 -1
2 1,210 605
0 -1
0 0 0 -1 |1010|0 0 -1
0 -1
1 1,202 618 618
1 618
0 34 0 -1 |1010|632
0 74 -1 74
0 -1
1 0 158
0 -1
0 84 0 -1 |1010|0 369 -1
0 -1
1 21 458 458
0 -1
1 540 14 458 |1010|532
1,164
Number of Clearance Intervals 1,500
0.776
Signal Coordination -0.100
0.676
B
Hirsch/Green Transportation Consulting, Inc.
Critical Movement Analysis (CMA) Worksheet
Right
Date
Robertson Boulevard
East/West:|1010|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Northbound
Through
Left
Left/Through
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sum of North/South Critical Volumes
Total Lanes
Total Lanes
Eastbound
Left
ATSAC + ATCS
Right
Left/Through/Right
Through/Right
Right
Total Lanes
Left/Through
Final CMA
Left/Through/Right
Through/Right
Sum of East/West Critical Volumes
Total Intersection Critical Volumes
Intersection Capacity
North/South:
July 26, 2010
Project Name|1010|PM Peak Hour
Intersection Number
Intersection Name
Analysis Period
Southbound
Westbound
Base CMA
Signal Coordination Adjustment
Level of Service (LOS)
Through
Through/Right
Right
Through/Right
Left
Left/Through
Total Lanes
Signalized
Left
Left/Through
Analysis Scenario
Intersection Control
Lane Type
Approach
Direction
I-405 WB Off-Ramp/Kincardine Avenue
ATTACHMENT 5
4148770 Washington Mixed-Use
Existing (2010)
Assigned
No. of Approach Right-Turn Lane Critical
Lanes Volumes on Red Volumes Moves
1 75 75
0 -1
1 776 452 452
1 452
0 129 0 -1 |1010|2 539 296 296
0 -1
1 922 568
1 568
0 214 0 -1 |1010|748
1 160 160
0 -1
1 850 492 492
1 492
0 135 0 -1 |1010|1 113 113 113
0 -1
1 368 368
0 -1
1 227 227 0 |1010|605
1,353
Number of Clearance Intervals 1,375
0.984
Signal Coordination -0.100
0.884
D
National Boulevard
Signalized
Left
Left/Through
Through
Through/Right
Right
Through/Right
Left
Analysis Scenario
Intersection Control
Lane Type
Approach
Direction
Left/Through
Total Lanes
Base CMA
Signal Coordination Adjustment
Project Name|1010|ATSAC + ATCS
PM Peak Hour
Intersection Number
Intersection Name
Analysis Period
Southbound
Westbound
Total Lanes
Date
Robertson Boulevard
East/West:|1010|North/South:
July 26, 2010
Level of Service (LOS)
Left
Left/Through
Through
Through/Right
Right
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Lanes
Intersection Capacity
WB Rt. Turn Overlap with SB Left
Through
Left
Left/Through
Through/Right
Sum of North/South Critical Volumes
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Northbound
Total Lanes
Through
Right
Eastbound
Right
Hirsch/Green Transportation Consulting, Inc.
Critical Movement Analysis (CMA) Worksheet
Final CMA
Sum of East/West Critical Volumes
Total Intersection Critical Volumes
ATTACHMENT 5
4158770 Washington Mixed-Use
Existing (2010)
Assigned
No. of Approach Right-Turn Lane Critical
Lanes Volumes on Red Volumes Moves
1 83 83 83
0 -1
2 650 325
0 -1
0 0 0 -1 |1010|0 0 -1
0 -1
2 971 486 486
0 -1
1 478 0 478 |1010|569
0 0 -1
0 -1
0 0 -1
0 -1
0 0 0 -1 |10 10|0 0 -1
0 -1
0 0 -1
0 -1
0 0 0 -1 |10 10 10|569
Number of Clearance Intervals 1,500
0.379
Signal Coordination -0.100
0.279
A
I-405 EB On-Ramp
Signalized
Left
Left/Through
Through
Through/Right
Right
Through/Right
Left
Analysis Scenario
Intersection Control
Lane Type
Approach
Direction
Left/Through
Total Lanes
Base CMA
Signal Coordination Adjustment
Project Name|1010|ATSAC + ATCS
PM Peak Hour
Intersection Number
Intersection Name
Analysis Period
Southbound
Westbound
Total Lanes
Date
National Boulevard
East/West:|1010|North/South:
July 26, 2010
Level of Service (LOS)
Left
Left/Through
Through
Through/Right
Right
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Lanes
Intersection Capacity
Through
Left
Left/Through
Through/Right
Sum of North/South Critical Volumes
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Northbound
Total Lanes
Through
Right
Eastbound
Right
Hirsch/Green Transportation Consulting, Inc.
Critical Movement Analysis (CMA) Worksheet
Final CMA
Sum of East/West Critical Volumes
Total Intersection Critical Volumes
ATTACHMENT 5
4168770 Washington Mixed-Use
Existing (2010)
Assigned
No. of Approach Right-Turn Lane Critical
Lanes Volumes on Red Volumes Moves
0 103 -1
0 -1
1 171 351 351
0 -1
0 77 0 -1 |1010|0 39 -1 39
0 -1
1 176 267
0 -1
0 52 0 -1 |1010|390
1 57 57
0 -1
3 1,634 545 545
0 -1
1 95 62 33 |1010|1 118 118 118
0 -1
3 1,528 509
0 -1
1 43 20 23 |1010|663
1,053
Number of Clearance Intervals 1,500
0.702
Signal Coordination -0.070
0.632
B
Venice Boulevard
Signalized
Left
Left/Through
Left/Through/Right
Through/Right
Right
Through/Right
Left
Analysis Scenario
Intersection Control
Lane Type
Approach
Direction
Left/Through
Total Lanes
Base CMA
Signal Coordination Adjustment
North/South:
July 26, 2010
Project Name|1010|PM Peak Hour
Intersection Number
Intersection Name
Analysis Period
Southbound
Westbound
Intersection Capacity
Level of Service (LOS)
Through
Through/Right
Sum of East/West Critical Volumes
Total Intersection Critical Volumes
Final CMA
Left
ATSAC
Right
Through
Through/Right
Right
Total Lanes
Left/Through
Left/Through/Right
Left
Left/Through
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sum of North/South Critical Volumes
Total Lanes
Total Lanes
Eastbound
Hirsch/Green Transportation Consulting, Inc.
Critical Movement Analysis (CMA) Worksheet
Right
Date
Hughes Avenue
East/West:|1010|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Northbound
ATTACHMENT 5
4178770 Washington Mixed-Use
Existing (2010)
Assigned
No. of Approach Right-Turn Lane Critical
Lanes Volumes on Red Volumes Moves
1 38 38 38
0 -1
0 100 -1
1 140
0 40 0 -1 |1010|0 88 -1
0 -1
1 164 345 345
0 -1
0 93 0 -1 |1010|383
1 109 109
0 -1
2 1,569 558 558
1 558
0 106 0 -1 |1010|1 77 77 77
0 -1
3 1,523 508
0 -1
1 70 70 0 |1010|635
1,018
Number of Clearance Intervals 1,375
0.740
Signal Coordination -0.070
0.670
B
Venice Boulevard
Signalized
Left
Left/Through
Through
Through/Right
Right
Through/Right
Left
Analysis Scenario
Intersection Control
Lane Type
Approach
Direction
Left/Through
Total Lanes
Base CMA
Signal Coordination Adjustment
North/South:
July 26, 2010
Project Name|1010|PM Peak Hour
Intersection Number
Intersection Name
Analysis Period
Southbound
Westbound
Intersection Capacity
Level of Service (LOS)
Through
Through/Right
Sum of East/West Critical Volumes
Total Intersection Critical Volumes
Final CMA
Left
ATSAC
Right
Through
Through/Right
Right
Total Lanes
Left/Through
Left/Through/Right
Left
Left/Through
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sum of North/South Critical Volumes
Total Lanes
Total Lanes
Eastbound
Hirsch/Green Transportation Consulting, Inc.
Critical Movement Analysis (CMA) Worksheet
Right
Date
Bagley Avenue/Main Street
East/West:|1010|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Northbound
ATTACHMENT 5
4188770 Washington Mixed-Use
Existing (2010)
Assigned
No. of Approach Right-Turn Lane Critical
Lanes Volumes on Red Volumes Moves
1 84 84
0 -1
1 81 81
0 -1
2 728 428 150 150|1010|1 296 208
0 -1
1 71 208 208
0 -1
0 48 0 -1 |1010|358
1 51 51
0 -1
2 1,718 593 593
1 593
0 61 0 -1 |1010|2 389 214 214
0 -1
2 1,636 614
1 614
0 206 0 -1 |1010|806
1,164
Number of Clearance Intervals 1,375
0.847
Signal Coordination -0.100
0.747
C
Hirsch/Green Transportation Consulting, Inc.
Critical Movement Analysis (CMA) Worksheet
Right
Date
Culver Boulevard
East/West:|1010|NB Rt. Turn Overlap with WB Left
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Northbound
Left/Through/Right
Left
Left/Through
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sum of North/South Critical Volumes
Total Lanes
Total Lanes
Eastbound
Left
ATSAC + ATCS
Right
Through
Through/Right
Right
Total Lanes
Left/Through
Final CMA
Through
Through/Right
Sum of East/West Critical Volumes
Total Intersection Critical Volumes
Intersection Capacity
North/South:
July 26, 2010
Project Name|1010|PM Peak Hour
Intersection Number
Intersection Name
Analysis Period
Southbound
Westbound
Base CMA
Signal Coordination Adjustment
Level of Service (LOS)
Through
Through/Right
North/South Opposed Phasing
Right
Through/Right
Left
Left/Through
Total Lanes
Signalized
Left
Left/Through
Analysis Scenario
Intersection Control
Lane Type
Approach
Direction
Venice Boulevard
ATTACHMENT 5
4198770 Washington Mixed-Use
Existing (2010)
Assigned
No. of Approach Right-Turn Lane Critical
Lanes Volumes on Red Volumes Moves
1 122 122
0 -1
1 485 485 485
0 -1
1 58 58 0 |1010|0 532 -1
1 532 532
1 304 304
0 -1
1 159 126 33 |1010|1,017
2 460 253 253
0 -1
2 1,983 712
1 712
0 154 0 -1 |1010|1 104 104
0 -1
2 1,932 685 685
1 685
0 123 0 -1 |1010|938
1,955
Number of Clearance Intervals 1,375
1.422
Signal Coordination -0.100
1.322
F
Venice Boulevard
Signalized
Left
Left/Through
Through
Through/Right
North/South Opposed Phasing
Right
Through/Right
Left
Analysis Scenario
Intersection Control
Lane Type
Approach
Direction
Left/Through
Total Lanes
Base CMA
Signal Coordination Adjustment
Project Name|1010|ATSAC + ATCS
PM Peak Hour
Intersection Number
Intersection Name
Analysis Period
Southbound
Westbound
Total Lanes
Date
Robertson Boulevard/Exposition Boulevard
East/West:|1010|North/South:
July 26, 2010
Level of Service (LOS)
Left
Left/Through
Through
Through/Right
Right
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Lanes
Intersection Capacity
NB Rt. Turn Overlap with WB Left
Through
Left
Left/Through
Through/Right
Sum of North/South Critical Volumes
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Northbound
Total Lanes
Through
Right
Eastbound
Right
Hirsch/Green Transportation Consulting, Inc.
Critical Movement Analysis (CMA) Worksheet
Final CMA
Sum of East/West Critical Volumes
Total Intersection Critical Volumes
ATTACHMENT 5
4208770 Washington Mixed-Use
Existing (2010)
Assigned
No. of Approach Right-Turn Lane Critical
Lanes Volumes on Red Volumes Moves
1 213 213 213
0 -1
1 502 300
1 300
0 98 0 -1 |1010|1 181 181
0 -1
1 695 396 396
1 396
0 97 0 -1 |1010|609
1 166 166
0 -1
2 1,971 758 758
1 758
0 304 0 -1 |1010|1 67 67 67
0 -1
2 1,479 513
1 513
0 59 0 -1 |1010|825
1,434
Number of Clearance Intervals 1,375
1.043
Signal Coordination -0.100
0.943
E
Hirsch/Green Transportation Consulting, Inc.
Critical Movement Analysis (CMA) Worksheet
Final CMA
Sum of East/West Critical Volumes
Through
Left
Sum of North/South Critical Volumes
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Northbound
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Lanes
Total Intersection Critical Volumes
Total Lanes
Through
Right
Eastbound
Left/Through
Through/Right
Total Lanes
Right
Left
Right
Left/Through
Through
Through/Right
Intersection Capacity
Level of Service (LOS)
Date
National Boulevard
East/West:|10 10|North/South:
July 26, 2010
Southbound
Westbound
Project Name|1010|ATSAC + ATCS
PM Peak Hour
Intersection Number
Intersection Name
Analysis Period
Base CMA
Signal Coordination Adjustment
Through
Through/Right
Right
Through/Right
Left
Left/Through
Total Lanes
Signalized
Left
Left/Through
Analysis Scenario
Intersection Control
Lane Type
Approach
Direction
Venice Boulevard
ATTACHMENT 5
4218770 Washington Mixed-Use
Existing (2010)
Assigned
No. of Approach Right-Turn Lane Critical
Lanes Volumes on Red Volumes Moves
0 16 -1 16
117
0 1 -1
0 -1
1 9 90 |1010|0 28 -1
0 -1
1 9 63 63
0 -1
0 26 0 -1 |1010|79
1 72 72
0 -1
2 2,219 751 751
1 751
0 33 0 -1 |1010|1 32 32 32
0 -1
2 1,618 542
1 542
0 8 0 -1 |1010|783
862
Number of Clearance Intervals 1,500
0.575
Signal Coordination -0.100
0.475
A
Hirsch/Green Transportation Consulting, Inc.
Critical Movement Analysis (CMA) Worksheet
Right
Date
Helms Avenue
East/West:
10
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Northbound
Left/Through/Right
Left
Left/Through
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sum of North/South Critical Volumes
Total Lanes
Total Lanes
Eastbound
Left
ATSAC + ATCS
Right
Through
Through/Right
Right
Total Lanes
Left/Through
Final CMA
Through
Through/Right
Sum of East/West Critical Volumes
Total Intersection Critical Volumes
Intersection Capacity
North/South:
July 26, 2010
Project Name|1010|PM Peak Hour
Intersection Number
Intersection Name
Analysis Period
Southbound
Westbound
Base CMA
Signal Coordination Adjustment
Level of Service (LOS)
Through
Through/Right
Right
Through/Right
Left
Left/Through
Total Lanes
Signalized
Left
Left/Through
Analysis Scenario
Intersection Control
Lane Type
Approach
Direction
Venice Boulevard
ATTACHMENT 5
4228770 Washington Mixed-Use
Existing (2010)
Assigned
No. of Approach Right-Turn Lane Critical
Lanes Volumes on Red Volumes Moves
0 13 -1 13
0 -1
1 61 85
0 -1
0 11 0 -1 |1010|0 183 -1
0 -1
1 72 286 286
0 -1
0 31 0 -1 |1010|299
1 110 110
0 -1
2 2,078 697 697
1 697
0 13 0 -1 |1010|1 77 77 77
0 -1
2 1,532 536
1 536
0 75 0 -1 |1010|774
1,073
Number of Clearance Intervals 1,500
0.715
Signal Coordination -0.100
0.615
B
Venice Boulevard
Signalized
Left
Left/Through
Left/Through/Right
Through/Right
Right
Through/Right
Left
Analysis Scenario
Intersection Control
Lane Type
Approach
Direction
Left/Through
Total Lanes
Base CMA
Signal Coordination Adjustment
Project Name|1010|ATSAC + ATCS
PM Peak Hour
Intersection Number
Intersection Name
Analysis Period
Southbound
Westbound
Total Lanes
Date
Cattaraugus Avenue
East/West:
11
North/South:
July 26, 2010
Level of Service (LOS)
Left
Left/Through
Through
Through/Right
Right
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Lanes
Intersection Capacity
Left/Through/Right
Left
Left/Through
Through/Right
Sum of North/South Critical Volumes
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Northbound
Total Lanes
Through
Right
Eastbound
Right
Hirsch/Green Transportation Consulting, Inc.
Critical Movement Analysis (CMA) Worksheet
Final CMA
Sum of East/West Critical Volumes
Total Intersection Critical Volumes
ATTACHMENT 5
4238770 Washington Mixed-Use
Existing (2010)
Assigned
No. of Approach Right-Turn Lane Critical
Lanes Volumes on Red Volumes Moves
1 93 93 93
0 -1
2 1,093 371
1 371
0 20 0 -1 |1010|1 36 36
0 -1
2 1,498 600 600
1 600
0 303 0 -1 |1010|693
2 274 151
0 -1
3 1,721 574 574
0 -1
1 235 46 189 |1010|1 197 197 197
0 -1
3 1,250 417
0 -1
1 34 34 0 |1010|771
1,464
Number of Clearance Intervals 1,375
1.065
Signal Coordination -0.070
0.995
E
Hirsch/Green Transportation Consulting, Inc.
Critical Movement Analysis (CMA) Worksheet
Final CMA
Sum of East/West Critical Volumes
Total Intersection Critical Volumes
Total Lanes
Through
Right
Eastbound
Right
Through
Left
Left/Through
Through/Right
Sum of North/South Critical Volumes
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Northbound
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Lanes
Intersection Capacity
Left
Left/Through
Through
Through/Right
Right
Level of Service (LOS)
Total Lanes
Date
La Cienega Boulevard
East/West:
12
North/South:
July 26, 2010
Project Name|1010|ATSAC
PM Peak Hour
Intersection Number
Intersection Name
Analysis Period
Southbound
Westbound
Base CMA
Signal Coordination Adjustment
Through
Through/Right
Right
Through/Right
Left
Left/Through
Total Lanes
Signalized
Left
Left/Through
Analysis Scenario
Intersection Control
Lane Type
Approach
Direction
Venice Boulevard
ATTACHMENT 5
4248770 Washington Mixed-Use
Existing (2010)
Assigned
No. of Approach Right-Turn Lane Critical
Lanes Volumes on Red Volumes Moves
1 59 59 59
0 -1
0 320 -1
1 339
0 19 0 -1 |1010|1 29 29
0 -1
0 319 -1
1 378 378
0 59 0 -1 |1010|437
1 46 46
0 -1
1 664 446 446
1 446
0 229 0 -1 |1010|1 78 78 78
0 -1
1 356 196
1 196
0 37 0 -1 |1010|524
961
Number of Clearance Intervals 1,500
0.641
Signal Coordination -0.070
0.571
A
Washington Boulevard
Signalized
Left
Left/Through
Through
Through/Right
Right
Through/Right
Left
Analysis Scenario
Intersection Control
Lane Type
Approach
Direction
Left/Through
Total Lanes
Base CMA
Signal Coordination Adjustment
Project Name|1010|ATSAC
PM Peak Hour
Intersection Number
Intersection Name
Analysis Period
Southbound
Westbound
Total Lanes
Date
Hughes Avenue/Duquesne Avenue
East/West:
13
North/South:
July 26, 2010
Level of Service (LOS)
Left
Left/Through
Through
Through/Right
Right
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Lanes
Intersection Capacity
Through
Left
Left/Through
Through/Right
Sum of North/South Critical Volumes
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Northbound
Total Lanes
Through
Right
Eastbound
Right
Hirsch/Green Transportation Consulting, Inc.
Critical Movement Analysis (CMA) Worksheet
Final CMA
Sum of East/West Critical Volumes
Total Intersection Critical Volumes
ATTACHMENT 5
4258770 Washington Mixed-Use
Existing (2010)
Assigned
No. of Approach Right-Turn Lane Critical
Lanes Volumes on Red Volumes Moves
1 107 107
0 -1
1 286 286 286
0 -1
1 147 52 95 |1010|1 118 118 118
0 -1
1 466 269
1 269
0 72 0 -1 |1010|404
1 67 67
0 -1
1 861 474 474
1 474
0 86 0 -1 |1010|1 103 103 103
0 -1
1 741 381
1 381
0 21 0 -1 |1010|577
981
Number of Clearance Intervals 1,375
0.713
Signal Coordination -0.070
0.643
B
Hirsch/Green Transportation Consulting, Inc.
Critical Movement Analysis (CMA) Worksheet
Right
Date
Duquesne Avenue
East/West:
14
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Northbound
Through
Left
Left/Through
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sum of North/South Critical Volumes
Total Lanes
Total Lanes
Eastbound
Left
ATSAC
Right
Through
Through/Right
Right
Total Lanes
Left/Through
Final CMA
Through
Through/Right
Sum of East/West Critical Volumes
Total Intersection Critical Volumes
Intersection Capacity
North/South:
July 26, 2010
Project Name|1010|PM Peak Hour
Intersection Number
Intersection Name
Analysis Period
Southbound
Westbound
Base CMA
Signal Coordination Adjustment
Level of Service (LOS)
Through
Through/Right
Right
Through/Right
Left
Left/Through
Total Lanes
Signalized
Left
Left/Through
Analysis Scenario
Intersection Control
Lane Type
Approach
Direction
Culver Boulevard
ATTACHMENT 5
4268770 Washington Mixed-Use
Existing (2010)
Assigned
No. of Approach Right-Turn Lane Critical
Lanes Volumes on Red Volumes Moves
0 0 -1
0 -1
2 1,044 366 366
1 366
0 55 0 -1 |1010|1 79 79 79
0 -1
1 831 416
1 416
1 465 337 128 |1010|445
1 655 337 337
1 337
0 19 -1
0 -1
1 6 06 |1010|0 13 -1
137 37
0 24 -1
0 -1
1 53 40 13 |1010|374
819
Number of Clearance Intervals 1,375
0.596
Signal Coordination -0.070
0.526
A
Hirsch/Green Transportation Consulting, Inc.
Critical Movement Analysis (CMA) Worksheet
Right
Date
Culver Boulevard
East/West:
15
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Northbound
Through
Left
Left/Through
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sum of North/South Critical Volumes
Total Lanes
Total Lanes
Eastbound
Left
ATSAC
East/West Opposed Phasing
Right
Through
Through/Right
Right
Total Lanes
Left/Through
Final CMA
Through
Through/Right
Sum of East/West Critical Volumes
Total Intersection Critical Volumes
Intersection Capacity
North/South:
July 26, 2010
Project Name|1010|PM Peak Hour
Intersection Number
Intersection Name
Analysis Period
Southbound
Westbound
Base CMA
Signal Coordination Adjustment
Level of Service (LOS)
Through
Through/Right
Right
Through/Right
Left
Left/Through
Total Lanes
Signalized
Left
Left/Through
Analysis Scenario
Intersection Control
Lane Type
Approach
Direction
Washington Boulevard/Irving Place
ATTACHMENT 5
4278770 Washington Mixed-Use
Existing (2010)
Assigned
No. of Approach Right-Turn Lane Critical
Lanes Volumes on Red Volumes Moves
1 112 112 112
0 -1
3 1,576 525
0 -1
0 0 0 -1 |1010|0 0 -1
0 -1
2 1,204 439 439
1 439
0 114 0 -1 |1010|551
1 273 273 273
0 -1
0 0 -1
0 -1
1 161 56 105 |1010|0 0 -1
0 -1
0 0 -1
0 -1
0 0 0 -1 |10 10|273
824
Number of Clearance Intervals 1,425
0.578
Signal Coordination -0.070
0.508
A
Main Street
Signalized
Left
Left/Through
Through
Through/Right
Right
Through/Right
Left
Analysis Scenario
Intersection Control
Lane Type
Approach
Direction
Left/Through
Total Lanes
Base CMA
Signal Coordination Adjustment
Project Name|1010|ATSAC
PM Peak Hour
Intersection Number
Intersection Name
Analysis Period
Southbound
Westbound
Total Lanes
Date
Culver Boulevard
East/West:
16
North/South:
July 26, 2010
Level of Service (LOS)
Left
Left/Through
Through
Through/Right
Right
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Lanes
Intersection Capacity
Through
Left
Left/Through
Through/Right
Sum of North/South Critical Volumes
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Northbound
Total Lanes
Through
Right
Eastbound
Right
Hirsch/Green Transportation Consulting, Inc.
Critical Movement Analysis (CMA) Worksheet
Final CMA
Sum of East/West Critical Volumes
Total Intersection Critical Volumes
ATTACHMENT 5
4288770 Washington Mixed-Use
Existing (2010)
Assigned
No. of Approach Right-Turn Lane Critical
Lanes Volumes on Red Volumes Moves
1 14 14
0 -1
2 810 405 405
0 -1
2 961 830 66 |1010|1 35 35 35
0 -1
1 489 249
1 249
0 9 0 -1 |1010|440
0 0 -1
0 -1
0 0 -1
0 -1
1 19 14 5 5|1010|1 801 415 415
1 415
0 29 -1
0 -1
1 75 18 57 |1010|420
860
Number of Clearance Intervals 1,425
0.604
Signal Coordination -0.070
0.534
A
Hirsch/Green Transportation Consulting, Inc.
Critical Movement Analysis (CMA) Worksheet
Right
Date
Culver Boulevard
East/West:
17
NB Rt. Turn Overlap with WB Left
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Northbound
Through
Left
Left/Through
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sum of North/South Critical Volumes
Total Lanes
Total Lanes
Eastbound
Left
ATSAC
EB Rt. Turn Overlap with NB Left
East/West Opposed Phasing
Right
Through
Through/Right
Right
Total Lanes
Left/Through
Final CMA
Through
Through/Right
Sum of East/West Critical Volumes
Total Intersection Critical Volumes
Intersection Capacity
North/South:
July 26, 2010
Project Name|1010|PM Peak Hour
Intersection Number
Intersection Name
Analysis Period
Southbound
Westbound
Base CMA
Signal Coordination Adjustment
Level of Service (LOS)
Through
Through/Right
Right
Through/Right
Left
Left/Through
Total Lanes
Signalized
Left
Left/Through
Analysis Scenario
Intersection Control
Lane Type
Approach
Direction
Washington Boulevard/Canfield Avenue
ATTACHMENT 5
4298770 Washington Mixed-Use
Existing (2010)
Assigned
No. of Approach Right-Turn Lane Critical
Lanes Volumes on Red Volumes Moves
1 45 45 45
0 -1
1 168 100
1 100
0 31 0 -1 |1010|1 146 146
0 -1
1 247 247 247
0 -1
1 54 054 |1010|292
1 94 94 94
0 -1
1 807 444
1 444
0 80 0 -1 |1010|1 77 77
0 -1
1 794 462 462
1 462
0 130 0 -1 |1010|556
848
Number of Clearance Intervals 1,425
0.595
Signal Coordination -0.070
0.525
A
Hirsch/Green Transportation Consulting, Inc.
Critical Movement Analysis (CMA) Worksheet
Right
Date
Robertson Boulevard/Higuera Street
East/West:
18
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Northbound
Through
Left
Left/Through
Total Lanes
Through/Right
Left
Sum of North/South Critical Volumes
Total Lanes
Right
Through
Through/Right
Right
Left/Through
Left/Through
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Lanes
Eastbound
Level of Service (LOS)
Through
Through/Right
Sum of East/West Critical Volumes
Total Intersection Critical Volumes
Final CMA
ATSAC
North/South:
July 26, 2010
Project Name|1010|PM Peak Hour
Intersection Number
Intersection Name
Analysis Period
Southbound
Westbound
Base CMA
Signal Coordination Adjustment
Intersection Capacity
Left
Total Lanes
Analysis Scenario
Intersection Control
Lane Type
Approach
Direction
Signalized
Left
Left/Through
Through
Through/Right
Right
Washington Boulevard
ATTACHMENT 5
4308770 Washington Mixed-Use
Existing (2010)
Assigned
No. of Approach Right-Turn Lane Critical
Lanes Volumes on Red Volumes Moves
1 26 26
0 -1
0 0 -1
0 -1
1 59 752 52|1010|0 0 -1
0 -1
0 0 -1
0 -1
0 0 0 -1 |10 10|52
0 0 -1
0 -1
1 1,274 642 642
1 642
0 10 0 -1 |1010|0 14 -1 14
1 438
1 932 508
0 -1
0 0 0 -1 |1010|656
708
Number of Clearance Intervals 1,500
0.472
Signal Coordination -0.070
0.402
A
Washington Boulevard
Signalized
Left
Left/Through
Through
Through/Right
Right
Through/Right
Left
Analysis Scenario
Intersection Control
Lane Type
Approach
Direction
Left/Through
Total Lanes
Base CMA
Signal Coordination Adjustment
Project Name|1010|ATSAC
PM Peak Hour
Intersection Number
Intersection Name
Analysis Period
Southbound
Westbound
Total Lanes
Date
Landmark Street
East/West:
19
North/South:
July 26, 2010
Level of Service (LOS)
Left
Left/Through
Through
Through/Right
Right
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Lanes
Intersection Capacity
Through
Left
Left/Through
Through/Right
Sum of North/South Critical Volumes
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Northbound
Total Lanes
Through
Right
Eastbound
Right
Hirsch/Green Transportation Consulting, Inc.
Critical Movement Analysis (CMA) Worksheet
Final CMA
Sum of East/West Critical Volumes
Total Intersection Critical Volumes
ATTACHMENT 5
4318770 Washington Mixed-Use
Existing (2010)
Assigned
No. of Approach Right-Turn Lane Critical
Lanes Volumes on Red Volumes Moves
2 171 94 94
0 -1
1 628 357
1 357
0 86 0 -1 |1010|2 203 112
0 -1
1 840 446 446
1 446
0 53 0 -1 |1010|540
1 41 41
0 -1
2 939 470 470
0 -1
1 190 47 143 |1010|1 68 68 68
0 -1
2 753 376
0 -1
1 175 0 175 |1010|538
1,078
Number of Clearance Intervals 1,375
0.784
Signal Coordination -0.070
0.714
C
Washington Boulevard
Lane Type
Approach
Direction
Left
Left/Through
Total Lanes
Signalized
Left
Left/Through
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Northbound
Analysis Scenario
Intersection Control
Through
Through/Right
Right
Through/Right
Project Name|1010|ATSAC
PM Peak Hour
Intersection Number
Intersection Name
Analysis Period
Southbound
Westbound
Total Lanes
Date
National Boulevard
East/West:
20
North/South:
July 26, 2010
Right
Level of Service (LOS)
Sum of East/West Critical Volumes
Intersection Capacity
Base CMA
Signal Coordination Adjustment
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Lanes
Left
Right
Left/Through
Through
Through/Right
Hirsch/Green Transportation Consulting, Inc.
Critical Movement Analysis (CMA) Worksheet
Through
Left
Left/Through
Through/Right
Sum of North/South Critical Volumes
Total Lanes
Through
Right
Eastbound
Total Intersection Critical Volumes
Final CMA
ATTACHMENT 5
4328770 Washington Mixed-Use
Existing (2010)
Assigned
No. of Approach Right-Turn Lane Critical
Lanes Volumes on Red Volumes Moves
0 5 -1
0 -1
1 0 12 12
0 -1
0 7 0 -1 |1010|0 0 -1
0 -1
0 0 -1
0 -1
0 0 0 -1 |10 10|12
0 0 -1
0 -1
1 1,187 594 594
1 594
0 1 0 -1 |1010|1 1 1 1
0 -1
2 930 465
0 -1
0 0 0 -1 |1010|595
607
Number of Clearance Intervals 1,200
0.506
Signal Coordination 0.000
0.506
A
Hirsch/Green Transportation Consulting, Inc.
Critical Movement Analysis (CMA) Worksheet
Final CMA
Sum of East/West Critical Volumes
Through
Left
Sum of North/South Critical Volumes
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Northbound
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Lanes
Total Intersection Critical Volumes
Total Lanes
Through
Right
Eastbound
Left/Through
Through/Right
Total Lanes
Right
Left
Right
Left/Through
Through
Through/Right
Intersection Capacity
Level of Service (LOS)
Date
Wesley Street
East/West:
21
North/South:
July 26, 2010
Southbound
Westbound
Project Name|10 10|None
PM Peak Hour
Intersection Number
Intersection Name
Analysis Period
Base CMA
Signal Coordination Adjustment
Left/Through/Right
Through/Right
Right
Through/Right
Left
Left/Through
Total Lanes
Two-Way STOP
Left
Left/Through
Analysis Scenario
Intersection Control
Lane Type
Approach
Direction
Washington Boulevard
ATTACHMENT 5
433TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY
General Information Site Information
Analyst RRH
Agency/Co. Hirsch/Green
Date Performed 7/26/2010
Analysis Time Period PM Peak Hour - Existing
Intersection 21
Jurisdiction Culver City
Analysis Year 2010
Project Description 8770 Washington Mixed-Use
East/West Street: Washington Boulevard North/South Street: Wesley Street
Intersection Orientation: East-West Study Period (hrs): 1.00
Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments
Major Street Eastbound Westbound
Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6
L T R L T R
Volume (veh/h) 1187 1 1 930
Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Hourly Flow Rate, HFR
(veh/h)
0 1187 1 1 930 0
Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 -- -- 0 -- --
Median Type Undivided
RT Channelized 0 0
Lanes 0 2 0 1 2 0
Configuration T TR L T
Upstream Signal 0 0
Minor Street Northbound Southbound
Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12
L T R L T R
Volume (veh/h) 5 0 7
Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Hourly Flow Rate, HFR
(veh/h)
5 0 7 0 0 0
Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0
Percent Grade (%) 0 0
Flared Approach N N
Storage 0 0
RT Channelized 0 0
Lanes 0 1 0 0 0 0
Configuration LTR
Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service
Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound
Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12
Lane Configuration L LTR
v (veh/h) 1 12
C (m) (veh/h) 595 175
v/c 0.00 0.07
95% queue length 0.01 0.22
Control Delay (s/veh) 11.1 27.1
LOS B D
Approach Delay (s/veh) -- -- 27.1
Approach LOS -- -- D
Copyright © 2007 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved
HCS+
TM
Version 5.3
Generated: 8/3/2010 7:39 PM
ATTACHMENT 5
4348770 Washington Mixed-Use
Existing (2010)
Assigned
No. of Approach Right-Turn Lane Critical
Lanes Volumes on Red Volumes Moves
0 48 -1
0 -1
1 0 61 61
0 -1
0 13 0 -1 |1010|0 0 -1
0 -1
0 0 -1
0 -1
0 0 0 -1 |10 10|61
0 0 -1
0 -1
1 1,118 574 574
1 574
0 29 0 -1 |1010|1 14 14 14
0 -1
2 918 459
0 -1
0 0 0 -1 |1010|588
649
Number of Clearance Intervals 1,500
0.433
Signal Coordination -0.070
0.363
A
Through/Right
Right
Through/Right
Left
Left
Left/Through
Left/Through/Right
Analysis Scenario
Intersection Control
Lane Type
Approach
Direction
Signalized
Base CMA
Signal Coordination Adjustment
Project Name|1010|ATSAC
PM Peak Hour
Intersection Number
Intersection Name
Analysis Period
Helms Avenue
Left/Through
Total Lanes
East/West:
22
North/South:
July 26, 2010 Date
Washington Boulevard
Left/Through
Through
Through/Right
Right
Intersection Capacity
Level of Service (LOS)
Eastbound
Right
Through
Left
Left/Through
Through/Right
Sum of North/South Critical Volumes
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Northbound
Total Intersection Critical Volumes
Total Lanes
Through
Right
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Lanes
Left
Southbound
Westbound
Total Lanes
Hirsch/Green Transportation Consulting, Inc.
Critical Movement Analysis (CMA) Worksheet
Final CMA
Sum of East/West Critical Volumes
ATTACHMENT 5
4358770 Washington Mixed-Use
Existing (2010)
Assigned
No. of Approach Right-Turn Lane Critical
Lanes Volumes on Red Volumes Moves
0 4 -1 4
0 -1
1 2 9
0 -1
0 3 0 -1 |1010|0 57 -1
0 -1
1 2 95 95
0 -1
0 36 0 -1 |1010|99
0 19 -1
1 540
0 1,123 -1
1 611 611
0 9 0 -1 |1010|0 11 -1 11
1 452
0 871 -1
1 504
0 74 0 -1 |1010|622
721
Number of Clearance Intervals 1,200
0.601
Signal Coordination 0.000
0.601
B
Hirsch/Green Transportation Consulting, Inc.
Critical Movement Analysis (CMA) Worksheet
Right
Date
Cattaraugus Avenue
East/West:
23
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Northbound
Left/Through/Right
Left
Left/Through
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sum of North/South Critical Volumes
Total Lanes
Total Lanes
Eastbound
Left
None
Right
Through
Through/Right
Right
Total Lanes
Left/Through
Final CMA
Through
Through/Right
Sum of East/West Critical Volumes
Total Intersection Critical Volumes
Intersection Capacity
North/South:
July 26, 2010
Project Name|10 10|PM Peak Hour
Intersection Number
Intersection Name
Analysis Period
Southbound
Westbound
Base CMA
Signal Coordination Adjustment
Level of Service (LOS)
Left/Through/Right
Through/Right
Right
Through/Right
Left
Left/Through
Total Lanes
Two-Way STOP
Left
Left/Through
Analysis Scenario
Intersection Control
Lane Type
Approach
Direction
Washington Boulevard
ATTACHMENT 5
436TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY
General Information Site Information
Analyst RRH
Agency/Co. Hirsch/Green
Date Performed 7/26/2010
Analysis Time Period PM Peak Hour - Existing
Intersection 23
Jurisdiction Culver City
Analysis Year 2010
Project Description 8770 Washington Mixed-Use
East/West Street: Washington Boulevard North/South Street: Cattaraugus Avenue
Intersection Orientation: East-West Study Period (hrs): 1.00
Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments
Major Street Eastbound Westbound
Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6
L T R L T R
Volume (veh/h) 19 1123 9 11 871 74
Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Hourly Flow Rate, HFR
(veh/h)
19 1123 9 11 871 74
Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 -- -- 0 -- --
Median Type Undivided
RT Channelized 0 0
Lanes 0 2 0 0 2 0
Configuration LT TR LT TR
Upstream Signal 0 0
Minor Street Northbound Southbound
Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12
L T R L T R
Volume (veh/h) 4 2 3 57 2 36
Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Hourly Flow Rate, HFR
(veh/h)
4 2 3 57 2 36
Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0
Percent Grade (%) 0 0
Flared Approach N N
Storage 0 0
RT Channelized 0 0
Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0
Configuration LTR LTR
Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service
Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound
Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12
Lane Configuration LT LT LTR LTR
v (veh/h) 19 11 9 95
C (m) (veh/h) 734 625 80 112
v/c 0.03 0.02 0.11 0.85
95% queue length 0.08 0.05 0.38 8.42
Control Delay (s/veh) 10.0 10.9 55.7 160.8
LOS B B F F
Approach Delay (s/veh) -- -- 55.7 160.8
Approach LOS -- -- F F
Copyright © 2007 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved
HCS+
TM
Version 5.3
Generated: 8/3/2010 7:45 PM
ATTACHMENT 5
4378770 Washington Mixed-Use
Existing (2010)
Assigned
No. of Approach Right-Turn Lane Critical
Lanes Volumes on Red Volumes Moves
1 143 143 143
0 -1
2 1,075 377
1 377
0 55 0 -1 |1010|1 218 218
0 -1
2 1,627 556 556
1 556
0 41 0 -1 |1010|699
1 71 71
0 -1
2 1,057 528 528
0 -1
1 134 72 62 |1010|1 67 67 67
0 -1
2 677 338
0 -1
1 122 122 0 |1010|595
1,294
Number of Clearance Intervals 1,375
0.941
Signal Coordination -0.070
0.871
D
Hirsch/Green Transportation Consulting, Inc.
Critical Movement Analysis (CMA) Worksheet
Right
Date
La Cienega Boulevard
East/West:
24
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Northbound
Through
Left
Left/Through
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sum of North/South Critical Volumes
Total Lanes
Total Lanes
Eastbound
Left
ATSAC
Right
Through
Through/Right
Right
Total Lanes
Left/Through
Final CMA
Through
Through/Right
Sum of East/West Critical Volumes
Total Intersection Critical Volumes
Intersection Capacity
North/South:
July 26, 2010
Project Name|1010|PM Peak Hour
Intersection Number
Intersection Name
Analysis Period
Southbound
Westbound
Base CMA
Signal Coordination Adjustment
Level of Service (LOS)
Through
Through/Right
Right
Through/Right
Left
Left/Through
Total Lanes
Signalized
Left
Left/Through
Analysis Scenario
Intersection Control
Lane Type
Approach
Direction
Washington Boulevard
ATTACHMENT 5
4388770 Washington Mixed-Use
Existing (2010)
Assigned
No. of Approach Right-Turn Lane Critical
Lanes Volumes on Red Volumes Moves
1 8 8
0 -1
1 1,541 770 770
1 770
1 1,361 1,361 0 |1010|0 0 -1
0 -1
2 1,329 448
1 448
0 14 0 -1 |1010|770
0 36 -1
0 -1
1 0 52 52
0 -1
0 16 0 -1 |1010|2 843 464
0 -1
0 12 -1
129 29
0 17 0 -1 |1010|516
1,286
Number of Clearance Intervals 1,425
0.902
Signal Coordination -0.100
0.802
D
Signalized
Left
Left/Through
Through
Through/Right
Right
Through/Right
Analysis Scenario
Intersection Control
Lane Type
Approach
Direction
Total Lanes
Base CMA
Signal Coordination Adjustment
Project Name|1010|ATSAC + ATCS
PM Peak Hour
Intersection Number
Intersection Name
Analysis Period
Southbound
Westbound
Total Lanes
Level of Service (LOS)
Intersection Capacity
Date
La Cienega Boulevard
East/West:
25
North/South:
July 26, 2010
Fairfax Avenue
Northbound
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Lanes
Left
Right
Left/Through
Through
Through/Right
Right
Left/Through
Left
Eastbound
Total Intersection Critical Volumes
Sum of North/South Critical Volumes
East/West Opposed Phasing
Through
Left
Left/Through
Through/Right
Total Lanes
Left/Through/Right
Right
Hirsch/Green Transportation Consulting, Inc.
Critical Movement Analysis (CMA) Worksheet
Final CMA
Sum of East/West Critical Volumes
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ATTACHMENT 5
4398770 Washington Mixed-Use
Existing (2010)
Assigned
No. of Approach Right-Turn Lane Critical
Lanes Volumes on Red Volumes Moves
0 23 -1
0 -1
1 0 137 137
0 -1
0 114 0 -1 |1010|0 0 -1
0 -1
0 0 -1
0 -1
0 0 0 -1 |10 10|137
0 0 -1
0 -1
2 975 488 488
0 -1
1 4 40 |1010|1 5 5 5
0 -1
2 885 442
0 -1
0 0 0 -1 |1010|493
630
Number of Clearance Intervals 1,500
0.420
Signal Coordination -0.070
0.350
A
Hirsch/Green Transportation Consulting, Inc.
Critical Movement Analysis (CMA) Worksheet
Right
Date
Wesley Street
East/West:
26
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Northbound
Through
Left
Left/Through
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sum of North/South Critical Volumes
Total Lanes
Total Lanes
Eastbound
Left
ATSAC
Right
Through
Through/Right
Right
Total Lanes
Left/Through
Final CMA
Through
Through/Right
Sum of East/West Critical Volumes
Total Intersection Critical Volumes
Intersection Capacity
North/South:
July 26, 2010
Project Name|1010|PM Peak Hour
Intersection Number
Intersection Name
Analysis Period
Southbound
Westbound
Base CMA
Signal Coordination Adjustment
Level of Service (LOS)
Left/Through/Right
Through/Right
Right
Through/Right
Left
Left/Through
Total Lanes
Signalized
Left
Left/Through
Analysis Scenario
Intersection Control
Lane Type
Approach
Direction
National Boulevard
ATTACHMENT 5
4408770 Washington Mixed-Use
Existing (2010)
Assigned
No. of Approach Right-Turn Lane Critical
Lanes Volumes on Red Volumes Moves
1 604 374
0 -1
1 0 374 374
0 -1
0 143 0 -1 |1010|0 0 -1
0 -1
0 0 -1
0 -1
0 0 0 -1 |10 10|374
0 0 -1
0 -1
1 982 558 558
1 558
0 134 0 -1 |1010|1 34 34 34
0 -1
1 276 276
0 -1
0 0 0 -1 |1010|592
966
Number of Clearance Intervals 1,425
0.678
Signal Coordination -0.070
Note: Intersection Currently Under Construction 0.608
B
Signalized
Left
Left/Through
Left/Through/Right
Through/Right
Right
Through/Right
Analysis Scenario
Intersection Control
Lane Type
Approach
Direction
Total Lanes
Base CMA
Signal Coordination Adjustment
Project Name|1010|ATSAC
PM Peak Hour
Intersection Number
Intersection Name
Analysis Period
Southbound
Westbound
Total Lanes
Level of Service (LOS)
Intersection Capacity
Date
Hayden Avenue
East/West:
27
North/South:
July 26, 2010
National Boulevard
Northbound
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Lanes
Left
Right
Left/Through
Through
Through/Right
Right
Left/Through
Left
Eastbound
Total Intersection Critical Volumes
Sum of North/South Critical Volumes
Through
Left
Left/Through
Through/Right
Total Lanes
Through
Right
Hirsch/Green Transportation Consulting, Inc.
Critical Movement Analysis (CMA) Worksheet
Final CMA
Sum of East/West Critical Volumes
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ATTACHMENT 5
4418770 Washington Mixed-Use
Existing (2010)
Assigned
No. of Approach Right-Turn Lane Critical
Lanes Volumes on Red Volumes Moves
0 0 -1
0 -1
1 860 860 860
0 -1
0 0 0 -1 |1010|0 0 -1
0 -1
2 539 270
0 -1
1 343 343 0 |1010|860
0 800 -1
0 -1
1 0 828 828
0 -1
0 28 0 -1 |1010|0 0 -1
0 -1
0 0 -1
0 -1
0 0 0 -1 |10 10|828
1,688
Number of Clearance Intervals 1,500
1.125
Signal Coordination -0.100
Note: Intersection Currently Under Construction 1.025
F
Signalized
Left
Left/Through
Through
Through/Right
Right
Through/Right
Analysis Scenario
Intersection Control
Lane Type
Approach
Direction
Total Lanes
Base CMA
Signal Coordination Adjustment
Project Name|1010|ATSAC + ATCS
PM Peak Hour
Intersection Number
Intersection Name
Analysis Period
Southbound
Westbound
Total Lanes
Level of Service (LOS)
Intersection Capacity
Date
Jefferson Boulevard
East/West:
28
North/South:
July 26, 2010
National Boulevard
Northbound
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Lanes
Left
Right
Left/Through
Through
Through/Right
Right
Left/Through
Left
Eastbound
Total Intersection Critical Volumes
Sum of North/South Critical Volumes
Through
Left
Left/Through
Through/Right
Total Lanes
Left/Through/Right
Right
Hirsch/Green Transportation Consulting, Inc.
Critical Movement Analysis (CMA) Worksheet
Final CMA
Sum of East/West Critical Volumes
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ATTACHMENT 5
4428770 Washington Mixed-Use
Existing (2010)
Assigned
No. of Approach Right-Turn Lane Critical
Lanes Volumes on Red Volumes Moves
1 63 63
0 -1
2 2,211 838 838
1 838
0 303 0 -1 |1010|1 34 34 34
0 -1
3 2,092 697
0 -1
1 213 213 0 |1010|872
2 529 291
0 -1
1 878 550 550
1 550
0 221 0 -1 |1010|2 286 157 157
0 -1
2 651 326
0 -1
1 63 063 |1010|707
1,579
Number of Clearance Intervals 1,375
1.148
Signal Coordination -0.100
1.048
F
Hirsch/Green Transportation Consulting, Inc.
Critical Movement Analysis (CMA) Worksheet
Right
Date
La Cienega Boulevard
East/West:
29
SB Rt. Turn Overlap with EB Left
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Northbound
Through
Left
Left/Through
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sum of North/South Critical Volumes
Total Lanes
Total Lanes
Eastbound
Left
ATSAC + ATCS
Right
Through
Through/Right
Right
Total Lanes
Left/Through
Final CMA
Through
Through/Right
Sum of East/West Critical Volumes
Total Intersection Critical Volumes
Intersection Capacity
North/South:
July 26, 2010
Project Name|1010|PM Peak Hour
Intersection Number
Intersection Name
Analysis Period
Southbound
Westbound
Base CMA
Signal Coordination Adjustment
Level of Service (LOS)
Through
Through/Right
Right
Through/Right
Left
Left/Through
Total Lanes
Signalized
Left
Left/Through
Analysis Scenario
Intersection Control
Lane Type
Approach
Direction
Jefferson Boulevard
ATTACHMENT 5
4438770 Washington Mixed-Use
Existing (2010)
Assigned
No. of Approach Right-Turn Lane Critical
Lanes Volumes on Red Volumes Moves
1 34 34
0 -1
2 800 400 400
0 -1
1 867 867 0 |1010|1 100 100 100
0 -1
2 485 242
0 -1
1 38 38 0 |1010|500
1 55 55
0 -1
2 556 278 278
0 -1
1 148 129 19 |1010|2 439 241
0 -1
1 318 318 318
0 -1
1 8 80 |1010|596
1,096
Number of Clearance Intervals 1,425
0.769
Signal Coordination -0.100
0.669
B
Hirsch/Green Transportation Consulting, Inc.
Critical Movement Analysis (CMA) Worksheet
Right
Date
Jefferson Boulevard
East/West:
30
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Northbound
Through
Left
Left/Through
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sum of North/South Critical Volumes
Total Lanes
Total Lanes
Eastbound
Left
ATSAC + ATCS
East/West Opposed Phasing
Right
Through
Through/Right
Right
Total Lanes
Left/Through
Final CMA
Through
Through/Right
Sum of East/West Critical Volumes
Total Intersection Critical Volumes
Intersection Capacity
North/South:
July 26, 2010
Project Name|1010|PM Peak Hour
Intersection Number
Intersection Name
Analysis Period
Southbound
Westbound
Base CMA
Signal Coordination Adjustment
Level of Service (LOS)
Through
Through/Right
Right
Through/Right
Left
Left/Through
Total Lanes
Signalized
Left
Left/Through
Analysis Scenario
Intersection Control
Lane Type
Approach
Direction
Higuera Street/Rodeo Road
ATTACHMENT 5
4448770 Washington Mixed-Use
Existing (2010)
Assigned
No. of Approach Right-Turn Lane Critical
Lanes Volumes on Red Volumes Moves
2 316 174
0 -1
2 2,177 801 801
1 801
0 227 0 -1 |1010|2 415 228 228
0 -1
2 2,110 725
1 725
0 64 0 -1 |1010|1,029
1 249 249
0 -1
2 1,080 540 540
0 -1
1 319 174 145 |1010|1 204 204 204
0 -1
2 451 226
0 -1
1 132 132 0 |1010|744
1,773
Number of Clearance Intervals 1,375
1.289
Signal Coordination -0.100
1.189
F
Rodeo Road
Lane Type
Approach
Direction
Left
Left/Through
Total Lanes
Signalized
Left
Left/Through
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Northbound
Analysis Scenario
Intersection Control
Through
Through/Right
Right
Through/Right
Project Name|1010|ATSAC + ATCS
PM Peak Hour
Intersection Number
Intersection Name
Analysis Period
Southbound
Westbound
Total Lanes
Date
La Cienega Boulevard
East/West:
31
North/South:
July 26, 2010
Right
Level of Service (LOS)
Sum of East/West Critical Volumes
Intersection Capacity
Base CMA
Signal Coordination Adjustment
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Lanes
Left
Right
Left/Through
Through
Through/Right
Hirsch/Green Transportation Consulting, Inc.
Critical Movement Analysis (CMA) Worksheet
EB/WB Rt. Turn Overlap With NB/SB Lefts
Through
Left
Left/Through
Through/Right
Sum of North/South Critical Volumes
Total Lanes
Through
Right
Eastbound
Total Intersection Critical Volumes
Final CMA
ATTACHMENT 5
4458770 Washington Mixed-Use
Existing (2010)
Assigned
No. of Approach Right-Turn Lane Critical
Lanes Volumes on Red Volumes Moves
0 149 -1
0 -1
1 167 485 485
0 -1
0 169 0 -1 |1010|0 7 -1 7
0 -1
1 35 55
0 -1
0 13 0 -1 |1010|492
0 121 -1
0 -1
1 400 674 674
0 -1
0 153 0 -1 |1010|0 16 -1 16
0 -1
1 384 416
0 -1
0 16 0 -1 |1010|690
1,182
Number of Clearance Intervals 1,000
1.182
Signal Coordination 0.000
1.182
F
Duquesne Avenue
Four-Way STOP
Left
Left/Through
Left/Through/Right
Through/Right
Right
Through/Right
Left
Analysis Scenario
Intersection Control
Lane Type
Approach
Direction
Left/Through
Total Lanes
Base CMA
Signal Coordination Adjustment
Project Name|10 10|None
PM Peak Hour
Intersection Number
Intersection Name
Analysis Period
Southbound
Westbound
Total Lanes
Date
Braddock Drive
East/West:
32
North/South:
July 26, 2010
Level of Service (LOS)
Left
Left/Through
Left/Through/Right
Through/Right
Right
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Lanes
Intersection Capacity
Left/Through/Right
Left
Left/Through
Through/Right
Sum of North/South Critical Volumes
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Northbound
Total Lanes
Left/Through/Right
Right
Eastbound
Right
Hirsch/Green Transportation Consulting, Inc.
Critical Movement Analysis (CMA) Worksheet
Final CMA
Sum of East/West Critical Volumes
Total Intersection Critical Volumes
ATTACHMENT 5
446ALL-WAY STOP CONTROL ANALYSIS
General Information Site Information
Analyst RRH
Agency/Co. Hirsch/Green
Date Performed 7/26/2010
Analysis Time Period PM Peak Hour - Existing
Intersection 32
Jurisdiction Culver City
Analysis Year 2010
Project ID 8770 Washington Mixed-Use
East/West Street: Duquesne Avenue North/South Street: Braddock Drive
Volume Adjustments and Site Characteristics
Approach Eastbound Westbound
Movement L T R L T R
Volume (veh/h) 121 400 153 16 384 16
%Thrus Left Lane
Approach Northbound Southbound
Movement L T R L T R
Volume (veh/h) 149 167 169 7 35 13
%Thrus Left Lane
Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound
L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2
Configuration LTR LTR LTR LTR
PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Flow Rate (veh/h) 674 416 485 55
% Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0
No. Lanes 1 1 1 1
Geometry Group 1 1 1 1
Duration, T 1.00
Saturation Headway Adjustment Worksheet
Prop. Left-Turns 0.2 0.0 0.3 0.1
Prop. Right-Turns 0.2 0.0 0.3 0.2
Prop. Heavy Vehicle 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
hLT-adj 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2
hRT-adj -0.6 -0.6 -0.6 -0.6 -0.6 -0.6 -0.6 -0.6
hHV-adj 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7
hadj, computed -0.1 -0.0 -0.1 -0.1
Departure Headway and Service Time
hd, initial value (s) 3.20 3.20 3.20 3.20
x, initial 0.60 0.37 0.43 0.05
hd, final value (s) 7.08 7.39 7.13 9.20
x, final value 1.33 0.85 0.96 0.14
Move-up time, m (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0
Service Time, t
s
(s) 5.1 5.4 5.1 7.2
Capacity and Level of Service
Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound
L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2
Capacity (veh/h) 674 482 504 305
Delay (s/veh) 624.53 48.01 91.03 13.70
LOS F E F B
Approach: Delay (s/veh)
624.53 48.01 91.03 13.70
LOS
F E F B
Intersection Delay (s/veh) 298.04
Intersection LOS F
Copyright © 2007 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved
HCS+
TM
Version 5.3
Generated: 8/3/2010 7:56 PM
ATTACHMENT 5
4478770 Washington Mixed-Use
Existing (2010)
Assigned
No. of Approach Right-Turn Lane Critical
Lanes Volumes on Red Volumes Moves
0 0 -1
0 -1
0 0 -1
0 -1
0 0 0 -1 |10 10|0 269 -1
0 -1
1 0 332 332
0 -1
0 63 0 -1 |1010|332
0 60 -1
1 630 630
0 570 -1
0 -1
0 0 0 -1 |1010|0 0 -1
0 -1
1 366 366
0 -1
1 188 166 22 |1010|630
962
Number of Clearance Intervals 1,000
0.962
Signal Coordination 0.000
0.962
E
Hirsch/Green Transportation Consulting, Inc.
Critical Movement Analysis (CMA) Worksheet
Right
Date
Lucerne Avenue
East/West:
33
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Northbound
Left/Through/Right
Left
Left/Through
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sum of North/South Critical Volumes
Total Lanes
Total Lanes
Eastbound
Left
None
Right
Through
Through/Right
Right
Total Lanes
Left/Through
Final CMA
Through
Through/Right
Sum of East/West Critical Volumes
Total Intersection Critical Volumes
Intersection Capacity
North/South:
July 26, 2010
Project Name|10 10|PM Peak Hour
Intersection Number
Intersection Name
Analysis Period
Southbound
Westbound
Base CMA
Signal Coordination Adjustment
Level of Service (LOS)
Through
Through/Right
Right
Through/Right
Left
Left/Through
Total Lanes
Four-Way STOP
Left
Left/Through
Analysis Scenario
Intersection Control
Lane Type
Approach
Direction
Duquesne Avenue
ATTACHMENT 5
448ALL-WAY STOP CONTROL ANALYSIS
General Information Site Information
Analyst RRH
Agency/Co. Hirsch/Green
Date Performed 7/26/2010
Analysis Time Period PM Peak Hour - Existing
Intersection 33
Jurisdiction Culver City
Analysis Year 2010
Project ID 8770 Washington Mixed-Use
East/West Street: Duquesne Avenue North/South Street: Lucerne Avenue
Volume Adjustments and Site Characteristics
Approach Eastbound Westbound
Movement L T R L T R
Volume (veh/h) 60 570 0 0 366 188
%Thrus Left Lane
Approach Northbound Southbound
Movement L T R L T R
Volume (veh/h) 0 0 0 269 0 63
%Thrus Left Lane
Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound
L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2
Configuration LT T R LTR
PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Flow Rate (veh/h) 630 366 188 332
% Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0
No. Lanes 1 2 0 1
Geometry Group 3a 5 1
Duration, T 1.00
Saturation Headway Adjustment Worksheet
Prop. Left-Turns 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.8
Prop. Right-Turns 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.2
Prop. Heavy Vehicle 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
hLT-adj 0.2 0.2 0.5 0.5 0.2 0.2
hRT-adj -0.6 -0.6 -0.7 -0.7 -0.6 -0.6
hHV-adj 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7
hadj, computed 0.0 0.0 -0.7 0.0
Departure Headway and Service Time
hd, initial value (s) 3.20 3.20 3.20 3.20
x, initial 0.56 0.33 0.17 0.30
hd, final value (s) 6.15 6.76 6.04 6.87
x, final value 1.08 0.69 0.32 0.63
Move-up time, m (s) 2.0 2.3 2.0
Service Time, t
s
(s) 4.2 4.5 3.7 4.9
Capacity and Level of Service
Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound
L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2
Capacity (veh/h) 630 527 438 516
Delay (s/veh) 206.88 23.94 11.52 21.54
LOS F C B C
Approach: Delay (s/veh)
206.88 19.73 21.54
LOS
F C C
Intersection Delay (s/veh) 97.90
Intersection LOS F
Copyright © 2007 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved
HCS+
TM
Version 5.3
Generated: 8/3/2010 8:01 PM
ATTACHMENT 5
4498770 Washington Mixed-Use
Existing (2010)
Assigned
No. of Approach Right-Turn Lane Critical
Lanes Volumes on Red Volumes Moves
1 346 346 346
0 -1
1 1,322 678
1 678
0 34 0 -1 |1010|1 51 51
0 -1
2 829 414 414
0 -1
1 187 187 0 |1010|760
1 427 427 427
0 -1
0 61 -1
1 389
0 328 0 -1 |1010|1 28 28
0 -1
1 41 41 41
0 -1
1 19 19 0 |1010|468
1,228
Number of Clearance Intervals 1,375
0.893
Signal Coordination -0.070
0.823
D
Duquesne Avenue
Signalized
Left
Left/Through
Through
Through/Right
Right
Through/Right
Left
Analysis Scenario
Intersection Control
Lane Type
Approach
Direction
Left/Through
Total Lanes
Base CMA
Signal Coordination Adjustment
Project Name|1010|ATSAC
PM Peak Hour
Intersection Number
Intersection Name
Analysis Period
Southbound
Westbound
Total Lanes
Date
Jefferson Boulevard
East/West:
34
North/South:
July 26, 2010
Level of Service (LOS)
Left
Left/Through
Through
Through/Right
Right
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Lanes
Intersection Capacity
EB/WB Rt. Turn Overlap With NB/SB Lefts
Through
Left
Left/Through
Through/Right
Sum of North/South Critical Volumes
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Northbound
Total Lanes
Through
Right
Eastbound
Right
Hirsch/Green Transportation Consulting, Inc.
Critical Movement Analysis (CMA) Worksheet
Final CMA
Sum of East/West Critical Volumes
Total Intersection Critical Volumes
ATTACHMENT 5
450
Future (2013) Without Project
AM Peak Hour
ATTACHMENT 5
4518770 Washington Mixed-Use
Future (2013)
Assigned
No. of Approach Right-Turn Lane Critical
Lanes Volumes on Red Volumes Moves
1 79 79 79
0 -1
1 1,346 676
1 676
0 5 0 -1 |1010|1 38 38
0 -1
1 1,862 968 968
1 968
0 73 0 -1 |1010|1,047
0 109 -1 109
0 -1
1 138 359
0 -1
0 112 0 -1 |1010|0 86 -1
0 -1
1 240 398 398
0 -1
0 72 0 -1 |1010|507
1,554
Number of Clearance Intervals 1,500
1.036
Signal Coordination -0.100
0.936
E
Hirsch/Green Transportation Consulting, Inc.
Critical Movement Analysis (CMA) Worksheet
Final CMA
Sum of East/West Critical Volumes
Total Intersection Critical Volumes
Through
Left
Left/Through
Through/Right
Sum of North/South Critical Volumes
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Northbound
Base CMA
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Left/Through
Total Lanes
Left/Through/Right
Right
Eastbound
Right
Southbound
Left/Through
Left/Through/Right
Through/Right
Right
Intersection Capacity
Date
Robertson Boulevard
East/West:|1010|North/South:
July 26, 2010
Cattaraugus Avenue
Left
Westbound
Total Lanes
Total Lanes
Project Name|1010|ATSAC + ATCS
AM Peak Hour
Intersection Number
Intersection Name
Analysis Period
Total Lanes
Analysis Scenario
Intersection Control
Signal Coordination Adjustment
Level of Service (LOS)
Lane Type
Approach
Direction
Without Project
Signalized
Through/Right
Right
Through/Right
Left
Left
Left/Through
Through
ATTACHMENT 5
4528770 Washington Mixed-Use
Future (2013)
Assigned
No. of Approach Right-Turn Lane Critical
Lanes Volumes on Red Volumes Moves
1 38 38 38
0 -1
2 1,201 600
0 -1
0 0 0 -1 |1010|0 0 -1
0 -1
1 1,766 920 920
1 920
0 74 0 -1 |1010|958
0 117 -1
0 -1
1 0 163 163
0 -1
0 46 0 -1 |1010|0 450 450
0
1 13 463
0
1 173 173 0 |1010|613
1,571
Number of Clearance Intervals 1,500
1.047
Signal Coordination -0.100
0.947
E
Total Lanes
Signalized
Through/Right
Total Lanes
Through
Left/Through
Northbound
Through/Right
Right
Left/Through
Left/Through/Right
Through/Right
Right
Direction
Without Project
Intersection Control
Lane Type
Analysis Scenario
Left
Left/Through
Through
Approach
Project Name|1010|ATSAC + ATCS
AM Peak Hour
Intersection Number
Intersection Name
Analysis Period
Date
Robertson Boulevard
East/West:|1010|North/South:
July 26, 2010
I-405 WB Off-Ramp/Kincardine Avenue
Left
Signal Coordination Adjustment
Intersection Capacity
Sum of North/South Critical Volumes
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Eastbound
Right
Through/Right
Westbound
Total Lanes
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Lanes
Left/Through/Right
Right
Left
Left/Through
Southbound
Hirsch/Green Transportation Consulting, Inc.
Critical Movement Analysis (CMA) Worksheet
Sum of East/West Critical Volumes
Total Intersection Critical Volumes
Left
Base CMA
Final CMA
Level of Service (LOS)
ATTACHMENT 5
4538770 Washington Mixed-Use
Future (2013)
Assigned
No. of Approach Right-Turn Lane Critical
Lanes Volumes on Red Volumes Moves
1 113 113 113
0 -1
1 637 360
1 360
0 84 0 -1 |1010|2 790 435
0 -1
1 1,238 732 732
1 732
0 227 0 -1 |1010|845
1 169 169 169
0 -1
1 696 480
1 480
0 264 0 -1 |1010|1 148 148
0 -1
1 598 598 598
0 -1
1 486 435 51 |1010|767
1,612
Number of Clearance Intervals 1,375
1.172
Signal Coordination -0.100
1.072
F
Hirsch/Green Transportation Consulting, Inc.
Critical Movement Analysis (CMA) Worksheet
Right
Date
Robertson Boulevard|1010|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Northbound
July 26, 2010
Through
Through/Right
Left
Left/Through
National Boulevard
Right
East/West:
Eastbound
Analysis Scenario
Southbound Through
Left
Left/Through
Signalized
AM Peak Hour
Total Lanes
Lane Type
Signal Coordination Adjustment
Sum of North/South Critical Volumes
Left
ATSAC + ATCS
Total Lanes
Sum of East/West Critical Volumes
Total Intersection Critical Volumes
Intersection Capacity
Total Lanes
Through
Base CMA
Left/Through
Through
Through/Right
WB Rt. Turn Overlap with SB Left
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|1010|North/South:
Westbound
Without Project
Right
Through/Right
Left
Left/Through
Total Lanes
Through/Right
Right
Project Name
Approach
Direction
Intersection Number
Intersection Name
Analysis Period
Intersection Control
Level of Service (LOS)
Final CMA
ATTACHMENT 5
4548770 Washington Mixed-Use
Future (2013)
Assigned
No. of Approach Right-Turn Lane Critical
Lanes Volumes on Red Volumes Moves
1 188 188 188
0 -1
2 1,169 584
0 -1
0 0 0 -1 |1010|0 0 -1
0 -1
2 1,006 503
0 -1
1 654 0 654 654|1010|842
0 0 -1
0 -1
0 0 -1
0 -1
0 0 0 -1 |10 10|0 0 -1
0 -1
0 0 -1
0 -1
0 0 0 -1 |10 10 10|842
Number of Clearance Intervals 1,500
0.561
Signal Coordination -0.100
0.461
A
Hirsch/Green Transportation Consulting, Inc.
Critical Movement Analysis (CMA) Worksheet
Right
Date
National Boulevard|1010|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Northbound
July 26, 2010
Through
Through/Right
Left
Left/Through
I-405 EB On-Ramp
Right
East/West:
Eastbound
Analysis Scenario
Southbound Through
Left
Left/Through
Signalized
AM Peak Hour
Total Lanes
Lane Type
Signal Coordination Adjustment
Sum of North/South Critical Volumes
Left
ATSAC + ATCS
Total Lanes
Sum of East/West Critical Volumes
Total Intersection Critical Volumes
Intersection Capacity
Total Lanes
Through
Base CMA
Left/Through
Through
Through/Right
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|1010|North/South:
Westbound
Without Project
Right
Through/Right
Left
Left/Through
Total Lanes
Through/Right
Right
Project Name
Approach
Direction
Intersection Number
Intersection Name
Analysis Period
Intersection Control
Level of Service (LOS)
Final CMA
ATTACHMENT 5
4558770 Washington Mixed-Use
Future (2013)
Assigned
No. of Approach Right-Turn Lane Critical
Lanes Volumes on Red Volumes Moves
0 107 -1 107
0 -1
1 188 344
0 -1
0 49 0 -1 |1010|0 67 -1
0 -1
1 207 342 342
0 -1
0 68 0 -1 |1010|449
1 46 46
0 -1
3 2,066 689 689
0 -1
1 124 54 70 |1010|1 178 178 178
0 -1
3 1,978 659
0 -1
1 43 43 0 |1010|867
1,316
Number of Clearance Intervals 1,500
0.877
Signal Coordination -0.070
0.807
D
Sum of East/West Critical Volumes
Total Intersection Critical Volumes|1010|ATSAC
Final CMA
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Northbound
Hirsch/Green Transportation Consulting, Inc.
Critical Movement Analysis (CMA) Worksheet
Project Name
AM Peak Hour
Intersection Number
Intersection Name
Analysis Period
Analysis Scenario
Eastbound
Right
Left/Through/Right
Left
Left/Through
Through/Right
Sum of North/South Critical Volumes
Total Lanes
Intersection Capacity
Left
Left/Through
Through
Through/Right
Right
Date
Hughes Avenue
East/West:|1010|North/South:
July 26, 2010
Level of Service (LOS)
Southbound
Westbound
Total Lanes
Total Lanes
Through
Right
Through/Right
Left
Base CMA
Signal Coordination Adjustment
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Left/Through
Total Lanes
Intersection Control
Lane Type
Approach
Direction
Without Project
Signalized
Left
Left/Through
Left/Through/Right
Through/Right
Right
Venice Boulevard
ATTACHMENT 5
4568770 Washington Mixed-Use
Future (2013)
Assigned
No. of Approach Right-Turn Lane Critical
Lanes Volumes on Red Volumes Moves
1 48 48 48
0 -1
0 149 -1
1 191
0 42 0 -1 |1010|0 75 -1
0 -1
1 170 312 312
0 -1
0 67 0 -1 |1010|360
1 69 69
0 -1
2 2,130 726 726
1 726
0 48 0 -1 |1010|1 60 60 60
0 -1
3 2,105 702
0 -1
1 39 39 0 |1010|786
1,146
Number of Clearance Intervals 1,375
0.833
Signal Coordination -0.070
0.763
C
Sum of East/West Critical Volumes
Total Intersection Critical Volumes|1010|ATSAC
Final CMA
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Northbound
Hirsch/Green Transportation Consulting, Inc.
Critical Movement Analysis (CMA) Worksheet
Project Name
AM Peak Hour
Intersection Number
Intersection Name
Analysis Period
Analysis Scenario
Eastbound
Right
Left/Through/Right
Left
Left/Through
Through/Right
Sum of North/South Critical Volumes
Total Lanes
Intersection Capacity
Left
Left/Through
Through
Through/Right
Right
Date
Bagley Avenue/Main Street
East/West:|1010|North/South:
July 26, 2010
Level of Service (LOS)
Southbound
Westbound
Total Lanes
Total Lanes
Through
Right
Through/Right
Left
Base CMA
Signal Coordination Adjustment
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Left/Through
Total Lanes
Intersection Control
Lane Type
Approach
Direction
Without Project
Signalized
Left
Left/Through
Through
Through/Right
Right
Venice Boulevard
ATTACHMENT 5
4578770 Washington Mixed-Use
Future (2013)
Assigned
No. of Approach Right-Turn Lane Critical
Lanes Volumes on Red Volumes Moves
1 39 39
0 -1
1 86 86 86
0 -1
2 781 781 0 |1010|1 180 128
0 -1
1 45 128 128
0 -1
0 32 0 -1 |1010|214
1 31 31
0 -1
2 2,141 723 723
1 723
0 27 0 -1 |1010|2 962 529 529
0 -1
2 2,002 717
1 717
0 149 0 -1 |1010|1,252
1,466
Number of Clearance Intervals 1,375
1.066
Signal Coordination -0.100
0.966
E
Total Lanes
Signalized
Through/Right
Total Lanes
Left/Through/Right
Left/Through
Northbound
Through/Right
North/South Opposed Phasing
Right
Left/Through
Through
Through/Right
Right
Direction
Without Project
Intersection Control
Lane Type
Analysis Scenario
Left
Left/Through
Through
Approach
Project Name|1010|ATSAC + ATCS
AM Peak Hour
Intersection Number
Intersection Name
Analysis Period
Date
Culver Boulevard
East/West:|1010|North/South:
July 26, 2010
Venice Boulevard
Left
Signal Coordination Adjustment
Intersection Capacity
Sum of North/South Critical Volumes
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Eastbound
Right
Through/Right
Westbound
Total Lanes
NB Rt. Turn Overlap with WB Left
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Lanes
Through
Right
Left
Left/Through
Southbound
Hirsch/Green Transportation Consulting, Inc.
Critical Movement Analysis (CMA) Worksheet
Sum of East/West Critical Volumes
Total Intersection Critical Volumes
Left
Base CMA
Final CMA
Level of Service (LOS)
ATTACHMENT 5
4588770 Washington Mixed-Use
Future (2013)
Assigned
No. of Approach Right-Turn Lane Critical
Lanes Volumes on Red Volumes Moves
1 205 205
0 -1
1 479 479 479
0 -1
1 47 47 0 |1010|0 634 -1
1 634 634
1 421 421
0 -1
1 537 172 365 |1010|1,113
2 627 345 345
0 -1
2 2,468 880
1 880
0 172 0 -1 |1010|1 99 99
0 -1
2 2,460 944 944
1 944
0 371 0 -1 |1010|1,289
2,402
Number of Clearance Intervals 1,375
1.747
Signal Coordination -0.100
1.647
F
Hirsch/Green Transportation Consulting, Inc.
Critical Movement Analysis (CMA) Worksheet
Right
Date
Robertson Boulevard/Exposition Boulevard|1010|NB Rt. Turn Overlap with WB Left
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Northbound
July 26, 2010
Through
Through/Right
Left
Left/Through
Venice Boulevard
North/South Opposed Phasing
Right
East/West:
Eastbound
Analysis Scenario
Southbound Through
Left
Left/Through
Signalized
AM Peak Hour
Total Lanes
Lane Type
Signal Coordination Adjustment
Sum of North/South Critical Volumes
Left
ATSAC + ATCS
Total Lanes
Sum of East/West Critical Volumes
Total Intersection Critical Volumes
Intersection Capacity
Total Lanes
Through
Base CMA
Left/Through
Through
Through/Right
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|1010|North/South:
Westbound
Without Project
Right
Through/Right
Left
Left/Through
Total Lanes
Through/Right
Right
Project Name
Approach
Direction
Intersection Number
Intersection Name
Analysis Period
Intersection Control
Level of Service (LOS)
Final CMA
ATTACHMENT 5
4598770 Washington Mixed-Use
Future (2013)
Assigned
No. of Approach Right-Turn Lane Critical
Lanes Volumes on Red Volumes Moves
1 335 335 335
0 -1
1 1,020 544
1 544
0 69 0 -1 |1010|1 132 132
0 -1
1 739 423 423
1 423
0 107 0 -1 |1010|758
2 210 116 116
0 -1
3 2,149 716
0 -1
1 672 168 504 |1010|2 210 116
0 -1
3 2,199 733 733
0 -1
1 115 107 8 |1010|849
1,607
Number of Clearance Intervals 1,375
1.169
Signal Coordination -0.100
1.069
F
Left
Left/Through
Right
Through/Right
Analysis Scenario
Intersection Control
Lane Type
Approach
Direction
Without Project
Signalized
Final CMA
Level of Service (LOS)
Project Name|1010|ATSAC + ATCS
AM Peak Hour
Intersection Number
Intersection Name
Analysis Period
Southbound
Westbound
Northbound
Date
National Boulevard
East/West:|10 10|North/South:
July 26, 2010
Venice Boulevard
Right
Total Lanes
Through
Through/Right
Left
Left/Through
Total Lanes
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Through/Right
Right
Left
Left/Through
Through
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Left
Left/Through
Through/Right
Eastbound
Hirsch/Green Transportation Consulting, Inc.
Critical Movement Analysis (CMA) Worksheet
Total Lanes
Through
Right
Sum of North/South Critical Volumes
Through
Sum of East/West Critical Volumes
Intersection Capacity
Total Intersection Critical Volumes
Base CMA
Signal Coordination Adjustment
Total Lanes
ATTACHMENT 5
4608770 Washington Mixed-Use
Future (2013)
Assigned
No. of Approach Right-Turn Lane Critical
Lanes Volumes on Red Volumes Moves
0 11 -1 11
120
0 9 -1
0 -1
1 4 40 |1010|0 12 -1
0 -1
1 2 39 39
0 -1
0 25 0 -1 |1010|50
1 76 76 76
0 -1
2 2,260 761
1 761
0 22 0 -1 |1010|1 23 23
0 -1
2 2,499 841 841
1 841
0 23 0 -1 |1010|917
967
Number of Clearance Intervals 1,500
0.645
Signal Coordination -0.100
0.545
A
Total Lanes
Signalized
Through/Right
Total Lanes
Left/Through/Right
Left/Through
Northbound
Through/Right
Right
Left/Through
Through
Through/Right
Right
Direction
Without Project
Intersection Control
Lane Type
Analysis Scenario
Left
Left/Through
Through
Approach
Project Name|1010|ATSAC + ATCS
AM Peak Hour
Intersection Number
Intersection Name
Analysis Period
Date
Helms Avenue
East/West:
10
North/South:
July 26, 2010
Venice Boulevard
Left
Signal Coordination Adjustment
Intersection Capacity
Sum of North/South Critical Volumes
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Eastbound
Right
Through/Right
Westbound
Total Lanes
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Lanes
Through
Right
Left
Left/Through
Southbound
Hirsch/Green Transportation Consulting, Inc.
Critical Movement Analysis (CMA) Worksheet
Sum of East/West Critical Volumes
Total Intersection Critical Volumes
Left
Base CMA
Final CMA
Level of Service (LOS)
ATTACHMENT 5
4618770 Washington Mixed-Use
Future (2013)
Assigned
No. of Approach Right-Turn Lane Critical
Lanes Volumes on Red Volumes Moves
0 48 -1
0 -1
1 250 326 326
0 -1
0 28 0 -1 |1010|0 163 -1 163
0 -1
1 86 267
0 -1
0 18 0 -1 |1010|489
1 71 71 71
0 -1
2 2,053 688
1 688
0 11 0 -1 |1010|1 71 71
0 -1
2 2,424 842 842
1 842
0 103 0 -1 |1010|913
1,402
Number of Clearance Intervals 1,500
0.935
Signal Coordination -0.100
0.835
D
Hirsch/Green Transportation Consulting, Inc.
Critical Movement Analysis (CMA) Worksheet
Right
Date
Cattaraugus Avenue
11
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Northbound
July 26, 2010
Left/Through/Right
Through/Right
Left
Left/Through
Venice Boulevard
Right
East/West:
Eastbound
Analysis Scenario
Southbound Left/Through/Right
Left
Left/Through
Signalized
AM Peak Hour
Total Lanes
Lane Type
Signal Coordination Adjustment
Sum of North/South Critical Volumes
Left
ATSAC + ATCS
Total Lanes
Sum of East/West Critical Volumes
Total Intersection Critical Volumes
Intersection Capacity
Total Lanes
Through
Base CMA
Left/Through
Through
Through/Right
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|1010|North/South:
Westbound
Without Project
Right
Through/Right
Left
Left/Through
Total Lanes
Through/Right
Right
Project Name
Approach
Direction
Intersection Number
Intersection Name
Analysis Period
Intersection Control
Level of Service (LOS)
Final CMA
ATTACHMENT 5
4628770 Washington Mixed-Use
Future (2013)
Assigned
No. of Approach Right-Turn Lane Critical
Lanes Volumes on Red Volumes Moves
1 150 150 150
0 -1
2 1,773 606
1 606
0 45 0 -1 |1010|1 35 35
0 -1
2 1,338 574 574
1 574
0 383 0 -1 |1010|724
2 353 194 194
0 -1
3 1,805 602
0 -1
1 169 75 94 |1010|1 136 136
0 -1
3 2,094 698 698
0 -1
1 15 15 0 |1010|892
1,616
Number of Clearance Intervals 1,375
1.175
Signal Coordination -0.070
1.105
F
Venice Boulevard
Right
Through/Right
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Left
ATSAC
Total Lanes
Sum of East/West Critical Volumes
Total Intersection Critical Volumes
Left/Through
Signal Coordination Adjustment
Level of Service (LOS)
Final CMA
Project Name|1010|AM Peak Hour
Intersection Number
Intersection Name
Analysis Period
Southbound
Westbound
Without Project
Base CMA
Intersection Capacity
Right
Left/Through
Through
Through/Right
Analysis Scenario
Intersection Control
Lane Type
Sum of North/South Critical Volumes
Total Lanes
Direction
Approach
Total Lanes
Left
Total Lanes
Eastbound
Left
Left/Through
Through
Through/Right
Right
North/South:
July 26, 2010
Through
Through/Right
Left
Left/Through
East/West:
Signalized
Hirsch/Green Transportation Consulting, Inc.
Critical Movement Analysis (CMA) Worksheet
Right
Date
La Cienega Boulevard
12
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Northbound
Through
ATTACHMENT 5
4638770 Washington Mixed-Use
Future (2013)
Assigned
No. of Approach Right-Turn Lane Critical
Lanes Volumes on Red Volumes Moves
1 200 200 200
0 -1
0 327 -1
1 367
0 40 0 -1 |1010|1 12 12
0 -1
0 304 -1
1 351 351
0 47 0 -1 |1010|551
1 41 41 41
0 -1
1 688 438
1 438
0 188 0 -1 |1010|1 55 55
0 -1
1 1,286 667 667
1 667
0 48 0 -1 |1010|708
1,259
Number of Clearance Intervals 1,500
0.839
Signal Coordination -0.070
0.769
C
Hirsch/Green Transportation Consulting, Inc.
Critical Movement Analysis (CMA) Worksheet
Right
Date
Hughes Avenue/Duquesne Avenue
13
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Northbound
July 26, 2010
Through
Through/Right
Left
Left/Through
Washington Boulevard
Right
East/West:
Eastbound
Analysis Scenario
Southbound Through
Left
Left/Through
Signalized
AM Peak Hour
Total Lanes
Lane Type
Signal Coordination Adjustment
Sum of North/South Critical Volumes
Left
ATSAC
Total Lanes
Sum of East/West Critical Volumes
Total Intersection Critical Volumes
Intersection Capacity
Total Lanes
Through
Base CMA
Left/Through
Through
Through/Right
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|1010|North/South:
Westbound
Without Project
Right
Through/Right
Left
Left/Through
Total Lanes
Through/Right
Right
Project Name
Approach
Direction
Intersection Number
Intersection Name
Analysis Period
Intersection Control
Level of Service (LOS)
Final CMA
ATTACHMENT 5
4648770 Washington Mixed-Use
Future (2013)
Assigned
No. of Approach Right-Turn Lane Critical
Lanes Volumes on Red Volumes Moves
1 96 96
0 -1
1 408 408 408
0 -1
1 108 46 62 |1010|1 52 52 52
0 -1
1 393 231
1 231
0 69 0 -1 |1010|460
1 106 106
0 -1
1 935 487 487
1 487
0 39 0 -1 |1010|1 93 93 93
0 -1
1 795 426
1 426
0 56 0 -1 |1010|580
1,040
Number of Clearance Intervals 1,375
0.756
Signal Coordination -0.070
0.686
B
Total Lanes
Signalized
Through/Right
Total Lanes
Through
Left/Through
Northbound
Through/Right
Right
Left/Through
Through
Through/Right
Right
Direction
Without Project
Intersection Control
Lane Type
Analysis Scenario
Left
Left/Through
Through
Approach
Project Name|1010|ATSAC
AM Peak Hour
Intersection Number
Intersection Name
Analysis Period
Date
Duquesne Avenue
East/West:
14
North/South:
July 26, 2010
Culver Boulevard
Left
Signal Coordination Adjustment
Intersection Capacity
Sum of North/South Critical Volumes
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Eastbound
Right
Through/Right
Westbound
Total Lanes
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Lanes
Through
Right
Left
Left/Through
Southbound
Hirsch/Green Transportation Consulting, Inc.
Critical Movement Analysis (CMA) Worksheet
Sum of East/West Critical Volumes
Total Intersection Critical Volumes
Left
Base CMA
Final CMA
Level of Service (LOS)
ATTACHMENT 5
4658770 Washington Mixed-Use
Future (2013)
Assigned
No. of Approach Right-Turn Lane Critical
Lanes Volumes on Red Volumes Moves
0 0 -1
0 -1
2 1,070 371
1 371
0 43 0 -1 |1010|1 68 68
0 -1
1 864 619 619
1 619
1 1,340 347 619 |1010|619
1 670 347 347
1 347
0 24 -1
0 -1
1 23 023 |1010|0 68 -1
1 124 124
0 56 -1
0 -1
1 116 116 0 |1010|471
1,090
Number of Clearance Intervals 1,375
0.793
Signal Coordination -0.070
0.723
C
Total Lanes
Signalized
Through/Right
Total Lanes
Through
Left/Through
Northbound
Through/Right
Right
Left/Through
Through
Through/Right
Right
Direction
Without Project
Intersection Control
Lane Type
Analysis Scenario
Left
Left/Through
Through
Approach
Project Name|1010|ATSAC
AM Peak Hour
Intersection Number
Intersection Name
Analysis Period
Date
Culver Boulevard
East/West:
15
North/South:
July 26, 2010
Washington Boulevard/Irving Place
Left
Signal Coordination Adjustment
Intersection Capacity
East/West Opposed Phasing
Sum of North/South Critical Volumes
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Eastbound
Right
Through/Right
Westbound
Total Lanes
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Lanes
Through
Right
Left
Left/Through
Southbound
Hirsch/Green Transportation Consulting, Inc.
Critical Movement Analysis (CMA) Worksheet
Sum of East/West Critical Volumes
Total Intersection Critical Volumes
Left
Base CMA
Final CMA
Level of Service (LOS)
ATTACHMENT 5
4668770 Washington Mixed-Use
Future (2013)
Assigned
No. of Approach Right-Turn Lane Critical
Lanes Volumes on Red Volumes Moves
1 164 164 164
0 -1
3 1,698 566
0 -1
0 0 0 -1 |1010|0 0 -1
0 -1
2 2,078 746 746
1 746
0 160 0 -1 |1010|910
1 150 150 150
0 -1
0 0 -1
0 -1
1 133 82 51 |1010|0 0 -1
0 -1
0 0 -1
0 -1
0 0 0 -1 |10 10|150
1,060
Number of Clearance Intervals 1,425
0.744
Signal Coordination -0.070
0.674
B
Hirsch/Green Transportation Consulting, Inc.
Critical Movement Analysis (CMA) Worksheet
Right
Date
Culver Boulevard
16
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Northbound
July 26, 2010
Through
Through/Right
Left
Left/Through
Main Street
Right
East/West:
Eastbound
Analysis Scenario
Southbound Through
Left
Left/Through
Signalized
AM Peak Hour
Total Lanes
Lane Type
Signal Coordination Adjustment
Sum of North/South Critical Volumes
Left
ATSAC
Total Lanes
Sum of East/West Critical Volumes
Total Intersection Critical Volumes
Intersection Capacity
Total Lanes
Through
Base CMA
Left/Through
Through
Through/Right
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|1010|North/South:
Westbound
Without Project
Right
Through/Right
Left
Left/Through
Total Lanes
Through/Right
Right
Project Name
Approach
Direction
Intersection Number
Intersection Name
Analysis Period
Intersection Control
Level of Service (LOS)
Final CMA
ATTACHMENT 5
4678770 Washington Mixed-Use
Future (2013)
Assigned
No. of Approach Right-Turn Lane Critical
Lanes Volumes on Red Volumes Moves
1 12 12
0 -1
2 847 424 424
0 -1
2 945 945 0 |1010|1 137 137 137
0 -1
1 875 440
1 440
0 4 0 -1 |1010|561
0 0 -1
0 -1
0 0 -1
0 -1
1 6 60 |1010|1 1,294 665 665
1 665
0 36 -1
0 -1
1 74 68 6 |1010|665
1,226
Number of Clearance Intervals 1,425
0.860
Signal Coordination -0.070
0.790
C
Total Lanes
Signalized
Through/Right
Total Lanes
Through
Left/Through
Northbound
Through/Right
Right
Left/Through
Through
Through/Right
Right
Direction
Without Project
Intersection Control
Lane Type
Analysis Scenario
Left
Left/Through
Through
Approach
Project Name|1010|ATSAC
AM Peak Hour
Intersection Number
Intersection Name
Analysis Period
Date
Culver Boulevard
East/West:
17
North/South:
July 26, 2010
Washington Boulevard/Canfield Avenue
Left
Signal Coordination Adjustment
Intersection Capacity
EB Rt. Turn Overlap with NB Left
East/West Opposed Phasing
Sum of North/South Critical Volumes
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Eastbound
Right
Through/Right
Westbound
Total Lanes
NB Rt. Turn Overlap with WB Left
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Lanes
Through
Right
Left
Left/Through
Southbound
Hirsch/Green Transportation Consulting, Inc.
Critical Movement Analysis (CMA) Worksheet
Sum of East/West Critical Volumes
Total Intersection Critical Volumes
Left
Base CMA
Final CMA
Level of Service (LOS)
ATTACHMENT 5
4688770 Washington Mixed-Use
Future (2013)
Assigned
No. of Approach Right-Turn Lane Critical
Lanes Volumes on Red Volumes Moves
1 32 32
0 -1
1 275 275 275
0 -1
1 46 46 0 |1010|1 183 183 183
0 -1
1 373 373
0 -1
1 156 0 156 |1010|458
1 42 42 42
0 -1
1 901 488
1 488
0 76 0 -1 |1010|1 72 72
0 -1
1 1,325 786 786
1 786
0 248 0 -1 |1010|828
1,286
Number of Clearance Intervals 1,425
0.902
Signal Coordination -0.070
0.832
D
Washington Boulevard
Intersection Control
Lane Type
Approach
Direction
Without Project
Signalized
Analysis Scenario
Right
Through/Right
Left
Left
Left/Through
Through
Sum of East/West Critical Volumes
Total Intersection Critical Volumes
Level of Service (LOS)
North/South:
July 26, 2010|1010|AM Peak Hour
Intersection Number
Intersection Name
Analysis Period
Southbound
Left/Through
Through
Through/Right
Right
Intersection Capacity
Final CMA
ATSAC
Base CMA
Signal Coordination Adjustment
Through
Left
Left/Through
Through/Right
Left
Sum of North/South Critical Volumes
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Lanes
Hirsch/Green Transportation Consulting, Inc.
Critical Movement Analysis (CMA) Worksheet
Right
Date
Robertson Boulevard/Higuera Street
East/West:
18
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Project Name
Northbound
Westbound
Total Lanes
Left/Through
Total Lanes
Through
Total Lanes
Eastbound
Right
Through/Right
ATTACHMENT 5
4698770 Washington Mixed-Use
Future (2013)
Assigned
No. of Approach Right-Turn Lane Critical
Lanes Volumes on Red Volumes Moves
1 94 94 94
0 -1
0 0 -1
0 -1
1 112 112 0 |1010|0 0 -1
0 -1
0 0 -1
0 -1
0 0 0 -1 |10 10|94
0 0 -1
0 -1
1 992 585
1 585
0 178 0 -1 |1010|0 96 -1
1 698
1 1,765 1,164 1,164
0 -1
0 0 0 -1 |1010|1,164
1,258
Number of Clearance Intervals 1,500
0.839
Signal Coordination -0.070
0.769
C
Hirsch/Green Transportation Consulting, Inc.
Critical Movement Analysis (CMA) Worksheet
Right
Date
Landmark Street
19
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Northbound
July 26, 2010
Through
Through/Right
Left
Left/Through
Washington Boulevard
Right
East/West:
Eastbound
Analysis Scenario
Southbound Through
Left
Left/Through
Signalized
AM Peak Hour
Total Lanes
Lane Type
Signal Coordination Adjustment
Sum of North/South Critical Volumes
Left
ATSAC
Total Lanes
Sum of East/West Critical Volumes
Total Intersection Critical Volumes
Intersection Capacity
Total Lanes
Through
Base CMA
Left/Through
Through
Through/Right
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|1010|North/South:
Westbound
Without Project
Right
Through/Right
Left
Left/Through
Total Lanes
Through/Right
Right
Project Name
Approach
Direction
Intersection Number
Intersection Name
Analysis Period
Intersection Control
Level of Service (LOS)
Final CMA
ATTACHMENT 5
4708770 Washington Mixed-Use
Future (2013)
Assigned
No. of Approach Right-Turn Lane Critical
Lanes Volumes on Red Volumes Moves
2 302 166
0 -1
1 890 514 514
1 514
0 139 0 -1 |1010|2 366 201 201
0 -1
1 895 493
1 493
0 91 0 -1 |1010|715
1 130 130 130
0 -1
2 799 400
0 -1
1 201 111 90 |1010|1 80 80
0 -1
2 1,271 544 544
1 544
0 361 0 -1 |1010|674
1,389
Number of Clearance Intervals 1,375
1.010
Signal Coordination -0.070
0.940
E
Hirsch/Green Transportation Consulting, Inc.
Critical Movement Analysis (CMA) Worksheet
Final CMA
Sum of East/West Critical Volumes
Total Intersection Critical Volumes
Through
Left
Left/Through
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Eastbound
Sum of North/South Critical Volumes
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Northbound
Right
Total Lanes
Total Lanes
Total Lanes
Through
Through/Right
Left
Right
Intersection Capacity
Level of Service (LOS)
Right
Left/Through
Through
Through/Right
Date
National Boulevard
East/West:
20
North/South:
July 26, 2010
Washington Boulevard
Project Name|1010|ATSAC
AM Peak Hour
Intersection Number
Intersection Name
Analysis Period
Southbound
Westbound
Without Project
Base CMA
Signal Coordination Adjustment
Through
Through/Right
Right
Through/Right
Left
Left/Through
Total Lanes
Signalized
Left
Left/Through
Analysis Scenario
Intersection Control
Lane Type
Approach
Direction
ATTACHMENT 5
4718770 Washington Mixed-Use
Future (2013)
Assigned
No. of Approach Right-Turn Lane Critical
Lanes Volumes on Red Volumes Moves
0 2 -1
0 -1
1 0 3 3
0 -1
0 1 0 -1 |1010|0 0 -1
0 -1
0 0 -1
0 -1
0 0 0 -1 |10 1010|0 0 -1
0 -1
1 1,264 636
1 636
0 9 0 -1 |1010|1 4 4
0 -1
2 1,726 863 863
0 -1
0 0 0 -1 |1010|863
866
Number of Clearance Intervals 1,200
0.722
Signal Coordination 0.000
0.722
C
Left
Left/Through
Right
Through/Right
Analysis Scenario
Intersection Control
Lane Type
Approach
Direction
Without Project
Two-Way STOP
Final CMA
Level of Service (LOS)
Project Name|10 10|None
AM Peak Hour
Intersection Number
Intersection Name
Analysis Period
Southbound
Westbound
Northbound
Date
Wesley Street
East/West:
21
North/South:
July 26, 2010
Washington Boulevard
Right
Total Lanes
Left/Through/Right
Through/Right
Left
Left/Through
Total Lanes
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Through/Right
Right
Left
Left/Through
Through
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Left
Left/Through
Through/Right
Eastbound
Hirsch/Green Transportation Consulting, Inc.
Critical Movement Analysis (CMA) Worksheet
Total Lanes
Through
Right
Sum of North/South Critical Volumes
Through
Sum of East/West Critical Volumes
Intersection Capacity
Total Intersection Critical Volumes
Base CMA
Signal Coordination Adjustment
Total Lanes
ATTACHMENT 5
472TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY
General Information Site Information
Analyst RRH
Agency/Co. Hirsch/Green
Date Performed 7/26/2010
Analysis Time Period
AM Peak Hour - Without
Project
Intersection 21
Jurisdiction Culver City
Analysis Year 2013
Project Description 8770 Washington Mixed-Use
East/West Street: Washington Boulevard North/South Street: Wesley Street
Intersection Orientation: East-West Study Period (hrs): 1.00
Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments
Major Street Eastbound Westbound
Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6
L T R L T R
Volume (veh/h) 1264 9 4 1726
Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Hourly Flow Rate, HFR
(veh/h)
0 1264 9 4 1726 0
Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 -- -- 0 -- --
Median Type Undivided
RT Channelized 0 0
Lanes 0 2 0 1 2 0
Configuration T TR L T
Upstream Signal 0 0
Minor Street Northbound Southbound
Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12
L T R L T R
Volume (veh/h) 2 0 1
Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Hourly Flow Rate, HFR
(veh/h)
2 0 1 0 0 0
Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0
Percent Grade (%) 0 0
Flared Approach N N
Storage 0 0
RT Channelized 0 0
Lanes 0 1 0 0 0 0
Configuration LTR
Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service
Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound
Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12
Lane Configuration L LTR
v (veh/h) 4 3
C (m) (veh/h) 552 62
v/c 0.01 0.05
95% queue length 0.02 0.15
Control Delay (s/veh) 11.6 66.0
LOS B F
Approach Delay (s/veh) -- -- 66.0
Approach LOS -- -- F
Copyright © 2007 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved
HCS+
TM
Version 5.3
Generated: 8/3/2010 7:38 PM
ATTACHMENT 5
4738770 Washington Mixed-Use
Future (2013)
Assigned
No. of Approach Right-Turn Lane Critical
Lanes Volumes on Red Volumes Moves
0 73 -1
0 -1
1 0 91 91
0 -1
0 18 0 -1 |1010|0 0 -1
0 -1
0 0 -1
0 -1
0 0 0 -1 |10 10|91
0 0 -1
0 -1
1 959 499
1 499
0 39 0 -1 |1010|1 31 31
0 -1
2 1,637 818 818
0 -1
0 0 0 -1 |1010|818
909
Number of Clearance Intervals 1,500
0.606
Signal Coordination -0.070
0.536
A
Hirsch/Green Transportation Consulting, Inc.
Critical Movement Analysis (CMA) Worksheet
Right
Date
Helms Avenue
22
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Northbound
Through
North/South:
July 26, 2010
Left/Through/Right
Through/Right
Left
Left/Through
Washington Boulevard
Total Lanes
Total Lanes
Eastbound
East/West:
Left
Left/Through
Signalized
Analysis Scenario
Intersection Control
Lane Type
Sum of North/South Critical Volumes
Left
ATSAC
Total Lanes
Sum of East/West Critical Volumes
Total Intersection Critical Volumes
Intersection Capacity
Right
Through
Through/Right
Right
Left/Through
Through
Through/Right
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Base CMA
Project Name|1010|AM Peak Hour
Intersection Number
Intersection Name
Analysis Period
Southbound
Westbound
Without Project
Signal Coordination Adjustment
Level of Service (LOS)
Final CMA
Through/Right
Left
Left/Through
Total Lanes
Approach
Direction
Right
ATTACHMENT 5
4748770 Washington Mixed-Use
Future (2013)
Assigned
No. of Approach Right-Turn Lane Critical
Lanes Volumes on Red Volumes Moves
0 9 -1 9
0 -1
1 5 17
0 -1
0 3 0 -1 |1010|0 88 -1
0 -1
1 6 141 141
0 -1
0 47 0 -1 |1010|150
0 24 -1 24
1 390
0 870 -1
1 510
0 6 0 -1 |1010|0 3 -1
1 983
0 1,647 -1
1 994 994
0 327 0 -1 |1010|1,018
1,168
Number of Clearance Intervals 1,200
0.973
Signal Coordination 0.000
0.973
E
Total Lanes
Two-Way STOP
Through/Right
Total Lanes
Left/Through/Right
Left/Through
Northbound
Through/Right
Right
Left/Through
Through
Through/Right
Right
Direction
Without Project
Intersection Control
Lane Type
Analysis Scenario
Left
Left/Through
Left/Through/Right
Approach
Project Name|10 10|None
AM Peak Hour
Intersection Number
Intersection Name
Analysis Period
Date
Cattaraugus Avenue
East/West:
23
North/South:
July 26, 2010
Washington Boulevard
Left
Signal Coordination Adjustment
Intersection Capacity
Sum of North/South Critical Volumes
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Eastbound
Right
Through/Right
Westbound
Total Lanes
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Lanes
Through
Right
Left
Left/Through
Southbound
Hirsch/Green Transportation Consulting, Inc.
Critical Movement Analysis (CMA) Worksheet
Sum of East/West Critical Volumes
Total Intersection Critical Volumes
Left
Base CMA
Final CMA
Level of Service (LOS)
ATTACHMENT 5
475TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY
General Information Site Information
Analyst RRH
Agency/Co. Hirsch/Green
Date Performed 7/26/2010
Analysis Time Period
AM Peak Hour - Without
Project
Intersection 23
Jurisdiction Culver City
Analysis Year 2013
Project Description 8770 Washington Mixed-Use
East/West Street: Washington Boulevard North/South Street: Cattaraugus Avenue
Intersection Orientation: East-West Study Period (hrs): 1.00
Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments
Major Street Eastbound Westbound
Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6
L T R L T R
Volume (veh/h) 24 870 6 3 1647 327
Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Hourly Flow Rate, HFR
(veh/h)
24 870 6 3 1647 327
Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 -- -- 0 -- --
Median Type Undivided
RT Channelized 0 0
Lanes 0 2 0 0 2 0
Configuration LT TR LT TR
Upstream Signal 0 0
Minor Street Northbound Southbound
Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12
L T R L T R
Volume (veh/h) 9 5 3 88 6 47
Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Hourly Flow Rate, HFR
(veh/h)
9 5 3 88 6 47
Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0
Percent Grade (%) 0 0
Flared Approach N N
Storage 0 0
RT Channelized 0 0
Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0
Configuration LTR LTR
Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service
Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound
Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12
Lane Configuration LT LT LTR LTR
v (veh/h) 24 3 17 141
C (m) (veh/h) 297 779 28 22
v/c 0.08 0.00 0.61 6.41
95% queue length 0.26 0.01 3.00 62.86
Control Delay (s/veh) 18.2 9.6 295.3 10095
LOS C A F F
Approach Delay (s/veh) -- -- 295.3 10095
Approach LOS -- -- F F
Copyright © 2007 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved
HCS+
TM
Version 5.3
Generated: 8/3/2010 7:43 PM
ATTACHMENT 5
4768770 Washington Mixed-Use
Future (2013)
Assigned
No. of Approach Right-Turn Lane Critical
Lanes Volumes on Red Volumes Moves
1 255 255
0 -1
2 1,684 568 568
1 568
0 21 0 -1 |1010|1 194 194 194
0 -1
2 1,483 504
1 504
0 29 0 -1 |1010|762
1 49 49 49
0 -1
2 836 418
0 -1
1 111 111 0 |1010|1 66 66
0 -1
2 1,624 812 812
0 -1
1 285 97 188 |1010|861
1,623
Number of Clearance Intervals 1,375
1.180
Signal Coordination -0.070
1.110
F
Total Lanes
Signalized
Through/Right
Total Lanes
Through
Left/Through
Northbound
Through/Right
Right
Left/Through
Through
Through/Right
Right
Direction
Without Project
Intersection Control
Lane Type
Analysis Scenario
Left
Left/Through
Through
Approach
Project Name|1010|ATSAC
AM Peak Hour
Intersection Number
Intersection Name
Analysis Period
Date
La Cienega Boulevard
East/West:
24
North/South:
July 26, 2010
Washington Boulevard
Left
Signal Coordination Adjustment
Intersection Capacity
Sum of North/South Critical Volumes
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Eastbound
Right
Through/Right
Westbound
Total Lanes
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Lanes
Through
Right
Left
Left/Through
Southbound
Hirsch/Green Transportation Consulting, Inc.
Critical Movement Analysis (CMA) Worksheet
Sum of East/West Critical Volumes
Total Intersection Critical Volumes
Left
Base CMA
Final CMA
Level of Service (LOS)
ATTACHMENT 5
4778770 Washington Mixed-Use
Future (2013)
Assigned
No. of Approach Right-Turn Lane Critical
Lanes Volumes on Red Volumes Moves
1 24 24
0 -1
1 1,804 902 902
1 902
1 979 979 0 |1010|0 0 -1
0 -1
2 1,405 475
1 475
0 21 0 -1 |1010|902
0 13 -1
0 -1
1 0 21 21
0 -1
0 8 0 -1 |1010|2 1,406 773
0 -1
0 24 -1
154 54
0 30 0 -1 |1010|794
1,696
Number of Clearance Intervals 1,425
1.190
Signal Coordination -0.100
1.090
F
Hirsch/Green Transportation Consulting, Inc.
Critical Movement Analysis (CMA) Worksheet
Final CMA
Sum of East/West Critical Volumes
Northbound
Total Lanes
Left/Through/Right
Left
Total Lanes
Total Intersection Critical Volumes
Eastbound
Left/Through
Intersection Capacity
Right
Left/Through
Through
Through/Right
East/West Opposed Phasing
Through
Left
Sum of North/South Critical Volumes
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Right
Through/Right
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Date
La Cienega Boulevard
East/West:
25
North/South:
July 26, 2010
Total Lanes
Project Name|1010|ATSAC + ATCS
AM Peak Hour
Intersection Number
Intersection Name
Analysis Period
Southbound
Westbound
Without Project
Base CMA
Signal Coordination Adjustment
Level of Service (LOS)
Through
Through/Right
Right
Through/Right
Left
Left/Through
Total Lanes
Right
Signalized
Left
Left/Through
Analysis Scenario
Intersection Control
Lane Type
Approach
Direction
Fairfax Avenue
ATTACHMENT 5
4788770 Washington Mixed-Use
Future (2013)
Assigned
No. of Approach Right-Turn Lane Critical
Lanes Volumes on Red Volumes Moves
0 109 -1
0 -1
1 0 210 210
0 -1
0 101 0 -1 |1010|0 0 -1
0 -1
0 0 -1
0 -1
0 0 0 -1 |10 10|210
0 0 -1
0 -1
2 1,079 540
0 -1
1 86 86 0 |1010|1 40 40
0 -1
2 1,656 828 828
0 -1
0 0 0 -1 |1010|828
1,038
Number of Clearance Intervals 1,500
0.692
Signal Coordination -0.070
0.622
B
Total Lanes
Signalized
Through/Right
Total Lanes
Through
Left/Through
Northbound
Through/Right
Right
Left/Through
Through
Through/Right
Right
Direction
Without Project
Intersection Control
Lane Type
Analysis Scenario
Left
Left/Through
Left/Through/Right
Approach
Project Name|1010|ATSAC
AM Peak Hour
Intersection Number
Intersection Name
Analysis Period
Date
Wesley Street
East/West:
26
North/South:
July 26, 2010
National Boulevard
Left
Signal Coordination Adjustment
Intersection Capacity
Sum of North/South Critical Volumes
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Eastbound
Right
Through/Right
Westbound
Total Lanes
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Lanes
Through
Right
Left
Left/Through
Southbound
Hirsch/Green Transportation Consulting, Inc.
Critical Movement Analysis (CMA) Worksheet
Sum of East/West Critical Volumes
Total Intersection Critical Volumes
Left
Base CMA
Final CMA
Level of Service (LOS)
ATTACHMENT 5
4798770 Washington Mixed-Use
Future (2013)
Assigned
No. of Approach Right-Turn Lane Critical
Lanes Volumes on Red Volumes Moves
1 634 358
0 -1
1 0 358 358
0 -1
0 83 0 -1 |1010|0 0 -1
0 -1
0 0 -1
0 -1
0 0 0 -1 |10 10|358
0 0 -1
0 -1
2 937 468 468
0 -1
1 236 179 57 |1010|1 196 196 196
0 -1
2 1,125 562
0 -1
0 0 0 -1 |1010|664
1,022
Number of Clearance Intervals 1,425
0.717
Signal Coordination -0.070
0.647
B
Hirsch/Green Transportation Consulting, Inc.
Critical Movement Analysis (CMA) Worksheet
Final CMA
Sum of East/West Critical Volumes
Northbound
Total Lanes
Through
Left
Total Lanes
Total Intersection Critical Volumes
Eastbound
Left/Through
Intersection Capacity
Right
Left/Through
Through
Through/Right
Through
Left
Sum of North/South Critical Volumes
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Right
Through/Right
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Date
Hayden Avenue
East/West:
27
North/South:
July 26, 2010
Total Lanes
Project Name|1010|ATSAC
AM Peak Hour
Intersection Number
Intersection Name
Analysis Period
Southbound
Westbound
Without Project
Base CMA
Signal Coordination Adjustment
Level of Service (LOS)
Left/Through/Right
Through/Right
Right
Through/Right
Left
Left/Through
Total Lanes
Right
Signalized
Left
Left/Through
Analysis Scenario
Intersection Control
Lane Type
Approach
Direction
National Boulevard
ATTACHMENT 5
4808770 Washington Mixed-Use
Future (2013)
Assigned
No. of Approach Right-Turn Lane Critical
Lanes Volumes on Red Volumes Moves
1 68 68 68
0 -1
2 599 300
0 -1
1 75 20 55 |1010|1 30 30
0 -1
1 717 717
0 -1
1 1,290 186 1,104 1,104|1010|1,172
1 609 372 372
1 372
0 135 -1
0 -1
1 157 34 123 |1010|0 20 -1
0 -1
1 10 40 40
0 -1
0 10 0 -1 |1010|412
1,584
Number of Clearance Intervals 1,425
1.112
Signal Coordination -0.100
1.012
F
Hirsch/Green Transportation Consulting, Inc.
Critical Movement Analysis (CMA) Worksheet
Final CMA
Sum of East/West Critical Volumes
Northbound
Total Lanes
Through
Left
Total Lanes
Total Intersection Critical Volumes
Eastbound
Left/Through
Intersection Capacity
Right
Left/Through
Left/Through/Right
Through/Right
Through
Left
Sum of North/South Critical Volumes
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Right
Through/Right
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Date
Jefferson Boulevard
East/West:
28
North/South:
July 26, 2010
Total Lanes
Project Name|1010|ATSAC + ATCS
AM Peak Hour
Intersection Number
Intersection Name
Analysis Period
Southbound
Westbound
Without Project
Base CMA
Signal Coordination Adjustment
Level of Service (LOS)
Through
Through/Right
Right
Through/Right
Left
Left/Through
Total Lanes
Right
Signalized
Left
Left/Through
Analysis Scenario
Intersection Control
Lane Type
Approach
Direction
National Boulevard
ATTACHMENT 5
4818770 Washington Mixed-Use
Future (2013)
Assigned
No. of Approach Right-Turn Lane Critical
Lanes Volumes on Red Volumes Moves
1 119 119
0 -1
2 2,281 799 799
1 799
0 116 0 -1 |1010|1 176 176 176
0 -1
3 2,026 675
0 -1
1 661 238 423 |1010|975
2 432 238 238
0 -1
1 664 408
1 408
0 153 0 -1 |1010|2 608 334
0 -1
2 1,210 605 605
0 -1
1 126 0 126 |1010|843
1,818
Number of Clearance Intervals 1,375
1.322
Signal Coordination -0.100
1.222
F
Total Lanes
Signalized
Through/Right
Total Lanes
Through
Left/Through
Northbound
Through/Right
Right
Left/Through
Through
Through/Right
Right
Direction
Without Project
Intersection Control
Lane Type
Analysis Scenario
Left
Left/Through
Through
Approach
Project Name|1010|ATSAC + ATCS
AM Peak Hour
Intersection Number
Intersection Name
Analysis Period
Date
La Cienega Boulevard
East/West:
29
North/South:
July 26, 2010
Jefferson Boulevard
Left
Signal Coordination Adjustment
Intersection Capacity
Sum of North/South Critical Volumes
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Eastbound
Right
Through/Right
Westbound
Total Lanes
SB Rt. Turn Overlap with EB Left
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Lanes
Through
Right
Left
Left/Through
Southbound
Hirsch/Green Transportation Consulting, Inc.
Critical Movement Analysis (CMA) Worksheet
Sum of East/West Critical Volumes
Total Intersection Critical Volumes
Left
Base CMA
Final CMA
Level of Service (LOS)
ATTACHMENT 5
4828770 Washington Mixed-Use
Future (2013)
Assigned
No. of Approach Right-Turn Lane Critical
Lanes Volumes on Red Volumes Moves
1 323 323 323
0 -1
2 617 308
0 -1
1 772 772 0 |1010|1 95 95
0 -1
2 660 330 330
0 -1
1 86 36 50 |1010|653
1 27 27
0 -1
2 142 71 71
0 -1
1 46 46 0 |1010|2 1,050 578
0 -1
1 555 555 555
0 -1
1 116 116 0 |1010|649
1,302
Number of Clearance Intervals 1,425
0.914
Signal Coordination -0.100
0.814
D
Total Lanes
Signalized
Through/Right
Total Lanes
Through
Left/Through
Northbound
Through/Right
Right
Left/Through
Through
Through/Right
Right
Direction
Without Project
Intersection Control
Lane Type
Analysis Scenario
Left
Left/Through
Through
Approach
Project Name|1010|ATSAC + ATCS
AM Peak Hour
Intersection Number
Intersection Name
Analysis Period
Date
Jefferson Boulevard
East/West:
30
North/South:
July 26, 2010
Higuera Street/Rodeo Road
Left
Signal Coordination Adjustment
Intersection Capacity
East/West Opposed Phasing
Sum of North/South Critical Volumes
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Eastbound
Right
Through/Right
Westbound
Total Lanes
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Lanes
Through
Right
Left
Left/Through
Southbound
Hirsch/Green Transportation Consulting, Inc.
Critical Movement Analysis (CMA) Worksheet
Sum of East/West Critical Volumes
Total Intersection Critical Volumes
Left
Base CMA
Final CMA
Level of Service (LOS)
ATTACHMENT 5
4838770 Washington Mixed-Use
Future (2013)
Assigned
No. of Approach Right-Turn Lane Critical
Lanes Volumes on Red Volumes Moves
2 564 310 310
0 -1
2 2,178 757
1 757
0 93 0 -1 |1010|2 251 138
0 -1
2 2,055 823 823
1 823
0 414 0 -1 |1010|1,133
1 214 214 214
0 -1
2 553 276
0 -1
1 200 200 0 |1010|2 317 174
0 -1
2 840 420 420
0 -1
1 347 138 209 |1010|634
1,767
Number of Clearance Intervals 1,375
1.285
Signal Coordination -0.100
1.185
F
Hirsch/Green Transportation Consulting, Inc.
Critical Movement Analysis (CMA) Worksheet
Final CMA
Sum of East/West Critical Volumes
Total Intersection Critical Volumes
EB/WB Rt. Turn Overlap With NB/SB Lefts
Through
Left
Left/Through
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Eastbound
Sum of North/South Critical Volumes
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Northbound
Right
Total Lanes
Total Lanes
Total Lanes
Through
Through/Right
Left
Right
Intersection Capacity
Level of Service (LOS)
Right
Left/Through
Through
Through/Right
Date
La Cienega Boulevard
East/West:
31
North/South:
July 26, 2010
Rodeo Road
Project Name|1010|ATSAC + ATCS
AM Peak Hour
Intersection Number
Intersection Name
Analysis Period
Southbound
Westbound
Without Project
Base CMA
Signal Coordination Adjustment
Through
Through/Right
Right
Through/Right
Left
Left/Through
Total Lanes
Signalized
Left
Left/Through
Analysis Scenario
Intersection Control
Lane Type
Approach
Direction
ATTACHMENT 5
4848770 Washington Mixed-Use
Future (2013)
Assigned
No. of Approach Right-Turn Lane Critical
Lanes Volumes on Red Volumes Moves
0 89 -1 89
0 -1
1 197 424
0 -1
0 138 0 -1 |1010|0 28 -1
0 -1
1 318 384 384
0 -1
0 38 0 -1 |1010|473
0 46 -1 46
0 -1
1 444 528
0 -1
0 38 0 -1 |1010|0 43 -1
0 -1
1 546 628 628
0 -1
0 39 0 -1 |1010|674
1,147
Number of Clearance Intervals 1,000
1.147
Signal Coordination 0.000
1.147
F
Hirsch/Green Transportation Consulting, Inc.
Critical Movement Analysis (CMA) Worksheet
Right
Date
Braddock Drive
32
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Northbound
July 26, 2010
Left/Through/Right
Through/Right
Left
Left/Through
Duquesne Avenue
Right
East/West:
Eastbound
Analysis Scenario
Southbound Left/Through/Right
Left
Left/Through
Four-Way STOP
AM Peak Hour
Total Lanes
Lane Type
Signal Coordination Adjustment
Sum of North/South Critical Volumes
Left
None
Total Lanes
Sum of East/West Critical Volumes
Total Intersection Critical Volumes
Intersection Capacity
Total Lanes
Left/Through/Right
Base CMA
Left/Through
Left/Through/Right
Through/Right
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|10 10|North/South:
Westbound
Without Project
Right
Through/Right
Left
Left/Through
Total Lanes
Through/Right
Right
Project Name
Approach
Direction
Intersection Number
Intersection Name
Analysis Period
Intersection Control
Level of Service (LOS)
Final CMA
ATTACHMENT 5
485ALL-WAY STOP CONTROL ANALYSIS
General Information Site Information
Analyst RRH
Agency/Co. Hirsch/Green
Date Performed 7/26/2010
Analysis Time Period AM Peak Hour - Without Project
Intersection 32
Jurisdiction Culver City
Analysis Year 2013
Project ID 8770 Washington Mixed-Use
East/West Street: Duquesne Avenue North/South Street: Braddock Drive
Volume Adjustments and Site Characteristics
Approach Eastbound Westbound
Movement L T R L T R
Volume (veh/h) 46 444 38 43 546 39
%Thrus Left Lane
Approach Northbound Southbound
Movement L T R L T R
Volume (veh/h) 89 197 138 28 318 38
%Thrus Left Lane
Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound
L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2
Configuration LTR LTR LTR LTR
PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Flow Rate (veh/h) 528 628 424 384
% Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0
No. Lanes 1 1 1 1
Geometry Group 1 1 1 1
Duration, T 1.00
Saturation Headway Adjustment Worksheet
Prop. Left-Turns 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.1
Prop. Right-Turns 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.1
Prop. Heavy Vehicle 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
hLT-adj 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2
hRT-adj -0.6 -0.6 -0.6 -0.6 -0.6 -0.6 -0.6 -0.6
hHV-adj 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7
hadj, computed -0.0 -0.0 -0.2 -0.0
Departure Headway and Service Time
hd, initial value (s) 3.20 3.20 3.20 3.20
x, initial 0.47 0.56 0.38 0.34
hd, final value (s) 9.79 9.79 9.65 9.77
x, final value 1.44 1.71 1.14 1.04
Move-up time, m (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0
Service Time, t
s
(s) 7.8 7.8 7.7 7.8
Capacity and Level of Service
Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound
L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2
Capacity (veh/h) 528 628 424 384
Delay (s/veh) 827.52 1310 322.65 190.83
LOS F F F F
Approach: Delay (s/veh)
827.52 1310 322.65 190.83
LOS
F F F F
Intersection Delay (s/veh) 748.24
Intersection LOS F
Copyright © 2007 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved
HCS+
TM
Version 5.3
Generated: 8/3/2010 7:55 PM
ATTACHMENT 5
4868770 Washington Mixed-Use
Future (2013)
Assigned
No. of Approach Right-Turn Lane Critical
Lanes Volumes on Red Volumes Moves
0 0 -1
0 -1
0 0 -1
0 -1
0 0 0 -1 |10 10|0 192 -1
0 -1
1 0 256 256
0 -1
0 64 0 -1 |1010|256
0 91 -1 91
1 528
0 437 -1
0 -1
0 0 0 -1 |1010|0 0 -1
0 -1
1 574 574 574
0 -1
1 350 128 222 |1010|665
921
Number of Clearance Intervals 1,000
0.921
Signal Coordination 0.000
0.921
E
Total Lanes
Four-Way STOP
Through/Right
Total Lanes
Left/Through/Right
Left/Through
Northbound
Through/Right
Right
Left/Through
Through
Through/Right
Right
Direction
Without Project
Intersection Control
Lane Type
Analysis Scenario
Left
Left/Through
Through
Approach
Project Name|10 10|None
AM Peak Hour
Intersection Number
Intersection Name
Analysis Period
Date
Lucerne Avenue
East/West:
33
North/South:
July 26, 2010
Duquesne Avenue
Left
Signal Coordination Adjustment
Intersection Capacity
Sum of North/South Critical Volumes
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Eastbound
Right
Through/Right
Westbound
Total Lanes
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Lanes
Through
Right
Left
Left/Through
Southbound
Hirsch/Green Transportation Consulting, Inc.
Critical Movement Analysis (CMA) Worksheet
Sum of East/West Critical Volumes
Total Intersection Critical Volumes
Left
Base CMA
Final CMA
Level of Service (LOS)
ATTACHMENT 5
487ALL-WAY STOP CONTROL ANALYSIS
General Information Site Information
Analyst RRH
Agency/Co. Hirsch/Green
Date Performed 7/26/2010
Analysis Time Period AM Peak Hour - Without Project
Intersection 33
Jurisdiction Culver City
Analysis Year 2013
Project ID 8770 Washington Mixed-Use
East/West Street: Duquesne Avenue North/South Street: Lucerne Avenue
Volume Adjustments and Site Characteristics
Approach Eastbound Westbound
Movement L T R L T R
Volume (veh/h) 91 437 0 0 574 350
%Thrus Left Lane
Approach Northbound Southbound
Movement L T R L T R
Volume (veh/h) 0 0 0 192 0 64
%Thrus Left Lane
Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound
L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2
Configuration LT T R LTR
PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Flow Rate (veh/h) 528 574 350 256
% Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0
No. Lanes 1 2 0 1
Geometry Group 3a 5 1
Duration, T 1.00
Saturation Headway Adjustment Worksheet
Prop. Left-Turns 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.8
Prop. Right-Turns 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.3
Prop. Heavy Vehicle 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
hLT-adj 0.2 0.2 0.5 0.5 0.2 0.2
hRT-adj -0.6 -0.6 -0.7 -0.7 -0.6 -0.6
hHV-adj 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7
hadj, computed 0.0 0.0 -0.7 -0.0
Departure Headway and Service Time
hd, initial value (s) 3.20 3.20 3.20 3.20
x, initial 0.47 0.51 0.31 0.23
hd, final value (s) 6.06 6.28 5.56 6.96
x, final value 0.89 1.00 0.54 0.49
Move-up time, m (s) 2.0 2.3 2.0
Service Time, t
s
(s) 4.1 4.0 3.3 5.0
Capacity and Level of Service
Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound
L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2
Capacity (veh/h) 592 574 600 506
Delay (s/veh) 49.20 116.27 14.77 16.72
LOS E F B C
Approach: Delay (s/veh)
49.20 77.82 16.72
LOS
E F C
Intersection Delay (s/veh) 59.82
Intersection LOS F
Copyright © 2007 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved
HCS+
TM
Version 5.3
Generated: 8/3/2010 7:59 PM
ATTACHMENT 5
4888770 Washington Mixed-Use
Future (2013)
Assigned
No. of Approach Right-Turn Lane Critical
Lanes Volumes on Red Volumes Moves
1 449 449 449
0 -1
1 1,163 596
1 596
0 28 0 -1 |1010|1 18 18
0 -1
2 1,530 765 765
0 -1
1 461 168 293 |1010|1,214
1 311 311
0 -1
0 32 -1
1 360 360
0 328 0 -1 |1010|1 8 8 8
0 -1
1 33 33
0 -1
1 6 60 |1010|368
1,582
Number of Clearance Intervals 1,375
1.151
Signal Coordination -0.070
1.081
F
Hirsch/Green Transportation Consulting, Inc.
Critical Movement Analysis (CMA) Worksheet
Right
Date
Jefferson Boulevard
34
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Northbound
July 26, 2010
Through
Through/Right
Left
Left/Through
Duquesne Avenue
Right
East/West:
Eastbound
Analysis Scenario
Southbound Through
Left
Left/Through
Signalized
AM Peak Hour
Total Lanes
Lane Type
Signal Coordination Adjustment
Sum of North/South Critical Volumes
Left
ATSAC
Total Lanes
Sum of East/West Critical Volumes
Total Intersection Critical Volumes
Intersection Capacity
Total Lanes
Through
Base CMA
Left/Through
Through
Through/Right
EB/WB Rt. Turn Overlap With NB/SB Lefts
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|1010|North/South:
Westbound
Without Project
Right
Through/Right
Left
Left/Through
Total Lanes
Through/Right
Right
Project Name
Approach
Direction
Intersection Number
Intersection Name
Analysis Period
Intersection Control
Level of Service (LOS)
Final CMA
ATTACHMENT 5
489
Future (2013) Without Project
PM Peak Hour
ATTACHMENT 5
4908770 Washington Mixed-Use
Future (2013)
Assigned
No. of Approach Right-Turn Lane Critical
Lanes Volumes on Red Volumes Moves
1 68 68 68
0 -1
1 1,771 893
1 893
0 15 0 -1 |1010|1 56 56
0 -1
1 1,743 904 904
1 904
0 65 0 -1 |1010|972
0 100 -1
0 -1
1 228 441 441
0 -1
0 113 0 -1 |1010|0 62 -1 62
0 -1
1 79 182
0 -1
0 41 0 -1 |1010|503
1,475
Number of Clearance Intervals 1,500
0.983
Signal Coordination -0.100
0.883
D
Cattaraugus Avenue
Signalized
Left
Left/Through
Through
Through/Right
Right
Through/Right
Left
Analysis Scenario
Intersection Control
Lane Type
Approach
Direction
Without Project
Left/Through
Total Lanes
Base CMA
Signal Coordination Adjustment
North/South:
July 26, 2010
Project Name|1010|PM Peak Hour
Intersection Number
Intersection Name
Analysis Period
Southbound
Westbound
Intersection Capacity
Level of Service (LOS)
Left/Through/Right
Through/Right
Sum of East/West Critical Volumes
Total Intersection Critical Volumes
Final CMA
Left
ATSAC + ATCS
Right
Left/Through/Right
Through/Right
Right
Total Lanes
Left/Through
Through
Left
Left/Through
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sum of North/South Critical Volumes
Total Lanes
Total Lanes
Eastbound
Hirsch/Green Transportation Consulting, Inc.
Critical Movement Analysis (CMA) Worksheet
Right
Date
Robertson Boulevard
East/West:|1010|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Northbound
ATTACHMENT 5
4918770 Washington Mixed-Use
Future (2013)
Assigned
No. of Approach Right-Turn Lane Critical
Lanes Volumes on Red Volumes Moves
1 14 14
0 -1
2 1,439 720 720
0 -1
0 0 0 -1 |1010|0 0 -1
0 -1
1 1,335 685
1 685
0 35 0 -1 |1010|720
0 76 -1
0 -1
1 0 163 163
0 -1
0 87 0 -1 |1010|0 550 550
0
1 22 572
0
1 556 0 556 |1010|713
1,433
Number of Clearance Intervals 1,500
0.955
Signal Coordination -0.100
0.855
D
Hirsch/Green Transportation Consulting, Inc.
Critical Movement Analysis (CMA) Worksheet
Right
Date
Robertson Boulevard
East/West:|1010|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Northbound
Through
Left
Left/Through
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sum of North/South Critical Volumes
Total Lanes
Total Lanes
Eastbound
Left
ATSAC + ATCS
Right
Left/Through/Right
Through/Right
Right
Total Lanes
Left/Through
Final CMA
Left/Through/Right
Through/Right
Sum of East/West Critical Volumes
Total Intersection Critical Volumes
Intersection Capacity
North/South:
July 26, 2010
Project Name|1010|PM Peak Hour
Intersection Number
Intersection Name
Analysis Period
Southbound
Westbound
Base CMA
Signal Coordination Adjustment
Level of Service (LOS)
Without Project
Through
Through/Right
Right
Through/Right
Left
Left/Through
Total Lanes
Signalized
Left
Left/Through
Analysis Scenario
Intersection Control
Lane Type
Approach
Direction
I-405 WB Off-Ramp/Kincardine Avenue
ATTACHMENT 5
4928770 Washington Mixed-Use
Future (2013)
Assigned
No. of Approach Right-Turn Lane Critical
Lanes Volumes on Red Volumes Moves
1 77 77
0 -1
1 901 617 617
1 617
0 333 0 -1 |1010|2 647 356 356
0 -1
1 1,106 672
1 672
0 239 0 -1 |1010|973
1 182 182
0 -1
1 888 514 514
1 514
0 140 0 -1 |1010|1 116 116 116
0 -1
1 418 418
0 -1
1 315 315 0 |1010|630
1,603
Number of Clearance Intervals 1,375
1.166
Signal Coordination -0.100
1.066
F
National Boulevard
Signalized
Left
Left/Through
Through
Through/Right
Right
Through/Right
Left
Analysis Scenario
Intersection Control
Lane Type
Approach
Direction
Without Project
Left/Through
Total Lanes
Base CMA
Signal Coordination Adjustment
Project Name|1010|ATSAC + ATCS
PM Peak Hour
Intersection Number
Intersection Name
Analysis Period
Southbound
Westbound
Total Lanes
Date
Robertson Boulevard
East/West:|1010|North/South:
July 26, 2010
Level of Service (LOS)
Left
Left/Through
Through
Through/Right
Right
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Lanes
Intersection Capacity
WB Rt. Turn Overlap with SB Left
Through
Left
Left/Through
Through/Right
Sum of North/South Critical Volumes
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Northbound
Total Lanes
Through
Right
Eastbound
Right
Hirsch/Green Transportation Consulting, Inc.
Critical Movement Analysis (CMA) Worksheet
Final CMA
Sum of East/West Critical Volumes
Total Intersection Critical Volumes
ATTACHMENT 5
4938770 Washington Mixed-Use
Future (2013)
Assigned
No. of Approach Right-Turn Lane Critical
Lanes Volumes on Red Volumes Moves
1 243 243 243
0 -1
2 789 394
0 -1
0 0 0 -1 |1010|0 0 -1
0 -1
2 1,049 524
0 -1
1 696 0 696 696|1010|939
0 0 -1
0 -1
0 0 -1
0 -1
0 0 0 -1 |10 10|0 0 -1
0 -1
0 0 -1
0 -1
0 0 0 -1 |10 10 10|939
Number of Clearance Intervals 1,500
0.626
Signal Coordination -0.100
0.526
A
I-405 EB On-Ramp
Signalized
Left
Left/Through
Through
Through/Right
Right
Through/Right
Left
Analysis Scenario
Intersection Control
Lane Type
Approach
Direction
Without Project
Left/Through
Total Lanes
Base CMA
Signal Coordination Adjustment
Project Name|1010|ATSAC + ATCS
PM Peak Hour
Intersection Number
Intersection Name
Analysis Period
Southbound
Westbound
Total Lanes
Date
National Boulevard
East/West:|1010|North/South:
July 26, 2010
Level of Service (LOS)
Left
Left/Through
Through
Through/Right
Right
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Lanes
Intersection Capacity
Through
Left
Left/Through
Through/Right
Sum of North/South Critical Volumes
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Northbound
Total Lanes
Through
Right
Eastbound
Right
Hirsch/Green Transportation Consulting, Inc.
Critical Movement Analysis (CMA) Worksheet
Final CMA
Sum of East/West Critical Volumes
Total Intersection Critical Volumes
ATTACHMENT 5
4948770 Washington Mixed-Use
Future (2013)
Assigned
No. of Approach Right-Turn Lane Critical
Lanes Volumes on Red Volumes Moves
0 113 -1
0 -1
1 180 372 372
0 -1
0 79 0 -1 |1010|0 41 -1 41
0 -1
1 186 293
0 -1
0 66 0 -1 |1010|413
1 80 80
0 -1
3 1,906 635 635
0 -1
1 107 60 47 |1010|1 122 122 122
0 -1
3 1,882 627
0 -1
1 45 20 25 |1010|757
1,170
Number of Clearance Intervals 1,500
0.780
Signal Coordination -0.070
0.710
C
Venice Boulevard
Signalized
Left
Left/Through
Left/Through/Right
Through/Right
Right
Through/Right
Left
Analysis Scenario
Intersection Control
Lane Type
Approach
Direction
Without Project
Left/Through
Total Lanes
Base CMA
Signal Coordination Adjustment
North/South:
July 26, 2010
Project Name|1010|PM Peak Hour
Intersection Number
Intersection Name
Analysis Period
Southbound
Westbound
Intersection Capacity
Level of Service (LOS)
Through
Through/Right
Sum of East/West Critical Volumes
Total Intersection Critical Volumes
Final CMA
Left
ATSAC
Right
Through
Through/Right
Right
Total Lanes
Left/Through
Left/Through/Right
Left
Left/Through
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sum of North/South Critical Volumes
Total Lanes
Total Lanes
Eastbound
Hirsch/Green Transportation Consulting, Inc.
Critical Movement Analysis (CMA) Worksheet
Right
Date
Hughes Avenue
East/West:|1010|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Northbound
ATTACHMENT 5
4958770 Washington Mixed-Use
Future (2013)
Assigned
No. of Approach Right-Turn Lane Critical
Lanes Volumes on Red Volumes Moves
1 42 42 42
0 -1
0 103 -1
1 143
0 40 0 -1 |1010|0 90 -1
0 -1
1 165 350 350
0 -1
0 95 0 -1 |1010|392
1 109 109 109
0 -1
2 1,844 651
1 651
0 108 0 -1 |1010|1 78 78
0 -1
3 1,876 625 625
0 -1
1 71 71 0 |1010|734
1,126
Number of Clearance Intervals 1,375
0.819
Signal Coordination -0.070
0.749
C
Venice Boulevard
Signalized
Left
Left/Through
Through
Through/Right
Right
Through/Right
Left
Analysis Scenario
Intersection Control
Lane Type
Approach
Direction
Without Project
Left/Through
Total Lanes
Base CMA
Signal Coordination Adjustment
North/South:
July 26, 2010
Project Name|1010|PM Peak Hour
Intersection Number
Intersection Name
Analysis Period
Southbound
Westbound
Intersection Capacity
Level of Service (LOS)
Through
Through/Right
Sum of East/West Critical Volumes
Total Intersection Critical Volumes
Final CMA
Left
ATSAC
Right
Through
Through/Right
Right
Total Lanes
Left/Through
Left/Through/Right
Left
Left/Through
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sum of North/South Critical Volumes
Total Lanes
Total Lanes
Eastbound
Hirsch/Green Transportation Consulting, Inc.
Critical Movement Analysis (CMA) Worksheet
Right
Date
Bagley Avenue/Main Street
East/West:|1010|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Northbound
ATTACHMENT 5
4968770 Washington Mixed-Use
Future (2013)
Assigned
No. of Approach Right-Turn Lane Critical
Lanes Volumes on Red Volumes Moves
1 86 86
0 -1
1 83 83
0 -1
2 1,271 666 302 302|1010|1 302 212
0 -1
1 72 212 212
0 -1
0 49 0 -1 |1010|514
1 53 53
0 -1
2 2,013 692 692
1 692
0 62 0 -1 |1010|2 606 333 333
0 -1
2 2,016 742
1 742
0 209 0 -1 |1010|1,024
1,538
Number of Clearance Intervals 1,375
1.119
Signal Coordination -0.100
1.019
F
Hirsch/Green Transportation Consulting, Inc.
Critical Movement Analysis (CMA) Worksheet
Right
Date
Culver Boulevard
East/West:|1010|NB Rt. Turn Overlap with WB Left
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Northbound
Left/Through/Right
Left
Left/Through
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sum of North/South Critical Volumes
Total Lanes
Total Lanes
Eastbound
Left
ATSAC + ATCS
Right
Through
Through/Right
Right
Total Lanes
Left/Through
Final CMA
Through
Through/Right
Sum of East/West Critical Volumes
Total Intersection Critical Volumes
Intersection Capacity
North/South:
July 26, 2010
Project Name|1010|PM Peak Hour
Intersection Number
Intersection Name
Analysis Period
Southbound
Westbound
Base CMA
Signal Coordination Adjustment
Level of Service (LOS)
Without Project
Through
Through/Right
North/South Opposed Phasing
Right
Through/Right
Left
Left/Through
Total Lanes
Signalized
Left
Left/Through
Analysis Scenario
Intersection Control
Lane Type
Approach
Direction
Venice Boulevard
ATTACHMENT 5
4978770 Washington Mixed-Use
Future (2013)
Assigned
No. of Approach Right-Turn Lane Critical
Lanes Volumes on Red Volumes Moves
1 160 160
0 -1
1 546 546 546
0 -1
1 60 60 0 |1010|0 596 -1
1 596 596
1 391 391
0 -1
1 292 214 78 |1010|1,142
2 778 428 428
0 -1
2 2,435 867
1 867
0 166 0 -1 |1010|1 112 112
0 -1
2 2,352 868 868
1 868
0 252 0 -1 |1010|1,296
2,438
Number of Clearance Intervals 1,375
1.773
Signal Coordination -0.100
1.673
F
Venice Boulevard
Signalized
Left
Left/Through
Through
Through/Right
North/South Opposed Phasing
Right
Through/Right
Left
Analysis Scenario
Intersection Control
Lane Type
Approach
Direction
Without Project
Left/Through
Total Lanes
Base CMA
Signal Coordination Adjustment
Project Name|1010|ATSAC + ATCS
PM Peak Hour
Intersection Number
Intersection Name
Analysis Period
Southbound
Westbound
Total Lanes
Date
Robertson Boulevard/Exposition Boulevard
East/West:|1010|North/South:
July 26, 2010
Level of Service (LOS)
Left
Left/Through
Through
Through/Right
Right
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Lanes
Intersection Capacity
NB Rt. Turn Overlap with WB Left
Through
Left
Left/Through
Through/Right
Sum of North/South Critical Volumes
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Northbound
Total Lanes
Through
Right
Eastbound
Right
Hirsch/Green Transportation Consulting, Inc.
Critical Movement Analysis (CMA) Worksheet
Final CMA
Sum of East/West Critical Volumes
Total Intersection Critical Volumes
ATTACHMENT 5
4988770 Washington Mixed-Use
Future (2013)
Assigned
No. of Approach Right-Turn Lane Critical
Lanes Volumes on Red Volumes Moves
1 630 630 630
0 -1
1 759 490
1 490
0 221 0 -1 |1010|1 183 183
0 -1
1 818 460 460
1 460
0 101 0 -1 |1010|1,090
2 206 113
0 -1
3 2,223 741 741
0 -1
1 539 315 224 |1010|2 123 68 68
0 -1
3 1,593 531
0 -1
1 59 59 0 |1010|809
1,899
Number of Clearance Intervals 1,375
1.381
Signal Coordination -0.100
1.281
F
Hirsch/Green Transportation Consulting, Inc.
Critical Movement Analysis (CMA) Worksheet
Final CMA
Sum of East/West Critical Volumes
Through
Left
Sum of North/South Critical Volumes
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Northbound
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Lanes
Total Intersection Critical Volumes
Total Lanes
Through
Right
Eastbound
Left/Through
Through/Right
Total Lanes
Right
Left
Right
Left/Through
Through
Through/Right
Intersection Capacity
Level of Service (LOS)
Date
National Boulevard
East/West:|10 10|North/South:
July 26, 2010
Southbound
Westbound
Without Project
Project Name|1010|ATSAC + ATCS
PM Peak Hour
Intersection Number
Intersection Name
Analysis Period
Base CMA
Signal Coordination Adjustment
Through
Through/Right
Right
Through/Right
Left
Left/Through
Total Lanes
Signalized
Left
Left/Through
Analysis Scenario
Intersection Control
Lane Type
Approach
Direction
Venice Boulevard
ATTACHMENT 5
4998770 Washington Mixed-Use
Future (2013)
Assigned
No. of Approach Right-Turn Lane Critical
Lanes Volumes on Red Volumes Moves
0 16 -1 16
117
0 1 -1
0 -1
1 9 90 |1010|0 29 -1
0 -1
1 9 65 65
0 -1
0 27 0 -1 |1010|81
1 74 74
0 -1
2 2,589 874 874
1 874
0 34 0 -1 |1010|1 33 33 33
0 -1
2 1,787 598
1 598
0 8 0 -1 |1010|907
988
Number of Clearance Intervals 1,500
0.659
Signal Coordination -0.100
0.559
A
Hirsch/Green Transportation Consulting, Inc.
Critical Movement Analysis (CMA) Worksheet
Right
Date
Helms Avenue
East/West:
10
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Northbound
Left/Through/Right
Left
Left/Through
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sum of North/South Critical Volumes
Total Lanes
Total Lanes
Eastbound
Left
ATSAC + ATCS
Right
Through
Through/Right
Right
Total Lanes
Left/Through
Final CMA
Through
Through/Right
Sum of East/West Critical Volumes
Total Intersection Critical Volumes
Intersection Capacity
North/South:
July 26, 2010
Project Name|1010|PM Peak Hour
Intersection Number
Intersection Name
Analysis Period
Southbound
Westbound
Base CMA
Signal Coordination Adjustment
Level of Service (LOS)
Without Project
Through
Through/Right
Right
Through/Right
Left
Left/Through
Total Lanes
Signalized
Left
Left/Through
Analysis Scenario
Intersection Control
Lane Type
Approach
Direction
Venice Boulevard
ATTACHMENT 5
5008770 Washington Mixed-Use
Future (2013)
Assigned
No. of Approach Right-Turn Lane Critical
Lanes Volumes on Red Volumes Moves
0 13 -1 13
0 -1
1 63 89
0 -1
0 13 0 -1 |1010|0 189 -1
0 -1
1 74 295 295
0 -1
0 32 0 -1 |1010|308
1 113 113
0 -1
2 2,444 819 819
1 819
0 13 0 -1 |1010|1 79 79 79
0 -1
2 1,698 592
1 592
0 77 0 -1 |1010|898
1,206
Number of Clearance Intervals 1,500
0.804
Signal Coordination -0.100
0.704
C
Venice Boulevard
Signalized
Left
Left/Through
Left/Through/Right
Through/Right
Right
Through/Right
Left
Analysis Scenario
Intersection Control
Lane Type
Approach
Direction
Without Project
Left/Through
Total Lanes
Base CMA
Signal Coordination Adjustment
Project Name|1010|ATSAC + ATCS
PM Peak Hour
Intersection Number
Intersection Name
Analysis Period
Southbound
Westbound
Total Lanes
Date
Cattaraugus Avenue
East/West:
11
North/South:
July 26, 2010
Level of Service (LOS)
Left
Left/Through
Through
Through/Right
Right
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Lanes
Intersection Capacity
Left/Through/Right
Left
Left/Through
Through/Right
Sum of North/South Critical Volumes
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Northbound
Total Lanes
Through
Right
Eastbound
Right
Hirsch/Green Transportation Consulting, Inc.
Critical Movement Analysis (CMA) Worksheet
Final CMA
Sum of East/West Critical Volumes
Total Intersection Critical Volumes
ATTACHMENT 5
5018770 Washington Mixed-Use
Future (2013)
Assigned
No. of Approach Right-Turn Lane Critical
Lanes Volumes on Red Volumes Moves
1 107 107 107
0 -1
2 1,100 373
1 373
0 20 0 -1 |1010|1 36 36
0 -1
2 1,516 609 609
1 609
0 311 0 -1 |1010|716
2 301 166
0 -1
3 2,037 679 679
0 -1
1 259 54 205 |1010|1 202 202 202
0 -1
3 1,397 466
0 -1
1 34 34 0 |1010|881
1,597
Number of Clearance Intervals 1,375
1.161
Signal Coordination -0.070
1.091
F
Hirsch/Green Transportation Consulting, Inc.
Critical Movement Analysis (CMA) Worksheet
Final CMA
Sum of East/West Critical Volumes
Total Intersection Critical Volumes
Total Lanes
Through
Right
Eastbound
Right
Through
Left
Left/Through
Through/Right
Sum of North/South Critical Volumes
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Northbound
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Lanes
Intersection Capacity
Left
Left/Through
Through
Through/Right
Right
Level of Service (LOS)
Total Lanes
Date
La Cienega Boulevard
East/West:
12
North/South:
July 26, 2010
Project Name|1010|ATSAC
PM Peak Hour
Intersection Number
Intersection Name
Analysis Period
Southbound
Westbound
Base CMA
Signal Coordination Adjustment
Without Project
Through
Through/Right
Right
Through/Right
Left
Left/Through
Total Lanes
Signalized
Left
Left/Through
Analysis Scenario
Intersection Control
Lane Type
Approach
Direction
Venice Boulevard
ATTACHMENT 5
5028770 Washington Mixed-Use
Future (2013)
Assigned
No. of Approach Right-Turn Lane Critical
Lanes Volumes on Red Volumes Moves
1 72 72 72
0 -1
0 341 -1
1 361
0 20 0 -1 |1010|1 34 34
0 -1
0 343 -1
1 404 404
0 61 0 -1 |1010|476
1 47 47
0 -1
1 1,252 760 760
1 760
0 267 0 -1 |1010|1 80 80 80
0 -1
1 576 308
1 308
0 41 0 -1 |1010|840
1,316
Number of Clearance Intervals 1,500
0.877
Signal Coordination -0.070
0.807
D
Washington Boulevard
Signalized
Left
Left/Through
Through
Through/Right
Right
Through/Right
Left
Analysis Scenario
Intersection Control
Lane Type
Approach
Direction
Without Project
Left/Through
Total Lanes
Base CMA
Signal Coordination Adjustment
Project Name|1010|ATSAC
PM Peak Hour
Intersection Number
Intersection Name
Analysis Period
Southbound
Westbound
Total Lanes
Date
Hughes Avenue/Duquesne Avenue
East/West:
13
North/South:
July 26, 2010
Level of Service (LOS)
Left
Left/Through
Through
Through/Right
Right
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Lanes
Intersection Capacity
Through
Left
Left/Through
Through/Right
Sum of North/South Critical Volumes
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Northbound
Total Lanes
Through
Right
Eastbound
Right
Hirsch/Green Transportation Consulting, Inc.
Critical Movement Analysis (CMA) Worksheet
Final CMA
Sum of East/West Critical Volumes
Total Intersection Critical Volumes
ATTACHMENT 5
5038770 Washington Mixed-Use
Future (2013)
Assigned
No. of Approach Right-Turn Lane Critical
Lanes Volumes on Red Volumes Moves
1 113 113
0 -1
1 316 316 316
0 -1
1 153 54 99 |1010|1 122 122 122
0 -1
1 525 300
1 300
0 74 0 -1 |1010|438
1 69 69
0 -1
1 1,008 550 550
1 550
0 92 0 -1 |1010|1 108 108 108
0 -1
1 912 467
1 467
0 22 0 -1 |1010|658
1,096
Number of Clearance Intervals 1,375
0.797
Signal Coordination -0.070
0.727
C
Hirsch/Green Transportation Consulting, Inc.
Critical Movement Analysis (CMA) Worksheet
Right
Date
Duquesne Avenue
East/West:
14
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Northbound
Through
Left
Left/Through
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sum of North/South Critical Volumes
Total Lanes
Total Lanes
Eastbound
Left
ATSAC
Right
Through
Through/Right
Right
Total Lanes
Left/Through
Final CMA
Through
Through/Right
Sum of East/West Critical Volumes
Total Intersection Critical Volumes
Intersection Capacity
North/South:
July 26, 2010
Project Name|1010|PM Peak Hour
Intersection Number
Intersection Name
Analysis Period
Southbound
Westbound
Base CMA
Signal Coordination Adjustment
Level of Service (LOS)
Without Project
Through
Through/Right
Right
Through/Right
Left
Left/Through
Total Lanes
Signalized
Left
Left/Through
Analysis Scenario
Intersection Control
Lane Type
Approach
Direction
Culver Boulevard
ATTACHMENT 5
5048770 Washington Mixed-Use
Future (2013)
Assigned
No. of Approach Right-Turn Lane Critical
Lanes Volumes on Red Volumes Moves
0 0 -1
0 -1
2 1,203 420
1 420
0 57 0 -1 |1010|1 81 81
0 -1
1 1,011 506 506
1 506
1 691 634 57 |1010|506
1 1,247 634 634
1 634
0 20 -1
0 -1
1 6 06 |1010|0 13 -1
138 38
0 25 -1
0 -1
1 55 43 12 |1010|672
1,178
Number of Clearance Intervals 1,375
0.857
Signal Coordination -0.070
0.787
C
Hirsch/Green Transportation Consulting, Inc.
Critical Movement Analysis (CMA) Worksheet
Right
Date
Culver Boulevard
East/West:
15
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Northbound
Through
Left
Left/Through
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sum of North/South Critical Volumes
Total Lanes
Total Lanes
Eastbound
Left
ATSAC
East/West Opposed Phasing
Right
Through
Through/Right
Right
Total Lanes
Left/Through
Final CMA
Through
Through/Right
Sum of East/West Critical Volumes
Total Intersection Critical Volumes
Intersection Capacity
North/South:
July 26, 2010
Project Name|1010|PM Peak Hour
Intersection Number
Intersection Name
Analysis Period
Southbound
Westbound
Base CMA
Signal Coordination Adjustment
Level of Service (LOS)
Without Project
Through
Through/Right
Right
Through/Right
Left
Left/Through
Total Lanes
Signalized
Left
Left/Through
Analysis Scenario
Intersection Control
Lane Type
Approach
Direction
Washington Boulevard/Irving Place
ATTACHMENT 5
5058770 Washington Mixed-Use
Future (2013)
Assigned
No. of Approach Right-Turn Lane Critical
Lanes Volumes on Red Volumes Moves
1 115 115
0 -1
3 2,323 774 774
0 -1
0 0 0 -1 |1010|0 0 -1
0 -1
2 1,483 533
1 533
0 117 0 -1 |1010|774
1 281 281 281
0 -1
0 0 -1
0 -1
1 166 120 46 |1010|0 0 -1
0 -1
0 0 -1
0 -1
0 0 0 -1 |10 10|281
1,055
Number of Clearance Intervals 1,425
0.740
Signal Coordination -0.070
0.670
B
Main Street
Signalized
Left
Left/Through
Through
Through/Right
Right
Through/Right
Left
Analysis Scenario
Intersection Control
Lane Type
Approach
Direction
Without Project
Left/Through
Total Lanes
Base CMA
Signal Coordination Adjustment
Project Name|1010|ATSAC
PM Peak Hour
Intersection Number
Intersection Name
Analysis Period
Southbound
Westbound
Total Lanes
Date
Culver Boulevard
East/West:
16
North/South:
July 26, 2010
Level of Service (LOS)
Left
Left/Through
Through
Through/Right
Right
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Lanes
Intersection Capacity
Through
Left
Left/Through
Through/Right
Sum of North/South Critical Volumes
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Northbound
Total Lanes
Through
Right
Eastbound
Right
Hirsch/Green Transportation Consulting, Inc.
Critical Movement Analysis (CMA) Worksheet
Final CMA
Sum of East/West Critical Volumes
Total Intersection Critical Volumes
ATTACHMENT 5
5068770 Washington Mixed-Use
Future (2013)
Assigned
No. of Approach Right-Turn Lane Critical
Lanes Volumes on Red Volumes Moves
1 14 14
0 -1
2 1,365 682 682
0 -1
2 1,156 1,086 35 |1010|1 116 116 116
0 -1
1 640 324
1 324
0 9 0 -1 |1010|798
0 0 -1
0 -1
0 0 -1
0 -1
1 20 14 6 6|1010|1 1,056 543 543
1 543
0 30 -1
0 -1
1 77 58 19 |1010|549
1,347
Number of Clearance Intervals 1,425
0.945
Signal Coordination -0.070
0.875
D
Hirsch/Green Transportation Consulting, Inc.
Critical Movement Analysis (CMA) Worksheet
Right
Date
Culver Boulevard
East/West:
17
NB Rt. Turn Overlap with WB Left
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Northbound
Through
Left
Left/Through
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sum of North/South Critical Volumes
Total Lanes
Total Lanes
Eastbound
Left
ATSAC
EB Rt. Turn Overlap with NB Left
East/West Opposed Phasing
Right
Through
Through/Right
Right
Total Lanes
Left/Through
Final CMA
Through
Through/Right
Sum of East/West Critical Volumes
Total Intersection Critical Volumes
Intersection Capacity
North/South:
July 26, 2010
Project Name|1010|PM Peak Hour
Intersection Number
Intersection Name
Analysis Period
Southbound
Westbound
Base CMA
Signal Coordination Adjustment
Level of Service (LOS)
Without Project
Through
Through/Right
Right
Through/Right
Left
Left/Through
Total Lanes
Signalized
Left
Left/Through
Analysis Scenario
Intersection Control
Lane Type
Approach
Direction
Washington Boulevard/Canfield Avenue
ATTACHMENT 5
5078770 Washington Mixed-Use
Future (2013)
Assigned
No. of Approach Right-Turn Lane Critical
Lanes Volumes on Red Volumes Moves
1 56 56
0 -1
1 221 221 221
0 -1
1 34 34 0 |1010|1 184 184 184
0 -1
1 331 331
0 -1
1 54 054 |1010|405
1 97 97 97
0 -1
1 1,007 550
1 550
0 94 0 -1 |1010|1 89 89
0 -1
1 963 568 568
1 568
0 173 0 -1 |1010|665
1,070
Number of Clearance Intervals 1,425
0.751
Signal Coordination -0.070
0.681
B
Hirsch/Green Transportation Consulting, Inc.
Critical Movement Analysis (CMA) Worksheet
Right
Date
Robertson Boulevard/Higuera Street
East/West:
18
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Northbound
Through
Left
Left/Through
Total Lanes
Through/Right
Left
Sum of North/South Critical Volumes
Total Lanes
Right
Through
Through/Right
Right
Left/Through
Left/Through
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Lanes
Eastbound
Level of Service (LOS)
Through
Through/Right
Sum of East/West Critical Volumes
Total Intersection Critical Volumes
Final CMA
ATSAC
North/South:
July 26, 2010
Project Name|1010|PM Peak Hour
Intersection Number
Intersection Name
Analysis Period
Southbound
Westbound
Base CMA
Signal Coordination Adjustment
Intersection Capacity
Left
Total Lanes
Analysis Scenario
Intersection Control
Lane Type
Approach
Direction
Without Project
Signalized
Left
Left/Through
Through
Through/Right
Right
Washington Boulevard
ATTACHMENT 5
5088770 Washington Mixed-Use
Future (2013)
Assigned
No. of Approach Right-Turn Lane Critical
Lanes Volumes on Red Volumes Moves
1 56 56
0 -1
0 0 -1
0 -1
1 113 31 82 82|1010|0 0 -1
0 -1
0 0 -1
0 -1
0 0 0 -1 |10 10|82
0 0 -1
0 -1
1 1,524 792 792
1 792
0 61 0 -1 |1010|0 62 -1 62
1 414
1 1,075 724
0 -1
0 0 0 -1 |1010|854
936
Number of Clearance Intervals 1,500
0.624
Signal Coordination -0.070
0.554
A
Washington Boulevard
Signalized
Left
Left/Through
Through
Through/Right
Right
Through/Right
Left
Analysis Scenario
Intersection Control
Lane Type
Approach
Direction
Without Project
Left/Through
Total Lanes
Base CMA
Signal Coordination Adjustment
Project Name|1010|ATSAC
PM Peak Hour
Intersection Number
Intersection Name
Analysis Period
Southbound
Westbound
Total Lanes
Date
Landmark Street
East/West:
19
North/South:
July 26, 2010
Level of Service (LOS)
Left
Left/Through
Through
Through/Right
Right
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Lanes
Intersection Capacity
Through
Left
Left/Through
Through/Right
Sum of North/South Critical Volumes
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Northbound
Total Lanes
Through
Right
Eastbound
Right
Hirsch/Green Transportation Consulting, Inc.
Critical Movement Analysis (CMA) Worksheet
Final CMA
Sum of East/West Critical Volumes
Total Intersection Critical Volumes
ATTACHMENT 5
5098770 Washington Mixed-Use
Future (2013)
Assigned
No. of Approach Right-Turn Lane Critical
Lanes Volumes on Red Volumes Moves
2 269 148 148
0 -1
1 849 472
1 472
0 96 0 -1 |1010|2 250 137
0 -1
1 1,071 572 572
1 572
0 73 0 -1 |1010|720
1 85 85
0 -1
2 1,048 524 524
0 -1
1 288 74 214 |1010|1 95 95 95
0 -1
2 845 406
1 406
0 372 0 -1 |1010|619
1,339
Number of Clearance Intervals 1,375
0.974
Signal Coordination -0.070
0.904
E
Washington Boulevard
Lane Type
Approach
Direction
Left
Left/Through
Total Lanes
Signalized
Left
Left/Through
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Northbound
Analysis Scenario
Intersection Control
Without Project
Through
Through/Right
Right
Through/Right
Project Name|1010|ATSAC
PM Peak Hour
Intersection Number
Intersection Name
Analysis Period
Southbound
Westbound
Total Lanes
Date
National Boulevard
East/West:
20
North/South:
July 26, 2010
Right
Level of Service (LOS)
Sum of East/West Critical Volumes
Intersection Capacity
Base CMA
Signal Coordination Adjustment
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Lanes
Left
Right
Left/Through
Through
Through/Right
Hirsch/Green Transportation Consulting, Inc.
Critical Movement Analysis (CMA) Worksheet
Through
Left
Left/Through
Through/Right
Sum of North/South Critical Volumes
Total Lanes
Through
Right
Eastbound
Total Intersection Critical Volumes
Final CMA
ATTACHMENT 5
5108770 Washington Mixed-Use
Future (2013)
Assigned
No. of Approach Right-Turn Lane Critical
Lanes Volumes on Red Volumes Moves
0 10 -1
0 -1
1 0 18 18
0 -1
0 8 0 -1 |1010|0 0 -1
0 -1
0 0 -1
0 -1
0 0 0 -1 |10 10|18
0 0 -1
0 -1
1 1,350 676 676
1 676
0 3 0 -1 |1010|1 1 1 1
0 -1
2 1,238 619
0 -1
0 0 0 -1 |1010|677
695
Number of Clearance Intervals 1,200
0.579
Signal Coordination 0.000
0.579
A
Hirsch/Green Transportation Consulting, Inc.
Critical Movement Analysis (CMA) Worksheet
Final CMA
Sum of East/West Critical Volumes
Through
Left
Sum of North/South Critical Volumes
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Northbound
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Lanes
Total Intersection Critical Volumes
Total Lanes
Through
Right
Eastbound
Left/Through
Through/Right
Total Lanes
Right
Left
Right
Left/Through
Through
Through/Right
Intersection Capacity
Level of Service (LOS)
Date
Wesley Street
East/West:
21
North/South:
July 26, 2010
Southbound
Westbound
Without Project
Project Name|10 10|None
PM Peak Hour
Intersection Number
Intersection Name
Analysis Period
Base CMA
Signal Coordination Adjustment
Left/Through/Right
Through/Right
Right
Through/Right
Left
Left/Through
Total Lanes
Two-Way STOP
Left
Left/Through
Analysis Scenario
Intersection Control
Lane Type
Approach
Direction
Washington Boulevard
ATTACHMENT 5
511TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY
General Information Site Information
Analyst RRH
Agency/Co. Hirsch/Green
Date Performed 7/26/2010
Analysis Time Period
PM Peak Hour - Without
Project
Intersection 21
Jurisdiction Culver City
Analysis Year 2013
Project Description 8770 Washington Mixed-Use
East/West Street: Washington Boulevard North/South Street: Wesley Street
Intersection Orientation: East-West Study Period (hrs): 1.00
Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments
Major Street Eastbound Westbound
Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6
L T R L T R
Volume (veh/h) 1350 3 1 1238
Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Hourly Flow Rate, HFR
(veh/h)
0 1350 3 1 1238 0
Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 -- -- 0 -- --
Median Type Undivided
RT Channelized 0 0
Lanes 0 2 0 1 2 0
Configuration T TR L T
Upstream Signal 0 0
Minor Street Northbound Southbound
Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12
L T R L T R
Volume (veh/h) 10 0 8
Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Hourly Flow Rate, HFR
(veh/h)
10 0 8 0 0 0
Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0
Percent Grade (%) 0 0
Flared Approach N N
Storage 0 0
RT Channelized 0 0
Lanes 0 1 0 0 0 0
Configuration LTR
Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service
Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound
Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12
Lane Configuration L LTR
v (veh/h) 1 18
C (m) (veh/h) 515 92
v/c 0.00 0.20
95% queue length 0.01 0.72
Control Delay (s/veh) 12.0 53.6
LOS B F
Approach Delay (s/veh) -- -- 53.6
Approach LOS -- -- F
Copyright © 2007 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved
HCS+
TM
Version 5.3
Generated: 8/3/2010 7:40 PM
ATTACHMENT 5
5128770 Washington Mixed-Use
Future (2013)
Assigned
No. of Approach Right-Turn Lane Critical
Lanes Volumes on Red Volumes Moves
0 49 -1
0 -1
1 0 62 62
0 -1
0 13 0 -1 |1010|0 0 -1
0 -1
0 0 -1
0 -1
0 0 0 -1 |10 10|62
0 0 -1
0 -1
1 1,254 642 642
1 642
0 30 0 -1 |1010|1 14 14 14
0 -1
2 1,000 500
0 -1
0 0 0 -1 |1010|656
718
Number of Clearance Intervals 1,500
0.479
Signal Coordination -0.070
0.409
A
Through/Right
Right
Through/Right
Left
Left
Left/Through
Left/Through/Right
Analysis Scenario
Intersection Control
Lane Type
Approach
Direction
Without Project
Signalized
Base CMA
Signal Coordination Adjustment
Project Name|1010|ATSAC
PM Peak Hour
Intersection Number
Intersection Name
Analysis Period
Helms Avenue
Left/Through
Total Lanes
East/West:
22
North/South:
July 26, 2010 Date
Washington Boulevard
Left/Through
Through
Through/Right
Right
Intersection Capacity
Level of Service (LOS)
Eastbound
Right
Through
Left
Left/Through
Through/Right
Sum of North/South Critical Volumes
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Northbound
Total Intersection Critical Volumes
Total Lanes
Through
Right
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Lanes
Left
Southbound
Westbound
Total Lanes
Hirsch/Green Transportation Consulting, Inc.
Critical Movement Analysis (CMA) Worksheet
Final CMA
Sum of East/West Critical Volumes
ATTACHMENT 5
5138770 Washington Mixed-Use
Future (2013)
Assigned
No. of Approach Right-Turn Lane Critical
Lanes Volumes on Red Volumes Moves
0 4 -1 4
0 -1
1 2 9
0 -1
0 3 0 -1 |1010|0 59 -1
0 -1
1 2 98 98
0 -1
0 37 0 -1 |1010|102
0 22 -1
1 599
0 1,257 -1
1 690 690
0 9 0 -1 |1010|0 11 -1 11
1 492
0 951 -1
1 546
0 76 0 -1 |1010|701
803
Number of Clearance Intervals 1,200
0.669
Signal Coordination 0.000
0.669
B
Hirsch/Green Transportation Consulting, Inc.
Critical Movement Analysis (CMA) Worksheet
Right
Date
Cattaraugus Avenue
East/West:
23
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Northbound
Left/Through/Right
Left
Left/Through
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sum of North/South Critical Volumes
Total Lanes
Total Lanes
Eastbound
Left
None
Right
Through
Through/Right
Right
Total Lanes
Left/Through
Final CMA
Through
Through/Right
Sum of East/West Critical Volumes
Total Intersection Critical Volumes
Intersection Capacity
North/South:
July 26, 2010
Project Name|10 10|PM Peak Hour
Intersection Number
Intersection Name
Analysis Period
Southbound
Westbound
Base CMA
Signal Coordination Adjustment
Level of Service (LOS)
Without Project
Left/Through/Right
Through/Right
Right
Through/Right
Left
Left/Through
Total Lanes
Two-Way STOP
Left
Left/Through
Analysis Scenario
Intersection Control
Lane Type
Approach
Direction
Washington Boulevard
ATTACHMENT 5
514TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY
General Information Site Information
Analyst RRH
Agency/Co. Hirsch/Green
Date Performed 7/26/2010
Analysis Time Period
PM Peak Hour - Without
Project
Intersection 23
Jurisdiction Culver City
Analysis Year 2013
Project Description 8770 Washington Mixed-Use
East/West Street: Washington Boulevard North/South Street: Cattaraugus Avenue
Intersection Orientation: East-West Study Period (hrs): 1.00
Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments
Major Street Eastbound Westbound
Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6
L T R L T R
Volume (veh/h) 22 1257 9 11 951 76
Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Hourly Flow Rate, HFR
(veh/h)
22 1257 9 11 951 76
Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 -- -- 0 -- --
Median Type Undivided
RT Channelized 0 0
Lanes 0 2 0 0 2 0
Configuration LT TR LT TR
Upstream Signal 0 0
Minor Street Northbound Southbound
Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12
L T R L T R
Volume (veh/h) 4 2 3 59 2 37
Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Hourly Flow Rate, HFR
(veh/h)
4 2 3 59 2 37
Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0
Percent Grade (%) 0 0
Flared Approach N N
Storage 0 0
RT Channelized 0 0
Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0
Configuration LTR LTR
Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service
Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound
Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12
Lane Configuration LT LT LTR LTR
v (veh/h) 22 11 9 98
C (m) (veh/h) 684 556 58 85
v/c 0.03 0.02 0.16 1.15
95% queue length 0.10 0.06 0.54 15.80
Control Delay (s/veh) 10.4 11.6 78.4 511.9
LOS B B F F
Approach Delay (s/veh) -- -- 78.4 511.9
Approach LOS -- -- F F
Copyright © 2007 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved
HCS+
TM
Version 5.3
Generated: 8/3/2010 7:47 PM
ATTACHMENT 5
5158770 Washington Mixed-Use
Future (2013)
Assigned
No. of Approach Right-Turn Lane Critical
Lanes Volumes on Red Volumes Moves
1 149 149 149
0 -1
2 1,114 394
1 394
0 68 0 -1 |1010|1 243 243
0 -1
2 1,663 569 569
1 569
0 44 0 -1 |1010|718
1 72 72
0 -1
2 1,191 596 596
0 -1
1 137 74 63 |1010|1 81 81 81
0 -1
2 748 374
0 -1
1 137 137 0 |1010|677
1,395
Number of Clearance Intervals 1,375
1.015
Signal Coordination -0.070
0.945
E
Hirsch/Green Transportation Consulting, Inc.
Critical Movement Analysis (CMA) Worksheet
Right
Date
La Cienega Boulevard
East/West:
24
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Northbound
Through
Left
Left/Through
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sum of North/South Critical Volumes
Total Lanes
Total Lanes
Eastbound
Left
ATSAC
Right
Through
Through/Right
Right
Total Lanes
Left/Through
Final CMA
Through
Through/Right
Sum of East/West Critical Volumes
Total Intersection Critical Volumes
Intersection Capacity
North/South:
July 26, 2010
Project Name|1010|PM Peak Hour
Intersection Number
Intersection Name
Analysis Period
Southbound
Westbound
Base CMA
Signal Coordination Adjustment
Level of Service (LOS)
Without Project
Through
Through/Right
Right
Through/Right
Left
Left/Through
Total Lanes
Signalized
Left
Left/Through
Analysis Scenario
Intersection Control
Lane Type
Approach
Direction
Washington Boulevard
ATTACHMENT 5
5168770 Washington Mixed-Use
Future (2013)
Assigned
No. of Approach Right-Turn Lane Critical
Lanes Volumes on Red Volumes Moves
1 8 8
0 -1
1 1,615 808 808
1 808
1 1,508 1,508 0 |1010|0 0 -1
0 -1
2 1,377 464
1 464
0 14 0 -1 |1010|808
0 36 -1
0 -1
1 0 52 52
0 -1
0 16 0 -1 |1010|2 1,057 581
0 -1
0 12 -1
130 30
0 18 0 -1 |1010|633
1,441
Number of Clearance Intervals 1,425
1.011
Signal Coordination -0.100
0.911
E
Signalized
Left
Left/Through
Through
Through/Right
Right
Through/Right
Analysis Scenario
Intersection Control
Lane Type
Approach
Direction
Without Project
Total Lanes
Base CMA
Signal Coordination Adjustment
Project Name|1010|ATSAC + ATCS
PM Peak Hour
Intersection Number
Intersection Name
Analysis Period
Southbound
Westbound
Total Lanes
Level of Service (LOS)
Intersection Capacity
Date
La Cienega Boulevard
East/West:
25
North/South:
July 26, 2010
Fairfax Avenue
Northbound
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Lanes
Left
Right
Left/Through
Through
Through/Right
Right
Left/Through
Left
Eastbound
Total Intersection Critical Volumes
Sum of North/South Critical Volumes
East/West Opposed Phasing
Through
Left
Left/Through
Through/Right
Total Lanes
Left/Through/Right
Right
Hirsch/Green Transportation Consulting, Inc.
Critical Movement Analysis (CMA) Worksheet
Final CMA
Sum of East/West Critical Volumes
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ATTACHMENT 5
5178770 Washington Mixed-Use
Future (2013)
Assigned
No. of Approach Right-Turn Lane Critical
Lanes Volumes on Red Volumes Moves
0 19 -1
0 -1
1 0 136 136
0 -1
0 117 0 -1 |1010|0 0 -1
0 -1
0 0 -1
0 -1
0 0 0 -1 |10 10|136
0 0 -1
0 -1
2 1,212 606
0 -1
1 4 40 |1010|1 5 5
0 -1
2 1,228 614 614
0 -1
0 0 0 -1 |1010|614
750
Number of Clearance Intervals 1,500
0.500
Signal Coordination -0.070
0.430
A
Hirsch/Green Transportation Consulting, Inc.
Critical Movement Analysis (CMA) Worksheet
Right
Date
Wesley Street
East/West:
26
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Northbound
Through
Left
Left/Through
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sum of North/South Critical Volumes
Total Lanes
Total Lanes
Eastbound
Left
ATSAC
Right
Through
Through/Right
Right
Total Lanes
Left/Through
Final CMA
Through
Through/Right
Sum of East/West Critical Volumes
Total Intersection Critical Volumes
Intersection Capacity
North/South:
July 26, 2010
Project Name|1010|PM Peak Hour
Intersection Number
Intersection Name
Analysis Period
Southbound
Westbound
Base CMA
Signal Coordination Adjustment
Level of Service (LOS)
Without Project
Left/Through/Right
Through/Right
Right
Through/Right
Left
Left/Through
Total Lanes
Signalized
Left
Left/Through
Analysis Scenario
Intersection Control
Lane Type
Approach
Direction
National Boulevard
ATTACHMENT 5
5188770 Washington Mixed-Use
Future (2013)
Assigned
No. of Approach Right-Turn Lane Critical
Lanes Volumes on Red Volumes Moves
1 701 438
0 -1
1 0 438 438
0 -1
0 176 0 -1 |1010|0 0 -1
0 -1
0 0 -1
0 -1
0 0 0 -1 |10 10|438
0 0 -1
0 -1
2 1,213 606 606
0 -1
1 144 144 0 |1010|1 56 56 56
0 -1
2 521 260
0 -1
0 0 0 -1 |1010|662
1,100
Number of Clearance Intervals 1,425
0.772
Signal Coordination -0.070
0.702
C
Signalized
Left
Left/Through
Left/Through/Right
Through/Right
Right
Through/Right
Analysis Scenario
Intersection Control
Lane Type
Approach
Direction
Without Project
Total Lanes
Base CMA
Signal Coordination Adjustment
Project Name|1010|ATSAC
PM Peak Hour
Intersection Number
Intersection Name
Analysis Period
Southbound
Westbound
Total Lanes
Level of Service (LOS)
Intersection Capacity
Date
Hayden Avenue
East/West:
27
North/South:
July 26, 2010
National Boulevard
Northbound
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Lanes
Left
Right
Left/Through
Through
Through/Right
Right
Left/Through
Left
Eastbound
Total Intersection Critical Volumes
Sum of North/South Critical Volumes
Through
Left
Left/Through
Through/Right
Total Lanes
Through
Right
Hirsch/Green Transportation Consulting, Inc.
Critical Movement Analysis (CMA) Worksheet
Final CMA
Sum of East/West Critical Volumes
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ATTACHMENT 5
5198770 Washington Mixed-Use
Future (2013)
Assigned
No. of Approach Right-Turn Lane Critical
Lanes Volumes on Red Volumes Moves
1 89 89 89
0 -1
2 890 445
0 -1
1 15 15 0 |1010|1 5 5
0 -1
1 631 631 631
0 -1
1 462 254 208 |1010|720
1 959 507 507
1 507
0 55 -1
0 -1
1 62 44 18 |1010|0 140 -1
0 -1
1 60 215 215
0 -1
0 15 0 -1 |1010|722
1,442
Number of Clearance Intervals 1,425
1.012
Signal Coordination -0.100
0.912
E
Signalized
Left
Left/Through
Through
Through/Right
Right
Through/Right
Analysis Scenario
Intersection Control
Lane Type
Approach
Direction
Without Project
Total Lanes
Base CMA
Signal Coordination Adjustment
Project Name|1010|ATSAC + ATCS
PM Peak Hour
Intersection Number
Intersection Name
Analysis Period
Southbound
Westbound
Total Lanes
Level of Service (LOS)
Intersection Capacity
Date
Jefferson Boulevard
East/West:
28
North/South:
July 26, 2010
National Boulevard
Northbound
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Lanes
Left
Right
Left/Through
Left/Through/Right
Through/Right
Right
Left/Through
Left
Eastbound
Total Intersection Critical Volumes
Sum of North/South Critical Volumes
Through
Left
Left/Through
Through/Right
Total Lanes
Through
Right
Hirsch/Green Transportation Consulting, Inc.
Critical Movement Analysis (CMA) Worksheet
Final CMA
Sum of East/West Critical Volumes
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ATTACHMENT 5
5208770 Washington Mixed-Use
Future (2013)
Assigned
No. of Approach Right-Turn Lane Critical
Lanes Volumes on Red Volumes Moves
1 94 94
0 -1
2 2,356 892 892
1 892
0 319 0 -1 |1010|1 49 49 49
0 -1
3 2,240 747
0 -1
1 311 311 0 |1010|941
2 601 331
0 -1
1 1,011 636 636
1 636
0 262 0 -1 |1010|2 310 170 170
0 -1
2 740 370
0 -1
1 93 093 |1010|806
1,747
Number of Clearance Intervals 1,375
1.271
Signal Coordination -0.100
1.171
F
Hirsch/Green Transportation Consulting, Inc.
Critical Movement Analysis (CMA) Worksheet
Right
Date
La Cienega Boulevard
East/West:
29
SB Rt. Turn Overlap with EB Left
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Northbound
Through
Left
Left/Through
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sum of North/South Critical Volumes
Total Lanes
Total Lanes
Eastbound
Left
ATSAC + ATCS
Right
Through
Through/Right
Right
Total Lanes
Left/Through
Final CMA
Through
Through/Right
Sum of East/West Critical Volumes
Total Intersection Critical Volumes
Intersection Capacity
North/South:
July 26, 2010
Project Name|1010|PM Peak Hour
Intersection Number
Intersection Name
Analysis Period
Southbound
Westbound
Base CMA
Signal Coordination Adjustment
Level of Service (LOS)
Without Project
Through
Through/Right
Right
Through/Right
Left
Left/Through
Total Lanes
Signalized
Left
Left/Through
Analysis Scenario
Intersection Control
Lane Type
Approach
Direction
Jefferson Boulevard
ATTACHMENT 5
5218770 Washington Mixed-Use
Future (2013)
Assigned
No. of Approach Right-Turn Lane Critical
Lanes Volumes on Red Volumes Moves
1 73 73
0 -1
2 823 412 412
0 -1
1 1,050 1,050 0 |1010|1 153 153 153
0 -1
2 564 282
0 -1
1 113 113 0 |1010|565
1 56 56
0 -1
2 567 284 284
0 -1
1 186 142 44 |1010|2 600 330
0 -1
1 328 328 328
0 -1
1 22 22 0 |1010|614
1,179
Number of Clearance Intervals 1,425
0.827
Signal Coordination -0.100
0.727
C
Hirsch/Green Transportation Consulting, Inc.
Critical Movement Analysis (CMA) Worksheet
Right
Date
Jefferson Boulevard
East/West:
30
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Northbound
Through
Left
Left/Through
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sum of North/South Critical Volumes
Total Lanes
Total Lanes
Eastbound
Left
ATSAC + ATCS
East/West Opposed Phasing
Right
Through
Through/Right
Right
Total Lanes
Left/Through
Final CMA
Through
Through/Right
Sum of East/West Critical Volumes
Total Intersection Critical Volumes
Intersection Capacity
North/South:
July 26, 2010
Project Name|1010|PM Peak Hour
Intersection Number
Intersection Name
Analysis Period
Southbound
Westbound
Base CMA
Signal Coordination Adjustment
Level of Service (LOS)
Without Project
Through
Through/Right
Right
Through/Right
Left
Left/Through
Total Lanes
Signalized
Left
Left/Through
Analysis Scenario
Intersection Control
Lane Type
Approach
Direction
Higuera Street/Rodeo Road
ATTACHMENT 5
5228770 Washington Mixed-Use
Future (2013)
Assigned
No. of Approach Right-Turn Lane Critical
Lanes Volumes on Red Volumes Moves
2 328 180
0 -1
2 2,234 822 822
1 822
0 232 0 -1 |1010|2 461 254 254
0 -1
2 2,183 793
1 793
0 196 0 -1 |1010|1,076
1 383 383
0 -1
2 1,200 600 600
0 -1
1 324 180 144 |1010|2 253 139 139
0 -1
2 494 247
0 -1
1 152 152 0 |1010|739
1,815
Number of Clearance Intervals 1,375
1.320
Signal Coordination -0.100
1.220
F
Rodeo Road
Lane Type
Approach
Direction
Left
Left/Through
Total Lanes
Signalized
Left
Left/Through
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Northbound
Analysis Scenario
Intersection Control
Without Project
Through
Through/Right
Right
Through/Right
Project Name|1010|ATSAC + ATCS
PM Peak Hour
Intersection Number
Intersection Name
Analysis Period
Southbound
Westbound
Total Lanes
Date
La Cienega Boulevard
East/West:
31
North/South:
July 26, 2010
Right
Level of Service (LOS)
Sum of East/West Critical Volumes
Intersection Capacity
Base CMA
Signal Coordination Adjustment
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Lanes
Left
Right
Left/Through
Through
Through/Right
Hirsch/Green Transportation Consulting, Inc.
Critical Movement Analysis (CMA) Worksheet
EB/WB Rt. Turn Overlap With NB/SB Lefts
Through
Left
Left/Through
Through/Right
Sum of North/South Critical Volumes
Total Lanes
Through
Right
Eastbound
Total Intersection Critical Volumes
Final CMA
ATTACHMENT 5
5238770 Washington Mixed-Use
Future (2013)
Assigned
No. of Approach Right-Turn Lane Critical
Lanes Volumes on Red Volumes Moves
0 154 -1
0 -1
1 173 501 501
0 -1
0 174 0 -1 |1010|0 7 -1 7
0 -1
1 37 61
0 -1
0 17 0 -1 |1010|508
0 129 -1
0 -1
1 457 744 744
0 -1
0 158 0 -1 |1010|0 16 -1 16
0 -1
1 415 447
0 -1
0 16 0 -1 |1010|760
1,268
Number of Clearance Intervals 1,000
1.268
Signal Coordination 0.000
1.268
F
Duquesne Avenue
Four-Way STOP
Left
Left/Through
Left/Through/Right
Through/Right
Right
Through/Right
Left
Analysis Scenario
Intersection Control
Lane Type
Approach
Direction
Without Project
Left/Through
Total Lanes
Base CMA
Signal Coordination Adjustment
Project Name|10 10|None
PM Peak Hour
Intersection Number
Intersection Name
Analysis Period
Southbound
Westbound
Total Lanes
Date
Braddock Drive
East/West:
32
North/South:
July 26, 2010
Level of Service (LOS)
Left
Left/Through
Left/Through/Right
Through/Right
Right
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Lanes
Intersection Capacity
Left/Through/Right
Left
Left/Through
Through/Right
Sum of North/South Critical Volumes
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Northbound
Total Lanes
Left/Through/Right
Right
Eastbound
Right
Hirsch/Green Transportation Consulting, Inc.
Critical Movement Analysis (CMA) Worksheet
Final CMA
Sum of East/West Critical Volumes
Total Intersection Critical Volumes
ATTACHMENT 5
524ALL-WAY STOP CONTROL ANALYSIS
General Information Site Information
Analyst RRH
Agency/Co. Hirsch/Green
Date Performed 7/26/2010
Analysis Time Period PM Peak Hour - Without Project
Intersection 32
Jurisdiction Culver City
Analysis Year 2013
Project ID 8770 Washington Mixed-Use
East/West Street: Duquesne Avenue North/South Street: Braddock Drive
Volume Adjustments and Site Characteristics
Approach Eastbound Westbound
Movement L T R L T R
Volume (veh/h) 129 457 158 16 415 16
%Thrus Left Lane
Approach Northbound Southbound
Movement L T R L T R
Volume (veh/h) 154 173 174 7 37 17
%Thrus Left Lane
Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound
L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2
Configuration LTR LTR LTR LTR
PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Flow Rate (veh/h) 744 447 501 61
% Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0
No. Lanes 1 1 1 1
Geometry Group 1 1 1 1
Duration, T 1.00
Saturation Headway Adjustment Worksheet
Prop. Left-Turns 0.2 0.0 0.3 0.1
Prop. Right-Turns 0.2 0.0 0.3 0.3
Prop. Heavy Vehicle 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
hLT-adj 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2
hRT-adj -0.6 -0.6 -0.6 -0.6 -0.6 -0.6 -0.6 -0.6
hHV-adj 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7
hadj, computed -0.1 -0.0 -0.1 -0.1
Departure Headway and Service Time
hd, initial value (s) 3.20 3.20 3.20 3.20
x, initial 0.66 0.40 0.45 0.05
hd, final value (s) 7.36 7.54 7.30 9.49
x, final value 1.52 0.94 1.02 0.16
Move-up time, m (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0
Service Time, t
s
(s) 5.4 5.5 5.3 7.5
Capacity and Level of Service
Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound
L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2
Capacity (veh/h) 744 478 501 311
Delay (s/veh) 969.41 79.53 141.71 14.30
LOS F F F B
Approach: Delay (s/veh)
969.41 79.53 141.71 14.30
LOS
F F F B
Intersection Delay (s/veh) 472.71
Intersection LOS F
Copyright © 2007 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved
HCS+
TM
Version 5.3
Generated: 8/3/2010 7:57 PM
ATTACHMENT 5
5258770 Washington Mixed-Use
Future (2013)
Assigned
No. of Approach Right-Turn Lane Critical
Lanes Volumes on Red Volumes Moves
0 0 -1
0 -1
0 0 -1
0 -1
0 0 0 -1 |10 10|0 294 -1
0 -1
1 0 360 360
0 -1
0 66 0 -1 |1010|360
0 64 -1
1 691 691
0 627 -1
0 -1
0 0 0 -1 |1010|0 0 -1
0 -1
1 396 396
0 -1
1 210 180 30 |1010|691
1,051
Number of Clearance Intervals 1,000
1.051
Signal Coordination 0.000
1.051
F
Hirsch/Green Transportation Consulting, Inc.
Critical Movement Analysis (CMA) Worksheet
Right
Date
Lucerne Avenue
East/West:
33
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Northbound
Left/Through/Right
Left
Left/Through
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sum of North/South Critical Volumes
Total Lanes
Total Lanes
Eastbound
Left
None
Right
Through
Through/Right
Right
Total Lanes
Left/Through
Final CMA
Through
Through/Right
Sum of East/West Critical Volumes
Total Intersection Critical Volumes
Intersection Capacity
North/South:
July 26, 2010
Project Name|10 10|PM Peak Hour
Intersection Number
Intersection Name
Analysis Period
Southbound
Westbound
Base CMA
Signal Coordination Adjustment
Level of Service (LOS)
Without Project
Through
Through/Right
Right
Through/Right
Left
Left/Through
Total Lanes
Four-Way STOP
Left
Left/Through
Analysis Scenario
Intersection Control
Lane Type
Approach
Direction
Duquesne Avenue
ATTACHMENT 5
526ALL-WAY STOP CONTROL ANALYSIS
General Information Site Information
Analyst RRH
Agency/Co. Hirsch/Green
Date Performed 7/26/2010
Analysis Time Period PM Peak Hour - Without Project
Intersection 33
Jurisdiction Culver City
Analysis Year 2013
Project ID 8770 Washington Mixed-Use
East/West Street: Duquesne Avenue North/South Street: Lucerne Avenue
Volume Adjustments and Site Characteristics
Approach Eastbound Westbound
Movement L T R L T R
Volume (veh/h) 64 627 0 0 396 210
%Thrus Left Lane
Approach Northbound Southbound
Movement L T R L T R
Volume (veh/h) 0 0 0 294 0 66
%Thrus Left Lane
Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound
L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2
Configuration LT T R LTR
PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Flow Rate (veh/h) 691 396 210 360
% Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0
No. Lanes 1 2 0 1
Geometry Group 3a 5 1
Duration, T 1.00
Saturation Headway Adjustment Worksheet
Prop. Left-Turns 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.8
Prop. Right-Turns 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.2
Prop. Heavy Vehicle 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
hLT-adj 0.2 0.2 0.5 0.5 0.2 0.2
hRT-adj -0.6 -0.6 -0.7 -0.7 -0.6 -0.6
hHV-adj 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7
hadj, computed 0.0 0.0 -0.7 0.1
Departure Headway and Service Time
hd, initial value (s) 3.20 3.20 3.20 3.20
x, initial 0.61 0.35 0.19 0.32
hd, final value (s) 6.37 6.93 6.21 6.96
x, final value 1.22 0.76 0.36 0.70
Move-up time, m (s) 2.0 2.3 2.0
Service Time, t
s
(s) 4.4 4.6 3.9 5.0
Capacity and Level of Service
Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound
L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2
Capacity (veh/h) 691 516 460 511
Delay (s/veh) 442.46 30.82 12.43 25.45
LOS F D B D
Approach: Delay (s/veh)
442.46 24.44 25.45
LOS
F C D
Intersection Delay (s/veh) 198.99
Intersection LOS F
Copyright © 2007 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved
HCS+
TM
Version 5.3
Generated: 8/3/2010 8:01 PM
ATTACHMENT 5
5278770 Washington Mixed-Use
Future (2013)
Assigned
No. of Approach Right-Turn Lane Critical
Lanes Volumes on Red Volumes Moves
1 373 373 373
0 -1
1 1,484 760
1 760
0 35 0 -1 |1010|1 53 53
0 -1
2 1,109 554 554
0 -1
1 211 211 0 |1010|927
1 481 481 481
0 -1
0 63 -1
1 417
0 354 0 -1 |1010|1 29 29
0 -1
1 42 42 42
0 -1
1 20 20 0 |1010|523
1,450
Number of Clearance Intervals 1,375
1.055
Signal Coordination -0.070
0.985
E
Duquesne Avenue
Signalized
Left
Left/Through
Through
Through/Right
Right
Through/Right
Left
Analysis Scenario
Intersection Control
Lane Type
Approach
Direction
Without Project
Left/Through
Total Lanes
Base CMA
Signal Coordination Adjustment
Project Name|1010|ATSAC
PM Peak Hour
Intersection Number
Intersection Name
Analysis Period
Southbound
Westbound
Total Lanes
Date
Jefferson Boulevard
East/West:
34
North/South:
July 26, 2010
Level of Service (LOS)
Left
Left/Through
Through
Through/Right
Right
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Lanes
Intersection Capacity
EB/WB Rt. Turn Overlap With NB/SB Lefts
Through
Left
Left/Through
Through/Right
Sum of North/South Critical Volumes
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Northbound
Total Lanes
Through
Right
Eastbound
Right
Hirsch/Green Transportation Consulting, Inc.
Critical Movement Analysis (CMA) Worksheet
Final CMA
Sum of East/West Critical Volumes
Total Intersection Critical Volumes
ATTACHMENT 5
528ATTACHMENT 5
529
III-i
8770 WASHINGTON BOULEVARD MIXED-USE HIRSCH/GREEN TRANSPORTATION CONSULTING, INC.
REVISED JULY 2010
APPENDICES
TABLE OF CONTENTS
VOLUME I
A – Related Projects Trip Generation Rates/Equations
B – Intersection Geometrics/Controls and Traffic Count Data Sheets
C – Project Local/Residential Street Trip Calculations
D – Conceptual Traffic Mitigation Improvements and Supporting Analyses
VOLUME II
E – CMA Calculation Worksheets
Existing (2010) Conditions
Future (2013) Without Project Conditions
VOLUME III
E – CMA Calculation Worksheets
Future (2013) With Project Conditions
Future (2013) With Project Plus Mitigation Conditions
ATTACHMENT 5
530
APPENDIX E (Continued)
CRITICAL MOVEMENT ANALYSIS/HIGHWAY CAPACITY MANUAL
INTERSECTION OPERATIONS CALCULATION WORKSHEETS
ATTACHMENT 5
531
Future (2013) With Project
AM Peak Hour
ATTACHMENT 5
5328770 Washington Mixed-Use
Future (2013)
Assigned
No. of Approach Right-Turn Lane Critical
Lanes Volumes on Red Volumes Moves
1 80 80 80
0 -1
1 1,350 678
1 678
0 5 0 -1 |1010|1 38 38
0 -1
1 1,866 970 970
1 970
0 73 0 -1 |1010|1,050
0 109 -1 109
0 -1
1 138 360
0 -1
0 113 0 -1 |1010|0 86 -1
0 -1
1 240 398 398
0 -1
0 72 0 -1 |1010|507
1,557
Number of Clearance Intervals 1,500
1.038
Signal Coordination -0.100
0.938
E
Hirsch/Green Transportation Consulting, Inc.
Critical Movement Analysis (CMA) Worksheet
Final CMA
Sum of East/West Critical Volumes
Total Intersection Critical Volumes
Through
Left
Left/Through
Through/Right
Sum of North/South Critical Volumes
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Northbound
Base CMA
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Left/Through
Total Lanes
Left/Through/Right
Right
Eastbound
Right
Southbound
Left/Through
Left/Through/Right
Through/Right
Right
Intersection Capacity
Date
Robertson Boulevard
East/West:|1010|North/South:
July 26, 2010
Cattaraugus Avenue
Left
Westbound
Total Lanes
Total Lanes
Project Name|1010|ATSAC + ATCS
AM Peak Hour
Intersection Number
Intersection Name
Analysis Period
Total Lanes
Analysis Scenario
Intersection Control
Signal Coordination Adjustment
Level of Service (LOS)
Lane Type
Approach
Direction
With Project
Signalized
Through/Right
Right
Through/Right
Left
Left
Left/Through
Through
ATTACHMENT 5
5338770 Washington Mixed-Use
Future (2013)
Assigned
No. of Approach Right-Turn Lane Critical
Lanes Volumes on Red Volumes Moves
1 38 38 38
0 -1
2 1,206 603
0 -1
0 0 0 -1 |1010|0 0 -1
0 -1
1 1,771 922 922
1 922
0 74 0 -1 |1010|960
0 117 -1
0 -1
1 0 163 163
0 -1
0 46 0 -1 |1010|0 451 451
0
1 13 464
0
1 173 173 0 |1010|614
1,574
Number of Clearance Intervals 1,500
1.049
Signal Coordination -0.100
0.949
E
Total Lanes
Signalized
Through/Right
Total Lanes
Through
Left/Through
Northbound
Through/Right
Right
Left/Through
Left/Through/Right
Through/Right
Right
Direction
With Project
Intersection Control
Lane Type
Analysis Scenario
Left
Left/Through
Through
Approach
Project Name|1010|ATSAC + ATCS
AM Peak Hour
Intersection Number
Intersection Name
Analysis Period
Date
Robertson Boulevard
East/West:|1010|North/South:
July 26, 2010
I-405 WB Off-Ramp/Kincardine Avenue
Left
Signal Coordination Adjustment
Intersection Capacity
Sum of North/South Critical Volumes
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Eastbound
Right
Through/Right
Westbound
Total Lanes
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Lanes
Left/Through/Right
Right
Left
Left/Through
Southbound
Hirsch/Green Transportation Consulting, Inc.
Critical Movement Analysis (CMA) Worksheet
Sum of East/West Critical Volumes
Total Intersection Critical Volumes
Left
Base CMA
Final CMA
Level of Service (LOS)
ATTACHMENT 5
5348770 Washington Mixed-Use
Future (2013)
Assigned
No. of Approach Right-Turn Lane Critical
Lanes Volumes on Red Volumes Moves
1 113 113 113
0 -1
1 637 360
1 360
0 84 0 -1 |1010|2 796 438
0 -1
1 1,238 732 732
1 732
0 227 0 -1 |1010|845
1 169 169 169
0 -1
1 697 480
1 480
0 264 0 -1 |1010|1 148 148
0 -1
1 598 598 598
0 -1
1 491 438 53 |1010|767
1,612
Number of Clearance Intervals 1,375
1.172
Signal Coordination -0.100
1.072
F
Hirsch/Green Transportation Consulting, Inc.
Critical Movement Analysis (CMA) Worksheet
Right
Date
Robertson Boulevard|1010|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Northbound
July 26, 2010
Through
Through/Right
Left
Left/Through
National Boulevard
Right
East/West:
Eastbound
Analysis Scenario
Southbound Through
Left
Left/Through
Signalized
AM Peak Hour
Total Lanes
Lane Type
Signal Coordination Adjustment
Sum of North/South Critical Volumes
Left
ATSAC + ATCS
Total Lanes
Sum of East/West Critical Volumes
Total Intersection Critical Volumes
Intersection Capacity
Total Lanes
Through
Base CMA
Left/Through
Through
Through/Right
WB Rt. Turn Overlap with SB Left
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|1010|North/South:
Westbound
With Project
Right
Through/Right
Left
Left/Through
Total Lanes
Through/Right
Right
Project Name
Approach
Direction
Intersection Number
Intersection Name
Analysis Period
Intersection Control
Level of Service (LOS)
Final CMA
ATTACHMENT 5
5358770 Washington Mixed-Use
Future (2013)
Assigned
No. of Approach Right-Turn Lane Critical
Lanes Volumes on Red Volumes Moves
1 188 188 188
0 -1
2 1,174 587
0 -1
0 0 0 -1 |1010|0 0 -1
0 -1
2 1,013 506
0 -1
1 654 0 654 654|1010|842
0 0 -1
0 -1
0 0 -1
0 -1
0 0 0 -1 |10 10|0 0 -1
0 -1
0 0 -1
0 -1
0 0 0 -1 |10 10 10|842
Number of Clearance Intervals 1,500
0.561
Signal Coordination -0.100
0.461
A
Hirsch/Green Transportation Consulting, Inc.
Critical Movement Analysis (CMA) Worksheet
Right
Date
National Boulevard|1010|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Northbound
July 26, 2010
Through
Through/Right
Left
Left/Through
I-405 EB On-Ramp
Right
East/West:
Eastbound
Analysis Scenario
Southbound Through
Left
Left/Through
Signalized
AM Peak Hour
Total Lanes
Lane Type
Signal Coordination Adjustment
Sum of North/South Critical Volumes
Left
ATSAC + ATCS
Total Lanes
Sum of East/West Critical Volumes
Total Intersection Critical Volumes
Intersection Capacity
Total Lanes
Through
Base CMA
Left/Through
Through
Through/Right
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|1010|North/South:
Westbound
With Project
Right
Through/Right
Left
Left/Through
Total Lanes
Through/Right
Right
Project Name
Approach
Direction
Intersection Number
Intersection Name
Analysis Period
Intersection Control
Level of Service (LOS)
Final CMA
ATTACHMENT 5
5368770 Washington Mixed-Use
Future (2013)
Assigned
No. of Approach Right-Turn Lane Critical
Lanes Volumes on Red Volumes Moves
0 107 -1 107
0 -1
1 188 344
0 -1
0 49 0 -1 |1010|0 67 -1
0 -1
1 207 342 342
0 -1
0 68 0 -1 |1010|449
1 46 46
0 -1
3 2,076 692 692
0 -1
1 124 54 70 |1010|1 178 178 178
0 -1
3 1,992 664
0 -1
1 43 43 0 |1010|870
1,319
Number of Clearance Intervals 1,500
0.879
Signal Coordination -0.070
0.809
D
Sum of East/West Critical Volumes
Total Intersection Critical Volumes|1010|ATSAC
Final CMA
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Northbound
Hirsch/Green Transportation Consulting, Inc.
Critical Movement Analysis (CMA) Worksheet
Project Name
AM Peak Hour
Intersection Number
Intersection Name
Analysis Period
Analysis Scenario
Eastbound
Right
Left/Through/Right
Left
Left/Through
Through/Right
Sum of North/South Critical Volumes
Total Lanes
Intersection Capacity
Left
Left/Through
Through
Through/Right
Right
Date
Hughes Avenue
East/West:|1010|North/South:
July 26, 2010
Level of Service (LOS)
Southbound
Westbound
Total Lanes
Total Lanes
Through
Right
Through/Right
Left
Base CMA
Signal Coordination Adjustment
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Left/Through
Total Lanes
Intersection Control
Lane Type
Approach
Direction
With Project
Signalized
Left
Left/Through
Left/Through/Right
Through/Right
Right
Venice Boulevard
ATTACHMENT 5
5378770 Washington Mixed-Use
Future (2013)
Assigned
No. of Approach Right-Turn Lane Critical
Lanes Volumes on Red Volumes Moves
1 48 48 48
0 -1
0 149 -1
1 191
0 42 0 -1 |1010|0 75 -1
0 -1
1 170 312 312
0 -1
0 67 0 -1 |1010|360
1 69 69
0 -1
2 2,140 729 729
1 729
0 48 0 -1 |1010|1 60 60 60
0 -1
3 2,119 706
0 -1
1 39 39 0 |1010|789
1,149
Number of Clearance Intervals 1,375
0.836
Signal Coordination -0.070
0.766
C
Sum of East/West Critical Volumes
Total Intersection Critical Volumes|1010|ATSAC
Final CMA
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Northbound
Hirsch/Green Transportation Consulting, Inc.
Critical Movement Analysis (CMA) Worksheet
Project Name
AM Peak Hour
Intersection Number
Intersection Name
Analysis Period
Analysis Scenario
Eastbound
Right
Left/Through/Right
Left
Left/Through
Through/Right
Sum of North/South Critical Volumes
Total Lanes
Intersection Capacity
Left
Left/Through
Through
Through/Right
Right
Date
Bagley Avenue/Main Street
East/West:|1010|North/South:
July 26, 2010
Level of Service (LOS)
Southbound
Westbound
Total Lanes
Total Lanes
Through
Right
Through/Right
Left
Base CMA
Signal Coordination Adjustment
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Left/Through
Total Lanes
Intersection Control
Lane Type
Approach
Direction
With Project
Signalized
Left
Left/Through
Through
Through/Right
Right
Venice Boulevard
ATTACHMENT 5
5388770 Washington Mixed-Use
Future (2013)
Assigned
No. of Approach Right-Turn Lane Critical
Lanes Volumes on Red Volumes Moves
1 39 39
0 -1
1 86 86 86
0 -1
2 781 781 0 |1010|1 180 128
0 -1
1 45 128 128
0 -1
0 32 0 -1 |1010|214
1 31 31
0 -1
2 2,151 726 726
1 726
0 27 0 -1 |1010|2 965 531 531
0 -1
2 2,016 722
1 722
0 149 0 -1 |1010|1,256
1,470
Number of Clearance Intervals 1,375
1.069
Signal Coordination -0.100
0.969
E
Total Lanes
Signalized
Through/Right
Total Lanes
Left/Through/Right
Left/Through
Northbound
Through/Right
North/South Opposed Phasing
Right
Left/Through
Through
Through/Right
Right
Direction
With Project
Intersection Control
Lane Type
Analysis Scenario
Left
Left/Through
Through
Approach
Project Name|1010|ATSAC + ATCS
AM Peak Hour
Intersection Number
Intersection Name
Analysis Period
Date
Culver Boulevard
East/West:|1010|North/South:
July 26, 2010
Venice Boulevard
Left
Signal Coordination Adjustment
Intersection Capacity
Sum of North/South Critical Volumes
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Eastbound
Right
Through/Right
Westbound
Total Lanes
NB Rt. Turn Overlap with WB Left
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Lanes
Through
Right
Left
Left/Through
Southbound
Hirsch/Green Transportation Consulting, Inc.
Critical Movement Analysis (CMA) Worksheet
Sum of East/West Critical Volumes
Total Intersection Critical Volumes
Left
Base CMA
Final CMA
Level of Service (LOS)
ATTACHMENT 5
5398770 Washington Mixed-Use
Future (2013)
Assigned
No. of Approach Right-Turn Lane Critical
Lanes Volumes on Red Volumes Moves
1 205 205
0 -1
1 479 479 479
0 -1
1 47 47 0 |1010|0 641 -1
1 641 641
1 421 421
0 -1
1 537 172 365 |1010|1,120
2 627 345 345
0 -1
2 2,478 883
1 883
0 172 0 -1 |1010|1 99 99
0 -1
2 2,477 953 953
1 953
0 382 0 -1 |1010|1,298
2,418
Number of Clearance Intervals 1,375
1.759
Signal Coordination -0.100
1.659
F
Hirsch/Green Transportation Consulting, Inc.
Critical Movement Analysis (CMA) Worksheet
Right
Date
Robertson Boulevard/Exposition Boulevard|1010|NB Rt. Turn Overlap with WB Left
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Northbound
July 26, 2010
Through
Through/Right
Left
Left/Through
Venice Boulevard
North/South Opposed Phasing
Right
East/West:
Eastbound
Analysis Scenario
Southbound Through
Left
Left/Through
Signalized
AM Peak Hour
Total Lanes
Lane Type
Signal Coordination Adjustment
Sum of North/South Critical Volumes
Left
ATSAC + ATCS
Total Lanes
Sum of East/West Critical Volumes
Total Intersection Critical Volumes
Intersection Capacity
Total Lanes
Through
Base CMA
Left/Through
Through
Through/Right
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|1010|North/South:
Westbound
With Project
Right
Through/Right
Left
Left/Through
Total Lanes
Through/Right
Right
Project Name
Approach
Direction
Intersection Number
Intersection Name
Analysis Period
Intersection Control
Level of Service (LOS)
Final CMA
ATTACHMENT 5
5408770 Washington Mixed-Use
Future (2013)
Assigned
No. of Approach Right-Turn Lane Critical
Lanes Volumes on Red Volumes Moves
1 345 345 345
0 -1
1 1,023 546
1 546
0 69 0 -1 |1010|1 132 132
0 -1
1 746 426 426
1 426
0 107 0 -1 |1010|771
2 210 116 116
0 -1
3 2,149 716
0 -1
1 689 172 517 |1010|2 213 117
0 -1
3 2,217 739 739
0 -1
1 117 112 5 |1010|855
1,626
Number of Clearance Intervals 1,375
1.183
Signal Coordination -0.100
1.083
F
Left
Left/Through
Right
Through/Right
Analysis Scenario
Intersection Control
Lane Type
Approach
Direction
With Project
Signalized
Final CMA
Level of Service (LOS)
Project Name|1010|ATSAC + ATCS
AM Peak Hour
Intersection Number
Intersection Name
Analysis Period
Southbound
Westbound
Northbound
Date
National Boulevard
East/West:|10 10|North/South:
July 26, 2010
Venice Boulevard
Right
Total Lanes
Through
Through/Right
Left
Left/Through
Total Lanes
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Through/Right
Right
Left
Left/Through
Through
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Left
Left/Through
Through/Right
Eastbound
Hirsch/Green Transportation Consulting, Inc.
Critical Movement Analysis (CMA) Worksheet
Total Lanes
Through
Right
Sum of North/South Critical Volumes
Through
Sum of East/West Critical Volumes
Intersection Capacity
Total Intersection Critical Volumes
Base CMA
Signal Coordination Adjustment
Total Lanes
ATTACHMENT 5
5418770 Washington Mixed-Use
Future (2013)
Assigned
No. of Approach Right-Turn Lane Critical
Lanes Volumes on Red Volumes Moves
0 11 -1 11
120
0 9 -1
0 -1
1 4 40 |1010|0 12 -1
0 -1
1 2 39 39
0 -1
0 25 0 -1 |1010|50
1 76 76 76
0 -1
2 2,260 761
1 761
0 22 0 -1 |1010|1 23 23
0 -1
2 2,522 848 848
1 848
0 23 0 -1 |1010|924
974
Number of Clearance Intervals 1,500
0.649
Signal Coordination -0.100
0.549
A
Total Lanes
Signalized
Through/Right
Total Lanes
Left/Through/Right
Left/Through
Northbound
Through/Right
Right
Left/Through
Through
Through/Right
Right
Direction
With Project
Intersection Control
Lane Type
Analysis Scenario
Left
Left/Through
Through
Approach
Project Name|1010|ATSAC + ATCS
AM Peak Hour
Intersection Number
Intersection Name
Analysis Period
Date
Helms Avenue
East/West:
10
North/South:
July 26, 2010
Venice Boulevard
Left
Signal Coordination Adjustment
Intersection Capacity
Sum of North/South Critical Volumes
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Eastbound
Right
Through/Right
Westbound
Total Lanes
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Lanes
Through
Right
Left
Left/Through
Southbound
Hirsch/Green Transportation Consulting, Inc.
Critical Movement Analysis (CMA) Worksheet
Sum of East/West Critical Volumes
Total Intersection Critical Volumes
Left
Base CMA
Final CMA
Level of Service (LOS)
ATTACHMENT 5
5428770 Washington Mixed-Use
Future (2013)
Assigned
No. of Approach Right-Turn Lane Critical
Lanes Volumes on Red Volumes Moves
0 68 -1
0 -1
1 250 353 353
0 -1
0 35 0 -1 |1010|0 163 -1 163
0 -1
1 86 267
0 -1
0 18 0 -1 |1010|516
1 71 71 71
0 -1
2 2,053 688
1 688
0 11 0 -1 |1010|1 76 76
0 -1
2 2,427 843 843
1 843
0 103 0 -1 |1010|914
1,430
Number of Clearance Intervals 1,500
0.953
Signal Coordination -0.100
0.853
D
Hirsch/Green Transportation Consulting, Inc.
Critical Movement Analysis (CMA) Worksheet
Right
Date
Cattaraugus Avenue
11
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Northbound
July 26, 2010
Left/Through/Right
Through/Right
Left
Left/Through
Venice Boulevard
Right
East/West:
Eastbound
Analysis Scenario
Southbound Left/Through/Right
Left
Left/Through
Signalized
AM Peak Hour
Total Lanes
Lane Type
Signal Coordination Adjustment
Sum of North/South Critical Volumes
Left
ATSAC + ATCS
Total Lanes
Sum of East/West Critical Volumes
Total Intersection Critical Volumes
Intersection Capacity
Total Lanes
Through
Base CMA
Left/Through
Through
Through/Right
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|1010|North/South:
Westbound
With Project
Right
Through/Right
Left
Left/Through
Total Lanes
Through/Right
Right
Project Name
Approach
Direction
Intersection Number
Intersection Name
Analysis Period
Intersection Control
Level of Service (LOS)
Final CMA
ATTACHMENT 5
5438770 Washington Mixed-Use
Future (2013)
Assigned
No. of Approach Right-Turn Lane Critical
Lanes Volumes on Red Volumes Moves
1 150 150 150
0 -1
2 1,773 607
1 607
0 48 0 -1 |1010|1 35 35
0 -1
2 1,339 574 574
1 574
0 384 0 -1 |1010|724
2 355 195 195
0 -1
3 1,810 603
0 -1
1 169 75 94 |1010|1 138 138
0 -1
3 2,101 700 700
0 -1
1 15 15 0 |1010|895
1,619
Number of Clearance Intervals 1,375
1.177
Signal Coordination -0.070
1.107
F
Venice Boulevard
Right
Through/Right
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Left
ATSAC
Total Lanes
Sum of East/West Critical Volumes
Total Intersection Critical Volumes
Left/Through
Signal Coordination Adjustment
Level of Service (LOS)
Final CMA
Project Name|1010|AM Peak Hour
Intersection Number
Intersection Name
Analysis Period
Southbound
Westbound
With Project
Base CMA
Intersection Capacity
Right
Left/Through
Through
Through/Right
Analysis Scenario
Intersection Control
Lane Type
Sum of North/South Critical Volumes
Total Lanes
Direction
Approach
Total Lanes
Left
Total Lanes
Eastbound
Left
Left/Through
Through
Through/Right
Right
North/South:
July 26, 2010
Through
Through/Right
Left
Left/Through
East/West:
Signalized
Hirsch/Green Transportation Consulting, Inc.
Critical Movement Analysis (CMA) Worksheet
Right
Date
La Cienega Boulevard
12
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Northbound
Through
ATTACHMENT 5
5448770 Washington Mixed-Use
Future (2013)
Assigned
No. of Approach Right-Turn Lane Critical
Lanes Volumes on Red Volumes Moves
1 200 200 200
0 -1
0 327 -1
1 367
0 40 0 -1 |1010|1 12 12
0 -1
0 304 -1
1 351 351
0 47 0 -1 |1010|551
1 41 41 41
0 -1
1 692 440
1 440
0 188 0 -1 |1010|1 55 55
0 -1
1 1,290 669 669
1 669
0 48 0 -1 |1010|710
1,261
Number of Clearance Intervals 1,500
0.841
Signal Coordination -0.070
0.771
C
Hirsch/Green Transportation Consulting, Inc.
Critical Movement Analysis (CMA) Worksheet
Right
Date
Hughes Avenue/Duquesne Avenue
13
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Northbound
July 26, 2010
Through
Through/Right
Left
Left/Through
Washington Boulevard
Right
East/West:
Eastbound
Analysis Scenario
Southbound Through
Left
Left/Through
Signalized
AM Peak Hour
Total Lanes
Lane Type
Signal Coordination Adjustment
Sum of North/South Critical Volumes
Left
ATSAC
Total Lanes
Sum of East/West Critical Volumes
Total Intersection Critical Volumes
Intersection Capacity
Total Lanes
Through
Base CMA
Left/Through
Through
Through/Right
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|1010|North/South:
Westbound
With Project
Right
Through/Right
Left
Left/Through
Total Lanes
Through/Right
Right
Project Name
Approach
Direction
Intersection Number
Intersection Name
Analysis Period
Intersection Control
Level of Service (LOS)
Final CMA
ATTACHMENT 5
5458770 Washington Mixed-Use
Future (2013)
Assigned
No. of Approach Right-Turn Lane Critical
Lanes Volumes on Red Volumes Moves
1 96 96
0 -1
1 408 408 408
0 -1
1 109 47 62 |1010|1 52 52 52
0 -1
1 393 231
1 231
0 69 0 -1 |1010|460
1 106 106
0 -1
1 938 488 488
1 488
0 39 0 -1 |1010|1 94 94 94
0 -1
1 799 428
1 428
0 56 0 -1 |1010|582
1,042
Number of Clearance Intervals 1,375
0.758
Signal Coordination -0.070
0.688
B
Total Lanes
Signalized
Through/Right
Total Lanes
Through
Left/Through
Northbound
Through/Right
Right
Left/Through
Through
Through/Right
Right
Direction
With Project
Intersection Control
Lane Type
Analysis Scenario
Left
Left/Through
Through
Approach
Project Name|1010|ATSAC
AM Peak Hour
Intersection Number
Intersection Name
Analysis Period
Date
Duquesne Avenue
East/West:
14
North/South:
July 26, 2010
Culver Boulevard
Left
Signal Coordination Adjustment
Intersection Capacity
Sum of North/South Critical Volumes
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Eastbound
Right
Through/Right
Westbound
Total Lanes
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Lanes
Through
Right
Left
Left/Through
Southbound
Hirsch/Green Transportation Consulting, Inc.
Critical Movement Analysis (CMA) Worksheet
Sum of East/West Critical Volumes
Total Intersection Critical Volumes
Left
Base CMA
Final CMA
Level of Service (LOS)
ATTACHMENT 5
5468770 Washington Mixed-Use
Future (2013)
Assigned
No. of Approach Right-Turn Lane Critical
Lanes Volumes on Red Volumes Moves
0 0 -1
0 -1
2 1,074 372
1 372
0 43 0 -1 |1010|1 68 68
0 -1
1 869 621 621
1 621
1 1,344 349 621 |1010|621
1 674 349 349
1 349
0 24 -1
0 -1
1 23 023 |1010|0 68 -1
1 124 124
0 56 -1
0 -1
1 116 116 0 |1010|473
1,094
Number of Clearance Intervals 1,375
0.796
Signal Coordination -0.070
0.726
C
Total Lanes
Signalized
Through/Right
Total Lanes
Through
Left/Through
Northbound
Through/Right
Right
Left/Through
Through
Through/Right
Right
Direction
With Project
Intersection Control
Lane Type
Analysis Scenario
Left
Left/Through
Through
Approach
Project Name|1010|ATSAC
AM Peak Hour
Intersection Number
Intersection Name
Analysis Period
Date
Culver Boulevard
East/West:
15
North/South:
July 26, 2010
Washington Boulevard/Irving Place
Left
Signal Coordination Adjustment
Intersection Capacity
East/West Opposed Phasing
Sum of North/South Critical Volumes
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Eastbound
Right
Through/Right
Westbound
Total Lanes
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Lanes
Through
Right
Left
Left/Through
Southbound
Hirsch/Green Transportation Consulting, Inc.
Critical Movement Analysis (CMA) Worksheet
Sum of East/West Critical Volumes
Total Intersection Critical Volumes
Left
Base CMA
Final CMA
Level of Service (LOS)
ATTACHMENT 5
5478770 Washington Mixed-Use
Future (2013)
Assigned
No. of Approach Right-Turn Lane Critical
Lanes Volumes on Red Volumes Moves
1 164 164 164
0 -1
3 1,706 569
0 -1
0 0 0 -1 |1010|0 0 -1
0 -1
2 2,087 749 749
1 749
0 160 0 -1 |1010|913
1 150 150 150
0 -1
0 0 -1
0 -1
1 133 82 51 |1010|0 0 -1
0 -1
0 0 -1
0 -1
0 0 0 -1 |10 10|150
1,063
Number of Clearance Intervals 1,425
0.746
Signal Coordination -0.070
0.676
B
Hirsch/Green Transportation Consulting, Inc.
Critical Movement Analysis (CMA) Worksheet
Right
Date
Culver Boulevard
16
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Northbound
July 26, 2010
Through
Through/Right
Left
Left/Through
Main Street
Right
East/West:
Eastbound
Analysis Scenario
Southbound Through
Left
Left/Through
Signalized
AM Peak Hour
Total Lanes
Lane Type
Signal Coordination Adjustment
Sum of North/South Critical Volumes
Left
ATSAC
Total Lanes
Sum of East/West Critical Volumes
Total Intersection Critical Volumes
Intersection Capacity
Total Lanes
Through
Base CMA
Left/Through
Through
Through/Right
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|1010|North/South:
Westbound
With Project
Right
Through/Right
Left
Left/Through
Total Lanes
Through/Right
Right
Project Name
Approach
Direction
Intersection Number
Intersection Name
Analysis Period
Intersection Control
Level of Service (LOS)
Final CMA
ATTACHMENT 5
5488770 Washington Mixed-Use
Future (2013)
Assigned
No. of Approach Right-Turn Lane Critical
Lanes Volumes on Red Volumes Moves
1 12 12
0 -1
2 847 424 424
0 -1
2 953 953 0 |1010|1 137 137 137
0 -1
1 878 441
1 441
0 4 0 -1 |1010|561
0 0 -1
0 -1
0 0 -1
0 -1
1 6 60 |1010|1 1,300 668 668
1 668
0 36 -1
0 -1
1 74 68 6 |1010|668
1,229
Number of Clearance Intervals 1,425
0.862
Signal Coordination -0.070
0.792
C
Total Lanes
Signalized
Through/Right
Total Lanes
Through
Left/Through
Northbound
Through/Right
Right
Left/Through
Through
Through/Right
Right
Direction
With Project
Intersection Control
Lane Type
Analysis Scenario
Left
Left/Through
Through
Approach
Project Name|1010|ATSAC
AM Peak Hour
Intersection Number
Intersection Name
Analysis Period
Date
Culver Boulevard
East/West:
17
North/South:
July 26, 2010
Washington Boulevard/Canfield Avenue
Left
Signal Coordination Adjustment
Intersection Capacity
EB Rt. Turn Overlap with NB Left
East/West Opposed Phasing
Sum of North/South Critical Volumes
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Eastbound
Right
Through/Right
Westbound
Total Lanes
NB Rt. Turn Overlap with WB Left
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Lanes
Through
Right
Left
Left/Through
Southbound
Hirsch/Green Transportation Consulting, Inc.
Critical Movement Analysis (CMA) Worksheet
Sum of East/West Critical Volumes
Total Intersection Critical Volumes
Left
Base CMA
Final CMA
Level of Service (LOS)
ATTACHMENT 5
5498770 Washington Mixed-Use
Future (2013)
Assigned
No. of Approach Right-Turn Lane Critical
Lanes Volumes on Red Volumes Moves
1 32 32
0 -1
1 275 275 275
0 -1
1 47 47 0 |1010|1 183 183 183
0 -1
1 373 373
0 -1
1 156 0 156 |1010|458
1 42 42 42
0 -1
1 909 492
1 492
0 76 0 -1 |1010|1 73 73
0 -1
1 1,331 790 790
1 790
0 248 0 -1 |1010|832
1,290
Number of Clearance Intervals 1,425
0.905
Signal Coordination -0.070
0.835
D
Washington Boulevard
Intersection Control
Lane Type
Approach
Direction
With Project
Signalized
Analysis Scenario
Right
Through/Right
Left
Left
Left/Through
Through
Sum of East/West Critical Volumes
Total Intersection Critical Volumes
Level of Service (LOS)
North/South:
July 26, 2010|1010|AM Peak Hour
Intersection Number
Intersection Name
Analysis Period
Southbound
Left/Through
Through
Through/Right
Right
Intersection Capacity
Final CMA
ATSAC
Base CMA
Signal Coordination Adjustment
Through
Left
Left/Through
Through/Right
Left
Sum of North/South Critical Volumes
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Lanes
Hirsch/Green Transportation Consulting, Inc.
Critical Movement Analysis (CMA) Worksheet
Right
Date
Robertson Boulevard/Higuera Street
East/West:
18
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Project Name
Northbound
Westbound
Total Lanes
Left/Through
Total Lanes
Through
Total Lanes
Eastbound
Right
Through/Right
ATTACHMENT 5
5508770 Washington Mixed-Use
Future (2013)
Assigned
No. of Approach Right-Turn Lane Critical
Lanes Volumes on Red Volumes Moves
1 94 94 94
0 -1
0 0 -1
0 -1
1 112 112 0 |1010|0 0 -1
0 -1
0 0 -1
0 -1
0 0 0 -1 |10 10|94
0 0 -1
0 -1
1 1,001 590
1 590
0 178 0 -1 |1010|0 96 -1
1 699
1 1,772 1,169 1,169
0 -1
0 0 0 -1 |1010|1,169
1,263
Number of Clearance Intervals 1,500
0.842
Signal Coordination -0.070
0.772
C
Hirsch/Green Transportation Consulting, Inc.
Critical Movement Analysis (CMA) Worksheet
Right
Date
Landmark Street
19
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Northbound
July 26, 2010
Through
Through/Right
Left
Left/Through
Washington Boulevard
Right
East/West:
Eastbound
Analysis Scenario
Southbound Through
Left
Left/Through
Signalized
AM Peak Hour
Total Lanes
Lane Type
Signal Coordination Adjustment
Sum of North/South Critical Volumes
Left
ATSAC
Total Lanes
Sum of East/West Critical Volumes
Total Intersection Critical Volumes
Intersection Capacity
Total Lanes
Through
Base CMA
Left/Through
Through
Through/Right
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|1010|North/South:
Westbound
With Project
Right
Through/Right
Left
Left/Through
Total Lanes
Through/Right
Right
Project Name
Approach
Direction
Intersection Number
Intersection Name
Analysis Period
Intersection Control
Level of Service (LOS)
Final CMA
ATTACHMENT 5
5518770 Washington Mixed-Use
Future (2013)
Assigned
No. of Approach Right-Turn Lane Critical
Lanes Volumes on Red Volumes Moves
2 302 166
0 -1
1 890 522 522
1 522
0 153 0 -1 |1010|2 393 216 216
0 -1
1 895 493
1 493
0 91 0 -1 |1010|738
1 130 130 130
0 -1
2 808 404
0 -1
1 201 122 79 |1010|1 88 88
0 -1
2 1,278 551 551
1 551
0 374 0 -1 |1010|681
1,419
Number of Clearance Intervals 1,375
1.032
Signal Coordination -0.070
0.962
E
Hirsch/Green Transportation Consulting, Inc.
Critical Movement Analysis (CMA) Worksheet
Final CMA
Sum of East/West Critical Volumes
Total Intersection Critical Volumes
Through
Left
Left/Through
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Eastbound
Sum of North/South Critical Volumes
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Northbound
Right
Total Lanes
Total Lanes
Total Lanes
Through
Through/Right
Left
Right
Intersection Capacity
Level of Service (LOS)
Right
Left/Through
Through
Through/Right
Date
National Boulevard
East/West:
20
North/South:
July 26, 2010
Washington Boulevard
Project Name|1010|ATSAC
AM Peak Hour
Intersection Number
Intersection Name
Analysis Period
Southbound
Westbound
With Project
Base CMA
Signal Coordination Adjustment
Through
Through/Right
Right
Through/Right
Left
Left/Through
Total Lanes
Signalized
Left
Left/Through
Analysis Scenario
Intersection Control
Lane Type
Approach
Direction
ATTACHMENT 5
5528770 Washington Mixed-Use
Future (2013)
Assigned
No. of Approach Right-Turn Lane Critical
Lanes Volumes on Red Volumes Moves
0 30 -1
0 -1
1 0 42 42
0 -1
0 12 0 -1 |1010|0 0 -1
0 -1
0 0 -1
0 -1
0 0 0 -1 |10 10|42
0 0 -1
0 -1
1 1,310 666
1 666
0 23 0 -1 |1010|1 23 23
0 -1
2 1,726 863 863
0 -1
0 0 0 -1 |1010|863
905
Number of Clearance Intervals 1,200
0.754
Signal Coordination 0.000
0.754
C
Left
Left/Through
Right
Through/Right
Analysis Scenario
Intersection Control
Lane Type
Approach
Direction
With Project
Two-Way STOP
Final CMA
Level of Service (LOS)
Project Name|10 10|None
AM Peak Hour
Intersection Number
Intersection Name
Analysis Period
Southbound
Westbound
Northbound
Date
Wesley Street
East/West:
21
North/South:
July 26, 2010
Washington Boulevard
Right
Total Lanes
Left/Through/Right
Through/Right
Left
Left/Through
Total Lanes
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Through/Right
Right
Left
Left/Through
Through
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Left
Left/Through
Through/Right
Eastbound
Hirsch/Green Transportation Consulting, Inc.
Critical Movement Analysis (CMA) Worksheet
Total Lanes
Through
Right
Sum of North/South Critical Volumes
Through
Sum of East/West Critical Volumes
Intersection Capacity
Total Intersection Critical Volumes
Base CMA
Signal Coordination Adjustment
Total Lanes
ATTACHMENT 5
553TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY
General Information Site Information
Analyst RRH
Agency/Co. Hirsch/Green
Date Performed 7/26/2010
Analysis Time Period
AM Peak Hour - With
Project
Intersection 21
Jurisdiction Culver City
Analysis Year 2013
Project Description 8770 Washington Mixed-Use
East/West Street: Washington Boulevard North/South Street: Wesley Street
Intersection Orientation: East-West Study Period (hrs): 1.00
Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments
Major Street Eastbound Westbound
Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6
L T R L T R
Volume (veh/h) 1310 23 23 1726
Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Hourly Flow Rate, HFR
(veh/h)
0 1310 23 23 1726 0
Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 -- -- 0 -- --
Median Type Undivided
RT Channelized 0 0
Lanes 0 2 0 1 2 0
Configuration T TR L T
Upstream Signal 0 0
Minor Street Northbound Southbound
Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12
L T R L T R
Volume (veh/h) 30 0 12
Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Hourly Flow Rate, HFR
(veh/h)
30 0 12 0 0 0
Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0
Percent Grade (%) 0 0
Flared Approach N N
Storage 0 0
RT Channelized 0 0
Lanes 0 1 0 0 0 0
Configuration LTR
Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service
Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound
Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12
Lane Configuration L LTR
v (veh/h) 23 42
C (m) (veh/h) 524 48
v/c 0.04 0.88
95% queue length 0.14 6.58
Control Delay (s/veh) 12.2 329.1
LOS B F
Approach Delay (s/veh) -- -- 329.1
Approach LOS -- -- F
Copyright © 2007 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved
HCS+
TM
Version 5.3
Generated: 8/3/2010 7:39 PM
ATTACHMENT 5
5548770 Washington Mixed-Use
Future (2013)
Assigned
No. of Approach Right-Turn Lane Critical
Lanes Volumes on Red Volumes Moves
0 73 -1
0 -1
1 0 91 91
0 -1
0 18 0 -1 |1010|0 0 -1
0 -1
0 0 -1
0 -1
0 0 0 -1 |10 10|91
0 0 -1
0 -1
1 1,016 528
1 528
0 39 0 -1 |1010|1 31 31
0 -1
2 1,656 828 828
0 -1
0 0 0 -1 |1010|828
919
Number of Clearance Intervals 1,500
0.613
Signal Coordination -0.070
0.543
A
Hirsch/Green Transportation Consulting, Inc.
Critical Movement Analysis (CMA) Worksheet
Right
Date
Helms Avenue
22
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Northbound
Through
North/South:
July 26, 2010
Left/Through/Right
Through/Right
Left
Left/Through
Washington Boulevard
Total Lanes
Total Lanes
Eastbound
East/West:
Left
Left/Through
Signalized
Analysis Scenario
Intersection Control
Lane Type
Sum of North/South Critical Volumes
Left
ATSAC
Total Lanes
Sum of East/West Critical Volumes
Total Intersection Critical Volumes
Intersection Capacity
Right
Through
Through/Right
Right
Left/Through
Through
Through/Right
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Base CMA
Project Name|1010|AM Peak Hour
Intersection Number
Intersection Name
Analysis Period
Southbound
Westbound
With Project
Signal Coordination Adjustment
Level of Service (LOS)
Final CMA
Through/Right
Left
Left/Through
Total Lanes
Approach
Direction
Right
ATTACHMENT 5
5558770 Washington Mixed-Use
Future (2013)
Assigned
No. of Approach Right-Turn Lane Critical
Lanes Volumes on Red Volumes Moves
0 9 -1 9
0 -1
1 5 17
0 -1
0 3 0 -1 |1010|0 88 -1
0 -1
1 6 146 146
0 -1
0 52 0 -1 |1010|155
0 51 -1 51
1 351
0 900 -1
1 606
0 6 0 -1 |1010|0 3 -1
1 990
0 1,661 -1
1 1,001 1,001
0 327 0 -1 |1010|1,052
1,207
Number of Clearance Intervals 1,200
1.006
Signal Coordination 0.000
1.006
F
Total Lanes
Two-Way STOP
Through/Right
Total Lanes
Left/Through/Right
Left/Through
Northbound
Through/Right
Right
Left/Through
Through
Through/Right
Right
Direction
With Project
Intersection Control
Lane Type
Analysis Scenario
Left
Left/Through
Left/Through/Right
Approach
Project Name|10 10|None
AM Peak Hour
Intersection Number
Intersection Name
Analysis Period
Date
Cattaraugus Avenue
East/West:
23
North/South:
July 26, 2010
Washington Boulevard
Left
Signal Coordination Adjustment
Intersection Capacity
Sum of North/South Critical Volumes
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Eastbound
Right
Through/Right
Westbound
Total Lanes
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Lanes
Through
Right
Left
Left/Through
Southbound
Hirsch/Green Transportation Consulting, Inc.
Critical Movement Analysis (CMA) Worksheet
Sum of East/West Critical Volumes
Total Intersection Critical Volumes
Left
Base CMA
Final CMA
Level of Service (LOS)
ATTACHMENT 5
556TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY
General Information Site Information
Analyst RRH
Agency/Co. Hirsch/Green
Date Performed 7/26/2010
Analysis Time Period
AM Peak Hour - With
Project
Intersection 23
Jurisdiction Culver City
Analysis Year 2013
Project Description 8770 Washington Mixed-Use
East/West Street: Washington Boulevard North/South Street: Cattaraugus Avenue
Intersection Orientation: East-West Study Period (hrs): 1.00
Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments
Major Street Eastbound Westbound
Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6
L T R L T R
Volume (veh/h) 51 900 6 3 1661 327
Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Hourly Flow Rate, HFR
(veh/h)
51 900 6 3 1661 327
Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 -- -- 0 -- --
Median Type Undivided
RT Channelized 0 0
Lanes 0 2 0 0 2 0
Configuration LT TR LT TR
Upstream Signal 0 0
Minor Street Northbound Southbound
Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12
L T R L T R
Volume (veh/h) 9 5 3 88 6 52
Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Hourly Flow Rate, HFR
(veh/h)
9 5 3 88 6 52
Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0
Percent Grade (%) 0 0
Flared Approach N N
Storage 0 0
RT Channelized 0 0
Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0
Configuration LTR LTR
Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service
Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound
Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12
Lane Configuration LT LT LTR LTR
v (veh/h) 51 3 17 146
C (m) (veh/h) 294 759 21 17
v/c 0.17 0.00 0.81 8.59
95% queue length 0.63 0.01 4.15 67.73
Control Delay (s/veh) 19.8 9.8 533.4 14111
LOS C A F F
Approach Delay (s/veh) -- -- 533.4 14111
Approach LOS -- -- F F
Copyright © 2007 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved
HCS+
TM
Version 5.3
Generated: 8/3/2010 7:44 PM
ATTACHMENT 5
5578770 Washington Mixed-Use
Future (2013)
Assigned
No. of Approach Right-Turn Lane Critical
Lanes Volumes on Red Volumes Moves
1 255 255
0 -1
2 1,684 568 568
1 568
0 21 0 -1 |1010|1 194 194 194
0 -1
2 1,483 505
1 505
0 32 0 -1 |1010|762
1 52 52 52
0 -1
2 855 428
0 -1
1 119 119 0 |1010|1 66 66
0 -1
2 1,635 818 818
0 -1
1 285 97 188 |1010|870
1,632
Number of Clearance Intervals 1,375
1.187
Signal Coordination -0.070
1.117
F
Total Lanes
Signalized
Through/Right
Total Lanes
Through
Left/Through
Northbound
Through/Right
Right
Left/Through
Through
Through/Right
Right
Direction
With Project
Intersection Control
Lane Type
Analysis Scenario
Left
Left/Through
Through
Approach
Project Name|1010|ATSAC
AM Peak Hour
Intersection Number
Intersection Name
Analysis Period
Date
La Cienega Boulevard
East/West:
24
North/South:
July 26, 2010
Washington Boulevard
Left
Signal Coordination Adjustment
Intersection Capacity
Sum of North/South Critical Volumes
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Eastbound
Right
Through/Right
Westbound
Total Lanes
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Lanes
Through
Right
Left
Left/Through
Southbound
Hirsch/Green Transportation Consulting, Inc.
Critical Movement Analysis (CMA) Worksheet
Sum of East/West Critical Volumes
Total Intersection Critical Volumes
Left
Base CMA
Final CMA
Level of Service (LOS)
ATTACHMENT 5
5588770 Washington Mixed-Use
Future (2013)
Assigned
No. of Approach Right-Turn Lane Critical
Lanes Volumes on Red Volumes Moves
1 24 24
0 -1
1 1,804 902 902
1 902
1 979 979 0 |1010|0 0 -1
0 -1
2 1,413 478
1 478
0 21 0 -1 |1010|902
0 13 -1
0 -1
1 0 21 21
0 -1
0 8 0 -1 |1010|2 1,406 773
0 -1
0 24 -1
154 54
0 30 0 -1 |1010|794
1,696
Number of Clearance Intervals 1,425
1.190
Signal Coordination -0.100
1.090
F
Hirsch/Green Transportation Consulting, Inc.
Critical Movement Analysis (CMA) Worksheet
Final CMA
Sum of East/West Critical Volumes
Northbound
Total Lanes
Left/Through/Right
Left
Total Lanes
Total Intersection Critical Volumes
Eastbound
Left/Through
Intersection Capacity
Right
Left/Through
Through
Through/Right
East/West Opposed Phasing
Through
Left
Sum of North/South Critical Volumes
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Right
Through/Right
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Date
La Cienega Boulevard
East/West:
25
North/South:
July 26, 2010
Total Lanes
Project Name|1010|ATSAC + ATCS
AM Peak Hour
Intersection Number
Intersection Name
Analysis Period
Southbound
Westbound
With Project
Base CMA
Signal Coordination Adjustment
Level of Service (LOS)
Through
Through/Right
Right
Through/Right
Left
Left/Through
Total Lanes
Right
Signalized
Left
Left/Through
Analysis Scenario
Intersection Control
Lane Type
Approach
Direction
Fairfax Avenue
ATTACHMENT 5
5598770 Washington Mixed-Use
Future (2013)
Assigned
No. of Approach Right-Turn Lane Critical
Lanes Volumes on Red Volumes Moves
0 109 -1
0 -1
1 0 210 210
0 -1
0 101 0 -1 |1010|0 0 -1
0 -1
0 0 -1
0 -1
0 0 0 -1 |10 10|210
0 0 -1
0 -1
2 1,086 543
0 -1
1 87 87 0 |1010|1 40 40
0 -1
2 1,670 835 835
0 -1
0 0 0 -1 |1010|835
1,045
Number of Clearance Intervals 1,500
0.697
Signal Coordination -0.070
0.627
B
Total Lanes
Signalized
Through/Right
Total Lanes
Through
Left/Through
Northbound
Through/Right
Right
Left/Through
Through
Through/Right
Right
Direction
With Project
Intersection Control
Lane Type
Analysis Scenario
Left
Left/Through
Left/Through/Right
Approach
Project Name|1010|ATSAC
AM Peak Hour
Intersection Number
Intersection Name
Analysis Period
Date
Wesley Street
East/West:
26
North/South:
July 26, 2010
National Boulevard
Left
Signal Coordination Adjustment
Intersection Capacity
Sum of North/South Critical Volumes
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Eastbound
Right
Through/Right
Westbound
Total Lanes
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Lanes
Through
Right
Left
Left/Through
Southbound
Hirsch/Green Transportation Consulting, Inc.
Critical Movement Analysis (CMA) Worksheet
Sum of East/West Critical Volumes
Total Intersection Critical Volumes
Left
Base CMA
Final CMA
Level of Service (LOS)
ATTACHMENT 5
5608770 Washington Mixed-Use
Future (2013)
Assigned
No. of Approach Right-Turn Lane Critical
Lanes Volumes on Red Volumes Moves
1 637 360
0 -1
1 0 360 360
0 -1
0 83 0 -1 |1010|0 0 -1
0 -1
0 0 -1
0 -1
0 0 0 -1 |10 10|360
0 0 -1
0 -1
2 944 472 472
0 -1
1 236 180 56 |1010|1 196 196 196
0 -1
2 1,136 568
0 -1
0 0 0 -1 |1010|668
1,028
Number of Clearance Intervals 1,425
0.721
Signal Coordination -0.070
0.651
B
Hirsch/Green Transportation Consulting, Inc.
Critical Movement Analysis (CMA) Worksheet
Final CMA
Sum of East/West Critical Volumes
Northbound
Total Lanes
Through
Left
Total Lanes
Total Intersection Critical Volumes
Eastbound
Left/Through
Intersection Capacity
Right
Left/Through
Through
Through/Right
Through
Left
Sum of North/South Critical Volumes
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Right
Through/Right
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Date
Hayden Avenue
East/West:
27
North/South:
July 26, 2010
Total Lanes
Project Name|1010|ATSAC
AM Peak Hour
Intersection Number
Intersection Name
Analysis Period
Southbound
Westbound
With Project
Base CMA
Signal Coordination Adjustment
Level of Service (LOS)
Left/Through/Right
Through/Right
Right
Through/Right
Left
Left/Through
Total Lanes
Right
Signalized
Left
Left/Through
Analysis Scenario
Intersection Control
Lane Type
Approach
Direction
National Boulevard
ATTACHMENT 5
5618770 Washington Mixed-Use
Future (2013)
Assigned
No. of Approach Right-Turn Lane Critical
Lanes Volumes on Red Volumes Moves
1 68 68 68
0 -1
2 599 300
0 -1
1 75 20 55 |1010|1 30 30
0 -1
1 717 717
0 -1
1 1,301 187 1,114 1,114|1010|1,182
1 612 374 374
1 374
0 135 -1
0 -1
1 161 34 127 |1010|0 20 -1
0 -1
1 10 40 40
0 -1
0 10 0 -1 |1010|414
1,596
Number of Clearance Intervals 1,425
1.120
Signal Coordination -0.100
1.020
F
Hirsch/Green Transportation Consulting, Inc.
Critical Movement Analysis (CMA) Worksheet
Final CMA
Sum of East/West Critical Volumes
Northbound
Total Lanes
Through
Left
Total Lanes
Total Intersection Critical Volumes
Eastbound
Left/Through
Intersection Capacity
Right
Left/Through
Left/Through/Right
Through/Right
Through
Left
Sum of North/South Critical Volumes
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Right
Through/Right
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Date
Jefferson Boulevard
East/West:
28
North/South:
July 26, 2010
Total Lanes
Project Name|1010|ATSAC + ATCS
AM Peak Hour
Intersection Number
Intersection Name
Analysis Period
Southbound
Westbound
With Project
Base CMA
Signal Coordination Adjustment
Level of Service (LOS)
Through
Through/Right
Right
Through/Right
Left
Left/Through
Total Lanes
Right
Signalized
Left
Left/Through
Analysis Scenario
Intersection Control
Lane Type
Approach
Direction
National Boulevard
ATTACHMENT 5
5628770 Washington Mixed-Use
Future (2013)
Assigned
No. of Approach Right-Turn Lane Critical
Lanes Volumes on Red Volumes Moves
1 123 123
0 -1
2 2,281 799 799
1 799
0 116 0 -1 |1010|1 179 179 179
0 -1
3 2,031 677
0 -1
1 661 238 423 |1010|978
2 432 238 238
0 -1
1 667 410
1 410
0 153 0 -1 |1010|2 608 334
0 -1
2 1,217 608 608
0 -1
1 126 0 126 |1010|846
1,824
Number of Clearance Intervals 1,375
1.327
Signal Coordination -0.100
1.227
F
Total Lanes
Signalized
Through/Right
Total Lanes
Through
Left/Through
Northbound
Through/Right
Right
Left/Through
Through
Through/Right
Right
Direction
With Project
Intersection Control
Lane Type
Analysis Scenario
Left
Left/Through
Through
Approach
Project Name|1010|ATSAC + ATCS
AM Peak Hour
Intersection Number
Intersection Name
Analysis Period
Date
La Cienega Boulevard
East/West:
29
North/South:
July 26, 2010
Jefferson Boulevard
Left
Signal Coordination Adjustment
Intersection Capacity
Sum of North/South Critical Volumes
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Eastbound
Right
Through/Right
Westbound
Total Lanes
SB Rt. Turn Overlap with EB Left
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Lanes
Through
Right
Left
Left/Through
Southbound
Hirsch/Green Transportation Consulting, Inc.
Critical Movement Analysis (CMA) Worksheet
Sum of East/West Critical Volumes
Total Intersection Critical Volumes
Left
Base CMA
Final CMA
Level of Service (LOS)
ATTACHMENT 5
5638770 Washington Mixed-Use
Future (2013)
Assigned
No. of Approach Right-Turn Lane Critical
Lanes Volumes on Red Volumes Moves
1 324 324 324
0 -1
2 617 308
0 -1
1 772 772 0 |1010|1 98 98
0 -1
2 661 330 330
0 -1
1 86 36 50 |1010|654
1 27 27
0 -1
2 142 71 71
0 -1
1 46 46 0 |1010|2 1,050 578
0 -1
1 557 557 557
0 -1
1 116 116 0 |1010|649
1,303
Number of Clearance Intervals 1,425
0.914
Signal Coordination -0.100
0.814
D
Total Lanes
Signalized
Through/Right
Total Lanes
Through
Left/Through
Northbound
Through/Right
Right
Left/Through
Through
Through/Right
Right
Direction
With Project
Intersection Control
Lane Type
Analysis Scenario
Left
Left/Through
Through
Approach
Project Name|1010|ATSAC + ATCS
AM Peak Hour
Intersection Number
Intersection Name
Analysis Period
Date
Jefferson Boulevard
East/West:
30
North/South:
July 26, 2010
Higuera Street/Rodeo Road
Left
Signal Coordination Adjustment
Intersection Capacity
East/West Opposed Phasing
Sum of North/South Critical Volumes
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Eastbound
Right
Through/Right
Westbound
Total Lanes
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Lanes
Through
Right
Left
Left/Through
Southbound
Hirsch/Green Transportation Consulting, Inc.
Critical Movement Analysis (CMA) Worksheet
Sum of East/West Critical Volumes
Total Intersection Critical Volumes
Left
Base CMA
Final CMA
Level of Service (LOS)
ATTACHMENT 5
5648770 Washington Mixed-Use
Future (2013)
Assigned
No. of Approach Right-Turn Lane Critical
Lanes Volumes on Red Volumes Moves
2 564 310 310
0 -1
2 2,181 758
1 758
0 93 0 -1 |1010|2 254 140
0 -1
2 2,057 824 824
1 824
0 414 0 -1 |1010|1,134
1 214 214 214
0 -1
2 554 277
0 -1
1 202 202 0 |1010|2 317 174
0 -1
2 842 421 421
0 -1
1 348 140 208 |1010|635
1,769
Number of Clearance Intervals 1,375
1.287
Signal Coordination -0.100
1.187
F
Hirsch/Green Transportation Consulting, Inc.
Critical Movement Analysis (CMA) Worksheet
Final CMA
Sum of East/West Critical Volumes
Total Intersection Critical Volumes
EB/WB Rt. Turn Overlap With NB/SB Lefts
Through
Left
Left/Through
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Eastbound
Sum of North/South Critical Volumes
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Northbound
Right
Total Lanes
Total Lanes
Total Lanes
Through
Through/Right
Left
Right
Intersection Capacity
Level of Service (LOS)
Right
Left/Through
Through
Through/Right
Date
La Cienega Boulevard
East/West:
31
North/South:
July 26, 2010
Rodeo Road
Project Name|1010|ATSAC + ATCS
AM Peak Hour
Intersection Number
Intersection Name
Analysis Period
Southbound
Westbound
With Project
Base CMA
Signal Coordination Adjustment
Through
Through/Right
Right
Through/Right
Left
Left/Through
Total Lanes
Signalized
Left
Left/Through
Analysis Scenario
Intersection Control
Lane Type
Approach
Direction
ATTACHMENT 5
5658770 Washington Mixed-Use
Future (2013)
Assigned
No. of Approach Right-Turn Lane Critical
Lanes Volumes on Red Volumes Moves
0 89 -1 89
0 -1
1 197 424
0 -1
0 138 0 -1 |1010|0 28 -1
0 -1
1 318 384 384
0 -1
0 38 0 -1 |1010|473
0 46 -1 46
0 -1
1 445 529
0 -1
0 38 0 -1 |1010|0 43 -1
0 -1
1 547 629 629
0 -1
0 39 0 -1 |1010|675
1,148
Number of Clearance Intervals 1,000
1.148
Signal Coordination 0.000
1.148
F
Hirsch/Green Transportation Consulting, Inc.
Critical Movement Analysis (CMA) Worksheet
Right
Date
Braddock Drive
32
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Northbound
July 26, 2010
Left/Through/Right
Through/Right
Left
Left/Through
Duquesne Avenue
Right
East/West:
Eastbound
Analysis Scenario
Southbound Left/Through/Right
Left
Left/Through
Four-Way STOP
AM Peak Hour
Total Lanes
Lane Type
Signal Coordination Adjustment
Sum of North/South Critical Volumes
Left
None
Total Lanes
Sum of East/West Critical Volumes
Total Intersection Critical Volumes
Intersection Capacity
Total Lanes
Left/Through/Right
Base CMA
Left/Through
Left/Through/Right
Through/Right
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|10 10|North/South:
Westbound
With Project
Right
Through/Right
Left
Left/Through
Total Lanes
Through/Right
Right
Project Name
Approach
Direction
Intersection Number
Intersection Name
Analysis Period
Intersection Control
Level of Service (LOS)
Final CMA
ATTACHMENT 5
566ALL-WAY STOP CONTROL ANALYSIS
General Information Site Information
Analyst RRH
Agency/Co. Hirsch/Green
Date Performed 7/26/2010
Analysis Time Period AM Peak Hour - With Project
Intersection 32
Jurisdiction Culver City
Analysis Year 2013
Project ID 8770 Washington Mixed-Use
East/West Street: Duquesne Avenue North/South Street: Braddock Drive
Volume Adjustments and Site Characteristics
Approach Eastbound Westbound
Movement L T R L T R
Volume (veh/h) 46 445 38 43 547 39
%Thrus Left Lane
Approach Northbound Southbound
Movement L T R L T R
Volume (veh/h) 89 197 138 28 318 38
%Thrus Left Lane
Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound
L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2
Configuration LTR LTR LTR LTR
PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Flow Rate (veh/h) 529 629 424 384
% Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0
No. Lanes 1 1 1 1
Geometry Group 1 1 1 1
Duration, T 1.00
Saturation Headway Adjustment Worksheet
Prop. Left-Turns 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.1
Prop. Right-Turns 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.1
Prop. Heavy Vehicle 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
hLT-adj 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2
hRT-adj -0.6 -0.6 -0.6 -0.6 -0.6 -0.6 -0.6 -0.6
hHV-adj 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7
hadj, computed -0.0 -0.0 -0.2 -0.0
Departure Headway and Service Time
hd, initial value (s) 3.20 3.20 3.20 3.20
x, initial 0.47 0.56 0.38 0.34
hd, final value (s) 9.79 9.79 9.65 9.77
x, final value 1.44 1.71 1.14 1.04
Move-up time, m (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0
Service Time, t
s
(s) 7.8 7.8 7.7 7.8
Capacity and Level of Service
Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound
L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2
Capacity (veh/h) 529 629 424 384
Delay (s/veh) 832.31 1315 322.65 190.83
LOS F F F F
Approach: Delay (s/veh)
832.31 1315 322.65 190.83
LOS
F F F F
Intersection Delay (s/veh) 751.40
Intersection LOS F
Copyright © 2007 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved
HCS+
TM
Version 5.3
Generated: 8/3/2010 7:56 PM
ATTACHMENT 5
5678770 Washington Mixed-Use
Future (2013)
Assigned
No. of Approach Right-Turn Lane Critical
Lanes Volumes on Red Volumes Moves
0 0 -1
0 -1
0 0 -1
0 -1
0 0 0 -1 |10 10|0 194 -1
0 -1
1 0 258 258
0 -1
0 64 0 -1 |1010|258
0 91 -1 91
1 529
0 438 -1
0 -1
0 0 0 -1 |1010|0 0 -1
0 -1
1 575 575 575
0 -1
1 351 129 222 |1010|666
924
Number of Clearance Intervals 1,000
0.924
Signal Coordination 0.000
0.924
E
Total Lanes
Four-Way STOP
Through/Right
Total Lanes
Left/Through/Right
Left/Through
Northbound
Through/Right
Right
Left/Through
Through
Through/Right
Right
Direction
With Project
Intersection Control
Lane Type
Analysis Scenario
Left
Left/Through
Through
Approach
Project Name|10 10|None
AM Peak Hour
Intersection Number
Intersection Name
Analysis Period
Date
Lucerne Avenue
East/West:
33
North/South:
July 26, 2010
Duquesne Avenue
Left
Signal Coordination Adjustment
Intersection Capacity
Sum of North/South Critical Volumes
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Eastbound
Right
Through/Right
Westbound
Total Lanes
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Lanes
Through
Right
Left
Left/Through
Southbound
Hirsch/Green Transportation Consulting, Inc.
Critical Movement Analysis (CMA) Worksheet
Sum of East/West Critical Volumes
Total Intersection Critical Volumes
Left
Base CMA
Final CMA
Level of Service (LOS)
ATTACHMENT 5
568ALL-WAY STOP CONTROL ANALYSIS
General Information Site Information
Analyst RRH
Agency/Co. Hirsch/Green
Date Performed 7/26/2010
Analysis Time Period AM Peak Hour - With Project
Intersection 33
Jurisdiction Culver City
Analysis Year 2013
Project ID 8770 Washington Mixed-Use
East/West Street: Duquesne Avenue North/South Street: Lucerne Avenue
Volume Adjustments and Site Characteristics
Approach Eastbound Westbound
Movement L T R L T R
Volume (veh/h) 91 438 0 0 575 351
%Thrus Left Lane
Approach Northbound Southbound
Movement L T R L T R
Volume (veh/h) 0 0 0 194 0 64
%Thrus Left Lane
Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound
L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2
Configuration LT T R LTR
PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Flow Rate (veh/h) 529 575 351 258
% Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0
No. Lanes 1 2 0 1
Geometry Group 3a 5 1
Duration, T 1.00
Saturation Headway Adjustment Worksheet
Prop. Left-Turns 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.8
Prop. Right-Turns 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.2
Prop. Heavy Vehicle 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
hLT-adj 0.2 0.2 0.5 0.5 0.2 0.2
hRT-adj -0.6 -0.6 -0.7 -0.7 -0.6 -0.6
hHV-adj 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7
hadj, computed 0.0 0.0 -0.7 0.0
Departure Headway and Service Time
hd, initial value (s) 3.20 3.20 3.20 3.20
x, initial 0.47 0.51 0.31 0.23
hd, final value (s) 6.07 6.29 5.58 6.96
x, final value 0.89 1.01 0.54 0.50
Move-up time, m (s) 2.0 2.3 2.0
Service Time, t
s
(s) 4.1 4.0 3.3 5.0
Capacity and Level of Service
Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound
L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2
Capacity (veh/h) 591 575 601 507
Delay (s/veh) 50.27 120.46 14.88 16.85
LOS F F B C
Approach: Delay (s/veh)
50.27 80.44 16.85
LOS
F F C
Intersection Delay (s/veh) 61.55
Intersection LOS F
Copyright © 2007 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved
HCS+
TM
Version 5.3
Generated: 8/3/2010 8:00 PM
ATTACHMENT 5
5698770 Washington Mixed-Use
Future (2013)
Assigned
No. of Approach Right-Turn Lane Critical
Lanes Volumes on Red Volumes Moves
1 451 451 451
0 -1
1 1,164 596
1 596
0 28 0 -1 |1010|1 18 18
0 -1
2 1,531 766 766
0 -1
1 461 169 292 |1010|1,217
1 311 311
0 -1
0 32 -1
1 363 363
0 331 0 -1 |1010|1 8 8 8
0 -1
1 33 33
0 -1
1 6 60 |1010|371
1,588
Number of Clearance Intervals 1,375
1.155
Signal Coordination -0.070
1.085
F
Hirsch/Green Transportation Consulting, Inc.
Critical Movement Analysis (CMA) Worksheet
Right
Date
Jefferson Boulevard
34
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Northbound
July 26, 2010
Through
Through/Right
Left
Left/Through
Duquesne Avenue
Right
East/West:
Eastbound
Analysis Scenario
Southbound Through
Left
Left/Through
Signalized
AM Peak Hour
Total Lanes
Lane Type
Signal Coordination Adjustment
Sum of North/South Critical Volumes
Left
ATSAC
Total Lanes
Sum of East/West Critical Volumes
Total Intersection Critical Volumes
Intersection Capacity
Total Lanes
Through
Base CMA
Left/Through
Through
Through/Right
EB/WB Rt. Turn Overlap With NB/SB Lefts
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|1010|North/South:
Westbound
With Project
Right
Through/Right
Left
Left/Through
Total Lanes
Through/Right
Right
Project Name
Approach
Direction
Intersection Number
Intersection Name
Analysis Period
Intersection Control
Level of Service (LOS)
Final CMA
ATTACHMENT 5
570
Future (2013) With Project
PM Peak Hour
ATTACHMENT 5
5718770 Washington Mixed-Use
Future (2013)
Assigned
No. of Approach Right-Turn Lane Critical
Lanes Volumes on Red Volumes Moves
1 69 69 69
0 -1
1 1,777 896
1 896
0 15 0 -1 |1010|1 56 56
0 -1
1 1,751 908 908
1 908
0 65 0 -1 |1010|977
0 100 -1
0 -1
1 228 442 442
0 -1
0 114 0 -1 |1010|0 62 -1 62
0 -1
1 79 182
0 -1
0 41 0 -1 |1010|504
1,481
Number of Clearance Intervals 1,500
0.987
Signal Coordination -0.100
0.887
D
Cattaraugus Avenue
Signalized
Left
Left/Through
Through
Through/Right
Right
Through/Right
Left
Analysis Scenario
Intersection Control
Lane Type
Approach
Direction
With Project
Left/Through
Total Lanes
Base CMA
Signal Coordination Adjustment
North/South:
July 26, 2010
Project Name|1010|PM Peak Hour
Intersection Number
Intersection Name
Analysis Period
Southbound
Westbound
Intersection Capacity
Level of Service (LOS)
Left/Through/Right
Through/Right
Sum of East/West Critical Volumes
Total Intersection Critical Volumes
Final CMA
Left
ATSAC + ATCS
Right
Left/Through/Right
Through/Right
Right
Total Lanes
Left/Through
Through
Left
Left/Through
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sum of North/South Critical Volumes
Total Lanes
Total Lanes
Eastbound
Hirsch/Green Transportation Consulting, Inc.
Critical Movement Analysis (CMA) Worksheet
Right
Date
Robertson Boulevard
East/West:|1010|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Northbound
ATTACHMENT 5
5728770 Washington Mixed-Use
Future (2013)
Assigned
No. of Approach Right-Turn Lane Critical
Lanes Volumes on Red Volumes Moves
1 14 14
0 -1
2 1,446 723 723
0 -1
0 0 0 -1 |1010|0 0 -1
0 -1
1 1,344 690
1 690
0 35 0 -1 |1010|723
0 76 -1
0 -1
1 0 163 163
0 -1
0 87 0 -1 |1010|0 552 552
0
1 22 574
0
1 556 0 556 |1010|715
1,438
Number of Clearance Intervals 1,500
0.959
Signal Coordination -0.100
0.859
D
Hirsch/Green Transportation Consulting, Inc.
Critical Movement Analysis (CMA) Worksheet
Right
Date
Robertson Boulevard
East/West:|1010|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Northbound
Through
Left
Left/Through
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sum of North/South Critical Volumes
Total Lanes
Total Lanes
Eastbound
Left
ATSAC + ATCS
Right
Left/Through/Right
Through/Right
Right
Total Lanes
Left/Through
Final CMA
Left/Through/Right
Through/Right
Sum of East/West Critical Volumes
Total Intersection Critical Volumes
Intersection Capacity
North/South:
July 26, 2010
Project Name|1010|PM Peak Hour
Intersection Number
Intersection Name
Analysis Period
Southbound
Westbound
Base CMA
Signal Coordination Adjustment
Level of Service (LOS)
With Project
Through
Through/Right
Right
Through/Right
Left
Left/Through
Total Lanes
Signalized
Left
Left/Through
Analysis Scenario
Intersection Control
Lane Type
Approach
Direction
I-405 WB Off-Ramp/Kincardine Avenue
ATTACHMENT 5
5738770 Washington Mixed-Use
Future (2013)
Assigned
No. of Approach Right-Turn Lane Critical
Lanes Volumes on Red Volumes Moves
1 77 77
0 -1
1 901 617 617
1 617
0 333 0 -1 |1010|2 658 362 362
0 -1
1 1,106 672
1 672
0 239 0 -1 |1010|979
1 182 182
0 -1
1 890 515 515
1 515
0 140 0 -1 |1010|1 116 116 116
0 -1
1 419 419
0 -1
1 322 322 0 |1010|631
1,610
Number of Clearance Intervals 1,375
1.171
Signal Coordination -0.100
1.071
F
National Boulevard
Signalized
Left
Left/Through
Through
Through/Right
Right
Through/Right
Left
Analysis Scenario
Intersection Control
Lane Type
Approach
Direction
With Project
Left/Through
Total Lanes
Base CMA
Signal Coordination Adjustment
Project Name|1010|ATSAC + ATCS
PM Peak Hour
Intersection Number
Intersection Name
Analysis Period
Southbound
Westbound
Total Lanes
Date
Robertson Boulevard
East/West:|1010|North/South:
July 26, 2010
Level of Service (LOS)
Left
Left/Through
Through
Through/Right
Right
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Lanes
Intersection Capacity
WB Rt. Turn Overlap with SB Left
Through
Left
Left/Through
Through/Right
Sum of North/South Critical Volumes
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Northbound
Total Lanes
Through
Right
Eastbound
Right
Hirsch/Green Transportation Consulting, Inc.
Critical Movement Analysis (CMA) Worksheet
Final CMA
Sum of East/West Critical Volumes
Total Intersection Critical Volumes
ATTACHMENT 5
5748770 Washington Mixed-Use
Future (2013)
Assigned
No. of Approach Right-Turn Lane Critical
Lanes Volumes on Red Volumes Moves
1 243 243 243
0 -1
2 797 398
0 -1
0 0 0 -1 |1010|0 0 -1
0 -1
2 1,062 531
0 -1
1 696 0 696 696|1010|939
0 0 -1
0 -1
0 0 -1
0 -1
0 0 0 -1 |10 10|0 0 -1
0 -1
0 0 -1
0 -1
0 0 0 -1 |10 10 10|939
Number of Clearance Intervals 1,500
0.626
Signal Coordination -0.100
0.526
A
I-405 EB On-Ramp
Signalized
Left
Left/Through
Through
Through/Right
Right
Through/Right
Left
Analysis Scenario
Intersection Control
Lane Type
Approach
Direction
With Project
Left/Through
Total Lanes
Base CMA
Signal Coordination Adjustment
Project Name|1010|ATSAC + ATCS
PM Peak Hour
Intersection Number
Intersection Name
Analysis Period
Southbound
Westbound
Total Lanes
Date
National Boulevard
East/West:|1010|North/South:
July 26, 2010
Level of Service (LOS)
Left
Left/Through
Through
Through/Right
Right
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Lanes
Intersection Capacity
Through
Left
Left/Through
Through/Right
Sum of North/South Critical Volumes
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Northbound
Total Lanes
Through
Right
Eastbound
Right
Hirsch/Green Transportation Consulting, Inc.
Critical Movement Analysis (CMA) Worksheet
Final CMA
Sum of East/West Critical Volumes
Total Intersection Critical Volumes
ATTACHMENT 5
5758770 Washington Mixed-Use
Future (2013)
Assigned
No. of Approach Right-Turn Lane Critical
Lanes Volumes on Red Volumes Moves
0 113 -1
0 -1
1 180 372 372
0 -1
0 79 0 -1 |1010|0 41 -1 41
0 -1
1 186 293
0 -1
0 66 0 -1 |1010|413
1 80 80
0 -1
3 1,928 643 643
0 -1
1 108 60 48 |1010|1 122 122 122
0 -1
3 1,901 634
0 -1
1 45 20 25 |1010|765
1,178
Number of Clearance Intervals 1,500
0.785
Signal Coordination -0.070
0.715
C
Venice Boulevard
Signalized
Left
Left/Through
Left/Through/Right
Through/Right
Right
Through/Right
Left
Analysis Scenario
Intersection Control
Lane Type
Approach
Direction
With Project
Left/Through
Total Lanes
Base CMA
Signal Coordination Adjustment
North/South:
July 26, 2010
Project Name|1010|PM Peak Hour
Intersection Number
Intersection Name
Analysis Period
Southbound
Westbound
Intersection Capacity
Level of Service (LOS)
Through
Through/Right
Sum of East/West Critical Volumes
Total Intersection Critical Volumes
Final CMA
Left
ATSAC
Right
Through
Through/Right
Right
Total Lanes
Left/Through
Left/Through/Right
Left
Left/Through
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sum of North/South Critical Volumes
Total Lanes
Total Lanes
Eastbound
Hirsch/Green Transportation Consulting, Inc.
Critical Movement Analysis (CMA) Worksheet
Right
Date
Hughes Avenue
East/West:|1010|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Northbound
ATTACHMENT 5
5768770 Washington Mixed-Use
Future (2013)
Assigned
No. of Approach Right-Turn Lane Critical
Lanes Volumes on Red Volumes Moves
1 42 42 42
0 -1
0 103 -1
1 143
0 40 0 -1 |1010|0 90 -1
0 -1
1 165 350 350
0 -1
0 95 0 -1 |1010|392
1 109 109 109
0 -1
2 1,866 658
1 658
0 108 0 -1 |1010|1 78 78
0 -1
3 1,895 632 632
0 -1
1 71 71 0 |1010|741
1,133
Number of Clearance Intervals 1,375
0.824
Signal Coordination -0.070
0.754
C
Venice Boulevard
Signalized
Left
Left/Through
Through
Through/Right
Right
Through/Right
Left
Analysis Scenario
Intersection Control
Lane Type
Approach
Direction
With Project
Left/Through
Total Lanes
Base CMA
Signal Coordination Adjustment
North/South:
July 26, 2010
Project Name|1010|PM Peak Hour
Intersection Number
Intersection Name
Analysis Period
Southbound
Westbound
Intersection Capacity
Level of Service (LOS)
Through
Through/Right
Sum of East/West Critical Volumes
Total Intersection Critical Volumes
Final CMA
Left
ATSAC
Right
Through
Through/Right
Right
Total Lanes
Left/Through
Left/Through/Right
Left
Left/Through
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sum of North/South Critical Volumes
Total Lanes
Total Lanes
Eastbound
Hirsch/Green Transportation Consulting, Inc.
Critical Movement Analysis (CMA) Worksheet
Right
Date
Bagley Avenue/Main Street
East/West:|1010|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Northbound
ATTACHMENT 5
5778770 Washington Mixed-Use
Future (2013)
Assigned
No. of Approach Right-Turn Lane Critical
Lanes Volumes on Red Volumes Moves
1 86 86
0 -1
1 83 83
0 -1
2 1,271 672 300 300|1010|1 302 212
0 -1
1 72 212 212
0 -1
0 49 0 -1 |1010|512
1 53 53
0 -1
2 2,035 699 699
1 699
0 62 0 -1 |1010|2 611 336 336
0 -1
2 2,035 748
1 748
0 209 0 -1 |1010|1,034
1,546
Number of Clearance Intervals 1,375
1.124
Signal Coordination -0.100
1.024
F
Hirsch/Green Transportation Consulting, Inc.
Critical Movement Analysis (CMA) Worksheet
Right
Date
Culver Boulevard
East/West:|1010|NB Rt. Turn Overlap with WB Left
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Northbound
Left/Through/Right
Left
Left/Through
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sum of North/South Critical Volumes
Total Lanes
Total Lanes
Eastbound
Left
ATSAC + ATCS
Right
Through
Through/Right
Right
Total Lanes
Left/Through
Final CMA
Through
Through/Right
Sum of East/West Critical Volumes
Total Intersection Critical Volumes
Intersection Capacity
North/South:
July 26, 2010
Project Name|1010|PM Peak Hour
Intersection Number
Intersection Name
Analysis Period
Southbound
Westbound
Base CMA
Signal Coordination Adjustment
Level of Service (LOS)
With Project
Through
Through/Right
North/South Opposed Phasing
Right
Through/Right
Left
Left/Through
Total Lanes
Signalized
Left
Left/Through
Analysis Scenario
Intersection Control
Lane Type
Approach
Direction
Venice Boulevard
ATTACHMENT 5
5788770 Washington Mixed-Use
Future (2013)
Assigned
No. of Approach Right-Turn Lane Critical
Lanes Volumes on Red Volumes Moves
1 160 160
0 -1
1 546 546 546
0 -1
1 60 60 0 |1010|0 611 -1
1 611 611
1 393 393
0 -1
1 292 214 78 |1010|1,157
2 778 428 428
0 -1
2 2,457 874
1 874
0 166 0 -1 |1010|1 112 112
0 -1
2 2,376 881 881
1 881
0 266 0 -1 |1010|1,308
2,465
Number of Clearance Intervals 1,375
1.793
Signal Coordination -0.100
1.693
F
Venice Boulevard
Signalized
Left
Left/Through
Through
Through/Right
North/South Opposed Phasing
Right
Through/Right
Left
Analysis Scenario
Intersection Control
Lane Type
Approach
Direction
With Project
Left/Through
Total Lanes
Base CMA
Signal Coordination Adjustment
Project Name|1010|ATSAC + ATCS
PM Peak Hour
Intersection Number
Intersection Name
Analysis Period
Southbound
Westbound
Total Lanes
Date
Robertson Boulevard/Exposition Boulevard
East/West:|1010|North/South:
July 26, 2010
Level of Service (LOS)
Left
Left/Through
Through
Through/Right
Right
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Lanes
Intersection Capacity
NB Rt. Turn Overlap with WB Left
Through
Left
Left/Through
Through/Right
Sum of North/South Critical Volumes
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Northbound
Total Lanes
Through
Right
Eastbound
Right
Hirsch/Green Transportation Consulting, Inc.
Critical Movement Analysis (CMA) Worksheet
Final CMA
Sum of East/West Critical Volumes
Total Intersection Critical Volumes
ATTACHMENT 5
5798770 Washington Mixed-Use
Future (2013)
Assigned
No. of Approach Right-Turn Lane Critical
Lanes Volumes on Red Volumes Moves
1 638 638 638
0 -1
1 763 492
1 492
0 221 0 -1 |1010|1 183 183
0 -1
1 831 466 466
1 466
0 101 0 -1 |1010|1,104
2 206 113
0 -1
3 2,223 741 741
0 -1
1 576 319 257 |1010|2 129 71 71
0 -1
3 1,623 541
0 -1
1 63 63 0 |1010|812
1,916
Number of Clearance Intervals 1,375
1.393
Signal Coordination -0.100
1.293
F
Hirsch/Green Transportation Consulting, Inc.
Critical Movement Analysis (CMA) Worksheet
Final CMA
Sum of East/West Critical Volumes
Through
Left
Sum of North/South Critical Volumes
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Northbound
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Lanes
Total Intersection Critical Volumes
Total Lanes
Through
Right
Eastbound
Left/Through
Through/Right
Total Lanes
Right
Left
Right
Left/Through
Through
Through/Right
Intersection Capacity
Level of Service (LOS)
Date
National Boulevard
East/West:|10 10|North/South:
July 26, 2010
Southbound
Westbound
With Project
Project Name|1010|ATSAC + ATCS
PM Peak Hour
Intersection Number
Intersection Name
Analysis Period
Base CMA
Signal Coordination Adjustment
Through
Through/Right
Right
Through/Right
Left
Left/Through
Total Lanes
Signalized
Left
Left/Through
Analysis Scenario
Intersection Control
Lane Type
Approach
Direction
Venice Boulevard
ATTACHMENT 5
5808770 Washington Mixed-Use
Future (2013)
Assigned
No. of Approach Right-Turn Lane Critical
Lanes Volumes on Red Volumes Moves
0 16 -1 16
117
0 1 -1
0 -1
1 9 90 |1010|0 29 -1
0 -1
1 9 65 65
0 -1
0 27 0 -1 |1010|81
1 74 74
0 -1
2 2,589 874 874
1 874
0 34 0 -1 |1010|1 33 33 33
0 -1
2 1,827 612
1 612
0 8 0 -1 |1010|907
988
Number of Clearance Intervals 1,500
0.659
Signal Coordination -0.100
0.559
A
Hirsch/Green Transportation Consulting, Inc.
Critical Movement Analysis (CMA) Worksheet
Right
Date
Helms Avenue
East/West:
10
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Northbound
Left/Through/Right
Left
Left/Through
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sum of North/South Critical Volumes
Total Lanes
Total Lanes
Eastbound
Left
ATSAC + ATCS
Right
Through
Through/Right
Right
Total Lanes
Left/Through
Final CMA
Through
Through/Right
Sum of East/West Critical Volumes
Total Intersection Critical Volumes
Intersection Capacity
North/South:
July 26, 2010
Project Name|1010|PM Peak Hour
Intersection Number
Intersection Name
Analysis Period
Southbound
Westbound
Base CMA
Signal Coordination Adjustment
Level of Service (LOS)
With Project
Through
Through/Right
Right
Through/Right
Left
Left/Through
Total Lanes
Signalized
Left
Left/Through
Analysis Scenario
Intersection Control
Lane Type
Approach
Direction
Venice Boulevard
ATTACHMENT 5
5818770 Washington Mixed-Use
Future (2013)
Assigned
No. of Approach Right-Turn Lane Critical
Lanes Volumes on Red Volumes Moves
0 47 -1 47
0 -1
1 63 135
0 -1
0 25 0 -1 |1010|0 189 -1
0 -1
1 74 295 295
0 -1
0 32 0 -1 |1010|342
1 113 113
0 -1
2 2,444 819 819
1 819
0 13 0 -1 |1010|1 90 90 90
0 -1
2 1,704 594
1 594
0 77 0 -1 |1010|909
1,251
Number of Clearance Intervals 1,500
0.834
Signal Coordination -0.100
0.734
C
Venice Boulevard
Signalized
Left
Left/Through
Left/Through/Right
Through/Right
Right
Through/Right
Left
Analysis Scenario
Intersection Control
Lane Type
Approach
Direction
With Project
Left/Through
Total Lanes
Base CMA
Signal Coordination Adjustment
Project Name|1010|ATSAC + ATCS
PM Peak Hour
Intersection Number
Intersection Name
Analysis Period
Southbound
Westbound
Total Lanes
Date
Cattaraugus Avenue
East/West:
11
North/South:
July 26, 2010
Level of Service (LOS)
Left
Left/Through
Through
Through/Right
Right
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Lanes
Intersection Capacity
Left/Through/Right
Left
Left/Through
Through/Right
Sum of North/South Critical Volumes
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Northbound
Total Lanes
Through
Right
Eastbound
Right
Hirsch/Green Transportation Consulting, Inc.
Critical Movement Analysis (CMA) Worksheet
Final CMA
Sum of East/West Critical Volumes
Total Intersection Critical Volumes
ATTACHMENT 5
5828770 Washington Mixed-Use
Future (2013)
Assigned
No. of Approach Right-Turn Lane Critical
Lanes Volumes on Red Volumes Moves
1 107 107 107
0 -1
2 1,101 375
1 375
0 23 0 -1 |1010|1 36 36
0 -1
2 1,518 611 611
1 611
0 314 0 -1 |1010|718
2 303 167
0 -1
3 2,047 682 682
0 -1
1 259 54 205 |1010|1 207 207 207
0 -1
3 1,411 470
0 -1
1 34 34 0 |1010|889
1,607
Number of Clearance Intervals 1,375
1.169
Signal Coordination -0.070
1.099
F
Hirsch/Green Transportation Consulting, Inc.
Critical Movement Analysis (CMA) Worksheet
Final CMA
Sum of East/West Critical Volumes
Total Intersection Critical Volumes
Total Lanes
Through
Right
Eastbound
Right
Through
Left
Left/Through
Through/Right
Sum of North/South Critical Volumes
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Northbound
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Lanes
Intersection Capacity
Left
Left/Through
Through
Through/Right
Right
Level of Service (LOS)
Total Lanes
Date
La Cienega Boulevard
East/West:
12
North/South:
July 26, 2010
Project Name|1010|ATSAC
PM Peak Hour
Intersection Number
Intersection Name
Analysis Period
Southbound
Westbound
Base CMA
Signal Coordination Adjustment
With Project
Through
Through/Right
Right
Through/Right
Left
Left/Through
Total Lanes
Signalized
Left
Left/Through
Analysis Scenario
Intersection Control
Lane Type
Approach
Direction
Venice Boulevard
ATTACHMENT 5
5838770 Washington Mixed-Use
Future (2013)
Assigned
No. of Approach Right-Turn Lane Critical
Lanes Volumes on Red Volumes Moves
1 72 72 72
0 -1
0 341 -1
1 361
0 20 0 -1 |1010|1 35 35
0 -1
0 343 -1
1 404 404
0 61 0 -1 |1010|476
1 47 47
0 -1
1 1,260 764 764
1 764
0 267 0 -1 |1010|1 80 80 80
0 -1
1 583 312
1 312
0 41 0 -1 |1010|844
1,320
Number of Clearance Intervals 1,500
0.880
Signal Coordination -0.070
0.810
D
Washington Boulevard
Signalized
Left
Left/Through
Through
Through/Right
Right
Through/Right
Left
Analysis Scenario
Intersection Control
Lane Type
Approach
Direction
With Project
Left/Through
Total Lanes
Base CMA
Signal Coordination Adjustment
Project Name|1010|ATSAC
PM Peak Hour
Intersection Number
Intersection Name
Analysis Period
Southbound
Westbound
Total Lanes
Date
Hughes Avenue/Duquesne Avenue
East/West:
13
North/South:
July 26, 2010
Level of Service (LOS)
Left
Left/Through
Through
Through/Right
Right
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Lanes
Intersection Capacity
Through
Left
Left/Through
Through/Right
Sum of North/South Critical Volumes
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Northbound
Total Lanes
Through
Right
Eastbound
Right
Hirsch/Green Transportation Consulting, Inc.
Critical Movement Analysis (CMA) Worksheet
Final CMA
Sum of East/West Critical Volumes
Total Intersection Critical Volumes
ATTACHMENT 5
5848770 Washington Mixed-Use
Future (2013)
Assigned
No. of Approach Right-Turn Lane Critical
Lanes Volumes on Red Volumes Moves
1 113 113
0 -1
1 316 316 316
0 -1
1 155 55 100 |1010|1 122 122 122
0 -1
1 525 300
1 300
0 74 0 -1 |1010|438
1 69 69
0 -1
1 1,015 554 554
1 554
0 92 0 -1 |1010|1 110 110 110
0 -1
1 917 470
1 470
0 22 0 -1 |1010|664
1,102
Number of Clearance Intervals 1,375
0.801
Signal Coordination -0.070
0.731
C
Hirsch/Green Transportation Consulting, Inc.
Critical Movement Analysis (CMA) Worksheet
Right
Date
Duquesne Avenue
East/West:
14
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Northbound
Through
Left
Left/Through
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sum of North/South Critical Volumes
Total Lanes
Total Lanes
Eastbound
Left
ATSAC
Right
Through
Through/Right
Right
Total Lanes
Left/Through
Final CMA
Through
Through/Right
Sum of East/West Critical Volumes
Total Intersection Critical Volumes
Intersection Capacity
North/South:
July 26, 2010
Project Name|1010|PM Peak Hour
Intersection Number
Intersection Name
Analysis Period
Southbound
Westbound
Base CMA
Signal Coordination Adjustment
Level of Service (LOS)
With Project
Through
Through/Right
Right
Through/Right
Left
Left/Through
Total Lanes
Signalized
Left
Left/Through
Analysis Scenario
Intersection Control
Lane Type
Approach
Direction
Culver Boulevard
ATTACHMENT 5
5858770 Washington Mixed-Use
Future (2013)
Assigned
No. of Approach Right-Turn Lane Critical
Lanes Volumes on Red Volumes Moves
0 0 -1
0 -1
2 1,212 423
1 423
0 57 0 -1 |1010|1 81 81
0 -1
1 1,018 509 509
1 509
1 698 638 60 |1010|509
1 1,256 638 638
1 638
0 20 -1
0 -1
1 6 06 |1010|0 13 -1
138 38
0 25 -1
0 -1
1 55 43 12 |1010|676
1,185
Number of Clearance Intervals 1,375
0.862
Signal Coordination -0.070
0.792
C
Hirsch/Green Transportation Consulting, Inc.
Critical Movement Analysis (CMA) Worksheet
Right
Date
Culver Boulevard
East/West:
15
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Northbound
Through
Left
Left/Through
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sum of North/South Critical Volumes
Total Lanes
Total Lanes
Eastbound
Left
ATSAC
East/West Opposed Phasing
Right
Through
Through/Right
Right
Total Lanes
Left/Through
Final CMA
Through
Through/Right
Sum of East/West Critical Volumes
Total Intersection Critical Volumes
Intersection Capacity
North/South:
July 26, 2010
Project Name|1010|PM Peak Hour
Intersection Number
Intersection Name
Analysis Period
Southbound
Westbound
Base CMA
Signal Coordination Adjustment
Level of Service (LOS)
With Project
Through
Through/Right
Right
Through/Right
Left
Left/Through
Total Lanes
Signalized
Left
Left/Through
Analysis Scenario
Intersection Control
Lane Type
Approach
Direction
Washington Boulevard/Irving Place
ATTACHMENT 5
5868770 Washington Mixed-Use
Future (2013)
Assigned
No. of Approach Right-Turn Lane Critical
Lanes Volumes on Red Volumes Moves
1 115 115
0 -1
3 2,341 780 780
0 -1
0 0 0 -1 |1010|0 0 -1
0 -1
2 1,497 538
1 538
0 117 0 -1 |1010|780
1 281 281 281
0 -1
0 0 -1
0 -1
1 166 121 45 |1010|0 0 -1
0 -1
0 0 -1
0 -1
0 0 0 -1 |10 10|281
1,061
Number of Clearance Intervals 1,425
0.745
Signal Coordination -0.070
0.675
B
Main Street
Signalized
Left
Left/Through
Through
Through/Right
Right
Through/Right
Left
Analysis Scenario
Intersection Control
Lane Type
Approach
Direction
With Project
Left/Through
Total Lanes
Base CMA
Signal Coordination Adjustment
Project Name|1010|ATSAC
PM Peak Hour
Intersection Number
Intersection Name
Analysis Period
Southbound
Westbound
Total Lanes
Date
Culver Boulevard
East/West:
16
North/South:
July 26, 2010
Level of Service (LOS)
Left
Left/Through
Through
Through/Right
Right
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Lanes
Intersection Capacity
Through
Left
Left/Through
Through/Right
Sum of North/South Critical Volumes
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Northbound
Total Lanes
Through
Right
Eastbound
Right
Hirsch/Green Transportation Consulting, Inc.
Critical Movement Analysis (CMA) Worksheet
Final CMA
Sum of East/West Critical Volumes
Total Intersection Critical Volumes
ATTACHMENT 5
5878770 Washington Mixed-Use
Future (2013)
Assigned
No. of Approach Right-Turn Lane Critical
Lanes Volumes on Red Volumes Moves
1 14 14
0 -1
2 1,365 682 682
0 -1
2 1,174 1,096 39 |1010|1 116 116 116
0 -1
1 645 327
1 327
0 9 0 -1 |1010|798
0 0 -1
0 -1
0 0 -1
0 -1
1 20 14 6 6|1010|1 1,065 548 548
1 548
0 30 -1
0 -1
1 77 58 19 |1010|554
1,352
Number of Clearance Intervals 1,425
0.949
Signal Coordination -0.070
0.879
D
Hirsch/Green Transportation Consulting, Inc.
Critical Movement Analysis (CMA) Worksheet
Right
Date
Culver Boulevard
East/West:
17
NB Rt. Turn Overlap with WB Left
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Northbound
Through
Left
Left/Through
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sum of North/South Critical Volumes
Total Lanes
Total Lanes
Eastbound
Left
ATSAC
EB Rt. Turn Overlap with NB Left
East/West Opposed Phasing
Right
Through
Through/Right
Right
Total Lanes
Left/Through
Final CMA
Through
Through/Right
Sum of East/West Critical Volumes
Total Intersection Critical Volumes
Intersection Capacity
North/South:
July 26, 2010
Project Name|1010|PM Peak Hour
Intersection Number
Intersection Name
Analysis Period
Southbound
Westbound
Base CMA
Signal Coordination Adjustment
Level of Service (LOS)
With Project
Through
Through/Right
Right
Through/Right
Left
Left/Through
Total Lanes
Signalized
Left
Left/Through
Analysis Scenario
Intersection Control
Lane Type
Approach
Direction
Washington Boulevard/Canfield Avenue
ATTACHMENT 5
5888770 Washington Mixed-Use
Future (2013)
Assigned
No. of Approach Right-Turn Lane Critical
Lanes Volumes on Red Volumes Moves
1 56 56
0 -1
1 221 221 221
0 -1
1 36 36 0 |1010|1 186 186 186
0 -1
1 331 331
0 -1
1 54 054 |1010|407
1 97 97 97
0 -1
1 1,025 560
1 560
0 94 0 -1 |1010|1 90 90
0 -1
1 972 572 572
1 572
0 173 0 -1 |1010|669
1,076
Number of Clearance Intervals 1,425
0.755
Signal Coordination -0.070
0.685
B
Hirsch/Green Transportation Consulting, Inc.
Critical Movement Analysis (CMA) Worksheet
Right
Date
Robertson Boulevard/Higuera Street
East/West:
18
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Northbound
Through
Left
Left/Through
Total Lanes
Through/Right
Left
Sum of North/South Critical Volumes
Total Lanes
Right
Through
Through/Right
Right
Left/Through
Left/Through
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Lanes
Eastbound
Level of Service (LOS)
Through
Through/Right
Sum of East/West Critical Volumes
Total Intersection Critical Volumes
Final CMA
ATSAC
North/South:
July 26, 2010
Project Name|1010|PM Peak Hour
Intersection Number
Intersection Name
Analysis Period
Southbound
Westbound
Base CMA
Signal Coordination Adjustment
Intersection Capacity
Left
Total Lanes
Analysis Scenario
Intersection Control
Lane Type
Approach
Direction
With Project
Signalized
Left
Left/Through
Through
Through/Right
Right
Washington Boulevard
ATTACHMENT 5
5898770 Washington Mixed-Use
Future (2013)
Assigned
No. of Approach Right-Turn Lane Critical
Lanes Volumes on Red Volumes Moves
1 56 56
0 -1
0 0 -1
0 -1
1 113 31 82 82|1010|0 0 -1
0 -1
0 0 -1
0 -1
0 0 0 -1 |10 10|82
0 0 -1
0 -1
1 1,546 804 804
1 804
0 61 0 -1 |1010|0 62 -1 62
1 418
1 1,085 728
0 -1
0 0 0 -1 |1010|866
948
Number of Clearance Intervals 1,500
0.632
Signal Coordination -0.070
0.562
A
Washington Boulevard
Signalized
Left
Left/Through
Through
Through/Right
Right
Through/Right
Left
Analysis Scenario
Intersection Control
Lane Type
Approach
Direction
With Project
Left/Through
Total Lanes
Base CMA
Signal Coordination Adjustment
Project Name|1010|ATSAC
PM Peak Hour
Intersection Number
Intersection Name
Analysis Period
Southbound
Westbound
Total Lanes
Date
Landmark Street
East/West:
19
North/South:
July 26, 2010
Level of Service (LOS)
Left
Left/Through
Through
Through/Right
Right
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Lanes
Intersection Capacity
Through
Left
Left/Through
Through/Right
Sum of North/South Critical Volumes
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Northbound
Total Lanes
Through
Right
Eastbound
Right
Hirsch/Green Transportation Consulting, Inc.
Critical Movement Analysis (CMA) Worksheet
Final CMA
Sum of East/West Critical Volumes
Total Intersection Critical Volumes
ATTACHMENT 5
5908770 Washington Mixed-Use
Future (2013)
Assigned
No. of Approach Right-Turn Lane Critical
Lanes Volumes on Red Volumes Moves
2 269 148 148
0 -1
1 849 488
1 488
0 126 0 -1 |1010|2 306 168
0 -1
1 1,071 572 572
1 572
0 73 0 -1 |1010|720
1 85 85
0 -1
2 1,070 535 535
0 -1
1 288 74 214 |1010|1 107 107 107
0 -1
2 855 413
1 413
0 384 0 -1 |1010|642
1,362
Number of Clearance Intervals 1,375
0.991
Signal Coordination -0.070
0.921
E
Washington Boulevard
Lane Type
Approach
Direction
Left
Left/Through
Total Lanes
Signalized
Left
Left/Through
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Northbound
Analysis Scenario
Intersection Control
With Project
Through
Through/Right
Right
Through/Right
Project Name|1010|ATSAC
PM Peak Hour
Intersection Number
Intersection Name
Analysis Period
Southbound
Westbound
Total Lanes
Date
National Boulevard
East/West:
20
North/South:
July 26, 2010
Right
Level of Service (LOS)
Sum of East/West Critical Volumes
Intersection Capacity
Base CMA
Signal Coordination Adjustment
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Lanes
Left
Right
Left/Through
Through
Through/Right
Hirsch/Green Transportation Consulting, Inc.
Critical Movement Analysis (CMA) Worksheet
Through
Left
Left/Through
Through/Right
Sum of North/South Critical Volumes
Total Lanes
Through
Right
Eastbound
Total Intersection Critical Volumes
Final CMA
ATTACHMENT 5
5918770 Washington Mixed-Use
Future (2013)
Assigned
No. of Approach Right-Turn Lane Critical
Lanes Volumes on Red Volumes Moves
0 44 -1
0 -1
1 0 74 74
0 -1
0 30 0 -1 |1010|0 0 -1
0 -1
0 0 -1
0 -1
0 0 0 -1 |10 10|74
0 0 -1
0 -1
1 1,419 726 726
1 726
0 32 0 -1 |1010|1 43 43 43
0 -1
2 1,238 619
0 -1
0 0 0 -1 |1010|769
843
Number of Clearance Intervals 1,200
0.703
Signal Coordination 0.000
0.703
C
Hirsch/Green Transportation Consulting, Inc.
Critical Movement Analysis (CMA) Worksheet
Final CMA
Sum of East/West Critical Volumes
Through
Left
Sum of North/South Critical Volumes
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Northbound
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Lanes
Total Intersection Critical Volumes
Total Lanes
Through
Right
Eastbound
Left/Through
Through/Right
Total Lanes
Right
Left
Right
Left/Through
Through
Through/Right
Intersection Capacity
Level of Service (LOS)
Date
Wesley Street
East/West:
21
North/South:
July 26, 2010
Southbound
Westbound
With Project
Project Name|10 10|None
PM Peak Hour
Intersection Number
Intersection Name
Analysis Period
Base CMA
Signal Coordination Adjustment
Left/Through/Right
Through/Right
Right
Through/Right
Left
Left/Through
Total Lanes
Two-Way STOP
Left
Left/Through
Analysis Scenario
Intersection Control
Lane Type
Approach
Direction
Washington Boulevard
ATTACHMENT 5
592TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY
General Information Site Information
Analyst RRH
Agency/Co. Hirsch/Green
Date Performed 7/26/2010
Analysis Time Period
PM Peak Hour - With
Project
Intersection 21
Jurisdiction Culver City
Analysis Year 2013
Project Description 8770 Washington Mixed-Use
East/West Street: Washington Boulevard North/South Street: Wesley Street
Intersection Orientation: East-West Study Period (hrs): 1.00
Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments
Major Street Eastbound Westbound
Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6
L T R L T R
Volume (veh/h) 1419 32 43 1238
Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Hourly Flow Rate, HFR
(veh/h)
0 1419 32 43 1238 0
Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 -- -- 0 -- --
Median Type Undivided
RT Channelized 0 0
Lanes 0 2 0 1 2 0
Configuration T TR L T
Upstream Signal 0 0
Minor Street Northbound Southbound
Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12
L T R L T R
Volume (veh/h) 44 0 30
Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Hourly Flow Rate, HFR
(veh/h)
44 0 30 0 0 0
Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0
Percent Grade (%) 0 0
Flared Approach N N
Storage 0 0
RT Channelized 0 0
Lanes 0 1 0 0 0 0
Configuration LTR
Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service
Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound
Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12
Lane Configuration L LTR
v (veh/h) 43 74
C (m) (veh/h) 473 62
v/c 0.09 1.19
95% queue length 0.30 13.95
Control Delay (s/veh) 13.4 631.1
LOS B F
Approach Delay (s/veh) -- -- 631.1
Approach LOS -- -- F
Copyright © 2007 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved
HCS+
TM
Version 5.3
Generated: 8/3/2010 7:41 PM
ATTACHMENT 5
5938770 Washington Mixed-Use
Future (2013)
Assigned
No. of Approach Right-Turn Lane Critical
Lanes Volumes on Red Volumes Moves
0 49 -1
0 -1
1 0 62 62
0 -1
0 13 0 -1 |1010|0 0 -1
0 -1
0 0 -1
0 -1
0 0 0 -1 |10 10|62
0 0 -1
0 -1
1 1,345 688 688
1 688
0 30 0 -1 |1010|1 14 14 14
0 -1
2 1,042 521
0 -1
0 0 0 -1 |1010|702
764
Number of Clearance Intervals 1,500
0.509
Signal Coordination -0.070
0.439
A
Through/Right
Right
Through/Right
Left
Left
Left/Through
Left/Through/Right
Analysis Scenario
Intersection Control
Lane Type
Approach
Direction
With Project
Signalized
Base CMA
Signal Coordination Adjustment
Project Name|1010|ATSAC
PM Peak Hour
Intersection Number
Intersection Name
Analysis Period
Helms Avenue
Left/Through
Total Lanes
East/West:
22
North/South:
July 26, 2010 Date
Washington Boulevard
Left/Through
Through
Through/Right
Right
Intersection Capacity
Level of Service (LOS)
Eastbound
Right
Through
Left
Left/Through
Through/Right
Sum of North/South Critical Volumes
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Northbound
Total Intersection Critical Volumes
Total Lanes
Through
Right
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Lanes
Left
Southbound
Westbound
Total Lanes
Hirsch/Green Transportation Consulting, Inc.
Critical Movement Analysis (CMA) Worksheet
Final CMA
Sum of East/West Critical Volumes
ATTACHMENT 5
5948770 Washington Mixed-Use
Future (2013)
Assigned
No. of Approach Right-Turn Lane Critical
Lanes Volumes on Red Volumes Moves
0 4 -1 4
0 -1
1 2 9
0 -1
0 3 0 -1 |1010|0 59 -1
0 -1
1 2 109 109
0 -1
0 48 0 -1 |1010|113
0 68 -1
1 544
0 1,302 -1
1 836 836
0 9 0 -1 |1010|0 11 -1 11
1 507
0 982 -1
1 562
0 76 0 -1 |1010|847
960
Number of Clearance Intervals 1,200
0.800
Signal Coordination 0.000
0.800
C
Hirsch/Green Transportation Consulting, Inc.
Critical Movement Analysis (CMA) Worksheet
Right
Date
Cattaraugus Avenue
East/West:
23
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Northbound
Left/Through/Right
Left
Left/Through
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sum of North/South Critical Volumes
Total Lanes
Total Lanes
Eastbound
Left
None
Right
Through
Through/Right
Right
Total Lanes
Left/Through
Final CMA
Through
Through/Right
Sum of East/West Critical Volumes
Total Intersection Critical Volumes
Intersection Capacity
North/South:
July 26, 2010
Project Name|10 10|PM Peak Hour
Intersection Number
Intersection Name
Analysis Period
Southbound
Westbound
Base CMA
Signal Coordination Adjustment
Level of Service (LOS)
With Project
Left/Through/Right
Through/Right
Right
Through/Right
Left
Left/Through
Total Lanes
Two-Way STOP
Left
Left/Through
Analysis Scenario
Intersection Control
Lane Type
Approach
Direction
Washington Boulevard
ATTACHMENT 5
595TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY
General Information Site Information
Analyst RRH
Agency/Co. Hirsch/Green
Date Performed 7/26/2010
Analysis Time Period
PM Peak Hour - With
Project
Intersection 23
Jurisdiction Culver City
Analysis Year 2013
Project Description 8770 Washington Mixed-Use
East/West Street: Washington Boulevard North/South Street: Cattaraugus Avenue
Intersection Orientation: East-West Study Period (hrs): 1.00
Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments
Major Street Eastbound Westbound
Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6
L T R L T R
Volume (veh/h) 68 1302 9 11 982 76
Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Hourly Flow Rate, HFR
(veh/h)
68 1302 9 11 982 76
Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 -- -- 0 -- --
Median Type Undivided
RT Channelized 0 0
Lanes 0 2 0 0 2 0
Configuration LT TR LT TR
Upstream Signal 0 0
Minor Street Northbound Southbound
Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12
L T R L T R
Volume (veh/h) 4 2 3 59 2 48
Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Hourly Flow Rate, HFR
(veh/h)
4 2 3 59 2 48
Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0
Percent Grade (%) 0 0
Flared Approach N N
Storage 0 0
RT Channelized 0 0
Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0
Configuration LTR LTR
Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service
Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound
Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12
Lane Configuration LT LT LTR LTR
v (veh/h) 68 11 9 109
C (m) (veh/h) 666 534 41 70
v/c 0.10 0.02 0.22 1.56
95% queue length 0.34 0.06 0.80 25.83
Control Delay (s/veh) 11.0 11.9 117.1 1187
LOS B B F F
Approach Delay (s/veh) -- -- 117.1 1187
Approach LOS -- -- F F
Copyright © 2007 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved
HCS+
TM
Version 5.3
Generated: 8/3/2010 7:48 PM
ATTACHMENT 5
5968770 Washington Mixed-Use
Future (2013)
Assigned
No. of Approach Right-Turn Lane Critical
Lanes Volumes on Red Volumes Moves
1 149 149 149
0 -1
2 1,114 394
1 394
0 68 0 -1 |1010|1 243 243
0 -1
2 1,663 571 571
1 571
0 51 0 -1 |1010|720
1 76 76
0 -1
2 1,217 608 608
0 -1
1 152 74 78 |1010|1 81 81 81
0 -1
2 772 386
0 -1
1 137 137 0 |1010|689
1,409
Number of Clearance Intervals 1,375
1.025
Signal Coordination -0.070
0.955
E
Hirsch/Green Transportation Consulting, Inc.
Critical Movement Analysis (CMA) Worksheet
Right
Date
La Cienega Boulevard
East/West:
24
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Northbound
Through
Left
Left/Through
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sum of North/South Critical Volumes
Total Lanes
Total Lanes
Eastbound
Left
ATSAC
Right
Through
Through/Right
Right
Total Lanes
Left/Through
Final CMA
Through
Through/Right
Sum of East/West Critical Volumes
Total Intersection Critical Volumes
Intersection Capacity
North/South:
July 26, 2010
Project Name|1010|PM Peak Hour
Intersection Number
Intersection Name
Analysis Period
Southbound
Westbound
Base CMA
Signal Coordination Adjustment
Level of Service (LOS)
With Project
Through
Through/Right
Right
Through/Right
Left
Left/Through
Total Lanes
Signalized
Left
Left/Through
Analysis Scenario
Intersection Control
Lane Type
Approach
Direction
Washington Boulevard
ATTACHMENT 5
5978770 Washington Mixed-Use
Future (2013)
Assigned
No. of Approach Right-Turn Lane Critical
Lanes Volumes on Red Volumes Moves
1 8 8
0 -1
1 1,615 808 808
1 808
1 1,508 1,508 0 |1010|0 0 -1
0 -1
2 1,392 469
1 469
0 14 0 -1 |1010|808
0 36 -1
0 -1
1 0 52 52
0 -1
0 16 0 -1 |1010|2 1,057 581
0 -1
0 12 -1
130 30
0 18 0 -1 |1010|633
1,441
Number of Clearance Intervals 1,425
1.011
Signal Coordination -0.100
0.911
E
Signalized
Left
Left/Through
Through
Through/Right
Right
Through/Right
Analysis Scenario
Intersection Control
Lane Type
Approach
Direction
With Project
Total Lanes
Base CMA
Signal Coordination Adjustment
Project Name|1010|ATSAC + ATCS
PM Peak Hour
Intersection Number
Intersection Name
Analysis Period
Southbound
Westbound
Total Lanes
Level of Service (LOS)
Intersection Capacity
Date
La Cienega Boulevard
East/West:
25
North/South:
July 26, 2010
Fairfax Avenue
Northbound
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Lanes
Left
Right
Left/Through
Through
Through/Right
Right
Left/Through
Left
Eastbound
Total Intersection Critical Volumes
Sum of North/South Critical Volumes
East/West Opposed Phasing
Through
Left
Left/Through
Through/Right
Total Lanes
Left/Through/Right
Right
Hirsch/Green Transportation Consulting, Inc.
Critical Movement Analysis (CMA) Worksheet
Final CMA
Sum of East/West Critical Volumes
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ATTACHMENT 5
5988770 Washington Mixed-Use
Future (2013)
Assigned
No. of Approach Right-Turn Lane Critical
Lanes Volumes on Red Volumes Moves
0 20 -1
0 -1
1 0 137 137
0 -1
0 117 0 -1 |1010|0 0 -1
0 -1
0 0 -1
0 -1
0 0 0 -1 |10 10|137
0 0 -1
0 -1
2 1,223 612
0 -1
1 5 50 |1010|1 5 5
0 -1
2 1,257 628 628
0 -1
0 0 0 -1 |1010|628
765
Number of Clearance Intervals 1,500
0.510
Signal Coordination -0.070
0.440
A
Hirsch/Green Transportation Consulting, Inc.
Critical Movement Analysis (CMA) Worksheet
Right
Date
Wesley Street
East/West:
26
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Northbound
Through
Left
Left/Through
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sum of North/South Critical Volumes
Total Lanes
Total Lanes
Eastbound
Left
ATSAC
Right
Through
Through/Right
Right
Total Lanes
Left/Through
Final CMA
Through
Through/Right
Sum of East/West Critical Volumes
Total Intersection Critical Volumes
Intersection Capacity
North/South:
July 26, 2010
Project Name|1010|PM Peak Hour
Intersection Number
Intersection Name
Analysis Period
Southbound
Westbound
Base CMA
Signal Coordination Adjustment
Level of Service (LOS)
With Project
Left/Through/Right
Through/Right
Right
Through/Right
Left
Left/Through
Total Lanes
Signalized
Left
Left/Through
Analysis Scenario
Intersection Control
Lane Type
Approach
Direction
National Boulevard
ATTACHMENT 5
5998770 Washington Mixed-Use
Future (2013)
Assigned
No. of Approach Right-Turn Lane Critical
Lanes Volumes on Red Volumes Moves
1 707 442
0 -1
1 0 442 442
0 -1
0 176 0 -1 |1010|0 0 -1
0 -1
0 0 -1
0 -1
0 0 0 -1 |10 10|442
0 0 -1
0 -1
2 1,224 612 612
0 -1
1 144 144 0 |1010|1 56 56 56
0 -1
2 544 272
0 -1
0 0 0 -1 |1010|668
1,110
Number of Clearance Intervals 1,425
0.779
Signal Coordination -0.070
0.709
C
Signalized
Left
Left/Through
Left/Through/Right
Through/Right
Right
Through/Right
Analysis Scenario
Intersection Control
Lane Type
Approach
Direction
With Project
Total Lanes
Base CMA
Signal Coordination Adjustment
Project Name|1010|ATSAC
PM Peak Hour
Intersection Number
Intersection Name
Analysis Period
Southbound
Westbound
Total Lanes
Level of Service (LOS)
Intersection Capacity
Date
Hayden Avenue
East/West:
27
North/South:
July 26, 2010
National Boulevard
Northbound
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Lanes
Left
Right
Left/Through
Through
Through/Right
Right
Left/Through
Left
Eastbound
Total Intersection Critical Volumes
Sum of North/South Critical Volumes
Through
Left
Left/Through
Through/Right
Total Lanes
Through
Right
Hirsch/Green Transportation Consulting, Inc.
Critical Movement Analysis (CMA) Worksheet
Final CMA
Sum of East/West Critical Volumes
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ATTACHMENT 5
6008770 Washington Mixed-Use
Future (2013)
Assigned
No. of Approach Right-Turn Lane Critical
Lanes Volumes on Red Volumes Moves
1 89 89 89
0 -1
2 890 445
0 -1
1 15 15 0 |1010|1 5 5
0 -1
1 631 631 631
0 -1
1 485 255 230 |1010|720
1 966 510 510
1 510
0 55 -1
0 -1
1 66 44 22 |1010|0 140 -1
0 -1
1 60 215 215
0 -1
0 15 0 -1 |1010|725
1,445
Number of Clearance Intervals 1,425
1.014
Signal Coordination -0.100
0.914
E
Signalized
Left
Left/Through
Through
Through/Right
Right
Through/Right
Analysis Scenario
Intersection Control
Lane Type
Approach
Direction
With Project
Total Lanes
Base CMA
Signal Coordination Adjustment
Project Name|1010|ATSAC + ATCS
PM Peak Hour
Intersection Number
Intersection Name
Analysis Period
Southbound
Westbound
Total Lanes
Level of Service (LOS)
Intersection Capacity
Date
Jefferson Boulevard
East/West:
28
North/South:
July 26, 2010
National Boulevard
Northbound
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Lanes
Left
Right
Left/Through
Left/Through/Right
Through/Right
Right
Left/Through
Left
Eastbound
Total Intersection Critical Volumes
Sum of North/South Critical Volumes
Through
Left
Left/Through
Through/Right
Total Lanes
Through
Right
Hirsch/Green Transportation Consulting, Inc.
Critical Movement Analysis (CMA) Worksheet
Final CMA
Sum of East/West Critical Volumes
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ATTACHMENT 5
6018770 Washington Mixed-Use
Future (2013)
Assigned
No. of Approach Right-Turn Lane Critical
Lanes Volumes on Red Volumes Moves
1 104 104
0 -1
2 2,356 892 892
1 892
0 319 0 -1 |1010|1 55 55 55
0 -1
3 2,249 750
0 -1
1 311 311 0 |1010|947
2 601 331
0 -1
1 1,018 640 640
1 640
0 262 0 -1 |1010|2 310 170 170
0 -1
2 753 376
0 -1
1 93 093 |1010|810
1,757
Number of Clearance Intervals 1,375
1.278
Signal Coordination -0.100
1.178
F
Hirsch/Green Transportation Consulting, Inc.
Critical Movement Analysis (CMA) Worksheet
Right
Date
La Cienega Boulevard
East/West:
29
SB Rt. Turn Overlap with EB Left
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Northbound
Through
Left
Left/Through
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sum of North/South Critical Volumes
Total Lanes
Total Lanes
Eastbound
Left
ATSAC + ATCS
Right
Through
Through/Right
Right
Total Lanes
Left/Through
Final CMA
Through
Through/Right
Sum of East/West Critical Volumes
Total Intersection Critical Volumes
Intersection Capacity
North/South:
July 26, 2010
Project Name|1010|PM Peak Hour
Intersection Number
Intersection Name
Analysis Period
Southbound
Westbound
Base CMA
Signal Coordination Adjustment
Level of Service (LOS)
With Project
Through
Through/Right
Right
Through/Right
Left
Left/Through
Total Lanes
Signalized
Left
Left/Through
Analysis Scenario
Intersection Control
Lane Type
Approach
Direction
Jefferson Boulevard
ATTACHMENT 5
6028770 Washington Mixed-Use
Future (2013)
Assigned
No. of Approach Right-Turn Lane Critical
Lanes Volumes on Red Volumes Moves
1 74 74
0 -1
2 823 412 412
0 -1
1 1,050 1,050 0 |1010|1 156 156 156
0 -1
2 565 282
0 -1
1 113 113 0 |1010|568
1 56 56
0 -1
2 567 284 284
0 -1
1 186 143 43 |1010|2 600 330
0 -1
1 333 333 333
0 -1
1 22 22 0 |1010|617
1,185
Number of Clearance Intervals 1,425
0.832
Signal Coordination -0.100
0.732
C
Hirsch/Green Transportation Consulting, Inc.
Critical Movement Analysis (CMA) Worksheet
Right
Date
Jefferson Boulevard
East/West:
30
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Northbound
Through
Left
Left/Through
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sum of North/South Critical Volumes
Total Lanes
Total Lanes
Eastbound
Left
ATSAC + ATCS
East/West Opposed Phasing
Right
Through
Through/Right
Right
Total Lanes
Left/Through
Final CMA
Through
Through/Right
Sum of East/West Critical Volumes
Total Intersection Critical Volumes
Intersection Capacity
North/South:
July 26, 2010
Project Name|1010|PM Peak Hour
Intersection Number
Intersection Name
Analysis Period
Southbound
Westbound
Base CMA
Signal Coordination Adjustment
Level of Service (LOS)
With Project
Through
Through/Right
Right
Through/Right
Left
Left/Through
Total Lanes
Signalized
Left
Left/Through
Analysis Scenario
Intersection Control
Lane Type
Approach
Direction
Higuera Street/Rodeo Road
ATTACHMENT 5
6038770 Washington Mixed-Use
Future (2013)
Assigned
No. of Approach Right-Turn Lane Critical
Lanes Volumes on Red Volumes Moves
2 329 181
0 -1
2 2,241 824 824
1 824
0 232 0 -1 |1010|2 465 256 256
0 -1
2 2,188 795
1 795
0 196 0 -1 |1010|1,080
1 383 383
0 -1
2 1,201 600 600
0 -1
1 326 181 145 |1010|2 253 139 139
0 -1
2 498 249
0 -1
1 155 155 0 |1010|739
1,819
Number of Clearance Intervals 1,375
1.323
Signal Coordination -0.100
1.223
F
Rodeo Road
Lane Type
Approach
Direction
Left
Left/Through
Total Lanes
Signalized
Left
Left/Through
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Northbound
Analysis Scenario
Intersection Control
With Project
Through
Through/Right
Right
Through/Right
Project Name|1010|ATSAC + ATCS
PM Peak Hour
Intersection Number
Intersection Name
Analysis Period
Southbound
Westbound
Total Lanes
Date
La Cienega Boulevard
East/West:
31
North/South:
July 26, 2010
Right
Level of Service (LOS)
Sum of East/West Critical Volumes
Intersection Capacity
Base CMA
Signal Coordination Adjustment
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Lanes
Left
Right
Left/Through
Through
Through/Right
Hirsch/Green Transportation Consulting, Inc.
Critical Movement Analysis (CMA) Worksheet
EB/WB Rt. Turn Overlap With NB/SB Lefts
Through
Left
Left/Through
Through/Right
Sum of North/South Critical Volumes
Total Lanes
Through
Right
Eastbound
Total Intersection Critical Volumes
Final CMA
ATTACHMENT 5
6048770 Washington Mixed-Use
Future (2013)
Assigned
No. of Approach Right-Turn Lane Critical
Lanes Volumes on Red Volumes Moves
0 154 -1
0 -1
1 173 501 501
0 -1
0 174 0 -1 |1010|0 7 -1 7
0 -1
1 37 61
0 -1
0 17 0 -1 |1010|508
0 129 -1
0 -1
1 459 746 746
0 -1
0 158 0 -1 |1010|0 16 -1 16
0 -1
1 417 449
0 -1
0 16 0 -1 |1010|762
1,270
Number of Clearance Intervals 1,000
1.270
Signal Coordination 0.000
1.270
F
Duquesne Avenue
Four-Way STOP
Left
Left/Through
Left/Through/Right
Through/Right
Right
Through/Right
Left
Analysis Scenario
Intersection Control
Lane Type
Approach
Direction
With Project
Left/Through
Total Lanes
Base CMA
Signal Coordination Adjustment
Project Name|10 10|None
PM Peak Hour
Intersection Number
Intersection Name
Analysis Period
Southbound
Westbound
Total Lanes
Date
Braddock Drive
East/West:
32
North/South:
July 26, 2010
Level of Service (LOS)
Left
Left/Through
Left/Through/Right
Through/Right
Right
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Lanes
Intersection Capacity
Left/Through/Right
Left
Left/Through
Through/Right
Sum of North/South Critical Volumes
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Northbound
Total Lanes
Left/Through/Right
Right
Eastbound
Right
Hirsch/Green Transportation Consulting, Inc.
Critical Movement Analysis (CMA) Worksheet
Final CMA
Sum of East/West Critical Volumes
Total Intersection Critical Volumes
ATTACHMENT 5
605ALL-WAY STOP CONTROL ANALYSIS
General Information Site Information
Analyst RRH
Agency/Co. Hirsch/Green
Date Performed 7/26/2010
Analysis Time Period PM Peak Hour - With Project
Intersection 32
Jurisdiction Culver City
Analysis Year 2013
Project ID 8770 Washington Mixed-Use
East/West Street: Duquesne Avenue North/South Street: Braddock Drive
Volume Adjustments and Site Characteristics
Approach Eastbound Westbound
Movement L T R L T R
Volume (veh/h) 129 459 158 16 417 16
%Thrus Left Lane
Approach Northbound Southbound
Movement L T R L T R
Volume (veh/h) 154 173 174 7 37 17
%Thrus Left Lane
Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound
L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2
Configuration LTR LTR LTR LTR
PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Flow Rate (veh/h) 746 449 501 61
% Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0
No. Lanes 1 1 1 1
Geometry Group 1 1 1 1
Duration, T 1.00
Saturation Headway Adjustment Worksheet
Prop. Left-Turns 0.2 0.0 0.3 0.1
Prop. Right-Turns 0.2 0.0 0.3 0.3
Prop. Heavy Vehicle 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
hLT-adj 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2
hRT-adj -0.6 -0.6 -0.6 -0.6 -0.6 -0.6 -0.6 -0.6
hHV-adj 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7
hadj, computed -0.1 -0.0 -0.1 -0.1
Departure Headway and Service Time
hd, initial value (s) 3.20 3.20 3.20 3.20
x, initial 0.66 0.40 0.45 0.05
hd, final value (s) 7.37 7.54 7.31 9.50
x, final value 1.53 0.94 1.02 0.16
Move-up time, m (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0
Service Time, t
s
(s) 5.4 5.5 5.3 7.5
Capacity and Level of Service
Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound
L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2
Capacity (veh/h) 746 478 501 311
Delay (s/veh) 979.36 81.91 142.82 14.32
LOS F F F B
Approach: Delay (s/veh)
979.36 81.91 142.82 14.32
LOS
F F F B
Intersection Delay (s/veh) 477.98
Intersection LOS F
Copyright © 2007 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved
HCS+
TM
Version 5.3
Generated: 8/3/2010 7:58 PM
ATTACHMENT 5
6068770 Washington Mixed-Use
Future (2013)
Assigned
No. of Approach Right-Turn Lane Critical
Lanes Volumes on Red Volumes Moves
0 0 -1
0 -1
0 0 -1
0 -1
0 0 0 -1 |10 10|0 296 -1
0 -1
1 0 362 362
0 -1
0 66 0 -1 |1010|362
0 64 -1
1 693 693
0 629 -1
0 -1
0 0 0 -1 |1010|0 0 -1
0 -1
1 398 398
0 -1
1 213 181 32 |1010|693
1,055
Number of Clearance Intervals 1,000
1.055
Signal Coordination 0.000
1.055
F
Hirsch/Green Transportation Consulting, Inc.
Critical Movement Analysis (CMA) Worksheet
Right
Date
Lucerne Avenue
East/West:
33
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Northbound
Left/Through/Right
Left
Left/Through
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sum of North/South Critical Volumes
Total Lanes
Total Lanes
Eastbound
Left
None
Right
Through
Through/Right
Right
Total Lanes
Left/Through
Final CMA
Through
Through/Right
Sum of East/West Critical Volumes
Total Intersection Critical Volumes
Intersection Capacity
North/South:
July 26, 2010
Project Name|10 10|PM Peak Hour
Intersection Number
Intersection Name
Analysis Period
Southbound
Westbound
Base CMA
Signal Coordination Adjustment
Level of Service (LOS)
With Project
Through
Through/Right
Right
Through/Right
Left
Left/Through
Total Lanes
Four-Way STOP
Left
Left/Through
Analysis Scenario
Intersection Control
Lane Type
Approach
Direction
Duquesne Avenue
ATTACHMENT 5
607ALL-WAY STOP CONTROL ANALYSIS
General Information Site Information
Analyst RRH
Agency/Co. Hirsch/Green
Date Performed 7/26/2010
Analysis Time Period PM Peak Hour - With Project
Intersection 33
Jurisdiction Culver City
Analysis Year 2013
Project ID 8770 Washington Mixed-Use
East/West Street: Duquesne Avenue North/South Street: Lucerne Avenue
Volume Adjustments and Site Characteristics
Approach Eastbound Westbound
Movement L T R L T R
Volume (veh/h) 64 629 0 0 398 213
%Thrus Left Lane
Approach Northbound Southbound
Movement L T R L T R
Volume (veh/h) 0 0 0 296 0 66
%Thrus Left Lane
Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound
L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2
Configuration LT T R LTR
PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Flow Rate (veh/h) 693 398 213 362
% Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0
No. Lanes 1 2 0 1
Geometry Group 3a 5 1
Duration, T 1.00
Saturation Headway Adjustment Worksheet
Prop. Left-Turns 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.8
Prop. Right-Turns 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.2
Prop. Heavy Vehicle 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
hLT-adj 0.2 0.2 0.5 0.5 0.2 0.2
hRT-adj -0.6 -0.6 -0.7 -0.7 -0.6 -0.6
hHV-adj 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7
hadj, computed 0.0 0.0 -0.7 0.1
Departure Headway and Service Time
hd, initial value (s) 3.20 3.20 3.20 3.20
x, initial 0.62 0.35 0.19 0.32
hd, final value (s) 6.39 6.94 6.22 6.97
x, final value 1.23 0.77 0.37 0.70
Move-up time, m (s) 2.0 2.3 2.0
Service Time, t
s
(s) 4.4 4.6 3.9 5.0
Capacity and Level of Service
Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound
L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2
Capacity (veh/h) 693 515 463 511
Delay (s/veh) 453.94 31.44 12.54 25.80
LOS F D B D
Approach: Delay (s/veh)
453.94 24.85 25.80
LOS
F C D
Intersection Delay (s/veh) 203.55
Intersection LOS F
Copyright © 2007 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved
HCS+
TM
Version 5.3
Generated: 8/3/2010 8:02 PM
ATTACHMENT 5
6088770 Washington Mixed-Use
Future (2013)
Assigned
No. of Approach Right-Turn Lane Critical
Lanes Volumes on Red Volumes Moves
1 378 378 378
0 -1
1 1,485 760
1 760
0 35 0 -1 |1010|1 53 53
0 -1
2 1,110 555 555
0 -1
1 211 211 0 |1010|933
1 481 481 481
0 -1
0 63 -1
1 421
0 358 0 -1 |1010|1 29 29
0 -1
1 42 42 42
0 -1
1 20 20 0 |1010|523
1,456
Number of Clearance Intervals 1,375
1.059
Signal Coordination -0.070
0.989
E
Duquesne Avenue
Signalized
Left
Left/Through
Through
Through/Right
Right
Through/Right
Left
Analysis Scenario
Intersection Control
Lane Type
Approach
Direction
With Project
Left/Through
Total Lanes
Base CMA
Signal Coordination Adjustment
Project Name|1010|ATSAC
PM Peak Hour
Intersection Number
Intersection Name
Analysis Period
Southbound
Westbound
Total Lanes
Date
Jefferson Boulevard
East/West:
34
North/South:
July 26, 2010
Level of Service (LOS)
Left
Left/Through
Through
Through/Right
Right
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Lanes
Intersection Capacity
EB/WB Rt. Turn Overlap With NB/SB Lefts
Through
Left
Left/Through
Through/Right
Sum of North/South Critical Volumes
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Northbound
Total Lanes
Through
Right
Eastbound
Right
Hirsch/Green Transportation Consulting, Inc.
Critical Movement Analysis (CMA) Worksheet
Final CMA
Sum of East/West Critical Volumes
Total Intersection Critical Volumes
ATTACHMENT 5
609
Future (2013) With Project Plus Mitigation
AM Peak Hour
ATTACHMENT 5
6108770 Washington Mixed-Use
Future (2013)
Assigned
No. of Approach Right-Turn Lane Critical
Lanes Volumes on Red Volumes Moves
1 205 205
0 -1
1 479 479 479
0 -1
1 47 47 0 |1010|0 641 -1
1 641 641
1 421 421
0 -1
1 537 172 365 |1010|1,120
2 627 345 345
0 -1
2 2,478 883
1 883
0 172 0 -1 |1010|1 99 99
0 -1
3 2,477 826 826
0 -1
1 382 320 62 |1010|1,171
2,291
Number of Clearance Intervals 1,375
1.666
Signal Coordination -0.100
1.566
F Level of Service (LOS)
Final CMA
Project Name
Approach
Direction
Intersection Number
Intersection Name
Analysis Period
Intersection Control
Westbound
With Project Plus Mitigation
Right
Through/Right
Left
Left/Through
Total Lanes
Through/Right
Right
North/South:
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|1010|Base CMA
Left/Through
Through
Through/Right
Signal Coordination Adjustment
Sum of North/South Critical Volumes
Left
ATSAC + ATCS
Total Lanes
Sum of East/West Critical Volumes
Total Intersection Critical Volumes
Intersection Capacity
Total Lanes
Through
Signalized
AM Peak Hour
Total Lanes
Lane Type
Eastbound
Analysis Scenario
Southbound Through
Left
Left/Through
July 26, 2010
Through
Through/Right
Left
Left/Through
Venice Boulevard
North/South Opposed Phasing
Right
East/West:
Hirsch/Green Transportation Consulting, Inc.
Critical Movement Analysis (CMA) Worksheet
Right
Date
Robertson Boulevard/Exposition Boulevard|1010|NB Rt. Turn Overlap with WB Left
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Northbound
ATTACHMENT 5
6118770 Washington Mixed-Use
Future (2013)
Assigned
No. of Approach Right-Turn Lane Critical
Lanes Volumes on Red Volumes Moves
1 363 363 363
0 -1
1 1,025 547
1 547
0 69 0 -1 |1010|1 132 132
0 -1
2 746 373 373
0 -1
1 107 58 49 |1010|736
2 210 116 116
0 -1
3 2,149 716
0 -1
1 689 182 507 |1010|2 213 117
0 -1
3 2,199 733 733
0 -1
1 115 94 21 |1010|849
1,585
Number of Clearance Intervals 1,375
1.153
Signal Coordination -0.100
1.053
F
Signal Coordination Adjustment
Total Lanes
Sum of East/West Critical Volumes
Intersection Capacity
Total Intersection Critical Volumes
Base CMA
Through
Hirsch/Green Transportation Consulting, Inc.
Critical Movement Analysis (CMA) Worksheet
Total Lanes
Through
Right
Sum of North/South Critical Volumes
Left
Left/Through
Through/Right
Eastbound
Through/Right
Right
Left
Left/Through
Through
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Right
Total Lanes
Through
Through/Right
Left
Left/Through
Total Lanes
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Date
National Boulevard
East/West:|10 10|North/South:
July 26, 2010
Venice Boulevard
Project Name|1010|ATSAC + ATCS
AM Peak Hour
Intersection Number
Intersection Name
Analysis Period
Southbound
Westbound
Northbound
Final CMA
Level of Service (LOS)
Analysis Scenario
Intersection Control
Lane Type
Approach
Direction
With Project Plus Mitigation
Signalized
Left
Left/Through
Right
Through/Right
ATTACHMENT 5
6128770 Washington Mixed-Use
Future (2013)
Assigned
No. of Approach Right-Turn Lane Critical
Lanes Volumes on Red Volumes Moves
0 11 -1 11
120
0 9 -1
0 -1
1 4 40 |1010|0 12 -1
0 -1
1 2 39 39
0 -1
0 25 0 -1 |1010|50
1 76 76 76
0 -1
2 2,260 761
1 761
0 22 0 -1 |1010|1 23 23
0 -1
2 2,502 842 842
1 842
0 23 0 -1 |1010|918
968
Number of Clearance Intervals 1,500
0.645
Signal Coordination -0.100
0.545
A
Base CMA
Final CMA
Level of Service (LOS)
Southbound
Hirsch/Green Transportation Consulting, Inc.
Critical Movement Analysis (CMA) Worksheet
Sum of East/West Critical Volumes
Total Intersection Critical Volumes
Left
Total Lanes
Through
Right
Left
Left/Through
Sum of North/South Critical Volumes
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Eastbound
Right
Through/Right
Westbound
Total Lanes
Left
Signal Coordination Adjustment
Intersection Capacity
Date
Helms Avenue
East/West:
10
North/South:
July 26, 2010
Venice Boulevard
Project Name|1010|ATSAC + ATCS
AM Peak Hour
Intersection Number
Intersection Name
Analysis Period
Intersection Control
Lane Type
Analysis Scenario
Left
Direction
With Project Plus Trip Redistributions Due to Wesley Street Signal
Approach
Northbound
Through/Right
Right
Left/Through
Through
Through/Right
Right
Total Lanes
Signalized
Through/Right
Total Lanes
Left/Through/Right
Left/Through
Left/Through
Through
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ATTACHMENT 5
6138770 Washington Mixed-Use
Future (2013)
Assigned
No. of Approach Right-Turn Lane Critical
Lanes Volumes on Red Volumes Moves
0 48 -1
0 -1
1 250 333 333
0 -1
0 35 0 -1 |1010|0 163 -1 163
0 -1
1 86 267
0 -1
0 18 0 -1 |1010|496
1 71 71 71
0 -1
2 2,053 688
1 688
0 11 0 -1 |1010|1 76 76
0 -1
2 2,427 843 843
1 843
0 103 0 -1 |1010|914
1,410
Number of Clearance Intervals 1,500
0.940
Signal Coordination -0.100
0.840
D Level of Service (LOS)
Final CMA
Project Name
Approach
Direction
Intersection Number
Intersection Name
Analysis Period
Intersection Control
Westbound
With Project Plus Trip Redistributions Due to Wesley Street Signal
Right
Through/Right
Left
Left/Through
Total Lanes
Through/Right
Right
North/South:
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|1010|Base CMA
Left/Through
Through
Through/Right
Signal Coordination Adjustment
Sum of North/South Critical Volumes
Left
ATSAC + ATCS
Total Lanes
Sum of East/West Critical Volumes
Total Intersection Critical Volumes
Intersection Capacity
Total Lanes
Through
Signalized
AM Peak Hour
Total Lanes
Lane Type
Eastbound
Analysis Scenario
Southbound Left/Through/Right
Left
Left/Through
July 26, 2010
Left/Through/Right
Through/Right
Left
Left/Through
Venice Boulevard
Right
East/West:
Hirsch/Green Transportation Consulting, Inc.
Critical Movement Analysis (CMA) Worksheet
Right
Date
Cattaraugus Avenue
11
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Northbound
ATTACHMENT 5
6148770 Washington Mixed-Use
Future (2013)
Assigned
No. of Approach Right-Turn Lane Critical
Lanes Volumes on Red Volumes Moves
2 302 166
0 -1
2 890 445 445
0 -1
1 153 142 11 |1010|2 393 216 216
0 -1
1 895 493
1 493
0 91 0 -1 |1010|661
1 130 130 130
0 -1
2 808 404
0 -1
1 201 84 117 |1010|1 88 88
0 -1
2 1,278 557 557
1 557
0 394 0 -1 |1010|687
1,348
Number of Clearance Intervals 1,375
0.980
Signal Coordination -0.070
0.910
E
Signalized
Left
Left/Through
Analysis Scenario
Intersection Control
Lane Type
Approach
Direction
Through
Through/Right
Right
Through/Right
Left
Left/Through
Total Lanes
Base CMA
Signal Coordination Adjustment
Project Name|1010|ATSAC
AM Peak Hour
Intersection Number
Intersection Name
Analysis Period
Southbound
Westbound
With Project Plus Mitigation
Date
National Boulevard
East/West:
20
North/South:
July 26, 2010
Washington Boulevard
Right
Left/Through
Through
Through/Right
Right
Intersection Capacity
Level of Service (LOS)
Northbound
Right
Total Lanes
Total Lanes
Total Lanes
Through
Through/Right
Left
Through
Left
Left/Through
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Eastbound
Sum of North/South Critical Volumes
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hirsch/Green Transportation Consulting, Inc.
Critical Movement Analysis (CMA) Worksheet
Final CMA
Sum of East/West Critical Volumes
Total Intersection Critical Volumes
ATTACHMENT 5
6158770 Washington Mixed-Use
Future (2013)
Assigned
No. of Approach Right-Turn Lane Critical
Lanes Volumes on Red Volumes Moves
1 50 50 50
0 -1
0 0 -1
0 -1
1 6 60 |1010|0 0 -1
0 -1
0 0 -1
0 -1
0 0 0 -1 |10 10|50
0 0 -1
0 -1
1 1,296 660
1 660
0 23 0 -1 |1010|1 23 23
0 -1
2 1,726 863 863
0 -1
0 0 0 -1 |1010|863
913
Number of Clearance Intervals 1,500
0.609
Signal Coordination -0.070
0.539
A
Signal Coordination Adjustment
Total Lanes
Sum of East/West Critical Volumes
Intersection Capacity
Total Intersection Critical Volumes
Base CMA
Through
Hirsch/Green Transportation Consulting, Inc.
Critical Movement Analysis (CMA) Worksheet
Total Lanes
Through
Right
Sum of North/South Critical Volumes
Left
Left/Through
Through/Right
Eastbound
Through/Right
Right
Left
Left/Through
Through
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Right
Total Lanes
Through
Through/Right
Left
Left/Through
Total Lanes
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Date
Wesley Street
East/West:
21
North/South:
July 26, 2010
Washington Boulevard
Project Name|1010|ATSAC
AM Peak Hour
Intersection Number
Intersection Name
Analysis Period
Southbound
Westbound
Northbound
Final CMA
Level of Service (LOS)
Analysis Scenario
Intersection Control
Lane Type
Approach
Direction
With Project Plus Mitigation
Signalized
Left
Left/Through
Right
Through/Right
ATTACHMENT 5
6168770 Washington Mixed-Use
Future (2013)
Assigned
No. of Approach Right-Turn Lane Critical
Lanes Volumes on Red Volumes Moves
0 73 -1
0 -1
1 0 91 91
0 -1
0 18 0 -1 |1010|0 0 -1
0 -1
0 0 -1
0 -1
0 0 0 -1 |10 10|91
0 0 -1
0 -1
1 996 518
1 518
0 39 0 -1 |1010|1 31 31
0 -1
2 1,656 828 828
0 -1
0 0 0 -1 |1010|828
919
Number of Clearance Intervals 1,500
0.613
Signal Coordination -0.070
0.543
A
Approach
Direction
Right
Through/Right
Left
Left/Through
Total Lanes
Signal Coordination Adjustment
Level of Service (LOS)
Final CMA
Project Name|1010|AM Peak Hour
Intersection Number
Intersection Name
Analysis Period
Southbound
Westbound
With Project Plus Trip Redistributions Due to Wesley Street Signal
Base CMA
Right
Left/Through
Through
Through/Right
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sum of North/South Critical Volumes
Left
ATSAC
Total Lanes
Sum of East/West Critical Volumes
Total Intersection Critical Volumes
Intersection Capacity
Right
Through
Through/Right
Total Lanes
Total Lanes
Eastbound
East/West:
Left
Left/Through
Signalized
Analysis Scenario
Intersection Control
Lane Type
North/South:
July 26, 2010
Left/Through/Right
Through/Right
Left
Left/Through
Washington Boulevard
Hirsch/Green Transportation Consulting, Inc.
Critical Movement Analysis (CMA) Worksheet
Right
Date
Helms Avenue
22
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Northbound
Through
ATTACHMENT 5
6178770 Washington Mixed-Use
Future (2013)
Assigned
No. of Approach Right-Turn Lane Critical
Lanes Volumes on Red Volumes Moves
0 9 -1 9
0 -1
1 5 17
0 -1
0 3 0 -1 |1010|0 88 -1
0 -1
1 6 146 146
0 -1
0 52 0 -1 |1010|155
1 31 31 31
0 -1
1 900 453
1 453
0 6 0 -1 |1010|0 3 -1
1 990
0 1,661 -1
1 1,001 1,001
0 327 0 -1 |1010|1,032
1,187
Number of Clearance Intervals 1,200
0.989
Signal Coordination 0.000
0.989
E
Base CMA
Final CMA
Level of Service (LOS)
Southbound
Hirsch/Green Transportation Consulting, Inc.
Critical Movement Analysis (CMA) Worksheet
Sum of East/West Critical Volumes
Total Intersection Critical Volumes
Left
Total Lanes
Through
Right
Left
Left/Through
Sum of North/South Critical Volumes
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Eastbound
Right
Through/Right
Westbound
Total Lanes
Left
Signal Coordination Adjustment
Intersection Capacity
Date
Cattaraugus Avenue
East/West:
23
North/South:
July 26, 2010
Washington Boulevard
Project Name|10 10|None
AM Peak Hour
Intersection Number
Intersection Name
Analysis Period
Intersection Control
Lane Type
Analysis Scenario
Left
Direction
With Project Plus Mitigation (Eastbound Left-turn Lane Only)
Approach
Northbound
Through/Right
Right
Left/Through
Through
Through/Right
Right
Total Lanes
Two-Way STOP
Through/Right
Total Lanes
Left/Through/Right
Left/Through
Left/Through
Left/Through/Right
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ATTACHMENT 5
618TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY
General Information Site Information
Analyst RRH
Agency/Co. Hirsch/Green
Date Performed 7/26/2010
Analysis Time Period
AM Peak Hour - With
Mitigation
Intersection 23
Jurisdiction Culver City
Analysis Year 2013
Project Description 8770 Washington Mixed-Use
East/West Street: Washington Boulevard North/South Street: Cattaraugus Avenue
Intersection Orientation: East-West Study Period (hrs): 1.00
Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments
Major Street Eastbound Westbound
Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6
L T R L T R
Volume (veh/h) 31 900 6 3 1661 327
Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Hourly Flow Rate, HFR
(veh/h)
31 900 6 3 1661 327
Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 -- -- 0 -- --
Median Type Undivided
RT Channelized 0 0
Lanes 1 2 0 0 2 0
Configuration L T TR LT TR
Upstream Signal 0 0
Minor Street Northbound Southbound
Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12
L T R L T R
Volume (veh/h) 9 5 3 88 6 52
Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Hourly Flow Rate, HFR
(veh/h)
9 5 3 88 6 52
Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0
Percent Grade (%) 0 0
Flared Approach N N
Storage 0 0
RT Channelized 0 0
Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0
Configuration LTR LTR
Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service
Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound
Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12
Lane Configuration L LT LTR LTR
v (veh/h) 31 3 17 146
C (m) (veh/h) 294 759 24 20
v/c 0.11 0.00 0.71 7.30
95% queue length 0.35 0.01 3.59 66.30
Control Delay (s/veh) 18.7 9.8 402.6 11730
LOS C A F F
Approach Delay (s/veh) -- -- 402.6 11730
Approach LOS -- -- F F
Copyright © 2007 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved
HCS+
TM
Version 5.3
Generated: 12/16/2010 12:45 PM
ATTACHMENT 5
6198770 Washington Mixed-Use
Future (2013)
Assigned
No. of Approach Right-Turn Lane Critical
Lanes Volumes on Red Volumes Moves
0 9 -1 9
0 -1
1 5 17
0 -1
0 3 0 -1 |1010|0 88 -1
0 -1
1 6 146 146
0 -1
0 52 0 -1 |1010|155
1 31 31 31
0 -1
1 900 453
1 453
0 6 0 -1 |1010|0 3 -1
1 990
0 1,661 -1
1 1,001 1,001
0 327 0 -1 |1010|1,032
1,187
Number of Clearance Intervals 1,425
0.833
Signal Coordination -0.070
0.763
C
Total Lanes
Signalized
Through/Right
Total Lanes
Left/Through/Right
Left/Through
Left/Through
Left/Through/Right
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Northbound
Through/Right
Right
Left/Through
Through
Through/Right
Right
Direction
With Project Plus Mitigation (EB Left-turn Lane plus Traffic Signal)
Approach
Intersection Control
Lane Type
Analysis Scenario
Left
Project Name|1010|ATSAC
AM Peak Hour
Intersection Number
Intersection Name
Analysis Period
Date
Cattaraugus Avenue
East/West:
23
North/South:
July 26, 2010
Washington Boulevard
Left
Signal Coordination Adjustment
Intersection Capacity
Sum of North/South Critical Volumes
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Eastbound
Right
Through/Right
Westbound
Total Lanes
Total Lanes
Through
Right
Left
Left/Through
Southbound
Hirsch/Green Transportation Consulting, Inc.
Critical Movement Analysis (CMA) Worksheet
Sum of East/West Critical Volumes
Total Intersection Critical Volumes
Left
Base CMA
Final CMA
Level of Service (LOS)
ATTACHMENT 5
620
Future (2013) With Project Plus Mitigation
PM Peak Hour
ATTACHMENT 5
6218770 Washington Mixed-Use
Future (2013)
Assigned
No. of Approach Right-Turn Lane Critical
Lanes Volumes on Red Volumes Moves
1 160 160
0 -1
1 546 546 546
0 -1
1 60 60 0 |1010|0 611 -1
1 611 611
1 393 393
0 -1
1 292 214 78 |1010|1,157
2 778 428 428
0 -1
2 2,457 874
1 874
0 166 0 -1 |1010|1 112 112
0 -1
3 2,376 792 792
0 -1
1 266 266 0 |1010|1,220
2,377
Number of Clearance Intervals 1,375
1.729
Signal Coordination -0.100
1.629
F
Venice Boulevard
Signalized
Left
Left/Through
Through
Through/Right
North/South Opposed Phasing
Right
Through/Right
Left
Analysis Scenario
Intersection Control
Lane Type
Approach
Direction
With Project Plus Mitigation
Left/Through
Total Lanes
Base CMA
Signal Coordination Adjustment
Project Name|1010|ATSAC + ATCS
PM Peak Hour
Intersection Number
Intersection Name
Analysis Period
Southbound
Westbound
Total Lanes
Date
Robertson Boulevard/Exposition Boulevard
East/West:|1010|North/South:
July 26, 2010
Level of Service (LOS)
Left
Left/Through
Through
Through/Right
Right
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Lanes
Intersection Capacity
NB Rt. Turn Overlap with WB Left
Through
Left
Left/Through
Through/Right
Sum of North/South Critical Volumes
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Northbound
Total Lanes
Through
Right
Eastbound
Right
Hirsch/Green Transportation Consulting, Inc.
Critical Movement Analysis (CMA) Worksheet
Final CMA
Sum of East/West Critical Volumes
Total Intersection Critical Volumes
ATTACHMENT 5
6228770 Washington Mixed-Use
Future (2013)
Assigned
No. of Approach Right-Turn Lane Critical
Lanes Volumes on Red Volumes Moves
1 668 668 668
0 -1
1 767 494
1 494
0 221 0 -1 |1010|1 183 183
0 -1
2 831 416 416
0 -1
1 101 101 0 |1010|1,084
2 206 113
0 -1
3 2,223 741 741
0 -1
1 576 334 242 |1010|2 129 71 71
0 -1
3 1,593 531
0 -1
1 59 59 0 |1010|812
1,896
Number of Clearance Intervals 1,375
1.379
Signal Coordination -0.100
1.279
F
Hirsch/Green Transportation Consulting, Inc.
Critical Movement Analysis (CMA) Worksheet
Final CMA
Sum of East/West Critical Volumes
Through
Left
Sum of North/South Critical Volumes
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Northbound
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Lanes
Total Intersection Critical Volumes
Total Lanes
Through
Right
Eastbound
Left/Through
Through/Right
Total Lanes
Right
Left
Right
Left/Through
Through
Through/Right
Intersection Capacity
Level of Service (LOS)
Date
National Boulevard
East/West:|10 10|North/South:
July 26, 2010
Southbound
Westbound
With Project Plus Mitigation
Project Name|1010|ATSAC + ATCS
PM Peak Hour
Intersection Number
Intersection Name
Analysis Period
Base CMA
Signal Coordination Adjustment
Through
Through/Right
Right
Through/Right
Left
Left/Through
Total Lanes
Signalized
Left
Left/Through
Analysis Scenario
Intersection Control
Lane Type
Approach
Direction
Venice Boulevard
ATTACHMENT 5
6238770 Washington Mixed-Use
Future (2013)
Assigned
No. of Approach Right-Turn Lane Critical
Lanes Volumes on Red Volumes Moves
0 16 -1 16
117
0 1 -1
0 -1
1 9 90 |1010|0 29 -1
0 -1
1 9 65 65
0 -1
0 27 0 -1 |1010|81
1 74 74
0 -1
2 2,589 874 874
1 874
0 34 0 -1 |1010|1 33 33 33
0 -1
2 1,793 600
1 600
0 8 0 -1 |1010|907
988
Number of Clearance Intervals 1,500
0.659
Signal Coordination -0.100
0.559
A
Hirsch/Green Transportation Consulting, Inc.
Critical Movement Analysis (CMA) Worksheet
Right
Date
Helms Avenue
East/West:
10
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Northbound
Left/Through/Right
Left
Left/Through
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sum of North/South Critical Volumes
Total Lanes
Total Lanes
Eastbound
Left
ATSAC + ATCS
Right
Through
Through/Right
Right
Total Lanes
Left/Through
Final CMA
Through
Through/Right
Sum of East/West Critical Volumes
Total Intersection Critical Volumes
Intersection Capacity
North/South:
July 26, 2010
Project Name|1010|PM Peak Hour
Intersection Number
Intersection Name
Analysis Period
Southbound
Westbound
Base CMA
Signal Coordination Adjustment
Level of Service (LOS)
With Project Plus Trip Redistributions Due to Wesley Street Signal
Through
Through/Right
Right
Through/Right
Left
Left/Through
Total Lanes
Signalized
Left
Left/Through
Analysis Scenario
Intersection Control
Lane Type
Approach
Direction
Venice Boulevard
ATTACHMENT 5
6248770 Washington Mixed-Use
Future (2013)
Assigned
No. of Approach Right-Turn Lane Critical
Lanes Volumes on Red Volumes Moves
0 13 -1 13
0 -1
1 63 101
0 -1
0 25 0 -1 |1010|0 189 -1
0 -1
1 74 295 295
0 -1
0 32 0 -1 |1010|308
1 113 113
0 -1
2 2,444 819 819
1 819
0 13 0 -1 |1010|1 90 90 90
0 -1
2 1,704 594
1 594
0 77 0 -1 |1010|909
1,217
Number of Clearance Intervals 1,500
0.811
Signal Coordination -0.100
0.711
C
Venice Boulevard
Signalized
Left
Left/Through
Left/Through/Right
Through/Right
Right
Through/Right
Left
Analysis Scenario
Intersection Control
Lane Type
Approach
Direction
With Project Plus Trip Redistributions Due to Wesley Street Signal
Left/Through
Total Lanes
Base CMA
Signal Coordination Adjustment
Project Name|1010|ATSAC + ATCS
PM Peak Hour
Intersection Number
Intersection Name
Analysis Period
Southbound
Westbound
Total Lanes
Date
Cattaraugus Avenue
East/West:
11
North/South:
July 26, 2010
Level of Service (LOS)
Left
Left/Through
Through
Through/Right
Right
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Lanes
Intersection Capacity
Left/Through/Right
Left
Left/Through
Through/Right
Sum of North/South Critical Volumes
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Northbound
Total Lanes
Through
Right
Eastbound
Right
Hirsch/Green Transportation Consulting, Inc.
Critical Movement Analysis (CMA) Worksheet
Final CMA
Sum of East/West Critical Volumes
Total Intersection Critical Volumes
ATTACHMENT 5
6258770 Washington Mixed-Use
Future (2013)
Assigned
No. of Approach Right-Turn Lane Critical
Lanes Volumes on Red Volumes Moves
2 269 148 148
0 -1
2 849 424
0 -1
1 126 54 72 |1010|2 306 168
0 -1
1 1,071 572 572
1 572
0 73 0 -1 |1010|720
1 85 85
0 -1
2 1,070 535 535
0 -1
1 288 74 214 |1010|1 107 107 107
0 -1
2 855 424
1 424
0 418 0 -1 |1010|642
1,362
Number of Clearance Intervals 1,375
0.991
Signal Coordination -0.070
0.921
E
Washington Boulevard
Lane Type
Approach
Direction
Left
Left/Through
Total Lanes
Signalized
Left
Left/Through
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Northbound
Analysis Scenario
Intersection Control
With Project Plus Mitigation
Through
Through/Right
Right
Through/Right
Project Name|1010|ATSAC
PM Peak Hour
Intersection Number
Intersection Name
Analysis Period
Southbound
Westbound
Total Lanes
Date
National Boulevard
East/West:
20
North/South:
July 26, 2010
Right
Level of Service (LOS)
Sum of East/West Critical Volumes
Intersection Capacity
Base CMA
Signal Coordination Adjustment
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Lanes
Left
Right
Left/Through
Through
Through/Right
Hirsch/Green Transportation Consulting, Inc.
Critical Movement Analysis (CMA) Worksheet
Through
Left
Left/Through
Through/Right
Sum of North/South Critical Volumes
Total Lanes
Through
Right
Eastbound
Total Intersection Critical Volumes
Final CMA
ATTACHMENT 5
6268770 Washington Mixed-Use
Future (2013)
Assigned
No. of Approach Right-Turn Lane Critical
Lanes Volumes on Red Volumes Moves
1 78 78 78
0 -1
0 0 -1
0 -1
1 22 22 0 |1010|0 0 -1
0 -1
0 0 -1
0 -1
0 0 0 -1 |10 10|78
0 0 -1
0 -1
1 1,393 712 712
1 712
0 32 0 -1 |1010|1 43 43 43
0 -1
2 1,238 619
0 -1
0 0 0 -1 |1010|755
833
Number of Clearance Intervals 1,500
0.555
Signal Coordination -0.070
0.485
A
Hirsch/Green Transportation Consulting, Inc.
Critical Movement Analysis (CMA) Worksheet
Final CMA
Sum of East/West Critical Volumes
Through
Left
Sum of North/South Critical Volumes
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Northbound
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Lanes
Total Intersection Critical Volumes
Total Lanes
Through
Right
Eastbound
Left/Through
Through/Right
Total Lanes
Right
Left
Right
Left/Through
Through
Through/Right
Intersection Capacity
Level of Service (LOS)
Date
Wesley Street
East/West:
21
North/South:
July 26, 2010
Southbound
Westbound
With Project Plus Mitigation
Project Name|1010|ATSAC
PM Peak Hour
Intersection Number
Intersection Name
Analysis Period
Base CMA
Signal Coordination Adjustment
Through
Through/Right
Right
Through/Right
Left
Left/Through
Total Lanes
Signalized
Left
Left/Through
Analysis Scenario
Intersection Control
Lane Type
Approach
Direction
Washington Boulevard
ATTACHMENT 5
6278770 Washington Mixed-Use
Future (2013)
Assigned
No. of Approach Right-Turn Lane Critical
Lanes Volumes on Red Volumes Moves
0 49 -1
0 -1
1 0 62 62
0 -1
0 13 0 -1 |1010|0 0 -1
0 -1
0 0 -1
0 -1
0 0 0 -1 |10 10|62
0 0 -1
0 -1
1 1,311 670 670
1 670
0 30 0 -1 |1010|1 14 14 14
0 -1
2 1,042 521
0 -1
0 0 0 -1 |1010|684
746
Number of Clearance Intervals 1,500
0.497
Signal Coordination -0.070
0.427
A
Through/Right
Right
Through/Right
Left
Left
Left/Through
Left/Through/Right
Analysis Scenario
Intersection Control
Lane Type
Approach
Direction
With Project Plus Trip Redistributions Due to Wesley Street Signal
Signalized
Base CMA
Signal Coordination Adjustment
Project Name|1010|ATSAC
PM Peak Hour
Intersection Number
Intersection Name
Analysis Period
Helms Avenue
Left/Through
Total Lanes
East/West:
22
North/South:
July 26, 2010 Date
Washington Boulevard
Left/Through
Through
Through/Right
Right
Intersection Capacity
Level of Service (LOS)
Eastbound
Right
Through
Left
Left/Through
Through/Right
Sum of North/South Critical Volumes
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Northbound
Total Intersection Critical Volumes
Total Lanes
Through
Right
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Lanes
Left
Southbound
Westbound
Total Lanes
Hirsch/Green Transportation Consulting, Inc.
Critical Movement Analysis (CMA) Worksheet
Final CMA
Sum of East/West Critical Volumes
ATTACHMENT 5
6288770 Washington Mixed-Use
Future (2013)
Assigned
No. of Approach Right-Turn Lane Critical
Lanes Volumes on Red Volumes Moves
0 4 -1 4
0 -1
1 2 9
0 -1
0 3 0 -1 |1010|0 59 -1
0 -1
1 2 109 109
0 -1
0 48 0 -1 |1010|113
1 34 34
0 -1
1 1,302 656 656
1 656
0 9 0 -1 |1010|0 11 -1 11
1 507
0 982 -1
1 562
0 76 0 -1 |1010|667
780
Number of Clearance Intervals 1,200
0.650
Signal Coordination 0.000
0.650
B
Hirsch/Green Transportation Consulting, Inc.
Critical Movement Analysis (CMA) Worksheet
Right
Date
Cattaraugus Avenue
East/West:
23
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Northbound
Left/Through/Right
Left
Left/Through
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sum of North/South Critical Volumes
Total Lanes
Total Lanes
Eastbound
Left
None
Right
Through
Through/Right
Right
Total Lanes
Left/Through
Final CMA
Through
Through/Right
Sum of East/West Critical Volumes
Total Intersection Critical Volumes
Intersection Capacity
North/South:
July 26, 2010
Project Name|10 10|PM Peak Hour
Intersection Number
Intersection Name
Analysis Period
Southbound
Westbound
Base CMA
Signal Coordination Adjustment
Level of Service (LOS)
With Project Plus Mitigation (Eastbound Left-turn Lane Only)
Left/Through/Right
Through/Right
Right
Through/Right
Left
Left/Through
Total Lanes
Two-Way STOP
Left
Left/Through
Analysis Scenario
Intersection Control
Lane Type
Approach
Direction
Washington Boulevard
ATTACHMENT 5
629TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY
General Information Site Information
Analyst RRH
Agency/Co. Hirsch/Green
Date Performed 7/26/2010
Analysis Time Period
PM Peak Hour - With
Mitigation
Intersection 23
Jurisdiction Culver City
Analysis Year 2013
Project Description 8770 Washington Mixed-Use
East/West Street: Washington Boulevard North/South Street: Cattaraugus Avenue
Intersection Orientation: East-West Study Period (hrs): 1.00
Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments
Major Street Eastbound Westbound
Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6
L T R L T R
Volume (veh/h) 34 1302 9 11 982 76
Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Hourly Flow Rate, HFR
(veh/h)
34 1302 9 11 982 76
Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 -- -- 0 -- --
Median Type Undivided
RT Channelized 0 0
Lanes 1 2 0 0 2 0
Configuration L T TR LT TR
Upstream Signal 0 0
Minor Street Northbound Southbound
Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12
L T R L T R
Volume (veh/h) 4 2 3 59 2 48
Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Hourly Flow Rate, HFR
(veh/h)
4 2 3 59 2 48
Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0
Percent Grade (%) 0 0
Flared Approach N N
Storage 0 0
RT Channelized 0 0
Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0
Configuration LTR LTR
Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service
Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound
Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12
Lane Configuration L LT LTR LTR
v (veh/h) 34 11 9 109
C (m) (veh/h) 666 534 48 80
v/c 0.05 0.02 0.19 1.36
95% queue length 0.16 0.06 0.67 21.95
Control Delay (s/veh) 10.7 11.9 97.1 841.9
LOS B B F F
Approach Delay (s/veh) -- -- 97.1 841.9
Approach LOS -- -- F F
Copyright © 2007 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved
HCS+
TM
Version 5.3
Generated: 12/16/2010 12:47 PM
ATTACHMENT 5
6308770 Washington Mixed-Use
Future (2013)
Assigned
No. of Approach Right-Turn Lane Critical
Lanes Volumes on Red Volumes Moves
0 4 -1 4
0 -1
1 2 9
0 -1
0 3 0 -1 |1010|0 59 -1
0 -1
1 2 109 109
0 -1
0 48 0 -1 |1010|113
1 34 34
0 -1
1 1,302 656 656
1 656
0 9 0 -1 |1010|0 11 -1 11
1 507
0 982 -1
1 562
0 76 0 -1 |1010|667
780
Number of Clearance Intervals 1,425
0.547
Signal Coordination -0.070
0.477
A
Washington Boulevard
Signalized
Left
Left/Through
Analysis Scenario
Intersection Control
Lane Type
Approach
Direction
With Project Plus Mitigation (EB Left-turn Lane plus Traffic Signal)
Left/Through/Right
Through/Right
Right
Through/Right
Left
Left/Through
Total Lanes
Base CMA
Signal Coordination Adjustment
Level of Service (LOS)
North/South:
July 26, 2010
Project Name|1010|PM Peak Hour
Intersection Number
Intersection Name
Analysis Period
Southbound
Westbound
Intersection Capacity
Through
Through/Right
Sum of East/West Critical Volumes
Total Intersection Critical Volumes
Final CMA
Left
ATSAC
Right
Through
Through/Right
Right
Total Lanes
Left/Through
Left/Through/Right
Left
Left/Through
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sum of North/South Critical Volumes
Total Lanes
Total Lanes
Eastbound
Hirsch/Green Transportation Consulting, Inc.
Critical Movement Analysis (CMA) Worksheet
Right
Date
Cattaraugus Avenue
East/West:
23
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Northbound
ATTACHMENT 5
631Proposed Mixed-Use Development
(115-Unit Residential and 31,240 Square Foot Retail)
Located at 8770 Washington Boulevard
in Culver City, California
TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS REPORT
EMC Development, LLC
8383 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 630
Beverly Hills, California 90211
Prepared for:
Prepared by:
Hirsch/Green Transportation Consulting, Inc.
13333 Ventura Boulevard, #204
Sherman Oaks, California 91423
JUNE 2012
SUPPLEMENT TO
ATTACHMENT 5
632
1
8770 WASHINGTON BOULEVARD MIXED-USE PROJECT HIRSCH/GREEN TRANSPORTATION CONSULTING, INC.
JUNE 2012 SUPPLEMENT TO “REVISED JULY 2010” TRAFFIC STUDY
INTRODUCTION
Pursuant to the request of the City of Culver City’s Community Development Department
Planning Division, and the Department of Public Works, this document has been prepared to
supplement the current traffic study (dated “Revised July 2010”) for the residential and
commercial mixed-use project proposed by Legado Companies at 8770 Washington Boulevard,
located at the southeast corner of Washington Boulevard and National Boulevard in the City of
Culver City. The purpose of this supplemental document is to provide updated traffic data and
project-related impact analyses for the proposed project, in order to assure that the traffic study
prepared for the project continues to accurately reflect current conditions in the project vicinity.
Additionally, this supplement includes expanded analyses to examine the potential effects of the
proposed project on area traffic conditions should date of its completion and occupancy be
delayed beyond the future year 2013 buildout timeline assumed in the analyses.
Therefore, this supplemental analysis has been prepared to identify the current (year 2012)
traffic volumes and operational conditions at a total of six key intersections evaluated in the
Revised July 2010 project traffic study, in order to compare these existing conditions to the
“existing” (year 2010) intersection conditions identified in the current traffic study. Additionally,
this supplemental analysis includes an evaluation of forecast future (year 2014) conditions,
based on the current 2012 traffic volume data, in order to provide a comparison to the forecast
future (year 2013) conditions shown in the Revised July 2010 analyses. The six intersections
selected for this supplemental evaluation are listed below and are shown in relation to the
project site in Figure 1 (note that for ease of comparison, the intersection identification numbers
shown are consistent with the designations used in the Revised July 2010 traffic study).
8. Venice Boulevard and Robertson Boulevard
[1]
9. Venice Boulevard and National Boulevard
[1]
18. Washington Boulevard and Robertson Boulevard/Higuera Street
20. Washington Boulevard and National Boulevard
23. Washington Boulevard and Cattaraugus Avenue
[2]
26. National Boulevard and Wesley Street
Notes:
[1]
Intersection under jurisdiction of City of Los Angeles
[2]
Unsignalized (two-way STOP controlled) intersection
ATTACHMENT 5
6338|10 10|18
23
26
20
PROJECT
SITE|1010 10|18
20
23
26
YEAR 2012 "CORRELATION" COUNT LOCATIONS
FIGURE 1
WASHINGTON-NATIONAL EMC (CULVER CITY) \ CORRELATION COUNT LOCATIONS 4/19/2012|1010|N
Hirsch/Green Transportation Consulting, Inc.
ATTACHMENT 5
634
3
8770 WASHINGTON BOULEVARD MIXED-USE PROJECT HIRSCH/GREEN TRANSPORTATION CONSULTING, INC.
JUNE 2012 SUPPLEMENT TO “REVISED JULY 2010” TRAFFIC STUDY
These six intersections represent locations along each of the four directions of approach to the
project site via both National Boulevard and Washington Boulevard, and also include four of the
five significantly impacted locations identified in the project traffic study (Venice Boulevard and
Robertson Boulevard, Venice Boulevard and National Boulevard, Washington Boulevard and
National Boulevard, and Washington Boulevard and Cattaraugus Avenue). The remaining
significantly impacted intersection, the intersection of Washington Boulevard and Wesley Street,
was not selected for inclusion in this supplemental analysis for several reasons, including that
Wesley Street is currently a lightly used cul-de-sac roadway that terminates just south of the
project site, and that although the project will utilize Wesley Street as an access location, the
significant impact at Washington Boulevard and Wesley Street is due primarily to the
intersection’s current unsignalized operations; this impact will be mitigated by the installation of
a new traffic signal, which is a recommended improvement in order to facilitate project access
(particularly left-turns from Wesley Street onto westbound Washington Boulevard) regardless of
whether or not a “significant” impact would occur at this intersection.
EXISTING (2012) TRAFFIC CONDITIONS AND COMPARISON TO 2010 CONDITIONS
The supplemental traffic counts at these six intersections were collected in early May 2012,
during both the AM (7:00 to 10:00 AM) and PM (4:00 to 7:00 PM) peak commute traffic periods,
with the “peak hour” volumes described in this analysis reflecting the highest total traffic (sum of
all moves through the intersection) from four consecutive 15-minute periods within these larger
three-hour count windows; note that the peak hour traffic volumes were determined individually
for each of the study intersections, assuring that the “worst case” operational conditions at each
location were analyzed. Additionally, as with the traffic counts utilized in the Revised July 2011
traffic study, the 2012 data represent typical mid-week conditions for weeks with no holidays or
other notable special events, with area schools and businesses generally in normal operation.
Based on these data and evaluation methodologies, the current 2012 AM and PM peak hour
traffic volumes at the six subject intersections are shown in Figures 2(a) and 2(b), respectively.
These current traffic volumes were then compared to the corresponding year 2010 “Existing”
conditions volumes, as identified in Figures 11(a) and 11(b) for the AM and PM peak hours,
respectively, in the Revised July 2010 project traffic study. For convenience, the year 2010
peak hour volumes at the six subject “comparison” intersection locations are excerpted from the
project traffic study, and are shown in Figure 3(a) for the AM peak hour and in Figure 3(b) for
the PM peak hour conditions. This comparison indicated that there is no definitive pattern of
ATTACHMENT 5
6354
20
22
26
18
128
1833
378
553
378
278
47
280
80
218
2034
96
124
2062
62
38
745
236
153
1745
239
128
403
102
101
255
96
35
767
69
130
982
58
96
320
174
290
940
78
74
704
231
132
478
74
44
662
211
339
1225
12
839
81
20|1010|14
10
14
725
18
73
171
27
PROJECT
SITE
19|10101010 101010
10|11
572
225
21|1010101010 10|18
20
23
26
EXISTING (2012) TRAFFIC VOLUMES
AM PEAK HOUR
(2012 CORRELATION COUNTS)
FIGURE 2(a)
WASHINGTON-NATIONAL EMC (CULVER CITY) \ EX2012-AM (FOR CORRELATION) 6/1/2012|1010|N
Hirsch/Green Transportation Consulting, Inc.
ATTACHMENT 5
6364
20
22
26
18
118
2033
339
421
336
361
36
216
86
96
1572
74
70
1468
38
59
485
200
184
1824
280
160
470
125
47
153
47
87
996
88
108
635
77
87
273
201
181
560
98
87
912
292
201
555
56
57
492
179
54
732
25
1091
108
36|1010|17
13|1010|705
10
12
46
27
PROJECT
SITE
19|10101010 101010
10|11
935
33
21|10 10101010 10|18
20
23
26
FIGURE 2(b)
WASHINGTON-NATIONAL EMC (CULVER CITY) \ EX2012-PM (FOR CORRELATION) 6/1/2012|1010|Hirsch/Green Transportation Consulting, Inc.
EXISTING (2012) TRAFFIC VOLUMES
PM PEAK HOUR
(2012 CORRELATION COUNTS)
N
ATTACHMENT 5
6374
20
22
26
18
131
2066
536
508
321
141
47
430
176
331
2076
79
115
1920
89
22
897
196
180
2049
285
130
561
100
48
232
24
38
705
64
207
1102
64
153
273
129
310
1154
76
73
707
109
136
730
60
104
784
219
317
1503
22
804
85
45|10101010 10|1531
39
98
111
27
PROJECT
SITE
19|10101010 101010
10|11
801
83
21|1010101010 10|18
20
23
26
EXISTING (2010) TRAFFIC VOLUMES
AM PEAK HOUR
(EXCERPT FROM FIGURE 11(a) - REVISED JULY 2010 TRAFFIC STUDY)
FIGURE 3(a)
WASHINGTON-NATIONAL EMC (CULVER CITY) \ EX2010-AM (FOR CORRELATION) 6/1/2012|1010|N
Hirsch/Green Transportation Consulting, Inc.
ATTACHMENT 5
6384
20
22
26
18
154
1983
460
532
304
159
58
485
122
123
1932
104
59
1479
67
98
502
213
166
1971
304
181
695
97
31
168
45
94
807
80
130
794
77
54
247
146
175
753
68
41
939
190
203
840
53
86
628
171
74
871
19
1123
57
36
11|10 101010|885|1010|114
23
27
PROJECT
SITE
19|10101010 101010
10|11
975|10101010101010 10|18
20
23
26
FIGURE 3(b)
WASHINGTON-NATIONAL EMC (CULVER CITY) \ EX2010-PM (FOR CORRELATION) 6/1/2012|1010|Hirsch/Green Transportation Consulting, Inc.
EXISTING (2010) TRAFFIC VOLUMES
PM PEAK HOUR
(EXCERPT FROM FIGURE 11(b) - REVISED JULY 2010 TRAFFIC STUDY)
N
ATTACHMENT 5
639
8
8770 WASHINGTON BOULEVARD MIXED-USE PROJECT HIRSCH/GREEN TRANSPORTATION CONSULTING, INC.
JUNE 2012 SUPPLEMENT TO “REVISED JULY 2010” TRAFFIC STUDY
change in the volumes for specific moves (e.g., left turns, “through” traffic, or right turns) at any
of the subject intersections during either the AM or PM peak hours, with the year 2012 volumes
for some intersection movements remaining approximately the same as their 2010 counterpart
values, while other moves exhibited notable increases or reductions in volumes. However, the
comparison also revealed that, in general, the total peak hour intersection volumes decreased
by between about eight and 12 percent between the “existing” 2010 and current 2012 counts,
with only one location (Washington Boulevard and Robertson Boulevard/Higuera Street)
showing a slight increase (less than five percent) in total traffic as compared to the 2010 data.
Despite the overall reductions in total intersection volumes at most of the subject intersections, it
is generally not possible to accurately assess whether the current year 2012 traffic conditions in
the project vicinity have actually improved from those associated with the 2010 “existing” traffic
volumes based solely on the comparison of total intersection volumes. As described in detail in
the Revised July 2010 traffic study, the Critical Movement Analysis (“CMA”) methodology used
to calculate the operational characteristics and associated levels of service (“LOS”) for the study
intersections is based primarily on the amount of traffic travelling through specific moves at the
intersection, known as “critical lanes”, and not necessarily on the total intersection volumes.
Therefore, it is possible that a reduction in volumes in a “non-critical” lane could be more than
offset by increases in traffic volumes through one or more of the critical lanes, since volumes in
the non-critical lanes are not used to calculate the CMA value for an intersection. As a result,
the indicated reductions in the total intersection volumes alone do not ensure that any of the six
subject study intersection(s) would actually exhibit improved operations.
Therefore, in order to provide a relevant comparison between the traffic conditions associated
with the current 2012 intersection counts and those identified in the Revised July 2010 traffic
study for the “existing” 2010 traffic volumes, the new 2012 traffic data was analyzed using the
CMA evaluation methodology described earlier. The results of this supplemental analysis for
the six intersections evaluated in this supplemental analysis are shown in Table 1, along with
the “existing” 2010 conditions for the corresponding intersections, as excerpted from Table 8 of
the project traffic study (note that values shown in bold text indicate intersections operating at
undesirable LOS E or F conditions, as described in the project traffic study).
As shown in Table 1, similar to the overall intersection volumes described earlier, the CMA
analyses indicate that the current 2012 conditions at most of the subject intersections studied in
this supplemental analysis are better (based on CMA value) than were reported for the
“existing” year 2010 scenario in the project traffic study, with the exceptions of the intersections
ATTACHMENT 5
640
9
8770 WASHINGTON BOULEVARD MIXED-USE PROJECT HIRSCH/GREEN TRANSPORTATION CONSULTING, INC.
JUNE 2012 SUPPLEMENT TO “REVISED JULY 2010” TRAFFIC STUDY
Change Change
Int. Peak in in
No. Intersection Hour CMA LOS CMA LOS CMA LOS?
8 Venice Boulevard and AM 1.380 F 1.203 F -0.177 No
Robertson Boulevard
[1]
PM 1.322 F 0.938 E -0.384 Improved
9 Venice Boulevard and AM 0.960 E 0.920 E -0.040 No
National Boulevard
[1]
PM 0.943 E 0.800 C -0.143 Improved
18 Washington Boulevard and AM 0.624 B 0.637 B 0.013 No
Robertson Boulevard/Higuera Street PM 0.525 A 0.589 A 0.064 No
20 Washington Boulevard and AM 0.780 C 0.635 B -0.145 Improved
National Boulevard PM 0.714 C 0.627 B -0.087 Improved
23 Washington Boulevard and AM 0.903 F
[2]
0.763 F
[2]
-0.140 No
Cattaraugus Avenue PM 0.601 F
[2]
0.636 F
[2]
0.035 No
26 National Boulevard and AM 0.580 A 0.334 A -0.246 No
Wesley Street PM 0.350 A 0.293 A -0.057 No
Notes:
[1] City of Los Angeles intersection.
[2] Unsignalized intersection. LOS value determined using HCM methodology.
* Existing (2010) CMA and LOS values excerpted from Table 8, Revised July 2010 project traffic study.
(2012)
Existing
(2010)
Table 1
Critical Movement Analysis Summary
Comparison of Current (2012) and "Existing" (2010)* Intersection Conditions
Current
of Washington Boulevard and Robertson Boulevard/Higuera Street (which, as noted previously,
was the lone location that also exhibited an increase on total intersection volumes) during both
the AM and PM peak hours, and at Washington Boulevard and Cattaraugus Avenue during the
PM peak hour only. However, these increases in CMA values are relatively nominal and do not
affect the LOS designations originally reported in the Revised July 2010 project traffic study;
Washington Boulevard and Robertson Boulevard/Higuera Street continues to operate at LOS B
during the AM peak hour and LOS A during the PM peak hour, while Washington Boulevard and
Cattaraugus Avenue continues to exhibit LOS F operations (based on the “unsignalized
intersection” evaluation methodologies required for this intersection) during the PM peak hour.
Conversely, three intersections have experienced improvement in their operating conditions
(both CMA and LOS values) since the 2010 analyses. The intersection of Venice Boulevard
and Robertson Boulevard has improved from LOS F (CMA = 1.322) to LOS E (CMA = 0.938)
ATTACHMENT 5
641
10
8770 WASHINGTON BOULEVARD MIXED-USE PROJECT HIRSCH/GREEN TRANSPORTATION CONSULTING, INC.
JUNE 2012 SUPPLEMENT TO “REVISED JULY 2010” TRAFFIC STUDY
during the PM peak hour (it continues to exhibit LOS F conditions during the AM peak hour),
while Venice Boulevard and National Boulevard has improved from LOS E (CMA = 0.943) to
LOS C (CMA = 0.800) during the PM peak hour (it remains at LOS E during the AM peak hour).
Additionally, the site-adjacent intersection of Washington Boulevard and National Boulevard has
improved from LOS C to LOS B operations during both the AM and PM peak hours.
Therefore, based on these data and analyses, the “existing” (year 2010) conditions identified in
the Revised July 2010 project traffic study continue to accurately reflect the current (year 2012)
conditions at the six subject study intersections, and it can be reasonably concluded that the
overall “existing” conditions identified in the 2010 traffic study remain valid estimates of the
current overall traffic conditions throughout the study area. As such, there is no need to
incorporate 2012 data, either for the six subject locations or for the remaining 28 intersections
analyzed in that study.
FUTURE (YEAR 2014) PROJECT TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS
The second component of this supplemental analysis evaluates the potential effects of the
proposed project on area traffic conditions should the completion and occupancy of the project
be delayed beyond the 2013, which was assumed in the Revised July 2010 project traffic study
as the “buildout/occupancy” date of the project. Therefore, in order to address this potential
circumstance, an additional analysis was conducted, assuming that unforeseen delays could
delay the completion and occupancy of the proposed project to the year 2014.
This additional study was prepared using the current year 2012 traffic data described earlier as
the baseline to forecast future conditions to the end of 2014. The additional analyses utilized
the same ambient traffic growth (1.0 percent, compounded annually), related projects (a review
of the current City of Culver City and City of Los Angeles related projects lists indicated that no
new significant development projects have been proposed for the study area since the
completion of the February 2011 update to the project traffic study), and programmed roadway
improvement assumptions described in detail in the Revised July 2010 traffic study, with the
exception that the “horizon” study year was updated from 2013 to 2014. The results of this
additional “Year 2014” analysis are summarized in Table 2.
As shown in Table 2, the forecast year 2014 conditions at each of the subject intersections will
again be better than the forecast year 2013 conditions reported in the Revised July 2010 traffic
study under both the “Without Project” and “With Project” scenarios, with the exceptions of
ATTACHMENT 5
642
11
8770 WASHINGTON BOULEVARD MIXED-USE PROJECT HIRSCH/GREEN TRANSPORTATION CONSULTING, INC.
JUNE 2012 SUPPLEMENT TO “REVISED JULY 2010” TRAFFIC STUDY
Int. Peak Future
No. Intersection Hour Year CMA LOS CMA LOS
8 Venice Boulevard and AM 2013 1.647 F 1.659 F 0.012 *
Robertson Boulevard
[1]
2014 1.452 F 1.464 F 0.012 *
PM 2013 1.673 F 1.693 F 0.020 *
2014 1.230 F 1.251 F 0.021 *
9 Venice Boulevard and AM 2013 1.069 F 1.083 F 0.014 *
National Boulevard
[1]
2014 1.056 F 1.070 F 0.014 *
PM 2013 1.281 F 1.293 F 0.012 *
2014 1.140 F 1.153 F 0.013 *
18 Washington Boulevard and AM 2013 0.832 D 0.835 D 0.003
Robertson Boulevard/Higuera Street 2014 0.802 D 0.804 D 0.002
PM 2013 0.681 B 0.685 B 0.004
2014 0.757 C 0.766 C 0.009
20 Washington Boulevard and AM 2013 0.940 E 0.962 E 0.022 *
National Boulevard 2014 0.807 D 0.827 D 0.020
PM 2013 0.904 E 0.921 E 0.017
2014 0.808 D 0.824 D 0.016
23 Washington Boulevard and AM 2013 0.973 F
[2]
1.006 F
[2]
0.033 *
Cattaraugus Avenue 2014 0.821 F
[2]
0.853 F
[2]
0.032 *
PM 2013 0.669 F
[2]
0.800 F
[2]
0.131 *
2014 0.698 F
[2]
0.813 F
[2]
0.115 *
26 National Boulevard and AM 2013 0.622 B 0.627 B 0.005
Wesley Street 2014 0.383 A 0.385 A 0.002
PM 2013 0.430 A 0.440 A 0.010
2014 0.365 A 0.370 A 0.005
Notes:
[1] City of Los Angeles intersection.
[2] Unsignalized intersection. LOS value determined using HCM methodology.
"*" Significant impact per City of Culver City criteria (CMA increase of +0.040 at LOS D; +0.020 at LOS E/F).
"*" Significant impact per City of Los Angeles criteria (CMA increase of +.0.40 at LOS C, +0.020 at LOS E, +0.010 at LOS E/F).
Table 2
Critical Movement Analysis Summary
Comparison of Future (2013) Traffic Study and (2014) Supplemental Analysis Conditions
Impact
Project With Project
Without
ATTACHMENT 5
643
12
8770 WASHINGTON BOULEVARD MIXED-USE PROJECT HIRSCH/GREEN TRANSPORTATION CONSULTING, INC.
JUNE 2012 SUPPLEMENT TO “REVISED JULY 2010” TRAFFIC STUDY
Washington Boulevard and Robertson Boulevard/Higuera Street (PM peak hour only), which
shows a slight deterioration in both the CMA and LOS values when compared to the 2013
analyses, although this location is forecast to continue to operate at acceptable levels of service
(year 2014 LOS C, as compared to the LOS B operations forecast for the year 2013). The
intersection of Washington Boulevard and Cattaraugus Avenue is also expected to exhibit a
slightly worse CMA value (again during the PM peak hour only) as compared to the forecast
2013 conditions, although the level of service would remain as previously anticipated, at LOS F.
Table 2 also shows that the site-adjacent intersection of Washington Boulevard and National
Boulevard is forecast to exhibit LOS D operations during both the AM and PM peak hours for
both the future 2014 “Without Project” and “With Project” scenarios, as compared to the LOS E
conditions forecast for the year 2013 under these scenarios in the Revised July 2010 traffic
study. Similarly, the intersection of National Boulevard and Wesley Street is forecast to exhibit
LOS A operations during both peak hours for the future year 2014 scenario, slightly better than
the LOS B operations shown for the AM peak hour for the original 2013 horizon study year
analyzed in the Revised July 2010 traffic study (this location was forecast to exhibit LOS A
operations by the forecast horizon year of 2013 during the PM peak hour).
Despite these general improvements in the future forecast conditions at the subject
intersections, a further review of Table 2 also indicates that, under the supplemental year 2014
conditions, the proposed project would be expected to again result in significant impacts at three
of the four intersections originally identified as significantly impacted in the Revised July 2010
traffic study during the same peak hour periods as originally noted for the forecast year 2013
conditions in that study, and with the magnitudes of these impacts also relatively unchanged
from those earlier analyses. (Note that, while the intersection of Washington Boulevard and
Wesley Street was not included in this supplemental year 2014 analysis, it is assumed, based
on the information presented in Table 2, that the proposed project would again result in a
significant impact to that location.)
However, as also shown in Table 2, the improvement to the forecast future year 2014 operating
conditions at the intersection of Washington Boulevard and National Boulevard as compared to
the year 2013 conditions shown in the Revised July 2010 traffic study (from LOS E to LOS D)
would mean that the previously-identified impact at this location would no longer be considered
to be significant. Therefore, the potential project impacts identified in the Revised July 2010
traffic study are considered to be a “worst case” assessment of the proposed project’s effects on
the surrounding intersections, since they result in a significant project-related impact at one of
ATTACHMENT 5
644
13
8770 WASHINGTON BOULEVARD MIXED-USE PROJECT HIRSCH/GREEN TRANSPORTATION CONSULTING, INC.
JUNE 2012 SUPPLEMENT TO “REVISED JULY 2010” TRAFFIC STUDY
the study intersections (Washington Boulevard and National Boulevard) that would not be
expected to occur based on the existing year 2012 traffic volume conditions, even when
assuming a project completion date of 2014.
Finally, even though the year 2014 CMA and/or LOS forecasts for the significantly impacted
intersections are generally lower, and with similar project-specific impact magnitudes, as
compared to the project traffic study year 2013 forecasts, the recommended traffic impact
mitigation improvements identified in the Revised July 2010 traffic study were evaluated to
ensure that these measures would continue to reduce the impacts of the proposed project to
less-than-significant levels. These mitigation improvements were assumed to be identical to
those originally proposed, and fully described in the Revised July 2010 traffic study. Again, the
same analysis methodologies and assumptions used in the Revised July 2010 study were
utilized for the year 2014 “With Mitigation” analysis, which is summarized in Table 3.
Int. Peak
No. Intersection Hour CMA LOS CMA LOS
8 Venice Boulevard and AM 1.452 F 1.400 F -0.052
Robertson Boulevard
[1]
PM 1.230 F 1.193 F -0.037
9 Venice Boulevard and AM 1.056 F 1.040 F -0.016
National Boulevard
[1]
PM 1.140 F 1.128 F -0.012
20 Washington Boulevard and AM 0.807 D 0.798 C -0.009
National Boulevard
[3]
PM 0.808 D 0.824 D 0.016
23 Washington Boulevard and AM 0.821 F
[2]
0.836
[a]
F
[2]
0.015
Cattaraugus Avenue PM 0.698 F
[2]
0.677
[a]
F
[2]
-0.021
0.634
[b]
B -0.187
0.500
[b]
A -0.198
Notes:
[1] City of Los Angeles intersection.
[2] Unsignalized intersection. LOS value determined using HCM methodology.
[3] Mitigation not needed, based on results of supplemental analyses (see Table 2).
[a] Assumes installation of EB left-turn lane only.
[b] Assumes installation of EB left-turn lane plus new 3-phase traffic signal.
Table 3
Critical Movement Analysis Summary
Future (2014) Without Project and With Project Plus Mitigation Conditions
Impact
Project Plus Mitigation
Without With Project
ATTACHMENT 5
645
14
8770 WASHINGTON BOULEVARD MIXED-USE PROJECT HIRSCH/GREEN TRANSPORTATION CONSULTING, INC.
JUNE 2012 SUPPLEMENT TO “REVISED JULY 2010” TRAFFIC STUDY
Note that Table 3 does not include the “With Project” CMA, LOS, or project impact values
shown in Table 2, nor does it include the year 2013 mitigation effectiveness values from the
Revised July 2010 traffic study, since the purpose of Table 3 is simply to summarize the
effectiveness of the recommended mitigation measures under forecast year 2014 conditions.
However, as shown in Table 3, the traffic mitigation measures previously identified in the
Revised July 2010 project traffic study will continue to be effective in reducing the potential
impacts of the proposed project to less-than-significant levels at each of the four impacted
intersections evaluated in this supplemental analysis.
Additionally, while not specifically shown in Table 3, a comparison of the “With Mitigation” CMA
values contained in that table with the “With Mitigation” CMA values identified in Table 16 of the
Revised July 2010 traffic study show that the year 2014 “With Mitigation” CMA and LOS values
for each of the four intersections are lower (better) than their corresponding year 2013 values,
with the exception of the intersection of Washington Boulevard and Cattaraugus Avenue during
the PM peak hour for the alternative traffic signal installation measure (identified in Table 3 as
mitigation option “b”), which will exhibit a year 2014 CMA value of 0.500 (LOS A) as compared
to the year 2013 CMA value of 0.477 (also LOS A). Therefore, the improvement measures
identified in the Revised July 2010 project traffic study will continue to be effective as project
impact mitigation even into the year 2014.
SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS
To summarize the results of these supplemental analyses, the “existing” (year 2010) traffic
volumes and intersection operating conditions identified in the Revised July 2010 project traffic
study are consistent with, and in some cases, lower than the current (year 2012) conditions at
the six study intersections examined in this supplemental study, and it can be reasonably
concluded that the “existing” conditions identified in the 2010 traffic study continue to accurately
represent the current overall traffic conditions throughout the study area. As such, the analysis
of existing “baseline” traffic conditions reported in the Revised July 2010 study is valid.
Additionally, the forecast year 2013 conditions shown in the current, Revised July 2010 traffic
study under consideration by the City generally present a “worst case” assessment of the
potential future traffic conditions in the immediate project vicinity, with the CMA and/or LOS
forecasts contained in that study reflecting more conservative (higher, or worse) values than
those obtained using the current 2012 intersection traffic values described earlier in this
document. Further, using these current 2012 traffic volumes as a baseline, and forecasting
ATTACHMENT 5
646
15
8770 WASHINGTON BOULEVARD MIXED-USE PROJECT HIRSCH/GREEN TRANSPORTATION CONSULTING, INC.
JUNE 2012 SUPPLEMENT TO “REVISED JULY 2010” TRAFFIC STUDY
future conditions one year further out than previously assumed, to the year 2014, these
supplemental analyses indicate once again that the forecast future year 2013 conditions noted
in the Revised July 2010 study reflect conservative estimates of the potential intersection
operations in the immediate project vicinity, and it can be reasonably assumed, throughout the
entire study area. While the forecast year 2014 conditions at the six intersections examined in
this supplemental analyses are anticipated to be somewhat lower than previously estimated, the
proposed mixed-use residential and commercial project at 8770 Washington Boulevard would
continue to result in significant impacts at three of the four locations (plus the intersection of
Washington Boulevard and Wesley Street, which was not included in this supplemental
analysis) as identified in the Revised July 2010 traffic study. The mitigation measures
recommended in that study would also continue to remain effective in reducing the impacts at
each of these three intersections to less-than-significant levels.
However, it is important to note that, based on the results of these supplemental analyses, the
previously-identified significant project-related traffic impact at the site-adjacent intersection of
Washington Boulevard and National Boulevard would not occur, even when the forecast future
year is extended to 2014. As such, the improvements currently required for that location,
including dedication and widening of the northbound approach of National Boulevard along the
project’s frontage to install a new right-turn only lane is mitigation for a worse-case scenario.
Therefore, based on these supplemental analyses, it can be concluded that the traffic analyses
contained in the Revised July 2010 project traffic study remain valid, both in the evaluation of
the “existing” conditions and in the forecasts of future traffic conditions, including the
identification of potential project-related impacts. As a result, the data and analyses contained
in the Revised July 2010 traffic study (including the assumption of 2013 as the anticipated
project completion year) are valid.
ATTACHMENT 5
647
APPENDIX
ATTACHMENT 5
648
CURRENT (YEAR 2012) TRAFFIC COUNT DATA SHEETS
ATTACHMENT 5
649INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT SUMMARY
CLIENT: HIRSCH/GREEN TRANSPORTATION CONSULTING, INC.
PROJECT: WASHINGTON / NATIONAL LEGADO - CULVER CITY
DATE: WEDNESDAY, MAY 02, 2012
PERIOD: 07:00 AM TO 10:00 AM
INTERSECTION: N/S ROBERTSON BOULEVARD - EXPOSITION BOULEVARD
E/W VENICE BOULEVARD
FILE NUMBER: 8-AM
15 MINUTE 1 2 3 3A 456789 10 11 12
TOTALS SBRT SBTH SBLT SBLT WBRT WBTH WBLT NBRT NBTH NBLT EBRT EBTH EBLT
0700-0715 32 22 18 52 48 343 13 7 63 19 14 268 62
0715-0730 44 30 26 89 62 404 10 6 78 20 19 343 89
0730-0745 52 57 44 95 65 413 15 7 83 21 21 358 95
0745-0800 64 73 47 79 58 526 23 5 81 18 29 411 89
0800-0815 59 93 39 70 50 500 20 9 82 23 23 433 70
0815-0830 60 90 41 93 62 539 22 7 74 18 31 481 93
0830-0845 73 98 44 90 45 500 18 10 76 20 20 454 87
0845-0900 65 85 69 83 50 535 22 17 68 20 32 477 119
0900-0915 80 105 51 82 61 460 34 13 62 22 45 421 79
0915-0930 84 83 44 63 66 494 20 8 45 16 31 493 63
0930-0945 63 95 37 57 64 420 29 13 41 12 30 478 67
0945-1000 66 89 36 96 64 473 21 11 43 14 25 455 86
1 HOUR 1 2 3 3A 456789 10 11 12
TOTALS SBRT SBTH SBLT SBLT WBRT WBTH WBLT NBRT NBTH NBLT EBRT EBTH EBLT TOTALS
0700-0800 192 182 135 315 233 1686 61 25 305 78 83 1380 335 5010
0715-0815 219 253 156 333 235 1843 68 27 324 82 92 1545 343 5520
0730-0830 235 313 171 337 235 1978 80 28 320 80 104 1683 347 5911
0745-0845 256 354 171 332 215 2065 83 31 313 79 103 1779 339 6120
0800-0900 257 366 193 336 207 2074 82 43 300 81 106 1845 369 6259
0815-0915 278 378 205 348 218 2034 96 47 280 80 128 1833 378 6303
0830-0930 302 371 208 318 222 1989 94 48 251 78 128 1845 348 6202
0845-0945 292 368 201 285 241 1909 105 51 216 70 138 1869 328 6073
0900-1000 293 372 168 298 255 1847 104 45 191 64 131 1847 295 5910
278 378 205 348
378
1833
128
80 280 47
ROBERTSON BOULEVARD - EXPOSITION BOULEVARD
218
2034
96
VENICE BOULEVARD
A.M. PEAK HOUR
0815-0915
THE TRAFFIC SOLUTION
329 DIAMOND STREET
ARCADIA, CALIFORNIA 91006
626.448.7978 PHONE
626.448.2877 FAX
ATTACHMENT 5
650INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT SUMMARY
CLIENT: HIRSCH/GREEN TRANSPORTATION CONSULTING, INC.
PROJECT: WASHINGTON / NATIONAL LEGADO - CULVER CITY
DATE: WEDNESDAY, MAY 02, 2012
PERIOD: 03:00 PM TO 06:00 PM
INTERSECTION: N/S ROBERTSON BOULEVARD - EXPOSITION BOULEVARD
E/W VENICE BOULEVARD
FILE NUMBER: 8-PM
15 MINUTE 1 2 3 3A 456789 10 11 12
TOTALS SBRT SBTH SBLT SBLT WBRT WBTH WBLT NBRT NBTH NBLT EBRT EBTH EBLT
0300-0315 66 79 31 64 11 352 13 5 47 9 18 388 68
0315-0330 73 80 36 67 15 362 12 7 55 12 22 491 77
0330-0345 82 88 40 70 14 381 14 7 60 16 31 534 89
0345-0400 76 105 41 89 25 360 19 7 53 14 33 527 91
0400-0415 81 72 31 75 25 337 18 6 45 13 28 507 70
0415-0430 81 64 42 62 24 314 17 9 45 22 30 501 86
0430-0445 76 69 36 50 35 333 22 5 59 15 28 545 99
0445-0500 70 93 43 61 24 376 15 9 51 19 26 559 91
0500-0515 82 85 34 78 20 371 18 9 63 13 25 433 74
0515-0530 107 78 45 68 27 377 21 10 50 28 35 497 90
0530-0545 102 80 24 68 25 448 20 8 52 26 32 544 84
0545-0600 101 91 32 84 17 364 26 10 71 23 29 488 96
1 HOUR 1 2 3 3A 456789 10 11 12
TOTALS SBRT SBTH SBLT SBLT WBRT WBTH WBLT NBRT NBTH NBLT EBRT EBTH EBLT TOTALS
0300-0400 297 352 148 290 65 1455 58 26 215 51 104 1940 325 5326
0315-0415 312 345 148 301 79 1440 63 27 213 55 114 2059 327 5483
0330-0430 320 329 154 296 88 1392 68 29 203 65 122 2069 336 5471
0345-0445 314 310 150 276 109 1344 76 27 202 64 119 2080 346 5417
0400-0500 308 298 152 248 108 1360 72 29 200 69 112 2112 346 5414
0415-0515 309 311 155 251 103 1394 72 32 218 69 109 2038 350 5411
0430-0530 335 325 158 257 106 1457 76 33 223 75 114 2034 354 5547
0445-0545 361 336 146 275 96 1572 74 36 216 86 118 2033 339 5688
0500-0600 392 334 135 298 89 1560 85 37 236 90 121 1962 344 5683
361 336 146 275
339
2033
118
86 216 36
ROBERTSON BOULEVARD - EXPOSITION BOULEVARD
96
1572
74
VENICE BOULEVARD
P.M. PEAK HOUR
0445-0545
THE TRAFFIC SOLUTION
329 DIAMOND STREET
ARCADIA, CALIFORNIA 91006
626.448.7978 PHONE
626.448.2877 FAX
ATTACHMENT 5
651INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT SUMMARY
CLIENT: HIRSCH/GREEN TRANSPORTATION CONSULTING, INC.
PROJECT: WASHINGTON / NATIONAL LEGADO - CULVER CITY
DATE: WEDNESDAY, MAY 02, 2012
PERIOD: 07:00 AM TO 10:00 AM
INTERSECTION: N/S NATIONAL BOULEVARD
E/W VENICE BOULEVARD
FILE NUMBER: 9-AM
15 MINUTE 123456789 10 11 12
TOTALS SBRT SBTH SBLT WBRT WBTH WBLT NBRT NBTH NBLT EBRT EBTH EBLT
0700-0715 9 48 5 18 286 9 3 118 68 32 227 29
0715-0730 8 63 11 25 323 7 2 183 83 22 284 23
0730-0745 10 83 17 40 497 12 2 167 83 41 352 36
0745-0800 19 96 15 33 497 11 4 199 68 36 397 35
0800-0815 29 116 26 31 504 16 7 178 62 53 442 45
0815-0830 22 103 35 32 473 19 12 179 56 71 401 28
0830-0845 24 98 36 27 499 14 11 207 59 65 435 37
0845-0900 27 86 31 34 586 13 8 181 59 50 467 43
0900-0915 39 80 31 30 475 12 9 170 64 65 436 42
0915-0930 24 115 21 43 447 17 7 143 50 69 414 41
0930-0945 27 106 26 28 536 13 6 171 52 67 451 44
0945-1000 24 80 16 34 459 12 9 144 61 63 425 36
1 HOUR 123456789 10 11 12
TOTALS SBRT SBTH SBLT WBRT WBTH WBLT NBRT NBTH NBLT EBRT EBTH EBLT TOTALS
0700-0800 46 290 48 116 1603 39 11 667 302 131 1260 123 4636
0715-0815 66 358 69 129 1821 46 15 727 296 152 1475 139 5293
0730-0830 80 398 93 136 1971 58 25 723 269 201 1592 144 5690
0745-0845 94 413 112 123 1973 60 34 763 245 225 1675 145 5862
0800-0900 102 403 128 124 2062 62 38 745 236 239 1745 153 6037
0815-0915 112 367 133 123 2033 58 40 737 238 251 1739 150 5981
0830-0930 114 379 119 134 2007 56 35 701 232 249 1752 163 5941
0845-0945 117 387 109 135 2044 55 30 665 225 251 1768 170 5956
0900-1000 114 381 94 135 1917 54 31 628 227 264 1726 163 5734
102 403 128
236745 38
124
2062
62
VENICE BOULEVARD
NATIONAL BOULEVARD
A.M. PEAK HOUR
0800-0900
153
1745
239
THE TRAFFIC SOLUTION
329 DIAMOND STREET
ARCADIA, CALIFORNIA 91006
626.448.7978 PHONE
626.448.2877 FAX
ATTACHMENT 5
652INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT SUMMARY
CLIENT: HIRSCH/GREEN TRANSPORTATION CONSULTING, INC.
PROJECT: WASHINGTON / NATIONAL LEGADO - CULVER CITY
DATE: WEDNESDAY, MAY 02, 2012
PERIOD: 03:00 PM TO 06:00 PM
INTERSECTION: N/S NATIONAL BOULEVARD
E/W VENICE BOULEVARD
FILE NUMBER: 9-PM
15 MINUTE 123456789 10 11 12
TOTALS SBRT SBTH SBLT WBRT WBTH WBLT NBRT NBTH NBLT EBRT EBTH EBLT
0300-0315 25 85 24 10 287 19 7 109 64 85 335 46
0315-0330 33 117 29 12 346 16 12 155 44 86 409 50
0330-0345 32 131 32 18 338 11 13 150 60 61 458 58
0345-0400 34 111 20 15 312 13 19 120 48 70 452 63
0400-0415 24 96 30 9 288 10 18 100 53 79 446 55
0415-0430 35 105 31 17 321 6 10 117 49 58 464 57
0430-0445 25 145 54 19 317 9 17 119 57 56 455 48
0445-0500 27 110 38 15 343 14 13 116 49 75 494 41
0500-0515 35 122 35 22 303 10 18 109 43 56 404 40
0515-0530 30 102 33 14 402 9 17 118 53 60 493 54
0530-0545 33 136 54 19 420 5 11 142 55 89 433 49
0545-0600 23 131 45 18 347 7 16 130 33 54 400 50
1 HOUR 123456789 10 11 12
TOTALS SBRT SBTH SBLT WBRT WBTH WBLT NBRT NBTH NBLT EBRT EBTH EBLT TOTALS
0300-0400 124 444 105 55 1283 59 51 534 216 302 1654 217 5044
0315-0415 123 455 111 54 1284 50 62 525 205 296 1765 226 5156
0330-0430 125 443 113 59 1259 40 60 487 210 268 1820 233 5117
0345-0445 118 457 135 60 1238 38 64 456 207 263 1817 223 5076
0400-0500 111 456 153 60 1269 39 58 452 208 268 1859 201 5134
0415-0515 122 482 158 73 1284 39 58 461 198 245 1817 186 5123
0430-0530 117 479 160 70 1365 42 65 462 202 247 1846 183 5238
0445-0545 125 470 160 70 1468 38 59 485 200 280 1824 184 5363
0500-0600 121 491 167 73 1472 31 62 499 184 259 1730 193 5282
125 470 160
200485 59
70
1468
38
VENICE BOULEVARD
NATIONAL BOULEVARD
P.M. PEAK HOUR
0445-0545
184
1824
280
THE TRAFFIC SOLUTION
329 DIAMOND STREET
ARCADIA, CALIFORNIA 91006
626.448.7978 PHONE
626.448.2877 FAX
ATTACHMENT 5
653INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT SUMMARY
CLIENT: HIRSCH/GREEN TRANSPORTATION CONSULTING, INC.
PROJECT: WASHINGTON / NATIONAL LEGADO - CULVER CITY
DATE: WEDNESDAY, MAY 02, 2012
PERIOD: 07:00 AM TO 10:00 AM
INTERSECTION: N/S ROBERTSON BOULEVARD / HIGUERA STREET
E/W WASHINGTON BOULEVARD
FILE NUMBER: 18-AM
15 MINUTE 123456789 10 11 12
TOTALS SBRT SBTH SBLT WBRT WBTH WBLT NBRT NBTH NBLT EBRT EBTH EBLT
0700-0715 13 33 7 36 145 5 9 42 5 6 83 8
0715-0730 14 47 9 39 188 3 14 48 6 8 93 11
0730-0745 13 52 16 46 238 4 14 60 12 5 126 12
0745-0800 17 64 27 40 209 5 19 64 27 7 156 10
0800-0815 25 76 39 39 274 9 20 73 20 11 171 8
0815-0830 24 83 47 37 256 10 29 71 21 18 226 5
0830-0845 20 70 39 37 259 17 31 62 27 15 194 9
0845-0900 22 72 47 25 219 15 22 61 20 19 180 8
0900-0915 30 95 41 31 248 16 19 61 28 17 167 13
0915-0930 36 81 32 32 243 19 18 33 20 18 137 11
0930-0945 46 70 28 20 250 17 22 43 10 20 150 9
0945-1000 42 72 26 23 191 9 16 23 11 19 159 12
1 HOUR 123456789 10 11 12
TOTALS SBRT SBTH SBLT WBRT WBTH WBLT NBRT NBTH NBLT EBRT EBTH EBLT TOTALS
0700-0800 57 196 59 161 780 17 56 214 50 26 458 41 2115
0715-0815 69 239 91 164 909 21 67 245 65 31 546 41 2488
0730-0830 79 275 129 162 977 28 82 268 80 41 679 35 2835
0745-0845 86 293 152 153 998 41 99 270 95 51 747 32 3017
0800-0900 91 301 172 138 1008 51 102 267 88 63 771 30 3082
0815-0915 96 320 174 130 982 58 101 255 96 69 767 35 3083
0830-0930 108 318 159 125 969 67 90 217 95 69 678 41 2936
0845-0945 134 318 148 108 960 67 81 198 78 74 634 41 2841
0900-1000 154 318 127 106 932 61 75 160 69 74 613 45 2734
96 320 174
96 255101
ROBERTSON BOULEVARD / HIGUERA STREET
130
982
58
WASHINGTON BOULEVARD
69
A.M. PEAK HOUR
0815-0915
35
767
THE TRAFFIC SOLUTION
329 DIAMOND STREET
ARCADIA, CALIFORNIA 91006
626.448.7978 PHONE
626.448.2877 FAX
ATTACHMENT 5
654INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT SUMMARY
CLIENT: HIRSCH/GREEN TRANSPORTATION CONSULTING, INC.
PROJECT: WASHINGTON / NATIONAL LEGADO - CULVER CITY
DATE: WEDNESDAY, MAY 02, 2012
PERIOD: 03:00 PM TO 06:00 PM
INTERSECTION: N/S ROBERTSON BOULEVARD / HIGUERA STREET
E/W WASHINGTON BOULEVARD
FILE NUMBER: 18-PM
15 MINUTE 123456789 10 11 12
TOTALS SBRT SBTH SBLT WBRT WBTH WBLT NBRT NBTH NBLT EBRT EBTH EBLT
0300-0315 20 57 34 41 140 14 15 34 14 13 173 17
0315-0330 25 75 41 30 153 14 12 34 10 13 196 14
0330-0345 27 62 48 23 151 13 14 34 12 13 216 19
0345-0400 21 70 55 20 148 18 12 30 9 11 222 21
0400-0415 20 57 46 24 155 11 16 28 9 17 184 25
0415-0430 23 59 44 29 146 12 8 33 8 15 204 17
0430-0445 22 53 47 24 180 8 9 39 14 19 247 22
0445-0500 23 58 48 20 174 13 8 30 10 16 231 15
0500-0515 20 65 42 22 159 19 11 36 11 16 249 17
0515-0530 23 73 52 21 166 17 13 49 13 22 239 22
0530-0545 18 69 57 36 152 20 15 33 10 25 255 27
0545-0600 26 66 50 29 158 21 8 35 13 25 253 21
1 HOUR 123456789 10 11 12
TOTALS SBRT SBTH SBLT WBRT WBTH WBLT NBRT NBTH NBLT EBRT EBTH EBLT TOTALS
0300-0400 93 264 178 114 592 59 53 132 45 50 807 71 2458
0315-0415 93 264 190 97 607 56 54 126 40 54 818 79 2478
0330-0430 91 248 193 96 600 54 50 125 38 56 826 82 2459
0345-0445 86 239 192 97 629 49 45 130 40 62 857 85 2511
0400-0500 88 227 185 97 655 44 41 130 41 67 866 79 2520
0415-0515 88 235 181 95 659 52 36 138 43 66 931 71 2595
0430-0530 88 249 189 87 679 57 41 154 48 73 966 76 2707
0445-0545 84 265 199 99 651 69 47 148 44 79 974 81 2740
0500-0600 87 273 201 108 635 77 47 153 47 88 996 87 2799
87 273 201
47 153 47
ROBERTSON BOULEVARD / HIGUERA STREET
108
635
77 88
WASHINGTON BOULEVARD
P.M. PEAK HOUR
0500-0600
87
996
THE TRAFFIC SOLUTION
329 DIAMOND STREET
ARCADIA, CALIFORNIA 91006
626.448.7978 PHONE
626.448.2877 FAX
ATTACHMENT 5
655INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT SUMMARY
CLIENT: HIRSCH/GREEN TRANSPORTATION CONSULTING, INC.
PROJECT: WASHINGTON / NATIONAL LEGADO - CULVER CITY
DATE: WEDNESDAY, MAY 02, 2012
PERIOD: 07:00 AM TO 10:00 AM
INTERSECTION: N/S NATIONAL BOULEVARD
E/W WASHINGTON BOULEVARD
FILE NUMBER: 20-AM
15 MINUTE 123456789 10 11 12
TOTALS SBRT SBTH SBLT WBRT WBTH WBLT NBRT NBTH NBLT EBRT EBTH EBLT
0700-0715 11 66 10 66 147 5 8 164 34 10 86 3
0715-0730 9 69 20 67 168 5 5 177 45 15 103 7
0730-0745 13 81 31 62 201 8 6 179 47 24 111 10
0745-0800 16 111 37 70 237 13 7 181 54 51 122 14
0800-0815 21 136 35 68 253 19 14 166 44 62 177 14
0815-0830 19 116 28 72 224 26 12 171 62 72 229 21
0830-0845 18 115 32 80 226 20 11 144 51 46 176 25
0845-0900 18 128 31 77 231 22 16 135 40 42 152 21
0900-0915 17 131 32 75 228 19 20 141 42 44 161 26
0915-0930 20 126 31 68 247 24 16 128 36 44 144 22
0930-0945 15 129 33 66 213 17 18 133 44 36 140 19
0945-1000 14 132 27 66 204 22 21 132 39 33 139 21
1 HOUR 123456789 10 11 12
TOTALS SBRT SBTH SBLT WBRT WBTH WBLT NBRT NBTH NBLT EBRT EBTH EBLT TOTALS
0700-0800 49 327 98 265 753 31 26 701 180 100 422 34 2986
0715-0815 59 397 123 267 859 45 32 703 190 152 513 45 3385
0730-0830 69 444 131 272 915 66 39 697 207 209 639 59 3747
0745-0845 74 478 132 290 940 78 44 662 211 231 704 74 3918
0800-0900 76 495 126 297 934 87 53 616 197 222 734 81 3918
0815-0915 72 490 123 304 909 87 59 591 195 204 718 93 3845
0830-0930 73 500 126 300 932 85 63 548 169 176 633 94 3699
0845-0945 70 514 127 286 919 82 70 537 162 166 597 88 3618
0900-1000 66 518 123 275 892 82 75 534 161 157 584 88 3555
74 478 132
211662 44
290
940
78
WASHINGTON BOULEVARD
NATIONAL BOULEVARD
A.M. PEAK HOUR
0745-0845
74
704
231
THE TRAFFIC SOLUTION
329 DIAMOND STREET
ARCADIA, CALIFORNIA 91006
626.448.7978 PHONE
626.448.2877 FAX
ATTACHMENT 5
656INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT SUMMARY
CLIENT: HIRSCH/GREEN TRANSPORTATION CONSULTING, INC.
PROJECT: WASHINGTON / NATIONAL LEGADO - CULVER CITY
DATE: WEDNESDAY, MAY 02, 2012
PERIOD: 03:00 PM TO 06:00 PM
INTERSECTION: N/S NATIONAL BOULEVARD
E/W WASHINGTON BOULEVARD
FILE NUMBER: 20-PM
15 MINUTE 123456789 10 11 12
TOTALS SBRT SBTH SBLT WBRT WBTH WBLT NBRT NBTH NBLT EBRT EBTH EBLT
0300-0315 13 140 38 64 128 14 15 117 43 73 163 12
0315-0330 13 158 51 60 120 14 22 129 41 85 170 14
0330-0345 16 150 49 55 124 19 15 127 40 69 183 18
0345-0400 11 153 42 48 126 17 15 131 44 74 195 17
0400-0415 10 126 48 42 127 19 11 120 45 67 184 19
0415-0430 12 132 40 36 120 21 10 112 46 71 188 15
0430-0445 12 137 47 38 141 22 10 119 49 72 211 18
0445-0500 13 151 48 40 132 24 12 121 46 65 209 22
0500-0515 14 135 45 44 142 22 15 115 38 73 227 21
0515-0530 15 132 41 38 135 27 12 114 49 66 231 25
0530-0545 12 145 55 48 150 24 14 120 44 78 219 19
0545-0600 15 143 60 51 133 25 16 143 48 75 235 22
1 HOUR 123456789 10 11 12
TOTALS SBRT SBTH SBLT WBRT WBTH WBLT NBRT NBTH NBLT EBRT EBTH EBLT TOTALS
0300-0400 53 601 180 227 498 64 67 504 168 301 711 61 3435
0315-0415 50 587 190 205 497 69 63 507 170 295 732 68 3433
0330-0430 49 561 179 181 497 76 51 490 175 281 750 69 3359
0345-0445 45 548 177 164 514 79 46 482 184 284 778 69 3370
0400-0500 47 546 183 156 520 86 43 472 186 275 792 74 3380
0415-0515 51 555 180 158 535 89 47 467 179 281 835 76 3453
0430-0530 54 555 181 160 550 95 49 469 182 276 878 86 3535
0445-0545 54 563 189 170 559 97 53 470 177 282 886 87 3587
0500-0600 56 555 201 181 560 98 57 492 179 292 912 87 3670
56 555 201
179492 57
181
560
98
WASHINGTON BOULEVARD
NATIONAL BOULEVARD
P.M. PEAK HOUR
0500-0600
87
912
292
THE TRAFFIC SOLUTION
329 DIAMOND STREET
ARCADIA, CALIFORNIA 91006
626.448.7978 PHONE
626.448.2877 FAX
ATTACHMENT 5
657INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT SUMMARY
CLIENT: HIRSCH/GREEN TRANSPORTATION CONSULTING, INC.
PROJECT: WASHINGTON / NATIONAL LEGADO - CULVER CITY
DATE: WEDNESDAY, MAY 02, 2012
PERIOD: 07:00 AM TO 10:00 AM
INTERSECTION: N/S CATTARAUGUS AVENUE
E/W WASHINGTON BOULEVARD
FILE NUMBER: 23-AM
15 MINUTE 123456789 10 11 12
TOTALS SBRT SBTH SBLT WBRT WBTH WBLT NBRT NBTH NBLT EBRT EBTH EBLT
0700-0715 3 0 6 47 173 03030 86 1
0715-0730 2 0 12 78 251 10030 119 2
0730-0745 5 0 16 111 296 02232 136 0
0745-0800 6 0 27 90 320 11153 177 3
0800-0815 4 2 25 96 320 03327 238 2
0815-0830 6 2 16 78 297 03142 213 3
0830-0845 4 0 13 75 288 03032 211 4
0845-0900 7 1 11 64 291 32124 201 3
0900-0915 6 0 9 52 243 32005 227 0
0915-0930 3 2 9 31 270 24033 183 0
0930-0945 6 0 8 35 235 21020 178 4
0945-1000 7 0 7 28 243 33021 161 4
1 HOUR 123456789 10 11 12
TOTALS SBRT SBTH SBLT WBRT WBTH WBLT NBRT NBTH NBLT EBRT EBTH EBLT TOTALS
0700-0800 16 0 61 326 1040 2 6 3 14 5 518 6 1997
0715-0815 17 2 80 375 1187 2 6 6 13 12 670 7 2377
0730-0830 21 4 84 375 1233 1 9 7 14 14 764 8 2534
0745-0845 20 4 81 339 1225 1 10 5 14 14 839 12 2564
0800-0900 21 5 65 313 1196 3 11 5 11 15 863 12 2520
0815-0915 23 3 49 269 1119 6 10 2 9 13 852 10 2365
0830-0930 20 3 42 222 1092 8 11 1 8 14 822 7 2250
0845-0945 22 3 37 182 1039 10 9 1 7 12 789 7 2118
0900-1000 22 2 33 146 991 10 10 0 7 9 749 8 1987
20 4 81
14 5 10
339
1225|1010|WASHINGTON BOULEVARD
CATTARAUGUS AVENUE
A.M. PEAK HOUR
0745-0845
12
839
14
THE TRAFFIC SOLUTION
329 DIAMOND STREET
ARCADIA, CALIFORNIA 91006
626.448.7978 PHONE
626.448.2877 FAX
ATTACHMENT 5
658INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT SUMMARY
CLIENT: HIRSCH/GREEN TRANSPORTATION CONSULTING, INC.
PROJECT: WASHINGTON / NATIONAL LEGADO - CULVER CITY
DATE: WEDNESDAY, MAY 02, 2012
PERIOD: 03:00 PM TO 06:00 PM
INTERSECTION: N/S CATTARAUGUS AVENUE
E/W WASHINGTON BOULEVARD
FILE NUMBER: 23-PM
15 MINUTE 123456789 10 11 12
TOTALS SBRT SBTH SBLT WBRT WBTH WBLT NBRT NBTH NBLT EBRT EBTH EBLT
0300-0315 8 0 23 29 181 20054 204 7
0315-0330 8 0 20 25 166 31144 216 3
0330-0345 8 0 21 17 176 51005 227 6
0345-0400 7 0 15 21 177 00009 231 3
0400-0415 6 2 17 15 169 30014 217 7
0415-0430 5 1 17 19 172 15215 239 2
0430-0445 8 1 28 17 180 13004 254 3
0445-0500 11 2 28 24 164 10026 232 4
0500-0515 10 2 26 18 181 22002 263 4
0515-0530 13 1 27 12 189 04024 289 7
0530-0545 7 1 29 11 192 45005 276 5
0545-0600 6 0 26 13 170 12036 263 9
1 HOUR 123456789 10 11 12
TOTALS SBRT SBTH SBLT WBRT WBTH WBLT NBRT NBTH NBLT EBRT EBTH EBLT TOTALS
0300-0400 31 0 79 92 700 10 2 1 9 22 878 19 1843
0315-0415 29 2 73 78 688 11 2 1 5 22 891 19 1821
0330-0430 26 3 70 72 694 9622 23 914 18 1839
0345-0445 26 4 77 72 698 5822 22 941 15 1872
0400-0500 30 6 90 75 685 6824 19 942 16 1883
0415-0515 34 6 99 78 697 5 10 2 3 17 988 13 1952
0430-0530 42 6 109 71 714 4904 16 1038 18 2031
0445-0545 41 6 110 65 726 7 11 0 4 17 1060 20 2067
0500-0600 36 4 108 54 732 7 13 0 5 17 1091 25 2092
36 4 108
50 13
54
732|1010|WASHINGTON BOULEVARD
CATTARAUGUS AVENUE
P.M. PEAK HOUR
0500-0600
25
1091
17
THE TRAFFIC SOLUTION
329 DIAMOND STREET
ARCADIA, CALIFORNIA 91006
626.448.7978 PHONE
626.448.2877 FAX
ATTACHMENT 5
659INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT SUMMARY
CLIENT: HIRSCH/GREEN TRANSPORTATION CONSULTING, INC.
PROJECT: WASHINGTON / NATIONAL LEGADO - CULVER CITY
DATE: WEDNESDAY, MAY 02, 2012
PERIOD: 07:00 AM TO 10:00 AM
INTERSECTION: N/S WESLEY STREET
E/W NATIONAL BOULEVARD
FILE NUMBER: 26-AM
15 MINUTE 123456789 10 11 12
TOTALS SBRT SBTH SBLT WBRT WBTH WBLT NBRT NBTH NBLT EBRT EBTH EBLT
0700-0715 0000 205 23022 65 0
0715-0730 0000 239 33022 93 0
0730-0745 0000 205 330 10 14 112 0
0745-0800 0000 224 8 16 0 37 49 137 0
0800-0815 0000 167 4 23 0 49 67 140 0
0815-0830 0000 168 2 21 0 58 77 135 0
0830-0845 0000 166 4 13 0 27 32 160 0
0845-0900 0000 192 420 16 23 182 0
0900-0915 0000 191 4008 19 162 0
0915-0930 0000 188 25006 170 0
0930-0945 0000 164 32045 173 0
0945-1000 0000 190 74084 187 0
1 HOUR 123456789 10 11 12
TOTALS SBRT SBTH SBLT WBRT WBTH WBLT NBRT NBTH NBLT EBRT EBTH EBLT TOTALS
0700-0800 0000 873 16 25 0 51 67 407 0 1439
0715-0815 0000 835 18 45 0 98 132 482 0 1610
0730-0830 0000 764 17 63 0 154 207 524 0 1729
0745-0845 0000 725 18 73 0 171 225 572 0 1784
0800-0900 0000 693 14 59 0 150 199 617 0 1732
0815-0915 0000 717 14 36 0 109 151 639 0 1666
0830-0930 0000 737 14 20 0 51 80 674 0 1576
0845-0945 0000 735 13 90 28 53 687 0 1525
0900-1000 0000 733 16 11 0 20 34 692 0 1506
000
171 0 73
|10 10|725
18
NATIONAL BOULEVARD
WESLEY STREET
A.M. PEAK HOUR
0745-0845|10 10|572
225
THE TRAFFIC SOLUTION
329 DIAMOND STREET
ARCADIA, CALIFORNIA 91006
626.448.7978 PHONE
626.448.2877 FAX
ATTACHMENT 5
660INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT SUMMARY
CLIENT: HIRSCH/GREEN TRANSPORTATION CONSULTING, INC.
PROJECT: WASHINGTON / NATIONAL LEGADO - CULVER CITY
DATE: WEDNESDAY, MAY 02, 2012
PERIOD: 03:00 PM TO 06:00 PM
INTERSECTION: N/S WESLEY STREET
E/W NATIONAL BOULEVARD
FILE NUMBER: 26-PM
15 MINUTE 123456789 10 11 12
TOTALS SBRT SBTH SBLT WBRT WBTH WBLT NBRT NBTH NBLT EBRT EBTH EBLT
0300-0315 0000 140 1 12 0 59 64 204 0
0315-0330 0000 154 780 22 30 232 0
0330-0345 0000 153 230 23 10 234 0
0345-0400 0000 163 14045 201 0
0400-0415 0000 192 3308 10 211 0
0415-0430 0000 151 6006 11 209 0
0430-0445 0000 164 2309 13 236 0
0445-0500 0000 149 1108 11 219 0
0500-0515 0000 171 570 16 8 205 0
0515-0530 0000 163 22077 243 0
0530-0545 0000 185 260 13 7 263 0
0545-0600 0000 186 160 10 11 224 0
1 HOUR 123456789 10 11 12
TOTALS SBRT SBTH SBLT WBRT WBTH WBLT NBRT NBTH NBLT EBRT EBTH EBLT TOTALS
0300-0400 0000 610 11 27 0 108 109 871 0 1736
0315-0415 0000 662 13 18 0 57 55 878 0 1683
0330-0430 0000 659 12 10 0 41 36 855 0 1613
0345-0445 0000 670 12 10 0 27 39 857 0 1615
0400-0500 0000 656 12 70 31 45 875 0 1626
0415-0515 0000 635 14 11 0 39 43 869 0 1611
0430-0530 0000 647 10 13 0 40 39 903 0 1652
0445-0545 0000 668 10 16 0 44 33 930 0 1701
0500-0600 0000 705 10 21 0 46 33 935 0 1750
000
46 0 21
|10 10|705
10
NATIONAL BOULEVARD
WESLEY STREET
P.M. PEAK HOUR
0500-0600|10 10|935
33
THE TRAFFIC SOLUTION
329 DIAMOND STREET
ARCADIA, CALIFORNIA 91006
626.448.7978 PHONE
626.448.2877 FAX
ATTACHMENT 5
661
CRITICAL MOVEMENT ANALYSIS (CMA) WORKSHEETS
ATTACHMENT 5
662
Existing (2012) Conditions
ATTACHMENT 5
6638770 Washington Mixed-Use
Existing (2012)
Assigned
No. of Approach Right-Turn Lane Critical
Lanes Volumes on Red Volumes Moves
1 80 80
0 -1
1 280 280 280
0 -1
1 47 47 0 |1010|0 553 -1
1 553 553
1 378 378
0 -1
1 278 104 174 |1010|833
2 378 208 208
0 -1
2 1,833 654
1 654
0 128 0 -1 |1010|1 96 96
0 -1
2 2,034 751 751
1 751
0 218 0 -1 |1010|959
1,792
Number of Clearance Intervals 1,375
1.303
Signal Coordination -0.100
1.203
F
Hirsch/Green Transportation Consulting, Inc.
Critical Movement Analysis (CMA) Worksheet
Right
Date
Robertson Boulevard/Exposition Boulevard|1010|NB Rt. Turn Overlap with WB Left
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Northbound
May 21, 2012
Through
Through/Right
Left
Left/Through
Venice Boulevard
North/South Opposed Phasing
Right
East/West:
Eastbound
Analysis Scenario
Southbound Through
Left
Left/Through
Signalized
AM Peak Hour
Total Lanes
Lane Type
Signal Coordination Adjustment
Sum of North/South Critical Volumes
Left
ATSAC + ATCS
Total Lanes
Sum of East/West Critical Volumes
Total Intersection Critical Volumes
Intersection Capacity
Total Lanes
Through
Base CMA
Left/Through
Through
Through/Right
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|1010|North/South:
Westbound
Right
Through/Right
Left
Left/Through
Total Lanes
Through/Right
Right
Project Name
Approach
Direction
Intersection Number
Intersection Name
Analysis Period
Intersection Control
Level of Service (LOS)
Final CMA
ATTACHMENT 5
6648770 Washington Mixed-Use
Existing (2012)
Assigned
No. of Approach Right-Turn Lane Critical
Lanes Volumes on Red Volumes Moves
1 236 236
0 -1
1 745 392 392
1 392
0 38 0 -1 |1010|1 128 128 128
0 -1
1 403 252
1 252
0 102 0 -1 |1010|520
1 153 153 153
0 -1
2 1,745 661
1 661
0 239 0 -1 |1010|1 62 62
0 -1
2 2,062 729 729
1 729
0 124 0 -1 |1010|882
1,402
Number of Clearance Intervals 1,375
1.020
Signal Coordination -0.100
0.920
E
Left
Left/Through
Right
Through/Right
Analysis Scenario
Intersection Control
Lane Type
Approach
Direction
Signalized
Final CMA
Level of Service (LOS)
Project Name|1010|ATSAC + ATCS
AM Peak Hour
Intersection Number
Intersection Name
Analysis Period
Southbound
Westbound
Northbound
Date
National Boulevard
East/West:|10 10|North/South:
May 21, 2012
Venice Boulevard
Right
Total Lanes
Through
Through/Right
Left
Left/Through
Total Lanes
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Through/Right
Right
Left
Left/Through
Through
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Left
Left/Through
Through/Right
Eastbound
Hirsch/Green Transportation Consulting, Inc.
Critical Movement Analysis (CMA) Worksheet
Total Lanes
Through
Right
Sum of North/South Critical Volumes
Through
Sum of East/West Critical Volumes
Intersection Capacity
Total Intersection Critical Volumes
Base CMA
Signal Coordination Adjustment
Total Lanes
ATTACHMENT 5
6658770 Washington Mixed-Use
Existing (2012)
Assigned
No. of Approach Right-Turn Lane Critical
Lanes Volumes on Red Volumes Moves
1 96 96 96
0 -1
1 255 178
1 178
0 101 0 -1 |1010|1 174 174
0 -1
1 320 320 320
0 -1
1 96 096 |1010|416
1 35 35 35
0 -1
1 767 418
1 418
0 69 0 -1 |1010|1 58 58
0 -1
1 982 556 556
1 556
0 130 0 -1 |1010|591
1,007
Number of Clearance Intervals 1,425
0.707
Signal Coordination -0.070
0.637
B
Washington Boulevard
Intersection Control
Lane Type
Approach
Direction
Signalized
Analysis Scenario
Right
Through/Right
Left
Left
Left/Through
Through
Sum of East/West Critical Volumes
Total Intersection Critical Volumes
Level of Service (LOS)
North/South:
May 21, 2012|1010|AM Peak Hour
Intersection Number
Intersection Name
Analysis Period
Southbound
Left/Through
Through
Through/Right
Right
Intersection Capacity
Final CMA
ATSAC
Base CMA
Signal Coordination Adjustment
Through
Left
Left/Through
Through/Right
Left
Sum of North/South Critical Volumes
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Lanes
Hirsch/Green Transportation Consulting, Inc.
Critical Movement Analysis (CMA) Worksheet
Right
Date
Robertson Boulevard/Higuera Street
East/West:
18
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Project Name
Northbound
Westbound
Total Lanes
Left/Through
Total Lanes
Through
Total Lanes
Eastbound
Right
Through/Right
ATTACHMENT 5
6668770 Washington Mixed-Use
Existing (2012)
Assigned
No. of Approach Right-Turn Lane Critical
Lanes Volumes on Red Volumes Moves
2 211 116
0 -1
1 662 353 353
1 353
0 44 0 -1 |1010|2 132 73 73
0 -1
1 478 276
1 276
0 74 0 -1 |1010|426
1 74 74 74
0 -1
2 704 352
0 -1
1 231 75 156 |1010|1 78 78
0 -1
2 940 470 470
0 -1
1 290 0 290 |1010|544
970
Number of Clearance Intervals 1,375
0.705
Signal Coordination -0.070
0.635
B
Hirsch/Green Transportation Consulting, Inc.
Critical Movement Analysis (CMA) Worksheet
Final CMA
Sum of East/West Critical Volumes
Total Intersection Critical Volumes
Through
Left
Left/Through
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Eastbound
Sum of North/South Critical Volumes
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Northbound
Right
Total Lanes
Total Lanes
Total Lanes
Through
Through/Right
Left
Right
Intersection Capacity
Level of Service (LOS)
Right
Left/Through
Through
Through/Right
Date
National Boulevard
East/West:
20
North/South:
May 21, 2012
Washington Boulevard
Project Name|1010|ATSAC
AM Peak Hour
Intersection Number
Intersection Name
Analysis Period
Southbound
Westbound
Base CMA
Signal Coordination Adjustment
Through
Through/Right
Right
Through/Right
Left
Left/Through
Total Lanes
Signalized
Left
Left/Through
Analysis Scenario
Intersection Control
Lane Type
Approach
Direction
ATTACHMENT 5
6678770 Washington Mixed-Use
Existing (2012)
Assigned
No. of Approach Right-Turn Lane Critical
Lanes Volumes on Red Volumes Moves
0 14 -1 14
0 -1
1 5 29
0 -1
0 10 0 -1 |1010|0 81 -1
0 -1
1 4 105 105
0 -1
0 20 0 -1 |1010|119
0 12 -1 12
1 402
0 839 -1
1 462
0 14 0 -1 |1010|0 1 -1
1 781
0 1,225 -1
1 784 784
0 339 0 -1 |1010|796
915
Number of Clearance Intervals 1,200
0.763
Signal Coordination 0.000
0.763
C
Total Lanes
Two-Way STOP
Through/Right
Total Lanes
Left/Through/Right
Left/Through
Left/Through
Left/Through/Right
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Northbound
Through/Right
Right
Left/Through
Through
Through/Right
Right
Direction
Approach
Intersection Control
Lane Type
Analysis Scenario
Left
Project Name|10 10|None
AM Peak Hour
Intersection Number
Intersection Name
Analysis Period
Date
Cattaraugus Avenue
East/West:
23
North/South:
May 21, 2012
Washington Boulevard
Left
Signal Coordination Adjustment
Intersection Capacity
Sum of North/South Critical Volumes
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Eastbound
Right
Through/Right
Westbound
Total Lanes
Total Lanes
Through
Right
Left
Left/Through
Southbound
Hirsch/Green Transportation Consulting, Inc.
Critical Movement Analysis (CMA) Worksheet
Sum of East/West Critical Volumes
Total Intersection Critical Volumes
Left
Base CMA
Final CMA
Level of Service (LOS)
ATTACHMENT 5
668TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY
General Information Site Information
Analyst RRH
Agency/Co. Hirsch/Green
Date Performed 5/21/2012
Analysis Time Period AM Peak Hour - Existing
Intersection 23
Jurisdiction Culver City
Analysis Year 2012
Project Description 8770 Washington Mixed-Use
East/West Street: Washington Boulevard North/South Street: Cattaraugus Avenue
Intersection Orientation: East-West Study Period (hrs): 1.00
Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments
Major Street Eastbound Westbound
Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6
L T R L T R
Volume (veh/h) 12 839 14 1 1225 339
Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Hourly Flow Rate, HFR
(veh/h)
12 839 14 1 1225 339
Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 -- -- 0 -- --
Median Type Undivided
RT Channelized 0 0
Lanes 0 2 0 0 2 0
Configuration LT TR LT TR
Upstream Signal 0 0
Minor Street Northbound Southbound
Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12
L T R L T R
Volume (veh/h) 14 5 10 81 4 20
Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Hourly Flow Rate, HFR
(veh/h)
14 5 10 81 4 20
Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0
Percent Grade (%) 0 0
Flared Approach N N
Storage 0 0
RT Channelized 0 0
Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0
Configuration LTR LTR
Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service
Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound
Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12
Lane Configuration LT LT LTR LTR
v (veh/h) 12 1 29 105
C (m) (veh/h) 428 795 80 48
v/c 0.03 0.00 0.36 2.19
95% queue length 0.09 0.00 1.60 33.24
Control Delay (s/veh) 13.7 9.5 75.0 2348
LOS B A F F
Approach Delay (s/veh) -- -- 75.0 2348
Approach LOS -- -- F F
Copyright © 2007 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved
HCS+
TM
Version 5.3
Generated: 5/31/2012 9:12 PM
ATTACHMENT 5
6698770 Washington Mixed-Use
Existing (2012)
Assigned
No. of Approach Right-Turn Lane Critical
Lanes Volumes on Red Volumes Moves
0 171 -1
0 -1
1 0 244 244
0 -1
0 73 0 -1 |1010|0 0 -1
0 -1
0 0 -1
0 -1
0 0 0 -1 |10 10|244
0 0 -1
0 -1
2 572 286
0 -1
1 225 122 103 |1010|1 18 18
0 -1
2 725 362 362
0 -1
0 0 0 -1 |1010|362
606
Number of Clearance Intervals 1,500
0.404
Signal Coordination -0.070
0.334
A
Total Lanes
Signalized
Through/Right
Total Lanes
Through
Left/Through
Left/Through
Left/Through/Right
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Northbound
Through/Right
Right
Left/Through
Through
Through/Right
Right
Direction
Approach
Intersection Control
Lane Type
Analysis Scenario
Left
Project Name|1010|ATSAC
AM Peak Hour
Intersection Number
Intersection Name
Analysis Period
Date
Wesley Street
East/West:
26
North/South:
May 21, 2012
National Boulevard
Left
Signal Coordination Adjustment
Intersection Capacity
Sum of North/South Critical Volumes
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Eastbound
Right
Through/Right
Westbound
Total Lanes
Total Lanes
Through
Right
Left
Left/Through
Southbound
Hirsch/Green Transportation Consulting, Inc.
Critical Movement Analysis (CMA) Worksheet
Sum of East/West Critical Volumes
Total Intersection Critical Volumes
Left
Base CMA
Final CMA
Level of Service (LOS)
ATTACHMENT 5
6708770 Washington Mixed-Use
Existing (2012)
Assigned
No. of Approach Right-Turn Lane Critical
Lanes Volumes on Red Volumes Moves
1 86 86
0 -1
1 216 216 216
0 -1
1 36 36 0 |1010|0 421 -1
1 421 421
1 336 336
0 -1
1 361 117 244 |1010|637
2 339 186
0 -1
2 2,033 717 717
1 717
0 118 0 -1 |1010|1 74 74 74
0 -1
2 1,572 556
1 556
0 96 0 -1 |1010|790
1,427
Number of Clearance Intervals 1,375
1.038
Signal Coordination -0.100
0.938
E
Hirsch/Green Transportation Consulting, Inc.
Critical Movement Analysis (CMA) Worksheet
Final CMA
Sum of East/West Critical Volumes
Total Intersection Critical Volumes
Total Lanes
Through
Right
Eastbound
Right
NB Rt. Turn Overlap with WB Left
Through
Left
Left/Through
Through/Right
Sum of North/South Critical Volumes
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Northbound
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Lanes
Intersection Capacity
Left
Left/Through
Through
Through/Right
Right
Date
Robertson Boulevard/Exposition Boulevard
East/West:|1010|North/South:
May 21, 2012
Level of Service (LOS)
Project Name|1010|ATSAC + ATCS
PM Peak Hour
Intersection Number
Intersection Name
Analysis Period
Southbound
Westbound
Total Lanes
Left/Through
Total Lanes
Base CMA
Signal Coordination Adjustment
Analysis Scenario
Intersection Control
Lane Type
Approach
Direction
Signalized
Left
Left/Through
Through
Through/Right
North/South Opposed Phasing
Right
Through/Right
Left
Venice Boulevard
ATTACHMENT 5
6718770 Washington Mixed-Use
Existing (2012)
Assigned
No. of Approach Right-Turn Lane Critical
Lanes Volumes on Red Volumes Moves
1 200 200 200
0 -1
1 485 272
1 272
0 59 0 -1 |1010|1 160 160
0 -1
1 470 298 298
1 298
0 125 0 -1 |1010|498
1 184 184
0 -1
2 1,824 701 701
1 701
0 280 0 -1 |1010|1 38 38 38
0 -1
2 1,468 513
1 513
0 70 0 -1 |1010|739
1,237
Number of Clearance Intervals 1,375
0.900
Signal Coordination -0.100
0.800
C
Venice Boulevard
Signalized
Left
Left/Through
Analysis Scenario
Intersection Control
Lane Type
Approach
Direction
Through
Through/Right
Right
Through/Right
Left
Left/Through
Total Lanes
Base CMA
Signal Coordination Adjustment
Project Name|1010|ATSAC + ATCS
PM Peak Hour
Intersection Number
Intersection Name
Analysis Period
Southbound
Westbound
Date
National Boulevard
East/West:|10 10|North/South:
May 21, 2012
Intersection Capacity
Level of Service (LOS)
Eastbound
Left/Through
Through/Right
Total Lanes
Right
Left
Right
Left/Through
Through
Through/Right
Total Intersection Critical Volumes
Total Lanes
Through
Right
Through
Left
Sum of North/South Critical Volumes
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Northbound
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Lanes
Hirsch/Green Transportation Consulting, Inc.
Critical Movement Analysis (CMA) Worksheet
Final CMA
Sum of East/West Critical Volumes
ATTACHMENT 5
6728770 Washington Mixed-Use
Existing (2012)
Assigned
No. of Approach Right-Turn Lane Critical
Lanes Volumes on Red Volumes Moves
1 47 47 47
0 -1
1 153 100
1 100
0 47 0 -1 |1010|1 201 201
0 -1
1 273 273 273
0 -1
1 87 087 |1010|320
1 87 87
0 -1
1 996 542 542
1 542
0 88 0 -1 |1010|1 77 77 77
0 -1
1 635 372
1 372
0 108 0 -1 |1010|619
939
Number of Clearance Intervals 1,425
0.659
Signal Coordination -0.070
0.589
A
Washington Boulevard
Signalized
Left
Left/Through
Through
Through/Right
Right
Analysis Scenario
Intersection Control
Lane Type
Approach
Direction
Base CMA
Signal Coordination Adjustment
Intersection Capacity
Left
Total Lanes
North/South:
May 21, 2012
Project Name|1010|PM Peak Hour
Intersection Number
Intersection Name
Analysis Period
Southbound
Westbound
Level of Service (LOS)
Through
Through/Right
Sum of East/West Critical Volumes
Total Intersection Critical Volumes
Final CMA
ATSAC
Right
Through
Through/Right
Right
Left/Through
Left/Through
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Lanes
Eastbound
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Northbound
Through
Left
Left/Through
Total Lanes
Through/Right
Left
Sum of North/South Critical Volumes
Total Lanes
Hirsch/Green Transportation Consulting, Inc.
Critical Movement Analysis (CMA) Worksheet
Right
Date
Robertson Boulevard/Higuera Street
East/West:
18
ATTACHMENT 5
6738770 Washington Mixed-Use
Existing (2012)
Assigned
No. of Approach Right-Turn Lane Critical
Lanes Volumes on Red Volumes Moves
2 179 98 98
0 -1
1 492 274
1 274
0 57 0 -1 |1010|2 201 111
0 -1
1 555 306 306
1 306
0 56 0 -1 |1010|404
1 87 87
0 -1
2 912 456 456
0 -1
1 292 49 243 |1010|1 98 98 98
0 -1
2 560 280
0 -1
1 181 0 181 |1010|554
958
Number of Clearance Intervals 1,375
0.697
Signal Coordination -0.070
0.627
B
Total Intersection Critical Volumes
Final CMA
Total Lanes
Through
Right
Eastbound
Hirsch/Green Transportation Consulting, Inc.
Critical Movement Analysis (CMA) Worksheet
Through
Left
Left/Through
Through/Right
Sum of North/South Critical Volumes
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Lanes
Left
Right
Left/Through
Through
Through/Right
Intersection Capacity
Base CMA
Signal Coordination Adjustment
Right
Level of Service (LOS)
Sum of East/West Critical Volumes
Date
National Boulevard
East/West:
20
North/South:
May 21, 2012
Project Name|1010|ATSAC
PM Peak Hour
Intersection Number
Intersection Name
Analysis Period
Southbound
Westbound
Total Lanes
Through
Through/Right
Right
Through/Right
Left
Left/Through
Total Lanes
Signalized
Left
Left/Through
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Northbound
Analysis Scenario
Intersection Control
Lane Type
Approach
Direction
Washington Boulevard
ATTACHMENT 5
6748770 Washington Mixed-Use
Existing (2012)
Assigned
No. of Approach Right-Turn Lane Critical
Lanes Volumes on Red Volumes Moves
0 5 -1 5
0 -1
1 0 18
0 -1
0 13 0 -1 |1010|0 108 -1
0 -1
1 4 148 148
0 -1
0 36 0 -1 |1010|153
0 25 -1
1 530
0 1,091 -1
1 603 603
0 17 0 -1 |1010|0 7 -1 7
1 381
0 732 -1
1 412
0 54 0 -1 |1010|610
763
Number of Clearance Intervals 1,200
0.636
Signal Coordination 0.000
0.636
B
Washington Boulevard
Two-Way STOP
Left
Left/Through
Analysis Scenario
Intersection Control
Lane Type
Approach
Direction
Left/Through/Right
Through/Right
Right
Through/Right
Left
Left/Through
Total Lanes
Base CMA
Signal Coordination Adjustment
Level of Service (LOS)
North/South:
May 21, 2012
Project Name|10 10|PM Peak Hour
Intersection Number
Intersection Name
Analysis Period
Southbound
Westbound
Intersection Capacity
Through
Through/Right
Sum of East/West Critical Volumes
Total Intersection Critical Volumes
Final CMA
Left
None
Right
Through
Through/Right
Right
Total Lanes
Left/Through
Left/Through/Right
Left
Left/Through
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sum of North/South Critical Volumes
Total Lanes
Total Lanes
Eastbound
Hirsch/Green Transportation Consulting, Inc.
Critical Movement Analysis (CMA) Worksheet
Right
Date
Cattaraugus Avenue
East/West:
23
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Northbound
ATTACHMENT 5
675TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY
General Information Site Information
Analyst RRH
Agency/Co. Hirsch/Green
Date Performed 5/21/2012
Analysis Time Period PM Peak Hour - Existing
Intersection 23
Jurisdiction Culver City
Analysis Year 2012
Project Description 8770 Washington Mixed-Use
East/West Street: Washington Boulevard North/South Street: Cattaraugus Avenue
Intersection Orientation: East-West Study Period (hrs): 1.00
Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments
Major Street Eastbound Westbound
Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6
L T R L T R
Volume (veh/h) 25 1091 17 7 732 54
Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Hourly Flow Rate, HFR
(veh/h)
25 1091 17 7 732 54
Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 -- -- 0 -- --
Median Type Undivided
RT Channelized 0 0
Lanes 0 2 0 0 2 0
Configuration LT TR LT TR
Upstream Signal 0 0
Minor Street Northbound Southbound
Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12
L T R L T R
Volume (veh/h) 5 0 13 108 4 36
Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Hourly Flow Rate, HFR
(veh/h)
5 0 13 108 4 36
Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0
Percent Grade (%) 0 0
Flared Approach N N
Storage 0 0
RT Channelized 0 0
Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0
Configuration LTR LTR
Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service
Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound
Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12
Lane Configuration LT LT LTR LTR
v (veh/h) 25 7 18 148
C (m) (veh/h) 842 638 190 126
v/c 0.03 0.01 0.09 1.17
95% queue length 0.09 0.03 0.31 21.38
Control Delay (s/veh) 9.4 10.7 25.9 482.4
LOS A B D F
Approach Delay (s/veh) -- -- 25.9 482.4
Approach LOS -- -- D F
Copyright © 2007 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved
HCS+
TM
Version 5.3
Generated: 5/31/2012 9:30 PM
ATTACHMENT 5
6768770 Washington Mixed-Use
Existing (2012)
Assigned
No. of Approach Right-Turn Lane Critical
Lanes Volumes on Red Volumes Moves
0 46 -1
0 -1
1 0 67 67
0 -1
0 21 0 -1 |1010|0 0 -1
0 -1
0 0 -1
0 -1
0 0 0 -1 |10 10|67
0 0 -1
0 -1
2 935 468 468
0 -1
1 33 33 0 |1010|1 10 10 10
0 -1
2 705 352
0 -1
0 0 0 -1 |1010|478
545
Number of Clearance Intervals 1,500
0.363
Signal Coordination -0.070
0.293
A
National Boulevard
Signalized
Left
Left/Through
Analysis Scenario
Intersection Control
Lane Type
Approach
Direction
Left/Through/Right
Through/Right
Right
Through/Right
Left
Left/Through
Total Lanes
Base CMA
Signal Coordination Adjustment
Level of Service (LOS)
North/South:
May 21, 2012
Project Name|1010|PM Peak Hour
Intersection Number
Intersection Name
Analysis Period
Southbound
Westbound
Intersection Capacity
Through
Through/Right
Sum of East/West Critical Volumes
Total Intersection Critical Volumes
Final CMA
Left
ATSAC
Right
Through
Through/Right
Right
Total Lanes
Left/Through
Through
Left
Left/Through
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sum of North/South Critical Volumes
Total Lanes
Total Lanes
Eastbound
Hirsch/Green Transportation Consulting, Inc.
Critical Movement Analysis (CMA) Worksheet
Right
Date
Wesley Street
East/West:
26
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Northbound
ATTACHMENT 5
677
Future (2014) Without Project Conditions
ATTACHMENT 5
6788770 Washington Mixed-Use
Future (2014)
Assigned
No. of Approach Right-Turn Lane Critical
Lanes Volumes on Red Volumes Moves
1 106 106
0 -1
1 322 322 322
0 -1
1 47 47 0 |1010|0 675 -1
1 675 675
1 476 476
0 -1
1 676 126 550 |1010|997
2 461 254 254
0 -1
2 2,209 792
1 792
0 168 0 -1 |1010|1 116 116
0 -1
2 2,396 883 883
1 883
0 252 0 -1 |1010|1,137
2,134
Number of Clearance Intervals 1,375
1.552
Signal Coordination -0.100
1.452
F Level of Service (LOS)
Final CMA
Project Name
Approach
Direction
Intersection Number
Intersection Name
Analysis Period
Intersection Control
Westbound
Without Project
Right
Through/Right
Left
Left/Through
Total Lanes
Through/Right
Right
North/South:
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|1010|Base CMA
Left/Through
Through
Through/Right
Signal Coordination Adjustment
Sum of North/South Critical Volumes
Left
ATSAC + ATCS
Total Lanes
Sum of East/West Critical Volumes
Total Intersection Critical Volumes
Intersection Capacity
Total Lanes
Through
Signalized
AM Peak Hour
Total Lanes
Lane Type
Eastbound
Analysis Scenario
Southbound Through
Left
Left/Through
May 21, 2012
Through
Through/Right
Left
Left/Through
Venice Boulevard
North/South Opposed Phasing
Right
East/West:
Hirsch/Green Transportation Consulting, Inc.
Critical Movement Analysis (CMA) Worksheet
Right
Date
Robertson Boulevard/Exposition Boulevard|1010|NB Rt. Turn Overlap with WB Left
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Northbound
ATTACHMENT 5
6798770 Washington Mixed-Use
Future (2014)
Assigned
No. of Approach Right-Turn Lane Critical
Lanes Volumes on Red Volumes Moves
1 374 374 374
0 -1
1 856 470
1 470
0 85 0 -1 |1010|1 129 129
0 -1
1 572 340 340
1 340
0 108 0 -1 |1010|714
2 181 100 100
0 -1
3 1,818 606
0 -1
1 622 187 435 |1010|2 181 100
0 -1
3 2,324 775 775
0 -1
1 123 122 1 |1010|875
1,589
Number of Clearance Intervals 1,375
1.156
Signal Coordination -0.100
1.056
F
Signal Coordination Adjustment
Total Lanes
Sum of East/West Critical Volumes
Intersection Capacity
Total Intersection Critical Volumes
Base CMA
Through
Hirsch/Green Transportation Consulting, Inc.
Critical Movement Analysis (CMA) Worksheet
Total Lanes
Through
Right
Sum of North/South Critical Volumes
Left
Left/Through
Through/Right
Eastbound
Through/Right
Right
Left
Left/Through
Through
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Right
Total Lanes
Through
Through/Right
Left
Left/Through
Total Lanes
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Date
National Boulevard
East/West:|10 10|North/South:
May 21, 2012
Venice Boulevard
Project Name|1010|ATSAC + ATCS
AM Peak Hour
Intersection Number
Intersection Name
Analysis Period
Southbound
Westbound
Northbound
Final CMA
Level of Service (LOS)
Analysis Scenario
Intersection Control
Lane Type
Approach
Direction
Without Project
Signalized
Left
Left/Through
Right
Through/Right
ATTACHMENT 5
6808770 Washington Mixed-Use
Future (2014)
Assigned
No. of Approach Right-Turn Lane Critical
Lanes Volumes on Red Volumes Moves
1 105 105
0 -1
1 296 296 296
0 -1
1 100 100 0 |1010|1 227 227 227
0 -1
1 418 418
0 -1
1 96 096 |1010|523
1 39 39 39
0 -1
1 957 518
1 518
0 80 0 -1 |1010|1 65 65
0 -1
1 1,192 680 680
1 680
0 168 0 -1 |1010|719
1,242
Number of Clearance Intervals 1,425
0.872
Signal Coordination -0.070
0.802
D
Northbound
Westbound
Total Lanes
Left/Through
Total Lanes
Through
Total Lanes
Eastbound
Right
Through/Right
Hirsch/Green Transportation Consulting, Inc.
Critical Movement Analysis (CMA) Worksheet
Right
Date
Robertson Boulevard/Higuera Street
East/West:
18
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Project Name
Through
Left
Left/Through
Through/Right
Left
Sum of North/South Critical Volumes
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Lanes
Intersection Capacity
Final CMA
ATSAC
Base CMA
Signal Coordination Adjustment
Left/Through
Through
Through/Right
Right
North/South:
May 21, 2012|1010|AM Peak Hour
Intersection Number
Intersection Name
Analysis Period
Southbound
Sum of East/West Critical Volumes
Total Intersection Critical Volumes
Level of Service (LOS)
Right
Through/Right
Left
Left
Left/Through
Through
Intersection Control
Lane Type
Approach
Direction
Without Project
Signalized
Analysis Scenario
Washington Boulevard
ATTACHMENT 5
6818770 Washington Mixed-Use
Future (2014)
Assigned
No. of Approach Right-Turn Lane Critical
Lanes Volumes on Red Volumes Moves
2 291 160
0 -1
1 757 417 417
1 417
0 77 0 -1 |1010|2 361 199 199
0 -1
1 631 368
1 368
0 104 0 -1 |1010|616
1 130 130 130
0 -1
2 789 394
0 -1
1 325 124 201 |1010|1 82 82
0 -1
2 1,041 460 460
1 460
0 338 0 -1 |1010|590
1,206
Number of Clearance Intervals 1,375
0.877
Signal Coordination -0.070
0.807
D
Signalized
Left
Left/Through
Analysis Scenario
Intersection Control
Lane Type
Approach
Direction
Through
Through/Right
Right
Through/Right
Left
Left/Through
Total Lanes
Base CMA
Signal Coordination Adjustment
Project Name|1010|ATSAC
AM Peak Hour
Intersection Number
Intersection Name
Analysis Period
Southbound
Westbound
Without Project
Date
National Boulevard
East/West:
20
North/South:
May 21, 2012
Washington Boulevard
Right
Left/Through
Through
Through/Right
Right
Intersection Capacity
Level of Service (LOS)
Northbound
Right
Total Lanes
Total Lanes
Total Lanes
Through
Through/Right
Left
Through
Left
Left/Through
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Eastbound
Sum of North/South Critical Volumes
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hirsch/Green Transportation Consulting, Inc.
Critical Movement Analysis (CMA) Worksheet
Final CMA
Sum of East/West Critical Volumes
Total Intersection Critical Volumes
ATTACHMENT 5
6828770 Washington Mixed-Use
Future (2014)
Assigned
No. of Approach Right-Turn Lane Critical
Lanes Volumes on Red Volumes Moves
0 14 -1 14
0 -1
1 5 29
0 -1
0 10 0 -1 |1010|0 83 -1
0 -1
1 4 108 108
0 -1
0 21 0 -1 |1010|122
0 13 -1 13
1 430
0 898 -1
1 495
0 14 0 -1 |1010|0 1 -1
1 846
0 1,348 -1
1 850 850
0 346 0 -1 |1010|863
985
Number of Clearance Intervals 1,200
0.821
Signal Coordination 0.000
0.821
D
Base CMA
Final CMA
Level of Service (LOS)
Southbound
Hirsch/Green Transportation Consulting, Inc.
Critical Movement Analysis (CMA) Worksheet
Sum of East/West Critical Volumes
Total Intersection Critical Volumes
Left
Total Lanes
Through
Right
Left
Left/Through
Sum of North/South Critical Volumes
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Eastbound
Right
Through/Right
Westbound
Total Lanes
Left
Signal Coordination Adjustment
Intersection Capacity
Date
Cattaraugus Avenue
East/West:
23
North/South:
May 21, 2012
Washington Boulevard
Project Name|10 10|None
AM Peak Hour
Intersection Number
Intersection Name
Analysis Period
Intersection Control
Lane Type
Analysis Scenario
Left
Direction
Without Project
Approach
Northbound
Through/Right
Right
Left/Through
Through
Through/Right
Right
Total Lanes
Two-Way STOP
Through/Right
Total Lanes
Left/Through/Right
Left/Through
Left/Through
Left/Through/Right
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ATTACHMENT 5
683TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY
General Information Site Information
Analyst RRH
Agency/Co. Hirsch/Green
Date Performed 5/21/2012
Analysis Time Period
AM Peak Hour - Without
Project
Intersection 23
Jurisdiction Culver City
Analysis Year 2014
Project Description 8770 Washington Mixed-Use
East/West Street: Washington Boulevard North/South Street: Cattaraugus Avenue
Intersection Orientation: East-West Study Period (hrs): 1.00
Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments
Major Street Eastbound Westbound
Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6
L T R L T R
Volume (veh/h) 13 898 14 1 1348 346
Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Hourly Flow Rate, HFR
(veh/h)
13 898 14 1 1348 346
Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 -- -- 0 -- --
Median Type Undivided
RT Channelized 0 0
Lanes 0 2 0 0 2 0
Configuration LT TR LT TR
Upstream Signal 0 0
Minor Street Northbound Southbound
Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12
L T R L T R
Volume (veh/h) 14 5 10 83 4 21
Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Hourly Flow Rate, HFR
(veh/h)
14 5 10 83 4 21
Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0
Percent Grade (%) 0 0
Flared Approach N N
Storage 0 0
RT Channelized 0 0
Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0
Configuration LTR LTR
Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service
Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound
Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12
Lane Configuration LT LT LTR LTR
v (veh/h) 13 1 29 108
C (m) (veh/h) 382 755 61 35
v/c 0.03 0.00 0.48 3.09
95% queue length 0.11 0.00 2.37 40.50
Control Delay (s/veh) 14.8 9.8 114.8 4009
LOS B A F F
Approach Delay (s/veh) -- -- 114.8 4009
Approach LOS -- -- F F
Copyright © 2007 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved
HCS+
TM
Version 5.3
Generated: 5/31/2012 9:14 PM
ATTACHMENT 5
6848770 Washington Mixed-Use
Future (2014)
Assigned
No. of Approach Right-Turn Lane Critical
Lanes Volumes on Red Volumes Moves
0 169 -1
0 -1
1 0 243 243
0 -1
0 74 0 -1 |1010|0 0 -1
0 -1
0 0 -1
0 -1
0 0 0 -1 |10 10|243
0 0 -1
0 -1
2 837 418 418
0 -1
1 230 122 108 |1010|1 18 18 18
0 -1
2 819 410
0 -1
0 0 0 -1 |1010|436
679
Number of Clearance Intervals 1,500
0.453
Signal Coordination -0.070
0.383
A
Base CMA
Final CMA
Level of Service (LOS)
Southbound
Hirsch/Green Transportation Consulting, Inc.
Critical Movement Analysis (CMA) Worksheet
Sum of East/West Critical Volumes
Total Intersection Critical Volumes
Left
Total Lanes
Through
Right
Left
Left/Through
Sum of North/South Critical Volumes
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Eastbound
Right
Through/Right
Westbound
Total Lanes
Left
Signal Coordination Adjustment
Intersection Capacity
Date
Wesley Street
East/West:
26
North/South:
May 21, 2012
National Boulevard
Project Name|1010|ATSAC
AM Peak Hour
Intersection Number
Intersection Name
Analysis Period
Intersection Control
Lane Type
Analysis Scenario
Left
Direction
Without Project
Approach
Northbound
Through/Right
Right
Left/Through
Through
Through/Right
Right
Total Lanes
Signalized
Through/Right
Total Lanes
Through
Left/Through
Left/Through
Left/Through/Right
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ATTACHMENT 5
6858770 Washington Mixed-Use
Future (2014)
Assigned
No. of Approach Right-Turn Lane Critical
Lanes Volumes on Red Volumes Moves
1 122 122
0 -1
1 266 266 266
0 -1
1 37 37 0 |1010|0 477 -1
1 477 477
1 421 421
0 -1
1 496 178 318 |1010|743
2 650 358 358
0 -1
2 2,466 864
1 864
0 127 0 -1 |1010|1 80 80
0 -1
2 1,965 729 729
1 729
0 223 0 -1 |1010|1,086
1,829
Number of Clearance Intervals 1,375
1.330
Signal Coordination -0.100
1.230
F
Hirsch/Green Transportation Consulting, Inc.
Critical Movement Analysis (CMA) Worksheet
Final CMA
Sum of East/West Critical Volumes
Total Intersection Critical Volumes
Total Lanes
Through
Right
Eastbound
Right
NB Rt. Turn Overlap with WB Left
Through
Left
Left/Through
Through/Right
Sum of North/South Critical Volumes
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Northbound
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Lanes
Intersection Capacity
Left
Left/Through
Through
Through/Right
Right
Date
Robertson Boulevard/Exposition Boulevard
East/West:|1010|North/South:
May 21, 2012
Level of Service (LOS)
Project Name|1010|ATSAC + ATCS
PM Peak Hour
Intersection Number
Intersection Name
Analysis Period
Southbound
Westbound
Total Lanes
Left/Through
Total Lanes
Base CMA
Signal Coordination Adjustment
Analysis Scenario
Intersection Control
Lane Type
Approach
Direction
Without Project
Signalized
Left
Left/Through
Through
Through/Right
North/South Opposed Phasing
Right
Through/Right
Left
Venice Boulevard
ATTACHMENT 5
6868770 Washington Mixed-Use
Future (2014)
Assigned
No. of Approach Right-Turn Lane Critical
Lanes Volumes on Red Volumes Moves
1 615 615 615
0 -1
1 737 458
1 458
0 180 0 -1 |1010|1 160 160
0 -1
1 581 355 355
1 355
0 129 0 -1 |1010|970
2 223 123
0 -1
3 2,053 684 684
0 -1
1 512 308 204 |1010|2 93 51 51
0 -1
3 1,567 522
0 -1
1 69 69 0 |1010|735
1,705
Number of Clearance Intervals 1,375
1.240
Signal Coordination -0.100
1.140
F
Venice Boulevard
Signalized
Left
Left/Through
Analysis Scenario
Intersection Control
Lane Type
Approach
Direction
Through
Through/Right
Right
Through/Right
Left
Left/Through
Total Lanes
Base CMA
Signal Coordination Adjustment
Project Name|1010|ATSAC + ATCS
PM Peak Hour
Intersection Number
Intersection Name
Analysis Period
Southbound
Westbound
Without Project
Date
National Boulevard
East/West:|10 10|North/South:
May 21, 2012
Intersection Capacity
Level of Service (LOS)
Eastbound
Left/Through
Through/Right
Total Lanes
Right
Left
Right
Left/Through
Through
Through/Right
Total Intersection Critical Volumes
Total Lanes
Through
Right
Through
Left
Sum of North/South Critical Volumes
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Northbound
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Lanes
Hirsch/Green Transportation Consulting, Inc.
Critical Movement Analysis (CMA) Worksheet
Final CMA
Sum of East/West Critical Volumes
ATTACHMENT 5
6878770 Washington Mixed-Use
Future (2014)
Assigned
No. of Approach Right-Turn Lane Critical
Lanes Volumes on Red Volumes Moves
1 58 58
0 -1
1 204 204 204
0 -1
1 50 44 6 |1010|1 239 239 239
0 -1
1 355 355
0 -1
1 87 087 |1010|443
1 89 89
0 -1
1 1,192 647 647
1 647
0 102 0 -1 |1010|1 89 89 89
0 -1
1 793 471
1 471
0 149 0 -1 |1010|736
1,179
Number of Clearance Intervals 1,425
0.827
Signal Coordination -0.070
0.757
C
Washington Boulevard
Signalized
Left
Left/Through
Through
Through/Right
Right
Analysis Scenario
Intersection Control
Lane Type
Approach
Direction
Without Project
Base CMA
Signal Coordination Adjustment
Intersection Capacity
Left
Total Lanes
North/South:
May 21, 2012
Project Name|1010|PM Peak Hour
Intersection Number
Intersection Name
Analysis Period
Southbound
Westbound
Level of Service (LOS)
Through
Through/Right
Sum of East/West Critical Volumes
Total Intersection Critical Volumes
Final CMA
ATSAC
Right
Through
Through/Right
Right
Left/Through
Left/Through
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Lanes
Eastbound
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Northbound
Through
Left
Left/Through
Total Lanes
Through/Right
Left
Sum of North/South Critical Volumes
Total Lanes
Hirsch/Green Transportation Consulting, Inc.
Critical Movement Analysis (CMA) Worksheet
Right
Date
Robertson Boulevard/Higuera Street
East/West:
18
ATTACHMENT 5
6888770 Washington Mixed-Use
Future (2014)
Assigned
No. of Approach Right-Turn Lane Critical
Lanes Volumes on Red Volumes Moves
2 276 152 152
0 -1
1 704 384
1 384
0 65 0 -1 |1010|2 246 135
0 -1
1 772 424 424
1 424
0 75 0 -1 |1010|576
1 132 132
0 -1
2 1,011 506 506
0 -1
1 390 76 314 |1010|1 125 125 125
0 -1
2 640 320
1 377
0 377 0 -1 |1010|631
1,207
Number of Clearance Intervals 1,375
0.878
Signal Coordination -0.070
0.808
D
Total Intersection Critical Volumes
Final CMA
Total Lanes
Through
Right
Eastbound
Hirsch/Green Transportation Consulting, Inc.
Critical Movement Analysis (CMA) Worksheet
Through
Left
Left/Through
Through/Right
Sum of North/South Critical Volumes
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Lanes
Left
Right
Left/Through
Through
Through/Right
Intersection Capacity
Base CMA
Signal Coordination Adjustment
Right
Level of Service (LOS)
Sum of East/West Critical Volumes
Date
National Boulevard
East/West:
20
North/South:
May 21, 2012
Project Name|1010|ATSAC
PM Peak Hour
Intersection Number
Intersection Name
Analysis Period
Southbound
Westbound
Total Lanes
Without Project
Through
Through/Right
Right
Through/Right
Left
Left/Through
Total Lanes
Signalized
Left
Left/Through
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Northbound
Analysis Scenario
Intersection Control
Lane Type
Approach
Direction
Washington Boulevard
ATTACHMENT 5
6898770 Washington Mixed-Use
Future (2014)
Assigned
No. of Approach Right-Turn Lane Critical
Lanes Volumes on Red Volumes Moves
0 5 -1 5
0 -1
1 0 18
0 -1
0 13 0 -1 |1010|0 110 -1
0 -1
1 4 151 151
0 -1
0 37 0 -1 |1010|156
0 28 -1
1 583
0 1,213 -1
1 675 675
0 17 0 -1 |1010|0 7 -1 7
1 414
0 801 -1
1 449
0 55 0 -1 |1010|682
838
Number of Clearance Intervals 1,200
0.698
Signal Coordination 0.000
0.698
B
Washington Boulevard
Two-Way STOP
Left
Left/Through
Analysis Scenario
Intersection Control
Lane Type
Approach
Direction
Without Project
Left/Through/Right
Through/Right
Right
Through/Right
Left
Left/Through
Total Lanes
Base CMA
Signal Coordination Adjustment
Level of Service (LOS)
North/South:
May 21, 2012
Project Name|10 10|PM Peak Hour
Intersection Number
Intersection Name
Analysis Period
Southbound
Westbound
Intersection Capacity
Through
Through/Right
Sum of East/West Critical Volumes
Total Intersection Critical Volumes
Final CMA
Left
None
Right
Through
Through/Right
Right
Total Lanes
Left/Through
Left/Through/Right
Left
Left/Through
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sum of North/South Critical Volumes
Total Lanes
Total Lanes
Eastbound
Hirsch/Green Transportation Consulting, Inc.
Critical Movement Analysis (CMA) Worksheet
Right
Date
Cattaraugus Avenue
East/West:
23
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Northbound
ATTACHMENT 5
690TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY
General Information Site Information
Analyst RRH
Agency/Co. Hirsch/Green
Date Performed 5/21/2012
Analysis Time Period
PM Peak Hour - Without
Project
Intersection 23
Jurisdiction Culver City
Analysis Year 2014
Project Description 8770 Washington Mixed-Use
East/West Street: Washington Boulevard North/South Street: Cattaraugus Avenue
Intersection Orientation: East-West Study Period (hrs): 1.00
Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments
Major Street Eastbound Westbound
Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6
L T R L T R
Volume (veh/h) 28 1213 17 7 801 55
Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Hourly Flow Rate, HFR
(veh/h)
28 1213 17 7 801 55
Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 -- -- 0 -- --
Median Type Undivided
RT Channelized 0 0
Lanes 0 2 0 0 2 0
Configuration LT TR LT TR
Upstream Signal 0 0
Minor Street Northbound Southbound
Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12
L T R L T R
Volume (veh/h) 5 0 13 110 4 37
Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Hourly Flow Rate, HFR
(veh/h)
5 0 13 110 4 37
Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0
Percent Grade (%) 0 0
Flared Approach N N
Storage 0 0
RT Channelized 0 0
Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0
Configuration LTR LTR
Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service
Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound
Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12
Lane Configuration LT LT LTR LTR
v (veh/h) 28 7 18 151
C (m) (veh/h) 793 574 149 100
v/c 0.04 0.01 0.12 1.51
95% queue length 0.11 0.04 0.41 32.47
Control Delay (s/veh) 9.7 11.3 32.5 1055
LOS A B D F
Approach Delay (s/veh) -- -- 32.5 1055
Approach LOS -- -- D F
Copyright © 2007 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved
HCS+
TM
Version 5.3
Generated: 5/31/2012 9:31 PM
ATTACHMENT 5
6918770 Washington Mixed-Use
Future (2014)
Assigned
No. of Approach Right-Turn Lane Critical
Lanes Volumes on Red Volumes Moves
0 42 -1
0 -1
1 0 63 63
0 -1
0 21 0 -1 |1010|0 0 -1
0 -1
0 0 -1
0 -1
0 0 0 -1 |10 10|63
0 0 -1
0 -1
2 1,161 580 580
0 -1
1 34 32 2 |1010|1 10 10 10
0 -1
2 1,035 518
0 -1
0 0 0 -1 |1010|590
653
Number of Clearance Intervals 1,500
0.435
Signal Coordination -0.070
0.365
A
National Boulevard
Signalized
Left
Left/Through
Analysis Scenario
Intersection Control
Lane Type
Approach
Direction
Without Project
Left/Through/Right
Through/Right
Right
Through/Right
Left
Left/Through
Total Lanes
Base CMA
Signal Coordination Adjustment
Level of Service (LOS)
North/South:
May 21, 2012
Project Name|1010|PM Peak Hour
Intersection Number
Intersection Name
Analysis Period
Southbound
Westbound
Intersection Capacity
Through
Through/Right
Sum of East/West Critical Volumes
Total Intersection Critical Volumes
Final CMA
Left
ATSAC
Right
Through
Through/Right
Right
Total Lanes
Left/Through
Through
Left
Left/Through
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sum of North/South Critical Volumes
Total Lanes
Total Lanes
Eastbound
Hirsch/Green Transportation Consulting, Inc.
Critical Movement Analysis (CMA) Worksheet
Right
Date
Wesley Street
East/West:
26
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Northbound
ATTACHMENT 5
692
Future (2014) With Project Conditions
ATTACHMENT 5
6938770 Washington Mixed-Use
Future (2014)
Assigned
No. of Approach Right-Turn Lane Critical
Lanes Volumes on Red Volumes Moves
1 106 106
0 -1
1 322 322 322
0 -1
1 47 47 0 |1010|0 682 -1
1 682 682
1 476 476
0 -1
1 676 127 549 |1010|1,004
2 461 254 254
0 -1
2 2,219 796
1 796
0 168 0 -1 |1010|1 116 116
0 -1
2 2,413 892 892
1 892
0 263 0 -1 |1010|1,146
2,150
Number of Clearance Intervals 1,375
1.564
Signal Coordination -0.100
1.464
F Level of Service (LOS)
Final CMA
Project Name
Approach
Direction
Intersection Number
Intersection Name
Analysis Period
Intersection Control
Westbound
With Project
Right
Through/Right
Left
Left/Through
Total Lanes
Through/Right
Right
North/South:
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|1010|Base CMA
Left/Through
Through
Through/Right
Signal Coordination Adjustment
Sum of North/South Critical Volumes
Left
ATSAC + ATCS
Total Lanes
Sum of East/West Critical Volumes
Total Intersection Critical Volumes
Intersection Capacity
Total Lanes
Through
Signalized
AM Peak Hour
Total Lanes
Lane Type
Eastbound
Analysis Scenario
Southbound Through
Left
Left/Through
May 21, 2012
Through
Through/Right
Left
Left/Through
Venice Boulevard
North/South Opposed Phasing
Right
East/West:
Hirsch/Green Transportation Consulting, Inc.
Critical Movement Analysis (CMA) Worksheet
Right
Date
Robertson Boulevard/Exposition Boulevard|1010|NB Rt. Turn Overlap with WB Left
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Northbound
ATTACHMENT 5
6948770 Washington Mixed-Use
Future (2014)
Assigned
No. of Approach Right-Turn Lane Critical
Lanes Volumes on Red Volumes Moves
1 384 384 384
0 -1
1 859 472
1 472
0 85 0 -1 |1010|1 129 129
0 -1
1 579 344 344
1 344
0 108 0 -1 |1010|728
2 181 100 100
0 -1
3 1,818 606
0 -1
1 639 192 447 |1010|2 184 101
0 -1
3 2,342 781 781
0 -1
1 125 125 0 |1010|881
1,609
Number of Clearance Intervals 1,375
1.170
Signal Coordination -0.100
1.070
F
Signal Coordination Adjustment
Total Lanes
Sum of East/West Critical Volumes
Intersection Capacity
Total Intersection Critical Volumes
Base CMA
Through
Hirsch/Green Transportation Consulting, Inc.
Critical Movement Analysis (CMA) Worksheet
Total Lanes
Through
Right
Sum of North/South Critical Volumes
Left
Left/Through
Through/Right
Eastbound
Through/Right
Right
Left
Left/Through
Through
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Right
Total Lanes
Through
Through/Right
Left
Left/Through
Total Lanes
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Date
National Boulevard
East/West:|10 10|North/South:
May 21, 2012
Venice Boulevard
Project Name|1010|ATSAC + ATCS
AM Peak Hour
Intersection Number
Intersection Name
Analysis Period
Southbound
Westbound
Northbound
Final CMA
Level of Service (LOS)
Analysis Scenario
Intersection Control
Lane Type
Approach
Direction
With Project
Signalized
Left
Left/Through
Right
Through/Right
ATTACHMENT 5
6958770 Washington Mixed-Use
Future (2014)
Assigned
No. of Approach Right-Turn Lane Critical
Lanes Volumes on Red Volumes Moves
1 105 105
0 -1
1 296 296 296
0 -1
1 101 100 1 |1010|1 227 227 227
0 -1
1 418 418
0 -1
1 96 096 |1010|523
1 39 39 39
0 -1
1 965 522
1 522
0 80 0 -1 |1010|1 66 66
0 -1
1 1,198 683 683
1 683
0 168 0 -1 |1010|722
1,245
Number of Clearance Intervals 1,425
0.874
Signal Coordination -0.070
0.804
D
Northbound
Westbound
Total Lanes
Left/Through
Total Lanes
Through
Total Lanes
Eastbound
Right
Through/Right
Hirsch/Green Transportation Consulting, Inc.
Critical Movement Analysis (CMA) Worksheet
Right
Date
Robertson Boulevard/Higuera Street
East/West:
18
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Project Name
Through
Left
Left/Through
Through/Right
Left
Sum of North/South Critical Volumes
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Lanes
Intersection Capacity
Final CMA
ATSAC
Base CMA
Signal Coordination Adjustment
Left/Through
Through
Through/Right
Right
North/South:
May 21, 2012|1010|AM Peak Hour
Intersection Number
Intersection Name
Analysis Period
Southbound
Sum of East/West Critical Volumes
Total Intersection Critical Volumes
Level of Service (LOS)
Right
Through/Right
Left
Left
Left/Through
Through
Intersection Control
Lane Type
Approach
Direction
With Project
Signalized
Analysis Scenario
Washington Boulevard
ATTACHMENT 5
6968770 Washington Mixed-Use
Future (2014)
Assigned
No. of Approach Right-Turn Lane Critical
Lanes Volumes on Red Volumes Moves
2 291 160
0 -1
1 757 424 424
1 424
0 91 0 -1 |1010|2 388 213 213
0 -1
1 631 368
1 368
0 104 0 -1 |1010|637
1 130 130 130
0 -1
2 798 399
0 -1
1 325 134 191 |1010|1 90 90
0 -1
2 1,048 466 466
1 466
0 351 0 -1 |1010|596
1,233
Number of Clearance Intervals 1,375
0.897
Signal Coordination -0.070
0.827
D
Signalized
Left
Left/Through
Analysis Scenario
Intersection Control
Lane Type
Approach
Direction
Through
Through/Right
Right
Through/Right
Left
Left/Through
Total Lanes
Base CMA
Signal Coordination Adjustment
Project Name|1010|ATSAC
AM Peak Hour
Intersection Number
Intersection Name
Analysis Period
Southbound
Westbound
With Project
Date
National Boulevard
East/West:
20
North/South:
May 21, 2012
Washington Boulevard
Right
Left/Through
Through
Through/Right
Right
Intersection Capacity
Level of Service (LOS)
Northbound
Right
Total Lanes
Total Lanes
Total Lanes
Through
Through/Right
Left
Through
Left
Left/Through
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Eastbound
Sum of North/South Critical Volumes
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hirsch/Green Transportation Consulting, Inc.
Critical Movement Analysis (CMA) Worksheet
Final CMA
Sum of East/West Critical Volumes
Total Intersection Critical Volumes
ATTACHMENT 5
6978770 Washington Mixed-Use
Future (2014)
Assigned
No. of Approach Right-Turn Lane Critical
Lanes Volumes on Red Volumes Moves
0 14 -1 14
0 -1
1 5 29
0 -1
0 10 0 -1 |1010|0 83 -1
0 -1
1 4 113 113
0 -1
0 26 0 -1 |1010|127
0 40 -1 40
1 391
0 928 -1
1 591
0 14 0 -1 |1010|0 1 -1
1 853
0 1,362 -1
1 856 856
0 346 0 -1 |1010|896
1,023
Number of Clearance Intervals 1,200
0.853
Signal Coordination 0.000
0.853
D
Base CMA
Final CMA
Level of Service (LOS)
Southbound
Hirsch/Green Transportation Consulting, Inc.
Critical Movement Analysis (CMA) Worksheet
Sum of East/West Critical Volumes
Total Intersection Critical Volumes
Left
Total Lanes
Through
Right
Left
Left/Through
Sum of North/South Critical Volumes
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Eastbound
Right
Through/Right
Westbound
Total Lanes
Left
Signal Coordination Adjustment
Intersection Capacity
Date
Cattaraugus Avenue
East/West:
23
North/South:
May 21, 2012
Washington Boulevard
Project Name|10 10|None
AM Peak Hour
Intersection Number
Intersection Name
Analysis Period
Intersection Control
Lane Type
Analysis Scenario
Left
Direction
With Project
Approach
Northbound
Through/Right
Right
Left/Through
Through
Through/Right
Right
Total Lanes
Two-Way STOP
Through/Right
Total Lanes
Left/Through/Right
Left/Through
Left/Through
Left/Through/Right
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ATTACHMENT 5
698TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY
General Information Site Information
Analyst RRH
Agency/Co. Hirsch/Green
Date Performed 5/21/2012
Analysis Time Period
AM Peak Hour - With
Project
Intersection 23
Jurisdiction Culver City
Analysis Year 2014
Project Description 8770 Washington Mixed-Use
East/West Street: Washington Boulevard North/South Street: Cattaraugus Avenue
Intersection Orientation: East-West Study Period (hrs): 1.00
Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments
Major Street Eastbound Westbound
Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6
L T R L T R
Volume (veh/h) 40 928 14 1 1362 346
Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Hourly Flow Rate, HFR
(veh/h)
40 928 14 1 1362 346
Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 -- -- 0 -- --
Median Type Undivided
RT Channelized 0 0
Lanes 0 2 0 0 2 0
Configuration LT TR LT TR
Upstream Signal 0 0
Minor Street Northbound Southbound
Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12
L T R L T R
Volume (veh/h) 14 5 10 83 4 26
Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Hourly Flow Rate, HFR
(veh/h)
14 5 10 83 4 26
Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0
Percent Grade (%) 0 0
Flared Approach N N
Storage 0 0
RT Channelized 0 0
Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0
Configuration LTR LTR
Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service
Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound
Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12
Lane Configuration LT LT LTR LTR
v (veh/h) 40 1 29 113
C (m) (veh/h) 377 736 49 28
v/c 0.11 0.00 0.59 4.04
95% queue length 0.36 0.00 3.28 46.17
Control Delay (s/veh) 15.7 9.9 172.9 5764
LOS C A F F
Approach Delay (s/veh) -- -- 172.9 5764
Approach LOS -- -- F F
Copyright © 2007 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved
HCS+
TM
Version 5.3
Generated: 5/31/2012 9:15 PM
ATTACHMENT 5
6998770 Washington Mixed-Use
Future (2014)
Assigned
No. of Approach Right-Turn Lane Critical
Lanes Volumes on Red Volumes Moves
0 169 -1
0 -1
1 0 243 243
0 -1
0 74 0 -1 |1010|0 0 -1
0 -1
0 0 -1
0 -1
0 0 0 -1 |10 10|243
0 0 -1
0 -1
2 844 422 422
0 -1
1 231 122 109 |1010|1 18 18 18
0 -1
2 833 416
0 -1
0 0 0 -1 |1010|440
683
Number of Clearance Intervals 1,500
0.455
Signal Coordination -0.070
0.385
A
Base CMA
Final CMA
Level of Service (LOS)
Southbound
Hirsch/Green Transportation Consulting, Inc.
Critical Movement Analysis (CMA) Worksheet
Sum of East/West Critical Volumes
Total Intersection Critical Volumes
Left
Total Lanes
Through
Right
Left
Left/Through
Sum of North/South Critical Volumes
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Eastbound
Right
Through/Right
Westbound
Total Lanes
Left
Signal Coordination Adjustment
Intersection Capacity
Date
Wesley Street
East/West:
26
North/South:
May 21, 2012
National Boulevard
Project Name|1010|ATSAC
AM Peak Hour
Intersection Number
Intersection Name
Analysis Period
Intersection Control
Lane Type
Analysis Scenario
Left
Direction
With Project
Approach
Northbound
Through/Right
Right
Left/Through
Through
Through/Right
Right
Total Lanes
Signalized
Through/Right
Total Lanes
Through
Left/Through
Left/Through
Left/Through/Right
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ATTACHMENT 5
7008770 Washington Mixed-Use
Future (2014)
Assigned
No. of Approach Right-Turn Lane Critical
Lanes Volumes on Red Volumes Moves
1 122 122
0 -1
1 266 266 266
0 -1
1 37 37 0 |1010|0 492 -1
1 492 492
1 423 423
0 -1
1 496 179 317 |1010|758
2 650 358 358
0 -1
2 2,488 872
1 872
0 127 0 -1 |1010|1 80 80
0 -1
2 1,989 742 742
1 742
0 237 0 -1 |1010|1,100
1,858
Number of Clearance Intervals 1,375
1.351
Signal Coordination -0.100
1.251
F
Hirsch/Green Transportation Consulting, Inc.
Critical Movement Analysis (CMA) Worksheet
Final CMA
Sum of East/West Critical Volumes
Total Intersection Critical Volumes
Total Lanes
Through
Right
Eastbound
Right
NB Rt. Turn Overlap with WB Left
Through
Left
Left/Through
Through/Right
Sum of North/South Critical Volumes
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Northbound
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Lanes
Intersection Capacity
Left
Left/Through
Through
Through/Right
Right
Date
Robertson Boulevard/Exposition Boulevard
East/West:|1010|North/South:
May 21, 2012
Level of Service (LOS)
Project Name|1010|ATSAC + ATCS
PM Peak Hour
Intersection Number
Intersection Name
Analysis Period
Southbound
Westbound
Total Lanes
Left/Through
Total Lanes
Base CMA
Signal Coordination Adjustment
Analysis Scenario
Intersection Control
Lane Type
Approach
Direction
With Project
Signalized
Left
Left/Through
Through
Through/Right
North/South Opposed Phasing
Right
Through/Right
Left
Venice Boulevard
ATTACHMENT 5
7018770 Washington Mixed-Use
Future (2014)
Assigned
No. of Approach Right-Turn Lane Critical
Lanes Volumes on Red Volumes Moves
1 623 623 623
0 -1
1 741 460
1 460
0 180 0 -1 |1010|1 160 160
0 -1
1 594 362 362
1 362
0 129 0 -1 |1010|985
2 223 123
0 -1
3 2,053 684 684
0 -1
1 549 312 237 |1010|2 99 54 54
0 -1
3 1,597 532
0 -1
1 73 73 0 |1010|738
1,723
Number of Clearance Intervals 1,375
1.253
Signal Coordination -0.100
1.153
F
Venice Boulevard
Signalized
Left
Left/Through
Analysis Scenario
Intersection Control
Lane Type
Approach
Direction
Through
Through/Right
Right
Through/Right
Left
Left/Through
Total Lanes
Base CMA
Signal Coordination Adjustment
Project Name|1010|ATSAC + ATCS
PM Peak Hour
Intersection Number
Intersection Name
Analysis Period
Southbound
Westbound
With Project
Date
National Boulevard
East/West:|10 10|North/South:
May 21, 2012
Intersection Capacity
Level of Service (LOS)
Eastbound
Left/Through
Through/Right
Total Lanes
Right
Left
Right
Left/Through
Through
Through/Right
Total Intersection Critical Volumes
Total Lanes
Through
Right
Through
Left
Sum of North/South Critical Volumes
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Northbound
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Lanes
Hirsch/Green Transportation Consulting, Inc.
Critical Movement Analysis (CMA) Worksheet
Final CMA
Sum of East/West Critical Volumes
ATTACHMENT 5
7028770 Washington Mixed-Use
Future (2014)
Assigned
No. of Approach Right-Turn Lane Critical
Lanes Volumes on Red Volumes Moves
1 58 58
0 -1
1 204 204 204
0 -1
1 52 45 7 |1010|1 241 241 241
0 -1
1 355 355
0 -1
1 87 087 |1010|445
1 89 89
0 -1
1 1,210 656 656
1 656
0 102 0 -1 |1010|1 90 90 90
0 -1
1 802 476
1 476
0 149 0 -1 |1010|746
1,191
Number of Clearance Intervals 1,425
0.836
Signal Coordination -0.070
0.766
C
Washington Boulevard
Signalized
Left
Left/Through
Through
Through/Right
Right
Analysis Scenario
Intersection Control
Lane Type
Approach
Direction
With Project
Base CMA
Signal Coordination Adjustment
Intersection Capacity
Left
Total Lanes
North/South:
May 21, 2012
Project Name|1010|PM Peak Hour
Intersection Number
Intersection Name
Analysis Period
Southbound
Westbound
Level of Service (LOS)
Through
Through/Right
Sum of East/West Critical Volumes
Total Intersection Critical Volumes
Final CMA
ATSAC
Right
Through
Through/Right
Right
Left/Through
Left/Through
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Lanes
Eastbound
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Northbound
Through
Left
Left/Through
Total Lanes
Through/Right
Left
Sum of North/South Critical Volumes
Total Lanes
Hirsch/Green Transportation Consulting, Inc.
Critical Movement Analysis (CMA) Worksheet
Right
Date
Robertson Boulevard/Higuera Street
East/West:
18
ATTACHMENT 5
7038770 Washington Mixed-Use
Future (2014)
Assigned
No. of Approach Right-Turn Lane Critical
Lanes Volumes on Red Volumes Moves
2 276 152 152
0 -1
1 704 400
1 400
0 95 0 -1 |1010|2 302 166
0 -1
1 772 424 424
1 424
0 75 0 -1 |1010|576
1 132 132
0 -1
2 1,033 516 516
0 -1
1 390 76 314 |1010|1 137 137 137
0 -1
2 650 325
1 389
0 389 0 -1 |1010|653
1,229
Number of Clearance Intervals 1,375
0.894
Signal Coordination -0.070
0.824
D
Total Intersection Critical Volumes
Final CMA
Total Lanes
Through
Right
Eastbound
Hirsch/Green Transportation Consulting, Inc.
Critical Movement Analysis (CMA) Worksheet
Through
Left
Left/Through
Through/Right
Sum of North/South Critical Volumes
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Lanes
Left
Right
Left/Through
Through
Through/Right
Intersection Capacity
Base CMA
Signal Coordination Adjustment
Right
Level of Service (LOS)
Sum of East/West Critical Volumes
Date
National Boulevard
East/West:
20
North/South:
May 21, 2012
Project Name|1010|ATSAC
PM Peak Hour
Intersection Number
Intersection Name
Analysis Period
Southbound
Westbound
Total Lanes
With Project
Through
Through/Right
Right
Through/Right
Left
Left/Through
Total Lanes
Signalized
Left
Left/Through
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Northbound
Analysis Scenario
Intersection Control
Lane Type
Approach
Direction
Washington Boulevard
ATTACHMENT 5
7048770 Washington Mixed-Use
Future (2014)
Assigned
No. of Approach Right-Turn Lane Critical
Lanes Volumes on Red Volumes Moves
0 5 -1 5
0 -1
1 0 18
0 -1
0 13 0 -1 |1010|0 110 -1
0 -1
1 4 162 162
0 -1
0 48 0 -1 |1010|167
0 74 -1
1 547
0 1,258 -1
1 802 802
0 17 0 -1 |1010|0 7 -1 7
1 430
0 832 -1
1 464
0 55 0 -1 |1010|809
976
Number of Clearance Intervals 1,200
0.813
Signal Coordination 0.000
0.813
D
Washington Boulevard
Two-Way STOP
Left
Left/Through
Analysis Scenario
Intersection Control
Lane Type
Approach
Direction
With Project
Left/Through/Right
Through/Right
Right
Through/Right
Left
Left/Through
Total Lanes
Base CMA
Signal Coordination Adjustment
Level of Service (LOS)
North/South:
May 21, 2012
Project Name|10 10|PM Peak Hour
Intersection Number
Intersection Name
Analysis Period
Southbound
Westbound
Intersection Capacity
Through
Through/Right
Sum of East/West Critical Volumes
Total Intersection Critical Volumes
Final CMA
Left
None
Right
Through
Through/Right
Right
Total Lanes
Left/Through
Left/Through/Right
Left
Left/Through
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sum of North/South Critical Volumes
Total Lanes
Total Lanes
Eastbound
Hirsch/Green Transportation Consulting, Inc.
Critical Movement Analysis (CMA) Worksheet
Right
Date
Cattaraugus Avenue
East/West:
23
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Northbound
ATTACHMENT 5
705TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY
General Information Site Information
Analyst RRH
Agency/Co. Hirsch/Green
Date Performed 5/21/2012
Analysis Time Period
PM Peak Hour - With
Project
Intersection 23
Jurisdiction Culver City
Analysis Year 2014
Project Description 8770 Washington Mixed-Use
East/West Street: Washington Boulevard North/South Street: Cattaraugus Avenue
Intersection Orientation: East-West Study Period (hrs): 1.00
Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments
Major Street Eastbound Westbound
Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6
L T R L T R
Volume (veh/h) 74 1258 17 7 832 55
Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Hourly Flow Rate, HFR
(veh/h)
74 1258 17 7 832 55
Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 -- -- 0 -- --
Median Type Undivided
RT Channelized 0 0
Lanes 0 2 0 0 2 0
Configuration LT TR LT TR
Upstream Signal 0 0
Minor Street Northbound Southbound
Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12
L T R L T R
Volume (veh/h) 5 0 13 110 4 48
Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Hourly Flow Rate, HFR
(veh/h)
5 0 13 110 4 48
Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0
Percent Grade (%) 0 0
Flared Approach N N
Storage 0 0
RT Channelized 0 0
Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0
Configuration LTR LTR
Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service
Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound
Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12
Lane Configuration LT LT LTR LTR
v (veh/h) 74 7 18 162
C (m) (veh/h) 772 551 108 79
v/c 0.10 0.01 0.17 2.05
95% queue length 0.32 0.04 0.59 46.70
Control Delay (s/veh) 10.2 11.6 45.0 2027
LOS B B E F
Approach Delay (s/veh) -- -- 45.0 2027
Approach LOS -- -- E F
Copyright © 2007 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved
HCS+
TM
Version 5.3
Generated: 5/31/2012 9:31 PM
ATTACHMENT 5
7068770 Washington Mixed-Use
Future (2014)
Assigned
No. of Approach Right-Turn Lane Critical
Lanes Volumes on Red Volumes Moves
0 43 -1
0 -1
1 0 64 64
0 -1
0 21 0 -1 |1010|0 0 -1
0 -1
0 0 -1
0 -1
0 0 0 -1 |10 10|64
0 0 -1
0 -1
2 1,172 586 586
0 -1
1 35 32 3 |1010|1 10 10 10
0 -1
2 1,064 532
0 -1
0 0 0 -1 |1010|596
660
Number of Clearance Intervals 1,500
0.440
Signal Coordination -0.070
0.370
A
National Boulevard
Signalized
Left
Left/Through
Analysis Scenario
Intersection Control
Lane Type
Approach
Direction
With Project
Left/Through/Right
Through/Right
Right
Through/Right
Left
Left/Through
Total Lanes
Base CMA
Signal Coordination Adjustment
Level of Service (LOS)
North/South:
May 21, 2012
Project Name|1010|PM Peak Hour
Intersection Number
Intersection Name
Analysis Period
Southbound
Westbound
Intersection Capacity
Through
Through/Right
Sum of East/West Critical Volumes
Total Intersection Critical Volumes
Final CMA
Left
ATSAC
Right
Through
Through/Right
Right
Total Lanes
Left/Through
Through
Left
Left/Through
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sum of North/South Critical Volumes
Total Lanes
Total Lanes
Eastbound
Hirsch/Green Transportation Consulting, Inc.
Critical Movement Analysis (CMA) Worksheet
Right
Date
Wesley Street
East/West:
26
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Northbound
ATTACHMENT 5
707
Future (2014) With Project Plus Redistribution Conditions
(Provided for Information Only)
ATTACHMENT 5
7088770 Washington Mixed-Use
Future (2014)
Assigned
No. of Approach Right-Turn Lane Critical
Lanes Volumes on Red Volumes Moves
1 106 106
0 -1
1 322 322 322
0 -1
1 47 47 0 |1010|0 682 -1
1 682 682
1 476 476
0 -1
1 676 127 549 |1010|1,004
2 461 254 254
0 -1
2 2,219 796
1 796
0 168 0 -1 |1010|1 116 116
0 -1
2 2,413 892 892
1 892
0 263 0 -1 |1010|1,146
2,150
Number of Clearance Intervals 1,375
1.564
Signal Coordination -0.100
1.464
F Level of Service (LOS)
Final CMA
Project Name
Approach
Direction
Intersection Number
Intersection Name
Analysis Period
Intersection Control
Westbound
With Project Plus Trip Redistributions Due to Wesley Street Signal
Right
Through/Right
Left
Left/Through
Total Lanes
Through/Right
Right
North/South:
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|1010|Base CMA
Left/Through
Through
Through/Right
Signal Coordination Adjustment
Sum of North/South Critical Volumes
Left
ATSAC + ATCS
Total Lanes
Sum of East/West Critical Volumes
Total Intersection Critical Volumes
Intersection Capacity
Total Lanes
Through
Signalized
AM Peak Hour
Total Lanes
Lane Type
Eastbound
Analysis Scenario
Southbound Through
Left
Left/Through
May 21, 2012
Through
Through/Right
Left
Left/Through
Venice Boulevard
North/South Opposed Phasing
Right
East/West:
Hirsch/Green Transportation Consulting, Inc.
Critical Movement Analysis (CMA) Worksheet
Right
Date
Robertson Boulevard/Exposition Boulevard|1010|NB Rt. Turn Overlap with WB Left
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Northbound
ATTACHMENT 5
7098770 Washington Mixed-Use
Future (2014)
Assigned
No. of Approach Right-Turn Lane Critical
Lanes Volumes on Red Volumes Moves
1 402 402 402
0 -1
1 861 473
1 473
0 85 0 -1 |1010|1 129 129
0 -1
1 579 344 344
1 344
0 108 0 -1 |1010|746
2 181 100 100
0 -1
3 1,818 606
0 -1
1 639 201 438 |1010|2 184 101
0 -1
3 2,324 775 775
0 -1
1 123 123 0 |1010|875
1,621
Number of Clearance Intervals 1,375
1.179
Signal Coordination -0.100
1.079
F
Signal Coordination Adjustment
Total Lanes
Sum of East/West Critical Volumes
Intersection Capacity
Total Intersection Critical Volumes
Base CMA
Through
Hirsch/Green Transportation Consulting, Inc.
Critical Movement Analysis (CMA) Worksheet
Total Lanes
Through
Right
Sum of North/South Critical Volumes
Left
Left/Through
Through/Right
Eastbound
Through/Right
Right
Left
Left/Through
Through
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Right
Total Lanes
Through
Through/Right
Left
Left/Through
Total Lanes
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Date
National Boulevard
East/West:|10 10|North/South:
May 21, 2012
Venice Boulevard
Project Name|1010|ATSAC + ATCS
AM Peak Hour
Intersection Number
Intersection Name
Analysis Period
Southbound
Westbound
Northbound
Final CMA
Level of Service (LOS)
Analysis Scenario
Intersection Control
Lane Type
Approach
Direction
With Project Plus Trip Redistributions Due to Wesley Street Signal
Signalized
Left
Left/Through
Right
Through/Right
ATTACHMENT 5
7108770 Washington Mixed-Use
Future (2014)
Assigned
No. of Approach Right-Turn Lane Critical
Lanes Volumes on Red Volumes Moves
2 291 160
0 -1
1 757 424 424
1 424
0 91 0 -1 |1010|2 388 213 213
0 -1
1 631 368
1 368
0 104 0 -1 |1010|637
1 130 130 130
0 -1
2 798 399
0 -1
1 325 134 191 |1010|1 90 90
0 -1
2 1,048 473 473
1 473
0 371 0 -1 |1010|603
1,240
Number of Clearance Intervals 1,375
0.902
Signal Coordination -0.070
0.832
D
Signalized
Left
Left/Through
Analysis Scenario
Intersection Control
Lane Type
Approach
Direction
Through
Through/Right
Right
Through/Right
Left
Left/Through
Total Lanes
Base CMA
Signal Coordination Adjustment
Project Name|1010|ATSAC
AM Peak Hour
Intersection Number
Intersection Name
Analysis Period
Southbound
Westbound
With Project Plus Trip Redistributions Due to Wesley Street Signal
Date
National Boulevard
East/West:
20
North/South:
May 21, 2012
Washington Boulevard
Right
Left/Through
Through
Through/Right
Right
Intersection Capacity
Level of Service (LOS)
Northbound
Right
Total Lanes
Total Lanes
Total Lanes
Through
Through/Right
Left
Through
Left
Left/Through
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Eastbound
Sum of North/South Critical Volumes
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hirsch/Green Transportation Consulting, Inc.
Critical Movement Analysis (CMA) Worksheet
Final CMA
Sum of East/West Critical Volumes
Total Intersection Critical Volumes
ATTACHMENT 5
7118770 Washington Mixed-Use
Future (2014)
Assigned
No. of Approach Right-Turn Lane Critical
Lanes Volumes on Red Volumes Moves
0 14 -1 14
0 -1
1 5 29
0 -1
0 10 0 -1 |1010|0 83 -1
0 -1
1 4 113 113
0 -1
0 26 0 -1 |1010|127
0 20 -1 20
1 431
0 928 -1
1 531
0 14 0 -1 |1010|0 1 -1
1 853
0 1,362 -1
1 856 856
0 346 0 -1 |1010|876
1,003
Number of Clearance Intervals 1,200
0.836
Signal Coordination 0.000
0.836
D
Base CMA
Final CMA
Level of Service (LOS)
Southbound
Hirsch/Green Transportation Consulting, Inc.
Critical Movement Analysis (CMA) Worksheet
Sum of East/West Critical Volumes
Total Intersection Critical Volumes
Left
Total Lanes
Through
Right
Left
Left/Through
Sum of North/South Critical Volumes
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Eastbound
Right
Through/Right
Westbound
Total Lanes
Left
Signal Coordination Adjustment
Intersection Capacity
Date
Cattaraugus Avenue
East/West:
23
North/South:
May 21, 2012
Washington Boulevard
Project Name|10 10|None
AM Peak Hour
Intersection Number
Intersection Name
Analysis Period
Intersection Control
Lane Type
Analysis Scenario
Left
Direction
With Project Plus Trip Redistributions Due to Wesley Street Signal
Approach
Northbound
Through/Right
Right
Left/Through
Through
Through/Right
Right
Total Lanes
Two-Way STOP
Through/Right
Total Lanes
Left/Through/Right
Left/Through
Left/Through
Left/Through/Right
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ATTACHMENT 5
712TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY
General Information Site Information
Analyst RRH
Agency/Co. Hirsch/Green
Date Performed 5/21/2012
Analysis Time Period
AM Peak Hour - With
Redistrib.
Intersection 23
Jurisdiction Culver City
Analysis Year 2014
Project Description 8770 Washington Mixed-Use
East/West Street: Washington Boulevard North/South Street: Cattaraugus Avenue
Intersection Orientation: East-West Study Period (hrs): 1.00
Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments
Major Street Eastbound Westbound
Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6
L T R L T R
Volume (veh/h) 20 928 14 1 1362 346
Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Hourly Flow Rate, HFR
(veh/h)
20 928 14 1 1362 346
Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 -- -- 0 -- --
Median Type Undivided
RT Channelized 0 0
Lanes 0 2 0 0 2 0
Configuration LT TR LT TR
Upstream Signal 0 0
Minor Street Northbound Southbound
Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12
L T R L T R
Volume (veh/h) 14 5 10 83 4 26
Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Hourly Flow Rate, HFR
(veh/h)
14 5 10 83 4 26
Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0
Percent Grade (%) 0 0
Flared Approach N N
Storage 0 0
RT Channelized 0 0
Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0
Configuration LTR LTR
Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service
Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound
Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12
Lane Configuration LT LT LTR LTR
v (veh/h) 20 1 29 113
C (m) (veh/h) 377 736 55 33
v/c 0.05 0.00 0.53 3.42
95% queue length 0.17 0.00 2.76 43.86
Control Delay (s/veh) 15.1 9.9 138.1 4627
LOS C A F F
Approach Delay (s/veh) -- -- 138.1 4627
Approach LOS -- -- F F
Copyright © 2007 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved
HCS+
TM
Version 5.3
Generated: 5/31/2012 9:15 PM
ATTACHMENT 5
7138770 Washington Mixed-Use
Future (2014)
Assigned
No. of Approach Right-Turn Lane Critical
Lanes Volumes on Red Volumes Moves
1 122 122
0 -1
1 266 266 266
0 -1
1 37 37 0 |1010|0 492 -1
1 492 492
1 423 423
0 -1
1 496 179 317 |1010|758
2 650 358 358
0 -1
2 2,488 872
1 872
0 127 0 -1 |1010|1 80 80
0 -1
2 1,989 742 742
1 742
0 237 0 -1 |1010|1,100
1,858
Number of Clearance Intervals 1,375
1.351
Signal Coordination -0.100
1.251
F
Hirsch/Green Transportation Consulting, Inc.
Critical Movement Analysis (CMA) Worksheet
Final CMA
Sum of East/West Critical Volumes
Total Intersection Critical Volumes
Total Lanes
Through
Right
Eastbound
Right
NB Rt. Turn Overlap with WB Left
Through
Left
Left/Through
Through/Right
Sum of North/South Critical Volumes
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Northbound
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Lanes
Intersection Capacity
Left
Left/Through
Through
Through/Right
Right
Date
Robertson Boulevard/Exposition Boulevard
East/West:|1010|North/South:
May 21, 2012
Level of Service (LOS)
Project Name|1010|ATSAC + ATCS
PM Peak Hour
Intersection Number
Intersection Name
Analysis Period
Southbound
Westbound
Total Lanes
Left/Through
Total Lanes
Base CMA
Signal Coordination Adjustment
Analysis Scenario
Intersection Control
Lane Type
Approach
Direction
With Project Plus Trip Redistributions Due to Wesley Street Signal
Signalized
Left
Left/Through
Through
Through/Right
North/South Opposed Phasing
Right
Through/Right
Left
Venice Boulevard
ATTACHMENT 5
7148770 Washington Mixed-Use
Future (2014)
Assigned
No. of Approach Right-Turn Lane Critical
Lanes Volumes on Red Volumes Moves
1 653 653 653
0 -1
1 745 462
1 462
0 180 0 -1 |1010|1 160 160
0 -1
1 594 362 362
1 362
0 129 0 -1 |1010|1,015
2 223 123
0 -1
3 2,053 684 684
0 -1
1 549 326 223 |1010|2 99 54 54
0 -1
3 1,567 522
0 -1
1 69 69 0 |1010|738
1,753
Number of Clearance Intervals 1,375
1.275
Signal Coordination -0.100
1.175
F
Venice Boulevard
Signalized
Left
Left/Through
Analysis Scenario
Intersection Control
Lane Type
Approach
Direction
Through
Through/Right
Right
Through/Right
Left
Left/Through
Total Lanes
Base CMA
Signal Coordination Adjustment
Project Name|1010|ATSAC + ATCS
PM Peak Hour
Intersection Number
Intersection Name
Analysis Period
Southbound
Westbound
With Project Plus Trip Redistributions Due to Wesley Street Signal
Date
National Boulevard
East/West:|10 10|North/South:
May 21, 2012
Intersection Capacity
Level of Service (LOS)
Eastbound
Left/Through
Through/Right
Total Lanes
Right
Left
Right
Left/Through
Through
Through/Right
Total Intersection Critical Volumes
Total Lanes
Through
Right
Through
Left
Sum of North/South Critical Volumes
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Northbound
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Lanes
Hirsch/Green Transportation Consulting, Inc.
Critical Movement Analysis (CMA) Worksheet
Final CMA
Sum of East/West Critical Volumes
ATTACHMENT 5
7158770 Washington Mixed-Use
Future (2014)
Assigned
No. of Approach Right-Turn Lane Critical
Lanes Volumes on Red Volumes Moves
2 276 152 152
0 -1
1 704 400
1 400
0 95 0 -1 |1010|2 302 166
0 -1
1 772 424 424
1 424
0 75 0 -1 |1010|576
1 132 132
0 -1
2 1,033 516 516
0 -1
1 390 76 314 |1010|1 137 137 137
0 -1
2 650 325
1 423
0 423 0 -1 |1010|653
1,229
Number of Clearance Intervals 1,375
0.894
Signal Coordination -0.070
0.824
D
Total Intersection Critical Volumes
Final CMA
Total Lanes
Through
Right
Eastbound
Hirsch/Green Transportation Consulting, Inc.
Critical Movement Analysis (CMA) Worksheet
Through
Left
Left/Through
Through/Right
Sum of North/South Critical Volumes
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Lanes
Left
Right
Left/Through
Through
Through/Right
Intersection Capacity
Base CMA
Signal Coordination Adjustment
Right
Level of Service (LOS)
Sum of East/West Critical Volumes
Date
National Boulevard
East/West:
20
North/South:
May 21, 2012
Project Name|1010|ATSAC
PM Peak Hour
Intersection Number
Intersection Name
Analysis Period
Southbound
Westbound
Total Lanes
With Project Plus Trip Redistributions Due to Wesley Street Signal
Through
Through/Right
Right
Through/Right
Left
Left/Through
Total Lanes
Signalized
Left
Left/Through
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Northbound
Analysis Scenario
Intersection Control
Lane Type
Approach
Direction
Washington Boulevard
ATTACHMENT 5
7168770 Washington Mixed-Use
Future (2014)
Assigned
No. of Approach Right-Turn Lane Critical
Lanes Volumes on Red Volumes Moves
0 5 -1 5
0 -1
1 0 18
0 -1
0 13 0 -1 |1010|0 110 -1
0 -1
1 4 162 162
0 -1
0 48 0 -1 |1010|167
0 40 -1
1 589
0 1,258 -1
1 726 726
0 17 0 -1 |1010|0 7 -1 7
1 430
0 832 -1
1 464
0 55 0 -1 |1010|733
900
Number of Clearance Intervals 1,200
0.750
Signal Coordination 0.000
0.750
C
Washington Boulevard
Two-Way STOP
Left
Left/Through
Analysis Scenario
Intersection Control
Lane Type
Approach
Direction
With Project Plus Trip Redistributions Due to Wesley Street Signal
Left/Through/Right
Through/Right
Right
Through/Right
Left
Left/Through
Total Lanes
Base CMA
Signal Coordination Adjustment
Level of Service (LOS)
North/South:
May 21, 2012
Project Name|10 10|PM Peak Hour
Intersection Number
Intersection Name
Analysis Period
Southbound
Westbound
Intersection Capacity
Through
Through/Right
Sum of East/West Critical Volumes
Total Intersection Critical Volumes
Final CMA
Left
None
Right
Through
Through/Right
Right
Total Lanes
Left/Through
Left/Through/Right
Left
Left/Through
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sum of North/South Critical Volumes
Total Lanes
Total Lanes
Eastbound
Hirsch/Green Transportation Consulting, Inc.
Critical Movement Analysis (CMA) Worksheet
Right
Date
Cattaraugus Avenue
East/West:
23
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Northbound
ATTACHMENT 5
717TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY
General Information Site Information
Analyst RRH
Agency/Co. Hirsch/Green
Date Performed 5/21/2012
Analysis Time Period
PM Peak Hour - With
Redistrib.
Intersection 23
Jurisdiction Culver City
Analysis Year 2014
Project Description 8770 Washington Mixed-Use
East/West Street: Washington Boulevard North/South Street: Cattaraugus Avenue
Intersection Orientation: East-West Study Period (hrs): 1.00
Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments
Major Street Eastbound Westbound
Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6
L T R L T R
Volume (veh/h) 40 1258 17 7 832 55
Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Hourly Flow Rate, HFR
(veh/h)
40 1258 17 7 832 55
Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 -- -- 0 -- --
Median Type Undivided
RT Channelized 0 0
Lanes 0 2 0 0 2 0
Configuration LT TR LT TR
Upstream Signal 0 0
Minor Street Northbound Southbound
Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12
L T R L T R
Volume (veh/h) 5 0 13 110 4 48
Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Hourly Flow Rate, HFR
(veh/h)
5 0 13 110 4 48
Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0
Percent Grade (%) 0 0
Flared Approach N N
Storage 0 0
RT Channelized 0 0
Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0
Configuration LTR LTR
Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service
Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound
Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12
Lane Configuration LT LT LTR LTR
v (veh/h) 40 7 18 162
C (m) (veh/h) 772 551 126 90
v/c 0.05 0.01 0.14 1.80
95% queue length 0.16 0.04 0.50 41.81
Control Delay (s/veh) 9.9 11.6 38.3 1570
LOS A B E F
Approach Delay (s/veh) -- -- 38.3 1570
Approach LOS -- -- E F
Copyright © 2007 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved
HCS+
TM
Version 5.3
Generated: 5/31/2012 9:32 PM
ATTACHMENT 5
718
Future (2014) With Project Plus Mitigation Conditions
ATTACHMENT 5
7198770 Washington Mixed-Use
Future (2014)
Assigned
No. of Approach Right-Turn Lane Critical
Lanes Volumes on Red Volumes Moves
1 106 106
0 -1
1 322 322 322
0 -1
1 47 47 0 |1010|0 682 -1
1 682 682
1 476 476
0 -1
1 676 127 549 |1010|1,004
2 461 254 254
0 -1
2 2,219 796
1 796
0 168 0 -1 |1010|1 116 116
0 -1
3 2,413 804 804
0 -1
1 263 263 0 |1010|1,058
2,062
Number of Clearance Intervals 1,375
1.500
Signal Coordination -0.100
1.400
F
Hirsch/Green Transportation Consulting, Inc.
Critical Movement Analysis (CMA) Worksheet
Right
Date
Robertson Boulevard/Exposition Boulevard|1010|NB Rt. Turn Overlap with WB Left
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Northbound
May 21, 2012
Through
Through/Right
Left
Left/Through
Venice Boulevard
North/South Opposed Phasing
Right
East/West:
Eastbound
Analysis Scenario
Southbound Through
Left
Left/Through
Signalized
AM Peak Hour
Total Lanes
Lane Type
Signal Coordination Adjustment
Sum of North/South Critical Volumes
Left
ATSAC + ATCS
Total Lanes
Sum of East/West Critical Volumes
Total Intersection Critical Volumes
Intersection Capacity
Total Lanes
Through
Base CMA
Left/Through
Through
Through/Right
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|1010|North/South:
Westbound
With Project Plus Mitigation
Right
Through/Right
Left
Left/Through
Total Lanes
Through/Right
Right
Project Name
Approach
Direction
Intersection Number
Intersection Name
Analysis Period
Intersection Control
Level of Service (LOS)
Final CMA
ATTACHMENT 5
7208770 Washington Mixed-Use
Future (2014)
Assigned
No. of Approach Right-Turn Lane Critical
Lanes Volumes on Red Volumes Moves
1 402 402 402
0 -1
1 861 473
1 473
0 85 0 -1 |1010|1 129 129
0 -1
2 579 290 290
0 -1
1 108 50 58 |1010|692
2 181 100 100
0 -1
3 1,818 606
0 -1
1 639 201 438 |1010|2 184 101
0 -1
3 2,324 775 775
0 -1
1 123 110 13 |1010|875
1,567
Number of Clearance Intervals 1,375
1.140
Signal Coordination -0.100
1.040
F
Left
Left/Through
Right
Through/Right
Analysis Scenario
Intersection Control
Lane Type
Approach
Direction
With Project Plus Mitigation
Signalized
Final CMA
Level of Service (LOS)
Project Name|1010|ATSAC + ATCS
AM Peak Hour
Intersection Number
Intersection Name
Analysis Period
Southbound
Westbound
Northbound
Date
National Boulevard
East/West:|10 10|North/South:
May 21, 2012
Venice Boulevard
Right
Total Lanes
Through
Through/Right
Left
Left/Through
Total Lanes
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Through/Right
Right
Left
Left/Through
Through
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Left
Left/Through
Through/Right
Eastbound
Hirsch/Green Transportation Consulting, Inc.
Critical Movement Analysis (CMA) Worksheet
Total Lanes
Through
Right
Sum of North/South Critical Volumes
Through
Sum of East/West Critical Volumes
Intersection Capacity
Total Intersection Critical Volumes
Base CMA
Signal Coordination Adjustment
Total Lanes
ATTACHMENT 5
7218770 Washington Mixed-Use
Future (2014)
Assigned
No. of Approach Right-Turn Lane Critical
Lanes Volumes on Red Volumes Moves
2 291 160
0 -1
2 757 378 378
0 -1
1 91 91 0 |1010|2 388 213 213
0 -1
1 631 368
1 368
0 104 0 -1 |1010|591
1 130 130 130
0 -1
2 798 399
0 -1
1 325 112 213 |1010|1 90 90
0 -1
2 1,048 473 473
1 473
0 371 0 -1 |1010|603
1,194
Number of Clearance Intervals 1,375
0.868
Signal Coordination -0.070
0.798
C
Hirsch/Green Transportation Consulting, Inc.
Critical Movement Analysis (CMA) Worksheet
Final CMA
Sum of East/West Critical Volumes
Total Intersection Critical Volumes
Through
Left
Left/Through
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Eastbound
Sum of North/South Critical Volumes
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Northbound
Right
Total Lanes
Total Lanes
Total Lanes
Through
Through/Right
Left
Right
Intersection Capacity
Level of Service (LOS)
Right
Left/Through
Through
Through/Right
Date
National Boulevard
East/West:
20
North/South:
May 21, 2012
Washington Boulevard
Project Name|1010|ATSAC
AM Peak Hour
Intersection Number
Intersection Name
Analysis Period
Southbound
Westbound
With Project Plus Mitigation
Base CMA
Signal Coordination Adjustment
Through
Through/Right
Right
Through/Right
Left
Left/Through
Total Lanes
Signalized
Left
Left/Through
Analysis Scenario
Intersection Control
Lane Type
Approach
Direction
ATTACHMENT 5
7228770 Washington Mixed-Use
Future (2014)
Assigned
No. of Approach Right-Turn Lane Critical
Lanes Volumes on Red Volumes Moves
0 14 -1 14
0 -1
1 5 29
0 -1
0 10 0 -1 |1010|0 83 -1
0 -1
1 4 113 113
0 -1
0 26 0 -1 |1010|127
1 20 20 20
0 -1
1 928 471
1 471
0 14 0 -1 |1010|0 1 -1
1 853
0 1,362 -1
1 856 856
0 346 0 -1 |1010|876
1,003
Number of Clearance Intervals 1,200
0.836
Signal Coordination 0.000
0.836
D
Total Lanes
Two-Way STOP
Through/Right
Total Lanes
Left/Through/Right
Left/Through
Left/Through
Left/Through/Right
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Northbound
Through/Right
Right
Left/Through
Through
Through/Right
Right
Direction
With Project Plus Mitigation (Eastbound Left-turn Lane Only)
Approach
Intersection Control
Lane Type
Analysis Scenario
Left
Project Name|10 10|None
AM Peak Hour
Intersection Number
Intersection Name
Analysis Period
Date
Cattaraugus Avenue
East/West:
23
North/South:
May 21, 2012
Washington Boulevard
Left
Signal Coordination Adjustment
Intersection Capacity
Sum of North/South Critical Volumes
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Eastbound
Right
Through/Right
Westbound
Total Lanes
Total Lanes
Through
Right
Left
Left/Through
Southbound
Hirsch/Green Transportation Consulting, Inc.
Critical Movement Analysis (CMA) Worksheet
Sum of East/West Critical Volumes
Total Intersection Critical Volumes
Left
Base CMA
Final CMA
Level of Service (LOS)
ATTACHMENT 5
723TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY
General Information Site Information
Analyst RRH
Agency/Co. Hirsch/Green
Date Performed 5/21/2012
Analysis Time Period
AM Peak Hour - With
Mitigation
Intersection 23
Jurisdiction Culver City
Analysis Year 2014
Project Description 8770 Washington Mixed-Use
East/West Street: Washington Boulevard North/South Street: Cattaraugus Avenue
Intersection Orientation: East-West Study Period (hrs): 1.00
Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments
Major Street Eastbound Westbound
Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6
L T R L T R
Volume (veh/h) 20 928 14 1 1362 346
Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Hourly Flow Rate, HFR
(veh/h)
20 928 14 1 1362 346
Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 -- -- 0 -- --
Median Type Undivided
RT Channelized 0 0
Lanes 1 2 0 0 2 0
Configuration L T TR LT TR
Upstream Signal 0 0
Minor Street Northbound Southbound
Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12
L T R L T R
Volume (veh/h) 14 5 10 83 4 26
Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Hourly Flow Rate, HFR
(veh/h)
14 5 10 83 4 26
Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0
Percent Grade (%) 0 0
Flared Approach N N
Storage 0 0
RT Channelized 0 0
Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0
Configuration LTR LTR
Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service
Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound
Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12
Lane Configuration L LT LTR LTR
v (veh/h) 20 1 29 113
C (m) (veh/h) 377 736 55 33
v/c 0.05 0.00 0.53 3.42
95% queue length 0.17 0.00 2.76 43.86
Control Delay (s/veh) 15.1 9.9 138.1 4627
LOS C A F F
Approach Delay (s/veh) -- -- 138.1 4627
Approach LOS -- -- F F
Copyright © 2007 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved
HCS+
TM
Version 5.3
Generated: 5/31/2012 9:13 PM
ATTACHMENT 5
7248770 Washington Mixed-Use
Future (2014)
Assigned
No. of Approach Right-Turn Lane Critical
Lanes Volumes on Red Volumes Moves
0 14 -1 14
0 -1
1 5 29
0 -1
0 10 0 -1 |1010|0 83 -1
0 -1
1 4 113 113
0 -1
0 26 0 -1 |1010|127
1 20 20 20
0 -1
1 928 471
1 471
0 14 0 -1 |1010|0 1 -1
1 853
0 1,362 -1
1 856 856
0 346 0 -1 |1010|876
1,003
Number of Clearance Intervals 1,425
0.704
Signal Coordination -0.070
0.634
B
Base CMA
Final CMA
Level of Service (LOS)
Southbound
Hirsch/Green Transportation Consulting, Inc.
Critical Movement Analysis (CMA) Worksheet
Sum of East/West Critical Volumes
Total Intersection Critical Volumes
Left
Total Lanes
Through
Right
Left
Left/Through
Sum of North/South Critical Volumes
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Eastbound
Right
Through/Right
Westbound
Total Lanes
Left
Signal Coordination Adjustment
Intersection Capacity
Date
Cattaraugus Avenue
East/West:
23
North/South:
May 21, 2012
Washington Boulevard
Project Name|1010|ATSAC
AM Peak Hour
Intersection Number
Intersection Name
Analysis Period
Intersection Control
Lane Type
Analysis Scenario
Left
Direction
With Project Plus Mitigation (EB Left-turn Lane plus Traffic Signal)
Approach
Northbound
Through/Right
Right
Left/Through
Through
Through/Right
Right
Total Lanes
Signalized
Through/Right
Total Lanes
Left/Through/Right
Left/Through
Left/Through
Left/Through/Right
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ATTACHMENT 5
7258770 Washington Mixed-Use
Future (2014)
Assigned
No. of Approach Right-Turn Lane Critical
Lanes Volumes on Red Volumes Moves
1 122 122
0 -1
1 266 266 266
0 -1
1 37 37 0 |1010|0 492 -1
1 492 492
1 423 423
0 -1
1 496 178 318 |1010|758
2 650 358 358
0 -1
2 2,488 872
1 872
0 127 0 -1 |1010|1 80 80
0 -1
3 1,989 663 663
0 -1
1 237 237 0 |1010|1,020
1,778
Number of Clearance Intervals 1,375
1.293
Signal Coordination -0.100
1.193
F
Hirsch/Green Transportation Consulting, Inc.
Critical Movement Analysis (CMA) Worksheet
Final CMA
Sum of East/West Critical Volumes
Total Intersection Critical Volumes
Total Lanes
Through
Right
Eastbound
Right
NB Rt. Turn Overlap with WB Left
Through
Left
Left/Through
Through/Right
Sum of North/South Critical Volumes
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Northbound
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Lanes
Intersection Capacity
Left
Left/Through
Through
Through/Right
Right
Date
Robertson Boulevard/Exposition Boulevard
East/West:|1010|North/South:
May 21, 2012
Level of Service (LOS)
Project Name|1010|ATSAC + ATCS
PM Peak Hour
Intersection Number
Intersection Name
Analysis Period
Southbound
Westbound
Total Lanes
Left/Through
Total Lanes
Base CMA
Signal Coordination Adjustment
Analysis Scenario
Intersection Control
Lane Type
Approach
Direction
With Project Plus Mitigation
Signalized
Left
Left/Through
Through
Through/Right
North/South Opposed Phasing
Right
Through/Right
Left
Venice Boulevard
ATTACHMENT 5
7268770 Washington Mixed-Use
Future (2014)
Assigned
No. of Approach Right-Turn Lane Critical
Lanes Volumes on Red Volumes Moves
1 653 653 653
0 -1
1 745 462
1 462
0 180 0 -1 |1010|1 160 160
0 -1
2 594 297 297
0 -1
1 129 108 21 |1010|950
2 223 123
0 -1
3 2,053 684 684
0 -1
1 549 326 223 |1010|2 99 54 54
0 -1
3 1,567 522
0 -1
1 69 69 0 |1010|738
1,688
Number of Clearance Intervals 1,375
1.228
Signal Coordination -0.100
1.128
F
Venice Boulevard
Signalized
Left
Left/Through
Analysis Scenario
Intersection Control
Lane Type
Approach
Direction
Through
Through/Right
Right
Through/Right
Left
Left/Through
Total Lanes
Base CMA
Signal Coordination Adjustment
Project Name|1010|ATSAC + ATCS
PM Peak Hour
Intersection Number
Intersection Name
Analysis Period
Southbound
Westbound
With Project Plus Mitigation
Date
National Boulevard
East/West:|10 10|North/South:
May 21, 2012
Intersection Capacity
Level of Service (LOS)
Eastbound
Left/Through
Through/Right
Total Lanes
Right
Left
Right
Left/Through
Through
Through/Right
Total Intersection Critical Volumes
Total Lanes
Through
Right
Through
Left
Sum of North/South Critical Volumes
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Northbound
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Lanes
Hirsch/Green Transportation Consulting, Inc.
Critical Movement Analysis (CMA) Worksheet
Final CMA
Sum of East/West Critical Volumes
ATTACHMENT 5
7278770 Washington Mixed-Use
Future (2014)
Assigned
No. of Approach Right-Turn Lane Critical
Lanes Volumes on Red Volumes Moves
2 276 152 152
0 -1
2 704 352
0 -1
1 95 68 27 |1010|2 302 166
0 -1
1 772 424 424
1 424
0 75 0 -1 |1010|576
1 132 132
0 -1
2 1,033 516 516
0 -1
1 390 76 314 |1010|1 137 137 137
0 -1
2 650 325
1 423
0 423 0 -1 |1010|653
1,229
Number of Clearance Intervals 1,375
0.894
Signal Coordination -0.070
0.824
D
Total Intersection Critical Volumes
Final CMA
Total Lanes
Through
Right
Eastbound
Hirsch/Green Transportation Consulting, Inc.
Critical Movement Analysis (CMA) Worksheet
Through
Left
Left/Through
Through/Right
Sum of North/South Critical Volumes
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Lanes
Left
Right
Left/Through
Through
Through/Right
Intersection Capacity
Base CMA
Signal Coordination Adjustment
Right
Level of Service (LOS)
Sum of East/West Critical Volumes
Date
National Boulevard
East/West:
20
North/South:
May 21, 2012
Project Name|1010|ATSAC
PM Peak Hour
Intersection Number
Intersection Name
Analysis Period
Southbound
Westbound
Total Lanes
With Project Plus Mitigation
Through
Through/Right
Right
Through/Right
Left
Left/Through
Total Lanes
Signalized
Left
Left/Through
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Northbound
Analysis Scenario
Intersection Control
Lane Type
Approach
Direction
Washington Boulevard
ATTACHMENT 5
7288770 Washington Mixed-Use
Future (2014)
Assigned
No. of Approach Right-Turn Lane Critical
Lanes Volumes on Red Volumes Moves
0 5 -1 5
0 -1
1 0 18
0 -1
0 13 0 -1 |1010|0 110 -1
0 -1
1 4 162 162
0 -1
0 48 0 -1 |1010|167
1 40 40
0 -1
1 1,258 638 638
1 638
0 17 0 -1 |1010|0 7 -1 7
1 430
0 832 -1
1 464
0 55 0 -1 |1010|645
812
Number of Clearance Intervals 1,200
0.677
Signal Coordination 0.000
0.677
B
Washington Boulevard
Two-Way STOP
Left
Left/Through
Analysis Scenario
Intersection Control
Lane Type
Approach
Direction
With Project Plus Mitigation (Eastbound Left-turn Lane Only)
Left/Through/Right
Through/Right
Right
Through/Right
Left
Left/Through
Total Lanes
Base CMA
Signal Coordination Adjustment
Level of Service (LOS)
North/South:
May 21, 2012
Project Name|10 10|PM Peak Hour
Intersection Number
Intersection Name
Analysis Period
Southbound
Westbound
Intersection Capacity
Through
Through/Right
Sum of East/West Critical Volumes
Total Intersection Critical Volumes
Final CMA
Left
None
Right
Through
Through/Right
Right
Total Lanes
Left/Through
Left/Through/Right
Left
Left/Through
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sum of North/South Critical Volumes
Total Lanes
Total Lanes
Eastbound
Hirsch/Green Transportation Consulting, Inc.
Critical Movement Analysis (CMA) Worksheet
Right
Date
Cattaraugus Avenue
East/West:
23
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Northbound
ATTACHMENT 5
729TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY
General Information Site Information
Analyst RRH
Agency/Co. Hirsch/Green
Date Performed 5/21/2012
Analysis Time Period
PM Peak Hour - With
Mitigation
Intersection 23
Jurisdiction Culver City
Analysis Year 2014
Project Description 8770 Washington Mixed-Use
East/West Street: Washington Boulevard North/South Street: Cattaraugus Avenue
Intersection Orientation: East-West Study Period (hrs): 1.00
Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments
Major Street Eastbound Westbound
Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6
L T R L T R
Volume (veh/h) 40 1258 17 7 832 55
Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Hourly Flow Rate, HFR
(veh/h)
40 1258 17 7 832 55
Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 -- -- 0 -- --
Median Type Undivided
RT Channelized 0 0
Lanes 1 2 0 0 2 0
Configuration L T TR LT TR
Upstream Signal 0 0
Minor Street Northbound Southbound
Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12
L T R L T R
Volume (veh/h) 5 0 13 110 4 48
Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Hourly Flow Rate, HFR
(veh/h)
5 0 13 110 4 48
Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0
Percent Grade (%) 0 0
Flared Approach N N
Storage 0 0
RT Channelized 0 0
Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0
Configuration LTR LTR
Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service
Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound
Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12
Lane Configuration L LT LTR LTR
v (veh/h) 40 7 18 162
C (m) (veh/h) 772 551 126 90
v/c 0.05 0.01 0.14 1.80
95% queue length 0.16 0.04 0.50 41.81
Control Delay (s/veh) 9.9 11.6 38.3 1570
LOS A B E F
Approach Delay (s/veh) -- -- 38.3 1570
Approach LOS -- -- E F
Copyright © 2007 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved
HCS+
TM
Version 5.3
Generated: 5/31/2012 9:30 PM
ATTACHMENT 5
7308770 Washington Mixed-Use
Future (2014)
Assigned
No. of Approach Right-Turn Lane Critical
Lanes Volumes on Red Volumes Moves
0 5 -1 5
0 -1
1 0 18
0 -1
0 13 0 -1 |1010|0 110 -1
0 -1
1 4 162 162
0 -1
0 48 0 -1 |1010|167
1 40 40
0 -1
1 1,258 638 638
1 638
0 17 0 -1 |1010|0 7 -1 7
1 430
0 832 -1
1 464
0 55 0 -1 |1010|645
812
Number of Clearance Intervals 1,425
0.570
Signal Coordination -0.070
0.500
A
Hirsch/Green Transportation Consulting, Inc.
Critical Movement Analysis (CMA) Worksheet
Right
Date
Cattaraugus Avenue
East/West:
23
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Northbound
Left/Through/Right
Left
Left/Through
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sum of North/South Critical Volumes
Total Lanes
Total Lanes
Eastbound
Left
ATSAC
Right
Through
Through/Right
Right
Total Lanes
Left/Through
Final CMA
Through
Through/Right
Sum of East/West Critical Volumes
Total Intersection Critical Volumes
Intersection Capacity
North/South:
May 21, 2012
Project Name|1010|PM Peak Hour
Intersection Number
Intersection Name
Analysis Period
Southbound
Westbound
Base CMA
Signal Coordination Adjustment
Level of Service (LOS)
With Project Plus Mitigation (EB Left-turn Lane plus Traffic Signal)
Left/Through/Right
Through/Right
Right
Through/Right
Left
Left/Through
Total Lanes
Signalized
Left
Left/Through
Analysis Scenario
Intersection Control
Lane Type
Approach
Direction
Washington Boulevard
ATTACHMENT 5
731PLANNED DEVELOPMENT NO. 12
LEGADO CROSSING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
JANUARY 28, 2013
ATTACHMENT 6
732Applicant
Planning Consultant
Architect
Landscape Architect
Civil Engineering
Traffic Engineer
Signage
LEED
Legado Companies
Hogle-Ireland, Inc.
Togawa Smith Martin
TGP
Kimley-Horn and Associates
Hirsch/Green Transportation Consulting, Inc.
SKIN Graphics at Wolcott
GAIA Development
01 PROJECT DESCRIPTION pg.1
02 PROJECT SITE pg.4
03 LAND USE AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS pg.7
A. LAND USES
B. DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
1. PEDESTRIAN SETBACKS
2. BUILDING SETBACKS
3. SETBACK PROJECTIONS
4. BUILDING HEIGHTS
5. PARKING REQUIREMENTS
6. PARKING SECURITY
7. BICYCLE PARKING
8. LOADING
9. TRASH AND RECYCLING MANAGEMENT PLAN
10. SIGNAGE
11. OUTDOOR DINING
C. ADMINISTRATION
04 SUSTAINABILITY pg.24
05 SITE PLANS/FLOOR PLANS pg.26
06 ELEVATIONS pg.40
07 CONCEPTUAL LANDSCAPE pg.47
08 CONCEPTUAL LIGHTING pg.54
09 CIVIL ENGINEERING pg.57
10 DOCUMENTS UNDER SEPARATE COVER pg.68
Legado Crossing Comprehensive Plan & Planned Development No. 12 - January 28, 2013
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Table of Contents
Acknowledgements
ATTACHMENT 6
73301
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Legado Crossing Comprehensive Plan & Planned Development No. 12 - January 28, 2013|1010|ATTACHMENT 6
734Project Description
Legado Crossing is a mixed use development consisting of one
hundred fifteen (115) residential units and 31,240 square feet of
commercial (retail and restaurant) uses (the Project) on 1.78 acres
located at 8770 Washington Boulevard within the Washington/
National Transit Oriented District (TOD) near the Exposition Light Rail
Transit Line and Station (Expo) in Culver City. The current surrounding
uses include a small City parkette, warehouse, commercial, creative
office, auto repair, the Helms Bakery Complex, and Expo station.
The Project is comprised of a 5-story 56 foot high building. Commercial
uses are located on the ground floor with residential uses located on
the second through fifth floors. Parking is located at grade level and
in two levels of below-grade parking providing a total of 344 spaces.
An extensive public open space area, totaling 7,198 square feet
including 4,304 square feet on the ground level comprised of mature
tree planting, a water feature, on grade planters with native trees,
shrubs and ground covers and stylized bench seating; and 2,894
square feet on the second level comprised of benches, fountain, and
landscape planters which also serves as a commercial plaza for a
café with outdoor dining.
The Project provides a number of on-site amenities for residential
tenants including a recreation room and fitness center, and a large
interior central courtyard with a swimming pool, shade structures,
BBQ area, and bench seating and tables.
Project Data
Site Area 1.78 Acres
Number of Residential Units 115
Total Sq Ft of Commercial 31,240
Total No. of Parking Stalls 344
Public Open Space 7,198
Private Open Space 11,949
View of the Public Park Space from National Blvd
Legado Crossing Comprehensive Plan & Planned Development No. 12 - January 28, 2013|1010|PROJECT DESCRIPTION
ATTACHMENT 6
735Design Concept
Legado Crossing has been designed to implement and meet the
goals of City of Culver City for the Washington/National Transit
Oriented District to develop a transit oriented development core
surrounding the Expo station Line by providing a mixed use
residential/commercial development that seamlessly blends with
the existing and future surrounding commercial, professional office
and residential communities near and around the Expo station.
The Project’s 115 upscale rental apartment homes are intended
to improve the jobs/housing balance serving the growing Culver
City employment centers. Its street level retail/restaurant space is
intended to serve both the residents who live in Legado Crossing and
those living and working in the area.
The public plaza/park at the intersection of Washington Boulevard
and National Boulevard opens itself to the general public and creates
an iconic presence at a prominent corner in the Washington/National
TOD District. This plaza/park will provide both a quiet respite for
people living, working and passing through the area, and will also
allow for public events to bring the community together. The park is
a multi-purpose space, an amenity welcoming Expo Line travelers
arriving at the Culver City Expo transit station and an attractive
respite for local residents, workers and shoppers
The architectural design of Legado Crossing was inspired by Culver
City’s own “Hayden Tract” where industrial warehouses have
been transformed into vibrant creative facilities with innovative
and modern designs. The building materials, dynamic forms and
colors were derived from this creative cultural district. Metal
canopy structures, sharp angled facades, metal siding, and large
windows were integrated into the Legado Crossing project to reflect
a more contemporary style of architecture, and will complement
the surrounding area. The commitment to sustainability has also
influenced the overall layout of buildings selection of materials,
landscaping design, and programming of the project. As a LEED
certified project, Legado Crossing also meets the City’s goals for
sustainable development and sets an example for future sustainable
developments within Culver City.
View of the corner of National Blvd and Washington Blvd
Legado Crossing Comprehensive Plan & Planned Development No. 12 - January 28, 2013|1010|PROJECT DESCRIPTION
ATTACHMENT 6
73602
PROJECT SITE
Legado Crossing Comprehensive Plan & Planned Development No. 12 - January 28, 2013|1010|ATTACHMENT 6
737WASHINGTON BOULEVARD
VENICE BOULEVARD
NATIONAL BOULEVARD
THE PLATFORM
MTA EXPO LINE
I-10 SANTA MONICA FREEWAY
HAYDEN TRACT
HELMS
BAKERY
TOD DISTRICT MTA EXPO LINE CULVER CITY STATION
DOWNTOWN
CULVER CITY
CULVER CITY ARTS DISTRICT
CULVER CITY STATION
(PARKING FOR CULVER CITY EXPO LRT STATION
AND FUTURE MIXED-USE DEVELOPMENT )
WASHINGTON/NATIONAL TOD
PROJECT
SITE
Legado Crossing Comprehensive Plan & Planned Development No. 12 - January 28, 2013|1010|PROJECT SITE
Urban Context Map
ATTACHMENT 6
738Lower Level Public Open Space
Upper Level Public Open Space
Private Outdoor Courtyard
Building Footprint
Legado Crossing Comprehensive Plan & Planned Development No. 12 - January 28, 2013|1010|PROJECT SITE
Project Site Plan
ATTACHMENT 6
73903
LAND USE/
DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
03 LAND USE/DEVELOPMENT
Legado Crossing Comprehensive Plan & Planned Development No. 12 - January 28, 2013|1010|ATTACHMENT 6
740planters, and also serves as a commercial plaza with a small café
and outdoor dining and provides access to an adjacent private pool
deck.
The Mixed Use Development Standards require overall commercial
floor area to be 10% of the projects total gross floor area or 30% of
the project lot size, whichever is greater.
The total gross residential and commercial floor area of the Project is
181,670 s.f. The Project lot size is 77,537 s.f. 10% of the gross floor
area = 18,167 s.f.; 30% of project lot size = 23,261 s.f. therefore
the Project requires a minimum of 23,261 s.f. of commercial floor
area. The project provides 31,240 s.f. of commercial floor area which
meets the minimum commercial floor area requirements.
A. Land Use
View of the Public Park on the corner of National and Washington Blvd
General Plan
The General Plan land use designation of the project site is
General Corridor. This land use designation allows for a range
of small to medium scale commercial uses, emphasizing
community serving retail, office, and service uses along major
corridors. It is intended to support desirable existing and future
neighborhood and community service commercial uses and
housing opportunities that are compatible with nearby residential
neighborhoods.
Zoning
Zoning for this site is intended to conform to the Culver City General
Plan. The zoning pursuant to the “Legado Crossing Comprehensive
Plan” is Planned Development (PD) District. Currently, the existing
zoning for the project site is “Industrial General” (IG), “Commercial
General” (CG) and East Washington Overlay (EWO). This designation
is changed to PD along with adoption of the Comprehensive Plan.
In combination with the PD zoning district, the Comprehensive Plan
supports innovation in site planning and other aspects of project
design, and more effective design responses to site features, uses
on adjoining properties and other impacts that the underlying zoning
code standards would produce without adjustment. The PD zoning
district is applied to areas of existing large scale, multiple family
residential and commercial complexes developed as a Planned
Development zoning district, and sites suitable for similar large scale
development. The PD zoning district is consistent with the General
Corridor land use designation of the General Plan.
Mixed Use Development Standards
A total of 115 residential dwelling units are permitted pursuant to the
maximum applicable density of 65 dwelling units per acre allowed
with a Community Benefit pursuant to the density requirements
of the Mixed Use Development Standards Zoning Code Section
17.400.065.E.3. The Project provides public open space as the
Community Benefit. Pursuant to Community Benefit Resolution No.
2008-R015, a minimum of 5,000 square feet shall be provided as
the Project’s Community Benefit contribution. The Project provides
public open space totaling 7,198 square feet (4,304 square feet on
the ground level and 2,894 square feet at the second level). The
ground level public open space is comprised of mature tree planting,
a water feature, on grade planters with native trees, shrubs and
ground covers and stylized bench seating. The second level public
open space is comprised of benches, a fountain and landscape
Legado Crossing Comprehensive Plan & Planned Development No. 12 - January 28, 2013|1010|LAND USE/DEV. STANDARD
ATTACHMENT 6
741B. Permitted Uses
General Provisions
The Project site is on the southeast corner of Washington Boulevard
and National Boulevard, and adjacent to the Expo Line located along
the southerly and westerly boundary. The project is transit oriented
and includes both residential and small-scale commercial uses to
provide services for both those living and working in the area, and
transit riders. The ground floor shall provide a mix of retail, eating
and drinking establishments, and artisan shops. Restaurant uses
shall not exceed more than 25% of the commercial space. The Proj-
ect shall provide open areas on the ground floor including a large
public open space directly on the corner, as well as outdoor dining
areas along Washington Boulevard. The second through fifth floors
shall contain the residential units, with a variety of unit types and
sizes to cater to different family sizes.
Allowed Uses and Requirements
The following is a complete list of uses that shall be allowed within the Legado Crossing Comprehensive
Plan:
Land Use
(1)
Permit Requirement
(2)
P - Permitted Use
AUP - Administrative Use Permit
CUP - Conditional Use Permit
See Specific Use
Regulations of
the Zoning Code
Alcoholic beverage sales AUP 17.400.015.B
Artisan shops P
Automated teller machines (ATMs) P 17.400.025
Bars, night clubs CUP
General retail stores P
Home Occupations P 17.400.055
Internet Café P
Mixed Use P 17.400.065
Outdoor retail sales and display
(3)
AUP 17.400.075
Parking facilities P
Personal services P
Restaurants P
Restaurants, outdoor dining P
Studios - art, dance, music, photography, etc. P
Telecommunications facilities, cellular
(4)
AUP 17.400.110
(1)
See Article 7 of the Culver City Zoning Code for definitions of the land uses listed.
(2)
See Chapter 17.530 of the Culver city Zoning Code for specific permit requirements.
(3)
Ancillary to a primary retail use.
(4)
Use shall not be permitted on the ground floor.
Legado Crossing Comprehensive Plan & Planned Development No. 12 - January 28, 2013|10 10|LAND USE/DEV. STANDARD
ATTACHMENT 6
742B. Development Standards
General Provisions
In addition to the development standards outlined herein, every
land use and structure shall comply with applicable requirements of
the Culver City Municipal Code (CCMC), Title 17, Zoning Code or as
amended.
1. Pedestrian Setbacks
The pedestrian environment of the project shall be enhanced by
providing a 12’ wide public sidewalk and 15’ wide pedestrian setback
along Washington Boulevard that shall be furnished with street trees,
planters, tree grates, benches, bicycle racks, trash receptacles, and
other street furniture consistent with the City’s Transit Oriented
Development District Streetscape Plan. In addition, the pedestrian
setback area provides opportunities for amenities such as seating
areas, landscape planters, and opportunities for outdoor dining.
Varied trellis features along Washington Boulevard provide shaded
entryways to the retail and restaurant spaces, as well as eye interest
from vehicles on Washington Boulevard.
The Project shall have a 12’ wide public sidewalk along National
Boulevard, and a 7’ wide public sidewalk along Wesley Street.
The building planes along these elevations shall provide varying
undulations to reduce the massing effect on the pedestrian
environment.
2. Building Setbacks
SETBACKS MINIMUM REQUIRED
Street Facing Washington Blvd. 15 feet
Street Facing National Blvd. None required
Street Facing Wesley St. None required
Adjoining Property None required
SETBACKS PROJECTIONS PERMITTED
Street Facing Washington Blvd Trellis 15 feet
Street Facing National Blvd Awnings and/or balconies 3 feet
Street Facing Wesley Street Awnings and/or balconies 3 feet
Adjoining Property None Permitted
Projections into setbacks shall comply with the following:
Building setbacks shall comply with the following:
3. Setback Projections
View from across Wesley Street
Legado Crossing Comprehensive Plan & Planned Development No. 12 - January 28, 2013
10
LAND USE/DEV. STANDARD
ATTACHMENT 6
743Building Setbacks - Wesley Street/National Blvd
Section 1
Section 2
Key Map (NTS)
Wall Section 2 - National Boulevard Wall Section 1 - Wesley Street
Section 3
Legado Crossing Comprehensive Plan & Planned Development No. 12 - January 28, 2013
11
LAND USE/DEV. STANDARD
ATTACHMENT 6
744Building Setbacks - Washington Blvd
Section 3
Key Map (NTS)
Wall Section 3 - Washington Boulevard
Trellis (2)
Trellis (1)
Legado Crossing Comprehensive Plan & Planned Development No. 12 - January 28, 2013
12
LAND USE/DEV. STANDARD
ATTACHMENT 6
745Key Map (NTS)
B. Development Standards
4. Building Heights
Buildings shall not exceed the maximum allowed height of 56 feet*.
Building heights shall vary at different points and elevations of the
building to provide focal relief and appropriate building scale to
surrounding development.
Roof-mounted mechanical equipment (e.g., air conditioning, heating,
exhaust, and ventilation ducts, etc.), shall be screened from public
view from adjoining public streets and rights-of-way. The method
of screening shall be architecturally compatible with other on-site
development in terms of colors, materials, and architectural style as
determined by the Planning Manager.
*Roof-mounted structures for the housing of mechanical equipment
required to operate and maintain the structure, shall be allowed, up
to a maximum of 13 feet 6 inches above the height of a building.
Structures for the housing of elevators and stairs shall be allowed up
to a maximum of 16 feet above the roofline of the building.
Building Sections
Legado Crossing Comprehensive Plan & Planned Development No. 12 - January 28, 2013
13
LAND USE/DEV. STANDARD
ATTACHMENT 6
746B. Development Standards
Total Parking Required/Provided
Parking by Type Required Provided
Total Number of Residential Stalls 199 201
Total Number of Commercial Stalls 128 128
Total Number of Public Parking Stalls 15 15
Total Number of Parking Stalls 342 344
Total Bicycle Parking Required/Provided
Parking by Type Required/Provided
Required Residential 10% of required stalls 20 Required Bike Stalls
Required Commercial 5% of required stalls 8 Required Bike Stalls
Provided Residential Lower Garage Level 24 Bike Stalls Provided
Provided Commercial Ground Level 26 Bike Stalls Provided
Total Number of Bike Stalls Provided 50 Bike Stalls Provided
Required Residential Parking
Residential Unit No. Units Required Stalls
Studio 3 1 3
1 Bedroom Unit 56 1 56
2 Bedroom Flat 34 2 68
2 Bedroom Th 12 2 24
3 Bedroom Th 10 2 20
Guest 115 1 per every 4 units 28
Total Number of Required Residential Parking Stalls 199
Note: The Total Number of Required Residential parking stalls includes:
Assigned accessible parking stalls for residents 3
Assigned accessible van parking stalls for residents 1
Unassigned accessible parking stalls for guests 1
Unassigned accessible van parking stalls for guest 1
Commercial Space Area s.f. Parking Factor Stalls
Retail 1 13,900 250 56
Retail 2 11,800 250 47
Restaurant 2,300 250 9
Café 1 3,000 250 12
Café 2 240 250 1
Outdoor Dining* 800 250 3
Total Number of Required Commercial Parking Stalls 128
Public Parking 15
Total Number of Parking Stalls 143
Required Commercial Parking
Note: The Total Number of Required Commercial parking stalls includes:
Accessible Parking Stalls 4
Accessible Van Parking Stalls 1
5. Parking Requirements
Vehicle Parking Plan
Vehicle Parking Plan All parking for the Project shall be on site. Legado
Crossing meets the requirements of the Culver City Municipal Code for
the number of parking spaces, as well as the standards for aisle width
and the dimensions for parking spaces. The parking plan shall provide
a total of 344 parking spaces including 201 residential stalls, and 128
commercial stalls and 15 public parking stalls.
Access to the parking area shall be provided from both Washington
Boulevard and Wesley Street. Vehicles shall enter and exit on the ground
level, and there shall be no access from National Boulevard. Parking on
the ground level shall be exclusively for public and commercial uses,
while the upper level shall have a mix of commercial and residential
parking spaces.
The lower level shall be exclusively for residential parking and
residential guest parking spaces. The drive aisles shall be 27 feet wide,
in compliance with the Culver City Municipal Code. In the center of the
parking area is the ramp which shall provide access to both commercial
and residential users to the lower levels. The ramp shall be 29 feet wide
and shall allow for vehicles to drive down to the lower levels as well as
up from them.
The parking structure shall offer preferred parking for low emission
vehicles (e.g. hybrid, alternative fuel and electrical automobiles) and
carpool vehicles as required by the California Green Building Code
(CGBC). Handicapped accessible spaces shall be provided per California
Building Code (CBC) regulations.
Numerical Parking Requirements
Commercial parking for the Project shall be provided at a ratio of 1 stall
per 250 square feet of retail and restaurant floor area consistent with
the Zoning Code parking requirements for shopping centers. Outdoor
dining areas up to 500 square feet per restaurant are covered under
these parking requirements. Outdoor dining areas larger than 500
square feet per restaurant shall be required to provide 1 stall per 250
square feet in excess of the initial 500 square feet, up to 800 square
feet or 3 stalls.
Residential Parking for the Project shall be provided at 1 stall for studio
and 1 bedroom units; 2 stall for 2 and 3 bedroom units; and residential
guest parking shall be provided at a ratio of 1 stall for every 4 residential
units consistent with the Zoning Code parking requirements for mixed
use developments.
*Area in excess of 500 square feet per restaurant tenant
Legado Crossing Comprehensive Plan & Planned Development No. 12 - January 28, 2013
14
LAND USE/DEV. STANDARD
ATTACHMENT 6
747B. Development Standards
Data
Use Standard Tandem Accessible
Van
Accessible
Total
Commercial 10 0 4 2 16
Public 15 0 0 0 15
Total 25 0 4 2 31
Bicycle Total (Outside and Inside Garage) 26
Parking Summary
CS = Commercial Stall
PP = Public Parking
Notes
Ground Level Garage
The ground level shall provide both commercial and public parking
spaces. A truck dock for deliveries to the commercial and residential
tenants shall be provided. Parking on the ground level shall be
exclusively for public and commercial uses.
Legado Crossing Comprehensive Plan & Planned Development No. 12 - January 28, 2013
15
LAND USE/DEV. STANDARD
ATTACHMENT 6
748B. Development Standards
Data
Use Standard Tandem Accessible
Van
Accessible
Total
Residential 10 9 0 0 19
Residential
Guest
3 0 1 1 5
Commercial 112 0 0 0 112
Total 125 9 1 1 136
Parking Summary
R = Residential Stall
RT = Residential Tandem Stall
RG = Residential Guest Stall
CS = Commercial Stall
Notes
Upper Level Garage
The Upper level garage is the level immediately below the ground
level. It shall provide the remainder of the commercial spaces and
some of the residential parking for both tenants and guests. Four
elevators and two stairways shall be provided for customers to
access the retail/commercial users.
The residential guest spaces shall be segregated in the south end of
this level behind security gates and fencing. Access to these spaces
shall be by key card or fob for the tenants. Guests shall use a keypad
to notify the tenants when they have arrived, who will be able to
remotely activate the security gates from their units to allow access
for their guests.
Tandem spaces shall only be assigned to units where both spaces
serve the same unit. Within the secured area, there is a ramp which
shall provide access for the residents and guests to and from the
lower level. Commercial users shall not have access to this ramp.
Legado Crossing Comprehensive Plan & Planned Development No. 12 - January 28, 2013
16
LAND USE/DEV. STANDARD
ATTACHMENT 6
749B. Development Standards
R = Residential Stall
RT = Residential Tandem Stall
RG = Residential Guest Stall
Data
Notes
Parking Summary
Use Standard Tandem Accessible
Van
Accessible
Total
Residential 103 47 3 1 154
Residential
Guest
23 0 0 0 23
Total 126 47 3 1 177
Bicycle Parking Total (Residential) 24
Lower Level Garage
The lower level garage shall be exclusively reserved for residential
tenant and guest parking. Access shall exclusively be from a ramp
from the upper level which shall be secured from the commercial
users and shall be accessed only by those who have access to the
secured residential portion on the upper level.
The tandem spaces shall only be assigned to units where both
spaces serve the same unit. There shall be 24 bicycle stalls located
along the southerly portion of the garage which shall be in a secured
room only accessible by residents.
Legado Crossing Comprehensive Plan & Planned Development No. 12 - January 28, 2013
17
LAND USE/DEV. STANDARD
ATTACHMENT 6
7506. Parking Security
The Project shall provide direct vehicular access from both
Washington Boulevard and Wesley Street. The driveways shall provide
both ingress and egress for the public, commercial and residential
spaces.
The entrance off of Washington Boulevard shall include a sentry gate
with a short raised median to separate ingress and egress traffic and
shall be located a minimum of 30 feet past the sidewalk to allow for
a stacking area before the sentry gate. The entrance off of Wesley
Street shall provide direct access to the 15 public parking spaces.
There shall be a sentry gate beyond the public parking area with a
short raised median to separate ingress and egress traffic. On the
upper level parking a security gate shall be provided to separate the
commercial parking with the access to the residential parking on
that level and the lower level parking.
All on-site parking including commercial, residential and public
parking shall be subject to the provisions of the Parking Management
Plan and any other applicable provisions required by the Project
conditions of approval.
B. Development Standards
Key Map (NTS)
Parking Entrance A
Parking Entrance B
Location of Gate
SECURITY FOR ENTRANCE A
SECURITY FOR ENTRANCE B
(At Wesley St.)
(At Washington Blvd.)
f t.
SECURITY FOR ENTRANCE A
SECURITY FOR ENTRANCE B
(At Wesley St.)
(At Washington Blvd.)
f t.
SECURITY FOR ENTRANCE A
SECURITY FOR ENTRANCE B
(At Wesley St.)
(At Washington Blvd.)
f t.
Legado Crossing Comprehensive Plan & Planned Development No. 12 - January 28, 2013
18
LAND USE/DEV. STANDARD
ATTACHMENT 6
751B. Development Standards
Lower Level Garage Ground Level (Street) Ground Level (Garage)
14 Bike Spaces (Commercial) 12 Bike Spaces (Commercial) 24 Bike Spaces (Residential)
Total Bicycle Parking Required/Provided
Parking by Type Required/Provided
Required Residential 10% of required stalls 20 Required
Required Commercial 5% of required stalls 8 Required
Provided Residential Lower Level 24 Provided
Provided Commercial Ground Level (Street) 14 Provided
Provided Commercial Ground Level (Garage) 12 Provided
Total Provided Bicycle Parking 50 Provided
7. Bicycle Parking
The Project shall provide a total of 50 bicycle parking stalls, of which
14 shall be located along the public sidewalk fronting Washington
Boulevard, and along the corner of Washington and National
Boulevard. These 14 bicycle stalls shall be conveniently located
adjacent the public open space, as well as the retail/restaurant
tenant spaces. 12 additional bicycle stalls shall be provided on-site
in the ground level parking area. The remaining 24 bicycle stalls
shall be located on the lower level of the parking garage in a secured
room only accessible by residents.
Legado Crossing Comprehensive Plan & Planned Development No. 12 - January 28, 2013
19
LAND USE/DEV. STANDARD
ATTACHMENT 6
752B. Development Standards
Loading Dock
Wesley Street
8. Loading
Delivery for commercial users shall be provided via a truck dock along
the south property line of the site. This dock shall have access from
Wesley Street. The dock shall be designed to allow for trucks with
one full size trailer, as well as for smaller vans, panel trucks or other
delivery vehicles. Drivers shall have direct access to the retail uses
on the ground level from the dock through appropriate corridors.
Large commercial moving vans loading and unloading furniture
and goods for residents as they move in or out shall access the
residential units through the truck dock. Residents who use small
residential vans, pickup trucks and panel trucks for moving in or out
shall either use the truck dock or shall have access to the units from
the secured residential parking areas on either the upper or lower
levels. All residential move-in and out deliveries shall be from either
the truck dock or the secured residential parking areas, and these
vehicles shall not block access to the commercial parking areas or
access to any commercial or public parking spaces.
Legado Crossing Comprehensive Plan & Planned Development No. 12 - January 28, 2013
20
LAND USE/DEV. STANDARD
ATTACHMENT 6
753B. Development Standards
Key Map (NTS)
9. Trash and Recycling Management Plan
A trash room shall be located on each residential level with two trash
chutes per level, one chute for trash and the other chute for recyclables.
The chutes shall empty into bins on the ground level. These bins
shall be towed to the curb of Wesley Street for pickup pursuant to the
requirements of the City’s Sanitation Division.
Commercial Trash
Retail 1, Cafe 1, Cafe 2, and Restaurant shall dispose of their trash in
the trash compactor at the loading dock. Retail 2 shall dispose of their
trash in the trash compactor adjacent to Stair 1. The trash compactors
shall be emptied pursuant to the requirements of the City’s Sanitation
Division.
Commercial Recyclables
Retail 1, Cafe 1, Cafe 2, and Restaurant shall dispose of their recyclable
items at the recycling enclosure adjacent to the loading dock. The
recycling bins shall be towed to the curb of Wesley Street for pick up
pursuant to the requirements of the City’s Sanitation Division. Retail
2 shall dispose of their recyclable items at the recycling enclosure
adjacent to the vehicular ramp. The recycling bins shall be towed to the
curb of Wesley Street for pick up pursuant to the requirements of the
City’s Sanitation Division.
Recycling
Trash Compactor
Trash
Legado Crossing Comprehensive Plan & Planned Development No. 12 - January 28, 2013
21
LAND USE/DEV. STANDARD
ATTACHMENT 6
7542nd Level Key Plan (NTS) Ground Level Key Plan (NTS)
B. Development Standards
10. Signage
To ensure that signs for the project are uniquely designed and
compatible with the overall architectural theme of the project, all
signage shall be processed through a Master Sign Program pursuant
to Zoning Code Section 17.330.050.D.2 or as amended.
11. Outdoor Dining
Outdoor dining is a key contributor to the interactive pedestrian
atmosphere which will stimulate the shopping and dining experience.
Areas have been identified, as shown on the diagram, where outdoor
dining may take place. Multiple areas are open to Washington
Boulevard further activating the pedestrian orientation and
environment along this frontage. The following diagram highlights
the allowable areas for outdoor dining.
Potential Outdoor Dining Area
Ground Level - Potential Outdoor Dining Area
Podium Level - Potential Outdoor Dining Area
• An unobstructed minimum 4 foot (4’-0”) clear wide
pedestrian pathway shall be maintained at all times between
the outside boundary of any outdoor dining areas and any
obstruction.
• The design of furniture, barriers and equipment to be used
within any outdoor dining area shall be high quality and
harmonious and compatible with the overall architecture
of the project as well as any site furniture provided by the
development
• No additional canopies or awnings are permitted. Inclement
weather enclosures shall be allowed provided the enclosure
is constructed of clear glass folding or stacking panels that
can be stored unobtrusively within the interior of the tenant
space. Plastic or acrylic enclosures of any kind shall not be
permitted.
• Umbrellas shall have a minimum vertical clearance of 6’-8”
and shall not exceed a maximum height of 13’-0”
• Portable heaters are subject to prior Landlord and City
approval and shall be of uniform design. They shall not project
beyond the limit of the outdoor dining area and shall require
written approval of the City of Culver City Fire Marshall prior
to placement.
• Establishments that serve alcoholic beverages in the outdoor
dining area shall provide a physical barrier that meets the
requirements of this document. No barrier is required if
alcohol will not be served. Barriers shall not exceed three feet-
six inches (3’-6”) in height. All barrier systems shall maintain
at least 70% transparency.
• All outdoor dining areas shall be accessible to the disabled in
accordance with ADA standards.
• Outdoor dining areas shall be operated in a manner that
meets all requirements of the Los Angeles County Health
Department.
• Restaurant management shall keep the outdoor dining area
clear of litter, food scraps, and soiled dishes at all times.
Trash receptacles shall be provided in the outdoor dining
areas used for consuming take-out items.
All proposed outdoor dining areas shall be subject to a conformance
review with the adopted Comprehensive Plan and approval by the
Planning Division prior to installation and operation. Conditions
of approval may be placed on outdoor dining areas to ensure
conformance with the standards contained herein, compatibility
with adjacent uses, and any other applicable City requirements.
Legado Crossing Comprehensive Plan & Planned Development No. 12 - January 28, 2013
22
LAND USE/DEV. STANDARD
ATTACHMENT 6
755C. Administration
Relationship to Other Regulations
This comprehensive Plan provides policies, standards and
regulations guiding the development the Project identified in Section
1, Project Description. Specific topics not addressed or provided
in this Comprehensive Plan shall be governed by the Culver City
Municipal Code. No provision of this Comprehensive Plan is intended
to repeal, abrogate, annul, impair, or interfere with any existing
ordinance, resolutions, or policy except: a) as specifically repealed
by the adoptions of this Comprehensive Plan; or b) where this
Comprehensive Plan’s provisions are more precise or restrictive than
the existing Municipal Code. Where provisions of this Comprehensive
Plan impose more restrictive regulations than required by any other
ordinance, resolution or policy, the provisions of this Comprehensive
Plan shall govern.
Amendments
Modifications to the Comprehensive Plan shall be pursuant to the
Culver City Zoning Code, Section 17.560.025 Comprehensive Plan
Modifications, Major and Minor or as amended.
View from across Washington Blvd at Wesley Street
View to the Sideyard View From National Boulevard
Legado Crossing Comprehensive Plan & Planned Development No. 12 - January 28, 2013
23
ADMINISTRATION
ATTACHMENT 6
75604 SUSTAINABILITY
Legado Crossing Comprehensive Plan & Planned Development No. 12 - January 28, 2013
24
ATTACHMENT 6
757SUSTAINABILITY
Energy saving and sustainable design is integral to the Project. It is
incorporated throughout in the building systems and in the choice
of materials. The Project shall incorporate green building design
as demonstrated in the list below, which is categorized into three
main categories: conservation; energy efficiency; carbon emission
reduction.
Conservation
In an effort to promote the conservation, reduction, reuse, and
recycling of renewable and non-renewable resources, the Project is
actively participating in this endeavor by adopting the following:
• Implementing a construction and demolition waste diversion
plan that will divert at least 50% of construction waste away
from landfills
• Utilize storm water filtration systems to capture and cleanse
storm water prior to discharging into public storm drain
• Use recycled materials and low volatile organic compounds
(VOC) in building materials
Energy Efficiency
Below is a list of energy efficient and sustainable specifications that
shall be used and incorporated into the Project:
• Low flow fixtures and low consumption urinals
• Landscape with drought tolerant vegetation and efficient
irrigation systems
• Photovoltaic electricity generation
• Dual low emissivity glazing
• High reflective roof material
• High efficiency heating and air conditioning systems
Carbon Emission Reduction
Below is a list of carbon emission reduction elements that shall be
incorporated into the Project:
• Mixed use development adjacent to public transit
• High residential density
• Bike Station (for storage and changing rooms)
LEED Certification
Upon completion of the project, it is expected that the Project will
obtain Gold Certification under the provisions of the Leadership in
Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) program.
The corner of Washington and Wesley Street
Legado Crossing Comprehensive Plan & Planned Development No. 12 - January 28, 2013
25
SUSTAINABILITY
ATTACHMENT 6
75805 SITE PLAN/FLOOR PLANS
Legado Crossing Comprehensive Plan & Planned Development No. 12 - January 28, 2013
26
ATTACHMENT 6
759Unit Type Description
2nd
Level
3rd
Level
4th
Level
No. Unit Types Unit s.f.
L1 Studio 1 1 1 3 607
1B1 1 Bedroom Flat 16 17 5 38 762
1B2a 1 Bedroom Flat 1 1 1 3 754
1B2b 1 Bedroom Flat 1 1 1 3 756
1B3 1 Bedroom Flat 4 4 4 12 738
1B1TH 2 Bedroom Townhouse 0 0 12 12 1,289
2B2 2 Bedroom Flat 13 14 5 32 1,104
2B3 2 Bedroom Flat 1 1 0 2 1,114
2B2TH 3 Bedroom Townhouse 0 0 9 9 1,758
2B3TH 3 Bedroom Townhouse 0 0 1 1 1,844
Number of Units per level 37 39 39
Total Number of Units 115
Unit Type Number of Units Percentage
Studio 3 2.6%
1 Bedroom Flat 56 48.7%
2 Bedroom Flat 34 29.6%
2 Bedroom Townhouse 12 10.4%
3 Bedroom Townhouse 10 8.7%
Totals 115 100.0%
Overall Unit Summary
Unit Mix
Level Square Footage
Lower Level Garage 66,120
Upper Level Garage 68,972
Ground Level 62,837
Second Level 43,441
Third Level 42,776
Fourth Level 42,776
Fifth Level | Mezzanine 21,677
Totals 348,599
Gross Area Per Level
Residential Unit Summary
Summary Tables
Level Square Footage
Second Level 11,949
Public Park Not Included*
Private Open Space Provided*
Level Storage Units
Lower Garage Level 83
Upper Garage Level 32
Total Number of Storage Units 115
Residential Storage Provided
Residential Unit Summary
The Project is comprised of five levels including the ground level
which comprises the retail/restaurant tenant spaces and ground
level parking. The second level comprises a total of 37 units, as
well as the residential courtyard and pool with private amenities for
residents. The third level has 39 units, while the fourth level includes
39 units that have a second floor above on the fifth level.
Residential storage units are provided in the upper and lower garage
levels. These storage units shall be in a secured area only accessible
by residents. A total of 32 storage units shall be provided on the
upper garage level and 83 on the lower garage level.
Residential Amenities
The Project provides a number of on-site amenities for residential
tenants including a recreation room and fitness center, and a large
interior central courtyard with a swimming pool, shade structures,
BBQ area, and bench seating and tables.
Legado Crossing Comprehensive Plan & Planned Development No. 12 - January 28, 2013
27
SITE PLANS/FLOOR PLANS
ATTACHMENT 6
760Project Site Plan
Lower Level Public Open Space Area
Upper Level Public Open Space Area
Private Outdoor Courtyard
Building Footprint
Legado Crossing Comprehensive Plan & Planned Development No. 12 - January 28, 2013
28
SITE PLANS/FLOOR PLANS
ATTACHMENT 6
761Bike Stalls
(4 Spaces)
Bike Stalls
(4 Spaces)
Bike Stalls
(4 Spaces)
Bike Stalls
(2 Spaces)
Ground Level Floor Plan
Data
Use Standard Tandem Accessible
Van
Accessible
Total
Commercial 10 0 4 2 16
Public 15 0 0 0 15
Total 25 0 4 2 31
Total Bicycle Parking (Outside and Inside Garage) 26
Use Area
Retail 1 13,900 s.f.
Retail 2 11,800 s.f.
Restaurant 2,300 s.f.
Cafe 1 3,000 s.f.
Parking Summary
Square Footage Summary
CS = Commercial Stall
PP = Public Parking
Notes
Legado Crossing Comprehensive Plan & Planned Development No. 12 - January 28, 2013
29
SITE PLANS/FLOOR PLANS
ATTACHMENT 6
762Commercial Space | Floor Plan/Lease Space
Key Map (NTS)
Legado Crossing Comprehensive Plan & Planned Development No. 12 - January 28, 2013
30
SITE PLANS/FLOOR PLANS
Level 1 - Retail 1, Cafe 1, and Restaurant
ATTACHMENT 6
763Commercial Space | Floor Plan/Lease Space
Level 1 - Retail 2
Key Plan (NTS)
Legado Crossing Comprehensive Plan & Planned Development No. 12 - January 28, 2013
31
SITE PLANS/FLOOR PLANS
ATTACHMENT 6
764Second Level
Data
Unit Summary
Unit Type Description Number of Units
L1 Studio 1
1B1 1 Bedroom Flat 16
1B2a 1 Bedroom Flat 1
1B2b 1 Bedroom Flat 1
1B3 1 Bedroom Flat 4
1B1TH 2 Bedroom Townhouse 0
2B2 2 Bedroom Flat 13
2B3 2 Bedroom Flat 1
2B2TH 3 Bedroom Townhouse 0
2B2TH-2 3 Bedroom Townhouse 0
2B3TH 3 Bedroom Townhouse 0
Total Number of Units 37
Cafe Space 2 Enlargement
L1
Legado Crossing Comprehensive Plan & Planned Development No. 12 - January 28, 2013
32
SITE PLANS/FLOOR PLANS
ATTACHMENT 6
765Third Level
Data
Unit Summary
Unit Type Description Number of Units
L1 Studio 1
1B1 1 Bedroom Flat 17
1B2a 1 Bedroom Flat 1
1B2b 1 Bedroom Flat 1
1B3 1 Bedroom Flat 4
1B1TH 2 Bedroom Townhouse 0
2B2 2 Bedroom Flat 14
2B3 2 Bedroom Flat 1
2B2TH 3 Bedroom Townhouse 0
2B3TH 3 Bedroom Townhouse 0
Total Number of Units 39
L1
Legado Crossing Comprehensive Plan & Planned Development No. 12 - January 28, 2013
33
SITE PLANS/FLOOR PLANS
ATTACHMENT 6
766Fourth Level
Data
Unit Summary
Unit Type Description Number of Units
L1 Studio 1
1B1 1 Bedroom Flat 5
1B2a 1 Bedroom Flat 1
1B2b 1 Bedroom Flat 1
1B3 1 Bedroom Flat 4
1B1TH 2 Bedroom Townhouse 12
2B2 2 Bedroom Flat 5
2B3 2 Bedroom Flat 0
2B2TH 3 Bedroom Townhouse 9
2B3TH 3 Bedroom Townhouse 1
Total Number of Units 39
L1
Legado Crossing Comprehensive Plan & Planned Development No. 12 - January 28, 2013
34
SITE PLANS/FLOOR PLANS
ATTACHMENT 6
767Fifth Level | Mezzanine
Legado Crossing Comprehensive Plan & Planned Development No. 12 - January 28, 2013
35
SITE PLANS/FLOOR PLANS
ATTACHMENT 6
768Roof Level
Legado Crossing Comprehensive Plan & Planned Development No. 12 - January 28, 2013
36
SITE PLANS/FLOOR PLANS
ATTACHMENT 6
769Patios and balconies vary by unit, level, location and orientation and
therefore are not shown on the unit plans. See floor plans for each level.
754 sf
756 sf
12 Units Total
Typical Unit Plans
3 Units Total
38 Units Total
3 Units Total
3 Units Total
738 sf
Legado Crossing Comprehensive Plan & Planned Development No. 12 - January 28, 2013
37
SITE PLANS/FLOOR PLANS
ATTACHMENT 6
770Patios and balconies vary by unit, level, location and orientation and
herefore are not shown on the unit plans. See floor plans for each level.
Typical Unit Plans
2 Units Total 12 Units Total 9 Units Total
32 Units Total
1104 sf
1114 sf 1289 sf
1758 sf
Legado Crossing Comprehensive Plan & Planned Development No. 12 - January 28, 2013
38
SITE PLANS/FLOOR PLANS
ATTACHMENT 6
771Patios and balconies vary by unit, level, location and orientation and
herefore are not shown on the unit plans. See floor plans for each level.
Typical Unit Plans
1 Units Total
1844 sf
Legado Crossing Comprehensive Plan & Planned Development No. 12 - January 28, 2013
39
SITE PLANS/FLOOR PLANS
ATTACHMENT 6
77206 ELEVATIONS
Legado Crossing Comprehensive Plan & Planned Development No. 12 - January 28, 2013
40
ATTACHMENT 6
773Washington Boulevard Elevation
Legado Crossing Comprehensive Plan & Planned Development No. 12 - January 28, 2013
41
ELEVATIONS
ATTACHMENT 6
774National Boulevard Elevation
Legado Crossing Comprehensive Plan & Planned Development No. 12 - January 28, 2013
42
ELEVATIONS
ATTACHMENT 6
775Side Yard Elevation
Legado Crossing Comprehensive Plan & Planned Development No. 12 - January 28, 2013
43
ELEVATIONS
ATTACHMENT 6
776Wesley Street Elevation
Legado Crossing Comprehensive Plan & Planned Development No. 12 - January 28, 2013
44
ELEVATIONS
ATTACHMENT 6
777Stucco Color 1
To Match
DE5718
Mother Earth
Dunn-Edwards or Equal
Stucco Color 2
To Match
DE6243
Union Spring
Dunn-Edwards or Equal
Stucco Color 3
To Match
DEW339
Bone China
Dunn-Edwards or Equal
Stucco Color 4
To Match
DEW339
Bone China
Smooth Finish
Dunn-Edwards or Equal
Stucco Color 5
To Match
DE6370
Charcoal Smudge
Dunn-Edwards or Equal
Stucco Color 6
To Match
DE5515
Ripe Pear
Dunn-Edwards or Equal
NOVEMBER 30, 2012|1010|Stucco Color 7
To Mach Dark Bronze|10101010|Metal Wire Mesh
3/16”opening, 11 GA
over/under
To Match Clear Anodized
15|1010|Clear Anodized Aluminum
Storefront
With Clear Glass
16|1010|Architectural Plaster
Simulated Concrete 17|1010|Standing Seam Metal
(Wall Panel-Pro-Loc I)
To Match DE6243
Union Springs|10 10|Vinyl Window to Match
Clear Anodized
11
Vinyl Window to Match
Dark Bronze
12
Metal Rail / Frame /
Panel / Brace
To Match Dark Bronze
13
Metal Wire Mesh
5/16”opening, 9 GA
over/under
To Match Dark Bronze
14b
Metal Wire Mesh
5/16”opening, 9 GA
over/under
To Match Clear Anodized
14a
Corrugated Metal Siding
(Wall Panel-V-Line 32)
Galvanized|1010|Corrugated Metal Siding
(Wall Panel-V-Line 32)
To Match DE5718
Mother Earth
10
Colors and Materials List
Legado Crossing Comprehensive Plan & Planned Development No. 12 - January 28, 2013
45
ELEVATIONS
ATTACHMENT 6
778
Trellis (1) Plan View Trellis (2) Plan View
Trellis Elevations/Details
Key Map (NTS)
Trellis (2) Elevation
Trellis (2)
Trellis (1) Beyond
Section View Partial Washington Blvd. Elevation
Trellis (1) Elevation
Trellis (2)
Trellis (1)
Legado Crossing Comprehensive Plan & Planned Development No. 12 - January 28, 2013
46
ELEVATION
ATTACHMENT 6
779Legado Crossing Comprehensive Plan & Planned Development No. 12 - January 28, 2013
47
07 CONCEPTUAL LANDSCAPE PLAN
ATTACHMENT 6
780Conceptual Landscape Plan
Public Art - Water Feature
The park includes a water feature at the ground level that is intended
to create a kinetic experience with the movement of falling water.
The artist’s design is intended to resemble a fabric of “sequins”,
with each sequin moving individually from the action of water and
scattering reflected light over the space.
Landscape
Three large planting areas on the lower level, as well as two on the
podium level define the space. The topography of these areas is
shaped to flow with the overall design of the plaza, and add visual
interest. The planting palette has distinct themes inspired by various
native Californian eco systems – riparian, chaparral and coastal
bluff. The area along National Boulevard will feature a riparian
environment: A large, multi-trunk Western Sycamore Tree (Platanus
Racemosa) provides shade and creates a counterpoint to the large
Ficus Tree in the park across the street. Along with the Sycamore,
smaller riparian plants (Spice bush (Calicanthus Occidentalus),
Coralbells (Heuchera), Scarlet Monkeyflower (Mimulus Cardinalis),
California Sword Fern (Woodwardia Fimbriata), etc), Western Mock
Orange (Philadelphus Lewisii) and a Western Redbud Tree (Cercis
Occidentalis) are combined to create a lush, layered landscape.
Landscape Concept
The Legado Crossing exterior has four distinctive landscape areas;
the Public Park, the Washington National TOD Streetscape, On-site
Perimeter Landscape, and the Residential Courtyard. Each having
unique landscape characters summarized below.
Public Park Concept Plan
The landscape design for the Project public park is intended to
soften the intersection of Washington and National Boulevards – a
prominent corner in the Washington National TOD District. The park
is a multi-purpose space – an amenity welcoming Expo Line travelers
arriving at the Culver City Expo transit station and an attractive
respite for local residents, workers and shoppers.
The park is an organic, flowing space rather than a typical symmetric
commercial plaza. The open space is provided on two levels to create
variety in opportunities for sitting, socializing and an overlook for the
emerging commercial area and the new light rail train.
The plan includes on grade planting to accommodate mature tree
planting along the project western edge, a water feature (which is
proposed for the project public art piece as required under the Art
in Public Places Ordinance), on grade planters with native trees,
shrubs and ground covers and stylized bench seating. The elevation
of the park at Washington and National Boulevards is resolved at
the building line with a series stepped plazas and planters. Overall,
the public open space provides an attractive and much needed park
amenity for the area.
Hardscape
The park gently slopes from the street frontage to the building line
with ramps and series of steps. Some of the grade changes are
resolved as planters or with seating. There is significant planter area
surrounded by colored concrete paving, saw cut to emphasize the
stylized paving pattern.
Seating
Free-form bench seating is located within the on-grade and second
level open space. The bench seating helps organize and define the
space and is proposed to be constructed of a natural material that
provides a tactile, but comfortable sitting experience.
View of the corner of National and Washington Blvd
*Water feature conceptual illustration only
The two planting areas along Washington Boulevard will feature a
chaparral environment. In the planter closer to the street several
Bigberry Manzanita (Arctostaphylos Glauca) and Desert Willow
(Chitalpa) Trees will provide a shade canopy. These trees have a
more delicate character and create interest with their trunk shapes.
The Chitalpa Tree as well as additional plants like the California
Sage Brush (Artemisia Californica), Desert Lavender (Hyptis Emoryi),
California Evening Primrose (Oenothera Californica), etc. create a
fragrant landscape. The planter closer to the staircase leading up
is planted with Acacia trees (Acacia Stenophylla) that create a taller,
but transparent / lace-like filter to the building.
The raised planter beds upstairs will reference a coastal bluff
environment: A California Laurel Tree (Umbellularia Californica) is
combined with Wild Lilac (Cantus spp.), Coyote Mint (Mona Della
Villas), Coffee Berry (Rhombus Californica), Hummingbird Sage
(Salvia Spathacea), etc. The filtration planters located in this area
feature riparian plants like Creek Dogwood (Cornus sericea), Rush
(Juncus spp.), etc.
Legado Crossing Comprehensive Plan & Planned Development No. 12 - January 28, 2013
48
LANDSCAPE PLANS
ATTACHMENT 6
781Conceptual Landscape Plan
Washington National TOD District Streetscape Plan
The Washington National TOD District Streetscape shall follow pre-
established Culver City TOD District Streetscape Plan. Street trees
and furnishings shall be coordinated with the City. The project is
required to comply with the streetscape program for the area which is
to be funded on a pro rata basis by area developments. Streetscape
improvements shall include new street trees, planters, tree grates,
way-finding signs, benches, trash receptacles, bicycle racks, and
other street furniture.
On-Site Perimeter Landscape at Ground Level
The perimeter plantings along National Blvd. and the southern
façade shall be a combination of narrow, vertical plant materials
that prevent graffiti where blank walls occur, and help to reduce the
scale of the buildings. These plant materials shall include: Alphonse
Karr Bamboo, Silver Sheen Kohuhu (Pittosporum tenuifolium ‘Silver
Sheen’), and Lavender Starflower (Grewia occidentalis).
Along Washington Blvd. at the architectural trellis that extends from
the building along the retail spaces just east of the community
benefit open space, flowering vines shall be planted at the base
of each column so that the trellis will have an attractive, flowering
cover. A narrow Italian Cypress shall be planted at each column, to
provide a landscape expression of the rhythm of the columns. A low
hedge between the Cypress trees separates the sidewalk traffic from
the storefront/restaurant activity.
Residential Courtyard at Podium Level
The landscape design of the private courtyard at the podium level
shall provide the residents of the development with the opportunity
to enjoy the open space both within and outside of the pool
enclosure. Outside of the enclosure, there shall be a common
space, contiguous to the interior amenities, for group gatherings.
A gas barbeque and built-in counter top shall be provided for the
space. The walkway that meanders around the perimeter of the
space shall be landscaped with raised planters generally occurring
on both sides of the walkway. Along the path there shall be a sitting
‘nook’ for a small group of people; a plinth with a piece of sculpture;
a recycled ‘wood’ deck area in front of a fireplace; and a ‘dining’ area
with another gas BBQ in a built-in countertop and space for multiple
groupings of tables and chairs.
The plant palette encompassing this meandering walkway shall
include a rich variety of plant materials such as: Lemon Bottlebrush,
Olive, Smoke Tree, Silk Floss Tree, varieties of Bamboo, Strawberry
Tree and Italian Cypress. A portion of the planters shall be filtration
planters that treat the rainwater from the roof before it is discharged
into the municipal stormwater system. Inside the pool enclosure,
there shall be a pool and spa with an associated outdoor shower;
two cabanas; lounging deck around the pool; and a large metal trellis
that covers a ‘wood’ deck area for shaded seating, and for enjoying
the second side of the outdoor fireplace.
Legado Crossing Comprehensive Plan & Planned Development No. 12 - January 28, 2013
49
DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
ATTACHMENT 6
782Conceptual Streetscape Plan & On-Site Perimeter Landscaping
Legado Crossing Comprehensive Plan & Planned Development No. 12 - January 28, 2013
50
LANDSCAPE PLANS
ATTACHMENT 6
783Conceptual Plaza Landscape
Legado Crossing Comprehensive Plan & Planned Development No. 12 - January 28, 2013
51
PUBLIC PARK/STREETSCAPE
ATTACHMENT 6
784Conceptual Courtyard Landscape Plan
Legado Crossing Comprehensive Plan & Planned Development No. 12 - January 28, 2013
52
LANDSCAPE PLANS
ATTACHMENT 6
785NOTE: Street furniture shall be consistent with the City’s Transit
Oriented Development District Streetscape Plan. Final location, type,
and size of tree wells to be determined by the City prior to building
permit issuance.
TOD District Streetscape Plan
Typical Tree Well Detail
Legado Crossing Comprehensive Plan & Planned Development No. 12 - January 28, 2013
53
LANDSCAPE PLANS
ATTACHMENT 6
786Legado Crossing Comprehensive Plan & Planned Development No. 12 - January 28, 2013
54
08 CONCEPTUAL LIGHTING
ATTACHMENT 6
787+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Lighting Elevation #2 - National Boulevard
Lighting Elevation #1 - Washington Boulevard
+
Wall Mounted Sconce Accent Light Soffit Mounted Downlight
+
Wall Mounted Sconce Accent Light Soffit Mounted Downlight
Conceptual Lighting Elevations
Wall Mounted Sconce
Legado Crossing Comprehensive Plan & Planned Development No. 12 - January 28, 2013
55
CONCEPTUAL LIGHTING
ATTACHMENT 6
788Lighting Elevation #3 - Side Yard
Lighting Elevation #4 - Wesley Street
+
Wall Mounted Sconce Accent Light Soffit Mounted Downlight
+
Wall Mounted Sconce Accent Light Soffit Mounted Downlight
Conceptual Lighting Elevations
Legado Crossing Comprehensive Plan & Planned Development No. 12 - January 28, 2013
56
CONCEPTUAL LIGHTING
ATTACHMENT 6
789Legado Crossing Comprehensive Plan & Planned Development No. 12 - January 28, 2013
57
09 CIVIL ENGINEERING
ATTACHMENT 6
790Infrastructure
Infrastructure and Community Facilities District: Based upon the
proposed development described in the Comprehensive Plan, the
Site will require sewer service improvements. It will not require
major upgrades to water or gas infrastructure however, some utility
relocation as well as various street and streetscape improvements
will be required. The property owner/developer is responsible for all
project related public improvements.
The precise extent and costs for the infrastructure improvements
will be determined prior to issuance of a building permit. These
costs will generally be shared on a pro rata basis with other TOD
developments, and may potentially be funded through formation
of a community facilities district (CFD). CFD’s provide one financial
tool for commercial property owners within the TOD District to help
fund public improvements through private property assessment and
bond finance. Required off-site improvements which may be funded
through a CFD include:
• New Infrastructure
• Utility Relocations
• Streetscape Improvements
• On-going maintenance
Establishment of a CFD can ensure timely completion of all necessary
pubic improvements. An infrastructure report has been prepared to
identify the necessary improvements to support formation of the CFD
consistent with Section 15.12.035 of the Culver City Municipal Code.
Legado Crossing Comprehensive Plan & Planned Development No. 12 - January 28, 2013
58
CIVIL ENGINEERING
ATTACHMENT 6
791Fine Grading and Drainage Plan
Legado Crossing Comprehensive Plan & Planned Development No. 12 - January 28, 2013
59
CIVIL ENGINEERING
FOR REFERENCE ONLY, SUBJECT
TO FINAL REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE
CITY ENGINEER
ATTACHMENT 6
792Standard Urban Stormwater Mitigation Plan
Legado Crossing Comprehensive Plan & Planned Development No. 12 - January 28, 2013
60
CIVIL ENGINEERING
FOR REFERENCE ONLY, SUBJECT
TO FINAL REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE
CITY ENGINEER
ATTACHMENT 6
793Utility Plan
FOR REFERENCE ONLY, SUBJECT
TO FINAL REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE
CITY ENGINEER
Legado Crossing Comprehensive Plan & Planned Development No. 12 - January 28, 2013
61
CIVIL ENGINEERING
ATTACHMENT 6
794Signing and Striping Plan
Legado Crossing Comprehensive Plan & Planned Development No. 12 - January 28, 2013
62
CIVIL ENGINEERING
FOR REFERENCE ONLY, SUBJECT
TO FINAL REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE
CITY ENGINEER
ATTACHMENT 6
795Sewer Plan and Profile
Legado Crossing Comprehensive Plan & Planned Development No. 12 - January 28, 2013
63
CIVIL ENGINEERING
FOR REFERENCE ONLY, SUBJECT
TO FINAL REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE
CITY ENGINEER
ATTACHMENT 6
796Typical Sections
Legado Crossing Comprehensive Plan & Planned Development No. 12 - January 28, 2013
64
CIVIL ENGINEERING
FOR REFERENCE ONLY, SUBJECT
TO FINAL REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE
CITY ENGINEER
ATTACHMENT 6
797Wesley Street Plan and Profile
Legado Crossing Comprehensive Plan & Planned Development No. 12 - January 28, 2013
65
CIVIL ENGINEERING
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
I
J
K
1 2 3 6 4 5 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
L
CITY OF CULVER CITY GPS MON. NO. 13
16
16
REVISION DATES
(DESIGN STAGE ONLY)
TRACT NO. 3772 MAR. 2011|1010|STREET KEY NOTES|1010|MATCH LINE STA: 13+29.56
SEE SHEET 2
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
I
J
K
1 2 3 6 4 5 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
L
CITY OF CULVER CITY GPS MON. NO. 13
16
16
REVISION DATES
(DESIGN STAGE ONLY)
TRACT NO. 3772 MAR. 2011|1010|STREET KEY NOTES|1010|MATCH LINE STA: 13+29.56
SEE SHEET 2
FOR REFERENCE ONLY, SUBJECT
TO FINAL REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE
CITY ENGINEER
ATTACHMENT 6
798Washington Boulevard Plan and Profile
Legado Crossing Comprehensive Plan & Planned Development No. 12 - January 28, 2013
66
CIVIL ENGINEERING
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
I
J
K
1 2 3 6 4 5 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
L
CITY OF CULVER CITY GPS MON. NO. 13
16
16
REVISION DATES
(DESIGN STAGE ONLY)
TRACT NO. 3772 MAR. 2011|1010|STREET KEY NOTES|1010|MATCH LINE STA: 13+29.56 - SEE SHEET 1
MATCH LINE STA: 10+93.22 - SEE SHEET 3
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
I
J
K
1 2 3 6 4 5 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
L
CITY OF CULVER CITY GPS MON. NO. 13
16
16
REVISION DATES
(DESIGN STAGE ONLY)
TRACT NO. 3772 MAR. 2011|1010|STREET KEY NOTES|1010|MATCH LINE STA: 13+29.56 - SEE SHEET 1
MATCH LINE STA: 10+93.22 - SEE SHEET 3
FOR REFERENCE ONLY, SUBJECT
TO FINAL REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE
CITY ENGINEER
ATTACHMENT 6
799National Boulevard Plan and Profile
Legado Crossing Comprehensive Plan & Planned Development No. 12 - January 28, 2013
67
CIVIL ENGINEERING
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
I
J
K
1 2 3 6 4 5 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
L
CITY OF CULVER CITY GPS MON. NO. 13
16
16
REVISION DATES
(DESIGN STAGE ONLY)
TRACT NO. 3772 MAR. 2011|1010|STREET KEY NOTES|1010|MATCH LINE STA: 10+93.22
SEE SHEET 2
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
I
J
K
1 2 3 6 4 5 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
L
CITY OF CULVER CITY GPS MON. NO. 13
16
16
REVISION DATES
(DESIGN STAGE ONLY)
TRACT NO. 3772 MAR. 2011|1010|STREET KEY NOTES|1010|MATCH LINE STA: 10+93.22
SEE SHEET 2
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
I
J
K
1 2 3 6 4 5 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
L
CITY OF CULVER CITY GPS MON. NO. 13
16
16
REVISION DATES
(DESIGN STAGE ONLY)
TRACT NO. 3772 MAR. 2011|1010|STREET KEY NOTES|1010|MATCH LINE STA: 10+93.22
SEE SHEET 2
FOR REFERENCE ONLY, SUBJECT
TO FINAL REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE
CITY ENGINEER
ATTACHMENT 6
800The following documents will be under a separate cover:
• GEO-TECHNICAL REPORT
• TRAFFIC STUDY
• GREENHOUSE GAS ASSESSMENT
• PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT
Legado Crossing Comprehensive Plan & Planned Development No. 12 - January 28, 2013
68
10 DOCUMENTS UNDER SEPARATE COVER
ATTACHMENT 6
801ATTACHMENT 6
802