Legislation Details

File #: HIST-17659    Version: 1 Subject:
Type: Historical Status: Consent Agenda
In control: City Council Meeting Agenda
On agenda: 8/22/2011 Final action: 8/22/2011
Title: Approval of the Certification and Submission of the Section 8 Management Assessment Program (SEMAP) for Fiscal Year 2010/2011.
Attachments: 1. Approval of the Certification and Submission of th - C-8__11-08-22_CDD_Housing_CITY COUNCIL__SEMAP_2011 - FINAL.docx, 2. Approval of the Certification and Submission of th - 11-08-22_ATT_CDD_SEMAP_2011.pdf
City of Culver City, California Agenda Item Report Meeting Date: 08/22/2011 Item Number: C-8 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM: Approval of the Certification and Submission of the Section 8 Management Assessment Program (SEMAP) for Fiscal Year 2010/2011. Contact Person/Dept.: Tevis Barnes, Mona Kennedy- Community Development Department/Housing Agency Phone Number: (310) 253-5782 Fiscal Impact: Yes [] No [X] General Fund: Yes [] No [ X] Public Hearing: [] Action Item: [] Attachments: [X] Commission Action Required: Yes [] No [X] Date: _______________ Public Notification: (Email) Meetings and Agendas-City Council (8/17/11) Department Approval: Sol Blumenfeld (08/09/11) City Attorney Approval: Carol Schwab (by H. Baker) (08/15/11) Chief Financial Officer Approval: Jeff Muir (by M. Noller) (08/16/11) City Manager: John M. Nachbar (08/17/11) RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the City Council: 1) Approve the certification and submission of the Section 8 Management Assessment Program (SEMAP) to the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) and, 2) Authorize the Mayor and the City Manager to execute the SEMAP Certification. BACKGROUND: On September 10, 1998, HUD established SEMAP. The Section 8 Management Assessment Program was designed to assist HUD with measuring the performance of Public Housing Agencies (PHAs) that administer the Section 8 Housing Choice Voucher (HCV) Program. Under SEMAP, PHA’s conduct a “self-evaluation” based on HUD defined fourteen (14) indicators (24 Code of Federal Regulations Section 985.1 – 985.3). A score of 60% or higher must be received to remain in good standing with HUD. These indicators are as follows: 1. Selection of applicants from the waiting list 2. Reasonable rent 3. Determination of the adjusted income 4. Utility Allowance Schedule 5. Housing Quality Standard (HQS) Control Inspections 6. HQS Enforcement 7. Expanding housing opportunities 8. Payment Standards City of Culver City, California Agenda Item Report 9. Annual program participant reexamination 10. Correct tenant rent calculation 11. Pre-Contract HQS Inspection 12. Annual HQS Inspections 13. Lease-up 14. Family Self Sufficiency PHA’s are required to transmit their SEMAP certification via the Internet within sixty (60) calendar days of fiscal year end (August 29, 2011). DISCUSSION: The Culver City Housing Agency (CCHA) is required to perform its own self- evaluation under SEMAP on an annual basis. In order to accurately complete this certification, seventeen (17) randomly selected Section 8 HCV Program participant case files were evaluated. The number of files and file selection methodology is defined in the 24 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Section 985.2. In summary, the CCHA self certification score is 125 points out of 145 points or 86% (this score is above the minimum required score of 60%). The scoring of each indicator is attached. (Attachment 1). During the 2009/2010 fiscal year, the CCHA received a score of 95. In a letter transmitted from HUD dated October 14, 2010, HUD verified the CCHA score and gave the CCHA a rating of “high performance”. FISCAL ANALYSIS: HUD requires submission of SEMAP to ensure continued funding. For Calendar Year 2011, the Section 8 HCV Program is budgeted for approximately $1.650 million dollars. These funds are recognized in Fund 426-Section 8 Fund (42654100). ATTACHMENTS: 1) CCHA Indicator Scoring 2) SEMAP Certification (HUD Form 52648) MOTION: That the City Council: 1) Approve the certification and submission of the Section 8 Management Assessment Program (SEMAP) to the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) and, 2) Authorize the Mayor and the City Manager to execute the SEMAP Certification on behalf of the City. ATTACHMENT COVER SHEET Meeting Date: August 22, 2011 Item: Approval of the Certification and Submission of the Section 8 Management Assessment Program (SEMAP) Attachments: Pages 1. CCHA Indicator Scoring 1-3 2. SEMAP Certification 4-6 Culver City Housing Agency SEMAP Indicator Scoring: Indicator 1: Selection from the Waitlist- The CCHA has written policies in its administrative plan for selecting applicants from the waiting list and therefore is in full compliance for this indicator. Indicator 2: Reasonable Rent - As required by HUD, all Section 8 HCV Program files must contain information pertaining to comparable rents of each leased unit. Of the files evaluated, each contained rent reasonableness information and resulted in a score of 100%. Indicator 3 — Determination of Adjusted Income — This evaluation resulted in a one-hundred (100%) performance rating. This high score in calculating adjusted income and calculating correct program participant rent is directly related to the creation of an internal Rent Calculation Audit Worksheet for each file managed by the housing staff. Additionally, the Housing Specialist, who oversees the daily management of the Section 8 HCV Program, conducts a quality control review of each file upon completion. Indicator 4- Utility Allowance Schedule- The CCHA maintains an up-to-date utility allowance schedule. The CCHA has reviewed the utility rate that were obtained within the last 12 months. The utility allowance schedule must be adjusted if there was a change of 10% or more in a utility rate since the last time the utility allowance was revised. There was not a significant adjustment to utility rates. Indicator 5 — Housing Quality Standard (HQS) Control Inspections — The CCHA remains in full compliance in FY 2010/2011 in terms of performing and subsequently auditing annual inspections. The Structural Rehabilitation Specialist and Housing Administrator re-inspected the units randomly selected for the SEMAP evaluation to ensure HQS compliance_ The result was a one hundred percent (100%) performance rating. Indicator 6- HQS Enforcement- The CCHA has not failed any units for 2010- 2011 that required action within 24 hours due to health and safety violations and therefore did not have a quality control sample for this indicator. The result was a one hundred percent (100%) performance rating. Indicator 7 — Expanding Housing Opportunities - The CCHA strategy to encourage owner participation was implemented by the CCHA's increased efforts to enhance property owner outreach. A strong relationship with property owners is essential to maintaining existing and attracting greater property owner participation which results in expanded housing opportunities. The activities created to maintain and attract property owners to participate in the Section 8 HCV Program include small gestures like giving hand-written "thank you" notes and making direct telephone calls to express CCHA gratitude to property owners who participate in the Section 8 HCV Program. To maintain excellent customer service, staff responds to owner and participants telephone calls within twenty-four (24) hours. Inspections for new lease-ups or rent increases are also scheduled either the same day or within twenty-four (24) to forty-eight (48) hours. CCHA staff continues to seek out new strategies to improve owner participation. Our strategies to encourage property owners to continue participation in the Section 8 HCV Program resulted in a 100% score for this Indicator. Indicator 8- Payment Standards- This evaluation resulted in a one hundred percent (100%) performance rating as the CCHA has adopted current payment standards for the voucher program by unit size. As an example, the payment standard for a two (2) bedroom is $1,497.00. Indicator 9-Timely Annual Reexaminations- This evaluation resulted in a one hundred percent (100%) performance rating as the CCHA has completed a reexamination to determine income eligibility and affordable rent payments for each participating family at least every 12 months. Indicator 10 — Correct Tenant Rent Calculations — Compliance is at one hundred percent (100%). To assure continued one hundred percent (100%) compliance in this area, staff will be given ongoing training to stay abreast of any changes in HUD rules and regulations in this area. Indicators 11 and 12 — Pre contract HQS Inspections and Annual HQS Inspections — One hundred percent (100%) of all units newly leased passed the HQS inspection before the execution of a lease and Housing Assistance Payment (HAP) contract. Additionally, one hundred percent (100%) of all units undergo an annual inspection. Housing staff also guarantees that initial inspections will be scheduled within forty-eight (48) hours. Indicator 13 — Lease-Up — The CCHA continues to be challenged in this area. The CCHA continues to strive towards improving the current lease up rate. It is anticipated that with the downturn in the economy, more landlords will contact the CCHA to list their unit and make it available to qualified program participants that have received a Section 8 HCV Program Voucher. Indicator 14-Family Self Sufficiency (F55) Since 1999 the CCHA has been awarded over $521,900 to assist Section 8 HCVP participants achieve their goal of self sufficiency. On June 27, 2011 the City Council approved a contract with St. Joseph's Center to provide case management, needs assessment, job development services and supportive service referrals for the FSS participants. Over the past year participation in the FSS Program has increased and the FSS Coordinator continues to provide these services. A total of fifty-one (51) households have participated in FSS. Of this number, fourteen (14) have graduated. There are currently twenty-five (25) households enrolled in the program. PHA Name Culver City Housing Division PHA Response At least 98% of units sampled [ 80 to 97% of units sampled Less than BO% of units sampled No Section 8 Management Assessment U.S. Department of Housing OMB Approval No. 2577-0215 and Urban Development (exp. 9(3012013) Program (SEMAP) Office of Public and Indian Housing Certification Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 12 hours per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. This agency may not conduct or sponsor, and you are not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number. , This collection of information is required by 24 CFR sec 985.101 which requires a Public Housing Agency (PHA) administering a Section 8 tenant-based assistance program to submit an annual SEMAP Certification within 60 days after the end of its fiscal year. The information from the PHA concerns the performance of the PHA and provides assurance that there is no evidence of seriously deficient performance. HUD uses the information and other data to assess PHA management capabilities and deficiencies, and to assign an overall performance rating to the PHA. Responses are mandatory and the information collected does not lend itself to confidentiality. Instructions Respond to this certification form using the PHA's actual data for the fiscal year just ended. For PHA FY Ending (mm/dd/yyyy) 06/30/20 11 Submission Date (mmiddiyyyy) 08/29/2011 Check here if the PHA expends less than $300,000 a year in Federal awards Indicators 1 - 7 will not be rated if the PHA expends less than $300,000 a year in Fe j -al awards and its Section 8 programs are not audited for compliance with regulations by an independent auditor. A PHA that expends less than $300,000 in Federal awards in a year must still complete the certification for these indicators. Performance Indicators 1. Selection from the Waiting List. (24 CFR 982.54(d)(1) and 982.204(a)) (a) The PHA has written policies in its administrative plan for selecting applicants from the waiting list. PHA Response Yes (b) The PHA's quality control samples of applicants reaching the top of the waiting list and of admissions show that at least 98% of the families in the samples were selected from the waiting list for admission in accordance with the PHA's policies and met the selection criteria that determined their places on the waiting list and their order, of selection. PHA Response Yes 1 11 No 2. Reasonable Rent. (24 CFR 982.4, 982.54(d)(15), 982.158(f)(7) and 982.507) (a) The PHA has and implements a reasonable written method to determine and document for each unit leased that the rent to owner is reasonable based on current rents for comparable unassisted units (i) at the time of initial leasing, (ii) before any increase in the rent to owner, and (iii) at the HAP contract anniversary if there is a, 5 percent decrease in the published FMR in effect 60 days before the HAP contract anniversary. The PHA's method takes into consideration the location, size, type, quality, and age of the program unit and of similar unassisted units, and any amenities, housing services, maintenance or utilities provided by the owners. PHA Response Yes 1 1 No (b) The PHA's quality control sample of tenant files for which a determination of reasonable rent was required shows that the PHA followed its written method to determine reasonable rent and documented its determination that the rent to owner is reasonable as required for (check one): No 3. Determination of Adjusted Income (24 CFR part 5, subpart F and 24 CFR 982.516) The PHA's quality control sample of tenant files shows that at the time of admission and reexamination, the PHA properly obtained third party verification of adjusted income or documented why third party verification was not available; used the verified information in determining adjusted income; properly attributed allowances for expenses; and, where the family is responsible for utilities under the lease, the PHA used the appropriate utility allowances for the unit leased in determining the gross rent for (check one): PHA Response At least 90% of files sampled 1_ -1 80 to 89% of files sampled Less than 80% of files sampled 4. Utility Allowance Schedule. (24 CFR 982.517) The PHA maintains an up-to-date utility allowance schedule. The PHA reviewed utility rate data that it obtained within the last 12 months, and adjusted its utility allowance schedule if there has been a change of 10% or more in a utility rate since the last time the utility allowance schedule was revised. PHA Response Yes 1 1 No 5. HOS Quality Control inspections. (24 CFR 982.405(b)) A PHA supervisor (or other qualified person) reinspected a sample of units during the PHA fiscal year, which met the minimum sample size required by HUD (see 24 CFR 985.2), for quality control of HOS inspections. The PHA supervisor's reinspected sample was drawn from recently completed HOS inspections and represents a cross section of neighborhoods and the work of a cross section of inspectors. PHA Response Yes 6. HOS Enforcement (24 CFR 982.404) The PHA's quality control sample of case files with failed HOS inspections shows that, for all cases sampled, any cited life-threatening HOS deficiencies were corrected within 24 hours from the inspection and, all other cited HOS deficiencies were corrected within no more than 30 calendar days from the inspection or any PHA-approved extension, or, if HOS deficiencies were not corrected within the required time frame, the PHA stopped housing assistance payments beginning no later than the first of the month following the correction period, or took prompt and vigorous action to enforce the family obligations for (check one): PHA Response 1 At least 98% of cases sampled 1 1 Less than 98% of cases sampled form HUD-62648 (13/2000) Page 1 of 4 ref. 24 CFR Part 985 Previous edition is obsolete Vt No No 0-BR FMR 973 PS 994 No No 7. Expanding Housing Opportunities. (24 CFR 982.54(d)(5), 982.153(b)(3) and (b)(4), 982.301(a) and 983.301(b)(4) and (b)(12)). Applies only to PHAs with jurisdiction in metropolitan FMR areas. Check here if not applicable (a) The PHA has a written policy to encourage participation by owners of units outside areas of poverty or minority concentration which clearly delineates areas in its jurisdiction that the PHA considers areas of poverty or minority concentration, and which includes actions the PHA will take to encourage owner participation. PHA Response Yes I I 1 No 1 I (b) The PHA has documentation that shows that it took actions indicated in its written policy to encourage participation by owners outside areas of poverty and minority concentration. PHA Response Yes I ,/ No (c) The PHA has prepared maps that show various areas, both within and neighboring its jurisdiction, with housing opportunities outside areas of poverty and minority concentration; the PHA has assembled information about job opportunities, schools and services in these areas; and the PHA uses the maps and related information when briefing voucher holders. PHA Response Yes (d) The PHA's information packet for voucher holders contains either a list of owners who are willing to lease, or properties available for lease, under the voucher program, or a list of other organizations that will help families find units and the list includes properties or organizations that operate outside areas of poverty or minority concentration. PHA Response Yes (e) The PHA's information packet includes an explanation of how portability works and includes a list of neighboring PHAs with the name, address and telephone number of a portability contact person at each. PHA Response Yes 1 ,/ I No (1) The PHA has analyzed whether voucher holders have experienced difficulties in finding housing outside areas of poverty or minority concentration and, where such difficulties were found, the PHA has considered whether it is appropriate to seek approval of exception payment standard amounts in any part of its jurisdiction and has sought HUD approval when necessary. PHA Response Yes 1 1 1 No 8. Payment Standards. The PHA has adopted current payment standards for the voucher program by unit size for each FMR area in the PHA jurisdiction and, if applicable, for each PHA-designated part of an FMR area, which do not exceed 110 percent of the current applicable FMR and which are not less than 90 percent of the current FMR (unless a lower percent is approved by HUD), (24 CFR 982.503) PHA Response Yes1 No Enter current FMRs and payment standards (PS) 1-BR FMR 1173 2-BR FMR 1465 3-BR FMR 1967 4-BR FMR 2367 PS 1199 PS 1497 PS 2011 PS 2419 If the PHA has jurisdiction in more than one FMR area, and/or if the PHA has established separate payment standards for a PHA-designated part of an FMR area, attach similar FMR and payment standard comparisons for each FMR area and designated area. 9. Annual Reexaminations. The PHA completes a reexamination for each participating family at least every 12 months. (24 CFR 982.516) PHA Response Yes 10. Correct Tenant Rent Calculations. The PHA correctly calculates tenant rent in the rental certificate program and the family rent to owner in the rental voucher program. (24 CFR 982, Subpart K) PHA Response Yes 11. Precontract HQS Inspections. Each newly leased unit passed HQS inspection before the beginning date of the assisted lease and HAP contract. (24 CFR 982.305) No PHA Response Yes 12. Annual HOS Inspections. The PHA inspects each unit under contract at least annually. (24 CFR 982.405(a)) PHA Response Yes 13. Lease-Up. The PHA executes assistance contracts on behalf of eligible families for the number of units that has been under budget for at least one year, PHA Response Yes 14a. Family Self-Sufficiency Enrollment. The PHA has enrolled families in FSS as required. (24 CFR 984.105) Applies only to PFLAs required to administer an FSS program. Check here if not applicable PHA Response a, Number of mandatory FSS slots (Count units funded under the FY 1992 FSS incentive awards and in FY 1993 and later through 10/20/1998. Exclude units funded in connection with Section 8 and Section 23 project-based contract terminations; public housing demolition, disposition and replacement; HUD multifamily property sales; prepaid or terminated mortgages under section 236 or section 221(d)(3); and Section 8 renewal funding. Subtract the number of families that successfully completed their contracts on or after 10121/1998.) or, Number of mandatory FSS slots under HUD-approved exception No 25 form HUD-52648 (8/2000) ref. 24 CFR Part 985 Previous edition is obsolete Page 2 of 4 25 0 100. 0 0 No 28 PHA Response Yes If yes, attach completed deconcentration bonus indicator addendum. No b. Number of FSS families currently enrolled c. Portabifity: If you are the initial PHA, enter the number of families currently enrolled in your FSS program, but who have moved under portability and whose Section -8 assistance is administered by another PHA Percent of FSS slots filled (b + c divided by a) (1) (3 ) 14b. Percent of FSS Participants with Escrow Account Balances. The PHA has made progress in supporting family self-sufficiency as measured by the percent of currently enrolled FSS families with escrow account balances. (24 CFR 984.305) Applies only to PHAs required to administer an FSS program, Check here if not applicable PHA Response • Yes Portability: if you are the initial PHA, enter the number of families with FSS escrow accounts currently enrolled in your FSS program, but who have moved under portability and whose Section B assistance is administered by another PHA Deconcentration Bonus Indicator (Optional and only for PHAs with jurisdiction in metropolitan FMR areas). The PHA is submitting with this certification data which show that: Half or more of all Section 8 families with children assisted by the PHA in its principal operating area resided in low poverty census tracts at the end of the last PHA FY; (2) The percent of Section 8 mover families with children who moved to low poverty census tracts in the PHA's principal operating area during the last PHA FY is at least two percentage points higher than the percent of all Section 8 families with children who resided in low poverty census tracts at the end of the last PHA FY; Or The percent of Section 8 mover families with children who moved to low poverty census tracts in the PHA's principal operating area over the last two PHA FYs is at least two percentage points higher than the percent of all Section 8 families with children who resided in low poverty census tracts at the end of the second to last PHA FY. I hereby certify that, to the best of my knowledge, the above responses under the Section 8 Management Assessment Program (SE MAP) are true and accurate for the PHA fiscal year indicated above. I also certify that, to my present knowledge, there is not evidence to indicate seriously deficient performance that casts doubt on the PHA's capacity to administer Section 8 rental assistance in accordance with Federal law and regulations. Warning: HUD will prosecute false claims and statements. Conviction may result in criminal and/or civil penalties. (18 U.S.C. 1001, 1010,1012; 31 U.S.C. 3729, 3802) Executive Director, signature Chairperson, Board of Commissioners, signature Date (mm/rld/yyyy) Date (mrn/dd/yyyy) The PHA niay include with its SE MAP certification any information bearing on the accuracy or completeness of the information used by the PHA in providing its certification. form HUD-52648 (8/2000) Page 3 of 4 ref. 24 CFR Part 985 Previous edition is obsolete