Legislation Details

File #: HIST-3202    Version: 1 Subject:
Type: Historical Status: Public Hearing
In control: City Council Meeting Agenda
On agenda: 8/14/2006 Final action: 8/14/2006
Title: Public Hearing and Adoption of a Resolution for the Certification of Conformance with the Congestion Management Program (CMP) for Los Angeles County and Adoption of the CMP Local Development Report.
Attachments: 1. PH-1__08_14_06_TRANS_Congestion Management Program.doc, 2. PH-1__CMP.pdf
City of Culver City, California City Council Agenda Item Report RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the City Council hold a public hearing and adopt a resolution certifying conformance with the Congestion Management Program (CMP); adopt the CMP Local Development Report; and direct the City Clerk to deliver the adopted resolution to the LACMTA by September 1, 2006. PROCEDURE: 1. Mayor seeks motion to receive and file the affidavit and notice of publication. 2. Mayor calls on staff for a brief report. 3. Mayor declares the Public Hearing open, calling upon the public for comment. 4. Mayor seeks motion to close the Public Hearing. 5. City Council discusses the matter and arrives at their decision. BACKGROUND: On November 18, 1992, the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (LACMTA), acting as the Congestion Management Agency for Los Angeles County, adopted the first Congestion Management Program for Los Angeles County. The CMP is a monitoring program that aims to address the impact of local growth on the regional transportation system by linking transportation, land use, and air quality decisions. Each year, cities must report all development activity to LACMTA, as well as the implementation of trip reducing strategies. In the past, the degree to which Meeting Date: 08/14/06 Item Number: PH-1 AGENDA ITEM: Public Hearing and Adoption of a Resolution for the Certification of Conformance with the Congestion Management Program (CMP) for Los Angeles County and Adoption of the CMP Local Development Report. Contact Person/Dept.: Diana Chang / Transportation Phone Number: (310) 253-6544 Fiscal Impact: Yes [X] No [] General Fund: Yes [] No [X] Public Hearing: [X] Action Item: [ ] Attachments: [X] Public Notification: Published in the Culver City News on 08/03/06; Master Notification List on 07/31/06. Department Approval: Steve Cunningham 07/31/06 City Manager Approval: Jerry B. Fulwood (08/09/2006) City Controller Approval: Marlee Chang (08/09/2006)City of Culver City, California City Council Agenda Item Report cities have balanced new development with such congestion mitigation strategies has been calculated via a credit/debit system called the Countywide Deficiency Plan. For the third year, however, the credit/debit requirement has been temporarily suspended while under evaluation, and Culver City must only report the actual amount of development and demolition that has occurred during the reporting period. Furthermore, the City must submit a resolution self-certifying its conformance to all the requirements of the CMP and future updates. As the Congestion Management Agency for Los Angeles County, LACMTA annually determines the County’s or cities’ conformance or non-conformance. Culver City’s conformance with the CMP and adoption of the Local Development Report ensures that the City continues to receive its portion of state gas tax revenues and preserves its eligibility for other State and Federal transportation revenues. Failure to adopt the resolution jeopardizes our ability to receive these funds. The self-certifying resolution required by the CMP must be submitted to LACMTA no later than September 1, 2006. DISCUSSION: The CMP requires the County and cities to: 1. Continue implementation of the CMP Transportation Demand Management (TDM) Ordinance; 2. Continue implementation of the CMP Land Use Analysis Program; 3. Track new development activity to determine mitigation goals; 4. Implement locally selected strategies to meet mitigation goals; and 5. Conduct biennial traffic counts and calculate levels of service for selected arterial intersections. The City of Culver City currently is in compliance with the above requirements. FISCAL ANALYSIS: CMP conformance is required for the City to receive state gas tax (Section 2105) funds and to preserve the City’s eligibility for other state and federal transportation dollars. Failure to adopt and submit the resolution to the LACMTA by September 1, City of Culver City, California City Council Agenda Item Report 2006 jeopardizes our eligibility to receive these funds. In FY 2005-06 Culver City received $252,650.53 in state gas tax funds. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Resolution 2006-R__ 2. The 2006 Local Development Report. MOTION: 1. Adopt the resolution certifying conformance with the CMP by adopting the CMP Local Development Report; and 2. Direct the City Clerk to deliver the adopted resolution to the LACMTA by September 1, 2006. MEETING DATE: 8/14/06 AGENDA ITEM: Certification of Conformance with the Congestion Management Program (CMP) for Los Angeles County and the Adoption of the CMP Local Development Report. ATTACHMENTS Pages 1. Resolution 1-2 2. 2006 CMP Local Development Report 3-6ATTACHMENT NO.1 RESOLUTION NO. 2006-R A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF CULVER CITY, CALIFORNIA, FINDING THE CITY TO BE IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE CONGESTION MANAGEMENT PROGRAM (CMP) AND ADOPTING THE CMP LOCAL DEVELOPMENT REPORT, IN ACCORDANCE WITH CALIFORNIA GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 65089. WHEREAS, CMP statute requires the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority ("LACMTA"), acting as the Congestion Management Agency for Los Angeles County, to annually determine that the County and cities within the County are conforming to all CMP requirements; and WHEREAS, LACMTA requires submittal of the CMP Local Development Report by September 1 of each year; and WHEREAS, the City Council held a noticed public hearing on August 14, 2006. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Culver City, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE as follows: 1. That the City has taken all of the following actions, and that the City is in conformance with all applicable requirements of the 2004 CMP adopted by the LACMTA Board on July 22, 2004. By June 15, of odd-numbered years, the City will conduct annual traffic counts and calculated levels of service for selected arterial intersections, consistent with the requirements identified in the CMP Highway and Roadway System chapter. The City has locally adopted and continues to implement a transportation demand management ordinance, consistent with the minimum requirements identified in I|1010101010101010 10 10|11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28CHRISTOPHER ARMENTA, City Clerk A06-00425 CAROL A. SCHWAB, City Attorney the CMP Transportation Demand Management chapter. The City has locally adopted and continues to implement a land use analysis program, consistent with the minimum requirements identified in the CMP Land Use Analysis Program chapter. The City has adopted a Local Development Report, attached hereto and made a part hereof, consistent with the requirements identified in the 2004 CMP. This report balances traffic congestion impacts due to growth within the City with transportation improvements, and demonstrates that the City is meeting its responsibilities under the Countywide Deficiency Plan consistent with the LACMTA Board adopted 2003 Short Range Transportation Plan. 2. That the City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution and shall forward a copy of this Resolution to the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority. APPROVED and ADOPTED this day of 2006. GARY SILBIGER, MAYOR City of Culver City, California ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: I|1010101010101010 10 10|11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -2-THE CITY OF CULVER CITY Date Prepared: July 31, 2006 2006 CMP Local Development Report Reporting Period: JUNE 1, 2005 - MAY 31, 2006 Contact: Diana Chang Phone Number: (310)253-6544 CONGESTION MANAGEMENT PROGRAM FOR LOS ANGELES COUNTY 2006 DEFICIENCY PLAN SUMMARY1 * IMPORTANT: All "Aralue!" cells on this page are automatically calculated. Please do not enter data in these cells. DEVELOPMENT TOTALS RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY Single Family Residential Multi-Family Residential Group Quarters COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY Commercial (less than 300,000 sq.ft.) Commercial (300,000 sq.ft. or more) Freestanding Eating & Drinking NON-RETAIL DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY Lodging Industrial Office (less than 50,000 sq.ft.) Office (50,000-299,999 sq.ft.) Office (300,000 sq.ft. or more) Medical Government Institutional/Educational University (# of students) OTHER DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY ENTER IF APPLICABLE ENTER IF APPLICABLE EXEMPTED DEVELOPMENT TOTALS Exempted Dwelling Units Exempted Non-residential sq. ft. (in 1,000s)|101010|Dwelling Units (1.00) (4.00) 0.00 1,000 Net Sq.Ft.2 (2.57) 0.00 0.00 1,000 Net Sq.Ft.2 0.00 (10.19) 1.00 0.00 557.09 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily Trips 0.00 0.00 ATTACHMENT NO.2 1. Note: Please change dates on this form for later years. Section I, Page 1 2. Net square feet is the difference between new development and adjustments entered on pages 2 and 3. -3-THE CITY OF CULVER CITY Date Prepared: July 31, 2006 2006 CMP Local Development Report Reporting Period: JUNE 1, 2005 - MAY 31, 2006 Enter data for all cells labeled "Enter." If there are no data for that category, enter "0." PART 1: NEW DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY Category Dwelling Units Single Family Residential 3.00 Multi-Family Residential 9.00 Group Quarters 0.00 COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY Category 1,000 Gross Square Feet Commercial (less than 300,000 sq.ft.) 0.15 Commercial (300,000 sq.ft. or more) 0.00 Freestanding Eating & Drinking 0.00 NON-RETAIL DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY Category 1,000 Gross Square Feet 0.00 Lodging Industrial 4.93 Office (less than 50,000 sq.ft.) 1.00 Office (50,000-299,999 sq.ft.) 0.00 Office (300,000 sq.ft. or more) 557.09 Medical 0.00 Government 0.00 Institutional/Educational 0.00 University (# of students) 0.00 OTHER DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY Description (Attach additional sheets if necessary) Daily Trips (Enter "0" if none) ENTER IF APPLICABLE 0.00 ENTER IF APPLICABLE 0.00 Section!, Page 2THE CITY OF CULVER CITY Date Prepared: July 31, 2006 2006 CMP Local Development Report Reporting Period: JUNE 1, 2005 - MAY 31, 2006 Enter data for all cells labeled "Enter." If there are no data for that category, enter "0." PART 2: NEW DEVELOPMENT ADJUSTMENTS IMPORTANT: Adjustments may be claimed only for 1) development permits that were both issued and revoked, expired or withdrawn during the reporting period, and 2) demolition of any structure with the reporting period. RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT ADJUSTMENTS Category Dwelling Units Single Family Residential 4.00 Multi-Family Residential 13.00 Group Quarters 0.00 COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY Category 1,000 Gross Square Feet Commercial (less than 300,000 sq.ft.) 2.72 Commercial (300,000 sq.ft. or more) 0.00 Freestanding Eating & Drinking 0.00 — NON-RETAIL DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY Category 1,000 Gross Square Feet 0.00 Lodging Industrial 15.12 Office (less than 50,000 sq.ft.) 0.00 Office (50,000-299,999 sq.ft.) 0.00 Office (300,000 sq.ft. or more) 0.00 Medical 0.00 Government 0.00 Institutional/Educational 0.00 University (# of students) 0.00 OTHER DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY Description (Attach additional sheets if necessary) Daily Trips (Enter "0" if none) ENTER IF APPLICABLE 0.00 ENTER IF APPLICABLE 0.00 Section I, Page 3THE CITY OF CULVER CITY 2006 CMP Local Development Report Reporting Period: JUNE 1, 2005 - MAY 31, 2006 Date Prepared: July 31, 2006 Enter data for all cells labeled "Enter." If there are no data for that category, enter "0." PART 3: EXEMPTED DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY (NOT INCLUDED IN NEW DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY TOTALS) LowNery Low Income Housing I 01 Dwelling Units High Density Residential Dwelling Units I ol Near Rail Stations Mixed Use Developments 0 1,000 Gross Square Feet Near Rail Stations 0 Dwelling Units Development Agreements Entered 1,000 Gross Square Feet 0 into Prior to July 10, 1989 0 Dwelling Units Reconstruction of Buildings 1,000 Gross Square Feet 0 Damaged in April 1992 Civil Unrest 0 Dwelling Units Reconstruction of Buildings 1,000 Gross Square Feet 0 Damaged in Jan. 1994 Earthquake Total Dwelling Units 0 Dwelling Units o Total Non-residential sq. ft. (in 1,000s) 0 Section!, Page 4 Exempted Development Definitions: 1. LowNery Low Income Housing: As defined by the California Department of Housing and Community Development as follows: - Low-Income: equal to or less than 80% of the County median income, with adjustments for family size. - Very Low-Income: equal to or less than 50% of the County median income, with adjustments for family size. 2. High Density Residential Near Rail Stations: Development located within 1/4 mile of a fixed rail passenger station and that is equal to or greater than 120 percent of the maximum residential density allowed under the local general plan and zoning ordinance. A project providing a minimum of 75 dwelling units per acre is automatically considered high density. 3. Mixed Uses Near Rail Stations: Mixed-use development located within 1/4 mile of a fixed rail passenger station, if more than half of the land area, or floor area, of the mixed use development is used for high density residential housing. 4. Development Agreements: Projects that entered into a development agreement (as specified under Section 65864 of the California Government Code) with a local jurisdiction prior to July 10, 1989. 5. Reconstruction or replacement of any residential or non-residential structure which is damaged or destroyed, to the extent of > or = to 50% of its reasonable value, by fire, flood, earthquake or other similar calamity. 6. Any project of a federal, state or county agency that is exempt from local jurisdiction zoning regulations and where the local jurisdiction is precluded from exercising any approval/disapproval authority. These locally precluded projects do not have to be reported in the LDR.