City of Culver City, California
City Council Agenda Item Report
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends the City Council adopt a resolution (1) approving the assessment
engineer’s report; (2) declaring its intention to form the West Washington Boulevard
Benefit Assessment District Number 2; (3) setting the time and place for the Public
Hearing; and (4) authorizing the City Clerk to send out the notice and ballot to all
record property owners in compliance with Proposition 218 and Article XIIID of the
California Constitution.
BACKGROUND
In December 2007, the City Council approved an Area Improvement Plan (AIP)
along West Washington Boulevard between Centinela Avenue and Boise Avenue
which includes landscaped medians. This is the second part of a multi-phased
program that will enhance the Washington Boulevard corridor (Attachment 1). The
installation of landscape medians will be funded by the Culver City Redevelopment
Agency. While the Agency has proposed to fund the improvements, it will only do
so if the on-going median maintenance is carried out through a property based
assessment district.
In November 2009, the City Council approved a Resolution of Initiation to begin the
proceedings for the formation of a benefit assessment district along West
Washington. The name designated for this district is “the West Washington
Boulevard Benefit Assessment District Number 2” (“The District”).
Meeting Date: 5/24/10 Item Number: A-2
AGENDA ITEM: Adoption of a Resolution Approving the Engineer’s Report and
Declaring the City Council’s Intention to Form the West Washington Boulevard
Benefit Assessment District Number 2.
Contact Person/Dept.: Elaine Warner Phone Number: 310.253.5777
Fiscal Impact: Yes [X] No [] General Fund: Yes [] No [X]
Public Hearing: [] Action Item: [X] Attachments: [X]
Commission Action Required: Yes [] No [X] Date: _______________
Public Notification: Agendas and Meetings – City Council (05/19/10); Property Owners in
West Washington Assessment District No. 2 (05/13/10)
Department Approval:
Sol Blumenfeld (05/14/10)
City Attorney Approval:
Carol Schwab (by H. Baker) (05/19/10)
Chief Financial Officer Approval:
Jeff Muir (by N. Kimball) (05/19/10)
City Manager Approval:
P. Lamont Ewell (05/19/10) City of Culver City, California
City Council Agenda Item Report
Since that time, conceptual plans have been developed and approved by the
Agency Board. The conceptual plans include three (3) new medians, totaling 437
linear feet, that will be positioned along West Washington Boulevard between
Centinela Avenue and Boise Avenue (Attachment 2). The proposed medians will
enhance the commercial area with drought tolerant and low maintenance planting
to ensure that ongoing maintenance costs are held to a minimum.
Estimated maintenance costs for these medians would be funded by the District
through assessment of these costs to property owners within the District. The total
annual cost is approximately $19,163 and would include maintenance service twice
a month. Assessments would be levied on a blended calculation of commercial
linear feet as well as buildable square feet. As previously noted, construction
documents for this project would not be prepared until the assessment district has
been formed with the majority approval vote of the District’s property owners.
DISCUSSION:
The District must provide a distinct and special benefit to those parcels that are
within the District. Linear front footage and building square footage combined, allow
for each parcel to be assessed in proportion to the special benefit received. The
area has 1,936 feet of commercial linear footage and approximately 94,386 of
building square footage.
In November 2009, a contract with NBS was approved by the Agency Board to
assist with the District’s formation. NBS has prepared an Engineer’s Report
(Attachment 2) that outlines the requirements and benefits for the District and details
the general nature, location, and extent of the improvements to be maintained. The
Engineer’s Report also contains an estimate of the costs of maintenance, operations
and servicing of the improvements, a diagram showing the area, and properties to
be assessed.
As determined by the Engineer’s Report, the assessments are proposed to be based
on the following formula:
Parcels linear front footage (total maintenance costs x .70)
+
Building square footage (total maintenance costs x .30)
= Total Annual Levy
A proposed Resolution of Intention has been prepared for the City Council’s
consideration. If adopted, it would approve the Engineer’s Report. The proposed
Resolution also sets the time and place for the Public Hearing (July 12, 2010 at 7:00
PM at the City Council Chambers) and authorizes the City Clerk to send out the City of Culver City, California
City Council Agenda Item Report
notice and ballot to all record property owners in compliance with Proposition 218
and Article XIIID of the California Constitution.
FISCAL ANALYSIS:
The Engineer’s Report calculates the total annual maintenance assessments to be
$19,163, which includes the County administration cost of $308.00. The proposed
assessments included in the Engineer’s Report set the initial maximum assessment
for Fiscal Year 2010-2011. On February 1
st
of each year beginning in Fiscal Year
2011-2012 the maximum assessment shall be increased by the year over year
change in Consumer Price Index for all Urban Consumers for the Los Angeles,
Riverside and Orange County Area (CPI-U LA-Riverside-OC) through December.
The annual assessment shall not exceed the maximum assessment unless the
appropriate Proposition 218 proceedings are conducted by the City to authorize an
increase beyond the maximum assessment amount.
As noted during conceptual plan approval, construction documents for this project
would not be prepared unless the assessment district is formed.
The engineer’s report includes annual administrative costs, including the
preparation of the annual engineer’s report and City/Agency administrative costs.
This cost is estimated to be approximately $3,500.
ATTACHMENTS:
Attachment 1 – Area Improvement Plan Map
Attachment 2 – Conceptual Plans
Attachment 3 – Engineer’s Report
Attachment 4 – Proposed Resolution
MOTION:
That the City Council:
Adopt a resolution (1) approving the Engineer’s Report, (2) declaring its
intention to form the West Washington Boulevard Assessment District Number 2
and (3) setting the time and place for the Public Hearing and (4) authorizing the
City Clerk to send out the notice and ballot to all record property owners in
compliance with Proposition 218 and Article XIIID of the California Constitution.
MEETING DATE: 05.17.10
AGENDA ITEM: Adoption of a Resolution Approving the Engineer’s
Report and Declaring the City Council’s Intention to
Form the West Washington Boulevard Benefit
Assessment District Number 2
ATTACHMENTS
Pages
1. Area Improvement Plan Map 1
2. Conceptual Plans 2-3
3. Engineer’s Report 4-18
4. Resolution 19-21
AREA IMPROVEMENT PLAN PHASES
Baldwin Project
Washington Centinela
ATTACHMENT 1
1ATTACHMENT 2
2ATTACHMENT 2
3
City of Culver City
Benefit Assessment District
West Washington Boulevard No. 2
Formation Engineer’s Report
May 2010
Submitted by
Main Office
32605 Temecula Parkway, Suite 100
Temecula, CA 92592
800.676.7516
Regional Office
870 Market Street, Suite 1223
San Francisco, CA 94102
800.434.8349
ATTACHMENT 3
4
CITY OF CULVER CITY
BENEFIT ASSESSMENT DISTRICT
WEST WASHINGTON BOULEVARD NO. 2
9770 Culver Blvd.
Culver City, CA. 90232
Phone - (310) 253-5700
CITY COUNCIL
Christopher Armenta, Mayor
Micheál O' Leary, Vice Mayor
D. Scott Malsin, Councilmember
Andrew Weissman, Councilmember
Jeffery Cooper, Councilmember
CITY STAFF
Lamont Ewell, Interim City Manager
Sol Blumenfeld, Community Development Director
Charles D. Herbertson, Public Works Director
Martin Cole, Assistant City Manager/City Clerk
Todd Tipton, Redevelopment Administrator
Mate Gaspar, Engineering Services Manager
Elaine Gerety Warner, Senior Management Analyst
NBS
Pablo Perez, Client Services Director
K. Dennis Klingelhofer, Assessment Engineer
Tiffany Ellis, Financial Analyst
ATTACHMENT 3
5
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1. ENGINEER’S LETTER 1-1
2. PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS 2-1
2.1. Description of the Boundaries of the District .............................................. 2-1
2.2. Description of Improvements and Services ................................................ 2-1
3. ESTIMATE OF COSTS 3-1
3.1. District Budget ............................................................................................ 3-1
3.2. Definitions of Budget Items ........................................................................ 3-2
4. METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT 4-1
4.1. General ...................................................................................................... 4-1
4.2. Special Benefit ............................................................................................. 4-1
4.3. General Benefit .......................................................................................... 4-2
4.4. Method of Apportionment Spread .............................................................. 4-2
4.5. Cost of Living Inflation ................................................................................ 4-3
5. ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM 5-1
6. ASSESSMENT ROLL 6-1
ATTACHMENT 3
6
Benefit Assessment District West Washington Boulevard No. 2 – City of Culver City 1-1
Prepared by NBS – Fiscal Year 2010/11
1. ENGINEER’S LETTER
WHEREAS, on _________, 2010, the City Council of the City of Culver City (the “City”), State of
California, under the Culver City Municipal Code (the “CCMC”), adopted Resolution No. ________
Initiating Proceedings for the Formation and Levy of Annual Assessments for a benefit assessment
district known and designated as “Benefit Assessment District West Washington Boulevard No. 2”,
(hereafter referred to as the “District”); and
WHEREAS, the Resolution Initiating Proceedings directed NBS to prepare and file a report
describing the general nature, location and extent of the improvements to be maintained, an estimate of
the costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing of the improvements, a diagram showing the area
and properties to be assessed and an estimate of the costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing
the improvements, assessing the net amount upon all assessable lots and/or parcels within the District in
proportion to the special benefit received, in accordance with Section 15.01.055 of the CCMC, Article
XIIID of the Constitution of the State of California (“Article XIIID”) and Proposition 218 Omnibus
Implementation Act (“Proposition 218”).
NOW THEREFORE, the following assessment is made to cover the portion of the estimated
costs of maintenance, operation and servicing of said improvements to be paid by the assessable real
property within the District in proportion to the special benefit received:
SUMMARY OF MAXIMUM ASSESSMENT
As
Preliminarily
Approved
As
Approved by
Council
Direct Maintenance and Administrative Costs $19,163.00
Reserve Fund Contribution 0.00
Total Maximum Budget Costs $19,163.00
Total District Parcels 32
Total Assessable Linear Front Footage 1,936.38
Total Assessable Building Square Footage 94,386.00
Proposed Maximum Assessment Per Linear Front Foot $6.93
Proposed Maximum Assessment Per Building Square Foot $0.06
In making the assessments contained herein pursuant to the Resolution of Initiation and the CCMC:
1. I identified all parcels (the “Specially Benefited Parcels”) which will have a special benefit
conferred upon them from the improvements described in Section 2.2 to this Engineer’s Report.
For particulars as to the identification of said parcels, reference is made to the Assessment
Diagram, a copy of which is included in Section 5 of this Engineer’s Report.
2. I have assessed the costs and expenses of the improvements upon the Specially Benefited
Parcels. In making such assessment:
a. The proportionate special benefit derived by each Specially Benefited Parcel from the
improvements was determined in relationship to the entirety of the maintenance costs of
the improvements;
ATTACHMENT 3
7
Benefit Assessment District West Washington Boulevard No. 2 – City of Culver City 1-2
Prepared by NBS – Fiscal Year 2010/11
b. No assessment has been imposed on any Specially Benefited Parcel which exceeds
the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on such parcel from
the improvements; and
c. The general benefits from the improvements have been separated from the special
benefits and only special benefits have been assessed.
I, the undersigned, respectfully submit the enclosed Engineer’s Report and, to the best of my knowledge,
information and belief, the Engineer’s Report, Assessments, and the Assessment Diagram herein have
been prepared and computed in accordance with the order of the City Council of the City of Culver City,
the CCMC, Article XIIID and Proposition 218.
K. Dennis Klingelhofer, P.E., Assessment Engineer
ATTACHMENT 3
8
Benefit Assessment District West Washington Boulevard No. 2 – City of Culver City 2-1
Prepared by NBS – Fiscal Year 2010/11
2. PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS
The District provides for the continued administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing of
various improvements located within the public right-of-way and dedicated easements within the
boundaries of the District.
2.1. Description of the Boundaries of the District
The District is located in the City of Culver City. The boundaries of the District are generally
described as that area located west of Centinela Avenue, east of Neosho Avenue, and along West
Washington Boulevard.
2.2. Description of Improvements and Services
The improvements are the construction, operation, maintenance and servicing of medians,
landscaping, lighting, and appurtenant facilities, including, but not limited to, labor costs, utilities,
material, contracting services and any other items necessary for the satisfactory maintenance and
operation of the these improvements as described below.
Reference is made to the plans and specifications for the improvements, which are on file with the
Culver City Redevelopment Agency. The table below lists specific improvements within the District to
be maintained:
Medians
Landscaping
Lighting
Irrigation
ATTACHMENT 3
9
Benefit Assessment District West Washington Boulevard No. 2 – City of Culver City 3-1
Prepared by NBS – Fiscal Year 2010/11
3. ESTIMATE OF COSTS
The estimated cost of administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing the improvements as
described in the Plans and Specifications are summarized below. Each year, as part of the
assessment district levy calculation process, the costs and expenses are reviewed and the annual
costs are projected for the following fiscal year.
3.1. District Budget
DIRECT MAINTENANCE COSTS
MAXIMUM BUDGET
FISCAL YEAR 2009/10
ACTUAL BUDGET
FISCAL YEAR 2009/10
Maintenance Costs $7,000.00
Water for Irrigation 985.00
Lighting 3,000.00
Mulch Replenishment 850.00
Plant Replacement 2,500.00
Irrigation Replacement 1,000.00
Subtotal Direct Costs $15,355.00
ADMINISTRATION COSTS
City Administration $1,000.00
Consultants 2,500.00
County Fee* 308.00
Subtotal Administration Costs $3,808.00
Subtotal of Direct & Administrative Costs $19,163.00
Amount to be carried over from Improvement Fund $0.00
Contributions from other Sources 0.00
Reserve Fund Contribution 0.00
Total Budget Costs $19,163.00
Rounding Adjustment 0.20
Total Balance to Levy $19,162.80
Total District Parcels 32
Total Assessable Linear Front Footage 1,936.38
Total Assessable Building Square Footage 94,386.00
Assessment Per Linear Front Foot $6.93
Assessment Per Building Square Foot $0.06
*Includes a $250 initial set up fee in addition to an annual fee of $50 per District, plus $0.25 per parcel.
ATTACHMENT 3
10
Benefit Assessment District West Washington Boulevard No. 2 – City of Culver City 3-2
Prepared by NBS – Fiscal Year 2010/11
It is the intent of the City of Culver City to establish a reserve which shall not exceed the estimated
costs of maintenance and servicing to December 10 of the fiscal year, or whenever the City expects
to receive its apportionment of special assessments and tax collections from the County, whichever is
later. The reserve balance information for the District is as follows:
Estimated Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2010 Reserve Fund Balance $0.00
Initial Operating Reserve Collection – Fiscal Year 2010/11 0.00
Estimated Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2011 Reserve Fund Balance $0.00
3.2. Definitions of Budget Items
The following definitions describe the services and costs included in the District Budget:
Direct Costs:
Maintenance Costs includes all regularly scheduled labor, material and equipment required to
properly maintain and ensure the satisfactory condition of all medians, palm trees, landscaping, and
appurtenant facilities, on a bi-monthly basis.
Water for Irrigation includes the furnishing of water required for the operation and maintenance of the
landscape and irrigation systems.
Lighting includes the furnishing of electricity required for the operation and maintenance of the palm
tree uplights.
Mulch Replenishment includes once annually replenishment of mulch as required for the operation
and maintenance of the landscaping and median facilities.
Plant Replacement includes the replacement of plants as required to ensure the satisfactory condition
of the landscaping and median facilities (does not include replacement of palm trees).
Irrigation Replacement includes the ongoing repair and replacement of the irrigation systems,
including solar controller and rain sensor.
Administration Costs:
City Administration includes the cost to all particular departments and staff of the City for providing
the coordination of the District services, operations and maintenance of the improvements, response
to public concerns and education, and procedures associated with the levy and collection of
assessments.
Consultants include the costs associated with contracting with professionals to provide services
specific to the administration of the annual assessment levy.
County Fee includes fees charged by the County of Los Angeles for placing the assessments onto
the tax rolls on a yearly basis. This fee is $0.25 per parcel plus $50 per District. Also, included for
Fiscal Year 2010/11 is an initial set up fee of $250.00
ATTACHMENT 3
11
Benefit Assessment District West Washington Boulevard No. 2 – City of Culver City 3-3
Prepared by NBS – Fiscal Year 2010/11
Operating Reserve Collection:
Operating Reserve Collection is the amount collected to maintain reserves to enable the City to pay
for the operation and maintenance costs to December 10 of the fiscal year. The Reserve Fund
Contribution will continue until such a time the Reserve Fund balance is approximately one half of the
annual costs. The funds will be allowed to build up gradually in anticipation of any unforeseen
expenses not normally included in the yearly maintenance costs. This may include, but is not limited
to, palm tree replacement, repair or damaged equipment due to vandalism, storms, and other similar
events.
ATTACHMENT 3
12
Benefit Assessment District West Washington Boulevard No. 2 – City of Culver City 4-1
Prepared by NBS – Fiscal Year 2010/11
4. METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT
4.1. General
Pursuant to the CCMC and Article XIIID, all parcels that have a special benefit conferred upon them
as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements and services shall be identified and the
proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel shall be determined in relationship to
the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of improvements. The net amount to be assessed
may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all
assessable lots or parcels. Proposition 218, approved by the voters in November 1996, requires the
Agency to separate general benefit from special benefit, where as only special benefit is assessed.
Each parcel within the District receives special and direct benefit from the improvements and
associated appurtenances located within the public rights-of-ways located within the District, due to
the proximity of said improvements.
4.2. Special Benefit
The landscape and median improvements will be installed by the Culver City Redevelopment Agency
and the continued maintenance is guaranteed through the establishment (formation) of the District.
Since these improvements are for the benefit of the properties within the District and those properties
also benefit from the maintenance of the improvements, only the property owners within the District
are assessed for the said maintenance of improvements.
In addition, the improvements confer a particular and distinct special benefit upon all parcels within
the District because of the nature of the improvements. The ongoing and proper maintenance of
landscaping improves the aesthetic appeal of the properties within the District providing a positive
representation as well as the enhanced desirability of properties through association with the
improvements. This increase in the value provides a distinct special benefit to the parcels within the
District, which includes higher occupancy rates, increased rentals and lower vacancies. According to
Judith Guido, Director of Marketing for LandCareUSA, landscaping can increase the resale value of a
building up to 14% and speed up the sale of a building by 6 weeks. The installation and maintenance
of raised medians improve both pedestrian and traffic safety to those either walking or driving within
the District. According to the US Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration,
raised medians provide pedestrian protection by “reducing pedestrian involved crashes by 45 percent
and fatalities by 78 percent” and after analysis of crash data in seven states, “raised medians reduce
crashes by over 40 percent in urban areas.” The parcels within the District receive a distinct special
benefit as their primary use is business/retail, and studies have proven that greenery and associated
landscaping attract shoppers to the area as well as stimulate economic growth (Kathleen Wolf,
University of Washington: Economic and Public Value of Urban Forests). Also, according to Virginia
Cooperative Extension, a recent study has found that consumers are willing to pay a premium of up
to 12% for goods purchased in retail establishments that are accompanied by quality landscaping.
The ongoing and proper maintenance of the landscaping and appurtenant facilities specially benefits
parcels within the District by enhancing the environmental quality of the parcels and making them
more desirable by improving air quality, providing shade from solar radiation, reducing temperatures
through evaporation and transpiration and absorbing heat (according to data from Planet,
professional landscape network). All of the above mentioned items contribute to a specific
enhancement and special benefit of the properties within the District.
ATTACHMENT 3
13
Benefit Assessment District West Washington Boulevard No. 2 – City of Culver City 4-2
Prepared by NBS – Fiscal Year 2010/11
4.3. General Benefit
In addition to the special benefits received by the parcels within the District, there are incidental
general benefits conferred by the proposed improvements. It is recognized that the proper
maintenance of the medians and landscaping improvements provide only an incidental benefit to the
public at large, including traffic and pedestrian safety for those passing though the District. Also,
according to Projectevergreen.com Economic Fact Sheet, the installation and proper maintenance of
landscaping can protect the City’s drainage systems. In addition, the proper maintenance of
landscaping, lighting and appurtenant facilities reduces property relating crimes (especially
vandalism) against properties located in the vicinity of the improvements (Diane Relf, Extension
Specialist and Environmental Horticulture of Virginia Tech). Finally, the proper maintenance of
landscaping provides a positive visual experience to persons passing through the District, which is
only an incidental benefit. All of the aforementioned constitutes incidental general benefits conferred
by the improvements.
The total benefits thus are a combination of the special benefits to the parcels within the District and
the general benefits to the public at large and to the adjacent properties. Because the median and
landscaping improvements are located immediately in front of the properties within the District, and is
maintained for the benefit of said properties, any benefit received by properties outside the District is
merely coincidental. Nonetheless, the Agency has agreed to ensure that no property is assessed in
excess of the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred upon that property.
4.4. Method of Apportionment Spread
Each of the parcels within the District is deemed to receive special benefit from the improvements.
Each parcel that has a special benefit conferred upon them as a result of the maintenance and
operation of improvements are identified and the proportionate special benefit derived by each
identified parcel is determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of
the improvements. The maximum assessment per linear front foot and building square foot is
determined as follows:
Assessment per Linear Front Foot = (Total Costs X 0.70) / Total District Linear Front Feet
Assessment per Building Square Foot = (Total Costs X 0.30) / Total District Building Square Feet
Only parcels that receive direct special benefit are assessed, and each parcel is assessed in
proportion to the estimated benefit received, in accordance with the formula listed below:
Parcel’s Linear Front Footage X
Assessment per Linear Foot
+
Parcel’s Building Square Footage X
Assessment per Building Square Foot
=
Maximum Assessment
Per Parcel
There are 32 total parcels within the District, with 1,936.38 total linear front feet and 94,386 total
building square feet. The maximum assessment is spread as follows:
Fiscal Year 2009/10 Maximum Budget Costs $19,163.000
Total District Linear Front Footage 1,936.38
Total District Building Square Footage 94,386.00
Proposed Fiscal Year 2009/10 Maximum Assessment per Linear Front Foot $6.93
Proposed Fiscal Year 2009/10 Maximum Assessment per Building Square Foot $0.06
ATTACHMENT 3
14
Benefit Assessment District West Washington Boulevard No. 2 – City of Culver City 4-3
Prepared by NBS – Fiscal Year 2010/11
4.5. Cost of Living Inflation
The proposed maximum assessment sets the initial maximum assessment and is stated in Fiscal
Year 2010/11 dollars. Each fiscal year beginning Fiscal Year 2011/12, the maximum assessment
amount shall be increased by the February Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers for the
Los Angeles, Riverside and Orange County area. The annual assessment shall not exceed the
maximum assessment, unless the appropriate Proposition 218 proceedings are conducted by the City
to authorize an increase beyond the maximum assessment amount.
ATTACHMENT 3
15
Benefit Assessment District West Washington Boulevard No. 2 – City of Culver City 5-1
Prepared by NBS – Fiscal Year 2010/11
5. ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
An Assessment Diagram for the District has been submitted to the City Clerk in the format required
under the provision of the CCMC. The lines and dimensions shown on maps of the County Assessor
of the County of Los Angeles for the current year are incorporated by reference herein and are made
a part of this Report.
ATTACHMENT 3
16
Benefit Assessment District West Washington Boulevard No. 2 – City of Culver City 6-1
Prepared by NBS – Fiscal Year 2010/11
6. ASSESSMENT ROLL
Parcel Identification, for each lot or parcel within the District, shall be the parcel as shown on the Los
Angeles County Assessor’s map for the year in which this Report is prepared.
A listing of parcels assessed within the District, along with the assessment amounts, is included on
the following page. If any parcel submitted for collection is identified by the County Auditor/Controller
to be an invalid parcel number for the current fiscal year, a corrected parcel number and/or new
parcel numbers will be identified and resubmitted to the County Auditor/Controller. The assessment
amount to be levied and collected for the resubmitted parcel(s) shall be based on the method of
apportionment spread approved in this Report. Therefore, if a single parcel has changed to multiple
parcels, the assessment amounts applied to each of the new parcels shall be recalculated and
applied according to the approved method of apportionment spread rather than a proportionate share
of the original assessment.
ATTACHMENT 3
17
Benefit Assessment District West Washington Boulevard No. 2 – City of Culver City 6-2
Prepared by NBS – Fiscal Year 2010/11
City of Culver City
Benefit Assessment District West Washington Boulevard No. 2
Assessment Roll – Fiscal Year 2010-11
Assessor's
Parcel Number Owner
Blg Sq
Footage
Levy Blg Sq
Footage
Linear Front
Footage
Levy Linear
Front Footage
Maximum
Assessment
Actual
Assessment
4231002901 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF CULVER CITY 9233 562.37 $ 103.39 716.23 $ 1,278.58 $
4231002902 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF CULVER CITY 4194 255.45 $ 75.00 519.56 $ 775.00 $
4231002903 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF CULVER CITY 1457 88.74 $ 25.00 173.19 $ 261.92 $
4231002904 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF CULVER CITY 3462 210.86 $ 46.63 323.03 $ 533.88 $
4231002905 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF CULVER CITY 0 - $ 25.00 173.19 $ 173.18 $
4231002906 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF CULVER CITY 0 - $ 25.00 173.19 $ 173.18 $
4231002907 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF CULVER CITY 968 58.96 $ 50.00 346.37 $ 405.32 $
4231002909 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF CULVER CITY 1273 77.54 $ 50.00 346.37 $ 423.90 $
4231003001 LAU DAVID H 950 57.86 $ 29.62 205.19 $ 263.04 $
4231003002 SARLO MICHAEL J & LORY 3169 193.02 $ 60.00 415.64 $ 608.66 $
4231003003 SARLO MICHAEL J & LORY 2559 155.86 $ 37.19 257.63 $ 413.50 $
4231003021 SMITH KEITH A 8414 512.48 $ 122.29 847.15 $ 1,359.64 $
4231018033 SEHESTED WENDY B 3584 218.30 $ 36.71 254.31 $ 472.60 $
4231018034 BROUILLETTE JOSEPH F JR 1500 91.36 $ 25.00 173.19 $ 264.54 $
4231018035 JACOBSON GLADYS B 1675 102.02 $ 25.00 173.19 $ 275.20 $
4231018036 BALLONOFF LILLIAN 6900 420.27 $ 38.23 264.83 $ 685.10 $
4231019038 DRAKOS EUGENIA 5016 305.52 $ 247.58 1,715.09 $ 2,020.60 $
4231020031 MIKHAIEL AMIR 1897 115.54 $ 33.00 228.60 $ 344.14 $
4231020032 MIKHAIEL AMIR 2000 121.82 $ 25.00 173.19 $ 295.00 $
4231020033 KAHAN RALPH 1250 76.14 $ 25.00 173.19 $ 249.32 $
4231020034 ENRIGHT JOHN 1250 76.14 $ 25.00 173.19 $ 249.32 $
4231020035 KAPELINIKOV SHLOMO NAND 1250 76.14 $ 25.00 173.19 $ 249.32 $
4231020038 SEHESTED WENDY B 11344 690.94 $ 133.00 921.35 $ 1,612.28 $
4231021037 CHAMAS KEVIN 5092 310.15 $ 120.84 837.07 $ 1,147.22 $
4231021038 WILLIAMS KEITH R 2358 143.62 $ 37.61 260.51 $ 404.12 $
4231021039 PERLOF STEPHEN & GORDANA 2629 160.13 $ 108.30 750.24 $ 910.36 $
4231022001 ELKINS HERSCHEL T & MIRIAM B 1595 97.15 $ 50.14 347.34 $ 444.48 $
4231022002 POLLOCK RONNIE L 5180 315.51 $ 50.14 347.34 $ 662.84 $
4231022003 POLLOCK RONNIE L 2286 139.24 $ 33.09 229.23 $ 368.46 $
4232009900 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF CULVER CITY 720 43.85 $ 24.99 173.12 $ 216.96 $
4232009901 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF CULVER CITY 0 - $ 119.55 828.17 $ 828.16 $
4232011031 MORITA GERALD & JOLENE 1181 71.93 $ 104.09 721.07 $ 793.00 $
Totals 94386 5,748.90 $ 1936.38 13,414.10 $ 19,162.80 $
ATTACHMENT 3
18ATTACHMENT 4
19ATTACHMENT 4
20ATTACHMENT 4
21