City of Culver City, California
City Council Agenda Item Report
Meeting Date: _02/09/09__ Item Number: _A-1
AGENDA ITEM: Discussion of Allowing Dogs in Culver City Parks and Direction to
Staff as Deemed Appropriate.
Contact Person/Dept.: Patrick Reynolds,
Parks Manager
Phone Number: (310) 253-6471
Fiscal Impact: Yes [X] No [] General Fund: Yes [X] No []
Public Hearing: [] Action Item: [X] Attachments: [X]
Public Notification: Master E-mail Notification List (02/04/09); Advance Courtesy Email
Notification to the City’s Master Email Notification List and PRCS Department Distribution
Lists (01/29/09); PRCS Public Notification Signs in Culver City Parks (01/30/09 through
02/09/09); Publication of Notice in the Culver City News (01/29/09); Postcard mailing to
residents and businesses within a 500 ft. radius and to the end of the block of all eleven
Culver City Parks, two Parkettes and two Playgrounds (01/08/09); Postcard mailing to
those in the Culver City Dog License database not included in 01/08/09 mailing (01/14/09).
Department Approval:
Bill La Pointe, (01/29/09)
City Attorney Approval:
Carol Schwab (by H. Baker) (02/03/09)
Chief Financial Officer Approval:
Jeff Muir (by M. Noller) (02/04/09)
City Manager Approval:
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends the City Council discuss whether or not dogs should be allowed in
Culver City Parks and, if so, under what conditions, and provide direction to staff as
deemed appropriate.
BACKGROUND:
The Parks, Recreation and Community Services Commission (formerly known as
the Parks and Recreation Commission, or the “Commission”) and the City Council
have heard the issue of allowing leashed dogs in Culver City Parks a number of
times during the past four years. At this time, staff will present information and
options that may not have been previously offered for consideration.
At the June 1, 2004 Parks and Recreation Commission Meeting, Agenda Item 7a)
Discussion Regarding Possible Amendment to the City Ordinance to Allow Dogs on
Leashes in Public Parks on a Temporary Basis Until the Dog Park is Developed was
discussed by the Commission. The Commission directed staff to return with
additional information, such as the impact on the park and other guests of the park
and how other cities handle this issue. Copies of the staff report and minutes of the
June 1, 2004 meeting are included as part of Attachment 1.
City of Culver City, California
City Council Agenda Item Report
At the October 5, 2004 Parks and Recreation Commission Meeting, Agenda Item 7c)
Continued Discussion Regarding a Possible Amendment to the City Ordinance to
Allow Dogs on Leashes in Public Parks on a Temporary Basis Until the Dog Park is
Developed was discussed by the Commission. Staff had conducted additional
research on the topic prior to this meeting. At that meeting, one member of the
public expressed opposition to allowing dogs in the parks, even if leashed. In order
to determine how other members of the public felt about this issue, it was suggested
by the Commission that a community survey be conducted or, in the alternative, that
a public hearing be held. The Commission moved to table the discussion of a
temporary amendment and requested that the issue of a permanent Municipal Code
amendment be agendized for a public hearing at a future meeting. Copies of the
staff report and minutes of the October 5, 2004 meeting are included as attachments
to Attachment 1.
At the June 7, 2005 Parks and Recreation Commission Meeting, Agenda Item PH-
1: Discussion of the Consideration of Making a Recommendation to the City Council
to Amend Sections 9.01.360 and 9.10.055 (A) of the Culver City Municipal Code to
Allow Dogs on Leashes in Public Parks within Culver City was heard by the
Commission. Staff presented a report giving an overview of what other California
cities are doing in relation to allowing leashed dogs in City parks. The meeting was
well attended by members of the public (including comments received by e-mail),
who expressed views both in support and in opposition to this issue. After giving the
public an opportunity to speak and considering all the information before it, the
Commission directed staff to come back with a proposal for the implementation of a
pilot program to allow dogs on leashes in one of Culver City’s public parks. Copies
of the staff report and minutes of the June 7, 2005 meeting are included as
attachments to Attachment 1.
At the July 5, 2005 Parks and Recreation Commission Meeting, Agenda Item A-2:
Consideration of a Proposal for a Dogs-on-Leashes Pilot Program in One of the
Parks in Culver City was discussed by the Commission. The proposal that staff
presented at that meeting was a pilot program to be conducted in the “lower park”
area of Culver City Park in order to study and observe the impacts of allowing
leashed dogs in the park for a 90-day period, before a decision would be made as to
whether or not to allow such a practice on a permanent basis and in additional City
parks. Some Commissioners did not believe Culver City Park to a be a good
location for the pilot program and suggested Culver West (Alexander) Park instead,
while other Commissioners were opposed to allowing dogs in the park at all, even as
part of a temporary program. After discussing the matter, a motion was passed by
the Commission (3-2, Shapiro and Deen dissenting) to recommend to the City
Council that a pilot program be implemented at Culver West (Alexander) Park for a
period of 90 days in order to evaluate the feasibility of allowing leashed dogs in City
parks on a permanent basis. Copies of the staff report and minutes of the July 5,
2005 meeting are included as attachments to Attachment 1.
City of Culver City, California
City Council Agenda Item Report
At the July 25, 2005 City Council Meeting, Agenda Item A-2: Consideration of a
Proposed Pilot Program to Allow Dogs on Leashes in Culver West Park for a Period
of Ninety Days; and Consideration of Introduction of an Ordinance Amending Culver
City Municipal Code Sections 9.01.360 and 9.10.055(A), Relating to the Prohibition
of Dogs Running at Large and in Public Parks, in Order to Implement the Pilot
Program was discussed by the City Council. Council took action to reconfirm the
current Ordinance which prohibits dogs in parks with the exception of the Dog Park
(motion by Councilmember Gross; seconded by Councilmember Rose, motion
passes 4-1 with Councilmember Silbiger dissenting). Due to concerns expressed at
the meeting by citizens who walked their dogs in the vicinity of Culver West
(Alexander) Park, the City Council directed staff to assess and bring back a
recommendation as to whether there was a way in Culver West (Alexander) Park to
permit dogs, on pavement, to go from the parking lot to the pass-throughs to the
adjacent neighborhoods (motion by Councilmember Gross; seconded by
Councilmember Rose; passed unanimously). Copies of the staff report and minutes
of the July 25, 2005 meeting are provided as Attachment 1.
DISCUSSION:
In this discussion, the following issues will be presented for the Council’s
consideration: 1) Parks lands space availability; 2) health; 3) safety; 4) possible
benefits to dogs and their owners of allowing dogs in parks; 5) the December 2,
2008 PRCS Commission recommendation to City Council regarding allowing dogs in
Culver City parks and 6) possible options for consideration.
1. Park Lands Space Availability – Currently Culver City has, as a part of its General
Plan, a recommended standard of 10 acres of park land per 1000 population.
Standards such as these are established in order to allocate adequate park space
for Culver City residents to recreate and play. Through various mitigating and
additive calculations and inclusions, the standard of 3 acres of park lands per 1000
population is Culver City’s specific target (that amount of park land that Culver City
alone should provide.) Currently, Culver City provides 2.3 acres of park lands per
1000 population which is 0.7 acres of park lands per 1000 population less than the
City’s target of available park lands space available to the City’s citizenry of
approximately 40,000. A rounded estimate of 2,000 dogs are licensed in the City.
(Currently there are no estimates as to the number of dogs in Culver City that have
not been licensed.) If these dogs were added into our City’s “population” figures for
park lands space calculations, the City would effectively have 2.19 acres per 1000
population, rather than 2.3 acres per 1000 currently. As one can see, the more
living entities (human as well as animals) allowed into the park system for
recreational purposes, the less park space is available for all.
2. Health Issues – Dogs will defecate and urinate in the parks and, even though
conscientious owners and dog-walkers will pick-up after their dogs, one cannot
completely “clean” the defecation from the turf and the urine cannot be cleaned from City of Culver City, California
City Council Agenda Item Report
the area at all. Also, unfortunately, not all dog owners are considerate and
conscientious enough to always pick-up after their dogs.
3. Safety – While dogs are considered “family members” by many, they are still
animals whose behavior cannot always be anticipated. Sometimes, even the
calmest and most congenial dog may, without warning and under unfamiliar
circumstances, demonstrate aggression towards other dogs, animals or people.
Dogs may act out aggressively when trying to assume dominance, when they
become fearful, protective, territorial or possessive, as well as for other reasons.
Oftentimes, dogs will attack, bite and/or maul another animal or human when acting
out aggressively.
Also, boisterous, loud or crowded areas may cause a dog to become aggressive or
“act out.” Activities such as cheering, sporting events, fairs, festivals, large crowds
and other events often associated with parks may cause the most calm and
congenial dog to become fearful or territorial and act out aggressively.
4. Possible Benefits to Dogs and their Owners of Allowing Dogs in Parks – As
noted in the survey of other California cities presented to the Commission on June
7, 2005, the top two benefits associated with allowing leashed dogs in park are
related to the pleasure/convenience of dog owners and their dogs. Specifically,
owners can share the park experience with their dog(s) and the park experience is a
convenient way for dogs to get adequate exercise. Another convenience for dog
owners might be that they no longer have to travel to neighboring cities or to Culver
City’s Dog Park to be with their dog(s) in a park-like environment.
5. Parks, Recreation and Community Services Commission Recommendation to
City Council Regarding Allowing Dogs in Culver City Parks – The PRCS
Commission took action to make the following recommendation to City Council at
their December 2, 2008 meeting (Attachment 2):
MOVED BY COMMISSIONER KIM, SECONDED BY VICE CHAIR DALY
REDHOLTZ, AND UNANIMOUSLY PASSED (ABSENT CHAIR SHAPIRO)
THAT THE PARKS, RECREATION AND COMMUNITY SERVICES
COMMISSION: RECOMMEND TO THE CITY COUNCIL THAT THE CITY
CONTINUE THE CURRENT ORDINANCES AND PRACTICES THAT DO
NOT ALLOW DOGS IN PARKS, EXCEPT WHERE THERE IS A
DESIGNATED DOG PATH OR DOG PARK AND THAT THE STAFF AND
COMMISSION WOULD CONSIDER DESIGNATED DOG PATHS IN OTHER
PARKS WHEN A NEED IS IDENTIFIED.
6. Possible Options for Consideration
City of Culver City, California
City Council Agenda Item Report
A. (Commission’s Recommendation) Continue the existing law and practices
that do not allow dogs in parks, except in the Dog Park or where there is a
designated dog path.
B. Designate a time(s), day(s), and park(s) where only those guests with
dogs are permitted to be in the park(s) and their dogs are allowed to be
off-leash under voice command in the park(s) and direct staff to return to
Council with a proposed ordinance for consideration.
C. Designate a time(s), day(s) and park(s) where dogs and their owners are
allowed in park(s) while the dog is kept on a maximum six (6) foot leash
and direct staff to return to Council with a proposed ordinance for
consideration.
When considering designating, time(s), day(s) and park(s), these should preferably
be times when: (1) there are the fewest number of people in the parks; (2) there are
the fewest number of children in the parks; (3) the activities in the parks are likely to
be the calmest; and, (4) the park(s) designated should have the least number of
“boisterous activity” amenities (i.e., sports fields, etc.), most probably pocket parks or
neighborhood parks. Also, it is important to note that only dogs that have been
licensed in Culver City would be allowed with their owners in the parks. All others
would be subject to citations and fines. For example, the following option was
considered (but not supported) by the PRCS Commission at the December 2, 2008
meeting:
…that dogs and their owners be allowed in seven Culver City parks including
Culver West Alexander, Tellefson, Carlson, Coombs, Blair Hills, Fox Hills
Mini- and El Marino Parks under the following conditions: a) the owner of the
dog must be present and be in control of the dog(s); b) the owner of the
dog(s) must be able to physically restrain the dog(s) (a maximum of two dogs
per owner); c) hours of park use are restricted to the hours of dawn until 10
a.m.; d) the dogs must be on a leash no longer than six (6) feet in length; e)
the owner must pick up after their dog, including disposing of any dog feces in
an appropriate manner; f) the dog must be kept at least twenty (20) feet from
all picnic and playground areas, as well as any boisterous and/or playful
activity taking place within the park; and, g) the dog must be currently
licensed in Culver City, if not, this constitutes a violation for which the owner
may be cited and fined.
Should Council decide to allow dogs in Culver City parks under certain
circumstances that are not consistent with the current Culver City Municipal Code,
staff will return with a draft Ordinance based on Council’s directive at this evening’s
meeting.
Public Notification
City of Culver City, California
City Council Agenda Item Report
As noted in the Public Notification section of the cover page of this report, both
standard and courtesy email notifications were done for this item. PRCS Public
Notification Signs were posted in Culver City Parks beginning on January 30, 2009
and remaining through February 9, 2009. A four (4) column by 6.25” Display Ad was
run in the January 29, 2009 edition of the Culver City News, at a cost of $320.00.
A total of 9,504 postcards were mailed to residents and businesses within a 500 ft.
radius and to the end of the block of all eleven Culver City Parks, two Parkettes and
two Playgrounds on January 8, 2009. This list of addresses was then cross-checked
with the 2,003 addresses in the Culver City Dog License database. There were
1,245 addresses that had not been included in January 8, 2009 mailing. Postcards
were sent to these addresses on January 14, 2009. The cost of a postcard
notification has been estimated at $0.50 per postcard, including postage, materials
and Graphic Services staff time. Using this estimate, the cost to the City of a mailing
of 10,749 postcards is $5,374.50.
An additional 255 postcards that were printed were not mailed, but instead placed on
public counters in City facilities, including at the Veterans’ Memorial Building, the
Senior Center, City Hall and at the back of the Mike Balkman Council Chambers. A
copy of the front and back of the public notification postcard, which noticed three (3)
Parks, Recreation and Community Services Department City Council Agenda Items
is provided as Attachment 3.
FISCAL IMPACT:
There would be added staff time and cost (incalculable at this time) in order to
handle any defecation issues not attended to by dog owners, as well as code
enforcement and complaint/injury issues that might arise.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. July 25, 2005 City Council Meeting Agenda Item A-2: Consideration of a
Proposed Pilot Program to Allow Dogs on Leashes in Culver West Park for a
Period of Ninety Days; and Consideration of Introduction of an Ordinance
Amending Culver City Municipal Code Sections 9.01.360 and 9.10.055(A),
Relating to the Prohibition of Dogs Running at Large and in Public Parks, in
Order to Implement the Pilot Program with Attachments and related approved
meeting minutes.
2. Approved minutes of the December 2, 2008 Parks, Recreation and Community
Services Commission meeting.
3. Copy of the postcard noticing this Agenda Item
MOTIONS:
City of Culver City, California
City Council Agenda Item Report
That the City Council:
1. (Commission’s Recommendation) Continue the existing law and practices that do
not allow dogs in parks, except at the Culver City Dog Park or where there is a
designated dog path;
or
2. (Consistent with Commission’s Recommendation) Continue the existing law and
practices that do not allow dogs in parks, except in the Culver City Dog Park or
where there is a designated dog path, and authorize staff and Parks, Recreation
and Community Services Commission to consider recommendations to Council
for designated dog paths in other parks when a need is identified, as
recommended by the Commission;
or
3. Determine that dogs and their owners be allowed in the following City Parks:
_______________________________________________________________,
under the following conditions:
_______________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________;
and direct staff to return to Council with a proposed ordinance consistent with
Council’s direction.
or
4. Provide staff with alternate direction.
MEETING DATE: February 9, 2009
AGENDA ITEM: Consideration of Allowing Dogs in Culver City Parks.
ATTACHMENTS
July 25, 2005 City Council Meeting Agenda Item A-2:
Consideration of a Proposed Pilot Program to Allow Dogs
on Leashes in Culver West Park for a Period of Ninety
Days; and Consideration of introduction of an Ordinance
Amending Culver City Municipal Code Sections 9.01.360
and 9.10.055(A), Relating to the Prohibition of Dogs
Running at Large and in Public Parks, in Order to
Implement the Pilot Program with Attachments and
related approved meeting minutes.
Pages
1 - 32
2. Approved minutes of the December 2, 2008 Parks, 33 - 35
Recreation and Community Services Commission
meeting.
3. Copy of the postcard noticing this Agenda Item 36ATTACHMENT 1
EXCERPT OF THE MINUTES OF THE
REGULAR MEETING OF THE
CITY COUNCIL, CITY OF CULVER CITY,
CALIFORNIA
Call to Order & Roll Call
July 25, 2005
6:00 P.M.
The meeting of the City Council was called to order at 6:00 P.M.
Present: Mayor Albert Vera
Vice Mayor Gary Silbiger
Councilmember Alan Corlin
Councilmember Carol Gross
Councilmember Steven Rose
o0o
Excerpt Begins Item A-2
Consideration of a Proposed Pilot Program to Allow Dogs on
Leashes in Culver West Park for a Period of Ninety Days; and
Consideration of Introduction of an Ordinance Amending Culver
City Municipal Code Sections 9.01.360 and 9.10.055(A), Relating
to the Prohibition of Dogs Running at Large and in Public Parks,
in Order to Implement the Pilot Program.
Mayor Vera requested that spokespersons be chosen to represent
those in favor of the proposed program and to represent those
against.
The following members of the audience addressed the City
Council, speaking against the proposed pilot program:
Jeannine Stehlin
Jamie Wallace
Dena Snedden
Eleanor Osgood
Rich Waters
Elizabeth Wheat
June Walden
Emily Glick
Anita Shapiro, member, Culver City Parks and Recreation
Commission
The following members of the audience addressed the City
Council, speaking in favor of the pY-pr,Qerl
02/09/09 - Page 1Jay Handal
Patricia Graf
Susan and Josh Kirchoff
Deborah Shands
Judy Scott
Jeff Cooper, member, Culver City Parks and Recreation Commission
David Hoyt
Mary E. McCallum
Judy Leviton
Lisa Michel
William LaPointe, Director of Parks, Recreation and Community
Services gave the staff report.
Discussion ensued regarding staffing required for this pilot
program; health concerns; and allowing residents near Culver
West Park to walk their dogs through the park in order to
provide easier access to streets on the other side of the park.
Following discussion, the following motions were made:
MOVED BY COUNCILMEMBER GROSS AND SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER ROSE,
THAT THE CITY COUNCIL RECONFIRM THE CURRENT ORDINANCE AS IT
STANDS WHICH PROHIBITS DOGS IN PARKS WITH THE EXCEPTION OF THE
DOG PARK.
AYES: Councilmembers Corlin, Gross, Rose, Vera
NOES: Councilmember Silbiger
ABSTAIN: None
ABSENT: None
MOVED BY COUNCILMEMBER GROSS, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER ROSE AND
UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED, THAT THE CITY COUNCIL DIRECT STAFF TO
ASSESS AND BRING BACK A RECOMMENDATION AS TO WHETHER THERE IS A
WAY IN CULVER WEST PARK TO PERMIT DOGS, ON PAVEMENT, TO GO FROM
THE PARKING LOT TO THE PASS-THROUGHS TO THE ADJACENT
NEIGHBORHHOODS (TO MOORE STREET AND TO MCCONNELL BLVD.).
o0o
Excerpt Ends-
02/09/09 - Page 2City of Culver City, California
City Council Agenda Item Report
Meeting Date 07/25/05 :::Itern Number : A-2
:AGENDA :ITEM: Consideration of . :0 Proposed :Pilot PrOgrarn10:: Allow Dogs on lLeashes:
in Culver West .Park for : a Period of Ninew:ippy;:: : 40d:::pcip§oeptipp : : ::of Eilwoduoori::Of E an
: Ordinance Amending : Culver city : Municipal : Code :::Sections :1901:.360 and : : 9: 10::.:055(Ao,:
Relating to the Prohibition of Dogs RUnhing::at::Large ::and in Public: ::Parks; : in Order to
Implement the Pilot Program
Contact Person/Dept .:: William :La Pointe : Phone Number (310):25M682:
:Fiscal Impact: yes [X] No [1
General Fund Yes [j No IX]::
Public Hearing ] Action OM: [X] : Attachments : :Pc]
Public Notification Master Notification List on 7/11/05; all bLiSineSSOS and residents
Within a 300-foot radius Of Culver West Park were notified via postcard totaling 97 Cards"
at a coStfort:ppstagp of $22:31 on 7/11105. :Ernails: ::or postcards : (40 pOSttards:atj'a
: postage: OOSt bf ::$9:20) : Were sent tO :intereSted : partieS ,:bn or before 40y,:itiC::20Q.5::
Department Approval:
William : La: Pointe 7/18/05
CAD APO-0\ra .
Jerry FulWbod: : 7/20/05:
City Controller ApproVal.
7/19/05 ,. Matlee :Chang
RECOMMENDATION:
staff is bringing to the City Council the
on leashes in Culver West Park for a
Culver City Municipal Code Sections
the prohibition of dogs running at large and
Pilot Program (Attachment 1).
Commission (the "Commission")
to the Culver City Municipal Code to allow
basis until the Dog Park is developed,
such as how other cities handle
for the June 1 st meeting are included
this issue was further discussed by the
C\ .- .
-member of the public expressed
- Page 3
By the Parks and Recreation Commission's action,
following recommendations for consideration.
1. Proposed Pilot Program to allow dogs
period of ninety days; and
2. Introduction of an Ordinance amending
9.01.360 and 9.10.055(A), relating to
in public parks, in order to implement the
BACKGROUND:
At its June 1, 2004 meeting, the Parks and Recreation
discussed the issue of a possible amendment
dogs on leashes in City parks on a temporary
and directed staff to return with additional information,
this issue. Copies of the staff report and minutes
as Attachment 2.
After staff conducted additional research,
Commission .at its October 5, 2004 meeting.
02/09/09City of Culver City, California
City Council Agenda Item Report
opposition to allowing dogs in the parks, even if leashed. In order to determine how
other members of the public felt about this issue, it was suggested by the Commission
that a community survey be conducted or, in the alternative, that a public hearing be
held. The Commission moved to table the discussion of a temporary amendment and
requested that the issue of a permanent Municipal Code amendment be agendized for a
public hearing at a future meeting. Copies of the staff report and minutes of the October
5th meeting are included as Attachment 3.
Subsequently, a public hearing was held to discuss this issue at the Commission's June
7, 2005 meeting. Staff presented a report giving an overview of what other California
cities are doing in relation to allowing leashed dogs in City parks. The meeting was well
attended by members of the public (including comments received by e-mail), who
expressed views both in support and in opposition to this issue. After giving the public
an opportunity to be heard and considering all the information before it, the Commission
directed staff to come back with a proposal for the implementation of a pilot program to
allow dogs on leashes in one of Culver City's public parks. Copies of the staff report
and minutes of the June 7 th meeting are included as Attachment 4.
On July 5, 2005, staff presented to the Commission a proposal for a pilot program to be
conducted in the "lower park" area of Culver City Park in order to study and observe the
impacts of allowing leashed dogs in the park for a 90-day period, before a decision is
made as to whether or not to allow such a practice on a permanent basis and in
additional City parks. Some Commissioners did not believe Culver City Park to be a
good location for the pilot program and suggested Culver West Park instead, while other
Commissioners were opposed to allowing dogs in the park at all, even as part of a
temporary program. After discussing the matter, a motion was passed by the
Commission (3-2, Shapiro and Deen dissenting) to recommend to the City Council that
a pilot program be implemented at Culver West Park for a period of 90 days, in order to
evaluate the feasibility of allowing leashed dogs in City parks on a permanent basis.
Copies of the staff report and minutes of the July 5 th meeting are included as
Attachment 5.
DISCUSSION:
This pilot program is being proposed in order to study and observe the impacts and
feasibility of allowing leashed dogs in one of the City's parks, before a decision is made
as to whether or not to allow such a practice in additional City parks and on a
permanent basis. The basic guidelines for the proposed Dogs-on-Leashes Pilot
Program were drawn from the Parks and Recreation Commission's comments and
recommendations at its meetings of June 7 and July 5, 2005, and include the following:
fl The pilot program shall be implemented at Culver West Park.
D The duration of the pilot program will be 90 days.
02/09/09 - Page 4City of Culver City, California
City Council Agenda Item Report
D Dogs must be on leashes not exceeding six feet in length at all times.
D Retractable leashes are not allowed.
E Dogs are prohibited from the park playground and tot lot areas.
5 Dog owners must clean-up and properly dispose of their dog's feces.
O Dogs are allowed in the park only during regular park operating hours.
111 Temporary signs will be posted to inform park users of the rules of conduct for
dogs and their owners.
FISCAL IMPACT:
Implementation of a Dogs-on-Leashes Pilot Program is anticipated to have some impact
on staff (for cleanup, patrolling efforts, data collection analysis and reports) and
temporary signage as noted below:
1. 48 hours staff time © $24.00/hour $1152.00
2. 3 ea. temporary signs and posts @ $25.00 ea. $ 75.00
Total cost estimate $1227.00
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Proposed ordinance;
2. Staff report and excerpt of minutes from 6/1/04 Commission meeting;
3. Staff report and excerpt of minutes from 10/5/04 Commission meeting;
4. Staff report and excerpt of minutes from 6/7/05Commission meeting; and
5. Staff report and excerpt of minutes from 7/5/05 Commission meeting.
MOTION:
That the City Council:
1. Authorize a Dogs-on-Leashes Pilot Program to be implemented in Culver West
Park for a period of ninety days;
and
2. Introduce, for first reading, the Ordinance amending Culver City Municipal Code
Sections 9.01.360 and 9.10.055(A), relating to the prohibition of dogs running at
large and in public parks, in order to implement the Pilot Program;
OR
02/09/09 - Page 5City of Culver City, California
City Council Agenda Item Report
3. Reject the Parks and Recreation Commission's recommendation for the
development of a Dogs-on-Leashes Pilot Program to be implemented in Culver
West Park for a period of ninety days;
OR
4. Discuss the issue and provide further direction to staff.
02/09/09 - Page 6MEETING DATE 07/25/05
AGENDA ITEM Consideration of a Proposed Pilot Program to Allow Dogs on
Leashes in Culver West Park for a Period of Ninety Days, and
Consideration of Introduction of an Ordinance Amending
Culver City Municipal Code Sections 9 01 360 and 9 10 055
(A), Relating to the Prohibition of Dogs Running at Large and
in Public Parks, in Order to Implement the Pilot Program
ATTACHMENTS
Pages |109| Proposed Ordinance 1-3|109| Staff report and excerpt of minutes of 6/1/04 Commission meeting 4-7|109| Staff report and excerpt of minutes of 10/5/04 Commission meeting 8-12|109| Staff report and excerpt of minutes of 6/7/05 Commission meeting 13-20|109| Staff report and excerpt of minutes of 7/5/05 Commission meeting 21-25
02/09/09 - Page 7Atem.timeor
I|1010101010101010 10
10|11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
ORDINANCE NO 2005-
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CULVER CITY,
CALIFORNIA AMENDING SECTIONS 901 360 AND
9 10 055 (A) OF THE CULVER CITY MUNICIPAL CODE
RELATING TO THE PROHIBITION OF DOGS RUNNING AT
LARGE AND IN PUBLIC PARKS, IN ORDER TO
IMPLEMENT A 90-DAY PILOT PROGRAM TO ALLOW
DOGS ON LEASHES IN CULVER WEST PARK
WHEREAS, the Culver City Municipal Code currently prohibits dogs in public
parks, and
WHEREAS, many other cities allow dogs in parks provided that they are on a
leash and other rules are followed, and
WHEREAS, it has been approved by the City Council, upon recommendation
of the Parks and Recreation Commission, to implement a 90-day pilot program to allow
leashed dogs in Culver West Park in order to observe and study the impacts and feasibility
of implementing such a practice on a permanent basis and in additional City parks
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Culver City, California
DOES HEREBY ORDAIN as follows
SECTION 1 Section 9 01 360 of the Culver City Municipal Code is hereby
amended to read as follows
§
901 360 DOGS RUNNING AT LARGE, PROHIBITION, EXCEPTIONS
It shall be unlawful for any person owning or having charge, care,
custody or control of any dog to cause, permit or allow the same to be or to
run at large upon any highway, street, lane, alley court or other public place,
or upon any private property or premises other than those of the person
owning or having charge, care, custody, or control of such dog, in the City,
27
02/09/09 - Page 8
281|1010101010101010 10
10|11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
nr.
unless such dog be restrained by a substantial chain or leash not exceeding
six (6) feet in length and is in charge care custody or control of such
competent person Provided however that no such dog shall be allowed or
permitted in any of the following places any store market, restaurant cafe
lunchroom, soda fountain, bakery or kindred establishments wherein foods for
human consumption are served, sold or kept for sale, or in any public park
except as permitted by §§ 9 10 055 (A) and 9 10 400
SECTION 2 Section 9 10 055 (A) of the Culver City Municipal Code is
hereby amended to read as follows
§ 9 10 055 PROHIBITIONS
Within the limits of any public park it shall be unlawful for any person
A Having charge, care, custody or control of any dog, except as
permitted by § 9 10 400, or other animal, fowl, or reptile to cause, permit or
allow the same to be within the limits of any public park within the City unless
such person shall have obtained a special permit from the City Council to
conduct an entertainment or exhibition in which an animal is a participant
Notwithstanding this prohibition, there shall be a 90-day pilot program
conducted in Culver West Park from September 7, 2005 through and
including December 6, 2005, dunng which time dogs shall be allowed in
Culver West Park during regular operating hours, provided that all persons
having charge, care, custody or control of any dog shall comply with the
following conditions 1) dogs shall be restrained by a substantial chain OF
leash not exceeding six feet in length, 21 retractable leashes shall not be
02/09/09 - gage 9permitted, 3) dogs shall not be permitted in the playground and tot lot areas,
and 4) dog feces shall be cleaned-up and properly disposed of by the person
having charge, care, custody or control of such dog
SECTION 3 Pursuant to Section 512 of the City Charter this
Ordinance shall take effect thirty (30) days after the date of its adoption Pursuant to
Sections 514 and 517 of the City Charter, prior to the expiration of fifteen (15) days after
the adoption, the City Clerk shall cause this Ordinance or a summary thereof, to be
published in the Culver City News and shall post this Ordinance or a summary thereof in at
least three places within the City
SECTION 4 The City Council hereby declares that if any provision, section,
subsection, paragraph, sentence, phrase or word of this ordinance is rendered or declared
invalid or unconstitutional by any final action in a court of competent jurisdiction or by
reason of any preemptive legislation then the City Council would have independently
adopted the remaining provisions sections subsections paragraphs sentences phrases
or words of this ordinance and as such they shall remain in full force and effect
APPROVED AND ADOPTED this day of August 2005
ALBERT M VERA, Mayor
City of Culver City California
ATTEST APPROVED AS TO FORM
CHRISTOPHER ARMENTA, City Clerk CAROL A SCHWAB, City Attorney
02/09109 - Pstge 10
3|101010101010101010 10
10|11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
LIU
27
28ArrAciifiglauT
eattleit, CITY
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
June 1, 2004
CHAIR DEEN AND MEMBERS OF THE PARKS AND
RECREATION COMMISSION
Marty Nicholson, Recreation Manager
Don Rogers PRCS Director
Discussion Regarding Possible Amendment to the City Ordinance
to Allow Dogs on Leashes in Public Parks on a Temporary Basis
Until the Dog Park is Developed
DATE
TO
FROM
THROUGH
SUBJECT
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the Parks and Recreation Commission deny a proposal to
recommend to City Council an amendment to the City Ordinance to allow dogs
on leashes in public parks on a temporary basis until the Culver City Dog Park is
developed
BACKGROUND
The City Council adopted regulations that govern the activities within City parks
on January 21, 1957 On May 22, 1961, the City Council added a regulation
prohibiting dogs in public parks Culver City Municipal Code (CCMC) § 9 10 055
(A), Attachment 1, prohibits dogs within any public park within the City unless a
special permit from the City Council has been obtained At the time the uno
animals in public parks" regulation was adopted there was a concern about the
health impact of dog fecal matter to children who use the limited grass areas in
the neighborhood parks
At the April 2004 Parks and Recreation Commission meeting the Commission
directed staff to agendize a discussion regarding a possible amendment to the
City Ordinance to allow dogs on leashes in City parks on a temporary basis until
the Dog Park is developed
DISCUSSION
Over the last twenty years, use of City parks has increased dramatically as open
space has declined and the population has increased The needs of park users,
like youth sports rirgnnrtinir, prnr pArn-ifttAAR and condo/apartment dwellers
9770 CULVERMOWS GURagerl IA 90232 0507Page 2 of 3
have impacted the local neighborhood parks significantly with increased usage
Therefore today park space is in extremely high demand
A recommendation to City Council regarding amending the CCMC §§ 9 10 055 to
allow dogs on leashes presents the following concerns 1) children's health, 2)
aggressive dogs, 3) conflicts with park users and 4) confusion in ordinance
Children's Health
Many years ago the City adopted a no dogs in public parks ordinance due to
concerns pnmanly with health and well being of the children who use the park
When dogs defecate in a public park it can lay on the ground overnight Dunng
the night, sprinklers water the fecal matter spreading it around on the grass and
making clean up impossible Small children using the park are prone to sit or lay
on the grass and prone to put objects into their mouths which could be
contaminated with dog fecal matter The fecal matter may not be visible to park
users as a result of the water sprayed on by the sprinklers
In addition, though the CCMC prohibits dogs within any public parks, dog fecal
matter is already a clean up issue Some dog owners are responsible and do
clean up after their dogs however, there are many dog owners who do not It is
assumed that if the existing ordinance were changed to allow dogs within public
parks, there will be an increase in dog fecal matter in the parks and
corresponding increase in maintenance costs and health issues to the children
that use the parks for youth sports, recreation programs and drop in use
Aggressive Dogs
Under current regulations staff has little problem with aggressive dog issues
because dogs are not allowed in public parks However, with a change to the
ordinance allowing dogs, there is a potential of aggressive animals impacting the
quality of park use for the majonty of residents who do not own dogs A dog
owner may not even be aware of his/her dog's aggressive tendencies until they
bring the animal to a public park Due to the high use of City parks, with a
change in ordinance conflicts between dogs and park users are bound to occur
Conflicts with Park Users
We could assume that if dogs on leashes were allowed some owners would
allow their dogs to be without leashes, which results in an increase in conflicts
and requires additional enforcement
A high percentage of permitted park use is for children s birthday parties,
company picnics and family gathenngs Dogs allowed to be in City parks may
impact the quality of the users experience with dogs barking and running about
without leashes There are some people who are afraid of dogs, allowing dogs
within in public parks may have an impact on the quality of their park expenence
02/09109 - Page 12
?imam 014 RECYCLED PAPER FILENAME DOGS IN PAR/CS REPORT 6 01 04 MTGPage 3 of 3
Confusion in Ordinance
A temporary change in the CCMC could create confusion for the public and City
staff hired to enforce City regulations Signage would be required to inform the
public of the change in ordinance The no dog ordinance has taken many years
of enforcement to bring most park users into compliance with the ordinance
Residents with dogs would become accustomed to the change and therefore,
once the Dog Park is built changing the ordinance back to its former regulation
would set back the many years of successful enforcement
FISCAL ANALYSIS
Changes to park signs to accommodate a temporary change in ordinance have
been estimated at $3,000 including installation costs Once the Dog Park has
been completed signage would have to be changed again Total costs for signs
would be $6,000 Increase in maintenance as a result of additional clean up has
been estimated at $3,000 per year There would be a need to provide dog
owners with the necessary equipment to clean up after their dogs Posts to hold
the dog fecal bags run approximately $400 per park including installation If only
one post was installed at every park, the cost would be $4,400 There is a
potential for $10,400 in equipment costs and approximately $3,000 annual
additional maintenance costs, for an estimated total cost of $13,400 per year
ATTACHMENTS |109| CCMS § 9 10 055
MOTION
That the Parks and Recreation Commission deny a recommendation to City
Council to amend the City Ordinance to allow dogs on leashes in public parks on
a temporary basis until the dog park is opened
02/09/09 - Page 13
FILE Nam DoGS IN PARJCS REPORT 6 Dl 114 Mu PRonTo ONR2CYDP4PERParks Recreation & Community Services Commission
June 1 2004
Item *7a
7 20 p m
Gary Ford thanked the Commission for the recognition He introduced family members
who were in the audience wife Linda, daughters Shama and Leah, and grand daughter
Tammy
Photographs were taken of the recipient and family with Commissioners and staff
members before the dais
000
Discussion Regarding Possible Amendment to the City Ordinance to Allow
Dogs on Leashes in Public Parks on a Temporary Basis Until the Dog Park is
Developed
Don Rogers, PRCS Director, called attention to the staff report and invited questions from
the Commission
Mr Rogers informed the Commission that he must leave the Commi8sion meeting early
to attend the City Council meeting concurrently scheduled at Syd Kronenthal Park
At this time, Commissioner Alexander entertained the following motion
IT WAS MOVED BY COMMISSIONER ALEXANDER, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
SHAPIRO, THAT THE COMMISSION DENY A RECOMMENDATION TO THE CITY
COUNCIL TO AMEND THE CITY ORDINANCE TO ALLOW DOGS ON LEASHES IN
PUBLIC PARKS ON A TEMPORARY BASIS UNTIL THE DOG PARK IS OPEN
Commissioner James initiated discussion as she questioned the validity of some of the
concerns cited in the staff report relating to 1.) children s health, 2) aggressive dogs, 3)
conflicts with park users, 4) confusion in ordinance and 5) additional maintenance costs
She further questioned the source of information and asked staff to return with additional
information, including how other cities address the issue of allowing dogs in public parks
She asked that this matter be reagendized for further discussion and action at the
Commissions July meeting
Commissioner Cooper concurred with Commissioner James' concerns
After a penod of discussion, the following action was taken
IT WAS MOVED BY COMMISSIONER ALEXANDER, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
COOPER, THAT THE COMMISSION TABLE THE MOTION AND REAGENDIZE THE
ISSUE FOR FURTHER DISCUSSION AND ACTION
The Chair called for a vote on the motion which resulted in the following
Ayes Commissioners James, Shapiro, Alexander, and Cooper
Noes Commissioner Deen
Abstain None
000
Item #71)
7 31 P M
Consideration and Discussion of the Needs and Benefits Related to the
Development of a Commu.mty Parks and Recreation Plan
Mr Rogers circulated a copy of the Culver City Recreation Element, an optional element
UI -ihe City s Genera-I Nan 4 1 - at -4-as adopted by the City Conned Januay, 1.96 R He AlAn
circulated a copy of the Draft General Plan which he noted was never adopted by the City
Council
02/09109 - Page 14torrItcamEAT 3
eatiteh, CITY INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
nn•11Apsel
October 5, 2004
CHAIR DEEN AND MEMBERS OF THE PARKS AND
RECREATION COMMISSION
Marty Nicholson, Recreation Manager
Don Rogers, PRCS Director
Continued Discussion Regarding Possible Amendment to the City
Ordinance to Allow Dogs on Leashes in Public Parks on a
Temporary Basis Until the Dog Park is Developed
DATE
TO
FROM
THROUGH
SUBJECT
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the Parks and Recreation Commission deny a proposal to
recommend to City Council an amendment to the City Ordinance to allow dogs
on leashes in public parks on a temporary basis until the Culver City Dog Park is
developed
BACKGROUND
At the June 2004 Parks and Recreation Commission meeting, the Commission
directed staff to agendize further discussion regarding a possible amendment to
the City Ordinance to allow dogs on leashes in City parks on a temporary basis
until the Dog Park is developed Attachment A provides a copy of the staff report
from the June meeting At the June Commission meeting the Commission
decided to table the motion and reagendize the issue for further discussion and
action Commissioner James requested additional information regarding how
other cities handle allowing dogs in public parks
DISCUSSION
Staff set out a survey to other cities regarding issues of aggressive dogs in parks
and the cost of maintenance regarding dog use in parks Attachment B provides
a copy of the request Only two cities responded City of Malibu and City of
South Pasadena The City of Malibu has always had dogs in their parks and
therefore had no information regarding increase in maintenance or problems with
aggressive dogs The City of South Pasadena decided to change their ordinance
because they do not offer a dog park The change in ordinance was due to
problems with lack of enforcement in the no-dog law Due to time constraints
and the short turn around, staff was unable to conduct additional research on
tmfhr
citp.
9770 CULVER02409109GUIPINOY1 CS 90232 0507Page 2 of 3
The City has experienced aggressive dogs in the past Three incidents in the
last year include|109| A woman brought her dog to Culver City Park to use the park as
grounds to train her dog to bite The woman was fully clothed in a bite
outfit and the dog was extremely aggressive growling and snapping at
the air when staff asked that she remove the dog
2 On April 30, 2004, Gary Ford, Employee of the Month of June, was
working at Carlson Park picking up trash when a dog on a leash
approached Mr Ford and bit him in the leg Attachment C provides the
police report descnbing the incident
3 On August 15, 2004, an employee distributing flyers door to door had a
leashed dog lunge at her and missed being bitten by jumping back
while the owner pulled back on the dog's leash The owner claimed
the dog was extremely fnendly
Dunng the survey of other Cities some Cities are now adopting very strict
aggressive dog ordinances to combat the problems with aggressive animals in
public parks
When it comes to dog feces, the Parks Division currently experiences problems
with people not cleaning up after their dogs It is anticipated, though there is no
documentation currently available from other cities, that a change in ordinance to
allow dogs in parks would increase the dog fecal matter in parks
In discussing the dogs on leashes in parks issue with members of the Friends of
the Culver City Dog Park, there is some concern that allowing dogs in parks on a
temporary basis would have a negative impact on the campaign to build a Dog
Park
FISCAL ANALYSIS
The fiscal analysis remains the same as last report Costs for signs would be
$6,000 and additional maintenance would run $3,000 Annual supply costs for
bags would be $400 Posts installation would be $4,400 Total costs would be
$10,400 in equipment and $3 000 annually in maintenance
ATTACHMENTS
A Dog Park Report from the April Commission Meeting
B Email Survey Questions on Dogs in Parks
C Police Report Regarding Dog Bite incident|1010|02/09/09 - Page 16
FILENAME 0000 114 PARKS REPORT 10 5 04 MTG. PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPERPage 3 of 3
MOTION
That the Parks and Recreation Commission deny a recommendation to City
Council to amendment to City Council an amendment to the City Ordinance to
allow dogs on leashes in public parks on a temporary basis until the dog park is
developed
FILE NAME DOGS IN PARKS REPORT W 5 04 MTG
02/09/09 - Page 17
PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPERParks Recreation & Community Services Commission
October 5 2004
RELATING TO DOGS IN CITY PARKS AND ESTABLISHING THE OFF-LEASH DOG
PARK RULES AND REGULATIONS, THE PROPOSED RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING
PARK PATROL OFFICERS TO ENFORCE THE RULES AT THE OFF-LEASH DOG
PARK, THE PROPOSED RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING DOG PARK HOURS, AND
THE PROPOSED SIGNAGE AT THE DOG PARK, AND DIRECT STAFF TO AGENDIZE
THE PROPOSED ORDINANCE AND RESOLUTIONS AT A CITY COUNCIL MEETING
FOR DISCUSSION AND ADOPTION
Staff fielded questions from the Commission relative to the staff report
Following lengthy discussion, Chair Shapiro called for a vote on the MOTION WHICH
PASSED UNANIMOUSLY
Ms Hirohama advised the proposed ordinance is tentatively scheduled for City Council
approval on November 86 with the introduction of the first reading of the ordinance The
Council will adopt the rules and regulations with the second reading of the ordinance on
November 22nd The ordinance would then take effect 30 days after adoption
Mr Rogers mentioned the dog park cleanup is estimated to be completed by late
November
000
Discussion Regarding Park Permits Enforcement Issues
As a follow-up to the Commission s discussion several months ago, Heather liter
informed the Commission that the City Attorney's Office is currently researching the issue
of enforcing park permits and other related ordinances pertaining to park usage,
mcluding
Item #713
750
p In
• enforcement of the current state law prohibiting smoking within 25 feet of a
playground or sandbox area,
• proposed Municipal Code amendments to the chapters pertammg to abandoned
personal property and shopping carts in pubhc parks as it relates to the homeless
population
Ms Iker added the City Attorneys Office is also dealing with other legal issues, which has
further delayed this process
She mentioned the City presently has a Homeless Subcommittee that is also addressing
some of the issues associated with homelessness
Ms Iker indicated the Commission would be apprised of the legal findings regarding
these issues as they develop
Recalling the Commissions action a few months ago to prohibit moon bounces in
Lindberg Park, Chair Shapiro asked if moon bounces are still being allowed in other
parks
Don Rogers responded that this is a policy issue that must be approved by the City
Council at a future meeting
000
Continued Discussion Regarding a Possible Amendment to the City
Ordinance to Allow Dogs on Leashes in Public Parks on a Temporary Basis
Until the Dog
Pariteb eier - Page 18
Item #7c
755 1
3 InParks Recreation & Community Services Commission
October 5 2004
Jeannine Stehlm, Culver City resident, addressed the Commission and spoke in strong
opposition on any change to the Culver City Dog Ordinance
She read statistical facts on Insurance costs relating to dog bite claims and cited a list of
diseases that can be transmitted from dog feces to humans
Ms Stehhn stated that the health and safety of children should be the primary concern
Commissioner Deen initiated discussion He stated that allowing dogs on leashes in the
parks would be counter productive to the purpose of a dog park
Commissioner Deen proposed the following motion That the Commission deny a
recommendation to the City Council to amend the City ordinance to allow dogs on leashes
in public parks on a temporary basis until the dog park is developed
There was no second to Commissioner Deen s motion
Discussion continued
Commissioner Cooper voiced concern that the staff report reflects a negative, one-sided
viewpoint on the issue of dogs m parks, and that the reference to the Friends of Culver
City Dog Park has no relevance to the subject of the report
Commissioner Cooper noted that any amendment to the dog ordinance should not be a
temporary change but a permanent change He said he was not ready to vote on the
proposed motion at this tune
Commissioner James concurred with Commissioner Coopers sentiments She requested
additional mforraa non regarding how other cities have addressed allowing dogs in public
parks
Commissioner Redholtz expressed concern that the reference in the report to the Friends
of Culver City Dog Park may connote an implied support of the issue She clarified the
Friends is a 5ol(c)(3) nonprofit organization and cannot take a stance on any issues other
than their own mission
Commissioner Redholtz also recommended staff conduct a community survey to assess
the publics level of support
Chair Shapiro voiced concern regarding the cost and amount of staff tune associated with
a community survey
Responding to Chair Shapiro s concern, Commissioner Cooper suggested holding a public
hearing as an option
The following motion was proposed
IT WAS MOVED BY COMMISSIONER JAMES, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
REDHOLTZ TO TABLE THE MOTION AND REAGENDIZE THE ISSUE OF
PERMANENTLY AMENDING THE DOG ORDINANCE TO ALLOW DOGS ON LEASHES
IN PARKS FOR FURTHER DISCUSSION AT A PUBLIC HEARING TO BE SCHEDULED
AT A FEBRUARY COMMISSION MEETING
Ayes Commissioners Cooper, James, Redholtz
Noes Commissioners Deen, Shapiro
Abstain None.
- Page 19
4Owl101
moor
elheiL CITY
PUBLIC HEARING ITEM PH-1
DATE May 31 2005
TO CHAIR SHAPIRO AND MEMBERS OF THE PARKS AND RECREATION
COMMISSION
FROM Patricia Mooney, PRCS Senior Management Analyst
SUBJECT Discussion of the consideration of making a recommendation to the
City Council to amend Sections 901 360 and 9 10 055 (A) of the
Culver City Municipal Code to allow dogs on leashes in public parks
within Culver City
RECOMMENDATION
That the Parks and Recreation Commission review the report, consider all public input and
discuss the issue of making a recommendation to the City Council to amend Sections 9 01 360
and 9 10 055 (A) of the Culver City Municipal Code to allow dogs on leashes in public parks
within Culver City
PROCEDURE
1 Chair seeks a motion to receive and file the affidavit and notice of publication
2 Chair calls on staff for a bnef report or asks Commissioners if they have questions of
staff on this subject
3 Chair declares the Public Hearing open, and calls upon the public for comments
4 Chair seeks a motion to close the Public Hearing
5 Commissioners discuss the matter and take the appropriate actions concerning the
recommendations or specifically approve changes
NOTICING INFORMATION
Notice was published in the Culver City News the Observer and The Front page dunng the
weeks of May 26 and June 2, 2005 On May 19, 2005 the notice of tonight's discussion was
sent out to over 500 persons on the Culver City Email Notification List On May 23rd and
31 st, and on June 1 st and 6th, and a cable crawler was placed on the Channel 35 video
broadcasts of City Council meetings Flyers were distnbuted at all City parks beginning on
May 25, 2005 On May 26, 2005, fifteen concerned residents who had signed a petition
regarding this issue were noticed via email Neighborhood Associations were contacted
regarding this meeting dunng the week of May 30, 2005
BACKGROUND
Section 901 360 reads as follows DOGS RUNNING AT LARGE PROHIBITION
It shall be unlawful for any person owning or having charge care custody or control of any dog to cause
permit or allow the same to be or to run at large upon any highway street lane alley court or other
public place or upon any pnvate property or premises other than those of the person owning or having
charge care custody or control of such dog in the City unless such dog be restrained by a substantial
chain or leash not exceeding six (6) feet in length and Is in charge care custody or control of such
competent person Provided however that no such dog shall be allowed or permitted in any of the
15-
9770 CULVE COLV CITVtA 90232 0507Page 2 of 4
following places any store market restaurant cafe lunchroom soda fountain bakery or kindred
establishments wherein foods for human consumption are served sold or kept for sale or in any public
park except as permitted by § 9 10 400
Section 9 10 055 (A) reads as follows PROHABITIONS - Within the limits of any public park it shall be
unlawful for any person
A Having charge care custody or control of any dog except as permitted by § 9 10 400 or other
animal fowl or reptile to cause permit or allow the same to be within the limits of any public park within
the City unless such person shall have obtained a special permit from the City Council to conduct an
entertainment or exhibition in which an animal is a participant
Prior Commission Actions
At the June 7, 2004 Parks and Recreation Commission meeting, the Commission directed staff
to agendize further discussion regarding a possible amendment to the City Ordinance to allow
dogs on leashes in City parks on a temporary basis until the Dog Park is developed
Attachment A provides a copy of the staff report from the June meeting At the June
Commission meeting the Commission decided to table the item for additional information
On October 5, 2004 the item was agendized and the Commission moved to table the
discussion A revised request to agendize a permanent amendment to the City Ordinance to
allow dogs on leashes in parks was put forth at that time Attachment B provides a copy of the
minutes of the October 5, 2004 meeting
The purpose of this report is to provide the Commission with an overview of what other
California cities are doing with relation to the issue of allowing leashed dogs in public parks
DISCUSSION
During the period of May 10, through May 20, 2005, individual emails were sent to 325 cities
listed on the California League of Crties website The "Dogs-on-Leash" Public Policy Survey
was sent to appropriate City Administration or City staff members with a posted email address
The survey posed the following questions
1 How many parks are there in your City's park system?
2 What is your City's policy regarding allowing dogs-on-leash in your parks?
3 What are the main reasons that your City has this policy?
4 In your opinion, what are the advantages of allowing dogs-on-leash in City parks?
5 In your opinion, what are the disadvantages of allowing dogs-on-leash in City parks?
Of the 325 emails sent, 94 surveys were received, for a 29% response rate Attachment C
provides a list of the cities whose information is included in this report The findings for each
question are as follows
Question 1 How many parks are there in your City's park system?
The number of parks per city ranged from 1 (Buelton) to 160 (Sacramento) Approximately 70%
of those who responded worked in cities with 25 parks or less Seven cities said they had 14
parks, which was also the midpoint of the sample
Question 2 What is your City's policy regarding allowing dogs-on-leash in your parks?
Ninety percent (90%) of those who responded said that leashed dogs were allowed in one or
more of their City parks Seventy-five percent (75%) reported th at i onQtlart ringR were allowed in
all of their City's parks Ten cities (or 3%) did not allow dogs in any of their parks and three of
these cities said they had or were planning designated dog parks
02/09/09 - Page 21ADVANTAGES OF ALLOW/NG LEASHED DOGS IN PARKS
Owners Can Share Park Experience w/ Dog 40%
Allows Adequate Exercise for Dogs 28%
Allows Shared Usage of the Parks 25%
Encourages Responsible Pet Ownership 13%
Leash Limits Dog s Mobility / More Control 13%
Added Safety of the Owner and/or the Dog 11%
Page 3 of 4
Due to the open-ended nature of the questions, some respondents offered additional
information regarding their parks For example, overall, 34% mentioned that off-leash
opportunities were or would soon be available in their cities for dogs and their owners Usually,
this opportunity was in the form of one or more designated dog parks It was also stated that
some of the parks allowing leashed dogs included an 'off-leash fenced exercise area ' In
addition, a few respondents mentioned that within parks allowing leashed dogs, dogs were
excluded from specific areas in the park, such as tot lots, sports fields buildings, outdoor
recreation courts, and/or large community gathenngs such as festivals Other supplemental
comments included 20% of respondents remarking that by ordinance, leashes must be 6' or
shorter and 13% who said that Their cities provided plastic bags or "doggie mitts" for park
patrons
Question 3 What are the main reasons that your City has this policy?
Sixty-four percent (64%) of those responding said public safety was the reason behind their
City's policy regarding leashed dogs in parks Eighteen percent (18%) stated that the main
reason behind the policy was to accommodate and/or benefit dog owners while minimizing the
impact of the dogs' presence on other members of the community Twelve percent (12%) said
that the policy was a long standing ordinance Six percent (6%) gave other reasons, such as
resident demand
Question 4 In your opinion, what are the advantages of allowing dogs-on-leash in City
parks? Please see the table below (percentages total more than 100% because more than one
advantage was sometimes stated)
Question 5 In your opinion, what are the disadvantages of allowing dogs-on-leash in
City parks? Please see the table below (percentages total more than 100% because more
than one disadvantage was sometimes stated)
DISADVANTAGES OF ALLOWING LEASHED DOGS IN PARKS
Some Owners Fail to Clean up After Their Dogs 60%
Public Safety Issues / Liability 28%
Some Dogs Interfere with Park Activities and/or Other
Users or Generally Misbehave 19%
Some Dog Owners Violate the Ordinance 17%
Some Dogs Pose a Threat to Children 12%
02/09/09 - Page 22
IsOVERVIEW OF SURVEY RESULTS
from 94 California Cities
Cities with 25 parks or less 70%
Cities allowing leashed dogs in parks 90%
Cities with public safety as a reason for their ordinance 64%
Advantage Owners can share park experience with dog 40%
Disadvantage Some owners fail to clean up after their dogs 60%
Page 4 of 4
Summary Table
FISCAL ANALYSIS
Questions regarding financial costs and/or benefits were not included in this survey Costs
related to allowing dogs on leashes in parks within Culver City were stated in the staff report
presented at the June 7, 2004 Commission meeting Costs detailed in that report included
changing park signs ($3,000 per park), increased maintenance costs ($3,000 annually per park),
and the cost of purchasing and installing posts to hold dog fecal bags ($400 per installation)
The fiscal impact of allowing dogs on leashes in parks is dependent upon several factors
including the number and size of parks where the policy is implemented, available staff
resources, and the degree to which owners take responsibility for cleaning up their dogs' fecal
matter In addition, if the ordinances are amended, there may be costs associated with litigation
due to potential public safety issues
ATTACHMENTS
A June 7, 2004 Commission Report
Minutes of the October 5, 2004 Commission meeting
List of cities participating in the survey
MOTIONS
1 Make a recommendation to the City Council to amend Sections 9 01 360 and 9 10 055 (A) of
the Culver City Municipal Code to allow dogs on leashes in all public parks within Culver City
OR
2 Make a recommendation to the City Council to amend Sections 9 01 360 and 9 10 055 (A) of
the Culver Crty Municipal Code to allow dogs on leashes in public parks within Culver City,
under one or more of the following conditions initiate a trial penod, limit the number of affected
parks, designate areas within specific parks, and/or designate hours within specific parks
OR
3 Provide further direction to staff
OR
4 Take no action at this time
02/09/09 - Page 23
I bParks and Recreation Commission June 7 2005
o0o
Item P-4
(725PM)
Employee of the Month for Outstanding Leadership
Marty Nicholson requested the Employee of the Month presentation be postponed until
after the public hearing
The Commission concurred with her request
o0o
Public Hearing
Item PH-1
251 3
pm)
Consideration of amendmg the City ordinance to allow leashed dogs in
parks
MOVED BY COMMISSIONER DEEN, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER JAMES AND
UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED, THAT THE PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION
RECEIVE AND FILE THE COPIES OF THE NOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Chair Shapiro called for a staff report
Patricia Mooney, Senior Management Analyst, gave the staff report, explaining the
report presents an overview of what other California cities are doing in relation to
allowing leashed dogs in City parks
She briefly reviewed the dogs on leash" park pohcy survey sent out to 325 cities listed in
the League of California Cities' website with email addresses, and the 94 responses
(29%) received that were used as date for the staff report The survey questions and an
overview of the results included the following
How many parks are there in your City's park system')
Cities with 25 parks or less — 70%
2) What is your City s policy regarding allowing dogs on leash in your parks'
Cities allowing leashed dogs in parks — 89%
3)
What are the main reasons that your City has this policy"
Cities with pubhc safety as a reasonfor their ordinance — 64%
4)
In your opinion, what are the advantages of allowing dogs on leash m City
parks,
Advantage Owners can share park experience with their dogs — 40%
5)
In your opinion, what are the disadvantages of allowing dogs on leash in City
parks'
02/09/09 - Page 24
iiParks and Recreation Commission
June 7 2005
Disadvantage Some owners fail to cleanup after their dogs
Chair Shapiro declared the pubhc hearing open
Chair Shapiro invited public testimony
The following members in the audience addressed the Commission in support of
amending the City ordinance to allow dogs on leash within City parks
Judy Scott
David Leathers
Ahsha Martin
Arthur Russell
Deborah Shands
Michael Faugno
Kathy Weaver
Marilyn Russell
Patricia Graf
Doug Roble (submitted written comments)
Stanley Horn-Bostel
Carole Wilson
Joyce Mundle
Linda Gross
Judy Levitow
Peter B Mundle
The following members m the audience addressed the Commission m opposition to
amending the City ordinance to allow dogs on leash within City parks
Laura Romero
Jeamune Stehhn (also submitted a copy of an online petition regarding dogs in parks)
Linda AsIdof
Jamie Wallace
Jean Stout
Dena Snedden
Steve Newton
Susan Deen
Daisy Horn-Bostel
MOVED BY COMMISSIONER DEEN, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER COOPER AND
UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED, TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING
Recess (8 30 p m )
At this time, Chair Shapiro called for a short recess
Reconvene (8 40 P m)
The meeting was reconvened with all Commissioners present
11,
02/09/0,12 - Page 25Parks and Recreation Commission
June 7 2005
It was noted that the following public comments via email were received relating to
amending the ordinance to allow dogs on leash within City parks
In support Ed Rybka
Carol Heirnrich
Simon Hortwitz
In opposition Larry Loughhn
Stephen O'Donnell
Gita Terry
Kathleen O'Donnell
}JhsD Smith
Larry Weiner and family
Jennifer Mann
Taim Wedekuad
Caroline Cicero
Pat Hubley
Emily H Ghck
Gerald Collins
Alan Resmck
Mitch Glickman and family
Melissa Orr Smith
Mercedes Anderberg
June Walden
Nancy Burne
Susan Wells
Leonel Marra
Kyle Nudo
No clear position taken but negative comments made regarding certam aspects of
allowing dogs on leash m City parks
R Waters
Yves Parent
Commissioner James initiated discussion, expressing her support of allowing dogs on
leash m one of the City parks She recommended implementing a pilot project at Fox
Hills Park (as suggested by a community member), where many of the residents h ying in
condom /mums and apartments do not have backyards and must travel out outside of the
City to take their dogs to a park
Commissioner Deen raised questions regarding the statistical aspect of the email survey
information
Patti Mooney provided clarification
Commissioner Deen shared infonnation about diseases that can be transmitted from
dogs to human He said he would not be in favor of amending the current ordinance to
allow dogs on leash in any public park
02/09/09 - Page 26|1010|19Parks and Recreation Commission
June 7 2005
Commissioner Cooper commented on the financial costs detailed m the staff report
including changing park signs ($3,000 per park), increased maintenance costs ($3,000
annually per park), and cost of purchasing and installing posts to hold dog fecal bags
($400 per installation)
Based on the overall information, he said he would support a test program on a trial
basis at Fox Hills Park and possibly along the Nature Trail in Culver City Park He said
he would not support any area where there are children present due to concern for
health issues
Commissioner Daly-Redholtz commended staff on the email notification process and the
public notification in the newspapers which resulted in a good turnout and response for
the public hearing Once again, she emphasized the Culver City Friends of Dog Park has
not taken a positron regarding the issue of dogs on leash m City parks since the issue is
not part of their mission and is separate from the dog park
Commissioner Daly-Reriboltz spoke in support of a pilot program, agreeing with Fox
Hills Park as a possible site She noted that this is not an urgent issue that requires
immediate action, but something that staff can research and develop a proposal for a
pilot program on a trial basis for perhaps a six-month period in order to study and
observe the impacts to the community
There was general discussion regarding the pilot program concept
Chair Shapiro stated that she is not in favor of dogs m parks, emphasizing that parks are
for children and not for dogs She said she would not vote for any pilot program or for
any park to be used for dogs, except for the Bone Yard currently the site for an off-leash
dog park
Following further discussion, the following action was taken
MOVED BY COMMISSION JAMES, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER COOPER, THAT
THE PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION DIRECT STAFF TO COME BACK
WITH INFORMATION REGARDING A PROPOSAL FOR IMPLEMENTATION OF A
PILOT PROGRAM FOR DOGS ON LEASHES IN ONE OF CULVER CITY'S PUBLIC
PARKS
AYES Commissioners James, Cooper, Daly-Redholtz
NOES Commissioners Deen, Shapiro
ABSTAIN None
ABSENT None
o0o
Public Comment — Items Not on the Agenda
Chair Shapiro invited public participation
(9 40 p m )
02/09/0%- Page 27AMON Etir
eticemze CITY
ITEM NUMBER A-2
DATE
July 5, 2005
TO
Chair Shapiro and Members of the Parks and Recreation
Commission
FROM William L La Pointe, Director of Parks, Recreation and Community
Services
SUBJECT CONSIDERATION OF A PROPOSAL FOR A DOGS-ON-
LEASHES PILOT PROGRAM IN ONE OF THE PARKS IN
CULVER CITY
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the Parks and Recreation Commission review, discuss
and recommend to the City Council
a) Implementation of the proposed pilot project for dogs on leashes in one of
the parks in Culver City, or
b) that Sections 9 01 360 and 9 10 055 (A) of the Culver City Municipal Code
that prohibit dogs in parks within Culver City remain unchanged, or
c) another option concerning the issue of allowing dogs in parks within
Culver City on which the City Council might act
BACKGROUND
There has been much discussion over the past year regarding whether or not to
allow dogs in parks within Culver City so long as they are leashed At the June
7, 2005 meeting, the Parks and Recreation Commission requested staff to bring
back a proposal of a "pilot project' on this issue
DISCUSSION
The proposal for this pilot project is as follows
That dogs on leashes (retractable leashes are not allowed) be allowed on the
grass area below the children s playground (commonly referred to as the "lower
park ) of Culver City Park during regular park operating hours for a three-month
period of time This pilot project lb being plupuoud for one park In order to study
9770 cavEF021.8909 Gt.paggr28A 90232 0507
2.1Page 2 of 2
and observe the impacts of a practice before a decision is made as to whether or
not to allow this practice in all the parks
FISCAL ANALYSIS
Approval of this proposal is anticipated to have some impact on staff and
resources for cleanup and patrolling efforts If this pilot project were approved, it
is expected that a more detailed analysis of the fiscal impact would be
developed
MOTION(S)
That the Parks and Recreation Commission
1) Recommend to the City Council that a pilot prolect allowing dogs on
leashes (retractable leashes are not allowed) on the grass area below the
children's playground (commonly referred to as the "lower park") of Culver
City Park during regular park operating hours for a three-month period, so
as to observe and quantify how a practice such as this might impact the
community if it were allowed in all the City's parks,
or
2) Recommend to the City Council that Sections 9 01 360 and 9 10 055 (A)
of the Culver City Municipal Code that prohibit dogs in parks within Culver
City remain unchanged,
or
3) Recommend to the City Council another option concerning the issue of
allowing dogs in parks within Culver City
02/09/09 - Page 29These Mmutes are not official until approved by the Parks and Recreation
Conunission
July 5, 2005
700 p m
REGULAR MEETING OF THE
PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION, CITY OF CULVER CITY,
CALIFORNIA
CHAIR ANITA SHAPIRO
NEW CHAIR JEANEI II, JAMES
Call to Order
The meeting of the Parks and Recreation Commission was called to order at 7 05 p m
the Council Chambers, City Hall
o0o
Roll Call
Members Present Commissioners Shapiro, James, Cooper, Deen, Daly-Redholtz
Staff Present
William La Pointe, Parks, Recreation and Community Services Director
Heather Iker, Assistant City Prosecutor
Patti Mooney, Senior Management Analyst
Marty Nicholson, Recreation Manager
Others Present
Jay Handal, Culver City Lions Club
Susan Deen, Cultural Affairs Commissioner
Jamie Wallace, Culver City
Jean Stout, Culver City
Judy Scott, Culver City
Clark Dikeman, Culver City
000
(Excerpt)
Item A-2
(727P1n)
Consideration of a proposal for a dogs-on-leashes pilot program m one of
the parks m Culver City
The following members in the audience addressed the Coranussion regarding this issue
02/09/09 - Page 30Parks and Recreation Commission
July 5 2005
Jamie Wallace, Culver City, spoke in opposition
Jean Stout, Culver City, spoke in opposition, commenting on the difficulty of enforcing
the ordinance
Judy Scott, Culver City, suggested as a compromise, allowing leashed dogs in parks only
during early morning or late at night when most children and parents are not m the
parks
Susan Deen, Cultural Affairs Commissioner, speaking as a resident, reminded the
Commission that three years ago the Friends of Culver City Dog Park conducted a City
Council candidates forum where the candidates had taken a position against allowing
dogs on leashes in City parks She voiced opposition, citing enforcement concerns
Jay Handal, Culver City Lions Club, speaking as an individual m support of staff's
proposal of a pilot program
At this time, the following action was taken
MOVED BY COMMISSIONER SHAPIRO, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER DALY
REDHOLTZ AND UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED, TO RECEIVE AND FILE EMAIL
CORRESPONDENCE FROM MR RUTS D SMITH AND MS DEBORAH RISSMAN IN
OPPOSITION AND MS FRAN LONGMIRE IN SUPPORT OF ALLOWING LEASHED
DOGS IN A CITY PARK
At this time, Chair James asked for a staff report
William La Pointe, Director of Parks, Recreation and Community Services, gave the staff
report, recommending a proposal for a pilot program on the grass area below the
children s playground (commonly referred to as the "lower park') of Culver City Park
during regular park operating hours The pilot project would be for a three-month trial
basis m order to study and observe the impacts before a decision is made as to whether
or not to allow the practice in all the parks
Commissioner Cooper initiated discussion, inquiring about the process in selecting
Culver City Park for the proposed program He ref-ailed the Commission had previously
discussed Fox Hills Park and Culver West Park as possible locations for a pilot project
Commissioner Daly Redholtz did not think Culver City Park was a good location, citing
the negative impacts from the Dog Park and construction of the new skateboard park
She questioned staffs rationale in selecting Culver City Park, as it was her understanding
that the process was to have involved community input
Commissioner Deen voiced his opposition to developing a pilot program, stating that it
was not positive use of staff time
Commissioner Shapiro cited her reasons for opposing the concept She said the Dog
Park is there for dogs, the rest of the parks are for children
The following action was taken
MOVED BY COMMISSIONERSHAPIRO rcIAT IT-IE PARKS AND RECREATION
COMMISSION RECOMMEND TO THE CITY COUNCIL THAT SECTIONS 901 360
02/09/092- Page 31Parks and Recreation Commission July 5 2005
AND 910 055(A) OF THE CULVER CITY MUNICIPAL CODE THAT PROHIBIT DOGS
IN PARKS WITHIN CULVER CITY REMAIN UNCHANGED
Commissioner Deen seconded the Motion
AYES Commissioners Deen, Shapiro
NOES Commissioners Cooper, James, Daly Redholtz
ABSTAIN None
ABSENT None
The Motion failed
At this time, Commissioner James provided a brief history regarding the issue of
allowing dogs on leashes in parks She did not feel Culver City Park was a good location
and recommended considering another site
Following further discussion, the following action was taken
MOVED BY COMMISSIONER COOPER THAT THE PARKS AND RECREATION
COMMISSION RECOMMEND TO THE CITY COUNCIL THAT A PILOT STUDY
ALLOWING DOGS ON 6-FT LEASHES BE DEVELOPED FOR IMPLEMENTATION AT
CULVER WEST PARK FOR A 90-DAY PERIOD IN ORDER TO EVALUATE THE
FEASIBILITY AND IMPACTS BEFORE A DECISION IS MADE AS TO WHETHER OR
NOT TO ALLOW THE PRACTICE IN ALL CITY PARKS
Commissioner Daly Redholtz seconded the Motion
AYES Commissioners Cooper, James, Daly Redholtz
NOES Commissioners Shapiro, Deen
ABSTAIN None
ABSENT None
The Motion carried
000
02/09/09 - Page 32|1010|isATTACHMENT 2
EXCERPT OF THE APPROVED MINUTES OF THE
December 2, 2008
REGULAR MEETING OF THE
7:00 P.M.
PARKS, RECREATION & COMMUNITY SERVICES COMMISSION
CITY OF CULVER CITY, CALIFORNIA
Call to Order & Roll Call
The meeting of the Parks, Recreation and Community Services
Commission was called to order at 7:07 P.M.
Present: Chair Anita Shapiro, Vice Chair Vicki Daly Redholtz,
Commissioner Jeffrey Cooper, Commissioner Rick Hudson,
Commissioner Marianne Kim
EXCERPT BEGINS
olDo
Item A-1
Consideration of a Recommendation to City Council Regarding
Allowing Dogs in Culver City Parks
Chair Shapiro clarified that the matter had previously come
before the Commission three times and was denied each time. She
noted for the record that the Commission had not brought the
matter forward.
Staff provided a summary of the material of record.
The following members of the public spoke in opposition to
allowing dogs in Culver City parks:
Yves Galea
Hamid Rostamian
Goren Eriksson
Karen Castle
Meg Hass
June Walden
Jamie Wallace
Jeannine Stehlin
Arthur L. Howe
David Winslow
Laura Stewart
Frank Manley
Homer Gentry
Lance Richter
Dorothy Jones
Tricia Cochee
Rene Cochee
Marvin Matthews
Steve O'Donnell
Paul Walseben
Robert Hitt
Issues cited in opposing dogs in City parks included: health
concerns; safety concerns; attracting users from out of the
City; concerns with excrement; and enforcement concerns.
Suggestions included adding more pooch paths, expanding the Bone
Yard, and alternative thinking to accommodate everyone since the
issue keeps coming up.
02/09/09 - Page 33The following members of the public spoke in support of allowing
dogs in City parks:
Pauline Spiker
Jeff Hammer Deborah Shands
Elizabeth Harmetz Todd Richards
Issues cited in support of allowing dogs in the parks included:
concerns with the exclusionary nature of a ban on dogs;
responsible pet owners being punished for the behavior of
irresponsible owners; fairness; paying taxes for services that
they are legally prohibited from using; neighborhood parks are
supposed to be a community resource; and allowing licensed dog
owners to opt out of paying park fees.
Chair Shapiro received clarification that Emily Glick's card was
previously received as an email and did not need to be read.
Eugene Paulish, Administrative Secretary read comment cards in
opposition to allowing dogs in Culver City parks from:
Mercedes and Bob Elaine Courtney
Julie Lugo Cera
Anderberg Jodi Reichel
Ann Easley
Beverly O'Brien Joanna Hoffman
Eugene Paulish, Administrative Secretary reported that 7 emails
had been received in support of allowing dogs in Culver City
parks and 25 emails had been received in opposition.
Chair Shapiro expressed opposition to allowing dogs in Culver
City parks.
Chair Shapiro excused herself from the meeting and turned the
meeting over to Vice Chair Daly Redholtz.
The Commission recessed from 9:30 p.m. to 9:40 p.m.
Discussion between staff and the Commission included: concern
that dog owners be accommodated or the issue will keep
returning; looking at alternative options; concerns with
enforcement; concerns with excluding non Culver City dogs; the
likelihood of diseases being transmitted between species;
statistics regarding dog bites; 75% of communities allow dogs in
all parks; the number of dogs in the City; concern with
confusion in the rules; support for a pooch path; support for a
different proposal; consideration on a park by park basis;
adding another dog park in the City; and actual costs to
implement changes.
02/09/09 - Page 34Commissioner Kim moved to adopt option 1 with direction to staff
to investigate the viability of more pooch paths in Culver City
parks. Vice Chair Daly Redholtz seconded the motion.
Additional Commission discussion included: concerns that most
parks would not be able to accommodate a pooch path; concerns
with taking up more staff time on the issue; clarification that
the Commission was not directing staff to do more work as that
would be the discretion of the Council; the motion as meant to
avoid more work in the long term; and whether Chair Shapiro's
statement of support for option I could be counted as a vote on
a motion.
Bill La Pointe, Director of Parks, Recreation and Community
Services explained staff's thinking in creating their
recommendation and noted that he had not heard any input from
speakers about Culver West Alexander Park, Tellefson Park,
Coombs Park, Blair Hills, or from the Fox Hills Mini Park. He
noted that fences were not recommended due to costs and he
suggested an alternative measure.
Commissioner Cooper proposed an amendment to the motion to
indicate: "...except where there is a designated dog path and
direct staff to explore the viability of implementing pooch
paths at Culver City Parks when there is an inquiry from a
Culver City resident."
Additional discussion between the Commission and staff included:
clarification that pooch paths could be installed wherever there
is a concrete or decomposed granite path; and whether changes
should be community driven or driven by the City.
Commissioner Kim and Vice Chair Daly Redholtz accepted
Commissioner Cooper's amendment.
MOVED BY COMMISSIONER KIM, SECONDED BY VICE CHAIR DALY REDHOLTZ,
AND UNANIMOUSLY PASSED (ABSENT CHAIR SHAPIRO) THAT THE PARKS,
RECREATION AND COMMUNITY SERVICES COMMISSION: RECOMMEND TO THE
CITY COUNCIL THAT THE CITY CONTINUE THE CURRENT ORDINANCES AND
PRACTICES THAT DO NOT ALLOW DOGS IN PARKS, EXCEPT WHERE THERE IS
A DESIGNATED DOG PATH OR DOG PARK AND THAT THE STAFF AND
COMMISSION WOULD CONSIDER DESIGNATED DOG PATHS IN OTHER PARKS
WHEN A NEED IS IDENTIFIED.
o0o
EA74..tacri. ENDS
02/09/09 - Page 35PARKS, RECREATION AND
COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPT.
CITY OF CULVER CITY
PO Box 507
CuLvER Cny CA 90232-0507
NOTIFICATION OF THREE IMPORTANT CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA ITEMS RELATING TO CULVER CITY PARKS
eakez. CITY
NOTIFICATION OF IMPORTANT
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEMS
7:00 PM — February 9, 2009
Mike Balkman Council Chambers
City Hall, 9770 Culver Blvd.
Culver City, CA 90232
The City Council will discuss:
• ALLOWING DOGS IN CULVER
CITY PARKS
This item may have implications for
a City park near you.
• CREATING A POOCH PATH IN
CULVER CITY PARK FOR
DOG PARK USERS
This item may result in changes to
Culver City Park/Bill Botts Field
(only).
• ADOPTING USER FEES &
IMPLEMENTING SUPER-
VISION AT THE CULVER CITY
SKATE PARK
This item may include the reduction
or elimination of Recreation Leader
staffing at Blanco, Culver West
Alexander, El Marino, Fox Hills,
Lindberg, Syd Kronenthal, and/or
Veterans' Memorial Parks, and/or
the playground at Culver City Park,
to provide funding for supervision of
the Skate Park.
For more information contact:
Bill La Pointe, Director
Parks, Recreation & Community
Services Department
PRCS.Department@CulverCitv.orq
310-253-6655
ATTACHMENT 3
02/09/09 - Page 36