City of Culver City, California
City Council Agenda Item Report
RECOMMENDATION:
By the Parks and Recreation Commission’s action, staff is bringing to the City Council the
following recommendations for consideration.
1. Proposed Pilot Program to allow dogs on leashes in Culver West Park for a
period of ninety days; and
2. Introduction of an Ordinance amending Culver City Municipal Code Sections
9.01.360 and 9.10.055(A), relating to the prohibition of dogs running at large and
in public parks, in order to implement the Pilot Program (Attachment 1).
BACKGROUND:
At its June 1, 2004 meeting, the Parks and Recreation Commission (the “Commission”)
discussed the issue of a possible amendment to the Culver City Municipal Code to allow
dogs on leashes in City parks on a temporary basis until the Dog Park is developed,
and directed staff to return with additional information, such as how other cities handle
this issue. Copies of the staff report and minutes for the June 1
st
meeting are included
as Attachment 2.
After staff conducted additional research, this issue was further discussed by the
Commission at its October 5, 2004 meeting. One member of the public expressed
Meeting Date: 07/25/05 Item Number: A-2
AGENDA ITEM: Consideration of a Proposed Pilot Program to Allow Dogs on Leashes
in Culver West Park for a Period of Ninety Days; and Consideration of Introduction of an
Ordinance Amending Culver City Municipal Code Sections 9.01.360 and 9.10.055(A),
Relating to the Prohibition of Dogs Running at Large and in Public Parks, in Order to
Implement the Pilot Program.
Contact Person/Dept.: William La Pointe Phone Number: (310) 253-6682
Fiscal Impact: Yes [X] No [] General Fund: Yes [] No [X]
Public Hearing: [] Action Item: [X] Attachments: [X]
Public Notification: Master Notification List on 7/11/05; all businesses and residents
within a 300-foot radius of Culver West Park were notified via postcard totaling 97 cards
at a cost for postage of $22.31 on 7/11/05. Emails or postcards (40 postcards at a
postage cost of $9.20) were sent to interested parties on or before July 14, 2005.
Department Approval:
William La Pointe 7/18/05
CAO Approval:
Jerry Fulwood 7/20/05
City Controller Approval:
Marlee Chang 7/19/05City of Culver City, California
City Council Agenda Item Report
opposition to allowing dogs in the parks, even if leashed. In order to determine how
other members of the public felt about this issue, it was suggested by the Commission
that a community survey be conducted or, in the alternative, that a public hearing be
held. The Commission moved to table the discussion of a temporary amendment and
requested that the issue of a permanent Municipal Code amendment be agendized for a
public hearing at a future meeting. Copies of the staff report and minutes of the October |1010|th
meeting are included as Attachment 3.
Subsequently, a public hearing was held to discuss this issue at the Commission’s June
7, 2005 meeting. Staff presented a report giving an overview of what other California
cities are doing in relation to allowing leashed dogs in City parks. The meeting was well
attended by members of the public (including comments received by e-mail), who
expressed views both in support and in opposition to this issue. After giving the public
an opportunity to be heard and considering all the information before it, the Commission
directed staff to come back with a proposal for the implementation of a pilot program to
allow dogs on leashes in one of Culver City’s public parks. Copies of the staff report
and minutes of the June 7
th
meeting are included as Attachment 4.
On July 5, 2005, staff presented to the Commission a proposal for a pilot program to be
conducted in the “lower park” area of Culver City Park in order to study and observe the
impacts of allowing leashed dogs in the park for a 90-day period, before a decision is
made as to whether or not to allow such a practice on a permanent basis and in
additional City parks. Some Commissioners did not believe Culver City Park to be a
good location for the pilot program and suggested Culver West Park instead, while other
Commissioners were opposed to allowing dogs in the park at all, even as part of a
temporary program. After discussing the matter, a motion was passed by the
Commission (3-2, Shapiro and Deen dissenting) to recommend to the City Council that
a pilot program be implemented at Culver West Park for a period of 90 days, in order to
evaluate the feasibility of allowing leashed dogs in City parks on a permanent basis.
Copies of the staff report and minutes of the July 5
th
meeting are included as
Attachment 5.
DISCUSSION:
This pilot program is being proposed in order to study and observe the impacts and
feasibility of allowing leashed dogs in one of the City’s parks, before a decision is made
as to whether or not to allow such a practice in additional City parks and on a
permanent basis. The basic guidelines for the proposed Dogs-on-Leashes Pilot
Program were drawn from the Parks and Recreation Commission’s comments and
recommendations at its meetings of June 7 and July 5, 2005, and include the following:
The pilot program shall be implemented at Culver West Park.
The duration of the pilot program will be 90 days.City of Culver City, California
City Council Agenda Item Report
Dogs must be on leashes not exceeding six feet in length at all times.
Retractable leashes are not allowed.
Dogs are prohibited from the park playground and tot lot areas.
Dog owners must clean-up and properly dispose of their dog’s feces.
Dogs are allowed in the park only during regular park operating hours.
Temporary signs will be posted to inform park users of the rules of conduct for
dogs and their owners.
FISCAL IMPACT:
Implementation of a Dogs-on-Leashes Pilot Program is anticipated to have some impact
on staff (for cleanup, patrolling efforts, data collection analysis and reports) and
temporary signage as noted below:
1. 48 hours staff time @ $24.00/hour $1152.00
2. 3 ea. temporary signs and posts @ $25.00 ea. $ 75.00
Total cost estimate $1227.00
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Proposed ordinance;
2. Staff report and excerpt of minutes from 6/1/04 Commission meeting;
3. Staff report and excerpt of minutes from 10/5/04 Commission meeting;
4. Staff report and excerpt of minutes from 6/7/05Commission meeting; and
5. Staff report and excerpt of minutes from 7/5/05 Commission meeting.
MOTION:
That the City Council:
1. Authorize a Dogs-on-Leashes Pilot Program to be implemented in Culver West
Park for a period of ninety days;
and
2. Introduce, for first reading, the Ordinance amending Culver City Municipal Code
Sections 9.01.360 and 9.10.055(A), relating to the prohibition of dogs running at
large and in public parks, in order to implement the Pilot Program;
ORCity of Culver City, California
City Council Agenda Item Report
3. Reject the Parks and Recreation Commission’s recommendation for the
development of a Dogs-on-Leashes Pilot Program to be implemented in Culver
West Park for a period of ninety days;
OR
4. Discuss the issue and provide further direction to staff.
MEETING DATE 07/25/05
AGENDA ITEM Consideration of a Proposed Pilot Program to Allow Dogs on
Leashes in Culver West Park for a Period of Ninety Days, and
Consideration of Introduction of an Ordinance Amending
Culver City Municipal Code Sections 9 01 360 and 9 10 055
(A), Relating to the Prohibition of Dogs Running at Large and
in Public Parks, in Order to Implement the Pilot Program
ATTACHMENTS
Pages|109| Proposed Ordinance 1-3|109| Staff report and excerpt of minutes of 6/1/04 Commission meeting 4-7|109| Staff report and excerpt of minutes of 10/5/04 Commission meeting 8-12|109| Staff report and excerpt of minutes of 6/7/05 Commission meeting 13-20|109| Staff report and excerpt of minutes of 7/5/05 Commission meeting 21-25I|1010101010101010 10
10|11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Arr
witurser et
ORDINANCE NO 2005-
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CULVER CITY,
CALIFORNIA AMENDING SECTIONS 901 360 AND
9 10 055 (A) OF THE CULVER CITY MUNICIPAL CODE
RELATING TO THE PROHIBITION OF DOGS RUNNING AT
LARGE AND IN PUBLIC PARKS, IN ORDER TO
IMPLEMENT A 90-DAY PILOT PROGRAM TO ALLOW
DOGS ON LEASHES IN CULVER WEST PARK
WHEREAS, the Culver City Municipal Code currently prohibits dogs in public
parks, and
WHEREAS, many other cities allow dogs in parks provided that they are on a
leash and other rules are followed, and
WHEREAS, it has been approved by the City Council, upon recommendation
of the Parks and Recreation Commission, to implement a 90-day pilot program to allow
leashed dogs in Culver West Park in order to observe and study the impacts and feasibility
of implementing such a practice on a permanent basis and in additional City parks
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Culver City, California
DOES HEREBY ORDAIN as follows
SECTION 1 Section 9 01 360 of the Culver City Municipal Code is hereby
amended to read as follows
§ 901 360 DOGS RUNNING AT LARGE, PROHIBITION, EXCEPTIONS
It shall be unlawful for any person owning or having charge, care,
custody or control of any dog to cause, permit or allow the same to be or to
run at large upon any highway, street, lane, alley court or other public place,
or upon any private property or premises other than those of the person
owning or having charge, care, custody, or control of such dog, in the City,|1010| II|1010101010101010 10
10|11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
2.28
unless such dog be restrained by a substantial chain or leash not exceeding
six (6) feet in length and is in charge care custody or control of such
competent person Provided however that no such dog shall be allowed or
permitted in any of the following places any store market, restaurant cafe
lunchroom, soda fountain, bakery or kindred establishments wherein foods for
human consumption are served, sold or kept for sale, or in any public park
except as permitted by §§ 9 10 055 (A) and 9 10 400
SECTION 2 Section 9 10 055 (A) of the Culver City Municipal Code is
hereby amended to read as follows
§ 9 10 055 PROHIBITIONS
Within the limits of any public park it shall be unlawful for any person
A Having charge, care, custody or control of any dog, except as
permitted by § 9 10 400, or other animal, fowl, or reptile to cause, permit or
allow the same to be within the limits of any public park within the City unless
such person shall have obtained a special permit from the City Council to
conduct an entertainment or exhibition in which an animal is a participant
Notwithstanding this prohibition, there shall be a 90-day pilot program
conducted in Culver West Park from September 7, 2005 through and
including December 6, 2005, during which time dogs shall be allowed in
Culver West Park during regular operating hours, provided that all persons
having charge, care, custody or control of any dog shall comply with the
following conditions 1) dogs shall be restrained by a substantial chain or
leash not exceeding six feet in length, 2) retractable leashes shall not be
2permitted, 3) dogs shall not be permitted in the playground and tot lot areas,
and 4) dog feces shall be cleaned-up and properly disposed of by the person
having charge, care, custody or control of such dog
SECTION 3 Pursuant to Section 512 of the City Charter this
Ordinance shall take effect thirty (30) days after the date of its adoption Pursuant to
Sections 514 and 517 of the City Charter, prior to the expiration of fifteen (15) days after
the adoption, the City Clerk shall cause this Ordinance or a summary thereof, to be
published in the Culver City News and shall post this Ordinance or a summary thereof in at
least three places within the City
SECTION 4 The City Council hereby declares that if any provision, section,
subsection, paragraph, sentence, phrase or word of this ordinance is rendered or declared
invalid or unconstitutional by any final action in a court of competent jurisdiction or by
reason of any preemptive legislation then the City Council would have independently
adopted the remaining provisions sections subsections paragraphs sentences phrases
or words of this ordinance and as such they shall remain in full force and effect
APPROVED AND ADOPTED this day of August 2005
ALBERT M VERA, Mayor
City of Culver City California
ATTEST APPROVED AS TO FORM
CHRISTOPHER ARMENTA, City Clerk CAROL A SCHWAB, City Attorney|1010| 3
I|1010101010101010 10
10|11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28Omar-4046yr 2,
Calle& CI TY
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
DATE June 1, 2004
TO CHAIR DEEN AND MEMBERS OF THE PARKS AND
RECREATION COMMISSION
FROM Marty Nicholson, Recreation Manager
THROUGH Don Rogers PRCS Director
SUBJECT Discussion Regarding Possible Amendment to the City Ordinance
to Allow Dogs on Leashes in Public Parks on a Temporary Basis
Until the Dog Park is Developed
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the Parks and Recreation Commission deny a proposal to
recommend to City Council an amendment to the City Ordinance to allow dogs
on leashes in public parks on a temporary basis until the Culver City Dog Park is
developed
BACKGROUND
The City Council adopted regulations that govern the activities within City parks
on January 21, 1957 On May 22, 1961, the City Council added a regulation
prohibiting dogs in public parks Culver City Municipal Code (CCMC) § 9 10 055
(A), Attachment 1, prohibits dogs within any public park within the City unless a
special permit from the City Council has been obtained At the time the "no
animals in public parks" regulation was adopted there was a concern about the
health impact of dog fecal matter to children who use the limited grass areas in
the neighborhood parks
At the Apra 2004 Parks and Recreation Commission meeting the Commission
directed staff to agendize a discussion regarding a possible amendment to the
City Ordinance to allow dogs on leashes in City parks on a temporary basis until
the Dog Park is developed
DISCUSSION
Over the last twenty years, use of City parks has increased dramatically as open
space has declined and the population has increased The needs of park users,
like youth sports organizations, picnic permittees and condo/apartment dwellers
9770 CULVER BOULEVARD CULVER CITY CA 90232 0507Page 2 of 3
have impacted the local neighborhood parks significantly with increased usage
Therefore today park space is in extremely high demand
A recommendation to City Council regarding amending the CCMC §§ 9 10 055 to
allow dogs on leashes presents the following concerns 1) children's health, 2)
aggressive dogs, 3) conflicts with park users and 4) confusion in ordinance
Children's Health
Many years ago the City adopted a no dogs in public parks ordinance due to
concerns primarily with health and well being of the children who use the park
When dogs defecate in a public park it can lay on the ground overnight During
the night, sprinklers water the fecal matter spreading it around on the grass and
making clean up impossible Small children using the park are prone to sit or lay
on the grass and prone to put objects into their mouths which could be
contaminated with dog fecal matter The fecal matter may not be visible to park
users as a result of the water sprayed on by the sprinklers
In addition, though the CCMC prohibits dogs within any public parks, dog fecal
matter is already a clean up issue Some dog owners are responsible and do
clean up after their dogs however, there are many dog owners who do not It is
assumed that if the existing ordinance were changed to allow dogs within public
parks, there will be an increase in dog fecal matter in the parks and
corresponding increase in maintenance costs and health issues to the children
that use the parks for youth sports, recreation programs and drop in use
Aggressive Dogs
Under current regulations staff has little problem with aggressive dog issues
because dogs are not allowed in public parks However, with a change to the
ordinance allowing dogs, there is a potential of aggressive animals impacting the
quality of park use for the majority of residents who do not own dogs A dog
owner may not even be aware of his/her dog's aggressive tendencies until they
bring the animal to a public park Due to the high use of City parks, with a
change in ordinance conflicts between dogs and park users are bound to occur
Conflicts with Park Users
We could assume that if dogs on leashes were allowed some owners would
allow their dogs to be without leashes, which results in an increase in conflicts
and requires additional enforcement
A high percentage of permitted park use is for children s birthday parties,
company picnics and family gatherings Dogs allowed to be in City parks may
impact the quality of the users experience with dogs barking and running about
without leashes There are some people who are afraid of dogs, allowing dogs
within in public parks may have an impact on the quality of their park experience
S
PILE NAME DOGS IN PARKS REPORT 601 04 MID PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPERPage 3 of 3
Confusion in Ordinance
A temporary change in the CCMC could create confusion for the public and City
staff hired to enforce City regulations Signage would be required to inform the
public of the change in ordinance The no dog ordinance has taken many years
of enforcement to bring most park users into compliance with the ordinance
Residents with dogs would become accustomed to the change and therefore,
once the Dog Park is built changing the ordinance back to its former regulation
would set back the many years of successful enforcement
FISCAL ANALYSIS
Changes to park signs to accommodate a temporary change in ordinance have
been estimated at $3,000 including installation costs Once the Dog Park has
been completed signage would have to be changed again Total costs for signs
would be $6,000 Increase in maintenance as a result of additional clean up has
been estimated at $3,000 per year There would be a need to provide dog
owners with the necessary equipment to clean up after their dogs Posts to hold
the dog fecal bags run approximately $400 per park including installation If only
one post was installed at every park, the cost would be $4,400 There is a
potential for $10,400 in equipment costs and approximately $3,000 annual
additional maintenance costs, for an estimated total cost of $13,400 per year
ATTACHMENTS |109| CCMS § 9 10 055
MOTION
That the Parks and Recreation Commission deny a recommendation to City
Council to amend the City Ordinance to allow dogs on leashes in public parks on
a temporary basis until the dog park is opened
FILE NAME DOGS IN PARKS REPORT 601 04 MTG PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPERParks Recreation & Community Services Commission June 1 2004
Item #
7 20 p m
Gary Ford thanked the Commission for the recognition He introduced family members
who were in the audience wife Linda, daughters Shauna and Leah, and grand daughter
Tammy
Photographs were taken of the recipient and family with Commissioners and staff
members before the dais
000
Discussion Regarding Possible Amendment to the City Ordinance to Allow
Dogs on Leashes in Public Parks on a Temporary Basis Until the Dog Park is
Developed
Don Rogers, PRCS Director, called attention to the staff report and invited questions from
the Commission
Mr Rogers informed the Commission that he must leave the Commission meeting early
to attend the City Council meeting concurrently scheduled at Syd Kronenthal Park
At this time, Commissioner Alexander entertained the following motion
IT WAS MOVED BY COMMISSIONER ALEXANDER, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
SHAPIRO, THAT THE COMMISSION DENY A RECOMMENDATION TO THE CITY
COUNCIL TO AMEND THE CITY ORDINANCE TO ALLOW DOGS ON LEASHES IN
PUBLIC PARKS ON A TEMPORARY BASIS UNTIL THE DOG PARK IS OPEN
Commissioner James initiated discussion as she questioned the validity of some of the
concerns cited in the staff report relating to 1) children s health, 2) aggressive dogs, 3)
conflicts with park users, 4) confusion in ordinance and 5) additional maintenance costs
She further questioned the source of information and asked staff to return with additional
information, including how other cities address the issue of allowing dogs in public parks
She asked that this matter be reagendized for further discussion and action at the
Commission s July meeting
Commissioner Cooper concurred with Commissioner James' concerns
After a period of discussion, the following action was taken
IT WAS MOVED BY COMMISSIONER ALEXANDER, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
COOPER, THAT THE COMMISSION TABLE THE MOTION AND REAGENDIZE THE
ISSUE FOR FURTHER DISCUSSION AND ACTION
The Chair called for a vote on the motion which resulted in the following
Ayes Commissioners James, Shapiro, Alexander, and Cooper
Noes Commissioner Deen
Abstain None
000
Item #713
7 3 1 P m
Consideration and Discussion of the Needs and Benefits Related to the
Development of a Community Parks and Recreation Plan
Mr Rogers circulated a copy of the Culver City Recreation Element, an optional element
of the City s General Plan that was adopted by the City Council in January, 1968 He also
circulated a copy of the Draft General Plan which he noted was never adopted by the City
Councila#1100414514T 3
eadWA. CITY
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
DATE October 5, 2004
TO CHAIR DEEN AND MEMBERS OF THE PARKS AND
RECREATION COMMISSION
FROM Marty Nicholson, Recreation Manager
THROUGH Don Rogers, PRCS Director
SUBJECT
Continued Discussion Regarding Possible Amendment to the City
Ordinance to Allow Dogs on Leashes in Public Parks on a
Temporary Basis Until the Dog Park is Developed
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the Parks and Recreation Commission deny a proposal to
recommend to City Council an amendment to the City Ordinance to allow dogs
on leashes in public parks on a temporary basis until the Culver City Dog Park is
developed
BACKGROUND
At the June 2004 Parks and Recreation Commission meeting, the Commission
directed staff to agendize further discussion regarding a possible amendment to
the City Ordinance to allow dogs on leashes in City parks on a temporary basis
until the Dog Park is developed Attachment A provides a copy of the staff report
from the June meeting At the June Commission meeting the Commission
decided to table the motion and reagendize the issue for further discussion and
action Commissioner James requested additional information regarding how
other cities handle allowing dogs in public parks
DISCUSSION
Staff set out a survey to other cities regarding issues of aggressive dogs in parks
and the cost of maintenance regarding dog use in parks Attachment B provides
a copy of the request Only two cities responded City of Malibu and City of
South Pasadena The City of Malibu has always had dogs in their parks and
therefore had no information regarding increase in maintenance or problems with
aggressive dogs The City of South Pasadena decided to change their ordinance
because they do not offer a dog park The change in ordinance was due to
problems with lack of enforcement in the no-dog law Due to time constraints
and the short turn around, staff was unable to conduct additional research on
other cities
s
9770 CULVER BOULEVARD CULVER CITY CA 90232 0507Page 2 of 3
The City has experienced aggressive dogs in the past Three incidents in the
last year include
1 A woman brought her dog to Culver City Park to use the park as
grounds to train her dog to bite The woman was fully clothed in a bite
outfit and the dog was extremely aggressive growling and snapping at
the air when staff asked that she remove the dog
2 On April 30, 2004, Gary Ford, Employee of the Month of June, was
working at Carlson Park picking up trash when a dog on a leash
approached Mr Ford and bit him in the leg Attachment C provides the
police report describing the incident
3 On August 15, 2004, an employee distributing flyers door to door had a
leashed dog lunge at her and missed being bitten by jumping back
while the owner pulled back on the dog's leash The owner claimed
the dog was extremely friendly
During the survey of other Cities some Cities are now adopting very strict
aggressive dog ordinances to combat the problems with aggressive animals in
public parks
When it comes to dog feces, the Parks Division currently experiences problems
with people not cleaning up after their dogs It is anticipated, though there is no
documentation currently available from other cities, that a change in ordinance to
allow dogs in parks would increase the dog fecal matter in parks
In discussing the dogs on leashes in parks issue with members of the Friends of
the Culver City Dog Park, there is some concern that allowing dogs in parks on a
temporary basis would have a negative impact on the campaign to build a Dog
Park
FISCAL ANALYSIS
The fiscal analysis remains the same as last report Costs for signs would be
$6,000 and additional maintenance would run $3,000 Annual supply costs for
bags would be $400 Posts installation would be $4,400 Total costs would be
$10,400 in equipment and $3 000 annually in maintenance
ATTACHMENTS
A Dog Park Report from the April Commission Meeting
Email Survey Questions on Dogs in Parks
Police Report Regarding Dog Bite Incident
FILE NAME DOGS IN PARICS REPORT 10 5 04 MID PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPERPage 3 of 3
MOTION
That the Parks and Recreation Commission deny a recommendation to City
Council to amendment to City Council an amendment to the City Ordinance to
allow dogs on leashes in public parks on a temporary basis until the dog park is
developed
I0
FILE NAME DOGS IN PARKS REPORT 10 5 04 MID PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPERParks Recreation & Community Services Commission October 5 2004
Item #713
750 p m
RELATING TO DOGS IN CITY PARKS AND ESTABLISHING THE OFF-LEASH DOG
PARK RULES AND REGULATIONS, THE PROPOSED RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING
PARK PATROL OFFICERS TO ENFORCE THE RULES AT THE OFF-LEASH DOG
PARK, THE PROPOSED RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING DOG PARK HOURS, AND
THE PROPOSED SIGNAGE AT THE DOG PARK, AND DIRECT STAFF TO AGENDIZE
THE PROPOSED ORDINANCE AND RESOLUTIONS AT A CITY COUNCIL MEETING
FOR DISCUSSION AND ADOPTION
Staff fielded questions from the Commission relative to the staff report
Following lengthy discussion, Chair Shapiro called for a vote on the MOTION WHICH
PASSED UNANIMOUSLY
Ms Hirohama advised the proposed ordmance is tentatively scheduled for City Council
approval on November 8 th with the introduction of the first reading of the ordinance The
Council will adopt the rules and regulations with the second reading of the ordinance on
November 22nd The ordinance would then take effect 30 days after adoption
Mr Rogers mentioned the dog park cleanup is estimated to be completed by late
November
000
Discussion Regarding Park Permits Enforcement Issues
As a follow-up to the Commission s discussion several months ago, Heather Iker
informed the Commission that the City Attorney's Office is currently researching the issue
of enforcing park permits and other related ordinances pertaining to park usage,
including
• enforcement of the current state law prohibiting smoking within 25 feet of a
playground or sandbox area,
• proposed Municipal Code amendments to the chapters pertaining to abandoned
personal property and shopping carts in public parks as it relates to the homeless
population
Ms Iker added the City Attorney s Office is also dealing with other legal issues, which has
further delayed this process
She mentioned the City presently has a Homeless Subcommittee that is also addressing
some of the issues associated with homelessness
Ms Iker indicated the Commission would be apprised of the legal findings regarding
these issues as they develop
Recalling the Commission s action a few months ago to prohibit moon bounces in
Lindberg Park, Chair Shapiro asked if moon bounces are still being allowed m other
parks
Don Rogers responded that this is a policy issue that must be approved by the City
Council at a future meeting
000
Item #7c
755 P m
Continued Discussion Regarding a Possible Amendment to the City
Ordinance to Allow Dogs on Leashes in Public Parks on a Temporary Basis
Until the Dog Park is DevelopedParks Recreation & Community Services Commission October 5 2004
Jeannine Stehlin, Culver City resident, addressed the Commission and spoke in strong
opposition on any change to the Culver City Dog Ordinance
She read statistical facts on insurance costs relating to dog bite claims and cited a list of
diseases that can be transmitted from dog feces to humans
Ms Stehlin stated that the health and safety of children should be the primary concern
Commissioner Deen initiated discussion He stated that allowing dogs on leashes in the
parks would be counter productive to the purpose of a dog park
Commissioner Deen proposed the following motion That the Commission deny a
recommendation to the City Council to amend the City ordinance to allow dogs on leashes
in public parks on a temporary basis until the dog park is developed
There was no second to Commissioner Deen s motion
Discussion continued
Commissioner Cooper voiced concern that the staff report reflects a negative, one-sided
viewpoint on the issue of dogs in parks, and that the reference to the Friends of Culver
City Dog Park has no relevance to the subject of the report
Commissioner Cooper noted that any amendment to the dog ordinance should not be a
temporary change but a permanent change He said he was not ready to vote on the
proposed motion at this time
Commissioner James concurred with Commissioner Coopers sentiments She requested
additional information regarding how other cities have addressed allowing dogs in public
parks
Commissioner Redholtz expressed concern that the reference in the report to the Friends
of Culver City Dog Park may connote an implied support of the issue She clarified the
Friends is a 5o1(c)(3) nonprofit organization and cannot take a stance on any issues other
than their own mission
Commissioner Redholtz also recommended staff conduct a community survey to assess
the public s level of support
Chair Shapiro voiced concern regarding the cost and amount of staff time associated with
a community survey
Responding to Chair Shapiro s concern, Commissioner Cooper suggested holding a public
hearing as an option
The following motion was proposed
IT WAS MOVED BY COMMISSIONER JAMES, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
REDHOLTZ TO TABLE THE MOTION AND REAGENDIZE THE ISSUE OF
PERMANENTLY AMENDING THE DOG ORDINANCE TO ALLOW DOGS ON LEASHES
IN PARKS FOR FURTHER DISCUSSION AT A PUBLIC HEARING TO BE SCHEDULED
AT A FEBRUARY COMMISSION MEETING
Ayes Commissioners Cooper, James, Redholtz
Noes Commissioners Deen, Shapiro
Abstain None
4Ar11011ieti vr Si
ettAteA CITY
PUBLIC HEARING ITEM PH-1
DATE May 31 2005
TO CHAIR SHAPIRO AND MEMBERS OF THE PARKS AND RECREATION
COMMISSION
FROM Patricia Mooney, PRCS Senior Management Analyst
SUBJECT Discussion of the consideration of making a recommendation to the
City Council to amend Sections 901 360 and 9 10 055 (A) of the
Culver City Municipal Code to allow dogs on leashes in public parks
within Culver City
RECOMMENDATION
That the Parks and Recreation Commission review the report, consider all public input and
discuss the issue of making a recommendation to the City Council to amend Sections 9 01 360
and 9 10 055 (A) of the Culver City Municipal Code to allow dogs on leashes in public parks
within Culver City
PROCEDURE
1 Chair seeks a motion to receive and file the affidavit and notice of publication
2 Chair calls on staff for a brief report or asks Commissioners if they have questions of
staff on this subject
3 Chair declares the Public Hearing open, and calls upon the public for comments
4 Chair seeks a motion to close the Public Hearing
5 Commissioners discuss the matter and take the appropriate actions concerning the
recommendations or specifically approve changes
NOTICING INFORMATION
Notice was published in the Culver City News the Observer and The Front page during the
weeks of May 26 and June 2, 2005 On May 19, 2005 the notice of tonight's discussion was
sent out to over 500 persons on the Culver City Email Notification List On May 23 rd and
31 st, and on June 1 st and 6th , and a cable crawler was placed on the Channel 35 video
broadcasts of City Council meetings Flyers were distributed at all City parks beginning on
May 25, 2005 On May 26, 2005, fifteen concerned residents who had signed a petition
regarding this issue were noticed via email Neighborhood Associations were contacted
regarding this meeting during the week of May 30, 2005
BACKGROUND
Section 9 01 360 reads as follows DOGS RUNNING AT LARGE PROHIBITION
It shall be unlawful for any person owning or having charge care custody or control of any dog to cause
permit or allow the same to be or to run at large upon any highway street lane alley court or other
public place or upon any private property or premises other than those of the person owning or having
charge care custody or control of such dog in the City unless such dog be restrained by a substantial
chain or leash not exceeding six (6) feet in length and is in charge care custody or control of such
competent person Provided however that no such dog shall be allowed or permitted in any of the
9770 CULVER BOULEVARD CULVER CITY CA 90232 0507
1Page 2 of 4
following places any store market restaurant cafe lunchroom soda fountain bakery or kindred
establishments wherein foods for human consumption are served sold or kept for sale or in any public
park except as permitted by § 9 10 400
Section 9 10 055 (A) reads as follows PROHABITIONS - Within the limits of any public park it shall be
unlawful for any person
A Having charge care custody or control of any dog except as permitted by § 9 10 400 or other
animal fowl or reptile to cause permit or allow the same to be within the limits of any public park within
the City unless such person shall have obtained a special permit from the City Council to conduct an
entertainment or exhibition in which an animal is a participant
Prior Commission Actions
At the June 7, 2004 Parks and Recreation Commission meeting, the Commission directed staff
to agendize further discussion regarding a possible amendment to the City Ordinance to allow
dogs on leashes in City parks on a temporary basis until the Dog Park is developed
Attachment A provides a copy of the staff report from the June meeting At the June
Commission meeting the Commission decided to table the item for additional information
On October 5, 2004 the item was agendized and the Commission moved to table the
discussion A revised request to agendize a permanent amendment to the City Ordinance to
allow dogs on leashes in parks was put forth at that time Attachment B provides a copy of the
minutes of the October 5, 2004 meeting
The purpose of this report is to provide the Commission with an overview of what other
California cities are doing with relation to the issue of allowing leashed dogs in public parks
DISCUSSION
During the period of May 10, through May 20, 2005, individual emails were sent to 325 cities
listed on the California League of Cities website The "Dogs-on-Leash" Public Policy Survey
was sent to appropriate City Administration or City staff members with a posted email address
The survey posed the following questions
1 How many parks are there in your City's park system?
2 What is your City's policy regarding allowing dogs-on-leash in your parks?
3 What are the main reasons that your City has this policy?
4 In your opinion, what are the advantages of allowing dogs-on-leash in City parks'?
5 In your opinion, what are the disadvantages of allowing dogs-on-leash in City parks'?
Of the 325 emails sent, 94 surveys were received, for a 29% response rate Attachment C
provides a list of the cities whose information is included in this report The findings for each
question are as follows
Question 1 How many parks are there in your City's park system?
The number of parks per city ranged from 1 (Buelton) to 160 (Sacramento) Approximately 70%
of those who responded worked in cities with 25 parks or less Seven cities said they had 14
parks, which was also the midpoint of the sample
Question 2 What is your City's policy regarding allowing dogs-on-leash in your parks?
Ninety percent (90%) of those who responded said that leashed dogs were allowed in one or
more of their City parks Seventy-five percent (75%) reported that leashed dogs were allowed in
all of their City's parks Ten cities (or 3%) did not allow dogs in any of their parks and three of
these cities said they had or were planning designated dog parks
PkADVANTAGES OF ALLOWING LEASHED DOGS IN PARKS
Owners Can Share Park Experience w/ Dog 40%
Allows Adequate Exercise for Dogs 28%
Allows Shared Usage of the Parks 25%
Encourages Responsible Pet Ownership 13%
Leash Limits Dog s Mobility / More Control 13%
Added Safety of the Owner and/or the Dog 11%
DISADVANTAGES OF ALLOWING LEASHED DOGS IN PARKS
Some Owners Fail to Clean up After Their Dogs 60%
Public Safety Issues / Liability 28%
Some Dogs Interfere with Park Activities and/or Other
Users or Generally Misbehave 19%
Some Dog Owners Violate the Ordinance 17%
Some Dogs Pose a Threat to Children 12%
Page 3 of 4
Due to the open-ended nature of the questions, some respondents offered additional
information regarding their parks For example, overall, 34% mentioned that off-leash
opportunities were or would soon be available in their cities for dogs and their owners Usually,
this opportunity was in the form of one or more designated dog parks It was also stated that
some of the parks allowing leashed dogs included an 'off-leash fenced exercise area ' In
addition, a few respondents mentioned that within parks allowing leashed dogs, dogs were
excluded from specific areas in the park, such as tot lots, sports fields buildings, outdoor
recreation courts, and/or large community gatherings such as festivals Other supplemental
comments included 20% of respondents remarking that by ordinance, leashes must be 6' or
shorter and 13% who said that their cities provided plastic bags or "doggie mitts" for park
patrons
Question 3 What are the main reasons that your City has this policy?
Sixty-four percent (64%) of those responding said public safety was the reason behind their
City's policy regarding leashed dogs in parks Eighteen percent (18%) stated that the main
reason behind the policy was to accommodate and/or benefit dog owners while minimizing the
impact of the dogs' presence on other members of the community Twelve percent (12%) said
that the policy was a long standing ordinance Six percent (6%) gave other reasons, such as
resident demand
Question 4 In your opinion, what are the advantages of allowing dogs-on-leash in City
parks'? Please see the table below (percentages total more than 100% because more than one
advantage was sometimes stated)
Question 5 In your opinion, what are the disadvantages of allowing dogs-on-leash in
City parks? Please see the table below (percentages total more than 100% because more
than one disadvantage was sometimes stated)
'SOVERVIEW OF SURVEY RESULTS
from 94 California Cities
Cities with 25 parks or less 70%
Cities allowing leashed dogs in parks 90%
Cities with public safety as a reason for their ordinance 64%
Advantage Owners can share park experience with dog 40%
Disadvantage Some owners fail to clean up after their dogs 60%
Page 4 of 4
Summary Table
FISCAL ANALYSIS
Questions regarding financial costs and/or benefits were not included in this survey Costs
related to allowing dogs on leashes in parks within Culver City were stated in the staff report
presented at the June 7, 2004 Commission meeting Costs detailed in that report included
changing park signs ($3,000 per park), increased maintenance costs ($3,000 annually per park),
and the cost of purchasing and installing posts to hold dog fecal bags ($400 per installation)
The fiscal impact of allowing dogs on leashes in parks is dependent upon several factors
including the number and size of parks where the policy is implemented, available staff
resources, and the degree to which owners take responsibility for cleaning up their dogs' fecal
matter In addition, if the ordinances are amended, there may be costs associated with litigation
due to potential public safety issues
ATTACHMENTS
A June 7, 2004 Commission Report
B Minutes of the October 5, 2004 Commission meeting
C List of cities participating in the survey
MOTIONS
1 Make a recommendation to the City Council to amend Sections 9 01 360 and 9 10 055 (A) of
the Culver City Municipal Code to allow dogs on leashes in all public parks within Culver City
OR
2 Make a recommendation to the City Council to amend Sections 9 01 360 and 9 10 055 (A) of
the Culver City Municipal Code to allow dogs on leashes in public parks within Culver City,
under one or more of the following conditions initiate a trial period, limit the number of affected
parks, designate areas within specific parks, and/or designate hours within specific parks
OR
3 Provide further direction to staff
OR
4 Take no action at this time
1 bParks and Recreation Commission June 7 2005
o0o
Item P-4
(7 25PM)
Employee of the Month for Outstanding Leadership
Marty Nicholson requested the Employee of the Month presentation be postponed until
after the public hearing
The Commission concurred with her request
o0o
Public Hearing
Item PH-1
(725 p m)
Consideration of amending the City ordinance to allow leashed dogs in
parks
MOVED BY COMMISSIONER DEEN, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER JAMES AND
UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED, THAT THE PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION
RECEIVE AND FILE THE COPIES OF THE NOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Chair Shapiro called for a staff report
Patricia Mooney, Senior Management Analyst, gave the staff report, explaining the
report presents an overview of what other California cities are doing in relation to
allowing leashed dogs in City parks
She briefly reviewed the 'dogs on leash" park policy survey sent out to 325 cities listed in
the League of California Cities' website with email addresses, and the 94 responses
(29%) received that were used as date for the staff report The survey questions and an
overview of the results included the following
1) How many parks are there in your City's park system?
Cities with 25 parks or less — 70%
2) What is your City s policy regarding allowing dogs on leash in your parks?
Cities allowing leashed dogs in parks — 89%
3)
What are the main reasons that your City has this policy?
Cities with public safety as a reason for their ordinance — 64%
4)
In your opinion, what are the advantages of allowing dogs on leash in City
parks?
Advantage Owners can share park experience with their dogs — 40%
5)
In your opinion, what are the disadvantages of allowing dogs on leash in City
parks?|1010| 11Parks and Recreation Commission June 7 2005
Disadvantage Some owners fail to clean up after their dogs
Chair Shapiro declared the public hearing open
Chair Shapiro invited public testimony
The following members in the audience addressed the Commission in support of
amending the City ordinance to allow dogs on leash within City parks
Judy Scott
David Leathers
Alisha Martin
Arthur Russell
Deborah Shands
Michael Faugno
Kathy Weaver
Marilyn Russell
Patricia Graf
Doug Roble (submitted written comments)
Stanley Horn-Bostel
Carole Wilson
Joyce Mundle
Linda Gross
Judy Levitow
Peter B Mundle
The following members in the audience addressed the Commission in opposition to
amending the City ordinance to allow dogs on leash within City parks
Laura Romero
Jeannine Stehlin (also submitted a copy of an online petition regarding dogs in parks)
Linda Asklof
Jamie Wallace
Jean Stout
Dena Snedden
Steve Newton
Susan Deen
Daisy Horn-Bostel
MOVED BY COMMISSIONER DEEN, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER COOPER AND
UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED, TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING
Recess (8 30 p m ) 1
At this time, Chair Shapiro called for a short recess
Reconvene (8 40 p m)
The meeting was reconvened with all Commissioners present
t Is
45
Parks and Recreation Commission June 7 2005
It was noted that the following public comments via email were received relating to
amending the ordinance to allow dogs on leash within City parks
In support Ed Rybka
Carol Heimrich
Simon Hortwitz
In opposition Larry Loughlin
Stephen O'Donnell
Gita Terry
Kathleen O'Donnell
Ellis D Smith
Larry Weiner and family
Jennifer Mann
Tami Wedekind
Caroline Cicero
Pat Hubley
Emily H Glick
Gerald Collins
Alan Resnick
Mitch Glickman and family
Melissa Orr Smith
Mercedes Anderberg
June Walden
Nancy Burne
Susan Wells
Leonel Ibarra
Kyle Nudo
No clear position taken but negative comments made regarding certain aspects of
allowing dogs on leash in City parks
R Waters
Yves Parent
Commissioner James initiated discussion, expressing her support of allowing dogs on
leash in one of the City parks She recommended implementing a pilot project at Fox
Hills Park (as suggested by a community member), where many of the residents living in
condominiums and apartments do not have backyards and must travel out outside of the
City to take their dogs to a park
Commissioner Deen raised questions regarding the statistical aspect of the email survey
information
Patti Mooney provided clarification
Commissioner Deen shared information about diseases that can be transmitted from
dogs to human He said he would not be in favor of amending the current ordinance to
allow dogs on leash in any public parkParks and Recreation Commission June 7 2005
Commissioner Cooper commented on the financial costs detailed in the staff report
including changing park signs ($3,000 per park), increased maintenance costs ($3,000
annually per park), and cost of purchasing and installing posts to hold dog fecal bags
($400 per installation)
Based on the overall information, he said he would support a test program on a trial
basis at Fox Hills Park and possibly along the Nature Trail in Culver City Park He said
he would not support any area where there are children present due to concern for
health issues
Commissioner Daly-Redholtz commended staff on the email notification process and the
public notification in the newspapers which resulted in a good turnout and response for
the public hearing Once again, she emphasized the Culver City Friends of Dog Park has
not taken a position regarding the issue of dogs on leash in City parks since the issue is
not part of their mission and is separate from the dog park
Commissioner Daly-Redholtz spoke in support of a pilot program, agreeing with Fox
Hills Park as a possible site She noted that this is not an urgent issue that requires
immediate action, but something that staff can research and develop a proposal for a
pilot program on a trial basis for perhaps a six-month period in order to study and
observe the impacts to the community
There was general discussion regarding the pilot program concept
Chair Shapiro stated that she is not in favor of dogs in parks, emphasizing that parks are
for children and not for dogs She said she would not vote for any pilot program or for
any park to be used for dogs, except for the Bone Yard currently the site for an off-leash
dog park
Following further discussion, the following action was taken
MOVED BY COMMISSION JAMES, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER COOPER, THAT
THE PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION DIRECT STAFF TO COME BACK
WITH INFORMATION REGARDING A PROPOSAL FOR IMPLEMENTATION OF A
PILOT PROGRAM FOR DOGS ON LEASHES IN ONE OF CULVER CITY'S PUBLIC
PARKS
AYES Commissioners James, Cooper, Daly-Redholtz
NOES Commissioners Deen, Shapiro
ABSTAIN None
ABSENT None
000
Public Comment — Items Not on the Agenda
(9
40 p m )
Chair Shapiro invited public participation
6A vr arivitiGor s
ettetteit CITY
ITEM NUMBER A-2
DATE July 5, 2005
TO Chair Shapiro and Members of the Parks and Recreation
Commission
FROM William L La Pointe, Director of Parks, Recreation and Community
Services
SUBJECT CONSIDERATION OF A PROPOSAL FOR A DOGS-ON-
LEASHES PILOT PROGRAM IN ONE OF THE PARKS IN
CULVER CITY
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the Parks and Recreation Commission review, discuss
and recommend to the City Council
a) Implementation of the proposed pilot project for dogs on leashes in one of
the parks in Culver City, or
b) that Sections 901 360 and 9 10 055 (A) of the Culver City Municipal Code
that prohibit dogs in parks within Culver City remain unchanged, or
c) another option concerning the issue of allowing dogs in parks within
Culver City on which the City Council might act
BACKGROUND
There has been much discussion over the past year regarding whether or not to
allow dogs in parks within Culver City so long as they are leashed At the June
7, 2005 meeting, the Parks and Recreation Commission requested staff to bring
back a proposal of a "pilot project' on this issue
DISCUSSION
The proposal for this pilot project is as follows
That dogs on leashes (retractable leashes are not allowed) be allowed on the
grass area below the children s playground (commonly referred to as the "lower
park ) of Culver City Park during regular park operating hours for a three-month
period of time This pilot project is being proposed for one park in order to study
9770 CULVER BOULEVARD CULVER CITY CA 90232 0507
2.1Page 2 of 2
and observe the impacts of a practice before a decision is made as to whether or
not to allow this practice in all the parks
FISCAL ANALYSIS
Approval of this proposal is anticipated to have some impact on staff and
resources for cleanup and patrolling efforts If this pilot project were approved, it
is expected that a more detailed analysis of the fiscal impact would be
developed
MOTION(S)
That the Parks and Recreation Commission
1) Recommend to the City Council that a pilot project allowing dogs on
leashes (retractable leashes are not allowed) on the grass area below the
children's playground (commonly referred to as the "lower park") of Culver
City Park during regular park operating hours for a three-month period, so
as to observe and quantify how a practice such as this might impact the
community if it were allowed in all the City's parks,
or
2) Recommend to the City Council that Sections 9 01 360 and 9 10 055 (A)
of the Culver City Municipal Code that prohibit dogs in parks within Culver
City remain unchanged,
Or
3) Recommend to the City Council another option concerning the issue of
allowing dogs in parks within Culver City
73.
PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPERThese Mmutes are not official until approved by the Parks and Recreation
Commission
July 5, 2005
7 00 p In
REGULAR MEETING OF THE
PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION, CITY OF CULVER CITY,
CALIFORNIA
CHAIR ANITA SHAPIRO
NEW CHAIR JEANETTE JAMES
Call to Order
The meeting of the Parks and Recreation Commission was called to order at 7 05 p m in
the Council Chambers, City Hall
000
Roll Call
Members Present Commissioners Shapiro, James, Cooper, Deen, Daly-Redholtz
Staff Present
Others Present
William La Pointe, Parks, Recreation and Community Services Director
Heather Iker, Assistant City Prosecutor
Path Mooney, Senior Management Analyst
Marty Nicholson, Recreation Manager
Jay Handal, Culver City Lions Club
Susan Deen, Cultural Affairs Commissioner
Jamie Wallace, Culver City
Jean Stout, Culver City
Judy Scott, Culver City
Clark Dikeman, Culver City
00o
(Excerpt)
Item A-2
(7 27P M )
Consideration of a proposal for a dogs-on-leashes pilot program m one of
the parks m Culver City
The following members in the audience addressed the Commission regarding this issue
23Parks and Recreation Commission July 5 2005
Jamie Wallace, Culver City, spoke in opposition
Jean Stout, Culver City, spoke in opposition, commenting on the difficulty of enforcing
the ordinance
Judy Scott, Culver City, suggested as a compromise, allowing leashed dogs in parks only
during early morning or late at night when most children and parents are not in the
parks
Susan Deen, Cultural Affairs Commissioner, speaking as a resident, reminded the
Commission that three years ago the Friends of Culver City Dog Park conducted a City
Council candidates forum where the candidates had taken a position against allowing
dogs on leashes in City parks She voiced opposition, citing enforcement concerns
Jay Handal, Culver City Lions Club, speaking as an individual in support of staffs
proposal of a pilot program
At this time, the following action was taken
MOVED BY COMMISSIONER SHAPIRO, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER DALY
REDHOLTZ AND UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED, TO RECEIVE AND FILE EMAIL
CORRESPONDENCE FROM MR ELLIS D SMITH AND MS DEBORAH RISSMAN IN
OPPOSITION AND MS FRAN LONGMIRE IN SUPPORT OF ALLOWING LEASHED
DOGS IN A CITY PARK
At this time, Chair James asked for a staff report
William La Pointe, Director of Parks, Recreation and Community Services, gave the staff
report, recommending a proposal for a pilot program on the grass area below the
children s playground (commonly referred to as the "lower park' ) of Culver City Park
during regular park operating hours The pilot project would be for a three-month trial
basis in order to study and observe the impacts before a decision is made as to whether
or not to allow the practice in all the parks
Commissioner Cooper initiated discussion, inquiring about the process in selecting
Culver City Park for the proposed program He recalled the Commission had previously
discussed Fox Hills Park and Culver West Park as possible locations for a pilot project
Commissioner Daly Redholtz did not think Culver City Park was a good location, citing
the negative impacts from the Dog Park and construction of the new skateboard park
She questioned staffs rationale in selecting Culver City Park, as it was her understanding
that the process was to have involved community input
Commissioner Deen voiced his opposition to developing a pilot program, stating that it
was not positive use of staff time
Commissioner Shapiro cited her reasons for opposing the concept She said the Dog
Park is there for dogs, the rest of the parks are for children
The following action was taken
MOVED BY COMMISSIONER SHAPIRO THAT THE PARKS AND RECREATION
COMMISSION RECOMMEND TO THE CITY COUNCIL THAT SECTIONS 9 01360
7-A
2Parks and Recreation Commission July 5 2005
AND 910 055(A) OF THE CULVER CITY MUNICIPAL CODE THAT PROHIBIT DOGS
IN PARKS WITHIN CULVER CITY REMAIN UNCHANGED
Commissioner Deen seconded the Motion
AYES Commissioners Deen, Shapiro
NOES Commissioners Cooper, James, Daly Redholtz
ABSTAIN None
ABSENT None
The Motion failed
At this time, Commissioner James provided a brief history regarding the issue of
allowing dogs on leashes in parks She did not feel Culver City Park was a good location
and recommended considering another site
Following further discussion, the following action was taken
MOVED BY COMMISSIONER COOPER THAT THE PARKS AND RECREATION
COMMISSION RECOMMEND TO THE CITY COUNCIL THAT A PILOT STUDY
ALLOWING DOGS ON 6-FT LEASHES BE DEVELOPED FOR IMPLEMENTATION AT
CULVER WEST PARK FOR A 90-DAY PERIOD IN ORDER TO EVALUATE THE
FEASIBILITY AND IMPACTS BEFORE A DECISION IS MADE AS TO WHETHER OR
NOT TO ALLOW THE PRACTICE IN ALL CITY PARKS
Commissioner Daly Redholtz seconded the Motion
AYES Commissioners Cooper, James, Daly Redholtz
NOES Commissioners Shapiro, Deen
ABSTAIN None
ABSENT None
The Motion carried
o0o|1010| 2$MEETING DATE 07/25/05
AGENDA ITEM Consideration of a Proposed Pilot Program to Allow Dogs on
Leashes in Culver West Park for a Period of Ninety Days, and
Consideration of Introduction of an Ordinance Amending
Culver City Municipal Code Sections 9 01 360 and 9 10 055
(A), Relating to the Prohibition of Dogs Running at Large and
in Public Parks, in Order to Implement the Pilot Program
ATTACHMENTS
Pages|109| Proposed Ordinance 1-3|109| Staff report and excerpt of minutes of 6/1/04 Commission meeting 4-7|109| Staff report and excerpt of minutes of 10/5/04 Commission meeting 8-12|109| Staff report and excerpt of minutes of 6/7/05 Commission meeting 13-20|109| Staff report and excerpt of minutes of 7/5/05 Commission meeting 21-25I|1010101010101010 10
10|11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Arr
witurser et
ORDINANCE NO 2005-
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CULVER CITY,
CALIFORNIA AMENDING SECTIONS 901 360 AND
9 10 055 (A) OF THE CULVER CITY MUNICIPAL CODE
RELATING TO THE PROHIBITION OF DOGS RUNNING AT
LARGE AND IN PUBLIC PARKS, IN ORDER TO
IMPLEMENT A 90-DAY PILOT PROGRAM TO ALLOW
DOGS ON LEASHES IN CULVER WEST PARK
WHEREAS, the Culver City Municipal Code currently prohibits dogs in public
parks, and
WHEREAS, many other cities allow dogs in parks provided that they are on a
leash and other rules are followed, and
WHEREAS, it has been approved by the City Council, upon recommendation
of the Parks and Recreation Commission, to implement a 90-day pilot program to allow
leashed dogs in Culver West Park in order to observe and study the impacts and feasibility
of implementing such a practice on a permanent basis and in additional City parks
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Culver City, California
DOES HEREBY ORDAIN as follows
SECTION 1 Section 9 01 360 of the Culver City Municipal Code is hereby
amended to read as follows
§ 901 360 DOGS RUNNING AT LARGE, PROHIBITION, EXCEPTIONS
It shall be unlawful for any person owning or having charge, care,
custody or control of any dog to cause, permit or allow the same to be or to
run at large upon any highway, street, lane, alley court or other public place,
or upon any private property or premises other than those of the person
owning or having charge, care, custody, or control of such dog, in the City,|1010| II|1010101010101010 10
10|11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
2.28
unless such dog be restrained by a substantial chain or leash not exceeding
six (6) feet in length and is in charge care custody or control of such
competent person Provided however that no such dog shall be allowed or
permitted in any of the following places any store market, restaurant cafe
lunchroom, soda fountain, bakery or kindred establishments wherein foods for
human consumption are served, sold or kept for sale, or in any public park
except as permitted by §§ 9 10 055 (A) and 9 10 400
SECTION 2 Section 9 10 055 (A) of the Culver City Municipal Code is
hereby amended to read as follows
§ 9 10 055 PROHIBITIONS
Within the limits of any public park it shall be unlawful for any person
A Having charge, care, custody or control of any dog, except as
permitted by § 9 10 400, or other animal, fowl, or reptile to cause, permit or
allow the same to be within the limits of any public park within the City unless
such person shall have obtained a special permit from the City Council to
conduct an entertainment or exhibition in which an animal is a participant
Notwithstanding this prohibition, there shall be a 90-day pilot program
conducted in Culver West Park from September 7, 2005 through and
including December 6, 2005, during which time dogs shall be allowed in
Culver West Park during regular operating hours, provided that all persons
having charge, care, custody or control of any dog shall comply with the
following conditions 1) dogs shall be restrained by a substantial chain or
leash not exceeding six feet in length, 2) retractable leashes shall not be
2permitted, 3) dogs shall not be permitted in the playground and tot lot areas,
and 4) dog feces shall be cleaned-up and properly disposed of by the person
having charge, care, custody or control of such dog
SECTION 3 Pursuant to Section 512 of the City Charter this
Ordinance shall take effect thirty (30) days after the date of its adoption Pursuant to
Sections 514 and 517 of the City Charter, prior to the expiration of fifteen (15) days after
the adoption, the City Clerk shall cause this Ordinance or a summary thereof, to be
published in the Culver City News and shall post this Ordinance or a summary thereof in at
least three places within the City
SECTION 4 The City Council hereby declares that if any provision, section,
subsection, paragraph, sentence, phrase or word of this ordinance is rendered or declared
invalid or unconstitutional by any final action in a court of competent jurisdiction or by
reason of any preemptive legislation then the City Council would have independently
adopted the remaining provisions sections subsections paragraphs sentences phrases
or words of this ordinance and as such they shall remain in full force and effect
APPROVED AND ADOPTED this day of August 2005
ALBERT M VERA, Mayor
City of Culver City California
ATTEST APPROVED AS TO FORM
CHRISTOPHER ARMENTA, City Clerk CAROL A SCHWAB, City Attorney|1010| 3
I|1010101010101010 10
10|11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28Omar-4046yr 2,
Calle& CI TY
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
DATE June 1, 2004
TO CHAIR DEEN AND MEMBERS OF THE PARKS AND
RECREATION COMMISSION
FROM Marty Nicholson, Recreation Manager
THROUGH Don Rogers PRCS Director
SUBJECT Discussion Regarding Possible Amendment to the City Ordinance
to Allow Dogs on Leashes in Public Parks on a Temporary Basis
Until the Dog Park is Developed
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the Parks and Recreation Commission deny a proposal to
recommend to City Council an amendment to the City Ordinance to allow dogs
on leashes in public parks on a temporary basis until the Culver City Dog Park is
developed
BACKGROUND
The City Council adopted regulations that govern the activities within City parks
on January 21, 1957 On May 22, 1961, the City Council added a regulation
prohibiting dogs in public parks Culver City Municipal Code (CCMC) § 9 10 055
(A), Attachment 1, prohibits dogs within any public park within the City unless a
special permit from the City Council has been obtained At the time the "no
animals in public parks" regulation was adopted there was a concern about the
health impact of dog fecal matter to children who use the limited grass areas in
the neighborhood parks
At the Apra 2004 Parks and Recreation Commission meeting the Commission
directed staff to agendize a discussion regarding a possible amendment to the
City Ordinance to allow dogs on leashes in City parks on a temporary basis until
the Dog Park is developed
DISCUSSION
Over the last twenty years, use of City parks has increased dramatically as open
space has declined and the population has increased The needs of park users,
like youth sports organizations, picnic permittees and condo/apartment dwellers
9770 CULVER BOULEVARD CULVER CITY CA 90232 0507Page 2 of 3
have impacted the local neighborhood parks significantly with increased usage
Therefore today park space is in extremely high demand
A recommendation to City Council regarding amending the CCMC §§ 9 10 055 to
allow dogs on leashes presents the following concerns 1) children's health, 2)
aggressive dogs, 3) conflicts with park users and 4) confusion in ordinance
Children's Health
Many years ago the City adopted a no dogs in public parks ordinance due to
concerns primarily with health and well being of the children who use the park
When dogs defecate in a public park it can lay on the ground overnight During
the night, sprinklers water the fecal matter spreading it around on the grass and
making clean up impossible Small children using the park are prone to sit or lay
on the grass and prone to put objects into their mouths which could be
contaminated with dog fecal matter The fecal matter may not be visible to park
users as a result of the water sprayed on by the sprinklers
In addition, though the CCMC prohibits dogs within any public parks, dog fecal
matter is already a clean up issue Some dog owners are responsible and do
clean up after their dogs however, there are many dog owners who do not It is
assumed that if the existing ordinance were changed to allow dogs within public
parks, there will be an increase in dog fecal matter in the parks and
corresponding increase in maintenance costs and health issues to the children
that use the parks for youth sports, recreation programs and drop in use
Aggressive Dogs
Under current regulations staff has little problem with aggressive dog issues
because dogs are not allowed in public parks However, with a change to the
ordinance allowing dogs, there is a potential of aggressive animals impacting the
quality of park use for the majority of residents who do not own dogs A dog
owner may not even be aware of his/her dog's aggressive tendencies until they
bring the animal to a public park Due to the high use of City parks, with a
change in ordinance conflicts between dogs and park users are bound to occur
Conflicts with Park Users
We could assume that if dogs on leashes were allowed some owners would
allow their dogs to be without leashes, which results in an increase in conflicts
and requires additional enforcement
A high percentage of permitted park use is for children s birthday parties,
company picnics and family gatherings Dogs allowed to be in City parks may
impact the quality of the users experience with dogs barking and running about
without leashes There are some people who are afraid of dogs, allowing dogs
within in public parks may have an impact on the quality of their park experience
S
PILE NAME DOGS IN PARKS REPORT 601 04 MID PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPERPage 3 of 3
Confusion in Ordinance
A temporary change in the CCMC could create confusion for the public and City
staff hired to enforce City regulations Signage would be required to inform the
public of the change in ordinance The no dog ordinance has taken many years
of enforcement to bring most park users into compliance with the ordinance
Residents with dogs would become accustomed to the change and therefore,
once the Dog Park is built changing the ordinance back to its former regulation
would set back the many years of successful enforcement
FISCAL ANALYSIS
Changes to park signs to accommodate a temporary change in ordinance have
been estimated at $3,000 including installation costs Once the Dog Park has
been completed signage would have to be changed again Total costs for signs
would be $6,000 Increase in maintenance as a result of additional clean up has
been estimated at $3,000 per year There would be a need to provide dog
owners with the necessary equipment to clean up after their dogs Posts to hold
the dog fecal bags run approximately $400 per park including installation If only
one post was installed at every park, the cost would be $4,400 There is a
potential for $10,400 in equipment costs and approximately $3,000 annual
additional maintenance costs, for an estimated total cost of $13,400 per year
ATTACHMENTS |109| CCMS § 9 10 055
MOTION
That the Parks and Recreation Commission deny a recommendation to City
Council to amend the City Ordinance to allow dogs on leashes in public parks on
a temporary basis until the dog park is opened
FILE NAME DOGS IN PARKS REPORT 601 04 MTG PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPERParks Recreation & Community Services Commission June 1 2004
Item #
7 20 p m
Gary Ford thanked the Commission for the recognition He introduced family members
who were in the audience wife Linda, daughters Shauna and Leah, and grand daughter
Tammy
Photographs were taken of the recipient and family with Commissioners and staff
members before the dais
000
Discussion Regarding Possible Amendment to the City Ordinance to Allow
Dogs on Leashes in Public Parks on a Temporary Basis Until the Dog Park is
Developed
Don Rogers, PRCS Director, called attention to the staff report and invited questions from
the Commission
Mr Rogers informed the Commission that he must leave the Commission meeting early
to attend the City Council meeting concurrently scheduled at Syd Kronenthal Park
At this time, Commissioner Alexander entertained the following motion
IT WAS MOVED BY COMMISSIONER ALEXANDER, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
SHAPIRO, THAT THE COMMISSION DENY A RECOMMENDATION TO THE CITY
COUNCIL TO AMEND THE CITY ORDINANCE TO ALLOW DOGS ON LEASHES IN
PUBLIC PARKS ON A TEMPORARY BASIS UNTIL THE DOG PARK IS OPEN
Commissioner James initiated discussion as she questioned the validity of some of the
concerns cited in the staff report relating to 1) children s health, 2) aggressive dogs, 3)
conflicts with park users, 4) confusion in ordinance and 5) additional maintenance costs
She further questioned the source of information and asked staff to return with additional
information, including how other cities address the issue of allowing dogs in public parks
She asked that this matter be reagendized for further discussion and action at the
Commission s July meeting
Commissioner Cooper concurred with Commissioner James' concerns
After a period of discussion, the following action was taken
IT WAS MOVED BY COMMISSIONER ALEXANDER, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
COOPER, THAT THE COMMISSION TABLE THE MOTION AND REAGENDIZE THE
ISSUE FOR FURTHER DISCUSSION AND ACTION
The Chair called for a vote on the motion which resulted in the following
Ayes Commissioners James, Shapiro, Alexander, and Cooper
Noes Commissioner Deen
Abstain None
000
Item #713
7 3 1 P m
Consideration and Discussion of the Needs and Benefits Related to the
Development of a Community Parks and Recreation Plan
Mr Rogers circulated a copy of the Culver City Recreation Element, an optional element
of the City s General Plan that was adopted by the City Council in January, 1968 He also
circulated a copy of the Draft General Plan which he noted was never adopted by the City
Councila#1100414514T 3
eadWA. CITY
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
DATE October 5, 2004
TO CHAIR DEEN AND MEMBERS OF THE PARKS AND
RECREATION COMMISSION
FROM Marty Nicholson, Recreation Manager
THROUGH Don Rogers, PRCS Director
SUBJECT
Continued Discussion Regarding Possible Amendment to the City
Ordinance to Allow Dogs on Leashes in Public Parks on a
Temporary Basis Until the Dog Park is Developed
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the Parks and Recreation Commission deny a proposal to
recommend to City Council an amendment to the City Ordinance to allow dogs
on leashes in public parks on a temporary basis until the Culver City Dog Park is
developed
BACKGROUND
At the June 2004 Parks and Recreation Commission meeting, the Commission
directed staff to agendize further discussion regarding a possible amendment to
the City Ordinance to allow dogs on leashes in City parks on a temporary basis
until the Dog Park is developed Attachment A provides a copy of the staff report
from the June meeting At the June Commission meeting the Commission
decided to table the motion and reagendize the issue for further discussion and
action Commissioner James requested additional information regarding how
other cities handle allowing dogs in public parks
DISCUSSION
Staff set out a survey to other cities regarding issues of aggressive dogs in parks
and the cost of maintenance regarding dog use in parks Attachment B provides
a copy of the request Only two cities responded City of Malibu and City of
South Pasadena The City of Malibu has always had dogs in their parks and
therefore had no information regarding increase in maintenance or problems with
aggressive dogs The City of South Pasadena decided to change their ordinance
because they do not offer a dog park The change in ordinance was due to
problems with lack of enforcement in the no-dog law Due to time constraints
and the short turn around, staff was unable to conduct additional research on
other cities
s
9770 CULVER BOULEVARD CULVER CITY CA 90232 0507Page 2 of 3
The City has experienced aggressive dogs in the past Three incidents in the
last year include
1 A woman brought her dog to Culver City Park to use the park as
grounds to train her dog to bite The woman was fully clothed in a bite
outfit and the dog was extremely aggressive growling and snapping at
the air when staff asked that she remove the dog
2 On April 30, 2004, Gary Ford, Employee of the Month of June, was
working at Carlson Park picking up trash when a dog on a leash
approached Mr Ford and bit him in the leg Attachment C provides the
police report describing the incident
3 On August 15, 2004, an employee distributing flyers door to door had a
leashed dog lunge at her and missed being bitten by jumping back
while the owner pulled back on the dog's leash The owner claimed
the dog was extremely friendly
During the survey of other Cities some Cities are now adopting very strict
aggressive dog ordinances to combat the problems with aggressive animals in
public parks
When it comes to dog feces, the Parks Division currently experiences problems
with people not cleaning up after their dogs It is anticipated, though there is no
documentation currently available from other cities, that a change in ordinance to
allow dogs in parks would increase the dog fecal matter in parks
In discussing the dogs on leashes in parks issue with members of the Friends of
the Culver City Dog Park, there is some concern that allowing dogs in parks on a
temporary basis would have a negative impact on the campaign to build a Dog
Park
FISCAL ANALYSIS
The fiscal analysis remains the same as last report Costs for signs would be
$6,000 and additional maintenance would run $3,000 Annual supply costs for
bags would be $400 Posts installation would be $4,400 Total costs would be
$10,400 in equipment and $3 000 annually in maintenance
ATTACHMENTS
A Dog Park Report from the April Commission Meeting
Email Survey Questions on Dogs in Parks
Police Report Regarding Dog Bite Incident
FILE NAME DOGS IN PARICS REPORT 10 5 04 MID PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPERPage 3 of 3
MOTION
That the Parks and Recreation Commission deny a recommendation to City
Council to amendment to City Council an amendment to the City Ordinance to
allow dogs on leashes in public parks on a temporary basis until the dog park is
developed
I0
FILE NAME DOGS IN PARKS REPORT 10 5 04 MID PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPERParks Recreation & Community Services Commission October 5 2004
Item #713
750 p m
RELATING TO DOGS IN CITY PARKS AND ESTABLISHING THE OFF-LEASH DOG
PARK RULES AND REGULATIONS, THE PROPOSED RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING
PARK PATROL OFFICERS TO ENFORCE THE RULES AT THE OFF-LEASH DOG
PARK, THE PROPOSED RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING DOG PARK HOURS, AND
THE PROPOSED SIGNAGE AT THE DOG PARK, AND DIRECT STAFF TO AGENDIZE
THE PROPOSED ORDINANCE AND RESOLUTIONS AT A CITY COUNCIL MEETING
FOR DISCUSSION AND ADOPTION
Staff fielded questions from the Commission relative to the staff report
Following lengthy discussion, Chair Shapiro called for a vote on the MOTION WHICH
PASSED UNANIMOUSLY
Ms Hirohama advised the proposed ordmance is tentatively scheduled for City Council
approval on November 8 th with the introduction of the first reading of the ordinance The
Council will adopt the rules and regulations with the second reading of the ordinance on
November 22nd The ordinance would then take effect 30 days after adoption
Mr Rogers mentioned the dog park cleanup is estimated to be completed by late
November
000
Discussion Regarding Park Permits Enforcement Issues
As a follow-up to the Commission s discussion several months ago, Heather Iker
informed the Commission that the City Attorney's Office is currently researching the issue
of enforcing park permits and other related ordinances pertaining to park usage,
including
• enforcement of the current state law prohibiting smoking within 25 feet of a
playground or sandbox area,
• proposed Municipal Code amendments to the chapters pertaining to abandoned
personal property and shopping carts in public parks as it relates to the homeless
population
Ms Iker added the City Attorney s Office is also dealing with other legal issues, which has
further delayed this process
She mentioned the City presently has a Homeless Subcommittee that is also addressing
some of the issues associated with homelessness
Ms Iker indicated the Commission would be apprised of the legal findings regarding
these issues as they develop
Recalling the Commission s action a few months ago to prohibit moon bounces in
Lindberg Park, Chair Shapiro asked if moon bounces are still being allowed m other
parks
Don Rogers responded that this is a policy issue that must be approved by the City
Council at a future meeting
000
Item #7c
755 P m
Continued Discussion Regarding a Possible Amendment to the City
Ordinance to Allow Dogs on Leashes in Public Parks on a Temporary Basis
Until the Dog Park is DevelopedParks Recreation & Community Services Commission October 5 2004
Jeannine Stehlin, Culver City resident, addressed the Commission and spoke in strong
opposition on any change to the Culver City Dog Ordinance
She read statistical facts on insurance costs relating to dog bite claims and cited a list of
diseases that can be transmitted from dog feces to humans
Ms Stehlin stated that the health and safety of children should be the primary concern
Commissioner Deen initiated discussion He stated that allowing dogs on leashes in the
parks would be counter productive to the purpose of a dog park
Commissioner Deen proposed the following motion That the Commission deny a
recommendation to the City Council to amend the City ordinance to allow dogs on leashes
in public parks on a temporary basis until the dog park is developed
There was no second to Commissioner Deen s motion
Discussion continued
Commissioner Cooper voiced concern that the staff report reflects a negative, one-sided
viewpoint on the issue of dogs in parks, and that the reference to the Friends of Culver
City Dog Park has no relevance to the subject of the report
Commissioner Cooper noted that any amendment to the dog ordinance should not be a
temporary change but a permanent change He said he was not ready to vote on the
proposed motion at this time
Commissioner James concurred with Commissioner Coopers sentiments She requested
additional information regarding how other cities have addressed allowing dogs in public
parks
Commissioner Redholtz expressed concern that the reference in the report to the Friends
of Culver City Dog Park may connote an implied support of the issue She clarified the
Friends is a 5o1(c)(3) nonprofit organization and cannot take a stance on any issues other
than their own mission
Commissioner Redholtz also recommended staff conduct a community survey to assess
the public s level of support
Chair Shapiro voiced concern regarding the cost and amount of staff time associated with
a community survey
Responding to Chair Shapiro s concern, Commissioner Cooper suggested holding a public
hearing as an option
The following motion was proposed
IT WAS MOVED BY COMMISSIONER JAMES, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
REDHOLTZ TO TABLE THE MOTION AND REAGENDIZE THE ISSUE OF
PERMANENTLY AMENDING THE DOG ORDINANCE TO ALLOW DOGS ON LEASHES
IN PARKS FOR FURTHER DISCUSSION AT A PUBLIC HEARING TO BE SCHEDULED
AT A FEBRUARY COMMISSION MEETING
Ayes Commissioners Cooper, James, Redholtz
Noes Commissioners Deen, Shapiro
Abstain None
4Ar11011ieti vr Si
ettAteA CITY
PUBLIC HEARING ITEM PH-1
DATE May 31 2005
TO CHAIR SHAPIRO AND MEMBERS OF THE PARKS AND RECREATION
COMMISSION
FROM Patricia Mooney, PRCS Senior Management Analyst
SUBJECT Discussion of the consideration of making a recommendation to the
City Council to amend Sections 901 360 and 9 10 055 (A) of the
Culver City Municipal Code to allow dogs on leashes in public parks
within Culver City
RECOMMENDATION
That the Parks and Recreation Commission review the report, consider all public input and
discuss the issue of making a recommendation to the City Council to amend Sections 9 01 360
and 9 10 055 (A) of the Culver City Municipal Code to allow dogs on leashes in public parks
within Culver City
PROCEDURE
1 Chair seeks a motion to receive and file the affidavit and notice of publication
2 Chair calls on staff for a brief report or asks Commissioners if they have questions of
staff on this subject
3 Chair declares the Public Hearing open, and calls upon the public for comments
4 Chair seeks a motion to close the Public Hearing
5 Commissioners discuss the matter and take the appropriate actions concerning the
recommendations or specifically approve changes
NOTICING INFORMATION
Notice was published in the Culver City News the Observer and The Front page during the
weeks of May 26 and June 2, 2005 On May 19, 2005 the notice of tonight's discussion was
sent out to over 500 persons on the Culver City Email Notification List On May 23 rd and
31 st, and on June 1 st and 6th , and a cable crawler was placed on the Channel 35 video
broadcasts of City Council meetings Flyers were distributed at all City parks beginning on
May 25, 2005 On May 26, 2005, fifteen concerned residents who had signed a petition
regarding this issue were noticed via email Neighborhood Associations were contacted
regarding this meeting during the week of May 30, 2005
BACKGROUND
Section 9 01 360 reads as follows DOGS RUNNING AT LARGE PROHIBITION
It shall be unlawful for any person owning or having charge care custody or control of any dog to cause
permit or allow the same to be or to run at large upon any highway street lane alley court or other
public place or upon any private property or premises other than those of the person owning or having
charge care custody or control of such dog in the City unless such dog be restrained by a substantial
chain or leash not exceeding six (6) feet in length and is in charge care custody or control of such
competent person Provided however that no such dog shall be allowed or permitted in any of the
9770 CULVER BOULEVARD CULVER CITY CA 90232 0507
1Page 2 of 4
following places any store market restaurant cafe lunchroom soda fountain bakery or kindred
establishments wherein foods for human consumption are served sold or kept for sale or in any public
park except as permitted by § 9 10 400
Section 9 10 055 (A) reads as follows PROHABITIONS - Within the limits of any public park it shall be
unlawful for any person
A Having charge care custody or control of any dog except as permitted by § 9 10 400 or other
animal fowl or reptile to cause permit or allow the same to be within the limits of any public park within
the City unless such person shall have obtained a special permit from the City Council to conduct an
entertainment or exhibition in which an animal is a participant
Prior Commission Actions
At the June 7, 2004 Parks and Recreation Commission meeting, the Commission directed staff
to agendize further discussion regarding a possible amendment to the City Ordinance to allow
dogs on leashes in City parks on a temporary basis until the Dog Park is developed
Attachment A provides a copy of the staff report from the June meeting At the June
Commission meeting the Commission decided to table the item for additional information
On October 5, 2004 the item was agendized and the Commission moved to table the
discussion A revised request to agendize a permanent amendment to the City Ordinance to
allow dogs on leashes in parks was put forth at that time Attachment B provides a copy of the
minutes of the October 5, 2004 meeting
The purpose of this report is to provide the Commission with an overview of what other
California cities are doing with relation to the issue of allowing leashed dogs in public parks
DISCUSSION
During the period of May 10, through May 20, 2005, individual emails were sent to 325 cities
listed on the California League of Cities website The "Dogs-on-Leash" Public Policy Survey
was sent to appropriate City Administration or City staff members with a posted email address
The survey posed the following questions
1 How many parks are there in your City's park system?
2 What is your City's policy regarding allowing dogs-on-leash in your parks?
3 What are the main reasons that your City has this policy?
4 In your opinion, what are the advantages of allowing dogs-on-leash in City parks'?
5 In your opinion, what are the disadvantages of allowing dogs-on-leash in City parks'?
Of the 325 emails sent, 94 surveys were received, for a 29% response rate Attachment C
provides a list of the cities whose information is included in this report The findings for each
question are as follows
Question 1 How many parks are there in your City's park system?
The number of parks per city ranged from 1 (Buelton) to 160 (Sacramento) Approximately 70%
of those who responded worked in cities with 25 parks or less Seven cities said they had 14
parks, which was also the midpoint of the sample
Question 2 What is your City's policy regarding allowing dogs-on-leash in your parks?
Ninety percent (90%) of those who responded said that leashed dogs were allowed in one or
more of their City parks Seventy-five percent (75%) reported that leashed dogs were allowed in
all of their City's parks Ten cities (or 3%) did not allow dogs in any of their parks and three of
these cities said they had or were planning designated dog parks
PkADVANTAGES OF ALLOWING LEASHED DOGS IN PARKS
Owners Can Share Park Experience w/ Dog 40%
Allows Adequate Exercise for Dogs 28%
Allows Shared Usage of the Parks 25%
Encourages Responsible Pet Ownership 13%
Leash Limits Dog s Mobility / More Control 13%
Added Safety of the Owner and/or the Dog 11%
DISADVANTAGES OF ALLOWING LEASHED DOGS IN PARKS
Some Owners Fail to Clean up After Their Dogs 60%
Public Safety Issues / Liability 28%
Some Dogs Interfere with Park Activities and/or Other
Users or Generally Misbehave 19%
Some Dog Owners Violate the Ordinance 17%
Some Dogs Pose a Threat to Children 12%
Page 3 of 4
Due to the open-ended nature of the questions, some respondents offered additional
information regarding their parks For example, overall, 34% mentioned that off-leash
opportunities were or would soon be available in their cities for dogs and their owners Usually,
this opportunity was in the form of one or more designated dog parks It was also stated that
some of the parks allowing leashed dogs included an 'off-leash fenced exercise area ' In
addition, a few respondents mentioned that within parks allowing leashed dogs, dogs were
excluded from specific areas in the park, such as tot lots, sports fields buildings, outdoor
recreation courts, and/or large community gatherings such as festivals Other supplemental
comments included 20% of respondents remarking that by ordinance, leashes must be 6' or
shorter and 13% who said that their cities provided plastic bags or "doggie mitts" for park
patrons
Question 3 What are the main reasons that your City has this policy?
Sixty-four percent (64%) of those responding said public safety was the reason behind their
City's policy regarding leashed dogs in parks Eighteen percent (18%) stated that the main
reason behind the policy was to accommodate and/or benefit dog owners while minimizing the
impact of the dogs' presence on other members of the community Twelve percent (12%) said
that the policy was a long standing ordinance Six percent (6%) gave other reasons, such as
resident demand
Question 4 In your opinion, what are the advantages of allowing dogs-on-leash in City
parks'? Please see the table below (percentages total more than 100% because more than one
advantage was sometimes stated)
Question 5 In your opinion, what are the disadvantages of allowing dogs-on-leash in
City parks? Please see the table below (percentages total more than 100% because more
than one disadvantage was sometimes stated)
'SOVERVIEW OF SURVEY RESULTS
from 94 California Cities
Cities with 25 parks or less 70%
Cities allowing leashed dogs in parks 90%
Cities with public safety as a reason for their ordinance 64%
Advantage Owners can share park experience with dog 40%
Disadvantage Some owners fail to clean up after their dogs 60%
Page 4 of 4
Summary Table
FISCAL ANALYSIS
Questions regarding financial costs and/or benefits were not included in this survey Costs
related to allowing dogs on leashes in parks within Culver City were stated in the staff report
presented at the June 7, 2004 Commission meeting Costs detailed in that report included
changing park signs ($3,000 per park), increased maintenance costs ($3,000 annually per park),
and the cost of purchasing and installing posts to hold dog fecal bags ($400 per installation)
The fiscal impact of allowing dogs on leashes in parks is dependent upon several factors
including the number and size of parks where the policy is implemented, available staff
resources, and the degree to which owners take responsibility for cleaning up their dogs' fecal
matter In addition, if the ordinances are amended, there may be costs associated with litigation
due to potential public safety issues
ATTACHMENTS
A June 7, 2004 Commission Report
B Minutes of the October 5, 2004 Commission meeting
C List of cities participating in the survey
MOTIONS
1 Make a recommendation to the City Council to amend Sections 9 01 360 and 9 10 055 (A) of
the Culver City Municipal Code to allow dogs on leashes in all public parks within Culver City
OR
2 Make a recommendation to the City Council to amend Sections 9 01 360 and 9 10 055 (A) of
the Culver City Municipal Code to allow dogs on leashes in public parks within Culver City,
under one or more of the following conditions initiate a trial period, limit the number of affected
parks, designate areas within specific parks, and/or designate hours within specific parks
OR
3 Provide further direction to staff
OR
4 Take no action at this time
1 bParks and Recreation Commission June 7 2005
o0o
Item P-4
(7 25PM)
Employee of the Month for Outstanding Leadership
Marty Nicholson requested the Employee of the Month presentation be postponed until
after the public hearing
The Commission concurred with her request
o0o
Public Hearing
Item PH-1
(725 p m)
Consideration of amending the City ordinance to allow leashed dogs in
parks
MOVED BY COMMISSIONER DEEN, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER JAMES AND
UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED, THAT THE PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION
RECEIVE AND FILE THE COPIES OF THE NOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Chair Shapiro called for a staff report
Patricia Mooney, Senior Management Analyst, gave the staff report, explaining the
report presents an overview of what other California cities are doing in relation to
allowing leashed dogs in City parks
She briefly reviewed the 'dogs on leash" park policy survey sent out to 325 cities listed in
the League of California Cities' website with email addresses, and the 94 responses
(29%) received that were used as date for the staff report The survey questions and an
overview of the results included the following
1) How many parks are there in your City's park system?
Cities with 25 parks or less — 70%
2) What is your City s policy regarding allowing dogs on leash in your parks?
Cities allowing leashed dogs in parks — 89%
3)
What are the main reasons that your City has this policy?
Cities with public safety as a reason for their ordinance — 64%
4)
In your opinion, what are the advantages of allowing dogs on leash in City
parks?
Advantage Owners can share park experience with their dogs — 40%
5)
In your opinion, what are the disadvantages of allowing dogs on leash in City
parks?|1010| 11Parks and Recreation Commission June 7 2005
Disadvantage Some owners fail to clean up after their dogs
Chair Shapiro declared the public hearing open
Chair Shapiro invited public testimony
The following members in the audience addressed the Commission in support of
amending the City ordinance to allow dogs on leash within City parks
Judy Scott
David Leathers
Alisha Martin
Arthur Russell
Deborah Shands
Michael Faugno
Kathy Weaver
Marilyn Russell
Patricia Graf
Doug Roble (submitted written comments)
Stanley Horn-Bostel
Carole Wilson
Joyce Mundle
Linda Gross
Judy Levitow
Peter B Mundle
The following members in the audience addressed the Commission in opposition to
amending the City ordinance to allow dogs on leash within City parks
Laura Romero
Jeannine Stehlin (also submitted a copy of an online petition regarding dogs in parks)
Linda Asklof
Jamie Wallace
Jean Stout
Dena Snedden
Steve Newton
Susan Deen
Daisy Horn-Bostel
MOVED BY COMMISSIONER DEEN, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER COOPER AND
UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED, TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING
Recess (8 30 p m ) 1
At this time, Chair Shapiro called for a short recess
Reconvene (8 40 p m)
The meeting was reconvened with all Commissioners present
t Is
45
Parks and Recreation Commission June 7 2005
It was noted that the following public comments via email were received relating to
amending the ordinance to allow dogs on leash within City parks
In support Ed Rybka
Carol Heimrich
Simon Hortwitz
In opposition Larry Loughlin
Stephen O'Donnell
Gita Terry
Kathleen O'Donnell
Ellis D Smith
Larry Weiner and family
Jennifer Mann
Tami Wedekind
Caroline Cicero
Pat Hubley
Emily H Glick
Gerald Collins
Alan Resnick
Mitch Glickman and family
Melissa Orr Smith
Mercedes Anderberg
June Walden
Nancy Burne
Susan Wells
Leonel Ibarra
Kyle Nudo
No clear position taken but negative comments made regarding certain aspects of
allowing dogs on leash in City parks
R Waters
Yves Parent
Commissioner James initiated discussion, expressing her support of allowing dogs on
leash in one of the City parks She recommended implementing a pilot project at Fox
Hills Park (as suggested by a community member), where many of the residents living in
condominiums and apartments do not have backyards and must travel out outside of the
City to take their dogs to a park
Commissioner Deen raised questions regarding the statistical aspect of the email survey
information
Patti Mooney provided clarification
Commissioner Deen shared information about diseases that can be transmitted from
dogs to human He said he would not be in favor of amending the current ordinance to
allow dogs on leash in any public parkParks and Recreation Commission June 7 2005
Commissioner Cooper commented on the financial costs detailed in the staff report
including changing park signs ($3,000 per park), increased maintenance costs ($3,000
annually per park), and cost of purchasing and installing posts to hold dog fecal bags
($400 per installation)
Based on the overall information, he said he would support a test program on a trial
basis at Fox Hills Park and possibly along the Nature Trail in Culver City Park He said
he would not support any area where there are children present due to concern for
health issues
Commissioner Daly-Redholtz commended staff on the email notification process and the
public notification in the newspapers which resulted in a good turnout and response for
the public hearing Once again, she emphasized the Culver City Friends of Dog Park has
not taken a position regarding the issue of dogs on leash in City parks since the issue is
not part of their mission and is separate from the dog park
Commissioner Daly-Redholtz spoke in support of a pilot program, agreeing with Fox
Hills Park as a possible site She noted that this is not an urgent issue that requires
immediate action, but something that staff can research and develop a proposal for a
pilot program on a trial basis for perhaps a six-month period in order to study and
observe the impacts to the community
There was general discussion regarding the pilot program concept
Chair Shapiro stated that she is not in favor of dogs in parks, emphasizing that parks are
for children and not for dogs She said she would not vote for any pilot program or for
any park to be used for dogs, except for the Bone Yard currently the site for an off-leash
dog park
Following further discussion, the following action was taken
MOVED BY COMMISSION JAMES, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER COOPER, THAT
THE PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION DIRECT STAFF TO COME BACK
WITH INFORMATION REGARDING A PROPOSAL FOR IMPLEMENTATION OF A
PILOT PROGRAM FOR DOGS ON LEASHES IN ONE OF CULVER CITY'S PUBLIC
PARKS
AYES Commissioners James, Cooper, Daly-Redholtz
NOES Commissioners Deen, Shapiro
ABSTAIN None
ABSENT None
000
Public Comment — Items Not on the Agenda
(9
40 p m )
Chair Shapiro invited public participation
6A vr arivitiGor s
ettetteit CITY
ITEM NUMBER A-2
DATE July 5, 2005
TO Chair Shapiro and Members of the Parks and Recreation
Commission
FROM William L La Pointe, Director of Parks, Recreation and Community
Services
SUBJECT CONSIDERATION OF A PROPOSAL FOR A DOGS-ON-
LEASHES PILOT PROGRAM IN ONE OF THE PARKS IN
CULVER CITY
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the Parks and Recreation Commission review, discuss
and recommend to the City Council
a) Implementation of the proposed pilot project for dogs on leashes in one of
the parks in Culver City, or
b) that Sections 901 360 and 9 10 055 (A) of the Culver City Municipal Code
that prohibit dogs in parks within Culver City remain unchanged, or
c) another option concerning the issue of allowing dogs in parks within
Culver City on which the City Council might act
BACKGROUND
There has been much discussion over the past year regarding whether or not to
allow dogs in parks within Culver City so long as they are leashed At the June
7, 2005 meeting, the Parks and Recreation Commission requested staff to bring
back a proposal of a "pilot project' on this issue
DISCUSSION
The proposal for this pilot project is as follows
That dogs on leashes (retractable leashes are not allowed) be allowed on the
grass area below the children s playground (commonly referred to as the "lower
park ) of Culver City Park during regular park operating hours for a three-month
period of time This pilot project is being proposed for one park in order to study
9770 CULVER BOULEVARD CULVER CITY CA 90232 0507
2.1Page 2 of 2
and observe the impacts of a practice before a decision is made as to whether or
not to allow this practice in all the parks
FISCAL ANALYSIS
Approval of this proposal is anticipated to have some impact on staff and
resources for cleanup and patrolling efforts If this pilot project were approved, it
is expected that a more detailed analysis of the fiscal impact would be
developed
MOTION(S)
That the Parks and Recreation Commission
1) Recommend to the City Council that a pilot project allowing dogs on
leashes (retractable leashes are not allowed) on the grass area below the
children's playground (commonly referred to as the "lower park") of Culver
City Park during regular park operating hours for a three-month period, so
as to observe and quantify how a practice such as this might impact the
community if it were allowed in all the City's parks,
or
2) Recommend to the City Council that Sections 9 01 360 and 9 10 055 (A)
of the Culver City Municipal Code that prohibit dogs in parks within Culver
City remain unchanged,
Or
3) Recommend to the City Council another option concerning the issue of
allowing dogs in parks within Culver City
73.
PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPERThese Mmutes are not official until approved by the Parks and Recreation
Commission
July 5, 2005
7 00 p In
REGULAR MEETING OF THE
PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION, CITY OF CULVER CITY,
CALIFORNIA
CHAIR ANITA SHAPIRO
NEW CHAIR JEANETTE JAMES
Call to Order
The meeting of the Parks and Recreation Commission was called to order at 7 05 p m in
the Council Chambers, City Hall
000
Roll Call
Members Present Commissioners Shapiro, James, Cooper, Deen, Daly-Redholtz
Staff Present
Others Present
William La Pointe, Parks, Recreation and Community Services Director
Heather Iker, Assistant City Prosecutor
Path Mooney, Senior Management Analyst
Marty Nicholson, Recreation Manager
Jay Handal, Culver City Lions Club
Susan Deen, Cultural Affairs Commissioner
Jamie Wallace, Culver City
Jean Stout, Culver City
Judy Scott, Culver City
Clark Dikeman, Culver City
00o
(Excerpt)
Item A-2
(7 27P M )
Consideration of a proposal for a dogs-on-leashes pilot program m one of
the parks m Culver City
The following members in the audience addressed the Commission regarding this issue
23Parks and Recreation Commission July 5 2005
Jamie Wallace, Culver City, spoke in opposition
Jean Stout, Culver City, spoke in opposition, commenting on the difficulty of enforcing
the ordinance
Judy Scott, Culver City, suggested as a compromise, allowing leashed dogs in parks only
during early morning or late at night when most children and parents are not in the
parks
Susan Deen, Cultural Affairs Commissioner, speaking as a resident, reminded the
Commission that three years ago the Friends of Culver City Dog Park conducted a City
Council candidates forum where the candidates had taken a position against allowing
dogs on leashes in City parks She voiced opposition, citing enforcement concerns
Jay Handal, Culver City Lions Club, speaking as an individual in support of staffs
proposal of a pilot program
At this time, the following action was taken
MOVED BY COMMISSIONER SHAPIRO, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER DALY
REDHOLTZ AND UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED, TO RECEIVE AND FILE EMAIL
CORRESPONDENCE FROM MR ELLIS D SMITH AND MS DEBORAH RISSMAN IN
OPPOSITION AND MS FRAN LONGMIRE IN SUPPORT OF ALLOWING LEASHED
DOGS IN A CITY PARK
At this time, Chair James asked for a staff report
William La Pointe, Director of Parks, Recreation and Community Services, gave the staff
report, recommending a proposal for a pilot program on the grass area below the
children s playground (commonly referred to as the "lower park' ) of Culver City Park
during regular park operating hours The pilot project would be for a three-month trial
basis in order to study and observe the impacts before a decision is made as to whether
or not to allow the practice in all the parks
Commissioner Cooper initiated discussion, inquiring about the process in selecting
Culver City Park for the proposed program He recalled the Commission had previously
discussed Fox Hills Park and Culver West Park as possible locations for a pilot project
Commissioner Daly Redholtz did not think Culver City Park was a good location, citing
the negative impacts from the Dog Park and construction of the new skateboard park
She questioned staffs rationale in selecting Culver City Park, as it was her understanding
that the process was to have involved community input
Commissioner Deen voiced his opposition to developing a pilot program, stating that it
was not positive use of staff time
Commissioner Shapiro cited her reasons for opposing the concept She said the Dog
Park is there for dogs, the rest of the parks are for children
The following action was taken
MOVED BY COMMISSIONER SHAPIRO THAT THE PARKS AND RECREATION
COMMISSION RECOMMEND TO THE CITY COUNCIL THAT SECTIONS 9 01360
7-A
2Parks and Recreation Commission July 5 2005
AND 910 055(A) OF THE CULVER CITY MUNICIPAL CODE THAT PROHIBIT DOGS
IN PARKS WITHIN CULVER CITY REMAIN UNCHANGED
Commissioner Deen seconded the Motion
AYES Commissioners Deen, Shapiro
NOES Commissioners Cooper, James, Daly Redholtz
ABSTAIN None
ABSENT None
The Motion failed
At this time, Commissioner James provided a brief history regarding the issue of
allowing dogs on leashes in parks She did not feel Culver City Park was a good location
and recommended considering another site
Following further discussion, the following action was taken
MOVED BY COMMISSIONER COOPER THAT THE PARKS AND RECREATION
COMMISSION RECOMMEND TO THE CITY COUNCIL THAT A PILOT STUDY
ALLOWING DOGS ON 6-FT LEASHES BE DEVELOPED FOR IMPLEMENTATION AT
CULVER WEST PARK FOR A 90-DAY PERIOD IN ORDER TO EVALUATE THE
FEASIBILITY AND IMPACTS BEFORE A DECISION IS MADE AS TO WHETHER OR
NOT TO ALLOW THE PRACTICE IN ALL CITY PARKS
Commissioner Daly Redholtz seconded the Motion
AYES Commissioners Cooper, James, Daly Redholtz
NOES Commissioners Shapiro, Deen
ABSTAIN None
ABSENT None
The Motion carried
o0o|1010| 2$