Legislation Details

File #: HIST-23013    Version: 1 Subject:
Type: Historical Status: Public Hearing
In control: City Council Meeting Agenda
On agenda: 8/26/2013 Final action: 8/26/2013
Title: Adoption of a Resolution (a) Approving the Certification of Conformance with the Congestion Management Program (CMP) for Los Angeles County and (b) Adoption of the CMP Local Development Report.
Attachments: 1. Adoption of a Resolution (a) Approving the Certifi - PH-1__13-08-26_TRANS_CITY COUNCIL_2013 Congestion Management Program - FINAL.pdf, 2. Adoption of a Resolution (a) Approving the Certifi - 13-08-26_Trans_City Council_Public Hearing_Congestion Management Program_ATTACHMENTS.pdf
City of Culver City, California Agenda Item Report Meeting Date: 08/26/2013 Item Number: PH-1 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM: PUBLIC HEARING - Adoption of a Resolution (a) Approving the Certification of Conformance with the Congestion Management Program (CMP) for Los Angeles County and (b) Adoption of the CMP Local Development Report Contact Person/Dept.: Diana Chang / Transportation Phone Number: (310) 253-6566 Fiscal Impact: Yes [X] No [] General Fund: Yes [] No [X] Public Hearing: [X] Action Item: [] Attachments: [X] Commission Action Required: Yes [] No [X] Date: _______________ Public Notification: Published in the Culver City News on 08/08/13 and 08/15/13; Meetings and Agendas - City Council (08/20/13) . Department Approval: Art Ida (08/12/13) City Attorney Approval: Carol Schwab (by H. Baker) (08/20/13) Chief Financial Officer Approval: Jeff Muir (by M. Noller) (08/20/13) City Manager Approval: John M. Nachbar (08/20/13) RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the City Council adopt a resolution (1) approving the Certificate of Conformance with the Congestion Management Program (CMP) and (2) adopt the CMP Local Development Report. PROCEDURE: 1. Mayor seeks motion from the City Council to receive and file the affidavits of publication and posting of notices and correspondence received in response to the public hearing notices; and, 2. The City Council Members may pose questions to staff as desired; and, 3. Mayor seeks a motion to open the public hearing; and, 4. Mayor seeks motion to close the public hearing after all public testimony has been presented; and, 5. City Council discusses the item and arrives at its decision. City of Culver City, California Agenda Item Report BACKGROUND: On November 18, 1992, the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (LACMTA), acting as the Congestion Management Agency for Los Angeles County, adopted the first Congestion Management Program for Los Angeles County. The CMP is a monitoring program that aims to address the impact of local growth on the regional transportation system by linking transportation, land use, and air quality decisions. Each year, cities must report all development activity to LACMTA, as well as the implementation of trip reducing strategies. In the past, the degree to which cities have balanced new development with such congestion mitigation strategies has been calculated via a credit/debit system called the Countywide Deficiency Plan. For the ninth year, however, the credit/debit requirement has been temporarily suspended while under evaluation, and Culver City must only report the actual amount of development and demolition that has occurred during the reporting period. Furthermore, the City must submit a resolution self-certifying its conformance with all requirements of the CMP and future updates. As the Congestion Management Agency for Los Angeles County, LACMTA annually determines the County’s or cities’ conformance or non-conformance. Culver City’s conformance with the CMP and adoption of the Local Development Report ensures that the City continues to receive its portion of state gas tax revenues and preserves its eligibility for other State and Federal transportation revenues. Failure to adopt the resolution jeopardizes our ability to receive these funds. The self-certifying resolution required by the CMP must be submitted to LACMTA no later than September 1, 2013. DISCUSSION: The CMP requires the County and cities to: 1. Continue implementation of the CMP Transportation Demand Management (TDM) Ordinance; 2. Continue implementation of the CMP Land Use Analysis Program; 3. Track new development activity; and 4. Conduct biennial traffic counts and calculate levels of service for selected arterial intersections. The City of Culver City currently is in compliance with the above requirements. City of Culver City, California Agenda Item Report FISCAL ANALYSIS: CMP conformance is required for the City to receive state gas tax (Section 2105) funds and to preserve the City’s eligibility for other state and federal transportation dollars. Failure to adopt and submit the resolution to the LACMTA by September 1, 2013 jeopardizes City’s eligibility to receive these funds. For Fiscal Year 2012/2013, the City is anticipated to receive $176,833.61 in state gas tax (Section 2105) funds. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Proposed resolution 2. The 2013 Local Development Report MOTION: That the City Council: Adopt a resolution finding the City to be in conformance with the Congestion Management Program (CMP) and adopting the CMP Local Development Report for 2013. MEETING DATE: 8/26/13 AGENDA ITEM: PUBLIC HEARING and Adoption of a Resolution for the Certification of Conformance with the Congestion Management Program (CMP) for Los Angeles County and Adoption of the CMP Local Development Report. ATTACHMENTS Pages 1. Resolution 2013-R__ 1-2 2. The 2013 Local Development Report 3-6 I RESOLUTION NO. 2013-R 2 3 4. 5 WHEREAS, pursuant to California Government Code Section 65089, Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority ("LACMTA"), acting as the Congestion Management Agency for Los Angeles County, is required to annually determine that the County and cities within the County are conforming to all congestion management program ("CMP") requirements; and WHEREAS, LACMTA requires submittal of a CMP Local Development Report by September 1 of each year; and WHEREAS, the City Council held a duly noticed public hearing on August 26, 2013 to consider its CMP Local Development Report. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Culver City, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE as follows: 1. The City is in conformance with all applicable requirements of the 2010 CMP adopted by the LACMTA Board on October 28, 2010, as set forth below: a. By June 15, of odd-numbered years, the City has and will continue to conduct annual traffic counts and calculated levels of service for selected arterial intersections, consistent with the requirements identified in the CMP Highway and Roadway System chapter. b. The City has locally adopted and continues to implement a -1- 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CULVER CITY, CALIFORNIA, FINDING THE CITY TO BE IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE CONGESTION MANAGEMENT PROGRAM (CMP) AND ADOPTING THE CMP LOCAL DEVELOPMENT REPORT, IN ACCORDANCE WITH CALIFORNIA GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 65089. transportation demand management ordinance, consistent with the minimum requirements identified in the CMP Transportation Demand Management chapter. c. The City has locally adopted and continues to implement a land use analysis program, consistent with the minimum requirements identified in the CMP Land Use Analysis Program chapter. d. The City has adopted a Local Development Report, attached hereto and made a part hereof, consistent with the requirements identified in the 2010 CMP. This report balances traffic congestion impacts due to growth -within the City with transportation improvements, and demonstrates that the City is meeting its responsibilities under the Countywide Deficiency Plan consistent with the LACMTA Board adopted 2003 Short Range Transportation Plan. 2. The City Clerk is hereby authorized to certify the adoption of this Resolution and forward a copy of this Resolution to the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority. APPROVED and ADOPTED this day of 2013. JEFFREY COOPER, MAYOR City of Culver City, California APPROVED AS TO FORM: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ATTEST: MARTIN R. COLE, City Clerk Al 3-00484 -2- CITY OF CULVER CITY Date Prepared: August 13, 2013 2013 CMP Local Development Report Reporting Period: JUNE 1, 2012 - MAY 31, 2013 Contact: Diana Chang, Sr. Management Analyst/Transportation Planner Phone Number: (310) 253-6566 CONGESTION MANAGEMENT PROGRAM FOR LOS ANGELES COUNTY 2011 DEFICIENCY PLAN SUMMARY * IMPORTANT: All "#value!" cells on this page are automatically calculated. Please do not enter data in these cells. DEVELOPMENT TOTALS RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY Dwelling Units Single Family Residential 1.00 Multi-Family Residential (5.00) Group Quarters 0.00 COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY 1,000 Net Sq.Ft.|1010|Commercial (less than 300,000 sq.ft.) (11.64) Commercial (300,000 sq.ft. or more) 0.00 Freestanding Eating & Drinking 0.00 NON-RETAIL DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY 1,000 Net Sq.Ft.|1010|Lodging 0.00 Industrial 0.00 Office (less than 50,000 sq.ft.) 20.86 Office (50,000-299,999 sq.ft.) 0.00 Office (300,000 sq.ft. or more) 0.00 Medical 0.00 Government 0.00 Institutional/Educational 9.10 University (# of students) 0.00 OTHER DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY Daily Trips ENTER IF APPLICABLE 0.00 ENTER IF APPLICABLE 0.00 EXEMPTED DEVELOPMENT TOTALS Exempted Dwelling Units 0 Exempted Non-residential sq. ft. (in 1,000s) 0 Page 1 2. Net square feet is the difference between new development and adjustments entered on pages 2 and 3. -3-CITY OF CULVER CITY Date Prepared: August 13, 2013 2013 CMP Local Development Report Reporting Period: JUNE 1, 2012 - MAY 31, 2013 Enter data for all cells labeled "Enter." If there are no data for that category, enter "0." PART 1: NEW DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY Category Dwelling Units Single Family Residential 3.00 Multi-Family Residential 0.00 Group Quarters 0.00 COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY Category 1,000 Gross Square Feet Commercial (less than 300,000 sq.ft.) 2.46 Commercial (300,000 sq.ft. or more) 0.00 Freestanding Eating & Drinking 0.00 NON-RETAIL DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY Category 1,000 Gross Square Feet Lodging 0.00 Industrial 0.00 Office (less than 50,000 sq.ft.) 20.86 Office (50,000-299,999 sq.ft.) 0.00 Office (300,000 sq.ft. or more) 0.00 Medical 0.00 Government 0.00 Institutional/Educational 9.10 University (# of students) 0.00 OTHER DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY Description Daily Trips (Attach additional sheets if necessary) (Enter "0" if none) ENTER IF APPLICABLE 0.00 ENTER IF APPLICABLE 0.00 Page 2 -4-CITY OF CULVER CITY Date Prepared: August 13, 2013 2013 CMP Local Development Report Reporting Period: JUNE 1, 2012 - MAY 31, 2013 Enter data for all cells labeled "Enter." If there are no data for that category, enter "0." PART 2: NEW DEVELOPMENT ADJUSTMENTS IMPORTANT: Adjustments may be claimed only for 1) development permits that were both issued and revoked, expired or withdrawn during the reporting period, and 2) demolition of any structure with the reporting period. RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT ADJUSTMENTS Category Dwelling Units Single Family Residential 2.00 Multi-Family Residential 5.00 Group Quarters 0.00 COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY Category 1,000 Gross Square Feet Commercial (less than 300,000 sq.ft.) 14.10 Commercial (300,000 sq.ft. or more) 0.00 Freestanding Eating & Drinking 0.00 NON-RETAIL DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY Category 1,000 Gross Square Feet Lodging 0.00 Industrial 0.00 Office (less than 50,000 sq.ft.) 0.00 Office (50,000-299,999 sq.ft.) 0.00 Office (300,000 sq.ft. or more) 0.00 Medical 0.00 Government 0.00 Institutional/Educational 0.00 University (# of students) 0.00 OTHER DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY Description Daily Trips (Attach additional sheets if necessary) (Enter "0" if none) ENTER IF APPLICABLE 0.00 ENTER IF APPLICABLE 0.00 Page 3 -5-CITY OF CULVER CITY Date Prepared: August 13, 2013 2013 CMP Local Development Report Reporting Period: JUNE 1, 2012 - MAY 31, 2013 Enter data for all cells labeled "Enter." If there are no data for that category, enter "0." PART 3: EXEMPTED DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY (NOT INCLUDED IN NEW DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY TOTALS) Low/Very Low Income Housing 0 Dwelling Units High Density Residential 0 Dwelling Units Near Rail Stations Mixed Use Developments 0 1,000 Gross Square Feet Near Rail Stations 0 Dwelling Units Development Agreements Entered 0 1,000 Gross Square Feet into Prior to July 10, 1989 0 Dwelling Units Reconstruction of Buildings 0 1,000 Gross Square Feet Damaged due to "calamity" 0 Dwelling Units Reconstruction of Buildings 0 1,000 Gross Square Feet Damaged in Jan. 1994 Earthquake 0 Dwelling Units Total Dwelling Units 0 Total Non-residential sq. ft. (in 1,000s) 0 Page 4 Exempted Development Definitions: 1. Low/Very Low Income Housing: As defined by the California Department of Housing and Community Development as follows: - Low-Income: equal to or less than 80% of the County median income, with adjustments for family size. - Very Low-Income: equal to or less than 50% of the County median income, with adjustments for family size. 2. High Density Residential Near Rail Stations: Development located within 1/4 mile of a fixed rail passenger station and that is equal to or greater than 120 percent of the maximum residential density allowed under the local general plan and zoning ordinance. A project providing a minimum of 75 dwelling units per acre is automatically considered high density. 3. Mixed Uses Near Rail Stations: Mixed-use development located within 1/4 mile of a fixed rail passenger station, if more than half of the land area, or floor area, of the mixed use development is used for high density residential housing. 4. Development Agreements: Projects that entered into a development agreement (as specified under Section 65864 of the California Government Code) with a local jurisdiction prior to July 10, 1989. 5. Reconstruction or replacement of any residential or non-residential structure which is damaged or destroyed, to the extent of > or = to 50% of its reasonable value, by fire, flood, earthquake or other similar calamity. 6. Any project of a federal, state or county agency that is exempt from local jurisdiction zoning regulations and where the local jurisdiction is precluded from exercising any approval/disapproval authority. These locally precluded projects do not have to be reported in the LDR. -6-