City of Culver City, California
Agenda Item Report
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the City Council 1) Determine that no new information has
become available and no changes in the proposed project have been made since
the Planning Commission’s adoption of a Mitigated Negative Declaration related to
the project and, therefore, no additional environmental analysis is required; and, 2)
introduce the proposed Ordinance (Attachment No. 1), amending the Culver City
Zoning Map, as referenced in Title 17, Zoning, of the Culver City Municipal Code,
Section 17.200.015, establishing Planned Development Zone No. 10 (Zoning Code
Map Amendment, ZCMA-P2012020) and approving a Comprehensive Plan (CP P-
2012018) for a commercial development consisting of approximately 41,735 square
feet of retail and restaurant uses and 38,732 square feet of office uses located at
8810-8850 Washington Boulevard and 3920 Landmark Street.
Meeting Date: 11/12/12 Item Number: PH-3
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM: PUBLIC HEARING – Introduction of an Ordinance
Amending the Culver City Zoning Map, as Referenced in Title 17, Zoning, of the
Culver City Municipal Code, Section 17.200.015, Establishing Planned Development
Zone No. 10 Zoning Code Map Amendment (ZCMA P-2012020) and Approving a
Comprehensive Plan (CP P-2012018) to Allow a Commercial Development
Consisting of Approximately 41,735 Square Feet of Retail and Restaurant Uses and
38,732 Square Feet of Office Uses Located at 8810-8850 Washington Boulevard and
3920 Landmark Street.
Contact Person/Dept.:
Susan Yun,
Thomas Gorham
Phone Number:
310-253-5755
310-253-5727
Fiscal Impact: Yes [X] No [] Fiscal Impact: Yes
Public Hearing: [X] Action Item: [] Attachments: [X]
Commission Action Required: Yes [X] No [] Date: 10/4/12
Planning Commission
Public Notification: On October 22, 2012, a notice was mailed to all the property owners
and occupants beyond a 1,000-foot radius of the project site and emailed to the Master
Notification List. The notice was mailed to East Culver City Neighborhood Alliance
Homeowners Association, the Chamber of Commerce and Downtown Business
Association. On October 22, 2012, the site was posted. The notice was also published in
the Culver City News on October 25, 2012 and November 1, 2012; Meetings and
Agendas – City Council (11/08/12)
Department Approval:
Sol Blumenfeld: (10/31/12)
City Attorney Approval:
Carol Schwab (by H. Baker) (11/05/12)
Chief Financial Officer Approval:
Jeff Muir (11/07/12)
City Manager Approval:
John M. Nachbar (11/08/12) City of Culver City, California
Agenda Item Report
PROCEDURE:
1. Mayor seeks motion to receive and file the affidavit of mailing and posting of
public notice.
2. Mayor calls on staff for a brief staff report and City Council poses questions to
staff as desired.
3. Mayor seeks motion to declare the public hearing open, providing the applicant
the first opportunity to speak, followed by the general public.
4. Mayor seeks a motion to close the public hearing after all testimony has been
presented.
5. City Council discusses the matter and arrives at its decision.
BACKGROUND:
The proposed request is to establish a Planned Development (PD) Zone through a
Zoning Code Map Amendment (ZCMA) and a Comprehensive Plan (CP) to allow the
construction of a multi-use commercial development consisting of approximately
41,735 square feet of retail and restaurant uses and 38,732 square feet of office use
with a total of 312 parking spaces located in two above ground parking structures
(the Project). The Project site is located near the recently completed Exposition Light
Rail Transit (Expo LRT) line, Culver City Expo Station and the City’s Washington
National Transit Oriented Development (TOD) at 8810–8850 Washington Boulevard
and 3920 Landmark Street.
In order to facilitate the proposed Project, a Zoning Code Map Amendment and
Comprehensive Plan are required pursuant to Zoning Code Section 17.240, Planned
Development Zoning Districts and Section 17.560, Comprehensive Plans. The
proposed Zoning Code Map Amendment includes re-zoning the project site from
Industrial General (IG) to Planned Development (PD). The proposed
Comprehensive Plan implements the PD zoning with specific development
standards and permitted land uses. The Comprehensive Plan is intended to allow
flexibility in the application of the Zoning Code standards for larger scaled proposed
developments and considers innovation in site planning in order to more effectively
respond to site features, uses on adjoining properties, and other impacts that the
Zoning Code may not be able to adequately address.
At its September 12, 2012 meeting, after considering the staff report, the application
materials and applicant presentation, the Planning Commission continued the item
to its October 4, 2012 meeting, requesting various clarifications, revisions and
additional information regarding the Project. At its October 4, 2012 meeting the
Planning Commission unanimously adopted a resolution (Attachment No. 2)
recommending City Council approval of ZCMA-P2012020 establishing PD Zone No.
10 and Comprehensive Plan (CP P-2012018) to allow the proposed Project on the
site.
City of Culver City, California
Agenda Item Report
Please see Attachment Nos. 3 through 6 (Comprehensive Plan document, Planning
Commission Staff Reports, Environmental Analysis, and Traffic Study) for a detailed
review of the Project.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Proposed Ordinance and Exhibit A, Zone Change Map and Exhibit B,
Conditions of Approval.
2. Planning Commission Resolution No. 2012-P011 (without attachments).
3. Proposed Comprehensive Plan.
4. September 12
th
and October 4
th
Planning Commission Staff Reports (without
attachments).
5. Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration dated August 22, 2012.
6. Traffic Analysis prepared by Raju and Associates Inc, dated July 2011 and
supplemented on March 2012.
MOTION:
That the City Council:
1. Determine that there is no new information or substantial changes to the Project
since the Planning Commission’s adoption of the Mitigated Negative Declaration
and, therefore, no additional environmental analysis is required; and
2. Introduce the proposed Ordinance, amending the Culver City Zoning Map, as
referenced in Title 17, Zoning, of the Culver City Municipal Code, Section
17.200.015, establishing Planned Development Zone No. 10 (Zoning Code Map
Amendment, ZCMA-P2012020) and approving a Comprehensive Plan (CP P-
2012018).
MEETING DATE: 11.12.12
AGENDA ITEM: Introduction of an Ordinance Amending the Culver City
Zoning Map, as referenced in Title 17, Zoning, of the Culver
City Municipal Code, Section 17.200.015, establishing
Planned Development Zone No. 10 Zoning Code Map
Amendment (ZCMA P-2012020) and approving a
Comprehensive Plan (CP P-2012018) to allow a commercial
development consisting of approximately 41,735 square feet
of retail and restaurant uses and 38,732 square feet of office
uses located at 8810-8850 Washington Boulevard and 3920
Landmark Street.
ATTACHMENTS
Pages
1. Proposed Ordinance and Exhibit A, Zone Change
Map and Exhibit B, Conditions of Approval 1- 34
2. Planning Commission Resolution
No. 2012-P011 (without attachments) 35 - 42
3. Proposed Comprehensive Plan 43 - 168
4. September 12
th
and October 4
th
Planning
Commission Staff Reports (without attachments) 169 - 192
5. Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration dated
August 22, 2012 193 - 221
6. Traffic Analysis prepared by Raju and Associates Inc,
dated July 2011 and supplemented on March 2012 222 - 642 ATTACHMENT 1
1ATTACHMENT 1
2ATTACHMENT 1
3ATTACHMENT 1
4ATTACHMENT 1
5ATTACHMENT 1
6ATTACHMENT 1
7ATTACHMENT 1
8ATTACHMENT 1
9Or di na nc e No. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
ATTACHMENT 1
10EXHIBIT B
Ordinance No._______________
Case Nos. ZCMA P-2012020,CP-P2012018 AND MND P-2012019
Page 1 of 24
NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Agency Source
Compliance
Verification
GENERAL
1. These Conditions of Approval are being
imposed on Platform Planned Development and
Comprehensive Plan, a commercial
development of 41,745 square feet of retail and
restaurant floor area, 38,732 square feet of
office floor area, and two multi-level parking
structures providing a total of 312 parking
spaces (the “Project”), for the property located at
8810 – 8850 Washington Boulevard and 3920
Landmark Street (the “Property”).
All Standard
2. A copy of the Resolution approving the Project,
and a copy of these Conditions of Approval,
shall be printed on the plans submitted as part of
any building permit application for the Project.
Planning Standard
3. All building permit applications for the Project
shall include sufficient information and detail to
clearly reflect compliance with all applicable
requirements of the Culver City Municipal Code
(the “CCMC”) and with these Conditions of
Approval.
Planning Standard
4. The land use permit to which these Conditions
of Approval apply (the “Land Use Permit’) shall
expire four years from the date of final approval
of said Land Use Permit, if the use has not been
exercised. As provided in CCMC Section
15.595.030 –“Time Limits and Extensions”, an
applicant may request an extension of said
expiration date by filing a written request with
the Planning Division prior to the expiration of
the land use permit.
Planning Standard
ATTACHMENT 1
11EXHIBIT B
Ordinance No._______________
Case Nos. ZCMA P-2012020,CP-P2012018 AND MND P-2012019
Page 2 of 24
NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Agency Source
Compliance
Verification
GENERAL
5. Pursuant to CCMC Section 17.630.010.C.4 –
“Posted Notice”, the public notification sign(s)
installed in accordance with the public
notification requirements for the Land Use
Permit shall be removed within ten days after
the end of the appeal period or the final decision
by the City Council on the Land Use Permit,
whichever occurs last.
Planning Standard
6. The Project shall be developed pursuant to
CCMC Chapter 17.300 – “General Property
Development and Use Standards”.
Planning Standard
7. All planted areas on the Property shall be
landscaped and irrigated pursuant to CCMC
Chapter 17.310 - “Landscaping”.
Planning Standard
8. All parking areas on the Property shall be
developed pursuant to CCMC Chapter 17.320 -
“Off-Street Parking and Loading”.
Planning Standard
9. Signs proposed for the Project shall meet all
applicable requirements of CCMC Chapter
17.330 - “Signs”. All signs require a separate
permit and approval.
Planning Standard
10. All permits and licenses required in connection
with the development or use of the Project shall
be applied for and obtained separately.
All Standard
11. All work within the public right-of-way (including
but not limited to curb, gutter, sidewalk, and
driveways) shall be designed and completed to
the satisfaction of the City Engineer.
Public
Works
Standard
12. Street trees shall be installed, to the satisfaction
of the City Engineer and the Community
Development Director, in conformity with the
City’s approved Street Tree Master Plan and/or
the City’s Transit Oriented Development District
Streetscape Plan adopted for this area including
tree wells and irrigation. All new (and existing)
street trees shall be supplied with irrigation
water from the overall site irrigation system
which shall include a timer and a rain sensor. All
new (and existing) street trees, landscaping, and
irrigation shall be indicated on the overall site
landscaping/ irrigation plan.
Planning/
Public
Works
Standard
ATTACHMENT 1
12EXHIBIT B
Ordinance No._______________
Case Nos. ZCMA P-2012020,CP-P2012018 AND MND P-2012019
Page 3 of 24
NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Agency Source
Compliance
Verification
GENERAL
13. Drainage devices, concrete curbs and gutters,
sidewalks, drive approaches, and roadway
pavement shall be designed in conformity with
all provisions of the latest edition of the
American Public Works Association Standard
Plans (“APWA Standards”).
Public
Works
Standard
14. At the sole cost and expense of the Property
Owner, any broken or damaged curbs, gutters,
sidewalks, and street pavement resulting from
construction of the Project shall be repaired and
reconstructed in conformity with APWA
Standards.
Public
Works
Standard
15. Trash enclosures shall be provided and shall
each have a minimum inside dimension of 10
feet x 12 feet, a gated opening that is at least 8
feet wide, and a 6 inch high by 6 inch wide
concrete curb along the inside perimeter wall.
Each enclosure shall also have at least a 6 inch
thick concrete slab that drains at a one percent
gradient out of the enclosure. Final approval for
the size, location, and type of equipment needed
for the adequate storage and disposal of all solid
and recyclable waste generated by the Project
shall be obtained from the City’s Environmental
Programs and Operations Manager. A fire
suppression sprinkler system shall be provided
within any covered trash enclosure area as
required by the Fire Marshal. All refuse
containers assigned to or otherwise used by the
Project shall be stored on-site in the trash
enclosures.
Public
Works/
Fire/
Planning
Standard
16. All Project related solid and recyclable waste
material handling shall be in accordance with
CCMC Section 5.01.010 – “Solid Waste
Management”, which outlines the Sanitation
Division’s exclusive franchise for this service.
Public
Works
Standard
17. The Project shall meet all provisions of CCMC
Section 7.05.015 -”Transportation Demand and
Trip Reduction Measures”.
Trans. Standard
ATTACHMENT 1
13EXHIBIT B
Ordinance No._______________
Case Nos. ZCMA P-2012020,CP-P2012018 AND MND P-2012019
Page 4 of 24
NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Agency Source
Compliance
Verification
GENERAL
18. All buildings and structures to be constructed as
part of the Project shall be designed and
constructed in accordance with all applicable
regulations and standards of the City’s Building
Code, Fire Code and any related codes as
determined by the Building Official and Fire
Marshal; and all other applicable provisions of
the CCMC which are adopted and in effect at
the time of issuance of a building permit.
Building/
Fire
Standard
19. Any new utilities shall be placed underground or
enclosed within the building construction; no
new overhead utilities shall be permitted.
Building/
Planning
Standard
20. The Project shall comply with all applicable
requirement of the Culver City Green Building
Program as set forth in CCMC Section
15.02.1100, et.seq.
Building Standard
21. The Project shall comply with the all applicable
requirements relating to solar photovoltaic
requirements as set forth in CCMC Section
15.02.100, et. seq.
Building Standard
22. Changes to the Project or use approved as part
of the Land Use Permit may only be made in
accordance with the provisions of CCMC
Section 17.595.035 – “Changes to an Approved
Project”.
Planning Standard
ATTACHMENT 1
14EXHIBIT B
Ordinance No._______________
Case Nos. ZCMA P-2012020,CP-P2012018 AND MND P-2012019
Page 5 of 24
NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Agency Source
Compliance
Verification
PRIOR TO BUILDING PERMIT ISSUANCE
23. A covenant and agreement, on a form provided
by the Planning Division and in form and
substance acceptable to the City Attorney,
acknowledging and agreeing to comply with all
terms and conditions established herein, shall
be signed by the Property Owner and recorded
in the County Recorder’s Office. The covenant
and agreement shall run with the land and shall
be binding on any subsequent owners, and
tenants or occupants of the Property. After
recordation, a certified copy bearing the
Recorder’s number and date shall be provided
to the Planning Division.
Planning/
City
Attorney
Standard
24. The Applicant and Property Owner shall
indemnify and agree to defend (at the
Applicant’s and Property Owner’s sole expense,
with legal counsel approved by the City) and
hold harmless the City, and its elected and
appointed officials, officers, employees, agents,
contractors and consultants from and against
any and all loss, damages, injuries, costs,
expenses, liabilities, claims, demands, lawsuits,
attorneys’ fees and judgments, arising from or in
any manner connected to any third party
challenge to the City's approval of the Project.
The obligations required by this Condition shall
be set forth in a written instrument in form and
substance acceptable to the City Attorney and
signed by the Applicant and the Property Owner.
City
Attorney
Standard
25. A minimum of three sets of final landscaping and
irrigation plans (separate from the plans
submitted for the building permit) shall be
submitted to the Planning Division for review
and approval.
Planning/
Parks &
Rec.
Standard
26. Payment of New Development Impact Fees
pursuant to CCMC Section 15.06.005 et. seq.
shall be submitted.
Planning/
Building
Standard
ATTACHMENT 1
15EXHIBIT B
Ordinance No._______________
Case Nos. ZCMA P-2012020,CP-P2012018 AND MND P-2012019
Page 6 of 24
NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Agency Source
Compliance
Verification
PRIOR TO BUILDING PERMIT ISSUANCE
27. A Construction Management Plan prepared by
the construction contractor, which identifies the
areas of construction staging, temporary power,
portable toilet, and trash and material storage
locations, shall be submitted to and approved
by the Building Official. Prior to commencement
of work the construction contractor shall advise
the Public Works Inspector and the Building
Inspector (‘Inspectors”) of the construction
schedule and shall meet with the Inspectors.
Building/
Public
Works
Standard
28. A Pedestrian Protection Plan shall be submitted
to and approved by the Building Official. Such
plan shall identify all areas of pedestrian
protection and indicate the method of pedestrian
protection or pedestrian diversion when
required. When pedestrian diversion is required,
the Pedestrian Protection Plan must also be
approved by the Public Works Director.
Building/
Public
Works
Standard
29. Plans submitted as part of the building permit
application shall include a schedule of the
special inspections anticipated, the firm
proposed for the special inspections, and the
resumes of all proposed special inspectors. The
Building Official reserves the right to reject any
special inspector at any time for the duration of
the Project. All special inspection reports shall
be made available to the Building Official and to
any Culver City Building Safety inspector as
required by the Building Official No work shall
be covered without a Culver City Building Safety
inspection, whether or not a special inspection
was performed on such work.
Building Standard
ATTACHMENT 1
16EXHIBIT B
Ordinance No._______________
Case Nos. ZCMA P-2012020,CP-P2012018 AND MND P-2012019
Page 7 of 24
NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Agency Source
Compliance
Verification
PRIOR TO BUILDING PERMIT ISSUANCE
30. A Construction Traffic Management Plan shall
be prepared by a traffic or civil engineer
registered in the State of California. The
Construction Traffic Management Plan shall be
submitted to the City Engineer and Planning
Manager for review and approval prior to the
issuance of any Project demolition, grading, or
excavation permit. The Construction Traffic
Management Plan shall also be reviewed and
approved by the City’s Fire and Police
Departments. The City Engineer and Planning
Manager reserve the right to reject any engineer
at any time and to require that the Plan be
prepared by a different engineer. The
Construction Traffic Management Plan shall
contain, but not be limited to, the following:
A. The name and telephone number of a
contact person who can be reached 24 hours
a day regarding construction traffic
complaints or emergency situations.
B. An up-to-date list of local police, fire, and
emergency response organizations and
procedures for the continuous coordination of
construction activity, potential delays, and
any alerts related to unanticipated road
conditions or delays, with local police, fire,
and emergency response agencies.
Coordination shall include the assessment of
any alternative access routes that might be
required through the Property, and maps
showing access to and within the Property
and to adjacent properties.
C. Procedures for the training and certification
of the flag persons used in implementation of
the Construction Traffic Management Plan.
D. The location, times, and estimated duration
of any roadway closures, traffic detours, use
of protective devices, warning signs, and
staging or queuing areas.
E. The location and travel routes of off-site
staging and parking locations.
Planning/
Public
Works
Standard
ATTACHMENT 1
17EXHIBIT B
Ordinance No._______________
Case Nos. ZCMA P-2012020,CP-P2012018 AND MND P-2012019
Page 8 of 24
NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Agency Source
Compliance
Verification
PRIOR TO BUILDING PERMIT ISSUANCE
31. Reasonable efforts shall be used to reuse and
recycle construction and demolition debris, to
use environmentally friendly materials, and to
provide energy efficient buildings, equipment
and systems. A Demolition Debris Recycling
Plan that indicates where select demolition
debris is to be sent shall be provided to the
Building Official prior to the issuance of a
demolition permit. The Plan shall list the
material to be recycled and the name, address,
and phone number of the facility of organization
accepting the materials.
Building Standard
32. A vector/pest control abatement plan prepared
by a pest control specialist licensed or certified
by the State of California shall be submitted for
review and approval by the Planning Manager
and the Building Official. Said plan shall outline
all steps to be taken prior to the commencement
of any demolition or construction activity in order
to ensure that any and all pests (including, but
not limited to, rodents, bees, ants and
mosquitoes) that may populate the Property do
not relocate to or impact adjoining properties.
Building/
Planning
Standard
33. Prior to issuance of a building permit, notice of
the Project construction schedule shall be
provided to all abutting property owners and
occupants. Evidence of such notification shall
be provided to the Building Division. The notice
shall identify the commencement date and
proposed timing for all construction phases
(demolition, grading, excavation/shoring,
foundation, rough frame, plumbing, roofing,
mechanical and electrical, and exterior finish).
Building Standard
ATTACHMENT 1
18EXHIBIT B
Ordinance No._______________
Case Nos. ZCMA P-2012020,CP-P2012018 AND MND P-2012019
Page 9 of 24
NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Agency Source
Compliance
Verification
PRIOR TO BUILDING PERMIT ISSUANCE
34. A Phase 1 Archaeological/Paleontological
Survey shall be completed and submitted to the
Planning Division and Building Safety Division
for review. If the Phase 1
Archaeological/Paleontological Survey indicates
the presence of archaeological and/or
paleontological resources, then an
archaeological and/or paleontological
professional(s), approved by the City, shall
monitor all phases of the excavation for the
project site. In the event that the Phase 1
Archaeological/Paleontological Survey
determines that no such resources exist but
undetected fossil resources and/or human
remains, or other archaeological/paleontological
resources are encountered during construction
activities, work in that area must be halted, and
both the City of Culver City and the coroner must
be notified. Work will be halted in that area of the
detected resource until the City of Culver City’s
archaeologist and paleontologist have been
contacted to evaluate the resources and
permission to commence work in that area has
been given by the City of Culver City.
Planning/
Building
Mitigation
Measure
35. An asbestos and lead survey shall be submitted
to the Planning Division and Building Safety
Division for review. The survey shall indicate the
requirements on remediating the site and
precautions taken during demolition and
transport of hazardous materials according to
the state regulations and Asbestos Hazard
Emergency Response Act (AHERA).
Planning/
Building
Mitigation
Measure
ATTACHMENT 1
19EXHIBIT B
Ordinance No._______________
Case Nos. ZCMA P-2012020,CP-P2012018 AND MND P-2012019
Page 10 of 24
NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Agency Source
Compliance
Verification
PRIOR TO BUILDING PERMIT ISSUANCE
36. A covenant and agreement on a form provided
by the Planning Division and in form and
substance acceptable to the City Attorney,
agreeing to hold lot numbers 1, 2, and 3 of
Record of Survey 81-95 as one parcel and lot
numbers 14 and portion of 13 of Record of
Survey 81-95 as one parcel, shall be signed by
the Property Owner and recorded in the County
Recorder’s office. After recordation, a certified
copy bearing the Recorder’s number and date
shall be provided to the Planning Division.
Planning/
Public
Works
Special
37. A covenant and agreement (reciprocal access
agreement) on a form provided by the Planning
Division and in form and substance acceptable
to the City Attorney, agreeing to tie all on-site
parking required for the project on both sites
making said parking available to all users of the
project shall be signed by the Property Owner
and recorded in the County Recorder’s office.
The covenant and agreement shall run with the
land and shall be binding on any subsequent
owners, and tenants or occupants of the
Property. After recordation, a certified copy
bearing the Recorder’s number and date shall
be provided to the Planning Division.
Planning Special
38. The off-site improvement plans shall
demonstrate streetscape improvements in
accordance with the City’s Transit Oriented
Development District Streetscape Plan including
but not limited to street trees and other
landscaping, concrete sidewalks, and street
furniture (benches, trash receptacles, and
bicycle racks.) These streetscape improvements
shall be installed along the project’s Washington
Boulevard and Landmark Street frontage as
determined by the Community Development
Director and Public Works Director.
Planning/
Public
Works
Special
ATTACHMENT 1
20EXHIBIT B
Ordinance No._______________
Case Nos. ZCMA P-2012020,CP-P2012018 AND MND P-2012019
Page 11 of 24
NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Agency Source
Compliance
Verification
PRIOR TO BUILDING PERMIT ISSUANCE
39. This project is subject to the National Pollution
Discharge Elimination System (N.P.D.E.S.)
requirements for a Standard Urban Stormwater
Mitigation Plan (SUSMP). The SUSMP shall be
approved prior to the issuance of the building
permit.
Public
Works
Special
40. A Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan
(SWPPP) shall be approved prior to the
issuance of any construction permits.
Public
Works
Special
41. This project is subject to the City’s Sewer
Facility Charge. This charge shall be paid prior
to the issuance of building permits or any
construction permits issued by the Engineering
Division.
Public
Works
Special
DURING CONSTRUCTION
42. During all phases of construction, a
“Construction Rules Sign” that includes contact
names and telephone numbers of the Applicant,
Property Owner, construction contractor(s), and
the City, shall be posted on the Property in a
location that is visible to the public. These
names and telephone numbers shall also be
made available to adjacent property owners and
occupants to the satisfaction of the Planning
Manager and Building Official.
Building/
Planning
Standard
43. The Property shall be maintained daily so that it
is free of trash and litter.
Building Standard
44. During construction, dust shall be controlled by
regular watering or other methods as
determined by the Building inspector.
Building Standard
45. The Building Division may apply administrative
assessments and/ or post general stop work
notices for any violations of the Conditions of
Approval for the Project, and any violations of
the CCMC.
Building Standard
ATTACHMENT 1
21EXHIBIT B
Ordinance No._______________
Case Nos. ZCMA P-2012020,CP-P2012018 AND MND P-2012019
Page 12 of 24
NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Agency Source
Compliance
Verification
DURING CONSTRUCTION
46. During all phases of construction, best efforts
shall be used to ensure that all construction
workers, contractors and others involved with
the Project park on the Property or at designated
offsite locations approved by the City, and not in
the surrounding neighborhood.
Building Standard
47. When foundation shoring and/or foundation piles
will be part of the Project, the engineer of record
shall use noise dampening measures such as
the drilling of shoring supports and piles as
determined by the Building Official and Planning
Manager.
Building/
Planning
Standard
48. Prior to the commencement of any excavation, a
temporary construction fence shall be installed
around the site. The height and fence material
is subject to approval by the City Engineer and
the Planning Manager.
Building/
Planning/
Public
Works
Standard
49. Hours of construction shall be limited to the
following: 8:00 AM to 8:00 PM Monday through
Friday; 9:00 AM to 7:00 PM Saturday; and 10:00
AM to 7:00 PM Sunday and National holidays.
Dirt hauling and construction material deliveries
or removal are prohibited during the morning
(7:00 AM to 9:00 AM) and afternoon (4:00 PM to
6:00 PM) peak traffic periods. All construction
workers shall be respectful of the surrounding
neighborhood and keep non-construction related
noise to a minimum prior to, during, and after
permissible construction hours.
Building/
Public
Works
Standard
50. All staging and storage of construction
equipment and materials, including the
construction dumpster, shall be on-site only.
The Property Owner must obtain written
permission from adjacent property owners for
any construction staging occurring on adjacent
property.
Building/
Public
Works
Standard
ATTACHMENT 1
22EXHIBIT B
Ordinance No._______________
Case Nos. ZCMA P-2012020,CP-P2012018 AND MND P-2012019
Page 13 of 24
NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Agency Source
Compliance
Verification
DURING CONSTRUCTION
51. Compliance with the following noise standards
shall be required with at all times:
A. No construction equipment shall be
operated without an exhaust muffler, and
all such equipment shall have mufflers
and sound control devices (i.e., intake
silencers and noise shrouds) that are no
less effective than those provided on
the original equipment;
B. All construction equipment shall be
properly maintained to minimize noise
emissions;
C. If any construction vehicles are serviced
at a location onsite, the vehicle(s) shall be
setback from any street and other
property lines so as to maintain the
greatest distance from the public right-of-
way and from Noise Sensitive Receptors;
D. Noise impacts from stationary sources
(i.e., mechanical equipment, ventilators,
and air conditioning units) shall be
minimized by proper selection of
equipment and the installation of
acoustical shielding as approved by the
Planning Manager and the Building
Official in order to comply with the City’s
Noise Regulations and Standards as set
forth in CCMC Chapter 9.07; and
E. Stationary source equipment (i.e.,
compressors) shall be located so as to
maintain the greatest distance from the
public right-of-way and from Noise
Sensitive Receptors.
Building/
Planning
Standard
ATTACHMENT 1
23EXHIBIT B
Ordinance No._______________
Case Nos. ZCMA P-2012020,CP-P2012018 AND MND P-2012019
Page 14 of 24
NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Agency Source
Compliance
Verification
DURING CONSTRUCTION
52. In the event three citations are issued in
connection with the Project for violations of
these Conditions of Approval or for other
violations of the CCMC, Project construction
shall be stopped until such time that it is
determined to the satisfaction of the Community
Development Director, that causes of such
violations have been eliminated or corrected and
that the Project will be able to proceed in full
compliance with these Conditions of Approval
and the CCMC.
Building/
Planning
Standard
53. Flag persons with certified training shall be
provided for work site traffic control to minimize
impacts to traffic flow and to ensure the safe
movement of vehicles into and out of the
Property.
Building/
Public
Works
Standard
54. During construction, trucks and other vehicles in
loading and unloading queues must be parked
with their engines off to reduce vehicle
emissions. Construction deliveries shall be
phased and scheduled to avoid emissions peaks
as determined by the Building Official and
discontinued during second-stage smog alerts.
Building Standard
55. Construction vehicles shall not be permitted to
stage or queue where they would interfere with
vehicular and pedestrian traffic or block access
to adjacent properties. Off-site staging shall be
at locations approved by the City Engineer and
shall be of sufficient length to accommodate
large trucks without being unduly disruptive to
traffic operations. The drivers of these trucks
shall be in radio or phone communication with
on-site personnel who shall advise the drivers
when to proceed from the staging location to the
Property. Construction-related vehicles shall not
be permitted to park on public streets.
Building/
Public
Works
Standard
ATTACHMENT 1
24EXHIBIT B
Ordinance No._______________
Case Nos. ZCMA P-2012020,CP-P2012018 AND MND P-2012019
Page 15 of 24
NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Agency Source
Compliance
Verification
PRIOR TO CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY OR FINAL INSPECTION
56. All provisions, and requirements set forth in
these Conditions of Approval, in the Resolution
approving the project, in the CCMC, or in any
applicable written comments as provided by City
representatives at the March 15, 2012 Project
Review Committee meeting (or from updates
from the City thereafter) on the Land Use Permit
application, shall be fulfilled and satisfied to the
satisfaction of all City departments before the
use may be established or the Project occupied.
All Standard
57. All requirements of the City’s Art in Public
Places Program, as set forth in CCMC Section
15.06.100, et. seq., shall be fully satisfied prior
to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy;
provided that if such requirements will be
satisfied by the payment of the public art in-lieu
fee, the same shall be paid prior to the issuance
of a building permit.
Cultural
Affairs
Standard
58. All onsite and offsite improvements and all
conditions of approval except those which are
deferred pursuant to a bond or letter of credit as
determined and approved by the Building
Official, Fire Marshal, Planning Manager, and/or
City Engineer shall be completed prior to
issuance of any certificate of occupancy. Prior
to issuance of any certificate of occupancy the
following shall be provided to and approved by
the City:
A. Five full sets of as-built plans that shall
include at a minimum the site plan,
grading and utility plan, landscape and
irrigation plan, floor plan for each level of
the Project, parking structure plan, roof
plan with all mechanical equipment
identified as to purpose and source and
all offsite improvements; and
B. One set of as-built plans as described
above in a digital format compatible with
the City’s computer system.
All Standard
ATTACHMENT 1
25EXHIBIT B
Ordinance No._______________
Case Nos. ZCMA P-2012020,CP-P2012018 AND MND P-2012019
Page 16 of 24
NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Agency Source
Compliance
Verification
PRIOR TO CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY OR FINAL INSPECTION
59. Washington Boulevard, along the project’s
frontage, shall be widened to a 40 foot half
street. The widening shall also include a new 10
foot sidewalk that will extend from the new curb
face to the existing southerly 50 foot right-of-way
line. The new easterly curb along Washington
Boulevard shall join the existing curb through a
smooth transitional reverse curve. The new
street section of Washington Boulevard shall be
a minimum of 6-inches of asphalt paving over
10-inches of crushed aggregate base (CAB).
This work shall be designed and installed to the
satisfaction of the City Engineer.
Public
Works
Special
60. New parking stalls and standard or kiosk type
parking meters shall be installed on Washington
Boulevard as determined by the City Engineer.
If standard meters are selected, they shall be of
the type that allows the use of credit cards as
manufactured by the IPS Group. If a kiosk
meter is selected, it shall be of the type as
manufactured by Duncan Solutions with each
stall being uniquely numbered.
Public
Works
Special
61. A bus stop and related appurtenances shall be
installed along the project’s Washington
Boulevard frontage. The bus shelter shall
conform to the City’s Transportation Department
standards. This work shall be designed and
installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.
Public
Works
Special
62. A bike lane shall be installed along the project’s
Washington Boulevard frontage. The required
striping and signage shall be reflected in the
signing and striping plan as part of the project’s
street improvement plans.
Public
Works
Special
63. The existing curb returns at both corners of
Washington Boulevard and Landmark Street
shall be reconstructed with a 25-foot radius and
new curb ramps. Adequate street easements
shall be dedicated for the corner cut-off at each
corner and any additional right-of-way necessary
for the construction of the new curb returns.
Public
Works
Special
ATTACHMENT 1
26EXHIBIT B
Ordinance No._______________
Case Nos. ZCMA P-2012020,CP-P2012018 AND MND P-2012019
Page 17 of 24
NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Agency Source
Compliance
Verification
PRIOR TO CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY OR FINAL INSPECTION
64. The existing traffic signal poles at both corners
of Washington Boulevard and Landmark Street
shall be relocated to an approved location based
on the reconstructed curb returns. A new
pedestrian crosswalk shall be installed across
Washington Boulevard at the easterly return,
which shall include a new or reconstructed curb
ramp on the north side of Washington
Boulevard. New LED countdown pedestrian
heads shall be installed on the two traffic signals
controlling this new crosswalk. ADA compliant
“Bulldog” type pedestrian push buttons and
audible signal devices shall be installed on the
four traffic signal poles that control all pedestrian
crosswalks at this intersection. A westbound left-
turn signal on Washington Boulevard shall also
be required at this intersection. Any other
ancillary work as determined by the City
Engineer required to accomplish the above
described work, including but not limited to
installation of new mast arms, signal poles,
street lights, and modifications to the service
and controller cabinets shall be included. Any
new signal poles shall be designed for 100 mph
winds per CALTRANS standards. This work
shall be shown on a traffic signal plan and a
signing and striping plan, prepared by a civil or
traffic engineer registered in the State of
California, and shall be submitted to the
Engineering Division for review, approval, and
permitting. Separate traffic signal timing charts
shall be submitted for review.
Public
Works
Special
65. A five foot sidewalk shall be provided adjacent to
the curb on Landmark Street. All street lights,
street trees, fire hydrants, etc. shall be relocated
to behind the sidewalk. A street easement shall
be dedicated for the sidewalk and a public utility
easement shall be dedicated at each location
where a public facility will be located. The new
sidewalk will require the reconstruction of the
existing drive approaches that will still be used.
Public
Works
Special
ATTACHMENT 1
27EXHIBIT B
Ordinance No._______________
Case Nos. ZCMA P-2012020,CP-P2012018 AND MND P-2012019
Page 18 of 24
NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Agency Source
Compliance
Verification
PRIOR TO CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY OR FINAL INSPECTION
66. The full width of Landmark Street shall be
repaved from Washington Boulevard to the
southeasterly project boundary. The repaving
shall consist of a two-inch grind and inlay of
Rubberized Asphalt Concrete (RAC). All striping,
parking tees and markers removed by said
repaving shall be replaced with thermoplastic
paint. The applicant has requested that a
portion of Landmark Street, as it approaches
Washington Boulevard, be reconstructed in
concrete. If this option is selected, the concrete
shall be a minimum of 8 inches thick and shall
be placed on a 6 inch layer of compacted CAB.
Public
Works
Special
67. All drive approaches that will no longer be used
shall be removed and reconstructed with curb,
gutter, and sidewalk.
Public
Works
Special
68. Existing parking meters located along the
project’s frontage with Landmark Street shall be
relocated due to the closure of any driveways.
New parking meters may be required as
determined by the City Engineer. Existing
parking meter heads shall be replaced and the
new parking meter heads shall both be of the
type that allows the use of credit cards as
manufactured by the IPS Group and approved
by the City Engineer.
Public
Works
Special
69. All drive approaches shall be at least as wide as
the drive aisle and not more than one foot wider
on each side.
Public
Works
Special
70. All existing and proposed drive approaches shall
have a minimum 3 foot ADA concrete landing at
the top of the approach.
Public
Works
Special
71. All concrete used in the public right-of-way shall
have a minimum strength of 3250 psi.
Public
Works
Special
72. The existing street light system along the
project's frontage with Washington Boulevard
and Landmark Street shall be converted to low
voltage induction type lighting. New street light
conduit, wiring, pull boxes, light fixtures, and
ballast shall be required.
Public
Works
Special
ATTACHMENT 1
28EXHIBIT B
Ordinance No._______________
Case Nos. ZCMA P-2012020,CP-P2012018 AND MND P-2012019
Page 19 of 24
NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Agency Source
Compliance
Verification
PRIOR TO CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY OR FINAL INSPECTION
73. Street trees, tree wells, tree grates, ground
cover planting, and irrigation shall be installed
within the project's frontage along Washington
Boulevard and Landmark Street in accordance
with the City’s Transit Oriented Development
District Streetscape Plan. A separate landscape
and irrigation plan shall be submitted to the
Engineering Division for review, approval, and
permitting. Irrigation within the public right-of-
way shall be connected to the private on-site
irrigation system.
Planning/
Public
Works
Special
74. Secure bicycle parking shall be provided to
accommodate twenty-two (22) bicycles. The
bicycle parking shall be provided to
accommodate seven (7) long-term and at least
fifteen (15) short-term parking positions. The
long-term spaces shall be provide in individual
bike lockers or bike racks in a secure locking
fenced enclosure on the ground floor of the
project’s parking structure on the main
development parcel. The short-term spaces
shall be provided on both of the development
sites and on the adjacent public sidewalk right-
of-way, using eight (8) City approved “Inverted -
U” Bicycle Racks. Exact location of the Bicycle
Racks and in the public right-of-way shall be
approved by the City Engineer.
Public
Works
Special
75. All existing sewer laterals that have been
abandoned or will be abandoned due to the
project design and are located within the project
boundary shall be capped at the property line.
Public
Works
Special
ATTACHMENT 1
29EXHIBIT B
Ordinance No._______________
Case Nos. ZCMA P-2012020,CP-P2012018 AND MND P-2012019
Page 20 of 24
NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Agency Source
Compliance
Verification
PRIOR TO CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY OR FINAL INSPECTION
76. The Project shall contribute $50,000 towards a
study and implementation of a shuttle system
connecting the residential and commercial areas
in Downtown Culver City and Hayden Tract
areas to and from the Culver City Exposition
Light Rail Transit (LRT) Station. This shuttle
system will include shuttle buses with stops
along Washington Boulevard. The schedules for
these shuttles should be developed such that
coordinated transfers to and from the LRT
station at Culver City are achieved. These
shuttles would operate at enhanced frequencies
during the peak commuter time periods and
provide fast, convenient, and efficient
connections to the Metro Exposition LRT line.
In the event that the proposed shuttle program
has not progressed sufficiently to warrant study
funding, the $50,000 contribution mentioned
above shall be used as the project’s fair share
towards the design and implementation of
Adaptive Traffic Control Systems (ATCS) at the
intersection of Washington Boulevard/National
Boulevard. This includes provision of ATCS-
associated control PC hardware/software, if
required.
Public
Works
Mitigation
Measure
77. A westbound left-turn signal at the intersection of
Washington Boulevard and Landmark Street
shall be designed and constructed by the
Applicant to the satisfaction of the Public Works
Director. The Applicant shall be responsible for
all costs associated with the modification of the
traffic signal.
Public
Works
Mitigation
Measure
78. A valet parking plan outlining the parking
management of the valet parking in Building D
shall be submitted to the Planning Division for
review and approval by the Planning Manager
and the City Traffic Engineer.
Planning Special
ATTACHMENT 1
30EXHIBIT B
Ordinance No._______________
Case Nos. ZCMA P-2012020,CP-P2012018 AND MND P-2012019
Page 21 of 24
NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Agency Source
Compliance
Verification
ON-GOING
79. The use and development of the Property shall
be in substantial conformance with the plans
and materials submitted with the application for
the Land Use Permit as reviewed by the
Planning Commission at its meeting on October
4, 2012, excepted as modified by these
Conditions of Approval.
Planning Standard
80. Pursuant to CCMC Section 17.650.020 -
“Inspection”, the Property Owner and Applicant
shall allow authorized City officials, or their
designees, access to the Property where there
is reasonable cause to believe the Property is
not in compliance with these Conditions of
Approval or other requirements of the CCMC.
All Standard
81. The use and development of the Property shall
comply with these Conditions of Approval and all
applicable local, special district or authority,
county, state and federal statutes, codes,
standards, and regulations including, but not
limited to, Building Division, Fire Department,
Planning Division and Public Works Department
requirements, and shall comply with all
applicable CCMC requirements and all
comments made during the City’s building
permit plan check review process. Failure to
comply with said Conditions, statutes, codes,
standards, and regulations may result in
reconstruction work, demolition, stop work
orders, withholding of certificate of occupancy,
revocation of land use permit approval and/or
any other lawful action the City might deem
reasonable and appropriate to bring about
compliance.
All Standard
82. All graffiti shall be removed from the Property
within 48 hours of its application.
Building/
Planning/
Public
Works
Standard
ATTACHMENT 1
31EXHIBIT B
Ordinance No._______________
Case Nos. ZCMA P-2012020,CP-P2012018 AND MND P-2012019
Page 22 of 24
NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Agency Source
Compliance
Verification
ON-GOING
83. The Property Owner shall maintain all street
trees along the property frontage at his/her sole
cost and expense.
Public
Works
Standard
84. All mitigation measures set forth in any
environmental document relating to the Project
(including any reports of the type contemplated
by the California Environmental Quality Act)
shall be completed as specified therein.
Planning Standard
85. The Director, or his or her designee, shall
conduct follow-up inspections on the design,
operation and maintenance of the Project after
full operation of the Project has commenced, as
set forth in this Condition. A report on the
Project traffic mitigations, on-site circulation,
parking, project design, maintenance and
operation shall be reviewed by the Planning
Commission six months after occupancy of the
Project. In the event the Project is not in full
compliance with the approved Project plans,
Project conditions of approval and approved
Comprehensive Plan, the matter shall be set for
public hearing pursuant to CCMC Chapter
17.660 – Revocations and Modifications.
Planning Special
86. Changes or alterations to this Comprehensive
Plan shall not be considered minor (and
therefore shall not be subject to administrative
approval pursuant to CCMC Section
17.560.025) if they will:
a) Alter the exterior appearance of the project;
b) Alter the materials being used on the exterior
of the project (unless the new materials are of
equal or better quality and are so similar in
appearance to the materials on the approved
materials board that the difference would not be
noticed by a reasonably observant person); or
c) Alter the floor plans in any material way, or
increase the size of any one or more of the
following areas: retail, restaurant, outdoor
dining, and/or office.
Planning Special
ATTACHMENT 1
32EXHIBIT B
Ordinance No._______________
Case Nos. ZCMA P-2012020,CP-P2012018 AND MND P-2012019
Page 23 of 24
NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Agency Source
Compliance
Verification
ON-GOING
87. The applicant shall be responsible for installing
“way finding signs” for the TOD District as
provided in the Washington National
Streetscape Plan as determined by the Director.
Planning Special
88. The total floor area of retail and restaurant
(including bars and nightclubs) uses shall not
exceed 41,745 square feet. Restaurants
(including bars and nightclubs) shall not exceed
35% of the overall retail/restaurant floor area.
Planning Special
89. The courtyard trees to be a minimum 72 inch
box size at installation and the exact location
and final species selection shall be subject to
review and approval by the City’s Landscape
Architect.
Planning Special
ATTACHMENT 1
33EXHIBIT B
Ordinance No._______________
Case Nos. ZCMA P-2012020,CP-P2012018 AND MND P-2012019
Page 24 of 24
NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Agency Source
Compliance
Verification
ON-GOING
90. Inspections of the on-site parking and valet
parking operations shall be conducted by the
Planning Manager and the City’s Traffic
Engineer at 6-month, 12-month, and 24-month
periods after full operation of the Project.
Thereafter, follow-up inspections shall be
conducted on a case by case basis as
determined necessary by the City. If it is
determined (i) that the number of on-site parking
spaces is not sufficient to satisfy demand, or (ii)
that the valet parking operations are not
adequately serving the Project, or (iii) that the
Project’s parking facilities or operations are in
any other way not fully and adequately serving
the customers, patrons, employees, suppliers
and contractors of the Project, then additional
methods to provide fully adequate on-site
parking shall be devised, such additional
requirements shall be set forth in a revised valet
parking plan acceptable to the City, and said
plan shall be promptly and fully implemented. If
fully adequate parking cannot be provided by the
above methods, the demand for parking at the
Project shall be reduced in a manner acceptable
to the City (by, for example, reducing the
amount of outdoor dining area), until the parking
that can be provided will be adequate for the
reduced demand.
Planning Special
ATTACHMENT 1
34ATTACHMENT 2
35ATTACHMENT 2
36ATTACHMENT 2
37ATTACHMENT 2
38ATTACHMENT 2
39ATTACHMENT 2
40ATTACHMENT 2
41ATTACHMENT 2
42PLATFORM
PLANNED DEVELOPMENT ZONE, and
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
Adopted on ___________, 2012, Ordinance No 2012-_________
ABRAMSON TEIGER ARCHITECTS
ATTACHMENT 3
4301 Project Description 1
02 Land Use and Development Standards 7
A. Land Use 8
B. Development Standards
1. Building Setbacks 9
2. Building Heights 10
3. Parking
• Vehicle Parking Plan 11
• Bicycle Parking Plan 11
• Parking Requirements 12
4. Loading Plan 13
5. Trash and Recycling Management Plan 13
6. Signage 13
C. Permitted Uses 14-16
D. Administration 17
03 Sustainability 18
04 Site 20
• Aerial Map 21
• Site Plan and Photos of Existing Conditions 22
• Proposed Site Plan 23
• Proposed Washington Boulevard Street Elevation 25
05 Building A 26
06 Building B 39
07 Building C 53
08 Building D 60
09 Building E/F 68
10 Conceptual Landscape Plan 81
11 Conceptual Lighting 93
12 Civil Engineering 107
• Site Survey 108-111
• Infrastructure/CFD 112
• Utility Plan 113-115
• Site Control Plan 116-118
• Site Grading Plan 119-121
13 Documents under Separate Cover 122
A. Geotechnical Report
C. Traffic Study
D. Carbon Emission Report
E. Phase 1 Environmental Assessment
TABLE OF CONTENTS
ATTACHMENT 3
44Page 1
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
01
ATTACHMENT 3
45TRUE
NORTH
D
E
FA
C
B
A
Page 2
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The project is a multi-use commercial development located at 8810,
8840, and 8850 Washington Boulevard and 3920 Landmark Street
within the Washington/National Transit Oriented District (TOD) near the
Exposition Light Rail Transit Line and Station (Expo) in Culver City. The
project comprises two sites totaling approximately 89,560 s.f. or 2.06
acres (Parcel 1: 21,796 s.f. or 0.5 acres and Parcel 2: 67,804 s.f. or 1.56
acres), fronting Washington Boulevard with Landmark Street bisecting the
project. Both sites were formerly occupied by the Hyundai, Mazda and
Nissan car-dealership. The current surrounding uses include a private
primary school, air conditioning manufacturing, general warehouse, auto
repair and some retail.
Project Area Summary Table
Building Retail Restaurant/
Retail
+
Office Parking Total
Building A 4,109 s.f. 3,020 s.f. 29,816 s.f. 36,945 s.f.
Tenant Space
Utility
Circulation
4,109 s.f. 3,020 s.f. 24,110 s.f.
1,608 s.f.
4,098 s.f.
Building B 2,060 s.f. 2,400 s.f. 576 s.f. 107,450 s.f. 112,486 s.f.
Tenant Space
Utility
Circulation
2,060 s.f. 2,400 s.f. 576 s.f. 100,271 s.f.
2,456 s.f.
4,723 s.f.
Building C 5,095 s.f. 5,095 s.f.
Tenant Space
Utility
4,345 s.f.
750 s.f.
Building D* 660 s.f. 39,935 s.f. 40,595 s.f.
Tenant Space
Utility
Circulation
660 s.f. 37,504 s.f.
2,016 s.f.
415 s.f.
Building E** 10,998 s.f. 6,789 s.f. 8,340 s.f. 1,068 s.f. 27,195 s.f.
Tenant Space
Utility
Circulation
8,176 s.f.
876 s.f.
1,946 s.f.
5,369 s.f.
639 s.f.
781 s.f.
5,865 s.f.
416 s.f.
2,059 s.f. 1,068 s.f.
Building F 4,135 s.f. 2,479 s.f. 6,614 s.f.
Tenant Space 4,135 s.f. 2,479 s.f.
Total Area by
Use 27,057 s.f. 14,688 s.f. 38,732 s.f. 148,453 s.f. 228,930 s.f.
+
maximum allowable area for potential restaurant use, may also be used as retail
* including courtyard kiosk
** excluding roof deck
Aerial view of project with Expo Train line in foreground.
KEY PLAN
The project consists of six buildings (Buildings A through F) totaling 41,745 square
feet of retail and restaurant floor area, and 38,732 square feet of office floor area.
There are two above ground parking structures, one existing 3 level structure
containing 93 parking spaces in a combination of self-parking and valet parking;
and the other a new 5 level structure containing 219 self-parking spaces for a total
of 312 on-site parking spaces.
The project includes adaptive reuse of
some existing buildings in conjunction with
new construction to create a community
oriented niche shopping environment
with office uses in some of the buildings
at the upper levels. The broad themes
that drive the design are transportation,
pedestrian flow and sustainability.
ATTACHMENT 3
46Page 3
DESIGN CONCEPTS
This is a transit oriented project that will complement the nearby
Expo station. The proximity of the project to the new Expo station at
Washington and National Boulevards is a key generator of visual cues
for the design of the retail and office environment.
Platform is a campus of six buildings that are connected by open
spaces between the buildings. This open space includes two paseos
and a 7,000 square foot open air central courtyard. The courtyard
serves as an interactive community space that serves as the connector
to the two paseos as well as to Washington Boulevard. In addition
to these open spaces the project is designed with wide pedestrian
oriented building setbacks along Washington Boulevard. Pedestrian
amenities such as canopies, benches and landscape elements will
add character to Washington Boulevard and offer a pleasant amenity
to the pedestrian.
The project also fosters pedestrian access and connectivity from
the Expo station which is located to the north across Washington
Boulevard, by providing a pedestrian entrance into the easternmost
part of the site near the intersection of Washington Boulevard and
National Boulevard. This urban design feature was incorporated into
the project to provide a direct and convenient access into the site
from the Expo station and to encourage people to visit the site.
Furthermore, the project will activate this portion of Washington
Boulevard that is currently undergoing revitalization as part of the TOD
district and is an integral and vital link of urban and commercial activity
between the Helms Bakery Complex and Arts District area to the east,
Downtown Culver City to the west, and the Hayden Tract area to the
South.
Energy saving and sustainable design is integral to the project. It is
incorporated throughout in the building systems and in the choice of
materials. There is an outward expression of green building design
visible from the passing train above and from the street level. The
buildings incorporate green design elements such as photovoltaic
electricity generation and storm water filtration.
View of Washington Boulevard
ATTACHMENT 3
47PLATFORM
EXPO LINE
STATION
WASHINGTON BLVD
Page 4
URBAN CONTEXT
HAYDEN
TRACT
CULVER CITY
DOWNTOWN
HELMS
BAKERY
I-10
VENCIE BOULEVARD
ROBERTSON BLVD
NATIONAL BLVD
CULVER CITY
ARTS DISTRICT
TO
LA CIENEGA
TRANSIT ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT BOUNDARY
TRUE
NORTH
ATTACHMENT 3
48Page 5
SITE CONTEXT
WASHINGTON BOULEVARD
VENICE BOULEVARD
ROBERTSON BOULEVARD
NATIONAL BOULEVARD
? EXPO LINE TO USC/DOWNTOWN
CULVER CITY STATOIN
PARKING FOR CULVER CITY
EXPO TRAIN STATION AND
FUTURE MIXED USE
DEVELOPMENT
FUTURE
MIXED USE
DEVELOPMENT
PROJECT SITE BOUNDARY
TRUE
NORTH
ATTACHMENT 3
49Page 6
SITE CONTEXT
Washington Boulevard
L
C
L L
L
P
L L
10'-3"
10'-3"
8'-9"
20'-0' 11'-10"
20'-0" 5'-0" 11'-10"
"
21'-7 1/2"
19'-6"
3'-3"
5'-0"
5'-0"
10-3"
5'-0"
5'-9 1/2"
SHOWERS
TRASH/RECYCLING
AREA
BIKE E E KE KE IK BIK B B LOCKERS S RS RS RS ER KE KE CK CK OC OC O LO LO L
NEW PROPERTYLINE
RETAIL
RESTAURANT/
RETAIL
ELEV. .
STAIR
RETAIL
RETAIL
RETAIL
AIL
ELEV.
LOBBY
VALET/CONCIERGE
UTILITY
RETAIL
RETAIL
INACCESSIBLE L SIB
PARKING
RETAIL
RESTAURANT/RETAIL
STAIR
LOBBY
UTILITY
V ELEV V V V V. . . ELEV. .
RESTAURANT/
RETAIL
MECH H. .
RETAIL
RETAIL RETAIL
STAIR
RETAIL
V V V V ELEV V.
MECH. MECH H H CH. .
M.
RETAIL
MEN
9'-7 3/4"
ATTACHMENT 3
50Page 7
LAND USE AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
02
ATTACHMENT 3
51Page 8
A. LAND USE
General Plan
The General Plan Land Use designation of the project site
is General Corridor. The General Corridor designation
allows a range of small to medium scale commercial
uses, emphasizing community serving retail, office and
service uses along major corridors. It is intended to support
desirable existing and future neighborhood and community
serving commercial uses and housing opportunities that are
compatible with nearby residential neighborhoods.
Zoning
Zoning for this site is intended to conform to the General
Plan. The zoning pursuant to the Platform Comprehensive Plan
is Planned Development (PD) District. The underlying
Industrial General (IG) zoning for the project site is changed
to PD along with adoption of the Comprehensive Plan. In
combination with the PD zoning district, the Comprehensive
Plan supports innovation in site planning and other aspects
of project design, and more effective design responses to
site features, uses on adjoining properties and other impacts
that the underlying zoning code standards would produce
without adjustment. The PD zoning district is applied to
areas of existing large scale, multiple family residential and
commercial complexes developed as a Planned Development
zoning district, and sites suitable for similar large scale
development. The PD zoning district is consistent with the
General Corridor land use designation of the General Plan. View of Washington Boulevard
ATTACHMENT 3
5210.3’ 10.3’
17.7’
14.5’
8.8’ 9.8’ 11.9’
10’
0.5’
12.8’
5.8’
4.3’
7’
10’
++
10’
++
Page 9
B. DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
In addition to the development standards outlined herein, every
land use and structure shall comply with applicable requirements
of the Culver City Municipal Code (CCMC), Title 17, Zoning Code
or as amended.
Pedestrian Setbacks
The project provides an ample pedestrian environment by providing
undulating setbacks ranging from approximately 9’ to 13’ wide at
the ground level along Washington Boulevard (Building A and B)
as well as the provision of a 10’ wide public sidewalk that will be
furnished with street trees, planters, tree grates, benches, bicycle
racks, trash receptacles, wayfinding signage, and other street
furniture consistent with the City’s Transit Oriented Development
District Streetscape Plan. The pedestrian setback area provides
for opportunities for amenities such as seating areas, landscape
planters, as well as opportunities for outdoor dining.
The upper levels of the buildings along Washington Boulevard
(Building A and B) overhang the ground floor, providing shaded
entryways to the retail and restaurant spaces.
1. Building Setbacks
Building setbacks shall comply with the following:
Setbacks Required
Street Facing Landmark Street*
Building A (min 5’-9” - max 17’-8”) average 12’-0”
Building B (min 0’-6” - max 10’-0”) average 3’-6”
Building C existing 7’-0”
Building D existing 4’-4”
Metro Line Facing
Building E 0’-0”
Building F existing 0’-0”
Interior Lot Line / Side Yard
Building B 0’-0”
Building D 0’-0”
Building E 0’-0”
* Setbacks are calculated after new 5’-0” sidewalk dedication.
Building Setback - Existing Building
Building Setback - New Building
Building Setback Diagram
++
10’ Public Right of Way Pedestrian Sidewalk
Setbacks Required
Street Facing Washington Blvd
Ground Floor Second Floor Third Floor Fourth Floor Fifth Floor Roof Level
Building A 10’-3’ 5’-3” 8’-0” 5’-3”
Building B min 8’-9”
max 12’-10”
avg. 9’-9”
5’-0” min 0’-9”
max 5’-8”
avg. 5’-4”
min 0’-9”
max 5’-8”
avg. 4’-7”
min 0’-9”
max 5’-8”
avg. 5’-4”
5’-8”
Building F existing 0’-0”
TRUE
NORTH
D
E
FA
C
B
A
KEY PLAN
ATTACHMENT 3
53Page 10
B. DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
2. Building Heights
TRUE
NORTH
D
E
FA
C
B
A
KEY PLAN
*Roof-mounted structures for the housing of mechanical equipment required to operate
and maintain the structure, shall be allowed, up to a maximum of 13 feet 6 inches above
the height of a building.
Structures for the housing of elevators and stairs shall be allowed up to a maximum of
16 feet above the roofline of the building.
View of Washington Boulevard
Buildings shall not exceed the maximum
allowed height limit of 56’. Buildings heights
within the Comprehensive Plan vary in height
from one story to five story structures.
Height Limit 56 Feet* 5 Stories
Height per Building
Building A 56 Feet 4 Stories
Building B 56 Feet 5 Stories
Building C 32 Feet 2 Stories
Building D 30 Feet 2 Stories
Building E 56 Feet 3 Stories
Building F 18 Feet 1 Stories
Roof-mounted mechanical equipment (e.g., air
conditioning, heating, exhaust, and ventilation
ducts, etc.), shall be screened from public view
from adjoining public streets and rights-of-way.
The method of screening shall be architectur-
ally compatible with other on-site development
in terms of colors, materials, and architectural
style as determined by the Planning Manager.
ATTACHMENT 3
54Page 11
B. DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
3. Parking
Vehicle Parking Plan
Parking for the project shall be provided in two separate
above ground structures. The newly built parking
structure on the corner of Landmark Street and
Washington Boulevard (Building B) shall contain at least
219 parking stalls across five levels of covered parking
and a roof level. The entire structure is accessed through
an automatic entry system off of Landmark Street that
will be activated by either a ticket or a key card system.
Office users and store employees shall be prohibited
from parking in the lower three levels of this structure,
leaving these prime spaces to customers.
The second parking structure will be a rehabilitated
existing structure located on the north side of Landmark
Street (Building D) containing 93 parking stalls. This
structure shall have ingress and egress off of Landmark
Street. Valet services shall be provided, with drop off
and pick up occurring on the first level and parking on the
two levels above. There will be 33 spaces on the second
level including 28 in tandem configuration and 38 spaces
on the third level including 36 in tandem configuration.
There will be 22 self-parking spaces on the first level.
Both parking structures will offer preferred parking
for low emission vehicles (e.g. hybrid, alternative fuel
and electrical automobiles) and carpool vehicles as
required by the California Green Building Code (CGBC).
Handicapped accessible spaces are provided per
California Building Code (CBC) regulations.
Bicycle Parking Plan
Long term bike parking shall be provided within fully enclosed bicycle lockers in the newly
built parking structure on the corner of Landmark Street and Washington Boulevard
(Building B). These lockers shall be coin/card operated and available for the general public.
Additional long term bike parking shall be available within a gated keycard operated area
inside the parking structure on the main site (Building D). To facilitate employee and office
worker bike commuting, a keycard protected shower shall be provided in the existing
(Building D) parking structure and shall be available to anyone who works in the project
and commutes by bike.
In addition short term bike racks shall be provided along Washington Boulevard in the
public right of way.
Short Term
Bicycle Parking
Long Term Secured
Bicycle Parking
Automobile Parking
ATTACHMENT 3
55Page 12
B. DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
Numerical Parking Requirements
Parking for the project site shall be provided at a ratio of 1 stall per 250 square feet of
retail and restaurant floor area consistent with the Zoning Code parking requirements
for shopping centers and 1 stall per 350 square feet of office floor area consistent with
the Zoning Code parking requirements for office uses. Restaurant space over 25% of
the combined retail and restaurant floor area shall be parked at a ratio of 1 stall per 100
square feet of floor area.
Outdoor dining areas up to 500 square feet per restaurant are covered under these parking
requirements. Outdoor dining areas larger than 500 square feet per restaurant space
including roof top dining at Building E shall be required to provide 1 stall per 250 square
feet in excess of the initial 500 square feet.
Bicycle Parking Requirements
Short Term Bicycle Parking Required* 36 Spaces
Long Term Bicycle Parking Required
+
23 Spaces
* Short Term Bicycle Parking in the form of bike racks is provided offsite in pub-
lic right of way along Washington Boulevard. One rack holds two bicycles.
+
Long Term Bicycle Parking is provided onsite only, in form of secured lock-
ers and a gated storage area inside the parking structures. See page 11 for
detailed location.
Auto Parking Required
Retail 1 Space per 250 s.f.
Restaurants up to 25% of the combined
retail and restaurant floor area
1 Space per 250 s.f.
Restaurants over 25% of the combined
retail and restaurant floor area
1 Space per 100 s.f.
Office 1 Space per 350 s.f.
Spaces Required
Retail 27,057 s.f. / 250 108 Spaces
Restaurants up to 25% of the com-
bined retail and restaurant floor area
10,435 s.f. / 250 42 Spaces
Restaurants over 25% of the com-
bined retail and restaurant floor area
4,253 s.f. / 100 43 Spaces
Outdoor Dining* 2,050 s.f. / 250 8 Spaces
Office
+
38,732 s.f. / 350 111 Spaces
Total 312 Spaces
Spaces Provided
Building B 219 Spaces
Building D
Regular
Valet
22 Spaces
71 Spaces
Total 312 Spaces
* area in excess of 500 square feet per restaurant tenant (including excess area of Building E roof
deck dining)
+
Office floor area includes Art Studio floor area in Building B parking structure
Accessible Parking Requirements
Building B Total Spaces Required 219 Spaces
Total Accessible Spaces Required 7 Spaces
Van Accessible Required* 2 Spaces
Clean Air Vehicle Spaces Required* 24 Spaces
Building D Total Spaces Required 93 Spaces
Total Accessible Spaces Required 4 Spaces
Van Accessible Required* 2 Spaces
Clean Air Vehicle Spaces Required 8 Spaces
* Required spaces listed are based on Comprehensive Plan and exceed requirements of Cali-
fornia Building Code Chapter 11B and California Green Building Code Chapter 5.
ATTACHMENT 3
56Page 13
B. DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
4. Loading Plan
Deliveries shall only be received in two dedicated
locations. Loading area (1) is located behind Building C
and serves the main development site, measures 1,500
square feet and is able to accommodate large trucks.
Loading area (2) is located inside the new parking
structure Building B and accommodates smaller, van
size delivery trucks (e.g. UPS delivery trucks).
5. Trash and Recycling Management
Plan
Trash and recycling enclosures shall be provided in
two locations.
The main development site shall be served by a trash
compactor housed inside a dedicated room within the
parking structure as well as dedicated recycling area
within the service yard (Area A). Building B shall be
served by a combined recycling and trash room inside
the parking garage (Area B). This shall be accessed by
smaller trucks which shall move the bins to the side of
Landmark Street for pickup. Both areas shall be gated
and visually shielded from public view from adjoining
public streets and rights-of-way.
All trash shall be collected by on-site maintenance at
the tenant suite at the end of each business day and
collectively disposed or recycled. The development
fosters recycling of reusable materials (e.g. cardboard,
plastics and aluminum) and shall provide dedicated and
easily accessible bins in the above outlined locations.
6. Signage
To ensure that signs for the project are uniquely
designed and compatible with the overall architectural
theme of the project, all signage shall be processed
through a Master Sign Program pursuant to Zoning
Code Section 17.330.050.D.2 or as amended.
Loading Area
Trash and Recycling
Access Path |101010|A
B
TRUE
NORTH
D
E
FA
C
B
A
KEY PLAN
ATTACHMENT 3
57Page 14
(1)
See Article 7 of the Culver City Zoning Code for definitions of the land uses listed.
(2)
See Chapter 17.530 of the Culver City Zoning Code for specific permit requirements
(3)
Ancillary to a primary retail use.
(4)
Only Specialized non-degree granting schools offering instruction in one of the follow-
ing: art, ballet and other dance, bartending, computer and electronics, drama, driver
education, language or music.
(5)
Use shall not be permitted on the ground floor.
(6)
Use shall not be permitted on the ground floor in tenant spaces fronting Washington
Boulevard or the central courtyard space.
C. PERMITTED USES
1. General Provisions
The project lies along the southerly edge of
Washington Boulevard and forms its southerly street
wall, contributing in a major way to the character
of the boulevard. The project shall be pedestrian
oriented and include a mix of permitted uses to
draw patrons from the surrounding neighborhoods
as well as from the adjacent light rail station. The
ground floor shall contain pedestrian oriented uses
including retail, eating and drinking establishments,
and artisan businesses. Restaurant uses shall not
exceed more than 35% of the commercial space.
Office uses and non-pedestrian oriented uses shall
be located on the upper levels. The open areas
of the project shall include outdoor dining and an
open air courtyard with community oriented uses
such as live music, farmers markets and fashion
events.
2. Allowed Uses and Permit
Requirements
The following is a complete list of uses that shall be
allowed within the Platform Comprehensive Plan.
PERMIT REQUIREMENT
P - Permitted Use
AUP - Administrative Use Permit
(2)
CUP - Conditional Use Permit
(2)
Alcoholic beverage sales AUP 17.400.015.B
Artisan shops P
Automated teller machines (ATMs) P 17.400.025
Banks and financial services
(6)
P
Bars, night clubs CUP
Broadcast studios
(5)
P
General retail stores P
Health/fitness facilities
(5)
CUP
Indoor amusement/entertainment facilities P
Internet Café P
Media production – Indoor support facilities
(5)
P
Medical services – Office/Clinics
(5)
P
Offices
(5)
P
Outdoor retail sales and display
(3)
AUP 17.400.075
Parking facilities P
Personal services
(6)
P
Pet shop P
Public recreational and cultural facilities P
Restaurants P
Restaurants, outdoor dining P
Specialized schools
(4)(6)
AUP
Studios – art, dance, music, photography, etc. P
Telecommunications facilities, cellular
(5)
AUP 17.400.010
Theaters P
LAND USE
(1)
SEE SPECIFIC USE
REGULATIONS OF
THE ZONING CODE
ATTACHMENT 3
58Page 15
3. Allowed Special Events and Temporary Events
The following types of special events and temporary events, either
outdoor or indoor, public or private shall be permitted to take place
within the open central courtyard area or the rooftop level of the two
parking structure(s) subject to the provisions of Zoning Code Chapter
17.520 “Temporary Use, Special Event, and Temporary Event Per-
mits” and as outlined below:
1. Markets and Fairs: Events including farmers markets (food,
flower and crafts), food events, arts and craft fairs, small sporting
events (i.e. bocce ball, ping pong), incidental to the center (no seating
necessary) shall be allowed up to 52 days per calendar year subject
to review and approval by the Planning Division. A special event per-
mit may be required for these types of events as determined by the
Planning Manager. These types of events shall be subject to a con-
formance review with the adopted Comprehensive Plan and approval
by the Planning Division prior to the event taking place. Conditions of
approval may be placed on the special event to ensure conformance
with the standards contained herein, compatibility with adjacent uses,
and compliance with any other applicable City requirements for spe-
cial events.
2. Performances and Public Events: Events including carnivals,
concerts, live entertainment, fashion shows, movie screenings and
other similar events designed to attract a large crowd and involves
seating for the public shall be allowed up to 24 days per calendar
year. These events must demonstrate provisions of adequate park-
ing. A special events permit is required for these types of events.
Conditions of approval may be placed on the special event to en-
sure conformance with the standards contained herein, compatibility
with adjacent uses, and compliance with any other applicable City
requirements for special events.
3. Private Events: Events that are privately held including wed-
dings and banquets shall be allowed up to 24 days per calendar year.
Fashion show event.
PERMITTED USES - COURTYARD SPACE
These events must demonstrate provisions of adequate park-
ing and must be held when office uses are not in operation (i.e.
weekday evenings or weekends). A special events permit is
required for these types of events. Conditions of approval may
be placed on the special event to ensure conformance with the
standards contained herein, compatibility with adjacent uses,
and compliance with any other applicable City requirements
for special events.
ATTACHMENT 3
59Page 16
2,000 sq ft
Third Floor
Roof Top
Dining
500 sq ft
10'-0"
9'-6'
7'-8"
10'-0"
600 sq ft
250 sq ft
600 sq ft
315 sq ft
500 sq ft
600 sq ft
PROPERTY LINE PROPERTY LINE
4. Outdoor Dining
Outdoor dining is key contributor to the interactive
pedestrian atmosphere which will stimulate the shopping
experience. Areas have been identified, as shown on the
following diagram, where outdoor dining may take place.
Multiple areas are open to Washington Boulevard further
activating the pedestrian orientation and environment
along this frontage.
The following diagram highlights the allowable areas for
outdoor dining.
Design and Operational Standards
• An unobstructed minimum 4 foot (4’-0”) clear wide
pedestrian pathway shall be maintained at all times
between the outside boundary of any outdoor dining areas
and any obstruction.
• The design of furniture, barriers and equipment
to be used within any outdoor dining area shall be high
quality and harmonious and compatible with the overall
architecture of the project as well as any site furniture
provided by the development.
• No additional canopies, trellises, or awnings are
permitted. Inclement weather enclosures shall be allowed
provided the enclosure is constructed of clear glass
folding or stacking panels that can be stored unobtrusively
within the interior of the tenant space. Plastic or acrylic
enclosures of any kind shall not be permitted.
• Umbrellas shall have a minimum vertical clearance
of 6’8” and shall not exceed a maximum height of 13’-0”.
• Portable heaters are subject to prior Landlord and
City approval and shall be of uniform design. They shall
not project beyond the limit of the outdoor dining area
and shall require written approval of the City of Culver City
Fire Marshal prior to placement.
• Establishments that serve alcoholic beverages in
the outdoor dining area shall provide a physical barrier.
No barrier is required if alcohol will not be served. Barriers
shall not exceed three feet-six inches (3’-6”) in height. All
barrier systems shall maintain at least 70% transparency.
• All outdoor dining areas shall be accessible to the
disabled in accordance with ADA standards.
• Outdoor dining areas shall be operated in a manner
PERMITTED USES - OUTDOOR DINING
Potential outdoor dining
Pedestrian Zone
that meets all requirements of the Los Angeles County Health Department.
• The outdoor dining area shall be kept clear of litter, food scraps, and soiled dishes and
utensils at all times. Trash receptacles shall be provided in outdoor dining areas used for
consuming take-out items.
Review Process
All proposed outdoor dining areas shall be subject to a conformance review with the adopted
Comprehensive Plan and approval by the Planning Division prior to installation and operation.
Conditions of approval may be placed on outdoor dining areas to ensure conformance with the
standards contained herein, compatibility with adjacent uses, and any other applicable City
requirements.
ATTACHMENT 3
60Page 17
D. ADMINISTRATION
Relationship to Other Regulations
This Comprehensive Plan provides policies, standards
and regulations guiding the development the project
identified in Section 01, Project Description. Specif-
ic topics not otherwise addressed or provided in this
Comprehensive Plan shall be governed by the Culver
City Municipal Code. No provision of this Comprehen-
sive Plan is intended to repeal, abrogate, annul, im-
pair, or interfere with any existing ordinance, resolu-
tions, or policy except: a) as specifically repealed by
the adoptions of this Comprehensive Plan; or b) where
this Comprehensive Plan’s provisions are more precise
or restrictive than the existing Municipal Code.
Where provisions of this Comprehensive Plan impose
more restrictive regulations than required by any other
ordinance, resolution or policy, the provisions of this
Comprehensive Plan shall govern.
Amendments
Modifications to the Comprehensive Plan shall be pursu-
ant to the Culver City Zoning Code, Section 17.560.025 –
Comprehensive Plan Modifications, Major and Minor or as
amended.
ADMINISTRATION
ATTACHMENT 3
61Page 18
SUSTAINABILITY
03
ATTACHMENT 3
62Page 19
SUSTAINABILITY
Energy saving and sustainable design is integral to the project.
It is incorporated throughout in the building systems and in the
choice of materials. The project incorporates green building
design in many ways as demonstrated in the list below, which
is categorized into three main categories: conservation; energy
efficiency; carbon emission reduction
Conservation:
In an effort to promote the conservation, reduction, reuse, and
recycling of renewable and non-renewable resources Platform is
actively participating in this endeavor by adopting the following:
• Saving existing structures for adaptive re-use where possible,
such as the renovated Building C, the refurbished Parking
Structure (Building D) and the modified warehouse (Building
F).
• Recycling of building materials during demolition of existing
structures.
• Using non-wood alternatives for exposed wood products
such as Resysta (simulated wood manufactured from rice
husks) in the wood decks.
• Using local manufactured and recycled products where
possible.
• Storm Water Filtration systems.
• Permeable exterior paving surfaces to reduce storm water
run-off
Energy Efficiency:
Below is a list of energy efficient and sustainable specifications
that have been used and incorporated into Platform:
• Photovoltaic electricity generation
• Low flow fixtures and low consumption urinals
• Landscape with drought tolerant vegetation
• Green-screen walls systems
• Living green walls to promote thermal stability
• Irrigation timers with rain sensors
• Dual low emissivity Glazing
• High reflective roof material
• High efficiency heating and air conditioning systems
View from Metro Train towards project
(RENDERING FOR ILLUSTRATIVE PURPOSES ONLY)
Carbon emission reduction:
Below is a list of Carbon emission reduction elements that have
been incorporated into Platform:
• Bicycle racks spread out throughout the site and bicycle facilities
that include safe lockable areas and bathroom and showers
facilities. Employees and office workers will have electronic card
access to these facilities to promote riding to work.
• Washington Boulevard will be widened to incorporate a new
bicycle lane.
• Developer participation in the start up of a shuttle service that
will loop from the Hayden Tract to the Expo Station and Platform
and then to Downtown Culver City.
• Preferred parking for low emission vehicles and carpool vehicles.
SUSTAINABILITY
ATTACHMENT 3
63Page 20
SITE
04
ATTACHMENT 3
64Page 21
AERIAL VIEW
SITE
SITE
The project site is located at the intersection of
Washington Boulevard and National Boulevard
adjacent to the newly constructed Metro light rail
EXPO line, within 500 feet of the Culver City Expo
station.
It is formed by five tied parcels encompassing 2.06
acres, and abuts commercial warehouses.
The site was previously occupied by automotive sales
and services uses. The project is rehabilitating and
reusing parts of the existing building (i.e. a warehouse
and repair shop).
Railroads and trains have had a long history with the
site. The corridor of the Expo Line has been historically
utilized by The Pacific Electric Railway.
ATTACHMENT 3
65Page 22
SITE PLAN OF EXISTING BUILDINGS
View of Landmark Site.
View looking South East from Washington Blvd.
EXISTING TO BE
DEMOLISHED
EXISTING TO
REMAIN
View looking South East towards future courtyard entrance.
ATTACHMENT 3
66016' 32' 64'
Scale: 1” = 40’
TRUE
NORTH
Page 23
SITE PLAN
D
E
F A
C
B
A
KEY PLAN
L
C
L
P
L
C
L
C
L
P
L
P L
P
L
P
L
P
L
P
L
P
L
P
C
L
P
L
30'-0" 20'-0" 10'-3"
10'-0" 10'-3"
5'-0"
7'-1 3/4"
4'-4" 8'-0" 20'-0"
8'-0" 8'-9"
30'-2" 20'-0' 11'-10"
20'-0" 5'-0" 11'-10"
108'-1"
160'-10" 104'-11"
118'-11 3/4" 66'-6 3/4"
113'-3" 46'-8 3/4"
154'-5"
89'-4 1/2" 12'-4" 45'-1" 53'-11"
57'-7 3/4" 28'-7 3/4" 21'-7"
21'-7 1/2"
19'-6"
107'-10 1/4"
3'-3"
14'-5 1/2"
5'-0"
5'-0" 6"
40'-0" 10'-0" 10-3"
5'-0"
5'-9 1/2"
40'-0" 10'-0" 9'-10"
11'-11"
45'-1" 53'-11" 18'-7" 69'-8" 124'-8"
EMPLOYEE
BIKE
SHOWERS
STAIR
TRASH
COMPACTOR
TRASH/RECYCLING
AREA
BIKE LOCKERS
RECYCLING
EXISTING CURB LINE
TO BE DEMOLISHED
EXISTING CURB LINE
TO BE DEMOLISHED
EXISTING PROPERTY-
LINE, TO BE MOVED
NEW PROPERTYLINE
2 STORY
EXISTING SCHOOL
BUILDING
WASHINGTON BOULEVARD
LANDMARK STREET
2 STORY
EXISTING SCHOOL
BUILDING
1 STORY
EXISTING
WAREHOUSE
BUILDING
RETAIL
RESTAURANT/
RETAIL
ELEV.
STAIR
RETAIL
RETAIL
RETAIL
RETAIL
RETAIL
ELEV.
LOBBY
STAIR
WOMEN
MEN
VALET/CONCIERGE
GARAGE
UTILITY
RETAIL RETAIL
UTILITY
INACCESSIBLE
EXTERIOR SPACE
PARKING
RETAIL
RESTAURANT/RETAIL
STAIR
LOBBY
UTILITY
SCE.
TRANS.
ELEV.
SCE
TRANS.
ELEV. ELEV.
LOADING
AREA
RESTAURANT/
RETAIL
MECH.
NEW BUS SHELTER SIZE, SHAPE,
FORM, AND FINAL LOCATION TO
BE DETERMINED IN
COORDINATION WITH THE CITY
RETAIL RETAIL RETAIL
STAIR
ELEV.
STAIR
RETAIL
ELEV.
MECH. MECH.
M.
RETAIL
FAMILY
RETAIL
UTILITY
MEN
WO-
MEN
9'-7 3/4"
ATTACHMENT 3
67016' 32' 64'
Scale: 1” = 5’
NOTE:
Street furniture shall be consistent with
the City’s Transit Oriented Development
District Streetscape Plan.
Final location, type, and size of tree wells
to be determined by the City prior to
building permit issuance.
TRUE
NORTH
Page 24
TYPICAL TREE WELL DETAIL
D
E
F A
C
B
A
KEY PLAN
2’ 0 4’ 8’
6" 5'-6" 4'-0"
2'-8" 5'-4" 2'-8" 6"
1'-6" MIN 4'-1" 5" 1'-6" MIN 4'-1" 1'-6" MIN 4'-1" 5"
2'-3" 2'-6"
1'-6"
2'-3" 2'-6"
6" 5'-6" 4'-0"
10'-0"
10'-0"
PERVIOUS CONCRETE
TREE STAKING
ROOT BARRIER
STREET TREE
TREE WELL
PERVIOUS CONCRETE
CURB AND GUTTER
BENCH
PCC SIDEWALK
R/W
BICYCLE RACK
GRASS PLANTER
CURB AND GUTTER
PCC SIDEWALK
R/W
BICYCLE RACK
TRASH/
RECYCLING
RECEPTABLE
WASHINGTON BOULEVARD
ATTACHMENT 3
68016' 32' 64'
Scale: 1” = 40’
TRUE
NORTH
P
L
C
L L
L L L L L
P P P P P P P P P P
L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L
L L L L L L
P P P P
L L L L L L
P
L
P
L L
L L
10'-3"
10'-3"
20'-0" 5'-0" 11'-10"
108'-1"
160'-10"
113'-3"
154'-5"
57'-7 3/4" 28'-7 3/4" 21'-7"
21'-7 1/2"
19'-6"
3'-3"
5'-0"
10-3"
5'-0"
5'-9 1/2"
11'-11"
EMPLOYEE
BIKE
SHOWERS
STAIR
TRASH/RECYCLING
AREA
BIKE E E KE KE LOCKERS S RS RS RS ER KE KE CK CK OC OC O LO LO L
RECYCLING
NEW PROPERTYLINE
EXISTING
WAREHOUSE
BUILDING
RETAIL
RESTAURANT/
RETAIL
ELEV. .
STAIR
RETAIL
RETAIL
RETAIL
RETAIL
ELEV.
LOBBY
UTILITY
RETAIL RETAIL
UTILITY
INACCESSIBLE L SIB
EXTERIOR SPACE
PARKING
RETAIL
RESTAURANT/RETAIL
STAIR
UTILITY
V ELEV V V V V. . . ELEV. .
LOADING
AREA
RESTAURANT/
RETAIL
RETAIL RETAIL
STAIR R
STAIR
RETAIL
V V V V ELEV V.
MECH. MECH H H CH. .
M.
RETAIL
UTILITY
9'-7 3/4"
Page 25
SITE ELEVATION
30'-2"
'-0"
'-0"
EXISTING CURB LINE
TO BE DEMOLISHED
EXISTING CURB LINE
TO BE DEMOLISHED
EXISTING PROPERTY-
LINE, TO BE MOVED
NEW BUS SHELTER SIZE, SHAPE,
FORM, AND FINAL LOCATION TO
BE DETERMINED IN
ATTACHMENT 3
69Page 26
BUILDING A
05
ATTACHMENT 3
70Page 27
BUILDING A
This four story building consists of ground floor
retail with three stories of office above. The
ground floor retail opens onto the wide sidewalk
on Washington Boulevard as well as the central
interior courtyard and paseo.
The building is split into two separate buildings on
the lower levels allowing pedestrians to enter the
project site at multiple locations along Washington
Boulevard. The two building sides are connected
by sky-bridges, to accommodate the building
circulation while introducing more light into the
newly created open air atrium space.
The retail is detailed in textured, warm colored
metals and glass. It is an inviting palette designed
to enhance the trees and plants found in the
courtyard.
The upper stories cantilever out overhead and
offers protection from the weather.
Above the retail spaces are three stories of office
spaces. The design of the buildings above is
meant to reference the site’s location along the
Red Car line by referencing a series of stacked
box cars. The individual units combine to create
a harmonious and varied facade. The stacking of
the box cars provides visual relief to the building
mass.
View of Building A
BUILDING A
TRUE
NORTH
D
E
FA
C
B
A
KEY PLAN
ATTACHMENT 3
71Scale: 1” = 20’
0’ 10’ 20’ 40’
Page 28
TRUE
NORTH
D
E
FA
C
B
A
KEY PLAN BUILDING A: FIRST FLOOR PLAN
1 1
62'-11 1/2"
10-3" 4' 11'-5 3/4" 28'-2" 18'-11"
142'-2" 5'-2" 3'-3"
18'-5"
18'-7"
147'-10"
3'-10"
64'-11 1/2"
4' 11'-5 3/4" 28'-1 3/4" 20'-11 1/4" 4 1/2" 10'-3"
3' 24' 23'-6" 5'-1 1/2" 19'-4 1/2" 21' 24' 24'
LINE OF FLOOR ABOVE, TYP.
LINE OF FLOOR ABOVE, TYP.
ELEV.
ELEV.
L L
L
L
Restaurant/Retail
3,020 sq ft
Retail
2,428 sq ft
Retail
1,681 sq ft
Mech
A: 196 sq ft
Mech
A: 160 sq ft|10101010101010|P P
P
P
Stair
A: 340 sq ft
Stair
A: 343 sq ft
ATTACHMENT 3
72Scale: 1” = 20’
Page 29
TRUE
NORTH
D
E
FA
C
B
A
KEY PLAN
BUILDING A: SECOND FLOOR PLAN
0’ 10’ 20’ 40’
1 1
72'-11 1/4"
18'-10 1/4" 7'-4 3/4" 18'-10 1/4" 8'-11 3/4" 18'-10 1/4"
72'-11 1/4"
5'-3 1/4" 24'-1" 18'-10 1/4" 11'-1 3/4" 18'-10 1/4"
6'-9" 55'-8 3/4" 17'-3" 74'-11 3/4" 4'-3"
158'-11 1/4"
17'-11"
14'-7 3/4"
65'-9" 14'-3 3/4" 75'-11 1/4"
158'-11 1/4"
9'-3 1/4" 24' 24' 24' 21' 24' 24' 5'-8 3/4"
LINE OF FLOOR ABOVE, TYP.
OPEN TO
BELOW
L L
Restrooms
A: 620 sq ft
Elev
A: 93 sq ft
Elev
A: 94 sq ft
Circulation
A: 175 sq ft
Circulation
A: 177 sq ft|10101010101010|P P
Stair
A: 226 sq ft
Office
A: 4,890 sq ft
Office
A: 3,200 sq ft
Stair
A: 226 sq ft
ATTACHMENT 3
73Scale: 1” = 20’
Page 30
TRUE
NORTH
D
E
FA
C
B
A
KEY PLAN BUILDING A: THIRD FLOOR PLAN
0’ 10’ 20’ 40’
1 1
67'-8 1/2"
18' 9'-1 1/4" 18'-2 1/4" 4'-2 3/4" 18'-2 1/4"
2'-1 1/4" 90'-3/4" 9'-11 3/4" 53'-9 1/4"
153'-10"
18'-2 1/4" 8'-4 1/4" 18'-2 1/4" 4'-11 3/4" 18'
67'-8 1/2"
154'-5 1/4"
62'-4" 16'-2 3/4" 75'-3 1/4" 7 1/4"
10'-1/2" 24' 24' 23'-6" 21'-6" 24' 24'
8'-1/4"
LINE OF FLOOR BELOW, TYP.
OPEN TO
BELOW
OPEN TO
BELOW
L L
Elev
A: 94 sq ft
Elev
A: 94 sq ft
Circulation
A: 176 sq ft
Circulation
A: 177 sq ft
Restrooms
A: 479 sq ft|10101010101010|P P
Stair
A: 226 sq ft
Office
A: 7,828 sq ft
Stair
A: 226 sq ft
ATTACHMENT 3
74Scale: 1” = 20’
0’ 10’ 20’ 40’
Page 31
TRUE
NORTH
D
E
FA
C
B
A
KEY PLAN
BUILDING A: FOURTH FLOOR PLAN
1 1
3'-2 3/4" 24' 24' 24' 21' 24' 24' 4'-4 3/4"
4'-3" 41'-9 3/4" 9'-3/4" 97'-8 3/4" 1'-7"
154'-5 1/4"
1'-7" 61'-8 3/4" 21'-1/4" 66'-3 1/4" 3'-10"
154'-5 1/4"
72'-11 3/4"
72'-11 1/2"
5'-3" 18'-10 1/4" 5'-2 3/4" 18'-10 1/4" 11'-2" 18'-10 1/4"
18'-10 1/4" 7'-4 3/4" 18'-10 1/4" 8'-9 1/2" 19'-1"
OPEN TO
BELOW
OPEN TO
BELOW
L L
Elev
A: 93 sq ft
Elev
A: 94 sq ft
Circulation
A: 177 sq ft
Circulation
A: 177 sq ft
Restrooms
A: 509 sq ft
Circ.
A: 77 sq ft|10101010101010|P P
Stair
A: 229 sq ft
Office
A: 5,043 sq ft
Stair
A: 228 sq ft
Office
A: 3,149 sq ft
ATTACHMENT 3
75Scale: 1” = 20’
0’ 10’ 20’ 40’
Page 32
TRUE
NORTH
D
E
FA
C
B
A
KEY PLAN BUILDING A: ROOF PLAN
1 1
4'-3" 41'-9 3/4" 9'-3/4" 97'-8 3/4" 1'-7"
154'-5 1/4"
154'-5 1/4"
1'-7" 62'-3/4" 20'-8 1/4" 66'-3 1/4"
72'-11 3/4"
72'-11 1/2"
18'-5"
24'-2 3/4"
18'-10 1/4" 5'-2 3/4" 18'-10 1/4" 11'-2" 18'-10 1/4"
18'-10 1/4" 7'-4 3/4" 18'-10 1/4" 8'-9 1/2" 19'-1"
PHOTOVOLTAIC PANEL TYP.
SCREEN FOR HVAC UNITS
HVAC EQUIPMENT TYP.
PHOTOVOLTAIC PANEL TYP.
SCREEN FOR HVAC UNITS
HVAC EQUIPMENT TYP.
OPEN TO
BELOW|10101010101010|48'-4 3/4"
ATTACHMENT 3
76Scale: 1” = 20’
0’ 10’ 20’ 40’
Photovoltaic Panels
Stucco - “Iron Fixture”
(DE6384) Paint Finish
Vertical Corrugated Metal
Siding - “Iron Fixture”
(DE6384) Paint Finish
Vertical Corrugated Metal
Siding - “Lunar Landing”
(DE6241) Paint Finish
Vertical Corrugated Metal
Siding -“Watermist”
(DE6240) Paint Finish
Blue Patina Metal Panel
Steel Guardrail “Iron
Fixture” (DE6384) Paint
Finish
Low-E Glazing, Typ.|101010101010101010|Page 33
+16' +16'
2nd Floor 2nd Floor
+29' +29'
3rd Floor 3rd Floor
+42' +42'
4th Floor 4th Floor
+55'-6" +55'-6"
Roof Roof
+65' +65'
Parapet Staircase Parapet Staircase
+0"
1st Floor
+0.33'
1st Floor
-6"
Adjacent Grade
16' 13' 13'
55'-6"
15'-8 1/4" 11'-11 3/4" 13' 14'-6 1/4" 9'-6"
13'-6"
37'-6 3/4" 53'-7 3/4"
56'
6"
BUILDING A ELEVATIONS
North Elevation
South Elevation
1 2 4 8 3 5 6
+16' +16'
2nd Floor 2nd Floor
+29' +29'
3rd Floor 3rd Floor
+42' +42'
4th Floor 4th Floor
+55'-6" +55'-6"
Roof Roof
+65' +65'
Parapet Staircase Parapet Staircase
16'-5 1/4" 13' 13' 13'-6"
13'-6"
37'-6 3/4" 53'-7 3/4"
55'-6"
56'
+0"
1st Floor
+0.33'
1st Floor
13' 13'
6"
15'-6 1/2"
*DISTANCE TO PROPERTY LINE VARIES PER PLANS
*DISTANCE TO PROPERTY LINE VARIES PER PLANS
1 2 7|1010|4 8 3 5 6
ATTACHMENT 3
77Scale: 1” = 20’
0’ 10’ 20’ 40’
Photovoltaic Panels
Stucco - “Iron Fixture”
(DE6384) Paint Finish
Vertical Corrugated Metal
Siding - “Iron Fixture”
(DE6384) Paint Finish
Vertical Corrugated Metal
Siding - “Lunar Landing”
(DE6241) Paint Finish
Vertical Corrugated Metal
Siding -“Watermist”
(DE6240) Paint Finish
Blue Patina Metal Panel
Steel Guardrail “Iron
Fixture” (DE6384) Paint
Finish
Low-E Glazing, Typ.|101010101010101010|+16'
2nd Floor
+29'
3rd Floor
+42'
4th Floor
+55'-6"
Roof
+65'
Parapet Staircase
+0"
1st Floor
16' 13' 13'
55'-6"
13'-6" 4'-8"
5'-3" 20' 23'-9 3/4"
55'-10"
56'
P L
16' 13' 13' 13'-6"
+16'
2nd Floor
+29'
3rd Floor
+42'
4th Floor
+55'-6"
Roof
+65'
Parapet Staircase
55'-2 1/4" 9'-6"
13' 13' 13'-6" 4'-8"
20' 5'-3" 23'-9 3/4"
P L
+0.33'
1st Floor
15'-8 1/4" 13' 13' 13'-6"
55'-2"
15'-8"
Page 34
BUILDING A ELEVATIONS
East Elevation
West Elevation
1 2 4 8 3 5 6
1 2 4 8 3 5 6
*DISTANCE TO PROPERTY LINE VARIES PER PLANS
*DISTANCE TO PROPERTY LINE VARIES PER PLANS
ATTACHMENT 3
78Scale: 1” = 20’
0’ 10’ 20’ 40’
Photovoltaic Panels
Stucco - “Iron Fixture”
(DE6384) Paint Finish
Vertical Corrugated Metal
Siding - “Iron Fixture”
(DE6384) Paint Finish
Vertical Corrugated Metal
Siding - “Lunar Landing”
(DE6241) Paint Finish
Vertical Corrugated Metal
Siding -“Watermist”
(DE6240) Paint Finish
Blue Patina Metal Panel
Steel Guardrail “Iron
Fixture” (DE6384) Paint
Finish
Low-E Glazing, Typ.|101010101010101010|Page 35
+16' +16'
2nd Floor 2nd Floor
+29' +29'
3rd Floor 3rd Floor
+42' +42'
4th Floor 4th Floor
+55'-6" +55'-6"
Roof Roof
+65' +65'
Parapet Staircase Parapet Staircase
5'-3" 20' 23'-9 3/4"
13' 13' 13'-6" 15'-7 1/4" 9'-6"
55'-2"
55'-2"
P L
+0.33' +0.33'
1st Floor 1st Floor
15'-8" 13' 13' 13'-6" 4'-8"
OFFICE
OFFICE OFFICE
CE
+16'
2nd Floor
+29'
3rd Floor
+42'
4th Floor
+55'-6"
Roof
+65'
Parapet Staircase
55'-2 1/4" 4'-8"
13' 13' 13'-6"
15'-8" 13' 13' 13'-6"
20' 5'-3" 23'-9 3/4"
15'-8"
P L
+0.33'
1st Floor
55'-2"
OFFICE
OFFICE
BUILDING A ELEVATIONS
Elevation Section 4
Elevation Section 3
1 8 2 4 3 5 6 7
1 8 2 4 3 5 6 7
*DISTANCE TO PROPERTY LINE VARIES PER PLANS
*DISTANCE TO PROPERTY LINE VARIES PER PLANS
ATTACHMENT 3
79Page 36
BUILDING A MATERIAL BOARD
Photovoltaic Panels
Vertical Corrugated Metal Siding - “Iron Fixture”
(DE6384) Paint Finish
Vertical Corrugated Metal Siding - “Lunar Landing”
(DE6241) Paint Finish
Steel Guardrail “Iron
Fixture” (DE6384) Paint
Finish
Low-E Glazing, Typ. Stucco - “Iron Fixture”
(DE6384) Paint Finish
Blue Patina Metal Panel
Vertical Corrugated Metal Siding -“Watermist”
(DE6240) Paint Finish
Blue Patina Metal Panel
ATTACHMENT 3
80Page 37
BUILDING A MATERIAL BOARD
Vertical Corrugated Metal Siding
Steel Guardrail “Iron Fixture”
(DE6384) Paint Finish
Low-E Glazing, Typ.
ATTACHMENT 3
81Scale: 1” = 20’
Section 1
Section 2
0’ 10’ 20’ 40’
Page 38
BUILDING A SECTIONS
+16' +16'
2nd Floor 2nd Floor
+29' +29'
3rd Floor 3rd Floor
+42' +42'
4th Floor 4th Floor
+55'-6" +55'-6"
Roof Roof
+65' +65'
Parapet Staircase Parapet Staircase
55'-6"
31'-8"
47'-3"
+0"
1st Floor
+0.33'
1st Floor
16' 13' 13' 13'-6" 9'-6"
15'-8" 13' 13' 13'-6" 9'-6"
OFFICE
OFFICE
OFFICE
RETAIL /
RESTAURANT
RETAIL
OFFICE
OFFICE
OFFICE
+16' +16'
2nd Floor 2nd Floor
+29' +29'
3rd Floor 3rd Floor
+42' +42'
4th Floor 4th Floor
+55'-6" +55'-6"
Roof Roof
+65' +65'
Parapet Staircase Parapet Staircase
13' 13' 13'-6"
19'-7 3/4" 23'-5 3/4"
4'-8" 4'-10"
4'-10"
55'-2 1/4"
P L
+0.33' +0.33'
1st Floor 1st Floor
55'-2" 9'-6"
15'-8"
15'-8 1/4" 13' 13' 13'-6"
OFFICE
OFFICE
OFFICE
RESTAURANT/RETAIL
OFFICE
OFFICE
OFFICE
ATTACHMENT 3
82Page 39
BUILDING B
06
ATTACHMENT 3
83Page 40
BUILDING B
This building is a 5 story parking structure with
retail and restaurant space on the ground floor.
The retail and restaurant space faces Washington
Boulevard and partially turns the corner to open
up onto Landmark Street. The retail is detailed in
a natural material selection consisting of wood,
glass, and metal. The retail façades undulate in
and out with store front windows flanked by solid
wood elements.
The controlled entry to the parking structure is
off of Landmark Street. From this entrance,
access is provided to five stories of parking with
219 parking spaces. On the ground floor of the
parking structure is secure bicycle parking and
a designated loading area for deliveries needed
to service the retail uses. Trash and recycling are
also housed in a gated and protected area. The
façade on Washington Boulevard, while open for
natural ventilation, is accented with two pop-out
glass art display studios. The Landmark Street
façade is designed as a wall with a series of
varying punched openings that add interest to this
elevation and serve to allow natural ventilation to
flow through the building.
View of Building B
BUILDING B
TRUE
NORTH
D
E
FA
C
B
A
KEY PLAN
ATTACHMENT 3
84Page 41
10" 8'-6" 8'-6" 8'-6" 5'-4" 8'-6" 8'-6" 8'-6" 7'-6" 8'-6" 8'-6" 8'-6"
9' 9' 8'-10" 9' 9' 5' 9'
30"
30" 30" 30"
30"
18' 33'-4" 18' 4'
4' 18' 29'-4"
124'-6"
12'-10" 100'-10 1/4"
115'-7 1/4"
44'-7 1/4"
1' 10' 2'-6" 10' 1' 4'-11"
25' 1'-6"
6'-6" 12'-6" 6'
8'-9"
11'-10"
9'-9 3/4"
7'-11" CMU WALL
4'-9" CMU WALL
ROLL-UP
SECURITY
GATE ABOBE|1010|9.
CLEAN AIR
VEHICLE
CLEAN AIR
VEHICLE
CLEAN AIR
VEHICLE
CLEAN AIR
VEHICLE
CLEAN AIR
VEHICLE
CLEAN AIR
VEHICLE
TEMP
LOADING
ONLY
TEMP
LOADING
ONLY
TEMP
LOADING
ONLY
VAN VAN 7
7.9%
SLOPE
6"
WHEELSTOP
ELEV. ELEV.
ELEV.
MECH.
ROOM
L L
L
L
11.25%
SLOPE
5.25%
SLOPE
6.9%
SLOPE
Trans-
former
Parking
A: 10,711 sq ft
Stair
A: 208 sq ft
Utility
A: 243 sq ft
Trash/
Recycling
A: 329 sq ft
Utility
A: 947 sq ft
Restaurant/Retail
2,400 sq ft
Retail
800 sq ft
Utility
A: 193 sq ft
Elev. Lobby
A: 415 sq ft
Retail
1,260 sq ft
Utility
A: 574 sq ft
Restrooms
A: 170 sq ft|1010101010|3 3
11'-11" 150'-7"
BIKE
LOCKERS
P P
P
P
Stair
A: 235 sq ft
TRUE
NORTH
D
E
FA
C
B
A
KEY PLAN BUILDING B: FIRST FLOOR PLAN
Scale: 1” = 20’
0’ 10’ 20’ 40’
16 Parking Stalls
ATTACHMENT 3
85Page 42
25'
116'-1 1/4"
18' 27' 18'
8'-6" 8'-6" 8'-6"
3'-2"
8'-6" 8'-6" 8'-6"
8'-6" 8'-6" 8'-6"
3'-2"
8'-6" 8'-6"
8'-6" 8'-6" 8'-6"
3'-2"
8'-6" 8'-6" 8'-6"
3'-2"
8'-6" 8'-6" 8'-6" 9'
8'-6" 8'-6" 8'-6"
3'-2"
8'-6" 8'-6" 8'-6" 3'-2" 8'-6"
8'-6" 8'-6"
3'-2"
8'-6" 8'-6" 8'-6"
3'-2"
8'-6" 8'-6" 8'-6"
3'-2"
8'-6" 8'-6" 8'-6" 8'-6" 3'-2" 8'-6"
18' 27' 18'
18'
46'-7 3/4"
18'-2 1/4" 119'-4 1/4" 8'
2'-3" 2'-6"
1'
2' TYP.
5' 24'-8 1/2" 70'-5 3/4"
95'-2 1/4"|1010101010|3 3
HVAC DUCT
TYP.
13|1010|9.
6.|1010|1% SLOPE
2% SLOPE
16% SLOPE 8% SLOPE 8% SLOPE
2% SLOPE
CLEAN AIR
VEHICLE
CLEAN AIR
VEHICLE
CLEAN AIR
VEHICLE
CLEAN AIR
VEHICLE
CLEAN AIR
VEHICLE
CLEAN AIR
VEHICLE
WHEELSTOP
ELEV. ELEV.
L
Elev. Lobby
A: 366 sq ft
Stair
A: 210 sq ft
Stair
A: 197 sq ft
18' 27'-6"
P
Parking
A: 18,421 sq ft
TRUE
NORTH
D
E
FA
C
B
A
KEY PLAN BUILDING B: SECOND FLOOR PLAN
Scale: 1” = 20’
0’ 10’ 20’ 40’
40 Parking Stalls
ATTACHMENT 3
86Page 43|1010101010|3 3
HVAC DUCT
TYP.
OPEN TO
BELOW
13|1010|1% SLOPE
2% SLOPE
16% SLOPE 8% SLOPE 8% SLOPE
2% SLOPE|1010|CLEAN AIR
VEHICLE
CLEAN AIR
VEHICLE
CLEAN AIR
VEHICLE|10 10|6.
WHEELSTOP
ELEV. ELEV.
CLEAN AIR
VEHICLE
CLEAN AIR
VEHICLE
CLEAN AIR
VEHICLE
CLEAN AIR
VEHICLE
CLEAN AIR
VEHICLE
L
Elev. Lobby
A: 366 sq ft
Stair
A: 210 sq ft
Stair
A: 197 sq ft
Art Display
A: 126 sq ft
18' 27' 18'
18' 27' 18'
116'-1 1/4"
8'-6" 8'-6" 8'-6"
3'-2"
8'-6" 8'-6" 8'-6"
28'-8" 8'-6" 8'-6" 8'-6"
3'-2"
8'-6" 8'-6" 8'-6"
18' 27'-6"
8'-6" 8'-6" 8'-6"
3'-2"
8'-6" 8'-6" 8'-6" 3'-2" 8'-6"
8'-6" 8'-6" 8'-6"
3'-2"
8'-6" 8'-6"
18'
8'-6" 8'-6"
3'-2"
8'-6" 8'-6" 8'-6"
3'-2"
8'-6" 8'-6" 8'-6"
3'-2"
8'-6" 8'-6" 8'-6" 8'-6" 3'-2" 8'-6"
46'-7 3/4"
2'-6" 2'-3"
2' TYP.
118'-1/4" 8'-8"
5'-8" 24'-1/2" 70'-5 3/4"
9 1/4"
94'-6 1/4"
P
Parking
A: 17,924 sq ft
TRUE
NORTH
D
E
FA
C
B
A
KEY PLAN BUILDING B: THIRD FLOOR PLAN
Scale: 1” = 20’
0’ 10’ 20’ 40’
40 Parking Stalls
ATTACHMENT 3
87Page 44|1010101010|3 3
9 1/4"
HVAC DUCT
TYP.
13|1010|1% SLOPE
2% SLOPE
16% SLOPE 8% SLOPE 8% SLOPE
2% SLOPE|1010|OPEN TO
BELOW
CLEAN AIR
VEHICLE
CLEAN AIR
VEHICLE
CLEAN AIR
VEHICLE
CLEAN AIR
VEHICLE
CLEAN AIR
VEHICLE
CLEAN AIR
VEHICLE
6.
WHEELSTOP
ELEV. ELEV.
6.
L
Elev. Lobby
A: 366 sq ft
Stair
A: 210 sq ft
Stair
A: 197 sq ft
Art Studio
A: 450 sq ft
18' 27' 18'
8'-6"
8'-6"
18' 27' 18'
8'-6" 8'-6" 8'-6"
3'-2"
8'-6" 8'-6" 8'-6"
8'-6" 8'-6" 8'-6"
3'-2"
8'-6" 8'-6"
8'-6" 8'-6" 8'-6"
3'-2"
8'-6" 8'-6" 8'-6"
27'-6"
8'-6" 8'-6" 8'-6"
3'-2"
8'-6" 8'-6" 8'-6" 3'-2" 8'-6"
18'
8'-6" 8'-6"
3'-2"
8'-6" 8'-6" 8'-6"
3'-2"
8'-6" 8'-6" 8'-6"
3'-2"
8'-6" 8'-6" 8'-6" 8'-6" 3'-2" 8'-6"
116'-1 1/4"
46'-7 3/4"
2'-6" 2'-3"
2' TYP.
2'-4"
5'-8" 24'-1/2" 70'-5 3/4"
94'-6 1/4"
18'-10 1/4" 118'-1/4" 8'-8"
P
Parking
A: 17,568 sq ft
TRUE
NORTH
D
E
FA
C
B
A
KEY PLAN BUILDING B: FOURTH FLOOR PLAN
37 Parking Stalls
Scale: 1” = 20’
0’ 10’ 20’ 40’
ATTACHMENT 3
88Page 45|1010101010|3 3
116'-1 1/4"
46'-7 3/4"
9 1/4"
HVAC DUCT
TYP.
13|1010|1% SLOPE
2% SLOPE
16% SLOPE 8% SLOPE 8% SLOPE
2% SLOPE|1010|OPEN TO
BELOW
7.
6.
WHEELSTOP
ELEV. ELEV.
L
Elev. Lobby
A: 366 sq ft
Stair
A: 210 sq ft
Stair
A: 197 sq ft
18' 27' 18'
18' 27' 18'
8'-6" 8'-6" 8'-6"
3'-2"
8'-6" 8'-6" 8'-6"
8'-6" 8'-6" 8'-6"
3'-2"
8'-6" 8'-6"
8'-6" 8'-6" 8'-6"
3'-2"
8'-6" 8'-6" 8'-6" 3'-2" 8'-6"
18'
8'-6" 8'-6"
3'-2"
8'-6" 8'-6" 8'-6"
3'-2"
8'-6" 8'-6" 8'-6"
3'-2"
8'-6" 8'-6" 8'-6" 8'-6" 3'-2" 8'-6"
27'-6"
8'-6" 8'-6" 8'-6"
3'-2"
8'-6" 8'-6" 8'-6" 20'-10" 8'-6"
18'-2 1/4" 127'-4 1/4"
2'-3" 2'-6"
2' TYP.
18'
5'-8" 24'-1/2" 70'-5 3/4"
94'-6 1/4"
P
Parking
A: 17,593 sq ft
TRUE
NORTH
D
E
FA
C
B
A
KEY PLAN BUILDING B: FIFTH FLOOR PLAN
38 Parking Stalls
Scale: 1” = 20’
0’ 10’ 20’ 40’
ATTACHMENT 3
89Page 46|1010101010|3 3
18' 27' 18'
18'
27'
18'
7'-6" 7'-6" 8'-6" 8'-6" 8'-6" 8'-6" 8'-6"
8'-6" 8'-6" 8'-6" 8'-6" 8'-6" 8'-6"
28'
8'-6" 8'-6" 8'-6" 8'-6" 8'-6" 8'-6" 8'-6" 8'-6" 8'-6"
8'-6"
18'
8'-6" 8'-6" 8'-6" 8'-6" 8'-6" 8'-6" 8'-6" 8'-6" 8'-6" 8'-6" 8'-6" 14'-6"
8'-6" 8'-6" 8'-6" 8'-6" 17' 8'-6" 8'-6" 8'-6" 8'-6" 8'-6" 8'-6" 8'-6" 8'-6" 3'
94'-5 3/4" 21'-7 1/2"
18'-10 1/4" 126'-8 1/4"
2' TYP.
94'-6 1/4"
5'-8" 24'-1/2" 70'-5 3/4"
46'-7 3/4"
14
10|1010|6.
1% SLOPE
2% SLOPE
16% SLOPE 8% SLOPE
2% SLOPE
WHEELSTOP
ELEV. ELEV.
11
OPEN TO
BELOW
L
Elev. Lobby
A: 366 sq ft
Stair
A: 210 sq ft
Stair
A: 197 sq ft
HVAC DUCT
TYP.
P
Parking
A: 18,054 sq ft
TRUE
NORTH
D
E
FA
C
B
A
KEY PLAN BUILDING B: ROOF FLOOR PLAN
48 Parking Stalls
Scale: 1” = 20’
0’ 10’ 20’ 40’
ATTACHMENT 3
90Scale: 1” = 20’
54'-2 1/4" 9'-6 3/4"
17'-2 1/4" 9'-3" 9'-3" 9'-3" 9'-3"
54'-2 1/4"
Existing
Neighboring
Building
16'-10 1/4" 9'-3" 9'-3" 9'-3" 9'-3" 15'-4"
54'-1 3/4" 15'-1"
16'-10 1/4" 9'-3" 9'-3" 9'-3" 9'-3" 15'-4"
53'-5 1/4" 4'
ENTRANCE TO
54'-1 - 3/4" 15'-1"
16'-10 1/4" 9'-3" 9'-3" 9'-3" 9'-3" 15'-4"
53'-5 5 1/4" 4'
ENTRANCE ANC R NT TO
Page 47
BUILDING B ELEVATIONS
North Elevation
East Elevation
0’ 10’ 20’ 40’
Artist Mural
Merlex Stucco P100-
“Glacier White, Sta.
Barbara” Finish
Steel Grate Railing, Blue
Patina Finish
Low-E Glazing, Typ.
Concrete – Painted White
Charred Cedar Siding
Concrete- Board formed,
Black Stained
Metal Mesh Screen|101010101010101010|1 8 7 5 2 7 6
1 7 7 3 8 6 4 5
ATTACHMENT 3
9154'-2 1/4" 9'-6 3/4"
17'-2 1/4" 9'-3" 9'-3" 9'-3" 9'-3" 9'-6 3/4"
Existing Neighboring Building Line
55'-6 3/4" 4'
3'-4 1/2" 15'-2" 9'-3" 9'-3" 9'-3" 9'-3" 4'
Page 48
BUILDING B ELEVATIONS Scale: 1” = 20’
South Elevation
West Elevation
0’ 10’ 20’ 40’
9'-3" 9'-3"
4'
9'-3" 9'-3"
4'
7 8 7 3 4 2
Artist Mural
Merlex Stucco P100-
“Glacier White, Sta.
Barbara” Finish
Steel Grate Railing, Blue
Patina Finish
Low-E Glazing, Typ.
Concrete – Painted White
Charred Cedar Siding
Concrete- Board formed,
Black Stained
Metal Mesh Screen|101010101010101010|1 5 7 8 2 7 2 6
ATTACHMENT 3
92Page 49
BUILDING B MATERIAL BOARD
Artist Mural Merlex Stucco P100-
“Glacier White, Sta.
Barbara” Finish
Steel Grate Railing, Blue
Patina Finish
Low-E Glazing, Typ.
Concrete – Painted White Charred Cedar Siding Concrete- Board
formed, Black Stained
ATTACHMENT 3
93Page 50
BUILDING B MATERIAL BOARD
Metal Mesh Screen
Steel Grate Railing, Blue
Patina Finish
Low-E Glazing, Typ.
ATTACHMENT 3
94Scale: 1” = 20’
0’ 10’ 20’ 40’
Page 51
BUILDING B SECTIONS
Section 2
Section 1
EL. 68'-8"
T.O. Parapet
P L P L
+0" +0"
1st Floor 1st Floor
+17'-2 1/4" +17'-2 1/4"
2nd Fl. West Landing 2nd Fl. West Landing
+26'-5 1/4" +26'-5 1/4"
3rd Fl. West Landing 3rd Fl. West Landing
+35'-8 1/4" +35'-8 1/4"
4th Fl. West Landing 4th Fl. West Landing
+44'-11 1/4" +44'-11 1/4"
5th Fl. West Landing 5th Fl. West Landing
+54'-2 1/4" +54'-2 1/4"
6th Fl. West Landing 6th Fl. West Landing
17'-2 1/4" 9'-3" 9'-3" 9'-3" 9'-3" 5'-10"
55'-5 1/2" 4'-1/2"
16'-10 1/4" 9'-3" 9'-3" 9'-3" 9'-3" 15'-4"
P L P L
+25'-7" +25'-7"
3rd Fl. Elev. Landing 3rd Fl. Elev. Landing
+-6 1/4"
1st Floor Elev. Landing
+16'-4" +16'-4"
2nd Fl. Elev. Landing 2nd Fl. Elev. Landing
+68'-8"
T.O. Parapet
+53'-4" +53'-4"
6th Fl. Elev. Landing 6th Fl. Elev. Landing
+44'-1" +44'-1"
5th Fl. Elev. Landing 5th Fl. Elev. Landing
+34'-10" +34'-10"
4th Fl. Elev. Landing 4th Fl. Elev. Landing
3'-6" 11'-6"
ATTACHMENT 3
95Section 3
Scale: 1” = 20’
0’ 10’ 20’ 40’
Page 52
BUILDING B SECTION
+ 0" + 0"
1st Floor 1st Floor
+ 17'-2 1/4" + 17'-2 1/4"
2nd Fl. West Landing 2nd Fl. West Landing
+ 26'-5 1/4" + 26'-5 1/4"
3rd Fl. West Landing 3rd Fl. West Landing
+ 35'-8 1/4" + 35'-8 1/4"
4th Fl. West Landing 4th Fl. West Landing
+ 44'-11 1/4" + 44'-11 1/4"
5th Fl. West Landing 5th Fl. West Landing
+ 54'-2 1/4" + 54'-2 1/4"
6th Fl. West Landing 6th Fl. West Landing
+ 63'-9"
T.O. Parapet
EL. 68'-8"
T.O. Parapet
+ 0" + 0"
1st Floor 1st Floor
+ 26'-5 1/4" + 26'-5 1/4"
3rd Fl. West Landing 3rd Fl. West Landing
+ 35'-8 1/4" + 35'-8 1/4"
4th Fl. West Landing 4th Fl. West Landing
+ 54'-2 1/4" + 54'-2 1/4"
6th Fl. West Landing 6th Fl. West Landing
EL. 68'-8"
T.O. Parapet
+ 17'-2 1/4" + 17'-2 1/4"
2nd Fl. West Landing 2nd Fl. West Landing
RETAIL RETAIL / RESTAURANT
17'-2 1/4" 9'-3" 9'-3" 9'-3" 9'-3"
54'-1 3/4" 15'-3 3/4"
54'-2 1/4" 9'-6 3/4"
1' 5' 66'-11 1/4" 2'-3"
ATTACHMENT 3
96Page 53
BUILDING C
07
ATTACHMENT 3
97Page 54
BUILDING C
This building is an existing automotive repair
building from the previous auto dealership that
occupied this site. Through adaptive re-use this
building is being converted to retail uses. The
ground floor façade will open up to the paseo that
leads from the parking structure at Landmark
Street to the central courtyard. The existing
concrete masonry façade will be maintained and
complimented with natural wood and aged metal
panels on the retail façade.
View of Building C on right
BUILDING C
TRUE
NORTH
D
E
FA
C
B
A
KEY PLAN
ATTACHMENT 3
980’ 10’ 20’ 40’
Page 55
TRUE
NORTH
D
E
FA
C
B
A
KEY PLAN BUILDING C: FIRST FLOOR PLAN
Scale: 1” = 20’
81'-4" 26'-8 1/4"
14'-10 1/2" 11'-8 3/4" 23'-5"
50'-1/4"
122'-9 1/2"
25' 21'-4 1/2" 20' 20' 21'-8 3/4" 14'-8"
50'-1/4"
19'-10 3/4" 30'-1 1/2"
1 1|101010|Retail
A: 550 sq ft
Retail
A: 1,225 sq ft
Mechanical
A: 750 sq ft
Retail
A: 500 sq ft
Retail
A: 1,000 sq ft
Retail
A: 1,070 sq ft
ATTACHMENT 3
99Page 56
TRUE
NORTH
D
E
FA
C
B
A
KEY PLAN BUILDING C: ROOF PLAN
Scale: 1” = 20’
0’ 10’ 20’ 40’
1 1|101010|81'-5 3/4" 26'-9"
50'-2 3/4"
108'-2 3/4"
26'-9" 23'-5 1/2"
ATTACHMENT 3
100Scale: 1” = 20’
Page 57
BUILDING C ELEVATIONS
0’ 10’ 20’ 40’
North Elevation West Elevation
South Elevation East Elevation
Merlex Stucco P722 -
“Artemisia, Sta. Barbara”
Finish
Low-E Glazing, Typ.
Blue Patina Metal Panel
Powder Coated Steel –
“Olive Drab” (RAL 6022)
Finish
Living Green Wall Vertical
Trellis
Open steel frame canopy,
finished with Rusting
Agent, Clear Coat
Existing CMU – “Warm
White” (SW7063) Paint
Finish|1010101010101010|+15'-2 3/4"
2nd Floor
+25'-9 3/4"
Roof
NEIGHBORING
BUILDING
+0"
1st Floor
-3'-0"
Project Datum
2'-8 3/4" 3/4" 11'-9"
29'-8 1/2"
15'-2 3/4" 10'-7"
27'
+15'-2 3/4"
2nd Floor
+25'-9 3/4"
Roof
12'-9"
NEIGHBORING
BUILDING
+0"
1st Floor
-3'-0"
Project Datum
11'-9"
27'
14'-3"|1010|1 2 6 3 1 7 5|101010|1 4|1010|ATTACHMENT 3
101Page 58
BUILDING C MATERIAL BOARD
Merlex Stucco P722 -
“Artemisia, Sta. Barbara”
Finish
Low-E Glazing, Typ.
Low-E Glazing, Typ.
Blue Patina Metal Panel Powder Coated Steel –
“Olive Drab” (RAL 6022)
Finish
Living Green Wall
Vertical Trellis
Open steel frame canopy,
finished with Rusting
Agent, Clear Coat
Open steel frame canopy, finished with Rusting Agent, Clear Coat
Existing CMU –
“Warm White”
(SW7063) Paint
Finish
ATTACHMENT 3
102Scale: 1” = 20’
Section 2
Section 1
0’ 10’ 20’ 40’
Page 59
BUILDING C SECTIONS
+15'-2 3/4" +15'-2 3/4"
2nd Floor 2nd Floor
+25'-9 3/4" +25'-9 3/4"
Roof Roof
15'-2 3/4" 10'-7" 1'-2"
28'-11 3/4"
12'-4 3/4" 2'-10" 8'-3 1/4" 2'-3 3/4"
+0" +0"
1st Floor 1st Floor
-3'-0" -3'-0"
Project Datum Project Datum
RETAIL RETAIL RETAIL RETAIL RETAIL
+15'-2 3/4"
2nd Floor
+25'-9 3/4"
Roof
15'-2 3/4" 11'-9"
12'-4 3/4" 2'-10" 9'-3 3/4" 1'-3 1/4"
+0"
1st Floor
-3'-0"
Project Datum
RETAIL RETAIL
ATTACHMENT 3
103Page 60
BUILDING D
08
ATTACHMENT 3
104Page 61
BUILDING D
This building is an existing parking structure that
was used by the previous auto dealership that
occupied this site. The structure parks 93 cars
on three levels. The existing concrete façade on
Landmark Street will be embellished with green
screen mesh and some smooth trowel cement
plaster at discrete areas that will allow way
finding signage to stand out. The green screen
will be planted, adding much needed greenery on
this industrial side street. Self-parking as well as
secure bicycle parking and bathroom and shower
facilities for the cyclists that work in the project
will be located on the first level. Valet parking will
be located on the second and third level.
View towards Building D at right side of background
(RENDERING FOR ILLUSTRATIVE PURPOSES ONLY)
BUILDING D
TRUE
NORTH
D
E
FA
C
B
A
KEY PLAN
ATTACHMENT 3
105Scale: 1” = 20’
0’ 10’ 20’ 40’
BUILDING D: FIRST FLOOR PLAN
Page 62
TRUE
NORTH
D
E
FA
C
B
A
KEY PLAN
22 Parking Stalls
Garage
A: 12,437 sq ft
18' 25'-4" 15'
8'-10 1/2" 8'-10 1/2" 8'-10 1/2" 8'-10 1/2" 3'-2" 9'
2'-5" 7'-6" 7'-6" 7'-6" 7'-6"
3'-2"
7'-10 1/2" 7'-10 1/2" 7'-10 1/2" 7'-10 1/2" 3'-2" 7' 7' 18'-5"
9' 4' 1' 9' 9' 4' 4' 9' 8'-6" 8'-6" 8'-6" 1'-6"
32'
18' 25'-4" 12'-1 3/4"
20'-6" 2'-6" 23'-9 1/2" 37'-10" 20'-6 1/2" 1'-3 3/4" 8' 3'-10"
5'-10" 43'-8 3/4" 14'-6 3/4"
64'-1 1/4"
15'-10 3/4" 39'-4 1/4"
47'-5 1/2"
104'
83'-8 1/2"
21'-1 1/4" 16'-10"
118'-11 3/4" 8'-8"|101010101010
1010|25% SLOPE
Valet &
Concierge
Service
16 Bike Racks
12.5% SLOPE
CLEAN AIR
VEHICLE
CLEAN AIR
VEHICLE
CLEAN AIR
VEHICLE
CLEAN AIR
VEHICLE
CLEAN AIR
VEHICLE
CLEAN AIR
VEHICLE
CLEAN AIR
VEHICLE
TEMP
LOADING
ONLY
TEMP
LOADING
ONLY
TEMP
LOADING
ONLY
Men's
Locker
Room
Women's
Locker
Room
Retail
VAN VAN
CLEAN AIR
VEHICLE
Stair
A: 89 sq ft
Trash
Compactor
A: 412 sq ft
Locker
Rooms
A: 366 sq ft
Retail
A: 660 sq ft|101010|ATTACHMENT 3
106Page 63
TRUE
NORTH
D
E
FA
C
B
A
KEY PLAN
Scale: 1” = 20’
0’ 10’ 20’ 40’
BUILDING D: SECOND FLOOR PLAN KEY PLAN
33 Parking Stalls|1010101010|20'-6"
39'-4 1/4"
47'-5 1/2"
83'-8 1/2"
21'-1 1/4"
64'-1 1/4"
2'-9 3/4" 49'-8 1/4" 11'-7"
19'-1 1/4"
8'-6"
15'-4"
10" 8'-6" 8'-6" 8'-6"
8'-6" 8'-6"
15'-3/4" 18' 18'
8'-6" 8'-6" 8'-6" 7'-6" 7'-6"
20'-4"
8'-6" 6'-11"
3'-10"
118'-11 3/4"
54'-4"
104'|1010|25% SLOPE 12.5%
SLOPE
25% SLOPE 12.5%
SLOPE
11
10|1010|Stair
A: 220 sq ft
Mechanical/
Storage
A: 1,238 sq ft|101010|13'-6" 27' 15'-3/4" 18' 18' 4'
Garage
A: 11,857 sq ft
ATTACHMENT 3
107Page 64
TRUE
NORTH
D
E
FA
C
B
A
KEY PLAN
Scale: 1” = 20’
0’ 10’ 20’ 40’
BUILDING D: ROOF PLAN KEY PLAN
38 Parking Stalls|1010101010|18' 18' 18' 48'-8"
20'-6"
39'-4 1/4"
47'-5 1/2"
83'-8 1/2"
21'-1 1/4"
64'-1 1/4"
10"
9' TYP. 9' TYP.
4'-11"
18' 18'
27' 8'-6" 8'-6" 4'-8"
34'
104'
118'-11 3/4"
10
25% SLOPE 12.5% SLOPE 12.5% SLOPE
10
10|1010101010|Stair
A: 106 sq ft|101010|Garage
A: 13,210 sq ft
ATTACHMENT 3
108Scale: 1” = 20’
+9'
Project Datum
+15'-4 3/4"
2nd Floor
+25'
3rd Floor
+0"
1st Floor
29'-8 1/4" TO GRADE LINE
+ 9"
PROJECT DATUM
+ 15'-4 3/4"
2ND FLOOR
+ 25'
3RD FLOOR
8'-0" 8'-0" 8'-0" 8'-0" 8'-0" 8'-0 8'- 8 8 8
+ 0"
1ST FLOOR
16'-6"
13 -1 1/2
+5'-11"
1st Floor Retail
+9"
Project Datum
+17'-7 1/4"
T.O. Roof
+29'-8 1/2"
T.O Parapet
13'-1 1/2"
+5'-11 3/4"
1st Floor Retail
+9"
Project Datum
+17'-8 3/4"
Roof
+29'-8 1/2"
T.O. Parapet
26'
2'-3/4" 10'-1"
13'-9 3/4"
r
r
r
Page 65
BUILDING D ELEVATIONS
North Elevation
East Elevation
West Elevation
East Elevation
South Elevation Landmark Street
0’ 10’ 20’ 40’
West Elevation
* Signage is shown for illustrative purposes only. All signage is
processed through Master Sign Program
(See page 13).
Merlex Stucco P722-
“Artemisia, Sta. Barbara”
Finish
Steel with Blue Patina
CMU – “Warm Grey”
Paint Finish, with Combed
Face
Powder Coated Steel –
“Olive Drab” (RAL 6022)
Paint Finish
Concrete – Exposed
Concrete with a larger
Aggregate Finish
Corten Steel– Corrugated
Roof Panels (1.25 x 1.25)
Charred Cedar Siding
Corten Steel – Window/
Door Frame
Existing CMU – “Warm
White” (SW7063) Paint
Finish
Living Green Wall Vertical
Trellis|10101010 1010101010
1010|r
r
r
7 10 9 3 8 6 9|1010 10|4 10 10 2 2 9 2 4 5
7 3 7|10 101010|ATTACHMENT 3
109Page 66
BUILDING D MATERIAL BOARD
Merlex Stucco P722-
“Artemisia, Sta. Barbara”
Finish
Steel with Blue Patina CMU – “Warm
Grey” Paint Finish,
with Combed Face
Powder Coated Steel –
“Olive Drab” (RAL 6022)
Paint Finish
Concrete – Exposed
Concrete with a larger
Aggregate Finish
Corten Steel– Corrugated
Roof Panels (1.25 x 1.25)
Charred Cedar
Siding
Corten Steel – Window/Door Frame
Existing CMU –
“Warm White”
(SW7063) Paint
Finish
Living Green Wall
Vertical Trellis
ATTACHMENT 3
1100’ 10’ 20’ 40’
Page 67
BUILDING D SECTIONS Scale: 1” = 20’
Section 2
Section 1
Section 3
+17'-7 1/4"
T.O. Roof
+29'-8 1/2"
T.O. Parapet
10'-6" 1'-3"
+5'-11 3/4"
1st Floor Retail
+9"
Project Datum
+0" +0"
1st Floor 1st Floor
+9" +9"
Project Datum Project Datum
+15'-4 3/4" +15'-4 3/4"
2nd Floor 2nd Floor
+25' +25'
3rd Floor 3rd Floor
NEIGHBORING
BUILDING
GARAGE
GARAGE
GARAGE
9" 14'-7 3/4" 9'-7 1/4"
4'-8 1/2"
29'-8 1/4"
+0" +0"
1st Floor 1st Floor
+9" +9"
PROJECT DATUM PROJECT DATUM
9'-7 1/4" 4'-10"
2'-2" 2'-2 1/4"
28'-11 1/4"
14'-7 3/4"
14'-7 3/4" 9'-7 1/4"
5'-1 1/4" 2'
NEIGHBORING
BUILDING
P L
GARAGE
GARAGE
GARAGE
+15'-4 3/4" +15'-4 3/4"
2nd Floor 2nd Floor
+25' +25'
3rd Floor 3rd Floor
ATTACHMENT 3
111Page 68
BUILDING E/F
09
ATTACHMENT 3
112Page 69
BUILDING E/F
Building E
This three story building is positioned on the interior
of the site in the location of the large warehouse
building. While it is situated to the rear of the site
it will rise up above the adjacent Expo light rail line
overhead track. The third story restaurant and dining
terrace is highly visible from the Expo Line train that
passes by on the way to the station. The exterior of
the third floor resembles the appearance of a green
house stacked on top of an existing warehouse style
building.
The second floor is office use. It is covered with living
green. It presents an exciting view of an elevated
green garden that is visible from the passing train
and the nearby station.
The retail component on the ground floor is covered
by greens growing down from the office floor above.
This building is conceived as one open space with
a 21’-0” high open ceiling. The space will serve as
a retail market space to be used by several smaller
vendors. The exterior of this building is covered in
living green walls.
Building F
The large existing warehouse building is reduced
in size and through adaptive re-use the remainder
of the warehouse structure is converted into retail
and restaurant space that opens to Washington
Boulevard, the central courtyard and the paseo at
Building E. The tilt up concrete façade will be left
in its natural concrete state reminiscent of an old
industrial building from the early 20th century. Aged
metal panels articulate the store window bays.
? View towards Building E on left side and Building F on right side - ? View Inside Building E
BUILDING E/F
TRUE
NORTH
D
E
FA
C
B
A
KEY PLAN
ATTACHMENT 3
113Page 70
TRUE
NORTH
D
E
FA
C
B
A
KEY PLAN BUILDING E/F: FIRST FLOOR PLAN
Scale: 1” = 20’
0’ 10’ 20’ 40’
44'-3 1/2" 45'-1"
89'-4 1/2"
21'-10"
75'-3 1/4"
55'-3" 17'-2 1/4" 2'-10"
40'-7"
23'-9 1/2" 16'-9 1/4"
60'-11 1/2"
Restaurant/
Retail
2,479 sq ft
Retail
1,270 sq ft
Retail
1,600 sq ft
Retail
1,265 sq ft|101010
10|Valet &
Concierg
Service
16 B
CLEAN AIR
VEHICLE
CLEAN AIR
VEHICLE
R
TEMP
LOADING
ONLY
TEMP
LOADING
ONLY
LO
ON
Men's
Locker
Room
Women's
Locker
Room
Retail
VAN|101010|Elev. Mech
A: 98 sq ft
159'-9 1/2"
19'-6 1/2" 18'-6" 18'-6" 18'-6" 18'-6" 18'-6" 12'-5" 35'-4"
27'-9" 11'-3 1/2" 21'-5 3/4"
56'-8 1/2"
8'-2 3/4" 40'-3 3/4" 8'-2 1/4" 29'-4"
83'-3 1/4"
ACCESS FOR EXISTING
PARKING STRUCTURE
ACCESS FOR EXISTING
PARKING STRUCTURE
Stair
A: 379 sq ft
Retail
7,451 sq ft
Retail
725 sq ft
Hall
A: 454 sq ft
Stair
A: 389 sq ft
Lobby/
Elevator
A: 536 sq ft
Restrooms
A: 778 sq ft
Lobby/ Elevator
A: 188 sq ft
ATTACHMENT 3
114Page 71
TRUE
NORTH
D
E
FA
C
B
A
KEY PLAN BUILDING E/F: PARKING ACCESS LEVEL
Scale: 1” = 20’
0’ 10’ 20’ 40’
72'-5 1/4"
40'-7"
21'-10 1/2"
89'-5 1/4"
60'-11 1/2"|1010101010|83'-3 1/4"
35'-4" 124'-5 1/2"
30'-7" 32'-9"
56'-8 1/2" 29'-4"
OPEN TO BELOW
INHABITABLE
NEW ACCESSIBLE
ACCESS FOR EXISTING
PARKING STRUCTURE
OPEN TO BELOW
Lobby/
Elevator
A: 679 sq ft
Stair
A: 389 sq ft
ATTACHMENT 3
115Page 72
TRUE
NORTH
D
E
FA
C
B
A
KEY PLAN BUILDING E/F: SECOND FLOOR PLAN
Scale: 1” = 20’
0’ 10’ 20’ 40’
72'-5 1/4"
40'-7"
21'-10 1/2"
89'-5 1/4"
60'-11 1/2"|1010101010|10" 158'-11 1/2"
83'-3 1/4"
30'-7" 32'-9"
29'-4" 7'-7 1/2" 49'-1"
56'-8 1/2"
10" 45'-7 1/2" 78' 35'-4"
Patio
NEW ACCESSIBLE
ACCESS FOR
EXISTING PARKING
STRUCTURE
Restaurant/
Retail
1,007 sq ft
Stair
A: 406 sq ft
Office
A: 5,865 sq ft
Lobby/
Elevator
A: 837 sq ft
Stair
A: 389 sq ft
Lobby/
Elevator
A: 427 sq ft
Restrooms
A: 416 sq ft
ATTACHMENT 3
116Page 73
TRUE
NORTH
D
E
FA
C
B
A
KEY PLAN BUILDING E/F: THIRD FLOOR PLAN
Scale: 1” = 20’
0’ 10’ 20’ 40’|101010|Outdoor Dining
A: 2,000 sq ft
149' 9'-9 1/2"
35'-4" 48'-10 1/2" 13' 25'-3 3/4" 26'-5 3/4" 9'-9 1/2"
68'-4" 14'-11 1/4"
44'-10 1/4" 4'-1 3/4"
41'-5 3/4"
65'-2 3/4"
32'-9"
Stair
A: 209 sq ft
Stair
A: 392 sq ft
Elev.
A: 96 sq ft
Restrooms
A: 639 sq ft
Elev.
A: 84 sq ft
Restaurant
4,362 sq ft
ATTACHMENT 3
117Page 74
TRUE
NORTH
D
E
FA
C
B
A
KEY PLAN BUILDING E/F: ROOF PLAN
Scale: 1” = 20’
0’ 10’ 20’ 40’|101010|9'-9 1/2" 64'-9 1/2" 74'-8 1/2" 9'-6"
41'-6"
50' 10'-10" 7'-6"
8'-2 1/2" 36'-7 3/4" 4'-1 3/4"
SCREEN FOR
HVAC UNITS
HVAC
EQUIPMENT TYP.
81'-6"
ATTACHMENT 3
118Scale: 1” = 20’|1010|Photovoltaic Panels
Merlex Stucco P722 -
“Artemisia, Sta. Barbara”
Finish
Low-E Glazing, Typ.
Corten Steel Panels
Powder Coated Steel –
“Olive Drab” (RAL 6022)
Finish
Concrete – Exposed
Concrete with a larger
Aggregate Finish
Living Green Wall with
Potted Plants
CMU – “Warm Grey”
Paint Finish with Combed
Face
Corten Steel –Corrugated
Roof Panels (1.25 x 7/8)
Steel Window Mullions –
“Aged Brass” Finish
Steel Window Mullions –
“Blackened” Finish
White Cap Sheet Roofing
Membrane|101010101010|12
11
10|10 101010|
10'-10" 11'-11" 14'-6" 18'-5"
55'-8"
10'-10" 11'-11"
54'-3"
17' 14'-6"
10'-10" 11'-11" 14'-6" 18'-5"
55'-8"
17'-6"
Page 75
BUILDING E/F ELEVATIONS
West Elevation Bldg E
North Elevation Bldg E - F
0’ 10’ 20’ 40’
Northwest Elevation Bldg E
9 12 12
4 11 10
7 5
11|1010|2 4 4 10
7 6 8 6|10101010|7 1 12
ATTACHMENT 3
119Scale: 1” = 20’
0’ 10’ 20’ 40’
10'-10" 11'-11" 14'-6" 18'-5"
55'-8"
Page 76
BUILDING E/F: ELEVATIONS
Southwest Elevation Bldg E - F
East Elevation Bldg E
10'-10" 11'-11" 14'-6" 18'-5"
55'-8"|1010|Photovoltaic Panels
Merlex Stucco P722 -
“Artemisia, Sta. Barbara”
Finish
Low-E Glazing, Typ.
Corten Steel Panels
Powder Coated Steel –
“Olive Drab” (RAL 6022)
Finish
Concrete – Exposed
Concrete with a larger
Aggregate Finish
Living Green Wall with
Potted Plants
CMU – “Warm Grey”
Paint Finish with Combed
Face
Corten Steel –Corrugated
Roof Panels (1.25 x 7/8)
Steel Window Mullions –
“Aged Brass” Finish
Steel Window Mullions –
“Blackened” Finish
White Cap Sheet Roofing
Membrane|101010101010|12
11
10|10 101010|9 4 1 8 12 10 3 6 3 5 7 11|10 10|8 4 12 3|1010|Line of Building in Front
Line of Building in Front
ATTACHMENT 3
12017'-6"
20'-6"
10'-10" 11'-11" 14'-6" 18'-5"
55'-8"
Page 77
South Elevation Bldg E
Scale: 1” = 20’
0’ 10’ 20’ 40’
BUILDING E/F: ELEVATIONS
East Elevation Bldg F Northwest Elevation Bldg F South Elevation Bldg F
4 1 11 11 11 11 2 12 3 4 3 1 2 4 1 2 5
9 12
8 4 6
Photovoltaic Panels
Merlex Stucco P722 -
“Artemisia, Sta. Barbara”
Finish
Low-E Glazing, Typ.
Corten Steel Panels
Powder Coated Steel –
“Olive Drab” (RAL 6022)
Finish
Concrete – Exposed
Concrete with a larger
Aggregate Finish
CMU – “Warm Grey”
Paint Finish with Combed
Face
Corten Steel –Corrugated
Roof Panels (1.25 x 7/8)
Steel Window Mullions –
“Blackened” Finish
White Cap Sheet Roofing
Membrane|101010101010|12
11|10 101010|Line of Building in Front
ATTACHMENT 3
121Page 78
BUILDING E/F MATERIAL BOARD
Photovoltaic Panels Merlex Stucco P722 -
“Artemisia, Sta. Barbara”
Finish
Low-E Glazing, Typ. Corten Steel Panels
Powder Coated Steel – “Olive
Drab” (RAL 6022) Finish
Concrete –
Exposed Concrete
with a larger
Aggregate Finish
CMU – “Warm Grey” Paint
Finish with Combed Face
Corten Steel –Corrugated
Roof Panels (1.25 x 7/8)
Steel Window Mullions –
“Blackened” Finish
White Cap Sheet
Roofing Membrane
Living Green Wall with Potted
Plants
Steel Window Mullions – “Aged Brass” Finish
ATTACHMENT 3
122Page 79
BUILDING E/F MATERIAL BOARD
Low-E Glazing, Typ.
Corten Steel –Corrugated Roof Panels (1.25 x 7/8)
ATTACHMENT 3
123Scale: 1” = 20’
Section 2
Section 1
+10'-10" +10'-10"
Parking Access Parking Access
+0" +0"
1st Floor 1st Floor
+22'-9" +22'-9"
2nd Floor 2nd Floor
+37'-3" +37'-3"
3rd Floor 3rd Floor
+55'-8' +55'-8'
Roof Roof
+ 0"
1st Floor
+ 20'-6"
T.O. Parapet
+17'-6"
Existing Parapet
Page 80
BUILDING E/F SECTIONS
0’ 10’ 20’ 40’
ATTACHMENT 3
124Page 81
CONCEPTUAL LANDSCAPE PLAN
10
ATTACHMENT 3
125Page 82
CONTEXTUAL SITE PLAN WITH ADJACENT PARK
LANDSCAPE
The Platform exterior has
four distinctive landscape
character zones; Washington
Streetscape, the Central
Courtyard, Green-house/
Landmark (Building E/F)
Paseo’s and WashArts
(Building B). Each having
unique landscape characters
summarized below.
The Washington Streetscape
shall follow pre-established
Culver City Streetscape
Guidelines. Street trees
and furnishings shall be
coordinated with the City.
The Central Courtyard shall
be a shaded seating areas
of Decomposed Granite
framed by filtering specimen
trees.
The Greenhouse Paseo
façade will to be draped in
trailing vines Vinca major
(Trailing Periwinkle) and
Hedera helix (English Ivy).
The WashArts building
has varying colors (white,
orange, red and magenta)
of Bougainvillea on the
stair towers to serve as a
vegetative mural of color.
ATTACHMENT 3
126Page 83
ILLUSTRATIVE LANDSCAPE PLAN
ATTACHMENT 3
127Page 84
LAYOUT AND MATERIALS PLAN
ATTACHMENT 3
128Page 85
MATERIAL AND FURNISHING IMAGERY
Paving Colors
Courtyard Sea ng and Olives
Bench Sea ng
Vegetated Structure
CIP Concrete Seat Wall
Trees in Decomposed Granite
CIP Concrete Steps
Concrete Honed Finish
Ivy Wall
Bike Rack
Decomposed Granite
Ivy Wall
Concrete Seat Wall Raised Wood Decking
ATTACHMENT 3
129Page 86
PLANTING DIAGRAM
ATTACHMENT 3
130Page 87
PLANTING IMAGERY
Tabebuia impe ginosa
Pink Trumpet Tree
Hymenosporum ? avum
Sweet Shade Tree
Platanus acerifolia
London Plane Tree
Paulownia tomentosa
Empress Tree
Quercus agrifolia
California Coast Live Oak
Olea europeae
Fruitless Mission Olive
Iris douglasiana
Douglas Iris
Campanula poscharskyana
Bell? ower
Ophiopogon japonicus
Mondo Grass
Clytostoma callistegiodes
Violet Trumpet Vine
Dis c s ‘Rivers’
Royal Trumpet Vine
Wisteria sinensis ‘Rosea’
Chinese Wisteria
Calamagros s x acu folia
Feather Reed Grass
Muhlenbergia capillaris
Pink Muhly
Nassela tenuissima
Mexican Feather Grass
Pennisetum orientale
Chinese Fountain Grass
Phyllostachys nigra
Black Bamboo
Bambusa mul plex ‘AK’
Alphonse Karr Bamboo
Festuca Glauca
Blue Fescue
Carex buchanii
Leather Leaf Sedge
Carex elata “Aurea’
Bowles Golden Sedge
ATTACHMENT 3
131Aloe arborescens
Torch Aloe
Agave vilmoriniana
Octopus Agave
Agave victoriae-reginae
Queen Victoria Agave
Agave ‘Blue Glow’
Agave
Agave a enuata ‘Variegata’
Variegated Agave
Agave ‘Blue Flame’
Agave
Aloe striata
Coral Aloe
Aloe ‘Johnson’s Hybrid’
No Common Name
Aloe brevifolia
No Common Name
Aloe plica lis
Fan Aloe
Aloe barberae
Tree Aloe
Aloe ‘Blue Elf’
No Common Name
Crassusa captella ‘Camp? re’
Crassula
Aeonium arboreum
Tree Aeonium
Aeonium arboreum ‘Zwartkop’
Zwartkop Aeonium
Aeonium ‘Kiwi’
No Common Name
Echeveria ‘A erglow’
No Common Name
Echeveria imbricate
No Common Name
Echeveria secunda
No Common Name
Echeveria agavoides
Agave Echeveria
Senecio serpens
Blue Chalks cks
Euphorbia characias ‘Wulfenii’
Mediterranean Spurge
Euphorbia rucalii ‘S cks of Fire’
Milkbush
Page 88
PLANTING IMAGERY
ATTACHMENT 3
132Page 89
LANDSCAPE IRRIGATION NOTES:
ALL LANDSCAPE AREAS TO BE WATERED WITH A FULLY AUTOMATIC UNDERGROUND IRRIGATION
SYSTEM UTILIZING AN AUTOMATIC CONTROLLER, REMOTE CONTROL VAL VES, POP-UP SPRINKLERS
AND A REDUCED PRESSURE TYPE BACKFLOW PREVENTOR. (TO MEET LOCAL CODE) ALL
IRRIGATION SYSTEMS SHALL BE DESIGNED TO AVOID SURFACE RUN-OFF, LOW HEAD DRAINAGE,
OVERSPRAY OR SIMILAR CONDITIONS WHERE IRRIGATION WATER FLOWS ONTO ADJACENT AREAS
NOT PART OF THE IRRIGATED AREA SUCH AS ADJACENT PROPERTY, NON-IRRIGATED AREAS,
WALKS, ROADWAYS OR STRUCTURES. LANDSCAPE AREAS WILL BE DIVIDED INTO HYOROZONES SO
THAT PLANTS WITH SIMILAR WATER REQUIREMENTS WILL BE VALVED TOGETHER.
IRRIGATION DIAGRAM
ATTACHMENT 3
133Page 90
STREETSCAPE PLANTING
ATTACHMENT 3
134Page 91
COURTYARD PLANTING
ATTACHMENT 3
135Page 92
GREENHOUSE PLANTING
ATTACHMENT 3
136Page 93
CONCEPTUAL LIGHTING
11
ATTACHMENT 3
137Page 94
LIGHTING CONCEPT NARRATIVE
Lighting Design Narrative
The Lighting Design for the Platform project strives to create an invit-
ing and dynamic nighttime presence that is both energy-efficient and
responsive to the multiple demands of both the tenants and visitors at
this exciting mixed-use development.
Building and Paseo Lighting
Lensed LED downlights (ambient lighting) integrated into the exterior
architecture at building canopies will produce light levels that strike a
restrained balance, making people feel good and comfortable while
providing retailers and restaurant tenants with lighting that invites cus-
tomers. This lighting move is clean and simple, meant to reinforce the
architecture with a refined aesthetic that is also highly energy-efficient.
Light levels will vary between 5fc and 25fc based on specific locations
under building canopies. Because the public paseo areas are relatively
narrow, the architectural canopies serve as the location for the main
source of lighting, allowing the center landscaped areas to be lit using
low-level landscape lighting and lighting integrated into the hardscape.
Decorative surface-mounted light fixtures along with decorative pen-
dants shall be used on buildings to provide scale to the architecture
and to establish elements of visual interest. These fixtures shall be of
a design meant to support the architectural style of the buildings. All
wall/building-mounted lighting shall provide glare free, full-cutoff light-
ing.
Facade Lighting
Facade lighting will be subtle yet will strive to reinforce the architecture
of the building while also helping to establish a nighttime presence for
the project. Lighting shall be executed so as to prevent lighting from
spilling onto neighboring properties. Uplighting shall be limited and all
lighting sources shall provide cut-off optics to prevent unwanted visual
glare. The goal is to establish a nighttime presence for the develop-
ment as a whole that works on both a pedestrian-scale and on a larger
scale that helps to communicate the character and qualities of the
project to riders on the Expo line as well as to drivers and pedestrians.
Site and Landscape Lighting
Feature trees shall be illuminated by small-scale, energy efficient up-
lights. Along prominent streetscapes, these fixtures shall be integrated
into the raised planter beds. At other locations, in-grade uplights shall
be integrated into the hardscape to illuminate feature trees. Low-level
steplights shall be used in planter and step walls to provide orientation
lighting and wayfinding. A creative use of suspended lighting fixtures
will be implemented in the ‘park’ feature, where decorative light fixtures
will be hung from mature trees creating a beautiful canopy of lighting,
helping to reinforce the park as a unique gathering place for guests to
the project during both daytime and nighttime hours. The suspended
lighting creates the notion of ‘festoon’ lighting overhead and serves to
meet the many proposed uses of this prominent outdoor area.
The large planted living walls shall be illuminated with recessed linear
LED uplights.
All lighting shall comply with all prevailing energy and building codes,
specifically California’s Title 24. Lamps shall be selected to accurately
render color, and all lighting shall maintain a consistent color tempera-
ture. Unless used for specific decorative purposes, no lamps shall be
visible to direct view and no lighting shall produce unwanted glare.
ATTACHMENT 3
138Page 95
SCHEMATIC LIGHTING PLAN - BUILDING A
D
E
FA
C
B
A
KEY PLAN
SCALE: 1/16” = 1’-0”
ATTACHMENT 3
139Page 96
SCHEMATIC LIGHTING PLAN - BUILDING B
D
E
FA
C
B
A
KEY PLAN
SCALE: 1/16” = 1’-0”
ATTACHMENT 3
140Page 97
SCHEMATIC LIGHTING PLAN - BUILDING C
D
E
FA
C
B
A
KEY PLAN
SCALE: 1/16” = 1’-0”
ATTACHMENT 3
141Page 98
SCHEMATIC LIGHTING PLAN - BUILDING D
D
E
FA
C
B
A
KEY PLAN
SCALE: 1/16” = 1’-0”
ATTACHMENT 3
142Page 99
SCHEMATIC LIGHTING PLAN - BUILDINGS E & F
D
E
FA
C
B
A
KEY PLAN
SCALE: 1/16” = 1’-0”
ATTACHMENT 3
143Page 100
SCHEMATIC LIGHTING PLAN - CENTRAL COURTYARD
D
E
FA
C
B
A
KEY PLAN
SCALE: 1/16” = 1’-0”
ATTACHMENT 3
144Page 101
FIXTURE TYPE: F1
STAKE MOUNTED LINEAR LED UPLIGHT
(IN PLANTERS)
FIXTURE TYPE: F2
RECESSED ADJUSTABLE ACCENT LIGHT
PERMA POSTS
ATTACHMENT 3
145Page 102
FIXTURE TYPE: F3
RECESSED COMPACT FLUORESCENT DOWNLIGHT
FIXTURE TYPE: F6
FLUSH MOUNTED STEPLIGHT
Directed
Unshielded
ATTACHMENT 3
146Page 103
FIXTURE TYPE: F7
WALL MOUNTED LIGHT FIXTURE
FIXTURE TYPE: F8
TREE MOUNTED LANTERN
LANTERN OPTIONS
10.1 in
4"/100MM
9.7 in
5.0"/125MM
.38"/10MM x
.50"/12MM SLOT
1.0"/25MM HOLE
3"/78MM
AWM2
Wall mounted arm for SP2.
Wall plate is 6.375”/162mm x 3.5”/89mm
WT: 5 lbs. EPA: 0.11
4”/100mm
3”/78mm
0.38”/10mm x
0.50”/12mm slot
1”/25mm hole
5”/127mm
27"
(686mm)
29"
(736mm)
16 |1010|/4"
(425mm)
ATTACHMENT 3
147Page 104
FIXTURE TYPE: F9
WALL MOUNTED LIGHT FIXTURE (FULL CUT-OFF)
FIXTURE TYPE: F10
WALL MOUNTED LIGHT FIXTURE
Luminaire for interior and exterior use .
Powdercoat 10 step process heavy
extruded aluminum housing 11.8” width,
featuring varying sizes to accommodate
the electrical components.
Powdercoat copper free die cast aluminum
trims and caps.
Powdercoat 10 step process die cast
aluminum bracket for wall mounted
applications, featuring ease of installation.
Clear tempered glass diffuser, 0.157”
thick.
Polymer gasket.
Aluminum type 99.85 reflectors with
controlled optics G12 lamp type versions,
featuring light beam type A, B, or C.
B versions, with dual light output, are
supplied with either one or two lamps and
are specifically designed for direct/
indirect light distribution.
M versions, with single light output, are
supplied with a single lamp and can be
used for either direct or indirect light
distribution.
Compact fluorescent or HID lamp versions
with direct/indirect light distribution.
Reflectors can be supplied varying
combinations. Consult factory .
UL Listed . Suitable for wet locations.
12
DILUME 300x230
e Dilume 300x230 B
1x70W MH
e Dilume 300x230 M/B
1x70W MH
r Dilume 300x230 M
1x57W CFL
e Dilume 300x230 M/C
1x70W MH
e Dilume 300x230 M/A
1x70W MH
r Dilume 300x230 B
1x57W CFL
9.02”
12.6” 3.15”
3.93”
2.13” 0.51”
5.91” 2.76”
6.58”
11.54”
3.98”
DILUME 300X230 B
e G12 1x70w MH M139 T6
r GX24q-5 1x57w CFL
DILUME 300X230 M
r GX24q-5 1x57w CFL
DILUME 300X230 M/A
DILUME 300X230 M/B
DILUME 300X230 M/C
e G12 1x70w MH M139 T6
MATTE METALLIC
GRAY
IRON GRAY
ATTACHMENT 3
148Page 105
FIXTURE TYPE: F11
IN-GRADE UPLIGHT (LOW VOLTAGE)
FIXTURE TYPE: F12
IN-GRADE LINEAR LED UPLIGHT
OUTER CASING
(I.5904), (TO BE ORDERED
SEPERATELY)
EXTRUDED
ALUMINUM
HOUSING
CONCRETE
GROUND SURFACE
STAINLESS
STEEL ALLEN
HEAD SCREW W/
INTERNAL
ADJUSTABLE
LOCKING SYSTEM
(X2, TYP.)
ENSURE 8" OF GRAVEL
FOR DRAINAGE
4-5/8"
(117mm)
4"
(101mm)
SECTION VIEW SIDE VIEW
INTEGRAL POWER
SUPPLY (X3 TYP.)
ATTACHMENT 3
149Page 106
FIXTURE TYPE: F13
LANDSCAPE ACCENT LIGHT
FIXTURE TYPE: F14
IN-GRADE UPLIGHT (METAL HALIDE)
ATTACHMENT 3
150Page 107
CIVIL ENGINEERING
12
ATTACHMENT 3
151Page 108
SURVEY
ATTACHMENT 3
152Page 109
ALTA-SURVEY
ATTACHMENT 3
153Page 110
SURVEY
ATTACHMENT 3
154Page 111
SURVEY
ATTACHMENT 3
155Page 112
INFRASTRUCTURE / CFD
INFRASTRUCTURE
Based upon the proposed development as described in the
Comprehensive Plan, the site development will not require major
upgrades to infrastructure such as water, sewer, or gas. Some utility
relocation as well as various offsite streetscape improvements shall be
required with Site development.
A Community Facilities District (CFD) is one financial tool available to
commercial property owners within the TOD District to help fund public
improvements and services through private property assessment and
bond finance. Required off-site improvements for Platform Comprehensive
Plan may be funded through a CFD if commercial property owners agree.
The kinds of improvement that may be funded on a pro rata basis include:
• New Infrastructure
• Utility Relocations
• Streetscape Improvements
• On-going maintenance
A CFD can ensure timely completion of all necessary pubic improvements.
Consistent with the CFD provisions in the City’s Municipal Code (Section
15.12.035), if established, the CFD funding for improvements may be
based upon a pro rata assessment for each parcel within the District.
ATTACHMENT 3
156Page 113
UTILITY PLAN
PAGE 108
FOR REFERENCE ONLY.
Subject to ? nal review
and approval by the
City Engineer.
PAGE 107
ATTACHMENT 3
157Page 114
UTILITY PLAN
PAGE 108
PAGE 106
FOR REFERENCE ONLY.
Subject to ? nal review
and approval by the
City Engineer.
ATTACHMENT 3
158FOR REFERENCE ONLY.
Subject to ? nal review
and approval by the
City Engineer.
Page 115
UTILITY PLAN
PAGE 107 PAGE 106
ATTACHMENT 3
159FOR REFERENCE ONLY.
Subject to ? nal review
and approval by the
City Engineer.
Page 116
SITE CONTROL PLAN
PAGE 111
PAGE 110
ATTACHMENT 3
160FOR REFERENCE ONLY.
Subject to ? nal review
and approval by the
City Engineer.
Page 117
SITE CONTROL PLAN
PAGE 111
PAGE 109
ATTACHMENT 3
161FOR REFERENCE ONLY.
Subject to ? nal review
and approval by the
City Engineer.
Page 118
SITE CONTROL PLAN
PAGE 110 PAGE 109
ATTACHMENT 3
162FOR REFERENCE ONLY.
Subject to ? nal review
and approval by the
City Engineer.
Page 119
GRADING PLAN
PAGE 114
PAGE 113
ATTACHMENT 3
163FOR REFERENCE ONLY.
Subject to ? nal review
and approval by the
City Engineer.
Page 120
GRADING PLAN
PAGE 114
PAGE 112
ATTACHMENT 3
164FOR REFERENCE ONLY.
Subject to ? nal review
and approval by the
City Engineer.
Page 121
GRADING PLAN
PAGE 113 PAGE 112
ATTACHMENT 3
165Page 122
DOCUMENTS UNDER SEPARATE COVER
13
ATTACHMENT 3
166Page 123
DOCUMENTS UNDER SEPARATE COVER
DOCUMENT REPORT DATED CONSULTANT
GEOTECHNICAL REPORT 11/05/2010 Feffer Geological Consulting
TRAFFIC STUDY 07/01/2011 Raju Associates, Inc.
GREENHOUSE GAS ASSESSMENT 04/26/2012 RBF Consulting
PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT 11/02/2010 AECOM
ATTACHMENT 3
167Page 124
PROJECT TEAM
Owner The Runyon Group
9107 Wilshire Blvd., Ste. 725
Beverly Hills, CA 90210
Contact: Joseph Miller
joseph@runyongroup.com
Tel. (213) 243-5530
Architect Abramson Teiger Architects
8924 Lindblade Street
Culver City, CA 90232
Contact: Bjorn Schrader
bjorn@abramsonteiger.com
Tel. (310) 838-8998 Ext. 209
Fax. (310) 838-8332
Project Mgmt. GARDINER + THEOBALD INC
9777 Wilshire Blvd, Ste. 800
Beverly Hills, CA 90210
Contact: Daniel Green
d.green@gardinerusa.com
Tel. (310) 598-1944
Fax. (310) 285-9833
Structural Eng. Nabih Youssef Associates
800 Wilshire Blvd, Ste. 200
Los Angeles, CA 90017
Contact: Ryan Wilkerson
rwilkerson@nyase.com
Tel. (213) 362-0707
Fax. (213) 688-3099
MEP Engineers ARC Engineering
15260 Ventura Blvd, Ste. 1520
Sherman Oaks, CA 91403
Contact: Hisham Nicholas Barakat
hbarakat@arceng.net
Tel. (818) 508-6300 Ext. 202
Fax. (818) 508-7050
Landscape Design Artifex
10
Contact: Eric S. Lennox
eric@artifex10.com
Tel. (480) 297-9464
Lighting Design Sean O’Connot Lighting
8820 Wilshire Blvd, Ste. 320
Beverly Hills, CA 90211
Contact: sean o’connor
sean@seanoconnorlighting.com
Tel. (310) 659-5900
Fax. (310) 659-5915
Civil Engineer VCA Engineers Inc
3951 Medford Street
Los Angeles, CA 90063
Contact: Mauricio Castro
mauricio.castro@vcaengineers-inc.com
Tel. (323) 729-6098
Fax. (323) 729-6043
Surveyor Mollenhauer Group
316 W 2nd Street, Fifth Floor
Los Angeles, CA 90012
Contact: Bill Nailing
bnailling@mollenhauergroup.com
Tel. (213) 624-2661
Fax. (213) 614-1863
Geotechnical Engineer Feffer Geotechnical Consulting
1990 S. Bundy Drive, 4th Floor
Los Angeles, CA 90025
Contact: Joshuar R. Feffer
josh@feffergeo.com
Tel. (310) 207-5408
Fax. (310) 826-0182
Traffic Study Raju Associates Inc.
505 E. Colorado Blvd, Suite 202
Pasadena, CA 91101
Contact: Srinath Raju
srinath.raju@rajuassociates.com
Tel. (626) 792-2700
Fax. (626) 792-2772
Greenhouse Gas RBF Consulting
Assessment 14725 Alton Parkway
Irvine, CA 92618
Contact: Eddie Torres, Kelly Chiene
Tel. (949) 472-3505
Environmental Consultant / Citadel Environmental Services
Phase I and II Report 1725 Victory Blvd.
Glendale, CA 91201
Contact: Nicolette Casarez
ncasarez@citadelenvironmental.com
Tel. (818) 246-2707
Fax. (818) 246-3145
AECOM
999 Town & Country Road, Fourt Floor
Orange, CA 92868
Tel. (714) 835-4447
Fax. (714) 953-6989
ATTACHMENT 3
168 City of Culver City, California
Planning Commission Agenda Item Report
Page 1 of 8
CONTINUATION OF SEPTEMBER 12, 2012, AGENDA ITEM NO. PH-1:
This item was presented to the Planning Commission as a public hearing at
the Commission’s September 12, 2012.
RECOMMENDATION:
That the Planning Commission:
1. Adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) based on the Initial Study
finding that the project, with mitigation measures incorporated, will not have a
significant adverse impact on the environment; and
2. Recommend Approval to the City Council of Zoning Code Map Amendment,
ZCMA P-2012020, and Comprehensive Plan, CP P-2012018, subject to the
Conditions of Approval as stated in Resolution No. 2012-P011 (Attachment
No. 1).
PROCEDURES:
1. Chair calls on staff for a staff report and Commission poses questions to
staff as desired.
2. Chair opens the public hearing, providing the applicant the first opportunity
to speak, followed by the general public.
Meeting Date: October 4, 2012 Item Number: PH-1
AGENDA ITEM: (CONTINUED ITEM FROM SEPTEMBER 12, 2012) Consideration
of Zoning Code Map Amendment (P-2012020) establishing Planned Development
Zone No.10 and Comprehensive Plan (P2012018) to allow a commercial
development consisting of approximately 41,735 square feet of retail and
restaurant uses and 38,732 square feet of office uses located at 8810-8850
Washington Boulevard and 3920 Landmark Street.
Contact Person/Dept.: Susan Yun, Senior
Planner
Phone Number: (310) 253-5755
Public Hearing: [X] Action Item: [] Attachments: [X]
Public Notification: On August 21, 2012, a notice (approximately 1,900 recipients) was
mailed to all the property owners and occupants beyond a 500-foot radius of the site,
posted on the site and emailed to the Master Notification List.
Planning Approval:
Thomas Gorham, Planning Manager
Department Approval:
Sol Blumenfeld, Community Development
Director
ATTACHMENT 4
169 City of Culver City, California
Planning Commission Agenda Item Report
Page 2 of 8
3. Chair seeks a motion to close the public hearing after all testimony has
been presented.
4. Commission discusses the matter and arrives at its decision.
BACKGROUND / DISCUSSION:
At its September 12, 2012 meeting, after considering the staff report, the
application materials and applicant presentation, the Commission adopted a
motion (5-0) to continue the item to the October 4, 2012, meeting, requesting
various clarifications, revisions and additional information regarding the project.
Please refer to the September 12
th
Agenda Item PH-1 packet for a full
description, analysis, and attachments regarding this project.
Comprehensive Plan
The Commission directed that the Comprehensive Plan be revised to incorporate
the alternate design to Building A and Building E, in its entirety as the single
project proposal rather than represent it as an option.
The alternate design option was proposed after the full application package was
received. The developer included this alternate design option based on
feedback from potential tenants and a desire to provide a direct connection from
Washington Boulevard to the paseo behind Building A and to create a more
dynamic restaurant space on Building E by relocating it to the third floor. This
was the preferred design option by the applicant/owner. The Commission felt the
Comprehensive Plan should reflect the preferred design option and the
document was revised accordingly.
All relevant pages of the Comprehensive Plan including floor plans, elevations,
tables and various diagrams were revised and/or added into the document to
reflect the previously proposed alternative design option to Building A and
Building E. In addition, all project summary tables, diagrams and illustrations
were revised to accurately reflect proposed project building square footages and
parking calculations (Attachment No. 2).
The language and text of the Comprehensive Plan was also revised to contain
more declarative statements to avoid any ambiguities related to City
requirements versus optional provisions.
ATTACHMENT 4
170 City of Culver City, California
Planning Commission Agenda Item Report
Page 3 of 8
Parking
The Commission requested clarifications in regards to how the projects required
parking was calculated.
Numerical Parking Requirements: Parking for the project site is provided at a
ratio of 1 stall per 250 square feet of retail and restaurant floor area consistent
with the Zoning Code parking requirements for shopping centers and 1 stall per
350 square feet of office floor area consistent with the Zoning Code parking
requirements for office uses. Restaurant space over 25% of the combined retail
and restaurant floor area is required to be parked at a ratio of 1 stall per 100
square feet of floor area, consistent with requirements of the Parking Ordinance.
The Zoning Code provides that the first 250 square feet of outdoor dining is
allowed without requiring parking. The Platform project proposes that this credit
of 250 square feet be increased to 500 square feet. This results in 6 additional
parking spaces required when applying a parking credit for first 250 square foot
of outdoor dining area as opposed to applying a parking credit to the first 500
square feet of outdoor dining area. The parking requirements described above
are summarized in the following table:
Land Use Parking Factor
Retail
(Shopping center)
1 stall per 250 sf
Restaurant
(Up to 25% of the combined retail and restaurant floor area.)
1 stall per 250sf
Restaurant
(Over 25% of the combined retail and restaurant floor area.)
1 stall per 100 sf
Office 1 stall per 350 sf
Outdoor Dining Areas
(Area in excess of 500 square feet per restaurant space.)
1 stall per 250 sf
The project proposes a total of 27,057 square feet of retail spaces, 14,688
square feet of restaurant spaces and 38,732 square feet of office spaces. As
mentioned above, restaurant space over 25% of the combined retail and
restaurant floor area is required to be parked at a ratio of 1 stall per 100 square
feet of floor area. The Project Area Summary Table on Page 3 of the revised
Comprehensive Plan provides detailed building square footage breakdown of the
proposed uses for each of the buildings proposed.
ATTACHMENT 4
171 City of Culver City, California
Planning Commission Agenda Item Report
Page 4 of 8
Restaurant Parking
Pursuant to Commission direction, the maximum percentage of restaurant space
is 35% of the combined retail and restaurant floor area (See Permitted Uses,
Page 14 of the Comprehensive Plan). The 14,688 square feet of proposed
restaurant space represents 35% of the combined retail and restaurant floor
area. The project proposes an additional 10% or 4,252 square feet of restaurant
space over the 25% or 10,436 square feet maximum. As a result, 4,252 square
feet of total restaurant space is parked at the required parking ratio of 1 stall per
100 square feet of floor area.
Outdoor Dining Parking
The project proposes a total of 5,365 square feet of outdoor dining. The
proposed outdoor dining area in excess of 500 square feet per restaurant space
totals 2,050 square feet. 8 parking spaces would be required for this outdoor
dining at the 1 to 250 ratio. The project provides parking for the 2,050 square
feet of outdoor dining in excess of 500 square feet per restaurant space or 8
spaces as shown in the required parking table on Page 12 of the Comprehensive
Plan.
1
The increase of parking credit to the first 500 square feet of outdoor dining rather
than the first 250 square feet results in only a 2% or 6 space reduction in what
the Zoning Code would otherwise require and is justified by the proximity of the
project to transit as part of the Transit Oriented Development (TOD) district.|1010|
There will not be a significant parking impact as result of applying the parking
credit due to the amount of parking that will be provided on-site and the nature
of the expected population the project will serve. Many users of the outdoor
dining area will generally include local office workers from the site and
employees and residents from the adjacent Hayden Tract and other TODs
planned nearby and will not likely generate additional auto trips and parking
demand. It is expected that many site users will be arriving by alternative modes
of travel such as walking, bicycling, or by taking the bus or train to the site.
Further, the project does not take any parking credit or discount as could be
allowed as a TOD project.
Based on the proposed uses (including the outdoor dining area in excess of 500
square feet), building square footage and parking ratios described above, the
project requires a total of 312 parking spaces. The quantity of parking required
based the land use and parking ratio is summarized in the table below:
ATTACHMENT 4
172 City of Culver City, California
Planning Commission Agenda Item Report
Page 5 of 8
Land Use Area s.f. Parking
Ratio
Total
Parking Stalls
Retail 27,057 1:250 sf 108
Restaurant 14,688* 1:250 sf 85
Outdoor Dining Areas
(Area in excess of 500 square
feet per restaurant space.)
2,050 1:250 sf 8
Office 38,732 1:350 sf 111
Total 312
*4,252 square feet of this total was calculated at 1 stall per 100 square feet of restaurant space.
Vehicle Parking Plan: Parking for the project is provided in two separate above
ground structures. The newly built parking structure on the corner of Landmark
Street and Washington Boulevard (Building B) contains 219 parking stalls across
five levels of covered parking and a roof level. The entire structure is accessed
through an automatic entry system off of Landmark Street that will be activated
by either a ticket or a key card system. This structure is intended for people who
are patronizing the shops and restaurants at Platform. Office users and store
employees are prohibited from parking in the lower three levels, leaving the lower
these prime spaces to customers. There have been no changes to this structure
with the revised plans.
The second parking garage is an existing structure that is to be rehabilitated and
is located on the north side of Landmark Street (Building D) In the original plan
this structure contained 72 parking spaces. The parking plan for Building D has
been revised to provide 93 parking stalls by converting the second and third
levels to valet parking only. The structure will have ingress and egress off of
Landmark Street. There will be 22 self-parking spaces on the first level along
with valet parking drop off and pick up. There will be 33 spaces on the second
level including 28 in tandem configuration, and 38 spaces on the third level
including 36 in tandem configuration that will be utilized for valet parking. This
structure will primarily be used by office users and patrons of the restaurant in
Building E. A condition of approval has been added requiring the applicant/owner
to provide a valet parking and management plan as approved by the Planning
Manager and City’s Traffic Engineer.
Both parking structures will offer preferred parking for low emission vehicles (e.g.
hybrid, alternative fuel and electrical automobiles) and carpool vehicles as
required by the California Green Building Code (CGBC). Handicapped
accessible spaces are provided per California Building Code (CBC) regulations.
ATTACHMENT 4
173 City of Culver City, California
Planning Commission Agenda Item Report
Page 6 of 8
General Land Use Provisions
The project is proposed as a pedestrian oriented development located near the
Exposition Light Rail Transit station and within the City’s Transit Oriented
Development (TOD) area. As such, the Commission wanted more assurances in
the land use provisions of Comprehensive Plan to reflect the goals and
objectives of a pedestrian friendly and TOD project by limiting the types of uses
that can be allowed on the ground floor.
The Permitted Uses section on page 14 of the Comprehensive plan has been
revised to permit pedestrian oriented uses including retail, eating and drinking
establishments, and artisan businesses on the ground floor. Also, restaurant
uses have been limited to no more than 35% of the commercial space to avoid
potential oversaturation of restaurant uses over retail uses in this project. The
office uses and other non-pedestrian oriented uses (i.e. health and fitness
facilities, broadcast studios, indoor support facilities of media production) are not
allowed on the ground floor.
Other uses such as personal services (i.e, day spa, hair salon, and nail salon),
specialized schools (i.e. culinary school) or banks or financial services are not
permitted on the ground floor in tenant spaces fronting Washington Boulevard or
the central courtyard space as these frontages are the primary pedestrian
oriented areas of the project.
For retail and restaurant uses selling alcohol, an Administrative Use Permit is
required. Convenience store use was removed from the permitted use table.
Landscaping
One of the concerns expressed by the Commission was lack of size specificity of
the trees preliminary landscape plan, in particular those proposed for the central
courtyard area. The original plan showed 6 trees in this area. The applicant has
revised the plan to show 3 trees in order to provide a larger scale tree. The trees
are proposed to be 72 inch box size which will result in a tree height at planting
of approximately 17-20 feet with a canopy spread of approximately 18 feet. Staff
has included an condition that requires the courtyard trees to be a minimum 72
inch box size and that the exact location and final species selection be subject to
review and approval by the City’s Landscape Architect. The remaining trees in
the project are the required street trees along Washington Boulevard which will
be installed pursuant to the City’s TOD District Streetscape Plan which will
provide a coordinated plan for public improvements within the TOD area.
Streetscape improvements will include new street trees, planters, tree grates,
benches, trash receptacles, bicycle racks, decorative pavers, way finding
ATTACHMENT 4
174 City of Culver City, California
Planning Commission Agenda Item Report
Page 7 of 8
signage and other street furniture. The developer is required to fund and install
all streetscape improvements in front of the project and is required to pro provide
a pro rata share of funding for decorative paved crosswalks at Washington and
National Boulevards as specified in a TOD District Streetscape Plan.
Sample Materials Board and Exhibits
As requested by the Commission, the applicant has provided an expanded view
or perspective of the entire projects’ building frontage as viewed from
Washington Boulevard in the Comprehensive Plan document. A large exhibit of
this perspective will be presented at the Commission meeting. Also, pictures of
the building materials have been incorporated into the Comprehensive Plan
document. An updated materials sample board reflecting all the materials in the
proposed project will also be presented at the Commission meeting.
CONCLUSION:
Based on the analysis contained herein staff believes the findings for a
Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Code Map Amendment can be made as
outlined in proposed Resolution No. 2012-P011 (Attachment No. 2) and
recommends project approval.
ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION:
Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) guidelines a
Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) has been prepared; the project has been
determined that with mitigation measures incorporated, it will have less than
significant impacts on the community.
ALTERNATIVE OPTIONS:
The following alternative actions may be considered by the Planning
Commission:
1. Approve the application with the recommended conditions of approval if the
application is deemed to meet the required findings.
2. Approve the application with additional or different conditions of approval, if
deemed necessary to meet the required findings and mitigate any new project
impacts identified at the meeting.
ATTACHMENT 4
175 City of Culver City, California
Planning Commission Agenda Item Report
Page 8 of 8
3. Disapprove the application if it does not meet the required findings.
NOTES:
1. As a comparison, staff calculated the difference in the parking required when applying a
parking credit for the first 250 square feet of outdoor dining area as opposed to a parking
credit for the first 500 square feet of outdoor dining area. The outdoor dining area in excess
of the first 250 square feet per restaurant space would total 3,615 square feet. Parking for
this at the 1 to 250 ratio would result in the need for 14 parking spaces.
2. Reduced parking is justified by close proximity to the Culver City Expo LRT station and
outdoor dining is an important pedestrian related use which should be encourage in TOD’s to
promote pedestrian activity.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Draft Resolution No. 2012-P011 (ZCMA P-2012020, CP-P2012018, MND –
P-2012019) including Exhibit A, Zone Change Map and Exhibit B, Conditions
of Approval.
2. Revised Comprehensive Plans date stamped September 28, 2012.
ATTACHMENT 4
176 City of Culver City, California
Planning Commission Agenda Item Report
Page 1 of 16
RECOMMENDATION:
That the Planning Commission:
1. Adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) based on the Initial Study
finding that the project, with mitigation measures incorporated, will not have a
significant adverse impact on the environment (Attachment No. 5 ); and
2. Recommend Approval to the City Council of Zoning Code Map Amendment,
ZCMA P-2012020, and Comprehensive Plan, CP P-2012018, subject to the
Conditions of Approval as stated in Resolution No. 2012-P011 (Attachment
No. 4).
PROCEDURES:
1. Chair calls on staff for a staff report and Commission poses questions to staff
as desired.
2. Chair opens the public hearing, providing the applicant the first opportunity to
speak, followed by the general public.
3. Chair seeks a motion to close the public hearing after all testimony has been
presented.
4. Commission discusses the matter and arrives at its decision
Meeting Date: September 12, 2012 Item Number: PH-1
AGENDA ITEM: Proposed Zoning Code Map Amendment to establish a Planned
Development Zoning District and Comprehensive Plan to allow a commercial
development consisting of approximately 41,253 square feet of retail and
restaurant uses and 38,120 square feet of office uses located at 8810-8850
Washington Boulevard and 3920 Landmark Street.
Contact Person/Dept.: Susan Yun, Senior
Planner
Phone Number: (310) 253-5755
Public Hearing: [X] Action Item: [] Attachments: [X]
Public Notification: On August 21, 2012, a notice (approximately 1,900 recipients) was
mailed to all the property owners and occupants beyond a 500-foot radius of the site,
posted on the site and emailed to the Master Notification List.
Planning Approval:
Thomas Gorham, Planning Manager
Department Approval:
Sol Blumenfeld, Community Development
Director
ATTACHMENT 4
177 City of Culver City, California
Planning Commission Agenda Item Report
Page 2 of 16
BACKGROUND:
Request
The proposed request is to establish a Planned Development (PD) Zone through
a Zoning Code Map Amendment (ZCMA) and a Comprehensive Plan (CP) to
allow the construction of multi-use commercial development consisting of
approximately 41,253 square feet of retail and restaurant uses and 38,120
square feet of office use. There are two above ground parking structures that will
provide a total of 291 parking spaces. The project site is located at 8810–8850
Washington Boulevard and 3920 Landmark Street (See Attachment No.1), near
the recently completed Exposition Light Rail Transit (Expo LRT) line, Culver City
Expo Station and the City’s Washington National Transit Oriented Development
(TOD.)
Existing Conditions
The project site comprises two properties on the south side of Washington
Boulevard split by Landmark Street and totals approximately 2.06 acres. Both
properties are currently zoned Industrial General (IG) and have a General
Corridor General Plan land use designation and were previously occupied by car
dealerships. The smaller of the two properties is located west of Landmark
Street and totals .5 acres with 5,817 square feet of existing building area. The
larger property located east of Landmark Street totals 1.56 acres with 80,015
square feet of existing building area.
The site topography is flat and contains one to two story structures with two at
grade paved surface parking lots at the front of both sites adjacent to Washington
Boulevard. The larger site contains a warehouse, service repair bay area, a
showroom, office areas, and a three level above ground parking structure. Some
of the buildings such as the parking structure, service repair bay building and a
portion of the warehouse structure will not be demolished and will be adaptively
reused as part of the proposed project. The smaller site contains a building
which will be demolished and replaced with a new six level parking structure with
the ground floor dedicated to retail uses.
The area around the project site is characterized by light industrial/warehouse,
commercial service and retail uses. Most prominent among the features
characterizing the surrounding area is the Expo LRT and Culver City Expo
station just north and east of the site. The project will be located 10 to 11 feet
from the elevated train platform creating unique views within the project and from
the train. To the west of the project is a one story brick commercial/warehouse
ATTACHMENT 4
178 City of Culver City, California
Planning Commission Agenda Item Report
Page 3 of 16
building and directly north are Washington Boulevard and a
warehouse/distribution building. To the south are Landmark Street and light
industrial uses and Pak Century private school.
Project Description
The project is one of several new Transit Oriented Developments that are
proposed for the area surrounding the new Culver City Expo Station.
The proposed project known as “Platform” consists of six buildings, Buildings A
through F (totaling approximately 227,136 square feet). There will be
approximately 41,253 square feet of retail and restaurant uses and 38,120
square feet of office uses. There are two above ground parking structures; one
is an existing structure consisting of three levels totaling approximately 39,940
square feet (including roof level area) and the other is a new structure consisting
of retail/restaurant uses at the ground level and parking on the upper five levels
totaling approximately 112,886 square feet (including roof level). The new six
level parking structure, Building B is located on the smaller site and the existing
three level parking structure (Building D) is located on the larger site. Both
parking structures combined accommodate a total of 291 parking spaces.
The project includes adaptive reuse of some existing buildings (Building C, D and
F) in conjunction with construction of new buildings to create a community
oriented shopping environment with office uses in some of the buildings
(Buildings A, B and E) at the upper levels. Currently, the site consists of
approximately 85,832 square feet of building area. The total net new building
area will be approximately 141,304 square feet with the majority of this new
square footage consisting of the new parking garage (Building B, 112,886 square
feet) located on the smaller site.
The six buildings are connected by a pedestrian network of open space between
the buildings. This open space includes two “paseos” or pedestrian walks and a
7,000 square foot open air central courtyard. The courtyard serves as an
interactive community space that connects the two paseos as well as to
Washington Boulevard. The developer envisions the open air central courtyard
paseos as venues for special events such as art exhibitions, outdoor evening
movie showings, community festivals, philanthropic charity events, outdoor
fashion shows, and family oriented special events. Pedestrian amenities such as
canopies, benches and landscape elements will enhance the street frontage of
Washington Boulevard and offer a variety of pedestrian amenities.
The property currently is divided into three lots on the larger site and one lot on
the smaller site. All of the lots are under common ownership. A covenant and
ATTACHMENT 4
179 City of Culver City, California
Planning Commission Agenda Item Report
Page 4 of 16
agreement, as part of this project, will combine the lots into one parcel. The
covenant and agreement will also tie all on-site parking at both sites to create
common parking for the project.
The project will have offsite improvements including new sidewalks, street
furniture and street trees and bike lanes adjacent to the site as well as various
operational and circulation improvements at the adjacent intersection of
Washington Boulevard and Landmark Street. It also includes new crosswalks on
Washington Boulevard and Landmark Street. These improvements must
comport with a TOD District Streetscape Plan that will be prepared for the area.
The owner’s expectation is to develop a place-making project. The project is
designed as a high quality multi-use commercial development with ample plazas
and setbacks to provide opportunities for outdoor dining and landscaping. Staff
has worked with the project developer and the community to incorporate design
and land use features that enhance the street and are fitting with adjacent areas.
The office component is also key element of the project. The office tenants that
the developer envisions include technology, fashion, and media companies.
These types of companies are prevalent in the Hayden Tract and Downtown
Culver City and it is the intent of developer to build upon that attraction in
tenanting the project. The office uses will maximize the benefits of close
proximity to the light rail station. The retail space will include design features that
help ensure quality retail tenants with attractive storefronts and signage. The
materials, colors and textures of the building evoke a contemporary look. The
building finishes include stucco, wood siding, corten steel, brick veneer, metal
and rock cladding, and store front glass. The buildings include setbacks at the
ground level and stepbacks at the upper levels to create an attractive building
form and provide visual interest. The project will also include public spaces and
plazas with benches, planters, seating niches, trellis structures and green
screens and an artist mural is proposed for the east building elevation of Building
B and north elevation of Building D.
Property line walls will be constructed on those portions of Buildings B and E that
are situated at zero lot lines. Building D is an existing building and its property
line wall will remain. On Building B there are two property line walls, one facing
the west, and one facing south. As required by the Building Code, no window
openings will be located where there are zero setbacks, however, architectural
relief will be provided in the form of square and rectangular shaped recessed or
niched areas. These recessed areas will be distributed over the wall surfaces
and treated with Resysta siding finish (which is a durable, recycled material but
has a natural wood appearance). The product is a sustainable material that will
add color and visual interest to these zero setback areas of the project. Building
ATTACHMENT 4
180 City of Culver City, California
Planning Commission Agenda Item Report
Page 5 of 16
E’s interior property line wall faces a large warehouse building and will be
finished in stucco.
An alternate design option is proposed for Buildings A and Building E as part of
the requested Comprehensive Plan. In the interest of increasing the pedestrian
flow and circulation through the project site, Building A was split into two
separate buildings allowing pedestrians to enter the project site at multiple
locations along Washington Boulevard. The two building sides are connected by
sky-bridges to accommodate the building circulation while introducing more light
into the newly created open air atrium space. The alternate design option breaks
up the massing of Building A by providing a paseo from Washington Boulevard.
The alternate design option maintains the same contemporary architectural
treatments as described above.
To counter balance the lost building area of approximately 3,500 square feet in
Building A due to the paseo, the layout and floor area of Building E has been
changed. The office space has been moved to the second floor with the
restaurant space and terrace dining area now occupying the top floor, allowing
for 360 degrees views above the adjacent Expo light rail bridge. The office floor
area in Building E has increased by approximately 2,500 square feet and the
restaurant/retail space has been increased by approximately 1,600 square feet
for a total of approximately 4,100 square feet. This slight increase (600 square
feet) in overall building area is due to additional required circulation for the 3rd
floor restaurant space. The alternate design option for Building E maintains the
same contemporary architectural treatments as described above.
The alternate design option was conceived after the full application package was
received. The developer included this alternate option based on feedback from
potential tenants and a desire to provide a direct connection from Washington
Boulevard to the paseo behind Building A and to create a more dynamic
restaurant space on Building E by relocating it to the third floor. The alternate
design option is preferred by the developer.
ANALYSIS:
In order to facilitate the proposed project, a Zoning Code Map Amendment and
Comprehensive Plan are required pursuant to Zoning Code Section 17.240,
Planned Development Zoning Districts and Section 17.560, Comprehensive
Plans. The proposed Zoning Code Map Amendment includes re-zoning the
project site from Industrial General (IG) to Planned Development (PD) (see
Attachment No. 2). The proposed Comprehensive Plan includes the
development standards and allowed land uses in the newly established PD
ATTACHMENT 4
181 City of Culver City, California
Planning Commission Agenda Item Report
Page 6 of 16
zoning district. The intent of a Comprehensive Plan is to allow for flexibility in the
application of the Zoning Code standards for larger scaled proposed
developments. A Comprehensive Plan considers innovation in site planning in
order to more effectively respond to site features, uses on adjoining properties,
and other impacts that the Zoning Code may not be able to adequately address.
The PD zoning district is the zoning designation created for a site that has been
entitled with a Comprehensive Plan.
Comprehensive Plan
The project has been designed to conform to all applicable Zoning Code
provisions for a Comprehensive Plan and all City development standards. The
building mass and scale has been designed to be compatible with the
surrounding adjacent uses and to provide a pedestrian orientation along
Washington Boulevard. The buildings will cover roughly 75 percent of the site,
with the remainder of the site developed with courtyard open space, landscaping
or pedestrian circulation. The proposed and rehabilitated buildings are well
articulated and aesthetically engaging by incorporation of varying building
heights, setbacks and design elements. The project’s mechanical equipment
and refuse containers have been designed to be concealed from the street,
public places and neighboring properties.
Height: The Planned Development district as well as the Commercial General
zone allows a maximum 56’ foot height limit. The proposed buildings will range
from one to six stories, all of which are consistent with the maximum height
requirement of 56 feet for commercial general designated areas.
Setback: The building frontage at ground level along Washington Boulevard will
be setback at varying widths of 8.9’ at a minimum and 13’ at a maximum (with
the exception of an existing building which is a zero setback) to accommodate
pedestrian amenities such as landscaped planter areas, seating niches for tables
and benches, and building canopies to provide for an enhanced pedestrian
friendly street edge.
Various building setback and stepback provisions of Comprehensive Plan result
in buildings that are compatible in size and scale with the existing single and
multi-story commercial buildings surrounding the project site.
General Land Use Provisions: The permitted uses in the Comprehensive Plan
shall be compatible with the General Corridor Land Use designation of the
ATTACHMENT 4
182 City of Culver City, California
Planning Commission Agenda Item Report
Page 7 of 16
General Plan, which is intended to support desirable existing and future
neighborhood and community serving uses that are compatible with adjacent
residential neighborhoods and with the Exposition Light Rail Transit TOD district
which encourages transit oriented uses. The uses in the Comprehensive Plan
are intended to be similar in nature to the allowed and permitted uses of the
Commercial General (CG) zone including but not limited to medium scale
commercial, restaurant, office, and retail services. However, certain uses
permitted under the CG zoning district such as auto related or auto repair
facilities, warehousing or distributing facilities are not allowed in the
Comprehensive Plan because they preclude pedestrian friendly or transit
oriented development. The project lies along the southerly edge of Washington
Boulevard, contributing in a major way to the character of the boulevard. The
ground floor will contain retail, eating and drinking establishments and artisan
businesses.
The open areas of the project will include outdoor dining and an open air
courtyard with community oriented uses such as live music, farmers markets and
fashion events. Office uses will be located on the upper levels. The project is
designed to be pedestrian oriented and the mixes of permitted uses are intended
to draw patrons from the surrounding neighborhoods as well as from the
adjacent Expo LRT station.
• Open Space/Courtyard: A large attractive open courtyard area is
designated for a portion of the property interior, providing a site amenity
for retail, restaurant and office tenants and customers. The open courtyard
space is on grade which allows on-grade planting, ground water recharge
and landscaping with mature trees in addition to shrubs and ground cover.
The Courtyard provides an opportunity for outdoor dining and a
programmed space for occasional special events.
• Special Events: Various types of special events and temporary events,
outdoor or indoor, public or private will take place within the open
courtyard area or the rooftop level of the two parking structure(s). Various
types of special events including markets and fairs, performances and
public events and private events may be allowed subject to the provisions
of Zoning Code Chapter 17.520 “Temporary Use, Special Event, and
Temporary Event Permits” and as outlined in the proposed
Comprehensive Plan:
• Outdoor Dining: Outdoor dining is a key contributor to the pedestrian
experience. The areas identified for outdoor dining are shown on the
Comprehensive Plan.
ATTACHMENT 4
183 City of Culver City, California
Planning Commission Agenda Item Report
Page 8 of 16
Architectural Design: The proposed project has a contemporary industrial feel
particularly along the Building A Washington Boulevard frontage that is clad in
corrugated metal and includes exposed metal diagonal bracing that is intended
to replicate the look of stacked ”box cars” to evoke the project name, Platform.
Other buildings in the project contain a mix of materials including stucco, wood
siding, metal cladding, glass store fronts, wood, metal and glass railings, corten
steel and aluminum framing but overall reflect a contemporary project image.
The colors are predominantly natural and neutral with bright color accents that
will fit the neighborhood character. The buildings are well articulated with the
use of stepbacks, overhangs and canopies; private balconies for office uses on
the second and third floors; substantial use of planter areas and open
space/courtyard areas which provide architectural articulation on of the sides of
building. The project will enhance the visual quality of the site and will be a
significant improvement for the immediate area.
Site Plan: The project has been laid out as a “campus” of six buildings which
reflects the adaptive reuse of the property and the geometry of the site. The
campus feel is created by varied building height and form and the pedestrian
network of paseos. The varied building form and setbacks helps avoid a
monolithic project feel. A central court provides a formal project entry comprised
of elevated planter, seat walls and planting with canopy shade trees, shrubs and
ground covers and connects to the pedestrian paths that wind through the
project. Some of the project restaurant space will front on the courtyard creating
the opportunity for outdoor dining. The adaptive reuse allows the development to
make use of existing buildings, but also results in some public space shading
that will occur along the paseos located immediately to the north of Buildings C,
D and E.
The Central Courtyard is also proposed to be used intermittently for special
events creating opportunities for public gatherings such as art or craft fairs or
small farmer’s markets. The project layout therefore provides the benefit for
maximizing site use for pedestrian serving purposes consistent with the goals for
establishing a Transit Oriented District.
Sustainability/Green Building Features: The project is comprised of adaptive
reuse and new construction. The reuse of buildings coupled with green building
retrofit and sustainable new construction will help make the project energy
efficient, conservation friendly and reduce the project carbon footprint. The
proposed project will incorporate building design standards to meet the Culver
City Green Building Program, California Green Building Code and U.S. Green
Building Council (USGBC’s) Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design
(LEED) green building standards. Sustainable/green building elements include:
ATTACHMENT 4
184 City of Culver City, California
Planning Commission Agenda Item Report
Page 9 of 16
Conservation: In an effort to promote the conservation, reduction, reuse, and
recycling of renewable and non-renewable resources, the project is:
• Using non-wood alternatives for exposed wood products such as Resysta
(simulated wood manufactured from rice husks) in the wood details,
benches soffits and Trespa (a Phoenelic resin panel made to look like
wood) in the facades of some of the store fronts.
• Using local manufactured products where possible.
• Storm Water Filtration systems.
• Highest rated building insulation.
• Operable windows in all retail and office spaces.
• Permeable exterior paving surfaces to reduce storm water run-off,
wherever possible.
Energy Efficiency: The following provides a list of energy efficient and
sustainable specifications that have been incorporated into the project:
• Photovoltaic electricity generation consistent with the City’s Photovoltaic
Solar Ordinance.
• Low flow /low consumption bathroom fixtures
• Landscape design with drought tolerant planting to conform with AB 1881
low water usage.
• Green-screen walls systems incorporated into the courtyard landscape
design to minimize solar gain in buildings and along public spaces
• Reduce energy consumption with LED lighting.
• Dual low emissivity glazing.
• Building façade shading elements (awnings, building projections, roof
overhangs) to reduce solar heat gain.
Operable windows to permit natural cooling.
• High efficiency heating and air conditioning systems.
Carbon Emission Reduction: The following provides a list of carbon emission
reduction items that have been incorporated into the project:
• Building reuse and building conservation.
• Bicycle racks located throughout the site to support biking to the project.
• Project location adjacent to the Expo Culver City LRT to permit easy and
convenient access for project office commuters or customers.
• Participation and support of a potential shuttle service that will connect the
Hayden track, the Expo Station and Downtown Culver City.
• Preferred parking for low emission vehicles and carpools vehicles.
• Sourcing products from local manufacturers wherever possible.
ATTACHMENT 4
185 City of Culver City, California
Planning Commission Agenda Item Report
Page 10 of 16
Landscaping. The Platform exterior has four distinctive landscape character
zones; Washington Streetscape, The Central Courtyard, Greenhouse/Landmark
(Building E/F), Paseos, and WashArts (Building B). Each having unique
landscape characters summarized below.
The Washington Streetscape will follow Culver City Streetscape Guidelines.
Street trees and furnishings will be coordinated with the City’s Transit Oriented
Development District Streetscape Plan that is being prepared for the area. The
Central Courtyard will be a shaded seating area with planter seat wall and
informal groupings of tables, chairs and benches. The landscape plan includes
formal planting of canopy shade trees such as Olea Europea (Fruitless Olive)
and Quercus Agrifolia (Coast Live Oak). The paseo between the Greenhouse
Building E and Showroom Building F will include an Ivy trellis constructed from
rebar and formed into arches projecting from the wall. The Ivy Arches will frame
the space and views as the plan renderings indicate. The WashArts Building B
has a plant palette with of varying colors (white, orange, red and magenta) of
Bougainvillea on the stair towers to serve as a landscaped color accent.
Offsite Park Area. The applicant is working with the City and the Los Angeles
County Metropolitan Transit Authority (LACMTA) to use the Metro right of way
area directly adjacent and east of the site as a small parkette. The parkette
would be connected to the development through one of the paseos that may be
extended beneath the Metro Expo LRT bridge. The parkette plans are not
defined but may include some passive elements such as landscaped walks,
seating areas, art pieces and potential outdoor vending as approved by the City.
Parking and Access. Vehicle Parking for the project site is provided at a ratio of
1 stall per 250 square feet of retail and restaurant floor area consistent with the
Zoning Code parking requirements for shopping centers and 1 stall per 350
square feet of office floor area consistent with the Zoning Code parking
requirements for office uses. Outdoor dining areas up to 500 square feet per
restaurant are covered under these parking requirements. Outdoor dining areas
larger than 500 square feet per restaurant space including roof top dining at
Building E are required to provide 1 stall per 250 square feet in excess of the
initial 500 square feet, up to 3,750 square feet or 15 cars. The Zoning Code
allows the first 250 square feet of outdoor dining to be allowed without requiring
parking. The increase to the first 500 square feet is justified by the amount of
parking that will be provided on-site and the nature of the expected population
the project will serve. Many users of the outdoor dining area will generally
include local office workers from the site and employees and residents from the
adjacent Hayden Tract and TOD developments and will not likely generate
additional parking demand. It is expected that many site users will be arriving by
ATTACHMENT 4
186 City of Culver City, California
Planning Commission Agenda Item Report
Page 11 of 16
alternative modes of travel such as walking, bicycling, or by taking the bus or
train to the site.
A total of 291 parking spaces are provided on both sites in order to meet the
Zoning Code required parking for the project. Driveways located along
Landmark Street will provide access to the project’s parking structures. One
driveway would be located on the west side of the street providing access to the
new 219-space parking structure. Three driveways would be located on the east
side of the street, two driveways providing access to the existing 72-space
parking structure and the other driveway providing access to the loading/trash
collection area. The existing driveways to the site along Washington Boulevard
will be removed. Motorists entering and exiting the site’s driveways will have
adequate maneuvering space and visibility. Additionally no stopping zones will
be striped as necessary for improved driver visibility.
Long term bicycle parking is being provided within fully enclosed bicycle lockers
in the newly built parking structure on the corner of Landmark Street and
Washington Boulevard (Building B). These lockers are coin/card operated and
available for the general public. Additional long term bike parking is available
within a gated keycard operated area inside the parking structure on the main
site (Building D). To facilitate employee and office worker bike commuting, a
keycard protected shower is provided in the existing parking structure (Building
D). In addition, short term bike racks are provided along Washington Boulevard
in the public right of way.
Loading for the project is proposed on-site in two dedicated locations. The first
loading area will be located on the larger parcel and will accommodate large
trucks. The second loading area is located inside the new parking structure and
will accommodate smaller, van size delivery trucks (e.g. UPS delivery trucks).
Traffic and Circulation
A traffic study prepared for the proposed project, dated July 11, 2011, and
supplemented on March 5, 2012, by Raju Associates Inc. was reviewed and
accepted by the City’s Traffic Engineer. Parking, access and circulation systems
were assessed as part of the study. A review of the proposed site plan was also
conducted. This review indicates that the project would adequately and that
there would not be adverse impact from the proposed project.
The traffic analysis evaluated thirty-four (34) intersections in the vicinity of the
project site during both the AM and PM peak hours. Of the 34 intersections, 17
are located within the City of Culver City and 17 intersections within City of Los
Angeles.
ATTACHMENT 4
187 City of Culver City, California
Planning Commission Agenda Item Report
Page 12 of 16
In order to assess the potential impact of the proposed project on the local street
system, and using the City’s significance criteria, the traffic study compared the
volume to capacity (V/C) ratio, which is a numerical measure of traffic
congestion, at each study location to determine the incremental difference in V/C
ratios caused by the proposed project. The “Critical Movement Analysis-
Planning” method of intersection capacity analysis was used to determine the
intersection V/C ratio and corresponding level of service (LOS), which is a letter-
grade measure of traffic congestion, at each of the signalized intersections.
The study indicates that 24 of the 34 analyzed intersection locations are
operating at acceptable levels of service (LOS) D or better during the morning
peak hour. During the evening peak hour, 26 of the 34 analyzed intersections
are operating at LOS D or better. The remaining intersections are operating at
LOS E or F.
Using the threshold criteria for determining significance of impacts of a project at
a specific location, the traffic analysis concluded one (1) out the thirty four (34)
analyzed intersection locations would be impacted by traffic generated by the
proposed project unless mitigation is incorporated. As a result of the traffic
generated by the proposed project, during the evening peak hour, the
Washington Boulevard/ National Boulevard intersection would exceed the
threshold for significance impact by .003 or .3%, which is an extremely small
amount and would not be considered significant. The traffic study concluded that
there would not be a significant impact at any of the remaining intersections
studied.
In order to address the project’s impact at the intersection of Washington
Boulevard/National Boulevard, the project is required to contribute funds
($50,000) for either the study and implementation of a shuttle system that would
operate within proposed project’s study area or the implementation of Adaptive
Traffic Control Systems (ATCS) at the intersection of Washington
Boulevard/National Boulevard. Funding of a study and implementation of a
shuttle service would improve traffic flow by reducing the amount of vehicles in
the immediate area because of the use of the shuttle. Similarly, implementation
of ATCS will improve traffic flow and reduce delays in the affected intersection
through the use signal synchronization.
There will be off-site improvements as part of the proposed project. The
proposed project will include various pedestrian and vehicular operational
improvements at and near the adjacent signalized intersections of Washington
Boulevard and Landmark Street. To improve access to the proposed project’s
facilities which are located off of Landmark Street, the proposed project will
ATTACHMENT 4
188 City of Culver City, California
Planning Commission Agenda Item Report
Page 13 of 16
require the design and construction of a westbound left-turn signal at the
intersection of Washington Boulevard and Landmark Street including all
associated costs for the modification of the traffic signal. Additionally, the curb at
the southwest corner and southeast corner of Landmark Street and Washington
Boulevard will be reconstructed to provide a larger radius and minimize the
impact of the existing acute angle experienced by motorists eastbound on
Washington Boulevard turning onto Landmark Street. The above changes will
enhance ingress/egress for motorists on Landmark Street, particularly for larger
trucks and emergency vehicle access.
Offsite and Streetscape Improvements
Pedestrian Setback: The project has been designed to include a “pedestrian
setback” along the major street frontage at the intersection of Washington
Boulevard and Landmark Avenue. This setback will allow ample area for outdoor
dining, installation of street trees, planters, trellis structures, arbors and other
pedestrian amenities.
Pedestrian related improvements include widening the roadways to provide
pedestrian friendly sidewalks. The project is required to install a 5’ wide sidewalk
along both the project’s frontage along Landmark Street. The sidewalk along
Washington Boulevard will be reconstructed to provide a 10’ wide sidewalk.
Also at the Washington/Landmark signalized intersection, a new crosswalk
across Washington Boulevard at the east side of the intersection will be installed
(a crosswalk currently exists on the west side of the intersection).
Transit Oriented Development District Streetscape Plan: The City is currently
developing a streetscape plan for the TOD District (see Attachment No. 3, TOD
Area Map). The project is required as condition of approval to comply with the
streetscape program for the area to be prepared as part of the Transit Oriented
District Streetscape Plan and funded on a pro rata basis by area developments.
The plan will include new canopy street trees, planters and tree grates, new
concrete sidewalks and new street furniture (benches, trash receptacles, and
bicycle racks). Also, a new bus shelter will be provided at the bus stop in front
of the project site.
The existing palm trees will be replaced with new street trees. Exact tree
location will be determined pursuant to the placement of traffic signal equipment
and utilities and production of the TOD Streetscape Plan. The preliminary
landscape plan identifies the London Plane tree (Platanus Acerfolia) as the street
tree that best fits the area in terms of scale and shade producing characteristics.
ATTACHMENT 4
189 City of Culver City, California
Planning Commission Agenda Item Report
Page 14 of 16
Infrastructure and Community Facilities District
Based upon the proposed development in the project Comprehensive Plan, the
site development will not require major upgrades to infrastructure such as water,
sewer, or gas; however, some utility relocation as well as various offsite
streetscape improvements will be required. The property owner/developer is
responsible for all project related public improvements and services.
A Community Facilities District (CFD) is one financial tool available to
commercial property owners within the TOD District to help fund public
improvements and services through private property assessment and bond
finance. A CFD can ensure timely completion of all necessary public
improvements. Consistent with the CFD provisions in the City’s Municipal Code
(Section 15.12.35), if established, the CFD funding may be based upon a pro
rata assessment for each commercial parcel within the District. The kinds of
improvement that may be funded on a pro rata basis include:
• New Infrastructure
• Utility Relocations
• Streetscape Improvements
• On-going maintenance
Community Meetings
Pursuant to the City’s Community Outreach Guidelines, the applicant hosted
three community meetings on November 30, 2010, May 5, 2011, and April 12,
2012. They hosted an additional community meeting on August 1, 2012.
All of the community meetings were well attended with approximately 20 people
per meeting. The feedback and input were generally positive and no written
correspondence in opposition to the proposed project has been received.
Attendee questions or comments were related to the project’s connection to the
Metro Exposition Light Rail Transit line and station, types and size of uses
proposed, parking provision, and access to and from the site. Attendees also
asked about the project schedule and when the project would begin construction.
ATTACHMENT 4
190 City of Culver City, California
Planning Commission Agenda Item Report
Page 15 of 16
CONCLUSION:
Platform is the first of several Transit Oriented Developments proposed in
connection with the Culver City Expo station. Staff has worked closely with the
applicant on the Platform Comprehensive Plan in order to ensure that it is
coordinated with future TOD projects and is fitting for the area.
A Comprehensive Plan is intended to reflect innovation in site planning and
design in order to more effectively respond to site features and minimize impacts
upon surrounding properties. Toward that end, the proposed PD zoning and
Comprehensive plan for Platform will help advance the goals good planning for
the site and achieve the City’s goals for transit oriented development.
Based on the analysis contained herein staff believes the findings for a
Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Code Map Amendment can be made as
outlined in proposed Resolution No. 2012-P011 (Attachment No. 4) and
recommends project approval.
ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION:
Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) guidelines a
Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) has been prepared; the project has been
determined that with mitigation measures incorporated, it will have less than
significant impacts on the community.
ALTERNATIVE OPTIONS:
The following alternative actions may be considered by the Planning
Commission:
1. Approve the application with the recommended conditions of approval if the
application is deemed to meet the required findings.
2. Approve the application with additional or different conditions of approval, if
deemed necessary to meet the required findings and mitigate any new project
impacts identified at the meeting.
3. Disapprove the application if it does not meet the required findings.
ATTACHMENT 4
191 City of Culver City, California
Planning Commission Agenda Item Report
Page 16 of 16
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Area Map
2. Zone Change Map
3. Transit Oriented Development District Map
4. Draft Resolution No. 2012-P011 (ZCMA P-2012020, CP-P2012018, MND –
P-2012019).
5. Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration dated August 22, 2012.
6. Traffic Analysis prepared by Raju and Associates Inc, dated July 2011 and
supplemented on March 2012.
7. Comprehensive Plans date stamped August 29, 2012.
ATTACHMENT 4
192ATTACHMENT 5
193ATTACHMENT 5
194ATTACHMENT 5
195ATTACHMENT 5
196ATTACHMENT 5
197ATTACHMENT 5
198ATTACHMENT 5
199ATTACHMENT 5
200ATTACHMENT 5
201ATTACHMENT 5
202ATTACHMENT 5
203ATTACHMENT 5
204ATTACHMENT 5
205ATTACHMENT 5
206ATTACHMENT 5
207ATTACHMENT 5
208ATTACHMENT 5
209ATTACHMENT 5
210ATTACHMENT 5
211ATTACHMENT 5
212ATTACHMENT 5
213ATTACHMENT 5
214ATTACHMENT 5
215ATTACHMENT 5
216ATTACHMENT 5
217ATTACHMENT 5
218ATTACHMENT 5
219ATTACHMENT 5
220ATTACHMENT 5
221
MEMORANDUM
TO: Mr. Barry Kurtz, P.E., City of Culver City
CC: Mr. Joseph Miller, The Runyon Group
FROM: Srinath Raju, P.E.
Chris Munoz
SUBJECT: The Platform Project Updated Project Description
Comparison of Trip Generation Estimates
DATE: March 5, 2012 REF: RA340-1
This memorandum documents details of the updated project description including the new
square-footages for the various uses at 8810 Washington Boulevard in the City of Culver City, CA
and compares the trip generation of the Proposed Project evaluated in the July 2011 Traffic Study
Final Report for the Platform at Culver Station Project with those of the updated Proposed Project
on the same site.
BACKGROUND
A detailed and comprehensive traffic study was prepared for the mixed-use project located at
8810 Washington Boulevard by Raju Associates, Inc. in July 2011 that the City of Culver City had
reviewed and approved. Since then, some modifications to the proposed project description have
occurred. This memorandum details these changes and provides an assessment of the potential
effects on trip generation and consequently, the traffic impacts detailed in the Original Traffic
Study.
505 E.Colorado Blvd.
Suite 202
Pasadena, CA 91101
91101
Voice:
Fax: (626) 792-2772
(626) 792-2700 |1010|ATTACHMENT 6
222The Original Traffic Study, dated July 2011, had the following project components –
1. Office equivalent to 28,708 square feet.
2. Retail equivalent to 36,819 square feet and Restaurant equivalent to 12,257 square feet for a
total of 49,076 square feet of retail and restaurant use.
3. Total Project of size 77,784 square feet.
4. Total off-street Parking of 279 spaces.
The Updated Project Description consists of the following component uses and elements –
1. Office equivalent to 38,120 square feet.
2. Retail equivalent to 31,059 square feet and Restaurant equivalent to 10,558 square feet for a
total of 41,617 square feet of retail and restaurant use.
3. Total Project of size 79,737 square feet.
4. Total off-street Parking of 292 spaces.
The updated project description calls for 9,412 square feet of additional office in lieu of 7,459
square feet of retail and restaurant use. The overall project size proposed is 1,953 square feet
more than that evaluated in the Original Traffic Study.
TRIP GENERATION COMPARISON
The Original Traffic Study uses and associated trip generation estimates are provided in Table 7
of the Final Report and enclosed for convenience in Attachment A of this memorandum. The
updated Project Description uses and corresponding associated trip generation estimates are
provided in Table 7 (Updated).
From Table 7 and Table 7 (Updated), the following observations can be made:
1. The Updated Proposed Project is estimated to generate a net additional 2,173 daily trips of
which 101 trips (81 inbound and 20 outbound) would occur in the morning peak hour, and 187
trips (89 trips inbound and 98 trips outbound) would occur in the evening peak hour. |1010|ATTACHMENT 6
2232. The Proposed Project evaluated in the Original July 2011 Raju Associates’ Traffic Study was
estimated to generate a net additional 2,357 daily trips of which 91 trips (71 inbound and 20
outbound) would occur in the morning peak hour, and 200 trips (100 inbound and 100 outbound)
would occur in the evening peak hour.
3. A comparison of the two project scenarios indicates that the updated project description is
estimated to result in 184 less daily trips, 10 additional morning peak hour trips and 13 less
evening peak hour trips.
TRAFFIC IMPACTS EVALUATION
From the Original July 2011 Raju Traffic Study, it can be observed that there would be no residual
significant traffic impacts at any of the 34 analyzed intersections in the study with the proposed
project and mitigation measure (or alternate mitigation measure) discussed in the study. The
traffic impact analyses table (Table 8) from the Original July 2011 Raju Traffic Study has been
included in Attachment B, for evaluation purposes.
From Table 8, the following observations can be made:
1. The Original Traffic Study’s Proposed Project would cause significant impact at the intersection
of Washington Boulevard and National Boulevard during the evening peak hour, but with the
proposed shuttle or advanced traffic signal synchronization alternative mitigation, there would be
no residual significant impact at this location.
2. The updated project description is estimated to generate less trips in the PM peak hour (and
daily conditions) than those evaluated in the study. Therefore, the conclusion of no residual
significant impact with the updated proposed project and the same mitigation measure can be
made.
3. During the morning peak hour, the updated proposed project would result in only 10 additional
AM peak hour trips and an examination of the magnitude of traffic impacts at all the analysis
locations reveals that, similar to the conclusions in the July 2011 Raju Traffic Study, there would
be no significant impacts due to the updated proposed project during the AM peak hour, as well.
4. At the intersection of Washington Boulevard and National Boulevard, during the morning peak |1010|ATTACHMENT 6
224hour, with the 10 additional project-only trips, the increase in volume to capacity ratio (V/C ratio)
would be an additional 0.002 for a total V/C increase of 0.019. This would not create a significant
impact in the morning peak hour at this location. Further, with the proposed mitigation or
alternative mitigation noted above, the V/C increase would be much less than significance levels
as shown in Table 8 of the Original Traffic Study Report. Therefore, there would be no change to
the conclusions of the Original Traffic Study Report.
5. In conclusion, given that the updated proposed project trip generation is very similar to or lower
than the proposed project trip generation in the July 2011 Raju Traffic Study, the same
conclusions relative to no residual significant impacts during both the peak hours at all the
analyzed intersection locations would hold and no further analysis would be necessary.
PARKING EVALUATION
The updated Proposed Project consists of 38,120 square feet of office use and 41,617 square
feet of retail and restaurant use. Based on the City of Culver City Municipal Zoning Code, the
updated Proposed Project would require 276 (office of 38,120/350 =109 spaces; retail/restaurant
of 41,617/250 = 167 spaces) off-street parking spaces. The updated project description calls for
provision of 292 parking spaces. Therefore, there would be adequate parking for the updated
Proposed Project.
CONCLUSION
The updated Proposed Project (along with the mitigation measure or the alternate mitigation
measure described in the July 2011 Raju Traffic Study) would not result in any residual significant
impacts at any of the analysis locations. The updated parking provisions would also be adequate
for the updated Proposed Project uses. The traffic impact analyses and conclusions in the July
2011 Traffic Study for the Platform at Culver Station Project, prepared by Raju Associates would
hold true for the updated project description evaluated in this memorandum. |1010|ATTACHMENT 6
225TABLE 7 (UPDATED)
ESTIMATED UPDATED PROJECT TRIP GENERATION
AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
Size Daily IN OUT TOTAL IN OUT TOTAL
Proposed Project (Updated)
Retail 31,059 s.f. 1,334 19 12 31 57 59 116
Restaurant 10,558 s.f. 950 5 4 9 53 26 79
Office 38,120 s.f. 635 77 10 87 10 47 57
Project Trip Generation Total 2,919 101 26 127 120 132 252
Transit Trip Use (7.5%) - Office (48) (6) (1) (7) (1) (4) (5)
*Internal Capture (10%) Trip Credit (287) (10) (2) (12) (12) (13) (25)
**Pass-By (20%) Trip Reduction - Retail/Restaurant (411) (4) (3) (7) (18) (17) (35)
Project Trip Generation Net Total 2,173 81 20 101 89 98 187
Trip Rates [1]
General Office (ITE Land Use 710) Trips per 1,000 s.f. [2] 88% 12% [2] 17% 83% 1.49
Retail (ITE Land Use 820) Trips per 1,000 s.f. 42.94 61% 39% 1.00 49% 51% 3.73
Restaurant (ITE Land Use 931) Trips per 1,000 s.f. 89.95 50% 50% 0.81 67% 33% 7.49
* Internal capture credit taken after reduction of transit trips.
** Pass-by trip reduction taken after internal capture credits.
[1] Trip Generation, An ITE Information Report , 8th Edition, ITE 2008
[2] Daily and AM peak hour trip generation for office was calculated using the following formulas:
Daily: Ln(T) = 0.77 Ln(X) + 3.65 Where:
AM Peak Hour: Ln(T) = 0.80 Ln(X) + 1.55 Ln = Natural logarithm
T = Two-way volume of traffic (total trip-ends)
X = Area in 1,000 square feet gross floor area|1010|ATTACHMENT 6
226
ATTACHMENT A
|1010|ATTACHMENT 6
227TABLE 7
ESTIMATED PROJECT TRIP GENERATION
AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
Size Daily IN OUT TOTAL IN OUT TOTAL
Proposed Project
Retail 36,819 s.f. 1,581 23 14 37 67 70 137
Restaurant 12,257 s.f. 1,103 5 5 10 62 30 92
Office 28,708 s.f. 510 61 8 69 7 36 43
Project Trip Generation Total 3,194 89 27 116 136 136 272
Transit Trip Use (7.5%) - Office (38) (5) (1) (6) (1) (3) (4)
*Internal Capture (10%) Trip Credit (316) (8) (3) (11) (14) (13) (27)
**Pass-By (20%) Trip Reduction - Retail/Restaurant (483) (5) (3) (8) (21) (20) (41)
Project Trip Generation Net Total 2,357 71 20 91 100 100 200
Trip Rates [1]
General Office (ITE Land Use 710) Trips per 1,000 s.f. [2] 88% 12% [2] 17% 83% 1.49
Retail (ITE Land Use 820) Trips per 1,000 s.f. 42.94 61% 39% 1.00 49% 51% 3.73
Restaurant (ITE Land Use 931) Trips per 1,000 s.f. 89.95 50% 50% 0.81 67% 33% 7.49
* Internal capture credit taken after reduction of transit trips.
** Pass-by trip reduction taken after internal capture credits.
[1] Trip Generation, An ITE Information Report, 8th Edition, ITE 2008
[2] Daily and AM peak hour trip generation for office was calculated using the following formulas:
Daily: Ln(T) = 0.77 Ln(X) + 3.65 Where:
AM Peak Hour: Ln(T) = 0.80 Ln(X) + 1.55 Ln = Natural logarithm
T = Two-way volume of traffic (total trip-ends)
X = Area in 1,000 square feet gross floor area|1010|ATTACHMENT 6
228
ATTACHMENT B
|1010|ATTACHMENT 6
229TABLE 8
SUMMARY OF INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE ANALYSIS - FUTURE CONDITIONS
Cumulative (2014) Cumulative (2014) Plus Project Conditions
Peak Base Conditions Increase Significant
Map # INTERSECTION Hour V/C LOS V/C LOS in V/C Impact
1 Robertson Boulevard Cattaraugus Avenue [1] AM 0.948 E 0.949 E 0.001 No
PM 0.933 E 0.936 E 0.003 No
2 Robertson Boulevard I-10 WB Off-Ramp/Kincardine Avenue [1] AM 0.797 C 0.801 D 0.004 No
PM 0.809 D 0.815 D 0.006 No
3 Robertson Boulevard National Boulevard [1] AM 1.049 F 1.053 F 0.004 No
PM 1.042 F 1.047 F 0.005 No
4 National Boulevard I-10 Eastbound On-Ramp [1] AM 0.415 A 0.415 A 0.000 No
PM 0.454 A 0.457 A 0.003 No
5 Hughes Avenue Venice Boulevard [1] AM 0.841 D 0.843 D 0.002 No
PM 0.767 C 0.771 C 0.004 No
6 Bagley Avenue Venice Boulevard [1] AM 0.789 C 0.791 C 0.002 No
PM 0.763 C 0.767 C 0.004 No
7 Culver Boulevard Venice Boulevard [1] AM 0.849 D 0.852 D 0.003 No
PM 0.957 E 0.961 E 0.004 No
8 Robertson Boulevard Venice Boulevard [1] AM 1.461 F 1.462 F 0.001 No
PM 1.430 F 1.434 F 0.004 No
9 National Boulevard Venice Boulevard [1] AM 1.038 F 1.043 F 0.005 No
PM 1.013 F 1.021 F 0.008 No
10 Helms Avenue Venice Boulevard [1] AM 0.527 A 0.528 A 0.001 No
PM 0.515 A 0.517 A 0.002 No
11 Cattaraugus Avenue Venice Boulevard [1] AM 0.863 D 0.865 D 0.002 No
PM 0.723 C 0.727 C 0.004 No|10 10|ATTACHMENT 6
230TABLE 8 (continued)
SUMMARY OF INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE ANALYSIS - FUTURE CONDITIONS
Cumulative (2014) Cumulative (2014) Plus Project Conditions
Peak Base Conditions Increase Significant
Map # INTERSECTION Hour V/C LOS V/C LOS in V/C Impact
12 La Cienega Boulevard Venice Boulevard [1,2] AM 1.083 F 1.085 F 0.002 No
PM 1.066 F 1.069 F 0.003 No
13 Hughes Avenue/Duquesne Avenue Washington Boulevard AM 0.641 B 0.641 B 0.000 No
PM 0.653 B 0.654 B 0.001 No
14 Duquesne Avenue Culver Boulevard AM 0.760 C 0.762 C 0.002 No
PM 0.886 D 0.891 D 0.005 No
15 Culver Boulevard Washington Boulevard/Irving Place AM 0.618 B 0.620 B 0.002 No
PM 0.635 B 0.638 B 0.003 No
16 Main Street Culver Boulevard AM 0.581 A 0.582 A 0.001 No
PM 0.613 B 0.613 B 0.000 No
17 Culver Boulevard Washington Boulevard AM 0.782 C 0.783 C 0.001 No
PM 0.752 C 0.756 C 0.004 No
18 Robertson Boulevard/Higuera Street Washington Boulevard AM 0.975 E 0.990 E 0.015 No
PM 0.816 D 0.847 D 0.031 No
19 Landmark Street Washington Boulevard AM 0.601 B 0.610 B 0.009 No
PM 0.514 A 0.599 A 0.085 No
20 National Boulevard Washington Boulevard AM 0.946 E 0.963 E 0.017 No
PM 0.925 E 0.947 E 0.022 Yes
with Mitigation Measure [5]
AM 0.913 E -0.033 No
PM 0.897 D -0.028 No
with Mitigation Measure - Alternative [5]
AM 0.933 E -0.013 No
PM 0.917 E -0.008 No
10
ATTACHMENT 6
231TABLE 8 (continued)
SUMMARY OF INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE ANALYSIS - FUTURE CONDITIONS
Cumulative (2014) Cumulative (2014) Plus Project Conditions
Peak Base Conditions Increase Significant
Map # INTERSECTION Hour V/C LOS V/C LOS in V/C Impact
21 Wesley Avenue Washington Boulevard [3] AM 134.9 sec F 138.9 sec F 0.005 No
PM 484.0 sec F 521.5 sec F 0.008 No
AM 0.768 [6] 0.773 [6] - -
PM 0.781 [6] 0.789 [6] - -
22 Helms Avenue Washington Boulevard AM 0.563 A 0.568 A 0.005 No
PM 0.503 A 0.509 A 0.006 No
23 Cattaraugus Avenue Washington Boulevard [3] AM *** sec F *** sec F 0.007 No
PM 709.6 sec F 778.5 sec F 0.016 No
AM 1.030 [6] 1.037 [6] - -
PM 0.898 [6] 0.914 [6] - -
24 La Cienega Boulevard Washington Boulevard AM 1.199 F 1.203 F 0.004 No
PM 0.990 E 0.996 E 0.006 No
25 La Cienega Boulevard Fairfax Avenue [1] AM 1.060 F 1.060 F 0.000 No
PM 0.898 D 0.898 D 0.000 No
26 Wesley Street National Boulevard AM 0.710 C 0.715 C 0.005 No
PM 0.472 A 0.479 A 0.007 No
27 Hayden Avenue National Boulevard AM 0.640 B 0.643 B 0.003 No
PM 0.738 C 0.747 C 0.009 No
28 Jefferson Boulevard National Boulevard [1] AM 1.002 F 1.009 F 0.007 No
PM 0.752 C 0.757 C 0.005 No
29 La Cienega Boulevard Jefferson Boulevard [1,2] AM 1.278 F 1.280 F 0.002 No
PM 1.205 F 1.210 F 0.005 No
30 Jefferson Boulevard Higuera Street/Rodeo Road [1] AM 0.755 C 0.758 C 0.003 No
PM 0.781 C 0.790 C 0.009 No
11
ATTACHMENT 6
232TABLE 8 (continued)
SUMMARY OF INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE ANALYSIS - FUTURE CONDITIONS
Cumulative (2014) Cumulative (2014) Plus Project Conditions
Peak Base Conditions Increase Significant
Map # INTERSECTION Hour V/C LOS V/C LOS in V/C Impact
31 La Cienega Boulevard Rodeo Road [1] AM 1.217 F 1.219 F 0.002 No
PM 1.248 F 1.251 F 0.003 No
32 Braddock Drive Duquesne Avenue [4] AM 227.9 sec F 229.1 sec F 0.001 No
PM 158.5 sec F 160.3 sec F 0.003 No
AM 1.185 [6] 1.186 [6] - -
PM 1.325 [6] 1.328 [6] - -
33 Lucerne Avenue Duquesne Avenue [4] AM 51.7 sec F 52.2 sec F 0.002 No
PM 66.8 sec F 68.4 sec F 0.005 No
AM 0.939 [6] 0.941 [6] - -
PM 1.052 [6] 1.057 [6] - -
34 Jefferson Boulevard Duquesne Avenue AM 1.211 F 1.215 F 0.004 No
PM 1.030 F 1.034 F 0.004 No
*** Intersection delay cannot be calculated.
[1] City of Los Angeles location.
[2] Los Angeles County Congestion Management Program (CMP) monitoring location.
[3] Unsignalized intersections - stop-controlled on minor approach(es).
[4] Unsignalized intersections - stop-controlled on all approach.
[6] V/C ratio was calculated, based on signalized LOS methodology, to determine project impacts.
[5] The Project requires only a small increment of V/C improvement to alleviate the significance of its impact (0.003 or 0.3% V/C improvement) during the PM peak hour. No significant
impact occurs during the AM peak hour and therefore, no V/C improvement is required.
12
ATTACHMENT 6
233
TRAFFIC STUDY
FOR THE
PLATFORM AT CULVER STATION PROJECT
Submitted by :
Prepared for:
July 2011
THE RUNYON GROUP
ATTACHMENT 6
234
TRAFFIC STUDY
FOR THE
PLATFORM AT CULVER STATION PROJECT
Prepared for:
THE RUNYON GROUP
Prepared by:
RAJU ASSOCIATES, INC.
505 E. Colorado Boulevard, Suite 202
Pasadena, California 91101
(626) 792-2700
Ref: RA 340
ATTACHMENT 6
235
TABLE OF CONTENTS
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
I. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................. 4
PROJECT DESCRIPTION ................................................................................. 4
STUDY SCOPE ................................................................................................ 6
ORGANIZATION OF REPORT ......................................................................... 8
II. EXISTING CONDITIONS .............................................................................................. 9
STUDY AREA ..................................................................................................... 9
EXISTING STREET SYSTEM .......................................................................... 9
EXISTING TRAFFIC VOLUMES AND LEVELS OF SERVICE ......................... 13
EXISTING TRANSIT LINES ............................................................................... 21
III. FUTURE YEAR 2014 TRAFFIC PROJECTIONS ........................................................ 26
CUMULATIVE (2014) BASE TRAFFIC PROJECTIONS ................................... 26
PROJECT TRAFFIC VOLUMES ...................................................................... 37
CUMULATIVE (2014) PLUS PROJECT TRAFFIC VOLUMES ......................... 39
IV. FUTURE YEAR 2014 TRAFFIC CONDITIONS & IMPACT ANALYSIS ...................... 45
SIGNIFICANT TRAFFIC IMPACT CRITERIA .................................................. 45
FUTURE BASE ROADWAY NETWORK IMPROVEMENTS .......................... 46
CUMULATIVE (2014) BASE TRAFFIC CONDITIONS .................................... 49
CUMULATIVE (2014) PLUS PROJECT TRAFFIC CONDITIONS .................. 54
PROJECT IMPACTS ........................................................................................ 55
RECOMMENDED MITIGATION MEASURE ..................................................... 55
V. STREET SEGMENT AND PARKING/ACCESS ANALYSIS ........................................ 60
RESIDENTIAL STREET SEGMENT TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS .............. 60
PARKING EVALUATION .................................................................................. 64
ACCESS AND CIRCULATION ........................................................................... 64
VI. REGIONAL CONGESTION MANAGEMENT PROGRAM ANALYSIS ........................ 67
CMP TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS ................................................................ 67
VII. SUMMARY OF CONCLUSIONS .................................................................................. 69
APPENDICES
ATTACHMENT 6
236
LIST OF FIGURES
NO.
1 LOCATION OF PROJECT AND ANALYZED INTERSECTIONS ................................ 5
2A EXISTING (2011) AM PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES .......................................... 14
2B EXISTING (2011) PM PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES .......................................... 15
3 EXISTING TRANSIT LINES ........................................................................................... 25
4 LOCATION OF RELATED PROJECTS ......................................................................... 30
5A RELATED PROJECTS ONLY AM PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES ...................... 33
5B RELATED PROJECTS ONLY PM PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES ...................... 34
6A CUMULATIVE (2014) BASE AM PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES ........................ 35
6B CUMULATIVE (2014) BASE PM PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES ........................ 36
7 PROJECT TRIP DISTRIBUTION ................................................................................ 40
8A PROJECT ONLY AM PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES .......................................... 41
8B PROJECT ONLY PM PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES .......................................... 42
9A CUMULATIVE (2014) PLUS AM PROJECT PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES ....... 43
9B CUMULATIVE (2014) PLUS PM PROJECT PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES ....... 44
10 CULVER CITY CIRCULATOR SERVICE-PRELIMINARY ROUTE ............................... 56
11 PROPOSED PROJECT SITE PLAN ............................................................................ 65
LIST OF TABLES
NO.
1 LIST OF STUDY INTERSECTIONS ............................................................................... 7
2 LEVEL OF SERVICE DEFINITIONS FOR SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS .............. 17
3 LEVEL OF SERVICE DEFINITIONS FOR STOP-CONTROLLED INTERSECTIONS . 18
4 SUMMARY OF INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE ANALYSIS-EXISTING (2011)
CONDITIONS ................................................................................................................. 20
5 LIST OF RELATED PROJECTS .................................................................................. 28
6 ESTIMATED WEEKDAY TRIP GENERATION OF RELATED PROJECTS .............. 31
7 ESTIMATED PROJECT TRIP GENERATION ............................................................ 38
8 SUMMARY OF INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE ANALYSIS – FUTURE
CONDITIONS ................................................................................................................. 50
9 RESIDENTIAL STREET TRAFFIC ANALYSIS ............................................................ 62
ATTACHMENT 6
237
APPENDICES
A MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING
B INTERSECTION LANE CONFIGURATIONS
C TRAFFIC COUNTS
D CAPACITY CALCULATION WORKSHEETS – EXISTING (2011) CONDITIONS
E RELATED PROJECTS TRIP GENERATION RATES / CAPACITY CALCULATION
WORKSHEETS – CUMULATIVE (2014) BASE CONDITIONS
F CAPACITY CALCULATION WORKSHEETS – CUMULATIVE (2014) PLUS PROJECT
CONDITIONS
G CAPACITY CALCULATION WORKSHEETS – CUMULATIVE (2014) PLUS PROJECT
WITH MITIGATION MEASURES
ATTACHMENT 6
238
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
A detailed traffic study was performed by Raju Associates, Inc. to assess the traffic impacts of the
proposed Platform at Culver Station Mixed-Use Project within the City of Culver City, California.
The Project is located at 8810-40-50 Washington Boulevard and 3920 Landmark Street.
The Project site occupies the southwest and southeast corners of the Landmark
Street/Washington Boulevard intersection. The Proposed Project involves the construction of
six buildings (two of the six buildings are parking structures) varying from one-story to four-
stories. Only one building, a multi-level parking structure with ground floor retail, would be
located on the southwest corner of the Landmark Street/Washington Boulevard intersection.
The remaining five buildings would be located on the southeast corner of this intersection. As
proposed, the Project would consist of 28,708 square feet of office use, 36,819 square feet of
retail use, and 12,257 square feet of restaurant use. The Project would provide a 202-space
multi-level parking structure (with ground floor retail) and a 77-space parking structure for an
overall total supply of 279 parking spaces. Currently, the existing site includes a vacant car
dealership.
Driveways located along Landmark Street would provide access to the Project’s parking
structures. One driveway would be located on the west side of the street providing access to
the 202-space parking structure. Three driveways would be located on the east side of the
street; two driveways providing access to the 77-space parking structure and the other driveway
providing access to the loading/trash collection area. The existing driveways along Washington
Boulevard to the site would be removed.
Current and future traffic analyses at 34 intersections within the Cities of Culver City and Los
Angeles were conducted in this study. At these locations, traffic operations were studied prior to
and after implementation of the Proposed Project; deficiencies and impacts, if any, identified;
improvements and mitigation measures, if required, developed; their effectiveness determined and
residual traffic impacts, if any, ascertained as part of this study. Access and circulation at the
proposed driveways to the parking area for the Project were also evaluated. The following
executive summary highlighting the key findings of this study is presented in the following page. |1010|ATTACHMENT 6
239
? Thirty-four intersections were analyzed within the study area for this project. These
locations are within the study area bounded by Cattaraugus Avenue on the north,
Jefferson Boulevard/Rodeo Road on the south, Hughes Avenue/Duquesne Avenue on the
west and La Cienega Boulevard on the east. Of the 34 intersections, 17 intersections are
located within the City of Culver City and 17 intersections within the City of Los Angeles.
? Currently, 24 of the 34 analyzed intersection locations are operating at acceptable levels of
service (LOS) D or better during the morning peak hour. During the evening peak hour, 26
of the 34 analyzed intersections are operating at LOS D or better. The remaining
intersections are operating at LOS E or F.
? In the Cumulative (Year 2014) Base conditions, i.e., future conditions without the
implementation of the Proposed Project, 17 of the 34 analyzed intersection locations are
projected to continue to operate at LOS D or better during the morning peak hour. During
the evening peak hour, 19 of the 34 analyzed intersections are projected to operate at LOS
D or better. The remaining intersections are projected to operate at LOS E or F.
? The Proposed Project would consist of 28,708 square feet of office use, 36,819 square
feet of retail use, and 12,257 square feet of restaurant use. The Project is estimated to
generate a net total of approximately 91 trips during the morning peak hour and 200 trips
during the evening peak hour.
? In the Cumulative (Year 2014) plus Project conditions, both the AM and PM peak hour
operating conditions would be similar to those projected for the Cumulative (2014) Base
conditions.
? The Cumulative (Year 2014) plus Project conditions indicate that the Proposed Project
would cause a significant traffic impact at the intersection of National Boulevard and
Washington Boulevard during the evening peak hour. The Project’s impact exceeds the
threshold for significant impact by an incremental volume-to-capacity ratio of 0.003 or
0.3%. No significant impact would occur at any of the other analyzed intersections.
? In order to address the Project’s impact at the intersection of National
Boulevard/Washington Boulevard, the following mitigation measure is recommended:
The Project shall contribute its fair share towards implementation of a shuttle system
connecting the residential and commercial areas in Downtown Culver City and Hayden
Tract areas to and from the Venice/Robertson Light Rail Train (LRT) Station on the
Exposition Line. This shuttle system will include shuttle buses with stops along
Washington Boulevard. The schedules for these shuttles should be developed such that
coordinated transfers to and from the rail station at Venice/Robertson are achieved.
These shuttles would operate at enhanced frequencies during the peak commuter time
periods and provide fast, convenient, and efficient connections to the Metro Exposition
LRT Line.
|1010|ATTACHMENT 6
240
In event that the proposed shuttle program has not progressed sufficiently to warrant
study funding, the following alternative mitigation measure shall be implemented:
The Project shall contribute its fair share towards the design and implementation of
ATCS (Adaptive Traffic Control System) at the intersection of National
Boulevard/Washington Boulevard. This includes provision of ATCS-associated signal
equipment, additional loop detectors, communications set-up and the associated control
PC hardware/software, if required.
Additionally, to improve access to the Proposed Project’s parking facilities along
Landmark Street, the applicant of the Proposed Project shall be required to design, and
construct the westbound left-turn signal at the intersection of Washington Boulevard and
Landmark Street and be responsible for all costs associated with the modification of the
traffic signal.
? Parking, access and circulation systems were assessed as part of this study. A review of
the proposed site plan was also conducted. This review indicates that they would all
function adequately and that there would be no adverse impact from the Proposed Project.
|1010|ATTACHMENT 6
241
I. INTRODUCTION
This report documents the assumptions, methodologies and findings of a study conducted by Raju
Associates, Inc., to evaluate the potential traffic impacts of the proposed Platform at Culver Station
Mixed-Use Project located at 8810-40-50 Washington Boulevard and 3920 Landmark Street within
the City of Culver City, California.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The Proposed Project is located on the south side of Washington Boulevard between Robertson
Boulevard-Higuera Street and National Boulevard. The Project site occupies the southwest and
southeast corners of the Landmark Street/Washington Boulevard intersection. Figure 1
illustrates the location of the Proposed Project in relation to the surrounding street system.
The Proposed Project involves the construction of six buildings (two of the six buildings are
parking structures) varying from one-story to four-stories. Only one building, a multi-level
parking structure with ground floor retail, would be located on the southwest corner of the
Landmark Street/Washington Boulevard intersection. The remaining five buildings would be
located on the southeast corner of this intersection. As proposed, the Project would consist of
28,708 square feet of office use, 36,819 square feet of retail use, and 12,257 square feet of
restaurant use. The Project would provide a 202-space multi-level parking structure (with ground
floor retail) and a 77-space parking structure for an overall total supply of 279 parking spaces.
Currently, the existing site includes a vacant car dealership.
Driveways located along Landmark Street would provide access to the Project’s parking
structures. One driveway would be located on the west side of the street providing access to the
202-space parking structure. Three driveways would be located on the east side of the street; |1010|ATTACHMENT 6
2425
ATTACHMENT 6
243
two driveways providing access to the 77-space parking structure and the other driveway
providing access to the loading/trash collection area. The existing driveways along Washington
Boulevard to the site would be removed.
STUDY SCOPE
The scope of work for this study was developed in conjunction with the Cities of Culver City and
Los Angeles staff. The base assumptions, technical methodologies and geographic coverage of
the study were all identified as part of the study approach. The study is directed at the analysis of
potential traffic impacts on the street system produced by the Proposed Project per the City of
Culver City traffic impact significance criteria. For locations within the City of Los Angeles, the City
of Los Angeles traffic impact significance criteria have been used. The scenarios identified on the
following page have been evaluated in this study.
• Existing (2011) Conditions - The analysis of existing traffic conditions is intended to provide
a basis for the remainder of the study. The existing conditions analysis includes an
assessment of streets, traffic volumes, and operating conditions.
• Cumulative Base (2014) Conditions - Future traffic conditions without the proposed project
has been developed for the year 2014. The objective of this analysis is to project future
traffic growth and operating conditions, which could be expected to result from regional
growth and related projects in the vicinity of the study area by the year 2014.
• Cumulative plus Project (2014) Conditions – The traffic expected to be generated by the
proposed project is estimated and added to the Cumulative Base (2014) traffic forecasts.
The impacts of the proposed project on future traffic operating conditions are then
identified.
As part of this traffic study, a total of 34 intersections within two jurisdictions have been analyzed.
A listing of these intersections including jurisdiction, control type, and signal control system is
presented in Table 1 and their locations are illustrated in Figure 1. Thirty of the 34 analyzed
intersections are signalized, while four intersections are stop-controlled. Of the 34 study locations,
17 intersections are in the City of Culver City, 16 intersections are in the City of Los Angeles, and
one intersection is within the Cities of Culver City and Los Angeles. These study locations were
coordinated with the affected jurisdictions as part of the scoping for the study and were analyzed
for the scenarios described above. |1010|ATTACHMENT 6
244TABLE 1
LIST OF STUDY INTERSECTIONS
Intersection Signal System
# Northbound/Southbound Eastbound/Westbound Jurisdiction Signalized? Control
1. Robertson Boulevard Cattaraugus Avenue City of Los Angeles Yes ATSAC/ATCS
2. Robertson Boulevard I-10 WB Off-Ramp/Kincardine Avenue City of Los Angeles Yes ATSAC/ATCS
3. Robertson Boulevard National Boulevard City of Los Angeles Yes ATSAC/ATCS
4. National Boulevard I-10 Eastbound On-Ramp City of Los Angeles Yes ATSAC/ATCS
5. Hughes Avenue Venice Boulevard City of Los Angeles Yes ATSAC
6. Bagley Avenue Venice Boulevard City of Los Angeles Yes ATSAC
7. Culver Boulevard Venice Boulevard City of Los Angeles Yes ATSAC/ATCS
8. Robertson Boulevard Venice Boulevard City of Los Angeles Yes ATSAC/ATCS
9. National Boulevard Venice Boulevard City of Los Angeles Yes ATSAC/ATCS
10. Helms Avenue Venice Boulevard City of Los Angeles Yes ATSAC/ATCS
11. Cattaraugus Avenue Venice Boulevard City of Los Angeles Yes ATSAC
12. La Cienega Boulevard Venice Boulevard [1] City of Los Angeles Yes ATSAC/ATCS
13. Hughes Avenue/Duquesne Avenue Washington Boulevard Culver City Yes ATSAC
14. Duquesne Avenue Culver Boulevard Culver City Yes ATSAC
15. Culver Boulevard Washington Boulevard/Irving Place Culver City Yes ATSAC
16. Main Street Culver Boulevard Culver City Yes ATSAC
17. Culver Boulevard Washington Boulevard Culver City Yes ATSAC
18. Robertson Boulevard/Higuera Street Washington Boulevard Culver City Yes ATSAC
19. Landmark Street Washington Boulevard Culver City Yes ATSAC
20. National Boulevard Washington Boulevard Culver City Yes ATSAC
21. Wesley Avenue Washington Boulevard Culver City No -
22. Helms Avenue Washington Boulevard Culver City Yes ATSAC
23. Cattaraugus Avenue Washington Boulevard Culver City No -
24. La Cienega Boulevard Washington Boulevard Culver City Yes ATSAC
25. La Cienega Boulevard Fairfax Avenue [1] City of Los Angeles/Culver City Yes ATSAC/ATCS
26. Wesley Street National Boulevard Culver City Yes ATSAC
27. Hayden Avenue National Boulevard Culver City Yes ATSAC
28. Jefferson Boulevard National Boulevard City of Los Angeles Yes ATSAC/ATCS
29. La Cienega Boulevard Jefferson Boulevard [1] City of Los Angeles Yes ATSAC/ATCS
30. Jefferson Boulevard Higuera Street/Rodeo Road City of Los Angeles Yes ATSAC/ATCS
31. La Cienega Boulevard Rodeo Road City of Los Angeles Yes ATSAC/ATCS
32. Braddock Drive Duquesne Avenue Culver City No -
33. Lucerne Avenue Duquesne Avenue Culver City No -
34. Jefferson Boulevard Duquesne Avenue Culver City Yes ATSAC
[1] Los Angeles County Congestion Management Program monitoring location.|1010|ATTACHMENT 6
245
A detailed Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) was prepared in coordination with the City of
Culver City staff. The MOU includes among other details, a description of the Proposed Project,
its trip generation and distribution characteristics. A copy of the MOU is attached in Appendix A of
this report.
ORGANIZATION OF REPORT
An executive summary presenting key details of the traffic study is provided at the beginning of
this report. The rest of the report is divided into seven chapters. Chapter I presents an
introduction and provides details of the various elements of the study. Chapter II describes the
existing circulation system, traffic volumes, and traffic conditions within the study area. The
methodology to obtain Future Year 2014 traffic volumes with and without the Proposed Project are
described and applied in Chapter III. Chapter IV presents assessment of traffic conditions with
and without the project and the potential traffic impacts due to the Proposed Project. Residential
street segment analysis, parking, and access/circulation evaluations are presented in Chapter V.
The results of the analysis of the Proposed Project’s impacts on the Congestion Management
Program (CMP) regional transportation system are provided in Chapter VI. A summary of the
analysis and study conclusions are included in Chapter VII. Appendices to this report include
details of the technical analysis. |1010|ATTACHMENT 6
246
II. EXISTING CONDITIONS
A comprehensive data collection effort was undertaken to develop a detailed description of
existing conditions within the study area. The assessment of conditions relevant to this study
includes an inventory of the street system, traffic volumes on these facilities, and operating condi-
tions at key intersections. A detailed description of these elements is presented in this chapter.
STUDY AREA
The Project site is located on south side of Washington Boulevard between Robertson Boulevard-
Higuera Street and National Boulevard. The Project site occupies the southwest and southeast
corners of the Landmark Street/Washington Boulevard intersection. The San Diego (I-405)
Freeway is located approximately two miles west of the Project site and the Santa Monica (I-10)
Freeway is located less than a half mile north of the Project site. The study area is bounded by
Cattaraugus Avenue on the north, Jefferson Boulevard/Rodeo Road on the south, Hughes
Avenue/Duquesne Avenue on the west and La Cienega Boulevard on the east.
EXISTING STREET SYSTEM
The City of Culver City uses the following street classification designations: primary arterials,
secondary arterials, and neighborhood feeder streets. The City of Los Angeles uses the following
designations: major highways, secondary highways, collector streets, and local streets. The
existing street system within the study area consists of a regional highway system including
primary arterials/major highways east of the San Diego (I-405) Freeway and south of the Santa
Monica (I-10) Freeway, and a sub-regional street system including secondary arterials/highways,
and neighborhood feeder streets/collectors and local streets. A description of the regional and
local access and circulation offered by the various roadways follows.
|10 10|ATTACHMENT 6
247
The San Diego (I-405) and Santa Monica (I-10) Freeways provide the primary regional access to
the study area. The key arterials/highways serving the site are Venice Boulevard, National
Boulevard, Washington Boulevard, Culver Boulevard, Duquesne Avenue, Robertson Boulevard,
Higuera Street, Hayden Avenue, Fairfax Avenue, Rodeo Road, Jefferson Boulevard, and La
Cienega Boulevard. The remaining neighborhood streets (collector and local streets) offer local
circulation possibilities. Brief descriptions of these facilities serving the study area are included in
the following section.
• Santa Monica (I-10) Freeway – The I-10 Freeway is an east-west freeway that transverses
the Southern California region from its western terminus at Pacific Coast Highway in the
City of Santa Monica into San Bernardino County and points east. Within the vicinity of the
study area, this freeway generally provides four lanes in the westbound direction and four
lanes in the eastbound direction. There are interchanges at Robertson Boulevard,
National Boulevard, La Cienega Boulevard/Venice Boulevard and Washington
Boulevard/Fairfax Avenue in the vicinity of the study area. This freeway provides access
to the regional interstate system.
• San Diego (I-405) Freeway – The I-405 Freeway is a north-south freeway that transverses
the Southern California region from its northern terminus at the I-5 Freeway in Sylmar to its
southern terminus at the I-5 Freeway in Irvine. Within the vicinity of the study area, this
freeway provides five lanes in the northbound direction and six lanes in the southbound
direction (including one HOV lane north of SR-90). There are interchanges at Culver
Boulevard and Venice Boulevard/Washington Boulevard in the vicinity of the study area.
This freeway provides access to the regional interstate system.
• Venice Boulevard – Venice Boulevard is classified as a primary arterial/major highway,
within the study area, and traverses in an east-west direction across several jurisdictions.
Venice Boulevard generally offers six travel lanes, three lanes in each direction, with left-
turn lanes at key intersections and a large raised median island. On-street parking is
allowed on both sides of the street throughout the study area. Venice Boulevard provides
access to the I-10 (Santa Monica) Freeway.
• Washington Boulevard – Washington Boulevard is classified as a primary arterial roadway
within the City of Culver City and a major highway within the City of Los Angeles and
defines the northern frontage of the Project site. Washington Boulevard traverses in an
east-west direction across several jurisdictions and generally offers four travel lanes, two
lanes per direction, with a central left-turn lane or median. On-street parking is generally
allowed along this roadway in the vicinity of the study area.
• Culver Boulevard – Culver Boulevard is a primary arterial within the City of Culver City and
a major highway within the City of Los Angeles and traverses diagonally in an east-west
direction from Playa del Rey to its terminus at Venice Boulevard. Within the study area,
this roadway offers four travel lanes, two lanes per direction, with a raised median and turn
10
ATTACHMENT 6
248
lanes at major or key intersections. On-street parking is allowed along this roadway
throughout the study area, except at major intersections where turn lanes are provided.
Culver Boulevard currently provides access to the I-405 (San Diego) Freeway to and from
the north.
• Jefferson Boulevard – Jefferson Boulevard is a primary arterial/major highway west of La
Cienega Boulevard and traverses in an east-west direction. East of La Cienega Boulevard,
Jefferson Boulevard is classified as a secondary highway. Within the study area, this
roadway generally provides four travel lanes, two lanes in each direction with a central left-
turn lane. On-street parking is generally allowed along this roadway.
• La Cienega Boulevard – La Cienega Boulevard is classified as a primary arterial/major
highway and traverses in a north-south direction across several jurisdictions. This
roadway offers six travel lanes, three lanes per direction, with a central left-turn median.
There is no stopping at any time along the roadway within the study area. This roadway
provides access to the I-10 (Santa Monica) Freeway, as well as, the I-405 (San Diego)
Freeway to and from the south.
• Fairfax Avenue – Fairfax Avenue is a primary arterial/major highway that traverses in a
north-south direction and offers four travel lanes, two lanes per direction, with left-turn
lanes at key intersections. On-street parking is generally prohibited along this roadway
within the study area. This roadway provides access to the I-10 (Santa Monica) Freeway.
• Rodeo Road – Rodeo Road is classified as a major highway and runs in an east-west
direction across the City of Los Angeles. Within the study area, this roadway generally
provides six travel lanes during peak commute hours, three lanes in each direction, with a
central left-turn median. Restricted on-street parking is generally allowed along this
roadway.
• Robertson Boulevard – Within the City of Los Angeles, Robertson Boulevard is classified
as a secondary highway. Within Culver City, south of Venice Boulevard, Robertson
Boulevard is classified as a primary arterial. This roadway runs in a north-south direction
and generally provides four travels lanes, two lanes in each direction. On-street parking is
allowed on both sides of the streets within the study area. Some segments of Robertson
Boulevard have parking prohibitions and/or restrictions on one or both sides of the street.
Robertson Boulevard provides access to the I-10 (Santa Monica) Freeway.
• National Boulevard – National Boulevard is a secondary arterial/highway that runs in an
east-west direction. It generally offers two lanes in the each direction and provides
connection to the I-10 (Santa Monica) Freeway north of the Project site. On-street parking
is available along many stretches of this roadway, generally, except at major intersections
where turn lanes are provided.
• Duquesne Avenue – Duquesne Avenue is a secondary arterial roadway that traverses in a
north-south direction. Within the study area, this roadway offers two travel lanes, one lane
per direction. On-street parking is generally allowed on both sides of the street.
11
ATTACHMENT 6
249
• Hayden Avenue – Hayden Avenue is a secondary arterial that traverses in a north-south
direction. This roadway offers two travel lanes, one lane in each direction. Between
National Boulevard and Higuera Street, on-street parking is generally prohibited or
restricted.
• Higuera Street – Higuera Street is classified as a secondary arterial between Hayden
Avenue and Jefferson Boulevard and provides four travel lanes, two lanes in each
direction. Between Washington Boulevard and Hayden Avenue, Higuera Street is
classified as a neighborhood feeder street and provides two travel lanes, one lane per
direction. On-street parking is generally allowed along many stretches of this roadway. At
the intersection of Hayden Avenue-Hayden Place/Higuera Street, a raised median barrier
has been placed to prevent eastbound and westbound through traffic movements. All
traffic in either direction along Higuera Street must turn onto Hayden Avenue or Hayden
Place.
• Hughes Avenue – Hughes Avenue is classified as a collector street and traverses in a
north-south direction. Within the study area, this roadway provides two travel lanes, with
one lane in each direction. On-street parking is generally allowed along this roadway
throughout the study area. Between Venice Boulevard and Washington Boulevard, on-
street parking is prohibited.
• Wesley Street – Wesley Street is a discontinuous local roadway that runs in a north–south
direction. One segment of Wesley Street extends south from Washington Boulevard,
terminating in a cul-de-sac. The other segment of Wesley Street connects National
Boulevard to Higuera Street. This roadway provides two travel lanes, one lane per
direction. On-street parking is generally allowed along this roadway within the study area.
• Irving Place – Irving Place is a local roadway that traverses in a north-south direction.
North of ‘A’ Street, the roadway provides one travel lane per direction with metered parking
on both sides of the street. South of ‘A’ Street to its terminus at Lucerne Avenue, the
roadway provides one-way northbound circulation. Parking is generally allowed on both
sides of the street along this segment.
• Braddock Drive – Braddock Avenue is a neighborhood feeder street that runs in a
northwest to southeast direction. It provides two travel lanes, one lane per direction. On-
street parking is generally allowed on the south side of the street within the study area.
• Landmark Street – Landmark Street is a local roadway that traverses in a north-south
direction and provides direct access to the Project site. This roadway offers two travel
lanes, one lane in each direction, and it is undivided. On-street parking is allowed along
this roadway.
• Cattaraugus Avenue – Cattaraugus Avenue is classified as a local roadway within the City
of Culver City and is classified as a collector street within the City of Los Angeles. This
roadway traverses in a north-south direction and generally offers two travel lanes, with one
lane per direction. On-street parking is generally allowed along this roadway.
12
ATTACHMENT 6
250
• Lucerne Avenue - Lucerne Avenue is a neighborhood feeder street that runs in a
northwest to southeast direction. It provides two travel lanes, one lane per direction. On-
street parking is generally allowed on the south side of the street within the study area.
The existing lane configurations of the analyzed intersections are included in Appendix B.
EXISTING TRAFFIC VOLUMES AND LEVELS OF SERVICE
The following sections present the existing intersection peak hour traffic volumes, a description of
the methodology utilized to analyze the intersection operating conditions, and the resulting level of
service conditions at each of the study intersections.
Existing Traffic Volumes
Weekday morning (7:00 to 9:00 AM) and evening (4:00 to 6:00 PM) peak hour traffic counts were
compiled from data collected at the 34 analyzed intersections between September 2008 and
March 2011. Due to the Metro Exposition Light Rail Project construction occurring at and affecting
the lane geometry at many of analyzed intersections consequently altering traffic patterns within
the study area, traffic counts collected prior to the construction were utilized in this analysis. All
traffic counts collected prior to 2011 were factored upward 1% per year (compounded annually) to
reflect existing 2011 conditions.
These traffic volumes reflect typical weekday operations during current year conditions. The traffic
volumes in Figure 2A and 2B represent, for the purposes of this analysis, the Existing (2011) AM
and PM peak hour conditions, respectively.
The raw data showing the intersection traffic counts are attached in Appendix C.
Level of Service Methodology
Level of Service (LOS) is a qualitative measure used to describe the condition of traffic flow,
ranging from excellent conditions at LOS A to overloaded conditions at LOS F. LOS D is typically
13
ATTACHMENT 6
25114
ATTACHMENT 6
25215
ATTACHMENT 6
253
recognized as the minimum acceptable level of service in urban areas. The Level of Service
definitions for signalized and unsignalized intersections is provided in Table 2 and Table 3,
respectively.
Thirty of the 34 analyzed intersections are controlled by traffic signals. Two intersections, Wesley
Street/Washington Boulevard and Cattaraugus Avenue/Washington Boulevard, are unsignalized
and controlled by a stop sign on the minor approaches. The remaining two locations, Braddock
Drive/Duquesne Avenue and Lucerne Avenue/Duquesne Avenue, are all-way stop controlled
intersections.
The "Critical Movement Analysis-Planning" (Transportation Research Board, 1980) method of
intersection capacity analysis was used to determine the intersection volume to capacity (V/C)
ratio and corresponding level of service at the signalized intersections. The CALCADB software
package developed by LADOT was used to implement the CMA methodology. Table 2 defines
the ranges of V/C ratios and corresponding levels of service for signalized intersections.
All 17 of the signalized study intersections under the City of Los Angeles jurisdiction are currently
controlled by the City of Los Angeles’ Automated Traffic Surveillance (ATSAC) and are part of the
Smart Corridor ATSAC system. Fourteen of the 17 intersections also include the City’s Adaptive
Traffic Control System (ATCS). A capacity increase of 10% (0.07 V/C adjustments for ATSAC and
0.03 V/C adjustments for ATCS) was applied to reflect the benefits of ATSAC/ATCS control at
these 14 intersections. At the remaining three intersections (intersection #5, 6 and 11), a capacity
increase of 7% (0.07 V/C adjustments) was applied to reflect the benefits of ATSAC control.
The remaining 13 signalized intersections under the jurisdiction of the City of Culver City currently
operate under a signal coordination system similar to ATSAC, but have not yet been upgraded
with the ATCS-type operations. Therefore, a capacity increase of 7% (0.07 V/C adjustments) was
applied to reflect the benefits of ATSAC-type control at these intersections.
The Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) 2000 method of unsignalized intersection analysis was
used to determine the delay (in seconds) and corresponding level of service at the stop-controlled
intersections.
16
ATTACHMENT 6
254TABLE 2
LEVEL OF SERVICE DEFINITIONS FOR SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS
Volume/Capacity
Level of Service Ratio Definition
A 0.000 - 0.600
EXCELLENT. No Vehicle waits longer than one red
light and no approach phase is fully used.
B >0.600 - 0.700
VERY GOOD. An occasional approach phase is
fully utilized; many drivers begin to feel somewhat
restricted within groups of vehicles.
C >0.700 - 0.800
GOOD. Occasionally drivers may have to wait
through more than one red light; backups may
develop behind turning vehicles.
D >0.800 - 0.900
FAIR. Delays may be substantial during portions
of the rush hours, but enough lower volume periods
occur to permit clearing of developing lines,
preventing excessive backups.
E >0.900 - 1.000
POOR. Represents the most vehicles intersection
approaches can accommodate; may be long lines
of waiting vehicles through several signal cycles.
F > 1.000
FAILURE. Backups from nearby locations or on
cross streets may restrict or prevent movement of
vehicles out of the intersection approaches.
Tremendous delays with continuously increasing
queue lengths.
Source: Transportation Research Board, Transportation Research Circular No. 212, Interim
Materials on Highway Capacity , 1980.
17
ATTACHMENT 6
255TABLE 3
LEVEL OF SERVICE DEFINITIONS FOR
STOP-CONTROLLED INTERSECTIONS
Average Total Delay
Level of Service (seconds/vehicle)
A < 10.0
B > 10.0 and < 15.0
C > 15.0 and < 25.0
D > 25.0 and < 35.0
E > 35.0 and < 50.0
F > 50.0
Source: Transportation Research Board, Highway Capacity
Manual, Special Report 209, 2000.
18
ATTACHMENT 6
256
For all-way stop controlled intersections, the intersection delay is defined as the average delay
experienced by drivers at the intersection. For two-way stop-controlled locations, the
intersection delay is defined as the worst case delay experienced by drivers at the intersection
who must stop or yield to unimpeded major street traffic. This method uses a “gap acceptance”
technique to predict driver delay and is applicable to unsignalized intersections where there is
potential for difficulty for minor street or stopped traffic to cross the traffic on the major or
unimpeded street. Table 3 defines the ranges of delay and corresponding levels of service for
unsignalized intersections.
Existing Levels of Service
The existing traffic volumes presented in Figures 2A and 2B for AM and PM peak hours,
respectively, were used in conjunction with the level of service methodologies described above
and the current intersection characteristics illustrated in Appendix B, to determine the existing
operating conditions at the analyzed intersections.
Table 4 summarizes the results of the intersection capacity analysis for existing conditions at each
of the analyzed intersections in the study area. The table indicates the existing V/C ratio (or delay)
during the morning and evening peak hours and the corresponding LOS at the study intersections.
As indicated in the table, 24 of the 34 study intersections are currently operating at LOS D or
better during the morning peak hour. During the evening peak hour, 26 of the 34 study
intersections are operating at LOS D or better. The remaining intersections are operating at
LOS E or F:
• Robertson Boulevard/Venice Boulevard: AM and PM Peak Hour – LOS F
• National Boulevard/Venice Boulevard: AM and PM Peak Hour – LOS E
• La Cienega Boulevard/Venice Boulevard: AM Peak Hour–LOS E; PM Peak Hour–LOS E
• Cattaraugus Avenue/Washington Boulevard: AM and PM Peak Hour – LOS F
• La Cienega Boulevard/Washington Boulevard: AM Peak Hour – LOS F
• La Cienega Boulevard/Fairfax Avenue: AM Peak Hour – LOS E
• Jefferson Boulevard/National Boulevard: PM Peak Hour – LOS F
• La Cienega Boulevard/Jefferson Boulevard: AM and PM Peak Hour – LOS F
19
ATTACHMENT 6
257TABLE 4
SUMMARY OF INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE ANALYSIS - EXISTING (2011) CONDITIONS
AM PEAK HOUR PM PEAK HOUR
# INTERSECTION V/C or Delay LOS V/C or Delay LOS
1 Robertson Boulevard Cattaraugus Avenue [1] 0.841 D 0.831 D
2 Robertson Boulevard I-10 WB Off-Ramp/Kincardine Avenue [1] 0.611 B 0.689 B
3 Robertson Boulevard National Boulevard [1] 0.898 D 0.894 D
4 National Boulevard I-10 Eastbound On-Ramp [1] 0.363 A 0.359 A
5 Hughes Avenue Venice Boulevard [1] 0.705 C 0.639 B
6 Bagley Avenue Venice Boulevard [1] 0.708 C 0.678 B
7 Culver Boulevard Venice Boulevard [1] 0.683 B 0.783 C
8 Robertson Boulevard Venice Boulevard [1] 1.237 F 1.159 F
9 National Boulevard Venice Boulevard [1] 0.970 E 0.954 E
10 Helms Avenue Venice Boulevard [1] 0.457 A 0.479 A
11 Cattaraugus Avenue Venice Boulevard [1] 0.771 C 0.653 B
12 La Cienega Boulevard Venice Boulevard [1,2] 0.961 E 0.975 E
13 Hughes Avenue/Duquesne Avenue Washington Boulevard 0.534 A 0.577 A
14 Duquesne Avenue Culver Boulevard 0.612 B 0.775 C
15 Culver Boulevard Washington Boulevard/Irving Place 0.504 A 0.534 A
16 Main Street Culver Boulevard 0.499 A 0.515 A
17 Culver Boulevard Washington Boulevard 0.566 A 0.540 A
18 Robertson Boulevard/Higuera Street Washington Boulevard 0.706 C 0.538 A
19 Landmark Street Washington Boulevard 0.472 A 0.394 A
20 National Boulevard Washington Boulevard 0.789 C 0.722 C
21 Wesley Avenue Washington Boulevard [3] 11.5 sec B 28.3 sec D
22 Helms Avenue Washington Boulevard 0.492 A 0.366 A
23 Cattaraugus Avenue Washington Boulevard [3] *** sec F 133.3 sec F
24 La Cienega Boulevard Washington Boulevard 1.047 F 0.881 D
25 La Cienega Boulevard Fairfax Avenue [1] 0.960 E 0.812 D
26 Wesley Street National Boulevard 0.586 A 0.355 A
27 Hayden Avenue National Boulevard 0.827 D 0.614 B
28 Jefferson Boulevard National Boulevard [1] 0.697 B 1.037 F
29 La Cienega Boulevard Jefferson Boulevard [1,2] 1.081 F 1.059 F
30 Jefferson Boulevard Higuera Street/Rodeo Road [1] 0.739 C 0.677 B
31 La Cienega Boulevard Rodeo Road [1] 1.067 F 1.203 F
32 Braddock Drive Duquesne Avenue [4] 140.4 sec F 85.7 sec F
33 Lucerne Avenue Duquesne Avenue [4] 23.7 sec C 28.6 sec D
34 Jefferson Boulevard Duquesne Avenue 0.950 E 0.833 D
*** Intersection delay cannot be calculated.
[1] City of Los Angeles location.
[2] Los Angeles County Congestion Management Program (CMP) monitoring location.
[3] Unsignalized intersections - stop-controlled on minor approach(es).
[4] Unsignalized intersections - stop-controlled on all approach.
20
ATTACHMENT 6
258
• La Cienega Boulevard/Rodeo Road: AM and PM Peak Hour – LOS F
• Braddock Drive/Duquesne Avenue: AM and PM Peak Hour – LOS F
• Jefferson Boulevard/Duquesne Avenue: AM Peak Hour – LOS E
Capacity calculation worksheets for Existing (2011) conditions are provided in Appendix D.
EXISTING TRANSIT LINES
Eighteen bus lines operated by three different transportation agencies currently serve the study
area. Four bus lines are operated by the Culver City Bus (CC), ten bus lines are operated by the
Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (MTA), three bus lines are operated
by the Santa Monica Big Blue Bus (SM) and one bus is operated by the Los Angeles
Department of Transportation (LADOT CE). These transit lines are described below:
• CC Line 1 – Line 1 is a local east/west line that provides service from Venice Beach to
West Los Angeles and travels primarily along Washington Boulevard within the study
area. This line runs everyday, including holidays. The frequency of service during peak
commute hours is approximately 12 minutes. The western terminus is at the intersection
of Windward Avenue and Main Street in Venice. The eastern terminus is at the West
Los Angeles Transit Center located at the intersection of Apple Street/Fairfax Avenue in
West Los Angeles.
• CC Line 4 – Line 4 is a local north/south line that provides service from the Fox Hills Mall
(Culver City) to West Los Angeles and travels primarily along Washington Boulevard
within the study area. This line runs Monday through Friday at a frequency of
approximately 60 minutes during peak commute hours. No weekend or holiday service
is provided. The southern terminus is at the Fox Hills Mall Transit Center. The northern
terminus is at the West Los Angeles Transit Center located at the intersection of Apple
Street/Fairfax Avenue in West Los Angeles.
• CC Line 5 – Line 5 is a local east/west line that provides service from the west side of
Culver City to Blair Hills on the east side, and travels primarily along Washington
Boulevard and Higuera Street within the study area. This line operates Monday through
Friday at a frequency of approximately 60 minutes during peak commute hours. No
weekend or holiday service is provided. The western terminus is at the intersection of
Washington Boulevard/Inglewood Boulevard. The eastern terminus is at the intersection
of La Cienega Boulevard/Rodeo Road.
21
ATTACHMENT 6
259
• CC Line 7 – Line 7 is a local east/west line that provides service from Marina Del Rey to
Culver City and travels primarily along Culver Boulevard within the study area. This line
runs Monday through Saturday at a frequency of approximately 40 minutes. No service
is provided on Sundays and holidays. The western terminus is at Fisherman’s Village in
Marina Del Rey. The eastern terminus is at the intersection of Culver Boulevard/Venice
Boulevard in Culver City.
• MTA Line 33 - Line 33 is a local east/west line that provides service from Santa Monica
to Downtown Los Angeles and travels primarily along Venice Boulevard within the study
area. This line runs everyday, including holidays, at a frequency of approximately 5-15
minutes during peak commute hours. The western terminus is at the intersection of 2
nd
Street/Santa Monica Boulevard in Santa Monica. The eastern terminus is at the
Patsaouras Transit Plaza (Union Station) in Downtown Los Angeles.
• MTA Line 35/335 - Line 35/335 is a local east/west line that provides service from West
Los Angeles to Downtown Los Angeles and travels primarily along Washington
Boulevard within the study area. This line runs everyday, including holidays, at a
frequency of approximately 12 minutes during peak commute hours. The western
terminus is at the West Los Angeles Transit Center located at the intersection of Apple
Street/Fairfax Avenue in West Los Angeles. The eastern terminus is at the intersection
of Main Street/17
th
Street in Downtown Los Angeles. Line 335 provides limited stop
service Monday through Friday and does not operate on weekends/holidays.
• MTA Line 38 - Line 38 is a local east/west line that provides service from West Los
Angeles to Downtown Los Angeles and travels primarily along Venice Boulevard within
the study area. This line runs everyday, including holidays, at a frequency of
approximately 30 minutes during peak commute hours. The western terminus is at the
West Los Angeles Transit Center located at the intersection of Apple Street/Fairfax
Avenue in West Los Angeles. The eastern terminus is at the intersection of
Broadway/17
th
Street in Downtown Los Angeles.
• MTA 105 - Line 105 is a local north/south line that provides service from West Hollywood
to Vernon and travels primarily along La Cienega Boulevard within the study area. This
line runs everyday, including holidays, at a frequency of approximately 10-12 minutes
during peak commute hours. The northern terminus is at the intersection of San Vicente
Boulevard/Santa Monica Boulevard in West Hollywood. The southern terminus is at the
intersection of Santa Fe Avenue/Vernon Avenue in the Vernon.
• MTA Line 217 – Line 217 is a local north/south line that provides service from West Los
Angeles to Hollywood and travels primarily along Fairfax Avenue and Washington
Boulevard within the study area. This line runs everyday, including holidays, at a
frequency of approximately 10-12 minutes during peak commute hours. The southern
terminus is at the West Los Angeles Transit Center located at the intersection of Apple
Street/Fairfax Avenue in West Los Angeles. The northern terminus is at
Vermont/Sunset Metro Station in Hollywood.
22
ATTACHMENT 6
260
• MTA Line 220 – Line 220 is a local north/south line that provides service from Los
Angeles International Airport (LAX) to West Hollywood and travels primarily along
Venice Boulevard and National Boulevard within the study area. This line runs
everyday, including holidays, at a frequency of approximately 55 minutes during peak
commute hours. The southern terminus is at the LAX City Bus Center. The northern
terminus is at intersection of Santa Monica Boulevard/San Vicente Boulevard in West
Hollywood.
• MTA 439 - Line 439 is an express service north/south line that provides service from Los
Angeles International Airport to Downtown Los Angeles and travels primarily along La
Cienega Boulevard within the study area. This line runs everyday, including holidays, at
a frequency of approximately 45 minutes during peak commute hours. The southern
terminus is at the Aviation/I-105 Green Line Station. The northern terminus is at the
Patsaouras Transit Plaza (Union Station) in Downtown Los Angeles.
• MTA 705 - Line 705 is a north/south ‘Rapid Bus’ line that provides service from West
Hollywood to Vernon and travels primarily along La Cienega Boulevard within the study
area. This line runs Monday through Friday at a frequency of approximately 10 minutes
during peak commute hours. No service is provided on weekends or holidays. The
northern terminus is at the intersection of San Vicente Boulevard/Santa Monica
Boulevard in West Hollywood. The southern terminus is at the intersection of Santa Fe
Avenue/Vernon Avenue in the Vernon.
• MTA 733 - Line 733 is an east/west ‘Rapid Bus’ line that provides service from Santa
Monica to Downtown Los Angeles and travels primarily along Venice Boulevard within
the study area. This line runs Monday through Friday at a frequency of approximately
10 minutes during peak commute hours. Service is also provided on weekends and
holidays. The western terminus is at the intersection of Ocean Avenue/Arizona Avenue
in Santa Monica. The eastern terminus is at the Patsaouras Transit Plaza (Union
Station) in Downtown Los Angeles.
• MTA 780 - Line 780 is an east/west ‘Rapid Bus’ line that provides service from
Pasadena to West Los Angeles and travels primarily along Washington Boulevard within
the study area. This line runs Monday through Friday at a frequency of approximately 8-
10 minutes during peak commute hours. No service is provided on weekends and
holidays. The western terminus is at the West Los Angeles Transit Center located at the
intersection of Apple Street/Fairfax Avenue in West Los Angeles. The eastern terminus
is at the intersection of Hill Avenue/Colorado Boulevard in Pasadena.
• CE 437 - Line 437 is a commuter express east/west line that provides service from
Downtown Los Angeles to Venice and travels primarily along Culver Boulevard within
the study area. This line runs Monday through Friday at a frequency of approximately
25 minutes during peak commute hours. The western terminus is at the intersection of
Pacific Avenue/Washington Boulevard in Venice. The eastern terminus is at the
intersection of San Pedro Street/Temple Street Drive in Los Angeles.
23
ATTACHMENT 6
261
• SM 6 – Santa Monica Big Blue Bus Line 6 is an east/west commuter line that provides
service from Santa Monica College to the Palms Community of Los Angeles and travels
primarily along Venice Boulevard and National Boulevard within the study area. This
line runs Monday through Friday at a peak frequency of approximately 25-30 minutes
during peak commute hours. The western terminus is at Santa Monica College in Santa
Monica. The eastern terminus is at the intersection of Venice Boulevard/Culver
Boulevard in Palms.
• SM 12 – Santa Monica Big Blue Bus Line 12 is a local east/west line that provides
service from Westwood to Palms Community of Los Angeles and travels primarily along
Venice Boulevard, National Boulevard and Robertson Boulevard within the study area.
This line runs Monday through Friday at a peak frequency of approximately 15 minutes
during peak commute hours. Service is also provided on weekends and holidays. The
western terminus is at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) Ackerman
Terminal in Westwood. The eastern terminus is at the intersection of Robertson
Boulevard/Pico Boulevard in Palms.
• SM Super 12 – Santa Monica Bus Blue Bus Line Super 12 is a north/south UCLA
commuter line that provides service from Westwood to West Los Angeles and travels
primarily along National Boulevard within the study area. This line runs Monday through
Friday at a frequency of approximately 10-15 minutes with no midday service. Service is
not provided on weekends and holidays. The northern terminus is at the University of
California Los Angeles (UCLA) Ackerman Terminal in Westwood. The southern
terminus is at the intersection of National Boulevard/Venice Boulevard in West Los
Angeles.
These transit lines within the study area are illustrated in Figure 3. It can be observed from
Figure 3 that there is a robust transit network serving the study area. Further, the Exposition
Line Light Rail Transit (LRT) with its Phase I terminus adjacent to the Project site will provide
mass transit connections to the University of Southern California (USC) and Downtown Los
Angeles. This phase of the Exposition LRT is expected to open with the next year and the
subsequent Phase 2 service extension to Santa Monica is expected to open by 2015.
24
ATTACHMENT 6
26225
ATTACHMENT 6
263
III. FUTURE YEAR 2014 TRAFFIC PROJECTIONS
In order to properly evaluate the potential impact of the proposed project on the local street
system, estimates of the Future Year 2014 traffic volumes both with and without the project were
developed. The Future Year 2014 without the project was first developed including estimates for
background growth in area-wide trip making and trips generated by future developments (related
projects) in the vicinity of the study area. The Future Year 2014 without project traffic represents
the cumulative base conditions. The traffic generated by the proposed project was then estimated
and assigned separately to the street system. The addition of the project traffic and the
cumulative base traffic represents the Future Cumulative (2014) Plus Project conditions. Each of
these future traffic scenarios is further described in this chapter.
CUMULATIVE (2014) BASE TRAFFIC PROJECTIONS
The Cumulative (2014) Base traffic projections reflect growth in traffic from two primary sources:
firstly, the background, or ambient growth, to reflect the effects of overall area-wide regional
growth both within and outside the study area; and secondly, from traffic generated by specific
related projects located within, or in the vicinity of, the study area. Each of these components is
described below.
Area-Wide Ambient Traffic Growth
The traffic in the vicinity of the study area has been estimated to increase at a rate of about 1%
per year. Future increases in background traffic volumes due to regional growth and development
are expected to continue at this rate. With the assumed completion date of 2014, the existing 2011
traffic volumes were adjusted upward by a factor of 3% (1% per year compounded annually) to
reflect this area-wide regional growth.
26
ATTACHMENT 6
264
Related Projects Traffic Generation and Assignment
As indicated, the second potential source of traffic growth in the study area is that expected from
other future development projects in the vicinity. These "cumulative” or related projects are those
developments that are planned and expected to be in place within the same timeframe as the
Proposed Project. Data describing related projects in the area was solicited from the City of
Culver City and the City of Los Angeles. Fifty-two related projects from the City of Culver City, City
of Los Angeles and County of Los Angeles were identified within the study area. The related
projects included in this study are described in Table 5. The locations of these projects are shown
in Figure 4.
The trip generation estimates for the related projects were based on different sources including trip
generation rates contained in the Institute of Traffic Engineers (ITE), Trip Generation – An ITE
Information Report, 8
th
Edition, and trip generation estimates provided by the recently completed
traffic studies for projects in Culver City. These rates are provided in Appendix E. The trip
generation estimates for the related projects are shown in Table 6. As summarized in Table 6, the
related projects are expected to generate approximately 52,000 daily trips, of which 5,063 trips are
estimated to occur during the morning peak hour and 5,452 trips during the evening peak hour.
These related projects’ trips were assigned to the street system and the results are shown in
Figures 5A and 5B. These related projects’ traffic estimates were added to the existing plus
ambient growth traffic to obtain the Cumulative (2014) Base traffic volumes. Figures 6A and 6B
provide the Cumulative (2014) Base traffic volumes at each of the analyzed intersections during
both AM and PM peak hours, respectively. These volumes represent Future Cumulative (2014)
Base (without project) conditions.
It is important to note that there are several large related projects planned in the immediate
vicinity of the Project site. Two of these projects, Metro Exposition Light Rail
Washington/National Station (#29) and the Triangle Project (#39), are located in the northwest
corner of intersection of National Boulevard/Washington Boulevard, across the street from the
Proposed Project. These two cumulative projects would have combined net trip generation total
of approximately 1,045 trips in the morning peak hour and 1,117 trips in the evening peak hour
with driveways located along National Boulevard and Washington Boulevard.
27
ATTACHMENT 6
265TABLE 5
LIST OF RELATED PROJECTS [1]
Map
# Project Name Address Description
1 Sony 10202 Washington Bl Sony Lot Project - Approved to build net new 100,000 G.S.F. of
office, post-production, stage, and support uses.
2 Huron Townhouses 3823-3833 Huron Av 15 new townhouses, demo 3 existing townhouses
3 Four Unit Condominium 3972 Tilden Av 4 unit condominium, TPM
4 Baldwin Hills Scenic Overlook Park Hetzler Rd Existing 10,300 G.S.F. visitor center, passive recreation area
5 Three New Condominiums 4048 Lincoln Av 3 townhome condominiums
6 Eight Unit Condo 4067/4073 Lincoln Av 8 unit condominiums, TTM, 2,000 G.S.F.; 20 parking spaces
provided
7 Turning Point School 8794 National School, addition/remodel of net 9,000 G.S.F.
8 Uptown Lofts 9900 Culver Bl 5,457 G.S.F. offices, 18 condominiums
9 Hampton Inn 3954 Sepulveda Bl 77-unit hotel
10 Four Unit Condominium 4014 Van Buren Pl 4 unit condominium, TPM
11 Irving Residential/Office 4043 Irving Pl 4 Story; 26 residential units; 3 office units
12 Legado Mixed Use TOD 8770 Washington Bl New mixed used development w/preliminary concept of up to
(appox.) 115 residential units, retail (market, pharmacy & café)
31,040 G.S.F.
13 West Los Angeles Community College Master
Plan and EIR
LA County Approx. 291,300 G.S.F. of new building construction & renovation.
Anticipate future student population of approx. 18,904 students &
1,248 employees by fall 2022. Project includes second access
road, parking structures, landscaping & development of athletic
facilities.
14 Morphosis Architects Office 3440 Wesley 11,657 S.F. Architects Office (Previously Clyde's Auto Body Shop)
15 Lux @ 9901 Mixed Use 9901 Washington Bl, City of LA 14,112 G.S.F. mixed use development with 131 dwelling units,
12,178 G.S.F. of retail and three level subterranean parking
structure with 244 parking spaces.
16 New Restaurant 5854 Blackwelder St/3077 La Cienega Addition of 1,150 G.S.F. Two story structure to existing 1,195
G.S.F. building for new restaurant use.
17 New Dental Office - Building Permit 10826, and 10830 Washington Bl Construction of new one story dental and retail building (2,989
G.S.F)
18 Union 76 10638 Culver Bl Gas station and convenience store with new car wash; 2,500
G.S.F.
19 Distribution & Warehouse 3434 Wesley St Approximately 10,500 G.S.F. of office, warehouse, & distribution
20 Four Unit Condominium 3846 Bentley Av 4 unit condominium, TPM
21 Four Unit Condominium 4058 Madison Av 4 unit condominium, TPM
22 Warner Parking Structure 8511 Warner Dr 51,520 G.S.F. Retail/Restaurant; 784 Parking Spaces, five levels
23 Office Building 9919 Jefferson Bl 113,467 G.S.F., three-story office building
24 New Vehicle Repair Shop 11167 Washington Pl Construction of a new vehicle repair shop with 1,196 G.S.F. of
repair area with two service bays and 191 G.S.F. of office.
25 Fresh Paint Mixed Use 9355 Culver Bl Additional 2nd story office and third floor residential unit for a total
of 5,708 G.S.F. to an existing office/warehouse building
26 Abraxis Bio Science 9920 Jefferson Bl Exterior and interior renovation to an existing two-story building.
Addition of a three story, 17,000 G.S.F. building over a one-story
building (net addition is 14,999 G.S.F. - demo 2,001 G.S.F of
existing building area).
27 Clive Wilkinson Architects 6114, 6116, 6118 Washington Bl New two-story, 5,560 G.S.F. office building which includes an
ancillary retail or office.
28 New 7-Eleven Convenient Store 4436 Sepulveda Bl Construction of a new 2,500 G.S.F., one story convenience store.
29 Metro Expo Light Rail Station-
Venice/Robertson Station
Venice Bl/Robertson Bl Light Rail Train Station
30 Metro Expo Light Rail Station-La Cienega
Station [2]
La Cienega Bl/Jefferson Bl Light Rail Train Station
31 Parcel B 9300 Culver Bl 118,000 G.S.F. of office, restaurant, and retail spaces
32 West Los Angeles Community College Master
Plan and EIR (2010)
West LA College Approximately 92,000 of net new building construction and
renovation.
33 Culver Studios Amend. No. 6 9336 Washington Bl Phase 1 - 25,093 G.S.F. office; 13,634 G.S.F. support; 302
parking spaces. Phase 2 - 63,500 G.S.F. office; 8,741 G.S.F.
support
34 Arco AM/PM - New Carwash 5884 Washington Bl New Carwash and storage room totaling 1,200 G.S.F. at an
existing fueling station.
35 New Two story commercial building 11012 - 11014 Washington Bl Two story commercial building totaling 3,385 G.S.F.
36 Tilden Terrace 11042-11056 Washington Bl New three-story, 48,525 G.S.F. mixed use development with
10,700 G.S.F. of ground floor retail and 33 residential units.
37 Duquesne Ave Condominiums 4139-4145 Duquesne Av Seven (7) condominium units.
38 Greg Reitz 8665 Hayden Pl Construct 63,679 G.S.F. of office
28
ATTACHMENT 6
266TABLE 5 (continued)
LIST OF RELATED PROJECTS [1]
Map
# Project Name Address Description
39 Triangle Site - Washington/National TOD Corner of Washington/National New transit oriented development to include light rail station &
mixed use development (preliminary concept includes up to 200
du, 149 room hotel, 200,000 G.S.F. office, 51,500 G.S.F. retail, &
20,000 G.S.F. restaurant.
40 Willow's School Comprehensive Plan 8509-8487 Higuera St, 8476 Warner
Dr
Phase 1 - new surface parking; increased student enrollment by
50 from 425 to 475; Phase II & III increased student enrollment by
100, from 475 to 575.
41 Bridge Housing Project 3814 Lenawee Av Proposal for 2-3 story senior housing project with 62 units and 41
parking spaces.
42 Jewish Home for the Aging, Gonda Healthy
Aging Campus
3847 Delmas Ter., 3820-3842 Hughes,
9823 Venice Bl
184 congregate care units, 48 residential care units, 14,000
G.S.F. PACE program
43 Mixed-Use (The Palms) [3] 10601 Washington Boulevard Proposed mixed-use with 126-unit apartment, 9,000 s.f. retail and
9,000 s.f. restaurant space. Existing 10,000 s.f. office to be
removed.
44 Apartment/Retail [3] 3417 Motor Avenue Proposed mixed-use with 115-unit apartment and 975 s.f. retail.
Existing 15 apartment units, 2 single-family d.u. and 3,300 s.f.
office to be demolished.
45 Mixed-Use [3] 10604 National Boulevard Construct 29 condominiums d.u., 1,250 s.f. retail, and 2,000 s.f.
retail.
46 Mixed-Use [3] 2900 S. Sepulveda Boulevard Proposed mixed-use with 48-unit apartment and 1,500 s.f. office.
47 Media Related Office [3] 3105 La Cienega Boulevard Proposed 133,000 s.f. media-relations office. Existing 109,000 s.f.
manufacturing to be removed.
48 Office [3] 10100 Culver Boulevard Proposed 50,000 s.f. office.
49 Mixed-Use [3] 3115 S. Sepulveda Boulevard Proposed mixed-use with 175-unit condominium and 28,000 s.f.
retail. Existing 28,000 discount store to be removed.
50 Condominium [3] 11131 Rose Avenue Proposed 227-unit condominium. Existing 89-unit apartment to be
removed.
51 Restaurant/Retail [3] 10612 National Boulevard Proposed 2,500 s.f. restaurant and 3,500 s.f. retail.
52 Private School [3] 2920 S. Sepulveda Boulevard
Proposed 120-student private school (Goethe International
Charter School). Existing 9,000 s.f. office to be removed.
[1] Source: Culver City Related Projects List provided by the City of Culver City, dated March 31, 2011, unless otherwise noted.
[2] Mid-City/Exposition LRT Project Final EIR/EIS, Los Angeles Metropolitan Transportation Authority/USDOT, Federal Transit Administration, October 2005.
[3] Related Projects List provided by the City of Los Angeles, LADOT, February 2011.
29
ATTACHMENT 6
26730
ATTACHMENT 6
268TABLE 6
ESTIMATED WEEKDAY TRIP GENERATION OF RELATED PROJECTS [1]
Map AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
# Project Name Description Daily IN OUT TOTAL IN OUT TOTAL
1 Sony Sony Lot Project - Approved to build net new 100,000 G.S.F. of
office, post-production, stage, and support uses.
1,334 165 23 188 32 159 191
2 Huron Townhouses 15 new townhouses, demo 3 existing townhouses 70 1 5 6 4 2 6
3 Four Unit Condominium 4 unit condominium, TPM 23 0 2 2 1 1 2
4 Baldwin Hills Scenic Overlook Park [2] Existing 10,300 G.S.F. visitor center, passive recreation area 446 0 0 0 8 60 68
5 Three New Condominiums 3 townhome condominiums 17 0 1 1 1 1 2
6 Eight Unit Condo 8 unit condominiums, TTM, 2,000 G.S.F.; 20 parking spaces
provided
46 1 3 4 3 1 4
7 Turning Point School [2] School, addition/remodel of net 9,000 G.S.F. 130 23 19 42 12 16 28
8 Uptown Lofts 5,457 G.S.F. offices, 18 condominiums 165 8 8 16 7 10 17
9 Hampton Inn 77-unit hotel 687 30 22 52 26 28 54
10 Four Unit Condominium 4 unit condominium, TPM 23 0 2 2 1 1 2
11 Irving Residential/Office 4 Story; 26 residential units; 3 office units 188 6 10 16 10 9 19
12 Legado Mixed Use TOD [2] New mixed used development w/preliminary concept of up to
(appox.) 115 residential units, retail (market, pharmacy & café)
31,040 G.S.F.
2,914 69 85 154 150 125 275
13 West Los Angeles Community College Master
Plan and EIR [2]
Approx. 291,300 G.S.F. of new building construction &
renovation. Anticipate future student population of approx.
18,904 students & 1,248 employees by fall 2022. Project
includes second access road, parking structures, landscaping &
development of athletic facilities.
6,785 436 45 481 300 133 433
14 Morphosis Architects Office 11,657 S.F. Architects Office (Previously Clyde's Auto Body
Shop)
129 16 2 18 3 14 17
15 Lux @ 9901 Mixed Use 14,112 G.S.F. mixed use development with 131 dwelling units,
12,178 G.S.F. of retail and three level subterranean parking
structure with 244 parking spaces.
1,457 24 60 84 74 49 123
16 New Restaurant Addition of 1,150 G.S.F. Two story structure to existing 1,195
G.S.F. building for new restaurant use.
146 7 6 13 8 5 13
17 New Dental Office - Building Permit Construction of new one story dental and retail building (2,989
G.S.F)
108 6 1 7 3 7 10
18 Union 76 Gas station and convenience store with new car wash; 2,500
G.S.F.
2,700 101 97 198 122 121 243
19 Distribution & Warehouse Approximately 10,500 G.S.F. of office, warehouse, & distribution 89 6 1 7 2 5 7
20 Four Unit Condominium 4 unit condominium, TPM 23 0 2 2 1 1 2
21 Four Unit Condominium 4 unit condominium, TPM 23 0 2 2 1 1 2
22 Warner Parking Structure 51,520 G.S.F. Retail/Restaurant; 784 Parking Spaces, five levels 3,112 94 76 170 116 109 225
23 Office Building
113,467 G.S.F., three-story office building
1,470 183 25 208 35 171 206
24 New Vehicle Repair Shop Construction of a new vehicle repair shop with 1,196 G.S.F. of
repair area with two service bays and 191 G.S.F. of office.
42 3 1 4 2 2 4
25 Fresh Paint Mixed Use Additional 2nd story office and third floor residential unit for a
total of 5,708 G.S.F. to an existing office/warehouse building
63 8 1 9 2 7 9
26 Abraxis Bio Science [3] Exterior and interior renovation to an existing two-story building.
Addition of a three story, 17,000 G.S.F. building over a one-story
building (net addition is 14,999 G.S.F. - demo 2,001 G.S.F of
existing building area).
194 23 2 25 4 21 25
27 Clive Wilkinson Architects New two-story, 5,560 G.S.F. office building which includes an
ancillary retail or office.
62 8 1 9 1 7 8
28 New 7-Eleven Convenient Store Construction of a new 2,500 G.S.F., one story convenience
store.
1,845 84 84 168 67 64 131
29 Metro Expo Light Rail Station-
Venice/Robertson Station [4]
Light Rail Train Station n/a 370 62 432 50 296 346
30 Metro Expo Light Rail Station-La Cienega
Station [4]
Light Rail Train Station n/a 223 41 264 33 179 212
31 Parcel B 118,000 G.S.F. of office, restaurant, and retail spaces 4,766 249 155 404 199 225 424
31
ATTACHMENT 6
269TABLE 6 (continued)
ESTIMATED WEEKDAY TRIP GENERATION OF RELATED PROJECTS [1]
Map AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
# Project Name Description Daily IN OUT TOTAL IN OUT TOTAL
32 West Los Angeles Community College Master
Plan and EIR (2010)
Approximately 92,000 of net new building construction and
renovation.
2,529 204 71 275 136 98 234
33 Culver Studios Amend. No. 6 Phase 1 - 25,093 G.S.F. office; 13,634 G.S.F. support; 302
parking spaces. Phase 2 - 63,500 G.S.F. office; 8,741 G.S.F.
support
1,445 180 24 204 35 168 203
34 Arco AM/PM - New Carwash New Carwash and storage room totaling 1,200 G.S.F. at an
existing fueling station.
189 8 9 17 9 8 17
35 New Two story commercial building Two story commercial building totaling 3,385 G.S.F. 145 2 1 3 6 7 13
36 Tilden Terrace [3] New three-story, 48,525 G.S.F. mixed use development with
10,700 G.S.F. of ground floor retail and 33 residential units.
367 6 15 21 17 12 29
37 Duquesne Ave Condominiums Seven (7) condominium units. 41 1 2 3 3 1 4
38 Greg Reitz Construct 63,679 G.S.F. of office 705 87 12 99 16 79 95
39 Triangle Site - Washington/National TOD New transit oriented development to include light rail station &
mixed use development (preliminary concept includes up to 200
du, 149 room hotel, 200,000 G.S.F. office, 51,500 G.S.F. retail,
& 20,000 G.S.F. restaurant.
9,021 415 198 613 349 476 825
40 Willow's School Comprehensive Plan [3] Phase 1 - new surface parking; increased student enrollment by
50 from 425 to 475; Phase II & III increased student enrollment
by 100, from 475 to 575.
372 75 60 135 12 15 27
41 Bridge Housing Project Proposal for 2-3 story senior housing project with 62 units and 41
parking spaces.
216 3 5 8 6 4 10
42 Jewish Home for the Aging, Gonda Healthy
Aging Campus
184 congregate care units, 48 residential care units, 14,000
G.S.F. PACE program
975 33 13 46 34 53 87
43 Mixed-Use (The Palms) [5] Proposed mixed-use with 126-unit apartment, 9,000 s.f. retail
and 9,000 s.f. restaurant space. Existing 10,000 s.f. office to be
removed.
1,802 56 69 125 95 72 167
44 Apartment/Retail [5] Proposed mixed-use with 115-unit apartment and 975 s.f. retail.
Existing 15 apartment units, 2 single-family d.u. and 3,300 s.f.
office to be demolished.
651 6 374331 16 47
45 Mixed-Use [5] Construct 29 condominiums d.u., 1,250 s.f. retail, and 2,000 s.f.
retail.
683 13 25 38 79 59 138
46 Mixed-Use [5] Proposed mixed-use with 48-unit apartment and 1,500 s.f. office. 376 7 24 31 18 10 28
47 Media Related Office [5] Proposed 133,000 s.f. media-relations office. Existing 109,000
s.f. manufacturing to be removed.
490 46 3 49 25 14 39
48 Office [5] Proposed 50,000 s.f. office. 551 66 9 75 16 80 96
49 Mixed-Use [5] Proposed mixed-use with 175-unit condominium and 28,000 s.f.
retail. Existing 28,000 discount store to be removed.
989 25 64 89 75 56 131
50 Condominium [5] Proposed 227-unit condominium. Existing 89-unit apartment to
be removed.
727 8 475555 26 81
51 Restaurant/Retail [5] Proposed 2,500 s.f. restaurant and 3,500 s.f. retail. 475 18 16 34 37 29 66
52 Private School [5] Proposed 120-student private school (Goethe International
Charter School). Existing 9,000 s.f. office to be removed.
199 56 56 112 3 4 7
RELATED PROJECTS TRIP GENERATION TOTAL 52,005 3,459 1,604 5,063 2,335 3,117 5,452
[1] Unless otherwise noted, trip generation estimates determined from trip rates contained in Trip Generation, An ITE Information Report, 8th Edition, ITE 2008.
[3] Trip generation provided by the City of Culver City.
[4] Trip generation from Mid-City/Exposition LRT Project Final EIR/EIS, Los Angeles Metropolitan Transportation Authority/USDOT, Federal Transit Administration, October 2005.
[5] Trip generation totals provided by LADOT, February 2011. Directional distribution based on Trip Generation, An ITE Information Report, 8th Edition, ITE 2008.
[2] Trip generation from Traffic Impact Analysis Report, Proposed Mixed-Use Development (115-Unit Residential and 31,240 Square Foot Retail) Located at 8770 Washington Boulevard in Culver City, California ,
Hirsch/Green Transportation Consulting, Inc., July 2010.
32
ATTACHMENT 6
27033
ATTACHMENT 6
27134
ATTACHMENT 6
27235
ATTACHMENT 6
27336
ATTACHMENT 6
274
Another related project, the Legado Mixed-Use Project (#12) at 8770 Washington Boulevard, is
planned at the southeast corner of the National Boulevard/Washington Boulevard intersection.
This project is estimated to generate a net total of approximately 154 trips during the morning
peak hour and 275 trips during the evening peak hour. These three related projects would
substantially increase the future traffic volumes along National Boulevard and Washington
Boulevard in the vicinity of the Project site. However, it is also worth noting that several physical
improvements to the intersection of Washington Boulevard and National Boulevard are also
planned for implementation prior to the addition of this traffic.
PROJECT TRAFFIC VOLUMES
The Proposed Project consists of 28,708 square feet of office use, 36,819 square feet of retail
use, and 12,257 square feet of restaurant use. The Project would provide a 202-space multi-
level parking structure (with ground floor retail) and a 77-space parking structure for an overall
total supply of 279 parking spaces.
Utilizing the Trip Generation – An ITE Information Report, 8
th
Edition trip generation rates, the
Proposed Project’s trip generation was determined. Table 7 presents details of the Proposed
Project’s trip generation including type of use, size, applicable rates and trip generation estimates.
Other calculations within the table also provide for adjustments due to transit, internal capture
and pass-by trips. It is important to note that existing use trip reduction credit was not taken.
From Table 7, it can be observed that the Proposed Project’s trip generation would result in a
net total of approximately 2,360 daily trips of which 91 trips (71 trips inbound, 20 trips outbound)
would occur during the morning peak hour and 200 trips (100 trips inbound, 100 trips outbound)
would occur during the evening peak hour.
37
ATTACHMENT 6
275TABLE 7
ESTIMATED PROJECT TRIP GENERATION
AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
Size Daily IN OUT TOTAL IN OUT TOTAL
Proposed Project
Retail 36,819 s.f. 1,581 23 14 37 67 70 137
Restaurant 12,257 s.f. 1,103 5 5 10 62 30 92
Office 28,708 s.f. 510 61 8 69 7 36 43
Project Trip Generation Total 3,194 89 27 116 136 136 272
Transit Trip Use (7.5%) - Office (38) (5) (1) (6) (1) (3) (4)
*Internal Capture (10%) Trip Credit (316) (8) (3) (11) (14) (13) (27)
**Pass-By (20%) Trip Reduction - Retail/Restaurant (483) (5) (3) (8) (21) (20) (41)
Project Trip Generation Net Total 2,357 71 20 91 100 100 200
Trip Rates [1]
General Office (ITE Land Use 710) Trips per 1,000 s.f. [2] 88% 12% [2] 17% 83% 1.49
Retail (ITE Land Use 820) Trips per 1,000 s.f. 42.94 61% 39% 1.00 49% 51% 3.73
Restaurant (ITE Land Use 931) Trips per 1,000 s.f. 89.95 50% 50% 0.81 67% 33% 7.49
* Internal capture credit taken after reduction of transit trips.
** Pass-by trip reduction taken after internal capture credits.
[1] Trip Generation, An ITE Information Report, 8th Edition, ITE 2008
[2] Daily and AM peak hour trip generation for office was calculated using the following formulas:
Daily: Ln(T) = 0.77 Ln(X) + 3.65 Where:
AM Peak Hour: Ln(T) = 0.80 Ln(X) + 1.55 Ln = Natural logarithm
T = Two-way volume of traffic (total trip-ends)
X = Area in 1,000 square feet gross floor area
38
ATTACHMENT 6
276
Project Trip Distribution
The generalized trip distribution for Project trips was estimated to be the following based on
current traffic patterns and land uses in the study area:
• To and From the North: 20%
• To and From the South: 15%
• To and From the East: 35%
• To and From the West: 30%
Intersection level trip distribution percentages are shown in Figure 7. Based on these
distribution assumptions, location of the Project driveways, and trip generation from the
Proposed Project, traffic estimates of project-only trips were developed. These project-only trips
are presented in Figures 8A and 8B for the AM and PM peak hours, respectively.
CUMULATIVE (2014) PLUS PROJECT TRAFFIC VOLUMES
Utilizing the project-only traffic estimates developed for both AM and PM peak hours, traffic
forecasts for the Future Year 2014 with Project conditions were developed. The Cumulative
(2014) Base traffic forecasts were combined with the project-only traffic volumes to obtain the
Future with Project traffic volume forecasts. The Future Year 2014 Cumulative plus Project traffic
volumes during both AM and PM peak hours are presented in Figures 9A and 9B, respectively.
39
ATTACHMENT 6
27740
ATTACHMENT 6
27841
ATTACHMENT 6
27942
ATTACHMENT 6
28043
ATTACHMENT 6
28144
ATTACHMENT 6
282
IV. FUTURE YEAR 2014 TRAFFIC CONDITIONS & IMPACT ANALYSIS
The Future Year 2014 Cumulative Base and Cumulative plus Project conditions were analyzed
utilizing the methodologies and assumptions per the City of Culver City traffic study guidelines.
The results were then used to assess the potential impact of the proposed project on the local
street system.
The traffic impact analysis compares the volume to capacity (V/C) ratios at each study location
under the cumulative base and cumulative plus project conditions to determine the incremental
difference in V/C ratios caused by the proposed project. This provides the information needed to
assess the potential impact of the project using significance criteria established by the Cities of
Culver City and Los Angeles.
SIGNIFICANT TRAFFIC IMPACT CRITERIA
City of Culver City Significant Impact Criteria
For intersections under the City of Culver City jurisdiction, the City of Culver City has established
threshold criteria for determining the significance of impacts of a project at a specific location.
According to the criteria provided by the City of Culver City, a project impact is considered
significant if the following conditions are met:
Intersection Condition Project-Related Increase
With Project Traffic __ in V/C Ratio
LOS V/C Ratio
D 0.801 – 0.900 equal to or greater than 0.040
E, F > 0.900 equal to or greater than 0.020
Using these criteria, for example, a project would not have a significant impact at an intersection if
it is operating at LOS D after the addition of project traffic and the incremental change in the V/C
ratio is less than 0.040. However, if the intersection is operating at LOS F after the addition of
45
ATTACHMENT 6
283
project traffic and the incremental change in the V/C ratio is 0.020 or greater, the project would be
considered to have a significant impact.
At unsignalized intersections, the levels of service for conditions with and without the project are
determined using the Highway Capacity Manual Methodology. Additionally, the V/C ratios at these
locations are computed and the incremental changes in V/C ratio due to the proposed project are
determined. Both the delay (and corresponding LOS) and V/C ratio are reported in the level of
service summary tables. Next, using the same sliding scale shown in significance criteria stated
for the signalized intersections, the unsignalized intersections significant impacts are identified.
City of Los Angeles Significant Impact Criteria
Intersections under the jurisdiction of the City of Los Angeles are evaluated using threshold
criteria|1010| established by the City of Los Angeles to determine if a project has a significant traffic
impact. According to the criteria provided by the City of Los Angeles, a project impact is
considered significant if the following conditions are met:
Intersection Condition Project-Related Increase
With Project Traffic __ in V/C Ratio
LOS V/C Ratio
C 0.701 – 0.800 equal to or greater than 0.040
D 0.801 – 0.900 equal to or greater than 0.020
E, F > 0.900 equal to or greater than 0.010
FUTURE BASE ROADWAY NETWORK IMPROVEMENTS
The roadway network for the future base conditions within the study area is affected by a
number of regional improvement plans and improvements implemented by the Metro Exposition
Light Rail Phase 1 Project (Related Project #29). These improvements are identified in the Mid-
City/Exposition LRT Project Final EIS/EIR, Los Angeles Metropolitan Transportation
Authority/U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Transit Administration, October 2005 and
have been verified by the City of Culver City. These improvements are included in the following
page.
|1010| L.A. CEQA Thresholds Guide: Your Resource for Preparing CEQA Analysis in Los Angeles, City of Los
Angeles, 2006.
46
ATTACHMENT 6
284
• Venice Boulevard between Robertson Boulevard/Exposition Boulevard and Ivy Street -
The improvement along this street segment would include widening the north side of
Venice Boulevard from approximately 500 feet west of Robertson Boulevard/Exposition
Boulevard easterly to Ivy Street. The south side of Venice Boulevard would also be
widened, including reconfiguration of the median islands, from Exposition Boulevard to
approximately 500 feet west of Robertson Boulevard/Exposition Boulevard. This
improvement would not result in any changes in lane configurations or operations from
existing conditions at the intersection of Robertson Boulevard/Venice Boulevard.
• Venice Boulevard/National Boulevard - The improvement at this location would include
the addition of a second left-turn lane and exclusive right-turn lane on the eastbound and
westbound approaches. Both the eastbound and westbound approach would then
provide dual left-turn lanes, three through lanes, and a separate right-turn lane. This
improvement is in addition to the Venice Boulevard widening described above.
• National Boulevard/Washington Boulevard – The westbound approach on Washington
Boulevard would be improved at this location to include a shared through/right-turn lane.
This improvement would be accomplished by restriping the westbound right-turn lane to
a shared through/right-turn lane. The westbound approach would then provide a left-
turn lane, two through lanes, and a shared through/right-turn lane.
• Hayden Avenue/National Boulevard – The eastbound approach on National Boulevard
would be improved at this location to include an exclusive right-turn lane. This
improvement will be accomplished by modifying the existing raised median along
National Boulevard to provide a separate right-turn lane on the eastbound approach.
The eastbound approach would then provide two through lanes and a separate right-turn
lane.
• Jefferson Boulevard/National Boulevard – The improvement at this location would
reconstruct the existing intersection to provide a private driveway on the westbound
approached with a single shared left/through/right-turn lane. The northbound approach
would be constructed to provide a left-turn lane (from Jefferson Boulevard to westbound
National Boulevard), two through lanes and a separate right-turn lane into the private
driveway. The southbound approach would be reconfigured to provide a left-turn lane
into the private driveway, a through lane, and a separate right-turn lane (to westbound
National Boulevard). The eastbound approach would be reconfigured to provide two
through lanes (including access to the private driveway) and a separate right-turn lane.
• La Cienega Boulevard/Jefferson Boulevard - The improvement at this location would
modify the eastbound/westbound traffic signal operations to provide permissive left-turn
phasing.
• La Cienega Boulevard/Rodeo Road - The westbound approach on Rodeo Road would
be improved at this location to provide a second left-turn lane. The westbound approach
would then provide dual left-turn lanes, two through lanes, and a separate right-turn
lane.
47
ATTACHMENT 6
285
In addition to the Metro Exposition Light Rail Project improvements described above, the City of
Culver City has identified other future roadway improvements within the study area. These
improvements include the following:
• Robertson Boulevard-Higuera Street/Washington Boulevard – The City of Culver City
has identified an improvement at this location to convert the existing northbound shared
through/right-turn lane to an exclusive right-turn lane. The northbound approach would
be restriped to provide a left-turn lane, a through lane, and a separate right-turn lane.
The northbound departure would also be striped to one lane.
• National Boulevard between Venice Boulevard and Washington Boulevard – As part of
the Triangle Site Project (Related Project #39), located on the northwest corner of the
intersection of National Boulevard/Washington Boulevard, the City of Culver City intends
to dedicate and widen the west side of National Boulevard between Venice Boulevard
and Washington Boulevard by 10 feet to provide a 72-foot roadway. All on-street
parking along this segment would be removed to accommodate bicycles lanes on both
sides of the street. No additional travel lanes have been proposed.
These roadway improvements are included in both the Cumulative (2014) Base conditions and
Cumulative (2014) plus Project conditions analyses and would improve/increase the overall
capacity of the future roadway network. The traffic effects due to the improvement at Jefferson
Boulevard/National Boulevard have been included in the Cumulative (2014) Base conditions and
Cumulative (2014) plus Project conditions analyses. The future lane configurations of the
analyzed intersections are included in Appendix B.
It worth noting that there are other long-term improvements planned in the study area including
improvements to the Santa Monica (I-10) Freeway Ramps at Robertson Boulevard, auxiliary lane
improvements to the Santa Monica (I-10) Freeway, and improvements to the Santa Monica (I-
10)/San Diego (I-405) Freeway interchange. These improvements are not anticipated to be
completed within the study timeframe (Year 2014), and, therefore, were not included in the future
conditions.
The Metro Exposition Light Rail Train (LRT) Phase 1 Project is providing local and regional
improvements within the study area. Phase 1 of the Metro Exposition LRT Project is an 8.5-mile
corridor project providing light rail train service from Downtown Los Angeles to the Westside and
Culver City that would be operated by Metro. Within the study area, the Exposition LRT will
provide service parallel to Jefferson Boulevard and National Boulevard. Ten new stations will be
48
ATTACHMENT 6
286
provided along the route from the existing Metro Rail station at 7
th
Street/Metro Center in
Downtown Los Angeles to the Venice/Robertson Station in Culver City. The route alignment will
be all above-grade within the study area. The LRT project includes aerial stations at Expo/La
Brea, La Cienega/Jefferson, and Venice/Robertson Stations. Phase 1 is expected to be
completed by 2012. Phase 2 of the Metro LRT Project will provide service from Culver City to
Santa Monica and is expected to be completed by 2015.
Two of the LRT Phase 1 stations, Venice/Robertson Station and La Cienega/Jefferson Station, are
located within the study area. The Proposed Project is located across the street from the
Venice/Robertson Station. The Venice/Robertson Station will also provide some parking spaces
for park-and-ride patrons. Driveways to the Venice/Robertson Station’s parking lot will be located
along National Boulevard and Washington Boulevard.
The La Cienega/Jefferson Station will be located on the southeast corner of the La Cienega
Boulevard/Jefferson Boulevard intersection. This station also provides park-and-ride possibilities
at a parking structure located adjacent to it. Driveways to this station’s park-and-ride facility are
proposed along La Cienega Boulevard and Jefferson Boulevard.
CUMULATIVE (2014) BASE TRAFFIC CONDITIONS
The Cumulative (2014) Base without proposed project peak hour traffic volumes were analyzed at
each of the study intersections to determine the V/C ratio (or delay in seconds) and corresponding
level of service. Table 8 presents the results of the Year 2014 Cumulative Base (without project)
traffic analysis. As indicated in the table, 17 of the 34 analyzed intersections are projected to
operate at LOS D or better during the morning peak hour. During the evening peak hour, 19 of the
34 analyzed intersections are projected to operate at LOS D or better. Eighteen of the 34
intersections are projected to be operating at LOS E or F during the morning and/or evening peak
hours and include the following:
• Robertson Boulevard/Cattaraugus Avenue: AM and PM Peak Hour – LOS E
• Robertson Boulevard/National Boulevard: AM and PM Peak Hour – LOS F
• Culver Boulevard/Venice Boulevard: PM Peak Hour – LOS E
49
ATTACHMENT 6
287TABLE 8
SUMMARY OF INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE ANALYSIS - FUTURE CONDITIONS
Cumulative (2014) Cumulative (2014) Plus Project Conditions
Peak Base Conditions Increase Significant
Map # INTERSECTION Hour V/C LOS V/C LOS in V/C Impact
1 Robertson Boulevard Cattaraugus Avenue [1] AM 0.948 E 0.949 E 0.001 No
PM 0.933 E 0.936 E 0.003 No
2 Robertson Boulevard I-10 WB Off-Ramp/Kincardine Avenue [1] AM 0.797 C 0.801 D 0.004 No
PM 0.809 D 0.815 D 0.006 No
3 Robertson Boulevard National Boulevard [1] AM 1.049 F 1.053 F 0.004 No
PM 1.042 F 1.047 F 0.005 No
4 National Boulevard I-10 Eastbound On-Ramp [1] AM 0.415 A 0.415 A 0.000 No
PM 0.454 A 0.457 A 0.003 No
5 Hughes Avenue Venice Boulevard [1] AM 0.841 D 0.843 D 0.002 No
PM 0.767 C 0.771 C 0.004 No
6 Bagley Avenue Venice Boulevard [1] AM 0.789 C 0.791 C 0.002 No
PM 0.763 C 0.767 C 0.004 No
7 Culver Boulevard Venice Boulevard [1] AM 0.849 D 0.852 D 0.003 No
PM 0.957 E 0.961 E 0.004 No
8 Robertson Boulevard Venice Boulevard [1] AM 1.461 F 1.462 F 0.001 No
PM 1.430 F 1.434 F 0.004 No
9 National Boulevard Venice Boulevard [1] AM 1.038 F 1.043 F 0.005 No
PM 1.013 F 1.021 F 0.008 No
10 Helms Avenue Venice Boulevard [1] AM 0.527 A 0.528 A 0.001 No
PM 0.515 A 0.517 A 0.002 No
11 Cattaraugus Avenue Venice Boulevard [1] AM 0.863 D 0.865 D 0.002 No
PM 0.723 C 0.727 C 0.004 No
50
ATTACHMENT 6
288TABLE 8 (continued)
SUMMARY OF INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE ANALYSIS - FUTURE CONDITIONS
Cumulative (2014) Cumulative (2014) Plus Project Conditions
Peak Base Conditions Increase Significant
Map # INTERSECTION Hour V/C LOS V/C LOS in V/C Impact
12 La Cienega Boulevard Venice Boulevard [1,2] AM 1.083 F 1.085 F 0.002 No
PM 1.066 F 1.069 F 0.003 No
13 Hughes Avenue/Duquesne Avenue Washington Boulevard AM 0.641 B 0.641 B 0.000 No
PM 0.653 B 0.654 B 0.001 No
14 Duquesne Avenue Culver Boulevard AM 0.760 C 0.762 C 0.002 No
PM 0.886 D 0.891 D 0.005 No
15 Culver Boulevard Washington Boulevard/Irving Place AM 0.618 B 0.620 B 0.002 No
PM 0.635 B 0.638 B 0.003 No
16 Main Street Culver Boulevard AM 0.581 A 0.582 A 0.001 No
PM 0.613 B 0.613 B 0.000 No
17 Culver Boulevard Washington Boulevard AM 0.782 C 0.783 C 0.001 No
PM 0.752 C 0.756 C 0.004 No
18 Robertson Boulevard/Higuera Street Washington Boulevard AM 0.975 E 0.990 E 0.015 No
PM 0.816 D 0.847 D 0.031 No
19 Landmark Street Washington Boulevard AM 0.601 B 0.610 B 0.009 No
PM 0.514 A 0.599 A 0.085 No
20 National Boulevard Washington Boulevard AM 0.946 E 0.963 E 0.017 No
PM 0.925 E 0.947 E 0.022 Yes
with Mitigation Measure [5]
AM 0.913 E -0.033 No
PM 0.897 D -0.028 No
with Mitigation Measure - Alternative [5]
AM 0.933 E -0.013 No
PM 0.917 E -0.008 No
51
ATTACHMENT 6
289TABLE 8 (continued)
SUMMARY OF INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE ANALYSIS - FUTURE CONDITIONS
Cumulative (2014) Cumulative (2014) Plus Project Conditions
Peak Base Conditions Increase Significant
Map # INTERSECTION Hour V/C LOS V/C LOS in V/C Impact
21 Wesley Avenue Washington Boulevard [3] AM 134.9 sec F 138.9 sec F 0.005 No
PM 484.0 sec F 521.5 sec F 0.008 No
AM 0.768 [6] 0.773 [6] - -
PM 0.781 [6] 0.789 [6] - -
22 Helms Avenue Washington Boulevard AM 0.563 A 0.568 A 0.005 No
PM 0.503 A 0.509 A 0.006 No
23 Cattaraugus Avenue Washington Boulevard [3] AM *** sec F *** sec F 0.007 No
PM 709.6 sec F 778.5 sec F 0.016 No
AM 1.030 [6] 1.037 [6] - -
PM 0.898 [6] 0.914 [6] - -
24 La Cienega Boulevard Washington Boulevard AM 1.199 F 1.203 F 0.004 No
PM 0.990 E 0.996 E 0.006 No
25 La Cienega Boulevard Fairfax Avenue [1] AM 1.060 F 1.060 F 0.000 No
PM 0.898 D 0.898 D 0.000 No
26 Wesley Street National Boulevard AM 0.710 C 0.715 C 0.005 No
PM 0.472 A 0.479 A 0.007 No
27 Hayden Avenue National Boulevard AM 0.640 B 0.643 B 0.003 No
PM 0.738 C 0.747 C 0.009 No
28 Jefferson Boulevard National Boulevard [1] AM 1.002 F 1.009 F 0.007 No
PM 0.752 C 0.757 C 0.005 No
29 La Cienega Boulevard Jefferson Boulevard [1,2] AM 1.278 F 1.280 F 0.002 No
PM 1.205 F 1.210 F 0.005 No
30 Jefferson Boulevard Higuera Street/Rodeo Road [1] AM 0.755 C 0.758 C 0.003 No
PM 0.781 C 0.790 C 0.009 No
52
ATTACHMENT 6
290TABLE 8 (continued)
SUMMARY OF INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE ANALYSIS - FUTURE CONDITIONS
Cumulative (2014) Cumulative (2014) Plus Project Conditions
Peak Base Conditions Increase Significant
Map # INTERSECTION Hour V/C LOS V/C LOS in V/C Impact
31 La Cienega Boulevard Rodeo Road [1] AM 1.217 F 1.219 F 0.002 No
PM 1.248 F 1.251 F 0.003 No
32 Braddock Drive Duquesne Avenue [4] AM 227.9 sec F 229.1 sec F 0.001 No
PM 158.5 sec F 160.3 sec F 0.003 No
AM 1.185 [6] 1.186 [6] - -
PM 1.325 [6] 1.328 [6] - -
33 Lucerne Avenue Duquesne Avenue [4] AM 51.7 sec F 52.2 sec F 0.002 No
PM 66.8 sec F 68.4 sec F 0.005 No
AM 0.939 [6] 0.941 [6] - -
PM 1.052 [6] 1.057 [6] - -
34 Jefferson Boulevard Duquesne Avenue AM 1.211 F 1.215 F 0.004 No
PM 1.030 F 1.034 F 0.004 No
*** Intersection delay cannot be calculated.
[1] City of Los Angeles location.
[2] Los Angeles County Congestion Management Program (CMP) monitoring location.
[3] Unsignalized intersections - stop-controlled on minor approach(es).
[4] Unsignalized intersections - stop-controlled on all approach.
[6] V/C ratio was calculated, based on signalized LOS methodology, to determine project impacts.
[5] The Project requires only a small increment of V/C improvement to alleviate the significance of its impact (0.003 or 0.3% V/C improvement) during the PM peak hour. No significant
impact occurs during the AM peak hour and therefore, no V/C improvement is required.
53
ATTACHMENT 6
291
• Robertson Boulevard/Venice Boulevard: AM and PM Peak Hour – LOS F
• National Boulevard/Venice Boulevard: AM and PM Peak Hour – LOS F
• La Cienega Boulevard/Venice Boulevard: AM and PM Peak Hour–LOS F
• Robertson Boulevard-Higuera Street/Washington Boulevard: AM Peak Hour – LOS E
• National Boulevard/Washington Boulevard: AM and PM Peak Hour – LOS E
• Wesley Street/Washington Boulevard: AM and PM Peak Hour – LOS F
• Cattaraugus Avenue/Washington Boulevard: AM and PM Peak Hour – LOS F
• La Cienega Boulevard/Washington Boulevard: AM Peak Hour – LOS F; PM Peak Hour -
LOS E
• La Cienega Boulevard/Fairfax Avenue: AM Peak Hour – LOS F
• Jefferson Boulevard/National Boulevard: AM Peak Hour – LOS F
• La Cienega Boulevard/Jefferson Boulevard: AM and PM Peak Hour – LOS F
• La Cienega Boulevard/Rodeo Road: AM and PM Peak Hour – LOS F
• Braddock Drive/Duquesne Avenue: AM and PM Peak Hour – LOS F
• Lucerne Avenue/Duquesne Avenue: AM and PM Peak Hour – LOS F
• Jefferson Boulevard/Duquesne Avenue: AM and PM Peak Hour – LOS F
Capacity calculation worksheets for Cumulative (2014) Base conditions are attached in Appendix
E of the report.
CUMULATIVE (2014) PLUS PROJECT TRAFFIC CONDITIONS
The Cumulative (2014) plus Project peak hour traffic volumes were analyzed to determine the
volume to capacity (V/C) ratio (or delay in seconds) and LOS at each of the analyzed
intersections. The results of this analysis are also summarized on Table 8. Table 8 indicates
that traffic generated by the Project would not change the intersection levels of service from
cumulative base conditions at 33 of the 34 study intersections. Addition of the Project traffic
would change the level of service at one of the study intersections.
The intersection of Robertson Boulevard/I-10 Westbound Off-Ramp-Kincardine Avenue would
operate at a LOS D under Cumulative (2014) plus Project conditions compared to a high LOS C
under Cumulative (2014) Base conditions during the morning peak hour.
54
ATTACHMENT 6
292
Capacity calculation worksheets for Cumulative (2014) Plus Project conditions are attached in
Appendix F of the report.
PROJECT IMPACTS
Using the specified significant impact criteria in the jurisdictions involved, traffic impacts at the
analysis locations were determined. Table 8 identifies the individual impacts during both AM and
PM peak hours at each of the analysis locations. It was estimated that one of the 34 analyzed
intersections would be significantly impacted by the Proposed Project. It can be observed that the
intersection of National Boulevard/Washington Boulevard would be significantly impacted during
the evening peak hour by the traffic effects of the Proposed Project. The Project’s impact exceeds
the threshold for significant impact by an incremental volume-to-capacity ratio of 0.003 or 0.3%.
Therefore, intersection level mitigation measures at this location would be required for the
Proposed Project.
Note that for the stop-controlled intersection, both the delay and V/C ratio are reported in order to
identify significant impacts. The delay is used to determine the level of service and the V/C is
used to determine the incremental difference in V/C ratios to assess the impact caused by the
Proposed Project.
RECOMMENDED MITIGATION MEASURES
In order to address the Project’s impact at the intersection of National Boulevard/Washington
Boulevard, the following mitigation measure is recommended:
? The Project shall contribute its fair share towards implementation of a shuttle system
service connecting the residential and commercial areas in Downtown Culver City and
Hayden Tract areas to and from the Venice/Robertson Light Rail Train (LRT) Station on
the Exposition Line (see Figure 10). Figure 10 shows the preliminary recommended
route for this Culver City circulator service (Culver City Downtown/Culver Studios – Expo
Culver City Station – Hayden Tract). This route will traverse along Washington
Boulevard with stops in both directions adjacent to the Proposed Project site. The
schedules for these shuttles should be developed such that coordinated transfers to and
from the rail station at Venice Boulevard/Robertson Boulevard are achieved. These
shuttles would operate at enhanced frequencies (10 minute headways) and provide fast,
convenient, and efficient connections to the Metro Exposition LRT Line.
55
ATTACHMENT 6
29356
ATTACHMENT 6
294
In event that the shuttle program has not progressed sufficiently to warrant study funding, the
following alternative mitigation measure shall be implemented:
? The Project shall contribute its fair share to the design and implementation of ATCS
(Adaptive Traffic Control System) at the intersection of National Boulevard/Washington
Boulevard. This includes provision of ATCS-associated signal equipment, additional loop
detectors, communications set-up and the associated control PC hardware/software, if
required. The ATCS is a PC-based traffic signal control program that provides full-
response signal control based on real time traffic operating conditions. ATCS
automatically adjusts and optimizes traffic signal timing in response to current traffic
demands on the entire signal network such that the number of stops and the amount of
delay are minimized along with improved traffic signal coordination throughout the network.
The City of Culver City allows intersection capacity improvement of 3% with ATCS
implementation.
It is also worth noting that the Project requires only a small increment of V/C improvement to
alleviate the significance of its impact (0.003 or 0.3% V/C improvement) during the PM peak
hour at the intersection of National Boulevard and Washington Boulevard. No significant impact
occurs in the AM peak hour and therefore, no V/C improvement is required. The Triangle
Project at the Venice/Robertson Station and other nearby future projects would also be able to
utilize the overall V/C improvement that the shuttle system service (or implementation of ATCS)
would provide. It is recommended that the City allow sharing of these important improvement
measures to advance their implementation schedule.
Project Access Improvement
Additionally, to enhance project access, the applicant of the Proposed Project shall be required
to design, and construct the westbound left-turn signal at the intersection of Washington
Boulevard and Landmark Street and be responsible for all costs associated with the
modification of the traffic signal. This would improve operations at this intersection such that
potential queuing beyond the left-turn pocket at the intersection would be alleviated.
57
ATTACHMENT 6
295
Effectiveness of Mitigation Measures
The potential effectiveness of the proposed shuttle bus mitigation measure is calculated using a
widely-used methodology. This methodology has been approved in several jurisdictions including
the City of Los Angeles (Playa Vista First Phase Project EIR and the Village at Playa Vista Project
EIR) and the City of Pasadena (Lake at Colorado Mixed-Use Project EIR).
? A shuttle bus has a seating capacity of 25 people. The auto occupancy in this region is 1.2
persons per automobile. Therefore, a 25-seat shuttle bus has the potential capacity of 21
autos (25/1.2 = 21) or critical movement trips traversing the intersection depending upon
the direction and the number of lanes available at the intersection for the critical movement
that the bus is traveling in.
? The frequency of the bus service provides the number of buses traversing the proposed
route in one hour. The proposed shuttle bus is expected to operate at 10 minute
frequencies throughout the day or at a rate of 6 buses per hour. Therefore, a total capacity
of 125 critical movement trips (25 x 6 / 1.2 = 125) will be offered by the proposed shuttle
route at the impacted intersection of National Boulevard/Washington Boulevard.
? This capacity of 125 critical movement trips was applied in the CMA (Critical Movement
Analysis) worksheet at the National Boulevard/Washington Boulevard intersection to arrive
at the intersection V/C ratio and level of service for the ‘traffic conditions with mitigation’
scenario.
? The ATCS improvement is allowed an intersection capacity improvement of 3%.
Therefore, with the implementation of ATCS, the National Boulevard/Washington
Boulevard intersection V/C ratio is estimated to improve by 3% in the traffic conditions with
the alternative mitigation scenario.
The results of the implementation of the recommended project-level improvements (including the
alternative improvement) are summarized in Table 8. As indicated in the table, the recommended
improvement (and alternative improvement) would fully mitigate the Project-related impact at the
impacted intersection, National Boulevard/Washington Boulevard.
Capacity calculation worksheets for Cumulative (2014) plus Project with Mitigation conditions are
attached in Appendix G.
It is also worth noting that this shuttle bus route would offer access to the Exposition LRT Line at
the Venice/Robertson Station to the commercial and office uses along Washington Boulevard
corridor including several large employers such as Sony Studios, Culver City City Hall, Culver
58
ATTACHMENT 6
296
Studios and others, as well as the residential community adjacent to City Hall and the Hayden
Tract area.
The applicant agrees to contribute $50,000 towards any costs associated with the implementation
of the shuttle program, including a study to determine the benefits of a shuttle service, the City’s
administrative work and start-up costs. In addition, the applicant agrees to participate in an
assessment district that will be formed to pay for the operation and maintenance of the shuttle
service.
In event that the proposed shuttle is not implemented, the applicant agrees to contribute $50,000
towards any costs associated with the implementation of ATCS at the intersection of National
Boulevard/Washington Boulevard, including the ATCS-associated signal equipment, additional
loop detectors, communications set-up and the associated control PC hardware/software, if
required.
59
ATTACHMENT 6
297
V. STREET SEGMENT AND PARKING/ACCESS ANALYSIS
This chapter provides an analysis of roadway segments in the vicinity of the Project. This analysis
is targeted towards assessment of potential neighborhood traffic intrusion impacts as a result of
the Proposed Project. Additionally, parking evaluation on site and other access/circulation issues
are addressed in this chapter. The parking evaluation consists of examining the proposed parking
supply for the Project in relation to the parking requirements for the various uses proposed by the
Project. The access and egress evaluation consists of a review of vehicular access and egress
driveways to ascertain that adequate provisions are provided by the Project.
RESIDENTIAL STREET SEGMENT TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS
Working closely with the City of Culver City staff, eight roadway segment locations were identified
for analysis and assessment of conditions with the Project. These street segments include:
• Lucerne Avenue between Duquesne Avenue and Ince Boulevard
• Lucerne Avenue between Ince Boulevard and Higuera Street
• Wesley Street between National Boulevard and Higuera Street
• Helms Avenue Street between National Boulevard and Higuera Street
• Schaefer Street between National Boulevard and Higuera Street
• Higuera Street between Washington Boulevard and Lucerne Avenue
• Higuera Street between Lucerne Avenue and Wesley Street
• Higuera Street between Wesley Street and Jefferson Boulevard
Existing Street Segment Traffic Volumes
Daily traffic counts were conducted in May 2010 and March 2011 using machine counters. Traffic
counts collected in May 2010 were factored upward 1% per year to reflect existing 2011
conditions. The raw data for these traffic counts are included in Appendix C.
60
ATTACHMENT 6
298
Existing daily traffic volumes are summarized in Table 9. As indicated in the table, the existing
daily traffic volume on Lucerne Avenue between Duquesne Avenue and Ince Boulevard is 6,629
vehicles per day and the street segment between Ince Boulevard and Higuera Street carries
3,956 vehicles per day. The existing daily traffic volume on Wesley Street between National
Boulevard and Higuera Street is 519 vehicles per day. The existing daily traffic volume on
Helms Avenue between National Boulevard and Washington Boulevard is 497 vehicles per day.
The existing daily traffic volume on Schaefer Avenue between National Boulevard and
Washington Boulevard is 600 vehicles per day. The analyzed street segments along Higuera
Street carry 6,540 vehicles per day on the east, between Wesley Street and Jefferson
Boulevard, and 8,361 vehicles per day on the west, between Washington Boulevard and
Lucerne Avenue.
Cumulative (2014) Base - Street Segment Traffic Volumes
Future daily traffic volumes were projected for the residential streets in a manner similar to that
used for the intersections described earlier. Firstly, with the assumed completion date of 2014,
the existing 2011 traffic volumes were adjusted upward by a factor of 3% (1% per year
compounded annually) to reflect this area-wide regional growth. Secondly, from traffic generated
by specific cumulative projects located within, or in the vicinity of, the study area were added to the
existing plus ambient growth traffic to obtain the Cumulative (2014) Base traffic volumes. The
resulting Cumulative (2014) Base street segment daily and peak hour traffic volumes are
summarized in Table 9.
The daily traffic volume along the Helms Avenue and Schaefer Avenue study street segments
increase by 3% due to future ambient growth and related projects. The Lucerne Avenue and
Wesley Street analyzed street segments experienced a 7% to 8% daily traffic volume increase;
while the Higuera Street analyzed street segments had a daily traffic increase of 14% to 17%. It
was observed that the increase in traffic along Higuera Street is primarily due to the future planned
projects along Hayden Place and Warner Drive.
61
ATTACHMENT 6
299TABLE 9
RESIDENTIAL STREET TRAFFIC ANALYSIS
Two-Way Traffic Volume
Time Existing (2011) Cumulative (2014) Project Cumulative (2014) Project % Significant
Street Segment Period Conditions Base Conditions Traffic Plus Project Increase Impact
Lucerne Avenue ADT 6,629 7,074 47 7,121 0.7% No
between Duquesne Avenue and Ince Boulevard AM 712 755 1 756 0.1% No
PM 760 803 4 807 0.5% No
Lucerne Avenue ADT 3,956 4,264 47 4,311 1.1% No
between Ince Boulevard and Higuera Street AM 446 476 1 477 0.2% No
PM 384 412 4 416 1.0% No
Wesley Street ADT 519 561 0 561 0.0% No
between National Boulevard and Higuera Street AM 60 63 0 63 0.0% No
PM 52 57 0 57 0.0% No
Helms Avenue ADT 497 512 0 512 0.0% No
between National Boulevard and Higuera Street AM 67 69 0 69 0.0% No
PM 45 46 0 46 0.0% No
Schaefer Street ADT 600 618 0 618 0.0% No
between National Boulevard and Higuera Street AM 61 63 0 63 0.0% No
PM 55 57 0 57 0.0% No
Higuera Street ADT 8,361 9,546 47 9,593 0.5% No
between Washington Boulevard and Lucerne Avenue AM 842 964 1 965 0.1% No
PM 743 851 4 855 0.5% No
Higuera Street ADT 6,760 7,761 0 7,761 0.0% No
between Lucerne Avenue and Wesley Avenue AM 769 875 0 875 0.0% No
PM 541 630 0 630 0.0% No
Higuera Street ADT 6,540 7,675 71 7,746 0.9% No
between Wesley Avenue and Jefferson Boulevard AM 696 809 4 813 0.5% No
PM 577 669 6 675 0.9% No
62
ATTACHMENT 6
300
Cumulative (2014) plus Project - Street Segment Traffic Volumes
Based on the distribution assumptions (included in Figure 7) and the daily trip generation
estimates (approximately 2,360 daily trips) for the Proposed Project, daily traffic estimates of
project-only trips were developed. It was determined that the Project would add 47 daily trips to
Higuera Street between Washington Boulevard and Lucerne Avenue and both Lucerne Avenue
analyzed street segments and would add 71 daily trips on Higuera Street between Wesley Street
and Jefferson Boulevard. The Cumulative (2014) plus Project daily traffic volumes resulting from
the addition of trips generated by the Proposed Project are shown in Table 9.
Street Segment Significant Impact Criteria
As outlined in the City of Culver City Traffic Study Criteria, the following specific threshold criteria
for project impacts to any street segment detailed below were used in this study:
Projected Avenue Daily Project-Related Increase
Traffic (ADT) with Project in Average Daily (ADT) Volume
999 Less 120 or more
1,000 to 1,999 12% or more of final ADT
2,000 to 2,999 10% or more of final ADT
3,000 or more 8% or more of final ADT
Assessment of Significant Impacts
As shown in Table 9, the Proposed Project would increase the traffic on Lucerne Avenue roadway
segment between Duquesne Avenue and Ince Boulevard by 0.7% on a daily basis and by 0.1%
and 0.5% during the morning and evening peak hours, respectively. On Lucerne Avenue between
Ince Boulevard and Higuera Street, the Proposed Project would increase traffic by 1.1% on a daily
basis and by 0.2% during the morning peak hour and 1% during the evening peak hour. On
Higuera Street between Washington Boulevard and Lucerne Avenue, the Proposed Project would
increase traffic by 0.5% on a daily basis and by 0.1% during the morning peak hour and 0.5%
during the evening peak hour. On Higuera Street between Wesley Street and Jefferson Boulevard,
the Proposed Project would increase traffic by 0.9% on a daily basis and by 0.5% and 0.9% during
the morning and evening peak hours, respectively.
63
ATTACHMENT 6
301
The potential impacts of the Proposed Project traffic on the adjacent neighborhood residential
streets were assessed using the City of Culver City criteria specified earlier in the chapter. The
results of the analysis, which are summarized in Table 9, indicate that the Proposed Project
would not have a significant impact on the residential streets in the local neighborhood.
PARKING EVALUATION
The Proposed Project consists of 28,708 square feet of office use, 36,819 square feet of retail
use, and 12,257 square feet of restaurant use. The Project would provide a 202-space multi-
level parking structure (with ground floor retail) and a 77-space parking structure for an overall
total supply of 279 parking spaces. The Project site plan is shown in Figure 10.
The following are the parking requirements contained within Section 17.320.020 Number of
Parking Spaces Required established by the Culver City Municipal Zoning Code:
? Offices, Administrative, Corporate, Professional - 1 space per 350 G.S.F.
? Shopping Centers, Less than 5 acres in net parcel area – 1 space per 250 G.S.F.
? Restaurant, Located in shopping centers: Less than 25% of floor area of center for all
restaurants – Parking requirement covered under the general requirement for shopping
center.
Based on these requirements, the required parking for this project would be 278 spaces (office:
28,708 G.S.F. x 1 space/350 G.S.F. = 82 spaces, retail: 36,819 G.S.F x 1 space/250 G.S.F =147
spaces; restaurant: 12,257 G.S.F. x 1 space/250 G.S.F. = 49 spaces). The Project would provide
a total 279 parking spaces. Therefore, there would be adequate parking for the Proposed Project.
ACCESS AND CIRCULATION
Driveways located along Landmark Street would provide access to the Project parking
structures. One driveway would be located on the west side of the street providing access to
the 202-space parking structure. Three driveways would be located on the east side of the
64
ATTACHMENT 6
30265
ATTACHMENT 6
303
street; two driveways providing access to the 77-space parking structure and the other driveway
providing access to the loading/trash area. The existing driveways along Washington Boulevard
to the site would be removed.
In the western 202-space parking structure, the typical parking spaces would be 18 feet deep X
8 ½ feet wide in size. The width of the parking aisles vary from approximately 34 ½ feet on the
first floor to 27 feet to 28 feet wide on floors 2 through 5, with a 25-foot ramp to access the
parking levels. The parking field would provide nine handicapped spaces. The driveway would
include gate arms controlling the entrance and exit lanes.
In the 77-space eastern parking structure, the typical parking spaces would be 18 feet deep X 8
½ feet wide in size. On the first floor, the width of the parking aisles vary from approximately 25
feet to 27 feet, with a 19 ½-foot ramp to access the second floor. On the second floor, the width
of the parking aisles vary from approximately 19 feet to 30 feet, with a 20 ½-foot ramp to access
the third floor. On the third floor, the width of the parking aisle varies from approximately 14 feet
to 26 feet. This parking structure would provide four handicapped spaces.
A detailed review of the site plan was conducted and it was determined that the access driveway,
all the parking aisles and parking spaces at all levels proposed as part of the Project would
function adequately.
Summarizing, the project’s parking, access and circulation systems would be adequate and they
would all function satisfactorily.
66
ATTACHMENT 6
304
VI. REGIONAL CONGESTION MANAGEMENT PROGRAM ANALYSIS
This section presents the Congestion Management Program (CMP) Transportation Impact
analysis. This analysis was conducted in accordance with the procedures outlined in the 2010
Congestion Management Program for Los Angeles County (Los Angeles County Metropolitan
Transportation Authority, 2010). The CMP requires that when a traffic impact report is prepared
for a project, traffic impact analyses be conducted for selected regional facilities based on the
quantity of project traffic expected to use these facilities.
CMP TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS
The CMP guidelines for determining the study area of the analysis for CMP arterial monitoring
intersections and for freeway monitoring locations are as follows:
• All CMP arterial monitoring intersections where the proposed project will add 50 or more
trips during either the AM or PM weekday peak hours of adjacent street traffic.
• All CMP mainline freeway monitoring locations where the proposed project will add 150 or
more trips, in either direction, during either the AM or PM weekday peak hours.
The CMP arterial monitoring intersections within a three-mile from the Project site includes the
following:
• La Cienega Boulevard/Venice Boulevard – City of Los Angeles jurisdiction
• La Cienega Boulevard/Jefferson Boulevard – City of Los Angeles jurisdiction
• Centinela Avenue/Venice Boulevard – City of Los Angeles jurisdiction
• La Cienega Boulevard/Stocker Street – County of Los Angeles jurisdiction
• La Cienega Boulevard/Wilshire Boulevard – City of Beverly Hills jurisdiction
• Santa Monica Boulevard/Wilshire Boulevard – City of Beverley Hills jurisdiction
• Overland Avenue/Venice Boulevard – City of Culver City jurisdiction
67
ATTACHMENT 6
305
Based on the incremental Project trip generation estimates presented in Chapter III, the Proposed
Project is not expected to add 50 or more new trips per hour to any of these locations. Therefore,
no further analysis of these CMP monitoring intersections would be required. However, two of the
CMP arterial monitoring intersections listed above, La Cienega Boulevard/Venice Boulevard and
La Cienega Boulevard/Jefferson Boulevard, have been included in the traffic analysis and it was
determined that the Project would not have a significant intersection traffic impact at either of these
locations.
The CMP mainline freeway monitoring locations within a three-mile radius from the Project site
includes the following:
• Santa Monica (I-10) Freeway east of Overland Avenue
• Santa Monica (I-10) Freeway east of La Brea Avenue
• San Diego Freeway (I-405) north of Venice Boulevard
Based on the incremental Project trip generation estimates, the Proposed Project will not add
150 or more new trips per hour to these locations in either direction. Therefore, no further
analysis of CMP freeway monitoring stations is required.
68
ATTACHMENT 6
306
VII. SUMMARY OF CONCLUSIONS
This study was undertaken to assess existing traffic conditions, estimate future conditions with and
without the proposed project, analyze potential traffic impacts of the Proposed Project, assess
required improvements and identify/recommend project mitigation to alleviate the significant traffic
impacts on the transportation system. Raju Associates, Inc. has performed this detailed study and
the following summarizes the results of this analysis:
? Thirty-four intersections were analyzed within the study area for this project. These
locations are within the study area bounded by Cattaraugus Avenue on the north,
Jefferson Boulevard/Rodeo Road on the south, Hughes Avenue/Duquesne Avenue on the
west and La Cienega Boulevard on the east. Of the 34 intersections, 17 intersections are
located within the City of Culver City and 17 intersections within the City of Los Angeles.
? Currently, 24 of the 34 analyzed intersection locations are operating at acceptable levels of
service (LOS) D or better during the morning peak hour. During the evening peak hour, 26
of the 34 analyzed intersections are operating at LOS D or better. The remaining
intersections are operating at LOS E or F.
? In the Cumulative (Year 2014) Base conditions, i.e., future conditions without the
implementation of the Proposed Project, 17 of the 34 analyzed intersection locations are
projected to continue to operate at LOS D or better during the morning peak hour. During
the evening peak hour, 19 of the 34 analyzed intersections are projected to operate at LOS
D or better. The remaining intersections are projected to operate at LOS E or F.
? The Proposed Project would consist of 28,708 square feet of office use, 36,819 square
feet of retail use, and 12,257 square feet of restaurant use. The Project is estimated to
generate a net total of approximately 91 trips during the morning peak hour and 200 trips
during the evening peak hour.
? In the Cumulative (Year 2014) plus Project conditions, both the AM and PM peak hour
operating conditions would be similar to those projected for the Cumulative (2014) Base
conditions.
? The Cumulative (Year 2014) plus Project conditions indicate that the Proposed Project
would cause a significant traffic impact at the intersection of National Boulevard and
Washington Boulevard during the evening peak hour. The Project’s impact exceeds the
threshold for significant impact by an incremental volume-to-capacity ratio of 0.003 or
0.3%. No significant impact would occur at any of the other analyzed intersections.
69
ATTACHMENT 6
307
? In order to address the Project’s impact at the intersection of National
Boulevard/Washington Boulevard, the following mitigation measure is recommended:
The Project shall contribute its fair share towards implementation of a shuttle system
connecting the residential and commercial areas in Downtown Culver City and Hayden
Tract areas to and from the Venice/Robertson Light Rail Train (LRT) Station on the
Exposition Line. This shuttle system will include shuttle buses with stops along
Washington Boulevard. The schedules for these shuttles should be developed such that
coordinated transfers to and from the rail station at Venice/Robertson are achieved.
These shuttles would operate at enhanced frequencies during the peak commuter time
periods and provide fast, convenient, and efficient connections to the Metro Exposition
LRT Line.
In event that the proposed shuttle program has not progressed sufficiently to warrant
study funding, the following alternative mitigation measure shall be implemented:
The Project shall contribute its fair share towards the design and implementation of
ATCS (Adaptive Traffic Control System) at the intersection of National
Boulevard/Washington Boulevard. This includes provision of ATCS-associated signal
equipment, additional loop detectors, communications set-up and the associated control
PC hardware/software, if required.
Additionally, to improve access to the Proposed Project’s parking facilities along
Landmark Street, the applicant of the Proposed Project shall be required to design, and
construct the westbound left-turn signal at the intersection of Washington Boulevard and
Landmark Street and be responsible for all costs associated with the modification of the
traffic signal.
? Parking, access and circulation systems were assessed as part of this study. A review of
the proposed site plan was also conducted. This review indicates that they would all
function adequately and that there would be no adverse impact from the Proposed Project.
70
ATTACHMENT 6
308
APPENDICES
A MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING
B INTERSECTION LANE CONFIGURATIONS
C TRAFFIC COUNTS
D CAPACITY CALCULATION WORKSHEETS – EXISTING (2011) CONDITIONS
E RELATED PROJECTS TRIP GENERATION RATES / CAPACITY CALCULATION
WORKSHEETS – CUMULATIVE (2014) BASE CONDITIONS
F CAPACITY CALCULATION WORKSHEETS – CUMULATIVE (2014) PLUS PROJECT
CONDITIONS
G CAPACITY CALCULATION WORKSHEETS – CUMULATIVE (2014) PLUS PROJECT
WITH MITIGATION MEASURES
ATTACHMENT 6
309
APPENDIX A
Memorandum of Understanding (MOU)
ATTACHMENT 6
310Attachment A
Memorandum Of Understanding For Traffic Study
This Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) acknowledges and agrees to all of the City of
Culver City requirements and fees for the preparation of a traffic study for the following project:
Project Name: The Platform @ Culver Station____________________________
Project Address: 8810-40-50 Washington Boulevard/3920 Landmark Street, Culver
City, CA______________________________________________
Project Description: 28,708 s.f. GFA Office / GFA Industrial
36,819 s.f. GFA Retail / Residential Units
12,257 s.f. GFA Restaurant / GFA Other
* Gross Floor Area (GFA) shall be as defined in the most recent ITE publication.
Project Horizon Year: ___2014__ Ambient Growth Rate: One (1.0) % Per Year
Directional Distribution: N: 20 % S: 15% % E: 35 % W: 30 %
[Attach map(s) illustrating directional distribution percentages at all intersections and driveways.]
Please see Figure C.
Trip Generation Rate(s): ITE Latest Edition / Other: Please see Attachment A.
Land Use:
ITE Code #: ITE Code #:
In / Out In / Out Total In / Total Out
AM Trips: _____ / __ / ___ ___ /
PM Trips: _____ / __ _ __ / ___ / __
Use additional pages if necessary.
Prior to the start of any proposed project analysis, the Traffic Consultant shall:
1) Obtain a list of related projects from the City of Culver City Planning Division and from all
other affected jurisdictions;
2) Prepare a draft list of “related projects specific to the proposed project”; and
Please see Attachment B.
3) Obtain written approval from the City of the “related projects specific to the proposed
project” list.
Intersections To Be Studied: 34 intersections, please see Attachment C.
No. Intersection: / Jurisdiction:
1. /
2. /
3. /
4. /
5. /
6. /
7. /
8. /
9. /
10. /
Use additional pages if necessary. Additionally, indicate any intersections that are subject to
capacity analysis credit for advanced traffic signal control synchronization. Indicate any non-
signalized intersections to be studied.
ATTACHMENT 6
311City of Culver City Traffic Study Criteria
Page 2
Residential Streets To Be Studied
No. Street Segment: / Jurisdiction:
1. Lucerne Avenue between Duquesne Av and Ince Bl / Culver City
2. Lucerne Avenue between Ince Bl and Higuera St / Culver City
3. Wesley Street between Higuera St and National Bl / Culver City
4. Helms Avenue between Higuera St and National Bl / Culver City
5. Schaeffer Street between Higuera St and National Bl / Culver City
6. Higuera Street between Washington Bl and Lucerne Av / Culver City
7. Higuera Street between Lucerne Av and Wesley St / Culver City
8. Higuera Street between Wesley St and Jefferson Bl / Culver City
9. /
10. /
Use additional pages if necessary. Additionally, all intersection and street segment traffic count
data shall be submitted both in written format and in an electronic format acceptable to the City.
Indicate trip credits to be requested (Amount subject to City approval): Yes No
1. Existing Uses: ? X
2. Pass-By Trips: X ?
3. Internal Trip Capture: X ?
4. Transit Oriented Developments (TOD): X ?
5. Transportation Demand Management (TDM): ? X
Proposed Traffic Mitigation
Any proposed traffic mitigation measure shall be listed and accompanied by a drawing of the
existing and proposed improvements [including city boundary lines and existing / proposed
property lines] and plans shall be of a minimum scale of one inch (1”) equal to forty feet (40’-0”).
Post-Occupancy Traffic Counts
By signing below, the Property Owner / Developer / Applicant hereby agrees to pay for and
submit to the City a post-occupancy traffic count analysis of the development to the satisfaction
of the City. The analysis shall determine the amount of actual traffic generated by the
development compared to the ITE trip generation rates. The analysis shall include traffic counts
of all onsite driveways to be taken upon reaching eighty five percent (85.0%) occupancy of the
total building gross floor area or within one (1) year of the issuance of the first Temporary
Certificate of Occupancy (TCO), as determined by the City. The data shall be used to confirm
the findings in the approved traffic study, and shall not result in any additional traffic mitigation
measures and/or conditions of approval on the subject project.
Congestion Management Plan (CMP)
This project shall also be subject to all City imposed CMP developer fees if the Planning
Commission approval date is on or after the effective date of any City Council imposed CMP
developer fees or as may be otherwise imposed by the City.
ATTACHMENT 6
312ATTACHMENT 6
313ATTACHMENT 6
314ATTACHMENT A
ESTIMATED PROJECT TRIP GENERATION
AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
Size Daily IN OUT TOTAL IN OUT TOTAL
Proposed Project
Retail 36,819 s.f. 1,581 23 14 37 67 70 137
Restaurant 12,257 s.f. 1,103 5 5 10 62 30 92
Office 28,708 s.f. 510 61 8 69 7 36 43
Project Trip Generation Total 3,194 89 27 116 136 136 272
Transit Trip Use (7.5%) - Office (38) (5) (1) (6) (1) (3) (4)
*Internal Capture (10%) Trip Credit (316) (8) (3) (11) (14) (13) (27)
**Pass-By (20%) Trip Reduction - Retail/Restaurant (483) (5) (3) (8) (21) (20) (41)
Project Trip Generation Net Total 2,357 71 20 91 100 100 200
Trip Rates [1]
General Office (ITE Land Use 710) Trips per 1,000 s.f. [2] 88% 12% [2] 17% 83% 1.49
Retail (ITE Land Use 820) Trips per 1,000 s.f. 42.94 61% 39% 1.00 49% 51% 3.73
Restaurant (ITE Land Use 931) Trips per 1,000 s.f. 89.95 50% 50% 0.81 67% 33% 7.49
* Internal capture credit taken after reduction of transit trips.
** Pass-by trip reduction taken after internal capture credits.
[1] Trip Generation, An ITE Information Report, 8th Edition, ITE 2008
[2] Daily and AM peak hour trip generation for office was calculated using the following formulas:
Daily: Ln(T) = 0.77 Ln(X) + 3.65 Where:
AM Peak Hour: Ln(T) = 0.80 Ln(X) + 1.55 Ln = Natural logarithm
T = Two-way volume of traffic (total trip-ends)
X = Area in 1,000 square feet gross floor area
ATTACHMENT 6
315ATTACHMENT B1
LIST OF RELATED PROJECTS - CULVER CITY [1]
Estimated Completed
# Project Name Address Description City Completion Date Date Project Phase
PROJECTS TO BE INCLUDED IN TRAFFIC STUDY
1 Sony 10202 Washington Bl Sony Lot Project - Approved to build net new 100,000
G.S.F. of office, post-production, stage, and support
uses.
CC 2009 2009 Completed
2 Huron Townhouses 3823-3833 Huron Av 15 new townhouses, demo 3 existing CC 2009 2009 Completed
3 Four Unit Condominium 3972 Tilden Av 4 unit condominium, TPM CC 2009 2009 Completed
5 Baldwin Hills Scenic Overlook Park Hetzler Rd Existing 10,300 G.S.F. visitor center, passive recreation
area
CC 2009 2009 Completed
6 Washington-Ince Realignment Washington and Ince Bl at 9300
Culver Bl
Washington-Ince Bl Realignment CC 2009 2009 Completed
9 Three New Condominiums 4048 Lincoln Av 3 Townhome Condominiums CC 2010 2010 Completed
10 Eight Unit Condo 4067/4073 Lincoln Av 8 unit condominiums, TTM, 2,000 G.S.F.; 20 parking
spaces provided
CC 2010 2010 Completed/TCO
12 Turning Point School - CUP
Modification
8794 National School, addition/remodel of net 9,000 G.S.F. CC 2010 2010 Completed
13 Uptown Lofts 9900 Culver Bl 5,457 G.S.F. offices, 18 condominiums CC 2010 2010 Completed
16 Hampton Inn 3954 Sepulveda Bl 77-unit hotel CC 2011 TBD Building Permit
17 Four Unit Condominium 4014 Van Buren Pl 4 unit condominium, TPM CC 2011 TBD Construction
18 Irving Residential/Office 4043 Irving Pl 4 Story; 26 residential units; 3 office units CC 2011 TBD Building Permit
20 Legado Mixed Use TOD 8770 Washington Bl New mixed used development w/preliminary concept of
up to (appox.) 115 residential units, retail (market,
pharmacy & café) 31,040 G.S.F.
CC 2011 TBD Pre-Application
21 West Los Angeles Community College
Master Plan and EIR
LA County
Approx. 291,300 G.S.F. of new building construction &
renovation. Anticipate future student population of
approx. 18,904 students & 1,248 employees by fall 2022.
Project includes second access road, parking structures,
landscaping & development of athletic facilities.
LA County 2011 TBD Construction
22 Morphosis Architects Office 3440 Wesley 11,657 S.F Architects Office (Previously Clyde's Auto
Body Shop)
CC 2011 TBD Construction
23 Lux @ 9901 Mixed Use 9901 Washington Bl, City of LA
14,112 G.S.F. mixed use development with 131 dwelling
units, 12,178 G.S.F. of retail and three level
subterranean parking structure with 244 parking spaces.
LA 2011 TBD Entitlement
24 New Restaurant 5854 Blackwelder St/3077 La
Cienega
Addition of 1,150 G.S.F. Two story structure to existing
1,195 G.S.F. building for new restaurant use.
CC 2011 TBD Entitlement
25 New Dental Office - Building Permit 10826, and 10830 Washington
Bl
Construction of new one story dental and retail building
(2,989 G.S.F)
CC 2011 TBD Construction
27 Union 76 10638 Culver Bl Gas station and convenience store with new car wash;
2,500 G.S.F.
CC 2012 TBD Building Permit
29 Distribution & Warehouse 3434 Wesley St 10,500 G.S.F. of office, warehouse, & distribution CC 2012 TBD Pre-Building Permit. Entitlements but
no Building Permits.
30 Four Unit Condominium 3846 Bentley Av 4 unit condominium, TPM CC 2012 TBD Building Permit
31 Four Unit Condominium 4058 Madison Av 4 unit condominium, TPM CC 2012 TBD Building Permit
34 Warner Parking Structure 8511 Warner Dr 51,520 G.S.F. Retail/Restaurant; 784 Parking Spaces,
five levels
CC 2012 TBD Building Permit
35 Office Building 9919 Jefferson Bl 113,467 G.S.F., three-story office building CC 2012 TBD Building Permit
36 New Vehicle Repair Shop 11167 Washington Pl Construction of a new vehicle repair shop with 1,196
G.S.F. of repair area with two service bays and 191
G.S.F. of office.
CC 2012 TBD Entitlement
37 Fresh Paint Mixed Use 9355 Culver Bl Additional 2nd story office and third floor residential unit
for a total of 5,708 G.S.F. to an existing office/warehouse
building
CC 2012 TBD Building Permit
ATTACHMENT 6
316ATTACHMENT B1
LIST OF RELATED PROJECTS - CULVER CITY [1]
Estimated Completed
# Project Name Address Description City Completion Date Date Project Phase
40 Abraxis Bio Science 9920 Jefferson Bl Exterior and interior renovation to an existing two-story
building. Addition of a three story, 17,000 G.S.F. building
over a one-story building (net addition is 14,999 G.S.F. -
demo 2,001 G.S.F of existing building area).
CC 2012 TBD Entitlement
41 Clive Wilkinson Architects, New
Architects Office and Ancillary Retail or
Office
6114, 6116, 6118 Washington Bl New two-story, 5,560 G.S.F. office building which
includes an ancillary retail or office.
CC 2012 TBD Building Permit
42 New 7-Eleven Convenient Store 4436 Sepulveda Bl Construction of a new 2,500 G.S.F., one story
convenience store.
CC 2012 TBD Entitlement
43 Expo Light Rail Station-Culver City
Station
Washington Bl/National Bl Light Rail Train Station CC 2013 TBD Pre-Application
48 Parcel B 9300 Culver Bl 118,000 G.S.F. of office, restaurant, and retail spaces CC 2013 TBD Building Permit
49 West Los Angeles Community College
Master Plan and EIR (2010)
West LA College Approximately 92,000 of net new building construction
and renovation.
LA County 2013 TBD Entitlement
50 Culver Studios Amend. No. 6 9336 Washington Bl Phase 1 - 25,093 G.S.F. office; 13,634 G.S.F. support;
302 parking spaces. Phase 2 - 63,500 G.S.F. office;
8,741 G.S.F. support
CC 2013 TBD Pre-Application
51 Arco AM/PM - New Carwash 5884 Washington Bl New Carwash and storage room totaling 1,200 G.S.F. at
an existing fueling station.
CC 2013 TBD Building Permit
52 New Two story commercial building 11012 - 11014 Washington Bl
Two story commercial building totaling 3,385 G.S.F.
CC 2013 TBD Entitlement
53 Tilden Terrace 11042-11056 Tilden Av New three-story, 48,525 G.S.F. mixed use development
with 10,700 G.S.F. of ground floor retail and 33
residential units.
CC 2013 TBD Entitlement
54 Duquesne Ave Condominiums 4139-4145 Duquesne Av Seven (7) condominium units. CC 2013 TBD Entitlement
55 Greg Reitz 8665 Hayden Pl Construct 63,679 G.S.F. of office CC 2014 TBD Pre-Building Permit. Entitlements but
no Building Permits.
56 Triangle Site - Washington/National
TOD
Corner of Washington/National New transit oriented development to include light rail
station & mixed use development (preliminary concept
includes up to 200 du, 149 room hotel, 200,000 G.S.F.
office, 51,500 G.S.F. retail, & 20,000 G.S.F. restaurant
CC 2014 TBD Pre-Application
57 Willow's School Comprehensive Plan 8509-8487 Higuera St, 8476
Warner Dr
Phase 1 - new surface parking; increased student
enrollment by 50 from 425 to 475; Phase II & III
increased student enrollment by 100, from 475 to 575.
CC 2014 TBD Pre-Application
58 Bridge Housing Project 3814 Lenawee Av Proposal for 2-3 story senior housing project with 62
units and 41 parking spaces.
CC 2014 TBD Pre-Application
59 Jewish Home for the Aging, Gonda
Healthy Aging Campus
3847 Delmas Ter., 3820-3842
Hughes, 9823 Venice Bl
184 congregate care units, 48 residential care units,
14,000 G.S.F. PACE program
CC/LA 2016 TBD Pre-Application
ATTACHMENT 6
317ATTACHMENT B1
LIST OF RELATED PROJECTS - CULVER CITY [1]
Estimated Completed
# Project Name Address Description City Completion Date Date Project Phase
PROJECTS FARTHER THAN 2 MILES FROM THE SITE, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE; EXCLUDED FROM THE STUDY'S RELATED PROJECTS LIST
4 Child Day-Care Center 4024/4026 Wade St Conversion of a 1,371 G.S.F. duplex into a day care - no
new square footage.
CC 2009 2009 Completed
7 Westfield Fox Hills Mall Expansion 6000 Sepulveda Bl 293,786 G.S.F. retail and 427 parking spaces CC 2010 2010 Phase 1 Completed
8 Four Unit Condominium 4025 Wade St 4 unit condominium, TPM CC 2010 2010 Completed
11 Fire Station No. 3 6030 Bristol Pkwy Two-story, 12,156 G.S.F. fire station CC 2010 2010 Completed
14 Burger King - Live/Work Units 13340 Washington Bl 41 unit condominium development with 6 live/work
condominium units in Culver City and 35 units in LA
CC/LA 2011 TBD Construction
15 Glencoe/Washington Mixed Use 13365 Washington Bl 4,183 G.S.F. ground floor retail and 19 units CC 2011 TBD Building Permit
19 Office & Retail Building 700-701 Corporate Pointe 240,612 G.S.F. office; 4,242 G.S.F. retail CC 2011 TBD Entitlement
26 11957 Washington Bl Office Project 11957 Washington Bl 73,569 G.S.F., 3-story office building CC 2012 TBD Entitlement
28 Faynsod Family Trust 11501-11509 Washington Bl Mixed Use: 3 Retail (2,359 G.S.F.), 1 Office (937 G.S.F.)
& 2 Apts. (1,867 G.S.F.)
CC 2012 TBD Building Permit
32 Dr. Brenord Dutt 5800 Uplander Wy Add 3 stories/57,050 G.S.F. to a 2 story 26,140 G.S.F.
Office
CC 2012 TBD Pre-Building Permit. Entitlements but
no Building Permits.
33 Radisson Office Tower 6161 Centinela Bl 342,400 G.S.F. office tower and parking structure
addition
CC 2012 2010 Building Permit
38 12714-12718 Washington Bl Mixed
Use
12714-12718 Washington Bl 5 unit mixed use project with approximately 3,300 G.S.F.
ground floor retail
CC 2012 TBD Pre-Application
39 11304 Culver Bl, CUP for Auto Repair
Shop
11304 Culver Bl T.I. to existing 1,280 G.S.F., 3-bay vacant building for
auto repair shop per plan
CC 2012 TBD Entitlement
44 Modification to CUP, Expanding School 12095-12101 Washington Bl Conversion of a 20,090 G.S.F. office building into
classrooms & administrative offices.
CC 2013 TBD Pre-Application
45 Washington Place Office Condos 12402 Washington Pl 42,000 S.F. 4-story office and retail building. 9,300
G.S.F. of retail and 30,400 G.S.F. of office
CC 2013 TBD Pre-Building Permit. Entitlements but
no Building Permits.
46 Baldwin Site 12803 W. Washington Bl
New 3 story commercial (office and retail) condominium
building (retail ground floor) totaling 37,308 G.S.F.
CC 2013 TBD Pre-Building Permit. Entitlements but
no Building Permits.
47 Washington/Landmark Mixed Use TOD
Project Site
8810,8840,8850 Washington Bl New commercial development consisting of
approximately 12,257 G.S.F. of restaurant use, 36,819
G.S.F. of retail, and 28,708 G.S.F. of office use.
CC 2013 TBD Pre-Application
[1] Culver City Related Projects List (dated March 31, 2011) provided by the City of Culver City.
ATTACHMENT 6
318No. Project Name Location Land Use Size
CITY OF LOS ANGELES RELATED PROJECTS LIST - PROVIDED BY LADOT, FEBRUARY 2011
1 Mixed-Use (The Palms) 10601 Washington Boulevard Apartment 126 units
Office 23,000 s.f.
Retail 9,000 s.f.
Restaurant 9,000 s.f.
Office (to be removed) (10,000) s.f.
2 Apartment/Retail 3417 Motor Avenue Apartment 115 units
Retail 975 s.f.
Apartment (to be removed) (15) units
Single-Family Dwelling (to be removed) (2) units
Office (to be removed) (3,300) s.f.
3 Mixed-Use 10604 West National Boulevard Condominium 29 units
Retail 1,250 s.f.
Office 2,000 s.f.
4 Mixed-Use 2900 S. Sepulveda Boulevard Apartment 48 units
Office 1,500 s.f.
5 Media Related Office 3105 La Cienega Boulevard Office 133,000 s.f.
Manufacturing (to be removed) (109,000) s.f.
6 Office 10100 Culver Boulevard Office 50,000 s.f.
7 Mixed-Use 3115 S. Sepulveda Boulevard Condominium 175 units
Retail 28,000 s.f.
Discount Store (to be removed) (28,000) s.f.
8 Condominium 11131 Rose Avenue Condominium 227 units
Apartment (to be removed) (89) units
9 Restaurant/Retail 10612 National Boulevard Restaurant 2,500 s.f.
Retail 3,500 s.f.
10 Private School 2920 S. Sepulveda Boulevard Private School 120 student
Office (to be removed) (9,000) s.f.
ATTACHMENT B2
LIST OF RELATED PROJECTS- CITY OF LOS ANGELES
ATTACHMENT 6
319ATTACHMENT C
LIST OF STUDY INTERSECTIONS
Intersection Signal System
# Northbound/Southbound Eastbound/Westbound Jurisdiction Signalized? Control
1. Robertson Boulevard Cattaraugus Avenue City of Los Angeles Yes ATSAC/ATCS
2. Robertson Boulevard I-10 WB Off-Ramp/Kincardine Avenue City of Los Angeles Yes ATSAC/ATCS
3. Robertson Boulevard National Boulevard City of Los Angeles Yes ATSAC/ATCS
4. National Boulevard I-10 Eastbound On-Ramp City of Los Angeles Yes ATSAC/ATCS
5. Hughes Avenue Venice Boulevard City of Los Angeles Yes ATSAC
6. Bagley Avenue Venice Boulevard City of Los Angeles Yes ATSAC
7. Culver Boulevard Venice Boulevard City of Los Angeles Yes ATSAC/ATCS
8. Robertson Boulevard Venice Boulevard City of Los Angeles Yes ATSAC/ATCS
9. National Boulevard Venice Boulevard City of Los Angeles Yes ATSAC/ATCS
10. Helms Avenue Venice Boulevard City of Los Angeles Yes ATSAC/ATCS
11. Cattaraugus Avenue Venice Boulevard City of Los Angeles Yes ATSAC
12. La Cienega Boulevard Venice Boulevard [1] City of Los Angeles Yes ATSAC/ATCS
13. Hughes Avenue/Duquesne Avenue Washington Boulevard Culver City Yes ATSAC
14. Duquesne Avenue Culver Boulevard Culver City Yes ATSAC
15. Culver Boulevard Washington Boulevard/Irving Place Culver City Yes ATSAC
16. Main Street Culver Boulevard Culver City Yes ATSAC
17. Culver Boulevard Washington Boulevard Culver City Yes ATSAC
18. Robertson Boulevard/Higuera Street Washington Boulevard Culver City Yes ATSAC
19. Landmark Street Washington Boulevard Culver City Yes ATSAC
20. National Boulevard Washington Boulevard Culver City Yes ATSAC
21. Wesley Avenue Washington Boulevard Culver City No -
22. Helms Avenue Washington Boulevard Culver City Yes ATSAC
23. Cattaraugus Avenue Washington Boulevard Culver City No -
24. La Cienega Boulevard Washington Boulevard Culver City Yes ATSAC
25. La Cienega Boulevard Fairfax Avenue [1] City of Los Angeles/Culver City Yes ATSAC/ATCS
26. Wesley Street National Boulevard Culver City Yes ATSAC
27. Hayden Avenue National Boulevard Culver City Yes ATSAC
28. Jefferson Boulevard National Boulevard City of Los Angeles Yes ATSAC/ATCS
29. La Cienega Boulevard Jefferson Boulevard [1] City of Los Angeles Yes ATSAC/ATCS
30. Jefferson Boulevard Higuera Street/Rodeo Road City of Los Angeles Yes ATSAC/ATCS
31. La Cienega Boulevard Rodeo Road City of Los Angeles Yes ATSAC/ATCS
32. Braddock Drive Duquesne Avenue Culver City No -
33. Lucerne Avenue Duquesne Avenue Culver City No -
34. Jefferson Boulevard Duquesne Avenue Culver City Yes ATSAC
[1] Los Angeles County Congestion Management Program monitoring location.
ATTACHMENT 6
320Copyright © 1988-2004 Microsoft Corp. and/or its suppliers. All rights reserved. http://www.microsoft.com/streets/
© Copyright 2003 by Geographic Data Technology, Inc. All rights reserved. © 2004 NAVTEQ. All rights reserved. This data includes information taken with permission from Canadian authorities © Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada.
ATTACHMENT D - LOCATION OF STUDY INTERSECTIONS/STREET SEGMENTS
0 mi 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8
ATTACHMENT 6
321ATTACHMENT 6
322
APPENDIX B
Intersection Lane Configurations
ATTACHMENT 6
323ATTACHMENT 6
324ATTACHMENT 6
325ATTACHMENT 6
326ATTACHMENT 6
327ATTACHMENT 6
328ATTACHMENT 6
329
APPENDIX C
Traffic Counts
ATTACHMENT 6
330*Counts provided by the City of Culver City.
ATTACHMENT 6
331*Counts provided by the City of Culver City.
ATTACHMENT 6
332*Counts provided by the City of Culver City.
ATTACHMENT 6
333*Counts provided by the City of Culver City.
ATTACHMENT 6
334*Counts provided by the City of Culver City.
ATTACHMENT 6
335*Counts provided by the City of Culver City.
ATTACHMENT 6
336*Counts provided by the City of Culver City.
ATTACHMENT 6
337Intersection Turning Movement
Prepared by:
National Data & Surveying Services
Day: THURSDAY
NS STREET: DATE: 3/10/2011 LOCATION:
EW STREET: DAY: THURSDAY PROJECT#:
NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL
LANES: 120021000000
4:00 PM 13 137 180 133 463
4:15 PM 27 135 219 99 480
4:30 PM 26 142 237 134 539
4:45 PM 31 161 237 143 572
5:00 PM 20 150 235 135 540
5:15 PM 39 134 236 160 569
5:30 PM 25 171 246 135 577
5:45 PM 31 155 248 132 566
NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL
TOTAL VOLUMES : 212 1185 0 0 1838 1071 000000 4306
APPROACH %'s : 15.18% 84.82% 0.00% 0.00% 63.18% 36.82% #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
nb a nb d sb a sb d eb a eb d wb a nb d
PEAK HR START TIME : 445 PM TOTAL
PEAK HR VOL :115 616 00 954 573 000000 2258
PEAK HR FACTOR : 0.978
CONTROL :
City of Culver City
0.000
WESTBOUND NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND
0.964 0.000 0.932
Signalized
11-5076-005
I-10 EB On-Ramp NS/EW Streets: I-10 EB On-Ramp
PM
National Blvd National Blvd
I-10 EB On-Ramp
Project ID: CA11_5076_005
National Blvd
ATTACHMENT 6
338*Counts provided by the City of Culver City.
ATTACHMENT 6
339*Counts provided by the City of Culver City.
ATTACHMENT 6
340*Counts provided by the City of Culver City.
ATTACHMENT 6
341*Counts provided by the City of Culver City.
ATTACHMENT 6
342*Counts provided by the City of Culver City.
ATTACHMENT 6
343*Counts provided by the City of Culver City.
ATTACHMENT 6
344*Counts provided by the City of Culver City.
ATTACHMENT 6
345*Counts provided by the City of Culver City.
ATTACHMENT 6
346*Counts provided by the City of Culver City.
ATTACHMENT 6
347*Counts provided by the City of Culver City.
ATTACHMENT 6
348*Counts provided by the City of Culver City.
ATTACHMENT 6
349*Counts provided by the City of Culver City.
ATTACHMENT 6
350*Counts provided by the City of Culver City.
ATTACHMENT 6
351*Counts provided by the City of Culver City.
ATTACHMENT 6
352*Counts provided by the City of Culver City.
ATTACHMENT 6
353*Counts provided by the City of Culver City.
ATTACHMENT 6
354*Counts provided by the City of Culver City.
ATTACHMENT 6
355*Counts provided by the City of Culver City.
ATTACHMENT 6
356*Counts provided by the City of Culver City.
ATTACHMENT 6
357*Counts provided by the City of Culver City.
ATTACHMENT 6
358*Counts provided by the City of Culver City.
ATTACHMENT 6
359*Counts provided by the City of Culver City.
ATTACHMENT 6
360*Counts provided by the City of Culver City.
ATTACHMENT 6
361*Counts provided by the City of Culver City.
ATTACHMENT 6
362*Counts provided by the City of Culver City.
ATTACHMENT 6
363*Counts provided by the City of Culver City.
ATTACHMENT 6
364*Counts provided by the City of Culver City.
ATTACHMENT 6
365*Counts provided by the City of Culver City.
ATTACHMENT 6
366*Counts provided by the City of Culver City.
ATTACHMENT 6
367Intersection Turning Movement
Prepared by:
National Data & Surveying Services
Day: THURSDAY
NS STREET: DATE: 3/24/2011 LOCATION:
EW STREET: DAY: THURSDAY PROJECT#:
NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL
LANES: 101000020120
4:00 PM 20 26 236 15 5 182 484
4:15 PM 7 6 269 3 5 180 470
4:30 PM 19 14 260 4 5 172 474
4:45 PM 8 9 255 3 1 181 457
5:00 PM 11 13 293 2 2 207 528
5:15 PM 7 10 315 0 0 227 559
5:30 PM 4 12 335 2 1 269 623
5:45 PM 8 6 355 2 0 353 724
NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL
TOTAL VOLUMES :84 0 96 0000 2318 31 19 1771 0 4319
APPROACH %'s : 46.67% 0.00% 53.33% #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! 0.00% 98.68% 1.32% 1.06% 98.94% 0.00%
nb a nb d sb a sb d eb a eb d wb a nb d
PEAK HR START TIME : 500 PM TOTAL
PEAK HR VOL :30 0 41 0000 1298 6 3 1056 0 2434
PEAK HR FACTOR : 0.840
CONTROL :
City of Culver City
0.750
WESTBOUND NORTHBOUND
Washington Blvd
PM
Landmark St Landmark St
SOUTHBOUND
Project ID: CA11_5081_011
Landmark St
Signalized
11-5081-011
Washington Blvd NS/EW Streets:
0.740
Washington Blvd
EASTBOUND
0.000 0.913
ATTACHMENT 6
368*Counts provided by the City of Culver City.
ATTACHMENT 6
369*Counts provided by the City of Culver City.
ATTACHMENT 6
370*Counts provided by the City of Culver City.
ATTACHMENT 6
371*Counts provided by the City of Culver City.
ATTACHMENT 6
372*Counts provided by the City of Culver City.
ATTACHMENT 6
373*Counts provided by the City of Culver City.
ATTACHMENT 6
374*Counts provided by the City of Culver City.
ATTACHMENT 6
375*Counts provided by the City of Culver City.
ATTACHMENT 6
376*Counts provided by the City of Culver City.
ATTACHMENT 6
377*Counts provided by the City of Culver City.
ATTACHMENT 6
378*Counts provided by the City of Culver City.
ATTACHMENT 6
379*Counts provided by the City of Culver City.
ATTACHMENT 6
380*Counts provided by the City of Culver City.
ATTACHMENT 6
381*Counts provided by the City of Culver City.
ATTACHMENT 6
382*Counts provided by the City of Culver City.
ATTACHMENT 6
383*Counts provided by the City of Culver City.
ATTACHMENT 6
384*Counts provided by the City of Culver City.
ATTACHMENT 6
385*Counts provided by the City of Culver City.
ATTACHMENT 6
386*Counts provided by the City of Culver City.
ATTACHMENT 6
387*Counts provided by the City of Culver City.
ATTACHMENT 6
388*Counts provided by the City of Culver City.
ATTACHMENT 6
389*Counts provided by the City of Culver City.
ATTACHMENT 6
390*Counts provided by the City of Culver City.
ATTACHMENT 6
391*Counts provided by the City of Culver City.
ATTACHMENT 6
392*Counts provided by the City of Culver City.
ATTACHMENT 6
393*Counts provided by the City of Culver City.
ATTACHMENT 6
394*Counts provided by the City of Culver City.
ATTACHMENT 6
395Intersection Turning Movement
Prepared by:
National Data & Surveying Services
Day: WEDNESDAY
NS STREET: DATE: 3/16/2011 LOCATION:
EW STREET: DAY: WEDNESDAY PROJECT#:
NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL
LANES: 011010000010
4:00 PM 103 28 13 102 47 18 311
4:15 PM 112 46 10 119 46 17 350
4:30 PM 84 56 12 112 44 10 318
4:45 PM 84 49 15 90 31 15 284
5:00 PM 89 48 12 118 66 21 354
5:15 PM 118 50 20 118 84 17 407
5:30 PM 116 60 7 93 84 17 377
5:45 PM 111 68 17 116 93 16 421
NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL
TOTAL VOLUMES : 0 817 405 106 868 0000 495 0 131 2822
APPROACH %'s : 0.00% 66.86% 33.14% 10.88% 89.12% 0.00% #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! 79.07% 0.00% 20.93%
nb a nb d sb a sb d eb a eb d wb a nb d
PEAK HR START TIME : 500 PM TOTAL
PEAK HR VOL : 0 434 226 56 445 0000 327 0 71 1559
PEAK HR FACTOR : 0.926
CONTROL :
City of Culver City
0.913
WESTBOUND NORTHBOUND
Duquesne Ave
PM
Lucerne Ave Lucerne Ave
SOUTHBOUND
Project ID: CA11_5081_013
Lucerne Ave
3-Way Stop (NB,SB,WB)
11-5081-013
Duquesne Ave NS/EW Streets:
0.922
Duquesne Ave
EASTBOUND
0.908 0.000
ATTACHMENT 6
396*Counts provided by the City of Culver City.
ATTACHMENT 6
397*Counts provided by the City of Culver City.
ATTACHMENT 6
398Day: City: Culver City
Date: Project #: CA11_5082_001
NB SB EB WB
00 3,340 3,289
AM PeriodNB SB EB WB NB SB EB WB
00:00 1 1 2 34 51 85
00:15 3 1 4 42 59 101
00:30 4 2 6 46 56 102
00:45 19263 15 49 171 41 207 90 378
01:00 2 0 2 42 54 96
01:15 1 3 4 71 63 134
01:30 2 1 3 70 69 139
01:45 16041 10 51 234 42 228 93 462
02:00 0 0 0 75 43 118
02:15 2 0 2 55 47 102
02:30 0 0 0 63 56 119
02:45 021113 53 246 51 197104443
03:00 0 0 0 64 53 117
03:15 0 1 1 46 56 102
03:30 1 1 2 50 42 92
03:45 123547 61 221 43 194104415
04:00 0 1 1 48 57 105
04:15 2 1 3 54 51 105
04:30 2 4 6 63 49 112
04:45 2 6 6 12 8 18 63 228 42 199 105 427
05:00 0 3 3 63 80 143
05:15 5 4 9 65 105 170
05:30 3 6 9 79 128 207
05:45 7 15 5 18 12 33 68 275 119 432 187 707
06:00 6 6 12 79 117 196
06:15 14 11 25 64 86 150
06:30 16 17 33 72 79 151
06:45 17 53 17 51 34 104 78 293 65 347 143 640
07:00 36 19 55 64 63 127
07:15 54 29 83 41 66 107
07:30 60 50 110 40 47 87
07:45 92 242 76 174 168 416 25 170 49 225 74 395
08:00 101 75 176 35 41 76
08:15 125 68 193 29 39 68
08:30 96 79 175 20 21 41
08:45 99 421 51 273 150 694 21 105 24 125 45 230
09:00 86 57 143 19 12 31
09:15 70 45 115 21 22 43
09:30 58 35 93 8 14 22
09:45 38 252 33 170 71 422 5 53 10 58 15 111
10:00 53 40 93 14 12 26
10:15 43 41 84 10 12 22
10:30 31 36 67 8 10 18
10:45 24 151 28 145 52 296 7 39 10 44 17 83
11:00 34 27 61 7 6 13
11:15 33 49 82 2 5 7
11:30 30 42 72 5 1 6
11:45 34 131 41 159 75 290 1 15 3 15 4 30
TOTALS 1290 1018 2308 2050 2271 4321
SPLIT % 55.9% 44.1% 34.8% 47.4% 52.6% 65.2%
NB SB EB WB
00 3,340 3,289
AM Peak
Hour
08:00 07:45 07:45 18:00 17:15 17:15
AM Pk Volume 421 298 712 293 469 760
Pk Hr Factor 0.842 0.943 0.922 0.927 0.916 0.918
7 - 9 Volume 00 663 447 1110 00 503 631 1134
7 - 9 Peak
Hour
08:00 07:45 07:45 17:00 17:00 17:00
7 - 9 Pk
Volume
0 0 421 298 712 0 0 275 432 707
Pk Hr Factor 0.000 0.000 0.842 0.943 0.922 0.000 0.000 0.870 0.844 0.854
20:45
19:15
16:45
17:00
17:15
Pk Hr Factor
PM Peak
PM Pk Volume
Pk Hr Factor
4 - 6 Volume
4 - 6 Peak
4 - 6 Pk
TOTAL
23:45
TOTALS
20:30
18:00
18:15
18:30
18:45
19:00
Total
6,629
DAILY TOTALS
21:00
21:15
SPLIT %
DAILY TOTALS
22:15
22:30
22:45
23:00
23:15
23:30
Lucerne Ave between Lafayette Place & Duquesne Ave
21:30
21:45
22:00
Total
6,629
19:30
19:45
20:00
20:15
17:30
17:45
15:15
15:30
15:45
16:00
16:15
16:30
14:30
3/16/2011
14:45
15:00
DAILY TOTALS
PM Period
13:45
14:00
TOTAL
14:15
VOLUME
Prepared by NDS/ATD
13:15
13:30
12:00
12:15
12:30
12:45
13:00
Wednesday
ATTACHMENT 6
399*Counts provided by the City of Culver City.
ATTACHMENT 6
400*Counts provided by the City of Culver City.
ATTACHMENT 6
401*Counts provided by the City of Culver City.
ATTACHMENT 6
402*Counts provided by the City of Culver City.
ATTACHMENT 6
403Day: City: Culver City
Date: Project #: CA11_5082_002
NB SB EB WB
00 4,542 3,819
AM PeriodNB SB EB WB NB SB EB WB
00:00 6 0 6 54 51 105
00:15 6 2 8 62 60 122
00:30 5 3 8 73 69 142
00:45 6 23 1 6 7 29 75 264 73 253 148 517
01:00 9 3 12 66 91 157
01:15 5 2 7 75 98 173
01:30 2 2 4 88 60 148
01:45 0 16 0 7 0 23 65 294 50 299 115 593
02:00 0 0 0 64 45 109
02:15 1 0 1 73 43 116
02:30 2 0 2 82 48 130
02:45 141125 97 316 44 180141496
03:00 0 0 0 100 72 172
03:15 0 1 1 104 62 166
03:30 0 1 1 71 48 119
03:45 333568 76 351 56 238132589
04:00 3 3 6 86 43 129
04:15 1 1 2 79 50 129
04:30 0 3 3 85 58 143
04:45 1 5 4 11 5 16 85 335 62 213 147 548
05:00 4 2 6 92 47 139
05:15 7 8 15 105 46 151
05:30 17 7 24 103 70 173
05:45 21 49 21 38 42 87 112 412 85 248 197 660
06:00 14 13 27 97 86 183
06:15 19 19 38 111 79 190
06:30 23 17 40 84 76 160
06:45 24 80 49 98 73 178 85 377 78 319 163 696
07:00 27 69 96 71 77 148
07:15 34 95 129 46 38 84
07:30 63 112 175 76 41 117
07:45 95 219 124 400 219 619 45 238 35 191 80 429
08:00 97 94 191 38 32 70
08:15 90 107 197 38 23 61
08:30 88 121 209 37 19 56
08:45 119 394 112 434 231 828 36 149 18 92 54 241
09:00 94 111 205 29 20 49
09:15 81 106 187 30 9 39
09:30 79 75 154 26 11 37
09:45 79 333 66 358 145 691 18 103 9 49 27 152
10:00 68 53 121 26 6 32
10:15 74 36 110 22 9 31
10:30 71 42 113 20 7 27
10:45 58 271 38 169 96 440 12 80 2 24 14 104
11:00 44 51 95 12 6 18
11:15 38 30 68 8 5 13
11:30 60 45 105 7 8 15
11:45 50 192 37 163 87 355 7 34 4 23 11 57
TOTALS 1589 1690 3279 2953 2129 5082
SPLIT % 48.5% 51.5% 39.2% 58.1% 41.9% 60.8%
NB SB EB WB
00 4,542 3,819
AM Peak
Hour
08:00 08:15 08:15 17:30 12:30 17:30
AM Pk Volume 394 451 842 423 331 743
Pk Hr Factor 0.828 0.932 0.911 0.944 0.844 0.943
7 - 9 Volume 00 613 834 1447 00 747 461 1208
7 - 9 Peak
Hour
08:00 07:45 08:00 17:00 17:00 17:00
7 - 9 Pk
Volume
0 0 394 446 828 0 0 412 248 660
Pk Hr Factor 0.000 0.000 0.828 0.899 0.896 0.000 0.000 0.920 0.729 0.838
VOLUME
Prepared by NDS/ATD
13:15
13:30
12:00
12:15
12:30
12:45
13:00
Wednesday
3/16/2011
14:45
15:00
DAILY TOTALS
PM Period
13:45
14:00
16:00
16:15
16:30
14:30
Higuera St between Washington Blvd & Hubbard St
21:30
21:45
22:00
Total
8,361
19:30
19:45
20:00
20:15
DAILY TOTALS
22:15
22:30
22:45
23:00
23:15
23:30
TOTAL
23:45
TOTALS
20:30
17:30
17:45
15:15
15:30
15:45
Total
8,361
DAILY TOTALS
21:00
21:15
19:00
Pk Hr Factor
PM Peak
PM Pk Volume
Pk Hr Factor
4 - 6 Volume
18:00
18:15
18:30
18:45
4 - 6 Peak
4 - 6 Pk
SPLIT %
TOTAL
20:45
19:15
16:45
17:00
17:15
14:15
ATTACHMENT 6
404*Counts provided by the City of Culver City.
ATTACHMENT 6
405Day: City: Culver City
Date: Project #: CA11_5082_003
NB SB EB WB
00 1,219 5,321
AM PeriodNB SB EB WB NB SB EB WB
00:00 2 5 7 21 68 89
00:15 0 2 2 12 66 78
00:30 0 2 2 10 66 76
00:45 1 3 1 10 2 13 19 62 62 262 81 324
01:00 0 0 0 23 56 79
01:15 0 5 5 18 66 84
01:30 1 2 3 22 74 96
01:45 2 3 4 11 6 14 18 81 91 287 109 368
02:00 0 0 0 15 110 125
02:15 0 0 0 24 113 137
02:30 0 3 3 23 139 162
02:45 0 3636 28 90 121483149573
03:00 0 4 4 30 99 129
03:15 1 0 1 27 58 85
03:30 0 1 1 45 69 114
03:45 012728 27 129 82 308109437
04:00 0 2 2 27 86 113
04:15 0 1 1 24 87 111
04:30 0 9 9 27 93 120
04:45 1 1 3 15 4 16 32 110 87 353 119 463
05:00 0 3 3 58 98 156
05:15 0 7 7 44 81 125
05:30 3 11 14 43 70 113
05:45 0 3 28 49 28 52 42 187 56 305 98 492
06:00 2 24 26 40 64 104
06:15 1 23 24 29 61 90
06:30 3 57 60 18 61 79
06:45 4 10 105 209 109 219 22 109 69 255 91 364
07:00 4 131 135 26 63 89
07:15 0 133 133 23 54 77
07:30 4 169 173 21 48 69
07:45 14 22 173 606 187 628 16 86 47 212 63 298
08:00 13 161 174 14 30 44
08:15 10 150 160 11 26 37
08:30 13 162 175 11 27 38
08:45 13 49 150 623 163 672 8 44 32 115 40 159
09:00 20 152 172 16 17 33
09:15 9 125 134 3 13 16
09:30 15 91 106 6 16 22
09:45 11 55 112 480 123 535 1 26 26 72 27 98
10:00 16 120 136 3 15 18
10:15 13 66 79 5 16 21
10:30 11 60 71 5 22 27
10:45 12 52 78 324 90 376 5 18 9 62 14 80
11:00 23 55 78 2 5 7
11:15 11 57 68 3 8 11
11:30 21 57 78 3 4 7
11:45 14 69 75 244 89 313 1 9 6 23 7 32
TOTALS 268 2584 2852 951 2737 3688
SPLIT % 9.4% 90.6% 43.6% 25.8% 74.2% 56.4%
NB SB EB WB
00 1,219 5,321
AM Peak
Hour
11:00 07:30 07:45 17:00 14:00 14:15
AM Pk Volume 69 653 696 187 483 577
Pk Hr Factor 0.750 0.944 0.930 0.806 0.869 0.890
7 - 9 Volume 00 71 1229 1300 00 297 658 955
7 - 9 Peak
Hour
07:45 07:30 07:45 17:00 16:15 16:30
7 - 9 Pk
Volume
0 0 50 653 696 0 0 187 365 520
Pk Hr Factor 0.000 0.000 0.893 0.944 0.930 0.000 0.000 0.806 0.931 0.833
VOLUME
Prepared by NDS/ATD
13:15
13:30
12:00
12:15
12:30
12:45
13:00
Wednesday
3/16/2011
14:45
15:00
DAILY TOTALS
PM Period
13:45
14:00
16:00
16:15
16:30
14:30
Higuera St between Jefferson Blvd & Hayden Ave
21:30
21:45
22:00
Total
6,540
19:30
19:45
20:00
20:15
DAILY TOTALS
22:15
22:30
22:45
23:00
23:15
23:30
TOTAL
23:45
TOTALS
20:30
17:30
17:45
15:15
15:30
15:45
Total
6,540
DAILY TOTALS
21:00
21:15
19:00
Pk Hr Factor
PM Peak
PM Pk Volume
Pk Hr Factor
4 - 6 Volume
18:00
18:15
18:30
18:45
4 - 6 Peak
4 - 6 Pk
SPLIT %
TOTAL
20:45
19:15
16:45
17:00
17:15
14:15
ATTACHMENT 6
406
APPENDIX D
Capacity Calculation Worksheets
Existing (2011) Conditions
ATTACHMENT 6
407
Existing (2011) Conditions
AM Peak Hour
ATTACHMENT 6
408Existing Conditions AM
Robertson Boulevard Cattaragus Avenue
N/S: W/E: 1
I/S No:
AM/PM: Comments:
COUNT DATE: GROWTH FACTOR:
STUDY DATE:
84
A:
B:
390
38
A:
B:
837
631 A:
B: 78
0.871 =
+
+
+ + + 390 837 107 78
*1500
353 A:
B: 107
V/C =
West/East Critical Movements =
North/South Critical Movements =
SouthBound
WestBound EastBound
NorthBound
A = Adjusted Through/Right Volume
B = Adjusted Left Volume
* = ATSAC Benefit
Results
V/C RATIO LOS
0.00 - 0.60 A
0.61 - 0.70 B
0.71 - 0.80 C
0.81 - 0.90 D
0.91 - 1.00 E
A(W/B)
B(N/B)
B(E/B)
A(S/B)
D LOS =
Critical Movements Diagram
TH RT LT TH LT TH RT LT TH RT
Phasing RTOR Phasing Phasing Phasing RTOR RTOR
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND
EXISTING
RTOR
RT
78
AMBIENT
RELATED
PROJECT
TOTAL
78
LANE
SIGNAL Perm|1010|Perm Perm Perm Auto Auto Auto Auto
0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0
LT
1257 5 38 1602 71 84 236 70 107 136 110
84 70 236 71 1602 38 5 1257 110 136 107
Volume/Lane/Signal Configurations
Developed by Chun Wong, 12/94
May 25, 2011 ,Wednesday 12:36:15 PM
CalcaDB
EXISTAM
INTERSECTION DATA SUMMARY SHEET
ATTACHMENT 6
409Existing Conditions AM
Robertson Boulevard I-10 WB Off-Ramp/Kincardine Av
N/S: W/E: 2
I/S No:
AM/PM: Comments:
COUNT DATE: GROWTH FACTOR:
STUDY DATE:
64
A:
B:
124|10 10|A:
B:
791
558 A:
B: 37
0.641 =
+
+
+ + + 124 791 115 37
*1500
160 A:
B: 115
V/C =
West/East Critical Movements =
North/South Critical Movements =
SouthBound
WestBound EastBound
NorthBound
A = Adjusted Through/Right Volume
B = Adjusted Left Volume
* = ATSAC Benefit
Results
V/C RATIO LOS
0.00 - 0.60 A
0.61 - 0.70 B
0.71 - 0.80 C
0.81 - 0.90 D
0.91 - 1.00 E
A(W/B)
B(N/B)
B(E/B)
A(S/B)
B LOS =
Critical Movements Diagram
TH RT LT TH LT TH RT LT TH RT
Phasing RTOR Phasing Phasing Phasing RTOR RTOR
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND
EXISTING
RTOR
RT
37
AMBIENT
RELATED
PROJECT
TOTAL
37
LANE
SIGNAL Perm|1010|Perm Perm Perm Auto Auto Auto Auto
0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
LT
1115 0 0 1508 73 64 13 170 115 0 45
64 170 13 73 1508 0 0 1115 45 0 115
Volume/Lane/Signal Configurations
Developed by Chun Wong, 12/94
May 25, 2011 ,Wednesday 12:36:15 PM
CalcaDB
EXISTAM
INTERSECTION DATA SUMMARY SHEET
ATTACHMENT 6
410Existing Conditions AM
Robertson Boulevard National Boulevard
N/S: W/E: 3
I/S No:
AM/PM: Comments:
COUNT DATE: GROWTH FACTOR:
STUDY DATE:
145
A:
B:
574
507 A:
B: 328
111
A:
B:
318
0.928 =
+
+
+ + + 574 318 152 328
*1375
447 A:
B: 152
V/C =
West/East Critical Movements =
North/South Critical Movements =
SouthBound
WestBound EastBound
NorthBound
A = Adjusted Through/Right Volume
B = Adjusted Left Volume
* = ATSAC Benefit
Results
V/C RATIO LOS
0.00 - 0.60 A
0.61 - 0.70 B
0.71 - 0.80 C
0.81 - 0.90 D
0.91 - 1.00 E
A(W/B)
A(N/B)
B(E/B)
B(S/B)
E LOS =
Critical Movements Diagram
TH RT LT TH LT TH RT LT TH RT
Phasing RTOR Phasing Phasing Phasing RTOR RTOR
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND
EXISTING
RTOR
RT
111
AMBIENT
RELATED
PROJECT
TOTAL
111
LANE
SIGNAL Perm|1010|Prot-Fix Perm Prot-Fix Auto Auto OLA Auto
0 1 0 1 0 0 2 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0
LT
592 44 596 814 200 145 574 457 152 639 254
145 457 574 200 814 596 44 592 254 639 152
Volume/Lane/Signal Configurations
Developed by Chun Wong, 12/94
May 25, 2011 ,Wednesday 12:36:15 PM
CalcaDB
EXISTAM
INTERSECTION DATA SUMMARY SHEET
ATTACHMENT 6
411Existing Conditions AM
National Boulevard I-10 EB On-Ramp
N/S: W/E: 4
I/S No:
AM/PM: Comments:
COUNT DATE: GROWTH FACTOR:
STUDY DATE:
A:
B: 0|10 10 10|A:
B:
596
562 A:
B: 99
0.393 =
+
+
+ + + 596 99
*1500
A:
B: 0|10 10|V/C =
West/East Critical Movements =
North/South Critical Movements =
SouthBound
WestBound EastBound
NorthBound
A = Adjusted Through/Right Volume
B = Adjusted Left Volume
* = ATSAC Benefit
Results
V/C RATIO LOS
0.00 - 0.60 A
0.61 - 0.70 B
0.71 - 0.80 C
0.81 - 0.90 D
0.91 - 1.00 E
B(N/B) A(S/B)
A LOS =
Critical Movements Diagram
TH RT LT TH LT TH RT LT TH RT
Phasing RTOR Phasing Phasing Phasing RTOR RTOR
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND
EXISTING
RTOR
RT
99
AMBIENT
RELATED
PROJECT
TOTAL
99
LANE
SIGNAL Prot-Fix|1010|Perm Auto Auto
0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
LT
1123 0 0 771 596 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 596 771 0 0 1123 0 0 0
Volume/Lane/Signal Configurations
Developed by Chun Wong, 12/94
May 25, 2011 ,Wednesday 12:36:15 PM
CalcaDB
EXISTAM
INTERSECTION DATA SUMMARY SHEET
ATTACHMENT 6
412Existing Conditions AM
Hughes Avenue Venice Boulevard
N/S: W/E: 5
I/S No:
AM/PM: Comments:
COUNT DATE: GROWTH FACTOR:
STUDY DATE:
601 A:
B: 174
64
A:
B:
309
324 A:
B: 93
0.705 =
+
+
+ + + 587 309 174 93
*1500
41
A:
B:
587
V/C =
West/East Critical Movements =
North/South Critical Movements =
SouthBound
WestBound EastBound
NorthBound
A = Adjusted Through/Right Volume
B = Adjusted Left Volume
* = ATSAC Benefit
Results
V/C RATIO LOS
0.00 - 0.60 A
0.61 - 0.70 B
0.71 - 0.80 C
0.81 - 0.90 D
0.91 - 1.00 E
B(W/B)
B(N/B)
A(E/B)
A(S/B)
C LOS =
Critical Movements Diagram
TH RT LT TH LT TH RT LT TH RT
Phasing RTOR Phasing Phasing Phasing RTOR RTOR
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND
EXISTING
RTOR
RT
93
AMBIENT
RELATED
PROJECT
TOTAL
93
LANE
SIGNAL Perm|10 10|Perm Perm Perm Auto Auto Auto Auto
0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 3 0 0 1 0 1 0 3 0 0 1 0
LT
182 49 64 199 46 174 1804 43 41 1760 117
174 43 1804 46 199 64 49 182 117 1760 41
Volume/Lane/Signal Configurations
Developed by Chun Wong, 12/94
May 25, 2011 ,Wednesday 12:36:15 PM
CalcaDB
EXISTAM
INTERSECTION DATA SUMMARY SHEET
ATTACHMENT 6
413Existing Conditions AM
Bagley Avenue Venice Boulevard
N/S: W/E: 6
I/S No:
AM/PM: Comments:
COUNT DATE: GROWTH FACTOR:
STUDY DATE:
59
A:
B:
642
74
A:
B:
311
193 A:
B: 48
0.708 =
+
+
+ + + 642 311 69 48
*1375
622 A:
B: 69
V/C =
West/East Critical Movements =
North/South Critical Movements =
SouthBound
WestBound EastBound
NorthBound
A = Adjusted Through/Right Volume
B = Adjusted Left Volume
* = ATSAC Benefit
Results
V/C RATIO LOS
0.00 - 0.60 A
0.61 - 0.70 B
0.71 - 0.80 C
0.81 - 0.90 D
0.91 - 1.00 E
A(W/B)
B(N/B)
B(E/B)
A(S/B)
C LOS =
Critical Movements Diagram
TH RT LT TH LT TH RT LT TH RT
Phasing RTOR Phasing Phasing Phasing RTOR RTOR
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND
EXISTING
RTOR
RT
48
AMBIENT
RELATED
PROJECT
TOTAL
48
LANE
SIGNAL Perm|1010|Perm Prot-Var Prot-Var Auto Auto Auto Auto
0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 3 0 0 1 0 1 0 2 0 1 0 0
LT
150 43 74 170 67 59 1926 40 69 1817 50
59 40 1926 67 170 74 43 150 50 1817 69
Volume/Lane/Signal Configurations
Developed by Chun Wong, 12/94
May 25, 2011 ,Wednesday 12:36:15 PM
CalcaDB
EXISTAM
INTERSECTION DATA SUMMARY SHEET
ATTACHMENT 6
414Existing Conditions AM
Culver Boulevard Venice Boulevard
N/S: W/E: 7
I/S No:
AM/PM: Comments:
COUNT DATE: GROWTH FACTOR:
STUDY DATE:
656 A:
B: 218
127
A:
B:
127
39
A:
B:
116
0.713 =
+
+
+ + + 615 127 116 218
*1375
29
A:
B:
615
V/C =
West/East Critical Movements =
North/South Critical Movements =
SouthBound
WestBound EastBound
NorthBound
A = Adjusted Through/Right Volume
B = Adjusted Left Volume
* = ATSAC Benefit
Results
V/C RATIO LOS
0.00 - 0.60 A
0.61 - 0.70 B
0.71 - 0.80 C
0.81 - 0.90 D
0.91 - 1.00 E
B(W/B)
A(N/B)
A(E/B)
A(S/B)
C LOS =
Critical Movements Diagram
TH RT LT TH LT TH RT LT TH RT
Phasing RTOR Phasing Phasing Phasing RTOR RTOR
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND
EXISTING
RTOR
RT
39
AMBIENT
RELATED
PROJECT
TOTAL
39
LANE
SIGNAL Split|1010|Split Prot-Fix Prot-Fix OLA Auto Auto Auto
0 1 0 0 2 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 2 0 2 0 1 0 0 1 0 2 0 1 0 0
LT
84 607 178 44 32 396 1821 148 29 1820 26
396 148 1821 32 44 178 607 84 26 1820 29
Volume/Lane/Signal Configurations
Developed by Chun Wong, 12/94
May 25, 2011 ,Wednesday 12:36:15 PM
CalcaDB
EXISTAM
INTERSECTION DATA SUMMARY SHEET
ATTACHMENT 6
415Existing Conditions AM
Robertson Boulevard Venice Boulevard
N/S: W/E: 8
I/S No:
AM/PM: Comments:
COUNT DATE: GROWTH FACTOR:
STUDY DATE:
79
A:
B:
810
325 A:
B: 513
178
A:
B:
218
1.267 =
+
+
+ + + 810 218 298 513
*1375
739 A:
B: 298
V/C =
West/East Critical Movements =
North/South Critical Movements =
SouthBound
WestBound EastBound
NorthBound
A = Adjusted Through/Right Volume
B = Adjusted Left Volume
* = ATSAC Benefit
Results
V/C RATIO LOS
0.00 - 0.60 A
0.61 - 0.70 B
0.71 - 0.80 C
0.81 - 0.90 D
0.91 - 1.00 E
A(W/B)
A(N/B)
B(E/B)
B(S/B)
F LOS =
Critical Movements Diagram
TH RT LT TH LT TH RT LT TH RT
Phasing RTOR Phasing Phasing Phasing RTOR RTOR
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND
EXISTING
RTOR
RT
178
AMBIENT
RELATED
PROJECT
TOTAL
178
LANE
SIGNAL Split|1010|Split Prot-Var Prot-Var OLA Auto Auto Auto
0 2 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 2 0 1 0 0 2 0 2 0 1 0 0
LT
435 47 513 325 142 79 2097 334 541 2086 132
79 334 2097 142 325 513 47 435 132 2086 541
Volume/Lane/Signal Configurations
Developed by Chun Wong, 12/94
May 25, 2011 ,Wednesday 12:36:15 PM
CalcaDB
EXISTAM
INTERSECTION DATA SUMMARY SHEET
ATTACHMENT 6
416Existing Conditions AM
National Boulevard Venice Boulevard
N/S: W/E: 9
I/S No:
AM/PM: Comments:
COUNT DATE: GROWTH FACTOR:
STUDY DATE:
685 A:
B: 90
334 A:
B: 131
198
A:
B:
464
1.000 =
+
+
+ + + 786 464 90 131
*1375
182
A:
B:
786
V/C =
West/East Critical Movements =
North/South Critical Movements =
SouthBound
WestBound EastBound
NorthBound
A = Adjusted Through/Right Volume
B = Adjusted Left Volume
* = ATSAC Benefit
Results
V/C RATIO LOS
0.00 - 0.60 A
0.61 - 0.70 B
0.71 - 0.80 C
0.81 - 0.90 D
0.91 - 1.00 E
B(W/B)
A(N/B)
A(E/B)
B(S/B)
E LOS =
Critical Movements Diagram
TH RT LT TH LT TH RT LT TH RT
Phasing RTOR Phasing Phasing Phasing RTOR RTOR
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND
EXISTING
RTOR
RT
198
AMBIENT
RELATED
PROJECT
TOTAL
198
LANE
SIGNAL Perm|1010|Prot-Fix Perm Prot-Fix Auto Auto Auto Auto
0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 2 0 1 0 0 1 0 2 0 1 0 0
LT
906 22 131 567 101 90 1939 116 182 2069 288
90 116 1939 101 567 131 22 906 288 2069 182
Volume/Lane/Signal Configurations
Developed by Chun Wong, 12/94
May 25, 2011 ,Wednesday 12:36:15 PM
CalcaDB
EXISTAM
INTERSECTION DATA SUMMARY SHEET
ATTACHMENT 6
417Existing Conditions AM
Helms Avenue Venice Boulevard
N/S: W/E: 10
I/S No:
AM/PM: Comments:
COUNT DATE: GROWTH FACTOR:
STUDY DATE:
22
A:
B:
712
12
A:
B:
38
20 A:
B: 11
0.487 =
+
+
+ + + 712 38 75 11
*1500
718 A:
B: 75
V/C =
West/East Critical Movements =
North/South Critical Movements =
SouthBound
WestBound EastBound
NorthBound
A = Adjusted Through/Right Volume
B = Adjusted Left Volume
* = ATSAC Benefit
Results
V/C RATIO LOS
0.00 - 0.60 A
0.61 - 0.70 B
0.71 - 0.80 C
0.81 - 0.90 D
0.91 - 1.00 E
A(W/B)
B(N/B)
B(E/B)
A(S/B)
A LOS =
Critical Movements Diagram
TH RT LT TH LT TH RT LT TH RT
Phasing RTOR Phasing Phasing Phasing RTOR RTOR
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND
EXISTING
RTOR
RT
11
AMBIENT
RELATED
PROJECT
TOTAL
11
LANE
SIGNAL Perm|10 10|Perm Perm Perm Auto Auto Auto Auto
1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 1 0 0 1 0 2 0 1 0 0
LT
9 4 12 2 24 22 2114 22 75 2133 21
22 22 2114 24 2 12 4 9 21 2133 75
Volume/Lane/Signal Configurations
Developed by Chun Wong, 12/94
May 25, 2011 ,Wednesday 12:36:15 PM
CalcaDB
EXISTAM
INTERSECTION DATA SUMMARY SHEET
ATTACHMENT 6
418Existing Conditions AM
Cattaraugus Avenue Venice Boulevard
N/S: W/E: 11
I/S No:
AM/PM: Comments:
COUNT DATE: GROWTH FACTOR:
STUDY DATE:
69
A:
B:
714
261 A:
B: 160
47
A:
B:
318
0.771 =
+
+
+ + + 714 318 70 160
*1500
647 A:
B: 70
V/C =
West/East Critical Movements =
North/South Critical Movements =
SouthBound
WestBound EastBound
NorthBound
A = Adjusted Through/Right Volume
B = Adjusted Left Volume
* = ATSAC Benefit
Results
V/C RATIO LOS
0.00 - 0.60 A
0.61 - 0.70 B
0.71 - 0.80 C
0.81 - 0.90 D
0.91 - 1.00 E
A(W/B)
A(N/B)
B(E/B)
B(S/B)
C LOS =
Critical Movements Diagram
TH RT LT TH LT TH RT LT TH RT
Phasing RTOR Phasing Phasing Phasing RTOR RTOR
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND
EXISTING
RTOR
RT
47
AMBIENT
RELATED
PROJECT
TOTAL
47
LANE
SIGNAL Perm|10 10|Perm Perm Perm Auto Auto Auto Auto
0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 1 0 0 1 0 2 0 1 0 0
LT
245 26 160 84 17 69 2040 101 70 1930 11
69 101 2040 17 84 160 26 245 11 1930 70
Volume/Lane/Signal Configurations
Developed by Chun Wong, 12/94
May 25, 2011 ,Wednesday 12:36:15 PM
CalcaDB
EXISTAM
INTERSECTION DATA SUMMARY SHEET
ATTACHMENT 6
419Existing Conditions AM
La Cienega Boulevard Venice Boulevard
N/S: W/E: 12
I/S No:
AM/PM: Comments:
COUNT DATE: GROWTH FACTOR:
STUDY DATE:
127
A:
B:
586
35
A:
B:
558
605 A:
B: 124
0.991 =
+
+
+ + + 586 558 191 124
*1375
564 A:
B: 191
V/C =
West/East Critical Movements =
North/South Critical Movements =
SouthBound
WestBound EastBound
NorthBound
A = Adjusted Through/Right Volume
B = Adjusted Left Volume
* = ATSAC Benefit
Results
V/C RATIO LOS
0.00 - 0.60 A
0.61 - 0.70 B
0.71 - 0.80 C
0.81 - 0.90 D
0.91 - 1.00 E
A(W/B)
B(N/B)
B(E/B)
A(S/B)
E LOS =
Critical Movements Diagram
TH RT LT TH LT TH RT LT TH RT
Phasing RTOR Phasing Phasing Phasing RTOR RTOR
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND
EXISTING
RTOR
RT
124
AMBIENT
RELATED
PROJECT
TOTAL
124
LANE
SIGNAL Perm|1010|Perm Prot-Var Prot-Var Auto Auto Auto Auto
0 2 0 1 0 0 1 0 2 0 1 0 0 1 0 3 0 0 1 0 2 0 3 0 0 1 0
LT
1771 45 35 1325 348 127 1758 15 348 1691 157
127 15 1758 348 1325 35 45 1771 157 1691 348
Volume/Lane/Signal Configurations
Developed by Chun Wong, 12/94
May 25, 2011 ,Wednesday 12:36:15 PM
CalcaDB
EXISTAM
INTERSECTION DATA SUMMARY SHEET
ATTACHMENT 6
420Existing Conditions AM
Hughes Avenue/Duquesne Avenue Washington Boulevard
N/S: W/E: 13
I/S No:
AM/PM: Comments:
COUNT DATE: GROWTH FACTOR:
STUDY DATE:
54
A:
B:
365
12
A:
B:
337
345 A:
B: 164
0.534 =
+
+
+ + + 365 337 40 164
*1500
336 A:
B: 40
V/C =
West/East Critical Movements =
North/South Critical Movements =
SouthBound
WestBound EastBound
NorthBound
A = Adjusted Through/Right Volume
B = Adjusted Left Volume
* = ATSAC Benefit
Results
V/C RATIO LOS
0.00 - 0.60 A
0.61 - 0.70 B
0.71 - 0.80 C
0.81 - 0.90 D
0.91 - 1.00 E
A(W/B)
B(N/B)
B(E/B)
A(S/B)
A LOS =
Critical Movements Diagram
TH RT LT TH LT TH RT LT TH RT
Phasing RTOR Phasing Phasing Phasing RTOR RTOR
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND
EXISTING
RTOR
RT
164
AMBIENT
RELATED
PROJECT
TOTAL
164
LANE
SIGNAL Perm|1010|Perm Perm Perm Auto Auto Auto Auto
0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0
LT
306 39 12 290 47 54 684 45 40 494 178
54 45 684 47 290 12 39 306 178 494 40
Volume/Lane/Signal Configurations
Developed by Chun Wong, 12/94
May 25, 2011 ,Wednesday 12:36:15 PM
CalcaDB
EXISTAM
INTERSECTION DATA SUMMARY SHEET
ATTACHMENT 6
421Existing Conditions AM
Duquesne Avenue Culver Boulevard
N/S: W/E: 14
I/S No:
AM/PM: Comments:
COUNT DATE: GROWTH FACTOR:
STUDY DATE:
366 A:
B: 91
50
A:
B:
371
352 A:
B: 91
0.612 =
+
+
+ + + 385 371 91 91
*1375
104
A:
B:
385
V/C =
West/East Critical Movements =
North/South Critical Movements =
SouthBound
WestBound EastBound
NorthBound
A = Adjusted Through/Right Volume
B = Adjusted Left Volume
* = ATSAC Benefit
Results
V/C RATIO LOS
0.00 - 0.60 A
0.61 - 0.70 B
0.71 - 0.80 C
0.81 - 0.90 D
0.91 - 1.00 E
B(W/B)
B(N/B)
A(E/B)
A(S/B)
B LOS =
Critical Movements Diagram
TH RT LT TH LT TH RT LT TH RT
Phasing RTOR Phasing Phasing Phasing RTOR RTOR
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND
EXISTING
RTOR
RT
91
AMBIENT
RELATED
PROJECT
TOTAL
91
LANE
SIGNAL Prot-Var|1010|Prot-Var Prot-Var Prot-Var Auto Auto Auto Auto
0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0
LT
352 100 50 371 68 91 677 55 104 734 36
91 55 677 68 371 50 100 352 36 734 104
Volume/Lane/Signal Configurations
Developed by Chun Wong, 12/94
May 25, 2011 ,Wednesday 12:36:15 PM
CalcaDB
EXISTAM
INTERSECTION DATA SUMMARY SHEET
ATTACHMENT 6
422Existing Conditions AM
Washington Bl/Irving Pl Culver Boulevard
N/S: W/E: 15
I/S No:
AM/PM: Comments:
COUNT DATE: GROWTH FACTOR:
STUDY DATE:
67
A:
B:
405
262
A:
B:
262
80 A:
B: 122
0.504 =
+
+
+ + + 405 262 0 122
*1375
299 A:
B: 0
V/C =
West/East Critical Movements =
North/South Critical Movements =
SouthBound
WestBound EastBound
NorthBound
A = Adjusted Through/Right Volume
B = Adjusted Left Volume
* = ATSAC Benefit
Results
V/C RATIO LOS
0.00 - 0.60 A
0.61 - 0.70 B
0.71 - 0.80 C
0.81 - 0.90 D
0.91 - 1.00 E
A(W/B)
B(N/B)
B(E/B)
A(S/B)
A LOS =
Critical Movements Diagram
TH RT LT TH LT TH RT LT TH RT
Phasing RTOR Phasing Phasing Phasing RTOR RTOR
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND
EXISTING
RTOR
RT
122
AMBIENT
RELATED
PROJECT
TOTAL
122
LANE
SIGNAL Split|1010|Split Prot-Fix Perm Auto Auto Auto Auto
0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 2 0 1 0 0
LT
0 114 501 0 23 67 742 474 0 854 42
-262
67 736 742 23 0 501 114 0 42 854 0
Volume/Lane/Signal Configurations
Developed by Chun Wong, 12/94
May 25, 2011 ,Wednesday 12:36:15 PM
CalcaDB
EXISTAM
INTERSECTION DATA SUMMARY SHEET
ATTACHMENT 6
423Existing Conditions AM
Main Street Culver Boulevard
N/S: W/E: 16
I/S No:
AM/PM: Comments:
COUNT DATE: GROWTH FACTOR:
STUDY DATE:|10 10|A:
B:
503
49 A:
B: 147|10 10|A:
B:|10 10|0.499 =
+
+
+ + + 503 0 161 147
*1425
430 A:
B: 161
V/C =
West/East Critical Movements =
North/South Critical Movements =
SouthBound
WestBound EastBound
NorthBound
A = Adjusted Through/Right Volume
B = Adjusted Left Volume
* = ATSAC Benefit
Results
V/C RATIO LOS
0.00 - 0.60 A
0.61 - 0.70 B
0.71 - 0.80 C
0.81 - 0.90 D
0.91 - 1.00 E
A(W/B)
A(N/B)
B(E/B)
B(S/B)
A LOS =
Critical Movements Diagram
TH RT LT TH LT TH RT LT TH RT
Phasing RTOR Phasing Phasing Phasing RTOR RTOR
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND
EXISTING
RTOR
RT|10 10|AMBIENT
RELATED
PROJECT
TOTAL|10 10|LANE
SIGNAL |10 10|Split Perm Prot-Fix Auto Auto Auto
0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 2 0 1 0 0 1 0 3 0 0 0 0
LT
0 0 147 0 130 0 1353 157 161 1290 0
0 157 1353 130 0 147 0 0 0 1290 161
Volume/Lane/Signal Configurations
Developed by Chun Wong, 12/94
May 25, 2011 ,Wednesday 12:36:15 PM
CalcaDB
EXISTAM
INTERSECTION DATA SUMMARY SHEET
ATTACHMENT 6
424Existing Conditions AM
Culver Boulevard Washington Boulevard/Canfield Avenu
N/S: W/E: 17
I/S No:
AM/PM: Comments:
COUNT DATE: GROWTH FACTOR:
STUDY DATE:
534
A:
B:
534
207 A:
B: 36
12
A:
B:
337
0.566 =
+
+
+ + + 534 0 337 36
*1425|10 10|A:
B:|10 10|V/C =
West/East Critical Movements =
North/South Critical Movements =
SouthBound
WestBound EastBound
NorthBound
A = Adjusted Through/Right Volume
B = Adjusted Left Volume
* = ATSAC Benefit
Results
V/C RATIO LOS
0.00 - 0.60 A
0.61 - 0.70 B
0.71 - 0.80 C
0.81 - 0.90 D
0.91 - 1.00 E
A(W/B)
A(N/B)
A(E/B)
B(S/B)
A LOS =
Critical Movements Diagram
TH RT LT TH LT TH RT LT TH RT
Phasing RTOR Phasing Phasing Phasing RTOR RTOR
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND
EXISTING
RTOR
RT
12
AMBIENT
RELATED
PROJECT
TOTAL
12
LANE
SIGNAL Prot-Fix|1010|Prot-Fix Split OLA Auto Auto OLA
0 2 0 0 2 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0
LT
674 757 36 409 4 1033 35 73 0 0 6
1033 73 35 4 409 36 757 674 6 0 0
Volume/Lane/Signal Configurations
Developed by Chun Wong, 12/94
May 25, 2011 ,Wednesday 12:36:15 PM
CalcaDB
EXISTAM
INTERSECTION DATA SUMMARY SHEET
ATTACHMENT 6
425Existing Conditions AM
Robertson Boulevard/Higuera Street Washington Boulevard
N/S: W/E: 18
I/S No:
AM/PM: Comments:
COUNT DATE: GROWTH FACTOR:
STUDY DATE:
85
A:
B:
649
225 A:
B: 182
65
A:
B:
203
0.706 =
+
+
+ + + 649 203 72 182
*1425
409 A:
B: 72
V/C =
West/East Critical Movements =
North/South Critical Movements =
SouthBound
WestBound EastBound
NorthBound
A = Adjusted Through/Right Volume
B = Adjusted Left Volume
* = ATSAC Benefit
Results
V/C RATIO LOS
0.00 - 0.60 A
0.61 - 0.70 B
0.71 - 0.80 C
0.81 - 0.90 D
0.91 - 1.00 E
A(W/B)
A(N/B)
B(E/B)
B(S/B)
C LOS =
Critical Movements Diagram
TH RT LT TH LT TH RT LT TH RT
Phasing RTOR Phasing Phasing Phasing RTOR RTOR
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND
EXISTING
RTOR
RT
65
AMBIENT
RELATED
PROJECT
TOTAL
65
LANE
SIGNAL Prot-Fix|1010|Prot-Fix Perm Perm Auto Auto Auto Auto
0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0
LT
338 68 182 225 65 85 1088 209 72 758 60
85 209 1088 65 225 182 68 338 60 758 72
Volume/Lane/Signal Configurations
Developed by Chun Wong, 12/94
May 25, 2011 ,Wednesday 12:36:15 PM
CalcaDB
EXISTAM
INTERSECTION DATA SUMMARY SHEET
ATTACHMENT 6
426Existing Conditions AM
Landmark Street Washington Boulevard
N/S: W/E: 19
I/S No:
AM/PM: Comments:
COUNT DATE: GROWTH FACTOR:
STUDY DATE:
61
A:
B:
783|10 10|A:
B:|10 10|29
A:
B:
30
0.472 =
+
+
+ + + 783 0 30 0
*1500
460 A:
B: 0
V/C =
West/East Critical Movements =
North/South Critical Movements =
SouthBound
WestBound EastBound
NorthBound
A = Adjusted Through/Right Volume
B = Adjusted Left Volume
* = ATSAC Benefit
Results
V/C RATIO LOS
0.00 - 0.60 A
0.61 - 0.70 B
0.71 - 0.80 C
0.81 - 0.90 D
0.91 - 1.00 E
A(W/B)
A(N/B)
B(E/B)
A(S/B)
A LOS =
Critical Movements Diagram
TH RT LT TH LT TH RT LT TH RT
Phasing RTOR Phasing Phasing Phasing RTOR RTOR
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND
EXISTING
RTOR
RT
29
AMBIENT
RELATED
PROJECT
TOTAL
29
LANE
SIGNAL Split|1010| Perm Perm Auto Auto Auto Auto
0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0
LT
0 30 0 0 0 61 1566 0 0 842 78
61 0 1566 0 0 0 30 0 78 842 0
Volume/Lane/Signal Configurations
Developed by Chun Wong, 12/94
May 25, 2011 ,Wednesday 12:36:15 PM
CalcaDB
EXISTAM
INTERSECTION DATA SUMMARY SHEET
ATTACHMENT 6
427Existing Conditions AM
National Boulevard Washington Boulevard
N/S: W/E: 20
I/S No:
AM/PM: Comments:
COUNT DATE: GROWTH FACTOR:
STUDY DATE:
77
A:
B:
583
399 A:
B: 75
122
A:
B:
449
0.789 =
+
+
+ + + 583 449 74 75
*1375
357 A:
B: 74
V/C =
West/East Critical Movements =
North/South Critical Movements =
SouthBound
WestBound EastBound
NorthBound
A = Adjusted Through/Right Volume
B = Adjusted Left Volume
* = ATSAC Benefit
Results
V/C RATIO LOS
0.00 - 0.60 A
0.61 - 0.70 B
0.71 - 0.80 C
0.81 - 0.90 D
0.91 - 1.00 E
A(W/B)
A(N/B)
B(E/B)
B(S/B)
C LOS =
Critical Movements Diagram
TH RT LT TH LT TH RT LT TH RT
Phasing RTOR Phasing Phasing Phasing RTOR RTOR
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND
EXISTING
RTOR
RT
221
AMBIENT
RELATED
PROJECT
TOTAL
221
LANE
SIGNAL Prot-Var|1010|Prot-Var Perm Perm Auto Auto Auto Auto
0 1 0 1 0 0 2 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 2 0 0 1 0 1 0 2 0 0 1 0
LT
792 105 137 737 61 77 1166 313 74 714 110
77 313 1166 61 737 137 105 792 110 714 74
Volume/Lane/Signal Configurations
Developed by Chun Wong, 12/94
May 25, 2011 ,Wednesday 12:36:15 PM
CalcaDB
EXISTAM
INTERSECTION DATA SUMMARY SHEET
ATTACHMENT 6
428Default Scenario Wed May 25, 2011 12:48:43 Page 3-1
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Base Volume Alternative)
********************************************************************************
Intersection #21 WESLEY AV/WASHINGTON BL [EXISTING AM]
********************************************************************************
Average Delay (sec/veh): 0.0 Worst Case Level Of Service: B[ 11.5]
********************************************************************************
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Lanes: 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 2 0 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 922 4 3 1571 0
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 922 4 3 1571 0
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 922 4 3 1571 0
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Final Vol.: 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 922 4 3 1571 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Critical Gap Module:
Critical Gp:xxxxx xxxx 6.9 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 4.1 xxxx xxxxx
FollowUpTim:xxxxx xxxx 3.3 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 2.2 xxxx xxxxx
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Module:
Cnflict Vol: xxxx xxxx 463 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 926 xxxx xxxxx
Potent Cap.: xxxx xxxx 551 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 746 xxxx xxxxx
Move Cap.: xxxx xxxx 551 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 746 xxxx xxxxx
Volume/Cap: xxxx xxxx 0.00 xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx 0.00 xxxx xxxx
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Level Of Service Module:
Queue: xxxxx xxxx 0.0 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 0.0 xxxx xxxxx
Stopped Del:xxxxx xxxx 11.5 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 9.8 xxxx xxxxx
LOS by Move: * * B * * * * * * A * *
Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT
Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx
SharedQueue:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx
Shrd StpDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx
Shared LOS: * * * * * * * * * * * *
ApproachDel: 11.5 xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx
ApproachLOS: B * * *
Traffix 7.6.0715 (c) 2003 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to RAJU ASSOC., PASADENA
ATTACHMENT 6
429Existing Conditions AM
Helms Avenue Washington Boulevard
N/S: W/E: 22
I/S No:
AM/PM: Comments:
COUNT DATE: GROWTH FACTOR:
STUDY DATE:
30
A:
B:
754|10 10|A:
B:|10 10|72
A:
B:
89
0.492 =
+
+
+ + + 754 0 89 0
*1500
468 A:
B: 0
V/C =
West/East Critical Movements =
North/South Critical Movements =
SouthBound
WestBound EastBound
NorthBound
A = Adjusted Through/Right Volume
B = Adjusted Left Volume
* = ATSAC Benefit
Results
V/C RATIO LOS
0.00 - 0.60 A
0.61 - 0.70 B
0.71 - 0.80 C
0.81 - 0.90 D
0.91 - 1.00 E
A(W/B)
A(N/B)
B(E/B)
A(S/B)
A LOS =
Critical Movements Diagram
TH RT LT TH LT TH RT LT TH RT
Phasing RTOR Phasing Phasing Phasing RTOR RTOR
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND
EXISTING
RTOR
RT
72
AMBIENT
RELATED
PROJECT
TOTAL
72
LANE
SIGNAL Split|10 10| Perm Perm Auto Auto Auto
0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0
LT
0 17 0 0 0 30 1508 0 0 898 38
30 0 1508 0 0 0 17 0 38 898 0
Volume/Lane/Signal Configurations
Developed by Chun Wong, 12/94
May 25, 2011 ,Wednesday 12:36:15 PM
CalcaDB
EXISTAM
INTERSECTION DATA SUMMARY SHEET
ATTACHMENT 6
430Default Scenario Wed May 25, 2011 12:48:43 Page 5-1
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Base Volume Alternative)
********************************************************************************
Intersection #23 CATTARAUGUS AV/WASHINGTON AV [EXISTING AM]
********************************************************************************
Average Delay (sec/veh): 86.5 Worst Case Level Of Service: F[1767.2]
********************************************************************************
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 9 5 3 86 6 45 22 812 6 3 1518 320
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 9 5 3 86 6 45 22 812 6 3 1518 320
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 9 5 3 86 6 45 22 812 6 3 1518 320
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Final Vol.: 9 5 3 86 6 45 22 812 6 3 1518 320
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Critical Gap Module:
Critical Gp: 7.5 6.5 6.9 7.5 6.5 6.9 4.1 xxxx xxxxx 4.1 xxxx xxxxx
FollowUpTim: 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3 2.2 xxxx xxxxx 2.2 xxxx xxxxx
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Module:
Cnflict Vol: 1627 2703 409 2137 2546 919 1838 xxxx xxxxx 818 xxxx xxxxx
Potent Cap.: 69 22 597 28 27 277 336 xxxx xxxxx 819 xxxx xxxxx
Move Cap.: 45 20 597 22 25 277 336 xxxx xxxxx 819 xxxx xxxxx
Volume/Cap: 0.20 0.25 0.01 3.96 0.24 0.16 0.07 xxxx xxxx 0.00 xxxx xxxx
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Level Of Service Module:
Queue: xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 0.2 xxxx xxxxx 0.0 xxxx xxxxx
Stopped Del:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 16.5 xxxx xxxxx 9.4 xxxx xxxxx
LOS by Move: * * * * * * C * * A * *
Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT
Shared Cap.: xxxx 37 xxxxx xxxx 31 xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx
SharedQueue:xxxxx 1.6 xxxxx xxxxx 16.3 xxxxx 0.2 xxxx xxxxx 0.0 xxxx xxxxx
Shrd StpDel:xxxxx 165 xxxxx xxxxx 1767 xxxxx 16.5 xxxx xxxxx 9.4 xxxx xxxxx
Shared LOS: * F * * F * C * * A * *
ApproachDel: 165.1 1767.2 xxxxxx xxxxxx
ApproachLOS: F F * *
Traffix 7.6.0715 (c) 2003 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to RAJU ASSOC., PASADENA
ATTACHMENT 6
431Existing Conditions AM
La Cienega Boulevard Washington Boulevard
N/S: W/E: 24
I/S No:
AM/PM: Comments:
COUNT DATE: GROWTH FACTOR:
STUDY DATE:
56
A:
B:
754
481 A:
B: 182
251
A:
B:
552
1.047 =
+
+
+ + + 754 552 48 182
*1375
391 A:
B: 48
V/C =
West/East Critical Movements =
North/South Critical Movements =
SouthBound
WestBound EastBound
NorthBound
A = Adjusted Through/Right Volume
B = Adjusted Left Volume
* = ATSAC Benefit
Results
V/C RATIO LOS
0.00 - 0.60 A
0.61 - 0.70 B
0.71 - 0.80 C
0.81 - 0.90 D
0.91 - 1.00 E
A(W/B)
A(N/B)
B(E/B)
B(S/B)
F LOS =
Critical Movements Diagram
TH RT LT TH LT TH RT LT TH RT
Phasing RTOR Phasing Phasing Phasing RTOR RTOR
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND
EXISTING
RTOR
RT
251
AMBIENT
RELATED
PROJECT
TOTAL
251
LANE
SIGNAL Prot-Var|1010|Prot-Var Perm Perm Auto Auto Auto Auto
0 2 0 1 0 0 1 0 2 0 1 0 0 1 0 2 0 0 1 0 1 0 2 0 0 1 0
LT
1637 20 182 1416 28 56 1508 245 48 782 106
56 245 1508 28 1416 182 20 1637 106 782 48
Volume/Lane/Signal Configurations
Developed by Chun Wong, 12/94
May 25, 2011 ,Wednesday 12:36:15 PM
CalcaDB
EXISTAM
INTERSECTION DATA SUMMARY SHEET
ATTACHMENT 6
432Existing Conditions AM
La Cienega Boulevard Fairfax Avenue
N/S: W/E: 25
I/S No:
AM/PM: Comments:
COUNT DATE: GROWTH FACTOR:
STUDY DATE:
55 A:
B: 599
451 A:
B: 0
24
A:
B:
891
0.990 =
+
+
+ ++21 891 599 0
*1425
13
A:
B:
21
V/C =
West/East Critical Movements =
North/South Critical Movements =
SouthBound
WestBound EastBound
NorthBound
A = Adjusted Through/Right Volume
B = Adjusted Left Volume
* = ATSAC Benefit
Results
V/C RATIO LOS
0.00 - 0.60 A
0.61 - 0.70 B
0.71 - 0.80 C
0.81 - 0.90 D
0.91 - 1.00 E
B(W/B)
A(N/B)
A(E/B)
B(S/B)
E LOS =
Critical Movements Diagram
TH RT LT TH LT TH RT LT TH RT
Phasing RTOR Phasing Phasing Phasing RTOR RTOR
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND
EXISTING
RTOR
RT
24
AMBIENT
RELATED
PROJECT
TOTAL
24
LANE
SIGNAL Perm|1010|Perm Split Split Free Auto Auto Auto
0 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 1 0 0 2 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0
LT
1781 927 0 1331 21 1089 25 30 13 0 8
1089 30 25 21 1331 0 927 1781 8 0 13
Volume/Lane/Signal Configurations
Developed by Chun Wong, 12/94
May 25, 2011 ,Wednesday 12:36:15 PM
CalcaDB
EXISTAM
INTERSECTION DATA SUMMARY SHEET
ATTACHMENT 6
433Existing Conditions AM
Wesley Street National Boulevard
N/S: W/E: 26
I/S No:
AM/PM: Comments:
COUNT DATE: GROWTH FACTOR:
STUDY DATE:
39
A:
B:
773
0 A:
B: 0
112
A:
B:
211
0.586 =
+
+
+ + + 773 211 0 0
*1500
405 A:
B: 0
V/C =
West/East Critical Movements =
North/South Critical Movements =
SouthBound
WestBound EastBound
NorthBound
A = Adjusted Through/Right Volume
B = Adjusted Left Volume
* = ATSAC Benefit
Results
V/C RATIO LOS
0.00 - 0.60 A
0.61 - 0.70 B
0.71 - 0.80 C
0.81 - 0.90 D
0.91 - 1.00 E
A(W/B)
A(N/B)
B(E/B)
B(S/B)
A LOS =
Critical Movements Diagram
TH RT LT TH LT TH RT LT TH RT
Phasing RTOR Phasing Phasing Phasing RTOR RTOR
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND
EXISTING
RTOR
RT
112
AMBIENT
RELATED
PROJECT
TOTAL
112
LANE
SIGNAL Perm|10 10|Perm Perm Perm Auto Auto Auto Auto
0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 1 0
LT
0 99 0 0 0 39 1546 0 0 809 83
39 0 1546 0 0 0 99 0 83 809 0
Volume/Lane/Signal Configurations
Developed by Chun Wong, 12/94
May 25, 2011 ,Wednesday 12:36:15 PM
CalcaDB
EXISTAM
INTERSECTION DATA SUMMARY SHEET
ATTACHMENT 6
434Existing Conditions AM
Hayden Avenue National Boulevard
N/S: W/E: 27
I/S No:
AM/PM: Comments:
COUNT DATE: GROWTH FACTOR:
STUDY DATE:
173
A:
B:
942|10 10|A:
B:|10 10|336
A:
B:
336
0.827 =
+
+
+ + + 942 0 336 0
*1425
451 A:
B: 0
V/C =
West/East Critical Movements =
North/South Critical Movements =
SouthBound
WestBound EastBound
NorthBound
A = Adjusted Through/Right Volume
B = Adjusted Left Volume
* = ATSAC Benefit
Results
V/C RATIO LOS
0.00 - 0.60 A
0.61 - 0.70 B
0.71 - 0.80 C
0.81 - 0.90 D
0.91 - 1.00 E
A(W/B)
A(N/B)
B(E/B)
A(S/B)
D LOS =
Critical Movements Diagram
TH RT LT TH LT TH RT LT TH RT
Phasing RTOR Phasing Phasing Phasing RTOR RTOR
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND
EXISTING
RTOR
RT
608
AMBIENT
RELATED
PROJECT
TOTAL
608
LANE
SIGNAL Split|1010| Prot-Fix Perm Auto Auto Auto
0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0
LT
0 63 0 0 0 173 942 0 0 675 227
173 0 942 0 0 0 63 0 227 675 0
Volume/Lane/Signal Configurations
Developed by Chun Wong, 12/94
May 25, 2011 ,Wednesday 12:36:15 PM
CalcaDB
EXISTAM
INTERSECTION DATA SUMMARY SHEET
ATTACHMENT 6
435Existing Conditions AM
Jefferson Boulevard National Boulevard
N/S: W/E: 28
I/S No:
AM/PM: Comments:
COUNT DATE: GROWTH FACTOR:
STUDY DATE:|10 10|A:
B:|10 10|332 A:
B: 0|10 10|A:
B:
576
0.727 =
+
+
+ + + 0 620 576 0
*1500
486
A:
B:
620
V/C =
West/East Critical Movements =
North/South Critical Movements =
SouthBound
WestBound EastBound
NorthBound
A = Adjusted Through/Right Volume
B = Adjusted Left Volume
* = ATSAC Benefit
Results
V/C RATIO LOS
0.00 - 0.60 A
0.61 - 0.70 B
0.71 - 0.80 C
0.81 - 0.90 D
0.91 - 1.00 E
A(W/B)
A(N/B)
A(E/B)
B(S/B)
C LOS =
Critical Movements Diagram
TH RT LT TH LT TH RT LT TH RT
Phasing RTOR Phasing Phasing Phasing RTOR RTOR
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND
EXISTING
RTOR
RT|10 10|AMBIENT
RELATED
PROJECT
TOTAL|10 10|LANE
SIGNAL Perm|10 10|Perm Split Auto Free Auto
0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
LT
576 0 0 664 1159 0 0 0 486 0 134
0 0 0 1159 664 0 0 576 134 0 486
Volume/Lane/Signal Configurations
Developed by Chun Wong, 12/94
May 25, 2011 ,Wednesday 12:36:15 PM
CalcaDB
EXISTAM
INTERSECTION DATA SUMMARY SHEET
ATTACHMENT 6
436Existing Conditions AM
La Cienega Boulevard Jefferson Boulevard
N/S: W/E: 29
I/S No:
AM/PM: Comments:
COUNT DATE: GROWTH FACTOR:
STUDY DATE:
315
A:
B:
549
610 A:
B: 71
99
A:
B:
787
1.111 =
+
+
+ + + 549 787 217 71
*1375
351 A:
B: 217
V/C =
West/East Critical Movements =
North/South Critical Movements =
SouthBound
WestBound EastBound
NorthBound
A = Adjusted Through/Right Volume
B = Adjusted Left Volume
* = ATSAC Benefit
Results
V/C RATIO LOS
0.00 - 0.60 A
0.61 - 0.70 B
0.71 - 0.80 C
0.81 - 0.90 D
0.91 - 1.00 E
A(W/B)
A(N/B)
B(E/B)
B(S/B)
F LOS =
Critical Movements Diagram
TH RT LT TH LT TH RT LT TH RT
Phasing RTOR Phasing Phasing Phasing RTOR RTOR
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND
EXISTING
RTOR
RT
99
AMBIENT
RELATED
PROJECT
TOTAL
99
LANE
SIGNAL Perm|1010|Perm Prot-Var Prot-Var Auto OLA Auto Auto
0 2 0 1 0 0 1 0 3 0 0 1 0 2 0 2 0 0 1 0 2 0 1 0 1 0 0
LT
2249 113 71 1829 580 572 1098 118 394 592 109
572 118 1098 580 1829 71 113 2249 109 592 394
Volume/Lane/Signal Configurations
Developed by Chun Wong, 12/94
May 25, 2011 ,Wednesday 12:36:15 PM
CalcaDB
EXISTAM
INTERSECTION DATA SUMMARY SHEET
ATTACHMENT 6
437Existing Conditions AM
Jefferson Boulevard Higuera Street/Rodeo Road
N/S: W/E: 30
I/S No:
AM/PM: Comments:
COUNT DATE: GROWTH FACTOR:
STUDY DATE:
421
A:
B:
555
76
A:
B:
315
289 A:
B: 254
0.769 =
+
+
+ + + 555 71 315 254
*1425
26
A:
B:
71
V/C =
West/East Critical Movements =
North/South Critical Movements =
SouthBound
WestBound EastBound
NorthBound
A = Adjusted Through/Right Volume
B = Adjusted Left Volume
* = ATSAC Benefit
Results
V/C RATIO LOS
0.00 - 0.60 A
0.61 - 0.70 B
0.71 - 0.80 C
0.81 - 0.90 D
0.91 - 1.00 E
A(W/B)
B(N/B)
A(E/B)
A(S/B)
C LOS =
Critical Movements Diagram
TH RT LT TH LT TH RT LT TH RT
Phasing RTOR Phasing Phasing Phasing RTOR RTOR
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND
EXISTING
RTOR
RT
254
AMBIENT
RELATED
PROJECT
TOTAL
254
LANE
SIGNAL Perm|1010|Perm Split Split Free Auto Auto Auto
0 2 0 0 1 0 1 0 2 0 0 1 0 2 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 2 0 0 1 0
LT
578 718 76 630 76 766 555 57 26 141 41
766 57 555 76 630 76 718 578 41 141 26
Volume/Lane/Signal Configurations
Developed by Chun Wong, 12/94
May 25, 2011 ,Wednesday 12:36:15 PM
CalcaDB
EXISTAM
INTERSECTION DATA SUMMARY SHEET
ATTACHMENT 6
438Existing Conditions AM
La Cienega Boulevard Rodeo Road
N/S: W/E: 31
I/S No:
AM/PM: Comments:
COUNT DATE: GROWTH FACTOR:
STUDY DATE:
357 A:
B: 306
131
A:
B:
743
727 A:
B: 295
1.097 =
+
+
+ + + 261 743 306 295
*1375
177
A:
B:
261
V/C =
West/East Critical Movements =
North/South Critical Movements =
SouthBound
WestBound EastBound
NorthBound
A = Adjusted Through/Right Volume
B = Adjusted Left Volume
* = ATSAC Benefit
Results
V/C RATIO LOS
0.00 - 0.60 A
0.61 - 0.70 B
0.71 - 0.80 C
0.81 - 0.90 D
0.91 - 1.00 E
B(W/B)
B(N/B)
A(E/B)
A(S/B)
F LOS =
Critical Movements Diagram
TH RT LT TH LT TH RT LT TH RT
Phasing RTOR Phasing Phasing Phasing RTOR RTOR
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND
EXISTING
RTOR
RT
537
AMBIENT
RELATED
PROJECT
TOTAL
537
LANE
SIGNAL Prot-Var|1010|Prot-Var Prot-Var Prot-Var Auto Auto OLA OLA
0 2 0 1 0 0 2 0 2 0 1 0 0 1 0 2 0 0 1 0 1 0 2 0 0 1 0
LT
2090 92 239 2046 183 306 714 313 177 521 201
306 313 714 183 2046 239 92 2090 201 521 177
Volume/Lane/Signal Configurations
Developed by Chun Wong, 12/94
May 25, 2011 ,Wednesday 12:36:15 PM
CalcaDB
EXISTAM
INTERSECTION DATA SUMMARY SHEET
ATTACHMENT 6
439Default Scenario Wed May 25, 2011 12:48:43 Page 7-1
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM 4-Way Stop Method (Base Volume Alternative)
********************************************************************************
Intersection #32 BRADDOCK DR/DUQUESNE AV [EXISTING AM]
********************************************************************************
Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap. (X): 1.407
Loss Time (sec): 0 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 140.4
Optimal Cycle: 0 Level Of Service: F
********************************************************************************
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Stop Sign Stop Sign
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 87 193 135 27 311 32 42 423 37 42 486 38
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 87 193 135 27 311 32 42 423 37 42 486 38
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 87 193 135 27 311 32 42 423 37 42 486 38
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 87 193 135 27 311 32 42 423 37 42 486 38
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Final Vol.: 87 193 135 27 311 32 42 423 37 42 486 38
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lanes: 0.21 0.46 0.33 0.07 0.84 0.09 0.08 0.85 0.07 0.07 0.86 0.07
Final Sat.: 86 190 133 29 333 34 34 339 30 30 345 27
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 1.02 1.02 1.02 0.93 0.93 0.93 1.25 1.25 1.25 1.41 1.41 1.41
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Delay/Veh: 79.2 79.2 79.2 60.8 60.8 60.8 157.7 158 157.7 221.9 222 221.9
Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 79.2 79.2 79.2 60.8 60.8 60.8 157.7 158 157.7 221.9 222 221.9
LOS by Move: F F F F F F F F F F F F
ApproachDel: 79.2 60.8 157.7 221.9
Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
ApprAdjDel: 79.2 60.8 157.7 221.9
LOS by Appr: F F F F
********************************************************************************
Traffix 7.6.0715 (c) 2003 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to RAJU ASSOC., PASADENA
ATTACHMENT 6
440Default Scenario Wed May 25, 2011 12:48:43 Page 9-1
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM 4-Way Stop Method (Base Volume Alternative)
********************************************************************************
Intersection #33 LUCERNE AV/DUQUESNE AV [EXISTING AM]
********************************************************************************
Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap. (X): 0.847
Loss Time (sec): 0 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 23.7
Optimal Cycle: 0 Level Of Service: C
********************************************************************************
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Stop Sign Stop Sign
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lanes: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 0 0 0 175 0 61 89 416 0 0 517 329
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 0 0 0 175 0 61 89 416 0 0 517 329
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 0 0 0 175 0 61 89 416 0 0 517 329
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 0 0 0 175 0 61 89 416 0 0 517 329
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Final Vol.: 0 0 0 175 0 61 89 416 0 0 517 329
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lanes: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.74 0.00 0.26 0.18 0.82 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00
Final Sat.: 0 0 0 397 0 138 111 519 0 0 610 692
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: xxxx xxxx xxxx 0.44 xxxx 0.44 0.80 0.80 xxxx xxxx 0.85 0.48
Crit Moves: **** **** ****
Delay/Veh: 0.0 0.0 0.0 14.0 0.0 14.0 26.9 26.9 0.0 0.0 32.2 12.4
Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 0.0 0.0 0.0 14.0 0.0 14.0 26.9 26.9 0.0 0.0 32.2 12.4
LOS by Move: * * * B * B D D * * D B
ApproachDel: xxxxxx 14.0 26.9 24.5
Delay Adj: xxxxx 1.00 1.00 1.00
ApprAdjDel: xxxxxx 14.0 26.9 24.5
LOS by Appr: * B D C
********************************************************************************
Traffix 7.6.0715 (c) 2003 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to RAJU ASSOC., PASADENA
ATTACHMENT 6
441Existing Conditions AM
Jefferson Boulevard Duquesne Avenue
N/S: W/E: 34
I/S No:
AM/PM: Comments:
COUNT DATE: GROWTH FACTOR:
STUDY DATE:
32 A:
B: 8
18
A:
B:
633
529 A:
B: 421
0.950 =
+
+
+ + + 341 633 8 421
*1375
290
A:
B:
341
V/C =
West/East Critical Movements =
North/South Critical Movements =
SouthBound
WestBound EastBound
NorthBound
A = Adjusted Through/Right Volume
B = Adjusted Left Volume
* = ATSAC Benefit
Results
V/C RATIO LOS
0.00 - 0.60 A
0.61 - 0.70 B
0.71 - 0.80 C
0.81 - 0.90 D
0.91 - 1.00 E
B(W/B)
B(N/B)
A(E/B)
A(S/B)
E LOS =
Critical Movements Diagram
TH RT LT TH LT TH RT LT TH RT
Phasing RTOR Phasing Phasing Phasing RTOR RTOR
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND
EXISTING
RTOR
RT
421
AMBIENT
RELATED
PROJECT
TOTAL
421
LANE
SIGNAL Prot-Var|1010|Prot-Var Perm Perm Auto Auto OLA Auto
0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 2 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0
LT
1031 27 18 1265 411 8 32 6 290 31 310
8 6 32 411 1265 18 27 1031 310 31 290
Volume/Lane/Signal Configurations
Developed by Chun Wong, 12/94
May 25, 2011 ,Wednesday 12:36:15 PM
CalcaDB
EXISTAM
INTERSECTION DATA SUMMARY SHEET
ATTACHMENT 6
442
Existing (2011) Conditions
PM Peak Hour
ATTACHMENT 6
443Existing Conditions PM
Robertson Boulevard Cattaragus Avenue
N/S: W/E: 1
I/S No:
AM/PM: Comments:
COUNT DATE: GROWTH FACTOR:
STUDY DATE:
179 A:
B: 60
54
A:
B:
839
782 A:
B: 66
0.861 =
+
+
+ + + 432 839 60 66
*1500
98
A:
B:
432
V/C =
West/East Critical Movements =
North/South Critical Movements =
SouthBound
WestBound EastBound
NorthBound
A = Adjusted Through/Right Volume
B = Adjusted Left Volume
* = ATSAC Benefit
Results
V/C RATIO LOS
0.00 - 0.60 A
0.61 - 0.70 B
0.71 - 0.80 C
0.81 - 0.90 D
0.91 - 1.00 E
B(W/B)
B(N/B)
A(E/B)
A(S/B)
D LOS =
Critical Movements Diagram
TH RT LT TH LT TH RT LT TH RT
Phasing RTOR Phasing Phasing Phasing RTOR RTOR
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND
EXISTING
RTOR
RT
66
AMBIENT
RELATED
PROJECT
TOTAL
66
LANE
SIGNAL Perm|1010|Perm Perm Perm Auto Auto Auto Auto
0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0
LT
1549 15 54 1614 63 60 78 41 98 223 111
60 41 78 63 1614 54 15 1549 111 223 98
Volume/Lane/Signal Configurations
Developed by Chun Wong, 12/94
May 25, 2011 ,Wednesday 12:45:39 PM
CalcaDB
EXISTPM
INTERSECTION DATA SUMMARY SHEET
ATTACHMENT 6
444Existing Conditions PM
Robertson Boulevard I-10 WB Off-Ramp/Kincardine Av
N/S: W/E: 2
I/S No:
AM/PM: Comments:
COUNT DATE: GROWTH FACTOR:
STUDY DATE:
373
A:
B:
470|10 10|A:
B:
624
611 A:
B: 14
0.719 =
+
+
+ + + 470 624 75 14
*1500
159 A:
B: 75
V/C =
West/East Critical Movements =
North/South Critical Movements =
SouthBound
WestBound EastBound
NorthBound
A = Adjusted Through/Right Volume
B = Adjusted Left Volume
* = ATSAC Benefit
Results
V/C RATIO LOS
0.00 - 0.60 A
0.61 - 0.70 B
0.71 - 0.80 C
0.81 - 0.90 D
0.91 - 1.00 E
A(W/B)
B(N/B)
B(E/B)
A(S/B)
C LOS =
Critical Movements Diagram
TH RT LT TH LT TH RT LT TH RT
Phasing RTOR Phasing Phasing Phasing RTOR RTOR
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND
EXISTING
RTOR
RT
14
AMBIENT
RELATED
PROJECT
TOTAL
14
LANE
SIGNAL Perm|1010|Perm Perm Perm Auto Auto Auto Auto
0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
LT
1222 0 0 1214 34 373 22 545 75 0 84
373 545 22 34 1214 0 0 1222 84 0 75
Volume/Lane/Signal Configurations
Developed by Chun Wong, 12/94
May 25, 2011 ,Wednesday 12:45:39 PM
CalcaDB
EXISTPM
INTERSECTION DATA SUMMARY SHEET
ATTACHMENT 6
445Existing Conditions PM
Robertson Boulevard National Boulevard
N/S: W/E: 3
I/S No:
AM/PM: Comments:
COUNT DATE: GROWTH FACTOR:
STUDY DATE:
372 A:
B: 114
574 A:
B: 299
76
A:
B:
457
0.924 =
+
+
+ + + 497 457 114 299
*1375
162
A:
B:
497
V/C =
West/East Critical Movements =
North/South Critical Movements =
SouthBound
WestBound EastBound
NorthBound
A = Adjusted Through/Right Volume
B = Adjusted Left Volume
* = ATSAC Benefit
Results
V/C RATIO LOS
0.00 - 0.60 A
0.61 - 0.70 B
0.71 - 0.80 C
0.81 - 0.90 D
0.91 - 1.00 E
B(W/B)
A(N/B)
A(E/B)
B(S/B)
E LOS =
Critical Movements Diagram
TH RT LT TH LT TH RT LT TH RT
Phasing RTOR Phasing Phasing Phasing RTOR RTOR
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND
EXISTING
RTOR
RT
76
AMBIENT
RELATED
PROJECT
TOTAL
76
LANE
SIGNAL Perm|1010|Prot-Fix Perm Prot-Fix Auto Auto OLA Auto
0 1 0 1 0 0 2 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0
LT
784 130 544 931 216 114 372 230 162 858 136
114 230 372 216 931 544 130 784 136 858 162
Volume/Lane/Signal Configurations
Developed by Chun Wong, 12/94
May 25, 2011 ,Wednesday 12:45:39 PM
CalcaDB
EXISTPM
INTERSECTION DATA SUMMARY SHEET
ATTACHMENT 6
446Existing Conditions PM
National Boulevard I-10 EB On-Ramp
N/S: W/E: 4
I/S No:
AM/PM: Comments:
COUNT DATE: GROWTH FACTOR:
STUDY DATE:
A:
B: 0|10 10 10|A:
B:
573
308 A:
B: 115
0.389 =
+
+
+ + + 573 115
*1500
A:
B: 0|10 10|V/C =
West/East Critical Movements =
North/South Critical Movements =
SouthBound
WestBound EastBound
NorthBound
A = Adjusted Through/Right Volume
B = Adjusted Left Volume
* = ATSAC Benefit
Results
V/C RATIO LOS
0.00 - 0.60 A
0.61 - 0.70 B
0.71 - 0.80 C
0.81 - 0.90 D
0.91 - 1.00 E
B(N/B) A(S/B)
A LOS =
Critical Movements Diagram
TH RT LT TH LT TH RT LT TH RT
Phasing RTOR Phasing Phasing Phasing RTOR RTOR
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND
EXISTING
RTOR
RT
115
AMBIENT
RELATED
PROJECT
TOTAL
115
LANE
SIGNAL Prot-Fix|1010|Perm Auto Auto
0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
LT
616 0 0 954 573 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 573 954 0 0 616 0 0 0
Volume/Lane/Signal Configurations
Developed by Chun Wong, 12/94
May 25, 2011 ,Wednesday 12:45:39 PM
CalcaDB
EXISTPM
INTERSECTION DATA SUMMARY SHEET
ATTACHMENT 6
447Existing Conditions PM
Hughes Avenue Venice Boulevard
N/S: W/E: 5
I/S No:
AM/PM: Comments:
COUNT DATE: GROWTH FACTOR:
STUDY DATE:
514 A:
B: 119
269 A:
B: 40
104
A:
B:
354
0.639 =
+
+
+ + + 550 354 119 40
*1500
57
A:
B:
550
V/C =
West/East Critical Movements =
North/South Critical Movements =
SouthBound
WestBound EastBound
NorthBound
A = Adjusted Through/Right Volume
B = Adjusted Left Volume
* = ATSAC Benefit
Results
V/C RATIO LOS
0.00 - 0.60 A
0.61 - 0.70 B
0.71 - 0.80 C
0.81 - 0.90 D
0.91 - 1.00 E
B(W/B)
A(N/B)
A(E/B)
B(S/B)
B LOS =
Critical Movements Diagram
TH RT LT TH LT TH RT LT TH RT
Phasing RTOR Phasing Phasing Phasing RTOR RTOR
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND
EXISTING
RTOR
RT
104
AMBIENT
RELATED
PROJECT
TOTAL
104
LANE
SIGNAL Perm|10 10|Perm Perm Perm Auto Auto Auto Auto
0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 3 0 0 1 0 1 0 3 0 0 1 0
LT
172 78 40 177 52 119 1543 44 57 1651 96
119 44 1543 52 177 40 78 172 96 1651 57
Volume/Lane/Signal Configurations
Developed by Chun Wong, 12/94
May 25, 2011 ,Wednesday 12:45:39 PM
CalcaDB
EXISTPM
INTERSECTION DATA SUMMARY SHEET
ATTACHMENT 6
448Existing Conditions PM
Bagley Avenue Venice Boulevard
N/S: W/E: 6
I/S No:
AM/PM: Comments:
COUNT DATE: GROWTH FACTOR:
STUDY DATE:
513 A:
B: 78
89
A:
B:
348
142 A:
B: 39
0.678 =
+
+
+ + + 564 348 78 39
*1375
110
A:
B:
564
V/C =
West/East Critical Movements =
North/South Critical Movements =
SouthBound
WestBound EastBound
NorthBound
A = Adjusted Through/Right Volume
B = Adjusted Left Volume
* = ATSAC Benefit
Results
V/C RATIO LOS
0.00 - 0.60 A
0.61 - 0.70 B
0.71 - 0.80 C
0.81 - 0.90 D
0.91 - 1.00 E
B(W/B)
B(N/B)
A(E/B)
A(S/B)
B LOS =
Critical Movements Diagram
TH RT LT TH LT TH RT LT TH RT
Phasing RTOR Phasing Phasing Phasing RTOR RTOR
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND
EXISTING
RTOR
RT
39
AMBIENT
RELATED
PROJECT
TOTAL
39
LANE
SIGNAL Perm|1010|Perm Prot-Var Prot-Var Auto Auto Auto Auto
0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 3 0 0 1 0 1 0 2 0 1 0 0
LT
101 41 89 165 94 78 1538 70 110 1584 107
78 70 1538 94 165 89 41 101 107 1584 110
Volume/Lane/Signal Configurations
Developed by Chun Wong, 12/94
May 25, 2011 ,Wednesday 12:45:39 PM
CalcaDB
EXISTPM
INTERSECTION DATA SUMMARY SHEET
ATTACHMENT 6
449Existing Conditions PM
Culver Boulevard Venice Boulevard
N/S: W/E: 7
I/S No:
AM/PM: Comments:
COUNT DATE: GROWTH FACTOR:
STUDY DATE:
620 A:
B: 216
210
A:
B:
210
84
A:
B:
189
0.813 =
+
+
+ + + 599 210 189 216
*1375
52
A:
B:
599
V/C =
West/East Critical Movements =
North/South Critical Movements =
SouthBound
WestBound EastBound
NorthBound
A = Adjusted Through/Right Volume
B = Adjusted Left Volume
* = ATSAC Benefit
Results
V/C RATIO LOS
0.00 - 0.60 A
0.61 - 0.70 B
0.71 - 0.80 C
0.81 - 0.90 D
0.91 - 1.00 E
B(W/B)
A(N/B)
A(E/B)
A(S/B)
D LOS =
Critical Movements Diagram
TH RT LT TH LT TH RT LT TH RT
Phasing RTOR Phasing Phasing Phasing RTOR RTOR
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND
EXISTING
RTOR
RT
84
AMBIENT
RELATED
PROJECT
TOTAL
84
LANE
SIGNAL Split|1010|Split Prot-Fix Prot-Fix OLA Auto Auto Auto
0 1 0 0 2 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 2 0 2 0 1 0 0 1 0 2 0 1 0 0
LT
81 736 299 72 48 393 1653 208 52 1735 62
393 208 1653 48 72 299 736 81 62 1735 52
Volume/Lane/Signal Configurations
Developed by Chun Wong, 12/94
May 25, 2011 ,Wednesday 12:45:39 PM
CalcaDB
EXISTPM
INTERSECTION DATA SUMMARY SHEET
ATTACHMENT 6
450Existing Conditions PM
Robertson Boulevard Venice Boulevard
N/S: W/E: 8
I/S No:
AM/PM: Comments:
COUNT DATE: GROWTH FACTOR:
STUDY DATE:
105
A:
B:
692
307 A:
B: 538
124
A:
B:
245
1.189 =
+
+
+ + + 692 245 256 538
*1375
720 A:
B: 256
V/C =
West/East Critical Movements =
North/South Critical Movements =
SouthBound
WestBound EastBound
NorthBound
A = Adjusted Through/Right Volume
B = Adjusted Left Volume
* = ATSAC Benefit
Results
V/C RATIO LOS
0.00 - 0.60 A
0.61 - 0.70 B
0.71 - 0.80 C
0.81 - 0.90 D
0.91 - 1.00 E
A(W/B)
A(N/B)
B(E/B)
B(S/B)
F LOS =
Critical Movements Diagram
TH RT LT TH LT TH RT LT TH RT
Phasing RTOR Phasing Phasing Phasing RTOR RTOR
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND
EXISTING
RTOR
RT
124
AMBIENT
RELATED
PROJECT
TOTAL
124
LANE
SIGNAL Split|1010|Split Prot-Var Prot-Var OLA Auto Auto Auto
0 2 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 2 0 1 0 0 2 0 2 0 1 0 0
LT
489 59 538 307 161 105 1951 125 465 2003 156
105 125 1951 161 307 538 59 489 156 2003 465
Volume/Lane/Signal Configurations
Developed by Chun Wong, 12/94
May 25, 2011 ,Wednesday 12:45:39 PM
CalcaDB
EXISTPM
INTERSECTION DATA SUMMARY SHEET
ATTACHMENT 6
451Existing Conditions PM
National Boulevard Venice Boulevard
N/S: W/E: 9
I/S No:
AM/PM: Comments:
COUNT DATE: GROWTH FACTOR:
STUDY DATE:
518 A:
B: 68
183
A:
B:
400
303 A:
B: 215
0.984 =
+
+
+ + + 766 400 68 215
*1375
168
A:
B:
766
V/C =
West/East Critical Movements =
North/South Critical Movements =
SouthBound
WestBound EastBound
NorthBound
A = Adjusted Through/Right Volume
B = Adjusted Left Volume
* = ATSAC Benefit
Results
V/C RATIO LOS
0.00 - 0.60 A
0.61 - 0.70 B
0.71 - 0.80 C
0.81 - 0.90 D
0.91 - 1.00 E
B(W/B)
B(N/B)
A(E/B)
A(S/B)
E LOS =
Critical Movements Diagram
TH RT LT TH LT TH RT LT TH RT
Phasing RTOR Phasing Phasing Phasing RTOR RTOR
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND
EXISTING
RTOR
RT
215
AMBIENT
RELATED
PROJECT
TOTAL
215
LANE
SIGNAL Perm|1010|Prot-Fix Perm Prot-Fix Auto Auto Auto Auto
0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 2 0 1 0 0 1 0 2 0 1 0 0
LT
507 99 183 702 98 68 1494 60 168 1991 307
68 60 1494 98 702 183 99 507 307 1991 168
Volume/Lane/Signal Configurations
Developed by Chun Wong, 12/94
May 25, 2011 ,Wednesday 12:45:39 PM
CalcaDB
EXISTPM
INTERSECTION DATA SUMMARY SHEET
ATTACHMENT 6
452Existing Conditions PM
Helms Avenue Venice Boulevard
N/S: W/E: 10
I/S No:
AM/PM: Comments:
COUNT DATE: GROWTH FACTOR:
STUDY DATE:
547 A:
B: 32
28
A:
B:
63
17 A:
B: 16
0.509 =
+
+
+ + + 758 63 32 16
*1500
73
A:
B:
758
V/C =
West/East Critical Movements =
North/South Critical Movements =
SouthBound
WestBound EastBound
NorthBound
A = Adjusted Through/Right Volume
B = Adjusted Left Volume
* = ATSAC Benefit
Results
V/C RATIO LOS
0.00 - 0.60 A
0.61 - 0.70 B
0.71 - 0.80 C
0.81 - 0.90 D
0.91 - 1.00 E
B(W/B)
B(N/B)
A(E/B)
A(S/B)
A LOS =
Critical Movements Diagram
TH RT LT TH LT TH RT LT TH RT
Phasing RTOR Phasing Phasing Phasing RTOR RTOR
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND
EXISTING
RTOR
RT
16
AMBIENT
RELATED
PROJECT
TOTAL
16
LANE
SIGNAL Perm|10 10|Perm Perm Perm Auto Auto Auto Auto
1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 1 0 0 1 0 2 0 1 0 0
LT
1 9 28 9 26 32 1634 8 73 2241 33
32 8 1634 26 9 28 9 1 33 2241 73
Volume/Lane/Signal Configurations
Developed by Chun Wong, 12/94
May 25, 2011 ,Wednesday 12:45:39 PM
CalcaDB
EXISTPM
INTERSECTION DATA SUMMARY SHEET
ATTACHMENT 6
453Existing Conditions PM
Cattaraugus Avenue Venice Boulevard
N/S: W/E: 11
I/S No:
AM/PM: Comments:
COUNT DATE: GROWTH FACTOR:
STUDY DATE:
541 A:
B: 78
185
A:
B:
289
86 A:
B: 13
0.653 =
+
+
+ + + 704 289 78 13
*1500
111
A:
B:
704
V/C =
West/East Critical Movements =
North/South Critical Movements =
SouthBound
WestBound EastBound
NorthBound
A = Adjusted Through/Right Volume
B = Adjusted Left Volume
* = ATSAC Benefit
Results
V/C RATIO LOS
0.00 - 0.60 A
0.61 - 0.70 B
0.71 - 0.80 C
0.81 - 0.90 D
0.91 - 1.00 E
B(W/B)
B(N/B)
A(E/B)
A(S/B)
B LOS =
Critical Movements Diagram
TH RT LT TH LT TH RT LT TH RT
Phasing RTOR Phasing Phasing Phasing RTOR RTOR
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND
EXISTING
RTOR
RT
13
AMBIENT
RELATED
PROJECT
TOTAL
13
LANE
SIGNAL Perm|10 10|Perm Perm Perm Auto Auto Auto Auto
0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 1 0 0 1 0 2 0 1 0 0
LT
62 11 185 73 31 78 1547 76 111 2099 13
78 76 1547 31 73 185 11 62 13 2099 111
Volume/Lane/Signal Configurations
Developed by Chun Wong, 12/94
May 25, 2011 ,Wednesday 12:45:39 PM
CalcaDB
EXISTPM
INTERSECTION DATA SUMMARY SHEET
ATTACHMENT 6
454Existing Conditions PM
La Cienega Boulevard Venice Boulevard
N/S: W/E: 12
I/S No:
AM/PM: Comments:
COUNT DATE: GROWTH FACTOR:
STUDY DATE:
421 A:
B: 199
36
A:
B:
606
375 A:
B: 94
1.005 =
+
+
+ + + 579 606 199 94
*1375
152
A:
B:
579
V/C =
West/East Critical Movements =
North/South Critical Movements =
SouthBound
WestBound EastBound
NorthBound
A = Adjusted Through/Right Volume
B = Adjusted Left Volume
* = ATSAC Benefit
Results
V/C RATIO LOS
0.00 - 0.60 A
0.61 - 0.70 B
0.71 - 0.80 C
0.81 - 0.90 D
0.91 - 1.00 E
B(W/B)
B(N/B)
A(E/B)
A(S/B)
F LOS =
Critical Movements Diagram
TH RT LT TH LT TH RT LT TH RT
Phasing RTOR Phasing Phasing Phasing RTOR RTOR
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND
EXISTING
RTOR
RT
94
AMBIENT
RELATED
PROJECT
TOTAL
94
LANE
SIGNAL Perm|1010|Perm Prot-Var Prot-Var Auto Auto Auto Auto
0 2 0 1 0 0 1 0 2 0 1 0 0 1 0 3 0 0 1 0 2 0 3 0 0 1 0
LT
1104 20 36 1513 306 199 1263 34 277 1738 237
199 34 1263 306 1513 36 20 1104 237 1738 277
Volume/Lane/Signal Configurations
Developed by Chun Wong, 12/94
May 25, 2011 ,Wednesday 12:45:39 PM
CalcaDB
EXISTPM
INTERSECTION DATA SUMMARY SHEET
ATTACHMENT 6
455Existing Conditions PM
Hughes Avenue/Duquesne Avenue Washington Boulevard
N/S: W/E: 13
I/S No:
AM/PM: Comments:
COUNT DATE: GROWTH FACTOR:
STUDY DATE:
199 A:
B: 78
29
A:
B:
382
344 A:
B: 60
0.577 =
+
+
+ + + 451 382 78 60
*1500
46
A:
B:
451
V/C =
West/East Critical Movements =
North/South Critical Movements =
SouthBound
WestBound EastBound
NorthBound
A = Adjusted Through/Right Volume
B = Adjusted Left Volume
* = ATSAC Benefit
Results
V/C RATIO LOS
0.00 - 0.60 A
0.61 - 0.70 B
0.71 - 0.80 C
0.81 - 0.90 D
0.91 - 1.00 E
B(W/B)
B(N/B)
A(E/B)
A(S/B)
A LOS =
Critical Movements Diagram
TH RT LT TH LT TH RT LT TH RT
Phasing RTOR Phasing Phasing Phasing RTOR RTOR
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND
EXISTING
RTOR
RT
60
AMBIENT
RELATED
PROJECT
TOTAL
60
LANE
SIGNAL Perm|1010|Perm Perm Perm Auto Auto Auto Auto
0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0
LT
324 20 29 322 60 78 360 37 46 671 231
78 37 360 60 322 29 20 324 231 671 46
Volume/Lane/Signal Configurations
Developed by Chun Wong, 12/94
May 25, 2011 ,Wednesday 12:45:39 PM
CalcaDB
EXISTPM
INTERSECTION DATA SUMMARY SHEET
ATTACHMENT 6
456Existing Conditions PM
Duquesne Avenue Culver Boulevard
N/S: W/E: 14
I/S No:
AM/PM: Comments:
COUNT DATE: GROWTH FACTOR:
STUDY DATE:
385 A:
B: 104
120
A:
B:
471
288 A:
B: 108
0.775 =
+
+
+ + + 479 471 104 108
*1375
68
A:
B:
479
V/C =
West/East Critical Movements =
North/South Critical Movements =
SouthBound
WestBound EastBound
NorthBound
A = Adjusted Through/Right Volume
B = Adjusted Left Volume
* = ATSAC Benefit
Results
V/C RATIO LOS
0.00 - 0.60 A
0.61 - 0.70 B
0.71 - 0.80 C
0.81 - 0.90 D
0.91 - 1.00 E
B(W/B)
B(N/B)
A(E/B)
A(S/B)
C LOS =
Critical Movements Diagram
TH RT LT TH LT TH RT LT TH RT
Phasing RTOR Phasing Phasing Phasing RTOR RTOR
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND
EXISTING
RTOR
RT
108
AMBIENT
RELATED
PROJECT
TOTAL
108
LANE
SIGNAL Prot-Var|1010|Prot-Var Prot-Var Prot-Var Auto Auto Auto Auto
0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0
LT
288 148 120 471 73 104 748 22 68 870 87
104 22 748 73 471 120 148 288 87 870 68
Volume/Lane/Signal Configurations
Developed by Chun Wong, 12/94
May 25, 2011 ,Wednesday 12:45:39 PM
CalcaDB
EXISTPM
INTERSECTION DATA SUMMARY SHEET
ATTACHMENT 6
457Existing Conditions PM
Washington Bl/Irving Pl Culver Boulevard
N/S: W/E: 15
I/S No:
AM/PM: Comments:
COUNT DATE: GROWTH FACTOR:
STUDY DATE:
420 A:
B: 79
344
A:
B:
344
14 A:
B: 38
0.534 =
+
+
+ + + 370 344 79 38
*1375|10 10|A:
B:
370
V/C =
West/East Critical Movements =
North/South Critical Movements =
SouthBound
WestBound EastBound
NorthBound
A = Adjusted Through/Right Volume
B = Adjusted Left Volume
* = ATSAC Benefit
Results
V/C RATIO LOS
0.00 - 0.60 A
0.61 - 0.70 B
0.71 - 0.80 C
0.81 - 0.90 D
0.91 - 1.00 E
B(W/B)
B(N/B)
A(E/B)
A(S/B)
A LOS =
Critical Movements Diagram
TH RT LT TH LT TH RT LT TH RT
Phasing RTOR Phasing Phasing Phasing RTOR RTOR
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND
EXISTING
RTOR
RT
38
AMBIENT
RELATED
PROJECT
TOTAL
38
LANE
SIGNAL Split|1010|Split Prot-Fix Perm Auto Auto Auto Auto
0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 2 0 1 0 0
LT
0 54 681 0 6 79 840 126 0 1054 56
-344
79 470 840 6 0 681 54 0 56 1054 0
Volume/Lane/Signal Configurations
Developed by Chun Wong, 12/94
May 25, 2011 ,Wednesday 12:45:39 PM
CalcaDB
EXISTPM
INTERSECTION DATA SUMMARY SHEET
ATTACHMENT 6
458Existing Conditions PM
Main Street Culver Boulevard
N/S: W/E: 16
I/S No:
AM/PM: Comments:
COUNT DATE: GROWTH FACTOR:
STUDY DATE:|10 10|A:
B:
444
106 A:
B: 276|10 10|A:
B:|10 10|0.515 =
+
+
+ + + 444 0 113 276
*1425
531 A:
B: 113
V/C =
West/East Critical Movements =
North/South Critical Movements =
SouthBound
WestBound EastBound
NorthBound
A = Adjusted Through/Right Volume
B = Adjusted Left Volume
* = ATSAC Benefit
Results
V/C RATIO LOS
0.00 - 0.60 A
0.61 - 0.70 B
0.71 - 0.80 C
0.81 - 0.90 D
0.91 - 1.00 E
A(W/B)
A(N/B)
B(E/B)
B(S/B)
A LOS =
Critical Movements Diagram
TH RT LT TH LT TH RT LT TH RT
Phasing RTOR Phasing Phasing Phasing RTOR RTOR
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND
EXISTING
RTOR
RT|10 10|AMBIENT
RELATED
PROJECT
TOTAL|10 10|LANE
SIGNAL |10 10|Split Perm Prot-Fix Auto Auto Auto
0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 2 0 1 0 0 1 0 3 0 0 0 0
LT
0 0 276 0 163 0 1216 115 113 1592 0
0 115 1216 163 0 276 0 0 0 1592 113
Volume/Lane/Signal Configurations
Developed by Chun Wong, 12/94
May 25, 2011 ,Wednesday 12:45:39 PM
CalcaDB
EXISTPM
INTERSECTION DATA SUMMARY SHEET
ATTACHMENT 6
459Existing Conditions PM
Culver Boulevard Washington Boulevard/Canfield Avenu
N/S: W/E: 17
I/S No:
AM/PM: Comments:
COUNT DATE: GROWTH FACTOR:
STUDY DATE:
419
A:
B:
419
252 A:
B: 35
14
A:
B:
409
0.540 =
+
+
+ + + 419 6 409 35
*1425|10 10|A:
B:|1010|V/C =
West/East Critical Movements =
North/South Critical Movements =
SouthBound
WestBound EastBound
NorthBound
A = Adjusted Through/Right Volume
B = Adjusted Left Volume
* = ATSAC Benefit
Results
V/C RATIO LOS
0.00 - 0.60 A
0.61 - 0.70 B
0.71 - 0.80 C
0.81 - 0.90 D
0.91 - 1.00 E
A(W/B)
A(N/B)
A(E/B)
B(S/B)
A LOS =
Critical Movements Diagram
TH RT LT TH LT TH RT LT TH RT
Phasing RTOR Phasing Phasing Phasing RTOR RTOR
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND
EXISTING
RTOR
RT
14
AMBIENT
RELATED
PROJECT
TOTAL
14
LANE
SIGNAL Prot-Fix|1010|Prot-Fix Split OLA Auto Auto OLA
0 2 0 0 2 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0
LT
818 971 35 494 9 809 29 76 0 0 20
809 76 29 9 494 35 971 818 20 0 0
Volume/Lane/Signal Configurations
Developed by Chun Wong, 12/94
May 25, 2011 ,Wednesday 12:45:39 PM
CalcaDB
EXISTPM
INTERSECTION DATA SUMMARY SHEET
ATTACHMENT 6
460Existing Conditions PM
Robertson Boulevard/Higuera Street Washington Boulevard
N/S: W/E: 18
I/S No:
AM/PM: Comments:
COUNT DATE: GROWTH FACTOR:
STUDY DATE:
427 A:
B: 73
200 A:
B: 176
57
A:
B:
125
0.538 =
+
+
+ + + 492 125 73 176
*1425
119
A:
B:
492
V/C =
West/East Critical Movements =
North/South Critical Movements =
SouthBound
WestBound EastBound
NorthBound
A = Adjusted Through/Right Volume
B = Adjusted Left Volume
* = ATSAC Benefit
Results
V/C RATIO LOS
0.00 - 0.60 A
0.61 - 0.70 B
0.71 - 0.80 C
0.81 - 0.90 D
0.91 - 1.00 E
B(W/B)
A(N/B)
A(E/B)
B(S/B)
A LOS =
Critical Movements Diagram
TH RT LT TH LT TH RT LT TH RT
Phasing RTOR Phasing Phasing Phasing RTOR RTOR
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND
EXISTING
RTOR
RT
57
AMBIENT
RELATED
PROJECT
TOTAL
57
LANE
SIGNAL Prot-Fix|1010|Prot-Fix Perm Perm Auto Auto Auto Auto
0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0
LT
167 82 176 200 149 73 719 135 119 896 88
73 135 719 149 200 176 82 167 88 896 119
Volume/Lane/Signal Configurations
Developed by Chun Wong, 12/94
May 25, 2011 ,Wednesday 12:45:39 PM
CalcaDB
EXISTPM
INTERSECTION DATA SUMMARY SHEET
ATTACHMENT 6
461Existing Conditions PM
Landmark Street Washington Boulevard
N/S: W/E: 19
I/S No:
AM/PM: Comments:
COUNT DATE: GROWTH FACTOR:
STUDY DATE:
528 A:
B: 3|10 10|A:
B:|10 10|30
A:
B:
41
0.394 =
+
+
+ + + 652 0 41 3
*1500|10 10|A:
B:
652
V/C =
West/East Critical Movements =
North/South Critical Movements =
SouthBound
WestBound EastBound
NorthBound
A = Adjusted Through/Right Volume
B = Adjusted Left Volume
* = ATSAC Benefit
Results
V/C RATIO LOS
0.00 - 0.60 A
0.61 - 0.70 B
0.71 - 0.80 C
0.81 - 0.90 D
0.91 - 1.00 E
B(W/B)
A(N/B)
A(E/B)
A(S/B)
A LOS =
Critical Movements Diagram
TH RT LT TH LT TH RT LT TH RT
Phasing RTOR Phasing Phasing Phasing RTOR RTOR
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND
EXISTING
RTOR
RT
30
AMBIENT
RELATED
PROJECT
TOTAL
30
LANE
SIGNAL Split|1010| Perm Perm Auto Auto Auto Auto
0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0
LT
0 41 0 0 0 3 1056 0 0 1298 6
3 0 1056 0 0 0 41 0 6 1298 0
Volume/Lane/Signal Configurations
Developed by Chun Wong, 12/94
May 25, 2011 ,Wednesday 12:45:39 PM
CalcaDB
EXISTPM
INTERSECTION DATA SUMMARY SHEET
ATTACHMENT 6
462Existing Conditions PM
National Boulevard Washington Boulevard
N/S: W/E: 20
I/S No:
AM/PM: Comments:
COUNT DATE: GROWTH FACTOR:
STUDY DATE:
381 A:
B: 69
113
A:
B:
451
361 A:
B: 95
0.722 =
+
+
+ + + 474 451 69 95
*1375
41
A:
B:
474
V/C =
West/East Critical Movements =
North/South Critical Movements =
SouthBound
WestBound EastBound
NorthBound
A = Adjusted Through/Right Volume
B = Adjusted Left Volume
* = ATSAC Benefit
Results
V/C RATIO LOS
0.00 - 0.60 A
0.61 - 0.70 B
0.71 - 0.80 C
0.81 - 0.90 D
0.91 - 1.00 E
B(W/B)
B(N/B)
A(E/B)
A(S/B)
C LOS =
Critical Movements Diagram
TH RT LT TH LT TH RT LT TH RT
Phasing RTOR Phasing Phasing Phasing RTOR RTOR
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND
EXISTING
RTOR
RT
173
AMBIENT
RELATED
PROJECT
TOTAL
173
LANE
SIGNAL Prot-Var|1010|Prot-Var Perm Perm Auto Auto Auto Auto
0 1 0 1 0 0 2 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 2 0 0 1 0 1 0 2 0 0 1 0
LT
634 87 205 848 54 69 761 177 41 948 192
69 177 761 54 848 205 87 634 192 948 41
Volume/Lane/Signal Configurations
Developed by Chun Wong, 12/94
May 25, 2011 ,Wednesday 12:45:39 PM
CalcaDB
EXISTPM
INTERSECTION DATA SUMMARY SHEET
ATTACHMENT 6
463Default Scenario Wed May 25, 2011 12:48:43 Page 11-1
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Base Volume Alternative)
********************************************************************************
Intersection #211 WESLEY AV/WASHINGTON BL [EXISTING PM]
********************************************************************************
Average Delay (sec/veh): 0.2 Worst Case Level Of Service: D[ 28.3]
********************************************************************************
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 2 0 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 5 0 7 0 0 0 0 1199 1 1 939 0
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 5 0 7 0 0 0 0 1199 1 1 939 0
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 5 0 7 0 0 0 0 1199 1 1 939 0
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Final Vol.: 5 0 7 0 0 0 0 1199 1 1 939 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Critical Gap Module:
Critical Gp: 6.8 xxxx 6.9 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 4.1 xxxx xxxxx
FollowUpTim: 3.5 xxxx 3.3 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 2.2 xxxx xxxxx
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Module:
Cnflict Vol: 1671 xxxx 600 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 1200 xxxx xxxxx
Potent Cap.: 89 xxxx 449 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 589 xxxx xxxxx
Move Cap.: 88 xxxx 449 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 589 xxxx xxxxx
Volume/Cap: 0.06 xxxx 0.02 xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx 0.00 xxxx xxxx
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Level Of Service Module:
Queue: xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 0.0 xxxx xxxxx
Stopped Del:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 11.1 xxxx xxxxx
LOS by Move: * * * * * * * * * B * *
Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT
Shared Cap.: xxxx 166 xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx
SharedQueue:xxxxx 0.2 xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx
Shrd StpDel:xxxxx 28.3 xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx
Shared LOS: * D * * * * * * * * * *
ApproachDel: 28.3 xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx
ApproachLOS: D * * *
Traffix 7.6.0715 (c) 2003 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to RAJU ASSOC., PASADENA
ATTACHMENT 6
464Existing Conditions PM
Helms Avenue Washington Boulevard
N/S: W/E: 22
I/S No:
AM/PM: Comments:
COUNT DATE: GROWTH FACTOR:
STUDY DATE:
464 A:
B: 14|10 10|A:
B:|10 10|48
A:
B:
61
0.366 =
+
+
+ + + 579 0 61 14
*1500|10 10|A:
B:
579
V/C =
West/East Critical Movements =
North/South Critical Movements =
SouthBound
WestBound EastBound
NorthBound
A = Adjusted Through/Right Volume
B = Adjusted Left Volume
* = ATSAC Benefit
Results
V/C RATIO LOS
0.00 - 0.60 A
0.61 - 0.70 B
0.71 - 0.80 C
0.81 - 0.90 D
0.91 - 1.00 E
B(W/B)
A(N/B)
A(E/B)
A(S/B)
A LOS =
Critical Movements Diagram
TH RT LT TH LT TH RT LT TH RT
Phasing RTOR Phasing Phasing Phasing RTOR RTOR
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND
EXISTING
RTOR
RT
48
AMBIENT
RELATED
PROJECT
TOTAL
48
LANE
SIGNAL Split|10 10| Perm Perm Auto Auto Auto
0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0
LT
0 13 0 0 0 14 927 0 0 1129 29
14 0 927 0 0 0 13 0 29 1129 0
Volume/Lane/Signal Configurations
Developed by Chun Wong, 12/94
May 25, 2011 ,Wednesday 12:45:39 PM
CalcaDB
EXISTPM
INTERSECTION DATA SUMMARY SHEET
ATTACHMENT 6
465Default Scenario Wed May 25, 2011 12:48:43 Page 13-1
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Base Volume Alternative)
********************************************************************************
Intersection #231 CATTARAUGUS AV/WASHINGTON AV [EXISTING PM]
********************************************************************************
Average Delay (sec/veh): 6.1 Worst Case Level Of Service: F[133.3]
********************************************************************************
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 4 2 3 58 2 36 19 1134 9 11 880 75
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 4 2 3 58 2 36 19 1134 9 11 880 75
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 4 2 3 58 2 36 19 1134 9 11 880 75
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Final Vol.: 4 2 3 58 2 36 19 1134 9 11 880 75
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Critical Gap Module:
Critical Gp: 7.5 6.5 6.9 7.5 6.5 6.9 4.1 xxxx xxxxx 4.1 xxxx xxxxx
FollowUpTim: 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3 2.2 xxxx xxxxx 2.2 xxxx xxxxx
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Module:
Cnflict Vol: 1640 2154 572 1546 2120 478 955 xxxx xxxxx 1143 xxxx xxxxx
Potent Cap.: 68 49 469 79 51 539 728 xxxx xxxxx 619 xxxx xxxxx
Move Cap.: 59 46 469 74 49 539 728 xxxx xxxxx 619 xxxx xxxxx
Volume/Cap: 0.07 0.04 0.01 0.79 0.04 0.07 0.03 xxxx xxxx 0.02 xxxx xxxx
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Level Of Service Module:
Queue: xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 0.1 xxxx xxxxx 0.1 xxxx xxxxx
Stopped Del:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 10.1 xxxx xxxxx 10.9 xxxx xxxxx
LOS by Move: * * * * * * B * * B * *
Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT
Shared Cap.: xxxx 77 xxxxx xxxx 107 xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx
SharedQueue:xxxxx 0.4 xxxxx xxxxx 5.3 xxxxx 0.1 xxxx xxxxx 0.1 xxxx xxxxx
Shrd StpDel:xxxxx 58.1 xxxxx xxxxx 133 xxxxx 10.1 xxxx xxxxx 10.9 xxxx xxxxx
Shared LOS: * F * * F * B * * B * *
ApproachDel: 58.1 133.3 xxxxxx xxxxxx
ApproachLOS: F F * *
Traffix 7.6.0715 (c) 2003 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to RAJU ASSOC., PASADENA
ATTACHMENT 6
466Existing Conditions PM
La Cienega Boulevard Washington Boulevard
N/S: W/E: 24
I/S No:
AM/PM: Comments:
COUNT DATE: GROWTH FACTOR:
STUDY DATE:
342 A:
B: 68
220
A:
B:
561
381 A:
B: 144
0.881 =
+
+
+ + + 534 561 68 144
*1375
72
A:
B:
534
V/C =
West/East Critical Movements =
North/South Critical Movements =
SouthBound
WestBound EastBound
NorthBound
A = Adjusted Through/Right Volume
B = Adjusted Left Volume
* = ATSAC Benefit
Results
V/C RATIO LOS
0.00 - 0.60 A
0.61 - 0.70 B
0.71 - 0.80 C
0.81 - 0.90 D
0.91 - 1.00 E
B(W/B)
B(N/B)
A(E/B)
A(S/B)
D LOS =
Critical Movements Diagram
TH RT LT TH LT TH RT LT TH RT
Phasing RTOR Phasing Phasing Phasing RTOR RTOR
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND
EXISTING
RTOR
RT
144
AMBIENT
RELATED
PROJECT
TOTAL
144
LANE
SIGNAL Prot-Var|1010|Prot-Var Perm Perm Auto Auto Auto Auto
0 2 0 1 0 0 1 0 2 0 1 0 0 1 0 2 0 0 1 0 1 0 2 0 0 1 0
LT
1086 56 220 1643 41 68 684 123 72 1068 135
68 123 684 41 1643 220 56 1086 135 1068 72
Volume/Lane/Signal Configurations
Developed by Chun Wong, 12/94
May 25, 2011 ,Wednesday 12:45:39 PM
CalcaDB
EXISTPM
INTERSECTION DATA SUMMARY SHEET
ATTACHMENT 6
467Existing Conditions PM
La Cienega Boulevard Fairfax Avenue
N/S: W/E: 25
I/S No:
AM/PM: Comments:
COUNT DATE: GROWTH FACTOR:
STUDY DATE:
30 A:
B: 468
452 A:
B: 0|1010|A:
B:
779
0.842 =
+
+
+ ++52 779 468 0
*1425
36
A:
B:
52
V/C =
West/East Critical Movements =
North/South Critical Movements =
SouthBound
WestBound EastBound
NorthBound
A = Adjusted Through/Right Volume
B = Adjusted Left Volume
* = ATSAC Benefit
Results
V/C RATIO LOS
0.00 - 0.60 A
0.61 - 0.70 B
0.71 - 0.80 C
0.81 - 0.90 D
0.91 - 1.00 E
B(W/B)
A(N/B)
A(E/B)
B(S/B)
D LOS =
Critical Movements Diagram
TH RT LT TH LT TH RT LT TH RT
Phasing RTOR Phasing Phasing Phasing RTOR RTOR
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND
EXISTING
RTOR
RT|1010|AMBIENT
RELATED
PROJECT
TOTAL|1010|LANE
SIGNAL Perm|1010|Perm Split Split Free Auto Auto Auto
0 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 1 0 0 2 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0
LT
1557 1374 0 1342 14 851 12 18 36 0 16
851 18 12 14 1342 0 1374 1557 16 0 36
Volume/Lane/Signal Configurations
Developed by Chun Wong, 12/94
May 25, 2011 ,Wednesday 12:45:39 PM
CalcaDB
EXISTPM
INTERSECTION DATA SUMMARY SHEET
ATTACHMENT 6
468Existing Conditions PM
Wesley Street National Boulevard
N/S: W/E: 26
I/S No:
AM/PM: Comments:
COUNT DATE: GROWTH FACTOR:
STUDY DATE:
447 A:
B: 5
0 A:
B: 0
24
A:
B:
139
0.355 =
+
+
+ + + 493 139 5 0
*1500|10 10|A:
B:
493
V/C =
West/East Critical Movements =
North/South Critical Movements =
SouthBound
WestBound EastBound
NorthBound
A = Adjusted Through/Right Volume
B = Adjusted Left Volume
* = ATSAC Benefit
Results
V/C RATIO LOS
0.00 - 0.60 A
0.61 - 0.70 B
0.71 - 0.80 C
0.81 - 0.90 D
0.91 - 1.00 E
B(W/B)
A(N/B)
A(E/B)
B(S/B)
A LOS =
Critical Movements Diagram
TH RT LT TH LT TH RT LT TH RT
Phasing RTOR Phasing Phasing Phasing RTOR RTOR
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND
EXISTING
RTOR
RT
24
AMBIENT
RELATED
PROJECT
TOTAL
24
LANE
SIGNAL Perm|10 10|Perm Perm Perm Auto Auto Auto Auto
0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 1 0
LT
0 115 0 0 0 5 894 0 0 985 4
5 0 894 0 0 0 115 0 4 985 0
Volume/Lane/Signal Configurations
Developed by Chun Wong, 12/94
May 25, 2011 ,Wednesday 12:45:39 PM
CalcaDB
EXISTPM
INTERSECTION DATA SUMMARY SHEET
ATTACHMENT 6
469Existing Conditions PM
Hayden Avenue National Boulevard
N/S: W/E: 27
I/S No:
AM/PM: Comments:
COUNT DATE: GROWTH FACTOR:
STUDY DATE:
279 A:
B: 34|10 10|A:
B:|10 10|377
A:
B:
377
0.614 =
+
+
+ + + 564 0 377 34
*1425|10 10|A:
B:
564
V/C =
West/East Critical Movements =
North/South Critical Movements =
SouthBound
WestBound EastBound
NorthBound
A = Adjusted Through/Right Volume
B = Adjusted Left Volume
* = ATSAC Benefit
Results
V/C RATIO LOS
0.00 - 0.60 A
0.61 - 0.70 B
0.71 - 0.80 C
0.81 - 0.90 D
0.91 - 1.00 E
B(W/B)
A(N/B)
A(E/B)
A(S/B)
B LOS =
Critical Movements Diagram
TH RT LT TH LT TH RT LT TH RT
Phasing RTOR Phasing Phasing Phasing RTOR RTOR
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND
EXISTING
RTOR
RT
610
AMBIENT
RELATED
PROJECT
TOTAL
610
LANE
SIGNAL Split|1010| Prot-Fix Perm Auto Auto Auto
0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0
LT
0 144 0 0 0 34 279 0 0 992 135
34 0 279 0 0 0 144 0 135 992 0
Volume/Lane/Signal Configurations
Developed by Chun Wong, 12/94
May 25, 2011 ,Wednesday 12:45:39 PM
CalcaDB
EXISTPM
INTERSECTION DATA SUMMARY SHEET
ATTACHMENT 6
470Existing Conditions PM
Jefferson Boulevard National Boulevard
N/S: W/E: 28
I/S No:
AM/PM: Comments:
COUNT DATE: GROWTH FACTOR:
STUDY DATE:|10 10|A:
B:|10 10|272 A:
B: 0|10 10|A:
B:
869
1.067 =
+
+
+ + + 0 836 869 0
*1500
808
A:
B:
836
V/C =
West/East Critical Movements =
North/South Critical Movements =
SouthBound
WestBound EastBound
NorthBound
A = Adjusted Through/Right Volume
B = Adjusted Left Volume
* = ATSAC Benefit
Results
V/C RATIO LOS
0.00 - 0.60 A
0.61 - 0.70 B
0.71 - 0.80 C
0.81 - 0.90 D
0.91 - 1.00 E
A(W/B)
A(N/B)
A(E/B)
B(S/B)
F LOS =
Critical Movements Diagram
TH RT LT TH LT TH RT LT TH RT
Phasing RTOR Phasing Phasing Phasing RTOR RTOR
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND
EXISTING
RTOR
RT|10 10|AMBIENT
RELATED
PROJECT
TOTAL|10 10|LANE
SIGNAL Perm|10 10|Perm Split Auto Free Auto
0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
LT
869 0 0 544 346 0 0 0 808 0 28
0 0 0 346 544 0 0 869 28 0 808
Volume/Lane/Signal Configurations
Developed by Chun Wong, 12/94
May 25, 2011 ,Wednesday 12:45:39 PM
CalcaDB
EXISTPM
INTERSECTION DATA SUMMARY SHEET
ATTACHMENT 6
471Existing Conditions PM
La Cienega Boulevard Jefferson Boulevard
N/S: W/E: 29
I/S No:
AM/PM: Comments:
COUNT DATE: GROWTH FACTOR:
STUDY DATE:
329 A:
B: 158
704 A:
B: 34
64
A:
B:
846
1.089 =
+
+
+ + + 556 846 158 34
*1375
294
A:
B:
556
V/C =
West/East Critical Movements =
North/South Critical Movements =
SouthBound
WestBound EastBound
NorthBound
A = Adjusted Through/Right Volume
B = Adjusted Left Volume
* = ATSAC Benefit
Results
V/C RATIO LOS
0.00 - 0.60 A
0.61 - 0.70 B
0.71 - 0.80 C
0.81 - 0.90 D
0.91 - 1.00 E
B(W/B)
A(N/B)
A(E/B)
B(S/B)
F LOS =
Critical Movements Diagram
TH RT LT TH LT TH RT LT TH RT
Phasing RTOR Phasing Phasing Phasing RTOR RTOR
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND
EXISTING
RTOR
RT
64
AMBIENT
RELATED
PROJECT
TOTAL
64
LANE
SIGNAL Perm|1010|Perm Prot-Var Prot-Var Auto OLA Auto Auto
0 2 0 1 0 0 1 0 3 0 0 1 0 2 0 2 0 0 1 0 2 0 1 0 1 0 0
LT
2233 306 34 2113 215 288 657 64 535 887 224
288 64 657 215 2113 34 306 2233 224 887 535
Volume/Lane/Signal Configurations
Developed by Chun Wong, 12/94
May 25, 2011 ,Wednesday 12:45:39 PM
CalcaDB
EXISTPM
INTERSECTION DATA SUMMARY SHEET
ATTACHMENT 6
472Existing Conditions PM
Jefferson Boulevard Higuera Street/Rodeo Road
N/S: W/E: 30
I/S No:
AM/PM: Comments:
COUNT DATE: GROWTH FACTOR:
STUDY DATE:
244
A:
B:
321
245 A:
B: 101
34
A:
B:
404
0.707 =
+
+
+ + + 321 281 404 101
*1425
56
A:
B:
281
V/C =
West/East Critical Movements =
North/South Critical Movements =
SouthBound
WestBound EastBound
NorthBound
A = Adjusted Through/Right Volume
B = Adjusted Left Volume
* = ATSAC Benefit
Results
V/C RATIO LOS
0.00 - 0.60 A
0.61 - 0.70 B
0.71 - 0.80 C
0.81 - 0.90 D
0.91 - 1.00 E
A(W/B)
A(N/B)
A(E/B)
B(S/B)
C LOS =
Critical Movements Diagram
TH RT LT TH LT TH RT LT TH RT
Phasing RTOR Phasing Phasing Phasing RTOR RTOR
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND
EXISTING
RTOR
RT
34
AMBIENT
RELATED
PROJECT
TOTAL
34
LANE
SIGNAL Perm|1010|Perm Split Split Free Auto Auto Auto
0 2 0 0 1 0 1 0 2 0 0 1 0 2 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 2 0 0 1 0
LT
808 876 101 489 38 443 321 8 56 562 149
443 8 321 38 489 101 876 808 149 562 56
Volume/Lane/Signal Configurations
Developed by Chun Wong, 12/94
May 25, 2011 ,Wednesday 12:45:39 PM
CalcaDB
EXISTPM
INTERSECTION DATA SUMMARY SHEET
ATTACHMENT 6
473Existing Conditions PM
La Cienega Boulevard Rodeo Road
N/S: W/E: 31
I/S No:
AM/PM: Comments:
COUNT DATE: GROWTH FACTOR:
STUDY DATE:
228 A:
B: 206
732 A:
B: 230
175
A:
B:
810
1.233 =
+
+
+ + + 546 810 206 230
*1375
251
A:
B:
546
V/C =
West/East Critical Movements =
North/South Critical Movements =
SouthBound
WestBound EastBound
NorthBound
A = Adjusted Through/Right Volume
B = Adjusted Left Volume
* = ATSAC Benefit
Results
V/C RATIO LOS
0.00 - 0.60 A
0.61 - 0.70 B
0.71 - 0.80 C
0.81 - 0.90 D
0.91 - 1.00 E
B(W/B)
A(N/B)
A(E/B)
B(S/B)
F LOS =
Critical Movements Diagram
TH RT LT TH LT TH RT LT TH RT
Phasing RTOR Phasing Phasing Phasing RTOR RTOR
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND
EXISTING
RTOR
RT
319
AMBIENT
RELATED
PROJECT
TOTAL
319
LANE
SIGNAL Prot-Var|1010|Prot-Var Prot-Var Prot-Var Auto Auto OLA OLA
0 2 0 1 0 0 2 0 2 0 1 0 0 1 0 2 0 0 1 0 1 0 2 0 0 1 0
LT
2199 230 419 2131 65 206 455 133 251 1091 322
206 133 455 65 2131 419 230 2199 322 1091 251
Volume/Lane/Signal Configurations
Developed by Chun Wong, 12/94
May 25, 2011 ,Wednesday 12:45:39 PM
CalcaDB
EXISTPM
INTERSECTION DATA SUMMARY SHEET
ATTACHMENT 6
474Default Scenario Wed May 25, 2011 12:48:43 Page 15-1
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM 4-Way Stop Method (Base Volume Alternative)
********************************************************************************
Intersection #321 BRADDOCK DR/DUQUESNE AV [EXISTING PM]
********************************************************************************
Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap. (X): 1.256
Loss Time (sec): 0 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 85.7
Optimal Cycle: 0 Level Of Service: F
********************************************************************************
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Stop Sign Stop Sign
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 150 169 171 7 35 13 123 404 155 16 387 16
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 150 169 171 7 35 13 123 404 155 16 387 16
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 150 169 171 7 35 13 123 404 155 16 387 16
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 150 169 171 7 35 13 123 404 155 16 387 16
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Final Vol.: 150 169 171 7 35 13 123 404 155 16 387 16
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lanes: 0.31 0.34 0.35 0.13 0.63 0.24 0.18 0.59 0.23 0.04 0.92 0.04
Final Sat.: 162 183 185 51 254 95 98 322 123 20 472 20
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.14 0.14 0.14 1.26 1.26 1.26 0.82 0.82 0.82
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Delay/Veh: 47.5 47.5 47.5 12.6 12.6 12.6 151.5 151 151.5 33.1 33.1 33.1
Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 47.5 47.5 47.5 12.6 12.6 12.6 151.5 151 151.5 33.1 33.1 33.1
LOS by Move: E E E B B B F F F D D D
ApproachDel: 47.5 12.6 151.5 33.1
Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
ApprAdjDel: 47.5 12.6 151.5 33.1
LOS by Appr: E B F D
********************************************************************************
Traffix 7.6.0715 (c) 2003 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to RAJU ASSOC., PASADENA
ATTACHMENT 6
475Default Scenario Wed May 25, 2011 12:48:43 Page 17-1
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM 4-Way Stop Method (Base Volume Alternative)
********************************************************************************
Intersection #331 LUCERNE AV/DUQUESNE AV [EXISTING PM]
********************************************************************************
Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap. (X): 0.876
Loss Time (sec): 0 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 28.6
Optimal Cycle: 0 Level Of Service: D
********************************************************************************
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Stop Sign Stop Sign
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lanes: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 0 0 0 327 0 71 56 445 0 0 434 226
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 0 0 0 327 0 71 56 445 0 0 434 226
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 0 0 0 327 0 71 56 445 0 0 434 226
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 0 0 0 327 0 71 56 445 0 0 434 226
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Final Vol.: 0 0 0 327 0 71 56 445 0 0 434 226
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lanes: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.82 0.00 0.18 0.11 0.89 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00
Final Sat.: 0 0 0 441 0 96 64 508 0 0 537 599
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: xxxx xxxx xxxx 0.74 xxxx 0.74 0.88 0.88 xxxx xxxx 0.81 0.38
Crit Moves: **** **** ****
Delay/Veh: 0.0 0.0 0.0 24.6 0.0 24.6 37.2 37.2 0.0 0.0 30.8 12.1
Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 0.0 0.0 0.0 24.6 0.0 24.6 37.2 37.2 0.0 0.0 30.8 12.1
LOS by Move: * * * C * C E E * * D B
ApproachDel: xxxxxx 24.6 37.2 24.4
Delay Adj: xxxxx 1.00 1.00 1.00
ApprAdjDel: xxxxxx 24.6 37.2 24.4
LOS by Appr: * C E C
********************************************************************************
Traffix 7.6.0715 (c) 2003 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to RAJU ASSOC., PASADENA
ATTACHMENT 6
476Existing Conditions PM
Jefferson Boulevard Duquesne Avenue
N/S: W/E: 34
I/S No:
AM/PM: Comments:
COUNT DATE: GROWTH FACTOR:
STUDY DATE:
28
A:
B:
41
52
A:
B:
419
685 A:
B: 349
0.833 =
+
+
+ + +41 419 432 349
*1375
394 A:
B: 432
V/C =
West/East Critical Movements =
North/South Critical Movements =
SouthBound
WestBound EastBound
NorthBound
A = Adjusted Through/Right Volume
B = Adjusted Left Volume
* = ATSAC Benefit
Results
V/C RATIO LOS
0.00 - 0.60 A
0.61 - 0.70 B
0.71 - 0.80 C
0.81 - 0.90 D
0.91 - 1.00 E
A(W/B)
B(N/B)
B(E/B)
A(S/B)
D LOS =
Critical Movements Diagram
TH RT LT TH LT TH RT LT TH RT
Phasing RTOR Phasing Phasing Phasing RTOR RTOR
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND
EXISTING
RTOR
RT
349
AMBIENT
RELATED
PROJECT
TOTAL
349
LANE
SIGNAL Prot-Var|1010|Prot-Var Perm Perm Auto Auto OLA Auto
0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 2 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0
LT
1335 34 52 838 189 28 41 20 432 62 332
28 20 41 189 838 52 34 1335 332 62 432
Volume/Lane/Signal Configurations
Developed by Chun Wong, 12/94
May 25, 2011 ,Wednesday 12:45:39 PM
CalcaDB
EXISTPM
INTERSECTION DATA SUMMARY SHEET
ATTACHMENT 6
477
APPENDIX E
Related Projects Trip Generation Rates
Capacity Calculation Worksheets
Cumulative (2014) Base Conditions
ATTACHMENT 6
478
Related Projects Trip Generation Rates
ATTACHMENT 6
479APPENDIX E
RELATED PROJCETS TRIP GENERATION RATES [1]
AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
Size Daily IN OUT TOTAL IN OUT TOTAL
Trip Rates [1]
Warehouse (ITE Land Use 150) per 1,000 s.f. [2] 79% 21% 0.30 25% 75% 0.32
Apartment (ITE Land Use 220) per d.u. [3] 20% 80% [3] 65% 35% [3]
Condominium/Townhouse (ITE Land Use 230) per d.u. 5.81 17% 83% 0.44 67% 33% 0.52
Senior Housing (ITE Land Use 252) per occupied d.u. 3.48 36% 64% 0.13 60% 40% 0.16
Congregate Care (ITE Land Use 253) per d.u. 2.02 59% 41% 0.06 55% 45% 0.17
Hotel (ITE Land Use 310) per occupied room 8.92 58% 42% 0.67 49% 51% 0.70
Community College (ITE Land Use 540) per 1,000 s.f. 27.49 74% 26% 2.99 58% 42% 2.54
General Office (ITE Land Use 710) per 1,000 s.f. [4] 88% 12% [4] 17% 83% [4]
Medical/Dental Office (ITE Land Use 720) per 1,000 s.f. 36.13 79% 21% 2.30 27% 73% 3.46
Specialty Retail (ITE Land Use 814) per 1,000 s.f. 44.32 60% 40% [5] 44% 56% 2.71
Retail (ITE Land Use 820) per 1,000 s.f. 42.94 61% 39% 1.00 49% 51% 3.73
Convenience Store (ITE Land Use 851) per 1,000 s.f. 737.99 50% 50% 67.03 51% 49% 52.41
Restaurant (ITE Land Use 931) per 1,000 s.f. 89.95 50% 50% 0.81 67% 33% 7.49
High-Turnover Restaurant (ITE Land Use 932) per 1,000 s.f. 127.15 52% 48% 11.52 59% 41% 11.15
Auto Care Center (ITE Land Use 942) per 1,000 s.f. n/a 65% 35% 2.94 50% 50% 3.38
Gas Station w/Convenience Store (ITE Land Use 945) per 1,000 s.f. n/a 51% 49% 79.30 50% 50% 97.08
Automated Car Wash (ITE Land Use 948) per 1,000 s.f. 900 [6] 50% 50% [6] 50% 50% 14.12
[1] Trip Generation, An ITE Information Report, 8th Edition, ITE 2008
[2] Daily trip generation for warehouse was calculated using the following formula:
Where:
Daily: Ln(T) = 0.86 Ln(X) + 2.24 Ln = Natural logarithm
T = Two-way volume of traffic (total trip-ends)
X = Area in 1,000 gross square feet of leasable area
[3] Trip generation for apartment was calculated using the following formulas:
Daily: T = 6.06 (X) + 123.56 Where:
AM Peak Hour: T =0.49 (X) + 3.73 T = Two-way volume of traffic (total trip-ends)
PM Peak Hour: T =0.55 (X) + 17.65 X = Number of dwelling units
[4] Trip generation for office was calculated using one of the following methods per ITE Trip Genration:
a) Average Rates
Daily: T = 11.01 (X)
AM Peak Hour: T = 1.55 (X)
PM Peak Hour: T = 1.49 (X)
b) Equations Where:
Daily: Ln(T) = 0.77 Ln(X) + 3.65 Ln = Natural logarithm
AM Peak Hour: Ln(T) = 0.80 Ln(X) + 1.55 T = Two-way volume of traffic (total trip-ends)
PM Peak Hour: T = 1.12 (X) + 78.81 X = Area in 1,000 gross square feet of leasable area
[5] AM peak hour trip rate obtained from Brief Guide of Vehicular Traffic Generation Rates for the San Diego Region, SANDAG, April 2002. AM peak hour is 3%
of Daily Trips.
[6] Daily and AM peak hour trip rate obtained from Brief Guide of Vehicular Traffic Generation Rates for the San Diego Region, SANDAG, April 2002. AM peak
hour is 4% of Daily Trips.
ATTACHMENT 6
480
Cumulative (2014) Base Conditions
AM Peak Hour
ATTACHMENT 6
481Cumulative (2014) Base AM
Robertson Boulevard Cattaragus Avenue
N/S: W/E: 1
I/S No:
AM/PM: Comments:
COUNT DATE: GROWTH FACTOR:
STUDY DATE:
87
A:
B:
403
40
A:
B:
961
684 A:
B: 98
0.978 =
+
+
+ + + 403 961 110 98
*1500
398 A:
B: 110
V/C =
West/East Critical Movements =
North/South Critical Movements =
SouthBound
WestBound EastBound
NorthBound
A = Adjusted Through/Right Volume
B = Adjusted Left Volume
* = ATSAC Benefit
Results
V/C RATIO LOS
0.00 - 0.60 A
0.61 - 0.70 B
0.71 - 0.80 C
0.81 - 0.90 D
0.91 - 1.00 E
A(W/B)
B(N/B)
B(E/B)
A(S/B)
E LOS =
Critical Movements Diagram
TH RT LT TH LT TH RT LT TH RT
Phasing RTOR Phasing Phasing Phasing RTOR RTOR
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND
EXISTING
RTOR
RT
98
AMBIENT
RELATED
PROJECT
TOTAL
98
LANE
SIGNAL Perm|1010|Perm Perm Perm Auto Auto Auto Auto
0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0
LT
1363 5 40 1848 73 87 244 72 110 142 146
87 72 244 73 1848 40 5 1363 146 142 110
Volume/Lane/Signal Configurations
Developed by Chun Wong, 12/94
May 25, 2011 ,Wednesday 01:27:11 PM
CalcaDB
CBASEAM
INTERSECTION DATA SUMMARY SHEET
ATTACHMENT 6
482Cumulative (2014) Base AM
Robertson Boulevard I-10 WB Off-Ramp/Kincardine Av
N/S: W/E: 2
I/S No:
AM/PM: Comments:
COUNT DATE: GROWTH FACTOR:
STUDY DATE:
227 A:
B: 214|10 10|A:
B:
930
618 A:
B: 38
0.827 =
+
+
+ + + 164 930 214 38
*1500
118
A:
B:
164
V/C =
West/East Critical Movements =
North/South Critical Movements =
SouthBound
WestBound EastBound
NorthBound
A = Adjusted Through/Right Volume
B = Adjusted Left Volume
* = ATSAC Benefit
Results
V/C RATIO LOS
0.00 - 0.60 A
0.61 - 0.70 B
0.71 - 0.80 C
0.81 - 0.90 D
0.91 - 1.00 E
B(W/B)
B(N/B)
A(E/B)
A(S/B)
D LOS =
Critical Movements Diagram
TH RT LT TH LT TH RT LT TH RT
Phasing RTOR Phasing Phasing Phasing RTOR RTOR
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND
EXISTING
RTOR
RT
38
AMBIENT
RELATED
PROJECT
TOTAL
38
LANE
SIGNAL Perm|1010|Perm Perm Perm Auto Auto Auto Auto
0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
LT
1235 0 0 1784 75 214 13 175 118 0 46
214 175 13 75 1784 0 0 1235 46 0 118
Volume/Lane/Signal Configurations
Developed by Chun Wong, 12/94
May 25, 2011 ,Wednesday 01:27:11 PM
CalcaDB
CBASEAM
INTERSECTION DATA SUMMARY SHEET
ATTACHMENT 6
483Cumulative (2014) Base AM
Robertson Boulevard National Boulevard
N/S: W/E: 3
I/S No:
AM/PM: Comments:
COUNT DATE: GROWTH FACTOR:
STUDY DATE:
149
A:
B:
609
612 A:
B: 447
121
A:
B:
357
1.079 =
+
+
+ + + 609 357 167 447
*1375
501 A:
B: 167
V/C =
West/East Critical Movements =
North/South Critical Movements =
SouthBound
WestBound EastBound
NorthBound
A = Adjusted Through/Right Volume
B = Adjusted Left Volume
* = ATSAC Benefit
Results
V/C RATIO LOS
0.00 - 0.60 A
0.61 - 0.70 B
0.71 - 0.80 C
0.81 - 0.90 D
0.91 - 1.00 E
A(W/B)
A(N/B)
B(E/B)
B(S/B)
F LOS =
Critical Movements Diagram
TH RT LT TH LT TH RT LT TH RT
Phasing RTOR Phasing Phasing Phasing RTOR RTOR
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND
EXISTING
RTOR
RT
121
AMBIENT
RELATED
PROJECT
TOTAL
121
LANE
SIGNAL Perm|1010|Prot-Fix Perm Prot-Fix Auto Auto OLA Auto
0 1 0 1 0 0 2 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0
LT
658 55 813 1013 211 149 609 500 167 740 262
149 500 609 211 1013 813 55 658 262 740 167
Volume/Lane/Signal Configurations
Developed by Chun Wong, 12/94
May 25, 2011 ,Wednesday 01:27:11 PM
CalcaDB
CBASEAM
INTERSECTION DATA SUMMARY SHEET
ATTACHMENT 6
484Cumulative (2014) Base AM
National Boulevard I-10 EB On-Ramp
N/S: W/E: 4
I/S No:
AM/PM: Comments:
COUNT DATE: GROWTH FACTOR:
STUDY DATE:
A:
B: 0|10 10 10|A:
B:
624
602 A:
B: 148
0.445 =
+
+
+ + + 624 148
*1500
A:
B: 0|10 10|V/C =
West/East Critical Movements =
North/South Critical Movements =
SouthBound
WestBound EastBound
NorthBound
A = Adjusted Through/Right Volume
B = Adjusted Left Volume
* = ATSAC Benefit
Results
V/C RATIO LOS
0.00 - 0.60 A
0.61 - 0.70 B
0.71 - 0.80 C
0.81 - 0.90 D
0.91 - 1.00 E
B(N/B) A(S/B)
A LOS =
Critical Movements Diagram
TH RT LT TH LT TH RT LT TH RT
Phasing RTOR Phasing Phasing Phasing RTOR RTOR
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND
EXISTING
RTOR
RT
148
AMBIENT
RELATED
PROJECT
TOTAL
148
LANE
SIGNAL Prot-Fix|1010|Perm Auto Auto
0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
LT
1204 0 0 1075 624 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 624 1075 0 0 1204 0 0 0
Volume/Lane/Signal Configurations
Developed by Chun Wong, 12/94
May 25, 2011 ,Wednesday 01:27:11 PM
CalcaDB
CBASEAM
INTERSECTION DATA SUMMARY SHEET
ATTACHMENT 6
485Cumulative (2014) Base AM
Hughes Avenue Venice Boulevard
N/S: W/E: 5
I/S No:
AM/PM: Comments:
COUNT DATE: GROWTH FACTOR:
STUDY DATE:
665 A:
B: 214
81
A:
B:
364
360 A:
B: 97
0.841 =
+
+
+ + + 692 364 214 97
*1500
42
A:
B:
692
V/C =
West/East Critical Movements =
North/South Critical Movements =
SouthBound
WestBound EastBound
NorthBound
A = Adjusted Through/Right Volume
B = Adjusted Left Volume
* = ATSAC Benefit
Results
V/C RATIO LOS
0.00 - 0.60 A
0.61 - 0.70 B
0.71 - 0.80 C
0.81 - 0.90 D
0.91 - 1.00 E
B(W/B)
B(N/B)
A(E/B)
A(S/B)
D LOS =
Critical Movements Diagram
TH RT LT TH LT TH RT LT TH RT
Phasing RTOR Phasing Phasing Phasing RTOR RTOR
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND
EXISTING
RTOR
RT
97
AMBIENT
RELATED
PROJECT
TOTAL
97
LANE
SIGNAL Perm|10 10|Perm Perm Perm Auto Auto Auto Auto
0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 3 0 0 1 0 1 0 3 0 0 1 0
LT
206 57 81 236 47 214 1996 44 42 2075 121
214 44 1996 47 236 81 57 206 121 2075 42
Volume/Lane/Signal Configurations
Developed by Chun Wong, 12/94
May 25, 2011 ,Wednesday 01:27:11 PM
CalcaDB
CBASEAM
INTERSECTION DATA SUMMARY SHEET
ATTACHMENT 6
486Cumulative (2014) Base AM
Bagley Avenue Venice Boulevard
N/S: W/E: 6
I/S No:
AM/PM: Comments:
COUNT DATE: GROWTH FACTOR:
STUDY DATE:
717 A:
B: 65
78
A:
B:
331
204 A:
B: 49
0.789 =
+
+
+ + + 736 331 65 49
*1375
72
A:
B:
736
V/C =
West/East Critical Movements =
North/South Critical Movements =
SouthBound
WestBound EastBound
NorthBound
A = Adjusted Through/Right Volume
B = Adjusted Left Volume
* = ATSAC Benefit
Results
V/C RATIO LOS
0.00 - 0.60 A
0.61 - 0.70 B
0.71 - 0.80 C
0.81 - 0.90 D
0.91 - 1.00 E
B(W/B)
B(N/B)
A(E/B)
A(S/B)
C LOS =
Critical Movements Diagram
TH RT LT TH LT TH RT LT TH RT
Phasing RTOR Phasing Phasing Phasing RTOR RTOR
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND
EXISTING
RTOR
RT
49
AMBIENT
RELATED
PROJECT
TOTAL
49
LANE
SIGNAL Perm|1010|Perm Prot-Var Prot-Var Auto Auto Auto Auto
0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 3 0 0 1 0 1 0 2 0 1 0 0
LT
159 45 78 179 74 65 2150 42 72 2153 54
65 42 2150 74 179 78 45 159 54 2153 72
Volume/Lane/Signal Configurations
Developed by Chun Wong, 12/94
May 25, 2011 ,Wednesday 01:27:11 PM
CalcaDB
CBASEAM
INTERSECTION DATA SUMMARY SHEET
ATTACHMENT 6
487Cumulative (2014) Base AM
Culver Boulevard Venice Boulevard
N/S: W/E: 7
I/S No:
AM/PM: Comments:
COUNT DATE: GROWTH FACTOR:
STUDY DATE:
724 A:
B: 356
131
A:
B:
131
67
A:
B:
90
0.879 =
+
+
+ + + 728 131 90 356
*1375
30
A:
B:
728
V/C =
West/East Critical Movements =
North/South Critical Movements =
SouthBound
WestBound EastBound
NorthBound
A = Adjusted Through/Right Volume
B = Adjusted Left Volume
* = ATSAC Benefit
Results
V/C RATIO LOS
0.00 - 0.60 A
0.61 - 0.70 B
0.71 - 0.80 C
0.81 - 0.90 D
0.91 - 1.00 E
B(W/B)
A(N/B)
A(E/B)
A(S/B)
D LOS =
Critical Movements Diagram
TH RT LT TH LT TH RT LT TH RT
Phasing RTOR Phasing Phasing Phasing RTOR RTOR
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND
EXISTING
RTOR
RT
67
AMBIENT
RELATED
PROJECT
TOTAL
67
LANE
SIGNAL Split|1010|Split Prot-Fix Prot-Fix OLA Auto Auto Auto
0 1 0 0 2 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 2 0 2 0 1 0 0 1 0 2 0 1 0 0
LT
87 810 183 45 33 647 2021 152 30 2094 91
647 152 2021 33 45 183 810 87 91 2094 30
Volume/Lane/Signal Configurations
Developed by Chun Wong, 12/94
May 25, 2011 ,Wednesday 01:27:11 PM
CalcaDB
CBASEAM
INTERSECTION DATA SUMMARY SHEET
ATTACHMENT 6
488Cumulative (2014) Base AM
Robertson Boulevard Venice Boulevard
N/S: W/E: 8
I/S No:
AM/PM: Comments:
COUNT DATE: GROWTH FACTOR:
STUDY DATE:
81
A:
B:
894
429 A:
B: 650
228
A:
B:
269
1.491 =
+
+
+ + + 894 269 334 650
*1375
880 A:
B: 334
V/C =
West/East Critical Movements =
North/South Critical Movements =
SouthBound
WestBound EastBound
NorthBound
A = Adjusted Through/Right Volume
B = Adjusted Left Volume
* = ATSAC Benefit
Results
V/C RATIO LOS
0.00 - 0.60 A
0.61 - 0.70 B
0.71 - 0.80 C
0.81 - 0.90 D
0.91 - 1.00 E
A(W/B)
A(N/B)
B(E/B)
B(S/B)
F LOS =
Critical Movements Diagram
TH RT LT TH LT TH RT LT TH RT
Phasing RTOR Phasing Phasing Phasing RTOR RTOR
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND
EXISTING
RTOR
RT
228
AMBIENT
RELATED
PROJECT
TOTAL
228
LANE
SIGNAL Split|1010|Split Prot-Var Prot-Var OLA Auto Auto Auto
0 2 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 2 0 1 0 0 2 0 2 0 1 0 0
LT
538 61 650 429 319 81 2327 356 607 2482 158
81 356 2327 319 429 650 61 538 158 2482 607
Volume/Lane/Signal Configurations
Developed by Chun Wong, 12/94
May 25, 2011 ,Wednesday 01:27:11 PM
CalcaDB
CBASEAM
INTERSECTION DATA SUMMARY SHEET
ATTACHMENT 6
489Cumulative (2014) Base AM
National Boulevard Venice Boulevard
N/S: W/E: 9
I/S No:
AM/PM: Comments:
COUNT DATE: GROWTH FACTOR:
STUDY DATE:
701 A:
B: 118
135
A:
B:
485
512 A:
B: 232
1.068 =
+
+
+ + + 730 485 118 232
*1375
116
A:
B:
730
V/C =
West/East Critical Movements =
North/South Critical Movements =
SouthBound
WestBound EastBound
NorthBound
A = Adjusted Through/Right Volume
B = Adjusted Left Volume
* = ATSAC Benefit
Results
V/C RATIO LOS
0.00 - 0.60 A
0.61 - 0.70 B
0.71 - 0.80 C
0.81 - 0.90 D
0.91 - 1.00 E
B(W/B)
B(N/B)
A(E/B)
A(S/B)
F LOS =
Critical Movements Diagram
TH RT LT TH LT TH RT LT TH RT
Phasing RTOR Phasing Phasing Phasing RTOR RTOR
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND
EXISTING
RTOR
RT
232
AMBIENT
RELATED
PROJECT
TOTAL
232
LANE
SIGNAL Perm|1010|Prot-Fix Prot-Fix Prot-Fix Auto Auto Auto Auto
0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 2 0 3 0 0 1 0 2 0 3 0 0 1 0
LT
1001 23 135 821 148 214 2104 122 211 2189 683
214 122 2104 148 821 135 23 1001 683 2189 211
Volume/Lane/Signal Configurations
Developed by Chun Wong, 12/94
May 25, 2011 ,Wednesday 01:27:11 PM
CalcaDB
CBASEAM
INTERSECTION DATA SUMMARY SHEET
ATTACHMENT 6
490Cumulative (2014) Base AM
Helms Avenue Venice Boulevard
N/S: W/E: 10
I/S No:
AM/PM: Comments:
COUNT DATE: GROWTH FACTOR:
STUDY DATE:
24
A:
B:
809
12
A:
B:
42
20 A:
B: 11
0.557 =
+
+
+ + + 809 42 78 11
*1500
759 A:
B: 78
V/C =
West/East Critical Movements =
North/South Critical Movements =
SouthBound
WestBound EastBound
NorthBound
A = Adjusted Through/Right Volume
B = Adjusted Left Volume
* = ATSAC Benefit
Results
V/C RATIO LOS
0.00 - 0.60 A
0.61 - 0.70 B
0.71 - 0.80 C
0.81 - 0.90 D
0.91 - 1.00 E
A(W/B)
B(N/B)
B(E/B)
A(S/B)
A LOS =
Critical Movements Diagram
TH RT LT TH LT TH RT LT TH RT
Phasing RTOR Phasing Phasing Phasing RTOR RTOR
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND
EXISTING
RTOR
RT
11
AMBIENT
RELATED
PROJECT
TOTAL
11
LANE
SIGNAL Perm|10 10|Perm Perm Perm Auto Auto Auto Auto
1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 1 0 0 1 0 2 0 1 0 0
LT
9 4 12 2 28 24 2404 23 78 2255 22
24 23 2404 28 2 12 4 9 22 2255 78
Volume/Lane/Signal Configurations
Developed by Chun Wong, 12/94
May 25, 2011 ,Wednesday 01:27:11 PM
CalcaDB
CBASEAM
INTERSECTION DATA SUMMARY SHEET
ATTACHMENT 6
491Cumulative (2014) Base AM
Cattaraugus Avenue Venice Boulevard
N/S: W/E: 11
I/S No:
AM/PM: Comments:
COUNT DATE: GROWTH FACTOR:
STUDY DATE:
79
A:
B:
805
273 A:
B: 168
68
A:
B:
354
0.863 =
+
+
+ + + 805 354 72 168
*1500
685 A:
B: 72
V/C =
West/East Critical Movements =
North/South Critical Movements =
SouthBound
WestBound EastBound
NorthBound
A = Adjusted Through/Right Volume
B = Adjusted Left Volume
* = ATSAC Benefit
Results
V/C RATIO LOS
0.00 - 0.60 A
0.61 - 0.70 B
0.71 - 0.80 C
0.81 - 0.90 D
0.91 - 1.00 E
A(W/B)
A(N/B)
B(E/B)
B(S/B)
D LOS =
Critical Movements Diagram
TH RT LT TH LT TH RT LT TH RT
Phasing RTOR Phasing Phasing Phasing RTOR RTOR
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND
EXISTING
RTOR
RT
68
AMBIENT
RELATED
PROJECT
TOTAL
68
LANE
SIGNAL Perm|10 10|Perm Perm Perm Auto Auto Auto Auto
0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 1 0 0 1 0 2 0 1 0 0
LT
252 34 168 87 18 79 2309 105 72 2045 11
79 105 2309 18 87 168 34 252 11 2045 72
Volume/Lane/Signal Configurations
Developed by Chun Wong, 12/94
May 25, 2011 ,Wednesday 01:27:11 PM
CalcaDB
CBASEAM
INTERSECTION DATA SUMMARY SHEET
ATTACHMENT 6
492Cumulative (2014) Base AM
La Cienega Boulevard Venice Boulevard
N/S: W/E: 12
I/S No:
AM/PM: Comments:
COUNT DATE: GROWTH FACTOR:
STUDY DATE:
159
A:
B:
657
36
A:
B:
632
649 A:
B: 131
1.113 =
+
+
+ + + 657 632 206 131
*1375
594 A:
B: 206
V/C =
West/East Critical Movements =
North/South Critical Movements =
SouthBound
WestBound EastBound
NorthBound
A = Adjusted Through/Right Volume
B = Adjusted Left Volume
* = ATSAC Benefit
Results
V/C RATIO LOS
0.00 - 0.60 A
0.61 - 0.70 B
0.71 - 0.80 C
0.81 - 0.90 D
0.91 - 1.00 E
A(W/B)
B(N/B)
B(E/B)
A(S/B)
F LOS =
Critical Movements Diagram
TH RT LT TH LT TH RT LT TH RT
Phasing RTOR Phasing Phasing Phasing RTOR RTOR
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND
EXISTING
RTOR
RT
131
AMBIENT
RELATED
PROJECT
TOTAL
131
LANE
SIGNAL Perm|1010|Perm Prot-Var Prot-Var Auto Auto Auto Auto
0 2 0 1 0 0 1 0 2 0 1 0 0 1 0 3 0 0 1 0 2 0 3 0 0 1 0
LT
1867 79 36 1485 411 159 1972 15 375 1783 173
159 15 1972 411 1485 36 79 1867 173 1783 375
Volume/Lane/Signal Configurations
Developed by Chun Wong, 12/94
May 25, 2011 ,Wednesday 01:27:11 PM
CalcaDB
CBASEAM
INTERSECTION DATA SUMMARY SHEET
ATTACHMENT 6
493Cumulative (2014) Base AM
Hughes Av/Duquesne Av Washington Boulevard
N/S: W/E: 13
I/S No:
AM/PM: Comments:
COUNT DATE: GROWTH FACTOR:
STUDY DATE:
56
A:
B:
439
14
A:
B:
411
371 A:
B: 170
0.641 =
+
+
+ + + 439 411 46 170
*1500
414 A:
B: 46
V/C =
West/East Critical Movements =
North/South Critical Movements =
SouthBound
WestBound EastBound
NorthBound
A = Adjusted Through/Right Volume
B = Adjusted Left Volume
* = ATSAC Benefit
Results
V/C RATIO LOS
0.00 - 0.60 A
0.61 - 0.70 B
0.71 - 0.80 C
0.81 - 0.90 D
0.91 - 1.00 E
A(W/B)
B(N/B)
B(E/B)
A(S/B)
B LOS =
Critical Movements Diagram
TH RT LT TH LT TH RT LT TH RT
Phasing RTOR Phasing Phasing Phasing RTOR RTOR
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND
EXISTING
RTOR
RT
170
AMBIENT
RELATED
PROJECT
TOTAL
170
LANE
SIGNAL Perm|1010|Perm Perm Perm Auto Auto Auto Auto
0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0
LT
331 40 14 360 51 56 827 51 46 641 186
56 51 827 51 360 14 40 331 186 641 46
Volume/Lane/Signal Configurations
Developed by Chun Wong, 12/94
May 25, 2011 ,Wednesday 01:27:11 PM
CalcaDB
CBASEAM
INTERSECTION DATA SUMMARY SHEET
ATTACHMENT 6
494Cumulative (2014) Base AM
Duquesne Avenue Culver Boulevard
N/S: W/E: 14
I/S No:
AM/PM: Comments:
COUNT DATE: GROWTH FACTOR:
STUDY DATE:
417 A:
B: 150
52
A:
B:
437
374 A:
B: 101
0.760 =
+
+
+ + + 453 437 150 101
*1375
113
A:
B:
453
V/C =
West/East Critical Movements =
North/South Critical Movements =
SouthBound
WestBound EastBound
NorthBound
A = Adjusted Through/Right Volume
B = Adjusted Left Volume
* = ATSAC Benefit
Results
V/C RATIO LOS
0.00 - 0.60 A
0.61 - 0.70 B
0.71 - 0.80 C
0.81 - 0.90 D
0.91 - 1.00 E
B(W/B)
B(N/B)
A(E/B)
A(S/B)
C LOS =
Critical Movements Diagram
TH RT LT TH LT TH RT LT TH RT
Phasing RTOR Phasing Phasing Phasing RTOR RTOR
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND
EXISTING
RTOR
RT
101
AMBIENT
RELATED
PROJECT
TOTAL
101
LANE
SIGNAL Prot-Var|1010|Prot-Var Prot-Var Prot-Var Auto Auto Auto Auto
0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0
LT
374 140 52 437 79 150 776 57 113 855 51
150 57 776 79 437 52 140 374 51 855 113
Volume/Lane/Signal Configurations
Developed by Chun Wong, 12/94
May 25, 2011 ,Wednesday 01:27:11 PM
CalcaDB
CBASEAM
INTERSECTION DATA SUMMARY SHEET
ATTACHMENT 6
495Cumulative (2014) Base AM
Culver Boulevard Washington Bl/Irving Pl
N/S: W/E: 15
I/S No:
AM/PM: Comments:
COUNT DATE: GROWTH FACTOR:
STUDY DATE:
76
A:
B:
481
337
A:
B:
337
94 A:
B: 128
0.618 =
+
+
+ + + 481 337 0 128
*1375
353 A:
B: 0
V/C =
West/East Critical Movements =
North/South Critical Movements =
SouthBound
WestBound EastBound
NorthBound
A = Adjusted Through/Right Volume
B = Adjusted Left Volume
* = ATSAC Benefit
Results
V/C RATIO LOS
0.00 - 0.60 A
0.61 - 0.70 B
0.71 - 0.80 C
0.81 - 0.90 D
0.91 - 1.00 E
A(W/B)
B(N/B)
B(E/B)
A(S/B)
B LOS =
Critical Movements Diagram
TH RT LT TH LT TH RT LT TH RT
Phasing RTOR Phasing Phasing Phasing RTOR RTOR
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND
EXISTING
RTOR
RT
128
AMBIENT
RELATED
PROJECT
TOTAL
128
LANE
SIGNAL Split|1010|Split Prot-Fix Perm Auto Auto Auto Auto
0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 2 0 1 0 0
LT
0 132 650 0 24 76 896 548 0 1015 44
-337
76 885 896 24 0 650 132 0 44 1015 0
Volume/Lane/Signal Configurations
Developed by Chun Wong, 12/94
May 25, 2011 ,Wednesday 01:27:11 PM
CalcaDB
CBASEAM
INTERSECTION DATA SUMMARY SHEET
ATTACHMENT 6
496Cumulative (2014) Base AM
Main Street Culver Boulevard
N/S: W/E: 16
I/S No:
AM/PM: Comments:
COUNT DATE: GROWTH FACTOR:
STUDY DATE:|10 10|A:
B:
607
53 A:
B: 151|10 10|A:
B:|10 10|0.581 =
+
+
+ + + 607 0 170 151
*1425
536 A:
B: 170
V/C =
West/East Critical Movements =
North/South Critical Movements =
SouthBound
WestBound EastBound
NorthBound
A = Adjusted Through/Right Volume
B = Adjusted Left Volume
* = ATSAC Benefit
Results
V/C RATIO LOS
0.00 - 0.60 A
0.61 - 0.70 B
0.71 - 0.80 C
0.81 - 0.90 D
0.91 - 1.00 E
A(W/B)
A(N/B)
B(E/B)
B(S/B)
A LOS =
Critical Movements Diagram
TH RT LT TH LT TH RT LT TH RT
Phasing RTOR Phasing Phasing Phasing RTOR RTOR
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND
EXISTING
RTOR
RT|10 10|AMBIENT
RELATED
PROJECT
TOTAL|10 10|LANE
SIGNAL |10 10|Split Perm Prot-Fix Auto Auto Auto
0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 2 0 1 0 0 1 0 3 0 0 0 0
LT
0 0 151 0 138 0 1656 164 170 1609 0
0 164 1656 138 0 151 0 0 0 1609 170
Volume/Lane/Signal Configurations
Developed by Chun Wong, 12/94
May 25, 2011 ,Wednesday 01:27:11 PM
CalcaDB
CBASEAM
INTERSECTION DATA SUMMARY SHEET
ATTACHMENT 6
497Cumulative (2014) Base AM
Culver Boulevard Washington Bl/Canfield Av
N/S: W/E: 17
I/S No:
AM/PM: Comments:
COUNT DATE: GROWTH FACTOR:
STUDY DATE:
606
A:
B:
606
289 A:
B: 187
12
A:
B:
421
0.782 =
+
+
+ + + 606 0 421 187
*1425|10 10|A:
B:|10 10|V/C =
West/East Critical Movements =
North/South Critical Movements =
SouthBound
WestBound EastBound
NorthBound
A = Adjusted Through/Right Volume
B = Adjusted Left Volume
* = ATSAC Benefit
Results
V/C RATIO LOS
0.00 - 0.60 A
0.61 - 0.70 B
0.71 - 0.80 C
0.81 - 0.90 D
0.91 - 1.00 E
A(W/B)
A(N/B)
A(E/B)
B(S/B)
C LOS =
Critical Movements Diagram
TH RT LT TH LT TH RT LT TH RT
Phasing RTOR Phasing Phasing Phasing RTOR RTOR
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND
EXISTING
RTOR
RT
12
AMBIENT
RELATED
PROJECT
TOTAL
12
LANE
SIGNAL Prot-Fix|1010|Prot-Fix Split OLA Auto Auto OLA
0 2 0 0 2 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0
LT
842 913 187 574 4 1176 36 139 0 0 6
1176 139 36 4 574 187 913 842 6 0 0
Volume/Lane/Signal Configurations
Developed by Chun Wong, 12/94
May 25, 2011 ,Wednesday 01:27:11 PM
CalcaDB
CBASEAM
INTERSECTION DATA SUMMARY SHEET
ATTACHMENT 6
498Cumulative (2014) Base AM
Robertson Bl/Higuera St Washington Boulevard
N/S: W/E: 18
I/S No:
AM/PM: Comments:
COUNT DATE: GROWTH FACTOR:
STUDY DATE:
91
A:
B:
835
279 A:
B: 188
68
A:
B:
383
0.975 =
+
+
+ + + 835 383 83 188
*1425
495 A:
B: 83
V/C =
West/East Critical Movements =
North/South Critical Movements =
SouthBound
WestBound EastBound
NorthBound
A = Adjusted Through/Right Volume
B = Adjusted Left Volume
* = ATSAC Benefit
Results
V/C RATIO LOS
0.00 - 0.60 A
0.61 - 0.70 B
0.71 - 0.80 C
0.81 - 0.90 D
0.91 - 1.00 E
A(W/B)
A(N/B)
B(E/B)
B(S/B)
E LOS =
Critical Movements Diagram
TH RT LT TH LT TH RT LT TH RT
Phasing RTOR Phasing Phasing Phasing RTOR RTOR
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND
EXISTING
RTOR
RT
68
AMBIENT
RELATED
PROJECT
TOTAL
68
LANE
SIGNAL Prot-Fix|1010|Prot-Fix Perm Perm Auto Auto Auto Auto
0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0
LT
383 71 188 279 136 91 1350 319 83 919 71
91 319 1350 136 279 188 71 383 71 919 83
Volume/Lane/Signal Configurations
Developed by Chun Wong, 12/94
May 25, 2011 ,Wednesday 01:27:11 PM
CalcaDB
CBASEAM
INTERSECTION DATA SUMMARY SHEET
ATTACHMENT 6
499Cumulative (2014) Base AM
Landmark Street Washington Boulevard
N/S: W/E: 19
I/S No:
AM/PM: Comments:
COUNT DATE: GROWTH FACTOR:
STUDY DATE:
63
A:
B:
975|10 10|A:
B:|10 10|30
A:
B:
31
0.601 =
+
+
+ + + 975 0 31 0
*1500
544 A:
B: 0
V/C =
West/East Critical Movements =
North/South Critical Movements =
SouthBound
WestBound EastBound
NorthBound
A = Adjusted Through/Right Volume
B = Adjusted Left Volume
* = ATSAC Benefit
Results
V/C RATIO LOS
0.00 - 0.60 A
0.61 - 0.70 B
0.71 - 0.80 C
0.81 - 0.90 D
0.91 - 1.00 E
A(W/B)
A(N/B)
B(E/B)
A(S/B)
B LOS =
Critical Movements Diagram
TH RT LT TH LT TH RT LT TH RT
Phasing RTOR Phasing Phasing Phasing RTOR RTOR
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND
EXISTING
RTOR
RT
30
AMBIENT
RELATED
PROJECT
TOTAL
30
LANE
SIGNAL Split|1010| Perm Perm Auto Auto Auto Auto
0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0
LT
0 31 0 0 0 63 1949 0 0 1007 80
63 0 1949 0 0 0 31 0 80 1007 0
Volume/Lane/Signal Configurations
Developed by Chun Wong, 12/94
May 25, 2011 ,Wednesday 01:27:11 PM
CalcaDB
CBASEAM
INTERSECTION DATA SUMMARY SHEET
ATTACHMENT 6
500Cumulative (2014) Base AM
National Boulevard Washington Boulevard
N/S: W/E: 20
I/S No:
AM/PM: Comments:
COUNT DATE: GROWTH FACTOR:
STUDY DATE:
90
A:
B:
560
142
A:
B:
485
500 A:
B: 256
0.946 =
+
+
+ + + 560 485 96 256
*1375
393 A:
B: 96
V/C =
West/East Critical Movements =
North/South Critical Movements =
SouthBound
WestBound EastBound
NorthBound
A = Adjusted Through/Right Volume
B = Adjusted Left Volume
* = ATSAC Benefit
Results
V/C RATIO LOS
0.00 - 0.60 A
0.61 - 0.70 B
0.71 - 0.80 C
0.81 - 0.90 D
0.91 - 1.00 E
A(W/B)
B(N/B)
B(E/B)
A(S/B)
E LOS =
Critical Movements Diagram
TH RT LT TH LT TH RT LT TH RT
Phasing RTOR Phasing Phasing Phasing RTOR RTOR
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND
EXISTING
RTOR
RT
466
AMBIENT
RELATED
PROJECT
TOTAL
466
LANE
SIGNAL Prot-Var|1010|Prot-Var Perm Perm Auto Auto Auto Auto
0 1 0 1 0 0 2 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 2 0 1 0 0 1 0 2 0 0 1 0
LT
874 126 258 902 67 90 1339 340 96 785 184
90 340 1339 67 902 258 126 874 184 785 96
Volume/Lane/Signal Configurations
Developed by Chun Wong, 12/94
May 25, 2011 ,Wednesday 01:27:11 PM
CalcaDB
CBASEAM
INTERSECTION DATA SUMMARY SHEET
ATTACHMENT 6
501Default Scenario Wed May 25, 2011 14:47:01 Page 3-1
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Base Volume Alternative)
********************************************************************************
Intersection #21 WESLEY AV/WASHINGTON BL [CUMULATIVE (2014) BASE AM]
********************************************************************************
Average Delay (sec/veh): 2.0 Worst Case Level Of Service: F[134.9]
********************************************************************************
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 2 0 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 30 0 13 0 0 0 0 1112 36 26 1756 0
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 30 0 13 0 0 0 0 1112 36 26 1756 0
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 30 0 13 0 0 0 0 1112 36 26 1756 0
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Final Vol.: 30 0 13 0 0 0 0 1112 36 26 1756 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Critical Gap Module:
Critical Gp: 6.8 xxxx 6.9 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 4.1 xxxx xxxxx
FollowUpTim: 3.5 xxxx 3.3 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 2.2 xxxx xxxxx
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Module:
Cnflict Vol: 2060 xxxx 574 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 1148 xxxx xxxxx
Potent Cap.: 49 xxxx 467 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 616 xxxx xxxxx
Move Cap.: 47 xxxx 467 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 616 xxxx xxxxx
Volume/Cap: 0.64 xxxx 0.03 xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx 0.04 xxxx xxxx
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Level Of Service Module:
Queue: xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 0.1 xxxx xxxxx
Stopped Del:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 11.1 xxxx xxxxx
LOS by Move: * * * * * * * * * B * *
Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT
Shared Cap.: xxxx 65 xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx
SharedQueue:xxxxx 2.9 xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx
Shrd StpDel:xxxxx 135 xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx
Shared LOS: * F * * * * * * * * * *
ApproachDel: 134.9 xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx
ApproachLOS: F * * *
Traffix 7.6.0715 (c) 2003 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to RAJU ASSOC., PASADENA
ATTACHMENT 6
502Cumulative (2014) Base AM
Wesley Avenue/Driveway Washington Boulevard
N/S: W/E: 21
I/S No:
AM/PM: Comments:
COUNT DATE: GROWTH FACTOR:
STUDY DATE:
26
A:
B:
878|10 10|A:
B:|10 10|30
A:
B:
43
0.768 =
+
+
+ + + 878 0 43 0
1200
574 A:
B: 0
V/C =
West/East Critical Movements =
North/South Critical Movements =
SouthBound
WestBound EastBound
NorthBound
A = Adjusted Through/Right Volume
B = Adjusted Left Volume
* = ATSAC Benefit
Results
V/C RATIO LOS
0.00 - 0.60 A
0.61 - 0.70 B
0.71 - 0.80 C
0.81 - 0.90 D
0.91 - 1.00 E
A(W/B)
A(N/B)
B(E/B)
A(S/B)
C LOS =
Critical Movements Diagram
TH RT LT TH LT TH RT LT TH RT
Phasing RTOR Phasing Phasing Phasing RTOR RTOR
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND
EXISTING
RTOR
RT
30
AMBIENT
RELATED
PROJECT
TOTAL
30
LANE
SIGNAL Perm|10 10| Perm Perm Auto Auto Auto
0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0
LT
0 13 0 0 0 26 1756 0 0 1112 36
26 0 1756 0 0 0 13 0 36 1112 0
Volume/Lane/Signal Configurations
Developed by Chun Wong, 12/94
May 25, 2011 ,Wednesday 01:27:11 PM
CalcaDB
CBASEAM
INTERSECTION DATA SUMMARY SHEET
ATTACHMENT 6
503Cumulative (2014) Base AM
Helms Avenue Washington Boulevard
N/S: W/E: 22
I/S No:
AM/PM: Comments:
COUNT DATE: GROWTH FACTOR:
STUDY DATE:
31
A:
B:
855|10 10|A:
B:|10 10|77
A:
B:
95
0.563 =
+
+
+ + + 855 0 95 0
*1500
569 A:
B: 0
V/C =
West/East Critical Movements =
North/South Critical Movements =
SouthBound
WestBound EastBound
NorthBound
A = Adjusted Through/Right Volume
B = Adjusted Left Volume
* = ATSAC Benefit
Results
V/C RATIO LOS
0.00 - 0.60 A
0.61 - 0.70 B
0.71 - 0.80 C
0.81 - 0.90 D
0.91 - 1.00 E
A(W/B)
A(N/B)
B(E/B)
A(S/B)
A LOS =
Critical Movements Diagram
TH RT LT TH LT TH RT LT TH RT
Phasing RTOR Phasing Phasing Phasing RTOR RTOR
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND
EXISTING
RTOR
RT
77
AMBIENT
RELATED
PROJECT
TOTAL
77
LANE
SIGNAL Split|10 10| Perm Perm Auto Auto Auto
0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0
LT
0 18 0 0 0 31 1710 0 0 1098 40
31 0 1710 0 0 0 18 0 40 1098 0
Volume/Lane/Signal Configurations
Developed by Chun Wong, 12/94
May 25, 2011 ,Wednesday 01:27:11 PM
CalcaDB
CBASEAM
INTERSECTION DATA SUMMARY SHEET
ATTACHMENT 6
504Default Scenario Wed May 25, 2011 14:47:01 Page 5-1
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Base Volume Alternative)
********************************************************************************
Intersection #23 CATTARAUGUS AV/WASHINGTON AV [CUMULATIVE (2014) BASE AM]
********************************************************************************
Average Delay (sec/veh): 265.8 Worst Case Level Of Service: F[5720.0]
********************************************************************************
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 9 5 3 89 6 54 50 982 6 3 1713 330
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 9 5 3 89 6 54 50 982 6 3 1713 330
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 9 5 3 89 6 54 50 982 6 3 1713 330
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Final Vol.: 9 5 3 89 6 54 50 982 6 3 1713 330
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Critical Gap Module:
Critical Gp: 7.5 6.5 6.9 7.5 6.5 6.9 4.1 xxxx xxxxx 4.1 xxxx xxxxx
FollowUpTim: 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3 2.2 xxxx xxxxx 2.2 xxxx xxxxx
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Module:
Cnflict Vol: 1951 3134 494 2478 2972 1022 2043 xxxx xxxxx 988 xxxx xxxxx
Potent Cap.: 39 11 526 16 14 237 280 xxxx xxxxx 708 xxxx xxxxx
Move Cap.: 16 9 526 8 12 237 280 xxxx xxxxx 708 xxxx xxxxx
Volume/Cap: 0.57 0.55 0.01 11.61 0.51 0.23 0.18 xxxx xxxx 0.00 xxxx xxxx
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Level Of Service Module:
Queue: xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 0.6 xxxx xxxxx 0.0 xxxx xxxxx
Stopped Del:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 20.7 xxxx xxxxx 10.1 xxxx xxxxx
LOS by Move: * * * * * * C * * B * *
Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT
Shared Cap.: xxxx 15 xxxxx xxxx 12 xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx
SharedQueue:xxxxx 2.6 xxxxx xxxxx 19.9 xxxxx 0.6 xxxx xxxxx 0.0 xxxx xxxxx
Shrd StpDel:xxxxx 618 xxxxx xxxxx 5720 xxxxx 20.7 xxxx xxxxx 10.1 xxxx xxxxx
Shared LOS: * F * * F * C * * B * *
ApproachDel: 618.3 5720.0 xxxxxx xxxxxx
ApproachLOS: F F * *
Traffix 7.6.0715 (c) 2003 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to RAJU ASSOC., PASADENA
ATTACHMENT 6
505Cumulative (2014) Base AM
Cattaraugus Avenue Washington Boulevard
N/S: W/E: 23
I/S No:
AM/PM: Comments:
COUNT DATE: GROWTH FACTOR:
STUDY DATE:|1010|A:
B:
1028
89
A:
B:
149
17 A:
B: 9
1.030 =
+
+
+ + + 1028 149 50 9
1200
644 A:
B: 50
V/C =
West/East Critical Movements =
North/South Critical Movements =
SouthBound
WestBound EastBound
NorthBound
A = Adjusted Through/Right Volume
B = Adjusted Left Volume
* = ATSAC Benefit
Results
V/C RATIO LOS
0.00 - 0.60 A
0.61 - 0.70 B
0.71 - 0.80 C
0.81 - 0.90 D
0.91 - 1.00 E
A(W/B)
B(N/B)
B(E/B)
A(S/B)
F LOS =
Critical Movements Diagram
TH RT LT TH LT TH RT LT TH RT
Phasing RTOR Phasing Phasing Phasing RTOR RTOR
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND
EXISTING
RTOR
RT|10 10|AMBIENT
RELATED
PROJECT
TOTAL|10 10|LANE
SIGNAL Perm|10 10|Perm Perm Perm Auto Auto Auto Auto
0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0
LT
5 3 89 6 54 3 1713 330 50 982 6
3 330 1713 54 6 89 3 5 6 982 50
Volume/Lane/Signal Configurations
Developed by Chun Wong, 12/94
May 25, 2011 ,Wednesday 01:27:11 PM
CalcaDB
CBASEAM
INTERSECTION DATA SUMMARY SHEET
ATTACHMENT 6
506Cumulative (2014) Base AM
La Cienega Boulevard Washington Boulevard
N/S: W/E: 24
I/S No:
AM/PM: Comments:
COUNT DATE: GROWTH FACTOR:
STUDY DATE:
58
A:
B:
840
188
A:
B:
549
580 A:
B: 260
1.199 =
+
+
+ + + 840 549 96 260
*1375
446 A:
B: 96
V/C =
West/East Critical Movements =
North/South Critical Movements =
SouthBound
WestBound EastBound
NorthBound
A = Adjusted Through/Right Volume
B = Adjusted Left Volume
* = ATSAC Benefit
Results
V/C RATIO LOS
0.00 - 0.60 A
0.61 - 0.70 B
0.71 - 0.80 C
0.81 - 0.90 D
0.91 - 1.00 E
A(W/B)
B(N/B)
B(E/B)
A(S/B)
F LOS =
Critical Movements Diagram
TH RT LT TH LT TH RT LT TH RT
Phasing RTOR Phasing Phasing Phasing RTOR RTOR
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND
EXISTING
RTOR
RT
260
AMBIENT
RELATED
PROJECT
TOTAL
260
LANE
SIGNAL Prot-Var|1010|Prot-Var Perm Perm Auto Auto Auto Auto
0 2 0 1 0 0 1 0 2 0 1 0 0 1 0 2 0 0 1 0 1 0 2 0 0 1 0
LT
1718 21 188 1591 56 58 1679 252 96 892 122
58 252 1679 56 1591 188 21 1718 122 892 96
Volume/Lane/Signal Configurations
Developed by Chun Wong, 12/94
May 25, 2011 ,Wednesday 01:27:11 PM
CalcaDB
CBASEAM
INTERSECTION DATA SUMMARY SHEET
ATTACHMENT 6
507Cumulative (2014) Base AM
La Cienega Boulevard Fairfax Avenue
N/S: W/E: 25
I/S No:
AM/PM: Comments:
COUNT DATE: GROWTH FACTOR:
STUDY DATE:
68 A:
B: 690
513 A:
B: 0
46
A:
B:
932
1.090 =
+
+
+ ++31 932 690 0
*1425
17
A:
B:
31
V/C =
West/East Critical Movements =
North/South Critical Movements =
SouthBound
WestBound EastBound
NorthBound
A = Adjusted Through/Right Volume
B = Adjusted Left Volume
* = ATSAC Benefit
Results
V/C RATIO LOS
0.00 - 0.60 A
0.61 - 0.70 B
0.71 - 0.80 C
0.81 - 0.90 D
0.91 - 1.00 E
B(W/B)
A(N/B)
A(E/B)
B(S/B)
F LOS =
Critical Movements Diagram
TH RT LT TH LT TH RT LT TH RT
Phasing RTOR Phasing Phasing Phasing RTOR RTOR
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND
EXISTING
RTOR
RT
46
AMBIENT
RELATED
PROJECT
TOTAL
46
LANE
SIGNAL Perm|1010|Perm Split Split Free Auto Auto Auto
0 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 1 0 0 2 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0
LT
1863 978 0 1495 43 1255 37 31 17 2 12
1255 31 37 43 1495 0 978 1863 12 2 17
Volume/Lane/Signal Configurations
Developed by Chun Wong, 12/94
May 25, 2011 ,Wednesday 01:27:11 PM
CalcaDB
CBASEAM
INTERSECTION DATA SUMMARY SHEET
ATTACHMENT 6
508Cumulative (2014) Base AM
Wesley Street National Boulevard
N/S: W/E: 26
I/S No:
AM/PM: Comments:
COUNT DATE: GROWTH FACTOR:
STUDY DATE:
40
A:
B:
953
0 A:
B: 0
115
A:
B:
217
0.710 =
+
+
+ + + 953 217 0 0
*1500
529 A:
B: 0
V/C =
West/East Critical Movements =
North/South Critical Movements =
SouthBound
WestBound EastBound
NorthBound
A = Adjusted Through/Right Volume
B = Adjusted Left Volume
* = ATSAC Benefit
Results
V/C RATIO LOS
0.00 - 0.60 A
0.61 - 0.70 B
0.71 - 0.80 C
0.81 - 0.90 D
0.91 - 1.00 E
A(W/B)
A(N/B)
B(E/B)
B(S/B)
C LOS =
Critical Movements Diagram
TH RT LT TH LT TH RT LT TH RT
Phasing RTOR Phasing Phasing Phasing RTOR RTOR
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND
EXISTING
RTOR
RT
115
AMBIENT
RELATED
PROJECT
TOTAL
115
LANE
SIGNAL Perm|10 10|Perm Perm Perm Auto Auto Auto Auto
0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 1 0
LT
0 102 0 0 0 40 1906 0 0 1058 87
40 0 1906 0 0 0 102 0 87 1058 0
Volume/Lane/Signal Configurations
Developed by Chun Wong, 12/94
May 25, 2011 ,Wednesday 01:27:11 PM
CalcaDB
CBASEAM
INTERSECTION DATA SUMMARY SHEET
ATTACHMENT 6
509Cumulative (2014) Base AM
Hayden Avenue National Boulevard
N/S: W/E: 27
I/S No:
AM/PM: Comments:
COUNT DATE: GROWTH FACTOR:
STUDY DATE:
652 A:
B: 221|10 10|A:
B:|10 10|352
A:
B:
352
0.640 =
+
+
+ + + 439 0 352 221
*1425|10 10|A:
B:
439
V/C =
West/East Critical Movements =
North/South Critical Movements =
SouthBound
WestBound EastBound
NorthBound
A = Adjusted Through/Right Volume
B = Adjusted Left Volume
* = ATSAC Benefit
Results
V/C RATIO LOS
0.00 - 0.60 A
0.61 - 0.70 B
0.71 - 0.80 C
0.81 - 0.90 D
0.91 - 1.00 E
B(W/B)
A(N/B)
A(E/B)
A(S/B)
B LOS =
Critical Movements Diagram
TH RT LT TH LT TH RT LT TH RT
Phasing RTOR Phasing Phasing Phasing RTOR RTOR
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND
EXISTING
RTOR
RT
607
AMBIENT
RELATED
PROJECT
TOTAL
607
LANE
SIGNAL Split|1010| Prot-Fix Perm Auto Auto Auto
0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 1 0
LT
0 96 0 0 0 221 1304 0 0 877 275
221 0 1304 0 0 0 96 0 275 877 0
Volume/Lane/Signal Configurations
Developed by Chun Wong, 12/94
May 25, 2011 ,Wednesday 01:27:11 PM
CalcaDB
CBASEAM
INTERSECTION DATA SUMMARY SHEET
ATTACHMENT 6
510Cumulative (2014) Base AM
Jefferson Boulevard National Boulevard
N/S: W/E: 28
I/S No:
AM/PM: Comments:
COUNT DATE: GROWTH FACTOR:
STUDY DATE:|10 10|A:
B:|10 10 10|A:
B:
1088
312 A:
B: 174
1.032 =
+
+
+ + + 0 309 1088 174
*1425
309
A:
B:
309
V/C =
West/East Critical Movements =
North/South Critical Movements =
SouthBound
WestBound EastBound
NorthBound
A = Adjusted Through/Right Volume
B = Adjusted Left Volume
* = ATSAC Benefit
Results
V/C RATIO LOS
0.00 - 0.60 A
0.61 - 0.70 B
0.71 - 0.80 C
0.81 - 0.90 D
0.91 - 1.00 E
A(W/B)
B(N/B)
A(E/B)
A(S/B)
F LOS =
Critical Movements Diagram
TH RT LT TH LT TH RT LT TH RT
Phasing RTOR Phasing Phasing Phasing RTOR RTOR
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND
EXISTING
RTOR
RT
174
AMBIENT
RELATED
PROJECT
TOTAL
174
LANE
SIGNAL Perm|1010|Perm Split Split Auto OLA Auto Auto
0 2 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 0
LT
624 0 0 753 1396 0 0 0 617 0 176
0 0 0 1396 753 0 0 624 176 0 617
Volume/Lane/Signal Configurations
Developed by Chun Wong, 12/94
May 25, 2011 ,Wednesday 01:27:11 PM
CalcaDB
CBASEAM
INTERSECTION DATA SUMMARY SHEET
ATTACHMENT 6
511Cumulative (2014) Base AM
La Cienega Boulevard Jefferson Boulevard
N/S: W/E: 29
I/S No:
AM/PM: Comments:
COUNT DATE: GROWTH FACTOR:
STUDY DATE:
325
A:
B:
657
665 A:
B: 179
146
A:
B:
822
1.308 =
+
+
+ + + 657 822 237 179
*1375
423 A:
B: 237
V/C =
West/East Critical Movements =
North/South Critical Movements =
SouthBound
WestBound EastBound
NorthBound
A = Adjusted Through/Right Volume
B = Adjusted Left Volume
* = ATSAC Benefit
Results
V/C RATIO LOS
0.00 - 0.60 A
0.61 - 0.70 B
0.71 - 0.80 C
0.81 - 0.90 D
0.91 - 1.00 E
A(W/B)
A(N/B)
B(E/B)
B(S/B)
F LOS =
Critical Movements Diagram
TH RT LT TH LT TH RT LT TH RT
Phasing RTOR Phasing Phasing Phasing RTOR RTOR
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND
EXISTING
RTOR
RT
146
AMBIENT
RELATED
PROJECT
TOTAL
146
LANE
SIGNAL Perm|1010|Perm Prot-Var Prot-Var Auto OLA Auto Auto
0 2 0 1 0 0 1 0 3 0 0 1 0 2 0 2 0 0 1 0 2 0 1 0 1 0 0
LT
2351 116 179 1994 643 591 1313 138 430 715 130
591 138 1313 643 1994 179 116 2351 130 715 430
Volume/Lane/Signal Configurations
Developed by Chun Wong, 12/94
May 25, 2011 ,Wednesday 01:27:11 PM
CalcaDB
CBASEAM
INTERSECTION DATA SUMMARY SHEET
ATTACHMENT 6
512Cumulative (2014) Base AM
Jefferson Boulevard Higuera St/Rodeo Rd
N/S: W/E: 30
I/S No:
AM/PM: Comments:
COUNT DATE: GROWTH FACTOR:
STUDY DATE:
562
A:
B:
583
111
A:
B:
354
357 A:
B: 202
0.785 =
+
+
+ + + 583 80 354 202
*1425
27
A:
B:
80
V/C =
West/East Critical Movements =
North/South Critical Movements =
SouthBound
WestBound EastBound
NorthBound
A = Adjusted Through/Right Volume
B = Adjusted Left Volume
* = ATSAC Benefit
Results
V/C RATIO LOS
0.00 - 0.60 A
0.61 - 0.70 B
0.71 - 0.80 C
0.81 - 0.90 D
0.91 - 1.00 E
A(W/B)
B(N/B)
A(E/B)
A(S/B)
C LOS =
Critical Movements Diagram
TH RT LT TH LT TH RT LT TH RT
Phasing RTOR Phasing Phasing Phasing RTOR RTOR
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND
EXISTING
RTOR
RT
202
AMBIENT
RELATED
PROJECT
TOTAL
202
LANE
SIGNAL Perm|1010|Perm Split Split Free Auto Auto Auto
0 2 0 0 1 0 1 0 2 0 0 1 0 2 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 2 0 0 1 0
LT
713 800 111 707 95 1022 583 147 27 160 51
1022 147 583 95 707 111 800 713 51 160 27
Volume/Lane/Signal Configurations
Developed by Chun Wong, 12/94
May 25, 2011 ,Wednesday 01:27:11 PM
CalcaDB
CBASEAM
INTERSECTION DATA SUMMARY SHEET
ATTACHMENT 6
513Cumulative (2014) Base AM
La Cienega Boulevard Rodeo Road
N/S: W/E: 31
I/S No:
AM/PM: Comments:
COUNT DATE: GROWTH FACTOR:
STUDY DATE:
179
A:
B:
461
141
A:
B:
806
788 A:
B: 331
1.247 =
+
+
+ + + 461 806 213 331
*1375
298 A:
B: 213
V/C =
West/East Critical Movements =
North/South Critical Movements =
SouthBound
WestBound EastBound
NorthBound
A = Adjusted Through/Right Volume
B = Adjusted Left Volume
* = ATSAC Benefit
Results
V/C RATIO LOS
0.00 - 0.60 A
0.61 - 0.70 B
0.71 - 0.80 C
0.81 - 0.90 D
0.91 - 1.00 E
A(W/B)
B(N/B)
B(E/B)
A(S/B)
F LOS =
Critical Movements Diagram
TH RT LT TH LT TH RT LT TH RT
Phasing RTOR Phasing Phasing Phasing RTOR RTOR
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND
EXISTING
RTOR
RT
601
AMBIENT
RELATED
PROJECT
TOTAL
601
LANE
SIGNAL Prot-Fix|1010|Prot-Fix Prot-Var Prot-Var Auto Auto OLA OLA
0 2 0 1 0 0 2 0 2 0 1 0 0 2 0 2 0 0 1 0 1 0 2 0 0 1 0
LT
2268 95 256 2126 291 325 921 329 213 595 228
325 329 921 291 2126 256 95 2268 228 595 213
Volume/Lane/Signal Configurations
Developed by Chun Wong, 12/94
May 25, 2011 ,Wednesday 01:27:11 PM
CalcaDB
CBASEAM
INTERSECTION DATA SUMMARY SHEET
ATTACHMENT 6
514Default Scenario Wed May 25, 2011 14:47:01 Page 7-1
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM 4-Way Stop Method (Base Volume Alternative)
********************************************************************************
Intersection #32 BRADDOCK DR/DUQUESNE AV [CUMULATIVE (2014) BASE AM]
********************************************************************************
Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap. (X): 1.635
Loss Time (sec): 0 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 227.9
Optimal Cycle: 0 Level Of Service: F
********************************************************************************
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Stop Sign Stop Sign
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 90 209 143 30 328 39 48 556 38 56 550 40
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 90 209 143 30 328 39 48 556 38 56 550 40
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 90 209 143 30 328 39 48 556 38 56 550 40
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 90 209 143 30 328 39 48 556 38 56 550 40
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Final Vol.: 90 209 143 30 328 39 48 556 38 56 550 40
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lanes: 0.20 0.48 0.32 0.07 0.83 0.10 0.07 0.87 0.06 0.09 0.85 0.06
Final Sat.: 82 190 130 30 328 39 30 342 23 34 336 24
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.62 1.62 1.62 1.64 1.64 1.64
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Delay/Veh: 105.2 105 105.2 76.3 76.3 76.3 314.6 315 314.6 319.0 319 319.0
Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 105.2 105 105.2 76.3 76.3 76.3 314.6 315 314.6 319.0 319 319.0
LOS by Move: F F F F F F F F F F F F
ApproachDel: 105.2 76.3 314.6 319.0
Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
ApprAdjDel: 105.2 76.3 314.6 319.0
LOS by Appr: F F F F
********************************************************************************
Traffix 7.6.0715 (c) 2003 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to RAJU ASSOC., PASADENA
ATTACHMENT 6
515Cumulative (2014) Base AM
Braddock Drive Duquesne Avenue
N/S: W/E: 32
I/S No:
AM/PM: Comments:
COUNT DATE: GROWTH FACTOR:
STUDY DATE:
646 A:
B: 56
30
A:
B:
397
442 A:
B: 90
1.185 =
+
+
+ + + 642 397 56 90
1000
48
A:
B:
642
V/C =
West/East Critical Movements =
North/South Critical Movements =
SouthBound
WestBound EastBound
NorthBound
A = Adjusted Through/Right Volume
B = Adjusted Left Volume
* = ATSAC Benefit
Results
V/C RATIO LOS
0.00 - 0.60 A
0.61 - 0.70 B
0.71 - 0.80 C
0.81 - 0.90 D
0.91 - 1.00 E
B(W/B)
B(N/B)
A(E/B)
A(S/B)
F LOS =
Critical Movements Diagram
TH RT LT TH LT TH RT LT TH RT
Phasing RTOR Phasing Phasing Phasing RTOR RTOR
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND
EXISTING
RTOR
RT
90
AMBIENT
RELATED
PROJECT
TOTAL
90
LANE
SIGNAL Perm|10 10|Perm Perm Perm Auto Auto Auto Auto
0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0
LT
209 143 30 328 39 56 550 40 48 556 38
56 40 550 39 328 30 143 209 38 556 48
Volume/Lane/Signal Configurations
Developed by Chun Wong, 12/94
May 25, 2011 ,Wednesday 01:27:11 PM
CalcaDB
CBASEAM
INTERSECTION DATA SUMMARY SHEET
ATTACHMENT 6
516Default Scenario Wed May 25, 2011 14:47:01 Page 9-1
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM 4-Way Stop Method (Base Volume Alternative)
********************************************************************************
Intersection #33 LUCERNE AV/DUQUESNE AV [CUMULATIVE (2014) BASE AM]
********************************************************************************
Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap. (X): 1.047
Loss Time (sec): 0 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 51.7
Optimal Cycle: 0 Level Of Service: F
********************************************************************************
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Stop Sign Stop Sign
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lanes: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 0 0 0 188 0 63 92 554 0 0 596 352
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 0 0 0 188 0 63 92 554 0 0 596 352
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 0 0 0 188 0 63 92 554 0 0 596 352
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 0 0 0 188 0 63 92 554 0 0 596 352
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Final Vol.: 0 0 0 188 0 63 92 554 0 0 596 352
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lanes: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.75 0.00 0.25 0.14 0.86 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00
Final Sat.: 0 0 0 399 0 134 88 529 0 0 586 661
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: xxxx xxxx xxxx 0.47 xxxx 0.47 1.05 1.05 xxxx xxxx 1.02 0.53
Crit Moves: **** **** ****
Delay/Veh: 0.0 0.0 0.0 15.6 0.0 15.6 73.0 73.0 0.0 0.0 66.1 14.2
Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 0.0 0.0 0.0 15.6 0.0 15.6 73.0 73.0 0.0 0.0 66.1 14.2
LOS by Move: * * * C * C F F * * F B
ApproachDel: xxxxxx 15.6 73.0 46.8
Delay Adj: xxxxx 1.00 1.00 1.00
ApprAdjDel: xxxxxx 15.6 73.0 46.8
LOS by Appr: * C F E
********************************************************************************
Traffix 7.6.0715 (c) 2003 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to RAJU ASSOC., PASADENA
ATTACHMENT 6
517Cumulative (2014) Base AM
Lucerne Avenue Duquesne Avenue
N/S: W/E: 33
I/S No:
AM/PM: Comments:
COUNT DATE: GROWTH FACTOR:
STUDY DATE:|10 10|A:
B:
596
188
A:
B:
251|10 10|A:
B:|10 10|0.939 =
+
+
+ + + 596 251092
1000
646 A:
B: 92
V/C =
West/East Critical Movements =
North/South Critical Movements =
SouthBound
WestBound EastBound
NorthBound
A = Adjusted Through/Right Volume
B = Adjusted Left Volume
* = ATSAC Benefit
Results
V/C RATIO LOS
0.00 - 0.60 A
0.61 - 0.70 B
0.71 - 0.80 C
0.81 - 0.90 D
0.91 - 1.00 E
A(W/B)
A(N/B)
B(E/B)
A(S/B)
E LOS =
Critical Movements Diagram
TH RT LT TH LT TH RT LT TH RT
Phasing RTOR Phasing Phasing Phasing RTOR RTOR
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND
EXISTING
RTOR
RT|10 10|AMBIENT
RELATED
PROJECT
TOTAL|10 10|LANE
SIGNAL |10 10|Split Perm Perm Auto Auto Auto
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
LT
0 0 188 0 63 0 596 352 92 554 0
0 352 596 63 0 188 0 0 0 554 92
Volume/Lane/Signal Configurations
Developed by Chun Wong, 12/94
May 25, 2011 ,Wednesday 01:27:11 PM
CalcaDB
CBASEAM
INTERSECTION DATA SUMMARY SHEET
ATTACHMENT 6
518Cumulative (2014) Base AM
Jefferson Boulevard Duquesne Avenue
N/S: W/E: 34
I/S No:
AM/PM: Comments:
COUNT DATE: GROWTH FACTOR:
STUDY DATE:
33 A:
B: 8
19
A:
B:
794
595 A:
B: 493
1.211 =
+
+
+ + + 467 794 8 493
*1375
316
A:
B:
467
V/C =
West/East Critical Movements =
North/South Critical Movements =
SouthBound
WestBound EastBound
NorthBound
A = Adjusted Through/Right Volume
B = Adjusted Left Volume
* = ATSAC Benefit
Results
V/C RATIO LOS
0.00 - 0.60 A
0.61 - 0.70 B
0.71 - 0.80 C
0.81 - 0.90 D
0.91 - 1.00 E
B(W/B)
B(N/B)
A(E/B)
A(S/B)
F LOS =
Critical Movements Diagram
TH RT LT TH LT TH RT LT TH RT
Phasing RTOR Phasing Phasing Phasing RTOR RTOR
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND
EXISTING
RTOR
RT
493
AMBIENT
RELATED
PROJECT
TOTAL
493
LANE
SIGNAL Prot-Var|1010|Prot-Var Perm Perm Auto Auto OLA Auto
0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 2 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0
LT
1162 28 19 1588 440 8 33 6 316 32 435
8 6 33 440 1588 19 28 1162 435 32 316
Volume/Lane/Signal Configurations
Developed by Chun Wong, 12/94
May 25, 2011 ,Wednesday 01:27:11 PM
CalcaDB
CBASEAM
INTERSECTION DATA SUMMARY SHEET
ATTACHMENT 6
519
Cumulative (2014) Base Conditions
PM Peak Hour
ATTACHMENT 6
520Cumulative (2014) Base PM
Robertson Boulevard Cattaragus Avenue
N/S: W/E: 1
I/S No:
AM/PM: Comments:
COUNT DATE: GROWTH FACTOR:
STUDY DATE:
186 A:
B: 62
57
A:
B:
923
882 A:
B: 105
0.963 =
+
+
+ + + 460 923 62 105
*1500
101
A:
B:
460
V/C =
West/East Critical Movements =
North/South Critical Movements =
SouthBound
WestBound EastBound
NorthBound
A = Adjusted Through/Right Volume
B = Adjusted Left Volume
* = ATSAC Benefit
Results
V/C RATIO LOS
0.00 - 0.60 A
0.61 - 0.70 B
0.71 - 0.80 C
0.81 - 0.90 D
0.91 - 1.00 E
B(W/B)
B(N/B)
A(E/B)
A(S/B)
E LOS =
Critical Movements Diagram
TH RT LT TH LT TH RT LT TH RT
Phasing RTOR Phasing Phasing Phasing RTOR RTOR
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND
EXISTING
RTOR
RT
105
AMBIENT
RELATED
PROJECT
TOTAL
105
LANE
SIGNAL Perm|1010|Perm Perm Perm Auto Auto Auto Auto
0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0
LT
1748 15 57 1780 65 62 81 43 101 231 128
62 43 81 65 1780 57 15 1748 128 231 101
Volume/Lane/Signal Configurations
Developed by Chun Wong, 12/94
May 25, 2011 ,Wednesday 02:46:17 PM
CalcaDB
CBASEPM
INTERSECTION DATA SUMMARY SHEET
ATTACHMENT 6
521Cumulative (2014) Base PM
Robertson Boulevard I-10 WB Off-Ramp/Kincardine Av
N/S: W/E: 2
I/S No:
AM/PM: Comments:
COUNT DATE: GROWTH FACTOR:
STUDY DATE:
531 A:
B: 476
709 A:
B: 0
14
A:
B:
724
0.839 =
+
+
+ + + 164 724 476 0
*1500
77
A:
B:
164
V/C =
West/East Critical Movements =
North/South Critical Movements =
SouthBound
WestBound EastBound
NorthBound
A = Adjusted Through/Right Volume
B = Adjusted Left Volume
* = ATSAC Benefit
Results
V/C RATIO LOS
0.00 - 0.60 A
0.61 - 0.70 B
0.71 - 0.80 C
0.81 - 0.90 D
0.91 - 1.00 E
B(W/B)
A(N/B)
A(E/B)
B(S/B)
D LOS =
Critical Movements Diagram
TH RT LT TH LT TH RT LT TH RT
Phasing RTOR Phasing Phasing Phasing RTOR RTOR
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND
EXISTING
RTOR
RT
14
AMBIENT
RELATED
PROJECT
TOTAL
14
LANE
SIGNAL Perm|1010|Perm Perm Perm Auto Auto Auto Auto
0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
LT
1448 0 0 1382 35 476 23 562 77 0 87
476 562 23 35 1382 0 0 1448 87 0 77
Volume/Lane/Signal Configurations
Developed by Chun Wong, 12/94
May 25, 2011 ,Wednesday 02:46:17 PM
CalcaDB
CBASEPM
INTERSECTION DATA SUMMARY SHEET
ATTACHMENT 6
522Cumulative (2014) Base PM
Robertson Boulevard National Boulevard
N/S: W/E: 3
I/S No:
AM/PM: Comments:
COUNT DATE: GROWTH FACTOR:
STUDY DATE:
415 A:
B: 117
646 A:
B: 370
106
A:
B:
553
1.072 =
+
+
+ + + 530 553 117 370
*1375
175
A:
B:
530
V/C =
West/East Critical Movements =
North/South Critical Movements =
SouthBound
WestBound EastBound
NorthBound
A = Adjusted Through/Right Volume
B = Adjusted Left Volume
* = ATSAC Benefit
Results
V/C RATIO LOS
0.00 - 0.60 A
0.61 - 0.70 B
0.71 - 0.80 C
0.81 - 0.90 D
0.91 - 1.00 E
B(W/B)
A(N/B)
A(E/B)
B(S/B)
F LOS =
Critical Movements Diagram
TH RT LT TH LT TH RT LT TH RT
Phasing RTOR Phasing Phasing Phasing RTOR RTOR
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND
EXISTING
RTOR
RT
106
AMBIENT
RELATED
PROJECT
TOTAL
106
LANE
SIGNAL Perm|1010|Prot-Fix Perm Prot-Fix Auto Auto OLA Auto
0 1 0 1 0 0 2 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0
LT
948 158 673 1056 235 117 415 278 175 920 140
117 278 415 235 1056 673 158 948 140 920 175
Volume/Lane/Signal Configurations
Developed by Chun Wong, 12/94
May 25, 2011 ,Wednesday 02:46:17 PM
CalcaDB
CBASEPM
INTERSECTION DATA SUMMARY SHEET
ATTACHMENT 6
523Cumulative (2014) Base PM
National Boulevard I-10 EB On-Ramp
N/S: W/E: 4
I/S No:
AM/PM: Comments:
COUNT DATE: GROWTH FACTOR:
STUDY DATE:
A:
B: 0|10 10 10|A:
B:
614
354 A:
B: 217
0.484 =
+
+
+ + + 614 217
*1500
A:
B: 0|10 10|V/C =
West/East Critical Movements =
North/South Critical Movements =
SouthBound
WestBound EastBound
NorthBound
A = Adjusted Through/Right Volume
B = Adjusted Left Volume
* = ATSAC Benefit
Results
V/C RATIO LOS
0.00 - 0.60 A
0.61 - 0.70 B
0.71 - 0.80 C
0.81 - 0.90 D
0.91 - 1.00 E
B(N/B) A(S/B)
A LOS =
Critical Movements Diagram
TH RT LT TH LT TH RT LT TH RT
Phasing RTOR Phasing Phasing Phasing RTOR RTOR
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND
EXISTING
RTOR
RT
217
AMBIENT
RELATED
PROJECT
TOTAL
217
LANE
SIGNAL Prot-Fix|1010|Perm Auto Auto
0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
LT
708 0 0 1132 614 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 614 1132 0 0 708 0 0 0
Volume/Lane/Signal Configurations
Developed by Chun Wong, 12/94
May 25, 2011 ,Wednesday 02:46:17 PM
CalcaDB
CBASEPM
INTERSECTION DATA SUMMARY SHEET
ATTACHMENT 6
524Cumulative (2014) Base PM
Hughes Avenue Venice Boulevard
N/S: W/E: 5
I/S No:
AM/PM: Comments:
COUNT DATE: GROWTH FACTOR:
STUDY DATE:
623 A:
B: 130
301 A:
B: 43
108
A:
B:
457
0.767 =
+
+
+ + + 626 457 130 43
*1500
59
A:
B:
626
V/C =
West/East Critical Movements =
North/South Critical Movements =
SouthBound
WestBound EastBound
NorthBound
A = Adjusted Through/Right Volume
B = Adjusted Left Volume
* = ATSAC Benefit
Results
V/C RATIO LOS
0.00 - 0.60 A
0.61 - 0.70 B
0.71 - 0.80 C
0.81 - 0.90 D
0.91 - 1.00 E
B(W/B)
A(N/B)
A(E/B)
B(S/B)
C LOS =
Critical Movements Diagram
TH RT LT TH LT TH RT LT TH RT
Phasing RTOR Phasing Phasing Phasing RTOR RTOR
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND
EXISTING
RTOR
RT
108
AMBIENT
RELATED
PROJECT
TOTAL
108
LANE
SIGNAL Perm|10 10|Perm Perm Perm Auto Auto Auto Auto
0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 3 0 0 1 0 1 0 3 0 0 1 0
LT
217 132 43 204 54 130 1869 45 59 1877 101
130 45 1869 54 204 43 132 217 101 1877 59
Volume/Lane/Signal Configurations
Developed by Chun Wong, 12/94
May 25, 2011 ,Wednesday 02:46:17 PM
CalcaDB
CBASEPM
INTERSECTION DATA SUMMARY SHEET
ATTACHMENT 6
525Cumulative (2014) Base PM
Bagley Avenue Venice Boulevard
N/S: W/E: 6
I/S No:
AM/PM: Comments:
COUNT DATE: GROWTH FACTOR:
STUDY DATE:
81
A:
B:
622
93
A:
B:
367
154 A:
B: 41
0.763 =
+
+
+ + + 622 367 116 41
*1375
656 A:
B: 116
V/C =
West/East Critical Movements =
North/South Critical Movements =
SouthBound
WestBound EastBound
NorthBound
A = Adjusted Through/Right Volume
B = Adjusted Left Volume
* = ATSAC Benefit
Results
V/C RATIO LOS
0.00 - 0.60 A
0.61 - 0.70 B
0.71 - 0.80 C
0.81 - 0.90 D
0.91 - 1.00 E
A(W/B)
B(N/B)
B(E/B)
A(S/B)
C LOS =
Critical Movements Diagram
TH RT LT TH LT TH RT LT TH RT
Phasing RTOR Phasing Phasing Phasing RTOR RTOR
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND
EXISTING
RTOR
RT
41
AMBIENT
RELATED
PROJECT
TOTAL
41
LANE
SIGNAL Perm|1010|Perm Prot-Var Prot-Var Auto Auto Auto Auto
0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 3 0 0 1 0 1 0 2 0 1 0 0
LT
108 46 93 174 100 81 1866 73 116 1859 110
81 73 1866 100 174 93 46 108 110 1859 116
Volume/Lane/Signal Configurations
Developed by Chun Wong, 12/94
May 25, 2011 ,Wednesday 02:46:17 PM
CalcaDB
CBASEPM
INTERSECTION DATA SUMMARY SHEET
ATTACHMENT 6
526Cumulative (2014) Base PM
Culver Boulevard Venice Boulevard
N/S: W/E: 7
I/S No:
AM/PM: Comments:
COUNT DATE: GROWTH FACTOR:
STUDY DATE:
714 A:
B: 299
216
A:
B:
216
146
A:
B:
245
0.987 =
+
+
+ + + 694 216 245 299
*1375
54
A:
B:
694
V/C =
West/East Critical Movements =
North/South Critical Movements =
SouthBound
WestBound EastBound
NorthBound
A = Adjusted Through/Right Volume
B = Adjusted Left Volume
* = ATSAC Benefit
Results
V/C RATIO LOS
0.00 - 0.60 A
0.61 - 0.70 B
0.71 - 0.80 C
0.81 - 0.90 D
0.91 - 1.00 E
B(W/B)
A(N/B)
A(E/B)
A(S/B)
E LOS =
Critical Movements Diagram
TH RT LT TH LT TH RT LT TH RT
Phasing RTOR Phasing Phasing Phasing RTOR RTOR
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND
EXISTING
RTOR
RT
146
AMBIENT
RELATED
PROJECT
TOTAL
146
LANE
SIGNAL Split|1010|Split Prot-Fix Prot-Fix OLA Auto Auto Auto
0 1 0 0 2 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 2 0 2 0 1 0 0 1 0 2 0 1 0 0
LT
83 988 308 74 49 543 1928 214 54 1984 99
543 214 1928 49 74 308 988 83 99 1984 54
Volume/Lane/Signal Configurations
Developed by Chun Wong, 12/94
May 25, 2011 ,Wednesday 02:46:17 PM
CalcaDB
CBASEPM
INTERSECTION DATA SUMMARY SHEET
ATTACHMENT 6
527Cumulative (2014) Base PM
Robertson Boulevard Venice Boulevard
N/S: W/E: 8
I/S No:
AM/PM: Comments:
COUNT DATE: GROWTH FACTOR:
STUDY DATE:
108
A:
B:
771
370 A:
B: 619
247
A:
B:
380
1.460 =
+
+
+ + + 771 380 334 619
*1375
841 A:
B: 334
V/C =
West/East Critical Movements =
North/South Critical Movements =
SouthBound
WestBound EastBound
NorthBound
A = Adjusted Through/Right Volume
B = Adjusted Left Volume
* = ATSAC Benefit
Results
V/C RATIO LOS
0.00 - 0.60 A
0.61 - 0.70 B
0.71 - 0.80 C
0.81 - 0.90 D
0.91 - 1.00 E
A(W/B)
A(N/B)
B(E/B)
B(S/B)
F LOS =
Critical Movements Diagram
TH RT LT TH LT TH RT LT TH RT
Phasing RTOR Phasing Phasing Phasing RTOR RTOR
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND
EXISTING
RTOR
RT
247
AMBIENT
RELATED
PROJECT
TOTAL
247
LANE
SIGNAL Split|1010|Split Prot-Var Prot-Var OLA Auto Auto Auto
0 2 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 2 0 1 0 0 2 0 2 0 1 0 0
LT
759 67 619 370 259 108 2165 147 607 2354 170
108 147 2165 259 370 619 67 759 170 2354 607
Volume/Lane/Signal Configurations
Developed by Chun Wong, 12/94
May 25, 2011 ,Wednesday 02:46:17 PM
CalcaDB
CBASEPM
INTERSECTION DATA SUMMARY SHEET
ATTACHMENT 6
528Cumulative (2014) Base PM
National Boulevard Venice Boulevard
N/S: W/E: 9
I/S No:
AM/PM: Comments:
COUNT DATE: GROWTH FACTOR:
STUDY DATE:
548 A:
B: 69
189
A:
B:
486
366 A:
B: 265
1.043 =
+
+
+ + + 710 486 69 265
*1375
128
A:
B:
710
V/C =
West/East Critical Movements =
North/South Critical Movements =
SouthBound
WestBound EastBound
NorthBound
A = Adjusted Through/Right Volume
B = Adjusted Left Volume
* = ATSAC Benefit
Results
V/C RATIO LOS
0.00 - 0.60 A
0.61 - 0.70 B
0.71 - 0.80 C
0.81 - 0.90 D
0.91 - 1.00 E
B(W/B)
B(N/B)
A(E/B)
A(S/B)
F LOS =
Critical Movements Diagram
TH RT LT TH LT TH RT LT TH RT
Phasing RTOR Phasing Phasing Phasing RTOR RTOR
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND
EXISTING
RTOR
RT
265
AMBIENT
RELATED
PROJECT
TOTAL
265
LANE
SIGNAL Perm|1010|Prot-Fix Prot-Fix Prot-Fix Auto Auto Auto Auto
0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 2 0 3 0 0 1 0 2 0 3 0 0 1 0
LT
629 102 189 847 125 126 1644 66 233 2131 538
126 66 1644 125 847 189 102 629 538 2131 233
Volume/Lane/Signal Configurations
Developed by Chun Wong, 12/94
May 25, 2011 ,Wednesday 02:46:17 PM
CalcaDB
CBASEPM
INTERSECTION DATA SUMMARY SHEET
ATTACHMENT 6
529Cumulative (2014) Base PM
Helms Avenue Venice Boulevard
N/S: W/E: 10
I/S No:
AM/PM: Comments:
COUNT DATE: GROWTH FACTOR:
STUDY DATE:
618 A:
B: 33
29
A:
B:
67
17 A:
B: 16
0.545 =
+
+
+ + + 807 67 33 16
*1500
76
A:
B:
807
V/C =
West/East Critical Movements =
North/South Critical Movements =
SouthBound
WestBound EastBound
NorthBound
A = Adjusted Through/Right Volume
B = Adjusted Left Volume
* = ATSAC Benefit
Results
V/C RATIO LOS
0.00 - 0.60 A
0.61 - 0.70 B
0.71 - 0.80 C
0.81 - 0.90 D
0.91 - 1.00 E
B(W/B)
B(N/B)
A(E/B)
A(S/B)
A LOS =
Critical Movements Diagram
TH RT LT TH LT TH RT LT TH RT
Phasing RTOR Phasing Phasing Phasing RTOR RTOR
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND
EXISTING
RTOR
RT
16
AMBIENT
RELATED
PROJECT
TOTAL
16
LANE
SIGNAL Perm|10 10|Perm Perm Perm Auto Auto Auto Auto
1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 1 0 0 1 0 2 0 1 0 0
LT
1 10 29 9 29 33 1847 8 76 2388 34
33 8 1847 29 9 29 10 1 34 2388 76
Volume/Lane/Signal Configurations
Developed by Chun Wong, 12/94
May 25, 2011 ,Wednesday 02:46:17 PM
CalcaDB
CBASEPM
INTERSECTION DATA SUMMARY SHEET
ATTACHMENT 6
530Cumulative (2014) Base PM
Cattaraugus Avenue Venice Boulevard
N/S: W/E: 11
I/S No:
AM/PM: Comments:
COUNT DATE: GROWTH FACTOR:
STUDY DATE:
601 A:
B: 91
193
A:
B:
300
136 A:
B: 47
0.723 =
+
+
+ + + 752 300 91 47
*1500
114
A:
B:
752
V/C =
West/East Critical Movements =
North/South Critical Movements =
SouthBound
WestBound EastBound
NorthBound
A = Adjusted Through/Right Volume
B = Adjusted Left Volume
* = ATSAC Benefit
Results
V/C RATIO LOS
0.00 - 0.60 A
0.61 - 0.70 B
0.71 - 0.80 C
0.81 - 0.90 D
0.91 - 1.00 E
B(W/B)
B(N/B)
A(E/B)
A(S/B)
C LOS =
Critical Movements Diagram
TH RT LT TH LT TH RT LT TH RT
Phasing RTOR Phasing Phasing Phasing RTOR RTOR
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND
EXISTING
RTOR
RT
47
AMBIENT
RELATED
PROJECT
TOTAL
47
LANE
SIGNAL Perm|10 10|Perm Perm Perm Auto Auto Auto Auto
0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 1 0 0 1 0 2 0 1 0 0
LT
64 25 193 75 32 91 1723 79 114 2243 13
91 79 1723 32 75 193 25 64 13 2243 114
Volume/Lane/Signal Configurations
Developed by Chun Wong, 12/94
May 25, 2011 ,Wednesday 02:46:17 PM
CalcaDB
CBASEPM
INTERSECTION DATA SUMMARY SHEET
ATTACHMENT 6
531Cumulative (2014) Base PM
La Cienega Boulevard Venice Boulevard
N/S: W/E: 12
I/S No:
AM/PM: Comments:
COUNT DATE: GROWTH FACTOR:
STUDY DATE:
469 A:
B: 223
37
A:
B:
654
457 A:
B: 104
1.096 =
+
+
+ + + 622 654 223 104
*1375
166
A:
B:
622
V/C =
West/East Critical Movements =
North/South Critical Movements =
SouthBound
WestBound EastBound
NorthBound
A = Adjusted Through/Right Volume
B = Adjusted Left Volume
* = ATSAC Benefit
Results
V/C RATIO LOS
0.00 - 0.60 A
0.61 - 0.70 B
0.71 - 0.80 C
0.81 - 0.90 D
0.91 - 1.00 E
B(W/B)
B(N/B)
A(E/B)
A(S/B)
F LOS =
Critical Movements Diagram
TH RT LT TH LT TH RT LT TH RT
Phasing RTOR Phasing Phasing Phasing RTOR RTOR
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND
EXISTING
RTOR
RT
104
AMBIENT
RELATED
PROJECT
TOTAL
104
LANE
SIGNAL Perm|1010|Perm Prot-Var Prot-Var Auto Auto Auto Auto
0 2 0 1 0 0 1 0 2 0 1 0 0 1 0 3 0 0 1 0 2 0 3 0 0 1 0
LT
1254 116 37 1618 344 223 1407 35 302 1865 249
223 35 1407 344 1618 37 116 1254 249 1865 302
Volume/Lane/Signal Configurations
Developed by Chun Wong, 12/94
May 25, 2011 ,Wednesday 02:46:17 PM
CalcaDB
CBASEPM
INTERSECTION DATA SUMMARY SHEET
ATTACHMENT 6
532Cumulative (2014) Base PM
Hughes Av/Duquesne Av Washington Boulevard
N/S: W/E: 13
I/S No:
AM/PM: Comments:
COUNT DATE: GROWTH FACTOR:
STUDY DATE:
293 A:
B: 80
33
A:
B:
421
428 A:
B: 66
0.653 =
+
+
+ + + 517 421 80 66
*1500
52
A:
B:
517
V/C =
West/East Critical Movements =
North/South Critical Movements =
SouthBound
WestBound EastBound
NorthBound
A = Adjusted Through/Right Volume
B = Adjusted Left Volume
* = ATSAC Benefit
Results
V/C RATIO LOS
0.00 - 0.60 A
0.61 - 0.70 B
0.71 - 0.80 C
0.81 - 0.90 D
0.91 - 1.00 E
B(W/B)
B(N/B)
A(E/B)
A(S/B)
B LOS =
Critical Movements Diagram
TH RT LT TH LT TH RT LT TH RT
Phasing RTOR Phasing Phasing Phasing RTOR RTOR
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND
EXISTING
RTOR
RT
66
AMBIENT
RELATED
PROJECT
TOTAL
66
LANE
SIGNAL Perm|1010|Perm Perm Perm Auto Auto Auto Auto
0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0
LT
407 21 33 352 69 80 534 52 52 793 240
80 52 534 69 352 33 21 407 240 793 52
Volume/Lane/Signal Configurations
Developed by Chun Wong, 12/94
May 25, 2011 ,Wednesday 02:46:17 PM
CalcaDB
CBASEPM
INTERSECTION DATA SUMMARY SHEET
ATTACHMENT 6
533Cumulative (2014) Base PM
Duquesne Avenue Culver Boulevard
N/S: W/E: 14
I/S No:
AM/PM: Comments:
COUNT DATE: GROWTH FACTOR:
STUDY DATE:
449 A:
B: 149
124
A:
B:
500
364 A:
B: 124
0.886 =
+
+
+ + + 542 500 149 124
*1375
80
A:
B:
542
V/C =
West/East Critical Movements =
North/South Critical Movements =
SouthBound
WestBound EastBound
NorthBound
A = Adjusted Through/Right Volume
B = Adjusted Left Volume
* = ATSAC Benefit
Results
V/C RATIO LOS
0.00 - 0.60 A
0.61 - 0.70 B
0.71 - 0.80 C
0.81 - 0.90 D
0.91 - 1.00 E
B(W/B)
B(N/B)
A(E/B)
A(S/B)
D LOS =
Critical Movements Diagram
TH RT LT TH LT TH RT LT TH RT
Phasing RTOR Phasing Phasing Phasing RTOR RTOR
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND
EXISTING
RTOR
RT
124
AMBIENT
RELATED
PROJECT
TOTAL
124
LANE
SIGNAL Prot-Var|1010|Prot-Var Prot-Var Prot-Var Auto Auto Auto Auto
0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0
LT
364 194 124 500 82 149 874 23 80 987 97
149 23 874 82 500 124 194 364 97 987 80
Volume/Lane/Signal Configurations
Developed by Chun Wong, 12/94
May 25, 2011 ,Wednesday 02:46:17 PM
CalcaDB
CBASEPM
INTERSECTION DATA SUMMARY SHEET
ATTACHMENT 6
534Cumulative (2014) Base PM
Culver Boulevard Washington Bl/Irving Pl
N/S: W/E: 15
I/S No:
AM/PM: Comments:
COUNT DATE: GROWTH FACTOR:
STUDY DATE:
504 A:
B: 95
407
A:
B:
407
18 A:
B: 41
0.635 =
+
+
+ + + 426 407 95 41
*1375|10 10|A:
B:
426
V/C =
West/East Critical Movements =
North/South Critical Movements =
SouthBound
WestBound EastBound
NorthBound
A = Adjusted Through/Right Volume
B = Adjusted Left Volume
* = ATSAC Benefit
Results
V/C RATIO LOS
0.00 - 0.60 A
0.61 - 0.70 B
0.71 - 0.80 C
0.81 - 0.90 D
0.91 - 1.00 E
B(W/B)
B(N/B)
A(E/B)
A(S/B)
B LOS =
Critical Movements Diagram
TH RT LT TH LT TH RT LT TH RT
Phasing RTOR Phasing Phasing Phasing RTOR RTOR
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND
EXISTING
RTOR
RT
41
AMBIENT
RELATED
PROJECT
TOTAL
41
LANE
SIGNAL Split|1010|Split Prot-Fix Perm Auto Auto Auto Auto
0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 2 0 1 0 0
LT
0 66 807 0 6 95 1008 254 0 1217 60
-407
95 661 1008 6 0 807 66 0 60 1217 0
Volume/Lane/Signal Configurations
Developed by Chun Wong, 12/94
May 25, 2011 ,Wednesday 02:46:17 PM
CalcaDB
CBASEPM
INTERSECTION DATA SUMMARY SHEET
ATTACHMENT 6
535Cumulative (2014) Base PM
Main Street Culver Boulevard
N/S: W/E: 16
I/S No:
AM/PM: Comments:
COUNT DATE: GROWTH FACTOR:
STUDY DATE:|10 10|A:
B:
567
112 A:
B: 286|10 10|A:
B:|10 10|0.613 =
+
+
+ + + 567 0 120 286
*1425
628 A:
B: 120
V/C =
West/East Critical Movements =
North/South Critical Movements =
SouthBound
WestBound EastBound
NorthBound
A = Adjusted Through/Right Volume
B = Adjusted Left Volume
* = ATSAC Benefit
Results
V/C RATIO LOS
0.00 - 0.60 A
0.61 - 0.70 B
0.71 - 0.80 C
0.81 - 0.90 D
0.91 - 1.00 E
A(W/B)
A(N/B)
B(E/B)
B(S/B)
B LOS =
Critical Movements Diagram
TH RT LT TH LT TH RT LT TH RT
Phasing RTOR Phasing Phasing Phasing RTOR RTOR
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND
EXISTING
RTOR
RT|10 10|AMBIENT
RELATED
PROJECT
TOTAL|10 10|LANE
SIGNAL |10 10|Split Perm Prot-Fix Auto Auto Auto
0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 2 0 1 0 0 1 0 3 0 0 0 0
LT
0 0 286 0 172 0 1583 119 120 1883 0
0 119 1583 172 0 286 0 0 0 1883 120
Volume/Lane/Signal Configurations
Developed by Chun Wong, 12/94
May 25, 2011 ,Wednesday 02:46:17 PM
CalcaDB
CBASEPM
INTERSECTION DATA SUMMARY SHEET
ATTACHMENT 6
536Cumulative (2014) Base PM
Culver Boulevard Washington Bl/Canfield Av
N/S: W/E: 17
I/S No:
AM/PM: Comments:
COUNT DATE: GROWTH FACTOR:
STUDY DATE:
550
A:
B:
550
307 A:
B: 118
14
A:
B:
496
0.752 =
+
+
+ + + 550 7 496 118
*1425|10 10|A:
B:|1010|V/C =
West/East Critical Movements =
North/South Critical Movements =
SouthBound
WestBound EastBound
NorthBound
A = Adjusted Through/Right Volume
B = Adjusted Left Volume
* = ATSAC Benefit
Results
V/C RATIO LOS
0.00 - 0.60 A
0.61 - 0.70 B
0.71 - 0.80 C
0.81 - 0.90 D
0.91 - 1.00 E
A(W/B)
A(N/B)
A(E/B)
B(S/B)
C LOS =
Critical Movements Diagram
TH RT LT TH LT TH RT LT TH RT
Phasing RTOR Phasing Phasing Phasing RTOR RTOR
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND
EXISTING
RTOR
RT
14
AMBIENT
RELATED
PROJECT
TOTAL
14
LANE
SIGNAL Prot-Fix|1010|Prot-Fix Split OLA Auto Auto OLA
0 2 0 0 2 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0
LT
991 1097 118 605 9 1069 30 219 0 0 21
1069 219 30 9 605 118 1097 991 21 0 0
Volume/Lane/Signal Configurations
Developed by Chun Wong, 12/94
May 25, 2011 ,Wednesday 02:46:17 PM
CalcaDB
CBASEPM
INTERSECTION DATA SUMMARY SHEET
ATTACHMENT 6
537Cumulative (2014) Base PM
Robertson Bl/Higuera St Washington Boulevard
N/S: W/E: 18
I/S No:
AM/PM: Comments:
COUNT DATE: GROWTH FACTOR:
STUDY DATE:
85
A:
B:
725
229 A:
B: 183
67
A:
B:
212
0.816 =
+
+
+ + + 725 212 143 183
*1425
625 A:
B: 143
V/C =
West/East Critical Movements =
North/South Critical Movements =
SouthBound
WestBound EastBound
NorthBound
A = Adjusted Through/Right Volume
B = Adjusted Left Volume
* = ATSAC Benefit
Results
V/C RATIO LOS
0.00 - 0.60 A
0.61 - 0.70 B
0.71 - 0.80 C
0.81 - 0.90 D
0.91 - 1.00 E
A(W/B)
A(N/B)
B(E/B)
B(S/B)
D LOS =
Critical Movements Diagram
TH RT LT TH LT TH RT LT TH RT
Phasing RTOR Phasing Phasing Phasing RTOR RTOR
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND
EXISTING
RTOR
RT
67
AMBIENT
RELATED
PROJECT
TOTAL
67
LANE
SIGNAL Prot-Fix|1010|Prot-Fix Perm Perm Auto Auto Auto Auto
0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0
LT
212 86 183 229 191 85 989 460 143 1156 93
85 460 989 191 229 183 86 212 93 1156 143
Volume/Lane/Signal Configurations
Developed by Chun Wong, 12/94
May 25, 2011 ,Wednesday 02:46:17 PM
CalcaDB
CBASEPM
INTERSECTION DATA SUMMARY SHEET
ATTACHMENT 6
538Cumulative (2014) Base PM
Landmark Street Washington Boulevard
N/S: W/E: 19
I/S No:
AM/PM: Comments:
COUNT DATE: GROWTH FACTOR:
STUDY DATE:|1010|A:
B:
834|10 10|A:
B:|10 10|31
A:
B:
42
0.514 =
+
+
+ + + 834 0 42 0
*1500
790 A:
B: 0
V/C =
West/East Critical Movements =
North/South Critical Movements =
SouthBound
WestBound EastBound
NorthBound
A = Adjusted Through/Right Volume
B = Adjusted Left Volume
* = ATSAC Benefit
Results
V/C RATIO LOS
0.00 - 0.60 A
0.61 - 0.70 B
0.71 - 0.80 C
0.81 - 0.90 D
0.91 - 1.00 E
A(W/B)
A(N/B)
B(E/B)
A(S/B)
A LOS =
Critical Movements Diagram
TH RT LT TH LT TH RT LT TH RT
Phasing RTOR Phasing Phasing Phasing RTOR RTOR
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND
EXISTING
RTOR
RT
31
AMBIENT
RELATED
PROJECT
TOTAL
31
LANE
SIGNAL Split|1010| Perm Perm Auto Auto Auto Auto
0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0
LT
0 42 0 0 0 3 1667 0 0 1574 6
3 0 1667 0 0 0 42 0 6 1574 0
Volume/Lane/Signal Configurations
Developed by Chun Wong, 12/94
May 25, 2011 ,Wednesday 02:46:17 PM
CalcaDB
CBASEPM
INTERSECTION DATA SUMMARY SHEET
ATTACHMENT 6
539Cumulative (2014) Base PM
National Boulevard Washington Boulevard
N/S: W/E: 20
I/S No:
AM/PM: Comments:
COUNT DATE: GROWTH FACTOR:
STUDY DATE:
366 A:
B: 86
261
A:
B:
563
427 A:
B: 186
0.925 =
+
+
+ + + 533 563 86 186
*1375
85
A:
B:
533
V/C =
West/East Critical Movements =
North/South Critical Movements =
SouthBound
WestBound EastBound
NorthBound
A = Adjusted Through/Right Volume
B = Adjusted Left Volume
* = ATSAC Benefit
Results
V/C RATIO LOS
0.00 - 0.60 A
0.61 - 0.70 B
0.71 - 0.80 C
0.81 - 0.90 D
0.91 - 1.00 E
B(W/B)
B(N/B)
A(E/B)
A(S/B)
E LOS =
Critical Movements Diagram
TH RT LT TH LT TH RT LT TH RT
Phasing RTOR Phasing Phasing Phasing RTOR RTOR
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND
EXISTING
RTOR
RT
338
AMBIENT
RELATED
PROJECT
TOTAL
338
LANE
SIGNAL Prot-Var|1010|Prot-Var Perm Perm Auto Auto Auto Auto
0 1 0 1 0 0 2 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 2 0 1 0 0 1 0 2 0 0 1 0
LT
730 123 475 1067 58 86 885 213 85 1066 303
86 213 885 58 1067 475 123 730 303 1066 85
Volume/Lane/Signal Configurations
Developed by Chun Wong, 12/94
May 25, 2011 ,Wednesday 02:46:17 PM
CalcaDB
CBASEPM
INTERSECTION DATA SUMMARY SHEET
ATTACHMENT 6
540Default Scenario Wed May 25, 2011 14:47:01 Page 11-1
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Base Volume Alternative)
********************************************************************************
Intersection #211 WESLEY AV/WASHINGTON BL [CUMULATIVE (2014) BASE PM]
********************************************************************************
Average Delay (sec/veh): 15.2 Worst Case Level Of Service: F[484.0]
********************************************************************************
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 2 0 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 54 0 33 0 0 0 0 1578 34 44 1065 0
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 54 0 33 0 0 0 0 1578 34 44 1065 0
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 54 0 33 0 0 0 0 1578 34 44 1065 0
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Final Vol.: 54 0 33 0 0 0 0 1578 34 44 1065 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Critical Gap Module:
Critical Gp: 6.8 xxxx 6.9 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 4.1 xxxx xxxxx
FollowUpTim: 3.5 xxxx 3.3 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 2.2 xxxx xxxxx
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Module:
Cnflict Vol: 2216 xxxx 806 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 1612 xxxx xxxxx
Potent Cap.: 38 xxxx 329 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 410 xxxx xxxxx
Move Cap.: 35 xxxx 329 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 410 xxxx xxxxx
Volume/Cap: 1.54 xxxx 0.10 xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx 0.11 xxxx xxxx
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Level Of Service Module:
Queue: xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 0.4 xxxx xxxxx
Stopped Del:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 14.8 xxxx xxxxx
LOS by Move: * * * * * * * * * B * *
Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT
Shared Cap.: xxxx 53 xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx
SharedQueue:xxxxx 8.2 xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx
Shrd StpDel:xxxxx 484 xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx
Shared LOS: * F * * * * * * * * * *
ApproachDel: 484.0 xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx
ApproachLOS: F * * *
Traffix 7.6.0715 (c) 2003 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to RAJU ASSOC., PASADENA
ATTACHMENT 6
541Cumulative (2014) Base PM
Wesley Avenue/Driveway Washington Boulevard
N/S: W/E: 21
I/S No:
AM/PM: Comments:
COUNT DATE: GROWTH FACTOR:
STUDY DATE:
533 A:
B: 44|10 10|A:
B:|10 10|54
A:
B:
87
0.781 =
+
+
+ + + 806 0 87 44
1200|10 10|A:
B:
806
V/C =
West/East Critical Movements =
North/South Critical Movements =
SouthBound
WestBound EastBound
NorthBound
A = Adjusted Through/Right Volume
B = Adjusted Left Volume
* = ATSAC Benefit
Results
V/C RATIO LOS
0.00 - 0.60 A
0.61 - 0.70 B
0.71 - 0.80 C
0.81 - 0.90 D
0.91 - 1.00 E
B(W/B)
A(N/B)
A(E/B)
A(S/B)
C LOS =
Critical Movements Diagram
TH RT LT TH LT TH RT LT TH RT
Phasing RTOR Phasing Phasing Phasing RTOR RTOR
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND
EXISTING
RTOR
RT
54
AMBIENT
RELATED
PROJECT
TOTAL
54
LANE
SIGNAL Perm|10 10| Perm Perm Auto Auto Auto
0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0
LT
0 33 0 0 0 44 1065 0 0 1578 34
44 0 1065 0 0 0 33 0 34 1578 0
Volume/Lane/Signal Configurations
Developed by Chun Wong, 12/94
May 25, 2011 ,Wednesday 02:46:17 PM
CalcaDB
CBASEPM
INTERSECTION DATA SUMMARY SHEET
ATTACHMENT 6
542Cumulative (2014) Base PM
Helms Avenue Washington Boulevard
N/S: W/E: 22
I/S No:
AM/PM: Comments:
COUNT DATE: GROWTH FACTOR:
STUDY DATE:
547 A:
B: 14|10 10|A:
B:|10 10|51
A:
B:
64
0.503 =
+
+
+ + + 781 0 64 14
*1500|10 10|A:
B:
781
V/C =
West/East Critical Movements =
North/South Critical Movements =
SouthBound
WestBound EastBound
NorthBound
A = Adjusted Through/Right Volume
B = Adjusted Left Volume
* = ATSAC Benefit
Results
V/C RATIO LOS
0.00 - 0.60 A
0.61 - 0.70 B
0.71 - 0.80 C
0.81 - 0.90 D
0.91 - 1.00 E
B(W/B)
A(N/B)
A(E/B)
A(S/B)
A LOS =
Critical Movements Diagram
TH RT LT TH LT TH RT LT TH RT
Phasing RTOR Phasing Phasing Phasing RTOR RTOR
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND
EXISTING
RTOR
RT
51
AMBIENT
RELATED
PROJECT
TOTAL
51
LANE
SIGNAL Split|10 10| Perm Perm Auto Auto Auto
0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0
LT
0 13 0 0 0 14 1094 0 0 1530 31
14 0 1094 0 0 0 13 0 31 1530 0
Volume/Lane/Signal Configurations
Developed by Chun Wong, 12/94
May 25, 2011 ,Wednesday 02:46:17 PM
CalcaDB
CBASEPM
INTERSECTION DATA SUMMARY SHEET
ATTACHMENT 6
543Default Scenario Wed May 25, 2011 14:47:01 Page 13-1
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Base Volume Alternative)
********************************************************************************
Intersection #231 CATTARAUGUS AV/WASHINGTON AV [CUMULATIVE (2014) BASE PM]
********************************************************************************
Average Delay (sec/veh): 28.8 Worst Case Level Of Service: F[709.6]
********************************************************************************
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 4 2 3 60 2 48 68 1487 9 11 1034 77
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 4 2 3 60 2 48 68 1487 9 11 1034 77
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 4 2 3 60 2 48 68 1487 9 11 1034 77
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Final Vol.: 4 2 3 60 2 48 68 1487 9 11 1034 77
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Critical Gap Module:
Critical Gp: 7.5 6.5 6.9 7.5 6.5 6.9 4.1 xxxx xxxxx 4.1 xxxx xxxxx
FollowUpTim: 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3 2.2 xxxx xxxxx 2.2 xxxx xxxxx
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Module:
Cnflict Vol: 2168 2761 748 1975 2727 556 1111 xxxx xxxxx 1496 xxxx xxxxx
Potent Cap.: 27 20 359 38 21 480 636 xxxx xxxxx 454 xxxx xxxxx
Move Cap.: 20 17 359 31 18 480 636 xxxx xxxxx 454 xxxx xxxxx
Volume/Cap: 0.20 0.12 0.01 1.96 0.11 0.10 0.11 xxxx xxxx 0.02 xxxx xxxx
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Level Of Service Module:
Queue: xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 0.4 xxxx xxxxx 0.1 xxxx xxxxx
Stopped Del:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 11.3 xxxx xxxxx 13.1 xxxx xxxxx
LOS by Move: * * * * * * B * * B * *
Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT
Shared Cap.: xxxx 28 xxxxx xxxx 51 xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx
SharedQueue:xxxxx 1.0 xxxxx xxxxx 11.1 xxxxx 0.4 xxxx xxxxx 0.1 xxxx xxxxx
Shrd StpDel:xxxxx 188 xxxxx xxxxx 710 xxxxx 11.3 xxxx xxxxx 13.1 xxxx xxxxx
Shared LOS: * F * * F * B * * B * *
ApproachDel: 188.4 709.6 xxxxxx xxxxxx
ApproachLOS: F F * *
Traffix 7.6.0715 (c) 2003 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to RAJU ASSOC., PASADENA
ATTACHMENT 6
544Cumulative (2014) Base PM
Cattaraugus Avenue Washington Boulevard
N/S: W/E: 23
I/S No:
AM/PM: Comments:
COUNT DATE: GROWTH FACTOR:
STUDY DATE:
589 A:
B: 11
60
A:
B:
110
9 A:
B: 4
0.898 =
+
+
+ + + 952 110 11 4
1200
68
A:
B:
952
V/C =
West/East Critical Movements =
North/South Critical Movements =
SouthBound
WestBound EastBound
NorthBound
A = Adjusted Through/Right Volume
B = Adjusted Left Volume
* = ATSAC Benefit
Results
V/C RATIO LOS
0.00 - 0.60 A
0.61 - 0.70 B
0.71 - 0.80 C
0.81 - 0.90 D
0.91 - 1.00 E
B(W/B)
B(N/B)
A(E/B)
A(S/B)
D LOS =
Critical Movements Diagram
TH RT LT TH LT TH RT LT TH RT
Phasing RTOR Phasing Phasing Phasing RTOR RTOR
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND
EXISTING
RTOR
RT|1010|AMBIENT
RELATED
PROJECT
TOTAL|1010|LANE
SIGNAL Perm|10 10|Perm Perm Perm Auto Auto Auto Auto
0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0
LT
2 3 60 2 48 11 1034 77 68 1487 9
11 77 1034 48 2 60 3 2 9 1487 68
Volume/Lane/Signal Configurations
Developed by Chun Wong, 12/94
May 25, 2011 ,Wednesday 02:46:17 PM
CalcaDB
CBASEPM
INTERSECTION DATA SUMMARY SHEET
ATTACHMENT 6
545Cumulative (2014) Base PM
La Cienega Boulevard Washington Boulevard
N/S: W/E: 24
I/S No:
AM/PM: Comments:
COUNT DATE: GROWTH FACTOR:
STUDY DATE:
405 A:
B: 70
227
A:
B:
604
419 A:
B: 150
0.990 =
+
+
+ + + 634 604 70 150
*1375
212
A:
B:
634
V/C =
West/East Critical Movements =
North/South Critical Movements =
SouthBound
WestBound EastBound
NorthBound
A = Adjusted Through/Right Volume
B = Adjusted Left Volume
* = ATSAC Benefit
Results
V/C RATIO LOS
0.00 - 0.60 A
0.61 - 0.70 B
0.71 - 0.80 C
0.81 - 0.90 D
0.91 - 1.00 E
B(W/B)
B(N/B)
A(E/B)
A(S/B)
E LOS =
Critical Movements Diagram
TH RT LT TH LT TH RT LT TH RT
Phasing RTOR Phasing Phasing Phasing RTOR RTOR
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND
EXISTING
RTOR
RT
150
AMBIENT
RELATED
PROJECT
TOTAL
150
LANE
SIGNAL Prot-Var|1010|Prot-Var Perm Perm Auto Auto Auto Auto
0 2 0 1 0 0 1 0 2 0 1 0 0 1 0 2 0 0 1 0 1 0 2 0 0 1 0
LT
1200 58 227 1755 56 70 809 127 212 1268 157
70 127 809 56 1755 227 58 1200 157 1268 212
Volume/Lane/Signal Configurations
Developed by Chun Wong, 12/94
May 25, 2011 ,Wednesday 02:46:17 PM
CalcaDB
CBASEPM
INTERSECTION DATA SUMMARY SHEET
ATTACHMENT 6
546Cumulative (2014) Base PM
La Cienega Boulevard Fairfax Avenue
N/S: W/E: 25
I/S No:
AM/PM: Comments:
COUNT DATE: GROWTH FACTOR:
STUDY DATE:
38 A:
B: 509
492 A:
B: 0
21
A:
B:
840
0.928 =
+
+
+ ++73 840 509 0
*1425
45
A:
B:
73
V/C =
West/East Critical Movements =
North/South Critical Movements =
SouthBound
WestBound EastBound
NorthBound
A = Adjusted Through/Right Volume
B = Adjusted Left Volume
* = ATSAC Benefit
Results
V/C RATIO LOS
0.00 - 0.60 A
0.61 - 0.70 B
0.71 - 0.80 C
0.81 - 0.90 D
0.91 - 1.00 E
B(W/B)
A(N/B)
A(E/B)
B(S/B)
E LOS =
Critical Movements Diagram
TH RT LT TH LT TH RT LT TH RT
Phasing RTOR Phasing Phasing Phasing RTOR RTOR
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND
EXISTING
RTOR
RT
21
AMBIENT
RELATED
PROJECT
TOTAL
21
LANE
SIGNAL Perm|1010|Perm Split Split Free Auto Auto Auto
0 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 1 0 0 2 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0
LT
1679 1460 0 1450 27 926 19 19 45 4 24
926 19 19 27 1450 0 1460 1679 24 4 45
Volume/Lane/Signal Configurations
Developed by Chun Wong, 12/94
May 25, 2011 ,Wednesday 02:46:17 PM
CalcaDB
CBASEPM
INTERSECTION DATA SUMMARY SHEET
ATTACHMENT 6
547Cumulative (2014) Base PM
Wesley Street National Boulevard
N/S: W/E: 26
I/S No:
AM/PM: Comments:
COUNT DATE: GROWTH FACTOR:
STUDY DATE:
595 A:
B: 5
0 A:
B: 0
26
A:
B:
144
0.472 =
+
+
+ + + 664 144 5 0
*1500|10 10|A:
B:
664
V/C =
West/East Critical Movements =
North/South Critical Movements =
SouthBound
WestBound EastBound
NorthBound
A = Adjusted Through/Right Volume
B = Adjusted Left Volume
* = ATSAC Benefit
Results
V/C RATIO LOS
0.00 - 0.60 A
0.61 - 0.70 B
0.71 - 0.80 C
0.81 - 0.90 D
0.91 - 1.00 E
B(W/B)
A(N/B)
A(E/B)
B(S/B)
A LOS =
Critical Movements Diagram
TH RT LT TH LT TH RT LT TH RT
Phasing RTOR Phasing Phasing Phasing RTOR RTOR
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND
EXISTING
RTOR
RT
26
AMBIENT
RELATED
PROJECT
TOTAL
26
LANE
SIGNAL Perm|10 10|Perm Perm Perm Auto Auto Auto Auto
0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 1 0
LT
0 118 0 0 0 5 1190 0 0 1327 5
5 0 1190 0 0 0 118 0 5 1327 0
Volume/Lane/Signal Configurations
Developed by Chun Wong, 12/94
May 25, 2011 ,Wednesday 02:46:17 PM
CalcaDB
CBASEPM
INTERSECTION DATA SUMMARY SHEET
ATTACHMENT 6
548Cumulative (2014) Base PM
Hayden Avenue National Boulevard
N/S: W/E: 27
I/S No:
AM/PM: Comments:
COUNT DATE: GROWTH FACTOR:
STUDY DATE:
249 A:
B: 53|10 10|A:
B:|10 10|442
A:
B:
442
0.738 =
+
+
+ + + 656 0 442 53
*1425|10 10|A:
B:
656
V/C =
West/East Critical Movements =
North/South Critical Movements =
SouthBound
WestBound EastBound
NorthBound
A = Adjusted Through/Right Volume
B = Adjusted Left Volume
* = ATSAC Benefit
Results
V/C RATIO LOS
0.00 - 0.60 A
0.61 - 0.70 B
0.71 - 0.80 C
0.81 - 0.90 D
0.91 - 1.00 E
B(W/B)
A(N/B)
A(E/B)
A(S/B)
C LOS =
Critical Movements Diagram
TH RT LT TH LT TH RT LT TH RT
Phasing RTOR Phasing Phasing Phasing RTOR RTOR
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND
EXISTING
RTOR
RT
687
AMBIENT
RELATED
PROJECT
TOTAL
687
LANE
SIGNAL Split|1010| Prot-Fix Perm Auto Auto Auto
0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 1 0
LT
0 197 0 0 0 53 497 0 0 1312 161
53 0 497 0 0 0 197 0 161 1312 0
Volume/Lane/Signal Configurations
Developed by Chun Wong, 12/94
May 25, 2011 ,Wednesday 02:46:17 PM
CalcaDB
CBASEPM
INTERSECTION DATA SUMMARY SHEET
ATTACHMENT 6
549Cumulative (2014) Base PM
Jefferson Boulevard National Boulevard
N/S: W/E: 28
I/S No:
AM/PM: Comments:
COUNT DATE: GROWTH FACTOR:
STUDY DATE:|10 10|A:
B:|10 10 10|A:
B:
617
464 A:
B: 77
0.782 =
+
+
+ + + 0 520 617 77
*1425
520
A:
B:
520
V/C =
West/East Critical Movements =
North/South Critical Movements =
SouthBound
WestBound EastBound
NorthBound
A = Adjusted Through/Right Volume
B = Adjusted Left Volume
* = ATSAC Benefit
Results
V/C RATIO LOS
0.00 - 0.60 A
0.61 - 0.70 B
0.71 - 0.80 C
0.81 - 0.90 D
0.91 - 1.00 E
A(W/B)
B(N/B)
A(E/B)
A(S/B)
C LOS =
Critical Movements Diagram
TH RT LT TH LT TH RT LT TH RT
Phasing RTOR Phasing Phasing Phasing RTOR RTOR
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND
EXISTING
RTOR
RT
77
AMBIENT
RELATED
PROJECT
TOTAL
77
LANE
SIGNAL Perm|1010|Perm Split Split Auto Auto Auto Auto
0 2 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 0
LT
927 0 0 617 506 0 0 0 1039 0 116
0 0 0 506 617 0 0 927 116 0 1039
Volume/Lane/Signal Configurations
Developed by Chun Wong, 12/94
May 25, 2011 ,Wednesday 02:46:17 PM
CalcaDB
CBASEPM
INTERSECTION DATA SUMMARY SHEET
ATTACHMENT 6
550Cumulative (2014) Base PM
La Cienega Boulevard Jefferson Boulevard
N/S: W/E: 29
I/S No:
AM/PM: Comments:
COUNT DATE: GROWTH FACTOR:
STUDY DATE:
413 A:
B: 168
751 A:
B: 60
100
A:
B:
892
1.235 =
+
+
+ + + 674 892 168 60
*1375
323
A:
B:
674
V/C =
West/East Critical Movements =
North/South Critical Movements =
SouthBound
WestBound EastBound
NorthBound
A = Adjusted Through/Right Volume
B = Adjusted Left Volume
* = ATSAC Benefit
Results
V/C RATIO LOS
0.00 - 0.60 A
0.61 - 0.70 B
0.71 - 0.80 C
0.81 - 0.90 D
0.91 - 1.00 E
B(W/B)
A(N/B)
A(E/B)
B(S/B)
F LOS =
Critical Movements Diagram
TH RT LT TH LT TH RT LT TH RT
Phasing RTOR Phasing Phasing Phasing RTOR RTOR
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND
EXISTING
RTOR
RT
100
AMBIENT
RELATED
PROJECT
TOTAL
100
LANE
SIGNAL Perm|1010|Perm Prot-Var Prot-Var Auto OLA Auto Auto
0 2 0 1 0 0 1 0 3 0 0 1 0 2 0 2 0 0 1 0 2 0 1 0 1 0 0
LT
2360 315 60 2253 245 306 826 102 588 1076 271
306 102 826 245 2253 60 315 2360 271 1076 588
Volume/Lane/Signal Configurations
Developed by Chun Wong, 12/94
May 25, 2011 ,Wednesday 02:46:17 PM
CalcaDB
CBASEPM
INTERSECTION DATA SUMMARY SHEET
ATTACHMENT 6
551Cumulative (2014) Base PM
Jefferson Boulevard Higuera St/Rodeo Rd
N/S: W/E: 30
I/S No:
AM/PM: Comments:
COUNT DATE: GROWTH FACTOR:
STUDY DATE:
333
A:
B:
337
281 A:
B: 178
34
A:
B:
441
0.811 =
+
+
+ + + 337 300 441 178
*1425
58
A:
B:
300
V/C =
West/East Critical Movements =
North/South Critical Movements =
SouthBound
WestBound EastBound
NorthBound
A = Adjusted Through/Right Volume
B = Adjusted Left Volume
* = ATSAC Benefit
Results
V/C RATIO LOS
0.00 - 0.60 A
0.61 - 0.70 B
0.71 - 0.80 C
0.81 - 0.90 D
0.91 - 1.00 E
A(W/B)
A(N/B)
A(E/B)
B(S/B)
D LOS =
Critical Movements Diagram
TH RT LT TH LT TH RT LT TH RT
Phasing RTOR Phasing Phasing Phasing RTOR RTOR
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND
EXISTING
RTOR
RT
34
AMBIENT
RELATED
PROJECT
TOTAL
34
LANE
SIGNAL Perm|1010|Perm Split Split Free Auto Auto Auto
0 2 0 0 1 0 1 0 2 0 0 1 0 2 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 2 0 0 1 0
LT
882 1026 178 561 52 605 337 67 58 600 165
605 67 337 52 561 178 1026 882 165 600 58
Volume/Lane/Signal Configurations
Developed by Chun Wong, 12/94
May 25, 2011 ,Wednesday 02:46:17 PM
CalcaDB
CBASEPM
INTERSECTION DATA SUMMARY SHEET
ATTACHMENT 6
552Cumulative (2014) Base PM
La Cienega Boulevard Rodeo Road
N/S: W/E: 31
I/S No:
AM/PM: Comments:
COUNT DATE: GROWTH FACTOR:
STUDY DATE:
299 A:
B: 141
792 A:
B: 243
195
A:
B:
847
1.278 =
+
+
+ + + 622 847 141 243
*1375
312
A:
B:
622
V/C =
West/East Critical Movements =
North/South Critical Movements =
SouthBound
WestBound EastBound
NorthBound
A = Adjusted Through/Right Volume
B = Adjusted Left Volume
* = ATSAC Benefit
Results
V/C RATIO LOS
0.00 - 0.60 A
0.61 - 0.70 B
0.71 - 0.80 C
0.81 - 0.90 D
0.91 - 1.00 E
B(W/B)
A(N/B)
A(E/B)
B(S/B)
F LOS =
Critical Movements Diagram
TH RT LT TH LT TH RT LT TH RT
Phasing RTOR Phasing Phasing Phasing RTOR RTOR
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND
EXISTING
RTOR
RT
355
AMBIENT
RELATED
PROJECT
TOTAL
355
LANE
SIGNAL Prot-Fix|1010|Prot-Fix Prot-Var Prot-Var Auto Auto OLA OLA
0 2 0 1 0 0 2 0 2 0 1 0 0 2 0 2 0 0 1 0 1 0 2 0 0 1 0
LT
2305 237 442 2248 129 257 598 150 312 1244 380
257 150 598 129 2248 442 237 2305 380 1244 312
Volume/Lane/Signal Configurations
Developed by Chun Wong, 12/94
May 25, 2011 ,Wednesday 02:46:17 PM
CalcaDB
CBASEPM
INTERSECTION DATA SUMMARY SHEET
ATTACHMENT 6
553Default Scenario Wed May 25, 2011 14:47:01 Page 15-1
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM 4-Way Stop Method (Base Volume Alternative)
********************************************************************************
Intersection #321 BRADDOCK DR/DUQUESNE AV [CUMULATIVE (2014) BASE PM]
********************************************************************************
Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap. (X): 1.531
Loss Time (sec): 0 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 158.5
Optimal Cycle: 0 Level Of Service: F
********************************************************************************
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Stop Sign Stop Sign
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 155 181 192 8 47 19 133 475 160 21 515 17
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 155 181 192 8 47 19 133 475 160 21 515 17
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 155 181 192 8 47 19 133 475 160 21 515 17
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 155 181 192 8 47 19 133 475 160 21 515 17
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Final Vol.: 155 181 192 8 47 19 133 475 160 21 515 17
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lanes: 0.29 0.34 0.37 0.11 0.63 0.26 0.17 0.62 0.21 0.04 0.93 0.03
Final Sat.: 149 174 184 43 254 103 87 310 104 19 462 15
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 1.04 1.04 1.04 0.18 0.18 0.18 1.53 1.53 1.53 1.11 1.11 1.11
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Delay/Veh: 78.3 78.3 78.3 14.0 14.0 14.0 268.5 269 268.5 101.8 102 101.8
Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 78.3 78.3 78.3 14.0 14.0 14.0 268.5 269 268.5 101.8 102 101.8
LOS by Move: F F F B B B F F F F F F
ApproachDel: 78.3 14.0 268.5 101.8
Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
ApprAdjDel: 78.3 14.0 268.5 101.8
LOS by Appr: F B F F
********************************************************************************
Traffix 7.6.0715 (c) 2003 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to RAJU ASSOC., PASADENA
ATTACHMENT 6
554Cumulative (2014) Base PM
Braddock Drive Duquesne Avenue
N/S: W/E: 32
I/S No:
AM/PM: Comments:
COUNT DATE: GROWTH FACTOR:
STUDY DATE:
553 A:
B: 21
74 A:
B: 8
155
A:
B:
528
1.325 =
+
+
+ + + 768 528 21 8
1000
133
A:
B:
768
V/C =
West/East Critical Movements =
North/South Critical Movements =
SouthBound
WestBound EastBound
NorthBound
A = Adjusted Through/Right Volume
B = Adjusted Left Volume
* = ATSAC Benefit
Results
V/C RATIO LOS
0.00 - 0.60 A
0.61 - 0.70 B
0.71 - 0.80 C
0.81 - 0.90 D
0.91 - 1.00 E
B(W/B)
A(N/B)
A(E/B)
B(S/B)
F LOS =
Critical Movements Diagram
TH RT LT TH LT TH RT LT TH RT
Phasing RTOR Phasing Phasing Phasing RTOR RTOR
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND
EXISTING
RTOR
RT
155
AMBIENT
RELATED
PROJECT
TOTAL
155
LANE
SIGNAL Perm|10 10|Perm Perm Perm Auto Auto Auto Auto
0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0
LT
181 192 8 47 19 21 515 17 133 475 160
21 17 515 19 47 8 192 181 160 475 133
Volume/Lane/Signal Configurations
Developed by Chun Wong, 12/94
May 25, 2011 ,Wednesday 02:46:17 PM
CalcaDB
CBASEPM
INTERSECTION DATA SUMMARY SHEET
ATTACHMENT 6
555Default Scenario Wed May 25, 2011 14:47:01 Page 17-1
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM 4-Way Stop Method (Base Volume Alternative)
********************************************************************************
Intersection #331 LUCERNE AV/DUQUESNE AV [CUMULATIVE (2014) BASE PM]
********************************************************************************
Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap. (X): 1.102
Loss Time (sec): 0 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 66.8
Optimal Cycle: 0 Level Of Service: F
********************************************************************************
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Stop Sign Stop Sign
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lanes: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 0 0 0 351 0 73 58 534 0 0 570 239
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 0 0 0 351 0 73 58 534 0 0 570 239
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 0 0 0 351 0 73 58 534 0 0 570 239
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 0 0 0 351 0 73 58 534 0 0 570 239
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Final Vol.: 0 0 0 351 0 73 58 534 0 0 570 239
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lanes: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.83 0.00 0.17 0.10 0.90 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00
Final Sat.: 0 0 0 438 0 91 54 496 0 0 517 575
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: xxxx xxxx xxxx 0.80 xxxx 0.80 1.08 1.08 xxxx xxxx 1.10 0.42
Crit Moves: **** **** ****
Delay/Veh: 0.0 0.0 0.0 32.0 0.0 32.0 85.5 85.5 0.0 0.0 95.7 13.3
Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 0.0 0.0 0.0 32.0 0.0 32.0 85.5 85.5 0.0 0.0 95.7 13.3
LOS by Move: * * * D * D F F * * F B
ApproachDel: xxxxxx 32.0 85.5 71.4
Delay Adj: xxxxx 1.00 1.00 1.00
ApprAdjDel: xxxxxx 32.0 85.5 71.4
LOS by Appr: * D F F
********************************************************************************
Traffix 7.6.0715 (c) 2003 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to RAJU ASSOC., PASADENA
ATTACHMENT 6
556Cumulative (2014) Base PM
Lucerne Avenue Duquesne Avenue
N/S: W/E: 33
I/S No:
AM/PM: Comments:
COUNT DATE: GROWTH FACTOR:
STUDY DATE:|10 10|A:
B:
570
351
A:
B:
424|10 10|A:
B:|10 10|1.052 =
+
+
+ + + 570 424058
1000
592 A:
B: 58
V/C =
West/East Critical Movements =
North/South Critical Movements =
SouthBound
WestBound EastBound
NorthBound
A = Adjusted Through/Right Volume
B = Adjusted Left Volume
* = ATSAC Benefit
Results
V/C RATIO LOS
0.00 - 0.60 A
0.61 - 0.70 B
0.71 - 0.80 C
0.81 - 0.90 D
0.91 - 1.00 E
A(W/B)
A(N/B)
B(E/B)
A(S/B)
F LOS =
Critical Movements Diagram
TH RT LT TH LT TH RT LT TH RT
Phasing RTOR Phasing Phasing Phasing RTOR RTOR
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND
EXISTING
RTOR
RT|10 10|AMBIENT
RELATED
PROJECT
TOTAL|10 10|LANE
SIGNAL |10 10|Split Perm Perm Auto Auto Auto
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
LT
0 0 351 0 73 0 570 239 58 534 0
0 239 570 73 0 351 0 0 0 534 58
Volume/Lane/Signal Configurations
Developed by Chun Wong, 12/94
May 25, 2011 ,Wednesday 02:46:17 PM
CalcaDB
CBASEPM
INTERSECTION DATA SUMMARY SHEET
ATTACHMENT 6
557Cumulative (2014) Base PM
Jefferson Boulevard Duquesne Avenue
N/S: W/E: 34
I/S No:
AM/PM: Comments:
COUNT DATE: GROWTH FACTOR:
STUDY DATE:
29
A:
B:
42
54
A:
B:
532
782 A:
B: 472
1.030 =
+
+
+ + +42 532 466 472
*1375
475 A:
B: 466
V/C =
West/East Critical Movements =
North/South Critical Movements =
SouthBound
WestBound EastBound
NorthBound
A = Adjusted Through/Right Volume
B = Adjusted Left Volume
* = ATSAC Benefit
Results
V/C RATIO LOS
0.00 - 0.60 A
0.61 - 0.70 B
0.71 - 0.80 C
0.81 - 0.90 D
0.91 - 1.00 E
A(W/B)
B(N/B)
B(E/B)
A(S/B)
F LOS =
Critical Movements Diagram
TH RT LT TH LT TH RT LT TH RT
Phasing RTOR Phasing Phasing Phasing RTOR RTOR
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND
EXISTING
RTOR
RT
472
AMBIENT
RELATED
PROJECT
TOTAL
472
LANE
SIGNAL Prot-Var|1010|Prot-Var Perm Perm Auto Auto OLA Auto
0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 2 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0
LT
1528 35 54 1064 212 29 42 21 466 64 411
29 21 42 212 1064 54 35 1528 411 64 466
Volume/Lane/Signal Configurations
Developed by Chun Wong, 12/94
May 25, 2011 ,Wednesday 02:46:17 PM
CalcaDB
CBASEPM
INTERSECTION DATA SUMMARY SHEET
ATTACHMENT 6
558
APPENDIX F
Capacity Calculation Worksheets
Cumulative (2014) Plus Project Conditions
ATTACHMENT 6
559
Cumulative (2014) Plus Project Conditions
AM Peak Hour
ATTACHMENT 6
560Cumulative (2014) Plus Project AM
Robertson Boulevard Cattaragus Avenue
N/S: W/E: 1
I/S No:
AM/PM: Comments:
COUNT DATE: GROWTH FACTOR:
STUDY DATE:
87
A:
B:
403
40
A:
B:
963
685 A:
B: 98
0.979 =
+
+
+ + + 403 963 110 98
*1500
399 A:
B: 110
V/C =
West/East Critical Movements =
North/South Critical Movements =
SouthBound
WestBound EastBound
NorthBound
A = Adjusted Through/Right Volume
B = Adjusted Left Volume
* = ATSAC Benefit
Results
V/C RATIO LOS
0.00 - 0.60 A
0.61 - 0.70 B
0.71 - 0.80 C
0.81 - 0.90 D
0.91 - 1.00 E
A(W/B)
B(N/B)
B(E/B)
A(S/B)
E LOS =
Critical Movements Diagram
TH RT LT TH LT TH RT LT TH RT
Phasing RTOR Phasing Phasing Phasing RTOR RTOR
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND
EXISTING
RTOR
RT
98
AMBIENT
RELATED
PROJECT
TOTAL
98
LANE
SIGNAL Perm|1010|Perm Perm Perm Auto Auto Auto Auto
0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0
LT
1364 5 40 1852 73 87 244 72 110 142 147
87 72 244 73 1852 40 5 1364 147 142 110
Volume/Lane/Signal Configurations
Developed by Chun Wong, 12/94
May 27, 2011 ,Friday 10:02:51 AM
CalcaDB
CPROJAM
INTERSECTION DATA SUMMARY SHEET
ATTACHMENT 6
561Cumulative (2014) Plus Project AM
Robertson Boulevard I-10 WB Off-Ramp/Kincardine Av
N/S: W/E: 2
I/S No:
AM/PM: Comments:
COUNT DATE: GROWTH FACTOR:
STUDY DATE:
231 A:
B: 218|10 10|A:
B:
932
618 A:
B: 38
0.831 =
+
+
+ + + 164 932 218 38
*1500
118
A:
B:
164
V/C =
West/East Critical Movements =
North/South Critical Movements =
SouthBound
WestBound EastBound
NorthBound
A = Adjusted Through/Right Volume
B = Adjusted Left Volume
* = ATSAC Benefit
Results
V/C RATIO LOS
0.00 - 0.60 A
0.61 - 0.70 B
0.71 - 0.80 C
0.81 - 0.90 D
0.91 - 1.00 E
B(W/B)
B(N/B)
A(E/B)
A(S/B)
D LOS =
Critical Movements Diagram
TH RT LT TH LT TH RT LT TH RT
Phasing RTOR Phasing Phasing Phasing RTOR RTOR
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND
EXISTING
RTOR
RT
38
AMBIENT
RELATED
PROJECT
TOTAL
38
LANE
SIGNAL Perm|1010|Perm Perm Perm Auto Auto Auto Auto
0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
LT
1236 0 0 1788 75 218 13 175 118 0 46
218 175 13 75 1788 0 0 1236 46 0 118
Volume/Lane/Signal Configurations
Developed by Chun Wong, 12/94
May 27, 2011 ,Friday 10:02:51 AM
CalcaDB
CPROJAM
INTERSECTION DATA SUMMARY SHEET
ATTACHMENT 6
562Cumulative (2014) Plus Project AM
Robertson Boulevard National Boulevard
N/S: W/E: 3
I/S No:
AM/PM: Comments:
COUNT DATE: GROWTH FACTOR:
STUDY DATE:
149
A:
B:
609
612 A:
B: 452
121
A:
B:
357
1.083 =
+
+
+ + + 609 357 167 452
*1375
502 A:
B: 167
V/C =
West/East Critical Movements =
North/South Critical Movements =
SouthBound
WestBound EastBound
NorthBound
A = Adjusted Through/Right Volume
B = Adjusted Left Volume
* = ATSAC Benefit
Results
V/C RATIO LOS
0.00 - 0.60 A
0.61 - 0.70 B
0.71 - 0.80 C
0.81 - 0.90 D
0.91 - 1.00 E
A(W/B)
A(N/B)
B(E/B)
B(S/B)
F LOS =
Critical Movements Diagram
TH RT LT TH LT TH RT LT TH RT
Phasing RTOR Phasing Phasing Phasing RTOR RTOR
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND
EXISTING
RTOR
RT
121
AMBIENT
RELATED
PROJECT
TOTAL
121
LANE
SIGNAL Perm|1010|Prot-Fix Perm Prot-Fix Auto Auto OLA Auto
0 1 0 1 0 0 2 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0
LT
658 55 821 1013 211 149 609 501 167 741 262
149 501 609 211 1013 821 55 658 262 741 167
Volume/Lane/Signal Configurations
Developed by Chun Wong, 12/94
May 27, 2011 ,Friday 10:02:51 AM
CalcaDB
CPROJAM
INTERSECTION DATA SUMMARY SHEET
ATTACHMENT 6
563Cumulative (2014) Plus Project AM
National Boulevard I-10 EB On-Ramp
N/S: W/E: 4
I/S No:
AM/PM: Comments:
COUNT DATE: GROWTH FACTOR:
STUDY DATE:
A:
B: 0|10 10 10|A:
B:
624
603 A:
B: 149
0.445 =
+
+
+ + + 624 149
*1500
A:
B: 0|10 10|V/C =
West/East Critical Movements =
North/South Critical Movements =
SouthBound
WestBound EastBound
NorthBound
A = Adjusted Through/Right Volume
B = Adjusted Left Volume
* = ATSAC Benefit
Results
V/C RATIO LOS
0.00 - 0.60 A
0.61 - 0.70 B
0.71 - 0.80 C
0.81 - 0.90 D
0.91 - 1.00 E
B(N/B) A(S/B)
A LOS =
Critical Movements Diagram
TH RT LT TH LT TH RT LT TH RT
Phasing RTOR Phasing Phasing Phasing RTOR RTOR
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND
EXISTING
RTOR
RT
149
AMBIENT
RELATED
PROJECT
TOTAL
149
LANE
SIGNAL Prot-Fix|1010|Perm Auto Auto
0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
LT
1205 0 0 1084 624 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 624 1084 0 0 1205 0 0 0
Volume/Lane/Signal Configurations
Developed by Chun Wong, 12/94
May 27, 2011 ,Friday 10:02:51 AM
CalcaDB
CPROJAM
INTERSECTION DATA SUMMARY SHEET
ATTACHMENT 6
564Cumulative (2014) Plus Project AM
Hughes Avenue Venice Boulevard
N/S: W/E: 5
I/S No:
AM/PM: Comments:
COUNT DATE: GROWTH FACTOR:
STUDY DATE:
666 A:
B: 214
81
A:
B:
364
360 A:
B: 97
0.843 =
+
+
+ + + 695 364 214 97
*1500
42
A:
B:
695
V/C =
West/East Critical Movements =
North/South Critical Movements =
SouthBound
WestBound EastBound
NorthBound
A = Adjusted Through/Right Volume
B = Adjusted Left Volume
* = ATSAC Benefit
Results
V/C RATIO LOS
0.00 - 0.60 A
0.61 - 0.70 B
0.71 - 0.80 C
0.81 - 0.90 D
0.91 - 1.00 E
B(W/B)
B(N/B)
A(E/B)
A(S/B)
D LOS =
Critical Movements Diagram
TH RT LT TH LT TH RT LT TH RT
Phasing RTOR Phasing Phasing Phasing RTOR RTOR
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND
EXISTING
RTOR
RT
97
AMBIENT
RELATED
PROJECT
TOTAL
97
LANE
SIGNAL Perm|10 10|Perm Perm Perm Auto Auto Auto Auto
0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 3 0 0 1 0 1 0 3 0 0 1 0
LT
206 57 81 236 47 214 1999 44 42 2086 121
214 44 1999 47 236 81 57 206 121 2086 42
Volume/Lane/Signal Configurations
Developed by Chun Wong, 12/94
May 27, 2011 ,Friday 10:02:51 AM
CalcaDB
CPROJAM
INTERSECTION DATA SUMMARY SHEET
ATTACHMENT 6
565Cumulative (2014) Plus Project AM
Bagley Avenue Venice Boulevard
N/S: W/E: 6
I/S No:
AM/PM: Comments:
COUNT DATE: GROWTH FACTOR:
STUDY DATE:
718 A:
B: 65
78
A:
B:
331
204 A:
B: 49
0.791 =
+
+
+ + + 739 331 65 49
*1375
72
A:
B:
739
V/C =
West/East Critical Movements =
North/South Critical Movements =
SouthBound
WestBound EastBound
NorthBound
A = Adjusted Through/Right Volume
B = Adjusted Left Volume
* = ATSAC Benefit
Results
V/C RATIO LOS
0.00 - 0.60 A
0.61 - 0.70 B
0.71 - 0.80 C
0.81 - 0.90 D
0.91 - 1.00 E
B(W/B)
B(N/B)
A(E/B)
A(S/B)
C LOS =
Critical Movements Diagram
TH RT LT TH LT TH RT LT TH RT
Phasing RTOR Phasing Phasing Phasing RTOR RTOR
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND
EXISTING
RTOR
RT
49
AMBIENT
RELATED
PROJECT
TOTAL
49
LANE
SIGNAL Perm|1010|Perm Prot-Var Prot-Var Auto Auto Auto Auto
0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 3 0 0 1 0 1 0 2 0 1 0 0
LT
159 45 78 179 74 65 2153 42 72 2164 54
65 42 2153 74 179 78 45 159 54 2164 72
Volume/Lane/Signal Configurations
Developed by Chun Wong, 12/94
May 27, 2011 ,Friday 10:02:51 AM
CalcaDB
CPROJAM
INTERSECTION DATA SUMMARY SHEET
ATTACHMENT 6
566Cumulative (2014) Plus Project AM
Culver Boulevard Venice Boulevard
N/S: W/E: 7
I/S No:
AM/PM: Comments:
COUNT DATE: GROWTH FACTOR:
STUDY DATE:
725 A:
B: 356
131
A:
B:
131
67
A:
B:
90
0.882 =
+
+
+ + + 732 131 90 356
*1375
30
A:
B:
732
V/C =
West/East Critical Movements =
North/South Critical Movements =
SouthBound
WestBound EastBound
NorthBound
A = Adjusted Through/Right Volume
B = Adjusted Left Volume
* = ATSAC Benefit
Results
V/C RATIO LOS
0.00 - 0.60 A
0.61 - 0.70 B
0.71 - 0.80 C
0.81 - 0.90 D
0.91 - 1.00 E
B(W/B)
A(N/B)
A(E/B)
A(S/B)
D LOS =
Critical Movements Diagram
TH RT LT TH LT TH RT LT TH RT
Phasing RTOR Phasing Phasing Phasing RTOR RTOR
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND
EXISTING
RTOR
RT
67
AMBIENT
RELATED
PROJECT
TOTAL
67
LANE
SIGNAL Split|1010|Split Prot-Fix Prot-Fix OLA Auto Auto Auto
0 1 0 0 2 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 2 0 2 0 1 0 0 1 0 2 0 1 0 0
LT
87 810 183 45 33 647 2024 152 30 2105 91
647 152 2024 33 45 183 810 87 91 2105 30
Volume/Lane/Signal Configurations
Developed by Chun Wong, 12/94
May 27, 2011 ,Friday 10:02:51 AM
CalcaDB
CPROJAM
INTERSECTION DATA SUMMARY SHEET
ATTACHMENT 6
567Cumulative (2014) Plus Project AM
Robertson Boulevard Venice Boulevard
N/S: W/E: 8
I/S No:
AM/PM: Comments:
COUNT DATE: GROWTH FACTOR:
STUDY DATE:
81
A:
B:
894
436 A:
B: 650
231
A:
B:
270
1.492 =
+
+
+ + + 894 270 334 650
*1375
884 A:
B: 334
V/C =
West/East Critical Movements =
North/South Critical Movements =
SouthBound
WestBound EastBound
NorthBound
A = Adjusted Through/Right Volume
B = Adjusted Left Volume
* = ATSAC Benefit
Results
V/C RATIO LOS
0.00 - 0.60 A
0.61 - 0.70 B
0.71 - 0.80 C
0.81 - 0.90 D
0.91 - 1.00 E
A(W/B)
A(N/B)
B(E/B)
B(S/B)
F LOS =
Critical Movements Diagram
TH RT LT TH LT TH RT LT TH RT
Phasing RTOR Phasing Phasing Phasing RTOR RTOR
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND
EXISTING
RTOR
RT
231
AMBIENT
RELATED
PROJECT
TOTAL
231
LANE
SIGNAL Split|1010|Split Prot-Var Prot-Var OLA Auto Auto Auto
0 2 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 2 0 1 0 0 2 0 2 0 1 0 0
LT
540 61 650 436 319 81 2327 356 607 2482 169
81 356 2327 319 436 650 61 540 169 2482 607
Volume/Lane/Signal Configurations
Developed by Chun Wong, 12/94
May 27, 2011 ,Friday 10:02:51 AM
CalcaDB
CPROJAM
INTERSECTION DATA SUMMARY SHEET
ATTACHMENT 6
568Cumulative (2014) Plus Project AM
National Boulevard Venice Boulevard
N/S: W/E: 9
I/S No:
AM/PM: Comments:
COUNT DATE: GROWTH FACTOR:
STUDY DATE:
701 A:
B: 121
135
A:
B:
489
514 A:
B: 232
1.073 =
+
+
+ + + 730 489 121 232
*1375
116
A:
B:
730
V/C =
West/East Critical Movements =
North/South Critical Movements =
SouthBound
WestBound EastBound
NorthBound
A = Adjusted Through/Right Volume
B = Adjusted Left Volume
* = ATSAC Benefit
Results
V/C RATIO LOS
0.00 - 0.60 A
0.61 - 0.70 B
0.71 - 0.80 C
0.81 - 0.90 D
0.91 - 1.00 E
B(W/B)
B(N/B)
A(E/B)
A(S/B)
F LOS =
Critical Movements Diagram
TH RT LT TH LT TH RT LT TH RT
Phasing RTOR Phasing Phasing Phasing RTOR RTOR
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND
EXISTING
RTOR
RT
232
AMBIENT
RELATED
PROJECT
TOTAL
232
LANE
SIGNAL Perm|1010|Prot-Fix Prot-Fix Prot-Fix Auto Auto Auto Auto
0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 2 0 3 0 0 1 0 2 0 3 0 0 1 0
LT
1003 25 135 830 148 220 2104 122 211 2189 683
220 122 2104 148 830 135 25 1003 683 2189 211
Volume/Lane/Signal Configurations
Developed by Chun Wong, 12/94
May 27, 2011 ,Friday 10:02:51 AM
CalcaDB
CPROJAM
INTERSECTION DATA SUMMARY SHEET
ATTACHMENT 6
569Cumulative (2014) Plus Project AM
Helms Avenue Venice Boulevard
N/S: W/E: 10
I/S No:
AM/PM: Comments:
COUNT DATE: GROWTH FACTOR:
STUDY DATE:
24
A:
B:
811
12
A:
B:
42
20 A:
B: 11
0.558 =
+
+
+ + + 811 42 78 11
*1500
760 A:
B: 78
V/C =
West/East Critical Movements =
North/South Critical Movements =
SouthBound
WestBound EastBound
NorthBound
A = Adjusted Through/Right Volume
B = Adjusted Left Volume
* = ATSAC Benefit
Results
V/C RATIO LOS
0.00 - 0.60 A
0.61 - 0.70 B
0.71 - 0.80 C
0.81 - 0.90 D
0.91 - 1.00 E
A(W/B)
B(N/B)
B(E/B)
A(S/B)
A LOS =
Critical Movements Diagram
TH RT LT TH LT TH RT LT TH RT
Phasing RTOR Phasing Phasing Phasing RTOR RTOR
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND
EXISTING
RTOR
RT
11
AMBIENT
RELATED
PROJECT
TOTAL
11
LANE
SIGNAL Perm|10 10|Perm Perm Perm Auto Auto Auto Auto
1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 1 0 0 1 0 2 0 1 0 0
LT
9 4 12 2 28 24 2410 23 78 2257 22
24 23 2410 28 2 12 4 9 22 2257 78
Volume/Lane/Signal Configurations
Developed by Chun Wong, 12/94
May 27, 2011 ,Friday 10:02:51 AM
CalcaDB
CPROJAM
INTERSECTION DATA SUMMARY SHEET
ATTACHMENT 6
570Cumulative (2014) Plus Project AM
Cattaraugus Avenue Venice Boulevard
N/S: W/E: 11
I/S No:
AM/PM: Comments:
COUNT DATE: GROWTH FACTOR:
STUDY DATE:
81
A:
B:
807
273 A:
B: 168
68
A:
B:
355
0.865 =
+
+
+ + + 807 355 72 168
*1500
686 A:
B: 72
V/C =
West/East Critical Movements =
North/South Critical Movements =
SouthBound
WestBound EastBound
NorthBound
A = Adjusted Through/Right Volume
B = Adjusted Left Volume
* = ATSAC Benefit
Results
V/C RATIO LOS
0.00 - 0.60 A
0.61 - 0.70 B
0.71 - 0.80 C
0.81 - 0.90 D
0.91 - 1.00 E
A(W/B)
A(N/B)
B(E/B)
B(S/B)
D LOS =
Critical Movements Diagram
TH RT LT TH LT TH RT LT TH RT
Phasing RTOR Phasing Phasing Phasing RTOR RTOR
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND
EXISTING
RTOR
RT
68
AMBIENT
RELATED
PROJECT
TOTAL
68
LANE
SIGNAL Perm|10 10|Perm Perm Perm Auto Auto Auto Auto
0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 1 0 0 1 0 2 0 1 0 0
LT
252 35 168 87 18 81 2315 105 72 2047 11
81 105 2315 18 87 168 35 252 11 2047 72
Volume/Lane/Signal Configurations
Developed by Chun Wong, 12/94
May 27, 2011 ,Friday 10:02:51 AM
CalcaDB
CPROJAM
INTERSECTION DATA SUMMARY SHEET
ATTACHMENT 6
571Cumulative (2014) Plus Project AM
La Cienega Boulevard Venice Boulevard
N/S: W/E: 12
I/S No:
AM/PM: Comments:
COUNT DATE: GROWTH FACTOR:
STUDY DATE:
159
A:
B:
660
36
A:
B:
633
649 A:
B: 131
1.115 =
+
+
+ + + 660 633 206 131
*1375
595 A:
B: 206
V/C =
West/East Critical Movements =
North/South Critical Movements =
SouthBound
WestBound EastBound
NorthBound
A = Adjusted Through/Right Volume
B = Adjusted Left Volume
* = ATSAC Benefit
Results
V/C RATIO LOS
0.00 - 0.60 A
0.61 - 0.70 B
0.71 - 0.80 C
0.81 - 0.90 D
0.91 - 1.00 E
A(W/B)
B(N/B)
B(E/B)
A(S/B)
F LOS =
Critical Movements Diagram
TH RT LT TH LT TH RT LT TH RT
Phasing RTOR Phasing Phasing Phasing RTOR RTOR
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND
EXISTING
RTOR
RT
131
AMBIENT
RELATED
PROJECT
TOTAL
131
LANE
SIGNAL Perm|1010|Perm Prot-Var Prot-Var Auto Auto Auto Auto
0 2 0 1 0 0 1 0 2 0 1 0 0 1 0 3 0 0 1 0 2 0 3 0 0 1 0
LT
1867 79 36 1486 412 159 1979 15 375 1785 173
159 15 1979 412 1486 36 79 1867 173 1785 375
Volume/Lane/Signal Configurations
Developed by Chun Wong, 12/94
May 27, 2011 ,Friday 10:02:51 AM
CalcaDB
CPROJAM
INTERSECTION DATA SUMMARY SHEET
ATTACHMENT 6
572Cumulative (2014) Plus Project AM
Hughes Av/Duquesne Av Washington Boulevard
N/S: W/E: 13
I/S No:
AM/PM: Comments:
COUNT DATE: GROWTH FACTOR:
STUDY DATE:
56
A:
B:
440
14
A:
B:
411
371 A:
B: 170
0.641 =
+
+
+ + + 440 411 46 170
*1500
416 A:
B: 46
V/C =
West/East Critical Movements =
North/South Critical Movements =
SouthBound
WestBound EastBound
NorthBound
A = Adjusted Through/Right Volume
B = Adjusted Left Volume
* = ATSAC Benefit
Results
V/C RATIO LOS
0.00 - 0.60 A
0.61 - 0.70 B
0.71 - 0.80 C
0.81 - 0.90 D
0.91 - 1.00 E
A(W/B)
B(N/B)
B(E/B)
A(S/B)
B LOS =
Critical Movements Diagram
TH RT LT TH LT TH RT LT TH RT
Phasing RTOR Phasing Phasing Phasing RTOR RTOR
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND
EXISTING
RTOR
RT
170
AMBIENT
RELATED
PROJECT
TOTAL
170
LANE
SIGNAL Perm|1010|Perm Perm Perm Auto Auto Auto Auto
0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0
LT
331 40 14 360 51 56 828 51 46 645 186
56 51 828 51 360 14 40 331 186 645 46
Volume/Lane/Signal Configurations
Developed by Chun Wong, 12/94
May 27, 2011 ,Friday 10:02:51 AM
CalcaDB
CPROJAM
INTERSECTION DATA SUMMARY SHEET
ATTACHMENT 6
573Cumulative (2014) Plus Project AM
Duquesne Avenue Culver Boulevard
N/S: W/E: 14
I/S No:
AM/PM: Comments:
COUNT DATE: GROWTH FACTOR:
STUDY DATE:
417 A:
B: 151
52
A:
B:
437
374 A:
B: 101
0.762 =
+
+
+ + + 455 437 151 101
*1375
113
A:
B:
455
V/C =
West/East Critical Movements =
North/South Critical Movements =
SouthBound
WestBound EastBound
NorthBound
A = Adjusted Through/Right Volume
B = Adjusted Left Volume
* = ATSAC Benefit
Results
V/C RATIO LOS
0.00 - 0.60 A
0.61 - 0.70 B
0.71 - 0.80 C
0.81 - 0.90 D
0.91 - 1.00 E
B(W/B)
B(N/B)
A(E/B)
A(S/B)
C LOS =
Critical Movements Diagram
TH RT LT TH LT TH RT LT TH RT
Phasing RTOR Phasing Phasing Phasing RTOR RTOR
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND
EXISTING
RTOR
RT
101
AMBIENT
RELATED
PROJECT
TOTAL
101
LANE
SIGNAL Prot-Var|1010|Prot-Var Prot-Var Prot-Var Auto Auto Auto Auto
0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0
LT
374 142 52 437 79 151 777 57 113 859 51
151 57 777 79 437 52 142 374 51 859 113
Volume/Lane/Signal Configurations
Developed by Chun Wong, 12/94
May 27, 2011 ,Friday 10:02:51 AM
CalcaDB
CPROJAM
INTERSECTION DATA SUMMARY SHEET
ATTACHMENT 6
574Cumulative (2014) Plus Project AM
Culver Boulevard Washington Bl/Irving Pl
N/S: W/E: 15
I/S No:
AM/PM: Comments:
COUNT DATE: GROWTH FACTOR:
STUDY DATE:
76
A:
B:
482
339
A:
B:
339
94 A:
B: 128
0.620 =
+
+
+ + + 482 339 0 128
*1375
355 A:
B: 0
V/C =
West/East Critical Movements =
North/South Critical Movements =
SouthBound
WestBound EastBound
NorthBound
A = Adjusted Through/Right Volume
B = Adjusted Left Volume
* = ATSAC Benefit
Results
V/C RATIO LOS
0.00 - 0.60 A
0.61 - 0.70 B
0.71 - 0.80 C
0.81 - 0.90 D
0.91 - 1.00 E
A(W/B)
B(N/B)
B(E/B)
A(S/B)
B LOS =
Critical Movements Diagram
TH RT LT TH LT TH RT LT TH RT
Phasing RTOR Phasing Phasing Phasing RTOR RTOR
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND
EXISTING
RTOR
RT
128
AMBIENT
RELATED
PROJECT
TOTAL
128
LANE
SIGNAL Split|1010|Split Prot-Fix Perm Auto Auto Auto Auto
0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 2 0 1 0 0
LT
0 132 654 0 24 76 898 547 0 1021 44
-339
76 886 898 24 0 654 132 0 44 1021 0
Volume/Lane/Signal Configurations
Developed by Chun Wong, 12/94
May 27, 2011 ,Friday 10:02:51 AM
CalcaDB
CPROJAM
INTERSECTION DATA SUMMARY SHEET
ATTACHMENT 6
575Cumulative (2014) Plus Project AM
Main Street Culver Boulevard
N/S: W/E: 16
I/S No:
AM/PM: Comments:
COUNT DATE: GROWTH FACTOR:
STUDY DATE:|10 10|A:
B:
608
53 A:
B: 151|10 10|A:
B:|10 10|0.582 =
+
+
+ + + 608 0 170 151
*1425
539 A:
B: 170
V/C =
West/East Critical Movements =
North/South Critical Movements =
SouthBound
WestBound EastBound
NorthBound
A = Adjusted Through/Right Volume
B = Adjusted Left Volume
* = ATSAC Benefit
Results
V/C RATIO LOS
0.00 - 0.60 A
0.61 - 0.70 B
0.71 - 0.80 C
0.81 - 0.90 D
0.91 - 1.00 E
A(W/B)
A(N/B)
B(E/B)
B(S/B)
A LOS =
Critical Movements Diagram
TH RT LT TH LT TH RT LT TH RT
Phasing RTOR Phasing Phasing Phasing RTOR RTOR
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND
EXISTING
RTOR
RT|10 10|AMBIENT
RELATED
PROJECT
TOTAL|10 10|LANE
SIGNAL |10 10|Split Perm Prot-Fix Auto Auto Auto
0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 2 0 1 0 0 1 0 3 0 0 0 0
LT
0 0 151 0 138 0 1659 164 170 1618 0
0 164 1659 138 0 151 0 0 0 1618 170
Volume/Lane/Signal Configurations
Developed by Chun Wong, 12/94
May 27, 2011 ,Friday 10:02:51 AM
CalcaDB
CPROJAM
INTERSECTION DATA SUMMARY SHEET
ATTACHMENT 6
576Cumulative (2014) Plus Project AM
Culver Boulevard Washington Bl/Canfield Av
N/S: W/E: 17
I/S No:
AM/PM: Comments:
COUNT DATE: GROWTH FACTOR:
STUDY DATE:
608
A:
B:
608
289 A:
B: 187
12
A:
B:
421
0.783 =
+
+
+ + + 608 0 421 187
*1425|10 10|A:
B:|10 10|V/C =
West/East Critical Movements =
North/South Critical Movements =
SouthBound
WestBound EastBound
NorthBound
A = Adjusted Through/Right Volume
B = Adjusted Left Volume
* = ATSAC Benefit
Results
V/C RATIO LOS
0.00 - 0.60 A
0.61 - 0.70 B
0.71 - 0.80 C
0.81 - 0.90 D
0.91 - 1.00 E
A(W/B)
A(N/B)
A(E/B)
B(S/B)
C LOS =
Critical Movements Diagram
TH RT LT TH LT TH RT LT TH RT
Phasing RTOR Phasing Phasing Phasing RTOR RTOR
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND
EXISTING
RTOR
RT
12
AMBIENT
RELATED
PROJECT
TOTAL
12
LANE
SIGNAL Prot-Fix|1010|Prot-Fix Split OLA Auto Auto OLA
0 2 0 0 2 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0
LT
842 922 187 574 4 1179 36 139 0 0 6
1179 139 36 4 574 187 922 842 6 0 0
Volume/Lane/Signal Configurations
Developed by Chun Wong, 12/94
May 27, 2011 ,Friday 10:02:51 AM
CalcaDB
CPROJAM
INTERSECTION DATA SUMMARY SHEET
ATTACHMENT 6
577Cumulative (2014) Plus Project AM
Robertson Bl/Higuera St Washington Boulevard
N/S: W/E: 18
I/S No:
AM/PM: Comments:
COUNT DATE: GROWTH FACTOR:
STUDY DATE:
91
A:
B:
839
279 A:
B: 206
68
A:
B:
383
0.990 =
+
+
+ + + 839 383 83 206
*1425
500 A:
B: 83
V/C =
West/East Critical Movements =
North/South Critical Movements =
SouthBound
WestBound EastBound
NorthBound
A = Adjusted Through/Right Volume
B = Adjusted Left Volume
* = ATSAC Benefit
Results
V/C RATIO LOS
0.00 - 0.60 A
0.61 - 0.70 B
0.71 - 0.80 C
0.81 - 0.90 D
0.91 - 1.00 E
A(W/B)
A(N/B)
B(E/B)
B(S/B)
E LOS =
Critical Movements Diagram
TH RT LT TH LT TH RT LT TH RT
Phasing RTOR Phasing Phasing Phasing RTOR RTOR
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND
EXISTING
RTOR
RT
68
AMBIENT
RELATED
PROJECT
TOTAL
68
LANE
SIGNAL Prot-Fix|1010|Prot-Fix Perm Perm Auto Auto Auto Auto
0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0
LT
383 72 206 279 136 91 1353 324 83 928 71
91 324 1353 136 279 206 72 383 71 928 83
Volume/Lane/Signal Configurations
Developed by Chun Wong, 12/94
May 27, 2011 ,Friday 10:02:51 AM
CalcaDB
CPROJAM
INTERSECTION DATA SUMMARY SHEET
ATTACHMENT 6
578Cumulative (2014) Plus Project AM
Landmark Street Washington Boulevard
N/S: W/E: 19
I/S No:
AM/PM: Comments:
COUNT DATE: GROWTH FACTOR:
STUDY DATE:
109
A:
B:
975|10 10|A:
B:|10 10|39
A:
B:
45
0.610 =
+
+
+ + + 975 0 45 0
*1500
559 A:
B: 0
V/C =
West/East Critical Movements =
North/South Critical Movements =
SouthBound
WestBound EastBound
NorthBound
A = Adjusted Through/Right Volume
B = Adjusted Left Volume
* = ATSAC Benefit
Results
V/C RATIO LOS
0.00 - 0.60 A
0.61 - 0.70 B
0.71 - 0.80 C
0.81 - 0.90 D
0.91 - 1.00 E
A(W/B)
A(N/B)
B(E/B)
A(S/B)
B LOS =
Critical Movements Diagram
TH RT LT TH LT TH RT LT TH RT
Phasing RTOR Phasing Phasing Phasing RTOR RTOR
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND
EXISTING
RTOR
RT
39
AMBIENT
RELATED
PROJECT
TOTAL
39
LANE
SIGNAL Split|1010| Perm Perm Auto Auto Auto Auto
0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0
LT
0 45 0 0 0 109 1949 0 0 1007 110
109 0 1949 0 0 0 45 0 110 1007 0
Volume/Lane/Signal Configurations
Developed by Chun Wong, 12/94
May 27, 2011 ,Friday 10:02:51 AM
CalcaDB
CPROJAM
INTERSECTION DATA SUMMARY SHEET
[1] Note: Pass-by credit not applied at this location.
ATTACHMENT 6
579Cumulative (2014) Plus Project AM
National Boulevard Washington Boulevard
N/S: W/E: 20
I/S No:
AM/PM: Comments:
COUNT DATE: GROWTH FACTOR:
STUDY DATE:
90
A:
B:
564
142
A:
B:
492
500 A:
B: 264
0.963 =
+
+
+ + + 564 492 100 264
*1375
395 A:
B: 100
V/C =
West/East Critical Movements =
North/South Critical Movements =
SouthBound
WestBound EastBound
NorthBound
A = Adjusted Through/Right Volume
B = Adjusted Left Volume
* = ATSAC Benefit
Results
V/C RATIO LOS
0.00 - 0.60 A
0.61 - 0.70 B
0.71 - 0.80 C
0.81 - 0.90 D
0.91 - 1.00 E
A(W/B)
B(N/B)
B(E/B)
A(S/B)
E LOS =
Critical Movements Diagram
TH RT LT TH LT TH RT LT TH RT
Phasing RTOR Phasing Phasing Phasing RTOR RTOR
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND
EXISTING
RTOR
RT
480
AMBIENT
RELATED
PROJECT
TOTAL
480
LANE
SIGNAL Prot-Var|1010|Prot-Var Perm Perm Auto Auto Auto Auto
0 1 0 1 0 0 2 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 2 0 1 0 0 1 0 2 0 0 1 0
LT
874 126 258 902 82 90 1353 340 100 789 188
90 340 1353 82 902 258 126 874 188 789 100
Volume/Lane/Signal Configurations
Developed by Chun Wong, 12/94
May 27, 2011 ,Friday 10:02:51 AM
CalcaDB
CPROJAM
INTERSECTION DATA SUMMARY SHEET
ATTACHMENT 6
580Default Scenario Thu May 26, 2011 16:04:10 Page 3-1
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Base Volume Alternative)
********************************************************************************
Intersection #21 WESLEY AV/WASHINGTON BL [CUMULATIVE (2014) + PROJECT AM]
********************************************************************************
Average Delay (sec/veh): 2.1 Worst Case Level Of Service: F[138.9]
********************************************************************************
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 2 0 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 30 0 13 0 0 0 0 1116 36 26 1770 0
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 30 0 13 0 0 0 0 1116 36 26 1770 0
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 30 0 13 0 0 0 0 1116 36 26 1770 0
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Final Vol.: 30 0 13 0 0 0 0 1116 36 26 1770 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Critical Gap Module:
Critical Gp: 6.8 xxxx 6.9 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 4.1 xxxx xxxxx
FollowUpTim: 3.5 xxxx 3.3 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 2.2 xxxx xxxxx
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Module:
Cnflict Vol: 2071 xxxx 576 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 1152 xxxx xxxxx
Potent Cap.: 48 xxxx 466 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 614 xxxx xxxxx
Move Cap.: 46 xxxx 466 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 614 xxxx xxxxx
Volume/Cap: 0.65 xxxx 0.03 xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx 0.04 xxxx xxxx
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Level Of Service Module:
Queue: xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 0.1 xxxx xxxxx
Stopped Del:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 11.1 xxxx xxxxx
LOS by Move: * * * * * * * * * B * *
Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT
Shared Cap.: xxxx 64 xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx
SharedQueue:xxxxx 2.9 xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx
Shrd StpDel:xxxxx 139 xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx
Shared LOS: * F * * * * * * * * * *
ApproachDel: 138.9 xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx
ApproachLOS: F * * *
Traffix 7.6.0715 (c) 2003 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to RAJU ASSOC., PASADENA
ATTACHMENT 6
581Cumulative (2014) Plus Project AM
Wesley Avenue/Driveway Washington Boulevard
N/S: W/E: 21
I/S No:
AM/PM: Comments:
COUNT DATE: GROWTH FACTOR:
STUDY DATE:
26
A:
B:
885|10 10|A:
B:|10 10|30
A:
B:
43
0.773 =
+
+
+ + + 885 0 43 0
1200
576 A:
B: 0
V/C =
West/East Critical Movements =
North/South Critical Movements =
SouthBound
WestBound EastBound
NorthBound
A = Adjusted Through/Right Volume
B = Adjusted Left Volume
* = ATSAC Benefit
Results
V/C RATIO LOS
0.00 - 0.60 A
0.61 - 0.70 B
0.71 - 0.80 C
0.81 - 0.90 D
0.91 - 1.00 E
A(W/B)
A(N/B)
B(E/B)
A(S/B)
C LOS =
Critical Movements Diagram
TH RT LT TH LT TH RT LT TH RT
Phasing RTOR Phasing Phasing Phasing RTOR RTOR
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND
EXISTING
RTOR
RT
30
AMBIENT
RELATED
PROJECT
TOTAL
30
LANE
SIGNAL Perm|10 10| Perm Perm Auto Auto Auto
0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0
LT
0 13 0 0 0 26 1770 0 0 1116 36
26 0 1770 0 0 0 13 0 36 1116 0
Volume/Lane/Signal Configurations
Developed by Chun Wong, 12/94
May 27, 2011 ,Friday 10:02:51 AM
CalcaDB
CPROJAM
INTERSECTION DATA SUMMARY SHEET
ATTACHMENT 6
582Cumulative (2014) Plus Project AM
Helms Avenue Washington Boulevard
N/S: W/E: 22
I/S No:
AM/PM: Comments:
COUNT DATE: GROWTH FACTOR:
STUDY DATE:
31
A:
B:
862|10 10|A:
B:|10 10|77
A:
B:
95
0.568 =
+
+
+ + + 862 0 95 0
*1500
571 A:
B: 0
V/C =
West/East Critical Movements =
North/South Critical Movements =
SouthBound
WestBound EastBound
NorthBound
A = Adjusted Through/Right Volume
B = Adjusted Left Volume
* = ATSAC Benefit
Results
V/C RATIO LOS
0.00 - 0.60 A
0.61 - 0.70 B
0.71 - 0.80 C
0.81 - 0.90 D
0.91 - 1.00 E
A(W/B)
A(N/B)
B(E/B)
A(S/B)
A LOS =
Critical Movements Diagram
TH RT LT TH LT TH RT LT TH RT
Phasing RTOR Phasing Phasing Phasing RTOR RTOR
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND
EXISTING
RTOR
RT
77
AMBIENT
RELATED
PROJECT
TOTAL
77
LANE
SIGNAL Split|10 10| Perm Perm Auto Auto Auto
0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0
LT
0 18 0 0 0 31 1724 0 0 1102 40
31 0 1724 0 0 0 18 0 40 1102 0
Volume/Lane/Signal Configurations
Developed by Chun Wong, 12/94
May 27, 2011 ,Friday 10:02:51 AM
CalcaDB
CPROJAM
INTERSECTION DATA SUMMARY SHEET
ATTACHMENT 6
583Default Scenario Thu May 26, 2011 16:04:10 Page 5-1
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Base Volume Alternative)
********************************************************************************
Intersection #23 CATTARAUGUS AV/WASHINGTON AV [CUMULATIVE (2014) + PROJECT AM]
********************************************************************************
Average Delay (sec/veh): 283.7 Worst Case Level Of Service: F[6057.0]
********************************************************************************
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 9 5 3 89 6 56 51 985 6 3 1724 330
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 9 5 3 89 6 56 51 985 6 3 1724 330
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 9 5 3 89 6 56 51 985 6 3 1724 330
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Final Vol.: 9 5 3 89 6 56 51 985 6 3 1724 330
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Critical Gap Module:
Critical Gp: 7.5 6.5 6.9 7.5 6.5 6.9 4.1 xxxx xxxxx 4.1 xxxx xxxxx
FollowUpTim: 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3 2.2 xxxx xxxxx 2.2 xxxx xxxxx
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Module:
Cnflict Vol: 1961 3150 496 2492 2988 1027 2054 xxxx xxxxx 991 xxxx xxxxx
Potent Cap.: 39 11 525 15 14 235 277 xxxx xxxxx 706 xxxx xxxxx
Move Cap.: 15 9 525 7 11 235 277 xxxx xxxxx 706 xxxx xxxxx
Volume/Cap: 0.61 0.56 0.01 12.28 0.53 0.24 0.18 xxxx xxxx 0.00 xxxx xxxx
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Level Of Service Module:
Queue: xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 0.7 xxxx xxxxx 0.0 xxxx xxxxx
Stopped Del:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 20.9 xxxx xxxxx 10.1 xxxx xxxxx
LOS by Move: * * * * * * C * * B * *
Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT
Shared Cap.: xxxx 14 xxxxx xxxx 12 xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx
SharedQueue:xxxxx 2.7 xxxxx xxxxx 20.2 xxxxx 0.7 xxxx xxxxx 0.0 xxxx xxxxx
Shrd StpDel:xxxxx 658 xxxxx xxxxx 6057 xxxxx 20.9 xxxx xxxxx 10.1 xxxx xxxxx
Shared LOS: * F * * F * C * * B * *
ApproachDel: 658.2 6057.0 xxxxxx xxxxxx
ApproachLOS: F F * *
Traffix 7.6.0715 (c) 2003 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to RAJU ASSOC., PASADENA
ATTACHMENT 6
584Cumulative (2014) Plus Project AM
Cattaraugus Avenue Washington Boulevard
N/S: W/E: 23
I/S No:
AM/PM: Comments:
COUNT DATE: GROWTH FACTOR:
STUDY DATE:|1010|A:
B:
1033
89
A:
B:
151
17 A:
B: 9
1.037 =
+
+
+ + + 1033 151 51 9
1200
649 A:
B: 51
V/C =
West/East Critical Movements =
North/South Critical Movements =
SouthBound
WestBound EastBound
NorthBound
A = Adjusted Through/Right Volume
B = Adjusted Left Volume
* = ATSAC Benefit
Results
V/C RATIO LOS
0.00 - 0.60 A
0.61 - 0.70 B
0.71 - 0.80 C
0.81 - 0.90 D
0.91 - 1.00 E
A(W/B)
B(N/B)
B(E/B)
A(S/B)
F LOS =
Critical Movements Diagram
TH RT LT TH LT TH RT LT TH RT
Phasing RTOR Phasing Phasing Phasing RTOR RTOR
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND
EXISTING
RTOR
RT|10 10|AMBIENT
RELATED
PROJECT
TOTAL|10 10|LANE
SIGNAL Perm|10 10|Perm Perm Perm Auto Auto Auto Auto
0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0
LT
5 3 89 6 56 3 1724 330 51 985 6
3 330 1724 56 6 89 3 5 6 985 51
Volume/Lane/Signal Configurations
Developed by Chun Wong, 12/94
May 27, 2011 ,Friday 10:02:51 AM
CalcaDB
CPROJAM
INTERSECTION DATA SUMMARY SHEET
ATTACHMENT 6
585Cumulative (2014) Plus Project AM
La Cienega Boulevard Washington Boulevard
N/S: W/E: 24
I/S No:
AM/PM: Comments:
COUNT DATE: GROWTH FACTOR:
STUDY DATE:
58
A:
B:
845
188
A:
B:
549
580 A:
B: 260
1.203 =
+
+
+ + + 845 549 96 260
*1375
448 A:
B: 96
V/C =
West/East Critical Movements =
North/South Critical Movements =
SouthBound
WestBound EastBound
NorthBound
A = Adjusted Through/Right Volume
B = Adjusted Left Volume
* = ATSAC Benefit
Results
V/C RATIO LOS
0.00 - 0.60 A
0.61 - 0.70 B
0.71 - 0.80 C
0.81 - 0.90 D
0.91 - 1.00 E
A(W/B)
B(N/B)
B(E/B)
A(S/B)
F LOS =
Critical Movements Diagram
TH RT LT TH LT TH RT LT TH RT
Phasing RTOR Phasing Phasing Phasing RTOR RTOR
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND
EXISTING
RTOR
RT
260
AMBIENT
RELATED
PROJECT
TOTAL
260
LANE
SIGNAL Prot-Var|1010|Prot-Var Perm Perm Auto Auto Auto Auto
0 2 0 1 0 0 1 0 2 0 1 0 0 1 0 2 0 0 1 0 1 0 2 0 0 1 0
LT
1718 21 188 1591 57 58 1690 252 96 895 122
58 252 1690 57 1591 188 21 1718 122 895 96
Volume/Lane/Signal Configurations
Developed by Chun Wong, 12/94
May 27, 2011 ,Friday 10:02:51 AM
CalcaDB
CPROJAM
INTERSECTION DATA SUMMARY SHEET
ATTACHMENT 6
586Cumulative (2014) Plus Project AM
La Cienega Boulevard Fairfax Avenue
N/S: W/E: 25
I/S No:
AM/PM: Comments:
COUNT DATE: GROWTH FACTOR:
STUDY DATE:
68 A:
B: 690
513 A:
B: 0
46
A:
B:
932
1.090 =
+
+
+ ++31 932 690 0
*1425
17
A:
B:
31
V/C =
West/East Critical Movements =
North/South Critical Movements =
SouthBound
WestBound EastBound
NorthBound
A = Adjusted Through/Right Volume
B = Adjusted Left Volume
* = ATSAC Benefit
Results
V/C RATIO LOS
0.00 - 0.60 A
0.61 - 0.70 B
0.71 - 0.80 C
0.81 - 0.90 D
0.91 - 1.00 E
B(W/B)
A(N/B)
A(E/B)
B(S/B)
F LOS =
Critical Movements Diagram
TH RT LT TH LT TH RT LT TH RT
Phasing RTOR Phasing Phasing Phasing RTOR RTOR
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND
EXISTING
RTOR
RT
46
AMBIENT
RELATED
PROJECT
TOTAL
46
LANE
SIGNAL Perm|1010|Perm Split Split Free Auto Auto Auto
0 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 1 0 0 2 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0
LT
1863 978 0 1495 43 1255 37 31 17 2 12
1255 31 37 43 1495 0 978 1863 12 2 17
Volume/Lane/Signal Configurations
Developed by Chun Wong, 12/94
May 27, 2011 ,Friday 10:02:51 AM
CalcaDB
CPROJAM
INTERSECTION DATA SUMMARY SHEET
ATTACHMENT 6
587Cumulative (2014) Plus Project AM
Wesley Street National Boulevard
N/S: W/E: 26
I/S No:
AM/PM: Comments:
COUNT DATE: GROWTH FACTOR:
STUDY DATE:
40
A:
B:
960
0 A:
B: 0
115
A:
B:
217
0.715 =
+
+
+ + + 960 217 0 0
*1500
531 A:
B: 0
V/C =
West/East Critical Movements =
North/South Critical Movements =
SouthBound
WestBound EastBound
NorthBound
A = Adjusted Through/Right Volume
B = Adjusted Left Volume
* = ATSAC Benefit
Results
V/C RATIO LOS
0.00 - 0.60 A
0.61 - 0.70 B
0.71 - 0.80 C
0.81 - 0.90 D
0.91 - 1.00 E
A(W/B)
A(N/B)
B(E/B)
B(S/B)
C LOS =
Critical Movements Diagram
TH RT LT TH LT TH RT LT TH RT
Phasing RTOR Phasing Phasing Phasing RTOR RTOR
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND
EXISTING
RTOR
RT
115
AMBIENT
RELATED
PROJECT
TOTAL
115
LANE
SIGNAL Perm|10 10|Perm Perm Perm Auto Auto Auto Auto
0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 1 0
LT
0 102 0 0 0 40 1920 0 0 1062 87
40 0 1920 0 0 0 102 0 87 1062 0
Volume/Lane/Signal Configurations
Developed by Chun Wong, 12/94
May 27, 2011 ,Friday 10:02:51 AM
CalcaDB
CPROJAM
INTERSECTION DATA SUMMARY SHEET
ATTACHMENT 6
588Cumulative (2014) Plus Project AM
Hayden Avenue National Boulevard
N/S: W/E: 27
I/S No:
AM/PM: Comments:
COUNT DATE: GROWTH FACTOR:
STUDY DATE:
657 A:
B: 221|10 10|A:
B:|10 10|354
A:
B:
354
0.643 =
+
+
+ + + 441 0 354 221
*1425|10 10|A:
B:
441
V/C =
West/East Critical Movements =
North/South Critical Movements =
SouthBound
WestBound EastBound
NorthBound
A = Adjusted Through/Right Volume
B = Adjusted Left Volume
* = ATSAC Benefit
Results
V/C RATIO LOS
0.00 - 0.60 A
0.61 - 0.70 B
0.71 - 0.80 C
0.81 - 0.90 D
0.91 - 1.00 E
B(W/B)
A(N/B)
A(E/B)
A(S/B)
B LOS =
Critical Movements Diagram
TH RT LT TH LT TH RT LT TH RT
Phasing RTOR Phasing Phasing Phasing RTOR RTOR
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND
EXISTING
RTOR
RT
611
AMBIENT
RELATED
PROJECT
TOTAL
611
LANE
SIGNAL Split|1010| Prot-Fix Perm Auto Auto Auto
0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 1 0
LT
0 96 0 0 0 221 1314 0 0 881 275
221 0 1314 0 0 0 96 0 275 881 0
Volume/Lane/Signal Configurations
Developed by Chun Wong, 12/94
May 27, 2011 ,Friday 10:02:51 AM
CalcaDB
CPROJAM
INTERSECTION DATA SUMMARY SHEET
ATTACHMENT 6
589Cumulative (2014) Plus Project AM
Jefferson Boulevard National Boulevard
N/S: W/E: 28
I/S No:
AM/PM: Comments:
COUNT DATE: GROWTH FACTOR:
STUDY DATE:|10 10|A:
B:|10 10 10|A:
B:
1096
312 A:
B: 174
1.039 =
+
+
+ + + 0 310 1096 174
*1425
310
A:
B:
310
V/C =
West/East Critical Movements =
North/South Critical Movements =
SouthBound
WestBound EastBound
NorthBound
A = Adjusted Through/Right Volume
B = Adjusted Left Volume
* = ATSAC Benefit
Results
V/C RATIO LOS
0.00 - 0.60 A
0.61 - 0.70 B
0.71 - 0.80 C
0.81 - 0.90 D
0.91 - 1.00 E
A(W/B)
B(N/B)
A(E/B)
A(S/B)
F LOS =
Critical Movements Diagram
TH RT LT TH LT TH RT LT TH RT
Phasing RTOR Phasing Phasing Phasing RTOR RTOR
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND
EXISTING
RTOR
RT
174
AMBIENT
RELATED
PROJECT
TOTAL
174
LANE
SIGNAL Perm|1010|Perm Split Split Auto OLA Auto Auto
0 2 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 0
LT
624 0 0 753 1406 0 0 0 620 0 177
0 0 0 1406 753 0 0 624 177 0 620
Volume/Lane/Signal Configurations
Developed by Chun Wong, 12/94
May 27, 2011 ,Friday 10:02:51 AM
CalcaDB
CPROJAM
INTERSECTION DATA SUMMARY SHEET
ATTACHMENT 6
590Cumulative (2014) Plus Project AM
La Cienega Boulevard Jefferson Boulevard
N/S: W/E: 29
I/S No:
AM/PM: Comments:
COUNT DATE: GROWTH FACTOR:
STUDY DATE:
325
A:
B:
660
665 A:
B: 179
149
A:
B:
822
1.310 =
+
+
+ + + 660 822 237 179
*1375
424 A:
B: 237
V/C =
West/East Critical Movements =
North/South Critical Movements =
SouthBound
WestBound EastBound
NorthBound
A = Adjusted Through/Right Volume
B = Adjusted Left Volume
* = ATSAC Benefit
Results
V/C RATIO LOS
0.00 - 0.60 A
0.61 - 0.70 B
0.71 - 0.80 C
0.81 - 0.90 D
0.91 - 1.00 E
A(W/B)
A(N/B)
B(E/B)
B(S/B)
F LOS =
Critical Movements Diagram
TH RT LT TH LT TH RT LT TH RT
Phasing RTOR Phasing Phasing Phasing RTOR RTOR
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND
EXISTING
RTOR
RT
149
AMBIENT
RELATED
PROJECT
TOTAL
149
LANE
SIGNAL Perm|1010|Perm Prot-Var Prot-Var Auto OLA Auto Auto
0 2 0 1 0 0 1 0 3 0 0 1 0 2 0 2 0 0 1 0 2 0 1 0 1 0 0
LT
2351 116 179 1994 643 591 1320 138 430 717 131
591 138 1320 643 1994 179 116 2351 131 717 430
Volume/Lane/Signal Configurations
Developed by Chun Wong, 12/94
May 27, 2011 ,Friday 10:02:51 AM
CalcaDB
CPROJAM
INTERSECTION DATA SUMMARY SHEET
ATTACHMENT 6
591Cumulative (2014) Plus Project AM
Jefferson Boulevard Higuera St/Rodeo Rd
N/S: W/E: 30
I/S No:
AM/PM: Comments:
COUNT DATE: GROWTH FACTOR:
STUDY DATE:
562
A:
B:
587
112
A:
B:
354
357 A:
B: 202
0.788 =
+
+
+ + + 587 80 354 202
*1425
27
A:
B:
80
V/C =
West/East Critical Movements =
North/South Critical Movements =
SouthBound
WestBound EastBound
NorthBound
A = Adjusted Through/Right Volume
B = Adjusted Left Volume
* = ATSAC Benefit
Results
V/C RATIO LOS
0.00 - 0.60 A
0.61 - 0.70 B
0.71 - 0.80 C
0.81 - 0.90 D
0.91 - 1.00 E
A(W/B)
B(N/B)
A(E/B)
A(S/B)
C LOS =
Critical Movements Diagram
TH RT LT TH LT TH RT LT TH RT
Phasing RTOR Phasing Phasing Phasing RTOR RTOR
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND
EXISTING
RTOR
RT
202
AMBIENT
RELATED
PROJECT
TOTAL
202
LANE
SIGNAL Perm|1010|Perm Split Split Free Auto Auto Auto
0 2 0 0 1 0 1 0 2 0 0 1 0 2 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 2 0 0 1 0
LT
713 800 112 707 95 1022 587 147 27 160 51
1022 147 587 95 707 112 800 713 51 160 27
Volume/Lane/Signal Configurations
Developed by Chun Wong, 12/94
May 27, 2011 ,Friday 10:02:51 AM
CalcaDB
CPROJAM
INTERSECTION DATA SUMMARY SHEET
ATTACHMENT 6
592Cumulative (2014) Plus Project AM
La Cienega Boulevard Rodeo Road
N/S: W/E: 31
I/S No:
AM/PM: Comments:
COUNT DATE: GROWTH FACTOR:
STUDY DATE:
179
A:
B:
463
141
A:
B:
806
789 A:
B: 331
1.249 =
+
+
+ + + 463 806 213 331
*1375
298 A:
B: 213
V/C =
West/East Critical Movements =
North/South Critical Movements =
SouthBound
WestBound EastBound
NorthBound
A = Adjusted Through/Right Volume
B = Adjusted Left Volume
* = ATSAC Benefit
Results
V/C RATIO LOS
0.00 - 0.60 A
0.61 - 0.70 B
0.71 - 0.80 C
0.81 - 0.90 D
0.91 - 1.00 E
A(W/B)
B(N/B)
B(E/B)
A(S/B)
F LOS =
Critical Movements Diagram
TH RT LT TH LT TH RT LT TH RT
Phasing RTOR Phasing Phasing Phasing RTOR RTOR
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND
EXISTING
RTOR
RT
602
AMBIENT
RELATED
PROJECT
TOTAL
602
LANE
SIGNAL Prot-Fix|1010|Prot-Fix Prot-Var Prot-Var Auto Auto OLA OLA
0 2 0 1 0 0 2 0 2 0 1 0 0 2 0 2 0 0 1 0 1 0 2 0 0 1 0
LT
2271 95 256 2126 291 325 925 329 213 596 229
325 329 925 291 2126 256 95 2271 229 596 213
Volume/Lane/Signal Configurations
Developed by Chun Wong, 12/94
May 27, 2011 ,Friday 10:02:51 AM
CalcaDB
CPROJAM
INTERSECTION DATA SUMMARY SHEET
ATTACHMENT 6
593Default Scenario Thu May 26, 2011 16:04:10 Page 7-1
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM 4-Way Stop Method (Base Volume Alternative)
********************************************************************************
Intersection #32 BRADDOCK DR/DUQUESNE AV [CUMULATIVE (2014) + PROJECT AM]
********************************************************************************
Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap. (X): 1.639
Loss Time (sec): 0 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 229.1
Optimal Cycle: 0 Level Of Service: F
********************************************************************************
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Stop Sign Stop Sign
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 90 209 143 30 328 39 48 557 38 56 552 40
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 90 209 143 30 328 39 48 557 38 56 552 40
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 90 209 143 30 328 39 48 557 38 56 552 40
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 90 209 143 30 328 39 48 557 38 56 552 40
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Final Vol.: 90 209 143 30 328 39 48 557 38 56 552 40
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lanes: 0.20 0.48 0.32 0.07 0.83 0.10 0.07 0.87 0.06 0.09 0.85 0.06
Final Sat.: 82 190 130 30 328 39 30 343 23 34 337 24
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.63 1.63 1.63 1.64 1.64 1.64
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Delay/Veh: 105.2 105 105.2 76.3 76.3 76.3 315.7 316 315.7 321.2 321 321.2
Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 105.2 105 105.2 76.3 76.3 76.3 315.7 316 315.7 321.2 321 321.2
LOS by Move: F F F F F F F F F F F F
ApproachDel: 105.2 76.3 315.7 321.2
Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
ApprAdjDel: 105.2 76.3 315.7 321.2
LOS by Appr: F F F F
********************************************************************************
Traffix 7.6.0715 (c) 2003 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to RAJU ASSOC., PASADENA
ATTACHMENT 6
594Cumulative (2014) Plus Project AM
Braddock Drive Duquesne Avenue
N/S: W/E: 32
I/S No:
AM/PM: Comments:
COUNT DATE: GROWTH FACTOR:
STUDY DATE:
648 A:
B: 56
30
A:
B:
397
442 A:
B: 90
1.186 =
+
+
+ + + 643 397 56 90
1000
48
A:
B:
643
V/C =
West/East Critical Movements =
North/South Critical Movements =
SouthBound
WestBound EastBound
NorthBound
A = Adjusted Through/Right Volume
B = Adjusted Left Volume
* = ATSAC Benefit
Results
V/C RATIO LOS
0.00 - 0.60 A
0.61 - 0.70 B
0.71 - 0.80 C
0.81 - 0.90 D
0.91 - 1.00 E
B(W/B)
B(N/B)
A(E/B)
A(S/B)
F LOS =
Critical Movements Diagram
TH RT LT TH LT TH RT LT TH RT
Phasing RTOR Phasing Phasing Phasing RTOR RTOR
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND
EXISTING
RTOR
RT
90
AMBIENT
RELATED
PROJECT
TOTAL
90
LANE
SIGNAL Perm|10 10|Perm Perm Perm Auto Auto Auto Auto
0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0
LT
209 143 30 328 39 56 552 40 48 557 38
56 40 552 39 328 30 143 209 38 557 48
Volume/Lane/Signal Configurations
Developed by Chun Wong, 12/94
May 27, 2011 ,Friday 10:02:51 AM
CalcaDB
CPROJAM
INTERSECTION DATA SUMMARY SHEET
ATTACHMENT 6
595Default Scenario Thu May 26, 2011 16:04:10 Page 9-1
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM 4-Way Stop Method (Base Volume Alternative)
********************************************************************************
Intersection #33 LUCERNE AV/DUQUESNE AV [CUMULATIVE (2014) + PROJECT AM]
********************************************************************************
Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap. (X): 1.049
Loss Time (sec): 0 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 52.2
Optimal Cycle: 0 Level Of Service: F
********************************************************************************
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Stop Sign Stop Sign
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lanes: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 0 0 0 188 0 63 92 555 0 0 598 353
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 0 0 0 188 0 63 92 555 0 0 598 353
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 0 0 0 188 0 63 92 555 0 0 598 353
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 0 0 0 188 0 63 92 555 0 0 598 353
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Final Vol.: 0 0 0 188 0 63 92 555 0 0 598 353
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lanes: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.75 0.00 0.25 0.14 0.86 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00
Final Sat.: 0 0 0 399 0 134 88 529 0 0 586 661
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: xxxx xxxx xxxx 0.47 xxxx 0.47 1.05 1.05 xxxx xxxx 1.02 0.53
Crit Moves: **** **** ****
Delay/Veh: 0.0 0.0 0.0 15.6 0.0 15.6 73.5 73.5 0.0 0.0 67.0 14.2
Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 0.0 0.0 0.0 15.6 0.0 15.6 73.5 73.5 0.0 0.0 67.0 14.2
LOS by Move: * * * C * C F F * * F B
ApproachDel: xxxxxx 15.6 73.5 47.4
Delay Adj: xxxxx 1.00 1.00 1.00
ApprAdjDel: xxxxxx 15.6 73.5 47.4
LOS by Appr: * C F E
********************************************************************************
Traffix 7.6.0715 (c) 2003 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to RAJU ASSOC., PASADENA
ATTACHMENT 6
596Cumulative (2014) Plus Project AM
Lucerne Avenue Duquesne Avenue
N/S: W/E: 33
I/S No:
AM/PM: Comments:
COUNT DATE: GROWTH FACTOR:
STUDY DATE:|10 10|A:
B:
598
188
A:
B:
251|10 10|A:
B:|10 10|0.941 =
+
+
+ + + 598 251092
1000
647 A:
B: 92
V/C =
West/East Critical Movements =
North/South Critical Movements =
SouthBound
WestBound EastBound
NorthBound
A = Adjusted Through/Right Volume
B = Adjusted Left Volume
* = ATSAC Benefit
Results
V/C RATIO LOS
0.00 - 0.60 A
0.61 - 0.70 B
0.71 - 0.80 C
0.81 - 0.90 D
0.91 - 1.00 E
A(W/B)
A(N/B)
B(E/B)
A(S/B)
E LOS =
Critical Movements Diagram
TH RT LT TH LT TH RT LT TH RT
Phasing RTOR Phasing Phasing Phasing RTOR RTOR
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND
EXISTING
RTOR
RT|10 10|AMBIENT
RELATED
PROJECT
TOTAL|10 10|LANE
SIGNAL |10 10|Split Perm Perm Auto Auto Auto
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
LT
0 0 188 0 63 0 598 353 92 555 0
0 353 598 63 0 188 0 0 0 555 92
Volume/Lane/Signal Configurations
Developed by Chun Wong, 12/94
May 27, 2011 ,Friday 10:02:51 AM
CalcaDB
CPROJAM
INTERSECTION DATA SUMMARY SHEET
ATTACHMENT 6
597Cumulative (2014) Plus Project AM
Jefferson Boulevard Duquesne Avenue
N/S: W/E: 34
I/S No:
AM/PM: Comments:
COUNT DATE: GROWTH FACTOR:
STUDY DATE:
33 A:
B: 8
19
A:
B:
794
595 A:
B: 497
1.215 =
+
+
+ + + 468 794 8 497
*1375
316
A:
B:
468
V/C =
West/East Critical Movements =
North/South Critical Movements =
SouthBound
WestBound EastBound
NorthBound
A = Adjusted Through/Right Volume
B = Adjusted Left Volume
* = ATSAC Benefit
Results
V/C RATIO LOS
0.00 - 0.60 A
0.61 - 0.70 B
0.71 - 0.80 C
0.81 - 0.90 D
0.91 - 1.00 E
B(W/B)
B(N/B)
A(E/B)
A(S/B)
F LOS =
Critical Movements Diagram
TH RT LT TH LT TH RT LT TH RT
Phasing RTOR Phasing Phasing Phasing RTOR RTOR
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND
EXISTING
RTOR
RT
497
AMBIENT
RELATED
PROJECT
TOTAL
497
LANE
SIGNAL Prot-Var|1010|Prot-Var Perm Perm Auto Auto OLA Auto
0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 2 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0
LT
1162 28 19 1588 440 8 33 6 316 32 436
8 6 33 440 1588 19 28 1162 436 32 316
Volume/Lane/Signal Configurations
Developed by Chun Wong, 12/94
May 27, 2011 ,Friday 10:02:51 AM
CalcaDB
CPROJAM
INTERSECTION DATA SUMMARY SHEET
ATTACHMENT 6
598
Cumulative (2014) Plus Project Conditions
PM Peak Hour
ATTACHMENT 6
599Cumulative (2014) Plus Project PM
Robertson Boulevard Cattaragus Avenue
N/S: W/E: 1
I/S No:
AM/PM: Comments:
COUNT DATE: GROWTH FACTOR:
STUDY DATE:
186 A:
B: 62
57
A:
B:
925
884 A:
B: 106
0.966 =
+
+
+ + + 461 925 62 106
*1500
101
A:
B:
461
V/C =
West/East Critical Movements =
North/South Critical Movements =
SouthBound
WestBound EastBound
NorthBound
A = Adjusted Through/Right Volume
B = Adjusted Left Volume
* = ATSAC Benefit
Results
V/C RATIO LOS
0.00 - 0.60 A
0.61 - 0.70 B
0.71 - 0.80 C
0.81 - 0.90 D
0.91 - 1.00 E
B(W/B)
B(N/B)
A(E/B)
A(S/B)
E LOS =
Critical Movements Diagram
TH RT LT TH LT TH RT LT TH RT
Phasing RTOR Phasing Phasing Phasing RTOR RTOR
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND
EXISTING
RTOR
RT
106
AMBIENT
RELATED
PROJECT
TOTAL
106
LANE
SIGNAL Perm|1010|Perm Perm Perm Auto Auto Auto Auto
0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0
LT
1753 15 57 1785 65 62 81 43 101 231 129
62 43 81 65 1785 57 15 1753 129 231 101
Volume/Lane/Signal Configurations
Developed by Chun Wong, 12/94
May 27, 2011 ,Friday 10:03:44 AM
CalcaDB
CPROJPM
INTERSECTION DATA SUMMARY SHEET
ATTACHMENT 6
600Cumulative (2014) Plus Project PM
Robertson Boulevard I-10 WB Off-Ramp/Kincardine Av
N/S: W/E: 2
I/S No:
AM/PM: Comments:
COUNT DATE: GROWTH FACTOR:
STUDY DATE:
533 A:
B: 481
712 A:
B: 0
14
A:
B:
727
0.845 =
+
+
+ + + 164 727 481 0
*1500
77
A:
B:
164
V/C =
West/East Critical Movements =
North/South Critical Movements =
SouthBound
WestBound EastBound
NorthBound
A = Adjusted Through/Right Volume
B = Adjusted Left Volume
* = ATSAC Benefit
Results
V/C RATIO LOS
0.00 - 0.60 A
0.61 - 0.70 B
0.71 - 0.80 C
0.81 - 0.90 D
0.91 - 1.00 E
B(W/B)
A(N/B)
A(E/B)
B(S/B)
D LOS =
Critical Movements Diagram
TH RT LT TH LT TH RT LT TH RT
Phasing RTOR Phasing Phasing Phasing RTOR RTOR
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND
EXISTING
RTOR
RT
14
AMBIENT
RELATED
PROJECT
TOTAL
14
LANE
SIGNAL Perm|1010|Perm Perm Perm Auto Auto Auto Auto
0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
LT
1454 0 0 1388 35 481 23 562 77 0 87
481 562 23 35 1388 0 0 1454 87 0 77
Volume/Lane/Signal Configurations
Developed by Chun Wong, 12/94
May 27, 2011 ,Friday 10:03:44 AM
CalcaDB
CPROJPM
INTERSECTION DATA SUMMARY SHEET
ATTACHMENT 6
601Cumulative (2014) Plus Project PM
Robertson Boulevard National Boulevard
N/S: W/E: 3
I/S No:
AM/PM: Comments:
COUNT DATE: GROWTH FACTOR:
STUDY DATE:
416 A:
B: 117
646 A:
B: 376
106
A:
B:
553
1.077 =
+
+
+ + + 531 553 117 376
*1375
175
A:
B:
531
V/C =
West/East Critical Movements =
North/South Critical Movements =
SouthBound
WestBound EastBound
NorthBound
A = Adjusted Through/Right Volume
B = Adjusted Left Volume
* = ATSAC Benefit
Results
V/C RATIO LOS
0.00 - 0.60 A
0.61 - 0.70 B
0.71 - 0.80 C
0.81 - 0.90 D
0.91 - 1.00 E
B(W/B)
A(N/B)
A(E/B)
B(S/B)
F LOS =
Critical Movements Diagram
TH RT LT TH LT TH RT LT TH RT
Phasing RTOR Phasing Phasing Phasing RTOR RTOR
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND
EXISTING
RTOR
RT
106
AMBIENT
RELATED
PROJECT
TOTAL
106
LANE
SIGNAL Perm|1010|Prot-Fix Perm Prot-Fix Auto Auto OLA Auto
0 1 0 1 0 0 2 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0
LT
948 158 684 1056 235 117 416 284 175 921 140
117 284 416 235 1056 684 158 948 140 921 175
Volume/Lane/Signal Configurations
Developed by Chun Wong, 12/94
May 27, 2011 ,Friday 10:03:44 AM
CalcaDB
CPROJPM
INTERSECTION DATA SUMMARY SHEET
ATTACHMENT 6
602Cumulative (2014) Plus Project PM
National Boulevard I-10 EB On-Ramp
N/S: W/E: 4
I/S No:
AM/PM: Comments:
COUNT DATE: GROWTH FACTOR:
STUDY DATE:
A:
B: 0|10 10 10|A:
B:
614
358 A:
B: 222
0.487 =
+
+
+ + + 614 222
*1500
A:
B: 0|10 10|V/C =
West/East Critical Movements =
North/South Critical Movements =
SouthBound
WestBound EastBound
NorthBound
A = Adjusted Through/Right Volume
B = Adjusted Left Volume
* = ATSAC Benefit
Results
V/C RATIO LOS
0.00 - 0.60 A
0.61 - 0.70 B
0.71 - 0.80 C
0.81 - 0.90 D
0.91 - 1.00 E
B(N/B) A(S/B)
A LOS =
Critical Movements Diagram
TH RT LT TH LT TH RT LT TH RT
Phasing RTOR Phasing Phasing Phasing RTOR RTOR
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND
EXISTING
RTOR
RT
222
AMBIENT
RELATED
PROJECT
TOTAL
222
LANE
SIGNAL Prot-Fix|1010|Perm Auto Auto
0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
LT
715 0 0 1144 614 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 614 1144 0 0 715 0 0 0
Volume/Lane/Signal Configurations
Developed by Chun Wong, 12/94
May 27, 2011 ,Friday 10:03:44 AM
CalcaDB
CPROJPM
INTERSECTION DATA SUMMARY SHEET
ATTACHMENT 6
603Cumulative (2014) Plus Project PM
Hughes Avenue Venice Boulevard
N/S: W/E: 5
I/S No:
AM/PM: Comments:
COUNT DATE: GROWTH FACTOR:
STUDY DATE:
628 A:
B: 130
301 A:
B: 43
108
A:
B:
457
0.771 =
+
+
+ + + 631 457 130 43
*1500
59
A:
B:
631
V/C =
West/East Critical Movements =
North/South Critical Movements =
SouthBound
WestBound EastBound
NorthBound
A = Adjusted Through/Right Volume
B = Adjusted Left Volume
* = ATSAC Benefit
Results
V/C RATIO LOS
0.00 - 0.60 A
0.61 - 0.70 B
0.71 - 0.80 C
0.81 - 0.90 D
0.91 - 1.00 E
B(W/B)
A(N/B)
A(E/B)
B(S/B)
C LOS =
Critical Movements Diagram
TH RT LT TH LT TH RT LT TH RT
Phasing RTOR Phasing Phasing Phasing RTOR RTOR
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND
EXISTING
RTOR
RT
108
AMBIENT
RELATED
PROJECT
TOTAL
108
LANE
SIGNAL Perm|10 10|Perm Perm Perm Auto Auto Auto Auto
0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 3 0 0 1 0 1 0 3 0 0 1 0
LT
217 132 43 204 54 130 1884 45 59 1892 101
130 45 1884 54 204 43 132 217 101 1892 59
Volume/Lane/Signal Configurations
Developed by Chun Wong, 12/94
May 27, 2011 ,Friday 10:03:44 AM
CalcaDB
CPROJPM
INTERSECTION DATA SUMMARY SHEET
ATTACHMENT 6
604Cumulative (2014) Plus Project PM
Bagley Avenue Venice Boulevard
N/S: W/E: 6
I/S No:
AM/PM: Comments:
COUNT DATE: GROWTH FACTOR:
STUDY DATE:
81
A:
B:
627
93
A:
B:
367
154 A:
B: 41
0.767 =
+
+
+ + + 627 367 116 41
*1375
661 A:
B: 116
V/C =
West/East Critical Movements =
North/South Critical Movements =
SouthBound
WestBound EastBound
NorthBound
A = Adjusted Through/Right Volume
B = Adjusted Left Volume
* = ATSAC Benefit
Results
V/C RATIO LOS
0.00 - 0.60 A
0.61 - 0.70 B
0.71 - 0.80 C
0.81 - 0.90 D
0.91 - 1.00 E
A(W/B)
B(N/B)
B(E/B)
A(S/B)
C LOS =
Critical Movements Diagram
TH RT LT TH LT TH RT LT TH RT
Phasing RTOR Phasing Phasing Phasing RTOR RTOR
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND
EXISTING
RTOR
RT
41
AMBIENT
RELATED
PROJECT
TOTAL
41
LANE
SIGNAL Perm|1010|Perm Prot-Var Prot-Var Auto Auto Auto Auto
0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 3 0 0 1 0 1 0 2 0 1 0 0
LT
108 46 93 174 100 81 1881 73 116 1874 110
81 73 1881 100 174 93 46 108 110 1874 116
Volume/Lane/Signal Configurations
Developed by Chun Wong, 12/94
May 27, 2011 ,Friday 10:03:44 AM
CalcaDB
CPROJPM
INTERSECTION DATA SUMMARY SHEET
ATTACHMENT 6
605Cumulative (2014) Plus Project PM
Culver Boulevard Venice Boulevard
N/S: W/E: 7
I/S No:
AM/PM: Comments:
COUNT DATE: GROWTH FACTOR:
STUDY DATE:
719 A:
B: 299
216
A:
B:
216
146
A:
B:
245
0.991 =
+
+
+ + + 699 216 245 299
*1375
54
A:
B:
699
V/C =
West/East Critical Movements =
North/South Critical Movements =
SouthBound
WestBound EastBound
NorthBound
A = Adjusted Through/Right Volume
B = Adjusted Left Volume
* = ATSAC Benefit
Results
V/C RATIO LOS
0.00 - 0.60 A
0.61 - 0.70 B
0.71 - 0.80 C
0.81 - 0.90 D
0.91 - 1.00 E
B(W/B)
A(N/B)
A(E/B)
A(S/B)
E LOS =
Critical Movements Diagram
TH RT LT TH LT TH RT LT TH RT
Phasing RTOR Phasing Phasing Phasing RTOR RTOR
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND
EXISTING
RTOR
RT
146
AMBIENT
RELATED
PROJECT
TOTAL
146
LANE
SIGNAL Split|1010|Split Prot-Fix Prot-Fix OLA Auto Auto Auto
0 1 0 0 2 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 2 0 2 0 1 0 0 1 0 2 0 1 0 0
LT
83 988 308 74 49 543 1943 214 54 1999 99
543 214 1943 49 74 308 988 83 99 1999 54
Volume/Lane/Signal Configurations
Developed by Chun Wong, 12/94
May 27, 2011 ,Friday 10:03:44 AM
CalcaDB
CPROJPM
INTERSECTION DATA SUMMARY SHEET
ATTACHMENT 6
606Cumulative (2014) Plus Project PM
Robertson Boulevard Venice Boulevard
N/S: W/E: 8
I/S No:
AM/PM: Comments:
COUNT DATE: GROWTH FACTOR:
STUDY DATE:
108
A:
B:
771
380 A:
B: 619
262
A:
B:
385
1.464 =
+
+
+ + + 771 385 334 619
*1375
846 A:
B: 334
V/C =
West/East Critical Movements =
North/South Critical Movements =
SouthBound
WestBound EastBound
NorthBound
A = Adjusted Through/Right Volume
B = Adjusted Left Volume
* = ATSAC Benefit
Results
V/C RATIO LOS
0.00 - 0.60 A
0.61 - 0.70 B
0.71 - 0.80 C
0.81 - 0.90 D
0.91 - 1.00 E
A(W/B)
A(N/B)
B(E/B)
B(S/B)
F LOS =
Critical Movements Diagram
TH RT LT TH LT TH RT LT TH RT
Phasing RTOR Phasing Phasing Phasing RTOR RTOR
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND
EXISTING
RTOR
RT
262
AMBIENT
RELATED
PROJECT
TOTAL
262
LANE
SIGNAL Split|1010|Split Prot-Var Prot-Var OLA Auto Auto Auto
0 2 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 2 0 1 0 0 2 0 2 0 1 0 0
LT
769 67 619 380 259 108 2165 147 607 2354 185
108 147 2165 259 380 619 67 769 185 2354 607
Volume/Lane/Signal Configurations
Developed by Chun Wong, 12/94
May 27, 2011 ,Friday 10:03:44 AM
CalcaDB
CPROJPM
INTERSECTION DATA SUMMARY SHEET
ATTACHMENT 6
607Cumulative (2014) Plus Project PM
National Boulevard Venice Boulevard
N/S: W/E: 9
I/S No:
AM/PM: Comments:
COUNT DATE: GROWTH FACTOR:
STUDY DATE:
548 A:
B: 74
189
A:
B:
492
376 A:
B: 265
1.051 =
+
+
+ + + 710 492 74 265
*1375
128
A:
B:
710
V/C =
West/East Critical Movements =
North/South Critical Movements =
SouthBound
WestBound EastBound
NorthBound
A = Adjusted Through/Right Volume
B = Adjusted Left Volume
* = ATSAC Benefit
Results
V/C RATIO LOS
0.00 - 0.60 A
0.61 - 0.70 B
0.71 - 0.80 C
0.81 - 0.90 D
0.91 - 1.00 E
B(W/B)
B(N/B)
A(E/B)
A(S/B)
F LOS =
Critical Movements Diagram
TH RT LT TH LT TH RT LT TH RT
Phasing RTOR Phasing Phasing Phasing RTOR RTOR
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND
EXISTING
RTOR
RT
265
AMBIENT
RELATED
PROJECT
TOTAL
265
LANE
SIGNAL Perm|1010|Prot-Fix Prot-Fix Prot-Fix Auto Auto Auto Auto
0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 2 0 3 0 0 1 0 2 0 3 0 0 1 0
LT
641 111 189 859 125 135 1644 66 233 2131 538
135 66 1644 125 859 189 111 641 538 2131 233
Volume/Lane/Signal Configurations
Developed by Chun Wong, 12/94
May 27, 2011 ,Friday 10:03:44 AM
CalcaDB
CPROJPM
INTERSECTION DATA SUMMARY SHEET
ATTACHMENT 6
608Cumulative (2014) Plus Project PM
Helms Avenue Venice Boulevard
N/S: W/E: 10
I/S No:
AM/PM: Comments:
COUNT DATE: GROWTH FACTOR:
STUDY DATE:
621 A:
B: 33
29
A:
B:
67
17 A:
B: 16
0.547 =
+
+
+ + + 810 67 33 16
*1500
76
A:
B:
810
V/C =
West/East Critical Movements =
North/South Critical Movements =
SouthBound
WestBound EastBound
NorthBound
A = Adjusted Through/Right Volume
B = Adjusted Left Volume
* = ATSAC Benefit
Results
V/C RATIO LOS
0.00 - 0.60 A
0.61 - 0.70 B
0.71 - 0.80 C
0.81 - 0.90 D
0.91 - 1.00 E
B(W/B)
B(N/B)
A(E/B)
A(S/B)
A LOS =
Critical Movements Diagram
TH RT LT TH LT TH RT LT TH RT
Phasing RTOR Phasing Phasing Phasing RTOR RTOR
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND
EXISTING
RTOR
RT
16
AMBIENT
RELATED
PROJECT
TOTAL
16
LANE
SIGNAL Perm|10 10|Perm Perm Perm Auto Auto Auto Auto
1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 1 0 0 1 0 2 0 1 0 0
LT
1 10 29 9 29 33 1856 8 76 2397 34
33 8 1856 29 9 29 10 1 34 2397 76
Volume/Lane/Signal Configurations
Developed by Chun Wong, 12/94
May 27, 2011 ,Friday 10:03:44 AM
CalcaDB
CPROJPM
INTERSECTION DATA SUMMARY SHEET
ATTACHMENT 6
609Cumulative (2014) Plus Project PM
Cattaraugus Avenue Venice Boulevard
N/S: W/E: 11
I/S No:
AM/PM: Comments:
COUNT DATE: GROWTH FACTOR:
STUDY DATE:
604 A:
B: 94
193
A:
B:
300
139 A:
B: 47
0.727 =
+
+
+ + + 755 300 94 47
*1500
114
A:
B:
755
V/C =
West/East Critical Movements =
North/South Critical Movements =
SouthBound
WestBound EastBound
NorthBound
A = Adjusted Through/Right Volume
B = Adjusted Left Volume
* = ATSAC Benefit
Results
V/C RATIO LOS
0.00 - 0.60 A
0.61 - 0.70 B
0.71 - 0.80 C
0.81 - 0.90 D
0.91 - 1.00 E
B(W/B)
B(N/B)
A(E/B)
A(S/B)
C LOS =
Critical Movements Diagram
TH RT LT TH LT TH RT LT TH RT
Phasing RTOR Phasing Phasing Phasing RTOR RTOR
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND
EXISTING
RTOR
RT
47
AMBIENT
RELATED
PROJECT
TOTAL
47
LANE
SIGNAL Perm|10 10|Perm Perm Perm Auto Auto Auto Auto
0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 1 0 0 1 0 2 0 1 0 0
LT
64 28 193 75 32 94 1732 79 114 2252 13
94 79 1732 32 75 193 28 64 13 2252 114
Volume/Lane/Signal Configurations
Developed by Chun Wong, 12/94
May 27, 2011 ,Friday 10:03:44 AM
CalcaDB
CPROJPM
INTERSECTION DATA SUMMARY SHEET
ATTACHMENT 6
610Cumulative (2014) Plus Project PM
La Cienega Boulevard Venice Boulevard
N/S: W/E: 12
I/S No:
AM/PM: Comments:
COUNT DATE: GROWTH FACTOR:
STUDY DATE:
472 A:
B: 223
37
A:
B:
655
457 A:
B: 104
1.099 =
+
+
+ + + 625 655 223 104
*1375
167
A:
B:
625
V/C =
West/East Critical Movements =
North/South Critical Movements =
SouthBound
WestBound EastBound
NorthBound
A = Adjusted Through/Right Volume
B = Adjusted Left Volume
* = ATSAC Benefit
Results
V/C RATIO LOS
0.00 - 0.60 A
0.61 - 0.70 B
0.71 - 0.80 C
0.81 - 0.90 D
0.91 - 1.00 E
B(W/B)
B(N/B)
A(E/B)
A(S/B)
F LOS =
Critical Movements Diagram
TH RT LT TH LT TH RT LT TH RT
Phasing RTOR Phasing Phasing Phasing RTOR RTOR
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND
EXISTING
RTOR
RT
104
AMBIENT
RELATED
PROJECT
TOTAL
104
LANE
SIGNAL Perm|1010|Perm Prot-Var Prot-Var Auto Auto Auto Auto
0 2 0 1 0 0 1 0 2 0 1 0 0 1 0 3 0 0 1 0 2 0 3 0 0 1 0
LT
1255 116 37 1619 346 223 1417 35 304 1875 249
223 35 1417 346 1619 37 116 1255 249 1875 304
Volume/Lane/Signal Configurations
Developed by Chun Wong, 12/94
May 27, 2011 ,Friday 10:03:44 AM
CalcaDB
CPROJPM
INTERSECTION DATA SUMMARY SHEET
ATTACHMENT 6
611Cumulative (2014) Plus Project PM
Hughes Av/Duquesne Av Washington Boulevard
N/S: W/E: 13
I/S No:
AM/PM: Comments:
COUNT DATE: GROWTH FACTOR:
STUDY DATE:
296 A:
B: 80
33
A:
B:
421
428 A:
B: 66
0.654 =
+
+
+ + + 519 421 80 66
*1500
52
A:
B:
519
V/C =
West/East Critical Movements =
North/South Critical Movements =
SouthBound
WestBound EastBound
NorthBound
A = Adjusted Through/Right Volume
B = Adjusted Left Volume
* = ATSAC Benefit
Results
V/C RATIO LOS
0.00 - 0.60 A
0.61 - 0.70 B
0.71 - 0.80 C
0.81 - 0.90 D
0.91 - 1.00 E
B(W/B)
B(N/B)
A(E/B)
A(S/B)
B LOS =
Critical Movements Diagram
TH RT LT TH LT TH RT LT TH RT
Phasing RTOR Phasing Phasing Phasing RTOR RTOR
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND
EXISTING
RTOR
RT
66
AMBIENT
RELATED
PROJECT
TOTAL
66
LANE
SIGNAL Perm|1010|Perm Perm Perm Auto Auto Auto Auto
0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0
LT
407 21 33 352 69 80 539 52 52 798 240
80 52 539 69 352 33 21 407 240 798 52
Volume/Lane/Signal Configurations
Developed by Chun Wong, 12/94
May 27, 2011 ,Friday 10:03:44 AM
CalcaDB
CPROJPM
INTERSECTION DATA SUMMARY SHEET
ATTACHMENT 6
612Cumulative (2014) Plus Project PM
Duquesne Avenue Culver Boulevard
N/S: W/E: 14
I/S No:
AM/PM: Comments:
COUNT DATE: GROWTH FACTOR:
STUDY DATE:
451 A:
B: 152
124
A:
B:
500
364 A:
B: 124
0.891 =
+
+
+ + + 545 500 152 124
*1375
80
A:
B:
545
V/C =
West/East Critical Movements =
North/South Critical Movements =
SouthBound
WestBound EastBound
NorthBound
A = Adjusted Through/Right Volume
B = Adjusted Left Volume
* = ATSAC Benefit
Results
V/C RATIO LOS
0.00 - 0.60 A
0.61 - 0.70 B
0.71 - 0.80 C
0.81 - 0.90 D
0.91 - 1.00 E
B(W/B)
B(N/B)
A(E/B)
A(S/B)
D LOS =
Critical Movements Diagram
TH RT LT TH LT TH RT LT TH RT
Phasing RTOR Phasing Phasing Phasing RTOR RTOR
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND
EXISTING
RTOR
RT
124
AMBIENT
RELATED
PROJECT
TOTAL
124
LANE
SIGNAL Prot-Var|1010|Prot-Var Prot-Var Prot-Var Auto Auto Auto Auto
0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0
LT
364 197 124 500 82 152 879 23 80 992 97
152 23 879 82 500 124 197 364 97 992 80
Volume/Lane/Signal Configurations
Developed by Chun Wong, 12/94
May 27, 2011 ,Friday 10:03:44 AM
CalcaDB
CPROJPM
INTERSECTION DATA SUMMARY SHEET
ATTACHMENT 6
613Cumulative (2014) Plus Project PM
Culver Boulevard Washington Bl/Irving Pl
N/S: W/E: 15
I/S No:
AM/PM: Comments:
COUNT DATE: GROWTH FACTOR:
STUDY DATE:
508 A:
B: 95
409
A:
B:
409
18 A:
B: 41
0.638 =
+
+
+ + + 428 409 95 41
*1375|10 10|A:
B:
428
V/C =
West/East Critical Movements =
North/South Critical Movements =
SouthBound
WestBound EastBound
NorthBound
A = Adjusted Through/Right Volume
B = Adjusted Left Volume
* = ATSAC Benefit
Results
V/C RATIO LOS
0.00 - 0.60 A
0.61 - 0.70 B
0.71 - 0.80 C
0.81 - 0.90 D
0.91 - 1.00 E
B(W/B)
B(N/B)
A(E/B)
A(S/B)
B LOS =
Critical Movements Diagram
TH RT LT TH LT TH RT LT TH RT
Phasing RTOR Phasing Phasing Phasing RTOR RTOR
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND
EXISTING
RTOR
RT
41
AMBIENT
RELATED
PROJECT
TOTAL
41
LANE
SIGNAL Split|1010|Split Prot-Fix Perm Auto Auto Auto Auto
0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 2 0 1 0 0
LT
0 66 812 0 6 95 1016 257 0 1225 60
-409
95 666 1016 6 0 812 66 0 60 1225 0
Volume/Lane/Signal Configurations
Developed by Chun Wong, 12/94
May 27, 2011 ,Friday 10:03:44 AM
CalcaDB
CPROJPM
INTERSECTION DATA SUMMARY SHEET
ATTACHMENT 6
614Cumulative (2014) Plus Project PM
Main Street Culver Boulevard
N/S: W/E: 16
I/S No:
AM/PM: Comments:
COUNT DATE: GROWTH FACTOR:
STUDY DATE:|10 10|A:
B:
567
112 A:
B: 286|10 10|A:
B:|10 10|0.613 =
+
+
+ + + 567 0 120 286
*1425
628 A:
B: 120
V/C =
West/East Critical Movements =
North/South Critical Movements =
SouthBound
WestBound EastBound
NorthBound
A = Adjusted Through/Right Volume
B = Adjusted Left Volume
* = ATSAC Benefit
Results
V/C RATIO LOS
0.00 - 0.60 A
0.61 - 0.70 B
0.71 - 0.80 C
0.81 - 0.90 D
0.91 - 1.00 E
A(W/B)
A(N/B)
B(E/B)
B(S/B)
B LOS =
Critical Movements Diagram
TH RT LT TH LT TH RT LT TH RT
Phasing RTOR Phasing Phasing Phasing RTOR RTOR
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND
EXISTING
RTOR
RT|10 10|AMBIENT
RELATED
PROJECT
TOTAL|10 10|LANE
SIGNAL |10 10|Split Perm Prot-Fix Auto Auto Auto
0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 2 0 1 0 0 1 0 3 0 0 0 0
LT
13 0 286 13 172 0 1583 119 120 1883 0
0 119 1583 172 13 286 0 13 0 1883 120
Volume/Lane/Signal Configurations
Developed by Chun Wong, 12/94
May 27, 2011 ,Friday 10:03:44 AM
CalcaDB
CPROJPM
INTERSECTION DATA SUMMARY SHEET
ATTACHMENT 6
615Cumulative (2014) Plus Project PM
Culver Boulevard Washington Bl/Canfield Av
N/S: W/E: 17
I/S No:
AM/PM: Comments:
COUNT DATE: GROWTH FACTOR:
STUDY DATE:
556
A:
B:
556
307 A:
B: 118
14
A:
B:
496
0.756 =
+
+
+ + + 556 7 496 118
*1425|10 10|A:
B:|1010|V/C =
West/East Critical Movements =
North/South Critical Movements =
SouthBound
WestBound EastBound
NorthBound
A = Adjusted Through/Right Volume
B = Adjusted Left Volume
* = ATSAC Benefit
Results
V/C RATIO LOS
0.00 - 0.60 A
0.61 - 0.70 B
0.71 - 0.80 C
0.81 - 0.90 D
0.91 - 1.00 E
A(W/B)
A(N/B)
A(E/B)
B(S/B)
C LOS =
Critical Movements Diagram
TH RT LT TH LT TH RT LT TH RT
Phasing RTOR Phasing Phasing Phasing RTOR RTOR
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND
EXISTING
RTOR
RT
14
AMBIENT
RELATED
PROJECT
TOTAL
14
LANE
SIGNAL Prot-Fix|1010|Prot-Fix Split OLA Auto Auto OLA
0 2 0 0 2 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0
LT
991 1110 118 605 9 1082 30 219 0 0 21
1082 219 30 9 605 118 1110 991 21 0 0
Volume/Lane/Signal Configurations
Developed by Chun Wong, 12/94
May 27, 2011 ,Friday 10:03:44 AM
CalcaDB
CPROJPM
INTERSECTION DATA SUMMARY SHEET
ATTACHMENT 6
616Cumulative (2014) Plus Project PM
Robertson Bl/Higuera St Washington Boulevard
N/S: W/E: 18
I/S No:
AM/PM: Comments:
COUNT DATE: GROWTH FACTOR:
STUDY DATE:
87
A:
B:
744
229 A:
B: 208
67
A:
B:
212
0.847 =
+
+
+ + + 744 212 143 208
*1425
631 A:
B: 143
V/C =
West/East Critical Movements =
North/South Critical Movements =
SouthBound
WestBound EastBound
NorthBound
A = Adjusted Through/Right Volume
B = Adjusted Left Volume
* = ATSAC Benefit
Results
V/C RATIO LOS
0.00 - 0.60 A
0.61 - 0.70 B
0.71 - 0.80 C
0.81 - 0.90 D
0.91 - 1.00 E
A(W/B)
A(N/B)
B(E/B)
B(S/B)
D LOS =
Critical Movements Diagram
TH RT LT TH LT TH RT LT TH RT
Phasing RTOR Phasing Phasing Phasing RTOR RTOR
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND
EXISTING
RTOR
RT
67
AMBIENT
RELATED
PROJECT
TOTAL
67
LANE
SIGNAL Prot-Fix|1010|Prot-Fix Perm Perm Auto Auto Auto Auto
0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0
LT
212 88 208 229 191 87 1002 485 143 1169 93
87 485 1002 191 229 208 88 212 93 1169 143
Volume/Lane/Signal Configurations
Developed by Chun Wong, 12/94
May 27, 2011 ,Friday 10:03:44 AM
CalcaDB
CPROJPM
INTERSECTION DATA SUMMARY SHEET
ATTACHMENT 6
617Cumulative (2014) Plus Project PM
Landmark Street Washington Boulevard
N/S: W/E: 19
I/S No:
AM/PM: Comments:
COUNT DATE: GROWTH FACTOR:
STUDY DATE:
834 A:
B: 76|10 10|A:
B:|10 10|79
A:
B:
114
0.599 =
+
+
+ + + 814 0 114 76
*1500|10 10|A:
B:
814
V/C =
West/East Critical Movements =
North/South Critical Movements =
SouthBound
WestBound EastBound
NorthBound
A = Adjusted Through/Right Volume
B = Adjusted Left Volume
* = ATSAC Benefit
Results
V/C RATIO LOS
0.00 - 0.60 A
0.61 - 0.70 B
0.71 - 0.80 C
0.81 - 0.90 D
0.91 - 1.00 E
B(W/B)
A(N/B)
A(E/B)
A(S/B)
A LOS =
Critical Movements Diagram
TH RT LT TH LT TH RT LT TH RT
Phasing RTOR Phasing Phasing Phasing RTOR RTOR
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND
EXISTING
RTOR
RT
79
AMBIENT
RELATED
PROJECT
TOTAL
79
LANE
SIGNAL Split|1010| Perm Perm Auto Auto Auto Auto
0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0
LT
0 114 0 0 0 76 1667 0 0 1574 54
76 0 1667 0 0 0 114 0 54 1574 0
Volume/Lane/Signal Configurations
Developed by Chun Wong, 12/94
May 27, 2011 ,Friday 10:03:44 AM
CalcaDB
CPROJPM
INTERSECTION DATA SUMMARY SHEET
[1] Note: Pass-by credit not applied at this location.
ATTACHMENT 6
618Cumulative (2014) Plus Project PM
National Boulevard Washington Boulevard
N/S: W/E: 20
I/S No:
AM/PM: Comments:
COUNT DATE: GROWTH FACTOR:
STUDY DATE:
372 A:
B: 86
261
A:
B:
573
427 A:
B: 197
0.947 =
+
+
+ + + 543 573 86 197
*1375
106
A:
B:
543
V/C =
West/East Critical Movements =
North/South Critical Movements =
SouthBound
WestBound EastBound
NorthBound
A = Adjusted Through/Right Volume
B = Adjusted Left Volume
* = ATSAC Benefit
Results
V/C RATIO LOS
0.00 - 0.60 A
0.61 - 0.70 B
0.71 - 0.80 C
0.81 - 0.90 D
0.91 - 1.00 E
B(W/B)
B(N/B)
A(E/B)
A(S/B)
E LOS =
Critical Movements Diagram
TH RT LT TH LT TH RT LT TH RT
Phasing RTOR Phasing Phasing Phasing RTOR RTOR
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND
EXISTING
RTOR
RT
358
AMBIENT
RELATED
PROJECT
TOTAL
358
LANE
SIGNAL Prot-Var|1010|Prot-Var Perm Perm Auto Auto Auto Auto
0 1 0 1 0 0 2 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 2 0 1 0 0 1 0 2 0 0 1 0
LT
730 123 475 1067 79 86 904 213 106 1085 323
86 213 904 79 1067 475 123 730 323 1085 106
Volume/Lane/Signal Configurations
Developed by Chun Wong, 12/94
May 27, 2011 ,Friday 10:03:44 AM
CalcaDB
CPROJPM
INTERSECTION DATA SUMMARY SHEET
ATTACHMENT 6
619Default Scenario Thu May 26, 2011 16:04:10 Page 11-1
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Base Volume Alternative)
********************************************************************************
Intersection #211 WESLEY AV/WASHINGTON BL [CUMULATIVE (2014) + PROJECT PM]
********************************************************************************
Average Delay (sec/veh): 16.2 Worst Case Level Of Service: F[521.5]
********************************************************************************
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 2 0 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 54 0 33 0 0 0 0 1597 34 44 1084 0
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 54 0 33 0 0 0 0 1597 34 44 1084 0
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 54 0 33 0 0 0 0 1597 34 44 1084 0
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Final Vol.: 54 0 33 0 0 0 0 1597 34 44 1084 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Critical Gap Module:
Critical Gp: 6.8 xxxx 6.9 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 4.1 xxxx xxxxx
FollowUpTim: 3.5 xxxx 3.3 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 2.2 xxxx xxxxx
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Module:
Cnflict Vol: 2244 xxxx 816 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 1631 xxxx xxxxx
Potent Cap.: 36 xxxx 325 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 403 xxxx xxxxx
Move Cap.: 33 xxxx 325 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 403 xxxx xxxxx
Volume/Cap: 1.61 xxxx 0.10 xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx 0.11 xxxx xxxx
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Level Of Service Module:
Queue: xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 0.4 xxxx xxxxx
Stopped Del:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 15.0 xxxx xxxxx
LOS by Move: * * * * * * * * * C * *
Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT
Shared Cap.: xxxx 51 xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx
SharedQueue:xxxxx 8.4 xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx
Shrd StpDel:xxxxx 522 xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx
Shared LOS: * F * * * * * * * * * *
ApproachDel: 521.5 xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx
ApproachLOS: F * * *
Traffix 7.6.0715 (c) 2003 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to RAJU ASSOC., PASADENA
ATTACHMENT 6
620Cumulative (2014) Plus Project PM
Wesley Avenue/Driveway Washington Boulevard
N/S: W/E: 21
I/S No:
AM/PM: Comments:
COUNT DATE: GROWTH FACTOR:
STUDY DATE:
542 A:
B: 44|10 10|A:
B:|10 10|54
A:
B:
87
0.789 =
+
+
+ + + 816 0 87 44
1200|10 10|A:
B:
816
V/C =
West/East Critical Movements =
North/South Critical Movements =
SouthBound
WestBound EastBound
NorthBound
A = Adjusted Through/Right Volume
B = Adjusted Left Volume
* = ATSAC Benefit
Results
V/C RATIO LOS
0.00 - 0.60 A
0.61 - 0.70 B
0.71 - 0.80 C
0.81 - 0.90 D
0.91 - 1.00 E
B(W/B)
A(N/B)
A(E/B)
A(S/B)
C LOS =
Critical Movements Diagram
TH RT LT TH LT TH RT LT TH RT
Phasing RTOR Phasing Phasing Phasing RTOR RTOR
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND
EXISTING
RTOR
RT
54
AMBIENT
RELATED
PROJECT
TOTAL
54
LANE
SIGNAL Perm|10 10| Perm Perm Auto Auto Auto
0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0
LT
0 33 0 0 0 44 1084 0 0 1597 34
44 0 1084 0 0 0 33 0 34 1597 0
Volume/Lane/Signal Configurations
Developed by Chun Wong, 12/94
May 27, 2011 ,Friday 10:03:44 AM
CalcaDB
CPROJPM
INTERSECTION DATA SUMMARY SHEET
ATTACHMENT 6
621Cumulative (2014) Plus Project PM
Helms Avenue Washington Boulevard
N/S: W/E: 22
I/S No:
AM/PM: Comments:
COUNT DATE: GROWTH FACTOR:
STUDY DATE:
557 A:
B: 14|10 10|A:
B:|10 10|51
A:
B:
64
0.509 =
+
+
+ + + 790 0 64 14
*1500|10 10|A:
B:
790
V/C =
West/East Critical Movements =
North/South Critical Movements =
SouthBound
WestBound EastBound
NorthBound
A = Adjusted Through/Right Volume
B = Adjusted Left Volume
* = ATSAC Benefit
Results
V/C RATIO LOS
0.00 - 0.60 A
0.61 - 0.70 B
0.71 - 0.80 C
0.81 - 0.90 D
0.91 - 1.00 E
B(W/B)
A(N/B)
A(E/B)
A(S/B)
A LOS =
Critical Movements Diagram
TH RT LT TH LT TH RT LT TH RT
Phasing RTOR Phasing Phasing Phasing RTOR RTOR
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND
EXISTING
RTOR
RT
51
AMBIENT
RELATED
PROJECT
TOTAL
51
LANE
SIGNAL Split|10 10| Perm Perm Auto Auto Auto
0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0
LT
0 13 0 0 0 14 1113 0 0 1549 31
14 0 1113 0 0 0 13 0 31 1549 0
Volume/Lane/Signal Configurations
Developed by Chun Wong, 12/94
May 27, 2011 ,Friday 10:03:44 AM
CalcaDB
CPROJPM
INTERSECTION DATA SUMMARY SHEET
ATTACHMENT 6
622Default Scenario Thu May 26, 2011 16:04:10 Page 13-1
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Base Volume Alternative)
********************************************************************************
Intersection #231 CATTARAUGUS AV/WASHINGTON AV [CUMULATIVE (2014) + PROJECT PM]
********************************************************************************
Average Delay (sec/veh): 31.9 Worst Case Level Of Service: F[778.5]
********************************************************************************
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 4 2 3 60 2 51 71 1503 9 11 1050 77
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 4 2 3 60 2 51 71 1503 9 11 1050 77
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 4 2 3 60 2 51 71 1503 9 11 1050 77
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Final Vol.: 4 2 3 60 2 51 71 1503 9 11 1050 77
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Critical Gap Module:
Critical Gp: 7.5 6.5 6.9 7.5 6.5 6.9 4.1 xxxx xxxxx 4.1 xxxx xxxxx
FollowUpTim: 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3 2.2 xxxx xxxxx 2.2 xxxx xxxxx
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Module:
Cnflict Vol: 2197 2799 756 2005 2765 564 1127 xxxx xxxxx 1512 xxxx xxxxx
Potent Cap.: 26 19 355 36 20 474 627 xxxx xxxxx 448 xxxx xxxxx
Move Cap.: 19 16 355 29 17 474 627 xxxx xxxxx 448 xxxx xxxxx
Volume/Cap: 0.22 0.12 0.01 2.09 0.12 0.11 0.11 xxxx xxxx 0.02 xxxx xxxx
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Level Of Service Module:
Queue: xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 0.4 xxxx xxxxx 0.1 xxxx xxxxx
Stopped Del:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 11.5 xxxx xxxxx 13.2 xxxx xxxxx
LOS by Move: * * * * * * B * * B * *
Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT
Shared Cap.: xxxx 26 xxxxx xxxx 49 xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx
SharedQueue:xxxxx 1.1 xxxxx xxxxx 11.7 xxxxx 0.4 xxxx xxxxx 0.1 xxxx xxxxx
Shrd StpDel:xxxxx 206 xxxxx xxxxx 778 xxxxx 11.5 xxxx xxxxx 13.2 xxxx xxxxx
Shared LOS: * F * * F * B * * B * *
ApproachDel: 205.8 778.5 xxxxxx xxxxxx
ApproachLOS: F F * *
Traffix 7.6.0715 (c) 2003 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to RAJU ASSOC., PASADENA
ATTACHMENT 6
623Cumulative (2014) Plus Project PM
Cattaraugus Avenue Washington Boulevard
N/S: W/E: 23
I/S No:
AM/PM: Comments:
COUNT DATE: GROWTH FACTOR:
STUDY DATE:
597 A:
B: 11
60
A:
B:
113
9 A:
B: 4
0.914 =
+
+
+ + + 969 113 11 4
1200
71
A:
B:
969
V/C =
West/East Critical Movements =
North/South Critical Movements =
SouthBound
WestBound EastBound
NorthBound
A = Adjusted Through/Right Volume
B = Adjusted Left Volume
* = ATSAC Benefit
Results
V/C RATIO LOS
0.00 - 0.60 A
0.61 - 0.70 B
0.71 - 0.80 C
0.81 - 0.90 D
0.91 - 1.00 E
B(W/B)
B(N/B)
A(E/B)
A(S/B)
E LOS =
Critical Movements Diagram
TH RT LT TH LT TH RT LT TH RT
Phasing RTOR Phasing Phasing Phasing RTOR RTOR
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND
EXISTING
RTOR
RT|1010|AMBIENT
RELATED
PROJECT
TOTAL|1010|LANE
SIGNAL Perm|10 10|Perm Perm Perm Auto Auto Auto Auto
0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0
LT
2 3 60 2 51 11 1050 77 71 1503 9
11 77 1050 51 2 60 3 2 9 1503 71
Volume/Lane/Signal Configurations
Developed by Chun Wong, 12/94
May 27, 2011 ,Friday 10:03:44 AM
CalcaDB
CPROJPM
INTERSECTION DATA SUMMARY SHEET
ATTACHMENT 6
624Cumulative (2014) Plus Project PM
La Cienega Boulevard Washington Boulevard
N/S: W/E: 24
I/S No:
AM/PM: Comments:
COUNT DATE: GROWTH FACTOR:
STUDY DATE:
412 A:
B: 70
227
A:
B:
604
419 A:
B: 150
0.996 =
+
+
+ + + 642 604 70 150
*1375
213
A:
B:
642
V/C =
West/East Critical Movements =
North/South Critical Movements =
SouthBound
WestBound EastBound
NorthBound
A = Adjusted Through/Right Volume
B = Adjusted Left Volume
* = ATSAC Benefit
Results
V/C RATIO LOS
0.00 - 0.60 A
0.61 - 0.70 B
0.71 - 0.80 C
0.81 - 0.90 D
0.91 - 1.00 E
B(W/B)
B(N/B)
A(E/B)
A(S/B)
E LOS =
Critical Movements Diagram
TH RT LT TH LT TH RT LT TH RT
Phasing RTOR Phasing Phasing Phasing RTOR RTOR
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND
EXISTING
RTOR
RT
150
AMBIENT
RELATED
PROJECT
TOTAL
150
LANE
SIGNAL Prot-Var|1010|Prot-Var Perm Perm Auto Auto Auto Auto
0 2 0 1 0 0 1 0 2 0 1 0 0 1 0 2 0 0 1 0 1 0 2 0 0 1 0
LT
1200 58 227 1755 57 70 824 127 213 1283 157
70 127 824 57 1755 227 58 1200 157 1283 213
Volume/Lane/Signal Configurations
Developed by Chun Wong, 12/94
May 27, 2011 ,Friday 10:03:44 AM
CalcaDB
CPROJPM
INTERSECTION DATA SUMMARY SHEET
ATTACHMENT 6
625Cumulative (2014) Plus Project PM
La Cienega Boulevard Fairfax Avenue
N/S: W/E: 25
I/S No:
AM/PM: Comments:
COUNT DATE: GROWTH FACTOR:
STUDY DATE:
38 A:
B: 509
492 A:
B: 0
21
A:
B:
840
0.928 =
+
+
+ ++73 840 509 0
*1425
45
A:
B:
73
V/C =
West/East Critical Movements =
North/South Critical Movements =
SouthBound
WestBound EastBound
NorthBound
A = Adjusted Through/Right Volume
B = Adjusted Left Volume
* = ATSAC Benefit
Results
V/C RATIO LOS
0.00 - 0.60 A
0.61 - 0.70 B
0.71 - 0.80 C
0.81 - 0.90 D
0.91 - 1.00 E
B(W/B)
A(N/B)
A(E/B)
B(S/B)
E LOS =
Critical Movements Diagram
TH RT LT TH LT TH RT LT TH RT
Phasing RTOR Phasing Phasing Phasing RTOR RTOR
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND
EXISTING
RTOR
RT
21
AMBIENT
RELATED
PROJECT
TOTAL
21
LANE
SIGNAL Perm|1010|Perm Split Split Free Auto Auto Auto
0 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 1 0 0 2 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0
LT
1679 1460 0 1450 27 926 19 19 45 4 24
926 19 19 27 1450 0 1460 1679 24 4 45
Volume/Lane/Signal Configurations
Developed by Chun Wong, 12/94
May 27, 2011 ,Friday 10:03:44 AM
CalcaDB
CPROJPM
INTERSECTION DATA SUMMARY SHEET
ATTACHMENT 6
626Cumulative (2014) Plus Project PM
Wesley Street National Boulevard
N/S: W/E: 26
I/S No:
AM/PM: Comments:
COUNT DATE: GROWTH FACTOR:
STUDY DATE:
605 A:
B: 5
0 A:
B: 0
26
A:
B:
144
0.479 =
+
+
+ + + 674 144 5 0
*1500|10 10|A:
B:
674
V/C =
West/East Critical Movements =
North/South Critical Movements =
SouthBound
WestBound EastBound
NorthBound
A = Adjusted Through/Right Volume
B = Adjusted Left Volume
* = ATSAC Benefit
Results
V/C RATIO LOS
0.00 - 0.60 A
0.61 - 0.70 B
0.71 - 0.80 C
0.81 - 0.90 D
0.91 - 1.00 E
B(W/B)
A(N/B)
A(E/B)
B(S/B)
A LOS =
Critical Movements Diagram
TH RT LT TH LT TH RT LT TH RT
Phasing RTOR Phasing Phasing Phasing RTOR RTOR
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND
EXISTING
RTOR
RT
26
AMBIENT
RELATED
PROJECT
TOTAL
26
LANE
SIGNAL Perm|10 10|Perm Perm Perm Auto Auto Auto Auto
0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 1 0
LT
0 118 0 0 0 5 1210 0 0 1347 5
5 0 1210 0 0 0 118 0 5 1347 0
Volume/Lane/Signal Configurations
Developed by Chun Wong, 12/94
May 27, 2011 ,Friday 10:03:44 AM
CalcaDB
CPROJPM
INTERSECTION DATA SUMMARY SHEET
ATTACHMENT 6
627Cumulative (2014) Plus Project PM
Hayden Avenue National Boulevard
N/S: W/E: 27
I/S No:
AM/PM: Comments:
COUNT DATE: GROWTH FACTOR:
STUDY DATE:
256 A:
B: 53|10 10|A:
B:|10 10|445
A:
B:
445
0.747 =
+
+
+ + + 666 0 445 53
*1425|10 10|A:
B:
666
V/C =
West/East Critical Movements =
North/South Critical Movements =
SouthBound
WestBound EastBound
NorthBound
A = Adjusted Through/Right Volume
B = Adjusted Left Volume
* = ATSAC Benefit
Results
V/C RATIO LOS
0.00 - 0.60 A
0.61 - 0.70 B
0.71 - 0.80 C
0.81 - 0.90 D
0.91 - 1.00 E
B(W/B)
A(N/B)
A(E/B)
A(S/B)
C LOS =
Critical Movements Diagram
TH RT LT TH LT TH RT LT TH RT
Phasing RTOR Phasing Phasing Phasing RTOR RTOR
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND
EXISTING
RTOR
RT
693
AMBIENT
RELATED
PROJECT
TOTAL
693
LANE
SIGNAL Split|1010| Prot-Fix Perm Auto Auto Auto
0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 1 0
LT
0 197 0 0 0 53 511 0 0 1332 161
53 0 511 0 0 0 197 0 161 1332 0
Volume/Lane/Signal Configurations
Developed by Chun Wong, 12/94
May 27, 2011 ,Friday 10:03:44 AM
CalcaDB
CPROJPM
INTERSECTION DATA SUMMARY SHEET
ATTACHMENT 6
628Cumulative (2014) Plus Project PM
Jefferson Boulevard National Boulevard
N/S: W/E: 28
I/S No:
AM/PM: Comments:
COUNT DATE: GROWTH FACTOR:
STUDY DATE:|10 10|A:
B:|10 10 10|A:
B:
617
464 A:
B: 77
0.787 =
+
+
+ + + 0 527 617 77
*1425
527
A:
B:
527
V/C =
West/East Critical Movements =
North/South Critical Movements =
SouthBound
WestBound EastBound
NorthBound
A = Adjusted Through/Right Volume
B = Adjusted Left Volume
* = ATSAC Benefit
Results
V/C RATIO LOS
0.00 - 0.60 A
0.61 - 0.70 B
0.71 - 0.80 C
0.81 - 0.90 D
0.91 - 1.00 E
A(W/B)
B(N/B)
A(E/B)
A(S/B)
C LOS =
Critical Movements Diagram
TH RT LT TH LT TH RT LT TH RT
Phasing RTOR Phasing Phasing Phasing RTOR RTOR
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND
EXISTING
RTOR
RT
77
AMBIENT
RELATED
PROJECT
TOTAL
77
LANE
SIGNAL Perm|1010|Perm Split Split Auto Auto Auto Auto
0 2 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 0
LT
927 0 0 617 520 0 0 0 1053 0 122
0 0 0 520 617 0 0 927 122 0 1053
Volume/Lane/Signal Configurations
Developed by Chun Wong, 12/94
May 27, 2011 ,Friday 10:03:44 AM
CalcaDB
CPROJPM
INTERSECTION DATA SUMMARY SHEET
ATTACHMENT 6
629Cumulative (2014) Plus Project PM
La Cienega Boulevard Jefferson Boulevard
N/S: W/E: 29
I/S No:
AM/PM: Comments:
COUNT DATE: GROWTH FACTOR:
STUDY DATE:
418 A:
B: 168
751 A:
B: 60
104
A:
B:
892
1.240 =
+
+
+ + + 681 892 168 60
*1375
323
A:
B:
681
V/C =
West/East Critical Movements =
North/South Critical Movements =
SouthBound
WestBound EastBound
NorthBound
A = Adjusted Through/Right Volume
B = Adjusted Left Volume
* = ATSAC Benefit
Results
V/C RATIO LOS
0.00 - 0.60 A
0.61 - 0.70 B
0.71 - 0.80 C
0.81 - 0.90 D
0.91 - 1.00 E
B(W/B)
A(N/B)
A(E/B)
B(S/B)
F LOS =
Critical Movements Diagram
TH RT LT TH LT TH RT LT TH RT
Phasing RTOR Phasing Phasing Phasing RTOR RTOR
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND
EXISTING
RTOR
RT
104
AMBIENT
RELATED
PROJECT
TOTAL
104
LANE
SIGNAL Perm|1010|Perm Prot-Var Prot-Var Auto OLA Auto Auto
0 2 0 1 0 0 1 0 3 0 0 1 0 2 0 2 0 0 1 0 2 0 1 0 1 0 0
LT
2360 315 60 2253 245 306 836 102 588 1086 275
306 102 836 245 2253 60 315 2360 275 1086 588
Volume/Lane/Signal Configurations
Developed by Chun Wong, 12/94
May 27, 2011 ,Friday 10:03:44 AM
CalcaDB
CPROJPM
INTERSECTION DATA SUMMARY SHEET
ATTACHMENT 6
630Cumulative (2014) Plus Project PM
Jefferson Boulevard Higuera St/Rodeo Rd
N/S: W/E: 30
I/S No:
AM/PM: Comments:
COUNT DATE: GROWTH FACTOR:
STUDY DATE:
333
A:
B:
343
281 A:
B: 184
34
A:
B:
441
0.820 =
+
+
+ + + 343 300 441 184
*1425
58
A:
B:
300
V/C =
West/East Critical Movements =
North/South Critical Movements =
SouthBound
WestBound EastBound
NorthBound
A = Adjusted Through/Right Volume
B = Adjusted Left Volume
* = ATSAC Benefit
Results
V/C RATIO LOS
0.00 - 0.60 A
0.61 - 0.70 B
0.71 - 0.80 C
0.81 - 0.90 D
0.91 - 1.00 E
A(W/B)
A(N/B)
A(E/B)
B(S/B)
D LOS =
Critical Movements Diagram
TH RT LT TH LT TH RT LT TH RT
Phasing RTOR Phasing Phasing Phasing RTOR RTOR
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND
EXISTING
RTOR
RT
34
AMBIENT
RELATED
PROJECT
TOTAL
34
LANE
SIGNAL Perm|1010|Perm Split Split Free Auto Auto Auto
0 2 0 0 1 0 1 0 2 0 0 1 0 2 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 2 0 0 1 0
LT
882 1026 184 561 52 605 343 67 58 600 165
605 67 343 52 561 184 1026 882 165 600 58
Volume/Lane/Signal Configurations
Developed by Chun Wong, 12/94
May 27, 2011 ,Friday 10:03:44 AM
CalcaDB
CPROJPM
INTERSECTION DATA SUMMARY SHEET
ATTACHMENT 6
631Cumulative (2014) Plus Project PM
La Cienega Boulevard Rodeo Road
N/S: W/E: 31
I/S No:
AM/PM: Comments:
COUNT DATE: GROWTH FACTOR:
STUDY DATE:
302 A:
B: 141
793 A:
B: 244
196
A:
B:
849
1.281 =
+
+
+ + + 624 849 141 244
*1375
312
A:
B:
624
V/C =
West/East Critical Movements =
North/South Critical Movements =
SouthBound
WestBound EastBound
NorthBound
A = Adjusted Through/Right Volume
B = Adjusted Left Volume
* = ATSAC Benefit
Results
V/C RATIO LOS
0.00 - 0.60 A
0.61 - 0.70 B
0.71 - 0.80 C
0.81 - 0.90 D
0.91 - 1.00 E
B(W/B)
A(N/B)
A(E/B)
B(S/B)
F LOS =
Critical Movements Diagram
TH RT LT TH LT TH RT LT TH RT
Phasing RTOR Phasing Phasing Phasing RTOR RTOR
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND
EXISTING
RTOR
RT
356
AMBIENT
RELATED
PROJECT
TOTAL
356
LANE
SIGNAL Prot-Fix|1010|Prot-Fix Prot-Var Prot-Var Auto Auto OLA OLA
0 2 0 1 0 0 2 0 2 0 1 0 0 2 0 2 0 0 1 0 1 0 2 0 0 1 0
LT
2309 237 444 2250 129 257 603 150 312 1247 383
257 150 603 129 2250 444 237 2309 383 1247 312
Volume/Lane/Signal Configurations
Developed by Chun Wong, 12/94
May 27, 2011 ,Friday 10:03:44 AM
CalcaDB
CPROJPM
INTERSECTION DATA SUMMARY SHEET
ATTACHMENT 6
632Default Scenario Thu May 26, 2011 16:04:10 Page 15-1
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM 4-Way Stop Method (Base Volume Alternative)
********************************************************************************
Intersection #321 BRADDOCK DR/DUQUESNE AV [CUMULATIVE (2014) + PROJECT PM]
********************************************************************************
Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap. (X): 1.538
Loss Time (sec): 0 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 160.3
Optimal Cycle: 0 Level Of Service: F
********************************************************************************
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Stop Sign Stop Sign
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 155 181 192 8 47 19 133 478 160 21 518 17
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 155 181 192 8 47 19 133 478 160 21 518 17
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 155 181 192 8 47 19 133 478 160 21 518 17
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 155 181 192 8 47 19 133 478 160 21 518 17
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Final Vol.: 155 181 192 8 47 19 133 478 160 21 518 17
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lanes: 0.29 0.34 0.37 0.11 0.63 0.26 0.17 0.62 0.21 0.04 0.93 0.03
Final Sat.: 149 174 184 43 254 103 87 311 104 19 462 15
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 1.04 1.04 1.04 0.18 0.18 0.18 1.54 1.54 1.54 1.12 1.12 1.12
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Delay/Veh: 78.3 78.3 78.3 14.0 14.0 14.0 271.1 271 271.1 103.8 104 103.8
Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 78.3 78.3 78.3 14.0 14.0 14.0 271.1 271 271.1 103.8 104 103.8
LOS by Move: F F F B B B F F F F F F
ApproachDel: 78.3 14.0 271.1 103.8
Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
ApprAdjDel: 78.3 14.0 271.1 103.8
LOS by Appr: F B F F
********************************************************************************
Traffix 7.6.0715 (c) 2003 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to RAJU ASSOC., PASADENA
ATTACHMENT 6
633Cumulative (2014) Plus Project PM
Braddock Drive Duquesne Avenue
N/S: W/E: 32
I/S No:
AM/PM: Comments:
COUNT DATE: GROWTH FACTOR:
STUDY DATE:
556 A:
B: 21
74 A:
B: 8
155
A:
B:
528
1.328 =
+
+
+ + + 771 528 21 8
1000
133
A:
B:
771
V/C =
West/East Critical Movements =
North/South Critical Movements =
SouthBound
WestBound EastBound
NorthBound
A = Adjusted Through/Right Volume
B = Adjusted Left Volume
* = ATSAC Benefit
Results
V/C RATIO LOS
0.00 - 0.60 A
0.61 - 0.70 B
0.71 - 0.80 C
0.81 - 0.90 D
0.91 - 1.00 E
B(W/B)
A(N/B)
A(E/B)
B(S/B)
F LOS =
Critical Movements Diagram
TH RT LT TH LT TH RT LT TH RT
Phasing RTOR Phasing Phasing Phasing RTOR RTOR
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND
EXISTING
RTOR
RT
155
AMBIENT
RELATED
PROJECT
TOTAL
155
LANE
SIGNAL Perm|10 10|Perm Perm Perm Auto Auto Auto Auto
0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0
LT
181 192 8 47 19 21 518 17 133 478 160
21 17 518 19 47 8 192 181 160 478 133
Volume/Lane/Signal Configurations
Developed by Chun Wong, 12/94
May 27, 2011 ,Friday 10:03:44 AM
CalcaDB
CPROJPM
INTERSECTION DATA SUMMARY SHEET
ATTACHMENT 6
634Default Scenario Thu May 26, 2011 16:04:10 Page 17-1
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM 4-Way Stop Method (Base Volume Alternative)
********************************************************************************
Intersection #331 LUCERNE AV/DUQUESNE AV [CUMULATIVE (2014) + PROJECT PM]
********************************************************************************
Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap. (X): 1.109
Loss Time (sec): 0 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 68.4
Optimal Cycle: 0 Level Of Service: F
********************************************************************************
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Stop Sign Stop Sign
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lanes: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 0 0 0 353 0 73 58 537 0 0 573 241
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 0 0 0 353 0 73 58 537 0 0 573 241
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 0 0 0 353 0 73 58 537 0 0 573 241
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 0 0 0 353 0 73 58 537 0 0 573 241
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Final Vol.: 0 0 0 353 0 73 58 537 0 0 573 241
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lanes: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.83 0.00 0.17 0.10 0.90 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00
Final Sat.: 0 0 0 438 0 91 54 496 0 0 517 574
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: xxxx xxxx xxxx 0.81 xxxx 0.81 1.08 1.08 xxxx xxxx 1.11 0.42
Crit Moves: **** **** ****
Delay/Veh: 0.0 0.0 0.0 32.4 0.0 32.4 87.7 87.7 0.0 0.0 98.2 13.4
Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 0.0 0.0 0.0 32.4 0.0 32.4 87.7 87.7 0.0 0.0 98.2 13.4
LOS by Move: * * * D * D F F * * F B
ApproachDel: xxxxxx 32.4 87.7 73.1
Delay Adj: xxxxx 1.00 1.00 1.00
ApprAdjDel: xxxxxx 32.4 87.7 73.1
LOS by Appr: * D F F
********************************************************************************
Traffix 7.6.0715 (c) 2003 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to RAJU ASSOC., PASADENA
ATTACHMENT 6
635Cumulative (2014) Plus Project PM
Lucerne Avenue Duquesne Avenue
N/S: W/E: 33
I/S No:
AM/PM: Comments:
COUNT DATE: GROWTH FACTOR:
STUDY DATE:|10 10|A:
B:
573
353
A:
B:
426|10 10|A:
B:|10 10|1.057 =
+
+
+ + + 573 426058
1000
595 A:
B: 58
V/C =
West/East Critical Movements =
North/South Critical Movements =
SouthBound
WestBound EastBound
NorthBound
A = Adjusted Through/Right Volume
B = Adjusted Left Volume
* = ATSAC Benefit
Results
V/C RATIO LOS
0.00 - 0.60 A
0.61 - 0.70 B
0.71 - 0.80 C
0.81 - 0.90 D
0.91 - 1.00 E
A(W/B)
A(N/B)
B(E/B)
A(S/B)
F LOS =
Critical Movements Diagram
TH RT LT TH LT TH RT LT TH RT
Phasing RTOR Phasing Phasing Phasing RTOR RTOR
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND
EXISTING
RTOR
RT|10 10|AMBIENT
RELATED
PROJECT
TOTAL|10 10|LANE
SIGNAL |10 10|Split Perm Perm Auto Auto Auto
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
LT
0 0 353 0 73 0 573 241 58 537 0
0 241 573 73 0 353 0 0 0 537 58
Volume/Lane/Signal Configurations
Developed by Chun Wong, 12/94
May 27, 2011 ,Friday 10:03:44 AM
CalcaDB
CPROJPM
INTERSECTION DATA SUMMARY SHEET
ATTACHMENT 6
636Cumulative (2014) Plus Project PM
Jefferson Boulevard Duquesne Avenue
N/S: W/E: 34
I/S No:
AM/PM: Comments:
COUNT DATE: GROWTH FACTOR:
STUDY DATE:
42 A:
B: 29
54
A:
B:
532
782 A:
B: 477
1.034 =
+
+
+ + + 480 532 29 477
*1375
466
A:
B:
480
V/C =
West/East Critical Movements =
North/South Critical Movements =
SouthBound
WestBound EastBound
NorthBound
A = Adjusted Through/Right Volume
B = Adjusted Left Volume
* = ATSAC Benefit
Results
V/C RATIO LOS
0.00 - 0.60 A
0.61 - 0.70 B
0.71 - 0.80 C
0.81 - 0.90 D
0.91 - 1.00 E
B(W/B)
B(N/B)
A(E/B)
A(S/B)
F LOS =
Critical Movements Diagram
TH RT LT TH LT TH RT LT TH RT
Phasing RTOR Phasing Phasing Phasing RTOR RTOR
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND
EXISTING
RTOR
RT
477
AMBIENT
RELATED
PROJECT
TOTAL
477
LANE
SIGNAL Prot-Var|1010|Prot-Var Perm Perm Auto Auto OLA Auto
0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 2 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0
LT
1528 35 54 1064 212 29 42 21 466 64 416
29 21 42 212 1064 54 35 1528 416 64 466
Volume/Lane/Signal Configurations
Developed by Chun Wong, 12/94
May 27, 2011 ,Friday 10:03:44 AM
CalcaDB
CPROJPM
INTERSECTION DATA SUMMARY SHEET
ATTACHMENT 6
637
APPENDIX G
Capacity Calculation Worksheets
Cumulative (2014) Plus Project with Mitigation Measures
ATTACHMENT 6
638Cumulative (2014) Plus Project MIT AM
National Boulevard Washington Boulevard
N/S: W/E: 20
I/S No:
AM/PM: Comments:
COUNT DATE: GROWTH FACTOR:
STUDY DATE:
90
A:
B:
564
142
A:
B:
492
500 A:
B: 195
0.913 =
+
+
+ + + 564 492 100 195
*1375
395 A:
B: 100
V/C =
West/East Critical Movements =
North/South Critical Movements =
SouthBound
WestBound EastBound
NorthBound
A = Adjusted Through/Right Volume
B = Adjusted Left Volume
* = ATSAC Benefit
Results
V/C RATIO LOS
0.00 - 0.60 A
0.61 - 0.70 B
0.71 - 0.80 C
0.81 - 0.90 D
0.91 - 1.00 E
A(W/B)
B(N/B)
B(E/B)
A(S/B)
E LOS =
Critical Movements Diagram
TH RT LT TH LT TH RT LT TH RT
Phasing RTOR Phasing Phasing Phasing RTOR RTOR
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND
EXISTING
RTOR
RT
480
AMBIENT
RELATED
PROJECT
TOTAL
355
-125
LANE
SIGNAL Prot-Var|1010|Prot-Var Perm Perm Auto Auto Auto Auto
0 1 0 1 0 0 2 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 2 0 1 0 0 1 0 2 0 0 1 0
LT
874 126 258 902 82 90 1353 340 100 789 63
-125
90 340 1353 82 902 258 126 874 188 789 100
Volume/Lane/Signal Configurations
Developed by Chun Wong, 12/94
June 15, 2011 ,Wednesday 09:08:55 AM
CalcaDB
CMITAM
INTERSECTION DATA SUMMARY SHEET
ATTACHMENT 6
639Cumulative (2014) Plus Project MIT PM
National Boulevard Washington Boulevard
N/S: W/E: 20
I/S No:
AM/PM: Comments:
COUNT DATE: GROWTH FACTOR:
STUDY DATE:
372 A:
B: 86
261
A:
B:
573
427 A:
B: 128
0.897 =
+
+
+ + + 543 573 86 128
*1375
106
A:
B:
543
V/C =
West/East Critical Movements =
North/South Critical Movements =
SouthBound
WestBound EastBound
NorthBound
A = Adjusted Through/Right Volume
B = Adjusted Left Volume
* = ATSAC Benefit
Results
V/C RATIO LOS
0.00 - 0.60 A
0.61 - 0.70 B
0.71 - 0.80 C
0.81 - 0.90 D
0.91 - 1.00 E
B(W/B)
B(N/B)
A(E/B)
A(S/B)
D LOS =
Critical Movements Diagram
TH RT LT TH LT TH RT LT TH RT
Phasing RTOR Phasing Phasing Phasing RTOR RTOR
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND
EXISTING
RTOR
RT
358
AMBIENT
RELATED
PROJECT
TOTAL
233
-125
LANE
SIGNAL Prot-Var|1010|Prot-Var Perm Perm Auto Auto Auto Auto
0 1 0 1 0 0 2 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 2 0 1 0 0 1 0 2 0 0 1 0
LT
730 123 475 1067 79 86 904 213 106 1085 198
-125
86 213 904 79 1067 475 123 730 323 1085 106
Volume/Lane/Signal Configurations
Developed by Chun Wong, 12/94
June 15, 2011 ,Wednesday 09:10:34 AM
CalcaDB
CMITPM
INTERSECTION DATA SUMMARY SHEET
ATTACHMENT 6
640Cumulative (2014) Plus Project MIT AM
National Boulevard Washington Boulevard
N/S: W/E: 20
I/S No:
AM/PM: Comments:
COUNT DATE: GROWTH FACTOR:
STUDY DATE:
90
A:
B:
564
142
A:
B:
492
500 A:
B: 264
0.963 =
+
+
+ + + 564 492 100 264
*1375
395 A:
B: 100
V/C =
West/East Critical Movements =
North/South Critical Movements =
SouthBound
WestBound EastBound
NorthBound
A = Adjusted Through/Right Volume
B = Adjusted Left Volume
* = ATSAC Benefit
Results
V/C RATIO LOS
0.00 - 0.60 A
0.61 - 0.70 B
0.71 - 0.80 C
0.81 - 0.90 D
0.91 - 1.00 E
A(W/B)
B(N/B)
B(E/B)
A(S/B)
E LOS =
Critical Movements Diagram
TH RT LT TH LT TH RT LT TH RT
Phasing RTOR Phasing Phasing Phasing RTOR RTOR
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND
EXISTING
RTOR
RT
480
AMBIENT
RELATED
PROJECT
TOTAL
480
LANE
SIGNAL Prot-Var|1010|Prot-Var Perm Perm Auto Auto Auto Auto
0 1 0 1 0 0 2 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 2 0 1 0 0 1 0 2 0 0 1 0
LT
874 126 258 902 82 90 1353 340 100 789 188
90 340 1353 82 902 258 126 874 188 789 100
Volume/Lane/Signal Configurations
Developed by Chun Wong, 12/94
August 17, 2012 ,Friday 04:08:44 PM
CalcaDB
CMITAM
INTERSECTION DATA SUMMARY SHEET
ATTACHMENT 6
641Cumulative (2014) Plus Project MIT PM
National Boulevard Washington Boulevard
N/S: W/E: 20
I/S No:
AM/PM: Comments:
COUNT DATE: GROWTH FACTOR:
STUDY DATE:
372 A:
B: 86
261
A:
B:
573
427 A:
B: 197
0.947 =
+
+
+ + + 543 573 86 197
*1375
106
A:
B:
543
V/C =
West/East Critical Movements =
North/South Critical Movements =
SouthBound
WestBound EastBound
NorthBound
A = Adjusted Through/Right Volume
B = Adjusted Left Volume
* = ATSAC Benefit
Results
V/C RATIO LOS
0.00 - 0.60 A
0.61 - 0.70 B
0.71 - 0.80 C
0.81 - 0.90 D
0.91 - 1.00 E
B(W/B)
B(N/B)
A(E/B)
A(S/B)
E LOS =
Critical Movements Diagram
TH RT LT TH LT TH RT LT TH RT
Phasing RTOR Phasing Phasing Phasing RTOR RTOR
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND
EXISTING
RTOR
RT
358
AMBIENT
RELATED
PROJECT
TOTAL
358
LANE
SIGNAL Prot-Var|1010|Prot-Var Perm Perm Auto Auto Auto Auto
0 1 0 1 0 0 2 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 2 0 1 0 0 1 0 2 0 0 1 0
LT
730 123 475 1067 79 86 904 213 106 1085 323
86 213 904 79 1067 475 123 730 323 1085 106
Volume/Lane/Signal Configurations
Developed by Chun Wong, 12/94
August 17, 2012 ,Friday 04:10:52 PM
CalcaDB
CMITPM
INTERSECTION DATA SUMMARY SHEET
ATTACHMENT 6
642