Legislation Details

File #: HIST-9697    Version: 1 Subject:
Type: Historical Status: Action Item
In control: City Council Meeting Agenda
On agenda: 10/27/2008 Final action: 10/27/2008
Title: Consideration of the “Youth Perspective Survey” as Recommended by the Parks, Recreation and Community Services (PRCS) Commission and Approval of Funding Therefore.
Attachments: 1. Consideration of the “Youth Perspective Survey” as - Youth Perspective.pdf, 2. Consideration of the “Youth Perspective Survey” as - A-1.pdf
MEETING DATE: October 27, 2008 AGENDA ITEM: Consideration of the "Youth Perspective Survey" as Recommended by the Parks, Recreation and Community Services (PRCS) Commission. ATTACHMENTS Pages 1. "Youth Perspective Survey" 1 2. Excerpt of the November 16, 2005 Parks and Recreation 2-3 Commission Approved Meeting Minutes 3. Excerpt of the June 26, 2006 City Council Approved Meeting 4-5 Minutes 4. Excerpt of the June 9, 2008 City Council Approved Meeting 6-7 MinutesC TY ATTACHMENT YOUTH PERSPECTIVE SURVEY The purpose of this survey is to find out what Culver City youth think about their role and participation in local decision making and in government. You will not be asked to give your name. We appreciate your honest responses. PLEASE CIRCLE YOUR ANSWERS. If you would like to make additional written comments, you may use the back of the form. 1. Do you live in Culver City? Yes No 2. VVhat is your gender? Male Female 3. What age group are you in? 15 Yrs. or Over 15 under years 4. Do you feel like you have the power to make a positive Don't difference in your community? Yes No Know 5. Do you think the concerns of youth are understood by Don't the local government leaders in Culver City? Yes No Know 6. Do youth currently have a way to participate in decision- Don't making at the local government level? Yes No Know 7. Have you ever participated in or heard about the Culver Participated Heard Neither City Teen Center "Youth Making Changes" group? in About One 8. Have you ever participated in or heard about the "Project Participated Heard Neither Citizen" program? In About One 9. If Culver City created a way for youth to give their input about decisions and policies for the City that affect Don't youth, would you want to participate? Yes No Know If NO or DON'T KNOW, go straight to question #10. If YES, please answer the questions a, b, and c below, then answer question #10. 1 to 2 2-3 3 or more a) How much time per month would you be willing to spend hours a hours a hours a being involved in the group? month month month Once b) How often should meetings of the group be scheduled? Once a Once every every 6 month 3 months months c) How important would it be to get community service hours credit for participating in the group? A lot A little Not at all 10. Would you be interested in attending a special event to meet Culver City elected and appointed officials and City staff to find out more about local government and Don't opportunities for youth involvement? Yes No Know Thank You!ATTACHMENT 2 EXCERPT OF THE IVIENUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE November 16, 2005 PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION 7:00 p.m. CITY OF CULVER CITY, CALIFORNIA CHAIR JEANETTE JAMES Call to Order The meeting of the Parks and Recreation Commission was called to order by Chair James at 7:03 p.m. in the Dan Patacchia Room, City Hall. 000 Roll Call Members Present: Commissioners James, Daly Redholtz, Deen, Cooper, Shapiro 000 Faccexpt Begins Item A-4. (8:19 p.m.) Review Subcommittee report on the need and/or establishment of a Youth Advisory Council and make a recommendation to City Council. Bill La Pointe gave the staff report and reported on the progress of the Subcommittee (comprised of Commissioners Daly Redholtz and James) in this effort. Focus centered on whether there is a need for a Youth Advisory Council/Commission to handle youth issues, and if so, what would be the costs. Commissioner Daly Redholtz pointed out that one of the things that became clear in conversations the Subcommittee had with youth is that many students indicated they were mainly concerned about school issues and their involvement in school; and that in speaking to teachers, they indicated students were not aware of how- city government works or how to get involved in learning more about local government. Commissioner Daly Redholtz also added that rather than forming a new group, we should look at using the existing Teen Advisory Group, as well as representatives of the Middle School and High School leadership classes and other interested students whenever youth input is needed. That was part of the Subcommittee's recommendation. Commissioner Deen asked why there was no input from Teen Center youths in this process. Commissioner James responded to Commissioner Deen's comment. Mr. La Pointe mentioned one idea to create interest/involvement that was suggested bv the Subcommittee was to develop a "Round Tables of Civic Affairs Day" event comprised of representatives from various governmental bodies in a location. Commissioner Cooper mentioned that most of the High School students who are interested in learning about government would be involved in the YMCA's Youth & Government program that meets regularly at City Hall. 2Responding to Commissioner Deen's query, Commissioner Daly Redholtz explained the Subcommittee went to the schools because there was a larger pool of students who might be interested, and that it was not the intent of the Subcommittee to ignore the Teen Center kids. Commissioner James deferred to Mr. La Pointe to elaborate on a suggestion to develop a Web database on teen information. Discussion continued. At this time, Commissioner Daly Redholtz proposed a motion to recommend to the City Council that the Commission does not see the need or the feasibility of a Teen Advisory Commission at this point, but that the Commission wishes to continue exploring the ideas of i) utilizing teen advisory groups at the Middle and High School leadership classes; 2) possibility of a Round Tables of Civic Affairs Day event; and 3) possibility of a Web database email blasting, etc. as ways of reaching out to youth. Commissioner James suggested not using the word "need" as a survey to assess teen needs was never conducted. Commissioner Daly Redholtz amended her motion and the following action was taken: MOVED BY COMMISSIONER DALY REDHOLTZ THAT AT THIS TIME THE PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION DOES NOT RECOMMEND THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A YOUTH ADVISORY COMMISSION; HOWEVER, THE COMMISSION WOULD LIKE TO FURTHER EXPLORE 1.) USING THE TEEN ADVISORY GROUP OF THE CITY AS WELL AS REPRESENTATIVES OF MIDDLE AND HIGH SCHOOL LEADERSHIP CLASSES FOR YOUTH INPUT; 2) EXPLORATION WITH TEENS AT "A ROUND TABLE OF CIVIC AFFAIRS DAY"; 3) EXPLORATION OF A WEB DATABASE EMAIL BLAST INFORMATION REQUEST; AND OTHER IDEAS AS THEY COME UP. Commissioner James seconded the motion. Commissioner Deen asked for more information regarding the Youth & Government organization that Commissioner Cooper had mentioned earlier. Commissioner Cooper responded that the YMCA Youth & Government is a state wide organization, with their own governing board who are elected by members, that provides opportunity for youth to learn about government and legislation. Commissioner Daly Redholtz said Youth & Government should have been added to her motion. She noted the organization focuses on state and federal issues rather than local, and since it is sponsored by YMCA it could serve as an adjunct to the Teen Advisory Group. Commissioner Deen said he was not comfortable with this idea since we are approaching an election year. Commissioner James asked Commissioner Deen for clarification regarding his comment. With no further discussion, the Chair called for a vote on the motion. AYES: Commissioners James, Daly Redholtz, Cooper, Shapiro NOES: Commissioner Deen ABSTAIN: None The Motion passes by a 4-1 vote. 000 -2112--ds 3ATTACHMENT 3 EXCERPT OF TITO MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL, CITY OF CULVER CITY, CALIFORNIA Call to Order & Roll Call June 26, 2006 6:00 P.M. The meeting of the City Council was called to order at 6:00 P.M. Present: Mayor Gary Silbiger Vice Mayor Alan Corlin Councilmember Carol Gross Councilmember D. Scott Malsin Councilmember Steven Rose o0o Excerpt Begins Item A-1 (out of sequence) Consideration of Establishing a Youth Advisory Commission. Bill LaPointe, Director of Parks, Recreation and Community Services gave the staff report. The following members of the audience addressed the City Council: Margaret Lindgren Carlene Brown Rebecca Rona Christopher Armenta, City Clerk read written comments submitted by the following: Jeanne T. Black Discussion ensued regarding the recommendation of the Parks and Recreation Commission. The Parks and Recreation Commission did not recommend establishing a Youth Advisory Commission. The Parks and Recreation Commission did recommend exploring the use of the Teen Advisory Group of the City as well as representatives of the middle and high school leadership classes for youth input; exploring with teens a "Round Table of Civic Affairs Day"; and exploring the development of a web database email blast information request and other ideas as they come up. 4Councilmember Rose proposed a motion to support the recommendation of the Parks and Recreation Commission. Councilmember Malsin seconded the motion. Mayor Silbiger offered the following substitute motion: That a Youth Advisory Commission be created; the City Council choose five members each for a total of 15 members on the commission; that the commission members would receive no stipend; that the commission would have staff support; and the commission would be funded out of Council Discretionary funds. There was no second for Mayor Silbiger's motion. Further discussion ensued regarding communicating with other youth organizations in the City; and the ongoing involvement of the subcommittee of Parks and Recreation commissioners formed to explore this issue. Following discussion, the following motion was voted on: MOVED BY COUNCILMEMBER ROSE, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER MALSIN AND UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED, THAT THE CITY COUNCIL SUPPORT THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION. o0o Excerpt Ends 5ATTACHMENT 4 EXCERPT OF THE MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL, CITY OF CULVER CITY, CALIFORNIA Call to Order & Roll Call June 9, 2008 5:31 p.m. The meeting of the City Council was called to order at 5:31 p.m. Present: D. Scott Malsin, Mayor Gary Silbiger, Vice Mayor Christopher Armenta, Councilmember Micheal O'Leary, Councilmember Andrew Weissman, Councilmember o0o Excezpt Begins Item A-I (out of sequence) Consideration of the Formation of a Culver City Youth Advisory Committee (CCYAC) Staff provided a brief summary of the material of record. The following members of the audience addressed the City Council: Karla Silbiger Menalik Tafari, Culver City High School student Rachel Lewis, Culver City High School student Jeff Cooper, Culver City Parks and Recreation Commissioner Martin Cole, Assistant City Manager/City Clerk read written comments submitted by the following: Tom Camarella Councilmember Silbiger gave his reasons for supporting this item and proposed the following: That the City Council approve the establishment of a Youth Advisory Committee and establish a budget of $5,000.00. Discussion ensued between the City Council and staff regarding the previous student shadowing program; costs involved to establish and run the committee; the impact of a Youth Committee on other programs and on the work plans; background history of this item; whether the program was redundant; restructuring existing programs at the Teen 6Center; obtaining an accurate assessment of interest within the youth community; and whether it was premature to bring the item to the City Council. Further discussion ensued regarding the need to define the structure and activities of a Youth Council; and having Parks and Recreation Commission re-evaluate the idea. Councilmember O'Leary proposed the following substitute motion: To act on the Roundtable of Civic Affairs Day, develop a web database and conduct a survey of Youth and Government participants, the Teen Center and high school students to gauge the interest. Councilmember Weissman proposed the following substitute motion: To refer the matter back to the Parks and Recreation Commission for a needs assessment with a recommendation back to City Council as to whether a Teen Advisory Council is appropriate, and to deteLmine the structure, the number of members, and how members are selected. Further discussion ensued regarding combining the motions; concern about follow up on City Council decisions; concern that the item would be defeated for budget reasons; and a desire for a timely resolution. At this time, Councilmember Silbiger stated that he would be voting against the motion because he knows there is a need; he feels that youth is underserved in this capacity; and he believes the City should act now to appoint a Youth Committee. Following discussion, the following motion was voted on: MOVED BY COUNCILMEMBER O'LEARY AND SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER WEISSMAN, THAT THE CITY COUNCIL CONTINUE THE PROCESS OF A ROUNDTABLE OF CIVIC AFFAIRS DAY; DEVELOP A WEB DATABASE; REFER THE MATTER BACK TO THE PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION FOR A NEEDS ASSESSMENT WITH A RECOMMENDATION AS TO WHETHER A TEEN ADVISORY COUNCIL IS APPROPRIATE; DETERMINE THE STRUCTURE, THE NUMBER OF MEMBERS, AND HOW MEMBERS ARE SELECTED, WITH A RECOMMENDATION FOR THE CITY COUNCIL TO BE READY BY SEPTEMBER 2008. AYES: Councilmembers Armenta, O'Leary, Weissman, Malsin NOES: Councilmember Silbiger ABSTAIN: None ABSENT: None o0o Elre_iexpt Ends|1013| Number. (am) 253-6655 City of Culver City, California City Council Agenda Item Report Meeting Date: 10/27/08 Item Number: - AGENDA ITEM: Consideration of the "Youth Perspective Survey" as Recommended by the Parks, Recreation and Community Services (PRCS) Commission and Approval of Funding Therefore. Celn"ladtrbron/DePt: ::::"Bill La Pointe, Director of Parks R creation:and Community Services Public Hearing: General Fund: Action Item. X] Attachments: [X] Yes [X] Magter.:ErnaltENOtifiCatiOnTia(Mg198);:. E .:NOtiOes .:atthe uiwèr Culver Culver-Palms YMCA (week of 10/20/08), • W High • g Teacheitg .:(eritait TO .:1206.0)Ciii.Vet Midd$chOet::: S .ocig . : .M .O.dies.C14'sgiTeacherg :(erriallori'l 0/20/08) Public Notification : CiWs City Teen Center- and the School Government Clas Department Approval: Bill La Poiñ Director of Parks Recreation and .Community Services (10/16/08). 'Chief Financial Officer -Approval: Jeff Muir (by M. Noller) (10/22/08). RECOMMENDATION: baker) Carol Schwab (by H City Manàger Approval: - : Jerryar.fol*OodiEttb/2/0.8):: Staff recommends that the City Council consider approving the "Youth Perspective Survey" (Attachment 1) as developed by staff and the Youth Outreach Subcommittee of the Parks, Recreation and Community Services (PRCS) Commission and as recommended by the PRCS Commission to the City Council for approval and approval of related funding therefore. BACKGROUND: Over the past several years, City Council has requested the PRCS Commission to assess what level of interest youth in Culver City have in becoming more involved in local government. In October 2004, the City Council requested a report on interest in the establishment of a Youth Council/Commission. in early 2005, the Parks and Recreation Commission (now known as the Parks, Recreation and Community Services Commission) began reviewing this issue in order to formulate a recommendation to the City Council. In February 2005, the Commission's Youth Outreach Subcommittee was created for the specific purpose of researching the feasibility of creating a Culver City Youth Advisory Commission (YAC) and the Subcommittee's research and discussion on this issue continued over the next several months. On November 16, 2005 the Commission reviewed the Subcommittee's report and took action to indicate to the City Council that they did not recommend the establishment of the YAC at that time, However, there were other related ideas that the Commission wished to explore further (Attachment 2).City of Culver City, California City Council Agenda Item Report On June 26, 2006 the City Council considered the establishment of a Youth Advisory Commission and took action to support the recommendation of the Parks and Recreation Commission not to establish a Youth Advisory Commission (Attachment 3). During the next two years, no further formal action was taken on this matter. At the May 05, 2008 City Council meeting, a consensus was reached that the discussion of the creation of a Youth Advisory Committee be agendized for an upcoming meeting. At the June 9, 2008 meeting, the City Council discussed the matter and directed it back to the PRCS Commission and their Youth Outreach Subcommittee for research, review and recommendation. The approved minutes of the City Council meeting related to this item (Item A-1) are provided as Attachment 4. Although not included in the meeting minutes, there was Council consensus that any survey created for the purpose of exploring youth interest in the formation of a Youth Advisory Committee must first be reviewed and approved by the City Council prior to being distributed to youth and youth groups. DISCUSSION: At the September 4, 2008 Parks and Recreation Commission meeting, a first draft of the "Youth Perspective Survey" was presented by staff for discussion by the Commission. The purpose of the survey is to gauge youth interest in the formation of a Culver City Youth Advisory Committee (CCYAC). The draft survey was based on comments and examples from other California cities and from Council's direction regarding the content of the survey. There was consensus that the survey should be reviewed during a meeting of the Youth Outreach Subcommittee before it returned to the Commission and was ultimately presented to the City Council. Therefore, the Parks, Recreation and Community Services Director contacted the City Manager's Office and requested that this item be moved forward to the last City Council meeting in October (October 27). Subsequently, the members of the Youth Outreach Subcommittee (Commissioners Cooper and Hudson) met with staff on September 10, 2008 to review and comment on the first draft of the "Youth Perspective Survey" and various other aspects of the Culver City Youth Advisory Committee (CCYAC) Project. One key point stressed by Commissioners Cooper and Hudson at the Youth Outreach Subcommittee meeting was that the survey should be no longer than one page. It was commented that there will be a better response rate to the survey if it is concise and does not take too much time or effort on the part of the responder to complete. With this goal in mind, staff and the Subcommittee edited the survey to one page in length, taking care to include those questions that will best gauge interest in the formation of a Youth Advisory Committee. At the October 7, 2008 PRCS Commission meeting, the Commission reviewed and discussed the one-page version of the "Youth Perspective Survey." The survey wasCity of Culver City, California City Council Agenda Item Report approved and the Commission took action to recommend this version of the survey to the City Council for approval (moved by Commissioner Hudson; seconded by Commissioner Cooper; passed unanimously). Once the "Youth Perspective Survey" (with Council-directed changes, if any) has been approved by the City Council, it will be distributed to the youth of Culver City and the results will be tabulated and presented to the Youth Outreach Subcommittee, the Parks, Recreation and Community Services Commission and the City Council. It is expected that the City Council will then determine the next steps, if any, to be taken with regard to the formation of a Culver City Youth Advisory Committee. FISCAL IMPACT: The cost of administering the "Youth Perspective Survey" is largely dependent upon the mode of administration. For example if the survey is administered via a "paper- and-pencil" method, costs will include those of photocopying and survey delivery and collection. If the survey is administered electronically (i.e., via an Internet service such as SurveyMonkey.com ), costs will include staff time and account set-up (if the service is fee-based). As this was an item not included in the PRCS Department's Fiscal Year 2008-09 budgeted Work Plan, expenditures related to the administration and tabulation of the "Youth Perspective Survey" were not included in the adopted Fiscal Year 08/09 and Approved Fiscal Year 09/10 Budget. Estimated costs for the administration of the survey are as follows: • Personnel 80 hours@ $ 50/hr. $4,000.00 • Materials/Supplies $ 350.00 • Total $4,350.00 Should the City Council determine to proceed with this process, staff recommends the City Council consider using a portion of the City Council's appropriated reserve for this purpose. ATTACHMENTS: 1. "Youth Perspective Survey" 2. Excerpt of the November 16, 2005 Parks and Recreation Commission Approved Meeting Minutes 3. Excerpt of the June 26, 2006 City Council Approved Meeting Minutes 4. Excerpt of the June 9, 2008 City Council Approved Meeting Minutes MOTIONS:City of Culver City, California City Council Agenda Item Report That the City Council: 1. Approve an allocation from the City Council Appropriated Reserve in the amount of $4,350 to the PRCS Account 10130100.512100; and 2. Approve the attached "Youth Perspective Survey;" or 3. Make revisions to the attached "Youth Perspective Survey" and approve the Survey as revised by the City Council; and 4. Direct staff to implement the "Youth Perspective Survey" to receive the best possible survey results within the available financial resources or 5. Provide staff with alternate direction.