Legislation Details

File #: HIST-22201    Version: 1 Subject:
Type: Historical Status: Action Item
In control: City Council Meeting Agenda
On agenda: 5/28/2013 Final action: 5/28/2013
Title: (1) Introduction of an Ordinance Amending Chapter 9.08, Streets and Sidewalks, and Chapter 9.10, Parks, Public Buildings, and Property, of the Culver City Municipal Code, by Repealing and Replacing Section 9.08.005, Amending Section 9.08.010, Adding a New Subchapter 9.08.200 et seq., and Repealing and Reserving Sections 9.10.025 Through 9.10.040, Relating to Parkway Planting Standards and Tree Removal Regulations; and (2) Adoption of a Resolution Establishing Residential Parkway Standards.
Attachments: 1. (1) Introduction of an Ordinance Amending Chapter - A-1__13-05-28__PW-ADMIN__CITY COUNCIL__Tree Removal and Parkway Standards - FINAL.pdf, 2. (1) Introduction of an Ordinance Amending Chapter - A-1__13-05-28__PW-ADMIN__CITY COUNCIL__Tree Removal and Parkway Standards Attachments.pdf
City of Culver City, California Agenda Item Report Meeting Date: 05/28/2013 Item Number: A-1 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM: (1) Introduction of an Ordinance Amending Chapter 9.08, Streets and Sidewalks, and Chapter 9.10, Parks, Public Buildings, and Property, of the Culver City Municipal Code, by Repealing and Replacing Section 9.08.005, Amending Section 9.08.010, Adding a New Subchapter 9.08.200 et seq., and Repealing and Reserving Sections 9.10.025 Through 9.10.040, Relating to Parkway Planting Standards and Tree Removal Regulations; and (2) Adoption of a Resolution Establishing Residential Parkway Standards. Contact Person/Dept.: Helen Kerstein/PW Phone Number: (310) 253-5618 Fiscal Impact: Yes [] No [X] General Fund: Yes [] No [X] Public Hearing: [] Action Item: [X] Attachments: [X] Commission Action Required: Yes [] No [X] Date: Public Notification: (E-mail) Meetings and Agendas – City Council (05/21/13); (Published) Culver City News (05/16/13; 05/23/13); (E-Mail) Environmental Listserv (05/14/13); (E-mail) Audubon Society (05/14/13); (E-mail) Ballona Creek Renaissance (05/14/13). Department Approval: Charles D. Herbertson 05/16/2013 City Attorney Approval: Carol Schwab (by H. Baker) (05/21/13) Chief Financial Officer Approval: Jeff Muir (by M. Noller) (05/21/13) City Manager Approval: John M. Nachbar (05/21/13) RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the City Council: 1. Introduce an Ordinance amending Chapter 9.08, Streets and Sidewalks, and Chapter 9.10, Parks, Public Buildings, and Property, of the Culver City Municipal Code, by repealing and replacing Section 9.08.005, amending Section 9.08.010, adding a new Subchapter 9.08.200, et seq., and repealing and reserving Sections 9.10.025 through 9.10.040, relating to parkway planting standards and tree removal regulations (Attachment 1); and 2. Adopt a resolution establishing Residential Parkway Standards (Attachment 2). ` BACKGROUND: Tree Removals There are approximately 15,500 trees in the City of Culver City, which contribute significantly to the quality of life of the community. These trees raise property City of Culver City, California Agenda Item Report values, encourage economic development, reduce the heat island effect, contribute to storm water infiltration, and reduce the particulates and greenhouse gases in the air. However, there are times when the City’s trees pose hazards or create hardships and thus their removal is in the best interest of the City and the public health, safety and welfare. The Public Works Director is charged with overseeing the City’s trees and determining whether a tree should be removed. The Director’s decision is based on the criteria outlined in the Culver City Municipal Code (CCMC). The existing provisions of the CCMC specify that the applicant for a tree removal bears the burden of proof to demonstrate the reasons for removal by a preponderance of evidence. It also requires that the following factors shall be considered, amongst other things, when evaluating tree removal requests: 1. Whether the tree or trees pose a potential for safety problems despite a sound maintenance program; 2. Whether the roots from adjacent parkway trees are interfering with sewers or utility lines servicing the abutting property to the extent that the property owner requires frequent repairs of sewers or utility lines (Damage to sewers alone, however, does not constitute major damage); 3. Whether the tree is dead, dying or incurably diseased; 4. Whether the tree is diseased and weakened by age, storm, fire or other injuries so as to pose a danger to persons, properties, improvements and other trees; 5. Whether the tree(s) is of an undesirable species; 6. Whether the tree poses a hardship to the adjacent property owner such as, but not limited to, damage to the foundation of house or garage, or in the case of a handicapped person, special circumstances which cause the location of the tree, or evenness of pavement to become a hindrance for vehicle or handicapped access; 7. Whether removal is necessary for construction of a street improvement project or other public improvement/repair work. Furthermore, the CCMC also states that the applicant must show by demonstrable evidence that the alleged damage to private property caused by the tree in question is at least $5,000. The $5,000 requirement is especially burdensome as it often precludes the Public Works Director from recommending removal of a tree that may otherwise merit removal. It has become clear in recent years that these provisions are in need of updating in order to ensure that the CCMC provides clear guidance to the Public Works Director, but also provides some flexibility so that the Director can exercise his judgment and expertise. Parkways A parkway is defined as the land area between the street curb and the sidewalk. In non-residential parts of the City, the parkway has generally been filled in with City of Culver City, California Agenda Item Report concrete. In residential parts of the City, the parkway has historically been planted with grass. With the increasing need for water conservation, there has been growing interest in replacing water-hungry grass in the City’s residential parkways with more water- efficient turf or other drought-tolerant alternatives. Along with this interest have come requests from property owners for clear guidance on what plantings and other improvements can be made to the parkway. Existing provisions of the CCMC: • Require a permit from the Department of Public Works prior to planting any flowers, grass, vines, vegetables, or other vegetation or removing and planting trees or shrubs in the parkway (§ 9.10.035). However, neither the CCMC nor formal Department policies provide direction on what types of plantings or other types of improvements are acceptable for a permit to be issued. • Prohibit any obstacle that will interfere with the free passage of pedestrians or vehicles in the sidewalk or street (which is defined to include the parkway for the purposes of the referenced section) (§9.08.010). This could be interpreted to preclude the installation of many types of plants and other improvements. • Do not specifically set forth maintenance responsibilities for the parkway. While it has been the City’s policy that, except for Landscape Assessment Districts and City-installed rain gardens for which the City has explicitly taken maintenance responsibility, maintenance is the responsibility of the adjoining property owner (a policy which is supported by Streets and Highways Code §5610). This policy has not been expressly stated in the CCMC, but is proposed to be included in the proposed amendments to the existing provisions. DISCUSSION: Tree Removals Staff recommends updating the CCMC to provide additional clarity and flexibility regarding tree removals. The proposed updates have been recommended with the recognition that the Public Works Director should have exclusive authority to remove trees and that these removals may be either initiated by an applicant or by the Director, articulating the process for each scenario. The changes to the criteria for tree removal include eliminating the following requirements: 1) that the applicant bear the burden of proof by preponderance of evidence, 2) that the Public Works Director makes a declaration on the costs of alternatives, and 3) that $5,000 in City of Culver City, California Agenda Item Report damage to private property be documented. The updates also add a procedure for removals that are necessary for the construction of a private improvement project, which was not included in the existing CCMC provisions, but is an important addition. Finally, the alterations consolidate and simplify criteria, remove redundant language, reorganize and relocate the relevant sections to improve clarity, and specify which criteria are sufficient to merit removal individually and which should be considered in combination. Together, these changes should provide the Public Works Director the flexibility to determine holistically whether or not it is in the best interest of the City to remove a tree, while simultaneously providing a sufficiently well-defined framework for making these decisions. Parkways In order to provide clearer guidance on acceptable alterations to parkways, staff recommends codifying broad requirements for parkways (through the Proposed Ordinance – Attachment 1), which are not expected to change significantly over time. These requirements include that permits only be issued if proposed changes do not: • Preclude the free passage of pedestrians along the sidewalk or from parking spaces or ramps to the sidewalk • Obstruct traffic signs or signals from view • Reduce or obstruct traffic visibility • Pose harm to the health or safety of persons or property Staff also recommends that more detailed parkway standards be adopted by resolution of the City Council (through the Proposed Resolution – Attachment 2) in order to facilitate adjustments to them at a later date should conditions change. Staff suggests that the standards include specific requirements aimed at promoting water conservation, access, and visibility, as well as eliminating potential hazards and nuisances. These requirements are summarized below and detailed in the attached Residential Parkway Standards (Standards) (see Attachment 2): In order to promote water conservation, the Standards: • Require new plants and turf to be water-efficient, climate appropriate, or native/indigenous, as well as non-invasive. Encourage low volume, non- overhead irrigation systems or hand-watering when irrigation is necessary; prohibit runoff outside the parkway area; and require compliance with the Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance and other local, state, and federal laws. Require that a minimum of 75 percent of the parkway area be permeable and 50 percent be planted. In order to promote access, the Standards: • Require a step-out strip (a uniform, firm walking surface such as turf, grass, other walkable ground cover, pavers, brick, or decomposed granite) along the City of Culver City, California Agenda Item Report length of the curb to allow passengers to enter and exit vehicles parked at the curb. Prohibit overhang and encroachment on to the sidewalk or step-out strip, and require at least one unimpeded path from the curb to the sidewalk (accessway) per standard parcel. In order to promote visibility of traffic signs, signals, and traffic, the Standards: • Prohibit additions to the parkway (except trees) that exceed 30 inches in height at maturity. In order to eliminate potential hazards and nuisances, the Standards: • Prohibit ivy or other dense ground covers that harbor or attract rodents; plants with thorns, stickers, or edible fruit; objects such as statues, raised planters and pots, benches, fences, other similar decorative items; artificial turf; and pea gravel or other loose small rock that can easily be kicked out or otherwise displaced onto the sidewalk. The Standards also ensure adequate access to fire hydrants, compatibility with street trees and that materials such as bricks, flagstone and pavers are maintained flush with the ground, so as not to pose a tripping hazard. The proposed Standards also allow for no-fee permits for the planting of walkable planting material selected from the pre-approved list and establish a more involved process for the installation of storm water capture systems (such as rain gardens or bioswales) or other complex changes to the parkway. The proposed ordinance and Standards will formally articulate the requirements for parkways for the first time, thus enhancing consistency and clarity in the permitting process. Finally, staff proposes clarifying that the prohibition on obstructions in CCMC §9.08.010 does not apply when parkways are permitted pursuant to these Standards, and also adding language to identify explicitly that, except in the case of a Landscape Assessment District or City-installed rain garden for which the City has explicitly taken maintenance responsibility, it is the owner of the adjoining property (not the City) who is responsible for maintaining the parkway area and keeping it free from anything that might pose a hazard to the public. This addition to the CCMC should help make it clear that the adjoining property owner is responsible for maintenance and provide stronger authority for code enforcement to cite those who fail to maintain their parkways and thus create aesthetic and public safety concerns. Violations/Penalties The Proposed Ordinance also includes provisions making it unlawful to violate the provisions of Subchapter 9.08.200 et seq., relating to parkway plantings and tree removal, and imposing certain fines and penalties. (See §9.08.230 of the Proposed Ordinance) City of Culver City, California Agenda Item Report City Council Sustainability Subcommittee Staff discussed these proposed changes with the City Council Sustainability Subcommittee (Sahli-Wells and Cooper) on September 19, 2012. The Subcommittee was generally supportive, but raised concerns and/or questions about the following aspects of the Standards: Benches The proposed Standards prohibit benches, among other items. Vice Mayor Sahli- Wells articulated the value of benches in public spaces such as parkways in promoting place-making and community building. Staff raised concerns about benches potentially creating hazards or nuisances, facilitating loitering, and contributing to visual blight if not appropriately selected and maintained. For these reasons, staff is not recommending allowing them in the parkways. If the City Council wishes to allow them, staff recommends permitting them under a revocable permit and requiring that the City be indemnified. If this is the direction of Council, staff would also investigate the possibility and practicality of requiring the property owner to cover the City under their homeowner’s liability policy. Fruit Trees The proposed Standards also prohibit plants that produce edible fruit. Although the Standards do not specifically mention trees, this prohibition would include fruit trees. Vice Mayor Sahli-Wells expressed a desire to allow fruit trees in parkways. There has been a movement in some places around the country to allow fruit trees in public places. Guerrilla Grafters have been grafting unauthorized fruit branches onto street trees in the San Francisco Bay Area. Los Angeles County has incorporated fruit trees as part of its renovation of Del Aire Park. However, cities have generally resisted this movement, especially for street trees, for a variety of reasons, including: these trees are typically not an appropriate size for the parkway, often drop fruit or attract pests, and are not consistent with the trees that are already planted in the parkways. In Culver City, the species of trees in the parkways are identified in the adopted Street Tree Master Plan and are chosen based on a wide range of criteria such as size, root invasiveness, hardiness, messiness, environmental sustainability, and location appropriateness. Because the City maintains these trees and faces complaints and claims that arise from them, it is important that they be appropriate for the site and be controlled by the Master Plan rather than allowed through an alternate process. Staff does not recommend that fruit trees be permitted. Existing Non-Conforming Parkways Another issue that was raised in the Sustainability Subcommittee meeting is the treatment of existing non-conforming parkways. There are currently a significant number of unpermitted alterations to parkways that will be out of compliance with these proposed Residential Parkway Standards (and with the existing CCMC and the Proposed Ordinance, if adopted, which require a permit). Code Enforcement has not been aggressively pursuing these violations due to the lack of clear Standards and a designated permit process. With the adoption of the proposed City of Culver City, California Agenda Item Report Residential Parkway Standards, the Code Enforcement Division has indicated that it intends to prioritize enforcement based on complaints received and the severity of the violations, consistent with the current Council-approved approach. FISCAL ANALYSIS: Staff does not believe that the proposed changes will result in a significant increased burden on staff. The proposed changes to the criteria for tree removals will provide the Public Works Director with more discretion to approve some tree removals, but will not be likely to significantly change the number of requests that are received. Additionally, while staff anticipates that the clarification of Residential Parkway Standards may spur some additional property owners to seek permits, this increase is anticipated to be relatively small and will be absorbable within existing resources. The parkways that are out of compliance with the new Residential Parkway Standards were not in compliance with the existing CCMC provisions. However, the adoption of the new Residential Parkway Standards may spur some additional enforcement actions. As described above, the Code Enforcement Division plans to prioritize out of compliance parkways based on complaints and severity of violations to make enforcement manageable given current staffing levels. For a number of years, there have been fees in the City’s fee schedule for tree removals applications and appeals (currently $75 each). Prior to the 2013/2014 fee schedule, there were no established fees for parkway permits. However, the following fees were added to the 2013/2014 fee schedule that the Council adopted on May 13, 2013 (pending the passage of the proposed ordinance and Standards): Parkway Permit Fees: Processing Application - Walkable Plantings: $ 0 Processing Application and Inspection - Basic Permit: $ 151.50 Rain Gardens or Other Complex Parkway Changes: Permit Review $175 per hour (1 hour min.) Inspection, if required $128 per hour (1 hour min.) These parkway fees were set to enable the City to cover the expected staff costs associated with parkway permits. At the May 13, 2013 Council meeting, Vice Mayor Sahli-Wells proposed reducing or eliminating the portion of the parkway fees associated with the installation of rain gardens in recognition of their environmental benefits. If the Council would like to direct staff to pursue this change to the 2013/2014 fee schedule, staff will bring the relevant resolution to the Council for consideration when the proposed ordinance is adopted. City of Culver City, California Agenda Item Report ATTACHMENTS: 1. Proposed Ordinance 2. Proposed Resolution (including Exhibit A - Residential Parkway Standards) MOTION: That the City Council: 1. Introduce an ordinance amending Chapter 9.08, Streets and Sidewalks, and Chapter 9.10, Parks, Public Buildings, and Property, of the Culver City Municipal Code, by repealing and replacing Section 9.08.005, amending Section 9.08.010, adding a new Subchapter 9.08.200, et seq., and repealing and reserving Sections 9.10.025 through 9.10.040, relating to parkway planting standards and tree removal regulations; and, 2. Adopt a resolution establishing Residential Parkway Standards. MEETING DATE: 05/28/2013 AGENDA ITEM: (1) Introduction of an Ordinance Amending Chapter 9.08, Streets and Sidewalks, and Chapter 9.10, Parks, Public Buildings, and Property, of the Culver City Municipal Code, by Repealing and Replacing Section 9.08.005, Amending Section 9.08.010, Adding a New Subchapter 9.08.200 et seq., and Repealing and Reserving Sections 9.10.025 Through 9.10.040, Relating to Parkway Planting Standards and Tree Removal Regulations; and (2) Adoption of a Resolution Establishing Residential Parkway Standards. ATTACHMENTS Pages 1 Proposed Ordinance 1-11 2 Proposed Resolution (including Exhibit A – Parkway Standards) 12-32 1 ro le. 3 5 7 9 10 11 12 CITY OF CULVER CITY PARKWAY STANDARDS PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT May 2013 13 Contents I. INTRODUCTION 1. Definitions 1 2. Applicability 1 3. Amendments to Standards 2 4. Background 2 5. Applications and Permits 2 6. Goals for Standards 3 II. CATEGORIES OF PARKWAY MODIFICATIONS AND STANDARDS FOR THOSE MODIFICATIONS 1. Walkable Plantings – Permit May Be Waived 3 2. Standard Plantings and Other Modifications – Basic Permit Required 3 3. Rain Gardens or Other Complex Modifications – Additional Permit Requirements5 III. QUESTIONS 1. Tree Questions 5 2. Other Parkway Questions 5 EXHIBITS 1. Exhibit A: Application 1 2. Exhibit B: Examples of Dos and Don’ts 2 3. Exhibit C: Recommended Walkable Plants 3 4. Exhibit D: Recommended Plants 6 14 1 I. INTRODUCTION 1. Definitions: A. CCMC: Culver City Municipal Code. B. Invasive: Non-native species that displace and crowd out native vegetation and the wildlife that feeds on it. See http://www.cal-ipc.org/ for a list. C. Parkway: The portion of the street right-of-way between the curb and the sidewalk. D. Pea gravel: A type of gravel/rock whose individual particles are approximately the size of peas (approx. 3/8” or less in diameter). E. Permeable: Containing pores or openings that permit liquids or gases to pass through. For the purposes of these Standards, decomposed granite and trees and tree roots are included in this definition. F. Public Works Director: Includes the Public Works Director/City Engineer or his/her designee. G. Rain garden and bioswales: Shallow planted depressions that are specially designed to capture and infiltrate storm water. Bioswales tend to slope to a destination, while rain gardens do not. H. Standards: The City of Culver City Parkway Standards. I. Step-out strip: A uniform, firm walking surface that should extend along the full length of the parkway (except where the presence of tree roots from existing street trees makes it impracticable). Some examples of firm walking surfaces include grass, decomposed granite, and walkable groundcover. J. Street right-of-way: Includes all streets, parkways, sidewalks, highways, avenues, lanes, alleys, courts, places, squares, curbs, or other public ways in the City, which have been or may hereafter be dedicated and opened to public use. K. Turf or grass: Short plants with long slender leaves that can be walked on. These terms are used interchangeably for the purposes of these Standards. 2. Applicability: These Standards apply to all residential parkways of the City of Culver City. Enforcement action related to existing non-conforming parkways will be prioritized based on the severity of the deviation from these Standards and the frequency of the complaints received. 15 2 3. Amendments to Standards: Substantive amendments to these Standards shall be made by resolution of the City Council. Non-substantive changes to these Standards, such as typographical or clerical errors, or modifications to the attached exhibits, may be made by the Public Works Director. 4. Background: Parkways are part of the street right-of-way. While parkways are not intended for pedestrian passage, it is important that they allow vehicle passengers to safely and easily open their car doors and reach a nearby sidewalk. It is also critical that they not obstruct the visibility of traffic, traffic signals, and traffic signs or otherwise cause hazards. Parkways often incorporate public infrastructure such as parking meters, bus stops, trees, and street lights. Despite this, except in the case of Landscape Assessment Districts or City-installed rain gardens for which the City has explicitly taken maintenance responsibility, it is the adjacent property owner, not the City, who is required to maintain all plantings and other items in the parkway, including watering, as necessary. The property owner is also responsible and liable for ensuring that the parkway is kept in a clean and neat condition and free from obstructions, encroachments or obstacles which may pose a hazard to persons or property, including tripping hazards (CCMC §9.08.210 E.). 5. Applications and Permits: Applications for street tree plantings, removals, and tree trimming (including tree roots) may be obtained from and must be submitted to the Maintenance Operations Division of the Public Works Department. With an approved application, tree plantings can be done by an approved contractor. However, trimming and removal of street trees shall only be conducted by the City except in the case of new development where the applicant may be authorized to remove or transplant an existing tree subject to CCMC § 9.08.220. Permits for all other plantings and other items in residential parkways (“Parkway Permits”) shall be issued by the Engineering Division of the Public Works Department. The application for a Parkway Permit may be obtained from and must be submitted to the Culver City Engineering Division of the Public Works Department. When submitted, the Parkway Permit application shall include all necessary exhibits, including a labeled and dimensioned drawing of the proposed plantings and other items to be placed in the parkway, specification sheets for each species of plant or other material proposed to be used (if not on pre- approved lists included as Exhibits C and D), and the permit fee as established by resolution of the City Council. The approved application shall serve as the required permit. Notwithstanding any permitted modifications to the parkway, the City reserves the right to remove any and all plantings in the modified parkway if it is determined by the Public Works Director that the removal is necessary to conduct maintenance, construct capital improvements, or further other governmental purposes, and the City shall not be responsible for the costs or work necessary to replace any removed planting. The property owner shall be 16 3 allowed to restore the modifications allowed under the original permit at his/her sole expense, so long as the restored modifications meet the City’s design requirements and do not otherwise interfere with the public health, safety and welfare. Furthermore, as practicable, the City will cooperate with the property owner to preserve the plants that are being removed for possible replanting at the conclusion of the project or for reuse by the property owner at another location. 6. Goals for Standards: In residential areas of the City, the parkway has historically been planted with grass. However, given the increasing need for water conservation, there has been growing interest in replacing water-hungry grass in the City’s parkways with more water-efficient turf or other drought-tolerant alternatives. The City has created the requirements outlined herein in order to facilitate the conversion of existing grass to more water-efficient alternatives and ensure that, as these modifications occur, parkways remain publicly accessible, safe, and otherwise free from hazards. In order to achieve these goals, CCMC §9.08.210.C requires that alterations to parkways must not: A. Preclude the passage of pedestrians along the curb or from parking spaces or ramps to the sidewalk B. Obstruct traffic signs or signals from view C. Reduce or obstruct the visibility of traffic D. Pose harm to the health or safety of persons or property The CCMC also references these Standards, which are intended to provide more specific guidance regarding acceptable modifications to the City’s parkways. II. CATEGORIES OF PARKWAY MODIFICATIONS AND STANDARDS FOR THOSE MODIFICATIONS There are three categories of modifications to parkways: 1. Walkable Plantings – Permit Fee Not Required The first category of modifications to the parkway is the planting of walkable plant material not requiring the installation or modification of an irrigation system (except for the replacement of sprinkler heads). If the walkable plant material is selected from the recommended list (attached as Exhibit C), it has already been found to meet the goals of these Standards and thus the permit fee is not required as long as no installation or modification of an irrigation system is requested. 2. Standard Plantings and Other Modifications – Basic Permit Required The second category is the planting of other standard plants and non-vegetative material (not walkable plants as described in 1 or complex changes such as rain gardens as described in 3). These modifications to the parkway require a permit, with a fee established by resolution of the City Council, and must comply with the following requirements aimed at meeting the stated City goals: 17 4 Goal: Promoting Water Conservation, Storm water Infiltration, and Other Environmental Goals In order to promote water conservation, new plants shall be water-efficient, climate appropriate or native/indigenous. No invasive species are allowed.|1010| A list of recommended plants is included as Exhibit D. When irrigation is necessary, it must be installed and maintained to preclude runoff outside the parkway area and must meet the requirements of the Model Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance|1010| and other local, state and federal requirements, if applicable. Additionally, when such irrigation is necessary, low-volume, non- overhead irrigation systems or hand-watering is recommended. At least 75 percent of the parkway area must be permeable and 50 percent must be planted.|1010| Goal: Promoting Access To promote pedestrian access, step-out strip along the length of the curb shall be provided for passengers to enter and exit vehicles parked at the curb, except when there is a red curb or tree roots preclude it. The strip must be a uniform, firm walking surface (such as turf, other walkable ground cover, pavers, brick, or decomposed granite) extending at least 18 inches from the back of the curb. Plantings shall not overhang or encroach on the sidewalk or step-out strip. Also, one unimpeded path from the curb to the sidewalk (accessway) is required per standard parcel. Additional accessways may be required for large parcels at the discretion of the Public Works Director. Goal: Promoting Visibility In order to promote the visibility of traffic signs, signals, and traffic, additions to the parkway (with the exception of trees) shall not exceed 30 inches in height at maturity. Goal: Eliminating Potential Hazards and Nuisances In order to prevent potential hazards or public nuisances, the following are not allowed in the parkway: 1) ivy or other dense ground covers that harbor or attract rodents; 2) plants with thorns, stickers, or edible fruit; 3) objects such as statues, raised planters and pots, benches, fences, other similar decorative items; 4) artificial turf; and 5) pea gravel or other loose small rock that can be easily kicked out or otherwise displaced onto the sidewalk. Additionally, plantings or other improvements shall not be placed or planted in such a way as to impede access to fire hydrants or be incompatible with street trees. For the health of the street trees, plantings shall be a minimum of 12 inches away from tree trunks (24 inches recommended, with the area covered in mulch) and shall not negatively impact the existing tree root systems. Finally, bricks, flagstone, pavers, and other similar materials are allowed if the minimum planting area requirement is met and these materials are maintained flush with the ground, so as not to pose a tripping hazard. |1010| To find invasive species, please visit http://www.cal-ipc.org/. |1010|To view the Model Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance, visit http://www.water.ca.gov/wateruseefficiency/docs/MWELO09-10-09.pdf. |1010|Step-out strips are included in the minimum permeable requirement, where applicable. 18 5 3. Rain Gardens or Other Complex Modifications to the Parkway – Additional Permit Requirements Rain gardens and bioswales are storm water capture systems. They are required to meet the criteria set forth in Section II of these Standards, outlined above. However, because of their complexity, additional requirements may apply and property owners wishing to install them must also present plans prepared by a California registered landscape architect or Civil Engineer and must pay an additional hourly plan check fee, as established by resolution of the City Council. Notwithstanding compliance with Section II of these Standards, proposed modifications to the parkway may nevertheless be denied if the Public Works Director deems such modifications are not in the best interest of the City and the public health, safety and welfare, or do not otherwise meet the objectives of these Standards. III. QUESTIONS 1. Tree Questions: For questions regarding trees, please contact the Maintenance Operations Division of the Public Works Department at: (310) 253-6420. 2. Other Parkway Questions: For other parkway questions, please contact the Engineering Division of the Public Works Department at: (310) 253-5600. EXHIBIT A: APPLICATION EXHIBIT B: DOS AND DON ’TS EXHIBIT C: RECOMMENDED WALKABLE PLANTS EXHIBIT D: RECOMMENDED PLANTS 19 1 9770 CULVER BOULEVARD, 2ND FLOOR CULVER CITY, CALIFORNIA 90232-0507 MATE GASPAR Phone (310) 253-5600 Engineering Services Manager Engineering Division FAX (310) 253-5626 RESIDENTIAL PARKWAY APPLICATION/PERMIT PROPERTY OWNER (REQUIRED) Name Mailing Address City/Zip Phone Number Email Address Tenant (if applicable) Address Phone Number Email Address Contractor (if applicable) Address City/Zip Phone Number State License Number City Business License Number Applicant Date Approved by Date - Fees are adopted annually by City Council Resolution. Technology surcharge of 4% applies to all fees. - Attach a labeled drawing of the proposed changes to the parkway, showing the location of all existing street trees, fire hydrants, etc. and any proposed changes, along with the relevant dimensions. Also, attach specification sheets for each proposed material or planting. - Notwithstanding any permitted modifications to the parkway, the City reserves the right to remove and all plantings in the modified parkway if it is determined by the Public Works Director that the removal is necessary to conduct maintenance, capital improvements, or other governmental purposes, and the City shall not be responsible for the costs or work necessary to replace any removed planting. The property owner shall be allowed to restore the modifications allowed under the original permit at his/her sole expense, so long as the restored modifications meet the City’s design requirements and do not otherwise interfere with the public health, safety and welfare. Furthermore, as practicable, the City will cooperate with the property owner to preserve the plants that are being removed for possible replanting at the conclusion of the project or for reuse by the property owner at another location. - Proposed changes to the parkway must comply with CCMC §9.08.210 and the Parkway Standards approved by Council Resolution. Tree removals/plantings require a separate application and must be approved by the Maintenance Operations Division, (310) 253-6420. For all other questions, please contact the Engineering Division at (310) 253-5600. ADDRESS LIST PLANT SPECIES PROPOSED FOR PLANTING: LIST ANY OTHER PROPOSED CHANGES TO THE PARKWAY: Category 1 ? Category 2 ? Category 3 ? Standard fee: Fee (Including Additional Inspection Hours): Exhibit A 20 2 Don’t overhang the step-out strip or sidewalk Don’t preclude the passage of pedestrians from parking spaces Do provide a step out strip to enable drivers to open doors and get from the curb to the sidewalk Don’t use the parkway as your vegetable garden or plant ivy or other rodent-attractors Fail to maintain the parkway adjacent to your property Do plant drought- tolerant species Do avoid planting near the base of street trees (this robs the trees of nutrition) Don’t put in plants that grow to more than 30 inches tall Exhibit B: Examples of Dos and Don’ts 21Exhibit C: Recommended Walkable Plants Category Scientific Name Common Name Reference Photo Walkable Turf Alternatives Buchloe dactyloides UC Verde™ UC Verde™ Buffalo Grass Walkable Turf Alternatives Bouteloua gracilis 'Hachita' Hachita' Blue Grama Grass Walkable Turf Alternatives Carex pansa California Meadow Sedge Walkable Turf Alternatives Achillea millifollium cultivars Achillea cultivars Walkable Turf Alternatives Chamaemelum nobile Chamomile Walkable Turf Alternatives Dymondia margaretae Dymondia Walkable Turf Alternatives No mow grass Mix of bentgrass and fescue Walkable Turf Alternatives Slope saver Mix of fescues|1010|22Exhibit C: Recommended Walkable Plants Category Scientific Name Common Name Reference Photo Walkable Turf Alternatives Carex tumulicola Foothill sedge Walkable Turf Alternatives Carex caryophyllea The Beatles Walkable Turf Alternatives Carex praegracilis Field sedge Walkable Turf Alternatives Cynodon dactylon 'GN- 1', 'Santa Ana', 'Tifdwarf', 'Tifgreen', 'Tifway 419' Hybrid bermuda Walkable Turf Alternatives Paspalum vaginatum 'Seaspray' Sea Spray Paspalum Walkable Turf Alternatives Achillea tomentosa Woolly Yarrow Walkable Turf Alternatives Herniaria glabra Green Carpet Walkable Turf Alternatives Leptinella squalida a.k.a. Cotula Squalida (Shade) Brass Buttons|1010|23Exhibit C: Recommended Walkable Plants Category Scientific Name Common Name Reference Photo Walkable Turf Alternatives Phyla Nodiflora Texas frogfruit, Turkey tangle fogfruit, Frogfruit Walkable Turf Alternatives Sagina Subulata Heath Pearlwort or Irish Moss Walkable Turf Alternatives Zoysia Tenufolia Korean Grass Walkable Turf Alternatives Zoysia Tenufolia Emerald|1010|24Exhibit D: Recommended Plants Category Scientific Name Common Name Reference Photo Low-Growing Grasses or Grass-like Perennials (18" or less) Carex divulsa (C. tumincola) Berkeley Sedge Low-Growing Grasses or Grass-like Perennials (18" or less) Festuca glauca 'Siskiyou Blue' & other var. Blue Fescue Low-Growing Grasses or Grass-like Perennials (18" or less) Pennisetum alopecuroides 'Little Bunny' Little Bunny Fountain Grass Low-Growing Grasses or Grass-like Perennials (18" or less) Sesleria autumnalis Autumn Moor Grass Low-Growing Grasses or Grass-like Perennials (18" or less) Festuca Ovina Glavca Sheep Fescue Low-Growing Grasses or Grass-like Perennials (18" or less) Achillea millifollium 'Terra Cotta' Yarrow Terra Cotta Low-Growing Perennials/Succulents (18" or less) Aptenia cordifolia/A. cordifolia 'Red Apple' Heartleaf Ice Plant Low-Growing Perennials/Succulents (18" or less) Delosperma cooperi Trailing Ice Plant|1010|25Exhibit D: Recommended Plants Category Scientific Name Common Name Reference Photo Low-Growing Perennials/Succulents (18" or less) Drosanthemum floribundum Rosea Ice Plant Low-Growing Perennials/Succulents (18" or less) Dudleya hassei Santa Catalina Live Forever Low-Growing Perennials/Succulents (18" or less) Erigeron karvinskianus & E.glaucus Santa Barbara & Seaside Daisy Low-Growing Perennials/Succulents (18" or less) Gazania rigens leucolaena Gazania Low-Growing Perennials/Succulents (18" or less) Gazania linearis 'Colorado Gold' Colorado Gold Gazania Low-Growing Perennials/Succulents (18" or less) Hypericum calycinum Creeping St. Johnswort Low-Growing Perennials/Succulents (18" or less) Iris douglasiana & 'Pacific Coast Hybrids' Douglas & Pacific Coast Iris Low-Growing Perennials/Succulents (18" or less) Lantana Patriot cultivars Dwarf Lantana|1010|26Exhibit D: Recommended Plants Category Scientific Name Common Name Reference Photo Low-Growing Perennials/Succulents (18" or less) Lessingia filaginifolia 'Silver Carpet' Beach Aster Low-Growing Perennials/Succulents (18" or less) Monardella villosa Coyote Mint Low-Growing Perennials/Succulents (18" or less) Nepeta mussinii Catmint Low-Growing Perennials/Succulents (18" or less) Osteospermum fruitcosum Trailing African Daisy Low-Growing Perennials/Succulents (18" or less) Oenothera caespitosa Tufted evening primrose Low-Growing Perennials/Succulents (18" or less) Rosmarinus officinalis 'Huntington Carpet' or other prostrate varieties Prostrate Rosemary Low-Growing Perennials/Succulents (18" or less) Scaevola aemula varieties Fairy Fan Flower Low-Growing Perennials/Succulents (18" or less) Senicio serpens, S. mandraeliscae Blue Chalksticks, Kleinia|1010|27Exhibit D: Recommended Plants Category Scientific Name Common Name Reference Photo Low-Growing Perennials/Succulents (18" or less) Thymus species Thyme Low-Growing Perennials/Succulents (18" or less) Verbena peruviana & hybrids Verbena Low-Growing Perennials/Succulents (18" or less) Vinca minor Dwarf Periwinkle Low-Growing Perennials/Succulents (18" or less) Senecio Jacobsensii Trailing Jade Low-Growing Shrubs (18" or less) Ceanothus 'Centennial' Wild Lilac Low-Growing Shrubs (18" or less) Cotoneaster dammeri 'Lowfast' Groundcover Cotoneaster varieties Low-Growing Shrubs (18" or less) Cotoneaster Kewensis Kew Broom Low-Growing Shrubs (18" or less) Juniperus horizontalis Groundcover Juniper varieties|10 10|28Exhibit D: Recommended Plants Category Scientific Name Common Name Reference Photo Low-Growing Shrubs (18" or less) Juniperus Chinensis Parsonii Prostrata Juniper Low-Growing Shrubs (18" or less) Juniperus Virginiana Silver Spreader Low-Growing Shrubs (18" or less) Baccharis Pilularis Dwarf Coyote Bush Low-Growing Shrubs (18" or less) Heuchera Hybrids Coral Bells Low-Growing Shrubs (18" or less) Ribes Viburnum Catalina Perfume, Evergreen Currant Low-Growing Shrubs (18" or less) Mahonia Repans Creeping Mahonia, Creeping Oregon Grape, Creeping Barberry, or Prostrate Barberry Low-Growing Shrubs (18" or less) Teucrium Chamaedrys Wall Germander Low-Growing Shrubs (18" or less) Myoporum Parvifolium Creeping Boobialla, Creeping Myoporum or Dwarf Native Myrtle 10 29Exhibit D: Recommended Plants Category Scientific Name Common Name Reference Photo 18" to 30" Tall Grasses Helictotrichon sempervirens Blue Oat Grass 18" to 30" Tall Grasses Leymus condensatus 'Canyon Prince' Canyon Prince Wild Rye 18" to 30" Tall Grasses Nasella tenuissima (Stipa tenuissima) Mexican Feather Grass 18" to 30" Tall Grasses Pennisetum orientale Oriental Fountain Grass 18" to 30" Tall Grasses Pennisetum setaceum 'Eaton Canyon' Dwarf Red Fountain Grass 18" to 30" Tall Perennials/Succulents Anigozanthos 'Bush Pearl', 'Bush Ranger' & 'Bush Devil' Kangaroo Paws varieties 18" to 30" Tall Perennials/Succulents Limonium perezii Statice 18" to 30" Tall Perennials/Succulents Lomondra longifolia 'Breeze' & 'Little Con' Lomondra cultivars 11 30Exhibit D: Recommended Plants Category Scientific Name Common Name Reference Photo 18" to 30" Tall Perennials/Succulents Penstemon heterophyllus 'Margarita BOP' Foothill Penstimon 18" to 30" Tall Perennials/Succulents Phormium 'Tom Thumb' & 'Jack Spratt' Small Flax hybrids 18" to 30" Tall Perennials/Succulents Hippocrepis Comosa Horseshoe Vetch 18" to 30" Tall Shrubs Arctostaphylos densiflora 'Pacific Mist' Pacific Mist' Manzanita 18" to 30" Tall Shrubs Artemisia pycnocephala 'David's Choice' David's Choice Sandhill Sagebrush 18" to 30" Tall Shrubs Ceanothus gloriosus 'Anchor Bay' Pt. Reyes Ceanothus 18" to 30" Tall Shrubs Cistus salvifolius Sageleaf Rockrose 18" to 30" Tall Shrubs Iva hayesiana Poverty Weed 12 31Exhibit D: Recommended Plants Category Scientific Name Common Name Reference Photo 18" to 30" Tall Shrubs Lantana montevidensis Trailing Lantana 18" to 30" Tall Shrubs Lantana camara 'Monol' Lantana 'Gold Rush', 'New Gold' & 'Cha- pel Hill Yellow' 18" to 30" Tall Shrubs Mimulus 'Jelly Bean Yellow' Persoff Hybrid Yellow Monkeyflower 18" to 30" Tall Shrubs Cistus Skanbergii Hybrid Rockrose 18" to 30" Tall Shrubs Coprosma Kirkii Mirror Plant 18" to 30" Tall Shrubs Coprosma “Verde Vista” Creeping Corposma 18" to 30" Tall Shrubs Correa ‘Carmine Bells’ Australian Fuscha 18" to 30" Tall Shrubs Salvia 'Bee's Bliss' Bee's Bliss Sage 13 32