City of Culver City, California
Agenda Item Report
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends the City Council adopt a resolution (1) approving the Engineer’s
Report for the West Washington Boulevard Benefit Assessment District Number 1;
(2) declaring the City Council’s intention to order the levy of annual assessments;
and ((3) setting the date, time and place for the Public Hearing on July 12, 2010.
BACKGROUND
In June 2009, the West Washington Assessment District No. 1 was formed to fund
the maintenance of five new landscaped medians on West Washington Boulevard
between Beethoven Street and Rosabell Avenue. Over the last year, utility issues
have been addressed, construction documents have been prepared, and the award
for construction contract has been approved.
Construction of the landscaped medians is slated to begin in July 2010 and be
completed by the fall.
DISCUSSION:
The annual assessment includes costs for median maintenance, County fees, and
administration of the District. Over the past year, funds were levied and collected for
the District to create a reserve fund. This fund will be utilized in the event that there
are unforeseen expenses not normally included in the yearly maintenance costs.
Meeting Date: 06/28/10 Item Number: A-3
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM: Adoption of a Resolution Approving the
Engineer’s Report and Declaring the City Council’s Intention to Order the Levy of
Annual Assessments for the West Washington Boulevard Benefit Assessment
District Number 1.
Contact Person/Dept.: Elaine Warner Phone Number: 310.253.5777
Fiscal Impact: Yes [X] No [] General Fund: Yes [] No [X]
Public Hearing: [] Action Item: [X Attachments: [X]
Commission Action Required: Yes [] No [X] Date: _______________
Public Notification: (E-MAIL) Meetings and Agendas – City Council (06/23/10); (USPS)
Property Owners in West Washington Assessment District No. 1 (06/16/10)
Department Approval:
Sol Blumenfeld: (06/16/10)
City Attorney Approval:
Carol Schwab (by H. Baker) (06/23/10)
Chief Financial Officer Review:
Jeff Muir (by N. Kimball) (06/23/10)
City Manager Approval:
P. Lamont Ewell (06/23/10) City of Culver City, California
Agenda Item Report
This may include, but is not limited to, palm tree replacement, repair or damaged
equipment due to vandalism, storms and other similar events.
An Engineer’s Report has been prepared and is on file with the City Clerk and has
been submitted to the City Council. A Resolution has been prepared for the City
Council to approve the report, declare its intention to levy and collect assessments
for the upcoming fiscal year and set the time and place for the public hearing on July
12, 2010, as required by CCMC Section 15.01.070. Should the City Council adopt
the proposed resolution this evening, the City Clerk would be authorized to give
notice of the public hearing by causing the Resolution of Intention to be published at
least 10 days prior to the date of the hearing.
The Engineer’s Report calculates the maximum maintenance and administration
budget for the District for Fiscal Year 2010-2011 to be $18,156.48, which includes a
CPI increase of approximately 1.44% (as allowed by the District’s formation action).
The annual assessment shall not exceed the maximum assessment; however, the
City Council may determine to levy an assessment below the maximum. Given the
economic conditions at the time of formation, it was proposed, that the Culver City
Redevelopment Agency could fund the administrative costs of the District for a
limited time (up to two years) with excess funds from Phase I as an incentive to
form the first district. Thereafter, it was proposed to have the District pay those
costs ($3,500 annually).
It is recommended the City Council allow the Culver City Redevelopment Agency to
reimburse the District for administrative costs for Fiscal Year 2010/2011 (the
second of two years). Should the City Council adopt staff’s recommendation, the
proposed budget and total balance to levy would be $14,656.48. If the City Council
wishes to levy the maximum assessment, the balance to levy would be $18,156.48.
The City Council may make its intentions known at this time and will consider the
actual amount of levy at the public hearing on July 12, 2010
FISCAL ANALYSIS:
Adopting the attached resolution does not create a fiscal impact to the City or the
District. Should the City Council adopt the proposed resolution, the City Council will
consider the levy of assessments on July 12, 2010.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Engineer’s Report
2. Proposed Resolution
City of Culver City, California
Agenda Item Report
MOTION:
That the City Council:
1. Adopt a resolution (1) approving the Engineer’s Report, (2) declaring its intention
to order the levy for West Washington Boulevard Assessment District Number 1
and (3) setting the time and place for the Public Hearing on July 12, 2010; and
2A. (Staff Recommendation) Declare its intention to levy the assessment in the
total amount of $14,656.48 (with the Culver City Redevelopment Agency
reimbursing the District for $3,500 of administrative costs for the second and final
year);
OR
2B. Declare its intention to levy the assessment in the total amount of $18,156.48
(the maximum assessment calculated by the Engineer’s Report).
MEETING DATE: 06/28/2010
AGENDA ITEM: Adoption of a Resolution Approving the Engineer’s Report
and Declaring the City Council’s Intention to Order the Levy
of Annual Assessments for the West Washington
Boulevard Benefit Assessment District Number 1.
ATTACHMENTS
Pages
1. Engineer’s Report 1-15
2. Resolution of Intent 16-18
City of Culver City
Benefit Assessment District
West Washington Boulevard No. 1
2010/11 Engineer’s Report
Submitted by
Main Office
32605 Temecula Parkway, Suite 100
Temecula, CA 92592
800.676.7516
Regional Office
870 Market Street, Suite 1223
San Francisco, CA 94102
800.434.8349
ATTACHMENT 1
1
CITY OF CULVER CITY
BENEFIT ASSESSMENT DISTRICT
WEST WASHINGTON BOULEVARD NO. 1
9770 Culver Blvd.
Culver City, CA. 90232
Phone - (310) 253-5700
CITY COUNCIL
Christopher Armenta, Mayor
Micheál O' Leary, Vice Mayor
D. Scott Malsin, Council Member
Andrew Weissman, Council Member
Jeffery Cooper, Council Member
CITY STAFF
Lamont Ewell, Interim City Manager
Sol Blumenfeld, Community Development Director
Charles D. Herbertson, Public Works Director
Martin Cole, Assistant City Manager/City Clerk
Todd Tipton, Redevelopment Administrator
Mate Gaspar, Engineering Services Manager
Elaine Gerety Warner, Senior Management Analyst
NBS
Pablo Perez, Client Services Director
Tiffany Ellis, Project Manager
Nick Dayhoff, Financial Analyst
ATTACHMENT 1
2
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1. ENGINEER’S LETTER 1-1
2. PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS 2-1
2.1. Description of the Boundaries of the District .............................................. 2-1
2.2. Description of Improvements and Services ................................................ 2-1
3. ESTIMATE OF COSTS 3-1
3.1. District Budget ............................................................................................ 3-1
3.2. Definitions of Budget Items ........................................................................ 3-2
4. METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT 4-1
4.1. General ...................................................................................................... 4-1
4.2. Special Benefit ............................................................................................. 4-1
4.3. General Benefit .......................................................................................... 4-2
4.4. Method of Apportionment Spread .............................................................. 4-2
4.5. Cost of Living Inflation ................................................................................ 4-3
5. ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM 5-1
6. ASSESSMENT ROLL 6-1
ATTACHMENT 1
3
Benefit Assessment District West Washington Boulevard No. 1 – City of Culver City 1-1
Prepared by NBS – Fiscal Year 2010/11
1. ENGINEER’S LETTER
WHEREAS, on June 14, 2010, the City Council of the City of Culver City (the “City”), State of
California, under the Culver City Municipal Code (the “CCMC”), adopted its Resolution Initiating
Proceedings for the Annual Levy of Assessments and Ordering the Preparation of an Engineer’s Report
for the Benefit Assessment District West Washington Boulevard No. 1 (the “District”);
WHEREAS, the Resolution of Initiation directed the NBS Government Finance Group, DBA NBS,
to prepare and file a report presenting plans and specifications describing the general nature, location
and extent of the improvements to be maintained, an estimate of cost of the maintenance, operations and
servicing of the improvements for the District for the referenced fiscal year, a diagram for the District,
showing the area and properties proposed to be assessed, and an assessment of the estimated costs of
the maintenance, operations and servicing the improvements, assessing the net amount upon all
assessable lots and/or parcels within the District in proportion to the special benefit received;
WHEREAS, the following assessment is made to cover the portion of the estimated cost of
maintenance, operation and servicing of said improvements to be paid by the assessable real property
within the District in proportion to the special benefit received:
SUMMARY OF ASSESSMENT
As
Preliminarily
Approved
As
Approved
by Council
Direct Maintenance and Administrative Costs $14,656.41
Reserve Fund Contribution 0.00
Total Actual Budget Costs $14,656.41
Total District Parcels 38
Total Assessable Linear Front Footage 1,863.05
Total Assessable Building Square Footage 113,092.00
Proposed Assessment Per Linear Front Foot $5.51
Proposed Assessment Per Building Square Foot $0.04
Maximum Assessment Per Linear Square Foot $6.82
Maximum Assessment Per Building Square Foot $0.05
ATTACHMENT 1
4
Benefit Assessment District West Washington Boulevard No. 1 – City of Culver City 2-1
Prepared by NBS – Fiscal Year 2010/11
2. PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS
The District provides for the continued administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing of
various improvements located within the public right-of-way and dedicated easements within the
boundaries of the District.
2.1. Description of the Boundaries of the District
The District is located in the City of Culver City. The boundaries of the District are generally described
as that area located west of Wade Street, east of Beethoven Street and along West Washington
Boulevard.
2.2. Description of Improvements and Services
The improvements are the construction, operation, maintenance and servicing of 5 medians,
landscaping, lighting, and appurtenant facilities, including, but not limited to, labor costs, utilities,
material, contracting services and any other items necessary for the satisfactory maintenance and
operation of the these improvements as described below.
Reference is made to the plans and specifications for the improvements, which are on file with the
Culver City Redevelopment Agency. The table below lists specific improvements within the District to
be maintained:
5 Medians
Landscaping
Lighting
Irrigation
ATTACHMENT 1
5
Benefit Assessment District West Washington Boulevard No. 1 – City of Culver City 3-1
Prepared by NBS – Fiscal Year 2010/11
3. ESTIMATE OF COSTS
The estimated cost of administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing the improvements as
described in the Plans and Specifications are summarized below. Each year, as part of the
assessment district levy calculation process, the costs and expenses are reviewed and the annual
costs are projected for the following fiscal year.
3.1. District Budget
DIRECT MAINTENANCE COSTS
MAXIMUM BUDGET
FISCAL YEAR 2010/11
ACTUAL BUDGET
FISCAL YEAR 2010/11
Maintenance Costs $6,734.07 $6,734.07
Water for Irrigation 870.25 870.25
Lighting 2,590.02 2,590.02
Mulch Replenishment 777.01 777.01
Plant Replacement 2,590.02 2,590.02
Irrigation Replacement 1,036.01 1,036.01
Subtotal Direct Costs $14,597.38 $14,597.38
ADMINISTRATION COSTS
City Administration $1,000.00 $0.00
Consultants 2,500.00 0.00
County Fee* 59.25 59.25
Subtotal Administration Costs $3,559.25 $59.25
Subtotal of Direct & Administrative Costs $18,156.63 $14,656.63
Amount to be carried over from Improvement Fund $0.00 $0.00
Contributions from other Sources 0.00 0.00
Reserve Fund Contribution 0.00 0.00
Total Budget Costs $18,156.63 $14,656.63
Rounding Adjustment (0.15) (0.22)
Total Balance to Levy $18,156.48 $14,656.41
Total District Parcels 38 38
Total Assessable Linear Front Footage 1,863.05 1,863.05
Total Assessable Building Square Footage 113,092.00 113,092.00
Assessment Per Linear Front Foot $6.82 $5.51
Assessment Per Building Square Foot $0.05 $0.04
*Annual fee of $50 per District, plus $0.25 per parcel.
ATTACHMENT 1
6
Benefit Assessment District West Washington Boulevard No. 1 – City of Culver City 3-2
Prepared by NBS – Fiscal Year 2010/11
It is the intent of the City of Culver City to establish a reserve that shall not exceed the estimated
costs of maintenance and servicing to December 10 of the fiscal year, or whenever the City expects
to receive its apportionment of special assessments and tax collections from the County, whichever is
later. The reserve balance information for the District is as follows:
Estimated Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2010 Reserve Fund Balance $14,090.00
Operating Reserve Collection – Fiscal Year 2010/11 0.00
Estimated Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2011 Reserve Fund Balance $14,090.00
3.2. Definitions of Budget Items
The following definitions describe the services and costs included in the District Budget:
Direct Costs:
Maintenance Costs includes all regularly scheduled labor, material and equipment required to
properly maintain and ensure the satisfactory condition of all medians, palm trees, landscaping, and
appurtenant facilities, on a bi-monthly basis.
Water for Irrigation includes the furnishing of water required for the operation and maintenance of the
landscape and irrigation systems.
Lighting includes the furnishing of electricity required for the operation and maintenance of the palm
tree uplights.
Mulch Replenishment includes once annually replenishment of mulch as required for the operation
and maintenance of the landscaping and median facilities.
Plant Replacement includes the replacement of plants as required to ensure the satisfactory condition
of the landscaping and median facilities (does not include replacement of palm trees).
Irrigation Replacement includes the ongoing repair and replacement of the irrigation systems,
including solar controller and rain sensor.
Administration Costs:
City Administration includes the cost to all particular departments and staff of the City for providing
the coordination of the District services, operations and maintenance of the improvements, response
to public concerns and education, and procedures associated with the levy and collection of
assessments.
Consultants include the costs associated with contracting with professionals to provide services
specific to the administration of the annual assessment levy.
County Fee includes fees charged by the County of Los Angeles for placing the assessments onto
the tax rolls on a yearly basis. This fee is $0.25 per parcel plus $50 per District.
ATTACHMENT 1
7
Benefit Assessment District West Washington Boulevard No. 1 – City of Culver City 3-3
Prepared by NBS – Fiscal Year 2010/11
Operating Reserve Collection:
Operating Reserve Collection is the amount collected to maintain reserves to enable the City to pay
for the operation and maintenance costs to December 10 of the fiscal year. The Reserve Fund
Contribution will continue until such a time the Reserve Fund balance is approximately one half of the
annual costs. The funds will be allowed to build up gradually in anticipation of any unforeseen
expenses not normally included in the yearly maintenance costs. This may include, but is not limited
to, palm tree replacement, repair or damaged equipment due to vandalism, storms, and other similar
events.
ATTACHMENT 1
8
Benefit Assessment District West Washington Boulevard No. 1 – City of Culver City 4-1
Prepared by NBS – Fiscal Year 2010/11
4. METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT
4.1. General
Pursuant to the CCMC and Article XIIID, all parcels that have a special benefit conferred upon them
as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements and services shall be identified and the
proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel shall be determined in relationship to
the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of improvements. The net amount to be assessed
may be apportioned by any formula or method that fairly distributes the net amount among all
assessable lots or parcels. Proposition 218, approved by the voters in November 1996, requires the
Agency to separate general benefit from special benefit, where as only special benefit is assessed.
Each parcel within the District receives special and direct benefit from the improvements and
associated appurtenances located within the public rights-of-ways located within the District, due to
the proximity of said improvements.
4.2. Special Benefit
The landscape and median improvements will be installed by the Culver City Redevelopment Agency
and the continued maintenance is guaranteed through the establishment (formation) of the District.
Since these improvements are for the benefit of the properties within the District and those properties
also benefit from the maintenance of the improvements, only the property owners within the District
are assessed for the said maintenance of improvements.
In addition, the improvements confer a particular and distinct special benefit upon all parcels within
the District because of the nature of the improvements. The ongoing and proper maintenance of
landscaping improves the aesthetic appeal of the properties within the District providing a positive
representation as well as the enhanced desirability of properties through association with the
improvements. This increase in the value provides a distinct special benefit to the parcels within the
District, which includes higher occupancy rates, increased rentals and lower vacancies. According to
Judith Guido, Director of Marketing for LandCareUSA, landscaping can increase the resale value of a
building up to 14% and speed up the sale of a building by 6 weeks. The installation and maintenance
of raised medians improve both pedestrian and traffic safety to those either walking or driving within
the District. According to the US Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration,
raised medians provide pedestrian protection by “reducing pedestrian involved crashes by 45 percent
and fatalities by 78 percent” and after analysis of crash data in seven states, “raised medians reduce
crashes by over 40 percent in urban areas.” The parcels within the District receive a distinct special
benefit as their primary use is business/retail, and studies have proven that greenery and associated
landscaping attract shoppers to the area as well as stimulate economic growth (Kathleen Wolf,
University of Washington: Economic and Public Value of Urban Forests). Also, according to Virginia
Cooperative Extension, a recent study has found that consumers are willing to pay a premium of up
to 12% for goods purchased in retail establishments that are accompanied by quality landscaping.
The ongoing and proper maintenance of the landscaping and appurtenant facilities specially benefits
parcels within the District by enhancing the environmental quality of the parcels and making them
more desirable by improving air quality, providing shade from solar radiation, reducing temperatures
through evaporation and transpiration and absorbing heat (according to data from Planet,
professional landscape network). All of the above-mentioned items contribute to a specific
enhancement and special benefit of the properties within the District.
ATTACHMENT 1
9
Benefit Assessment District West Washington Boulevard No. 1 – City of Culver City 4-2
Prepared by NBS – Fiscal Year 2010/11
4.3. General Benefit
In addition to the special benefits received by the parcels within the District, there are incidental
general benefits conferred by the proposed improvements. It is recognized that the proper
maintenance of the medians and landscaping improvements provide only an incidental benefit to the
public at large, including traffic and pedestrian safety for those passing though the District. Also,
according to Projectevergreen.com Economic Fact Sheet, the installation and proper maintenance of
landscaping can protect the City’s drainage systems. In addition, the proper maintenance of
landscaping, lighting and appurtenant facilities reduces property-related crimes (especially vandalism)
against properties located in the vicinity of the improvements (Diane Relf, Extension Specialist and
Environmental Horticulture of Virginia Tech). Finally, the proper maintenance of landscaping provides
a positive visual experience to persons passing through the District, which is only an incidental
benefit. All of the aforementioned constitutes incidental general benefits conferred by the
improvements.
The total benefits thus are a combination of the special benefits to the parcels within the District and
the general benefits to the public at large and to the adjacent properties. Because the median and
landscaping improvements are located immediately in front of the properties within the District, and is
maintained for the benefit of said properties, any benefit received by properties outside the District is
merely coincidental. Nonetheless, the Agency has agreed to ensure that no property is assessed in
excess of the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred upon that property.
4.4. Method of Apportionment Spread
Each of the parcels within the District is deemed to receive special benefit from the improvements.
Each parcel that has a special benefit conferred upon them as a result of the maintenance and
operation of improvements are identified and the proportionate special benefit derived by each
identified parcel is determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of
the improvements. The assessment per linear front foot and building square foot is determined as
follows:
Assessment per Linear Front Foot = (Total Costs X 0.70) / Total District Linear Front Feet
Assessment per Building Square Foot = (Total Costs X 0.30) / Total District Building Square Feet
Only parcels that receive direct special benefit are assessed, and each parcel is assessed in
proportion to the estimated benefit received, in accordance with the formula listed below:
Parcel’s Linear Front Footage X
Assessment per Linear Foot
+
Parcel’s Building Square Footage X
Assessment per Building Square Foot
=
Assessment Per
Parcel
There are 38 total parcels within the District, with 1,863.05 total linear front feet and 113,092.00 total
building square feet. The assessment is spread as follows:
Fiscal Year 2010/11 Total Budget Costs $14,656.41
Total District Linear Front Footage 1,863.05
Total District Building Square Footage 113,092.00
Fiscal Year 2010/11 Assessment per Linear Front Foot $5.51
Fiscal Year 2010/11 Assessment per Building Square Foot $0.04
ATTACHMENT 1
10
Benefit Assessment District West Washington Boulevard No. 1 – City of Culver City 4-3
Prepared by NBS – Fiscal Year 2010/11
4.5. Cost of Living Inflation
The proposed maximum assessment sets the initial maximum assessment and is stated in Fiscal
Year 2009/10 dollars. As of February 1 of each fiscal year beginning Fiscal Year 2010/11, the
maximum assessment amount shall be increased by the February Consumer Price Index for All
Urban Consumers for the Los Angeles, Riverside and Orange County area. The annual assessment
shall not exceed the maximum assessment, unless the appropriate Proposition 218 proceedings are
conducted by the City to authorize an increase beyond the maximum assessment amount.
The following table shows the historical maximum and actual assessments for the District:
FISCAL
YEAR CPI
MAXIMUM
ASSESSMENT
PER LINEAR
FRONT FOOT
MAXIMUM
ASSESSMENT
PER BUILDING
SQUARE FOOT
ACTUAL
ASSESSMENT
PER LINEAR
FRONT FOOT
ACTUAL
ASSESSMENT
PER BUILDING
SQUARE FOOT
2009/10
- $6.73 $0.05 $5.41 $0.04
2010/11 +1.44% 6.82 0.05 5.51 0.04
ATTACHMENT 1
11
Benefit Assessment District West Washington Boulevard No. 1 – City of Culver City 5-1
Prepared by NBS – Fiscal Year 2010/11
5. ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
An Assessment Diagram for the District has been submitted to the City Clerk in the format required
under the provision of the CCMC. The lines and dimensions shown on maps of the County Assessor
of the County of Los Angeles for the current year are incorporated by reference herein and are made
a part of this Report.
ATTACHMENT 1
12ATTACHMENT 1
13
Benefit Assessment District West Washington Boulevard No. 1 – City of Culver City 6-1
Prepared by NBS – Fiscal Year 2010/11
6. ASSESSMENT ROLL
Parcel Identification, for each lot or parcel within the District, shall be the parcel as shown on the Los
Angeles County Assessor’s map for the year in which this Report is prepared.
A listing of parcels assessed within the District, along with the assessment amounts, is included on
the following page. If any parcel submitted for collection is identified by the County Auditor/Controller
to be an invalid parcel number for the current fiscal year, a corrected parcel number and/or new
parcel numbers will be identified and resubmitted to the County Auditor/Controller. The assessment
amount to be levied and collected for the resubmitted parcel(s) shall be based on the method of
apportionment spread approved in this Report. Therefore, if a single parcel has changed to multiple
parcels, the assessment amounts applied to each of the new parcels shall be recalculated and
applied according to the approved method of apportionment spread rather than a proportionate share
of the original assessment.
ATTACHMENT 1
14CITY OF CULVER CITY
BENEFIT ASSESSMENT DISTRICT WEST WASHINGTON BOULEVARD NO. 1
ASSESSMENT ROLL
FISCAL YEAR 2010/11
Assessor's Assessment Linear Levy Linear Building Levy Building Rounding Total
Parcel Number Number Owner Front Footage Front Footage Square Footage Square Footage Adjustment Assesment
4230-023-001 1 KIGAWA STEVEN 27.31 $150.39 2,300.00 $89.42 $0.00 $239.82
4230-023-002 2 KIGAWA STEVEN 25.00 137.67 864.00 33.59 0.00 171.26
4230-023-005 3 SAQQARA INC 25.00 137.67 0.00 0.00 (0.01) 137.66
4230-023-027 4 RECO CORPORATION 25.00 137.67 3,700.00 143.86 (0.01) 281.52
4230-023-036 5 SAQQARA INC 102.30 563.36 2,040.00 79.31 (0.01) 642.66
4231-027-001 6 BERKE FAMILY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP 56.50 311.14 3,370.00 131.02 0.00 442.16
4231-027-004 7 FLECK JEFFREY 56.50 311.14 3,736.00 145.25 (0.01) 456.38
4231-027-008 8 ROCKVIEW DAIRIES INC 153.56 845.64 5,000.00 194.40 0.00 1,040.04
4231-027-029 9 MACDONALD HAMISH I & JUDY K 32.96 181.51 2,409.00 93.66 (0.01) 275.16
4231-027-030 10 ROWELL JAMES & EULENE 50.83 279.92 3,111.00 120.95 (0.01) 400.86
4231-027-031 11 FLECK JEFFREY 56.00 308.39 3,248.00 126.28 (0.01) 434.66
4231-027-902 12 CULVER CITY 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
4231-028-001 13 IRANI GEVE 50.00 275.35 744.00 28.93 (0.01) 304.26
4231-028-024 14 KEYVAN FARROKH & ZOHREH 45.91 252.82 0.00 0.00 0.00 252.82
4231-028-025 15 KEYVAN FARROKH & ZOHREH 44.47 244.89 2,701.00 105.01 (0.01) 349.90
4231-028-026 16 MONTELEONE ROBERT E 43.50 239.55 664.00 25.82 (0.01) 265.36
4231-028-027 17 WASHINGTON BLVD INVESTMENTS INC 55.19 303.93 1,626.00 63.22 0.00 367.14
4231-028-029 18 IRANI GEVE K 45.91 252.82 3,232.00 125.66 0.00 378.48
4231-028-037 19 MOSES ALBALAS O D INC 21.20 116.75 1,863.00 72.43 0.00 189.18
4231-028-038 20 COOMBS GALE C 35.60 196.05 1,703.00 66.21 0.00 262.26
4231-028-039 21 XU JUNLI 29.30 161.35 1,860.00 72.32 (0.01) 233.66
4231-028-040 22 RIOS MARINA CORTINOVIS L DDS INC 48.40 266.53 1,822.00 70.84 (0.01) 337.36
4236-020-001 23 TRIANGLE CENTER LLC 32.70 180.08 2,450.00 95.26 (0.01) 275.32
4236-020-002 24 TRIANGLE CENTER LLC 25.00 137.67 0.00 0.00 (0.01) 137.66
4236-020-003 25 TRIANGLE CENTER LLC 25.00 137.67 0.00 0.00 (0.01) 137.66
4236-020-004 26 TRIANTGLE CENTER LLC 25.00 137.67 0.00 0.00 (0.01) 137.66
4236-020-005 27 TRIANTGLE CENTER LLC 25.00 137.67 0.00 0.00 (0.01) 137.66
4236-020-006 28 TRIANTGLE CENTER LLC 219.05 1,206.29 13,946.00 542.22 0.00 1,748.50
4236-021-001 29 UPWARD BOUND HOUSE 107.70 593.09 6,875.00 267.30 (0.01) 860.38
4236-021-002 30 ONTIVEROS ANGELA 25.00 137.67 1,400.00 54.43 0.00 192.10
4236-021-003 31 ROCKENWAGNER HANS & PATRICIA 25.00 137.67 1,120.00 43.55 0.00 181.22
4236-021-004 32 MOSKOWITZ M & L 25.00 137.67 1,585.00 61.62 0.00 199.30
4236-021-005 33 MOSKOWITZ M & L 25.00 137.67 1,875.00 72.90 (0.01) 210.56
4236-021-006 34 MOSER RETA C 32.73 180.24 1,588.00 61.74 0.00 241.98
4236-021-900 35 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF CULVER CITY 50.00 275.35 9,065.00 352.44 (0.01) 627.78
4236-021-901 36 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF CULVER CITY 82.70 455.42 9,065.00 352.44 (0.01) 807.86
4236-021-902 37 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF LVER CITY 57.73 317.91 9,065.00 352.44 0.00 670.36
4236-021-903 38 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF CULVER CITY 50.00 275.35 9,065.00 352.44 (0.01) 627.78
Totals: 1,863.05 $10,259.64 113,092.00 $4,396.99 ($0.22) $14,656.41
Page 1 of 1
ATTACHMENT 1
15ATTACHMENT 2
16ATTACHMENT 2
17ATTACHMENT 2
18