Legislation Details

File #: HIST-19946    Version: 1 Subject:
Type: Historical Status: Consent Agenda
In control: City Council Meeting Agenda
On agenda: 7/2/2012 Final action: 7/2/2012
Title: Adoption of a Resolution Approving the Engineer’s Report and Declaring the City Council’s Intention to Order the Levy of Annual Assessments for the West Washington Boulevard Benefit Assessment District Number 1.
Attachments: 1. Adoption of a Resolution Approving the Engineer’s - C-10__12-07-02__CITY COUNCIL__WW AIP_Phase I_2012 - FINAL.pdf, 2. Adoption of a Resolution Approving the Engineer’s - C-10__12-07-02__ATT__WW AIP_Phase I_2012 - FINAL.pdf
City of Culver City, California Agenda Item Report RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends the City Council adopt a resolution 1) approving the Engineer’s Report for the West Washington Boulevard Benefit Assessment District No. 1; 2) declare the City Council’s intention to order the levy of annual assessments; and, 3) set the date, time, and place for the Public Hearing for the West Washington Boulevard Benefit Assessment District Number 1. . BACKGROUND In June 2009, the West Washington Boulevard Benefit Assessment District No. 1 was formed to fund the maintenance of five new landscaped medians installed between Beethoven Street and Rosabell Avenue. DISCUSSION: The annual assessment includes costs for landscape maintenance, utilities, County fees and administration of the District. During the first year of formation, funds were levied and collected for the District to formulate a reserve fund. This fund was created to cover unforeseen expenses not normally included in the yearly maintenance costs. This may include, but is not limited to, palm tree replacement, and repair of damaged equipment due to vandalism, storms and other similar events. Meeting Date: July 2, 2012 Item Number: C-10 AGENDA ITEM: Adoption of a Resolution Approving the Engineer’s Report and Declaring the City Council’s Intention to Order the Levy of Annual Assessments for the West Washington Boulevard Benefit Assessment District Number 1. Contact Person/Dept.: Elaine Warner Phone Number: 310.253.5777 Fiscal Impact: Yes [X] No [] General Fund: Yes [] No [X] Public Hearing: [] Action Item: [] Attachments: [X] Commission Action Required: Yes [] No [X] Date: _______________ Public Notification: Meetings and Agendas – City Council (06/28/12); Property Owners in West Washington Assessment District No. 1 (5.25.15) Department Approval: Sol Blumenfeld (06/27/12) City Attorney Approval: Carol Schwab (by H. Baker) (06/27/12) Chief Financial Officer Approval: Jeff Muir (06/28/12) City Manager Approval: John Nachbar (06/28/12) City of Culver City, California Agenda Item Report Per the Resolution of Initiation approved on May 14, 2012, an Engineer’s Report has been prepared and is on file with the City Clerk and is hereby submitted to the City Council. This evening, the City Council is asked to adopt a resolution which (1) approves the Engineer’s Report, (2) declares the City Council’s intention to levy and collect assessments for Fiscal Year 2012/2013, and (3) sets the date, time, and place for the public hearing as required by CCMC Section 15.01.070. Should the City Council adopt the proposed resolution, pursuant to CCMC Section 15.01.070.G, the City Clerk shall give notice of the public hearing by causing the Resolution of Intention to be published at least 10 days prior to the date of the hearing. The public hearing is scheduled for July 23, 2012. FISCAL ANALYSIS: The Engineer’s Report calculates the maximum maintenance and administration budget for Fiscal Year 2012/2013 to be $18,958.25, which includes a CPI increase of approximately 2.09% based on the February Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers for the Los Angeles, Riverside and Orange County Area. This constitutes the Maximum Assessment. Per State law, however, the assessment district may only carry six months of reserve in any given year. The current reserve balance is $15,302.05 and six months of reserve funds relative to direct maintenance costs total $7,588.40. Thus, there are $7,713.65 extra in excess reserve funds that must be credited against the Maximum Annual Assessment of $18,938.25 resulting in the net annual levy of $11,244.60. Over the past year, there has been some minor damage to the medians including palm tree displacement (due to a wind storm) and damage to a backflow device resulting in a $2,350 expenditure from reserve funds. As previously approved, the District will also fund a portion of the existing median replanting improvements currently being constructed. ATTACHMENTS: Attachment 1 – Engineer’s Report Attachment 2 – Resolution of Intention MOTION: That the City Council: City of Culver City, California Agenda Item Report Adopt a resolution (1) approving the Engineer’s Report, (2) declaring the City Council’s intention to order the levy for the West Washington Boulevard Assessment District No. 1, and (3) setting the date, time and place for the Public Hearing to be July 23, 2012 at 7:00 PM in the City Council Chambers. MEETING DATE: 07.02.12 AGENDA ITEM: Adoption of a Resolution Approving the Engineer's Report and Declaring the City Council's Intention to Order the Levy of Annual Assessments for the West Washington Boulevard Benefit Assessment District Number 1. ATTACHMENTS Pages 1. Engineer's Report 1-15 2. Resolution of Intention 16-18 Ma Offce 32605 Temecu S .!ite DO rec1ja C: 9: 92 Toll free: 800.676.751 • 9E. i .2 98 Rep 87C. :e 93 C. 9. • 02 free: 800,434.8242 -39 clop -.1un ti s fund tomcat: - City of Culver City Benefit Assessment District West Washington Boulevard No. Fiscal Year 2012113 Engineer's Report July 2012 CITY OF CULVER CITY BENEFIT ASSESSMENT DISTRICT WEST WASHINGTON BOULEVARD NO. 1 9770 Culver Blvd. Culver City, CA. 90232 Phone - (310) 253-5700 CITY COUNCIL Andrew Weissman, Mayor Jeffery Cooper, Councilmember Micheal 0 Leary, Councilmember Jim B. Clark, Councilmember Meghan Sahli-Wells CITY STAFF John Nachbar, City Manager Sol Blumenfeld, Community Development Director Charles D. Herbertson, Public Works Director Martin Cole, Assistant City Manager/City Clerk Mate Gaspar, Engineering Services Manager Elaine Gerety-Warner, Senior Management Analyst NBS Pablo Perez, Client Services Director Tiffany Ellis, Project Manager Nick Dayhoff, Financial Analyst 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. ENGINEER'S LETTER 1-1 2. PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS 2-1 2.1. Description of the Boundaries of the District 2-1 2.2. Description of Improvements and Services - 2-1 3. ESTIMATE OF COSTS 3-1 3.1. District Budget 3-1 3.2. Definitions of Budget Items 3-2 4. METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT 4-1 4.1. General 4-1 4.2. Special Benefit 4-1 4.3. General Benefit 4-2 4.4. Method of Apportionment Spread 4-2 4.5. Cost of Living Inflation 4-3 5. ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM 5-1 6. ASSESSMENT ROLL 6-1 3 1. ENGINEER'S LETTER WHEREAS the City Council of the City of Culver City (the "City"), State of California, under the Culver City Municipal Code (the "CCMC"), adopted its Resolution Initiating Proceedings for the Annual Levy of Assessments and Ordering the Preparation of an Engineer's Report for the Benefit Assessment District West Washington Boulevard No. 1 (the "District"); WHEREAS, the Resolution of Initiation directed the NBS Government Finance Group, to prepare and file a report presenting plans and specifications describing the general nature, location and extent of the improvements to be maintained, an estimate of cost of the maintenance, operations and servicing of the improvements for the District for the referenced fiscal year, a diagram for the District, showing the area and properties proposed to be assessed, and an assessment of the estimated costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing the improvements, assessing the net amount upon all assessable lots and/or parcels within the District in proportion to the special benefit received; WHEREAS, the following assessment is made to cover the portion of the estimated cost of maintenance, operation and servicing of said improvements to be paid by the assessable real property within the District in proportion to the special benefit received: SUMMARY OF ASSESSMENT As Preliminarily Approved As Approved by Council Direct Maintenance and Administrative Costs $18,958.25 Reserve Fund Contribution ($7,713.65) Total Actual Budget Costs $11,244.60 Total District Parcels 38 Total Assessable Linear Front Footage 1,863.05 Total Assessable Building Square Footage 113,092 Proposed Assessment Per Linear Front Foot $4.22491 Proposed Assessment Per Building Square Foot $0.02983 Maximum Assessment Per Linear Square Foot $7.12314 Maximum Assessment Per Building Square Foot $0.05029 Benefit Assessment District West Washington Boulevard Na 1 — City of Culver City 1-1 Prepared by NIBS Fiscal Year 2012/13 4 2. PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS The District provides for the continued administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing of various improvements located within the public right-of-way and dedicated easements within the boundaries of the District. 2.1. Description of the Boundaries of the District The District is located in the City of Culver City. The boundaries of the District are generally described as that area located west of Wade Street, east of Beethoven Street and along West Washington Boulevard. 2.2. Description of Improvements and Services The improvements are the construction, operation, maintenance and servicing of 7 medians, landscaping, lighting, and appurtenant facilities, including, but not limited to, labor costs, utilities, material, contracting services and any other items necessary for the satisfactory maintenance and operation of the these improvements as described below. Reference is made to the plans and specifications for the improvements, which are on file with the Culver City Redevelopment Agency. The table below lists specific improvements within the District to be maintained: 7 Medians Landscaping Lighting Irrigation Benefit Assessment District West Washington Boulevard No. 1 — City of Culver City 2-1 Prepared by NBS — Fiscal Year 2012/13 5 3. ESTIMATE OF COSTS The estimated cost of administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing the improvements as described in the Plans and Specifications are summarized below. Each year, as part of the assessment district levy calculation process, the costs and expenses are reviewed and the annual costs are projected for the following fiscal year. 3.1. District Budget DIRECT MAINTENANCE COSTS MAXIMUM BUDGET FISCAL YEAR 2012113 ACTUAL BUDGET FISCAL YEAR 2012/13 Maintenance Costs $5,237.96 $5,237.96 Water for Irrigation 4,015.76 4,015.76 Lighting 4,364.96 4,364.96 Mulch Replenishment 274.97 274.97 Plant Replacement 916.54 916.54 Irrigation Replacement 366.61 366.61 Subtotal Direct Costs $15,176.80 $15,176.80 ADMINISTRATION COSTS City Administration $1,000.00 $1,000.00 Consultants 2,721.70 2,721.70 County Fee* 59.75 59.75 Subtotal Administration Costs $3,781.45 $3,781.45 Subtotal of Direct & Administrative Costs $18,958.25 $18,958.25 Amount to be carried over from Improvement Fund $0.00 $0.00 Contributions from other Sources 0.00 0.00 Reserve Fund Contribution 0.00 (7,713.65) Total Budget Costs $18,958.25 $11,244.60 Rounding Adjustment (0.13) (0.24) Total Balance to Levy $18,958.12 $11,244.36 Total District Parcels 39 39 Total Assessable Linear Front Footage 1,863.05 1,863.05 Total Assessable Building Square Footage 113,092 113,092 Assessment Per Linear Front Foot $7.12314 $4.22491 Assessment Per Building Square Foot $0.05029 $0.02983 *Annual fee of $50 per District, plus $0.25 per parcel. Benefit Assessment District West Washington Boulevard No. 1 — City of Culver City 3-1 Prepared by NBS — Fiscal Year 2012/13 6 It is the intent of the City of Culver City to establish a reserve that shall not exceed the estimated costs of maintenance and servicing to December 10 of the fiscal year, or whenever the City expects to receive its apportionment of special assessments and tax collections from the County, whichever is later. The reserve balance information for the District is as follows: Estimated Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2012 Reserve Fund Balance $15,302.05 Operating Reserve Collection / (Reduction) — Fiscal Year 2012113 ($7,713.65) Estimated Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2013 Reserve Fund Balance $7,588.40 3.2. Definitions of Budget Items The following definitions describe the services and costs included in the District Budget: Direct Costs: Maintenance Costs includes all regularly scheduled labor, material and equipment required to properly maintain and ensure the satisfactory condition of all medians, palm trees, landscaping, and appurtenant facilities, on a bi-monthly basis. Water for Irrigation includes the furnishing of water required for the operation and maintenance of the landscape and irrigation systems. Lighting includes the furnishing of electricity required for the operation and maintenance of the palm tree uplights. Mulch Replenishment includes once annually replenishment of mulch as required for the operation and maintenance of the landscaping and median facilities. Plant Replacement includes the replacement of plants as required to ensure the satisfactory condition of the landscaping and median facilities (does not include replacement of palm trees). Irrigation Replacement includes the ongoing repair and replacement of the irrigation systems, including solar controller and rain sensor. Administration Costs: City Administration includes the cost to all particular departments and staff of the City for providing the coordination of the District services, operations and maintenance of the improvements, response to public concerns and education, and procedures associated with the levy and collection of assessments. Consultants include the costs associated with contracting with professionals to provide services specific to the administration of the annual assessment levy. County Fee includes fees charged by the County of Los Angeles for placing the assessments onto the tax rolls on a yearly basis. This fee is $0.25 per parcel plus $50 per District. Benefit Assessment District West Washington Boulevard No. 1 — City of Culver City 3-2 Prepared by NBS — Fiscal Year 2012/13 7 Operating Reserve Collection: Operating Reserve Collection is the amount collected to maintain reserves to enable the City to pay for the operation and maintenance costs to December 10 of the fiscal year. The Reserve Fund Contribution will continue until such a time the Reserve Fund balance is approximately one half of the annual costs. The funds will be allowed to build up gradually in anticipation of any unforeseen expenses not normally included in the yearly maintenance costs. This may include, but is not limited to, palm tree replacement, repair or damaged equipment due to vandalism, storms, and other similar events. Benefit Assessment District West Washington Boulevard No. 1 — City of Culver City 3-3 Prepared by NBS — Fiscal Year 2012/13 8 4. METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT 4.1. General Pursuant to the CCMC and Article XIIID, all parcels that have a special benefit conferred upon them as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements and services shall be identified and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel shall be determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of improvements. The net amount to be assessed may be apportioned by any formula or method that fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels_ Proposition 218, approved by the voters in November 1996, requires the Agency to separate general benefit from special benefit, where as only special benefit is assessed. Each parcel within the District receives special and direct benefit from the improvements and associated appurtenances located within the public rights-of-ways located within the District, due to the proximity of said improvements. 4.2. Special Benefit The landscape and median improvements will be installed by the Culver City Redevelopment Agency and the continued maintenance is guaranteed through the establishment (formation) of the District. Since these improvements are for the benefit of the properties within the District and those properties also benefit from the maintenance of the improvements, only the property owners within the District are assessed for the said maintenance of improvements. In addition, the improvements confer a particular and distinct special benefit upon all parcels within the District because of the nature of the improvements. The ongoing and proper maintenance of landscaping improves the aesthetic appeal of the properties within the District providing a positive representation as well as the enhanced desirability of properties through association with the improvements. This increase in the value provides a distinct special benefit to the parcels within the District, which includes higher occupancy rates, increased rentals and lower vacancies. According to Judith Guido, Director of Marketing for LandCareUSA, landscaping can increase the resale value of a building up to 14% and speed up the sale of a building by 6 weeks. The installation and maintenance of raised medians improve both pedestrian and traffic safety to those either walking or driving within the District. According to the US Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration, raised medians provide pedestrian protection by "reducing pedestrian involved crashes by 45 percent and fatalities by 78 percent" and after analysis of crash data in seven states, 'raised medians reduce crashes by over 40 percent in urban areas." The parcels within the District receive a distinct special benefit as their primary use is business/retail, and studies have proven that greenery and associated landscaping attract shoppers to the area as well as stimulate economic growth (Kathleen Wolf, University of Washington: Economic and Public Value of Urban Forests). Also, according to Virginia Cooperative Extension, a recent study has found that consumers are willing to pay a premium of up to 12% for goods purchased in retail establishments that are accompanied by quality landscaping. The ongoing and proper maintenance of the landscaping and appurtenant facilities specially benefits parcels within the District by enhancing the environmental quality of the parcels and making them more desirable by improving air quality, providing shade from solar radiation, reducing temperatures through evaporation and transpiration and absorbing heat (according to data from Planet, professional landscape network). All of the above-mentioned items contribute to a specific enhancement and special benefit of the properties within the District. Benefit Assessment District West Washington Boulevard No. 1 — City of Culver City 4-1 Prepared by NBS — Fiscal Year 2012/13 9 4.3. General Benefit In addition to the special benefits received by the parcels within the District, there are incidental general benefits conferred by the proposed improvements. It is recognized that the proper maintenance of the medians and landscaping improvements provide only an incidental benefit to the public at large, including traffic and pedestrian safety for those passing though the District Also, according to Projectevergreen.com Economic Fact Sheet, the installation and proper maintenance of landscaping can protect the City's drainage systems. In addition, the proper maintenance of landscaping, lighting and appurtenant facilities reduces property-related crimes (especially vandalism) against properties located in the vicinity of the improvements (Diane Reif, Extension Specialist and Environmental Horticulture of Virginia Tech). Finally, the proper maintenance of landscaping provides a positive visual experience to persons passing through the District, which is only an incidental benefit. All of the aforementioned constitutes incidental general benefits conferred by the improvements. The total benefits thus are a combination of the special benefits to the parcels within the District and the general benefits to the public at large and to the adjacent properties. Because the median and landscaping improvements are located immediately in front of the properties within the District, and is maintained for the benefit of said properties, any benefit received by properties outside the District is merely coincidental. Nonetheless, the Agency has agreed to ensure that no property is assessed in excess of the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred upon that property. 4.4. Method of Apportionment Spread Each of the parcels within the District is deemed to receive special benefit from the improvements. Each parcel that has a special benefit conferred upon them as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements are identified and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel is determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of the improvements. The assessment per linear front foot and building square foot is determined as follows: Assessment per Linear Front Foot = (Total Costs X 0.70) / Total District Linear Front Feet Assessment per Building Square Foot = (Total Costs X 0.30) / Total District Building Square Feet Only parcels that receive direct special benefit are assessed, and each parcel is assessed in proportion to the estimated benefit received, in accordance with the formula listed below: Parcel's Linear Front Footage X 4. Parcel's Building Square Footage X Assessment per Linear Foot Assessment per Building Square Foot Assessment Per Parcel There are 39 total parcels within the District, with 1,863.05 total linear front feet and 113,092 total building square feet. The assessment is spread as follows: Fiscal Year 2012/13 Total Budget Costs $11,244.60 Total District Linear Front Footage 1,863.05 Total District Building Square Footage 113,092 Fiscal Year 2012113 Assessment per Linear Front Foot $4.22491 Fiscal Year 2012113 Assessment per Building Square Foot $0.02983 Benefit Assessment District West Washington Boulevard No. 1 — City of Culver City 4-2 Prepared by NBS — Fiscal Year 2012/13 10 4.5. Cost of Living Inflation The proposed maximum assessment sets the initial maximum assessment and is stated in Fiscal Year 2009/10 dollars. As of February 1 of each fiscal year beginning Fiscal Year 2010/11, the maximum assessment amount shall be increased by the February Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers for the Los Angeles, Riverside and Orange County area. The annual assessment shall not exceed the maximum assessment, unless the appropriate Proposition 218 proceedings are conducted by the City to authorize an increase beyond the maximum assessment amount. The following table shows the historical maximum and actual assessments for the District: FISCAL YEAR CP1 MAXIMUM ASSESSMENT PER LINEAR FRONT FOOT MAXIMUM ASSESSMENT PER BUILDING SQUARE FOOT ACTUAL ASSESSMENT PER LINEAR FRONT FOOT ACTUAL ASSESSMENT PER BUILDING SQUARE FOOT 2009/10 - $6.72534 $0.04748 $5.41000 $0.04000 2010/11 +1.44% 6.82195 0.04816 5.50690 0.03888 2011/12 +2.27% 6.97712 0.04926 1.41160 0.00997 2012/13 +2.09% 7.12314 0.05029 4.22491 0.02983 Benefit Assessment District West Washington Boulevard No. 1 — City of Culver City 4-3 Prepared by NBS — Fiscal Year 2012/13 11 5. ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM An Assessment Diagram for the District has been submitted to the City Clerk in the format required under the provision of the CCMC. The lines and dimensions shown on maps of the County Assessor of the County of Los Angeles for the current year are incorporated by reference herein and are made a part of this Report. Benefit Assessment District West Washington Boulevard No. 1 — City of Culver City 5-1 Prepared by NBS — Fiscal Year 2012/13 12 API CITY OF CULVER CITY COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES STATE OF CALIFORNIA Assessment Number LEMMINGIONINIMMI CH4014.121.01,11101NIMI Efla51,1CIR,In 2n cp - A,15a5K1111•FilIMIN C,9k erotism] mesiramounitunis merikli101111 1 151•31:10-01.14 CPMinegla 0,NIZNICAN1 LwarOi 0411111MEMINI MENEM MICM11:8/1}1 CY1, •1eo IIM11110111111011111 111,11:2=1 IMICINM1011111111K111111111 EgTzENEPAIMIMIN FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK CF THE CITY OF OUTER cIrr THIS _DAY OF 205_. CITY CLERK CITY OF CULVER CITY LOS ANGELES COUNTY. CALIFORNIA I HERESY CERTIFY THAT THE WNW DIAGRAM SHOWING THE PROPOSED FORMATION OF BENEFIT ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NEST WASHINGTON BOULEVARD NO. 1, CITY OF COINER CITY. COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES. STATE 0! CALIFORNIA WAS AFFROmE0 ST THE CITY COUNCIL CF IME are OF CAR.TER [ITT AT A REGULAR REELING THERECW HELD ON THE DAT Cl 200 ST ITS RESOLUTION NO. CITY cufl< OTT OF WLVEN OTT LOU ANGELES COUNTY, GALIEGHMA PLED TIES DAY OF 2012 AT THE HOMR OF ONDLOOK IN BOOK AT PAGE OF MAPS OF ASSESSMENT AND 001,IMMN re FA Lin S-- DISTRICTS IN THE OFFICE CF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF THE COUNT( OF LOS ANIKES.I STATE CI SF E GALFORNIA. DEPUTY COUNTY RECORSER COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES NOTE: FOR A DETA/LED DESCRIPTION OF THE LINES AND INMENSONS OF EACH FARM. WHIN THE DISTRICT REFER TO THE COUNTY OF LDS ANGELES ASSESSOR'S MAPS. itiMIIFfateMi/. syx ET615411.11 4 4231-078-027 4231-026-229 18 18 20 taf tlifffep 2072leRa818. LIE:1:07102 LW:PICA 114,,M010:41, NB S 15685 Ternecia 01017,0111 ISO TernectIT 10 12582 LOUT OosommAt 9060010 BENEFIT ASSESSMENT DISTRICT BOUNDARY PARCEL LINES ASSESSMENT NUMBER LEGEND SHEET 1 OF 1 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM BENEFIT ASSESSMENT DISTRICT WEST WASHINGTON BOULEVARD NO. 1 BEETHOVE N 1 ST MO ORE r ST . . . m M cp.:De:14mo il CD WASHINGTON BLVD GRAPHIC SCALE 80 40 0 80 SCALE 1 60. 13 6. ASSESSMENT ROLL Parcel Identification, for each lot or parcel within the District, shall be the parcel as shown on the Los Angeles County Assessor's map for the year in which this Report is prepared. A listing of parcels assessed within the District, along with the assessment amounts, is included on the following page. If any parcel submitted for collection is identified by the County Auditor/Controller to be an invalid parcel number for the current fiscal year, a corrected parcel number and/or new parcel numbers will be identified and resubmitted to the County Auditor/Controller. The assessment amount to be levied and collected for the resubmitted parcel(s) shall be based on the method of apportionment spread approved in this Report. Therefore, if a single parcel has changed to multiple parcels, the assessment amounts applied to each of the new parcels shall be recalculated and applied according to the approved method of apportionment spread rather than a proportionate share of the original assessment. Benefit Assessment District West Washington Boulevard No. 1 — City of Culver City 6-1 Prepared by NBS — Fiscal Year 2012/13 14 CITY OF CULVER CITY BENEFIT ASSESSMENT DISTRICT WEST WASHINGTON BOULEVARD NO. ASSESSMENT ROLL FISCAL YEAR 2012113 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 21 22 20-A 20-B 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 4230-023-001 4230-023-002 4230-023-005 4230-023-027 4230-023-036 4231-027-001 4231-027-004 4231-027-008 4231-027-029 4231-027-030 4231-027-031 4231-027-902 4231-028-001 4231-028-024 4231-028-025 4231-028-026 4231-028-027 4231-028-029 4231-028-037 4231-028-039 4231-028-040 4231-028-055 4231-028-900 4236-020-001 4236-020-002 4236-024-003 4236-020-004 4236-020-005 4236-020-006 4236-021-001 4236-021-002 4236-021-003 4236-021-004 4236-021-005 4236-021-006 4236-021-900 4236-021-901 4236-021-902 4236-021-903 KIGAWA STEVEN KIGAWA STEVEN SAQQARA INC RECO CORPORATION SAQQARA INC BERKE FAMILY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP FLECK JEFFREY ROCKVIEVV DAIRIES INC MACDONALD HAMISH I & JUDY K ROWELL JAMES & EULENE FLECK JEFFREY CULVER CITY IRANI GEVE KEYVAN FARROKH & ZOHREH KEYVAN FARROKH & ZOHREH MONTELEONE ROBERT E WASHINGTON BLVD INVESTMENTS INC IRANI GEVE K MOSES ALBALAS GD INC XU JUNLI RIOS MARINA CORTINOVIS L DDS INC COOMBS CHAD C & GALE C COOMBS DECD TRUST REGENTS OF UNIVERSITY OF CA TRIANGLE CENTER LLC TRIANGLE CENTER LLC TRIANGLE CENTER LLC TRIANTGLE CENTER LLC TRIANTGLE CENTER LLC TRIANTGLE CENTER LLC UPWARD BOUND HOUSE ONTIVEROS ANGELA ROCKENWAGNER HANS & PATRICIA MOSKOWITZ M & L MOSKOWITZ M & L MOSER RETA C REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF CULVER CITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF CULVER CITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF LVER CITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF CULVER CITY Linear Front Footage 27.31 25,00 25.00 25.00 102.30 56.50 56,50 153.56 32.96 50.83 56.00 0.00 50.00 45.91 44.47 43.50 55.19 45.91 21.20 29.30 48.40 28.48 7.12 32.70 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 219.05 107.70 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 32.73 50.00 82.70 57.73 50.00 Levy Linear Front Footage 6115.38 105.62 105:62 105.62 432.21 238.71 238.71 648.78 139.25 214,75 236.60 0.00 211.25 193.97 187.88 163.75 233.17 193.97 89.57 123.79 204.49 120.33 30.08 138.15 105.62 105.62 105.62 105.62 925.47 455.02 105.62 105.62 105.62 105.62 138.28 211.25 349.40 243.90 211.25 Building Square Footage 2,300 864 0 3,700 2040 , 3,370 3.736 5,000 2,409 3,111 3,248 0 744 0 2,701 664 1,626 3,232 1,863 1,860 1,822 1,362 341 2,450 0 0 0 13,946 6,875 1,400 1,120 1,585 1,875 1,588 9,065 9,065 9,065 9,065 Levy Building Square Footage $68.61 25.77 0.00 110.37 60.85 100.52 111.44 149.14 71.86 92.80 96.88 0.00 22.19 0.00 80.57 19.81 48.50 96.41 55.57 55.48 54.35 40.63 10.17 73.08 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 415.99 205.07 41.76 33.41 47.28 55.93 47.37 270.40 270.40 270.40 270.40 Rounding Total Adjustment Assesment ($0.01) $183.98 (0.01) 131.38 0.00 105.62 (0.01) 215.98 0,00 493.06 (0.01) 339.22 (0.01) 350.14 0.00 797.92 (0.01) 211.10 (0.01) 307.54 0.00 333.48 0.00 0.00 0.00 233.44 (0.01) 193.96 (0.01) 268.44 (0.01) 203.58 (0.01) 281.66 (0.01) 290.36 0.00 145.14 (0,01) 179.26 (0,01) 258.82 (0.01) 160.94 (0.01) 40.24 (0.01) 211.22 0.00 105.62 0.00 105,62 0.00 105.62 0.00 105.62 0.00 1,341.46 (0.01) 660.08 0.00 147.38 (0.01) 139.02 0.00 152.90 (0.01) 161.54 (0.01) 185,64 0.00 481.64 0.00 619.80 0.00 514.30 0.00 481.64 Assessor's Assessment Parcel Number Number Owner Totals: 1,863.05 $7,871.22 113,092 $3,373.38 ($0.21) $11,244.36 Page 1 of 1 15 ATTACHMENT 2 RESOLUTION NO. 2012-R A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CULVER CITY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE ASSESSMENT ENGINEER'S REPORT, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO ORDER THE ANNUAL LEVY AND COLLECTION OF ASSESSMENTS FOR THE BENEFIT ASSESSMENT DISTRICT WEST WASHINGTON BOULEVARD NO. 1, AND SETTING A TIME AND PLACE FOR A PUBLIC HEARING THEREON 7 8 WHEREAS, the City Council previously initiated proceedings in accordance with 9 10 the provisions of Chapter 15.01 of the Culver City Municipal Code ("CCMC") for the levy and 11 collection of annual assessments for Benefit Assessment District West Washington Boulevard 12 No 1 (the "District") and ordered the preparation of an Assessment Engineer's Report (the 13 "Engineers Report") thereon; and 14 WHEREAS, the City Council desires to declare its intention to provide for the 15 levy and collection of annual assessments for Fiscal Year 2012-2013, to provide for the costs 16 and expenses necessary to pay for the maintenance and servicing of the improvements 17 (defined below) within the District; and, 18 WHEREAS, the Engineer's Report has been prepared and filed with the City 19 Clerk and submitted to the City Council in accordance with Section 15.01.070 of the CCIVIC; 20 and, 21 WHEREAS, the City Council has carefully examined and reviewed the 22 23 Engineer's Report as presented and is preliminary satisfied with the proposed report, each and 24 all of the budget items and documents as set forth therein and is satisfied that the levy amounts, on a preliminary basis, have been spread in accordance with the special benefit 4;3 26 received from the improvements, operation, maintenance and services within the District as set 27 forth in the Engineer's Report. 28 1 2 3 4 5 6 16 ATTACHMENT 2 NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Culver City, DOES HEREBY 2 RESOLVE as follows: 3 1. The Engineer's Report as presented, consisting of the following: a 4 description of improvements, the estimated costs of improvements, a diagram of the District 5 and the District assessment roll containing the Fiscal Year 2012-2013 levy for each Assessor's 6 parcel within the District, is hereby approved on a preliminary basis and ordered to be filed in 7 the Office of the City Clerk as a permanent record and to remain open for public inspection. 2. It is the intention of the City Council to levy and collect assessments within the District to pay the annual costs and expenses for the maintenance and servicing of the improvements authorized to be maintained and serviced for the fiscal year commencing July 1, 2012 and ending June 30, 2013. The improvements are generally described as: five medians, landscaping, lighting, irrigation and appurtenant facilities including any other improvements authorized by the CCMC within the boundaries of the District. Services provided include all necessary service, operations, administration and maintenance required to keep the improvements in a healthy, vigorous and satisfactory condition. 3. The District is located generally west of Wade Street, east of Beethoven Street, and along West Washington Boulevard. The District is designated by the name of "Benefit Assessment District West Washington Boulevard No. 1." 4. The Engineer's Report, as preliminary approved by the City Council, is on file with the City Clerk and open for public inspection. Reference is made to the Engineer's Report for a full detailed description of the improvements to be maintained, the boundaries of the District and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the District. 5_ The maximum assessment is not proposed to increase from the previous year above that previously approved by the property owners (as "increased assessment" is defined in Section 54954.6 of the California Government Code). -2- 17 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 26 27 28 aJ L A. SCHWAB Xity Attorney day of 2012. ANDREW VVEISSMAN, Mayor City of Culver City, California APPROVED AS TO FORM: ATTACHMENT 2 I 6. Notice is hereby given that a Public Hearing is scheduled to be held at 2 Mike Balkman Council Chambers, 9770 Culver Boulevard, Culver City, California, on July 23, 3 2012 at 7:00pm or as soon thereafter as the matter may be heard. All interested persons, prior 4 to the conclusion of the hearing, shall be afforded the opportunity to hear and be heard. The 5 City Council shall consider all oral statements or written communication made or filed by any 6 interested person. 7 7. The City Clerk is hereby directed to give notice of the Public Hearing by causing the resolution of intention, or summary thereof, to be published, posted and mailed as 9 provided in Section 15.01.050 of the CCMC. 10 11 APPROVED and ADOPTED this 12 13 14 15 16 ATTEST: 17 18 MARTIN R. COLE, City Clerk 19 Al2-00501 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -3- 18