City of Culver City - File #: HIST-20563

• File #: HIST-20563
• Version: 1
• Type: Historical
• Status: Public Hearing
• In control: City Council Meeting Agenda
• On agenda: 9/10/2012
• Final action: 9/10/2012
• Title: Consideration of Appeal of Planning Commission Approval of an Administrative Site Plan Review to Allow the Development of a One-Story Retail Building with 2,500 Square Feet of Floor Area and 12 On-Site Parking Spaces Located at 4436 Sepulveda Boulevard.

Date	Ver.	Action By	Action	Result
9/10/2012	1	City Council Meeting Agenda	approved

City of Culver City, California Agenda Item Report RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the City Council consider the appeal of the Planning Commission’s approval of Administrative Site Plan Review, ASPR P- 2011127, to allow the development of a one-story retail building with 2,500 square feet of floor area and 12 on-site parking spaces located at 4436 Sepulveda Boulevard and either: 1. Deny the appeal and affirm the Planning Commission’s approval of ASPR P-2011127. OR 2. Grant the appeal and reverse the Planning Commission’s approval of ASPR P-2011127. PROCEDURE: 1. Mayor calls on staff for a brief staff report and Council poses questions to staff as desired. Meeting Date: 9/10/2012 Item Number: PH-3 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM: PUBLIC HEARING – Consideration of Appeal of Planning Commission Approval of an Administrative Site Plan Review to Allow the Development of a One-Story Retail Building with 2,500 Square Feet of Floor Area and 12 On-Site Parking Spaces Located at 4436 Sepulveda Boulevard Contact Person/Dept.: Thomas Gorham, Joshua Williams/CDD Phone Number: (310) 253-5710 (310) 253-5706 Fiscal Impact: Yes [X] No [] General Fund: Yes [] No [X] Public Hearing: [X ] Action Item: [] Attachments: [X] Commission Action Required: Yes [X] No [] Date: 05/23/12 Public Notification: Notices mailed to all property owners and occupants within a 1000- foot radius of the project site (8/20/12); Meetings and Agendas – City Council (9/5/12); Applicant and property owner (8/20/12). Department Approval: Sol Blumenfeld: (08/29/12) City Attorney Approval: Carol Schwab (by H. Baker) (08/29/12) Chief Financial Officer Approval: Jeff Muir (09/05/12) City Manager Approval: John M. Nachbar (09/05/12) City of Culver City, California Agenda Item Report 2. Mayor seeks a motion to open the public hearing, providing the applicant the first opportunity to speak, followed by the appellant and then the general public. 3. Applicant and appellant are given an opportunity to provide rebuttal comments. 4. Mayor seeks a motion to close the public hearing after all testimony has been presented. 5. Council discusses the matter and arrives at its decision. BACKGROUND: Appeal On May 23, 2012 the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. P2012- 003 (Attachment No. 1) approving Administrative Site Plan Review, ASPR P- 2011127 (ASPR) to permit construction of a 2,500 sq. ft. 7- Eleven convenience store (the “Project”). On June 8, 2012, a timely appeal was filed pursuant to Culver City Municipal Code (CCMC) Section 17.640.030, regarding the Planning Commission’s ASPR approval. The basis for the appeal is summarized as follows: ? Inadequacy of conditions to mitigate potential impacts. ? Increased risk and liability to the City given the insufficient discovery, testing and evaluation of the impact on public safety of the proposed Project, with respect to traffic and building parameters (blind corner or diminished traffic visibility) and investigation of vehicular accidents at the intersection of Sepulveda Boulevard and Braddock Drive. ? Previous traffic studies (Gap Study related to pedestrians) were inadequate. ? Store safety related to “hold-ups” may be an issue due to the store design. A copy of the entire appeal is included as Attachment No. 2 - Appeal Document, dated June 8, 2012. Project The Project consists of the construction of a new 2,500 square foot one-story 7-Eleven convenience store at 4436 Sepulveda Boulevard. The Project has received significant public, staff and Commission input|10
10| since the original application submittal in September 2011 and has evolved from the standard City of Culver City, California Agenda Item Report company 7-Eleven building plan with parking located along street frontage, to the current plan which locates the building along the street edge to make it more pedestrian oriented. (See Attachment No. 3 - Project Site Plan). Further, under the revised plan, the building has been sited to accommodate a new “Outdoor Retail Component” along Sepulveda Boulevard as a means to activate the pedestrian environment with a flower stand, coffee vendor, newsstand, or other similar use to complement the convenience store. The Outdoor Retail Component is intended to generate pedestrian activity consistent with the revitalization of the area. Toward that end, the City has also recently installed new benches, planters, canopy shade trees and accessibility ramps along Sepulveda Boulevard adjacent to the proposed Project. The outdoor retail area is approximately 10 feet in depth and 35 feet in length and will incorporate special paving and planters and the necessary utility hook-ups and lighting to provide a safe, attractive and functional environment. The site plan has also evolved to include new landscaping with tall columnar trees, shrubs and ground cover along the site perimeter to screen the parking areas from view. An 8-foot high decorative block wall and large planter has been added at the rear property line to provide a visual screen for residential neighbors to the east. The Planning Commission determined that it was necessary to avoid the standard company store design and encouraged the Project architect to produce a more modern architectural style, unique to the 7-Eleven franchise and the neighborhood. The building facade incorporates varied building materials including an aluminum screen mesh that accentuates the building form. A second store entry has also been incorporated at the northeast corner of the building at Sepulveda Boulevard and Braddock Drive. An on- street loading zone on Sepulveda Boulevard has also been added to minimize impacts to adjacent residential neighbors during deliveries. DISCUSSION: Response to Appeal The proposed Project is a convenience store, which is a permitted use “by- right” in the zone (Commercial General - CG, Table 2-5 – Allowable Uses and Permit Requirements for Commercial Zoning Districts). Pursuant to the Zoning Code, the Project is subject only to administrative review. However, City of Culver City, California Agenda Item Report given the extent of public comment received on the Project, the Director exercised his authority, pursuant to CCMC Section 17.540.015.D, to refer the matter to the Planning Commission for consideration, Since the use is permitted in the zone, the Planning Commission’s project review was limited to the Site Plan Review findings related to site plan layout, architectural design and the landscaping; general compatibility of the project with surrounding uses and development; and whether the project serves the public health, safety and general welfare. If a use is permitted in the zone and comports with basic zoning restrictions including traffic and parking requirements, and if the required project findings for approval can be made, then the Commission is authorized to approve the project under the City’s Zoning Code and the California Government Code. Below is a response to the above-listed grounds of the appeal: APPEAL RESPONSE NO. 1: Inadequacy of conditions to mitigate potential impacts. The current Project design and conditions of approval reflect the Planning Commission’s comments to the original Project building design, siting, traffic, transients, parking, loading, business operations, and neighborhood compatibility issues in response to the public testimony received during three public meetings and two public hearings. Some public comments regarding the Project were favorable and recommended Project approval as a means to eliminate the existing, blighted abandoned gas station at the property. However, to the extent feasible, the Planning Commission also wanted to address those neighbors who were critical of the Project. The Applicant has worked closely with staff and the Planning Commission to modify the building architecture and site plan and volunteered changes to the conditions of approval to address neighborhood concerns, including the relocation of late night/early morning loading to an on- street location, trash pick-up by 7-Eleven staff at multiple times during the day on and around the property perimeter, and the placement a tall landscape screen around the property. Special Conditions of Approval The conditions of approval that mitigate project impacts and address potential nuisance issues are: City of Culver City, California Agenda Item Report ? A lighting plan for the building and parking area shall be approved by the Planning Division prior to building permit issuance. The Project shall comply with the City’s outdoor lighting standards to ensure that all on- site exterior lighting is directed away from or shielded from residential neighbors. ? No vending machines or reverse vending machines shall be permitted on the exterior of the building to minimize noise and nuisance impacts. ? The driveway at Sepulveda Boulevard shall be right turn-in and right turn-out only. Signage restricting left turns out of the driveway shall be posted on site. The sign is subject to Director of Public Works/City Engineer and Planning Manager approval. ? The applicant shall prepare a Construction Management Plan identifying construction area parking, service area, materials storage, and emergency or complaint contact information. ? During construction, the Planning Division may periodically inspect the project and/or request status updates from the Applicant and construction contractor(s) to ensure the Project design comports with the approved plan. The Planning Division, with the Building & Safety Division, may issue general stop work notices for any violations of the Conditions of Approval, including any non-conformance with the specified design and materials for the Project and any violations of the CCMC. ? The Property Owner and any tenant of the Property shall be responsible for on-site trash pickup within 100-feet of the Property at least twice per day, and for trash pickup around the Property’s perimeter, including the sidewalks, gutters, and other public areas where trash may collect. ? The setback area along the Sepulveda Boulevard street frontage, designated on the approved development plans for an “Outdoor Retail Component” and comprising an area of 7 feet by 35 feet, shall be utilized for a pedestrian oriented retail use. It may be operated by the same entity that operates the convenience store, or it may be run as a separate business operation by a subtenant approved by the Community Development Director. It shall open at the time of occupancy of the convenience store use, and shall operate seven days a week for no less than 10 hours a day. ? All Project employees who drive to work must park on-site. Employees shall be informed of this requirement during any employee training or orientation. ? No outdoor chairs, benches, and/or tables shall be permitted on the Property without an Outdoor Dining Administrative Use Permit approval. ? The Project shall maintain a clear line of sight for vehicles negotiating the project access points and adjacent alleyways. Trees, shrubs, and other landscaping shall be trimmed and architectural décor shall be located so as to not block pedestrian line of sight requirements. City of Culver City, California Agenda Item Report ? Follow-up inspection of the operation of the traffic, on-site circulation and parking, shall be conducted by the Planning Division after six months and after one year of full operation. If it is determined by the Planning Manager and the City’s Traffic Engineer that the recommendations of the traffic study are insufficient, additional requirements may be imposed as determined by the Planning Manager and the City’s Traffic Engineer. In the event the Project fails to operate subject to the traffic study requirements, the matter shall be set for public hearing pursuant to CCMC Chapter 17.660 – Revocations and Modifications. APPEAL RESPONSE NO. 2: Increased risk and liability to the City given the insufficient discovery, testing and evaluation of the impact on public safety of the proposed Project, with respect to traffic and building parameters (blind corner or diminished traffic visibility) and investigation of vehicular accidents at the intersection of Sepulveda Boulevard and Braddock Drive. Project parking and traffic have been thoroughly vetted by the City’s traffic engineer as follows: Vehicular & Pedestrian Safety at Sepulveda and Braddock Staff worked with the City’s Engineering Division to acquire a list of traffic accidents occurring at the intersection of Sepulveda Boulevard and Braddock Drive. The information was provided through the California Highway Patrol’s Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS) database, which compiles traffic incidents as reported by the Culver City Police Department to the CHP. The SWITRS database has collected incident reports from all California cities between January 2000 and December 2010. For this ten year period, the SWITRS database identified 18 vehicular accidents at the intersection, including two incidents involving vehicles and pedestrians. The Culver City Police Department has provided a report to supplement SWITRS and notes that from 2011 through May 2012, there have been four traffic collisions at the intersection of Sepulveda & Braddock. The City's Traffic Engineer indicates that the number of reported accidents for this intersection is considered low. Further, the project is subject to the Pedestrian Traffic Safety Sightline clearance requirements in Section 17.300.030 (Table 3-4) of the Zoning Code which requires a 10 foot setback for walls in excess of 4 feet in height. This requirement is also noted in the 7-Eleven Traffic Impact Study (Exhibit M – Recommendations). The City’s Traffic Engineer reviewed the Project plans for conformance with this setback provision and found that the Project rear City of Culver City, California Agenda Item Report property line wall and landscaped setback of 10 feet comport with this requirement. APPEAL RESPONSE NO. 3: Previous traffic studies (Gap Study related to pedestrians) were inadequate. To address concerns by the adjacent neighbors, the Planning Commission directed the Applicant to prepare, a Traffic and Pedestrian Safety Evaluation also known as a “Gap Study” (the “Study”). The Study, prepared by RK Engineering Group and reviewed and approved by the City’s Traffic Engineer, analyzes the movement of pedestrians and vehicles at the proposed 7-Eleven driveways on Sepulveda Boulevard and Braddock Drive for the purpose of determining pedestrian safety and identifying potential conflicts. The study determined that based on the “gap time” assumptions for vehicles comfortably turning into and out of the Project site, more vehicles will be able to access the site than there are vehicles generated by the Project during the traffic peak hour (in some cases almost three times as many). The study measured the number of vehicles and pedestrians on both sides of Braddock Drive and on Sepulveda Boulevard during the peak hours in the morning (6:30 AM to 8:30 AM), lunch hour (12:15 PM to 1:15 PM), and afternoon (2:15 PM to 4:15 PM). The peak hours were determined according to the times associated with students walking to school during the morning, walking toward Sepulveda Boulevard during their lunch period, and leaving school during the afternoon. The study did not show a significant amount of pedestrian traffic and determined that the potential for conflicts with vehicles would be considered minimal. Pedestrian and vehicle counts were taken on Thursday, March 22, 2012, which is shown as being a normal operating school day by the Culver City Unified School District calendar. The counts were taken along the eastern sidewalk of Sepulveda Boulevard and the northern sidewalk (adjacent to Taco Bell) and southern sidewalk (adjacent to the Project site) of Braddock Drive. As noted in the Study, in order for a vehicle to safely enter or exit the site, a gap in pedestrians traveling along the sidewalk, as well as a gap in vehicles traveling along the roadway must be present. The “gap” is defined as the time interval between a car or pedestrian crossing a point and another car or pedestrian crossing that same point. In this instance, the “point” is a driveway to the proposed 7-Eleven store. The more gaps there are between the pedestrians and the cars, the less likely it is that a conflict will occur. The study looked at the worst case peak one-hour totals, i.e. the 60-minute interval within the survey period where the least amount of gap time occurs. City of Culver City, California Agenda Item Report The minimum gap time needed for one car to complete a turn is seven (7) seconds with each subsequent car following the first car requiring five (5) seconds to complete the turn. A more conservative estimate would require seven (7) seconds for both the first car and subsequent cars to complete a turn. The study showed that under both scenarios, pedestrian and vehicle gaps were available to safely and efficiently provide access to and from the site. Therefore the Planning Commission considered the Project traffic and pedestrian analysis (Gap Study) and determined there was sufficient evidence in the record to make the necessary finding that the design and layout of the Project would not result in vehicular or pedestrian hazards. APPEAL RESPONSE NO. 4: Store safety related to “hold-ups” may be an issue due to the store design. Public Safety The Culver City Police Department was asked to supply crime and transient incident statistics over the prior year at the four existing 7-Eleven stores in Culver City. The Police Department provided the following information based on an examination of police records from September 1, 2011 to April 12, 2012: ? 5495 Sepulveda Boulevard: One police call for a person in the parking lot (PD stated that this response did not identify if it was related to a transient and may have been due to a loitering teenager or other suspicious person.) The 7-Eleven is located in a strip mall and another store may have been the source of the incident. ? 5900 Washington Boulevard: One police call regarding a robbery and 3 calls related to a transient. The 7-Eleven is located in a strip mall and the 7-Eleven may not have been the source of the incident. ? 11299 Washington Boulevard: One police call for a person in the parking lot (PD stated that this response did not identify if it was related to a transient and could have been due to a loitering teenager or other suspicious person.) The 7-Eleven is a stand-alone store. ? 11001 Washington Boulevard: 1 police call for a transient. The 7- Eleven is a stand-alone store. The Police Department did not believe that the number or types of incidents reported were significant and did not believe that the 7-Eleven stores in the City were attracting crime and nuisance activities. Further, the Police City of Culver City, California Agenda Item Report Department did not believe that the design of the store, in particular the two entrances, would make it more likely to attract crime and nuisance activities. Required Findings in Support of the Project Approval Zoning Code Chapter 17.540 – “Site Plan Review” outlines procedures and standards for the comprehensive review of proposed development projects including the required findings that must be made in order to approve the Site Plan Review as listed below: A. The general layout of the project, including orientation and location of buildings, open space, vehicular and pedestrian access and circulation, parking and loading facilities, building setbacks and heights, and other improvements on the site, is consistent with the purpose and intent of this Chapter, the requirements of the zoning district in which the site is located, and with all applicable development standards and design guidelines. B. The architectural design of the structure(s) and their materials and colors are compatible with the scale and character of surrounding development and other improvements on the site and are consistent with the purpose and intent of this Chapter, the requirements of the zoning district in which the site is located, and with all applicable development standards and design guidelines. C. The landscaping, including the location, type, size, color, texture, and coverage of plant materials, provisions for irrigation, and protection of landscape elements has been designed to create visual relief, complement structures, and provide an attractive environment and is consistent with the purpose and intent of this Chapter, the requirements of the zoning district in which the site is located, and with all applicable development standards and design guidelines. D. The design and layout of the proposed project will not interfere with the use and enjoyment of neighboring existing or future development, will not result in vehicular or pedestrian hazards, and will be in the best interest of the public health, safety, and general welfare. E. The existing or proposed public facilities necessary to accommodate the proposed project (e.g., fire protection devices, parkways, public utilities, sewers, sidewalks, storm drains, street lights, traffic control devices, and the width and pavement of adjoining streets and alleys) will be available to serve the subject site. City of Culver City, California Agenda Item Report F. The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan and any applicable specific plan. The Planning Commission determined that there was sufficient evidence in the record to make all of the required findings and, therefore, approved the Project. Environmental Determination Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) guidelines, the Project has been determined to be Categorically Exempt pursuant to Section 15303, Class 3, New Construction and Section 15332, Class 32, In-Fill Development Projects. The environmental review of the Project was not appealed. City Council Review Authority The City Council’s consideration of the appeal is “de novo.” In essence, this means the City Council is holding a new hearing. In that regard, the City Council is not solely limited to considering the record that was before the Planning Commission. The City Council’s review authority for this appeal is governed by CCMC Section 17.640.030.D, which provides that the City Council may consider any issue involving the matter that is the subject of the appeal in addition to the specific grounds that form the basis of the appeal. In its consideration of this matter, the City Council may take the following actions: • Affirm, affirm in part, or reverse the Planning Commission’s decision. • Amend or adopt additional conditions of approval that may address issues or concerns regarding the Project (regardless of whether they were raised in the appeal). • If new or different evidence is presented on appeal, the City Council may, but is not required to, refer the matter back to the Planning Commission for further consideration. CONCLUSION: The Planning Commission conducted two public hearings on the 7-Eleven Administrative Site Plan Review application and continued the hearing to direct the Applicant to evaluate vehicle movements and potential conflicts with City of Culver City, California Agenda Item Report pedestrians at the store driveways. In order to address the Project architecture, the Planning Commission also requested a new site plan with a pedestrian orientation and directed the Project architect to design a building unique for the neighborhood and not merely to replicate a corporate building style. After deliberating over two public hearings and considering the traffic and pedestrian analysis and the new architectural concept for the store, the Planning Commission unanimously voted to approve the application making the necessary findings in Resolution, No. 2012-P003. FISCAL IMPACT: The Project will generate one-time building permit revenues and on-going sales and property tax revenues. There will be potential emergency service costs to the City. If the project is not constructed the property may remain an undeveloped site as it has since it ceased operating as a gas station 14 years ago. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Planning Commission, Resolution P2012-003, dated May 23, 2012 2. Appeal Document, dated June 8, 2012 3. Project Plans 4. Traffic Analysis and Gap Study 5. Written Public Comments 6. Draft Resolution No. 2012-R___ Denying the Appeal 7. Draft Resolution No. 2012-R___ Granting the Appeal 8. Planning Commission Minutes, March 14, 2012 9. Additional Correspondence MOTION: That the City Council: 1. Adopt Resolution No. 2012-R____ denying the appeal and affirming the Planning Commission’s approval of Administrative Site Plan Review, ASPR P-2011127, for the construction of a 2,500 square foot convenience store at 4436 Sepulveda Boulevard. OR City of Culver City, California Agenda Item Report 2. Adopt Resolution No. 2012-R____ granting the appeal and reversing the Planning Commission’s approval of Administrative Site Plan Review, ASPR P-2011127, for the construction of a 2,500 square foot convenience store at 4436 Sepulveda Boulevard. NOTES: 1. As part of the entitlement proceedings there have been three community meetings on the proposed project. Due to the high level of public interest and in order to provide an opportunity for local residents to provide comments on the project in a public hearing setting, the matter was referred to the Planning Commission for review and decision pursuant to CCMC Section 17.540.015.D, “Referral to the Planning Commission”. Further, due to the high level of interest in the proposed Project by local residents pursuant to CCMC Section 17.630.010.E, the public notice for the Project was extended beyond the required adjacent property owners and occupants to property owners and occupants within a 1000-foot radius of the Project site. MEETING DATE: 09.10.12 AGENDA ITEM: PUBLIC HEARING – Consideration of Appeal of Planning Commission Approval of an Administrative Site Plan Review to Allow the Development of a One-Story Retail Building with 2,500 Square Feet of Floor Area and 12 On-Site Parking Spaces Located at 4436 Sepulveda Boulevard ATTACHMENTS Pages 1. Planning Commission, Resolution P2012-003, dated May 23, 2012 1-25 2. Appeal Document, dated June 8, 2012 26-35 3. Project Plans 36-39 4. Traffic Analysis and Gap Study 40-217 5. Written Public Comments 218-275 6. Draft Resolution No. 2012-R___ Denying the Appeal 276-282 7. Draft Resolution No. 2012-R___ Granting the Appeal 283-285 8. Planning Commission Minutes, March 14, 2012 286-299 9. Additional Correspondence 300 ATTACHMENT 1 ATTACHMENT 1 ATTACHMENT 1 ATTACHMENT 1 ATTACHMENT 1 ATTACHMENT 1 ATTACHMENT 1 EXHIBIT A RESOLUTION NO. 2012-P003 Administrative Site Plan Review, ASPR P2011127 4436 Sepulveda Boulevard Page 1 of 18 NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Agency Source Compliance Verification GENERAL 1. These Conditions of Approval are being imposed on the one story, 2,500 square foot Convenience store with 12 parking spaces (the “Project”), for the property located at 4436 Sepulveda Boulevard (the “Property”). All Standard 2. A copy of the Resolution approving the Project, and a copy of these Conditions of Approval, shall be printed on the plans submitted as part of any building permit application for the Project. Planning Standard 3. All building permit applications for the Project shall include sufficient information and detail to clearly reflect compliance with all applicable requirements of the Culver City Municipal Code (the “CCMC”) and with these Conditions of Approval. Planning Standard 4. The land use permit to which these Conditions of Approval apply (the “Land Use Permit’) shall expire one year from the date of final approval of said Land Use Permit, if the use has not been exercised. As provided in CCMC Section 15.595.030 –“Time Limits and Extensions”, an applicant may request an extension of said expiration date by filing a written request with the Planning Division prior to the expiration of the land use permit. Planning Standard 5. The Project shall be developed pursuant to CCMC Chapter 17.300 – “General Property Development and Use Standards”. Planning Standard 6. All planted areas on the Property shall be landscaped and irrigated pursuant to CCMC Chapter 17.310 - “Landscaping”. Planning Standard ATTACHMENT 1 8EXHIBIT A RESOLUTION NO. 2012-P003 Administrative Site Plan Review, ASPR P2011127 4436 Sepulveda Boulevard Page 2 of 18 NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Agency Source Compliance Verification GENERAL 7. All parking areas on the Property shall be developed pursuant to CCMC Chapter 17.320 - “Off-Street Parking and Loading”. Planning Standard 8. Signs proposed for the Project shall meet all applicable requirements of CCMC Chapter 17.330 - “Signs”. All signs require a separate permit and approval. Planning Standard 9. All permits and licenses required in connection with the development or use of the Project shall be applied for and obtained separately. All Standard 10. All work within the public right-of-way (including but not limited to curb, gutter, sidewalk, and driveways) shall be designed and completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Public Works Standard 11. One street tree shall be installed, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer, in conformity with the City’s approved Street Tree Master Plan including tree wells and irrigation on Braddock Drive. All new (and existing) street trees shall be supplied with irrigation water from the overall site irrigation system which shall include a timer and a rain sensor. All new (and existing) street trees, landscaping, and irrigation shall be indicated on the overall site landscaping/ irrigation plan. Public Works Standard 12. Drainage devices, concrete curbs and gutters, sidewalks, drive approaches, and roadway pavement shall be designed in conformity with all provisions of the latest edition of the American Public Works Association Standard Plans (“APWA Standards”). Public Works Standard ATTACHMENT 1 9EXHIBIT A RESOLUTION NO. 2012-P003 Administrative Site Plan Review, ASPR P2011127 4436 Sepulveda Boulevard Page 3 of 18 NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Agency Source Compliance Verification GENERAL 13. At the sole cost and expense of the Property Owner, any broken or damaged curbs, gutters, sidewalks, and street pavement resulting from construction of the Project shall be repaired and reconstructed in conformity with APWA Standards. Public Works Standard 14. Trash enclosures shall be provided and shall each have a minimum inside dimension of 10 feet x 12 feet, a gated opening that is at least 8 feet wide, and a 6 inch high by 6 inch wide concrete curb along the inside perimeter wall. Each enclosure shall also have at least a 6 inch thick concrete slab that drains at a one percent gradient out of the enclosure. Final approval for the size, location, and type of equipment needed for the adequate storage and disposal of all solid and recyclable waste generated by the Project shall be obtained from the City’s Environmental Programs and Operations Manager. A fire suppression sprinkler system shall be provided within any covered trash enclosure area as required by the Fire Marshal. All refuse containers assigned to or otherwise used by the Project shall be stored on-site in the trash enclosures. Public Works/ Fire/ Planning Standard 15. All Project related solid and recyclable waste material handling shall be in accordance with CCMC Section 5.01.010 – “Solid Waste Management”, which outlines the Sanitation Division’s exclusive franchise for this service. Public Works Standard ATTACHMENT 1 10EXHIBIT A RESOLUTION NO. 2012-P003 Administrative Site Plan Review, ASPR P2011127 4436 Sepulveda Boulevard Page 4 of 18 NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Agency Source Compliance Verification GENERAL 16. All buildings and structures to be constructed as part of the Project shall be designed and constructed in accordance with all applicable regulations and standards of the City’s Building Code, Fire Code and any related codes as determined by the Building Official and Fire Marshal; and all other applicable provisions of the CCMC which are adopted and in effect at the time of issuance of a building permit. Building/ Fire Standard 17. Any new utilities shall be placed underground or enclosed within the building construction; no new overhead utilities shall be permitted. Building/ Planning Standard 18. The Project shall comply with all applicable requirement of the Culver City Green Building Program as set forth in CCMC Section 15.02.1100, et.seq. Building Standard 19. Changes to the Project or use approved as part of the Land Use Permit may only be made in accordance with the provisions of CCMC Section 17.595.035 – “Changes to an Approved Project”. Planning Standard 20. All perimeter block walls shall be of decorative block and shall be approved by the Planning Division prior to installation. Planning Special 21. The design (including color, material, and shape) for decorative pavers or stamped concrete located on site shall be approved by the Planning Division prior to installation. Planning Special 22. A materials board for the Project and a lighting plan for the building and the parking area shall be approved by the Planning Division prior to building permit issuance. Planning Special ATTACHMENT 1 11EXHIBIT A RESOLUTION NO. 2012-P003 Administrative Site Plan Review, ASPR P2011127 4436 Sepulveda Boulevard Page 5 of 18 NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Agency Source Compliance Verification GENERAL 23. All signs shall be in accordance with CCMC Section 17.330 – “Signs” subject to the following: A. Only one freestanding monument sign shall be permitted on-site, located adjacent to the Sepulveda Boulevard driveway entrance. The monument sign shall be a maximum of 6 feet in height. B. No window signs shall be permitted, except for those providing the hours of operation, open/closed signs, and contact information for the store and/or operating company. C. All signs shall require approval of a sign permit issued by the Planning Division. Planning Special 24. No vending machines or reverse vending machines shall be permitted on the exterior of the building. Planning Special 25. The project shall comply with Section 17.300.040 – Outdoor Lighting of the Culver City Municipal Code, to ensure that all on- site exterior lighting is directed away from or shielded from residential neighbors. Planning Special 26. Offsite improvements shall include the relocation of the existing Culver City bus stop from the southwest corner of Sepulveda/ Braddock to the front of this project, on Braddock Drive. The bus stop furniture shall include a 13 foot shelter with 4 seat bench with back and armrests, a tall trash receptacle, transit information display and a sign pole. Trans. Special 27. The driveway at Sepulveda Boulevard shall be right turn-in and right turn-out only. Signage restricting left turns out of the driveway shall be posted on-site. The sign is subject to approval by the City Engineer and Planning Manager. Public Works Special ATTACHMENT 1 12EXHIBIT A RESOLUTION NO. 2012-P003 Administrative Site Plan Review, ASPR P2011127 4436 Sepulveda Boulevard Page 6 of 18 NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Agency Source Compliance Verification PRIOR TO BUILDING PERMIT ISSUANCE 28. A covenant and agreement, on a form provided by the Planning Division and in form and substance acceptable to the City Attorney, acknowledging and agreeing to comply with all terms and conditions established herein, shall be signed by the Property Owner and recorded in the County Recorder’s Office. The covenant and agreement shall run with the land and shall be binding on any subsequent owners, and tenants or occupants of the Property. After recordation, a certified copy bearing the Recorder’s number and date shall be provided to the Planning Division. Planning/ City Attorney Standard 29. The Applicant and Property Owner shall indemnify and agree to defend (at the Applicant’s and Property Owner’s sole expense, with legal counsel approved by the City) and hold harmless the City, and its elected and appointed officials, officers, employees, agents, contractors and consultants from and against any and all loss, damages, injuries, costs, expenses, liabilities, claims, demands, lawsuits, attorneys’ fees and judgments, arising from or in any manner connected to any third party challenge to the City's approval of the Project. The obligations required by this Condition shall be set forth in a written instrument in form and substance acceptable to the City Attorney and signed by the Applicant and the Property Owner. City Attorney Standard 30. A minimum of three sets of final landscaping and irrigation plans (separate from the plans submitted for the building permit) shall be submitted to the Planning Division for review and approval. Planning/ Parks & Rec. Standard 31. Payment of New Development Impact Fees pursuant to CCMC Section 15.06.005 et. seq. shall be submitted. Planning/ Building Standard ATTACHMENT 1 13EXHIBIT A RESOLUTION NO. 2012-P003 Administrative Site Plan Review, ASPR P2011127 4436 Sepulveda Boulevard Page 7 of 18 NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Agency Source Compliance Verification PRIOR TO BUILDING PERMIT ISSUANCE 32. A Construction Management Plan prepared by the construction contractor, which identifies the areas of construction staging, temporary power, portable toilet, and trash and material storage locations, shall be submitted to and approved by the Building Official. Prior to commencement of work the construction contractor shall advise the Public Works Inspector and the Building Inspector (‘Inspectors”) of the construction schedule and shall meet with the Inspectors. Building/ Public Works Standard 33. A Pedestrian Protection Plan shall be submitted to and approved by the Building Official. Such plan shall identify all areas of pedestrian protection and indicate the method of pedestrian protection or pedestrian diversion when required. When pedestrian diversion is required, the Pedestrian Protection Plan must also be approved by the Public Works Director. Building/ Public Works Standard 34. Plans submitted as part of the building permit application shall include a schedule of the special inspections anticipated, the firm proposed for the special inspections, and the resumes of all proposed special inspectors. The Building Official reserves the right to reject any special inspector at any time for the duration of the Project. All special inspection reports shall be made available to the Building Official and to any Culver City Building Safety inspector as required by the Building Official No work shall be covered without a Culver City Building Safety inspection, whether or not a special inspection was performed on such work. Building Standard ATTACHMENT 1 14EXHIBIT A RESOLUTION NO. 2012-P003 Administrative Site Plan Review, ASPR P2011127 4436 Sepulveda Boulevard Page 8 of 18 NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Agency Source Compliance Verification PRIOR TO BUILDING PERMIT ISSUANCE 35. A Construction Traffic Management Plan shall be prepared by a traffic or civil engineer registered in the State of California. The Construction Traffic Management Plan shall be submitted to the City Engineer and Planning Manager for review and approval prior to the issuance of any Project demolition, grading, or excavation permit. The Construction Traffic Management Plan shall also be reviewed and approved by the City’s Fire and Police Departments. The City Engineer and Planning Manager reserve the right to reject any engineer at any time and to require that the Plan be prepared by a different engineer. The Construction Traffic Management Plan shall contain, but not be limited to, the following: A. The name and telephone number of a contact person who can be reached 24 hours a day regarding construction traffic complaints or emergency situations. B. An up-to-date list of local police, fire, and emergency response organizations and procedures for the continuous coordination of construction activity, potential delays, and any alerts related to unanticipated road conditions or delays, with local police, fire, and emergency response agencies. Coordination shall include the assessment of any alternative access routes that might be required through the Property, and maps showing access to and within the Property and to adjacent properties. C. Procedures for the training and certification of the flag persons used in implementation of the Construction Traffic Management Plan. D. The location, times, and estimated duration of any roadway closures, traffic detours, use of protective devices, warning signs, and staging or queuing areas. E. The location and travel routes of off-site staging and parking locations. Planning/ Public Works Standard ATTACHMENT 1 15EXHIBIT A RESOLUTION NO. 2012-P003 Administrative Site Plan Review, ASPR P2011127 4436 Sepulveda Boulevard Page 9 of 18 NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Agency Source Compliance Verification PRIOR TO BUILDING PERMIT ISSUANCE 36. Reasonable efforts shall be used to reuse and recycle construction and demolition debris, to use environmentally friendly materials, and to provide energy efficient buildings, equipment and systems. A Demolition Debris Recycling Plan that indicates where select demolition debris is to be sent shall be provided to the Building Official prior to the issuance of a demolition permit. The Plan shall list the material to be recycled and the name, address, and phone number of the facility of organization accepting the materials. Building Standard 37. A vector/pest control abatement plan prepared by a pest control specialist licensed or certified by the State of California shall be submitted for review and approval by the Planning Manager and the Building Official. Said plan shall outline all steps to be taken prior to the commencement of any demolition or construction activity in order to ensure that any and all pests (including, but not limited to, rodents, bees, ants and mosquitoes) that may populate the Property do not relocate to or impact adjoining properties. Building/ Planning Standard 38. Prior to issuance of a building permit, notice of the Project construction schedule shall be provided to all abutting property owners and occupants. Evidence of such notification shall be provided to the Building Division. The notice shall identify the commencement date and proposed timing for all construction phases (demolition, grading, excavation/shoring, foundation, rough frame, plumbing, roofing, mechanical and electrical, and exterior finish). Building Standard ATTACHMENT 1 16EXHIBIT A RESOLUTION NO. 2012-P003 Administrative Site Plan Review, ASPR P2011127 4436 Sepulveda Boulevard Page 10 of 18 NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Agency Source Compliance Verification DURING CONSTRUCTION 39. During all phases of construction, a “Construction Rules Sign” that includes contact names and telephone numbers of the Applicant, Property Owner, construction contractor(s), and the City, shall be posted on the Property in a location that is visible to the public. These names and telephone numbers shall also be made available to adjacent property owners and occupants to the satisfaction of the Planning Manager and Building Official. Building/ Planning Standard 40. The Property shall be maintained daily so that it is free of trash and litter. Building Standard 41. During construction, dust shall be controlled by regular watering or other methods as determined by the Building inspector. Building Standard 42. The Building Division may apply administrative assessments and/ or post general stop work notices for any violations of the Conditions of Approval for the Project, and any violations of the CCMC. Building Standard 43. During all phases of construction, best efforts shall be used to ensure that all construction workers, contractors and others involved with the Project park on the Property or at designated offsite locations approved by the City, and not in the surrounding neighborhood. Building Standard 44. When foundation shoring and/or foundation piles will be part of the Project, the engineer of record shall use noise dampening measures such as the drilling of shoring supports and piles as determined by the Building Official and Planning Manager. Building/ Planning Standard ATTACHMENT 1 17EXHIBIT A RESOLUTION NO. 2012-P003 Administrative Site Plan Review, ASPR P2011127 4436 Sepulveda Boulevard Page 11 of 18 NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Agency Source Compliance Verification DURING CONSTRUCTION 45. Prior to the commencement of any excavation, a temporary construction fence shall be installed around the site. The height and fence material is subject to approval by the City Engineer and the Planning Manager. Building/ Planning/ Public Works Standard 46. Hours of construction shall be limited to the following: 8:00 AM to 8:00 PM Monday through Friday; 9:00 AM to 7:00 PM Saturday; and 10:00 AM to 7:00 PM Sunday and National holidays. Dirt hauling and construction material deliveries or removal are prohibited during the morning (7:00 AM to 9:00 AM) and afternoon (4:00 PM to 6:00 PM) peak traffic periods. All construction workers shall be respectful of the surrounding neighborhood and keep non-construction related noise to a minimum prior to, during, and after permissible construction hours. Building/ Public Works Standard 47. All staging and storage of construction equipment and materials, including the construction dumpster, shall be on-site only. The Property Owner must obtain written permission from adjacent property owners for any construction staging occurring on adjacent property. Building/ Public Works Standard 48. During construction, the Planning Division may periodically inspect the Project and/or request status updates from the Applicant and construction contractor(s) to ensure the Project design comports with the approved plan. The Planning Division, with the Building & Safety Division, may issue general stop work notices for any violations of the Conditions of Approval, including non- conformance with the specified design and materials for the Project, and any violations of the CCMC. Planning Special ATTACHMENT 1 18EXHIBIT A RESOLUTION NO. 2012-P003 Administrative Site Plan Review, ASPR P2011127 4436 Sepulveda Boulevard Page 12 of 18 NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Agency Source Compliance Verification DURING CONSTRUCTION 49. Compliance with the following noise standards shall be required with at all times: A. No construction equipment shall be operated without an exhaust muffler, and all such equipment shall have mufflers and sound control devices (i.e., intake silencers and noise shrouds) that are no less effective than those provided on the original equipment; B. All construction equipment shall be properly maintained to minimize noise emissions; C. If any construction vehicles are serviced at a location onsite, the vehicle(s) shall be setback from any street and other property lines so as to maintain the greatest distance from the public right-of- way and from Noise Sensitive Receptors; D. Noise impacts from stationary sources (i.e., mechanical equipment, ventilators, and air conditioning units) shall be minimized by proper selection of equipment and the installation of acoustical shielding as approved by the Planning Manager and the Building Official in order to comply with the City’s Noise Regulations and Standards as set forth in CCMC Chapter 9.07; and E. Stationary source equipment (i.e., compressors) shall be located so as to maintain the greatest distance from the public right-of-way and from Noise Sensitive Receptors. Building/ Planning Standard ATTACHMENT 1 19EXHIBIT A RESOLUTION NO. 2012-P003 Administrative Site Plan Review, ASPR P2011127 4436 Sepulveda Boulevard Page 13 of 18 NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Agency Source Compliance Verification DURING CONSTRUCTION 50. In the event three citations are issued in connection with the Project for violations of these Conditions of Approval or for other violations of the CCMC, Project construction shall be stopped until such time that it is determined to the satisfaction of the Community Development Director, that causes of such violations have been eliminated or corrected and that the Project will be able to proceed in full compliance with these Conditions of Approval and the CCMC. Building/ Planning Standard 51. Flag persons with certified training shall be provided for work site traffic control to minimize impacts to traffic flow and to ensure the safe movement of vehicles into and out of the Property. Building/ Public Works Standard 52. During construction, trucks and other vehicles in loading and unloading queues must be parked with their engines off to reduce vehicle emissions. Construction deliveries shall be phased and scheduled to avoid emissions peaks as determined by the Building Official and discontinued during second-stage smog alerts. Building Standard 53. Construction vehicles shall not be permitted to stage or queue where they would interfere with vehicular and pedestrian traffic or block access to adjacent properties. Off-site staging shall be at locations approved by the City Engineer and shall be of sufficient length to accommodate large trucks without being unduly disruptive to traffic operations. The drivers of these trucks shall be in radio or phone communication with on-site personnel who shall advise the drivers when to proceed from the staging location to the Property. Construction-related vehicles shall not be permitted to park on public streets. Building/ Public Works Standard ATTACHMENT 1 20EXHIBIT A RESOLUTION NO. 2012-P003 Administrative Site Plan Review, ASPR P2011127 4436 Sepulveda Boulevard Page 14 of 18 NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Agency Source Compliance Verification PRIOR TO CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY OR FINAL INSPECTION 54. All provisions, and requirements set forth in these Conditions of Approval, in the Resolution approving the project, in the CCMC, or in any applicable written comments as provided by City representatives on October 20, 2011 at the Project Review Committee meeting on the Land Use Permit application, shall be fulfilled and satisfied to the satisfaction of all City departments before the use may be established or the Project occupied. All Standard 55. All requirements of the City’s Art in Public Places Program, as set forth in CCMC Section 15.06.100, et. seq., shall be fully satisfied prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy; provided, that if such requirements will be satisfied by the payment of the public art in-lieu fee, the same shall be paid prior to the issuance of a building permit. Cultural Affairs Standard 56. All onsite and offsite improvements and all conditions of approval except those which are deferred pursuant to a bond or letter of credit as determined and approved by the Building Official, Fire Marshal, Planning Manager, and/or City Engineer shall be completed prior to issuance of any certificate of occupancy. Prior to issuance of any certificate of occupancy the following shall be provided to and approved by the City: A. Five full sets of as-built plans that shall include at a minimum the site plan, grading and utility plan, landscape and irrigation plan, floor plan for each level of the Project, parking structure plan, roof plan with all mechanical equipment identified as to purpose and source and all offsite improvements; and B. One set of as-built plans as described above in a digital format compatible with the City’s computer system. All Standard ATTACHMENT 1 21EXHIBIT A RESOLUTION NO. 2012-P003 Administrative Site Plan Review, ASPR P2011127 4436 Sepulveda Boulevard Page 15 of 18 NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Agency Source Compliance Verification ON-GOING 57. The use and development of the Property shall be in substantial conformance with the plans and materials submitted with the application for the Land Use Permit as reviewed by the Planning Commission at its meeting on May 23, 2012, excepted as modified by these Conditions of Approval. Planning Standard 58. Pursuant to CCMC Section 17.650.020 - “Inspection”, the Property Owner and Applicant shall allow authorized City officials, or their designees, access to the Property where there is reasonable cause to believe the Property is not in compliance with these Conditions of Approval or other requirements of the CCMC. All Standard 59. The use and development of the Property shall comply with these Conditions of Approval and all applicable local, special district or authority, county, state and federal statutes, codes, standards, and regulations including, but not limited to, Building Division, Fire Department, Planning Division and Public Works Department requirements, and shall comply with all applicable CCMC requirements and all comments made during the City’s building permit plan check review process. Failure to comply with said Conditions, statutes, codes, standards, and regulations may result in reconstruction work, demolition, stop work orders, withholding of certificate of occupancy, revocation of land use permit approval and/or any other lawful action the City might deem reasonable and appropriate to bring about compliance. All Standard 60. The Applicant shall process the request for curbside loading on Sepulveda Boulevard through the Engineering Division. The Applicant shall be responsible for necessary curbside demarcations/ improvements as required by the City Engineer and/or Public Works Director. Public Works/ Planning Special ATTACHMENT 1 22EXHIBIT A RESOLUTION NO. 2012-P003 Administrative Site Plan Review, ASPR P2011127 4436 Sepulveda Boulevard Page 16 of 18 NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Agency Source Compliance Verification ON-GOING 61. All graffiti shall be removed from the Property within 48 hours of its application. Building/ Planning/ Public Works Standard 62. The Property Owner shall maintain all street trees along the property frontage at his/her sole cost and expense. Public Works Standard 63. All mitigation measures set forth in any environmental document relating to the Project (including any reports of the type contemplated by the California Environmental Quality Act) shall be completed as specified therein. Planning Standard 64. The Property Owner and any tenant of the Property shall be responsible for onsite trash pickup at least twice per day, and for trash pickup around the Property’s perimeter, including the sidewalks, gutters, and other public areas where trash may collect within 100-feet of the Property. Planning Special 65. The setback area along the Sepulveda Boulevard street frontage, designated on the approved development plans for an “Outdoor Retail Component” and comprising an area of 7 feet by 35 feet, shall be utilized for a pedestrian oriented retail use. The Outdoor Retail Component may be operated by the same entity that operates the convenience store, as part of the operation of such store, or it may be run as a separate business operation by a subtenant approved by the Community Development Director. The use and the final design of the Outdoor Retail Component area shall be subject to review and approval by the Community Development Director. The Outdoor Retail Component area shall at all times be operated and maintained in a clean and safe manner. Planning Special ATTACHMENT 1 23EXHIBIT A RESOLUTION NO. 2012-P003 Administrative Site Plan Review, ASPR P2011127 4436 Sepulveda Boulevard Page 17 of 18 NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Agency Source Compliance Verification ON-GOING 66. The Outdoor Retail Component shall be opened for business at the time of occupancy of the convenience store use for the Property, and shall thereafter operate seven days a week for no less than 10 hours a day. If a subtenant operating the secondary retail use vacates the premises, the Outdoor Retail Component area shall immediately be secured and thereafter maintained in a safe and attractive condition, and the secondary retail use shall be re-opened for business (by the operator of the convenience store or by a new subtenant approved by the Community Development Director) within no more than 6 months Planning Special 67. A covenant and agreement, on a form provided by the Planning Division and in form and substance approved by the City Attorney, designating an area of 7 feet by 35 feet, as identified on the approved development plans for an “Outdoor Retail Component” shall be signed by the Property Owner and recorded in the County Recorder’s Office. The covenant and agreement shall run with the land and shall be binding on any subsequent owners, and tenants or occupants of the Property. After recordation, a certified copy bearing the Recorder’s number and date shall be provided to the Planning Division. Planning /City Attorney Special ATTACHMENT 1 24EXHIBIT A RESOLUTION NO. 2012-P003 Administrative Site Plan Review, ASPR P2011127 4436 Sepulveda Boulevard Page 18 of 18 NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Agency Source Compliance Verification ON-GOING 68. Any street tree that is removed or relocated as part of the site development shall be promptly replaced with a tree of a type and size approved by the Community Development Director, and thereafter maintained. Planning Special 69. All Project employees who drive to work must park on-site. Employees shall be informed of this requirement during any employee training or orientation. Planning Special 70. No outdoor chairs, benches and/or tables shall be permitted on the Property without the approval of an Administrative Use Permit for Outdoor Dining pursuant to CCMC Section 17.400.070 – Outdoor Dining. Planning Special 71. The Project shall maintain a clear line of sight for vehicles negotiating the project access points and adjacent alleyways. Trees, bushes, and architectural décor shall not block line of sight requirements at these intersections. Planning Special 72. Follow-up inspection of the operation of the traffic, on-site circulation and parking, shall be conducted by the Planning Division after six months and after one year of full operation. If it is determined by the Planning Manager and the City’s Traffic Engineer that the recommendations of the traffic study are insufficient, additional requirements may be imposed as determined by the Planning Manager and the City’s Traffic Engineer. In the event the project fails to operate subject to the traffic study requirements, the matter shall be set for public hearing pursuant to CCMC Chapter 17.660 – Revocations and Modifications. Planning Special ATTACHMENT 1 25ATTACHMENT 2 26 ATTACHMENT 2 27 ATTACHMENT 2 28 ATTACHMENT 2 29 ATTACHMENT 2 30 ATTACHMENT 2 31 ATTACHMENT 2 32 ATTACHMENT 2 33 ATTACHMENT 2 34 ATTACHMENT 2 35 ATTACHMENT 3 3677 248 248 248 600 601 210 210 210 210 89 478 479 478 479 16 15 18 63 19 71 17|1010|21 21 21 21 21 21 31 66 67 68 70 70 70 70 70 70 10|10 1010|466 467 58 34 33 30 32 301 300 299 466 467 298 297 36|1010|470 231 232 234 235 236 237 238 230 174 108 22 87 170 88 171 303 305 135 146 602 179 160 160|101010|4' - 0" 3' - 8" 3' - 8" 4' - 9" 5' - 4" 5' - 4" 5' - 4" 5' - 6" 3' - 7" BREW STATION 2 BRL SLURP 4 BRL SLURP POST MIX M/W CONDI CHILI CHEESE ROLLER GRILL ROLLER GRILL POS SAFE POS M/W A BAKERY CASE B BAKERY CASE SANDWICH CASE FFE CHIP CAPP. ICE FREEZER NOEVLTY NEWS PMU PMU PMU 118 24 700 118 116 27 27 477 477 125 127 723 400 400 96 113 114 95 44 86 115 82 65 71 70 70 360 74 46 33 73 39 73 39 85 58 17 2 6 3 2 20 20 17 14|1010|84 65 57 82 83 198 48 38 90 90 102 133 126 126 126 126 134 139 127 126 127 211 41 127 42 126 126 126 615 518 89 89 91 516 401 610 500|10101010|72 81 11 24 24 5' - 0" 4' - 2" 4' - 2" 3' - 10" 90 023 16 ATM ATTACHMENT 3 37NICHIHA FIBER CEMENT PANEL SYSTEM ALUMINUM RAIN SCREEN WITH STELL SUPPORTS NICHIHA FIBER CEMENT PANEL SYSTEM ALUMINUM RAIN SCREEN WITH STELL SUPPORTS NICHIHA FIBER CEMENT PANEL SYSTEM ALUMINUM RAIN SCREEN WITH STELL SUPPORTS NICHIHA FIBER CEMENT PANEL SYSTEM ALUMINUM RAIN SCREEN WITH STELL SUPPORTS RENCH ARRISON HF & A S S O C I A T E S , LT D 809 S.W. A Street, Suite 201 Bentonville, Arkansas 72712 t 479.273.7780 f 479.273.9486 www.hfa-ae.com STIPULATION FOR REUSE THIS DRAWING WAS PREPARED FOR USE ON A SPECIFIC SITE AT SHEET: CHECKED BY: DRAWN BY: DOCUMENT DATE: ISSUE BLOCK JOB NUMBER: CONTEMPORANEOUSLY WITH ITS ISSUE DATE ON ( ), AND IT IS NOT SUITABLE FOR USE ON A DIFFERENT PROJECT SITE OR AT A LATER TIME. USE OF THIS DRAWING FOR REFERENCE OR EXAMPLE ON ANOTHER PROJECT REQUIRES THE SERVICES OF PROPERLY LICENSED ARCHITECTS AND ENGINEERS. REPRODUCTION OF THIS DRAWING FOR REUSE ON ANOTHER PROJECT IS NOT AUTHORIZED AND MAY BE CONTRARY TO THE LAW STORE NO.: 7-ELEVEN 5/14/2012 3:48:06 PM C:\Users\kelly.guittar\Desktop\My Projects\Culver City, Ca OPTION 10 - CENTRAL FILE_kelly.guittar.rvt RB-E ELEVATIONS CS KJG 05/14/12 SEPLUVEDA BLVD. & BRADDOCK DR. CULVER CITY, CA 12-10-00391 05/14/12 CULVER CITY, CA 34735 3/16" = 1'-0"|1010|BRADDOCK ELEVATION 3/16" = 1'-0"|1010|EAST ELEVATION 3/16" = 1'-0"|1010|SOUTH ELEVATION 3/16" = 1'-0"|10
10|SEPLUVEDA ELEVATION ATTACHMENT 3 38RENCH ARRISON HF & A S S O C I A T E S , LT D 809 S.W. A Street, Suite 201 Bentonville, Arkansas 72712 t 479.273.7780 f 479.273.9486 www.hfa-ae.com STIPULATION FOR REUSE THIS DRAWING WAS PREPARED FOR USE ON A SPECIFIC SITE AT SHEET: CHECKED BY: DRAWN BY: DOCUMENT DATE: ISSUE BLOCK JOB NUMBER: CONTEMPORANEOUSLY WITH ITS ISSUE DATE ON ( ), AND IT IS NOT SUITABLE FOR USE ON A DIFFERENT PROJECT SITE OR AT A LATER TIME. USE OF THIS DRAWING FOR REFERENCE OR EXAMPLE ON ANOTHER PROJECT REQUIRES THE SERVICES OF PROPERLY LICENSED ARCHITECTS AND ENGINEERS. REPRODUCTION OF THIS DRAWING FOR REUSE ON ANOTHER PROJECT IS NOT AUTHORIZED AND MAY BE CONTRARY TO THE LAW STORE NO.: 7-ELEVEN 5/17/2012 11:26:21 AM C:\Users\kelly.guittar\Desktop\My Projects\Culver City, Ca OPTION 10 - CENTRAL FILE_kelly.guittar.rvt RB EXTERIOR PERSPECTIVES CS KJG 05/17/12 SEPLUVEDA BLVD. & BRADDOCK DR. CULVER CITY, CA 12-10-00391 05/17/12 CULVER CITY, CA 34735 ATTACHMENT 3 39ATTACHMENT 4 ATTACHMENT 4 42 ATTACHMENT 4 Table of Contents Section Page 1.0 Introduction........................................................................................... 1-1 2.0 Existing Conditions.............................................................................. 2-1 3.0 Intersection Analysis............................................................................ 3-1 3.1 ICU Methodology 3-1 3.2 HCM Methodology 3-3 3.3 Thresholds of Significance 3-3 3.4 Existing Level of Service 3-4 4.0 Trip Generation.................................................................................... 4-1 5.0 Trip Distribution.................................................................................. 5-1 6.0 Trip Assignment..................................................................................... 6-1 7.0 Traffic Impact Analysis........................................................................ 7-1 7.1 Existing Plus Project Conditions 7-1 7.2 Existing Plus Ambient Growth (Year 2013) Plus Related Projects Conditions 7-1 7.3 Existing Plus Ambient Growth (Year 2013) Plus Related Projects Plus Project Conditions 7-2 8.0 Residential Streets Segment Analysis.................................................. 8-1 9.0 Recommendations................................................................................. 9-1 10.0 Conclusions.......................................................................................... 9-1 ATTACHMENT 4 43 List of Attachments Exhibits Location Map ........................................................................................................... A Site Plan ................................................................................................................... B Existing Lane Geometry and Intersection Controls..............………………………… C City of Culver City General Plan Circulation Element......……………………………… D Existing Peak Hour Traffic Volumes.......................................................................... E Project Outbound Trip Distribution.......................................................................... F-1 Project Inbound Trip Distribution ............................................................................ F-2 Project Peak Hour Traffic Volumes............................................................................. G Existing Plus Project Peak Hour Traffic Volumes ......................................................... H Related Projects Location Map ................................................................................ I Related Projects Peak Hour Traffic Volumes ............................................................... J Existing Plus Ambient Growth (Year 2013) Plus Related Projects Peak Hour Traffic Volumes ...................................................... K Existing Plus Ambient Growth (Year 2013) Plus Related Projects Plus Project Peak Hour Traffic Volumes .................................... L Recommendations.................................................................................................. M ATTACHMENT 4 44 Tables Intersection Analysis for Existing Conditions ............................................................ 1 Trip Generation Rates ............................................................................................... 2 Project Trip Generation Comparison........................................................................ 3 Intersection Analysis for Existing Plus Project Conditions.......................................... 4 Related Projects Trip Generation.............................................................................. 5 Intersection Analysis for Project Buildout (Year 2013) Plus Related Projects Conditions.............................................................................. 6 Intersection Analysis for Project Buildout (Year 2013) Plus Related Projects Plus Project Conditions............................................................ 7 Summary Intersection Analysis ................................................................................ 8 Residential Streets Segment Analysis ......................................................................... 9 Project Fair-Share Intersection Contribution............................................................... 10 Appendices Traffic Count Worksheets ......................................................................................... A Existing Level of Service Analysis Worksheets ............................................................. B Existing Plus Project Level of Service Analysis Worksheets........................................... C Related Projects Data .............................................................................................. D Existing Plus Ambient Growth (Year 2013) Plus Related Projects Conditions Level of Service Analysis Worksheets ...................... E Existing Plus Ambient Growth (Year 2013) Plus Related Projects and Project Conditions Level of Service Analysis Worksheets .... F City of Culver City Thresholds of Significance for Traffic Impacts .............................. G Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) ................................................................... H ATTACHMENT 4 45 1-1 1.0 Introduction The proposed 7-Eleven 24-hour Convenience Market will be located at the southeast corner of Sepulveda Boulevard and Braddock Drive in the City of Culver City, as shown in Exhibit A. The proposed project would consist of approximately 2,500 square feet of 24-hour convenience market. The site was previously occupied by a gas service station but has been vacant since 1998. No vehicle trip credit has been taken for a previously existing land use. A site plan is available in Exhibit B. The project’s anticipated buildout year is 2013. The project site would be served by one (1) right-in/right-out access point on Sepulveda Boulevard and one full access point on Braddock Drive. The City of Culver City has specified that RK analyze the following area-wide intersections from a traffic standpoint: North-South Street East-West Street Sepulveda Boulevard Culver Boulevard Sepulveda Boulevard Braddock Drive Sepulveda Boulevard Project Access 1 Project Access 2 Braddock Drive The purpose of this traffic impact study is to review (1) Existing conditions; (2) Existing Plus Project Conditions; (3) Existing Plus Ambient Growth (Year 2013) Plus Related Projects conditions; and (4) Existing Plus Ambient Growth (Year 2013) Plus Related Projects and Project conditions. The traffic impact study will determine any recommendations necessary to accommodate the project. This traffic impact study utilized AM and PM peak hour traffic data provided by the City. ATTACHMENT 4 46 1-2 RK has been in frequent contact with the City of Culver City regarding this 7-Eleven Project, and has included the necessary requirements and specifications for this analysis. The scoping for the project and all study assumptions were discussed with the City staff during the preparation of the traffic impact study. ATTACHMENT 4 47 2-1 2.0 Existing Conditions Exhibit C identifies the existing roadway conditions, number of through traffic lanes and the intersection controls for the study area roadways, and Exhibit D shows the City of Culver City General Plan Circulation Element for the area adjacent to the project location. Existing traffic volumes throughout the study area are shown on Exhibit E. These volumes are based upon traffic data provided by the City and were conducted in September 2011. Traffic count worksheets are included in Appendix A. ATTACHMENT 4 48 2-2 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK ATTACHMENT 4 49 3-1 3.0 Intersection Analysis The methodology used to assess the operation of the signalized study area intersections is Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU). To calculate the ICU, the volume of traffic using the intersection is compared with the capacity of the intersection. ICU is usually expressed as a ratio. This ratio represents that portion of the hour required to provide sufficient capacity to accommodate all intersection traffic if all approaches operate at capacity. Research has determined that signalized intersections connected by an Automated Traffic Surveillance and Control (ATSAC)-type advanced traffic signal synchronization system experience an approximate seven percent increase in capacity as compared to signalized intersections without such advanced traffic signal synchronization. Therefore, per Culver City policy, and as approved by the City Traffic Engineer, the level of service values using the ICU methodology for the signalized intersections analyzed were reduced by 0.070 3.1. ICU Methodology 1. Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) methodology was used to analyze signalized study area intersections. 2. Saturation Flow Rate: Saturation flow value of 1,600 vehicles per lane per hour; 2,880 vehicles per lane per hour for dual left-turn lanes. 3. Clearance Internal and Cycle Time: A clearance interval factor of 10% (0.10) is applied to the ICU calculations. The cycle time is 90 seconds for ICU analysis purposes. 4. Level of Service Ranges: LOS CRITICAL VOLUME TO CAPACITY RATIO A 0.00 - 0.600 B 0.601 - 0.700 C 0.701 - 0.800 D 0.801 - 0.900 E 0.901 - 1.000 F >1.00 ATTACHMENT 4 50 3-2 5. Peak-Periods: Weekday peak-hour analysis periods are defined as follows: 7:00 AM to 9:00 AM 4:00 PM to 6:00 PM 6. Peak-Hour: The highest one-hour period in the AM and PM peak periods, as determined by four (4) consecutive 15-minute count periods are used in the ICU calculations. AM and PM peak hours are studied. No peak hour factor is applied to the traffic volumes for ICU methodology. 7. Peak-Hour Data Consistency: Variations in peak-hour volumes can affect LOS calculations because they vary from day-to-day. To minimize these variations, no counts are taken on Mondays, Fridays or holidays. The traffic count worksheets for this study are included in Appendix A. 8. Right Turn Movements: If the distance from the edge of the outside through lane is at least 22 feet and parking is prohibited during the peak period, right turning vehicles may be assumed to utilize this "unofficial" right turn lane. Otherwise, all right turn traffic is assigned to the through lane. If a right turn lane exists, right turn activity is checked for conflicts with other critical movements. It is assumed that right turn movements are accommodated during non-conflicting left turn phases (e.g., northbound right turns during westbound left turn phase), as well as non-conflicting through flows (e.g., northbound right turn movements and north/south through flows). Right turn movements become critical when conflicting movements (e.g., northbound right turns, southbound left turns, and eastbound through flows) represent a sum of V/C ratios that are greater than the normal through/left turn critical movements. ATTACHMENT 4 51 3-3 3.2 HCM Methodology Study area intersections that are stop sign controlled with stop control on the minor street only have been analyzed using the unsignalized intersection methodology of the Highway Capacity Manual (HCM 2000). For these intersections, the calculation of level of service is dependent on the occurrence of gaps occurring in the traffic flow of the main street. Using data collected describing the intersection configuration and traffic volumes at these locations, the level of service has been calculated. The level of service is determined based on the worst individual movement or movements sharing a single lane. The relationship between the level of service and delay is different than for signalized intersections. The level of service is defined for the various analysis methodologies as follows: Average Control Delay Per Vehicle (Seconds) LOS Unsignalized A 0.0 - 10.0 B 10.1 - 15.0 C 15.1 - 25.0 D 25.1 - 35.0 E 35.1 - 50.0 F >50.1 3.3 Thresholds of Significance In Culver City, the impact of a project on a signalized intersection is considered significant if the project related increase in the V/C ratio equals or exceeds the thresholds shown below: ATTACHMENT 4 52 3-4 SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Pre-project LOS V/C Project Related Increase in V/C Ratio A 0.600 or less No Significant Impact B 0.601 – 0.700 No Significant Impact C 0.701 – 0.800 Equal or greater than 0.05 D 0.801 - 0.900 Equal or greater than 0.04 E 0.901 – 1.000 Equal or greater than 0.02 F 1.00 or more Equal or greater than 0.02 Based on the analysis, the proposed 7-Eleven is not expected to exceed the intersection thresholds and therefore does not create a significant impact. 3.4 Existing Level of Service Table 1 shows the existing intersection levels of service. Currently, the intersection of Sepulveda Boulevard (NS) at Braddock Drive (EW) is operating at a LOS D in both the weekday AM and PM peak hours. The levels of service worksheets for existing conditions are included in Appendix B. ATTACHMENT 4 53 4-1 4.0 Trip Generation Trip generation represents the amount of traffic that is attracted to and produced by a development. The traffic generation for the proposed project is based upon the specific land uses which have been planned for the development. Trip generation rates for the proposed project’s land uses are shown in Table 2. These rates were pre-approved by the City of Culver City staff. The trip generation rates are based upon data collected by the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE). The ITE description of a convenience market (open 24 hours), ITE Trip Code 851, accurately reflects the operation of the proposed 7-Eleven project. The ITE trip rates are based off of 33 weekday peak hour samples. Based upon these samples, it is justifiable to use ITE Trip Code 851 for this project. Based on surveys published by ITE, it is generally acceptable to assume a conservative 50% of all vehicles frequenting a convenience market (open 24 hours) are from pass-by traffic. However, in order to be conservative, the City of Culver City has required that a maximum of 25% pass-by trip credits be taken for this project. The net trip generation has been applied to the two (2) signalized study intersections and the full trip generation has been applied to the project driveways. The proposed development is projected to generate on weekdays approximately 1,384 net trip-ends per day with 168 total net vehicles per hour during the AM peak hour and 98 total vehicles per hour during the PM peak hour. The net trip generation, with a 25% pass-by credit, was utilized when analyzing the proposed project. The net trip generation is calculated by subtracting 25% of the total trips generated by the project. Table 3 provides a detailed summary of the project trip generation. ATTACHMENT 4 54 4-2 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK ATTACHMENT 4 55 5-1 5.0 Trip Distribution Trip distribution represents the directional orientation of traffic to and from the project site. Trip distribution is heavily influenced by the geographical location of the site, the location of residential, employment, commercial and recreational opportunities and the proximity to the regional freeway system. The directional orientation of traffic was determined by evaluating existing and proposed land uses and highways within the community and existing traffic volumes. The trip distribution for this analysis has been based upon Future (Year 2013) conditions, based upon those highway facilities, which are in place or will be contemplated over the near-term. Outbound and inbound trip distribution patterns for this project are shown on Exhibit F-1 and F-2, respectively. The project trip distribution was pre-approved by the City of Culver City prior to completing the analysis. ATTACHMENT 4 56 5-2 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK ATTACHMENT 4 57 6-1 6.0 Trip Assignment The assignment of traffic from the site to the adjoining roadway system has been based upon the site's trip generation, trip distribution, existing arterial highway and local street systems. Based on the identified project trip generation and distributions, project related traffic volumes are shown on Exhibit G. ATTACHMENT 4 58 6-2 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK ATTACHMENT 4 59 7-1 7.0 Traffic Impact Analysis Traffic impacts have been projected and analyzed for (1) Existing Plus Project Conditions; (2) Existing Plus Ambient Growth (Year 2013) Plus Related Projects conditions; and (3) Existing Plus Ambient Growth (Year 2013) Plus Related Projects and Project conditions. The traffic impact study will determine any recommendations necessary to accommodate the project. 7.1 Existing Plus Project Conditions Existing Plus Project conditions traffic volumes are determined by adding the project traffic to the existing traffic volumes. These volumes are shown in Exhibit H. Table 4 shows the intersection analysis for Existing Plus Project conditions. The LOS calculation worksheets are included in Appendix C. 7.2 Existing Plus Ambient Growth (Year 2013) Plus Related Projects Conditions A list of related projects has been obtained from the City of Culver City staff. Table 5 summarizes the trip generation for each of these projects. Exhibit I shows the related projects locations. Appendix D contains the related projects list provided to RK by the City. The related projects are based upon a report previously submitted to the City. The projected weekday AM and PM peak hour traffic volumes for the related projects are available in Exhibit J. Existing Plus Ambient Growth (Year 2013) Plus Related Projects conditions traffic volumes are determined by adding area wide growth (1% per year) to the existing traffic volumes and adding in the Related Project’s traffic volumes. These volumes are shown in Exhibit K. ATTACHMENT 4 60 7-2 Table 6 shows the intersection analysis for Existing Plus Ambient Growth Plus (Year 2013) Plus Related Projects conditions. The LOS calculation worksheets are included in Appendix E. 7.3 Existing Plus Ambient Growth (Year 2013), Plus Related Projects Plus Project Conditions To assess Existing Plus Ambient Growth (Year 2013) Plus Related Projects Plus Project conditions, traffic for the proposed project was added to the Existing Plus Ambient Growth (Year 2013) Plus Related Projects conditions. Weekday AM and PM peak hour traffic volumes for this scenario are shown in Exhibit L. Table 7 presents the intersection analysis for Existing Plus Ambient Growth (Year 2013) Plus Related Projects Plus Project conditions. The LOS calculation worksheets are included in Appendix F. Based on the City’s thresholds, this project will not significantly impact any the study area intersections or roadway segments. Table 8 shows a level of service summary. ATTACHMENT 4 61 8-1 8.0 Residential Streets Segment Analysis Due to the close proximity of the proposed project to a residential neighborhood, a residential street segment analysis has been performed. Braddock Drive, east and west of Sepulveda Boulevard, is classified as a collector street and the surrounding land uses are zoned residential. To determine a significant impact on the residential streets, the project’s average daily traffic (ADT) was compared to the future ADT along the roadway segment for the Existing Plus Ambient Growth (Year 2013) Plus Related Projects Plus Project conditions. This analysis follows the guidelines for determining significant impacts set forth by the City of Culver City. The following table shows the City of Culver City’s significant impact thresholds. Projected Average Daily Traffic (ADT) with Project Project-Related Increase in Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 999 or less 120 or more 1,000 to 1,999 12 percent or more of final ADT 2,000 to 2,999 10 percent or more of final ADT 3,000 or more 8 percent or more of final ADT Based on the City’s thresholds the proposed project will not significantly impact any of the study area roadway segments. Table 9 shows the results of the Residential Street Segment Analysis ATTACHMENT 4 62 8-2 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK ATTACHMENT 4 63 9-1 9.0 Recommendations As aforementioned, based on the City’s thresholds, this project will not significantly impact any off-site study area intersection. As such, given the findings of the traffic impact study, RK would make the following recommendations: 1. Complete internal circulation system per City of Culver City standards. This will include constructing the two (2) project driveways to existing City standards. 2. Complete any remaining half-section improvements to Sepulveda Boulevard and Braddock Drive adjacent to the project. 3. In conjunction with the preparation of precise grading and landscape plans, sight distance should be reviewed at project access points per City of Culver City standards. 4. Install stop signs, stop bars and stop legends at the project access points. 5. Participate in any City appropriate Development Impact Fees as they pertain to the project. 6. Recommendations are graphically summarized in Exhibit M. ATTACHMENT 4 64 9-2 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK ATTACHMENT 4 65 10-1 10.0 Conclusions Based upon the analysis of Existing and Future (Year 2013) traffic volumes, the proposed 7-Eleven 24-hour Convenience Market can be accommodated within the City of Culver City, with the implementation of the recommendations stated in this report. The project will not have a significant traffic impact to the City of Culver City. ATTACHMENT 4 66 10-2 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK ATTACHMENT 4 67______________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________ Exhibits ATTACHMENT 4 68ATTACHMENT 4 ATTACHMENT 4 ATTACHMENT 4 A TTACHMENT 4 ATTACHMENT 4 A TTACHMENT A TTACHMENT ATTACHMENT 4 ATTACHMENT 4 A TTACHMENT 4 ATTACHMENT 4 ATTACHMENT 4 ATTACHMENT 4 ATTACHMENT 4 ______________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________ Tables ATTACHMENT 4 83L T R L T R L T R L T R AM PM AM PM AM PM • Culver Boulevard (EW) TS 2.0 2.0 1.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 2.5 0.5 0.869 0.825 0.799 0.755 C C • Braddock Drive (EW) TS 1.0 1.5 0.5 1.0 1.5 0.5 0.0 1! 0.0 0.0 1! 0.0 0.772 0.727 0.702 0.657 C B • Project Access 1 (EW) CSS N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A • Braddock Drive (EW) CSS N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A|10
10| L = Left; T = Through; R = Right; > = Right Turn Overlap; >> = Free Right Turn; Bold = Improvement|101010|TS = Traffic Signal CSS = Cross Street Stop|1010|A 0.07 reduction in the V/C ration was taken for ATSAC-type traffic signal synchronization, as specified by the City of Culver City ATSAC = Automated Traffic Surveillance and Control TABLE 1 Level of Service Southbound Eastbound Westbound Intersection Approach Lane(s)|10
10|Critical V/C Ratio or Delay (Sec.)|1010|Northbound Intersection Analysis For Existing Conditions Intersection Sepulveda Blvd. (NS) at: When a right turn lane is designated, the lane can either be striped or unstriped. To function as a right turn lane there must be sufficient width for right turning vehicles to travel outside the through lanes. Where "1!" is indicated for the through movement and "0"s are indicated for R/L movements, the R and/or L turns are shared with the through movement. Analysis Software: Traffix, Version 8.0. Per the Intersection Capacity Utilization methodology, overall volume to capacity ratios and levels of service are shown for intersections controlled by traffic signals. Critical delay in seconds is shown per Highway Capacity Manual (HCM 2000) methodology to analyze stop controlled intersections and LOS is determined based on the worst individual movement or movements sharing a single lane. Traffic Control|1010|Project Access 2 (NS) at: V/C Less ATSAC Adjustment 4 J:\RKtables\RK9299TB JN:2243-2012-01 ATTACHMENT 4 84In Out In Out 7-Eleven Convenience Market (Open 24 Hours) 851 TSF 33.52 33.52 26.73 25.68 737.99|10
10| Source: Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE), Trip Generation, 8th Edition , 2008 (Trip Code 851).|1010| TSF = Thousand Square Feet TABLE 2 Trip Generation Rates|10
10|AM PM Peak Hour ITE CODE Land Use Units|1010|PROPOSED PROJECT (7-ELEVEN) LAND USE Daily j:/rktables/RK9299TB.xls JN:2243-2012-01 ATTACHMENT 4 85In Out Total AM In Out Total PM 851 2.50 TSF 84 84 168 67 64 131 1,845 -21 -21 -42 -17 -16 -33 -461 63 63 126 50 48 98 1,384|10
10|TSF = Thousand Square Feet|1010|Pass-by trip percentages were approved by City of Culver City Traffic Engineer. Net Trip Total TABLE 3 Project Trip Generation Comparison Proposed Project (7-Eleven) Land Use Less Pass-by Trips (25%)|1010|Qty. AM Peak Hour PM Proposed Land Use ITE Code 7-Eleven Convenience Market (Open 24 Hours) Daily Units|10
10|j:/rktables/RK9299TB.xls JN:2243-2012-01 ATTACHMENT 4 86L T R L T R L T R L T R AM PM AM PM AM PM • Culver Boulevard (EW) TS 2.0 2.0 1.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 2.5 0.5 0.875 0.831 0.805 0.761 D C • Braddock Drive (EW) TS 1.0 1.5 0.5 1.0 1.5 0.5 0.0 1! 0.0 0.0 1! 0.0 0.811 0.742 0.741 0.672 C B • Project Access 1 (EW) CSS 0.0 1.5 0.5 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 15.1 13.1 N/A N/A C B • Braddock Drive (EW) CSS 0.5 0.0 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.0 14.1 13.2 N/A N/A B B|10
10| L = Left; T = Through; R = Right; > = Right Turn Overlap; >> = Free Right Turn; Bold = Improvement|101010|TS = Traffic Signal CSS = Cross Street Stop|1010|A 0.07 reduction in the V/C ration was taken for ATSAC-type traffic signal synchronization, as specified by the City of Culver City ATSAC = Automated Traffic Surveillance and Control Traffic Control|1010|Project Access 2 (NS) at: Sepulveda Blvd. (NS) at: When a right turn lane is designated, the lane can either be striped or unstriped. To function as a right turn lane there must be sufficient width for right turning vehicles to travel outside the through lanes. Where "1" is indicated for the through movement and "0"s are indicated for R/L movements, the R and/or L turns are shared with the through movement. Intersection V/C Less ATSAC Adjustment Analysis Software: Traffix, Version 8.0. Per the Intersection Capacity Utilization methodology, overall volume to capacity ratios and levels of service are shown for intersections controlled by traffic signals. Critical delay in seconds is shown per Highway Capacity Manual (HCM 2000) methodology to analyze stop controlled intersections and LOS is determined based on the worst individual movement or movements sharing a single lane. TABLE 4 Level of Service Southbound Eastbound Westbound Intersection Approach Lane(s)|10
10|Critical V/C Ratio or Delay (Sec.)|1010|Northbound Intersection Analysis For Existing Plus Project Conditions j:/rktables/RK9299TB JN:2243-2012-01 ATTACHMENT 4 87Size In Out Total In Out Total Townhomes 15 units 1 6 75 38 87 Townhomes -3 units 0 -1 -1-1 -1-2 -17 1 5 64 26 70 2 3972 Tilden Ave. Condominiums 4 units 0 2 21 12 23 3 3954 Sepulveda Blvd. Hotel 77 rooms 26 17 43 24 21 45 629 4 10826-10830 Washington Blvd. Dental Office 2,989 sq. ft. 6 1 7 3 7 10 108 5 11957 Washington Blvd. Office 73,569 sq. ft. 100 14 114 24 21 45 810 6 10638 Culver Blvd. Gas Station N/A 5510 0 0 0 125 Retail 2,359 sq. ft 2 1 33 36 105 Office 937 sq. ft. 1 0 10 11 10 Apartments 2 units 0 1 11 01 13 3 2 54 48 128 8 3846 Bentley Ave. Condominiums 4 units 0 2 21 12 23 9 11167 Washington Blvd. Auto Repair Shop 1,196 sq. ft. 3 1 42 24 42 10 11304 Culver Blvd. Auto Repair Shop 1,280 sq. ft. 3 1 42 24 45 Elementary School 124 Students 31 25 56 9 10 19 160 Middle School 42 Students 13 10 23 3 3 6 68 High School 84 Students 24 11 35 5 6 11 144 Medical Office 10,000 sq. ft. -18 -5 -23 -9 -25 -34 -363 50 41 91 8 -6 2 9 12 11012-11014 Washington Blvd. Commercial 3,385 sq. ft. 4 1 51 45 162 Retail 10,700 sq. ft. 8 6 1413 1629 474 Apartments 33 units 3 14 17 13 7 20 219 11 20 31 26 23 49 693 Apartments 30 units 3 12 15 12 7 19 200 Special Retail 8,798 7 5 1210 1323 390 10 17 27 22 20 42 590 Apartments 126 units -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Office 23,000 sq. ft. -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Retail 9,000 sq. ft -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 52 73 125 96 71 167 1,802 Retail 6,500 sq. ft. 3 3 6 11 11 22 251 Restaurant 12,722 sq. ft 61 57 118 67 47 114 1,294 Supermarket 14,900 sq. ft 25 17 42 64 61 125 1,218 89 77 166 142 119 261 2,763 363 279 642 360 292 652 8,022|10
10| Note: Related projects trip generation provided by the City of Culver City Zone|10
10|Land Use 10601 Washington Blvd. Net Total Zone 1 3823-3833 Huron Ave. 11501-11509 Washington Blvd. 11042-11056 Tilden Ave. 12095-12101 Washington Blvd. Net Total Zone 11 Net Total (All Zones)|1010|TABLE 5 Related Projects Trip Generation|10
10|AM Peak Hour PM 11 Project Address Daily Net Total Zone 15 4114 Sepulveda Boulevard 16 Net Total Zone 16 15 14 13 11955 Washington Blvd. Net Total Zone 7 Net Total Zone 13 Net Total Zone 14 j:/rktables/RK9299TB JN:2243-2012-01 ATTACHMENT 4 88L T R L T R L T R L T R AM PM AM PM AM PM • Culver Boulevard (EW) TS 2.0 2.0 1.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 2.5 0.5 0.914 0.866 0.844 0.796 D C • Braddock Drive (EW) TS 1.0 1.5 0.5 1.0 1.5 0.5 0.0 1! 0.0 0.0 1! 0.0 0.811 0.780 0.741 0.710 C C • Project Access 1 (EW) CSS N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A • Braddock Drive (EW) CSS N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A|10
10| L = Left; T = Through; R = Right; > = Right Turn Overlap; >> = Free Right Turn; Bold = Improvement|101010|TS = Traffic Signal CSS = Cross Street Stop|1010|A 0.07 reduction in the V/C ration was taken for ATSAC-type traffic signal synchronization, as specified by the City of Culver City ATSAC = Automated Traffic Surveillance and Control TABLE 6 Level of Service Southbound Eastbound Westbound Intersection Approach Lane(s)|10
10|Critical V/C Ratio or Delay (Sec.)|1010|Northbound Intersection Analysis For Buildout Year (2013) Plus Related Projects Conditions Intersection Sepulveda Blvd. (NS) at: When a right turn lane is designated, the lane can either be striped or unstriped. To function as a right turn lane there must be sufficient width for right turning vehicles to travel outside the through lanes. Where "1!" is indicated for the through movement and "0"s are indicated for R/L movements, the R and/or L turns are shared with the through movement. Analysis Software: Traffix, Version 8.0. Per the Intersection Capacity Utilization methodology, overall volume to capacity ratios and levels of service are shown for intersections controlled by traffic signals. Critical delay in seconds is shown per Highway Capacity Manual (HCM 2000) methodology to analyze stop controlled intersections and LOS is determined based on the worst individual movement or movements sharing a single lane. Traffic Control|1010|Project Access 2 (NS) at: V/C Less ATSAC Adjustment j:/rktables/RK9299TB JN:2243-2012-01 ATTACHMENT 4 89L T R L T R L T R L T R AM PM AM PM AM PM • Culver Boulevard (EW) TS 2.0 2.0 1.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 2.5 0.5 0.920 0.871 0.850 0.801 D D • Braddock Drive (EW) TS 1.0 1.5 0.5 1.0 1.5 0.5 0.0 1! 0.0 0.0 1! 0.0 0.850 0.795 0.780 0.725 C C • Project Access 1 (EW) TS 0.0 1.5 0.5 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 16.3 13.8 N/A N/A B C • Braddock Drive (EW) TS 0.5 0.0 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.0 14.3 13.4 N/A N/A B B|10
10| L = Left; T = Through; R = Right; > = Right Turn Overlap; >> = Free Right Turn; Bold = Improvement|101010|TS = Traffic Signal CSS = Cross Street Stop|1010|A 0.07 reduction in the V/C ration was taken for ATSAC-type traffic signal synchronization, as specified by the City of Culver City ATSAC = Automated Traffic Surveillance and Control Traffic Control|1010|Project Access 2 (NS) at: Sepulveda Blvd. (NS) at: When a right turn lane is designated, the lane can either be striped or unstriped. To function as a right turn lane there must be sufficient width for right turning vehicles to travel outside the through lanes. Where "1!" is indicated for the through movement and "0"s are indicated for R/L movements, the R and/or L turns are shared with the through movement. Intersection V/C Less ATSAC Adjustment Analysis Software: Traffix, Version 8.0. Per the Intersection Capacity Utilization methodology, overall volume to capacity ratios and levels of service are shown for intersections controlled by traffic signals. Critical delay in seconds is shown per Highway Capacity Manual (HCM 2000) methodology to analyze stop controlled intersections and LOS is determined based on the worst individual movement or movements sharing a single lane. TABLE 7 Level of Service Southbound Eastbound Westbound Intersection Approach Lane(s)|10
10|Critical V/C Ratio or Delay (Sec.)|1010|Northbound Intersection Analysis For Buildout Year (2013) Plus Related Projects Plus Project Conditions j:/rktables/RK9299TB JN:2243-2012-01 ATTACHMENT 4 90AM PM AM PM AM PM AM PM AM PM AM PM • Culver Boulevard (EW) 0.799 0.755 C C 0.805 0.761 D C 0.006 0.006 NO NO • Braddock Drive (EW) 0.702 0.657 C B 0.741 0.672 C B 0.039 0.015 NO NO • Project Access 1 (EW) N/A N/A N/A N/A 15.1 13.1 C B N/A N/A N/A N/A • Braddock Drive (EW) N/A N/A N/A N/A 14.1 13.2 B B N/A N/A N/A N/A AM PM AM PM AM PM AM PM AM PM AM PM • Culver Boulevard (EW) 0.844 0.796 D C 0.850 0.801 D D 0.006 0.005 NO NO • Braddock Drive (EW) 0.741 0.710 C C 0.780 0.725 C C 0.039 0.015 NO NO • Project Access 1 (EW) N/A N/A N/A N/A 16.3 13.8 B C N/A N/A N/A N/A • Braddock Drive (EW) N/A N/A N/A N/A 14.3 13.4 B B N/A N/A N/A N/A|10
101010|Significant Impact = Yes, if project related increase in V/C ratio is: ? LOS C, equal or greater than 0.05 ? LOS D, equal or greater than 0.04 ? LOS E, equal or greater than 0.02 ? LOS F, equal or greater than 0.02 V/C Ratio for all signalized intersections include ATSAC-type adjustment. Project Access 2 (NS) at Level of Service Sepulveda Boulevard (NS) at: ICU Critical V/C Ratio 1,2 Level of Service ICU Critical V/C Ratio 1,2 Level of Service Level of Service ICU Critical V/C Ratio 1,2 Analysis Software: Traffix, Version 8.0. Per the Intersection Capacity Utilization methodology, overall volume to capacity ratios and levels of service are shown for intersections controlled by traffic signals. Critical delay in seconds is shown per Hig. TABLE 8 Summary Intersection Analysis Intersection Intersection Analysis for Existing Conditions Intersection Analysis For Existing Plus Project Conditions Intersection Intersection Analysis For Buildout Year (2013) With Related Projects Conditions ICU Critical V/C Ratio 1,2 Intersection Analysis For Buildout Year (2013) With Related Projects and Project Conditions Sepulveda Boulevard (NS) at: Project Access 2 (NS) at Project Related Increase V/C Ratio Significant Impact|1010|Project Related Increase in V/C Ratio Significant Impact|1010|j:/rktables/RK9299TB JN:2243-2012-01 ATTACHMENT 4 91Project Buildout (Year 2013) Plus Related Projects Plus Project (ADT) Project Traffic (ADT) Project % of Project Buildout (Year 2013) Plus Related Projects Plus Project Conditions Significant Impact • East of Sepulveda Boulevard 6,400 138 2.16% NO • West of Sepulveda Boulevard 6,700 138 2.06% NO|10
10| Residential Street Analysis performed in accordance with City of Culver City guidelines. Residential Streets Segment Analysis|10
10|TABLE 9 Roadway Segment Braddock Drive j:/rktables/RK9299TB JN:2243-2012-01 ATTACHMENT 4 92ATTACHMENT 4 93 ATTACHMENT 4 94 ATTACHMENT 4 96 ATTACHMENT 4 99 ATTACHMENT 4 100 ATTACHMENT 4 101 ATTACHMENT 4 102 ATTACHMENT 4 103 ATTACHMENT 4 104 ATTACHMENT 4 105 ATTACHMENT 4 106 ATTACHMENT 4 107 ATTACHMENT 4 108 ATTACHMENT 4 109 ATTACHMENT 4 110 ATTACHMENT 4 111 ATTACHMENT 4 112 ATTACHMENT 4 113 ATTACHMENT 4 114 ATTACHMENT 4 115 ATTACHMENT 4 116 ATTACHMENT 4 117 ATTACHMENT 4 118 ATTACHMENT 4 119 120 ATTACHMENT 4 ATTACHMENT 4 121 ATTACHMENT 4 122 ATTACHMENT 4 123 ATTACHMENT 4 124 ATTACHMENT 4 125 ATTACHMENT 4 126 ATTACHMENT 4 127 ATTACHMENT 4 128 ATTACHMENT 4 129 ATTACHMENT 4 130 ATTACHMENT 4 131 ATTACHMENT 4 132 ATTACHMENT 4 133 ATTACHMENT 4 134 ATTACHMENT 4 135 ATTACHMENT 4 136 ATTACHMENT 4 137 ATTACHMENT 4 138 ATTACHMENT 4 139 ATTACHMENT 4 140 ATTACHMENT 4 141 ATTACHMENT 4 142 ATTACHMENT 4 143 ATTACHMENT 4 144 ATTACHMENT 4 BE:mn/RK9387.doc 2 JN:2243-2012-02 This study has addressed the following issues raised by the Culver City Planning Commission on March 14, 2012: 1. Evaluate the potential for conflicts between vehicles entering/exiting the project site and pedestrians along the sidewalk adjacent to the site. 2. Review the project’s impact on motorists queuing up at the intersection of Sepulveda Boulevard and Braddock Drive. 3. Review the sight distance for motorists entering Braddock Drive from the adjacent alley. Findings This study’s main focus was to evaluate potential safety issues that may arise as a result of the proposed project. The project was assessed from a traffic engineering standpoint and both vehicular and pedestrian safety was reviewed. Based upon our analysis of the proposed project site, the project can be accommodated within the City of Culver City without causing significant traffic or pedestrian safety conflicts. There would be more than adequate gaps of pedestrians and vehicles for motorists to access the project site without causing excessive delays. Existing Conditions The project site is located on the southeast corner of Sepulveda Boulevard and Braddock Drive, at 4436 Sepulveda Boulevard, in the City of Culver City. The site was previously occupied by a gas service station but has been vacant since 1998. Pedestrian Counts Pedestrian counts were conducted on Thursday March 22, 2012 along the eastern sidewalk of Sepulveda Boulevard and the northern and southern sidewalks of Braddock Drive. The locations are shown in Exhibit B. The count times were conducted before, during, and after school hours in order to capture the highest amount of school-age pedestrian traffic. The following peak time intervals were recorded: PEAK PERIOD TIME AM 6:30 AM – 8:30 AM NOON 12:15 PM – 1:15 PM PM 2:15 PM – 4:15 PM The results of the pedestrian survey are shown in Exhibit B. Pedestrian count worksheets are provided in Appendix A. ATTACHMENT 4 147BE:mn/RK9387.doc 3 JN:2243-2012-02 Pedestrian and Vehicle Gap Study One of the main concerns raised by the Planning Commission and local residents was whether vehicles going to and from the proposed project will be able to safely access the site without conflicting with pedestrians. Specifically, traffic entering/exiting the site should have plenty of time to complete a turn without having excessive delay. To address this concern, a pedestrian and vehicle Gap Study was performed to determine the feasibility of accessing the site during peak hours. In order for a vehicle to safely enter or exit the site, a gap in pedestrians traveling along the sidewalk, as well as a gap in vehicles traveling along the roadway must be present. For the purposes of this analysis, a gap is defined as the time interval between a car or pedestrian crossing a point (the proposed driveway) and another car or pedestrian crossing that same point. Therefore, it may be assumed that the number of potential conflicts between pedestrians and vehicles are inversely related to the number of gaps. In other words, the more gaps there are between pedestrians and vehicles, the less likely it is that a conflict would occur. The pedestrian and vehicle Gap Study was performed on Thursday, March 22, 2012, during the peak pedestrian count periods described above. The Gap study was performed by counting the number of gaps of pedestrians on the sidewalk and the number of gaps in vehicles on the roadway and the length of each gap. The Pedestrian and Vehicle Gap Study had the following specifications: I. The Gap studies were performed at three (3) locations: a. Northside of Braddock Drive at the alley b. Southside of Braddock Drive at the proposed driveway c. Eastside of Sepulveda Boulevard at the proposed driveway II. Gap studies were performed during the following time periods: a. 6:30 AM – 8:30 AM b. 12:15 PM – 1:15 PM c. 2:15 PM – 4:15 PM III. The minimum gap time needed for one (1) car to complete a turn is seven (7) seconds. Each subsequent car following the first car needs five (5) seconds to complete a turn. (A gap of 7 seconds can accommodate 1 car, a gap of 8 seconds can accommodate 1 car… a gap of 12 seconds can accommodate 2 cars… a gap of 17 seconds can accommodate 3 cars… etc.) IV. The worst case peak one-hour totals were analyzed. (The 60-minute interval within the survey period where the least amount of gap time occurs.) V. Gaps less than five (5) seconds in length were not recorded. ATTACHMENT 4 148BE:mn/RK9387.doc 4 JN:2243-2012-02 The results of the Pedestrian and Vehicle Gap Study are provided in Tables 1A through 3C. Table 4 compares the number of gaps observed during the study to the amount of vehicular traffic that will be utilizing the project driveways. The project will generate approximately 168 total vehicle trips in the AM peak hour and 131 total vehicle trips in the PM peak hour (Appendix D). Access to the site will be shared between the Braddock Driveway and the Sepulveda Driveway. It should be noted that the alleyway on the north side of Braddock Drive was included in this study for reference purposes only. The amount of traffic entering and exiting the alleyway during the peak hours is based on trip generation rates provided by the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation 8 th Edition, for a 2,000 square foot fast food restaurant with drive-thru. Based on the results of the analysis, there will be an ample number of pedestrians and vehicles gaps to allow for safe and efficient access to and from the site. Gap count worksheets are provided in Appendix B. It is noted that using a more conservative measure of seven (7) second gaps for all motorists still provides more gaps than needed to avoid excessive delay for motorists entering/exiting the site. See Appendix E for calculations. Queuing at Sepulveda Boulevard and Braddock Drive This study has addressed the concern that the project will have an impact on motorists queuing at the intersection of Sepulveda Boulevard and Braddock Drive. Based on the data provided in the traffic impact study, the project would add 25 additional vehicles in the AM peak hour and 19 vehicles in the PM peak hour entering the intersection from westbound Braddock Drive. The intersection analysis conducted in the traffic study showed that with the project, the intersection of Sepulveda Boulevard and Braddock Drive will continue to operate at a good level of service (LOS) C, without excessive delays for motorists entering the intersection. Sight Distance Sight distance restrictions have been reviewed at the project access points, as well as at the existing alleyway, and compared to standards set for by the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO). Intersections should be carefully designed to ensure adequate approach sight distance. Sight distance has been reviewed to allow drivers of stopped vehicles a sufficient view of the intersecting roadway so they may decide when to enter the intersecting roadway. Per AASHTO standards, the driver’s eye height is assumed to be 3.5 feet while in a vehicle at an intersection, and 15 feet back from the projection of the curb line. This sight distance is based upon full access driveways, without access restrictions. It should be noted that access from Sepulveda Boulevard is restricted to ATTACHMENT 4 149BE:mn/RK9387.doc 5 JN:2243-2012-02 right-in/right-out only. The object height is assumed to be 4.5 feet. A copy of the AASHTO intersection site distance standards is available in Appendix C. Special care has also been taken to ensure that the project site will not impact the adjacent residential homes. The existing alley to the east of the site will remain and an eight-foot property line wall will be installed along the north side of the site. Concerns have been raised with regards to sight distance for drivers exiting the alley. Braddock Drive has a posted speed limit of 25 miles per hour; however to be conservative, a 35 mile per hour design speed has been assumed for calculating sight distance. Drivers exiting the alley would need approximately 390 feet of sight distance to have sufficient view of the roadway. Given that the proposed wall will be offset ten (10) feet from the property line, sufficient view of the roadway will exist. See Exhibit C for a sight distance diagram. Sight distance has been reviewed at all access points to the site. Based on the analysis of the current site plan, adequate sight distance is provided per AASHTO standards. Recommendations The following recommendations have been made for the proposed 7-Eleven 24-Hour Convenience Market located on the southeast corner of Sepulveda Boulevard and Braddock Drive. I. Construct project per specifications described in the latest site plan. II. Provide pedestrian walkways to the front entrance of the convenience market, from the sidewalks along Sepulveda Boulevard and Braddock Drive. III. Maintain a clear line of sight for vehicles negotiating the project access points and adjacent alleyway. Trees, bushes, and architectural décor should not block the line of sight requirements at these intersections. IV. The City of Culver City should periodically review traffic operations in the vicinity of the site once the project is constructed to assure that the traffic operations are satisfactory. All recommendations are graphically illustrated on Exhibit D. Conclusions Based upon the analyses described in this study for the proposed 7-Eleven 24-Hour Convenience Market, there are ample gaps of pedestrians on the sidewalk and vehicles on the street to allow for safe and efficient access to and from the site. ATTACHMENT 4 150151 ATTACHMENT 4 Exhibits ATTACHMENT 4 152ATTACHMENT 4 ATTACHMENT 4 ATTACHMENT 4 Tables ATTACHMENT 4 157Gap (Seconds)|10
10|Number of Vehicles Served by Gap|1010|Number of Gaps Occurring During Peak Hour|1010|Total Vehicles Served During Peak Hour |1010|5 - 6 0 19 0 7 - 11 1 46 46 12 - 16 2 15 30 17 - 21 3 9 27 22 - 26 4 10 40 27 - 31 5 6 30 32 - 36 6 5 30 37 - 41 7 4 28 42 - 46 8 3 24 47 - 51 9 3 27 52 - 56 10 2 20 57 - 61 11 1 11 62 and greater 12 9 108 421|10
1010101010|TABLE 1A (AM PEAK HOUR) Values are based on Gap Survey performed on March 22, 2012. Total Vehicles Served = (Number of Vehicles Served) x (Number of Gaps During Peak Hour) Sum of Total Vehicles Served During Peak Hour. PEDESTRIAN AND VEHICLE GAP ANALYSIS TOTAL NUMBER OF VEHICLES ABLE TO ENTER/EXIT PROJECT DRIVEWAY DURING PEAK HOUR|1010|A gap is defined as the time interval between a car or pedestrian crossing a point (the proposed driveway) and another car or pedestrian crossing that point. For the purposes of this study, it is assumed the minimum time for one vehicle to safely complete a turning movement into or out of the project driveway is 7 seconds. For each vehicle subsequently following the first, the time to complete a turn is 5 seconds . NORTHERN SIDE OF BRADDOCK DRIVE (7:17AM - 8:17AM) NORTHERN SIDE OF BRADDOCK DRIVE J:\RKtables\RK9387TB.xls JN:2243-2012-02 ATTACHMENT 4 158Gap (Seconds)|10
10|Number of Vehicles Served by Gap|1010|Number of Gaps Occurring During Peak Hour|1010|Total Vehicles Served During Peak Hour |1010|5 - 6 0 29 0 7 - 11 1 57 57 12 - 16 2 28 56 17 - 21 3 27 81 22 - 26 4 10 40 27 - 31 5 9 45 32 - 36 6 9 54 37 - 41 7 2 14 42 - 46 8 5 40 47 - 51 9 3 27 52 - 56 10 3 30 57 - 61 11 1 11 62 and greater 12 1 12 467|10
1010101010|TABLE 1B NORTHERN SIDE OF BRADDOCK DRIVE Values are based on Gap Survey performed on March 22, 2012. Total Vehicles Served = (Number of Vehicles Served) x (Number of Gaps During Peak Hour) Sum of Total Vehicles Served During Peak Hour. PEDESTRIAN AND VEHICLE GAP ANALYSIS TOTAL NUMBER OF VEHICLES ABLE TO ENTER/EXIT PROJECT DRIVEWAY DURING PEAK HOUR|1010|A gap is defined as the time interval between a car or pedestrian crossing a point (the proposed driveway) and another car or pedestrian crossing that point. For the purposes of this study, it is assumed the minimum time for one vehicle to safely complete a turning movement into or out of the project driveway is 7 seconds. For each vehicle subsequently following the first, the time to complete a turn is 5 seconds. NORTHERN SIDE OF BRADDOCK DRIVE (12:15PM - 1:15PM) (MID-DAY PEAK HOUR) J:\RKtables\RK9387TB.xls JN:2243-2012-02 ATTACHMENT 4 159Gap (Seconds)|10
10|Number of Vehicles Served by Gap|1010|Number of Gaps Occurring During Peak Hour|1010|Total Vehicles Served During Peak Hour |1010|5 - 6 0 30 0 7 - 11 1 55 55 12 - 16 2 33 66 17 - 21 3 19 57 22 - 26 4 8 32 27 - 31 5 8 40 32 - 36 6 3 18 37 - 41 7 4 28 42 - 46 8 3 24 47 - 51 9 2 18 52 - 56 10 2 20 57 - 61 11 3 33 62 and greater 12 3 36 427|10
1010101010|TABLE 1C NORTHERN SIDE OF BRADDOCK DRIVE Values are based on Gap Survey performed on March 22, 2012. Total Vehicles Served = (Number of Vehicles Served) x (Number of Gaps During Peak Hour) Sum of Total Vehicles Served During Peak Hour. PEDESTRIAN AND VEHICLE GAP ANALYSIS TOTAL NUMBER OF VEHICLES ABLE TO ENTER/EXIT PROJECT DRIVEWAY DURING PEAK HOUR|1010|A gap is defined as the time interval between a car or pedestrian crossing a point (the proposed driveway) and another car or pedestrian crossing that point. For the purposes of this study, it is assumed the minimum time for one vehicle to safely complete a turning movement into or out of the project driveway is 7 seconds. For each vehicle subsequently following the first, the time to complete a turn is 5 seconds. NORTHERN SIDE OF BRADDOCK DRIVE (3:15PM - 4:15PM) (PM PEAK HOUR) J:\RKtables\RK9387TB.xls JN:2243-2012-02 ATTACHMENT 4 160Gap (Seconds)|10
10|Number of Vehicles Served by Gap|1010|Number of Gaps Occurring During Peak Hour|1010|Total Vehicles Served During Peak Hour |1010|5 - 6 0 16 0 7 - 11 1 56 56 12 - 16 2 21 42 17 - 21 3 11 33 22 - 26 4 7 28 27 - 31 5 6 30 32 - 36 6 5 30 37 - 41 7 3 21 42 - 46 8 1 8 47 - 51 9 5 45 52 - 56 10 3 30 57 - 61 11 1 11 62 and greater 12 8 96 430|10
1010101010|Sum of Total Vehicles Served During Peak Hour. PEDESTRIAN AND VEHICLE GAP ANALYSIS TOTAL NUMBER OF VEHICLES ABLE TO ENTER/EXIT PROJECT DRIVEWAY DURING PEAK HOUR|1010|A gap is defined as the time interval between a car or pedestrian crossing a point (the proposed driveway) and another car or pedestrian crossing that point. For the purposes of this study, it is assumed the minimum time for one vehicle to safely complete a turning movement into or out of the project driveway is 7 seconds. For each vehicle subsequently following the first, the time to complete a turn is 5 seconds. SOUTHERN SIDE OF BRADDOCK DRIVE (7:29AM - 8:29AM) SOUTHERN SIDE OF BRADDOCK DRIVE TABLE 2A (AM PEAK HOUR) Values are based on Gap Survey performed on March 22, 2012. Total Vehicles Served = (Number of Vehicles Served) x (Number of Gaps During Peak Hour) J:\RKtables\RK9387TB.xls JN:2243-2012-02 ATTACHMENT 4 161Gap (Seconds)|10
10|Number of Vehicles Served by Gap|1010|Number of Gaps Occurring During Peak Hour|1010|Total Vehicles Served During Peak Hour |1010|5 - 6 0 20 0 7 - 11 1 46 46 12 - 16 2 35 70 17 - 21 3 22 66 22 - 26 4 17 68 27 - 31 5 11 55 32 - 36 6 9 54 37 - 41 7 3 21 42 - 46 8 3 24 47 - 51 9 2 18 52 - 56 10 3 30 57 - 61 11 0 0 62 and greater 12 2 24 476|10
1010101010|Sum of Total Vehicles Served During Peak Hour. PEDESTRIAN AND VEHICLE GAP ANALYSIS TOTAL NUMBER OF VEHICLES ABLE TO ENTER/EXIT PROJECT DRIVEWAY DURING PEAK HOUR|1010|A gap is defined as the time interval between a car or pedestrian crossing a point (the proposed driveway) and another car or pedestrian crossing that point. For the purposes of this study, it is assumed the minimum time for one vehicle to safely complete a turning movement into or out of the project driveway is 7 seconds. For each vehicle subsequently following the first, the time to complete a turn is 5 seconds. SOUTHERN SIDE OF BRADDOCK DRIVE (12:15PM - 1:15PM) (MID-DAY PEAK HOUR) TABLE 2B SOUTHERN SIDE OF BRADDOCK DRIVE Values are based on Gap Survey performed on March 22, 2012. Total Vehicles Served = (Number of Vehicles Served) x (Number of Gaps During Peak Hour) J:\RKtables\RK9387TB.xls JN:2243-2012-02 ATTACHMENT 4 162Gap (Seconds)|10
10|Number of Vehicles Served by Gap|1010|Number of Gaps Occurring During Peak Hour|1010|Total Vehicles Served During Peak Hour |1010|5 - 6 0 32 0 7 - 11 1 47 47 12 - 16 2 27 54 17 - 21 3 14 42 22 - 26 4 7 28 27 - 31 5 6 30 32 - 36 6 4 24 37 - 41 7 5 35 42 - 46 8 0 0 47 - 51 9 3 27 52 - 56 10 4 40 57 - 61 11 1 11 62 and greater 12 7 84 422|10
1010101010|Sum of Total Vehicles Served During Peak Hour. PEDESTRIAN AND VEHICLE GAP ANALYSIS TOTAL NUMBER OF VEHICLES ABLE TO ENTER/EXIT PROJECT DRIVEWAY DURING PEAK HOUR|1010|A gap is defined as the time interval between a car or pedestrian crossing a point (the proposed driveway) and another car or pedestrian crossing that point. For the purposes of this study, it is assumed the minimum time for one vehicle to safely complete a turning movement into or out of the project driveway is 7 seconds. For each vehicle subsequently following the first, the time to complete a turn is 5 seconds. SOUTHERN SIDE OF BRADDOCK DRIVE (3:15PM - 4:15PM) (PM PEAK HOUR) TABLE 2C SOUTHERN SIDE OF BRADDOCK DRIVE Values are based on Gap Survey performed on March 22, 2012. Total Vehicles Served = (Number of Vehicles Served) x (Number of Gaps During Peak Hour) J:\RKtables\RK9387TB.xls JN:2243-2012-02 ATTACHMENT 4 163Gap (Seconds)|10
10|Number of Vehicles Served by Gap|1010|Number of Gaps Occurring During Peak Hour|1010|Total Vehicles Served During Peak Hour |1010|5 - 6 0 47 0 7 - 11 1 62 62 12 - 16 2 23 46 17 - 21 3 8 24 22 - 26 4 5 20 27 - 31 5 2 10 32 - 36 6 3 18 37 - 41 7 1 7 42 - 46 8 1 8 47 - 51 9 0 0 52 - 56 10 0 0 57 - 61 11 0 0 62 and greater 12 0 0 195|10
1010101010|TABLE 3A (AM PEAK HOUR) Values are based on Gap Survey performed on March 22, 2012. Total Vehicles Served = (Number of Vehicles Served) x (Number of Gaps During Peak Hour) Sum of Total Vehicles Served During Peak Hour. PEDESTRIAN AND VEHICLE GAP ANALYSIS TOTAL NUMBER OF VEHICLES ABLE TO ENTER/EXIT PROJECT DRIVEWAY DURING PEAK HOUR|1010|A gap is defined as the time interval between a car or pedestrian crossing a point (the proposed driveway) and another car or pedestrian crossing that point. For the purposes of this study, it is assumed the minimum time for one vehicle to safely complete a turning movement into or out of the project driveway is 7 seconds. For each vehicle subsequently following the first, the time to complete a turn is 5 seconds. EASTERN SIDE OF SEPULVEDA BLVD (7:04AM - 8:04AM) EASTERN SIDE OF SEPULVEDA BOULEVARD J:\RKtables\RK9387TB.xls JN:2243-2012-02 ATTACHMENT 4 164Gap (Seconds)|10
10|Number of Vehicles Served by Gap|1010|Number of Gaps Occurring During Peak Hour|1010|Total Vehicles Served During Peak Hour |1010|5 - 6 0 52 0 7 - 11 1 71 71 12 - 16 2 28 56 17 - 21 3 17 51 22 - 26 4 11 44 27 - 31 5 5 25 32 - 36 6 5 30 37 - 41 7 0 0 42 - 46 8 0 0 47 - 51 9 1 9 52 - 56 10 0 0 57 - 61 11 0 0 62 and greater 12 0 0 286|10
1010101010|TABLE 3B EASTERN SIDE OF SEPULVEDA BOULEVARD Values are based on Gap Survey performed on March 22, 2012. Total Vehicles Served = (Number of Vehicles Served) x (Number of Gaps During Peak Hour) Sum of Total Vehicles Served During Peak Hour. PEDESTRIAN AND VEHICLE GAP ANALYSIS TOTAL NUMBER OF VEHICLES ABLE TO ENTER/EXIT PROJECT DRIVEWAY DURING PEAK HOUR|1010|A gap is defined as the time interval between a car or pedestrian crossing a point (the proposed driveway) and another car or pedestrian crossing that point. For the purposes of this study, it is assumed the minimum time for one vehicle to safely complete a turning movement into or out of the project driveway is 7 seconds. For each vehicle subsequently following the first, the time to complete a turn is 5 seconds. EASTERN SIDE OF SEPULVEDA BLVD (12:15PM - 1:15PM) (MID-DAY PEAK HOUR) J:\RKtables\RK9387TB.xls JN:2243-2012-02 ATTACHMENT 4 165Gap (Seconds)|10
10|Number of Vehicles Served by Gap|1010|Number of Gaps Occurring During Peak Hour|1010|Total Vehicles Served During Peak Hour |1010|5 - 6 0 50 0 7 - 11 1 70 70 12 - 16 2 26 52 17 - 21 3 19 57 22 - 26 4 7 28 27 - 31 5 0 0 32 - 36 6 4 24 37 - 41 7 1 7 42 - 46 8 1 8 47 - 51 9 0 0 52 - 56 10 0 0 57 - 61 11 0 0 62 and greater 12 0 0 246|10
1010101010|TABLE 3C EASTERN SIDE OF SEPULVEDA BOULEVARD Values are based on Gap Survey performed on March 22, 2012. Total Vehicles Served = (Number of Vehicles Served) x (Number of Gaps During Peak Hour) Sum of Total Vehicles Served During Peak Hour. PEDESTRIAN AND VEHICLE GAP ANALYSIS TOTAL NUMBER OF VEHICLES ABLE TO ENTER/EXIT PROJECT DRIVEWAY DURING PEAK HOUR|1010|A gap is defined as the time interval between a car or pedestrian crossing a point (the proposed driveway) and another car or pedestrian crossing that point. For the purposes of this study, it is assumed the minimum time for one vehicle to safely complete a turning movement into or out of the project driveway is 7 seconds. For each vehicle subsequently following the first, the time to complete a turn is 5 seconds. EASTERN SIDE OF SEPULVEDA BLVD (3:15PM - 4:15PM) (PM PEAK HOUR) J:\RKtables\RK9387TB.xls JN:2243-2012-02 ATTACHMENT 4 166Total Number of Gaps (Scenario 1)|10
10|Total Number of Gaps (Scenario 2)|1010|Amount of Vehicles Entering/ Exiting|1010|Total Number of Gaps (Scenario 1)|10
10|Total Number of Gaps (Scenario 2)|1010|Amount of Vehicles Entering/ Exiting|1010|Total Number of Gaps (Scenario 1)|10
10|Total Number of Gaps (Scenario 2)|1010|Amount of Vehicles Entering/ Exiting|1010|Existing Alley on Northside of Braddock Drive 421 297 50 467 327 50 427 298 34 Project Driveway on Southside of Braddock Drive 430 302 92 476 327 92 422 292 73 Project Driveway on Eastside of Sepulveda Boulevard 195 145 76 286 207 76 246 182 59|10
1010101010|PM Total Number of Gaps are based on peak periods from Gap Study performed on March 22, 2012. Total number of gaps utilizing seven (7) seconds for first motorist and 5 seconds for all subsequent motorist. Total Number of Gaps are based on peak periods from Gap Study performed on March 22, 2012. Total number of gaps utilizing seven (7) seconds for all motorists. Location It is noted that using a more conservative measure of 7 second gaps for all motorists still provides more gaps than needed to avoid excessive delay for motorists entering/exiting the site (See Appendix E for results). TABLE 4 SUMMARY GAP STUDY WITH PROJECT TRAFFIC Worst case peak hour traffic was assumed for Mid-Day. AM MID-DAY|1010|The amount of vehicles entering the alleyway to on the northern side of Braddock Drive are based on ITE Trip Generation Rates for a 2,000 square foot restaurant with drive-thru. 50% of the total traffic generated by the site is assumed to access the site via the alleyway. The amount of vehicles entering the project driveways on the southside of Braddock and the eastside of Sepulveda are based on project trip generation from the Traffic Impact Study, 7-Eleven 24-Hour Convenience Market Traffic Impact Study (February 2012) . J:\RKtables\RK9387TB.xls JN:2243-2012-02 ATTACHMENT 4 167Appendices ATTACHMENT 4 168ATTACHMENT 4 169 ATTACHMENT 4 170 ATTACHMENT 4 171 ATTACHMENT 4 172 ATTACHMENT 4 173 ATTACHMENT 4 174 ATTACHMENT 4 175 ATTACHMENT 4 176 ATTACHMENT 4 177 ATTACHMENT 4 178 ATTACHMENT 4 179 ATTACHMENT 4 180 ATTACHMENT 4 181 ATTACHMENT 4 182 ATTACHMENT 4 183 ATTACHMENT 4 184 ATTACHMENT 4 185 ATTACHMENT 4 186 ATTACHMENT 4 187 ATTACHMENT 4 188 ATTACHMENT 4 189 ATTACHMENT 4 190 ATTACHMENT 4 191 ATTACHMENT 4 192 ATTACHMENT 4 193 ATTACHMENT 4 194 ATTACHMENT 4 195 ATTACHMENT 4 196 ATTACHMENT 4 197 ATTACHMENT 4 198 199 ATTACHMENT 4 200 ATTACHMENT 4 201 ATTACHMENT 4 202 ATTACHMENT 4 203 ATTACHMENT 4 204 ATTACHMENT 4 205 ATTACHMENT 4 206 ATTACHMENT 4 207 ATTACHMENT 4 208 Gap (Seconds)|10
10|Number of Vehicles Served by Gap|1010|Number of Gaps Occurring During Peak Hour|1010|Total Vehicles Served During Peak Hour |1010|5 - 6 0 19 0 7 - 11 1 46 46 12 - 16 1 15 15 17 - 21 2 9 18 22 - 26 3 10 30 27 - 31 3 6 18 32 - 36 4 5 20 37 - 41 5 4 20 42 - 46 6 3 18 47 - 51 6 3 18 52 - 56 7 2 14 57 - 61 8 1 8 62 and greater 8 9 72 297|10
1010101010|APPENDIX E 1A (AM PEAK HOUR) Values are based on Gap Survey performed on March 22, 2012. Total Vehicles Served = (Number of Vehicles Served) x (Number of Gaps During Peak Hour) Sum of Total Vehicles Served During Peak Hour. PEDESTRIAN AND VEHICLE GAP ANALYSIS TOTAL NUMBER OF VEHICLES ABLE TO ENTER/EXIT PROJECT DRIVEWAY DURING PEAK HOUR|1010|A gap is defined as the time interval between a car or pedestrian crossing a point (the proposed driveway) and another car or pedestrian crossing that point. To be conservative, a measure of 7 second minimum gaps for all motorists has been used for this scenario. NORTHERN SIDE OF BRADDOCK DRIVE (7:17AM - 8:17AM) NORTHERN SIDE OF BRADDOCK DRIVE J:\RKtables\RK9387TB.xls JN:2243-2012-02 ATTACHMENT 4 209Gap (Seconds)|10
10|Number of Vehicles Served by Gap|1010|Number of Gaps Occurring During Peak Hour|1010|Total Vehicles Served During Peak Hour |1010|5 - 6 0 29 0 7 - 11 1 57 57 12 - 16 1 28 28 17 - 21 2 27 54 22 - 26 3 10 30 27 - 31 3 9 27 32 - 36 4 9 36 37 - 41 5 2 10 42 - 46 6 5 30 47 - 51 6 3 18 52 - 56 7 3 21 57 - 61 8 1 8 62 and greater 8 1 8 327|10
1010101010|APPENDIX E 1B NORTHERN SIDE OF BRADDOCK DRIVE Values are based on Gap Survey performed on March 22, 2012. Total Vehicles Served = (Number of Vehicles Served) x (Number of Gaps During Peak Hour) Sum of Total Vehicles Served During Peak Hour. PEDESTRIAN AND VEHICLE GAP ANALYSIS TOTAL NUMBER OF VEHICLES ABLE TO ENTER/EXIT PROJECT DRIVEWAY DURING PEAK HOUR|1010|A gap is defined as the time interval between a car or pedestrian crossing a point (the proposed driveway) and another car or pedestrian crossing that point. To be conservative, a measure of 7 second minimum gaps for all motorists has been used for this scenario. NORTHERN SIDE OF BRADDOCK DRIVE (12:15PM - 1:15PM) (MID-DAY PEAK HOUR) J:\RKtables\RK9387TB.xls JN:2243-2012-02 ATTACHMENT 4 210Gap (Seconds)|10
10|Number of Vehicles Served by Gap|1010|Number of Gaps Occurring During Peak Hour|1010|Total Vehicles Served During Peak Hour |1010|5 - 6 0 30 0 7 - 11 1 55 55 12 - 16 1 33 33 17 - 21 2 19 38 22 - 26 3 8 24 27 - 31 3 8 24 32 - 36 4 3 12 37 - 41 5 4 20 42 - 46 6 3 18 47 - 51 6 2 12 52 - 56 7 2 14 57 - 61 8 3 24 62 and greater 8 3 24 298|10
1010101010|APPENDIX E 1C NORTHERN SIDE OF BRADDOCK DRIVE Values are based on Gap Survey performed on March 22, 2012. Total Vehicles Served = (Number of Vehicles Served) x (Number of Gaps During Peak Hour) Sum of Total Vehicles Served During Peak Hour. PEDESTRIAN AND VEHICLE GAP ANALYSIS TOTAL NUMBER OF VEHICLES ABLE TO ENTER/EXIT PROJECT DRIVEWAY DURING PEAK HOUR|1010|A gap is defined as the time interval between a car or pedestrian crossing a point (the proposed driveway) and another car or pedestrian crossing that point. To be conservative, a measure of 7 second minimum gaps for all motorists has been used for this scenario. NORTHERN SIDE OF BRADDOCK DRIVE (3:15PM - 4:15PM) (PM PEAK HOUR) J:\RKtables\RK9387TB.xls JN:2243-2012-02 ATTACHMENT 4 211Gap (Seconds)|10
10|Number of Vehicles Served by Gap|1010|Number of Gaps Occurring During Peak Hour|1010|Total Vehicles Served During Peak Hour |1010|5 - 6 0 16 0 7 - 11 1 56 56 12 - 16 1 21 21 17 - 21 2 11 22 22 - 26 3 7 21 27 - 31 3 6 18 32 - 36 4 5 20 37 - 41 5 3 15 42 - 46 6 1 6 47 - 51 6 5 30 52 - 56 7 3 21 57 - 61 8 1 8 62 and greater 8 8 64 302|10
1010101010|APPENDIX E 2A (AM PEAK HOUR) Values are based on Gap Survey performed on March 22, 2012. Total Vehicles Served = (Number of Vehicles Served) x (Number of Gaps During Peak Hour) Sum of Total Vehicles Served During Peak Hour. PEDESTRIAN AND VEHICLE GAP ANALYSIS TOTAL NUMBER OF VEHICLES ABLE TO ENTER/EXIT PROJECT DRIVEWAY DURING PEAK HOUR|1010|A gap is defined as the time interval between a car or pedestrian crossing a point (the proposed driveway) and another car or pedestrian crossing that point. To be conservative, a measure of 7 second minimum gaps for all motorists has been used for this scenario. SOUTHERN SIDE OF BRADDOCK DRIVE (7:29AM - 8:29AM) SOUTHERN SIDE OF BRADDOCK DRIVE J:\RKtables\RK9387TB.xls JN:2243-2012-02 ATTACHMENT 4 212Gap (Seconds)|10
10|Number of Vehicles Served by Gap|1010|Number of Gaps Occurring During Peak Hour|1010|Total Vehicles Served During Peak Hour |1010|5 - 6 0 20 0 7 - 11 1 46 46 12 - 16 1 35 35 17 - 21 2 22 44 22 - 26 3 17 51 27 - 31 3 11 33 32 - 36 4 9 36 37 - 41 5 3 15 42 - 46 6 3 18 47 - 51 6 2 12 52 - 56 7 3 21 57 - 61 8 0 0 62 and greater 8 2 16 327|10
1010101010|Sum of Total Vehicles Served During Peak Hour. PEDESTRIAN AND VEHICLE GAP ANALYSIS TOTAL NUMBER OF VEHICLES ABLE TO ENTER/EXIT PROJECT DRIVEWAY DURING PEAK HOUR|1010|A gap is defined as the time interval between a car or pedestrian crossing a point (the proposed driveway) and another car or pedestrian crossing that point. To be conservative, a measure of 7 second minimum gaps for all motorists has been used for this scenario. SOUTHERN SIDE OF BRADDOCK DRIVE (12:15PM - 1:15PM) (MID-DAY PEAK HOUR) APPENDIX E 2B SOUTHERN SIDE OF BRADDOCK DRIVE Values are based on Gap Survey performed on March 22, 2012. Total Vehicles Served = (Number of Vehicles Served) x (Number of Gaps During Peak Hour) J:\RKtables\RK9387TB.xls JN:2243-2012-02 ATTACHMENT 4 213Gap (Seconds)|10
10|Number of Vehicles Served by Gap|1010|Number of Gaps Occurring During Peak Hour|1010|Total Vehicles Served During Peak Hour |1010|5 - 6 0 32 0 7 - 11 1 47 47 12 - 16 1 27 27 17 - 21 2 14 28 22 - 26 3 7 21 27 - 31 3 6 18 32 - 36 4 4 16 37 - 41 5 5 25 42 - 46 6 0 0 47 - 51 6 3 18 52 - 56 7 4 28 57 - 61 8 1 8 62 and greater 8 7 56 292|10
1010101010|Sum of Total Vehicles Served During Peak Hour. PEDESTRIAN AND VEHICLE GAP ANALYSIS TOTAL NUMBER OF VEHICLES ABLE TO ENTER/EXIT PROJECT DRIVEWAY DURING PEAK HOUR|1010|A gap is defined as the time interval between a car or pedestrian crossing a point (the proposed driveway) and another car or pedestrian crossing that point. To be conservative, a measure of 7 second minimum gaps for all motorists has been used for this scenario. SOUTHERN SIDE OF BRADDOCK DRIVE (3:15PM - 4:15PM) (PM PEAK HOUR) APPENDIX E 2C SOUTHERN SIDE OF BRADDOCK DRIVE Values are based on Gap Survey performed on March 22, 2012. Total Vehicles Served = (Number of Vehicles Served) x (Number of Gaps During Peak Hour) J:\RKtables\RK9387TB.xls JN:2243-2012-02 ATTACHMENT 4 214Gap (Seconds)|10
10|Number of Vehicles Served by Gap|1010|Number of Gaps Occurring During Peak Hour|1010|Total Vehicles Served During Peak Hour |1010|5 - 6 0 47 0 7 - 11 1 62 62 12 - 16 1 23 23 17 - 21 2 8 16 22 - 26 3 5 15 27 - 31 3 2 6 32 - 36 4 3 12 37 - 41 5 1 5 42 - 46 6 1 6 47 - 51 6 0 0 52 - 56 7 0 0 57 - 61 8 0 0 62 and greater 8 0 0 145|10
1010101010|APPENDIX E 3A (AM PEAK HOUR) Values are based on Gap Survey performed on March 22, 2012. Total Vehicles Served = (Number of Vehicles Served) x (Number of Gaps During Peak Hour) Sum of Total Vehicles Served During Peak Hour. PEDESTRIAN AND VEHICLE GAP ANALYSIS TOTAL NUMBER OF VEHICLES ABLE TO ENTER/EXIT PROJECT DRIVEWAY DURING PEAK HOUR|1010|A gap is defined as the time interval between a car or pedestrian crossing a point (the proposed driveway) and another car or pedestrian crossing that point. To be conservative, a measure of 7 second minimum gaps for all motorists has been used for this scenario. EASTERN SIDE OF SEPULVEDA BLVD (7:04AM - 8:04AM) EASTERN SIDE OF SEPULVEDA BOULEVARD J:\RKtables\RK9387TB.xls JN:2243-2012-02 ATTACHMENT 4 215Gap (Seconds)|10
10|Number of Vehicles Served by Gap|1010|Number of Gaps Occurring During Peak Hour|1010|Total Vehicles Served During Peak Hour |1010|5 - 6 0 52 0 7 - 11 1 71 71 12 - 16 1 28 28 17 - 21 2 17 34 22 - 26 3 11 33 27 - 31 3 5 15 32 - 36 4 5 20 37 - 41 5 0 0 42 - 46 6 0 0 47 - 51 6 1 6 52 - 56 7 0 0 57 - 61 8 0 0 62 and greater 8 0 0 207|10
1010101010|APPENDIX E 3B EASTERN SIDE OF SEPULVEDA BOULEVARD Values are based on Gap Survey performed on March 22, 2012. Total Vehicles Served = (Number of Vehicles Served) x (Number of Gaps During Peak Hour) Sum of Total Vehicles Served During Peak Hour. PEDESTRIAN AND VEHICLE GAP ANALYSIS TOTAL NUMBER OF VEHICLES ABLE TO ENTER/EXIT PROJECT DRIVEWAY DURING PEAK HOUR|1010|A gap is defined as the time interval between a car or pedestrian crossing a point (the proposed driveway) and another car or pedestrian crossing that point. To be conservative, a measure of 7 second minimum gaps for all motorists has been used for this scenario. EASTERN SIDE OF SEPULVEDA BLVD (12:15PM - 1:15PM) (MID-DAY PEAK HOUR) J:\RKtables\RK9387TB.xls JN:2243-2012-02 ATTACHMENT 4 216Gap (Seconds)|10
10|Number of Vehicles Served by Gap|1010|Number of Gaps Occurring During Peak Hour|1010|Total Vehicles Served During Peak Hour |1010|5 - 6 0 50 0 7 - 11 1 70 70 12 - 16 1 26 26 17 - 21 2 19 38 22 - 26 3 7 21 27 - 31 3 0 0 32 - 36 4 4 16 37 - 41 5 1 5 42 - 46 6 1 6 47 - 51 6 0 0 52 - 56 7 0 0 57 - 61 8 0 0 62 and greater 8 0 0 182|10
1010101010|APPENDIX E 3C EASTERN SIDE OF SEPULVEDA BOULEVARD Values are based on Gap Survey performed on March 22, 2012. Total Vehicles Served = (Number of Vehicles Served) x (Number of Gaps During Peak Hour) Sum of Total Vehicles Served During Peak Hour. PEDESTRIAN AND VEHICLE GAP ANALYSIS TOTAL NUMBER OF VEHICLES ABLE TO ENTER/EXIT PROJECT DRIVEWAY DURING PEAK HOUR|1010|A gap is defined as the time interval between a car or pedestrian crossing a point (the proposed driveway) and another car or pedestrian crossing that point. To be conservative, a measure of 7 second minimum gaps for all motorists has been used for this scenario. EASTERN SIDE OF SEPULVEDA BLVD (3:15PM - 4:15PM) (PM PEAK HOUR) J:\RKtables\RK9387TB.xls JN:2243-2012-02 ATTACHMENT 4 217ATTACHMENT 5 218 ATTACHMENT 5 219 ATTACHMENT 5 220 ATTACHMENT 5 221 ATTACHMENT 5 222 ATTACHMENT 5 223 224 ATTACHMENT 5 225 ATTACHMENT 5 226 ATTACHMENT 5 227 ATTACHMENT 5 228 ATTACHMENT 5 229 ATTACHMENT 5 230 ATTACHMENT 5 231 5 232 ATTACHMENT 5 233 ATTACHMENT 5 234 TTACHMENT 5 235 ATTACHMENT 5 236 ATTACHMENT 5 237 ATTACHMENT 5 238 ATTACHMENT 5 239 ATTACHMENT 5 240 ATTACHMENT 5 241 ATTACHMENT 5 242 ATTACHMENT 5 243 ATTACHMENT 5 244 ATTACHMENT 5 245 ATTACHMENT 5 246 ATTACHMENT 5 247 ATTACHMENT 5 ATTACHMENT 5 249 ATTACHMENT 5 250 ATTACHMENT 5 251 ATTACHMENT 5 252 ATTACHMENT 5 253 254 ATTACHMENT 5 255 ATTACHMENT 5 256 ATTACHMENT 5 257 ATTACHMENT 5 258 ATTACHMENT 5 259 ATTACHMENT 5 260 ATTACHMENT 5 261 ATTACHMENT 5 262 ATTACHMENT 5 263 ATTACHMENT 5 264 ATTACHMENT 5 265 ATTACHMENT 5 266 ATTACHMENT 5 267 ATTACHMENT 5 268 ATTACHMENT 5 ATTACHMENT 5 270 ATTACHMENT 5 271 ATTACHMENT 5 272 ATTACHMENT 5 273 ATTACHMENT 5 274 ATTACHMENT 5 275 ATTACHMENT 6 276 ATTACHMENT 6 277 ATTACHMENT 6 278 ATTACHMENT 6 279 ATTACHMENT 6 280 281 ATTACHMENT 6 282 ATTACHMENT 6 ATTACHMENT 7 283 284 ATTACHMENT 7 ATTACHMENT 7 285 ATTACHMENT 8 286 NT 8 287 ATTACHMENT 8 288 T 8 289 T 8 290 T 8 291 T 8 292 ATTACHMENT 8 293 ATTACHMENT 8 294 ATTACHMENT 8 295 ATTACHMENT 8 296 ATTACHMENT 8 297 ATTACHMENT 8 298 ATTACHMENT 8 299 ATTACHMENT 9

Staff Report

Staff Report Details

Staff Report Details (With Text)