Legislation Details

File #: HIST-818    Version: 1 Subject:
Type: Historical Status: Action Item
In control: City Council Meeting Agenda
On agenda: 7/11/2005 Final action: 7/11/2005
Title: Authorize entering into an agreement with Hoffman Video Systems for upgrades to the audio-visual equipment in the Mike Balkman Council Chambers.
Attachments: 1. Admin Council Chambers AV Bid Award A-10.doc, 2. Agreement Hoffman Video Systems.pdf
City of Culver City, California City Council Agenda Item Report RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council authorize entering into an agreement with Hoffman Video Systems for the purchase and installation of various audio, video and broadcast production equipment, and to replace the existing voting software and hardware system for $204,851 Council Chambers Audio-Video Upgrade P-849, and Council Chambers Acoustics, P-846. BACKGROUND: When City Hall’s construction was completed in 1995, the Mike Balkman Council Chambers (Chambers) was equipped with various voting, audio and video equipment components, many of which are controlled through an AMX system. The AMX system remotely controls such functions as voting, microphone muting, speaker volume, white screen up/down, chime, document stand camera zoom/focus, radio station transmission on/off, room lighting, overflow room speakers, and rear-projection screen viewing such as VHS tape, slide projector, and the City Clerk’s personal computer. Within two years after completing construction of City Hall, the City’s cable television operator equipped the Chambers with broadcasting capability, adding Meeting Date: 07/11/05 Item Number: A-10 AGENDA ITEM: Authorization to Enter Into an Agreement with Hoffman Video Systems for the Purchase and Installation of Voting Software and Hardware, Audio, Video, and Broadcast Production Equipment for the Mike Balkman Council Chambers. Contact Person/Dept.: Joe Susca Public Works Phone Number: 310-253-5763 Fiscal Impact: Yes [X] No [] General Fund: Yes [X] No [] Public Hearing: [] Action Item: [X] Attachments: [X] Public Notification: Master Notification List; Doug Nielsen; Broadcast Media Communications; Studio Spectrum Inc.; Edwards Technologies, Inc.; Spinitar; VTP Inc.; SPL Integrated Solutions; Pro Sound; Media Centric; TV Magic; Sunset Studios; Granicus; Hoffman Video Systems; A-Vidd Electronics; and Darren Doerschel were notified by e-mail on July 6, 2005. Department Approval: Charles D. Herbertson 6/28/05 CAO Approval: Deborah Fancett for Jerry Fulwood 7/5/05 Interim City Controller Approval: Marlee Chang 7/5/05City of Culver City, California City Council Agenda Item Report cameras and other broadcast production equipment necessary to produce and air live meetings held in the Chambers. The primary goal of the Council Chambers Audio Video and Acoustics Project (Project) is to evaluate the audio, video, voting, room control, and broadcast production systems (System) and replace those components that are in jeopardy of failing, or have a poor history of reliability due to their age. The goal of the acoustic component of the Project is to identify and implement facility improvements to optimize the Chambers audio system performance. The secondary goal of the Project is to enhance the System’s existing technology, features, and functionality. At their February 14, 2005 meeting, the City Council authorized entering into an agreement for $13,425 with Darren Doerschel, a Systems Integration Consultant, to perform the following tasks: 1. Evaluate the Chambers acoustics and prepare a recommendation for its improvement. 2. Assess the existing System, advising staff on each component’s life expectancy and its state of technology. 3. Analyze the feasibility of broadcasting in High Definition Television format. 4. Interview users of the System to discuss existing features and functionality and to identify any problems or desired enhancements to them. 5. Prepare a list of equipment and estimate their replacement costs. 6. Prepare installation diagrams for the new equipment and components to integrate them into the existing System. 7. Prepare a Request for Bid of plans and specifications to seek competitive pricing from dealers for the equipment, its configuration and programming, labor to install it, and end-user training. 8. Evaluate the bid responses with staff. 9. Perform project management oversight to ensure the equipment is properly installed, tested, and fine-tuned. 10.Compile the various new equipment operations manuals and other documentation into binders for end user reference. 11.Oversee training on the updated System for staff and City Councilmembers. DISCUSSION: Darren Doerschel has evaluated the City’s existing System, coordinated meetings with various equipment manufacturers on behalf of the City, attended staff meetings to discuss the Project, and prepared a Request for Bid (RFB)City of Culver City, California City Council Agenda Item Report document of equipment and other specifications that was subsequently advertised to equipment dealers. Assessment and Evaluation Report Darren Doerschel evaluated the Chambers acoustics and the existing System’s software, hardware and equipment components and prepared an Assessment and Evaluation Report (Report) that is attached to this staff report for your reference. The conclusions of the Report are summarized below:  Chamber Room Acoustics: Some minor sound echoing was observed in a few areas of the Chambers, as well as a loud Heating, Ventilation and Air Conditioning (HVAC) system. The minor echoing could be improved by hiring an architect to design and subsequently install acoustical material retrofits, but the $15,000 to $40,000 cost to do so is prohibitive when compared to the relatively minor amount of acoustical improvement it would provide. Taking the measures outlined in the Chamber Acoustical Improvement section of this staff report at a cost of $4,635 would reduce the noise originating from the HVAC system, allowing the audio system to operate without having to constantly compete with the background noise it creates.  Voting System: The existing AMX voting system has exceeded its life expectancy. Although the software is operational for most functions and provides adequate electronic voting support for the public meetings, the operational limitations along with intermittent functional problems due to its age, call into question the future viability of the system. Additionally, due to continual compatibility issues with current technologies in the audio/video industry and the lack of system support or maintenance from the manufacturer and their dealers, the likelihood of component failure is high. Since no replacement exists, such a failure would be considered very problematic. As a result, the primary voting system should be replaced. This portion of the project is estimated to cost $45,000-$50,000.  AMX Room Control System: Certain aspects of the system may still be of some functional use when integrated with a new voting system; however, due to signs of failure, life expectancy, and difficulty in integrating it with newer technologies, the entire system should be replaced with the expectation of City of Culver City, California City Council Agenda Item Report some cost savings realized by retaining some components and/or existing cabling. This portion of the project is estimated to cost $10,000-$15,000.  Sound System: Although the sound system may be improved with a few component upgrades, the overall value of such an enhancement could only be accurately measured after installation, with little or no recourse if the improvements were not adequate. Most of the critical components in the existing sound system have exceeded their life expectancy and should be replaced by a complete, turnkey sound reinforcement system that has enhanced features and functionality that is better suited to the Chambers. This portion of the project is estimated to cost $45,000-$55,000.  Rear Screen Projector: The existing rear-projection system has exceeded its life expectancy and should be replaced with a new one. Today’s rear-screen projectors will be a marked improvement in image quality and illumination over the existing one. This portion of the project is estimated to cost $8,000- $12,000.  Broadcast Production System: Show Production System: The Video Toaster, which is the heart of the PC-based broadcast system, has exceeded its life expectancy and should be replaced immediately. This portion of the project is estimated to cost $20,000-$25,000. Cameras: With the exception of the document camera, which is recommended to remain in place, the other cameras do not provide adequate low lighting capabilities, suffer from poor dynamic response, and due to their age, have become unreliable. The gain adjustment that is required on each camera, due to the light levels in the Chambers, make the images grainy and noisy. The cameras are obsolete, cannot be upgraded, and require complete replacement; however, their lenses may be used in the new cameras purchased. The existing cameras should be replaced with cameras equipped with better low-light features and current technologies. This portion of the project is estimated to cost $35,000-$40,000.City of Culver City, California City Council Agenda Item Report  New System Enhancements: In addition to evaluating the existing System, Darren Doerschel also addressed the following enhancements derived from the Public, Educational, and Government Television Channel Needs Assessment prepared for the City’s cable television franchise renewal negotiations: Playback System: The budget may allow for a new, moderately priced automated playback system that will allow staff to automatically schedule the airing of the previously recorded meetings, as well as create and broadcast a bulletin board of community information. This portion of the project is estimated to cost $12,000-$15,000. On-Location Production Equipment: Budgetary constraints do not permit the purchase of an on-location production system at this time. A multi-camera system could be rented on occasion if required; or if an increased number of off-site meetings and events are expected, a multi-camera system should be considered in the future, along with equipment capable of editing the pre-recorded event prior to its broadcast. This portion of the project is estimated to cost $15,000- $20,000. Producing in High Definition Television (HDTV) Format: The responsibility of converting analog signal programming into digital format so that viewers at home may decode them on their digital televisions lies squarely with the satellite or cable television provider. The City currently produces its programming in analog signal format and may choose to invest in HDTV equipment to begin sending digital signals to the cable television operator directly, but to do so would cost considerably more for the Project’s equipment replacements, or approximately $350,000 to $500,000 in additional costs. In approximately five or six years, however, the cost for HDTV production equipment will be reduced significantly, making it more feasible for Municipal Government TV Channels to begin thinking about slowly converting their equipment at that time. A couple of the components that will be purchased as part of this Project, like the Video Toaster Show Production System replacement, have dual analog/HDTV compatibility built into them.City of Culver City, California City Council Agenda Item Report System Evaluation Cost Estimate Summary Item Estimated Cost Chamber Room Acoustics Improvement $4,635 Voting System Replacement: Software and Hardware $45,000 to $50,000 AMX Room Control System Replacement $10,000 to $15,000 Sound System Replacement $45,000 to $55,000 Show Production System Replacement $20,000 to $25,000 Camera Replacements $35,000 to $40,000 Automated Playback System* $12,000 to $15,000 On-Location Production Equipment* $15,000-$20,000 HDTV Production* $350,000 to $500,000 *Denote Enhancements to the Existing System Request for Bid Utilizing the Assessment and Evaluation Report conclusions as a guide, Darren Doerschel prepared a RFB that specified equipment make and models, software, hardware, and end-user training requirements for the Project. Unfortunately, no Culver City firms exist that are qualified to bid on the Project. The RFB was formally advertised on April 22, 2005. Fourteen equipment dealers attended the mandatory job walk held on May 12, 2005. Of those fourteen dealers, six submitted bids by the June 2, 2005 deadline as follows: Hoffman Video Systems, Glendale, CA $216,519 Broadcast Media Communications, Laguna Niguel, CA $239,496 Pro Sound, North Hollywood, CA $250,890 TV Magic, San Diego, CA $265,059 Edwards Technologies, Inc., El Segundo, CA $273,362 Spinitar, La Mirada, CA $315,849 Upon receipt of the RFB responses, Darren Doerschel met with staff to evaluate and recommend an equipment dealer. Hoffman Video Systems (Hoffman) has received favorable recommendations from their existing and prior clientele and as a result, staff recommends entering City of Culver City, California City Council Agenda Item Report into an agreement with Hoffman in the amount of $204,851 for the purchase and installation of the replacement audio, video, voting, and broadcast production equipment. To remain within budget, the $11,668 On-Location Production Equipment has been eliminated from the Project. The new equipment comes with end-user training, a one-year warranty, and an enhanced maintenance agreement that includes a four-hour on-site response time to any new equipment failures. SUMMARY OF ACOUSTIC IMPROVEMENTS AND SYSTEM EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENTS Chamber Acoustical Improvements Staff met with an HVAC contractor recommended by Darren Doerschel that proposed some low-cost measures that could be taken to reduce the HVAC noise in the Chambers. After reviewing the list with City facilities staff, all but their last recommendation was implemented as follows: o Airflow Balancing: It was noted that the amount of air coming out of the air registers was significantly unbalanced throughout the Chambers. Some air registers had a very high volume of air coming out of them (creating noise) and others very little. We hired the HVAC contractor to balance the Chambers air registers, returning them to their original engineering specification when the building was first constructed. Completion of the air balancing has reduced the overall noise level from the air registers significantly, without reducing the overall volume of air being circulated throughout the Chambers. o HVAC Pipe Vibration: It was observed that the HVAC piping that runs just behind the dais and over the roof of the Chambers was vibrating loudly, creating noise. City staff retrofitted the pipe with vibration eliminators, which has significantly reduced the vibration noise generated. o Dais Air Registers: Subsequent to completing City Hall’s construction, two additional air registers were installed in the ceiling directly above the dais. These air registers are noisy. City staff installed two attenuator boxes in the ceiling ductwork, which has resulted in making the air registers significantly quieter. o *New Air Registers: Replacement of all the ceiling mounted air registers with new ones known for their reduced noise levels, along with increasing the size of the ducting that leads to them, was recommended.City of Culver City, California City Council Agenda Item Report *The HVAC contractor proposing the air register replacements could not guarantee a minimum amount of measurable noise reduction as a result of their replacement. As a result, staff decided to forego completing the work, estimated at $3,360. The acoustical improvement work outlined above, except for the registers, was completed by a combination of Public Works crews and the HVAC contractor at a cost of $1,275 to the Project’s budget. Audio, Video, Broadcast Production, and Voting Systems Following is a summary of the equipment replacements:  Rear Projector: The new rear projection system will deliver nearly twice the illumination over the existing projector and deliver significantly enhanced image clarity. The total cost for this component is $14,000.  Cameras: With the exception of the fixed document camera, all the remaining room cameras will be replaced. To reduce costs, the camera lenses will be reused, saving an estimated $10,000, for a total cost of $20,000.  Room Control and Voting System: The existing AMX system that controls the Chambers audio and video functions and its voting system will be replaced with a state-of-the-art AMX system. The total cost for this component is $75,000.  Speakers: All the ceiling speakers will be replaced. The total cost for this component is $4,000-$8,000.  Microphones: Many of the microphones will be replaced. The total cost for this component is $4,000.  Audio System Replacement: The heart of audio control system will be completely replaced with a state-of-the-art computerized system that will: o Increase the systems overall volume capability. o Increase the number of microphone ports and fix the existing poor quality floor microphones periodically installed for public meetings. This will eliminate the need for talkers to speak so closely into the microphone. o Automatically control any gain (feedback) the room may experience and adjust the speaker sound levels in a millisecond. o Includes a processor that permits individual microphone control. o The Chambers microphones will await sound input before turning on, in lieu of always being on. This helps to control gain and feedback from microphones that are not currently in use, but continue to be “on”. o Enhanced microphone sensitivity levels allowing automatic self- adjustments to accommodate quiet or loud talkers, and close or far away City of Culver City, California City Council Agenda Item Report talkers. The microphones will automatically adjust to each type of talker to maximize their sound input resulting in a consistent level of speaker volume. The total cost for this component is $35,000-$45,000.  Broadcast Production System: The broadcast equipment will be replaced with a state-of-the-art system. The new broadcast system may provide staff the ability to create DVD’s and automatically playback previously recorded meetings at a date and time desired, and will include the ability to create a community bulletin board. The total cost for this component is $20,000- $30,000 Project Cost Summary Item Cost Chamber Room Acoustics Improvement $1,275 Rear Projector Replacement $14,600 AMX Room Control and Voting System Replacement $75,000 Show Production System Replacement, New Cameras, and Automated Playback System $65,800 Audio System Replacement $40,600 On-Location Production Equipment $11,668 Miscellaneous materials and supplies $7,576 TOTAL 216,519 Chambers Unavailability Hoffman Video Systems has proposed a nine week timeframe to complete the Project. As a result, staff anticipates the work will be completed by the end of September, 2005. Staff anticipates the Chambers will not be operational for a period of up to three weeks during the new equipment installation. Public Works staff will be coordinating with the Chief Administrative Office to determine where to hold the public meetings usually held in the Chambers during the cutover period. Once installed, training on the new systems’ use will be held for the City Councilmembers, staff, and the City’s Videographer. In addition to the training sessions, Hoffman will be attending the first public meeting for all the City of Culver City, California City Council Agenda Item Report Commissions, Redevelopment Agency, and City Council to perform any troubleshooting that may be necessary, and to ensure that users of the new system feel comfortable with its use. Public Address System The Fire Communications Division is researching the purchase of a mobile public address system budgeted at $10,000. The portable system will have wireless microphones and wired speakers allowing it to be set up for use at any remote location that has access to electricity. The system will be used at town hall and other public meetings and events and is funded by this Project. FISCAL ANALYSIS: The Council Chamber Audio-Visual Upgrade (42000849) and Council Chamber Acoustics (42000846) budget amounts to $229,580. These funds are allocated as follows: Portable Public Address System $ 10,000 Consulting $ 13,425 Acoustical Improvements $ 1,275 Chambers new voting software, hardware, and other audio, video and broadcast production equipment components; Installation and training. $204,880 TOTAL $229,580 Sufficient funds exist to purchase and install the replacement equipment from Hoffman Video Systems amounting to $204,851. The City is currently negotiating a renewal of its cable television franchise. All or a portion of these expenditures may be reimbursed by the cable operator upon conclusion of those negotiations. Staff recommends postponing the purchase of the $11,668 On-Location Field Equipment at this time due to budgetary constraints. Upon conclusion of the cable television franchise renewal process, funds may become available to purchase this equipment at that time. ATTACHMENTS:City of Culver City, California City Council Agenda Item Report  Voting, Audio, Video and Broadcast Production System Equipment Assessment and Evaluation Report, April 17, 2005.  Hoffman Video Systems RFB response, June 2, 2005 MOTION: That the City Council: 1. Award an agreement with Hoffman Video Systems for Audio, Video, Voting and Broadcast Production Equipment in a total amount of $204,851; and 2. Direct the City Attorney to prepare the appropriate agreement; and authorize the Chief Administrative Officer to execute the agreement on behalf of the City. 07/11/05 Authorization to Enter Into an Agreement with Hoffman Video Systems for the Purchase, Installation, and Training of Voting Software and Hardware Audio, Video, and Broadcast Production Equipment for the Mike Balkman Council Chambers MEETING DATE AGENDA ITEM ATTACHMENTS Pages|109| Voting Audio Video and Broadcast Production 1-7 System Equipment Assessment and Evaluation Report April 17, 2005|109| Hoffman Video Services RFB response June 2, 2005 8-32Created for The City of Culver City Public Works Division Attention Joe Susca, SeruorManagement Analyst 1 Assessment and Evaluation Voting, AV & Production System Equipment Pursuant To Project- RFP- #1305, April 17 th, 2005 Council Chambers Voting System & AV System Assessment and Evaluation /Assessment Evaluation of current equipment pursuant to RFP #1305 Assessment and Evaluation Goals Assess audiovisual system, (including, voting system) and production facilities assess and review needs of system users, advise staff of types of equipment to be integrated and recommend configuration changes to Improve workflow efficiency and functionality Evaluate the existing Council Chambers acoustical conditions, advise City Staff of possible changes and/or equipment implementations to Improve overall sound quality Voting and AV Control System Background In 1995 pursuant to Project #90550 under the General Contractor CHCG Architects Inc the Voting system was installed by subcontractors Valley Sound Electronics and included implementation of the current AN system as well The present Voting System was installed consisting of several hardware pieces including Touch Screen Panels Button Control Panels along with the master Voting Management Software and also included the A/V control system Functional drawings and abridged equipment operation manuals were submitted upon completion of the project and since that time no major system upgrades to the electronic voting system have taken place Voting System Assessment The current voting software is entitled Voting Management System Version 2 11 and was provided by AMX Corp (now AMX) as a 1992 DOS based system and considered proprietary customized software for the City of Culver City AMX no longer provides support for these products under the Windows platform The touch panels are no longer compatible with the new voting system software offered by AMX and service/maintenance of the system hardware components does not exist from any authorized AMX dealers Staff members who operate the system have expressed concern regarding functional limitations of the system and have reported some minor malfunctions Staff reported attempts to upgrade the system were not successful as the company has since moved on to several generations of new technologies based on the changes of the Windows platform Due to incompatibility with current technologies a number of the Voting System s devices are likely to sustain failures that cannot not be repaired or replaced rendering the system inoperable Many of the button panels can still function with some of the newer control systems if compatibility requirements are strictly adhered to however several new more efficient technologies have been developed in regards to both form and function Ultimately the decision may be left to those users who are able to test and compare these devices dunng manufacturer s demos especially since these devices provide dual functionality that may require the compatibility of both A/V Control Assessment The AN Control system consists of modular computer boards (or cards) that control A/V devices by way of remote switching Though the voting system software and hardware is independent of the A/V control system the touch panels themselves do provide an on screen interface to control the Chamber s A/V devices A number of the current touch panels and button control panels employ this secondary functionality controlling AV functions such as mic muting lighting adjustments projector control and others Some functions of the aging A/V control system are intermittently failing and require various degrees of system modification ranging from repair to replacement The control system may still be compatible with some of the proposed new Voting System devices functionally however integration or interfacing of the two systems may prove difficult as only a detailed design may determine a,Assessment & Evaluation of current equipment pursuant to RFP 171305 Additionally the life expectancy of the existing control equipment is likely to fall short of those systems recommended to be replaced The replacement costs are relatively inexpensive Some wiring and cabling may still be compatible and may not have reached the end of its lifecycle including some components that may serve only a passive role or perfunctory purpose such as some of the switchers or routers Recommendation onVotingSystem The present voting system and A/V control system has occeeded its life oTectancy Although the software is operational for most functions and ' ',wades adequate electronic voting supportfor the public meetings the operational limitations along with in functional problems due to age call into question the future viability of the system Additionally due to continual compatibility issues with current technologies in the A/V industry and the lack of system support or maintenance from the manufacturer and dealers the likely hood of component failure is high Since no replacements exist such a failure would be considered a catastrophic system failure The primary voting system should be replaced Recommendation on A/V Control System Certain aspects of the A/V control system may still be of some functional use in a new Voting System ' however due to signs offailure life expectancy and difficulty with Integration the budget should include funding to replace the entire system with some expectation of costs savings by retaining certain components and/or cabling Current AV System Background The current A/V system including the Sound Reinforcement system (Audio System) and the AJV devices were installed under the same contract as the above voting system by Valley Sound Electronics The A/V Devices installed included a document camera a projector and remote controlled projector screen Sound Reinforcement System Assessment The Sound Reinforcement system includes the microphones loudspeakers local dais speakers audio mixing equipment audio processing equipment and amplification equipment The mixing equipment has recently been replaced by GMF Sound who reported failing components in the original system after staff complained of the sound suffering during public meetings when speakers were difficult to hear The sound quality in the room still suffers from low gain before feedback (or a low threshold of audio before feeding back through the loudspeakers) Higher volume level settings cause ringing and then feedback as volume is increased Furthermore the microphone sensitivity of each microphone in the chambers can not be fully realized due to these feedback problems (causing persons speaking in the microphones to get closer than would otherwise be required in a properly working system A process and configuration of the loudspeakers known as zoning allow for automatic level setting when certain microphones are triggered in the system to allow loudspeakers further from the cued microphone to be louder while the closer loudspeakers are quieter all to help avoid feedback This zoning type system does not seem to be in use or it is not functioning properly The sound volume is also competing with the HVAC system and small improvements in its design or overall decrease in fan noise or the sound of air movement through the registers would also improve the sound intelligibility in the room Due to multiple undocumented changes in the system a complete assessment can not be ascertained Though the recent upgrade of the system indicates the type of equipment that was installed there are no drawings available to indicate what components are still in use from the original installation or what if any changes were made to the wiring of any components or loudspeakers Without drawings troubleshooting is a cumbersome and difficult task at bestAssessment & Evaluation of current equipment pursuant to RFP #1305 With a modest budget relative to complete replacement the sound system can be extensively tested for problems with room acoustics as well as the electro acoustical equipment to determine the proper replacement of certain devices and what components need to be added to the system While this approach may bring acceptable results it will be difficult and relatively expensive to find companies who will guarantee improvement beyond modest results Such an endeavor is very risky for sound reinforcement contractors to assume responsibility for a system that is only partially of their design The reluctance of contractors guaranteeing all but measurable improvements may require the City to accept such terms under the scope of this project and conclude that full replacement may be budgeted in the future The microphones and local dais speakers are assessed in the device assessment below Assessment of AN Devices (#1) Projector The current projector s technology is obsolete and fails to compete in the current market due vastly improved technologies The increase in computer display resolution and scan frequency are just a few causes affecting the projectors ability to perform as desired Also many additional features are offered in the current projectors currently offered on the market such as network control and monitoring of all aspects of the projectors condition status and functions The projector can be replaced with greatly improved specifications and substantial savings compared to the cost of the current projector (#2) Microphones All of the current microphones are of professional grade however their performance can not completely be determined under the present conditions of the sound system Regardless modest improvements may be possible if the existing microphones were replaced with microphones of newer specifications As well certain microphone pick up patterns work in concert with certain sound system configurations and replacing the microphones pick up element to match new sound systems parameters would allow for better performance An A/V Systems Integrator may determine such compatibility and performance increase during the detailed design phase of the project (#3) Document Camera - The Document Camera is performing adequately and is completely compatible with the proposed new control technologies Staff has indicated that smaller documents may be better suited to a smaller local document camera that could be added to the system for a relatively small cost (#4) Local Dais Speakers The small speakers located around the dais are performing well and can be compatible with any newly installed sound system (#5) VHS VCR Player—Due to the low costs of replacing VHS decks the current player is easily replaced Considerations to replace the VHS player with a DVD player should be discussed as this technology would provide clearer video and improved functionality of the systemAssessment & Evaluation of current equipment pursuant to RFP #1305 Recommendation on South/ System Although the sound system may be improved with several component upgrades the overall value of such an enhancement could only be determined after installation with little or no recourse if the improvements were not acceptable Most of the critical components in the Sound System have exceeded their life expectancy and should be replaced to include a complete turnkey sound reinforcement system Currently the budget is not sufficient to completely replace the system given the stated budget priorities An enhancement to the current budget would be required or reevaluate the priorities of the project to free up funding from other replacement costs Recommendation on A/V Devices All above reviewed devices except the Dias speakers should be budgeted for replacement Budget permitting the Projector should be replaced given the prospects of increased performance functionality and overall value Microphone replacement should be budgeted under the scope of this enhancement project however savings should be expected with the likelihood that the existing microphones may perform as required in the new system The Document Camera should be retained if staff requests for smaller documents can be accommodated by a local A/V document camera Unless the Local Dais Speakers are found to be damaged in any way upon inspection when the new system is installed they may be retained Production Control System Background The current Production Control System (Television recording equipment) which includes a remote control camera system and dubbing station was installed in 1997 by Studio Spectrum Since then certain modifications to the system have not been documented Assessment The current recording system is centered around an aging Video Toaster system that can be charactenzed as an all in one production device The software support and development of the main applications have long been obsolete Its computer platform the Amiga is not compatible with present computers and no longer exists Users of the system have expressed frustration with various limitations that prevent certain basic presentations from being displayed and does not allow some common data files to be imported or exported Cameras The current cameras being used do not provide adequate low lighting capabilities and suffer from poor dynamic response The gain adjustment that is required on each camera due to the light levels in the chambers makes the images gramy and noisy The cameras are obsolete and can not be upgraded without complete replacement Playback System Several automated playback system technologies exist that allow for a measure of control over IP or the City s LAN Systems appropriate for this application and budget range from around $8 000 to 20 000 To add such a system to the existing Production Control room facilities would require some space in the existing racks and moderate integration between the existing recording system and the AV System Field Production Equipment While field production equipment would provide a convenient way to cover meetings away from City Hall the type and scope of equipment proposed would not be adequate for this kind of production application Multiple cameras are required when several people seated at different angles to the camera and various distances from each other are speaking to each other While television coverage is possible under these challenging conditions with the deployment of a single camera the recordings may not meet professional standards Special conditions during field shooting would have to be met in order to forgo this post production step Furthermore field equipment usually requires some associated postAssessment & Evaluation of current equipment pursuant to RFP #1305 production equipment (editing equipment) to allow for graphics titling and editing of the field recorded footage (costs would be from $4 000 to 8 000) This equipment is not presently in the budget Recommendation on Video Toaster System_ The Video Toaster should be immediately replaced with an industry standard video switcher and an independent Character Generator to provide titling and graphics of the Public Meetings being recorded and aired Cameras The existing cameras are obsolete and should be replaced with cameras that have better low light features and current interface technologies Playback System A moderately priced automated playback system should be added to the production facilities This would allow staff to remotely control playback of the recorded meetings Field Production System While coverage of remote events in the City may be possible with new field production equipment recording of public meetings would not be adequately covered with a single camera system A multi camera system could be rented on occasion if required or if increased off site meetings are expected a multi camera system should be budgeted for the future Feasibility of HDTV Implementation With nearly 1 500 television stations broadcasting in digital in 211 markets there may be initial cause for questioning whether Municipal Cable TV markets should invest in High Definition Television Equipment or wait and risk being left with no way of putting programming on the air The issue concerns two areas of technology that need to be differentiated (1) High Definition recording in a television production environment and (2) High Definition Television signals that are broadcast or cablecast to the viewers at home To begin with the two areas of technology are not mutually exclusive or rather one does not require the other to exist In fact it is quite possible even common place to shoot and provide High Definition programming but broadcast/cablecast it on regular analog television or Standard Definition digital television Regardless of shooting in standard definition analog or digital the signal can still be accommodated for delivery to all viewers with standard televisions or HD televisions Principally this happens by way of conversion of the standard signal known as up converting or conversion of the HD signal known which known as down converting Such conversion can be accomplished with industry standard conversion equipment Current analog television is broadcast in a 4 by 3 aspect ratio while High Definition TV is broadcast in 16 by 9 These aspect ratio changes can also be accommodated for in the standard conversion equipment Hundreds of television shows and films shot in the 4 by 3 aspect ratio will continue to be displayed successfully long after consumers have upgraded to 16 by 9 televisions The City of Culver City will look to their cable provider to convert any program shot in analog or standard definition television This approach (conversion equipment) for now is easier to implement and much more cost effective to provide rather than expensive HD equipment and signal pathsAssessment & Evaluation of current equipment pursuant to RFP #1305 The cost of HD equipment is still too high for serious consideration by most local municipal governments A relevant example is to compare the price of a standard definition camera the City is considenng purchasing for the Council Chambers versus a similar model offered with High Definition outputs The standard definition camera is $4 200 and the High Def camera is $28 000 As in this example High Definition equipment can currently be as much as 4 and 5 times the cost of regular production equipment 1 Recommendation on High Definition Equipment Based on the Iinformation above the City of Culver City can still invest in standard i definition equipment and send signals over the air that are compatible with ' all the citizens of Culver City even when most of them convert to HDTV Five to six years into the future the High Definition equipment cost may be l low enough for Municipal channels to begin thinking about slowly converting their equipment Acoustics in Chambers As most of the audio equipment and sound levels in the Chambers were evaluated above the Acoustics in the room should also be assessed The HVAC system is producing sound levels which compete with audio amplification in the room It will be necessary to hire an HVAC firm to test the systems overall performance based on the original design specifications as well as provide service recommendations to mitigate vibration and fan noise While certain common areas or positions in the Chambers where the public may be standing or sitting sound acoustically flat or with little or no echo there are certain areas flanking the concave ceiling covering the center of the room where noticeable echoing or reverberation can be heard This may or may not be of concern to the City as it was not brought to my attention initially Acoustical tests and measurements can be taken to determine the proper course of action when and if the City should decide to rectify the problem Modifications could cost between $15 000 and $40 000 dollars The typical modifications to the room may range from simple acoustical treatments to the existing ceiling surface to acoustical tiles or baffles added Just below the surfaces Either could be done in an esthetically pleasing way with the help of an Architectural firm with design experience and an Acoustical design firm with extensive knowledge in acoustical (and electro acoustical) testing and measurement Prepared and Submitted by Darren P Doerschel Systems Integration Consultant 310 350 8399 1inarii Pr.- 1. I loflitian Intercipanecting Audio and Video Systems Technology CITY OF CULVER CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS AUDIONIDEO FACILITIES PROJECT BID NO 1305 Presented By Vicki' Chaffee Hoffman Video Systems 1049 Flower Street Glendale CA 91201 www hoffmanvideo corn (818) 507 7116 Fax (818) 507 7118Jim) qir- u"sit • Hoffma Interconnecting Audio and Video Systems Tecimolo - - .11 D-4=AF4 Assessment & Evaluation of current equipment pursuant to RFP #1305 TABLE OF CONTENTS Hoffman Cover Letter Executive Summary Project Overview Hoffman History and Background Executive Management Team Project Management Team Integration and Construction Standards Quality Assurance Program Equipment and Labor Bid Specifications Hoffman Reference Form and Project Samples Addenda Received Document Hoffman Financial Data (inc Insurance & License) Proposed Project Timeline Bidders Affidavit Form Custom Warranty Agreement and Sample Maintenance Agreements Additional Copies of Submitted RFB (Separate Attachment) Ruffin a n 9Interconnecting Audio and Vide* Systems Technolfty n 11111 9' 4"eit Huffman Assessment & Evaluation of current equipment pursuant to RFP #1305 June 2 2005 Mr Joe Susca Project Manager/Senior Management Analyst Culver City Public Works Department 9505 W Jefferson Boulevard Culver City CA 90232 Dear Mr Susca Thank you for the opportunity to provide Culver City with our submission for consideration in the upgrade project of city s council chambers audio/video facilities Based on the site review and evaluating the requirements specified in Bid Number 1305 we have prepared this proposal to implement the professional technical services requested We will address the scope of work and installation plan as well as describe who we are and how we apply our design protocols in realizing your vision of the chamber complex Our submission will also demonstrate Hoffman s involvement extends beyond the actual completion of the project as our technicians and engineers will stay on to assist the staff in understanding each part of the system operation troubleshooting and accessing after sale support As outlined in the bid its scope is complex and more than a simple upgrade—it s the creation of a technically advanced media system that must also be very user friendly This project is exciting—to be partnered with Culver City in transforming the existing infrastructure into a vibrant public venue and effective staff workplace Hoffman has been fortunate in developing strong relationships with several municipalities over the last several years including a recent city council upgrade for the City of Long Beach earlier this year And one of our current projects is a large scale broadcast/classroom integration at LAPD s Ahmanson Recruitment Center We are a local systems integrator in our 63 rd year with a significant understanding and appreciation of this endeavor We would be ho ed to involve our talent and expertise to revitalize the Mike Balkman hambers President and Chief Operations Officer sfman Vzfoul Victoria Chaffee Chaffee General Sales ManagerInterconnecting Audio .ind Video Systems Technology ' Assessment & Evaluation of current equipment pursuant to RFP #1305 Project Overview Some of you reviewing our proposal may already know of Hoffman Video Systems We are one of Southern California s leading full service integration companies in the design procurement and installation of professional multi media broadcast video audio and software control systems We are a family owned business in our third generation with a good understanding and appreciation of a wide spectrum of clients and their applications—including municipality operations Wed like to familiarize you with our philosophy and approach to the integration process and to that end we have included a detailed profile on Hoffman in subsequent sections From our collective experience each system integration project of this sophistication is unique The challenge for the successful bidder will be multifold combining highly competitive hardware costs a fairly aggressive timetable for design and installation and a complex programming structure A well known adage in our industry is that a project can be completed fast cheap and good you get to pick two out of three The key here for the selected integration team will be assigning experienced talent who realizes the fast track nature of the work particularly in the initial hardware and software design phase An immediate comfort level between the City s PMT and the integrator will have to be established with both parties looking forward to rolling up their sleeves and getting to work For the City s part you have a strong foundation with an esteemed consultant on board a clear idea on the overall bill of materials and the inclusion of smart architecture in the software upgrade path We agree with the City s recommendation of incorporating two phases of implementation Phase One concentrating on the AN System and Voting System Phase Two focusing on the Production Control Systems after the first phase is fully ramped up We would provide the PMT with an extensively detailed schedule of implementation within the required fifteen days after contract award Initially we would not require daily access to the site or the PMT However in the initial start up it may require daily contact with the PMT via e mail and a scheduled timeframe for phone calls The core team will have the ability to respond quickly consistently and concisely within the group Well set up parameters for mutual decision making submission of documentation and obtain approvals on all planned procedures A significant portion of the project is devoted to AMX hardware and programming We are fortunate to have two fully certified AMX designer/programmers on our engineering staff Jason Gottfredson and Christian I lollinan 1 800 550 0275Interconnecting Audio and Video Systems Technology Huffman Assessment & Evaluation of current equipment pursuant to RFP #1305 Baker We also employ several experienced CAD operators who will assist with the design requirements and as built drawing work ups We will assign a special team responsible for design touch panel revisions and customized programming Their extensive background in this area will collaborate with the PMT in bringing proven ideas in creating attractive and easy to use touch panel sequences In addition to AMX engineering our Technical Services Manager Jason Gottfredson is also trained in acoustical sciences and is well versed in sound system design in environments similar to the one in the council chamber One of our current projects under construction the Getty at Malibu mandates extensive acoustical testing with noise/vibration control We have Included samples of our audio testing documentation in a later section of our proposal titled Quality Assurance Program We will carefully review the existing infrastructure in the council chamber ceiling make any necessary recommendations prior to actual replacement and will make sure the new speakers match cosmetically as well as acoustically Hoffman Video Systems is well versed in clean and accurate placement of projection displays including many small space rear screen reflected configurations We will provide a very stable secure and optimized positioning of the projector resulting in the best signal output the Sanyo is capable of We are knowledgeable in immersing the MediaMatnx audio products into the mix and have staff certified for this manufacturer s control system design We will be happy to go over the matrix in detail during the engineering phase to make sure the correct number of I/O cards and ancillary hardware has been correctly included Later in Phase Two we will want to develop a more accessible and logical approach to the control room s rack layouts provide new cabling as needed and re harness the wiring at the rear of the racks and feeding into the conduit The movement to adding a Leightronix server system DVD recorders and a capable switcher and character generator will result in better signal quality output and duplications on a medium built for today In regards to the robotic camera upgrade we spoke with Telemetncs and received reassurances that the proprietary 25 pin interconnecting cable will be all that is necessary for the interfacing of the pan tilt capabilities with the new Panasonic camera heads It should be noted that the Canon lenses and Panasonic camera heads will require shipment back to Telemetncs for lens modification compatibility This procedure will take a few weeks to complete and the special cable order will have a 4 6 week lead time before shipment While we are actively working on Phase One our install team will want to conduct a full Iloflinan 1 800 550 0725 1otInterconnecting Audio and Video Systems Technology memo N WIN oIIu.san Assessment & Evaluation of current equipment pursuant to RFP #1305 inspection of the conduit run for the camera cabling In case we discover any issues of concern we will want to address them early in the project run With the release last week of the revised budget numbers we realized we would have to re evaluate equipment/labor bid itself Because of the constraints on the budget cap we did not include funding of the Field Production Equipment While we have included costs for the products we have specifically noted on the itemized equipment bid that this section is not included in the combined totals Looking at the equipment quote you will notice that our proposed dollar values do not fully conform with the budget guidelines given Because this is a relatively labor intensive implementation we sharpened the pencil on the hardware portion to allow sufficient coverage for the labor and programming The bottom line does come in under budget and we welcome discussions with you on our choices of dollar allocation if you have any questions We also encourage a discussion with the PMT on possible models that may benefit from value engineering thereby creating flexibility to moving any freed up funds where they might be needed most—especially if there are product unknowns we may discover in the design phase There s much work to be done collectively from the very start of the project award and we at Hoffman are up for the challenge We thank you for allowing our participation in the bid process and look forward to answering any questions and/or providing more information to the evaluation team at Culver City Lastly we extend our congratulations and best wishes as you begin this worthwhile upgrade It will be one of the highlights of 2005 for the City and how it presents and represents itself to its citizens Hoffman 1 800 550 0225 /3Interconnecting Audio and Video Systems Teehneldigy Hoffman Assessment & Evaluation of current equipment pursuant to RFP #1305 HOFFMAN HISTORY & BACKGROUND The story of Hoffman begins in 1941 Los Angeles when a fluorescent light salesman stopped in on the Mission Bell Radio Corporation to collect on a past due bill In an interesting twist of fate H Leslie Hoffman ended up walking out of Mission Bell s headquarters as its new owner — and Just prior to the outbreak of WWII the Hoffman Electronics Corporation began production of AM radios The ensuing years saw Hoffman grow steadily from a small radio manufacturer into a diversified national corporation with seven divisions in multiple states The company was enormously successful due to its innovations in the fields of communications and technology From 1941 to 1977 Hoffman made significant advances in solar power and solar cells semi conductors airborne navigation systems color television transistor radios satellite arid antenna transmission radar technology and management and manufacturing processes In 1977 after 36 years in business the Board of Directors at Hoffman Electronics decided to sell off the main divisions to Gould Electronics a worldwide corporation and leading manufacturer of circuit boards and military products With the sale of the parent company J Knstoffer Popovich son in law of H Leslie Hoffman and Bob Jablonski a 30 year Hoffman executive intensified their focus on a new area of business that Hoffman had just begun to explore — audio visual systems integration Their partnership and interest in this relatively new field of systems integration led to the creation of Hoffman Video Systems in 1978 Mirroring the growth of the Hoffman Electronics almost 40 years earlier Hoffman Video Systems started small by selling products designing and servicing systems primarily for television and film production companies But the company maintained Les Hoffman s drive for innovation and growth and over the next thirty years began developing new systems with applications across a variety of industries and markets Today Hoffman Video Systems is one of the nation s largest and leading integrators of audio and video components With corporate offices in Los Angeles Denver and Atlanta Hoffman has strategically positioned itself to lead the way in providing innovative visual communication solutions combining video expertise technology and service an 1 rs" r.). 1111 [Zi '-'7121% - 7 - 114 f: re! Hoffman Interconnecting Audi* and Vide Systems Technolorgy Assessment & Evaluation of current equipment pursuant to RFP #1305 Hoffman has completed projects in 33 states the District of Columbia and Puerto Rico And Hoffman s reputation as the leader in systems integration is not limited to the United States In recent years Hoffman has completed international projects in Japan Korea Philippines Egypt Saudi Arabia Mexico Canada and Switzerland Hoffman s capabilities include consultation design custom fabrication installation training and service for the audio visual security networking and communication marketplaces Hoffman has been getting increased recognition recently due to our groundbreaking design and build process known as the — Four Wall In (4WI sm) Approach exclusive to Hoffman whereby we design and install every element within the four walls of your project Hoffman s philosophy is that the proper system solution is not just the right configuration of electronic components it is the integration of electronics the surrounding environment and human factors of those who work within the four walls of the project As Hoffman looks to the future the audio video systems integration industry continues to grow and thrive New applications for technology spring up in new industries almost daily and Hoffman stands ready to meet this new demand for Control Rooms Videoconferencing Systems Multi Media Systems Streaming Media Security Systems and Broadcast/Professional Video Systems -ffrnan I 1 J /5Assessment & Evaluation of current equipment pursuant to RFP #1305 HOFFMAN EXECUTIVE TEAM Chief Executive Officer — J Kristoffer Popovich Kris founded Hoffman Video Systems in 1977 after previously working as an executive at Hoffman Electronics heading up the company s Learning & Educational Systems division Prior to joining Hoffman Popovich worked within the Ford Administration and for Bank of America Kris sits on the Boards of multiple organizations in the Los Angeles area including Childrens Hospital the YMCA of Metropolitan Los Angeles and the University of Southern California Graduate of University of Southern California MBA University of Southern California President Criminal Justice Legal Foundation President & Chief Operating Officer Robert T Shepherd Robert became President and COO of Hoffman in 1999 Prior to joining Hoffman Shepherd held management positions in several financial services corporations including Great West Life and Manulife Financial Rob sits on the Boards of the Pasadena YMCA and San Gabriel Council of the Boy Scouts of America Graduate of University of Washington Member of the 1992 U S Olympic Team Rowing Member of the Young Presidents Organization Chief Financial Officer — Michael Gavigan Michael joined Hoffman in May 2002 He brings more than 20 years of experience in various senior management and executive positions at Pico Macom Walt Disney ICN Pharmaceuticals and Arthur Anderson Michael is a Certified Public Accountant Graduate of Cal Poly University Member of American Institute of Certified Public Accountants Member of the California Society of Certified Public Accountants Fro jm a n )Interconnecting Audio and Video Systems Technology I 0 Hon Assessment & Evaluation of current equipment pursuant to RFP #1305 HOFFMAN PROJECT TEAM Manager Technical Services Glendale Jason Gottfredson Jason joined Hoffman Video Systems in 2002 Jason brings over 12 years experience in audio video and lighting applications including all aspects of production design and system engineering in the rental and installation sectors He has been responsible for engineering lighting/audio/video design installation setup programming logistics and project management Member USITT Associate Member AES AMX Certified ACE Designer Certified in Control System Design by AMX Crestron and Media Matrix Senior Project Manager Doug Kautsky Doug has been with Hoffman for over nine years He began his career in audio visual systems integration in 1994 with American Video Communications Doug was a Service Technician with American Video and started in a similar position when he came to Hoffman Doug s knowledge of systems integration and proficiency with design and troubleshooting led to his promotion to Project Manager As Senior Project Manager Doug has managed several large projects including Loyola Law School USC Dole Foods and Wellpoint Health Care Manufacturer certified by AMX Electrohome Christie Extron Crestron and Altinex Recipient of the Hoffman Transmitter Award for achieving 100% customer satisfaction rating in 2002 Project Coordinator Francis Alviso Francis has 12 years experience in designing engineering installation and project management In his career prior to Hoffman Francis designed hotel conference facilities for Paul Alan Magil & Associates where his clients included Hyatt International Four Seasons Hotel Nikko and Intercontinental Hotels As a System Engineer for Douglas Roesch Communications Inc Francis oversaw aspects of multimedia system integration at the 1984 LA Olympics LAX Reagan Library the Nixon Library and Lockheed At Hoffman Francis oversees project schedules equipment orders and delivery He assists project engineers and represents onsite engineers coordinating all field conditions to the owner/consultant and head of office Graduate of the Asian Institute of Electronics Degree in Electrical Engineering Factory certified by Extron Picturetel Video Conferencing Trompeter Christie Digital and Bose among othersInterconnecting Audio and Video Systems Technology Hoffinan n•n•. " i • au. Assessment & Evaluation of current equipment pursuant to RFP #1305 Engineer Chien Huang Chien joined Hoffman as a Field Service Engineer in 1997 His career path has taken him through almost the entire spectrum of audio visual communication and electronics from computer testing and repair to assembling and calibrating medical lasers to designing prototype image capturing technology and microprocessor emulators Chien has a gift for understanding most anything electronic Chien holds the record at Hoffman for client satisfaction communications to the company President Manufacturer certified by Tandberg Polycom AMX and others Degree in Electrical Engineering from Cal State Long Beach Recognized by the International Communication Industries Association (ICIA) Field Engineer/Project Manager Al Martinez Al joined the Hoffman team in February 2003 as a Service Technician In the past 14 years Al has held engineering positions in systems integration computer support and audio visual equipment Most recently Al worked for Innovative Design Technologies where he was responsible for project management service and installation on projects for the GAP Warner Bros Studio Stores Nike Factory Stores and Citicorp Graduate of Phoenix Institute of Technology Manufacturer certified by AMX Christie Crestron and Sony Recognized by the International Communication Industries Association (CTS) Senior Programmer Christian Baker Christian became a member of the Hoffman team in 2004 bringing a wealth of experience in the technical areas of design protocol coding and programming of various software control systems His background experiences include a seven year career with the Church of Latter Day Saints at the Salt Lake City Temple complex as a member of their facilities management group AMX Certified ACE Designer and AMX Control System Design Service Coordinator Ram Fasheh Rami handles the service on all major accounts serving as the primary contact between Hoffman and its customer after the sale Rami responsible for monitoring and administering existing service contracts maintaining remote systems monitoring for various clients and initiating periodic service upgrades as they become available Rami developed Hoffman s Priority Response System which allows customers to have technicians on site within four hours of a service call 24/7/365 Prior to coming to Hoffman Rami was a customer service representative at Andrews Electronics where he was recognized for having a 100% satisfaction rate by his clients Graduate of ITT Technical Institute Degree in Electrical Engineering Hoffman s Employee of the Year 2001 Ho-Firnan ,I r IS1 ; 4.-- an Interconnecting Audio and Video Systems Technolny Assessment & Evaluation of current equipment pursuant to RFP #1305 General Sales Manager Vicki' Chaffee An industry veteran of over 25 years Vicki' has been with Hoffman since 1998 specializing in broadcast video applications Prior to joining Hoffman her resume includes Instructional Media Producer at Long Beach City College and was a Senior District Sales Manager at Panasonic Broadcast and Televisions Systems for 17 years She also periodically teaches field production/editing at a local community college Graduate of Long Beach State University Bachelor of Arts Degree in Radio/Television Member of SMPTE Sub contracting Services PGS Services Inc /Paul Stickelmaier PGS Services is a long established electrical and structural contractor specializing in the display and video broadcast market Hoffman Video Systems has regularly contracted with PGS over last several years with multiple projects including installations at the FilmNideo Department at Orange Coast College Amgen USC Loyola Law School California Institute of the Arts and most recently a custom dual screen installation in the International Ballroom at the Beverly Hilton Hotel His expertise in millwork display structural installation and electrical integration are components that may include his involvement IIo1Ii.in /91 TE. Hf afin i 4 1"Ir i^aA an Interconnecting Audio and Vile* Systems Technolny Assessment & Evaluation of current equipment pursuant to RFP #1305 HOFFMAN INTEGRATION & CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS Hoffman maintains the highest standards and all work performed will be completed in accordance with Applicable Codes and Standards I APPLICABLE CODES AND STANDARDS A Codes All work performed by Hoffman will be completed in accordance with applicable requirements of governing codes rules and regulations including the following minimum standards 1 UBC Uniform Building Code 2 NEC National Electrical Code 3 NFPA National Fire Protection Association 4 FCC Federal Communications Commission B Standards Equipment materials and associated components provided by Hoffman will conform to the current revisions of the following standards as applicable|109| UL Underwriters Laboratories|109| ANSI American National Standards Institute|109| NEMA National Electrical Manufacturer s Association|109| SMPTE Society of Motion Picture and Television Engineers|109| ISO International Standards Organization|109| AES Audio Engineering Society II CABLE PULLS AND INFRASTRUCTURE The heart of the project is the cabling infrastructure and connection plates that provide access to and distribution for the AN systems Hoffman Video Systems follows industry accepted and proven standards for cable run sheets labels cable management termination and testing Hoffman will provide and build the following A Provide permanent identification of run destination at all raceway terminations B All wire and cable shall be continuous and splice free for the entire length of the run between designated connections or terminations C All shielded cables shall be insulated Do not permit shields to contact conduit raceway boxes panels or equipment enclosures I. 'Tinian 1Assessment & Evaluation of current equipment pursuant to RFP #1305 D Verify that all new raceway have been de burred and properly joined coupled and terminated prior to installation of cables Verify that all raceways are clear of foreign matter and substances prior to installation of wire or cable E Inspect all conduit bends to verify proper radius Comply with relevant Code for minimum permissible radius and maximum permissible deformation F Apply a chemically inert lubricant to all wire and cable prior to pulling in conduit Hoffman will not subject wire and cable to tension greater than that recommended by the manufacturer Use multi spool rollers where cable is pulled in place around bends Reverse bends are not allowed G Secure all wire and cable run vertically for continuous distances greater than thirty (30) feet Secure robust non coaxial cables with screw flange nylon cable ties or similar approved devices appropriate to cable weight For all other cables provide symmetrical conforming nonmetallic bushings or woven cable grips appropriate to cable weight II WIRING PRACTICE A Land all non coaxial field wiring entering each AV equipment rack at specified terminal devices prior to connection to any equipment or devices within racks Terminals will be located in the equipment racks or in the terminal cabinets provided B Identify all wire and cable clearly with permanent labels wrapped about the full circumference within one (1) inch of each connection Indicate the number designated on the associated field or shop drawing or run sheet as applicable Assign consistent wire or cable designations throughout a given system Each wire or cable shall carry the same labeled designation over its entire run regardless of intermediate terminations C Apply all crimp connectors only with manufacturers recommended ratchet type tooling and correct crimp dies for connector and wire size D Coordinate insulation displacement (quick connect) terminal devices with wire size and type Comply with manufacturers recommendations Make connections with automatic impact type tooling set to recommended force E Make all connections to screw type barrier blocks with insulated crimp type spade lugs Provide permanent designation strips designed for use with the terminal blocks provided Huffman 1Haffina Interconnecting Audio and Video Systems Technolo Assessment & Evaluation of current equipment pursuant to RFP #1305 F Dress lace or harness all wire and cable to prevent mechanical stress on electrical connections Provide service loops where harnesses of different classes cross or where hinged panels are to be interconnected III ASSEMBLY AND FABRICATION The equipment racks and components will be built in the rack rooms at a Hoffman office The end user is welcome to view the progress of their project at our facility at any time throughout the process This portion of the installation includes the unpacking and testing of all major pieces of equipment prior to rack building HVS builds programs and tests each system before the rack is bubble wrapped and delivered to the site IV PROGRAMMING HVS s control systems programmers will develop code for the system to function as specified The code will be uploaded into the system and tested after all the required AN components are installed and have been wired to the control system HVS will perform continual in house and on site testing of the system to ensure that it meets the project specifications V SYSTEM TESTING AND ADJUSTMENTS Prior to the notification of system completion each sub system will be thoroughly tested and adjusted This will include confirming remote controls for video and audio inputs and outputs setting and equalizing normal level controls for video audio and adjusting physical installation parameters Hoffman Video Systems complies with industry standard specifications including SMPTE IEEE NCAC and ASTM Prior to the sign off of the system Hoffman will perform a series of systems tests with the end user(s) Additionally all functions of the system will be demonstrated Following the approval of this demonstration the AN systems submittals V i ACCEPTANCE TESTING REQUIREMENTS A HVS shall perform acceptance tests to validate the requirements of these specifications and to verify the operation of the installed systems Any equipment and/or materials necessary to complete these tests will be provided by HVS for the duration of the testing period B Acceptance test procedures shall be prepared by HVS and submitted to OWNER for their review and approval 15 days prior to the scheduled start of any tests Test procedures will be printed in sufficient detail to verify the functionality of each individual sub system 1 0 man.• -311 Interconnecting Audio and Video Systems Technology Assessment & Evaluation of current equipment pursuant to RFP #1305 C HVS will coordinate all testing with OWNER and shall conduct the testing in the presence of OWNER S designate Upon completion of the testing the contractor shall publish a complete test report itemizing the individual tests and the results of each action VI CLOSEOUT Upon completion of installation and testing activities HVS shall prepare a list identifying any aspects of the project which have not been completed in their entirety These items will be considered the Punch List Items on the punch list will for the most part be cosmetic in nature or not related to the function of the systems This list will be presented to OWNER for approval and upon approval shall be the contract close out document Vli TECHNICAL MANUALS AND SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION A HVS provides complete sets of installation and user s manuals for each piece of equipment provided under the contract This document set includes the entire set of audio visual as built plans an operator and a user manual for all equipment pieces and a copy of the warranty information for each item B In addition to the above HVS will generate a complete systems operator manual for this project This manual will include a step by step instruction manual for the multi media control system Each button press on the control panel will be detailed in this manual and a description of the action taken and expected results will be provided This manual will contain any required power on sequences and a detailed listing of common problems and their resolutions The goal of this manual is for a qualified OWNER representative to be able to manipulate the system and adjust the displays to their requirement C HVS provides a set of system functional diagrams and a list of power on steps to follow adjacent to each set of equipment racks Both items will be provided in a sturdy frame with clear glass or non scratching plastic cover Provide permanent non fading media VI ii TRAINING Operator training is an essential component of the audio visual industry A comprehensive training session will be provided The three main categories of training are Operations Technical and Management A training session will commence at the earliest possible date in each category and could be conducted oilman Aa 'MI 1.77-i -----714 Is7 " .41vom Hoffman Interconnecting Audio and Vile* Systems Technology Assessment & Evaluation of current equipment pursuant to RFP #1305 throughout the installation process to avoid delays Training for the completed system will be at the convenience of the OWNER Training sessions for Operations will cover the operational philosophy of the system Technical training sessions will cover the operational philosophy of the system and how the signals flow from area to area Specific maintenance/support instruction on each major piece of equipment will be tailored to the needs of the maintenance staff and their experience level System timing integrity of the electronic pathways technical adjustments and troubleshooting will be addressed as they relate to the specific sub systems Diagnostics training as well as support lines will be addressed to provide the technical staff with assistance should their troubleshooting efforts not provide the desired results Operator training will focus on the set up of inputs and outputs control and manipulation of the media and resources and the overall functional operation of the control system usage for operations and technical adjustments and basic rules of presentation in an AA/ system learning environment Management training emphasis will identify the appropriate overall view of the systems any sub systems designated for presentations and the briefing / demonstrations of the system VII STANDARD WARRANTY SERVICE HVS will warrant all of the Work to be free from defects in materials and workmanship for a period of twelve (12) months from the date of OWNER acceptance of the work of this section A First year service and maintenance will include telephone support and Depot Level Service B HVS offers a variety of On Site Service Contracts ranging from time and materials to Platinum Level of On Site 24/7 Service C HVS will warrant all of the Work to be free from defects in materials and workmanship for a period of twelve (12) months from the date of OWNER acceptance of the work of this section Hoffman elfAssessment & Evaluation of current equipment pursuant to RFP #1305 Our team will always be certified have decades of audio visual experience be professional and courteous on site be responsive to the customer and they will barring extraordinary circumstances finish the project on schedule Throughout the installation we will continuously solicit input from the client report on our progress adapt designs as necessary test all components before during and after installation to ensure proper operation test and re test the entire system and finally train all client staff on the operation of the system With our continuing service we will ensure the following client staff is trained to handle/troubleshoot minor problems HVS will respond to all calls for service HVS will offer on site service and HVS will continue to provide ongoing training to the client as necessary Some services may incur service charges or require the purchase of a service contract Warranties will only cover service up to a certain point The ultimate responsibility of the Quality Assurance Program resides with Hoffman s Chief Operating Officer He will monitor the results of all systems testing select the implementation team for your project and be actively involved in soliciting feedback The COO will make sure that system is installed on time on budget and meets both Hoffman s and the client s functional standards The Hoffman Process • Find out what they want • Find out when they want it • Make it happen Find out what they want • HVS Management Acknowledges Order O Meet the customer o Review Purchase Order O Review Project Manager O Establish schedule for delivery identify milestones Review Change Order Process o Review Invoice and Payment Process o Review Extended Warranty Program HuffmanIntercdnnecting Audio and Vides Systems Technolog 1111 zrf-Der4 • '1. • Assessment & Evaluation of current equipment pursuant to RFP #1305 • Customer Advocacy Program Hoffman s Sales Rep is Customer Advocate C Sales Rep acts as customer s agent within Hoffman ) Discuss progress ask if we re meeting customer expectations Find out when they want it • Establish Schedule O Define customer s milestones o Monitor the schedule • Review schedule with PM and purchasing • Discuss project with suppliers O Get suppliers to believe in our jobs Make it happen • System Engineering Prove system design Value engineer the system if necessary Revise equipment list • Review and revise rack requirements after on site review • Identify deliverables - Submittals c, Riser diagram o M&E drawings O Acknowledge importance of submittal process • Purchasing O Just in time delivery Careful coordination between Project Manager and Purchasing Agent o Volume purchasing O Attention to delivery fees schedule and storage • Site meetings o Regular attendance O Visit the site to assess progress Count conduit verify size and continuity Make sure pull boxes are where we asked them to be placed Make sure they re taking no shortcuts huff-man„ Interconnecting Audio and Vide* Systems Technology|1010|Assessment & Evaluation of current equipment pursuant to RFP #1305 Verify availability of loading dock freight elevators make sure racks and equipment will fit inside elevator • Establish relationships with other vendors Carefully explain the AV systems impact to other contractors Review heat loads size shape of equipment Make a huge fuss when subcontractors don t pay attention to our requirements o Sort out site problems make sure the AV stuff does not delay other contractors • In house Installation o Racks and sub assemblies Documented procedures for wiring termination O Testing and Quality Control • On site Installation o Documented procedures for shipping and delivery c Project management Clean and tidy personnel Adherence to safety procedures Respect for Building Code local rules • Project Meetings at HVS O Delivery based on customer approval milestones • Internal Audit Weekly progress reporting Punch list • Operational deficiencies • Site problems • Equipment malfunctions O Correcting problems to be a cooperative effort O Share punch list information with customer advocate • Manage Change Orders Qualify the requirement O Present and approve paperwork • Training O Earliest possible date o System philosophy O Control & manipulation Huffman ; g27Interconnecting Audis and Video Systems Technel a MI MI izrvDuly re' Assessment & Evaluation of current equipment pursuant to RFP #1305 Functional operation • Customer Complaints c Project manager to Investigate and Correct c All complaints reported to senior management for review Complaint analysis and revaluation Eliminate problem Satisfy customer Establish new procedures Ruffin a nAssessment & Evaluation of current equipment pursuant to RFP #1305 VF E Voting and AN Control It mS I Dry 1 Pen N 'ober 1 Description I u to ti I E t I Voting System 1 1 F0070 516 AMX NSS VOTE Sobs are Solut on I vote $6 540 00 $6 540 00 2 1 FG2253 61V AMX NXD1500VGV Modero VG se es 15 Touch Panel Fl sh mount $7 074 00 $7 074 00 3 3 FG2251 61V AMX NXD1200VG Modero VG ser es 12 Touch Panel Flush nount 55 232 00 $15 696 00 4 4 FG2258 02K AMX NM CV7 Mode o7 Touch Panel Flt sh mount voting stat ens $2 071 00 $8 284 00 5 5 FG423-41 AMX PSN6 5 12V 6 5A Power supply $25000 Si 250 00 6 1 FG2275 01 AMX NXP TPI/4 NexLinx Touch Panel Interface 4 $3 264 00 $3 264 00 AV Control System 7 1 FG2105 AMX Ni 4000 NelL ox Integrated Master controller SIR 8 I/O 7 RS 422 $1 00700 Si 90/ 00 8 6 FG2020 AMX NXC REL 10 Relay card (10) channels $21800 Si 308 00 9 1 F02024 AMX NXC VOL4 volume control card $381 00 $381 00 10 3 FG2009 10 AMX NXS NMS NetModule Shell chassis for co trol ca d $10900 $32700 11 5 FG423 45 AMX PSN4 4 13 5V 4 4A Powe s poly CV7 Mode o $82 00 $41000 12 3 FG515 AMX AC RK Rack Mount Accessory (1H) o44 00 5132 00 13 1 F0517 AMX CSB Cable Supoport Bracket (Nellinx) $28 00 528 00 14 1 FG10 000 11 AMX CC NIRC IR Emitter Cable N/C NC 15 1 MTRLS Installation materials connections cabling etc $1 500 00 Profess onal Services and Installat on Labor _ _ 16 1 P87000 System Commissioning (requ red) Project Management 53 360 00 17 1 PS2000 Touch Panel GUI Des gn 52 520 00 18 1 PS3000 Cont ol System De gn (button by button Axw e) 2 520 00 19 1 P81000 Control System Programming $11 234 00 20 1 INSTALL Labor on Cable runs connect ons material nstall millwork $3 000 00 Vote System Total 542 108 00 AV Control System Total 55 993 00 Subtotal S48 101 00 System Commissioning and Professional Services Labor total 522 634 00 TAX 825/ $3 968 33 Total $74 703 33 AN Devices it C j City P IN mix j De cnpbon jU Oh f Er Projector Equipment 1 1 PLC XF35NL Sanyo XGA Dig tal Multimedia Projector 5200 ANSI Lumens $8 718 00 58 718 00 2 1 LNS VV022 Sanyo On Ax s Short zoom1 35 1 8 1 Lens $2 398 00 52 398 GO 3 1 POA MDO4VGA Sanyo D Sub 15 VGAJRGBHV Input Module $18500 518n 00 4 1 POA MD13NET Sanyo Advanced Network Control and Image Transfer $382 00 $382 00 5 1 Bracket Mount q Bracket for projector in ear screen m rrortframe $300 00 S300 00 Other AN Devices 6 1 NV 110XG Elmo V sual High Resolut on Mobile Presenter dig tat mac o doc camera $709 00 $709 00 7 1 AG VP310 Pa ason c DVDNNS VCR $18500 5185 00 8 1 VS 402XL Kramer 4 X 2 AN Sw tcher w/RS 232 control 5596 00 5590 00 Subtotal $13 473 00 TAX 826/ $1111 52 Total $14 584 52Sound Reinforcement System shall the St design (see fac lily audio drawings Exh b It) the spec Scat o s I d n the RFB a 91 se ex ng The AN Integrato the guldline below to propose a complete turnkey system replacing most of the equipment in the Exhib It w th new equipment The proposed system may be a ge e at p p sat of the des gn w th a I mp sum cost (see bele ) A final detailed des go II be requ red upon award of a contract to the successful b dder At that ti ne a dote led equipment I st shall be created by the AN I tegrator w th assisstance from the PMT I UndSil E Iii m# I Oty P rtt yiimbe Sr pl Audio Equipment|109| 1 N3 Pea ey Med aMatr x NION Hardware and Nware Software 2 NIO 8ML Peavey MediaMatrix NION Mickine input cards 3 NIO Bo Peavey MediaMat x NION output cards 4 V R0151-4/KVM RackMount Flip up LCD Monitor w/4 input KVM w/tradit onal mouse 5 TED PC W do Rackmo ntable CPU|109| 4 MB 15 Rolls aud o solat on transformer bi d reel o at balanced/u lbala c d|1010|20 CMS 6 TDC Tannoy Ce ling Speaker for Council Chambers only ( o adiace I 00015)|109| 1 05146560 5501 Powerware PVV5115 1000 Uninterrupted Power Supply|10 9| 14 AT857MLa Aud o Technica M crophone w/AT8416 Shockmount 10 4 AT857MLa Aud o Technica Mc ophone w/table top stand model AT8615 Additional Equipment (AN Integrate to add eq pme 1 as n cessary to above equ pment to complete proposed des g ) 11 12 1 MTRLS Wiring connectors supplies cabling 13 1 U124M/BETA87/ Shure W reless Transm tting Microphone System 14 4 QSC CX168 Power Ampl f e s (8 channels) 5 channels driving 20 Speake s n chambers 15 (90 watts per channel) Audio Equipment $27 823 00 Materials $2 500 00 (Lump Sum) Subtotal 530 323 00 Labor d gE g g IS d dP 9 am g IGUlf $7 800 00 TAX 8 25/ 2 $2 501 65 Total 540 624 65 Production Control System I It mri I City I P Nor be D scdplion U S II I E I Robotic Camera Control and Cameras|109| 3 AW 6650 Panasonic AW E650 1/2 Cameras $3 888 00 $11 664 00|109| 3 YH19x6 7 KTS Canon Lenses mounted to camera 54 131 00 512 393 00|109| CFE PT CP 9252327C Telemetr cs Robotic PAN/T It Head SO 00 SO 00|109| 4 CA CP 250 D 25 te connect cable to Pan T It Head 2509 $630 00 S2 520 00|109| 6 EL 1505A 500 Belden Cable 50011 spools of Con cable for V den Out and Genlock 5110 00 5660 00 Sound Re nforcem nt Equ pment|109| 1 AG MX70 Panason c Switcher $5 641 00 S5 641 00|109| 1 I CG 5000R Comp Character Generator $4 897 00 $4 897 00|109| 1 PRV LX1DW Pioneer DVD Harddnve Recorder/Player only d al HD a a table 55 329 00 $5 329 00|10 9| 2 DMR T6070 Panasonic Hardrive Recorder/Player w/ FEC rackmount $796 00 $796 00 10 1 AP41 SP U Hot o c Vdeo Sych onize /Processor $1145 00 $1145 00 11 2 V R53P Marshall Tr ple 5 Mo tor Pa el $1 688 00 53 376 00 Automated Playback System 12 1 Ne u Serv r Le ghtroni Nexus Controller/Server Sy t m lc dog P o buss ports $5 718 00 55 71600 13 1 LGX USBHD400 Seagate USB coed aH dD es f Serve 5499 00 $49900 14 1 DVP CX777ES Sony 4000 sc DVD Cha ger $59400 $59400 Install 15 1 Lot Male als Cable Co nectors misc etc $1 100 00 $1 100 00 16 1 Labor Installation Labor nclud nq P oq awn nq cable runs wir nq acks etc $4 670 00 $4 670 00 Robotic Camera Control and Cameras $27 237 00 Production Recording Equipment 921 184 00 Playback System $6811 00 Mater als Connectors etc $1 100 00 Subtotal $56 33 00 Labor total $4 710 00 TAX 8 25/ $4 647 39 Total $65 774 39 Assessment & Evaluation of current equipment pursuant to RFP #1305 C I AV F EFIAssessment & Evaluation of current equipment pursuant to RFP #1305 C I AV F Field Production Equipment Future Purchase Only Iii on, I ory I P-et N mbe I D pt U t S E|1010101010101010 101010101010101010|Came a System DSRPD170 Sony DVCAM Camcorder Package ACC P01 0 DVCAM Accessones Lens Adapt Case Charger Extra Battery DV6 0611 Sachller DV 6/2D system Tripod 12 3 LBS UCR201/UH400 Lectrosonic UHF UCR 201 Rece ye OH 400 T a sm tie W eless M on V LCO56 KIT Marshall V 56 LCD r lonitor with Speaker PAG 6 Kit PAG Pagl ght sun gun I ght with batteries and accessories EV RE50 Electra Voice hand held microphone Lighting ARRI 03 KIT ARRI Soft back 03 Kit IN e Ira Soft I ght k t Cabl ng & Materials ACC PKG XLR flue cables Video cables Fire wire cables extra bulbs etc Camera System Lighting Materials Subtotal TAX 8 25/ Total (exclusive of bid total below) Equipment Materials and Labor Bid Totals $3 220 00 $40400 $1 758 00 82 168 00 $304 00 $409 00 $272 00 $1 944 00 8250 00 $3 220 00 $40400 51 758 00 $2 168 00 S304 00 5409 00 $272 00 $1 944 00 $250 00 S8 535 00 $1 994 00 $250 00 $10 779 00 9889 27 511 668 27|109| pile 1 j Eel Bid cost summary Equipment Totals (excluding Field Production Equ pment) Mate als supplies Labor Totals Warranty Serv ce One Year TAX 8 25 / Bid Total (Not to Exceed Bid amount) 5144 629 00 $3 600 00 $35 144 00 $9 250 00 512 218 89 $204 851 89 OPTIONAL LINE ITEMS Extended Service Maintenance Agreements Available for 2nd 3rd and 4th Year After First Year Warranty Service Custom Platinum Gold Silver and Bronze Level Options (See attached sample agreements) TAX 825/ Total of optional t msAssessment & Evaluation of current equipment pursuant to RFP #1305 STATE OF CALIFORNIA BIDDER S AFFIDAVIT COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES Michael Gavigan being first duly sworn deposes and says 1 That he/she is the Vice Pres & CFO of Hoffman Video Systems (Title of Office) (Name of Company) hereinafter called Bidder who has submitted to the City of Culver City a bid for Design and Installation of the Culver City A/V Facilities (AVF) Project 2 That the bid is genuine that the same is not sham that all statements of fact in the bid are true 3 That the bid was not made in the interest or behalf of any person partnership company association organization or corporation not named or disclosed 4 That the Bidder did not directly or indirectly induce solicit or agree with anyone else to submit a false or sham bid to refrain from proposing or to withdraw his bid to raise or fix the bid price of the Bidder or of anyone else or to raise or fix any overhead profit or cost element of the Bidder's price or the price of anyone else and did not attempt to induce action prejudicial to the interest of the City of Culver City or of any other Bidder or anyone else interested in the proposed purchase order 5 That the Bidder has not in any other manner sought by collusion to secure for itself an advantage over any other Bidder or to induce action prejudicial to the interests of the City of Culver City or of any other Bidder or of anyone else interested in the proposed purchase order 6 That the Bidder has not accepted any bid from any subpurchase order or matenalman through any bid depository the bylaws rules or regulations of which prohibit or prevent the Bidder from considering any bid from any subpurchase order or matenalman which is not processed through that bid depository or which prevent any subpurchase order or matenalman from proposing to any purchase order or who does not use the facilities of or accept bids from or through such bid depository 7 That the Bidder did not directly or indirectly submit the Bidder s bid price or any breakdown thereof or the contents thereof or divulge information or data relative thereto to any corporation partnership company association organization bid depository or to any member or agent thereof or to any individual or group of individuals except to the City of Culver City or to any person or persons who have a partnership or other financial interest with said Bidder in its business 8 That the Bidder has not been debarred from participation in any state federal or public works project Dated this 27 day of may 20 05 (Bidder Signature) (Title)