Legislation Details

File #: HIST-22220    Version: 1 Subject:
Type: Historical Status: Action Item
In control: City Council Meeting Agenda
On agenda: 5/28/2013 Final action: 5/28/2013
Title: Adoption of the Resolution (1) Approving the Engineer’s Report that Includes Proposed Rated for Approval by the District Members for Fiscal Year 2013/2014; 2014/2015; and 2015/2016; (2) Declaring the Intention to Order the Sewer User’s Service Charge for Fiscal Year 2013/2014; and (3) Setting the Date, Time, and Place for the Public Hearing to be Monday, July 22, 2013 at 7:00 PM in the City Council Chambers.
Attachments: 1. Adoption of the Resolution (1) Approving the Engin - A-5__13-05-28__PW-Eng__CITY COUNCIL__NOI_Sewer User Service Charge - FINAL.pdf, 2. Adoption of the Resolution (1) Approving the Engin - A-5__13-05-28__PW-Eng__CITY COUNCIL__Intention_Sewer User Service Charge__Attachment with cover.pdf
City of Culver City, California Agenda Item Report RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council: Adopt a Resolution approving the Engineer’s Report for the Sewer User’s Service Charge for Fiscal Year 2013/2014; Declaring its Intention to levy and collect the Sewer User’s Service Charges for Fiscal Years 2013/2014; and setting a public hearing for July 22, 2013, at 7:00 p.m. in the Mike Balkman Council Chambers. BACKGROUND: Culver City owns and operates a separate sewage collection system, which is connected to Los Angeles’ system. Culver City sewage, which is deposited into the Los Angeles system, is treated at the City of Los Angeles' Hyperion Treatment Plant prior to its ultimate disposal in the Pacific Ocean or additional treatment by West Basin Municipal Water District for the production of recycled water that is used throughout the region. An agreement between the City of Los Angeles and a number of other cities called the Amalgamated Agreement (Agreement) requires Culver City to pay a proportionate share of the costs of conveyance, operation, maintenance, repair and capital improvements to upgrade and improve the Amalgamated Sewerage system. Federal law requires that all agencies using the City of Los Angeles' Hyperion Treatment Plant adopt a system of charges to assure that each property served by a public sewer pays its fair share of costs for the operation, maintenance, repair and Meeting Date: 05/28/2013 Item Number: A-5 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM: Adoption of the Resolution (1) Approving the Engineer’s Report that Includes Proposed Rated for Approval by the District Members for Fiscal Year 2013/2014; 2014/2015; and 2015/2016; (2) Declaring the Intention to Order the Sewer User’s Service Charge for Fiscal Year 2013/2014; and (3) Setting the Date, Time, and Place for the Public Hearing to be Monday, July 22, 2013 at 7:00 PM in the City Council Chambers. Contact Person/Dept.: Mate Gaspar/PW Phone Number: 310-253-5602 Fiscal Impact: Yes [] No [X] General Fund: Yes [] No [X] Public Hearing: [] Action Item: [X] Attachments: [X] Commission Action Required: Yes [] No [X] Date: _______________ Public Notification: (E-Mail) Agenda and Meetings – City Council (05/21/13) Department Approval: Charles D. Herbertson (05/15/13) City Attorney Approval: Carol Schwab (by H. Baker) (05/21/13) Chief Financial Officer Approval: Jeff Muir (by M. Noller) (05/21/13) City Manager Approval: John M. Nachbar (05/21/13) City of Culver City, California Agenda Item Report improvement of the Hyperion Treatment Plant. The “fair share” of each property is based on its contribution to the system in terms of flow quantity and sewage strength (biochemical oxygen demand and suspended solids). This is in addition to the cost experienced by Culver City in the collection, operation, and improvement of our own sewage collection and conveyance system. In addition to formulating and adopting a system of Sewer User’s Service Charges (SUSC), the City must also select a system for collecting these charges. In 1980, based on an engineering study and the City Engineer’s recommendation, the City Council initiated a once-a-year billing procedure for the SUSC that places each property owner’s charges on their property tax bill. This method of collection has proven to be very efficient and provides the lowest cost billing and collection service for Culver City. On May 7, 2012, the City Council awarded a contract to NBS Government Finance Group dba NBS to conduct an in-depth review of the existing SUSC and determine if they were fair and equitable to each customer class taking into consideration the cost of City of Los Angeles’ services to convey and treat the wastewater and Culver City’s costs for collection and conveyance of the sewage in its own system. NBS determined the following findings: 1. The City’s current sewer rates need to be adjusted to collect more revenue from single family customers and less from other customer classes, particularly commercial/restaurant customers. 2. The City should collect approximately 60% of rate revenue from base charges and 40% from its commodity charges based on the classification of current expenses as either fixed or variable. Currently the City collects 90% of rate revenue from commodity charges. Fixed costs (which are associated with Base Charges) are personnel costs (including cost for maintenance of the City’s sewage collection system), office expense and most of the administrative charges, and consultant support costs. These costs do not vary directly with the quantity of sewage produced. Variable costs (which are associated with Commodity Charges) are what the City pays to the City of Los Angeles for wastewater treatment-related costs, utilities at the pump stations, and 25% of administrative charges and consultant support. These charges are more directly tied to the quantity of sewage produced. 3. Existing landscape irrigation credits for residential customers are reasonable. In addition, NBS prepared a 5-year financial plan/revenue requirements for the sewer enterprise fund. These requirements are based on several factors such as NBS’ recommended targets for operating, capital and debt reserve balances and the City’s projected capital improvement program. City of Culver City, California Agenda Item Report Based on recommendation contained in NBS’ study and Engineer’s Report, on August 13, 2012, the City Council approved rate adjustments for the following customer classes at last year’s Public Hearing on August 13, 2012: Code Customer Class Proposed percentage reduction 102 Multi-Family 200 Commercial/Business: 300 Commercial/Restaurants: 400 Institutional: 600 Special Users -1% reduction -2% reduction -13% reduction -4% reduction -8% reduction The Study recommended an 11% rate increase for single family residences. However, Staff could not recommend any rate increase since any proposed rate increase requires a 45-day public notice under Proposition 218, and there was not enough time to submit the sewer charges to the County Assessor’s office in August 2012. Accordingly the single family rates remained unchanged last year. DISCUSSION: Pursuant to a Resolution adopted by the City Council on Monday, April 22, 2013, the Public Works Director/City Engineer has prepared the Engineer’s Report for the SUSC and filed said Report with the City Clerk. A copy of the Engineer’s Report is attached to this report for consideration by the City Council. Rate increases of 4% are proposed across all customer classes for Fiscal Year 2013/2014 and continuing through 2014/2015 and 2015/2016 with the exception of only a 3% rate increase for single family residences in Fiscal Year 2015/2016. In addition, Base Charges are proposed to be adjusted in Fiscal Year 2013/2014 to achieve the recommended 60%/40% revenue split. This is explained in detail in the Study and Engineer’s Report. This evening, the City Council is asked to adopt a resolution (1) approving the Engineer’s Report, (2) declaring the City Council’s intention to levy and collect assessments for the upcoming fiscal year; and (3) setting the time and place for the public hearing as required by Culver City Municipal Code (CCMC) Section 15.01.070. City of Culver City, California Agenda Item Report Should the City Council adopt the proposed resolution, pursuant to Section 15.01.070(G) of the CCMC, the City Clerk shall give notice of the public hearing by causing the Resolution of Intention to be published at least 45 days prior to the date of the hearing. Each property owner in the City will receive a notice of the proposed rate increases as required by Proposition 218. Staff is proposing that the rate increases for the next three fiscal years be considered at one time on July 22, 2013, to save money on postage and handling. The public hearing is scheduled for July 22, 2013. The proposed Proposition 218 notice as prepared by NBS is attached. Should the rate increases be adopted for the next three fiscal years, the City Council will still be asked to consider each levy annually (generally in May/June of each year). FISCAL ANALYSIS: As detailed in the Engineer’s Report, the proposed charges for Fiscal Year 2013/2014 will address estimated costs for providing complete operation, maintenance, and local capital improvements for the Culver City sewerage system and for the estimated payments due to the City of Los Angeles for Culver City's share of the Los Angeles Amalgamated System costs. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Proposed Resolution 2. Engineer’s Report 3. NBS Sewer Rate Study 4. Proposition 218 notice MOTION: That the City Council: Adopt a Resolution (1) approving the Engineer’s Report, (2) declaring the City Council’s intention to levy and collect assessments for the Sewer User’s Service Charge - Fiscal Year 2013/2014 , and (3) setting the time, date, and place for a Public Hearing for July 22, 2013, at 7:00 p.m. in the Mike Balkman Council Chambers. MEETING DATE: 05/28/13 AGENDA ITEM: (1) Receipt and Filing a Presentation on the Engineer's Report (2) Adoption of the Resolution Approving the Engineer's Report, (3) Declaring the Intention to Order the Sewer User's Service Charge and (4) Setting the Date, Time, and Place for the Public Hearing to be Monday, July 22, 2013 at 7:00 PM in the City Council Chambers for Fiscal Years 2013/2014, 2014/2015, and 2015/2016 charges ATTACHMENTS 1 Resolution 2 Engineer's Report 3 June 26, 2012 Sewer Rate Study by NBS 4 Proposition 218 Public Hearing Notice Pages 1 - 4 5-15 16 — 40 41 - 42 RESOLUTION NO. 2013-R 2 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CULVER CITY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE ASSESSMENT ENGINEER'S REPORT, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO ORDER THE ANNUAL LEVY AND COLLECTION OF ASSESSMENTS FOR THE SEWER USER'S SERVICE CHARGES AND SETTING A TIME AND PLACE FOR A PUBLIC HEARING THEREON. WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of Culver City Municipal Code ("CCMC") §5.02.035.A, the City Council previously established a system of sewer user's service charges providing that each parcel of property shall pay its proportionate share of the costs for operation, maintenance, repair and improvements of the City sewerage system (the "Sewer Users Service Charges"); and WHEREAS, the City Council desires to declare its intention to provide for the levy and collection of annual assessments for Fiscal Year 2013-2014, to provide for the costs and expenses necessary for the operation, maintenance, repair and improvements of 17 the City sewerage system; and 18 WHEREAS, the Engineer's Report has been prepared and filed with the City 19 Clerk and submitted to the City Council in accordance with CCMC §5.02.035.B; and 20 WHEREAS, the. City Council has carefully examined and reviewed the 21 22 Engineer's Report as presented and is preliminary satisfied with the proposed report, each 23 and all of the budget items and documents as set forth therein and is satisfied that the levy 24 amounts, on a preliminary basis, have been allocated so that each parcel of property shall 25 pay its proportionate share of the costs for operation, maintenance, repair and 26 improvements of the City sewerage system as set forth in the Engineer's Report. 27 28 3 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Culver City, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE as follows: 3 t The Engineer's Report as presented, consisting of the following: a 4 description of the operation, maintenance, repair and improvements of the City sewerage 5 system, the estimated costs of operation, maintenance, repair and improvements, and the 6 formulas used to determine the sewer user service charges for the parcels, is hereby 7 8 approved on a preliminary basis and is on file in the Office of the City Clerk open for public 9 inspection. 10 2. It is the intention of the City Council to levy and collect assessments 11 for the Sewer User's Service Charges to pay the annual costs and expenses for the costs 12 for operation, maintenance, repair and improvements of the City sewerage system for the 13 fiscal year commencing July 1, 2013 and ending June 30, 2014. The operation, 14 15 maintenance, repair and improvements are generally described as: 90 miles of sewer 16 pipelines, seven sewer pump stations, and sewage transmission and treatment costs 17 payable to the City of Los Angeles per the executed Amalgamated Agreement with City of 18 Los Angeles. Costs include all necessary service, operations, administration and 19 maintenance required to keep the City's sewerage system in a healthy, vigorous and 20 satisfactory condition. 21 22 3_ The Engineer's Report, as preliminarily approved by the City Council, 23 is on fife with the City Clerk and open for public inspection_ Reference is made to the 24 Engineer's Report for a full detailed description of the operation, maintenance, repair and 25 improvements to be maintained, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and 26 parcels of land within the City. 27 28 -2- 4. As recommended in the Sewer Rate Study: 1) the maximum assessment for all customer classes for Fiscal Years 2013-2014 and 2014-2015 is proposed to increase annually by four percent (4%) above that previously approved by the property owners for the preceding fiscal year; and 2) for the 2015-2016 Fiscal Year, the maximum assessment for all customer classes (except for single family residences) is proposed to increase by four percent (4%) above that previously approved by the property owners for the preceding fiscal year, and the maximum assessment for single family residences is proposed to increase by three percent (3%) above that previously approved • by the property owners for the preceding fiscal year (as "increased assessment" is defined in California Government Code §54954.6). 5. Notice is hereby given that a public hearing is scheduled to be held at the Mike Balkman Council Chambers, 9770 Culver Boulevard, Culver City, California, on July 22, 2013 at 7:00pm or as soon thereafter as the matter may be heard. All interested persons, prior to the conclusion of the hearing, shall be afforded the opportunity to hear and be heard. The City Council shall consider all oral statements or written communication made or filed by any interested person. II 1 / 11 I I I 1/I 24 1 I 25 iii 26 27 ill 28 I 2 3 4 6 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 -3- 12 ATTEST: 13 14 15 A13-00268 16 17 18 19 MARTIN R. COLE, City Clerk 6 7 8 9 10 11 1 6. The City Clerk is hereby directed to give notice of the public hearing by 2 causing the resolution of intention, or summary thereof, to be published at least 45 days 3 prior to the date set for public hearing, as provided in CCMC §5.02.040 and Proposition 4 218_ 5 APPROVED AND ADOPTED this day of 2013_ JEFFREY COOPER, Mayor City of Culver City, California 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -4- Main Office 32605 Temecula Parkway, Suite 100 Temecula, CA 92592 Toll free: 800.676.7516 Fax: 951296.1998 Regional Office 870 Market Street, Suite 1223 San Francisco, CA 94102 Toll free: 800.434.8349 Fax: 415.391.8439 City of Culver City Sewer User's Service Charge Fiscal Year 2013/14 Engineer's Report Pursuant to Chapter 5.02 of the Code of the City of Culver City CITY OF CULVER CITY SEWER USER'S SERVICE CHARGE 9770 Culver Blvd. Culver City, CA. 90232 Phone - (310) 253-5700 CITY COUNCIL Jeffery Cooper, Mayor Meghan Sahli-Wells, Councilmember Jim B. Clarke, Counciimember Micheal 0' Leary, Councilmember Andrew Weissman, Councilmember CITY STAFF John Nachbar, City Manager Charles D. Herbertson, Public Works Director Mate Gaspar, Engineering Services Manager NBS Pablo Perez, Client Services Director Danielle Wood, Project Manager Nick Dayhoff, Financial Analyst TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION 1-1 2. DISCUSSION 2-1 2.1 Recommendation 2-1 2.2 Landscaping 2-1 3. ANNUAL EXPENDITURES AND REVENUE 3-1 3.1 Expenditures 3-1 3.2 Revenues 3-1 3.3 Reserve Fund 3-1 4. SUMMARY OF CURRENT RATE STRUCTURE 4-1 5. CURRENT SUSC RATES - FY 2012/13 5-1 6. PROPOSED SUSC RATES - FY 2013/14 6-1 7. ESTIMATED REVENUE PER CUSTOMER CLASS 7-1 8. 600 CUSTOMER CLASS USER DESCRIPTIONS 8-1 1. INTRODUCTION A major challenge confronting those responsible for wastewater infrastructure, transportation, treatment and disposal is acquiring adequate funds to finance and operate facilities and capital equipment, along with implementing appropriate pricing structures to ensure the self-sufficiency of the utility. The financing vehicle that is used by the utility and the timing of the financing are crucial in ensuring that wastewater customers are appropriately paying for facilities that they need, and not inappropriately financing facilities for future customers. It is a major goal of an effective financial plan to 'match' the economic impact on customers with the benefits received from the service. Regulations governing Federal and State grant funds require the City of Los Angeles to maintain a Cost Recover Program (Sewer User Charges System) which includes all operations and maintenance costs directly or indirectly related to the treatment and collection of liquid waste discharge by residents and businesses. As a result of the City of Culver City's (the "City") contractual relationship with the City of Los Angeles for wastewater treatment at the Hyperion Treatment Facility, the City is also required to recover from each wastewater user their proportionate share of the costs incurred for wastewater collection capital improvements within the City, wastewater system operation and maintenance, City of Los Angeles capital improvements for conveyance to Hyperion and operation and Maintenance at Hyperion. Accordingly, the City has adopted a plan to collect wastewater user charges and implemented it for the first time in Fiscal Year 1980-81. The City recovers wastewater user charges on an annual basis. Since the plan's inception, the Los Angeles County Auditor-Controller and the annual property tax bill have been utilized as the vehicle for both billing and collection. This method has proven to be both functionally satisfactory and exceptionally economical over the last thirty-two years. In order to achieve a fair and equitable system of wastewater user charges, users are charged in a manner consistent with their actual use of the system. This comprises not only the flow quantity, but also the wastewater strength (quality) as characterized by BOD (biochemical oxygen demand) and SS (suspended solids). Pursuant to the City's Municipal Code, in Fiscal Year 2012/13 the City and NBS reviewed and approved the Sewer User's Service Charges (SUSC) structures and billing formulas to ensure that the City utilizes an effective pricing structure within the constraints of Proposition 218. Additionally, the City wanted to ensure that its sewer pricing structure continues to achieve the goals and objectives of the community, while maintaining a fair and equitable distribution of costs to all of its customers. Sewer User's Service Charge Engineer's Report — City of Culver City 1-1 Prepared by NBS — Fiscal Year 2013/14 2. DISCUSSION 2.1 Recommendation NBS recommends that the SUSC rates proposed in Section 6 of this report be implemented for Fiscal Year 2013/14. Based on the current Reserve Fund balance and the anticipated revenues and expenses, the existing rates will be adequate to maintain the solvency of the Fund. 2.2 Landscaping City of Los Angeles data indicates that 58% of single-family water usage is returned to the sanitary sewer collection system as effluent, compared to 85% for multi-family customers. In fight of the lack of recent, actual flow-return data for these two customer classes, these assumptions are not unreasonable; due to landscape irrigation, single-family customers typically return a lower percentage of water consumption to the sewer system. As such, the water consumption for single-family and multi-family customers will be multiplied by the following factors: Factor Customer Class Sinale-Familv Residential Multi-Family Residential 0.58 0.85 Credits for residential landscaping can be given in two ways. A resident can either 1) install a separate water meter for landscaping, the usage on which will not be assessed the SUSC, or 2) prove by submitting calculations and evidence that the percentage reduction in the table above is not adequate. Sewer User's Service Charge Engineer's Report — City of Culver City 2-1 Prepared by NBS — Fiscal Year 2013/14 3. ANNUAL EXPENDITURES AND REVENUE 3.1 Expenditures The following table shows the estimated annual expenditures for Fiscal Year 2013/14: :;*:: Amount Budget Item Operating Expenses Debt Service Rate-Funded Capital Expenses 1 TOTAL $6,210,405 1,605,200 0 $7,815,605 3.2 Revenues The following table shows the estimated annual revenues for Fiscal Year 2013/14: Revenue Source Amount Sewer User's Service Charge Industrial Waste Inspection Fees Interest Earnings TOTAL $7,983,141 70,000 150,000 $8,2030 41 3.3 Reserve Fund The total minimum reserve amount recommended is calculated as follows: Minimum Reserve Fund = 25% of annual operations operation and maintenance expenses, plus 3% of Net Assets 3, plus the debt service requirement which is equal to the maximum annual debt service payment. For Fiscal Year 2013/14, the minimum required reserve fund is estimated to be $4,477,801, and the available cash balance is projected to be $10,187,340. The City has budgeted $3.3 million in Capital Expenses for FY 2013/14; however, such expenses will be funded by the use of reserve funds. 2 Estimates for the Commodity Charge are based on 2011 water consumption data. 3 Based on the 2011/12 CAFR, NBS has used a Net Asset Value of $44.0 million. Sewer User's Service Charge Engineer's Report — City of Culver City 3-1 Prepared by NBS — Fiscal Year 2013/14 4. SUMMARY OF CURRENT RATE STRUCTURE The purpose of the rate design analysis performed by NBS in FY 2012/13 was to determine how to collect fixed costs (i.e., base charges) and variable costs (i.e. commodity charges) from each of the customer classes. The primary factor in allocating rate revenue between these fixed and variable charges is the nature of the costs being collected. That is, fixed costs should be collected from fixed charges, and variable costs should be collected from variable charges. Accurately allocating these fixed and variable charges improves the revenue stability of the sewer utility's rates, because changes in variable usage, or water consumption patterns, will be accounted for in the variable (commodity-related) charges. In other words, if overall water consumption dropped, the revenue collected from commodity-related charges would change in proportion to the commodity- related costs. A basic evaluation of fixed and variable costs indicates that approximately 63% of the sewer utility costs are fixed and 37% are variable. Therefore, base charges and commodity rates should collect sewer rate revenue from fixed and variable charges in roughly these proportions. NBS' analysis incorporates these types of changes for FY 2013-14, rounding these percentages to 60% and 40% respectively. Sewer User's Service Charge Engineer's Report — City of Culver City 4-1 Prepared by NBS — Fiscal Year 2013/14 II 5. CURRENT SUSC RATES FY 2012/13 The following table shows the current SUSC rates for Fiscal Year 2012/13: Sewer Rates Base Charges I Commodity (,$/yr) Rate ($/hcf/yr) Customer Class 101 Single-Family 1 102 Multi-Family 2 200 Commercial/Business 3 300 Commercial/Restaurants 400 Institutional 3 500 Schools/Public 3 601 Special 3 602 Special 3 603 Special 3 604 Special 3 605 Special 3 606 Special 3 607 Special 3 608 Special 3 609 Special 3 610 Special 3 612 Special 3 613 Special 3 614 Special 3 615 Special 3 $42.32 41.80 41.37 36.89 40.50 42.32 39.11 39.11 39.11 39.11 39.11 39.11 39.03 39.10 39.11 39.12 39.11 39.09 39.12 n ••• $3.85 3.80 3.76 6.65 3.59 3.26 3.79 4.94 4.94 3.47 2.97 4.94 3.55 4.55 3.56 0.71 0.36 0.36 3.02 Base charge is per parcel. 2 Base charge is per dwelling unit. 3 Base charge is per meter. Sewer User's Service Charge Engineer's Report - City of Culver City Prepared by NBS - Fiscal Year 2013/14 la Customer Class Base Charges Commodity ($/yr) Rate ($/hcf/yr) 6. PROPOSED SUSC RATES FY 2013/14 The following table shows the proposed SUSC rates for Fiscal Year 2013/14: 101 Single-Family 1 102 Multi-Family 2 200 Commercial/Business 3 300 Commercial/Restaurants 3 400 Institutional 3 500 Schools/Public 3 601 Special 3 602 Special 3 603 Special 3 604 Special 3 605 Special 3 606 Special 3 608 Special 3 610 Special 3 612 Special 3 613 Special 3 614 Special 3 615 Special 3 4 $254.24 202.97 254.24 254.24 254.24 254.24 254.24 254.24 254.24 254.24 254.24 254.24 254.24 254.24 128.07 254.24 254.24 254.24 $1.17 1.17 3.30 6.54 3.48 2.67 3.86 5.11 5.12 3.58 3.04 5.13 3.98 0.55 0.00 0.24 2.88 3.94 Base charge is per parcel. 4 Base charge is per dwelling unit. 3 Base charge is per meter. 4 Class 615 was added for FY 2013/14 as directed by City staff, assuming this rate consists of 20% of Class 300 and 80% of Class 200 Sewer User's Service Charge Engineer's Report - City of Culver City 6-1 Prepared by NBS - Fiscal Year 2013/14 13 From Base Cha rges From Commodity Rates 1 Total Annual I Revenue 7. ESTIMATED REVENUE PER CUSTOMER CLASS The following table shows the estimated SUSC revenue per customer class based on the proposed SUSC rates for Fiscal Year 201 3/14: Total Annual Rate Revenue Customer Class 101 Single-Family 102 Multi-Family 200 Commercial/Business 300 Commercial/Restaurants 400 Institutional 500 Schools/Public 601 Special 602 Special 603 Special 604 Special 605 Special 606 Special 608 Special 610 Special 612 Special 613 Special 614 Special 615 Special Total $1,437,981 2,233,076 262,851 42,712 19,576 5,841 763 508 254 508 1,271 254 254 254 768 254 508 254 $4,007,887 $473,115 752,769 1,288,641 716,287 226,475 75,155 96,257 59,010 57,917 44,961 72,291 104,780 1,345 974 0 381 3,781 1,115.02 $1,911,096 2,985,845 1,551,492 758,999 246,051 80,996 97,020 59,518 58,171 45,469 73,562 105,034 1,599 1,228 768 635 4,289 1,369 $7,983,141 Estimates for the Commodity Charge are based on 2011 water consumption data Sewer User's Service Charge Engineers Report - City of Culver City Prepared by NBS - Fiscal Year 2013/14 7-1 11 8. 600 CUSTOMER CLASS USER DESCRIPTIONS The following table shows the user descriptions for the Special ''600"Customer Classes: Use Description Use Code 601 Mall 602 6333 Bristol Parkway 603 5992 Green Valley Circle —4 Points Sheraton 604 Brotman Medical Center 605 Sony Studios 606 6161 Centinela — Double Tree 608 Jackson Market 610 4545 Sepulveda - #1818847 — 20% of User Code 200 Rates 612 Nurseries 613 10121 Jefferson - #4904654 — 10% of User Code 200 Rates 614 10555 Jefferson — 85% of Use Code 200 Rates 615 10824 Venice Blvd — 20% of User Code 300 Rates + 80% of User Code 200 Rates Sewer User's Service Charge Engineer's Report — City of Culver City 8-1 Prepared by NBS — Fiscal Year 2013/14 /Si° 870 Market Street, Suite 1223 San Francisco, CA 94102 Toll free: 800.434.8349 nbsg ov.com TRANSMITTAL TO: MATE GASPAR, ENGINEERING SERVICE MANAGER CULVER CITY FROM: KIM BOEHLER, CONSULTANT GREG CLUMPNER, DIRECTOR NBS NBS SUBJECT: SEWER RATE STUDY FINDINGS, RECOMMENDATIONS AND PROPOSED RATES DATE: JUNE 26, 2012 PURPOSE The purpose of this transmittal is to summarize the findings of the Sewer Rate Study that NBS performed for Culver City's Sewer Utility (City or Utility). NBS' findings focus on equitably allocating Utility costs to each customer class and adjusting base charges and commodity rates in a manner that meets Proposition 218 requirements and is fiscally sustainable. Projected revenue requirements and rate adjustments cover the next four years (2012-13 through 2015-16). Recommended rate adjustments for 2012-13 retain the City's current rate design, while rates after 2012-13 incorporate cost-of-service adjustments, including collecting 60% of rate revenue from base charges and 40% from commodity charges. These changes are explained in more detail below. Two appendices are included in this transmittal: • Appendix A: Selected Tables for the Financial Plan and Revenue Requirement Analysis • Appendix B: Selected Tables for the Cost-of-Service and Rate Design Analysis OVERVIEW A comprehensive sewer rate study typically includes the three key components shown in Exhibit 1, which are based on industry standards such as the American Water Works Association (AVVWA) and Water Environment Federation (WEF) cost of service methodologies. The cost-of-service component in particular addresses the general requirements of equity and fairness embodied in Proposition 218. In terms of the chronology, these three steps represent the order they were performed in this study. Sewer Rate Study — City of Culver City Page 1 Prepared by NBS — June 26, 2012 1. Financial Plan/Revenue Requirements Exhibit 1. Primary Components of a Rate Study Step 1: Financial Plan/ Revenue Requirements - Compares current sources of funds (revenues) to uses of funds (expenses) and determines the revenue needed from rates. 2. Cost-of- Service Analysis Step 2: Cost-of-Service Analysis - Allocates the revenue requirements to the various customer classes in a 'fair and equitable" manner that complies with Prop 218. 3. Rate Design Step 3: Rate Design - Considers what rate structure alternatives will best meet the City's need to collect the annual revenue requirements from each customer class. As a result of this rate study, changes in the total amount of rate revenue collected from each customer class, as well as changes to base charges and commodity rates, are recommended. The following are the key findings, followed by a summary of each of the three parts of this rate analysis. KEY RATE STUDY FINDINGS The following are NBS' key findings based on our analysis of the City's sewer revenue requirements, cost of service, and rate design issues. More details are provided in the following sections. • Revenue Requirements by Customer Class — Based on the results of the cost-of-service analysis, the City's current sewer rates need to be adjusted to collect more revenue from single- family residential customers and less from other customer classes, particularly commercial/ restaurant customers. However, this additional revenue that should be collected from the single- family residential customers will be "phased-in" over a period of three years. Changes in Rate Design — The City currently collects approximately 90% of its rate revenue from commodity (consumption-based) charges and only 10% from base charges. Based on a classification of current expenses as either fixed or variable, the City should collect closer to 60% of rate revenue from base charges and 40% from its commodity charges. • Landscape/Irrigation Factors for Residential Customers — The City's most current water consumption data (for 2010) indicates that total water consumption per dwelling unit is approximately 10 hcf/month for single-family customers compared to 5.6 hcf/month for multi- family customers. City of Los Angeles data l indicates that 58% of single-family water usage 'is returned to the sanitary sewer collection system as effluent, compared to 85% for multi-family customers. In light of the lack of recent, actual flow-return data for these two customer classes, these assumptions are not unreasonable; due to landscape irrigation, single-family customers typically return a lower percentage of water consumption to the sewer system. From the City's 2003 -04 Engineer's report, Table 2 - Summary of Users. Sewer Rate Study — City of Culver City Page 2 Prepared by NBS — June 26, 2012 /7 Projected FY 2012113 FY 2013/14 FY 2014/15 FY 2015/16 FY 2016117 0.00% 12.49% FINANCIAL PLAN AND REVENUE REQUIREMENTS ANALYSIS Projected Revenue Requirements and Rate Increases NBS prepared a detailed five-year financial plan. The results of this plan indicate that the Utility is able to meet all obligations in Fiscal Year 2012/13 without rate increases, but will need a four percent rate increase in each of the next three years (2013/14 through 2015/16). Exhibit 2. Summary of Five-Year Revenue Requirements and Rate Increases Summary of Sources and Uses of Funds and Net Revenue Requirements Sources of Sewer Funds Rate Revenue Under PreNailing Rates Industrial Waste Inspection Fees Interest Earnings Total Sources of Funds Uses of Sewer Funds Operating Expenses Debt Service - Rate-Funded Capital Expenses Total Use of Funds $ 7,340,661 $ 7,340,661 $ 7,340,661 $ 7,340,661 $ 7,340,661 70,000 70,000 70,000 70,000 70,000 202,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 $ 7,612,661 $ 7,560,661 I $ 7,560,661 1$ 7,560,661 $ 7,560,661 $ 5,858,475 $ 6,210,405 $ 6,096,069 $ 6,332,396 $ 6,509,572 1,606,800 1,605,200 1,603,000 1,608,300 1,605,650 482.386 $ 7,465,275 $ 7,815,605 $ 7,699,069 $ 8,423,082 $ 8,115,222 :1.4P.eff,qi.Vcr0040(9, -AVA. :Ipcf.e.0 se 147:386; Additional Revenue from Rate Increases 293,626 598,998 916,584 I 916,584 AiiiiiI0M0000Miii*N10 ... '4:10* Projected Annual Rate Increase Rum atab ve Hate Increases lIATAIKO 0.00% 0.00% 1:1-014, A§O.glit 4 ,1 :kW 4.00% 4.00% 4.00% 4.00% a 16% 14.9% -Net Revenue Requini . - „$ 7AS-3-41.0 $ 4,-AOTA0015t1000.069-4 -: 4-400. -R8?-1 /. Total Use of Funds less industrial Water inspection Fees and Interest Earnings. This is the annual amount needed from seiner rates. However, the proposed rates in this rate study have been set to recover the revenue currently collected from customers (i.e., $7,544,660 less $204,000 for the reduction in estimated revenue for FY 2012-13, per the Cost of Service Analysis results. Capital Improvement Projects and Costs — The Utility has an adopted Capital Improvement Program (CIP) that has identified capital projects totaling $13.8 million, which are planned in 2012/13 through 2015/16. These projects will be funded from a combination of cash reserves set aside for rehabilitation and replacement, and rate revenue. Exhibit 3. Adopted Capital Improvement Program Fiscal Years 2012/13 through 2015/16 Project Description FY 2012/13 FY 2013/14 FY 2014/15 •FY 2015/16 Sewer Main Rehabilitation Project Sewer Main Point Repair, Manhole Rehabilitation, and Sewer Video Sewer Pump Stations Improvement P-521 Jasmine Second Force Main Project Overland pipeline diversion (Construction) Hayden second force main Project 2nd force main Braddock connection to Los Angeles New Pump Station Selmaraine New pipelines to dhert Mesmer New siphon at sewer convergences at Culver/Madison Upsize Duquesne Sewer Pipe to 21 inch from Lucerne to Jefferson Financial System Replacement/Enhancements $ 3,000,000 - $ 100,000 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,090 200,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 - - $ 500,000 $ $ $ 100,000 $ 160,000 3,000,000 $ - $ 3,000,000 $ 3,000,000 - $ 26,472 .3;200* Sewer Rate Study — City of Culver City Page 3 Prepared by NBS — June 26, 2012 16 -Recommended Target Reserve Balance 3- Cash Management and Target Reserve Fund Balances — The Utility will begin Fiscal Year 2012/13 with a total cash balance of $17.2 million. Exhibits 4 and 5 summarize the cash balances by reserve fund and show the recommended target reserves. Due to the costs of the planned capital improvement projects, the Utility will need to draw down the Capital Rehab & Replacement Reserve over the next five years. Exhibit 4. Ending Cash Balance Compared to Recommended Reserve Target Beginning Reserve Fund Balances and Recommended Reserve Targets Operating Reserve Budge t FY 2012/13 FY 2013/14 Projected FY2014115 FY 2015/16 FY 2016/17 Beginning Balance $ 1,479,650 $ 1,465,000 $ 1,503,683 $ 1,524,000 $ 1,578,163 Recommended Minimum Target 1,465,000 1,563,000 1,524,000 1,553,000 1,627,000 Capital Rehab & Replacement Reserve Beginning Balance $ 14,101,776 $ 10,187,340 $ 6,887,340 $ 4,127,614 $ 1,410,000 Recommended Minimum Target 1,250,000 1,310,000 1,360,000 1,410,000 1,370,000 Debt Reserve Beginning Balance $ 1,608,838 $ 1,608,838 $ 1,608,838 $ 1,608,838 $ 1,608,838 Recommended Minimum Target 1,603838 1,608,838 1,608.838 1. 606. 838 , 1,. 608.838 letaLBe,glinningBalance $ ---11,1440.;264 $l&2&IiTL =$- 9,520.41 . - 4-.4144.4V-- E4:49T.044.- Totatiik- orrunAWif unimum 7 -, fge t $ 432$$38 $ ;=4 - - **,001,0U 4- Exhibit 5. Ending Cash Balance Compared to Recommended Reserve Target 514000,000 NES' recommended targets for year reserve balances are as follows: • Operating Reserve - 25% or 90 days of operating and maintenance expenses. • Capital Rehabilitation and Replacement Reserve - 3% of system net assets 2. • Debt Reserve - the maximum annual debt service payment, as specified by the bond covenants. 2 Based on the 2010111 CAFR, plus capital asset additions and annual depreciation adjustments, NBS has used a Net Asset Value of $41.6 million. Sewer Rate Study — City of Culver City Page 4 Prepared by NBS — June 26, 2012 Cost of Service Allocated Costs -20.12 Net Revenue Requirement by Class (CA) 22% (BOD) Percent thine ence 26.4% 38.2% 19.1% 8.4% 2.3% 0.1% 5.5% $992013 $1,522,095 $868,087 $225,777 $113,140 $7,444 $258,430 $1,992,310 $2,879,417 $1,440,000 $632,840 $171,751 $10,814 $418,020 $239,608 $379,107 $221,195 $202,890 $16,011 $1,053 $71,316 $246,676 $399290 $227,720 $188,523 $37,194 $1,273 $84,956 $1,788,571 $2,915,211 $1,472,993 $725,973 $174,491 $10,594 $452,318 :13tifttn: COST-OF-SERVICE ANALYSIS The purpose of the cost-of-service analysis is to equitably allocate the sewer utility costs, or the net revenue required from sewer rates, to each customer class. This process includes two primary steps: 1. Classifying various expenditures to one of four types of costs: a. Volumetric-related costs b. Strength-related costs, including: • Biochemical Oxygen Demand, or BOD • Total Suspended Solids, or TSS c. Customer-related costs 2. Allocating costs to customer classes based on specific allocation factors for each of the four cost types: a. Volumetric-related costs are allocated using the percentage of total effluent (or water consumption as adjusted for landscaping uses) from each customer class. b. BOD-related costs are allocated based on estimated total pounds of BOD generated per year by each customer class, and reflects the assumed concentrations of BOD for residential, restaurants, commercial offices, etc. c. TSS-related costs are allocated based on estimated total pounds of TSS generated per year by each customer class, which reflects the concentrations of TSS for residential, restaurants, commercial offices, etc. d. Customer-related costs are allocated based on the number of accounts in each customer class. This analysis produced the results shown in Exhibit 6 below, along with a summary of the sewer rate revenue currently collected from each customer class compared to the revenue requirements based on the cost-of-service. As shown in this table, an additional 11% of the revenue should come from single- family customers, while the restaurants and hotels should have reductions in rate revenue of 13% and 8%, respectively. Exhibit 6. Revenue Requirements by Customer Class from COS Analysis Cost-of-Service: Summary of Allocation of Revenue Requirements El=11 101 Single-Family 102 Multi-Family 200 CommerciaLBusiness 300 Comm erciaRestaurants 400 institutional 500 Schools/Public 600 Corn mercial/Hotels We note that Exhibit 6 indicates that net revenue requirements of $7,545,151 should be recovered through sewer rates. This total reflects the City's current level of rate revenue, per the 2012/13 budget, and therefore represents a "revenue neutral" level of rate revenue. However, as directed by City staff, proposed rates will include the reductions indicated in Exhibit 6, but none of the increases. As a result, total annual rate revenue is estimated to be approximately $7.34 million. Sewer Rate Study - City of Culver City Page 5 Prepared by NBS - June 26, 2012 ao RATE DESIGN AND PROPOSED RATES The purpose of the rate design analysis is to determine how to collect fixed costs (i.e., base charges) and variable costs (i.e. commodity charges) from each of the customer classes. The primary factor in allocating rate revenue between these fixed and variable charges is the nature of the costs being collected. That is, fixed costs should be collected from fixed charges, and variable costs should be collected from variable charges. Accurately allocating these fixed and variable charges improves the revenue stability of the sewer utility's rates, because changes in variable usage, or water consumption patterns, will be accounted for in the variable (commodity-related) charges. in other words, if overall water consumption dropped, the revenue collected from commodity-related charges would change in proportion to the commodity-related costs. A basic evaluation of fixed and variable costs indicates that approximately 63% of the sewer utility costs are fixed and 37% are variable. Therefore, base charges and commodity rates should collect sewer rate revenue from fixed and variable charges in roughly these proportions. NBS' analysis incorporates these types of changes after 2012-13, rounding these percentages to 60% and 40% respectively. The following table summarizes the 2011-12 rates and rate revenue along with the adjustments to 2012- 13 sewer rates (note: this table reflects revenue requirements by customer class, but has made only the reductions previously shown in Exhibit 6). Sewer Rate Study — City of Culver City Page 6 Prepared by NBS —June 26, 2012 Exhibit 7. Existing and Proposed Sewer Rates and Rate Revenue Reflecting COS and Rate Design Adjustments Fiscal Year 2011-12 Sewer Rates and Rate Revenue and New 2012-13 Sewer Rates Incorporating COS Revenue Requirements Customer Class _ 101 Single-Family P . Mu1I-Ferny_ 200 Commercial/Business 2011-12 Sewer Rates 2011-12 Annual Rate Revenue 2012-13 Adjusted Sewer Rates 2012-13 Annual Rate Revenue Base Charges ($/yr) $42.32 Commodity Rate ($/hcf) $3.85 $3.85 $3.85 Base Charges (Styr) _ $242,748 Commodity Rate ($/hcf) $1,545,823 Total Annual Revenue $1,788,571 $2,915,211 !Base Charg s (Sir) $42.32 $41,80 $41.37 COM modity Rate (MO) Base Charges Commodity Rate ($/yr) ($/hcf) Total Annuat Revenue $3.85 $3.80 $242,748 $1,545,823 , , $1,788,571 $2,879,417 . $1,440,000 $632,840 $171,751 $42.32 $42.32 $469,413 $45,960 $2,445,798 $1,427,033 $718,990 $177,079 $463,650 $2,415,767 $1,472,993 $3.76 $6.65 $44,930 $1,395,070 $6,087 $626,753 300 Com merc!al/Restaurants 400 Institutional $42.32 $42.32 $7.63 $3.75 $6,983 $2,412 $725,973 $179,491 $36.89 $40.50 $3.59 $2,308 $169,443 500 Schools/Public _- $42.32 $42.32 $3.26 $486 $10,129 $10,594 $67,564 $70,758 $42.32 $39.11 $39.11 $3.26 $3.79 $466 $10,129 $10,594 $62,441 ... _ 601 Special $4.10 $254 $67,310 $235 $62 , 206 602 Special $42.32 $5.35 $65 $70,674 $4.94 $78 $65,315 $65,393 603 Special 604 Special $42.32 $42.32 $5.35 $3.75 $42 $65,382 $75,685 $65,425 $75,970 $39.11 $39.11 $4.94 $39 $60,425 $60,464 $85 $3.47 $2.97 $4.94 $3.55 $4.55 $3.56 $78 $70,131 8196 868,475 $39 $82,081 $39 $174 $70,209 8613,871 . 605 Special $42,32 $3.21 $212 $74,093 674,305 639.11 606 Special _. 6137SP.2., - . - - _ 608_Special 609 Speclal $42.32 $5.35 $42 $42 $88,815 $88,858 $39.11 _$82,120 $42.32 $42.32 $42.32 $3.85 $189 $1,385 $231 $1,428 82,614 $39.03 $213 $1,319 $2,416 _. $4.93 $3.85 $42 $39,10 539.11 $39 $1,280 $254 $2,360 6235 $2,181 610 Special _. _ 612 Speolai 613 Special $4232 $42.32 $42.32 $0.77 $0.39 $0.39 $42 $885 $927 $39.12 $0.71 $39 $818 $857 $862 $605 $296 $636 $933 $39,11 $39.09 $0.36 $274 $568 $42 $613 $665 $0.36 $39 $566 614 S4eciai ' Total - $42.32 $3.27 $42 $789A82 $2,609 . $6,770.669 $2,652 87,545,151 $39.12 $3.02 $39 $2,412 _ $781 557 $6,5 0037 - „. $2,451 , $7,341;10-' 0050 IsiA'41( 7etei ' 10W ,-, 90% 100% 10% .9091 . Sewer Rate Study - City of Culver City Prepared by NBS -June 26, 2012 Page 7 Exhibit 8 summarizes the proposed sewer rates for 2013-14 through 2015-16 that incorporate the cost-of- service based changes necessary to accomplish the following objectives: • Phase-in cost-of-service based rate increases to two customer classes (single-family and Schools/Public accounts) over a three-year period. • Increase all rates by 4% annually for 2013-14 through 2015-16, as indicated by the financial plan previously shown in Exhibit 2. • Adjust sewer rates so they collect 60% of the revenue required from base charges and 40% from commodity rates. Exhibit 8. Proposed Sewer Rates for 2013-14 through 2015-16 Summary of Proposed 2013-14 Through 2016-16 Sewer Rates Incorporating COS Revenue Requirements Including Rate COS-Adjusted Allocations to Base Charges and Commodity Rates 1 Customer Class 101 Single-Family 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 Base Charges ($/'.r) $254.24 i Commodity Rates (Skid) $1.17 Base Charges ($/j/r) $264.32 Commodity Rates ($/hcf) $1.21 Base Charges ($/yr) $274.80 Commodity Rates (Me) $1.25 102 Multi-Family2 $202.97I $1.17 : $21t48 $1.21 $22042 $1.25 200 Commercial/Business $254.24 $3.30 $264,32 $3.43 $274.80 $3.56 300 Commercial/Restaurants $254.24 $6.54 $264.32 $6.80 $274.80 $7.07 400 Institutional $254.24 I $3.48 $264.32 $3.61 $274.80 $3.76 500 Schools/Public $254.24 $2.67 $264.32 $2.78 $274.80 $2.89 601 Special $254,24 $3.86 $264.32 $4.02 $274.80 $4.18 602 Special $254.24 $5.11 $264.32 $5,31 $274.80 $5.53 603 S ecia I $254.24 $5.12 $264.32 $533 $274.80 $5.54 604 S ecia I $254.24 $3.58 $264.32 $3.73 $274.80 $3.88 605 Special $254.24 $3.04 $264.32 $3.16 $274.80 $3.29 606 Special . $254,24 $5.13 $26432 $5.33 $274.80 $5.55 607_Special $222.00 $0.00 $230.00 $0.00 $240.00 $0,00 608 Special $254.24 $3.98 5264.32 $4.14 $274.80 $430 609 Special $254.24 $1.61 $264.32 $1.68 $274.80 - $1.74 610 S ecial $254.24 $0.55 $0.58 $274.80 $0.60 612 Special $128.07 J $0.00 $133.19 $0.00 $138.52 $0.00 613 Special $254.24 J $0.24 $26432 _j $0.25 $2.99 $274.80 $0.26 614 S ecial $264.24 , $2.88 $264.32 $274.80 $3.11 1. The base charges reflect residential classes and collect 60% of all sewer rate revenues; commodity charges collect 40%. The overall sewer rate revenue collected from each customer class matches the cost-of-service revenue requirements. 2. Multi-Family base charges are SO% of Single-Family base charges based on the differences in per unit wafer consumption. Muff-Family commodity rates are also adjusted to meet the revenue requirements for this class. Sewer Rate Study - City of Culver City Page 8 Prepared by NBS - June 26, 2012 23 CONSULTANT RECOMMENDATIONS Based on the results of this study, NBS recommends the City consider the following actions: • Adopt this rate analysis as the basis for adjustments to the City's current sewer rates. • Adopt a five-year financial plan, as summarized in Exhibits 2 through 4, as the "road map" for the Utility's financial management and cash management of reserves through 2016/17. • Adopt the minimum target reserve fund balances as shown in Exhibit 4 and accumulate cash funds in excess of these targets into the Capital Rehab and Replacement Reserve with the intent of cash-funding planned capital improvements. • Adopt and implement the proposed sewer rates shown above in Exhibits 7 and 8. This should not require a Prop 218 protest balloting process for the 2012-13 rates, but will necessitate a Prop 218 process each year thereafter in order to adopt and implement the recommended rates. PRINCIPAL ASSUMPTIONS AND CONSIDERATIONS In preparing this transmittal and the opinions and recommendations included herein, NBS has relied on a number of assumptions and considerations with regard to financial matters, conditions, and events that may occur in the future. The information and assumptions, including the Utility's budgets and information from Utility staff, were provided by sources we believe to be reliable. While we believe the use of such information and assumptions is reasonable for the purpose of this transmittal, some assumptions will invariably not materialize as stated herein and may vary significantly due to unanticipated events and circumstances. Therefore, the actual results can be expected to vary from those projected to the extent that actual future conditions differ from those assumed by us or provided to us by others. Given that, the Utility should closely monitor future revenues, costs and capital plans to determine any significant variances from the results shown in this report and take appropriate management and City Council action to reconcile differences as needed. Sewer Rate Study — City of Culver City Page 9 Prepared by NBS — June 26, 2012 SEWER RATE STUDY - APPENDIX A SELECTED TABLES FROM THE FINANCIAL PLAN AND REVENUE REQUIREMENTS ANALYSIS $ 1,606,800 I $ 1,605,200 $ 1,603,000 $ 1,608,300 $ 1,605,650 $ 1,606,213 I $ 1,607,213 $ 1,604,088 $ 1,603,838 $ 1,605,338 $ 7,340,661 $ 7,340,661 3 7,340,661 293.626 8 7,340,661 $ 7,634,287 7340661 4,00. 74• 6.16% 0,004 0.00% .4(110% 4.00% Impacts of Rate Increases Rate Revenues After Rate Increase 2 Net Cash Flow After Rate Increase Coverage After Rate Increase $ 7,340,661 147,386 1.09 $ 8,325,831 362,023 1.23 $ 8,325,831 54,163 1.33 $ 7,702,828 38,683 1.02 $ 8,008,222 460,590 1.29 $ 8,922,061 (19,646) 0.99 $ 8,747,118 15,345 1.01 A-1 Appendix A Sewer Rate Study - City of Culver City Prepared by NBS June 26, 2012 RATE REVENUE REQUIREMENTS SUMMARY Sources of Sewer Funds Rate Revenue Under Freveing Rates Industrial Waste Inspection Fees Interest Earnings Total Sources of Funds Uses of Sewer Funds Operating Evenses: Personnel Services Maintenance and Operations Subtotal: Operating Evens es Other Expenditures: Eksting Debt Service New Debt Service Rate-Funded Capital Expenses Total Uses of Sewer Funds Budget Projected FY2018/19 FY2017118 FY 2019120 WEDIZEIMMECHEEEMI InEUEIENINIZELIEMININZELIEEEMIMELLUERIIMEELLUNI $ 7,340,661 70,000 202,000 $ 7,612,661 $ 7,340,661 70,000 150,000 $ 7,560,661 $ 7,340,661 70,000 150,000 $ 7,560,681 $ 7,340,661 70,000 150,000 $ 7,560,661 $ 7,340,661 70,000 150,000 $ 7,560,661 $ 7,340,661 70,000 150,000 7,560,661 $ 7,340,661 70,000 150,000 $ 7,560,661 $ 7,340,661 70,000 150,000 $ 7,560,661 $ 7,340,661 70,000 150,000 $ 7,560,661 $ 7,340,661 70,000 150,000 $ 7,560,661 $ 1,367,370 3 1,394,717 4,491,105 4,815,687 $ 5,858,475 3 6,210,405 $ 1,422,612 4,673,457 $ 6.096,069 $ 1,451,064 4,881,332 $ 6,332,396 $ 1,480,085 5,029,487 $ 6,509,572 $ 1,509,687 5,182,625 $ 6,692,312 $ 1,539,881 5,340,929 $ 6,880,810 $ 1,570,678 5,504,585 $ 7,075,263 $ 1,602,092 6,673,787 $ 7,275,879 $ 1,634,134 5,848,738 $ 7,482,872 482,386 $ 7,465,275 I $ 7,815,605 1$ 7,699,069 1$ 8,423,082 I $ 8,116,222 I $ 8,298,525 1$ 8,488,022 1$ 6,679,351 I $ 8,879,716 I $ 9,088,209 Calculation of Required Rate Increases Rate Revenue with No Rate Increase plus: Revenue from Prior Rate Increases Total Rate Revenue Before Rate increase ,PrOjeCte,PTAti nUalftefel .ere aSJD Cumulative Increase from Annual Rate Increases $ 8,325,831 $ 8,492,348 (10,777) (36,960) 0.99 0.98 Forecasted Surplus (Deficiency) before Rate Increase $ 147,386 $ (254,944H$ (138,408)1 $ {862,421)I$ (554,561) $ (737,864) $ (927,361) $ (1,118,690)13 (1,319,056) $ (1,527,548) $ 7,340,661 598.998 $ 7,939,659 $ 7,340,661 916,684 $ 8,257,245 $ 7,340,661 916.584 $ 8,257,245 $ 7,340,661 91§.584 $ 8.257,245 $ 7,340,661 916,584 $ 8.257,245 $ 7,340,661 1 081.729 $ 8 422,390 $ 7,340,661 1 334,401 $ 8 675,062 cl:a3 0,0K o*y% igt104,, 3 00% 12.49% 12.49% 12.49% 12.49% 14.74% 18.18% 20.64% 1. in this iteration of the analysis, the rate increases target s total cash reserve balance of $4.6 million at the end of FY 2015/16. 2. Refer to Cost of Service Analysis for detailed calculations. $ 8,325,831 178,720 1.11 Total Revenue Deficiency Increase/(Decrease) to Reserves Less: Revenue from Prior Rate Increases Net Revenue Deficiency $ 254,944 2,621 $ 138,408 $ 276,624 $ (138,408) $ 862,421 $ 67,109 $ (598,998) $ 330,532 $ 257,565 $ 276,824 $ 554,561 $ (554,561) $ 737,864 $ • $ (737,864) $ 927,361 $ (916,584) $ 1,118,690 - $ (916,584) $ 1,319,056 - $ (1,081,729) $ 1,527,548 $ (1,334,401) $ 10,777 $ 202,105 $ 237,326 $ 193,147 SOURCES & USES OF FUNDS FOR EXISTING CAPITAL NEEDS Budget Projected FY 2 0 1 2/1 3 FY2013/14 FY2014115 FY 2015/16 FY2016117 PY2017/18 FY 2016119 P(2019/20 FY2020/21 FY2021/22 Sources of Capital Funds Grants State Revolving Fund Loan Revenue Bond Surplus Capital Reserve Rate Revenue Total Sources of Capital Funds Uses of Capital Funds Funding of Capital Evenditures {Existing Needs) Total Uses of Capital Funds _ Ca 4001.000.444*.: 4,076,472 3,300,000 3,200,000 2,717,614 482.306 $ 4,076,472 $ 3,300,000 $ 3,200,000 $ 3,200,000 $ $ 4,076,472 $ 3,300,000 $ 3,200,000 $ 3,200,000 $ $ 4,076,472 $ 3,300,000 $ 3,200,006 $ 3,200,000 Appendix A Sewer Rate Study — City of Culver City Prepared by NBS — June 26, 2012 A-2 $ 3,000,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 100,000 $ 200,000 100,000 $ 500,000 $ 100,000 $ 150,000 $ - $ 3,000,000 26,472 $ 100,000 100,000 $ 3,000,000 100,000 100,000 $ 3,000,000 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FY 2012/13 MECUM! FY 2014/15 FY2015/16 Sewer Main Rehabilitation Project Sewer Main Point Repair, Manhole Rehabilitation, and Sewer Video Sewer Pump Stations Improvement P-521 Jasmine Second Force Main Project Overland pipeline diversion (Construction) Hayden second force main Project 2nd force main Braddock connection to Los Angeles New Pump Station Selmaraine New pipelines to divert Mesmer New siphon at sewer convergences at Culver/Madison Upsize Duquesne Sewer Pipe to 21 inch from Lucerne to Jefferson Financial System Replacement/Enhancements osts Appendix A Sewer Rate Study — City of Culver City Prepared by NBS — June 26, 2012 A-3 SUPAMARY OF CASH ACTIVITY Total Estimated Beginning Cash Budget FY2012113 FY2013114 Projected FY2014115 FY2015116 FY2016117 FY2017118 FY2018119 PY 2019/20 FY2020121 FY2021/22 : $ 17,190,264 Operating Reserve Beginning Reserve Balance 1 1,479,650 $ 1,465,000 $ 1,503,683 $ 1,524,000 $ 1,578,163 $ 1,627,000 $ 1,673,000 $ 1,662,223 $ 1,625,263 $ 1,640,608 Plus: Net Cash Flow (After Rate Increases) 147,386 38,683 460,590 54,163 382,023 178,720 (10,777) (38,960) 15,345 (19,646) Plus: Transfer of Debt Reserve Surplus . 1 - - - - - - - Less: Transfers Out to Capital Replacement Reserve (162,036) - (440,273) - (313,186) (132,720) - - Ending Operating Reserve Balance $ 1,465,000 $ 1,503,683 $ 1,524,000 $ 1,578,163 $ 1,627,000 $ 1,673,000 $ 1,662,223 $ 1,625,263 $ 1,640,608 $ 1,620,962 Target Ending Balance (25% or 00 481/.5. r.f moil Of4.041i -lif4i,')=4: •:it'is:i ' : Fc.ft $ f 465,0 41 0 . $ 1 553,000 (4,81,4Yf f :524 0140 _ $ 1 583,000 _ _,.,......._,, $ " ' ,8 . : . $ 1.627.000 :?:$ 9' 1 673,000 : , $ 1.720.000 $ 7 777 5 1.769,000 43_,Ifat 1 1,819 000 $- ' ! 178.392 $ 1.871,000 $ too. Capital Rehab 8 Replacement Reserve Beginning Reserve Balance ' $ 14,101,775 $ 10,187,340 $ 6,887,340 $ 4,127,614 $ 1,410,000 $ 1,723,186 $ 1,855,907 $ 1,855,907 $ 1,855,907 $ 1,855,907 Plus: Net Debt Proceeds - _ - - - - - - - - Plus: Transfer of Operating Reserve Surplus 162,036 - 440,273 - 313,186 132,720 - - - Less: Use of Reserves for Capital Projects (4,076,472) (3,300,000) (3,200,000j (2,717,614) - - - - - - Ending Repair & Replacement Balance $ 10,187,340 $ 6,887,340 $ 4,127,614 $ 1,410,000 $ 1,723,186 $ 1,855,907 $ 1,855,907 $ 1,865,907 $ 1,855,907 $ 1,865,907 Target Ending Balance +:3% of Assets) $ 1,250,000 1,310,000 $ 1 , 369,000 $ 1,410.000 $ 1.370,000 . 1,330000 SS ' 290,000 . $ 1.250,000 $ 1,210,000 $ 1,160,000 Giareitiagirgliiiialiiit 411W4 ridiiikit) $ 8;00:* f•- %strove' ' it -lAi,4: is - iiiiiiis' . -- :0147 45:00t, 4747Rif '0007-1- . Debt Reserve Beginning Reserve Balance' $ 1,608,838 $ 1,608,838 $ 1808,838 $ 1,608,538 $ 1,608,838 $ 1,6013,838 $ 1,608,838 $ 1,608,838 $ 1,608,838 $ 1,608,838 Plus: Reserve Funding from New Debt Obligations - . - - - - - - - Less: Transfer of Surplus to Operating Reserve (11 - - - - - - - - Ending Debt Reserve Balance $ 1,808,838 $ 1,608,838 $ 1,608,838 $ 1,608,838 $ 1,808,838 $ 1,608,838 $ 1,606,838 $ 1,608,838 $ 1,608,838 $ 1,608,838 , TargelEnding .9a Is nce .... , l'eieldlieitiilltiiirpiqigtheii . citl 5 1,A0R,839 $ 1 11 -6,6,98 4 508 '?qe 8 1 508.F38 4 $ 1,60. 838 8 1 608.833 $ 1 608 8.38 .,t 1 608 538 $ - $ 1 608,838 5 $ -, i,6r) Er38 - De,bt Coverage Ratio (After Rat( 18 88 H 03 ,, 1 02 , 1.29 1.33 1 23 0.99 , 1 Ji 0.99 Recommondcd Target Ending t,ildlice - i-H Pes8r , , 0-8 4,323,838 4,471,838 4 ,:2,838 481 , 01,833 S 4305,838 4 n:,11 8" 4,618,838 4 827,83H 4337 4_658,838 1,, Total Minimum Reserves Recommended in this study: 25%, or 90 days of O&M expenses, plus 3% of Net Assets, plus the debt reserve requirement which is equal to the maximum annual debt service payment For reference purposes, the total Minimum Reserves Per Existing City Policy: 70% of annual operations budget, plus two years of debt service payments, plus the annual capital improvements budget. 1. For purposes of this analysis, itis assumed that available cash can be deposited into distinct Operating, Capital and Debt Reserve Funds. Accordingly, the total beginning cash balance of $17,190,264 has been segregated as follows: $1,479,650 has been assigned as the beginning cash balance in the Operating Fund, $14,101,776 has been assigned as the beginning cash balance in the Capital Reserve and $1,608,838 has been assigned as the beginning Debt Reserve balance. No fund have been assigned to the Developer - Impact Fee Fund, because the City has no funds set aside for this fund currently. Appendix A A-4 Sewer Rate Study City of Culver City Prepared by NBS — June 26, 2012 Classification of Expenses Budget Categories Total Revenue Requirements (1300) • 846,544 25,000 15,912 5 12,763 65,1547 134,715 18,530 69,286 151,154 5,200 15,973 - $ 2,546 5132 3,400 $ 1,367,370 $ 338,618 $ 10,000 6,365 5,105 $ 26,339 $ 53,886 7,412 $ 27,714 $ 60,462 2,080 6,389 1,018 200 • 1,360 $ 546.54* 4,491,105 $ 2,586,6$61 5,858,475 $ 3,133,604 100% 53% 056 2009 Series A Revenue Bonds 1.6.7:6 50 903.400 $ 401,700 101,700 9:i.•:•±1;250:08W 16% Classification of Expenses {cont.) Adjustments to Classification of Expenses Adjustment for Current Rate Level: (VOL) IWO 2013 Net Revenue Requirement Current Level of Rate Revenue Adjustment Factor loofa**, Maio_ $7,193,275 $7,545,151 1.0489 Vqt-4 Less Non-Rafe Revenues (less) Industrial Waste Inspection Fees (less) Interest Eaminas NET REVENUE REQUIREMENTS Alioestion of Revende Requirementa (70,000) $ (37,442) $ (9,022) (202,000 $ (109,047) $ (26,036) ... 7,193,270 $ 3,791,515 5 1,121,757 $ . .. . . . . ..... . . 100% 53%1 16% (8,480) $ (24,470) 8 (43445. 1 MEM! 1,078,426 12% 1,000 2,000 10,000 7,100 76,000 30,310 10,000 6,690 3,400 3,500 2,000 $ 3272,000 88,000 95,000 360,000 33,412 400 733,318 7,680 28,300 $ • 43,900 • 21,613 655,484 21,950 2,161 85.548 $ 522,580 13,200 14,250 126,555 3,750 2,387 1,914 9,877 20,207 2,780 10,393 22,673 780 2,396 382 75 510 205,106 477,120 13,200 14,250 382 75 510 205,106 1,6,,552 3,750 2.3157 1,914 9,877 20,207 2,780 10,393 22,673 780 2,396 $ 550,010 $ 755,116 $ 709, 676 1:t% 129; 504,570 a- arid/40S Regular Salaries Part-Time Saieries Overtime Pay Deferred Compensation Social Security Retirement Deferred Retirement Workers Compensation Group Issuance Retiree Health Savings Retiree Insurance Retiree Medical Pre-funcing State Disalality Instrance Health Benefits 1-cn9evitY Pal Uniform Allowance Total Personnel Service* Office Expense Printing & Bindng Postage & Delivery Communications Utilities Departmental Special Supplies Small Tools & Equipment Trdning & Education Conferences & Conventions Special Events & Meetings Memberships & Dues Contributions to Agencies (1) R&M - Equipment . Garage EXpORSCS Rental of Land Amortization of Equipment Med Services - 01+9/ Certificate Med Services - Special Examine Refuse Disp Services - Other Other Contractual Services hsurance Premiums - Other Liability Reserve Charge Depreciation Improvements other than Bldg. Auto - Rolling Stock& Equipment FT Equipment- Hardware Administrative Ch es Total Maintenance & Operations Total Operating Expenses Allocation of Operafino Expenses 11 2031+1 7,500 4,774 3,829 $ 19,754 $ 40,415 5,559 $ 20,786 $ 45,346 1,560 4,792 764 150 1,020 $ 410,211 1,uuu 2,000 -10,000 7,100 7,600 3,031 1,000 8,690 3,400 3,500 2,000 25,400 28,500 36,000 3,341 40 73,332 768 2,830 21,950 56'6 19,452 589,936 849,869 1,260,080 27 ."- 68,400 27,270 9,000 1,272,320 35,200 39,000 324,000 30,071 - WO 659,984 6,912 25,470 15% 1s-5;, 1556 15% 155s, 1555 159.6 1556 1556 1555 15% 15% 1555 15% 15% 15% 3.06 5 n";, 15% 15% - I. Estimated Volumetric, BOD/TSS strength factors are from the City's 2003104 Engineers Report (Table 4). Appendix B B-1 Sewer Rate Study - City of Culver City Prepared by NBS -June 26, 2012 Allocation of Revenue Requirements Customer Classes Net Revenue Requirements' 200 Comnmerciall Business 300 Commercial/ Restaurants Classification Components 600 Commercial/ Hotels 101 Single-Family 102 400 Institutional 500 Schools/ Public 3,976,986 $962,013 $1,522,095 $888,087 $225,777 $113,144 $7,444 $258,430 Volume Treatment - BO D - TSS Customer-Related Direct Assignment Net Revenue RequirementA 1,176,630 1,131,180 1,260,354 ifrtb10 1::: $246,676 $390,290 $227,720 $239,608 $379,107 $221,195 $544,013 $587,925 $102,998 $0 $O $0 777 r$1 14{410 $Z879 417 $144Q 000 $188,523 $202,890 $15,649 $0 AMMO $37,194 $16,011 $5,406 $0 $1 71 N1 $1,273 $1,053 $1,043 $0 $10414 $84,956 $71,316 $3,319 $0 $41NPUR 1. These rmenue requirements have been adjusted to meet the City's currant revenue collected from sewer rates. Appendix B Sewer Rate Study — City of Culver City Prepared by NBS — June 26, 2012 tra Customer Data No. of Parcels/ Dwelling Units New Base Charges Commodity Rates Adjusted 2010 Consumption New Rate Who° New Base Charges Total Annual Revenue Current Rate Revenue COS Rev. Reqts Annual Rate Revenue Target Rev, Regts 2 Commodity Charges 601 Special* 6 $39.11 16,417 $3.79 $235 $62,206 602 Special* 2 $39.11 13,210 $4.94 $78 $65,315 603 Special* 1 $39.11 12,221 $4.94 $39 $60,425 604 Special* 2 $39.11 20,236 13.47 $78 $70,131 605 Special* 5 $39.11 23,082 $2:97 $196 $68,475 606 Special* 1 $39.11 16,601 $4.94 $39 $82,081 607 Special* 1 $39.03 49 $3.55 $39 $174 608 Special* 1 $39.10 281 $4.55 $39 $1,280 609 Special* $39,11 613 $3.56 $235 $2,181 610 Special* 1 $39.12 1,149 $0.71 $39 $818 612 Spacial* 7 $39.11 1,632 $0.36 $274 $588 613 Special* 1 $39.09 1,571 $0.36 $39 $566 614 Special* 1 $39.12 798 $3.02 $39 $2,412 18,182 1,659,863 7100*.ii 10,4% $7 :•;00:5.1:: *Ati. $62,441 $65,393 $60,464 $70,209 $68,671 $82,120 $213 $1,319 $2,416 $857 $862 $605 $2,451 $62,441 : $65393 $60,464 $70,200 $68,671 $82,1 . 20 §213 $2,416 $862 $606 $2,461 ......... 570 168 85$ 42$ $7:4",306: :!: $88 858.: 31 426 : $2 814 .5655 Proposed 2012-13 Sewer Rate Revenue - Base and Commodity Charges 101 Single-Famy 102 Multi-Familyt 200 Commercial/Business* 300 Commercial/Restaurants* 400 institutional* 500 Schools/Public* $242,748 $463,650 $44,930 $6,087 $2,306 $466 $1,545,823 $2,415,767 $1,395,070 $626,753 $169,443 $10,129 $1,788,571 $2,879,417 $1,440,000 $632,640 $171,751 $10,594 $1;882,310 $2,879,417' $1,440,000 $632,840: $171,751 : 5,736 11,092 1,086 165 57 11 $42.32 $41.80 $41.37 $36.89 $40.50 $42.32 401,513 635,272 370,658 94,232 47,221 3,167 $3.85 $3.80 $3.76 $665 $3.59 $3.26 * Parcels. Dwelling Units. 1. Adjusted for irdgaffon factors. 2 Cost-of-Service (COS) analysis indicates some crosses should be reduced. The "Target Rev. Reqts" ere the /esser of Current or COS Revenue Requirement (which are highfigded in yellow). Appendix B B-3 Sewer Rate Study - City of Culver City Prepared by NBS - June 26, 2012 New 201243 Sewer Rates Incorporating Customer Class COS Revenue Requirements Adjusted' Sewer Rates Total Annual Revenue Base Commodity Charges Rates Base Charges Commodity Rate $ 11(r) (VW) 101 Single-Family $42.32 $3.85 $242,748 $1,545,823 $1,788,571 102 Multi-Family $41.80 $3.80 $463,650 $2,415,767 $2,879,417 200 Commercial/Business $41.37 $3.76 $44,930 $1,395,070 $1,440,000 300 Commercial/Restaurants $36.89 $6.65 $6,087 $626,753 $632,840 400 Institutional H $40.50 $3.59 $2,308 $169,443 $171,751 500 Schools/Public $42.32 $3.26 $466 $10,129 $10,594 601 Special $39.11 $3.79 $235 $62,206 $62,441 602 Special $39.11 $4.94 $78 $65,315 $65,393 603 Special $39.11 $4.94 , $39 $60,425 $60,464 604 Special $39.11 $3.47 $78 $70,131 $70,209 605 Special $39.11 $2.97 $196 $68,475 $68,671 606 Special $39.11 $4.94 $39 $82,081 $82,120 607 Special $39.03 $3.55 $39 $174 $213 608 Special $39.10 $4.55 $39 $1,280 $1,319 609 Special $39.11 $3.56 $235 $2,181 $2,416 610 Special $39.12 $0.71 $39 $818 $857 612 Special $39.11 $0.36 $274 $588 $862 613 Special $39.09 $0,36 $39 $566 $605 614 Special .' Tia . PI TiMal $39.12 $3.02 $39 $2,412 ,637 $2,451 . $7 ,341,194 ,L ., a,m 4 . ,-- -e754114R 1. Adjustments to base charges and commodity rates were made to generate the Target Revenue Requirements, including reductions in most customer classes based on the cost-of-service analysis results Appendix B B-5 Sewer Rate Study - City of Culver City Prepared by NBS - June 26, 2012 33 Projected Sewer Revenue Requirements - Including Rate Increases and COS Adjustments to Single-Family and Code 500 Customers Rate Revenue Customer Class - nNti . . - _ , Total Annual '11- 12 Rate Revenue . One-Third of COS Rev. Reqt Adjustment 1 $67,913 Total Annual _hill111•11111MIKE4h* 201344 $1,928,027 1 2014-15 $2,002,431 01111.:- 2015-16 $2,079,812 101 Single-Family $1,788,571 102 Multi-Earnily $2,879,417 N.A. $2,994,594 $3,114,377 $3,238,953 200 Commercial/Business $1,440,000 N.A. $1,497,600 $1,557,504 $1,619,804 300 Corn mercial/Restaurants $632,840 N.A. $658,154 $684,480 $711,859 400 Institutional $171,751 N.A. $178,621 $185,766 $193,197 500 Schools/Public $10,594 $73 $11,091 $11,532 $11,990 601 Special $62,441 N.A. $64,939 $67,536 $70,238 602 Special $65,393 ALA. $68,009 $70,729 $73,558 603 Special $60,464 ALA. $62,883 $65,398 $68,014 604 Special $70,209 N.A. $73,017 $75,938 $78,976 605 Special $68,671 N.A. $71,418 $74,275 $77,246 606 5 ecial $82,120 N.A. $85,405 $88,821 $92,374 607 Special $213 N.A. $222 $230 $240 608 Special $1,319 N.A. $1,372 $1,427 $1,484 609 Special $2 ,416 N.A. $2,513 $2,613 $2,718 610 Special $857 N.A. $891 $927 $964 612 Special $862 N.A. $896 $932 $970 613 Special $605 ALA. $629 $654 $681 614 Special ALA. $2,549 $2,757 , ' ' ,i '3.41.1941 , $8,428,80 This is added to the revenue requirements for these class in each of the next 3 years. Appendix B B-6 Sewer Rate Study - City of Culver City Prepared by NBS - June 26, 2012 Proposed 2013-14 Sewer Rates Incorporating COS Revenue Requirements Including Rate COS-Adjusted Allocations to Base Charges and Commodity Rates Total Annual Rate Revenue 3 Base Customer Class 101 Single-Family 1 Charges ($/yr) $254.24 Commodity 2 Rates ($/fic0 $1.17 From Base 1 Charges $1,458,327 From Commodity Total Annual 3 Rates 2 Revenue $469,700 $1,928,027 102 Multi-FarniFyl $202.97 $1.17 $2,251,326 $743,268 1 [ $2,994,594 200 Commercial/Business $254.24 $3,30 $276,106 $1,221,494 $1,497,600 300 Commercial/Restaurants $254.24 $6.54 $41,950 $616,204 $658,154 400 Institutional $254.24 $3.48 - $14,492 $164,129. $178,621 500 Schools/Public $254.24 $2.67 $2,797 $8,294 $11,091 601 Special $254.24 $254.24 $3.86 $5.11 $1,5251 $5081 $63,4141 $64,939 $67,501 $68,009 602 Special 603 Special $25424 $6.12 $2541 $62,6291 $62,883 $72,50- 91 $73,017 604 Special $254.24 $3.58 'I $5081 605 Special $264.24 $3.04 $1,271 $70,147 $71,418 606 Special $254.24 $5.13 $2541 $85,151 $85,405 607 Special $222.00 $0.00 -1 $222 $0 $222 608 Special $254.24 $3.98 $254. $1,118 $1,372 609 Special $254.24 $1.61 $1,5251 $988 $637 $2,513 $891 610 Special $254.24 $0.55 $254 1 612 Special $128.07 $0.00 $896 $0 $896 613 Special $254.24 $0.24 $254; $375 $629 614 Special $254.24 $2.88 $2541 $2,295 , $2,549 _ -WO% , 1.-The base charges reflect residential classes but are adjusted to overall collect 60% of all revenues. 2. Commodity charges are individually adjusted for each customer class to meet COS revenue requirements. 3,. The total rate revenue collected from each easterner class are the cost-of-service (COS) revenue requirement. 4. Multi-Family base charges are 80% of Single-Family base charges based on the differences in per unit water consumption. Multi-Family commodity rates are also adjusted to meet the revenue requirements for this class. Appendix B B-7 Sewer Rate Study - City of Culver City Prepared by NBS - June 26, 2012 Proposed 2014-15 Sewer Rates Incorporating COS Revenue Requirements Including Rate COS-Adjusted Allocations to Base Charges and Base . Commodity Rates Total Annual Rate Revenue Customer Class 101 Single-Family Charges1 (Sip) $264.32 |1010|Commodity Rates ($474 $1.21 From Base i Charges From Commodity 2 Rates Total Annual 3 Revenue $1,516,1461 $486,2811 $768,679 $2,002,431 $3,114,377 102 Multi-Family4 Ile- $211.48 $1.21 $2,345,698 1 200 Commercial/Business $264.32 $343 $287,0531 $43,6131 $1,270,451 $640,8674 $170,7001 $8,6241 $1,557,504 $684,480 $185,766 $11,532 300 Corn mercial/Restaurants $264.32 $6.80 400 Institutional $264.32 $3.61 $15,066] $2,908! 500 Schools/Public $264.32 $2.78 _cotsip s.ia I $264.32 $4.02 $15861 $65,9501 $67,536 602 Special $264.32 $5.31 $529 , i $70,2001 $70,729 603 Special $264.32 $5.33 $264 = $65,134 t [ $65,398 604 Special $264.32 $3.73 $529 $75,4091 $75,938 605 Special $264.32 $3.16 $1,322 l $72,953 $74,275 606 Special $264.32 $5.33 $2641 $88,557 1 $88,821 607 Special $230.00 $0.00 $2301 $0 $230 608 Special $264.32 $4.14 $264! $1,163 [ $1,427 609 Special $264.32 $1.68 $1,58 H 6 $1,0271 $2,613 610 Special $264.32 $0.58 $2641 $663 i $927 612 Special $133.19 $0.00 $932 $01 $3901 $2,3871 $932 $654 $2,651 14?" 613 Special $264.32 $025 $264 $264[ 614 Ssecial , $264.32 $2.99 1. The base charges reflect residential classes but are adjusted to overall collect 60% of all revenues. 2. Commodity charges are individually adjusted for each customer class to meet COS revenue requirements. 3. The total rate revenue collected from each customer class are the cost-of-service (COS) revenue requirement. 4. Multi-Family base charges are 80% of Single-Family base charges based on the differences in per unit water consumption. Multi-Family commodity rates are also adjusted to meet the revenue requirements for this class. Appendix B B-8 Sewer Rate Study - City of Culver City Prepared by NBS - June 26, 2012 Base Charges' (Sir) Commodity Rates 2 ($/hc0 From Base Charges 1 From Commodity Rates 2 Total Annual' Reve nUe 3 Customer Class Total Annual Rate Revenue Proposed 2015-16 Sewer Rates Incorporating COS Revenue Requirements Including Rate COS -Adjusted Allocations to Base Charges and Commodity Rates 101 Single-Family $274.80 $1.25 $1,576,276 1 $503,536 $2,079,812 102 Multi-Family4 $220.42 $1.25 $2,444,863 $794,090 $3,238,953 200 Commercial/Business $274.80 $3.56 $298,437 $1,321,367 $1,619,804 300 Corn m ercial/Resthurants $274.80 $7.07 $45,343 $666,516 $711,859 400 Institutional $274.80 $3.76 $2.89 $15,664! $177,533. $193,197 $3,023 1 $8,967 ! 1 $11,990 500 Schools/Public $274.80 601_Special $274.80 $4.18 $1 i ,649 1 $68,589 1 $70,238 602 Special $274.80 $5.53 $550 $73,0081 $73,558 $67,739] $68,014 $78,426 $78,976 603 Special $274.80 $5.54 $275 604 Special $274.80 $3.88 $550 605 Special $274.80 $3.29 $1,374 $75,872 $77,246 606 Special $274.80 $5.55 $0.00 $275 1 ---1 $240 $92,099 $92,374 607 Special $240.00 $0 $240 608 Special $274.80 $4.30 $275 $1,209 $1,484 609 Special $274.80 $1.74 $1,649 $1,069 $2,718 610 Special • $274.80 $0.60 $275 $689 $964 612 Special $138.52 $0.00 $970 1 . i $04 $970 $4061 $681 613 Special $274.80 $0.26 $275 1 --1 $275 614 S•ecial $274.80 $3.11 $2,482 $2,757 31 rc- ttai - i 00 58,328,831. 1. The base charges reflect residential classes but are adjusted to overall collect 60% of all revenues. 2. Commodity charges are individually adjusted for each customer class to meet COS revenue requirements. 3. The total rate revenue collected from each customer class are the cost-of-service (CPS) revenue requirement. 4. Multi-Family base charges are 80% of Single-Family base charges based on the differences in per unit water consumption. Multi-Family commodity rates are also adjusted to meet the revenue requirements for this class. Appendix B B-9 Sewer Rate Study - City of Culver City Prepared by NBS - June 26, 2012 37 ALLOCATION OF OPERATING EXPENSE FORECAST': - . Personnel Services - 2013:_ . .All '.. .. oc,ation 'Vs . Allocation $'s Fixed Variable 010$:::::::C:A7 '''147:1M43.074; ' Fixed Variable 411100 Regular Salaries $ 846,544 100% $ 846,544 - 411200 Part-Time Salaries 25,000 100% $ 25,000 $ 411300 Overtime Pay 15,912 100% $ 15,912 $ - 431000 Deferred Compensation 12,763 100% $ 12,763 $ - 432000 Social Security 65,847 100% $ 65,847 $ - 433000 Retirement 134,715 100% $ 134,715 $ - 433500 Deferred Retirement 18,530 100% $ 18,530 $ - 434000 Workers Compensation 69,286 100% $ 69,286 $ - 435000 Group Insurance 151,154 100% $ 151,154 $ - 435400 Retiree Health Savings 5,200 100% $ 5,200 $ - 435500 Retiree Insurance 15,973 100% $ 15,973 $ - 436000 State Disability Insurance 2,546 100% 2,546 $ - 437000 Health Benefits 500 100% $ 500 $ - 440000 Uniform Allowance 3,400 100% 3,400 $ - Total: Personnel Services 1,367,370 Aitiiiiaii:4*,41604tiOirt 512100 Office Expense 1,000 100% 1,000 $ - 512200 Printing & Binding 2,000 100% $ 2,000 $ - 512299 Postage & Delivery 10,000 100% $ 10,000 $ - 512400 Communications 7,100 100% $ 7,100 $ - 513000 Utilities 76,000 100% $ - $ 76,000 514100 Departmental Special Supplies 30,310 100% $ 30,310 $ - 514600 Small Tools & Equipment 10,000 100% $ 10,000 $ - 516100 Training & Education 6,690 100% $ 6,690 $ - 516500 Conferences & Conventions 3,400 100% $ 3,400 $ - 516600 Special Events & Meetings 3,500 100% $ 3,500 $ - 516700 Memberships & Dues 2,000 100% $ 2,000 $ - 517500 Contributions to Agencies (5) 2,272,000 100% $ - $ 2,272,000 600200 R&M- Equipment 88,000 100% $ 88,000 $ - 600800 Garage Expenses 95,000 100% $ 95,000 $ - 605200 Rental of Land 360,000 100% $ 360,000 $ - 605400 Amortization of Equipment 33,412 100% $ - $ 33,412 614500 Med Services - Special Examine 400 100% $ 400 $ - 619800 Other Contractual Services 733,316 75% 25% $ 549,987 $ 183,329 650200 Insurance Premiums - Other 7,680 100% $ 7,680 $ - 650300 Liability Reserve Charge 28,300 100% $ 28,300 $ - 732100 Auto - Rolling Stock & Equipment 43,900 100% $ 43,900 $ - 732150 IT Equipment - Hardware 21,613 100% $ 21,613 $ - 670100 Administrative Charges 655,484 75% 25% $ 491,613 $ 163,871 Totat:' Mainteilancet ,OperatiOS 44911 05 Digit Se.Nicie,-: . - -1:* 2009 Series A Revenue E onds. 1,6(36,800 1 n - 1,606,36C 6 - aatj tiA11:444040 --Riiiitienient 444275 $ 4,736 663 4 Z128,12 I rigs table is used to evaluate the f:,tal wrnortagp of, costs that are frod vs. a naptc, for rata design purposes. Appendix B B-10 Sewer Rate Study - City of Culver City Prepared by NBS - June 26, 2012 3% % of 2010 Volume (Unadjusted) Development of the Customer Allocation Factor 5,736 6,199 1,086 165 57 11 35 1089 43.16% 46.65% 8.17% 1.24% 0.43% 0.08% 0.26% Oh. 101 Single-Family 102 Multi-Family 200 Commercial/Business 300 Commercial/Restaurants 400 Institutional 500 Schools/Public 600 Commercial/Hotels Total 5,736 6,199 1,086 165 57 11 35 Development of the Volume Allocation Factor Est. 2010 Volume' (ccf) Adjusted Vol. Total (ccf) Percent of Adjusted Vol. Customer Class 316% 36.2% 18.0% 4.6% 2.3% 0.2% 5.2% oOo 24.2% 38.3% 22.3% 5.7% 2.8% 0.2% 6.5% IOU% 101 Single-Family 102 Multi-Family 200 CornmerciaVBusiness 300 Commercial/Restaurants 400 Institutional 500 Schools/Public 600 Commercial/Hotels 692,263 747,379 370,658 94,232 47,221 3,107 107,860 At' 401,513 635,272 370,658 94,232 47,221 3,107 107,860 1,6$063 Target TotaI 3 (cc0: itv Flow4 (11/7GD) 435,675 689,323 402,195 102,250 51,239 3,371 117,037 1000 1,801,090 3.6910 1. City-provided water use data (2011/12 Sewer User Charges, Summary by User code). 2. Single- and Multi-Family adjustments reflect landscape-inigation factors. 3. Total effluent from L.A. Hyperion records (effluent flow meters). 4. From flow meter data for Aoril 1. 2010 to March 31, 2011. Email from Public Works Dark, March 29. 2012. Appendix B B-11 Sewer Rate Study — City of Culver City Prepared by NBS —June 26, 2012 Development of the Strength Allocation Factor Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BOO) Total Suspended Solids (TSS) Adjusted Annual Flow (ccf) 1 Avg Strength Factor2 (mg/1) Calculated BOO (Itifyr) Adjusted BOO (lb/yr) Percent of Total Avg Strength Factor2 (mg/1) Percent of Total CuStOrner Class Calculated TSS (113/yr) Acljusted TSS (lbfyr) 195 195 195 635 250 130 250 101 Single-Family 102 Multi-Family 200 Commercial/Business 300 Commercial/Restaurants 400 Institutional 600 Schools/Public 600 CommerciaVHotels 3 435,675 689,323 402,195 102,250 51,239 3,371 117,037 529,986 838,543 489,259 405,045 79,911 2,734 182,529 529,986 20.96% 838,543 33.17% 489,259 19.35% 405,045 16,02% 79,911 3.16% 2,734 0:11% 182,529 7.22% 2,4213,00 M00% 478,347 756,839 441,588 405,045 31,964 2,103 142.372 478,347 756,839 441,588 405,045 31,964 2,103 142,372 Zitit> 8 :IT J 13101; 2, 48:0Yr 1. Reflects irrigation credits for single-and multi-family classes. 2. Estimated BODITSS strength factors are from the City's 2003/04 Engineers Report (Table 2). 3. Estimated BOD/TSS from City's 2003/04 Engineers Report (Table 2): 21.18% 33,51% 19.55% 17.94% 1.42% 0.09% 6.30% Appendix B B-12 Sewer Rate Study - City of Culver City Prepared by NBS - June 26, 2012 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ON PROPOSED SEWER UTILITY RATE INCREASES JULY 22, 2013 AT 7:00 PM CITY OF CULVER CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 9770 CULVER BOULEVARD THE CITY OF CULVER CITY, IN COMPLIANCE WITH ARTICLE XIIID OF THE CALIFORNIA STATE CONSTITUTION AND THE PROPOSITION 218 OMNIBUS IMPLEMENTATION ACT, IS HEREBY NOTIFYING ALL AFFECTED PROPERTY OWNERS OF THE FOLLOWING: • The City of Culver City is proposing to increase its sewer utility rates. The purpose of the proposed increases is to adequately fund the ongoing costs of providing sewer utility service to properties within the City of Culver City. Revenue from sewer utility charges pays for operations, maintenance, and capital improvements to the City of Culver City's sewer system. • This notice includes the proposed schedule of rates for Fiscal Year 2013/14 through Fiscal Year 2015/16. If the proposed rate increases are approved by the City Council, the rates will become effective July 1 of each fiscal year, commencing July 1, 2013, and remain in effect until otherwise modified by the City Council. The sewer utility rates cannot exceed the amounts adopted by the City Council without providing written notice to property owners. COMMENTS AND WRITTEN PROTEST A Public Hearing on the proposed rate increases will be held on July 22, 2013, at 7:00 pm, or as soon thereafter as the matter may be heard, in the City Council Chambers located at 9770 Culver Boulevard in the City of Culver City. The City Council will hear and consider all oral and written testimony concerning the proposed sewer utility rates. If you oppose the proposed rate increases, you may submit a formal written protest in-person at the Public Hearing, via postal mail, or by hand-delivery to the City Clerk's office. The protest must be submitted in writing, include the property owner's name, contain a description of the affected property or properties for which the protest is entered (assessor's parcel number or address), and be signed by the property owner (faxes:lie-mailed protests will not be accepted). Written protests will be tabulated pursuant to procedures adopted by the City Council. If written protests, opposing the proposed rate increases, are received with respect to a majority (50% plus 1) of the properties within the City of Culver City, then the proposed rate increases will not be imposed. All written protests must be received by the conclusion of the Public Hearing on July 22, 2013. Please mail written protests to: City of Culver City Office of the City Clerk RE: Written Protest — Sewer Utility Rates 9770 Culver Boulevard Culver City, CA 90232 REASON FOR PROPOSED INCREASES Sewer utility rates were last raised in Fiscal Year 2007/08, and rates were actually lowered in Fiscal Year 2012/13 for all customer classes except Single-Family Residential. The purpose of the proposed increases is to adequately fund the ongoing costs of providing sewer utility service to properties within the City. The proposed rates have been designed to fairly and equitably recover the cost of providing sewer utility service from all customer classes. For further information regarding the rates and analysis, please refer to the Sewer Rate Study, which is on file with the City Clerk. *PLEASE SEE THE REVERSE SIDE OF THIS NOTICE FOR DETAIL OF THE PROPOSED RATE INCREASES* City of Culver City Phone: (310) 253-6000 www.culvercity.org 41 Annual Water Consumption {HCF) HCF Adjustme nt Factor Dwelling Units $42.32 : 41.37 40.50 39.11 39.11 ii 39.11 39:117 39.10 39.11 39.12 $3.85 $254.24 • -2(12,97: 3.76 254.24 254.24 3.26 54.24 3.79 254.24 .4:94 .:24 . .,24 4.94 254.24 3,47 254.24. 2:97 254.24 • 494 25424 4.55 264.24 0.71 254,24 0.36 128.07 9 ,36 254,24 3.02 254.24 25 .4.24 $1.17 $264.32 1.17 211:48 3.30 264.32 54 20447 3.48 264 32 . 2.67 :264_32 3.86 264.32 5.11 2043.2 5.12 264.32 3.5.3 2643 3.04 264.32 .513 244:32 3.93 264.32 0 .45 264.32 0.00 133.19 2.88 264.32 394 .25432 6274.80 274.80 274.80 2748(1,: 274.80 274.60 274.80 274.60 274.80 274.80, $1.21 .•••• 3.43 6.50 : 3.61 4.02 5.31 5.33 3.73: 3.16 533 4.14 $1.25 0 00 2.99 4. 19 SAMPLE COMPARISON OF EXISTING AND PROPOSED CHARGES The following table shows how some of the various customer classes will be affected by the proposed rates increases. These are samples only. Your charge will be determined by your number of dwelling units and/or actual metered water consumption. Customer Class 101 Single-Family 51 0 2::10.0 11P+MAY:::: 200 Commercial/Business 300:::COMMerCial/ReStaUrantS:::: Current Charge $310.28 568:10 1,470.17 .436;38. - Proposed FY 2013(14 Charge $335.67 1,508.24 PROPOSED SEWER RATES The proposed sewer utility rates for Fiscal Year 2013/14 through Fiscal Year 2015/16 are compared to the current sewer utility rates in the following table: Customer Class Proposed Annual Rates FY 2014/16 Commodity Base Rate Charge (per HCF g) Current Annual Rates FY 2013114 Commodity Base Rate Charge (per HCF 6) FY 2015/16 Commodity Base Rate Charge (per HCF 6) Commodity Base j Rate Charge (per HCF 6 ) 101 Single-Family' 102 Multi FaSitly 200 Commercial/Business . . . . • : .300-.P0mrper iOjafiReSta0taritS 400 Institutional 3 500 Sthoojs/Public 601 Special 34 602 Spacial 603 Special 34 604 pecla1 34 • 605 Special 34 606 Special 608 Special 34 610 Special 34 612 Special ...• • 614 Special 61.5 SpecIal Base charge is per parcel 2 Base charge is per dwelling unit 3 Base charge is per meter 4 User descriptions of "Specie customer classes are on file at the City Engineer's office 'Class els was added for FY 2013114 as directed by City staff, assuming this rate consists of 20% of Class 300 and 80% of Class 200 5 HCF - hundred cubic feet of water consumption; for Single-Family and Multi-Family, only 58% and 85%, respectively, of the annual HCF (water consumption) will be used in the calculation of the sewer charge Detailed tables showing the development of the analysis and proposed rates are shown in the Sewer Rate Study on file with the City Clerk. The sewer charges will be forwarded to the Los Angeles County Auditor's office in August 2013 for placement on the property tax bills that will be mailed to property owners in September/October 2013. Questions? If you have any questions regarding the proposed rate increases, please contact NBS at (800) 676-7516. . 6:65 3 59 City of Culver City Phone: (310) 253-6000 www.culvercity.org