Legislation Details

File #: HIST-1353    Version: 1 Subject:
Type: Historical Status: Historical
In control: City Council Meeting Agenda
On agenda: 11/14/2005 Final action: 11/14/2005
Title: Appeal of the Planning Commission's Approval of Condition No. 43 of CUP P-20005019, and Administrative Use Permit AUP P-2005018 at 3939 Landmark Street in the M-1 Zone.
Attachments: 1. Pages from GS 111405 sire-4PH4.pdf, 2. PH4-Pt1a.pdf, 3. PH4-Pt1b.pdf, 4. PH4-Pt2a.pdf, 5. PH4-Pt2b.pdf, 6. PH4-Pt3a.pdf, 7. PH4-Pt3b.pdf, 8. PH4-Pt4.pdf
City of Culver City, California City Council Agenda Item Report Meeting Date: 11/14/05 Item Number: PH-4 AGENDA ITEM: Appeal of Condition No. 43 of Planning Commission Approved Conditional Use Permit, CUP P-2005019 and Administrative Use Permit, AUP P- 2005018 that Allows the Establishment of a Private School with Tandem Parking at 3939 Landmark Street in the Light Manufacturing (M-1) Zone Contact Person/Dept.: Jose Mendivil Phone Number: (310) 253-5757 Fiscal Impact: Yes [X] No [] General Fund: Yes [X] No [] Public Hearing: [X] Action Item: [] Attachments: [X] Public Notification: Notices were mailed on October 24, 2005, to all property owners and occupants within a 300 foot radius of the site, extended to end of city block; courtesy notices were mailed on October 24, 2005, to the City Council, Planning Commission, Cultural Affairs Commission, Culver City Homeowners Association, Culver City Chamber of Commerce, CAO, and Department Heads; Master Notification List e-mailed by the CAO's office on 11/10/05. Department Approval: Susan Evans, 11/2/05 CAO Approval: Jerry Fulwood 11/9/05 City Controller Approval: Marlee Chang 11/9/05 RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council uphold Planning staff’s recommended amendment to Condition No. 43 of the Planning Commission approved Conditional Use Permit, CUP P- 2005019 and Administrative Use Permit, AUP P-2005018 that allows the establishment of a private school with tandem parking at 3939 Landmark Street in the Light Manufacturing (M-1) Zone (Draft City Council Resolution – Attachment No. 7). BACKGROUND: On June 8, 2005, the Planning Commission opened the public hearing for a Conditional Use Permit and Administrative Use Permit request to allow a private school to operate at 3939 Landmark Street (June 8, 2005, Planning Commission Staff Report – Attachment No. 11). Due to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) mandated public review period, the Commission could not act on the project that evening and after hearing public testimony, continued the hearing to July 13, 2005 (July 13, 2005, Planning Commission Staff Report – Attachment No. 11). On July 13, 2005, the Commission approved the project; in conjunction with that approval and pursuant to CEQA guidelines, the Commission adopted a Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) after finding that the proposed project will require mitigation measures to reduce certain impacts on the environment (MND – Attachment No. 6). 17 City of Culver City, California City Council Agenda Item Report 18 One of the mitigation measures requires the installation of a traffic signal at the intersection of Washington Boulevard and Landmark Street. At the July 13 th Commission meeting, the Commissioners expressed concern that a westbound left turn pocket on Washington Boulevard should be required in addition to the traffic signal. They stated that idle vehicles waiting to turn left onto Landmark Street would create congestion and potential hazards for west bound through traffic along Washington Boulevard. The project’s traffic study (Attachment No. 9) and the City’s Traffic Engineer concurred that a left turn pocket was not necessary to mitigate potential impacts created by the project. However, the City’s Traffic Engineer did state that such a roadway feature would be helpful with traffic flow. The Commission then discussed the necessity to eliminate a parking lane if a left turn pocket is installed. Staff informed the Commission that Howard Industries on the north side of Washington Boulevard had expressed concern over potential elimination of the parking lane adjacent to their property. They stated that they use the westbound parking lane as a queuing lane for delivery trucks waiting to enter their site. Howard Industries reported that main usage of the parking lane for queuing occurs from about 6 AM to 3 PM. Commissioners asked if the eastbound, south parking lane could be eliminated, especially since the auto dealership sites adjacent to the eastbound parking lane (and at the intersection with Landmark Street) are vacant. Staff responded that the south (or eastbound) parking lane could be eliminated just as well the north (or westbound) parking lane, in order to accommodate the left turn pocket. The Commission voted to approve the project with an amendment to Condition No. 43 (which requires the traffic signal) adding a requirement for a left turn pocket. Following the Planning Commission meeting, Brentwood Capital, owner and developer of the vacant auto dealerships on the south side of Washington Boulevard, told staff that in order for their future development to be successful, they would need the parking lane. They have expressed an interest in potential construction of a mixed use project that would include street level commercial/retail space and upper level residential units. Staff initiated discussions between the Applicant, Brentwood Capital, and Howard Industries to see if there could be a resolution that all parties would accept. Staff then returned to the Planning Commission on August 10, 2005, to seek clarification on which parking lane should be eliminated (August 10, 2005, Memo - Attachment No. 12). Originally, staff was going to recommend that the Commission state clearly that the south side parking lane be taken out. Due to ongoing discussions with all parties involved, staff recommended on August 10 th that the Planning Commission clarify Condition No. 43 such that they direct staff to work with all parties involved in minimizing impacts resulting from the installation of the left turn pocket and not City of Culver City, California City Council Agenda Item Report 19 designate elimination of parking on one side or the other. The Planning Commission agreed with staff and Condition No. 43 of Planning Commission Resolution No. 2005-P013 (Attachment No .10) is worded to reflect this clarification. Subsequent discussions with the Applicant, Appellant (Howard Industries), and Brentwood Capital did not lead to a definitive resolution or decision as to which parking lane would be eliminated. On September 12, 2005, Howard Industries submitted an appeal (Attachment No. 13). They did not appeal the project as a whole and did not wish to see a reversal of the Planning Commission approval. The appeal is related to Condition No. 43, specifically the potential for the elimination of the north parking lane to make room for the Planning Commission required left turn pocket. DISCUSSION: After submittal of the appeal, staff continued discussions with the Applicant and Appellant to see if a compromise could be reached satisfying both parties and the City. Resulting from these discussions was a letter, jointly signed by the Applicant and the Appellant, and submitted to the City on November 1, 2005 (Attachment No. 14). The letter contains proposed amended language for Condition No. 43 that requires the Applicant to post a bond with the City to cover the cost of installation of the left turn pocket. The amended condition also requires the applicant to prepare a study on the necessity of the left turn pocket within 12 months of the school’s opening and to recommend a lane configuration if the study determines that the left turn pocket is required. The 12 month delay is required so that the Applicant can monitor traffic flows created by the school over time. The bond would be returned to the applicant if no such left turn lane is deemed necessary by the City within four years following final approval of the Project (the date the City Council votes on the appeal). The reason for the four year limit is that within this time frame, several developments (such as Brentwood Capital’s proposal, Turning Point School Expansion, and the Specific Plan for the area) are expected to commence with entitlements and/or City approvals. It is anticipated that given the cumulative traffic impacts for all these projects, including Park Century School, a left turn pocket will be required to mitigate traffic impacts. Further, during this time frame, the Appellant and Applicant hope that a final lane configuration is approved for the left turn pocket, assuming a left turn pocket is required. This could mean some street dedication, a narrowing of the sidewalks, or a combination of the two. Because no entitlement requests (other than Park Century School and Turing Point) are currently in the system, it cannot be determined at this time which side of the street should be modified in order to accommodate the left City of Culver City, California City Council Agenda Item Report 20 turn pocket, should it be needed. There are unknown variables. The bond and study are required to ensure that the school is able to open, even if the left turn pocket has not been installed, while still maintaining responsibility for the left turn pocket installation, should it be needed. Both parties agree with this revised condition; staff believes that the spirit of the Planning Commission’s intent and sufficient protection for the City are achieved through this proposed amended language. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION Pursuant to CEQA guidelines this project has been determined to have less than significant impacts on the community provided certain mitigations are incorporated; a Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) was adopted by the Planning Commission on July 13, 2005. Specifically, the increased number of vehicle trips for the school and the exposure of persons to noise levels in excess of standards established in the General Plan were identified as potentially significant unless mitigated. Several mitigations have been proposed as conditions of approval; Attachment No. 6 identifies the specific mitigation measures. The left turn pocket was not a required mitigation and was a revision to the Conditions of Approval as a whole, and not to the MND. Further revision pertaining to the left turn pocket as recommended by staff, will not affect the already adopted MND. FISCAL ANALYSIS: As an industrial use, the site generates property taxes for the City, the Redevelopment Agency, and other non-city agencies. Normally, this revenue source would be eliminated because the applicant, Park Century School, is a not-for- profit entity. However, the applicant agreed to pay annually, the property taxes that would normally be generated for the City and the Redevelopment Agency had an industrial use continued on the site. The applicant has agreed to pay property taxes due to the City and the Redevelopment Agency; this condition is included in Planning Commission approved Resolution No. 2005-P013 (Attachment No. 10) as Condition No. 48. City of Culver City, California City Council Agenda Item Report 21 CONCLUSION The Planning Commission, after discussing both traffic and fiscal impacts (the non- profit status of the Applicant) approved the project. They felt that with all mitigations, the inclusion of a left turn pocket, and the acceptance by the school to pay the property tax, the project would, overall, be a benefit to the City. The Appellant did not disagree with the merits of having a school locate on the project site and was not opposed to the project. Staff believes the contents in the joint letter agreement will achieve an acceptable outcome for all parties. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Project Summary 2. Area Map 3. Aerial Photo of Area 4. General Plan Land Use Designation Map 5. Photographs of Existing Building and Proposed Art. 6. Mitigated Negative Declaration 7. Draft City Council Resolution No. 2005-R 8. Letter to Sean T. Matsler, Esq. from Geomatrix Consultants, Inc., received March 10, 2005 9. Traffic Study for the Park Century School – Revised April 27, 2005 10. Approved Planning Commission Resolution No. 2005-P013 11. June 8, 2005, and July 13, 2005, Planning Commission Staff Reports without Attachments 12. August 10, 2005, Planning Commission Memo without Attachments 13. September 12, 2005, Howard Industries Appeal Letter 14. November 1, 2005, Joint Parties Letter with Proposed Amended Language 15. Plans dated April 27, 2005 (Date received) MOTION: That the City Council: Adopt Resolution No. 2005-R__that amends Condition No. 43 of Planning Commission approved Resolution No. 2005-P013, addressing the installation of a left turn pocket. OR, City of Culver City, California City Council Agenda Item Report 22 Uphold the original Planning Commission approved Resolution No. 2005-P013, with no modifications. 11/14/05 Appeal of Condition No 43 of Planning Commission Approved Conditional Use Permit, CUP P-2005019 and Administrative Use Permit, AUP P-2005018 that Allows the Establishment of a Private School with Tandem Parking at 3939 Landmark Street in the Light Manufacturing (M-1) Zone MEETING DATE AGENDA ITEM ATTACHMENTS Pages|109| Project Summary 1-2 2 Area Map 3|109| Aerial Photo of Area 4 4 General Plan Land Use Designation Map 5|109| Photographs of Existing Building and Proposed Art 6-7|109| Mitigated Negative Declaration 8-23|109| Draft City Council Resolution No 2005-R 24-27|109| Geomatnx Consultants, Inc , Letter Received March 10, 2005 28-41|10 9| Traffic Study — Revised Apnl 27, 2005 42-181 10 Approved Planning Commission Resolution No 2005-P013 182-190 11 June 8, 2005, & July 13, 2005, Planning Commission Staff Reports 191-201 without Attachments 12 August 10, 2005, Planning Commission Memo without Attachments 202-203 13 September 12, 2005, Howard Industries Appeal Letter 204-206 14 November 1, 2005, Joint Parties Letter with 207-208 Proposed Amended Language 15 Plans dated Apnl 27, 2005 (Date received)Attachment 1 PROJECT SUMMARY APPLICATION TITLE & CASE NO Conditional Use Permit, CUP P-2005019 and Administrative Use Permit, AUP P-2005018 to Allow the Establishment of a Private School with Tandem Parking at 3939 Landmark Street in the Light Manufacturing (M-1) Zone PROJECT ADDRESS/LOCATIQN: 3939 Landmark Street (Near Intersection of Landmark Street and Washington Boulevard) APP4ICANT I N FORMAI-KM Park Century School Contact Person Sean Matsler 2040 Stoner Avenue Latham & Watkins LLP Los Angeles CA 90025 633 W Fifth Street, #400 (310) 478-5065 Los Angeles CA 90071 [(213) 891-8685] FTE,RIVICETAR1?-MATION TYPE: Z Administrative Use Permit Conditional Use Permit El Administrative Site Plan Review D Site Plan Review 0 Administrative Variance El Variance D Master Sign Program El Certificate of Appropriateness El Certificate of Exemption El DOBI El Tentative Parcel Map 0 Tentative Tract Map 0 Lot Line Adjustment El Zoning Code Amendment - Text El Zoning Code Amendment -Map 0 General Plan Amendment - Text El General Plan Amendment - Map 0 Planned Unit Development El Specific Plan 0 Other 'APPROVAltBODY: ublic Hearing Public Meeting EAdminis rative Agency El Administrative El Redevelopment D Other ii Planning Commission El City Council CEQA Determination ignimo DETERMINATION AND NOTICING: El Categorical Exemption, Class El Negative Declaration or .1 Mitigated Negative Declaration Type El Environmental Impact Report CEQA Noticing El Notice of Exemption (w/in 5 days of decision) days prior to 5 days of decision) Exemption Notice of decision) (w/in 5 days of decision) ' Notice of Intent to Adopt (21 ' Notice of Determination (w/in • Fish & Game Certificate of Fee El Notice of Preparation Availabilit • Notice of Completeness PUBLIC NOTIFICATION Mailing Date 05/18/05 gial Occupants J w/in 300' foot radius A. Property Owners 0 Occupants w/in 300 foot radius / Extended Adjacent Property Owners & El Other Posting Date N/A El Onsite Offsite El Other Publication Date N/A El Culver City News El Other Courtesy Date 05/18/05 • City Council El Press Release ' Commissions .k. HOA /Neighborhood Groups ' Master Notification List r Culver City Organizations Cultural Affairs El Culver City Website El Cable Crawler Commission Chamber I4 Other Culver City Observer CCUSD interested parties, etc Project Summary— Attachment 1 Updated 06/02/2005 Page 1 of 2APPLICATIOMTITLE & CASE NO. Conditional Use Permit, CUP P-2005019 and Administrative Use Permit, AUP P-2005018 to Allow the Establishment of a Private School with Tandem Parking at 3939 Landmark Street in the Light Manufacturing (M-1) Zone PROJECVADDRESS/LOC TION: APPLICANTEINFORMATION: Park Century School 2040 Stoner Avenue Los Angeles CA 90025 (310) 478-5065 Contact Person Sean Matsler Latham & Watkins LLP 633 W Fifth Street, #400 Los Angeles CA 90071 [(213) 891-8685] 3939 Landmark Street (Near Intersection of Landmark Street and Washington Boulevard) iPER,MITi4PRLICATION T*TIE: 1E1 Administrative Use Permit Conditional Use Permit El Administrative Site Plan Review O Site Plan Review El Administrative Variance O Variance O Master Sign Program O Certificate of Appropriateness 0 Certificate of Exemption El DOBI 0 Tentative Parcel Map 0 Tentative Tract Map 0 Lot Line Adjustment O Zoning Code Amendment - Text El Zoning Code Amendment -Map 0 General Plan Amendment - Text O General Plan Amendment - Map CI Planned Unit Development El Specific Plan O Other ApPRoVg. BODY: pi thir6ea 1 n 1 Ou L._E :,ftcW . g . Ieetrn -Administrative 0 Administrative 0 Redevelopment Agency Z Planning Commission 0 Other 0 City Council ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION AND NOTICING Attachment 1 PROJECT SUMMARY CEQA Determination _, El Categorical Exemption, Class El Negative Declaration or n Mitigated Negative Declaration El Environmental Impact Report, Type CEQA Noticing El Notice of Exemption (w/in 5 days of decision) 4, Notice of Intent to Adopt (21 days prior to decision) I Notice of Determination (w/in 5 days of decision) Fish & Game Certificate of Fee Exemption (w/in 5 days of decision) El Notice of Preparation • Notice of Availabilit El Notice of Com • leteness PUBLIC NOTIFICATION Mailing Date 05/18/05 El w/in 300 foot radius w/in 300 foot radius / Extended El Other fa Property Owners ' Occupants El Adjacent Property Owners & Occupants Posting Date N/A El Onsite El Offsite El Other Publication Date N/A El Culver City News El Other Courtesy Date 05/18/05 ii City Council • Press Release i Commissions n HOA /Neighborhood Groups Master Notification List 6. Culver City Organizations Cultural Affairs El Culver City Website El Cable Crawler Commission Chamber ii Other Culver City Observer CCUSD interested parties etc Updated 06/02/2005 Page 1 of 2 Project Summary - Attachment 10 0 08 0 08 016 Miles Area Map Attachment No 2 (NI CUP P-2005019 & AUP P-2005018 Century Park School 3939 Landmark Street Parks Parcels 4 I • • City Boundary 40 08 0 08 016 Miles Aerial Map Attachment No 3|1010|CUP P-2005019 & AUP P-2005018 Century Park School 3939 Landmark StreetAttachment No 5 PHOTOGRAPHS OF EXISTING BUILDINGPLANNING DIVISION Attachment 6 (310) 253 5710 FAX (310) 253 5721|1010|9770 CULVER BOULEVARD CULVER CITY CALIFORNIA 90232 0507 INITIAL STUDY ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM AND ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION Project Title Conditional Use Permit CUP P-2005019 and Administrative Use Permit AUP P- 2005018 for Park Century School Lead Agency Name & Address City of Culver City Planning Division 9770 Culver Blvd Culver City, CA 90232 Contact Person & Phone No Jose Mendivil Associate Planner (310) 253-5757 Project Location/Address 3939 Landmark Street Culver City Nearest Cross Street Washington Boulevard APN 4206-013-012 Project Sponsor's Name & Applicant Contact Person Address Park Century School Sean Matsler 2040 Stoner Avenue Latham & Watkins LLP Los Angeles CA 90025 633 West Fifth Street Suite 4000 (310) 478-5065 Los Angeles California 90071 (213 891-8685 General Plan Designation Industrial & General Zoning Light Manufacturing (M-1) Corridor Redevelopment Project Area Component Area No 3 Overlay Zone/Special District N/A Project Description and Requested Action Proposed conversion of a 37 000 square foot industrial building (currently used for printing and woodworking) into an elementary school for children with learning disabilities ages seven through 14 In addition, the applicant proposes to use blocked access parking (tandem parking) to meet some of its required onsite parking The school would have a maximum enrollment of 120 students and 47 staff This project requires a CUP for the school use and an AUP for the tandem parking Existing Conditions of the Project Site The site is fully developed with a 37 000 square foot industrial building with approximately 64 surface parking spaces and 100 to 150 employees On site activities include printing and woodworking Existing uses of toxic solvents include resin and paint thinner no material changes or building expansion are proposed (except for a street facing art façade) Surrounding Land Uses and Setting (Directions are reflective of Project North which assumes Washington Boulevard to run in an East/West orientation and Landmark Street to run in a North/South orientation) West Single Story Office and Food Commissary Building Single Story Duplex (residential) East Two Story Auto Dealership Service Garage North Single Story Auto Dealership, Single Story Book Bindery Building South Single Story Commercial Rubber Supply Building Other public agencies whose approval is required (e g permits financing approval or participation agreement) N/A 92 Form Updated 3/16/04CUP P 2005019 & AUP P-2005018 Park Century School May 18 2005 ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project involving at least one impact that is a Potentially Significant Impact as indicated by the checklist on the following pages El Aesthetics 0 Mineral Resources Ej Agriculture Resources 0 Noise 0 Air Quality 0 Population / Housing 0 Biological Resources 0 Public Services 0 Cultural Resources 0 Recreation 0 Geology /Soils 0 Transportation/Traffic 0 Hazards & Hazardous Materials 0 Utilities / Service Systems Ej Hydrology / Water Quality 0 Mandatory Findings of Significance O Land Use / Planning ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION On the basis of this initial evaluation 0 I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared E I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment there will not be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the project have been made by or agreed to by the project proponent A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared O I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required 0 I find that the proposed project MAY have a potentially significant impact or potentially significant unless mitigated impact on the environment but at least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed El I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment because all potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuant to applicable standards and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project nothing further is required FISH AND GAME FEE (AB 3158) [E] I find that the proposed project WILL NOT have an impact on fish or wildlife resources or habitat upon which fish and wildlife depend I find that the proposed project IS EXEMPT from the Fish and Game fee A Certificate of Fee Exemption will be prepared for this project 0 I find that the proposed project IS NOT EXEMPT from the Fish and Game fee 3----/Y-5- Date Jose Mendivil Printed Name Associate Planner Title|1010|Form Updated 3/16/04 Page 2 of 16a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? b) Substantially damage scenic resources including but not limited to trees rock outcroppings and historic buildings within a state scenic highway? c) Substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of the site and its surroundings? d) CreaLe a new source of substantial light or glare which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area?|109| El El|109| CI 111 z|109| CI 0 Z El 0 0 Z El El CUP P 2005019 & AUP P 2005018 Park Century School May 18 2005 Potentially Significant Impact EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact I. AESTHETICS -- Would the project: H. AGRICULTURE RESOURCES: In determining whether impacts to agricultural resources are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to the California Agricultural Land Evaluation and Site Assessment Model (1997) prepared by the California Dept. of Conservation as an optional model to use in assessing impacts on agriculture and farmland. Would the project: a) Convert Prime Farmland Unique Farmland or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland) as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency to non-agricultural use? b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use or a Williamson Act contract? c) Involve other changes in the existing environment which E l 0 due to their location or nature could result in conversion of Farmland to non-agricultural use? III. AIR QUALITY -- Where available, the significance criteria established by the applicable air quality management or air pollution control district may be relied upon to make the following determinations. Would the project: a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan? b) Violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation?|109| El El c) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non- attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions which exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors)? d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations? e) Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of people? El El El El Form Updated 3/16/04 Page 3 of 16Potentially Potentially Significant Less Than EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS Significant Impact Impact Unless Mitigation Significant Impact Incorporated No Impact CUP P2005019 & AUP P 2005018 Park Century School May 18 2005 IV. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES -- Would the project: LI z Have a substantial adverse effect either directly or through habitat modifications on any species identified as a candidate sensitive or special status species in local or regional plans policies or regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U S Fish and Wildlife Service? Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans policies regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or US Fish and Wildlife Service? Have a substantial adverse effect on federally protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including but not limited to marsh vernal pool coastal etc ) through direct removal filling hydrological interruption or other means? Interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan Natural Community Conservation Plan or other approved local regional or state habitat conservation plan? V. CULTURAL RESOURCES -- Would the project: Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource as defined in 15064 57 Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resource pursuant to 15064 59 Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or unique geologic feature? Disturb any human remains including those interred outside of formal cemeteries? Form Updated 3/16/04 Page 4 of 16Potentially EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS Potentially Significant Impact Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Less Than Significant Impact No Impact Incorporated VI. GEOLOGY AND SOILS -- Would the project: Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects including the risk of loss injury or death involving i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault as delineated on the most recent Alquist Pnolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42 it) Strong seismic ground shaking? Hi) Seismic related ground failure including liquefaction? iv) Landslides? b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable or that would become unstable as a result of the project and potentially result in on or off site landslide lateral spreading subsidence liquefaction or collapse? Be located on expansive soil as defined in Table 18 1-B of the Uniform Building Code (1994) creating substantial risks to life or property? Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative waste water disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of waste water? El El O 0 El Z El 0 Z El CI CI CI Z CI CI ID Z O CI 111 Z O CI CI El El CI CUP P2005019 & AUP P 2005018 Park Century School May 18 2005 VII. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS --Would the project: Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport use or disposal of hazardous materials? Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials substances or waste within one quarter mile of an existing or proposed school?? Be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962 5 and as a result would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? For a project located within an airport land use plan or where such a plan has not been adopted within two miles of a public airport or public use airport would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area?|1010|Form Updated 3/16/04 Page 5 of 16Potentially Potentially EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS Significant Impact Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Less Than Significant Impact No Impact Incorporated VII. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS (continued) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss injury or death involving midland fires including where midlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands? LI LI LI z LI El LI LI LI CUP P 2005019 & AUP P 2005018 Park Century School May 18 2005 VIII. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY -- Would the project: Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements? Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (e g the production rate of pre-existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted)? Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river in a manner which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on or off site? Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river or substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on- or off site? Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff? f) Otherwise substantially degrade water quality? g) Place housing within a 100 year flood hazard area as mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map? Place within a 100 year flood hazard area structures which would impede or redirect flood flows? Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss injury or death involving flooding including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam? Inundation by seiche tsunami or mudflow? Form Updated 3/16/04 Page 6 of 16a) Physically divide an established community? b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan policy or regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including but not limited to the general plan specific plan local coastal program or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? c) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or natural community conservation plan? a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the state? b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally-important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan specific plan or other land use plan? a) Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance or applicable standards of other agencies? b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels? c) A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? d) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or where such a plan has not been adopted within two miles of a public airport or public use airport would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? Es] O 0 a z O 0 Z 0|109| 0 Z 0 O 0 0 Z Li 0 0 CUP P2005019 & AUP P 2005018 Park Century School May 18 2005 EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS Potentially Potentially Significant Significant Impact Unless Impact Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact IX. LAND USE AND PLANNING - Would the project: X. MINERAL RESOURCES — Would the project: XL NOISE --Would the project result in: XII. POPULATION AND HOUSING — Would the project: a) Induce substantial population growth in an area either z directly (for example by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example through extension of roads or other infrastructure)? Form Updated 3/16/04 Page 7 of 16CUP P 2005019 & AUP P-2005018 Park Century School May 18 2005 EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS Potentially Significant Impact Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact XII. POPULATION AND HOUSING (continue) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing El El El necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere'? Displace substantial numbers of people necessitating the El construction of replacement housing elsewhere'? XIII. PUBLIC SERVICES No Impact z z a) Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities need for new or physically altered governmental facilities the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts in order to maintain acceptable service ratios response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services Fire protection'? Police protection'? Schools'? Parks'? Other public facilities'? XIV. RECREATION -- Would the project increase the use of existing El El El neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated'? Does the project include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment'? XV. TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC -- Would the project: Cause an increase in traffic which is substantial in relation to the existing traffic load and capacity of the street system e result in a substantial increase in either the number of vehicle trips the volume to capacity ratio on roads or congestion at intersections)? Exceed either individually or cumulatively a level of service standard established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways'? Result in a change in air traffic patterns including either an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results in substantial safety risks'? Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature (e g sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e g farm equipment)? e) Result in inadequate emergency access'? f) Result in inadequate parking capacity'? g) Conflict with adopted policies plans or programs supporting alternative transportation (e g bus turnouts bicycle racks)? Form Updated 3/16/04 Page 8 of 16 El El ElPotentially EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS Potentially Significant Impact Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Less Than Significant Impact No Impact Incorporated XVI. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS --Would the project: Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board? Require or result in the construction of new water or wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects'? Require or result in the construction of new storm water drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects'? d) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project from existing entitlements and resources or are new or expanded entitlements needed'? e) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the projects projected demand in addition to the provider s existing commitments'? f) Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity to accommodate the project s solid waste disposal needs'? g) Comply with federal state and local statutes and regulations related to solid waste'? zLI CUP P 2005019 & AUP P-2005018 Park Century School May 18 2005 XVII. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE — Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory'? Does the project have impacts that are individually limited but cumulatively considerable'? ( Cumulatively considerable means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects the effects of other current projects and the effects of probable future projects)? Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings either directly or indirectly'? Form Updated 3116/04 Page 9 of 16CUP P 2005019 & AUP P 2005018 Park Century School May 18 2005 XVIII EARLIER ANALYSES Revised April 27, 2005, Traffic Study on file with the Planning Division of the City of Culver City, January 24, 2005, Air Toms Evaluation on file with the Planning Division various maps showing intersection of 500 foot radius areas for various schools and the proposed school on file with the Planning Division of the City of Culver City XIX DISCUSSION Discussion of Initial Study Checklist responses I. AESTHETICS No Impact There are no scenic vistas or resources in the vicinity of the project site that is located in a fully developed a) through d) urbanized area No significant adverse impacts relative to scenic vistas and resources will occur because of the proposed project The change of use from manufacturing to educational institution will occur on a site that is currently developed with a two-story concrete block building that already produces light The discretionary approval for the project will require implementation of all applicable City zoning standards and design guidelines including a requirement that all lighting not project onto or create a nuisance for adjacent public rights of—way and private properties Through these code and design requirements there will be no impacts adversely affecting views in the area MITIGATION MEASURE S None re. uired II. AGRICULTURE RESOURCES: No Impact The project site is not located on land identified utilized or zoned for agricultural purposes and there is a) through c) no known Williamson Act contract in effect on the project site MITIGATION MEASURE(S) None required III. AIR QUALITY: No Impact The entire South Coast Air Basin (which includes Culver City) does not meet National Ambient Air Quality a) through c) Standards Future new development (or re development) in any portion of Culver City will contribute both and e) at the project level and cumulatively to pollutant emissions over this existing non attainment area (at both construction and operation phases) It is very likely that any project requiring a Mitigated Negative Declaration will contribute to pollutant emissions either during construction and/or operations no matter how minute that contribution may be In addition per the SCAQMD Air Quality Handbook the threshold of significance for air quality impacts caused by an elementary school such as the one proposed is a school comprised of 220 000 square feet or more At 43 950 square feet this project is below the threshold of significance If a proposed project is consistent with the city s General Plan and Zoning Code the project s operational impacts are considered to be factored into the SCAQMD s regional air quality models This project as proposed is consistent with Culver City s General Plan and Zoning Code Because the project s operations are factored into regional air quality models the cumulative air quality impacts are less than significant Air quality impacts due to construction will be less than significant because the project applicant will be required to comply with SCAQMD Rule 403 which provides specific control actions to be implemented during construction activities to control fugitive dust Additionally elementary school operations generally do not create objectionable odors MITIGATION MEASURE(S) None required Less Than Because the site is located within an industrial area there is a potential for children to be exposed to Significant pollutant concentrations However research on existing surrounding industrial uses indicate that several Impact SCAQMD permits have been issued to various businesses thereby limiting emissions in the project d) vicinity and lessening impacts to children that may attend the new school Also uses along Landmark Street are not incompatible with the school use and do not necessarily require SCAQMD permits or cause significant emissions MITIGATION MEASURE S None re. wed Form Updated 3/16/04 Page 10 of 16CUP P2005019 & AUP P-2005018 Park Century School May 18 2005 IV. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES The project site is located in an urbanized area surrounded by existing disturbed land and development Information on existing conditions of the project site and materials submitted with the project application indicate that biological resources as identified by the California Department of Fish and Game or US Fish and Wildlife Service do not exist on the project site No federally protected wetlands as defined by the Clean Water Act exist on site No Impact a) through f) MITIGATION MEASURE(S) None required V. CULTURAL RESOURCES: No Impact The project site is located in an urbanized area surrounded by existing disturbed land and development a) through d) Information on existing conditions of the project site and application materials indicate that there are no identified archaeological paleontological geological and human burial site resources on site M ITIGATION MEASURE(S) None required VI. GEOLOGY AND SOILS: Less than Significant Impact a) The project site is located in an urbanized area surrounded by existing disturbed land and development and is within a liquefaction zone as identified on the City of Culver City Natural Hazards Map Any new construction will have to meet all Uniform Building Code requirements and will have to comply with City and state seismic standards Utilizing these existing regulations geology and soil impacts will be less than significant MITIGATION MEASURE(S) None required No Impact The site is fairly flat and fully developed with a building and parking area The building is hooked up to the b) through e) City s sewer system Any new construction will have to meet all Uniform Building Code requirements and will have to comply with City and state seismic standards MITIGATION MEASURE(S) None required VII. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS: No Impact a) through h) Environmental information submitted by the applicant with the project plans and application materials indicates that no hazardous materials will be utilized on the project site Adverse impacts relative to health hazards are expected to be less than significant Any future use of hazardous materials will be required to obtain the necessary approvals from the Culver City Fire Department in compliance with applicable Fire Code regulations MITIGATION MEASURE(S) None required VIII HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY: No Impact a) through j) Grading and building plans will be reviewed and approved by the City s Building and Engineering Divisions to assure that on and off-site drainage will not create significant impacts to drainage facilities groundwater quality and quantity If applicable an erosion control plan will be required by the City Engineer to ensure compliance with the Los Angeles County Stormwater Quality Management Program NPDES Permit No CAS614001 The erosion control plan must include the design and placement of recommended Best Management Practices (BMPs) to effectively prohibit the entry of pollutants from the construction site into the public street of storm drain system If applicable the construction contractor will be required to comply with the California Storm Water Best Management Practice Handbook The site is not within a flood inundation zone or special flood hazard area as identified on the City s Natural Hazards Map MITIGATION MEASURE(S) None required I &. Form Updated 3116/04 Page 11 of 16CUP P 2005019 & AUP P 2005018 Park Century School May 18 2005 IX. LAND USE AND PLANNING: The project will not physically divide an established community because the site is contiguous on to itself There is no habitat conservation or natural community conservation plan for this built out urban area MITIGATION MEASURE(S) None required The proposed use is consistent with the Industrial and General Corridor General Plan Land Use designations and is permitted in the Light Manufacturing (M 1) Zone Upon the City s review and approval of the application the project will be consistent with the City s Zoning Code There is a potential for limitation on the expansion of current industrial uses and relocation of new industry should the school a sensitive receptor be allowed to locate in the project site that is within an industrial zone However there are potential industrial uses that are allowed within the area and that are not considered to be an impact on sensitive receptors such as a school Also existing industrial uses within the vicinity are not affected by the school due to the nature of their intensity which could be characterized as clean industries A street ending at the west end of the project site has a Light Industrial General Plan Designation which calls for clean industrial uses Some of the allowed uses in this General Plan designation are compatible with a school use Other schools in the vicinity already serve to limit potential expansion of industrial uses and several industries within the area are regulated by the South Coast Air Quality Management District which sets ceilings on the amount of emissions through a permitting process Finally part of the site is within a commercial General Plan Designation that allows schools Overall impacts to land use and compatibility with the General Plan will be less than significant MITIGATION MEASURE(S) None required No Impact a)and c) Less Than Significant Impact b) X. MINERAL RESOURCES' Materials submitted with the application and also City Staff site review or the project shows that mineral resources have not been identified on or within the project site MITIGATION MEASURE(S) None required No Impact a) & b) XI. NOISE: Potentially Because the site will be located in an industrial area near a major artery there is a potential for children to Significant be exposed to noise levels in excess of the standards set in the General Plan Noise Element However Impact prior to building permit issuance the applicant will be required to submit a noise study to the Building Unless Official that identifies proper methods needed to maintain interior and exterior noise levels Mitigation Incorporated MITIGATION MEASURE The applicant shall submit to the Building Official a noise study that a) demonstrates the methods by which standards for interior and exterior noise levels will be attained Building Permits will not be issued until after the Building Official has approved the noise study No Impact The proposed project is not expected to generate significant noise levels and all grading and construction b) e) and f) activities will be conducted during the appropriate hours as allowed by the Culver City Municipal Code The project is not located within and airport land use plan nor within the vicinity of an airport MITIGATION MEASURE(S) None required Less Than Because the uses will change from an industrial to school use there is a potential for increased noise Significant levels due to children and parents However theses increased noise levels will only occur during AM and Impact early PM drop-off and pick up periods The play area will be within the building A temporary increase in c) and d) noise levels will occur during construction However most construction will occur within the building with some re grading of the parking area All grading and construction activities will be conducted during the appropriate hours as allowed by the Culver City Municipal Code MITIGATION MEASURE(S) None required Form Updated 3/16/04 Page 12 of 16CUP P 2005019 & AUP P 2005018 Park Century School May 18 2005 XII. POPULATION AND HOUSING: The proposed project is a private school facility with no residential component No impacts to population or housing are associated with the project MITIGATION MEASURE(S) None required No Impact a) through c) XIII. PUBLIC SERVICES: Less Than The project will comply with all applicable California Building and Fire Codes Impacts to fire and police Significant protection are expected to be less than significant No significant adverse impacts to schools are expected Impact to result from the project However market competition for the education of learning disabled children a) could economically affect the Culver City Unified School District should parents decide to place their children in the new school CEQA does not consider market forces in determining potential impacts Maintenance of public facilities and requirements for other public services associated with the project are expected to be incidental and no significant adverse impacts are expected MITIGATION MEASURE S None re uired XIV. RECREATION: No Impact The proposed project is a school use with its own on site recreation area No significant adverse impacts a) & b) relative to recreation are associated with the project MITIGATION MEASURE(S) None required Form Updated 3/16/04 Page 13 of 16CUP P2005019 & AUP P-2005018 Park Century School May 18 2005 XV. TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC: Potentially A traffic study (dated Revised April 27 2005) was prepared for the project The impacted intersection of Significant Landmark St and Washington BI is controlled by a stop sign on the Landmark St approach The Impacts intersection is currently functioning at Level of Service (LOS) F The requirement for a traffic signal to be Unless installed at the intersection will mitigate the impacts of the school The new signal would also be required Mitigation to connect to the Automated Traffic Surveillance and Control coordinated signal system operated by the Incorporated City of Los Angeles The school also proposes to establish a combination of offset start and dismissal a) times for students and staff With the proposed improvements average vehicle delay is projected to be reduced at the Washington BI and Landmark St intersection MITIGATION MEASURE(S) 1 A traffic signal shall be installed at the intersection of Washington Boulevard and Landmark Street The new signal shall be connected to the Automated Traffic Surveillance and Control (ATSAC) coordinated signal system operated by the City of Los Angeles 2 As discussed in the Revised April 27 2005 Traffic Study for the Park Century School the school shall establish a combination of offset start and dismissal time for students and staff Said schedule shall be subject to approval of the Traffic Engineer and Planning Division No Impact In the traffic study conducted for this project an analysis of the project s traffic impact on the regional b) through g) transportation system was conducted in accordance with the transportation impact analysis (TIA) procedures outlined in the 2004 Congestion Management Program for Los Angeles County If a project would add 50 or more peak hour trips (of adjacent street traffic) to a Congestion Management Program (CMP) arterial intersection then a CMP arterial intersection analysis must be conducted Based on the traffic study analysis the project would not add more than 50 morning or afternoon peak hour trips at any of the CMP arterial monitoring intersections nearest the project Thus no further analysis is required The project will not result a change in any air traffic patterns or traffic levels The site is fully developed with no dangerous design features There currently exists and will remain one ingress and egress driveway onto Landmark St The requirement to add a traffic signal at the Washington BI intersection will actually allow for safer turns into and out of Landmark St The site will continue to maintain an emergency-only access gate at the rear of the property onto Lindblade St resulting in adequate emergency access The Culver City Municipal Code requires 47 parking spaces for this project and 47 spaces are being provided Eight of the spaces are proposed to be blocked access spaces The project will not affect any City or regional adopted policies plans or programs supporting alternative transportation MITIGATION MEASURE(S) None required XVI. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS: a) through g) The proposed project will connect to existng utilities available to the project site No significant adverse impacts to utilities are expected from project implementation MITIGATION MEASURE(S) None required 9, 1 Form Updated 3/16/04 Page 14 of 16CUP P 2005019 & AUP P 2005018 Park Century School May 18 2005 XVII. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE: No Impact The project will not have significant impacts to any plant or animal wildlife species or cause substantial a) adverse effects on human beings MITIGATION MEASURE(S) None required Less Than The proposed school would cause traffic impacts in the surrounding area and add to the cumulative traffic Significant in the area However with the proposed mitigation measures implemented the LOS at the Washington BI Impact and Landmark St intersection will be improved even at today s LOS (See discussion under the b) and c) Transportation section) As the site is located in an industrial area there is a potential for children to be exposed to pollution Existing uses along Landmark Street are not incompatible with the school Any uses that may be incompatible with the school use would most likely require SCAQMD permits that would limit emissions in the project vicinity MITIGATION MEASURE(S) None required Form Updated 3/16/04 Page 15 of 16CUP P 2005019 & AUP P 2005018 Park Century School May 18 2005 MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM The following environmental mitigation measures shall be incorporated into the project development as conditions of approval The project applicant shall secure a signed verification for each of the mitigation measures which indicates that mitigation measures have been complied with and implemented and fulfills the City environmental and other requirements (Public Resources Code Section 21081 6 ) Final clearance shall require all applicable verification as included in the following table The City of Culver City will have primary responsibility for monitoring and reporting the implementation of the mitigation measures unless otherwise indicated The mitigation measures have been identified by impact category and numbered for ease of reference MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM CUP P 2005019 and AUP P-2005018 Park Century School MITIGATION MEASURE TIMING I VERIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE DEPT.: SIGNATURE. DATE: NOISE A 1 Prior to issuance of any building permits the applicant shall submit a noise study to the Building Official identifying the construction methods needed to maintain interior and exterior noise levels to within the standards set in the General Plan Noise Element Prior to issuance of building permits Planning Building TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC T 1 A traffic signal shall be installed at the intersection of Washington Boulevard and Landmark Street The new signal shall be connected to the Automated Traffic Surveillance and Control (ATSAC) coordinated signal system operated by the City of Los Angeles _ Prior to final release by Building and Safety inspectors of electrical and gas utilities Public Works T 2 As discussed in the Revised April 27 2005 Traffic Study for the Park Century School the school shall establish a combination of offset start and dismissal time for students and staff Said schedule shall be subject to approval of the Traffic Engineer and Planning Division Prior to issuance of building permits Pubic Works Planning References Utilized|109| Culver City General Plan Land Use Element and Noise Element|109| Culver City Zoning Code|109| Culver City Natural Hazards Map|109| Traffic Study for the Park Century School (Revised April 27 2005)|109| Project application materials Form Updated 3/16/04 Page 16 of 16Attachment No 7 RESOLUTION NO 2005-R A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CULVER CITY, CALIFORNIA, UPHOLDING AN APPEAL FILED BY HOWARD INDUSTRIES (APPEALANT) THEREBY AMENDING CONDITION NO 43 (RELATING TO INSTALLATION OF A LEFT TURN LANE) OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT, CUP P-2005019 AND ADMINISTRATIVE USE PERMIT, AUP P-2005018 THAT ALLOWS THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A PRIVATE SCHOOL WITH TANDEM PARKING AT 3939 LANDMARK STREET IN THE LIGHT MANUFACTURING (M-1) ZONE (CUP P-2005019 and AUP P-2005018) WHEREAS, on March 10, 2005, an application was filed for a Conditional Use Permit and Administrative Use Permit for the establishment of a private school with tandem parking at 3939 Landmark Street, being Lot 12 and a portion of Lot 13 of Tract No 29708, in the Light Manufacturing (M-1) Zone and, WHEREAS, on June 8, 2005, the Planning Commission opened a duly noticed public hearing for Conditional Use Permit, CUP P-2005019 and Administrative Use Permit, AUP P-2005018, for the establishment of a private school and continued the hearing to July 13 2005, in order to comply with the required public review period as stipulated in the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), and, WHEREAS, on July 13 2005, the Planning Commission continued the duly noticed public hearing on Conditional Use Permit, CUP P-2005019 and Administrative Use Permit AUP P-2005018, fully considering the applications, site plans, staff reports, environmental information and all testimony presented, and, WHEREAS, in accordance with CEQA, the City provided public notice of the intent to adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration for this project and based upon the initial 7,'( Page 1 2005-R I|1010101010101010 10 10|11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 study, public comments, and the record before the Planning Commission the project was determined to not have a significant adverse impact on the environment provided certain mitigations are required, and the Planning Commission hereby adopted a Mitigated Negative Declaration and, WHEREAS, on July 13, 2005, following conclusion of the public discussion and thorough deliberation of the subject matter, the Planning Commission determined by a vote of 3 to 1 that Conditional Use Permit, CUP P-2005019 and Administrative Use Permit, AUP P-2005018, should be conditionally approved and adopted Resolution No 2005-P013, and, WHEREAS, No new information has been provided regarding the project or any potentially significant environmental impacts since approval of the Mitigated Negative Declaration by the Planning Commission, therefore, no further environmental action is required, and, WHEREAS on September 12 2005, Howard Industries submitted an appeal to Conditional Use Permit, CUP P-2005019 and Administrative Use Permit, AUP P-2005018, requesting reconsideration of certain aspects of Condition No 43, relating to the installation of a left turn pocket on westbound Washington Boulevard at the intersection with Landmark Street, of the Planning Commission Conditions of Approval as stated in Planning Commission Resolution No 2005-P013 and WHEREAS discussions with the Applicant, Appellant, and City staff have lead to proposed modifications to Condition No 43 that are acceptable to all parties and, WHEREAS, on November 14 2005, at its regular meeting, a duly noticed public hearing the City Council heard the appeal and proposed modifications to Condition No 43 of Planning Commission Resolution No 2005-P013, gave an opportunity for all interested parties to Page 2 2005-R I|1010101010101010 10 10|11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28speak and after consideration of all testimony, determined to uphold the appeal approving certain modifications to Condition No 43 of Planning Commission Resolution No 2005- P013 NOW, THEREFORE the City Council of the ' City of Culver City California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE as follows|109| That no new information has been made available since Planning Commission adoption of the Mitigated Negative Declaration, which finds Conditional Use Permit, CUP P-2005019 and Administrative Use Permit, AUP P-2005018 will not have a significant effect on the environment provided certain mitigation measures are incorporated into the Conditions of Approval, therefore no further environmental action is required|109| That the Appellant has demonstrated and the Applicant and City staff concur that the nature of the project is an appropriate basis for modifications to Condition of Approval No 43, related to the installation of a left turn pocket on westbound Washington Boulevard at the intersection with Landmark Street 3 That based on the foregoing the City Council does hereby uphold the appeal thereby amending Condition No 43 of Planning Commission Resolution No 2005- P013 as set forth below The applicant shall install a traffic signal at the intersection of Washington Boulevard and Landmark Street The new traffic signal shall be connected to the City s ATSAC system, contain a battery backup system and shall be installed with a Transit Priority System (this is a mitigation measure) The applicant shall a lcft turn pocket along westbound Washington The applicant shall conduct and complete a traffic study ( 'Traffic Study ) within 12 months following the commencement of school operations (considered to be the first day of classes) or at an earlier date as determined by the Planning Manager The Page 3 2005-R|101010101010101010 10 10|11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28scope of the Traffic Study shall be determined by the City's Traffic Engineer and the Planning Manager The Traffic Study shall examine the need for a left turn lane on Washington Boulevard at Landmark Street, shall make a recommendation as to whether a left turn lane is required and, if required, shall recommend a configuration for the left turn lane The Traffic Study shall be subiect to review and approval by the Planning Division and the Public Works/Enqineenng Department Prior to issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall post a bond with the City, in a form satisfactory to the Public Works/Enqineennq Department, in the amount of twenty five thousand dollars ($25,000 00) to pay the cost of implementing a left turn lane on Washington Boulevard at Landmark Street should the City decide to implement such a left turn lane within a four (4) year period following the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy The bond shall be returned to the applicant if no such left turn lane is deemed necessary by the City within four (4) years following the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy APPROVED and ADOPTED this day of , 2005 ALBERT VERA, MAYOR City of Culver City, California ATTEST APPROVED AS TO FORM CHRISTOPHER ARMENTA, CAROL A SCHWAB, City Clerk City Attorney A05 00629 9:7 Page 4 2005-R|101010101010101010 10 10|11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28Attachment No 8 C20 Coolidge Drive Suite 1B5 Folsom CA 95630 (S16) 053 2150 FAX (916) 353 2155 GEOMATRIX CONFIDENTIAL ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGED ATTORNEY WORK PRODUCT January 24, 2005 Project No 10322 Sean T Matsler, Esq Latham & Watkins, LLP 633 West 5 th Street, Suite 4000 Los Angeles, CA 90071 Subject Status Report - Air Tomes Evaluation Proposed Park Century School Site Dear Mr Matsler fireftrill MAR 1 0 2005 Cu/ver city tic:Inning Division As requested, we have been collecting and reviewing the available information on potential air toxics emissions within the area surrounding the proposed site for the Park Century School to be located at 3939 Landmark Street, Culver City (the "site") This review is designed to assist us in determining if there is a need for further assessment of potential health impacts from air tomes in the area of the proposed school Consistent with the voluntary guidelines presented in Chapter 4 of the South Coast Air Quality Management District's ( SCAQMD ) Air Quality Analysis Guidance Handbook', our review has focused on identifying any industrial activities within the area surrounding the proposed school site that might be releasing toxic air contaminants in amounts that could potentially be of concern If any such release is identified, we would then quantify the potential impacts at the school site using common health risk assessment methodologies Based on the information obtained from the SCAQMD and California Air Resources Board ( CARB ) regarding facility emissions, and focusing on the most likely significant emitters, we have not identified any source of air tomes in the neighborhood that has the potential to be a significant nsk factor warranting further evaluation and quantification We are continuing our review of facilities, but those remaining to be reviewed appear less likely to have air toxic emissions BACKGROUND We have relied on a hierarchy of information to identify potential sources of air tomes in the neighborhood The first tier was a list of all business within 1,000 feet of the site that was prepared by Slcyers & Associates in response to a request by the Culver City Community Development Department (attached) Simple inspection of this list shows a number of businesses that would not be expected to use chemicals of any type in any large amount or be a source of chemical emissions Retail establishments, radio stations, and business offices, for 'See http //www aqmd gov/ceqa/handbook/CH4 DOC Geomatroc Consultants, Inc Engineers Geologists and Environmental Scientists 7,sGEDIVIATRIX Sean T Matsler, Esq CONFIDENTIAL Latham & Watkins, LLP ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGED January 24 2005 ATTORNEY WORK PRODUCT Page 2 example, fit this definition These facilities were not reviewed further Significantly, there were no facilities on the list that are busmesses identified by SCAQMD 2 as major sources of air tomes (e g , battery manufactunng, dye casting, electroplating, petroleum refining, photography, etc ) Other facility descriptions (e g , pamt shops), although not identified by the SCAQMD as likely sources of significant air emissions, were presumed to be potential sources of chemical release pending additional information and became the focus of our review The second tier of information was a list of facilities with permits (or applications for permits) to operate equipment that might release chemicals, but not necessarily air tomes, within one- quarter or one-half mile of the site, as compiled by the SCAQMD This information is contained in a letter from the SCAQMD to Ms Karen Spinney of CNS Environmental, Inc , dated May 19, 2004 (attached) The list, as identified by name, includes schools, fire stations, paint shops, auto repair shops and other less readily identified business activities Fifteen sites were within one-quarter mile, the size of the area identified by the SCAQMD 3 m its guidelines An additional nineteen sites were within one-half mile Although they are of secondary interest, these more distant facilities were also screened for potential air toxic emissions It is our opinion that this list represents the most complete identification of facilities with some type of air emissions, potentially including toxic air contaminants, since it is the SCAQMD s responsibility to regulate sources of air emissions Sources of emissions not known to the SCAQMD would presumably be operating illegally FINDINGS We used the SCAQMD list of permitted facilities to query the database maintained by CARB CARB coordinates the activities of local air quality agencies, including the SCAQMD, and collects information on the emissions of chemicals from California industrial facilities Significant sources of air toxic contaminants should be identified within the CARB database and facilities not on the list are probably not generating sigruficant toxic air contaminants The database contained information on five (three within one-quarter mile) of the facilities identified by the SCAQMD The database identified the following 1 Finish First (furniture refinishing, stripping and repairs) Emission data available for 2002 included 3 2 tons per year of organic gasses No health risk assessment has been required 2 Cytech Fibente (formerly Culver City Composites) Emission data available from 1996 A health risk assessment had been completed 2 lbld 3 lbld 9.9GEOMATRIX Sean T Matsler, Esq CONFIDENTIAL Latham & Watkins, LLP ATTORNEY CLIENT PRIVILEGED January 24, 2005 ATTORNEY WORK PRODUCT Page 3 3 Ian Walmsley Design "Zero emissions or No Facility Data Found" 4 Helms Antiques, Inc (greater than one quarter mile, but less than one-half mile from site) Emission data available for 2002 mcluded 1 1 tons per year of total organic gasses No health nsk assessment has been required 5 70 MM (greater than one-quarter mile and less than one-half mile from site) Emission data available for_2002 included 1 0 tons per year of total organic gasses No health nsk assessment has been required The CARB database mformation provided important clues to identifying potentially significant facilities for our review First, the database captures important sources of air emissions, the very few facilities identified in the CARB database serves to focus attention on facilities with the potentially largest contnbution to air emissions Second, the total amount of emissions for each facility is presented It is important to note that this total, while it may contain specific toxic air contaminants, is predominately compnsed of chemicals with low toxicity This determination can, m general terms, be refined by whether or not a health risk assessment had been required for the facility Facilities with potentially significant releases of toxic air contaminants are required to prepare health risk assessments under California's 'Toxic Hot Spot (AB2588) regulations Only one of the facilities, Cytech Fibente, had apparently been required to do so in 1996 and that fact would make this a high priority facility for our review However, as noted below, this facility is no longer in operation in the area The final source of information is the individual facility files maintained by the SCAQMD These files form the basis for the initial list of facilities and contain all of the information on equipment, chemical use, details of facility inspections conducted by the SCAQMD and, for a few facilities, complaints regarding facility emissions The files of facilities closest to the site have been prioritized for review, specifically those within one-quarter mile Within this group the file for Cytech Fibente was the highest pnonty Individual facility files were requested through the procedures established by SCAQMD and copied by Ms Mary Hamson Those reviewed to date include the following Adam Paint Shop (8931Y2 National Blvd, Los Angeles) This facility is approximately 0 2 miles to the northwest of the site The facility paints and stains wooden shutters The SCAQMD permits three spray paint booths and one stain dip tank Emissions from the spray booths are controlled and maximum emission limits are in place Total chemical usage is low and the SCAQMD routinely monitors compliance The causes of past complaints (e g, chemical odor, release of dusts in the immediate vicmity) were reported as being correctedGEOIVIATRIX Sean T Matsler, Esq CONFIDENTIAL Latham & Watkins, LLP ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGED January 24, 2005 ATTORNEY WORK PRODUCT Page 4 The release of toxic air contaminants, if any, from this facility would be negligible in terms of quantity and there would be no reason to expect impacts on air quality at the school site Beverly Hills Body (8951 Venice Blvd, Los Angeles) This facility is a little less than 0 2 miles to the west of the site It has a permit from the SCAQMD for a paint spray booth used in the repair of automobiles Emissions from the booth are controlled Maximum paint usage is two gallons per day The release of toxic air contammants, if any, from this facility would be negligible in terms of quantity and there would be no reason to expect impacts on air quality at the school site AAA Flag & Banner Mfg Co (8951 National Blvd, Los Angeles) This facility is a little more than 0 2 miles to the northwest of the site The facility manufactures banners and flags through screen pnntmg followed by oven drying The SCAQMD permits are in place for pnntmg and drying equipment, as necessary Emissions of volatile organic chemicals associated with inks, lacquer thinner and acetone are limited by permit conditions Histoncally, numerous complaints related predominately to odor in the immediate vicinity have been lodged against the facility The SCAQMD was very involved in responding to the complaints and it appears that corrective measures (i e, an increase m stack height) eliminated the complaints The release of toxic air contaminants, if any, from this facility would be negligible in terms of quantity and there would be no reason to expect impacts on air quality at the school site Glassers Automotive Repair (8750 Washington Blvd , Culver City) This facility is slightly less than 0 2 miles to the north of the site The SCAQMD permits are in place for an automobile paint spray booth The total amount of paint that may be used in any one day is limited to three gallons and the spray booth controls particulate emissions The release of toxic air contaminants, if any, from this facility would be negligible m terms of quantity and there would be no reason to expect impacts on air quality at the school site Cytec Fib erite (3512 Helms Ave , Culver City) This facility was approximately 0 2 miles to the east of the site Consistent with the CARB database described above, this facility had a number of permits with the SCAQMD and likely had a complex emission profile All of the permits are currently inactive and the facility is described as "out of business s/GEOMATRIX Sean T Matsler, Esq CONFIDENTIAL Latham & Watkins, LLP ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGED January 24, 2005 ATTORNEY WORK PRODUCT Page 5 SUMMARY The information gathered to date supports that none of the facilities m the vicinity of the site represent a source of potentially significant toxic air contaminants and their operations do not represent a potential for adverse health impacts at the school site I am available at your convenience if you have any comments or questions Sincerely yours, GEOMATRIX CONSULTANTS, INC mbree, Ph D , DAI3T Pnncip oxicologist \projects \ 10322 park entury sch \revised clean status report 1 21-05 AttachmentsBUSINESSES WITHIN 1,000 FEET OF 3939 LANDMARK STREET Property No NUMBER STREET BUSINESS NAME DESCRIPTION STATE/FEDERAL LIST 1 8827 Exposition Blvd [No signage] [Unknown use] 2 8829 Exposition Blvd Metal Art Metal fabrication 3 8831 Exposition Blvd [No signage] [Unknown use] 4 8839 Exposition Blvd [No signage] [Unknown use] 5 8843 Exposition Blvd [Signage vandalized] [Unknown use] 6 8850 Exposition Blvd [No signage] [Unknown use] 7 8860 Exposition Blvd Classic Fine Finish Furniture Furniture refinishing 8 8860 1/2 Exposition Blvd Cabinet 2000 Custom Woodwork Custom furniture 9 8860B Exposition Blvd A L S Furniture stripping fine finishes kitchen furniture antique restoration hand stripping 10 3940 Higuera St [Vacant Building] [Unknown use] 11 3951 Higuera St [Vacant Building] [Unknown use] 12 3960 Higuera St Westwood One Companies Parking Lot 13 3969 Higuera St Jerry s Market & Deli Market 14 3947 Landmark Street Hands Services Order fulfillment mass mailing 15 3947 Landmark Street Rubber Supply Co Resale of rubber products No mfg 16 3960 Landmark Street World Cuisine Culinary Equipment [Unknown use] 17 3961 Landmark Street AA Wireless Inc Cellular phones distribution and accessories 18 3962 Landmark Street MYCEL Office supply shipping/fulfillment 19 3965 Landmark Street Pacifica Consulting Services Janitorial Supply Paper distributor 20 3965 Landmark Street Sermon Systems Inc Janitonal Supply Household cleaning supplies and floor wax 21 3975 Landmark Street Event Solutions Catering 22 3975 Landmark Street DIVA Warehouse [Unknown use] 23 8906 Lindblade St Taos Tacos (Kitchen) Food preparation 24 8921 Lindblade St UCLA Book Bindery Book bindery 25 8924 Lindblade St Abramson Teiger Architects Architectural practice 26 8925 Lindblade St Lindblade Hotel Hotel 27 8930 Lindblade St Rover Dog Kennels 12/20/2004 1 32 PM Skyers & Associates Page 1 of 5BUSINESSES WITHIN 1,000 FEET OF 3939 LANDMARK STREET Property No NUMBER STREET BUSINESS NAME DESCRIPTION STATE/FEDERAL LIST 28 8935 Lindblade St Metro Networks Radio Station 29 8944 Lindblade St KTWV - The Wave Radio Station Radio Station UST 30 8965 Lindblade St Westwood One Companies Sales office for radio network 31 9014 Lindblade St Caggiano Fine Leather Retail 32 9018 Lindblade St [Vacant Building] [Unknown use] 33 8690 National Blvd Alger International Manufacture lights 34 8780 National Blvd Turning Point School School 35 8824 National Blvd [No signage Looks occupied] [Unknown use] 36 8825 National Blvd Surfas Restaurant equipment Supplies Gourmet Foods 37 8828 National Blvd [Vacant building] [Unknown use] 38 8829 National Blvd Palms Self Storage Storage 39 8833 National Blvd Plummer s Furniture Retailer 40 8834 National Blvd Harry Art Furniture Showroom 41 8836 National Blvd Finish First Fine furniture refinishing hand stripping repairs 42 8840 National Blvd [Vacant building] [Unknown use] 43 8842 National Blvd Stone Candles Factory Outlet Retail Candle Sales 44 8884 National Blvd Civilization Furniture Retailer 45 8794 National Blvd Warehouse for Motion Picture Studios Storage 46 3700 Robertson Blvd FedEx Mail/package distribution LUST UST 47 3719 Robertson Blvd [Vacant Building] [Unknown use] 48 3723 Robertson Blvd Janor Tool & Machine Tool and machine shop 49 3727 Robertson Blvd Sound Arena Studios Music Studio 50 3729 Robertson Blvd From Wags 2 Whiskers Dog boarding & daycare 51 3731 Robertson Blvd Cold Fusion Corporate office for nutrition food company 52 3733 Robertson Blvd Upholstery Upholstery 53 3737 Robertson Blvd [No signage] [Unknown use] 54 3741 Robertson Blvd Butch s Truck & Auto Auto repair 55 3743 Robertson Blvd Mono Tech Tool & Engineering Co Tools-Jigs Fixtures Prototype & Production Machining 56 3747 Robertson Blvd [Vacant buildnig] [Unknown use] 12/20/2004 1 32 PM Skyers & Associates Page 2 of 5BUSINESSES WITHIN 1,000 FEET OF 3939 LANDMARK STREET Property No NUMBER STREET BUSINESS NAME DESCRIPTION STATE/FEDERAL LIST 57 3749 Robertson Blvd [No signage] [Unknown use] 58 3750 Robertson Blvd Multimedia Systems Office use 59 3750 Robertson Blvd Labite com Restaurant Delivery Restaurant Food Delivery 60 3751 Robertson Blvd Digital Soup Digital art layout 61 3760 Robertson Blvd Plasma T V Gallery [Unknown use] 62 8949 Venice Blvd Beverly Hills Body & Paint NOTE Outside of 1 000 ft Radius Spray booths Auto paint 63 8953 Venice Blvd Early Scheib Paint & Body NOTE Outside of 1 000ft Radius Spray booths Auto paint 64 8740 W Washington Blvd ECF Par Services Reseller of Hospital bed tables and beds 65 8748 W Washington Blvd Tesserae Custom Mosaics Custom mosaic art pieces/Furniture 66 8750 W Washington Blvd Glasser s Auto Body Body Shop 67 8810 W Washington Blvd Culver City Mazda/Nissan Nissan dealership RCRIS CORTESE LUST CA FID 68 8817 W Washington Blvd The Jungle Tropical Plants Plant Nursery 69 8850 W Washington Blvd Culver City Hyundai Hyundai dealership RCRIS CORTESE LUST 70 8855 W Washington Blvd Howard Industries Heating A/C Refrigeration Sheet Metal Wholesale distributors Parts supplies Equipment 71 8888 W Washington Blvd Insurance Collision Center Body Shop 72 8910 W Washington Blvd Burke Williams Corporate Office Corporate office and training facility for Day Spa 73 8966 W Washington Blvd Westwood One Companies Sales office for radio network 74 8970 W Washington Blvd DalTile Showroom/Contractor 75 8723 8739 W Washington Blvd Mercier Wimberg Studio Office and Studio use 76 8723 8739 W Washington Blvd Yokotake Design & Associates Office and Studio use 77 8723 8739 W Washington Blvd ah be Landscape Architects Office and Studio use 78 8723 8739 W Washington Blvd Studio ll Office and Studio use 79 8723 8739 W Washington Blvd Ultimatum Music Office and Studio use 80 8723 - 8739 W Washington Blvd Richard Ruthsatz Photography Office and Studio use 12/20/2004 1 32 PM Skyers & Associates Page 3 of 5BUSINESSES WITHIN 1,000 FEET OF 3939 LANDMARK STREET Property No NUMBER STREET BUSINESS NAME DESCRIPTION STATE/FEDERAL LIST 81 8723 - 8739 W Washington Blvd Peter MacArthur Studio Office and Studio use 82 8741 8745 W Washington Blvd IT Studios Office and Studio use 83 8741 - 8745 W Washington Blvd RKADE Office and Studio use 84 8741 8745 W Washington Blvd Krasner Studio Office and Studio use 85 8741 - 8745 W Washington Blvd Polar Bear Productions Office and Studio use 86 8741 8745 W Washington Blvd Vogler Audio Media Office and Studio use 87 8741 - 8745 W Washington Blvd Dick Zimmerman Studio Office and Studio use 88 8741 8745 W Washington Blvd NTIUS Office and Studio use 89 8753 - 8763 W Washington Blvd Artisan Restoration Centre Office and Studio use 90 8753 8763 W Washington Blvd Light Space Office and Studio use 91 8753 - 8763 W Washington Blvd Summit Architects Collaborative Office and Studio use 92 8753 - 8763 W Washington Blvd Prefix Office and Studio use 93 8753 8763 W Washington Blvd Loucheim Studio Office and Studio use 94 8781 & 8777 W Washington Blvd [Vacant building] [Unknown use] 95 8786 - 8770 W Washington Blvd Spartan Supply Roofing Materials Reseller of supplies No manufacture 96 9055 W Washington Blvd Miller Honda Only parking lot within radius 97 9094 W Washington Blvd Sony Pictures Parking area for Sony 98 3416 Wesley St GPO Accessories Reseller of Wireless Accessories 99 3418 Wesley St [No signage] [Unknown use] 100 3429 Wesley St [No signage] [Unknown use] 101 3431 Wesley St Wesley Studios Studio/Office use 102 3434 Wesley St Studio City Auto Dismantlers Used car parts 103 3444 Wesley St Clyde s Auto Body Shop Auto repair 104 3444 Wesley St A-1 Upholstery Shop Upholstery shop with auto body shop 105 3444 Wesley St Clyde s Auto Sales With auto body shop 106 3520 Wesley St Playa Digital Media Digital Prepress 12/20/2004 1 32 PM Skyers & Associates Page 4 of 5BUSINESSES WITHIN 1,000 FEET OF 3939 LANDMARK STREET|1010| Property No NUMBER STREET BUSINESS NAME DESCRIPTION STATE/FEDERAL LIST RCRIS UST LUST CA FID CORTESE LEGEND FOR STATE/FEDERAL LIST ACRONYMS Resource Conservation and Recovery Information System RCRIS includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) Underground Storage Tank Data from State Water Resources Control Board $ Hazardous Substance Storage Container Database Leaking Underground Storage Tank Data from State Water Resources Control Board s Hazardous Substance Storage Container Database The Facility Inventory Database contains active and inactive underground storage tank locations The source is the State Water Resource Control Board This database identifies public drinking water wells with detectable levels of contamination hazardous substance sites selected for remedial action sites with known toxic material identified through the abandoned site assessment program sites with USTs having a reportable release and all solid waste disposal facilities from which there is known migration The source is the California Environmental Protection Agency/Office of Emergency Information Skyers & Associates Page 5 of 5 12/20/2004 1 32 PM05/20/2004 16 12 5628685445 PAGE 02 05/19/2004 10 09 SCAGMD 1 9155286E35445 H0838 1?001 1711 South Coast Air Quality Management District 21865 E Copley Dnve, Diamond Bar, CA 91765-4182 '-^n -sr (909) 396-2000 www aqmd gov May 19, 2004 Ms Karen Spinney CNS Environmental, Inc 12440 Firestone Blvd., 0228 Norwalk, CA 90650 Dear Ms Spinney Thank you for your May 12, 2004 request to identify facilities with the potential to emit hazardous or acutely hazardous air emissions located within one-quarter mile of the proposed school site, Park Century School, located at 3939 Landmark St, Culver City In response to your request, the South Coast Air Quality Management District (AQMD) is providing the following mformation in accordance with Public Resources Code 21151 8(a)(4) 1 A map showing all facilities, with AQMD permits or pending applications, that are located within a radius of one-quarter and one-half mile of the proposed school site 2 A list identifying each facility shown on the map Please be advised that tins Information only covers facilities that have permits or pending applications with the AQMD Other facilities that emit hazardous or acutely hazardous air emissions and do not exist in AQMD records may be located within one-quarter mile of the proposed school site In accordance with AQIviD Rule 301(i)(8), an invoice in the amount of $23227 is enclosed to cover the costs of developing and providing the requested mformaton. Please submit this fee to the AQMD vnthin thirty (30) days of the invoice date If you have any questinna regarding the enclosed information, please call Ms Nancy Velasquez at (909) 396-2557 Sincerely, Mohan Nagavedu Supervising Air Quality Inspector TOMOS and Waste Management Team MN IC Enclosures Record #2004-46ACIIVID-listed facilities within 0.26 or 0.60 mile of proposed Park Century Schools 3939 Landmark St, Culver City • PennlitedFaclIktiesaap "/ Calosas.shp 2004-46 Cn 1FAC.;tn L iANW: I- --F2.'.ilf:N -,.1)C,t1-•.!-, •:', - t; 1)!5: At. :1_, ' , Jir LI-i-- 90034 4026 exils 1111 , 00034 .025141118 GLASSERS AUTOMOTIVE REPAIR 8750 WASHINGTON BLVD t 90232 402.5 nn66 75024 MA FLAG 5 BANNER MFG CO INC 8951 ! NATIONAL BLVD STE KM OS ANGELES 90034 t .025 ram 77211 FINISH FIRST 8838 NATIONAL BLVD 'CULVER CITY CA 90232 4025 ens 108317 IAN WALMSLEY DESIGN 38251 VVILLAT AVE CULVER CITY 90282, 4oza mils 107014 CLYDE'S AUTO BODY SHOP INC 3444 WESLEY ST CULVER CITY GA 32 , 428 mite 109794 LVER STUDIOS OFFICE BLDG SONY PICTURE 9050 WASH/NC/TON BLVD AM 3421 CULVER CITY CA 90232 .025 mils 113407 ADAN'S PAINT STORE 0931 NATIONAL BLVD LOS ANGELES GA 0034 .05 m114 115128 EARL SCHEIB OF CAIFORNIA INC. 8953 VENICE BLVD LOS ANGELES CA 90034 40.25 mlin -, 115606 & B FINXHING_ 8000 EXPOSITION BLVD CULVER CITY 90232 - 4025 mire 118996 CYTEG FIBERITE INC 3512 HELMS AVE CULVER CITY 90232 4025 mils 119291 ClASSIO FURNITURE INC 8915 NATIONAL BLVD LOS ANGELES CA 90034 4025 mils 120339 CLASSIC DESIGN 1520 WESLEY ST cuLVER0irt CA 00232, 4026 mile 126784 IIMICE COLLISION EXPERT 8930 VENICE BLVD CULVER CITY 90232 4925 Me 15531 PACIFIC BELL 3847 CARDIFF AVE 'CULVER CITY A 90232 ' 4050 isle 18582 %MANSON FURNITURE FINISHING INC 8511 STELLER OR CULVER CITY CA 00232 4060 Me 20048 ANGELUS SHOE POLISH CO 80441NATIQNAL BLVD CULVER CITY C 0252; 4050 [BIN 25200 FANCY CLEANERS 28958 ROBERTSON BLVD LOS ANGELES CA 90034 4050 ndis 45785 CHEVRON DIA, SAMIR I EL-KHOURY 3029 8 ROSEN 1 bON BLVD LOS ANGELES 90034: 4050 mils 55391 DSA PHOTOTECH INC 3383 LIVONIA AVE LOS ANGELES GA 90034 : 4060 MI6 6296470 tetil INC 6649 HAYDEN FL .CULVER CITY CA 90232 , .4050 *Ile 88114 CAMPOS FAMOUS BURRITOS 8885 WASHINGTON BLVD CULVER CITY GA 90232 450 m116 70097 MOBIL DER,FLOR APELES DBA 3071 8 ROBERTSON BLVD LOS ANGELES CA 90034' 40E60 m Ile 72654 • UNI SCH DIST, HAMILTONNIGH SCHOOL 2956 ROBERTSON BLVD . LOS ANGELES A 90034 00.50 mita 761 ; 4 THE CULVER STUMOS 9336 WASHINGTON BLVD CULVER CITY 0 00232 00.30 Ow 89128 UNIVERSAL PROCESS EQUIPMENT INC •3585 HAYDEN AVE CULVER Oily C 90232 40 80 mile 92730 CITY OF CULVER CITY FIRE STATION 1 9000 CULVER BLVD - CULVER CITY C 00232 40.30 mils 96063 GOOD FOOD CATERING & CONSULTING, P WBINK 8549 I-IIGUERA ST CULVER CITY CA 90232 40.60 mire _ 1 05047 HELMS ANTIQUES INC 3231 HELMS AVE LOS ANGELES GA 90034 4030 Mile 5/19/2004 t58 AM 200446 Pag.I of 2|1010|cn cn CO Ul .11 C71 t . 2 C71 179 1n 1 AC/Mb-listed facilities located within 025 or 0 50 mila of CD proposed Park Century &hoot, 3939 Landmark St • Culver City 01 Ca IV119877. EURO COACH, BERNARD COHEN D/3A 120938 ALGER INTERNATIONAL 127426 AVEDIS KALAYOJIAN 132112 DISCUS DENTAL 2588 B ROBERTSON BLVD 98170 NATIONAL BLVD 3040 S ROBERTSON BLVD 8530 HIGUERA ST LOS ANGELES CA 90034 CULVER CITY CA -90232 •LOS ANGELES . CA CULVER CrlY 'CA 90232 40 00 mils 415Dmile 40150 mils 40,150 WIG 90034 ACIAi0-listed facilities located within 0 25 or 050 Itt1 le of proposed Pork Century School 3939 Landmark St , Weer City 'AC . E. r .) kAME 5n912004 8 58 AM 100445|1010|3>|1010|rn co Pose 2 of 2 O 1ATTACHMENT NO 9 TRAFFIC STUDY FOR THE PARK CENTURY SCHOOL CULVER CITY, CALIFORNIA REVISED APRIL 27, 2005 PREPARED FOR LATHAM & WATKINS LLP PREPARED BY Lt L C91KUASSOCIATESTRAFFIC STUDY FOR THE PARK CENTURY SCHOOL CULVER CITY, CALIFORNIA Revised April 27 2005 Prepared for LATHAM & WATKINS LLP Prepared by KAKU ASSOCIATES, INC 201 Santa Monica Boulevard Suite 500 Santa Monica California 90401 (310) 458-9916 Ref 1780 C3TABLE OF CONTENTS I Introduction Project Description Study Scope Organization of Report II Existing Conditions Existing Freeway and Street System Existing Traffic Volumes and Operating Conditions Existing Public Transit Service III Future Traffic Projections Cumulative Base Traffic Projections Project Traffic Volumes Cumulative Base Traffic Conditions (Future without Project) Cumulative Plus Project Traffic Projections IV Traffic Impact Analysis Criteria for Determination of Significant Intersection Traffic Impact Project Impact Analysis Traffic Mitigation Measures V Parking Analysis and Pick Up and Drop-Off Analysis Parking Analysis Pick-Up and Drop-Off Analysis VI Regional Transportation System Impact Analysis CMP Significant Traffic Impact Cntena VII Summary and Conclusions|1010101010101010|11 15 15 19 25 30 32 32 33 33 39 39 40 50 50 52 References Appendix A Appendix B Appendix C Appendix D Intersection Configurations Traffic Count Sheets Intersection Level of Service Worksheets and Signal Warrant Analysis Existing Parking Utilization by Lot — Washington/Landmark Intersection LHLIST OF FIGURES NO|109| Study Area and Analyzed Intersections 2|109| Proposed Site Plan 3|109| Existing Peak Hour Traffic Volumes 9|109| Location of Related Projects 18|109| Cumulative Base Peak Hour Traffic Volumes 20|109| Project Trip Distribution (Inbound) 26|109| Project Trip Distribution (Outbound) 27|109| Project Only Peak Hour Volumes 28|1010 9| Cumulative Plus Project Peak Hour Volumes 31 10 Proposed Improvement for Landmark Street & Washington Boulevard (Remove Fifteen Parking Spaces) 37 11 Existing Site and Parking Lot Circulation 41 12 23 Cars Queuing in the Parking Lot 43 13A Existing School Traffic Queue Diagram with 60 Students 45 13B Year 2008 School Traffic Queue Diagram — Proposed II with 72/48 Split and 30 Min Separation Between Student Groups 46 1 13C Year 2008 School Traffic Queue Diagram — Alternative 1 with 67/53 Split and 30 Min Separation Between Student Groups 47 13D Year 2008 School Traffic Queue Diagram — Alternative 2 with 70/50 Split and 35 Min Separation Between Student Groups 48 LIST OF TABLES NO|109| Existing Street Physical Characteristics 7|109| Level of Service Definitions for Signalized Intersections 10|109| Level of Service Definitions for Stop-Controlled Intersections 12|109| Existing Intersection Levels of Service 13|109| Trip Generation Estimates for Related Projects 16|109| School Morning Peak Hour Traffic Patterns 23|109| Project Trip Generation 24|109| Intersection Level of Service Analysis — Future Conditions 29|10 9| Existing Parking Utilization by Quadrant — Intersection of Washington Boulevard and Landmark Street 35 10 Intersection Level of Service Analysis — Future with Mitigation Conditions 38I INTRODUCTION This report documents the results of a traffic study conducted by Kaku Associates Inc to evaluate the potential traffic impact of the proposed Park Century School Project at 3939 Landmark Street in Culver City California This document includes a description of the assumptions and methods used to conduct the study as well as discussion of the results PROJECT DESCRIPTION The project as proposed involves the conversion of an existing industrial warehouse building to a private elementary school The industrial building is now being used as studio production and office space The Park Century School is currently located at 2040 Stoner Avenue in the City of Los Angeles It serves an enrollment of 60 students with learning disabilities The school will relocate to the existing industrial building located at 3939 Landmark Street in the City of Culver City Figure 1 illustrates the location of the proposed future school site in relation to the surrounding street system The school would open with an enrollment of 80 and ultimately serve a student population of 120 in a combination of required offset start and dismissal times when the school enrollment exceeds 80 students It is expected that the maximum enrollment of 120 students would not be reached until 2008 The site plan for the proposed school as shown in Figure 2 includes approximately 47 on site parking spaces of which 16 would be tandem parking spaces Approximately two thirds of the 47 spaces are designed for regular vehicles and the other one-third of spaces (i e 13 spaces) are for compact vehicles Student loading and unloading would take place on-site adjacent to the school building In addition a 20-foot emergency fire access point with a connection to Lit-1dblade Street is planned at the northwest corner of the parking lot L 6 1FIGURE 1 STUDY AREA AND ANALYZED INTERSECTIONS KAKU ASSOCIATES (LEGEND El Project Site , e' Analyzed intersections National BIFIGURE 2 PROPOSED SITE PLAN KAKU ASSOCIATES ------1 /STUDY SCOPE The study analyzed the potential project-generated traffic impacts on the street system surrounding the project site The following traffic scenarios were analyzed for the weekday a m midday school dismissal hour (2 to 3 p m) and p m peak hours • Existing Conditions (2004) - Analysis of existing traffic conditions provided a basis for the remainder of the study The existing conditions analysis includes an assessment of streets traffic volumes and current operating conditions • Cumulative Base Conditions (2008) - Future traffic conditions without the proposed project were developed for the year 2008 The objective of this analysis was to project future traffic growth and operating conditions that could be expected to result from regional growth and related projects in the vicinity of the project site by the year 2008 • Cumulative plus Project Conditions (2008) - This traffic sc' enano provides projected traffic volumes and an assessment of operating conditions under future conditions with the addition of project-generated traffic The potential impacts of the proposed project on future traffic operating conditions were then identified Seven intersections were analyzed for the traffic scenarios descnbed above The seven study intersections shown in Figure 1 are as follows 1 Robertson Boulevard & National Boulevard 2 Exposition Boulevard/Robertson Boulevard & Venice Boulevard 3 Robertson Boulevard/Higuera Street & Washington Boulevard 4 National Boulevard & Venice Boulevard 5 National Boulevard & Washington Boulevard 6 Landmark Street & Washington Boulevard 7 Culver Boulevard & Washington Boulevard/Main Street The study includes an analysis of potential project impacts on the regional highway and transit systems in accordance with requirements of the Los Angeles County Congestion Management Program (CMP)|1010| (fq Finally the study evaluates the adequacy of the proposed future on-campus parking supply to accommodate projected campus parking demands Future student pick up and drop-off procedures and issues of site access for the school were also evaluated ORGANIZATION OF REPORT This report is divided into the following seven chapters • Chapter I presents the preceding introduction • Chapter ll describes the existing circulation system traffic volumes and traffic conditions within the study area Chapter II also describes the existing Park Century School access and circulation system and analyzes existing parking conditions on the campus • Chapter III describes the methodologies used to develop future cumulative traffic forecasts and project traffic volumes • Chapter IV presents an assessment of potential traffic impacts on intersection operations discusses potential mitigation measures and provides an assessment of those measures effectiveness • Chapter V contains an analysis of potential impacts of the project on campus parking conditions and an evaluation of future pick-up and drop-off procedures and internal circulation • Chapter VI contains the results of the Congestion Management Program regional transportation system impact analysis for the project • Chapter VII summarizes the conclusions and recommendations of the study|1010|5II EXISTING CONDITIONS A data collection effort was undertaken to develop analysis of existing transportation conditions within the study area The preliminary assessment of conditions relevant to this study includes a description of the street system previous traffic volumes on these facilities and operating conditions of analyzed intersections EXISTING FREEWAY AND STREET SYSTEM As shown in Figure 1 access to the project site would be provided by Landmark Street via Washington Boulevard Landmark Street is a two-way street with one travel lane in each direction Washington Boulevard is a major arterial with two lanes in each direction The study area for this analysis is bounded by Hughes Avenue on the west National Boulevard on the north Robertson Boulevard on the east and Washington Boulevard on the south Robertson Boulevard and National Boulevard are the nearest major roadways to the north and south while Washington Boulevard and Venice Boulevard are the nearest major roadways to the east and west Regional access to the site is provided by Santa Monica Freeway (I-10) The Santa Monica Freeway runs east-west less than one-quarter of a mile north of the project site Access to the Santa Monica Freeway can be obtained via ramps at Robertson Boulevard National Boulevard and Exposition Boulevard Additional streets serving the project site and the surrounding study area include Exposition Boulevard Culver Boulevard Higuera Street and Lindblade Street Table 1 includes a description of the above key roadways in the vicinity of the site Diagrams of the existing lane configurations at the study intersections are provided in Appendix A of this report|1010| 5- 1TABLE 1 EXISTING STREET PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS LANES MEDIAN PARKING RESTRICTIONS SPEED SEGMENT FROM TO NB/WB SB/EB TYPE NB/WB SB/EB LIMIT Main St/ Bagley Av Washington 61 Venice BI 1 1 DY lhr Meter 8a 6p 1hr Meter 8a-6p - Venice BI Regent St 1 1 UD PA NSAT - National BI Bagley Av Robertson B1 1 1 2LT PA NSAT 35 Robertson BI 110 ES On ramp 2 2 2L7 PA NSAT 35 110 ES On ramp Venice 81 2 2 2LT PA PA 35 Venice BI Washington B1 2 2 2L7 10hr Meter 8a 6p 10hr Meter 8a-6p 35 Washington BI Wesley St 2 2 2LT NSAT NSAT 35 Washington BI Wesley St National B1 2 2 2LT 10hr Meter 8a 6p 10hr Meter 8a-6p 35 National BI Higuera $t / Robertson 131 2 2 DY 10hr Meter 8a 6p PA 35 Higuera St / Robertson B1 Inca BI 2 2 2LT 10hr Meter 8a 6p NSAT 35 Inca 81 Culver B1 2 2 RM NSAT NSAT 35 Culver BI Cardiff Av 2 3 RM 2hr Meter 8a 6p NSAT 35 Cardiff Av Hughes Av 2 2 RM NSAT 2hr Meter 8a 6p 35 Higuera St / Robertson BI Krueger St Lindblade St 1 1 SY PA PA 25 Lindblade St Washington BI 1 1 DY NSAT 2hr Meter 8a 6p 25 Washington 61 Venice 81 2 2 2LT NSAT 2hr Meter 8a 6p n/a Venice BI 110 WB On ramp 2 One Way One Way LZ + 30 min 8a lap NSAT n/a 110 WB On ramp Ellis Av 1 2 DY NSAT NSAT - Ellis Av National B1 2 2 RM PA PA n/a National B1 110 WB Off ramp 2 2 2LT PA PA 35 Exposition B1 Livonia Av 110 ES Off ramp _ 1 1 UD PA PA 35 110 ES Off ramp Venice 131 One Way 4 One Way North Side PA South Side NSAT 35 Venice BI Washington BI 1 1 UD PA PA n/a Lindblade St Inca 131 Higuera St One Way 1 n/a 10hr Meter 8a-6p 10hr Meter 8a-6p n/a Higuera St end of street 1 1 UD 10hr Meter Ba-6p PA n/a Landmark St Washington BI end of street 1 1 UD 2hr Meter 8a 6p 2hr Meter ea 6p n/a Venice 131 Helms Av Curtis Av 3 3 RM 2hr Meter 8a 6p 2hr Meter 83 6p 35 Curtis Av National 131 3 3 RM PA 2hr Meter ea 6p 35 National B1 Ellis Av 3 3 RM 1hr Meter 8a 6p 1hr 8a 6p 35 Ellis Av Robertson BI 3 3 RM NS 4p 7p 1hr ea 6p 35 Robertson BI Culver 131 3 3 RM N$AT 1hr 8a 6p 35 Culver BI Hughes Av 3 3 RM 1hr Meter 8a 6p 1hr Meter 8a-6p 35 Culver BI Venice 81 Ince 131 2 2 RM NSAT NSAT 35 Ince BI Main St 2 2 RM 2hr Meter 8a 6p 2hr Meter 8a 6p 35 Washington BI Lafayette PI 2 2 RM 2hr Meter 8a 6p NSAT 35 Lafayette PI Duquesne Av 2 2 RM 2hr Meter ea 6p _ 2hr Meter ea 6p 35 Notes LANES # - Number of lanes MEDIAN TYPE 2LT Two Way Left Turn Lane RM Raised Median UD - Undivided $Y Single Yellow Line PARKING PA Parking allowed NPAT - No parking anytime NSAT No stopping anytime Meter Metered Parking 12 - Loading Only ZoneEXISTING TRAFFIC VOLUMES AND OPERATING CONDITIONS The following sections present the existing peak hour turning movement traffic volumes at the study intersections a description of the methodology used to analyze intersection operating conditions and the resulting level of service at each location under existing conditions Existmq Peak Hour Traffic Volumes Weekday morning (7 to 9 a m) midday (2 to 4 p m) and afternoon (4 to 6 p m) peak period traffic counts were collected at the seven study intersections in September and October 2004 These weekday traffic volumes illustrated in Figure 3 represent existing 2004 conditions for the purposes of this analysis Appendix B contains the detailed traffic count data Intersection Level of Service Standards and Methodology Level of service (LOS) is a qualitative measure used to describe the condition of traffic flow ranging from excellent conditions at LOS A to overloaded conditions at LOS F LOS D is typically recognized as the minimum acceptable service level in urban areas Of the seven analyzed intersections, six intersections are currently controlled by traffic signals The intersection of Landmark Street and Washington Boulevard is stop-controlled on the northbound approach Four of the seven intersections are located within the jurisdiction of the City of Culver City including Roberson Boulevard/Higuera Street & Washington Boulevard National Boulevard & Washington Boulevard Landmark Street & Washington Boulevard and Culver Boulevard & Washington Boulevard/Main Street The remaining three intersections fall within the jurisdiction of the City of Los Angeles The Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) method of intersection analysis was used to determine the intersection volume-to-capacity (V/C) ratio and corresponding level of service for the given turning movements and intersection characteristics at the three signalized intersections located in the City of Culver City A capacity of 1 600 vehicles per lane per hour was assumed in the capacity calculations with a clearance interval of 0 10 Table 2 defines the|1010| 9NOT TO SCALE T'9,•cieo* 'RTA6;i96> ‘'? 6;6006) t.53 gy,cP,4350 t- 215(55)(ssi Ac3Land mark St APZ‘v% Pezt> KAKU ASSOCIATES Project Site AM(MID)(PM] Peak Hour Traffic Volumes (Rounded to the Nearest Five Vehicles) te-ep *e-ei National BI 4)06. FIGURE 3 EXISTING PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES JarTABLE 2 LEVEL OF SERVICE DEFINITIONS FOR SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Level of Service Volume/Capacity Ratio Definition A 0 000 0 600 EXCELLENT No Vehicle waits longer than one red light and no approach phase is fully used B 0 601 -0 700 VERY GOOD An occasional approach phase is fully utilized many drivers begin to feel somewhat what restricted within groups of vehicles C 0 701 0 800 GOOD Occasionally drivers may have to wait through more than one red light backups may develop behind turning vehicles D 0 801 0 900 FAIR Delays may be substantial during portions of the rush hours but enough lower volume periods occur to permit clearing of developing lines preventing excessive backups E 0 901 1 000 POOR Represents the most vehicles intersection approaches can accommodate may be long lines of waiting vehicles through several signal cycles F > 1 000 FAILURE Backups from nearby locations or on cross streets may restrict or prevent movement of vehicles out of the intersection approaches Tremendous delays with continuously increasing queue lengths Source Transportation Research Board 10 ;-'11 ranges of V/C ratios and corresponding level of service for signalized intersections The three intersections located in the City of Los Angeles were evaluated using the Critical Movement Analysis (CMA) method as required by the City of Los Angeles The CALCADB software package developed by Los Angeles Department of Transportation (LADOT) was used to implement the CMA method at these three intersections All six signalized intersections are currently controlled by the City of Los Angeles Automated Traffic Surveillance and Control (ATSAC) system In accordance with LADOT procedures a capacity increase of 7% (0 07 V/C adjustment) was applied to reflect the benefits of ATSAC control at the six signalized intersections The Two Way Stop-Controlled methodology from the 2000 Highway Capacity Manual was used to determine the average vehicle delay (in seconds) and the corresponding level of service for the stop-controlled study intersection of Landmark Street & Washington Boulevard The level of service definitions for the stop-controlled intersection are summarized in Table 3 Existing Peak Hour Intersection Levels of Service The existing traffic volumes presented in Figure 3 were analyzed using the intersection capacity analysis methodology described above to determine the current operating conditions at the seven study intersections Table 4 summarizes the existing weekday morning peak hour midday peak hour and afternoon peak hour V/C ratio and corresponding level of service at the analyzed intersections As indicated in Table 4 three of the seven study intersections in the vicinity of the project site are currently operating at an acceptable level of service i e LOS D or better in all three analyzed peak periods EXISTING PUBLIC TRANSIT SERVICE Existing public transit services that operate in the project area include bus routes of Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (MTA) system LADOT Commuter Express services the Culver City Bus system and the Santa Monica City Big Blue Bus systemTABLE 3 LEVEL OF SERVICE DEFINITIONS FOR STOP CONTROLLED INTERSECTIONS Level of Service Control Delay (seconds/vehicle) A .c. 10 0 B > 10 0 and 5. 15 0 C > 15 0 and 250 D > 25 0 and 350 E > 35 0 and :s 50 0 F > 50 0 Source Transportation Research Board Highway Capacity Manual 2000 12 c-7TABLE 4 EXISTING INTERSECTION LEVELS OF SERVICE No INTERSECTION PEAK HOUR EXISTING V/C or Delay LOS 1* Robertson BI & National B1 A M 0 863 D MID 0 844 D PM 0 914 E 2* Exposition 61/Robertson BI & Venice BI AM 1 003 F MID 0 882 D PM 0 998 E 3* Robertson BI/Higuera St & Washington 61 A M 0 746 C MID 0 535 A PM 0 630 B 4 National B1 & Venice BI AM 1 110 F MID 0 958 E PM 1 018 F 5 National BI & Washington 61 A M 0 858 D MID 0 608 B PM 0 799 C 6 Landmark St & Washington BI [a] AM *. F MID 69 F PM 72 F 7* Culver BI & Washington BI/Main St [b] A M 0 783 C MID 0 583 A PM 0 736 C Note [al Intersection is controlled by stop signs Average vehicular delay in seconds is reported rather than V/C ratio [b] Field observation at this location has indicated worse traffic conditons than the projected LOS C or better during the three analyzed peak periods The projected good level of servies were resulted from the undercounted traffic volumes at this intersection when the majority of the cars were caught in the downstream or the upstream bottlenecks at Culver Boulevrad Washington Boulevard Watseka and Irving Place However this projected good level of service would not affect the determination of whether this intersection is significantly impacted As the incremental change in the V/C ratios due to the project traffic is 0 005 or less (as shown in Table 8) so the intersecion would not be impacted even if the projected level of service were E or F Intersections are controlled by ATSAC system A credit of 0 07 in v/c ratio was included in the above analysis Overflow condition indicating oversaturated conditions for long periods Average vehicle delay cannot be calculatedThe following illustrates these routes and their peak hour frequencies during morning (7 to 9 a m) and afternoon (4 to 6 p m ) peak periods • LACMTA 220 - Line 220 is a north south local service that primarily travels along Robertson Boulevard Culver Boulevard Pershing Drive and Imperial Highway connecting West Hollywood and Los Angeles International Airport In the vicinity of the project this line travels along Robertson Boulevard National Boulevard Venice Boulevard and Culver Boulevard Line 220 has an average headway of 60 minutes throughout the day • LACMTA 333/33 - Line 33/333 is an east-west local service that travels along Venice Boulevard connecting Santa Monica and downtown Los Angeles In the vicinity of the project this line serves stops on Venice Boulevard Line 33/333 provides an average headway of 15 minutes during the peak hours • LADOT CE437 - This LADOT commuter express line serves the cities of Venice Manna Del Rey Mar Vista and Culver City It travels along Santa Monica Freeway (1-10) and connects them with downtown Los Angeles In the vicinity of the project this line travels along Washington Boulevard and Culver Boulevard This line provides average a m and p m peak hour headways of 25 minutes and 30 minutes respectively • Culver CityBus Line 1 — Line 1 travels primarily along Washington Boulevard and Pacific Avenue and connects the Venice Beach area Culver City area and the West Los Angeles transit center In the vicinity of the project this line has stops on Washington Boulevard with 15 minute headways throughout the day • Culver CityBus Line 4 - Line 4 provides service in the north-south direction between the West Los Angeles Transit Center at Washington Boulevard and Fairfax Avenue and the Fox Hills Mall on a route that includes Washington Boulevard Duquesne Avenue Jefferson Boulevard Sepulveda Boulevard Bristol Parkway and Hannum Avenue Line 4 has stops on Washington Boulevard in the vicinity of the project site Line 4 is operated on an hourly basis on weekdays only • Culver CityBus Line 5 - Line 5 provides service in the northeast-southwest direction between Blair Hills and Mar Vista In the vicinity of the project site it travels along Higuera Street Washington Boulevard and Culver Boulevard This line is operated on an hourly basis on weekdays only • Santa Monica Line 12 — Line 12 serves the communities of West Los Angeles Culver City Palms and the Westwood area In the vicinity of the study area this line travels along National Boulevard and Venice Boulevard This line provides 15-minute headways throughout the day 14 riIII FUTURE TRAFFIC PROJECTIONS In order to evaluate properly the potential impacts of the proposed project on the street system it was necessary to develop estimates of future traffic conditions in the study area both with and without the project Future traffic volumes were first estimated for the study area without the project These future forecasts reflect traffic increases due to general regional growth and traffic expected to be generated by other specific developments in the vicinity of the project and represent cumulative base (no project) conditions Incremental project traffic was then estimated and separately assigned to the surrounding street system The sum of the cumulative base and project-generated traffic represents the cumulative plus project conditions Development of each of these future traffic scenarios is described in this chapter CUMULATIVE BASE TRAFFIC PROJECTIONS Regional Growth and Related Projects The cumulative base traffic projections reflect growth in traffic over existing conditions from two sources growth in the existing traffic volumes to reflect the effects of overall regional growth and development outside the study area and traffic generated by specific projects located within or in the vicinity of the study area Existing traffic volumes was adjusted by a growth factor of 1% per year to reflect changes in regional growth and development in the between 2004 and 2008 This results in a projected adjustment of 4% over existing conditions The second element in the development of the cumulative base traffic forecasts is the consideration of the effects of specific projects in the vicinity of the project study area The list of these related projects were obtained from the Cities of Los Angeles and Culver City and Los Angeles County A total of 36 related projects were identified as shown in Table 5 The locations of these related projects are shown in Figure 4 (A 15TABLE 5 TRIP GENERATION ESTIMATES FOR RELATED PROJECTS Map 108 Project Desc pt o Location Da Iv Trios AM Peak Hour Tnps PM Peak Hour Trips Midday Peak Hour Trips In Out Total In Out Total In Out Total — City of Cut or City 1 New office and retail building [IA 9 000 SQ ft office building 4447 Sepulveda BI 99 12 2 14 2 11 13 0 1 1|1010|L Baldwin Hills Scenic Overlook P °Int [b) passive recreation and parhing Hetzle Rd 265 2 1 3 s 7 12 4 5 9 3 Offce B Id g [b) Co sirucl a of 151 000 sq ft cffce bu Id |10 10|3505 Hayden A 1 663 208 28 236 38 187 225 4 19 23 4 School building expans on [6] Bu Id ng expansion (net increase of 8 352 sq ft (and an nc ease 0140 students 3430 McManus Av N/A 19 11 30 0 0 0 11 19 30 5 SPE Tele sion Building lb) Approximately 27 000 sq ft office build ng 9050 Wash ngton BI 297 37 5 42 7 33 40 1 3 4 6 Chevron Gas Stat on [b) Relocate the car wash facility and construction of a new 2 000 sq ft convenience store 10649 Jefferson Bi N/A 79 76 155 96 96 192 72 72 144 7 Culver City Commerce Center [6] 242 950 sq ft office/industnal fad ty with tandem parking 10100 Jefferson BI 2 626 333 45 378 60 292 362 6 29 35 8 Vehicle Repair Shop [6] 1 150 sq ft auto repair shop and used car sales 11304 Culver 61 N/A 2 1 3 2 2 4 2 2 4 9 Retail/ Commercial [131 2 125 sq ft retail bu Id ng 5530 Sepulveda BI 573 10 6 16 24 26 50 18 20 38 10 Residential Condominiums [c] Four unit condominium 4071-4073 La Fayette PI 42 4 1 5 3 1 4 2 1 3 11 M ed Use De elopment [b) 25 969 sq ft two story office building with 8 livetwork units, a small studio and coffee house 8601-8637 Wash ngto BI 471 56 8 64 18 90 108 12 59 70 [12 Ullman Res dence (b) Addition of a third unit loan existing two bedroom duplex 4070 Madison Av 7 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 13 Res dent al Development OA Demol sh two e st g s gle ram ly houses adjust the lot I ne to c eate a larger lot and develop Bunt apartment build q 4210 Duquesne A 28 1 6 7 15 8 23 10 5 15 14 Welk [b) 40 000 sq ft of new off ces 9699 Jefferson BI 440 55 7 62 10 50 60 1 5 6 15 Culver City Muffler Shop [b] 2 500 sq fl car repair facility 11333 Washington Ell N/A 5 3 8 4 4 13 3 3 6 16 Baldwin H Ils Rego al Park Maste Plan project [b) De elopment of a 38 acre park Stocker St 174 1 1 2 4 4 8 3 3 6 17 i< rk Douglas Theat e [b) Reno at o of the forme Cul er Theatre 9820 Wash gton 61 6 089 0 o o 452 29 481 339 22 361 18 Wind Swept Parcel Map/Single Family [b] Construct on of fou res dential un Is on 4 new parcels 4227 Inca 61 38 1 2 3 3 1 4 2 1 3 19 Culver City Transfer Station [b] Increased throughput from 500 tpd to 1056 tpd 9255 Jefferson BI N/A 12 5 17 3 14 17 2 11 13 20 Mixed Use Development (b) 6 411 sq ft m xed use project cons sting of three reta I spaces and three (Iwo bedroom two bath) apartment us Is on the second floor 11511 Washington BI 150 0 1 1 5 6 11 4 5 9(CONTINUED) TABLE 5 TRIP GENERATION ESTIMATES FOR RELATED PROJECTS Map ID# Protect Descnphon Location Daily Trips AM Peak Hour Trips PM Peak Hour Trips Midday Peak Hour Trips In Out Total In Out Total In Out Total City of Culver City 21 Jeffrey Palmer Property OffiCe/Industnal Condos lb 29 986 sq ft commercial condos 3525 Eastham Dr 270 33 4 37 6 31 37 1 3 4 Max Leather AUP (Clothing Apartment Building (b) Child Development Center [bi Condo (b) K9t;fifiPZftTYxv 111 Lin versity of Phoenix Training Center Removal of existing 25 000 sf office use and construction of new Ira n ng center to accommodate up to 100 students in day t me classes and 300 students in evening classes 200 300 Corporate Pointe 85 40 11 51 167 66 233 17 7 24 City of Los Angeles 30 Shopping Center (D) 132 802 sq ft shopping center 8985 Venice BI 5 700 83 53 136 238 258 496 179 194 372 31 Office Bu Ming [a) 45 712 sq ft office building 8787 Venice BI 503 62 e 71 12 56 68 1 6 7 32 MTA Division 6 West Los Angeles Transit Center on NI Transportation Center for operations and maintenance fac I ty fo up to 175 MTA buses and assoc sled admIn strat ye staff Jefferson 131 1 666 67 40 107 77 26 103 8 3 11 33 Apartment (a) construct 118 un t apartme Is with 206 parking spaces 10001 Ven ce BI 782 10 50 60 39 19 58 25 12 37 34 Private School [a) construct a pnvate school for pre K to 5th grade with 42,000 stand 44 parking spaces 9051 Pico BI 333 57 47 104 48 54 102 47 57 104 35 Say On Drugstore w/Dnve through (a) Construct Say-On drugstore with dnve through pharmacy and alcohol sales for off site consumption 3563 La B ea Av 1 480 26 19 45 51 54 105 39 40 79 County of Los Angeles 36 West Los A geles College Master Plan Project [13( Proposed Master Plan for the College to increase the student enrollment from current 10 312 to 15 124 students by year 2015 anticipated enrollment growth through 2008 used for trip go oration for purposes of this study Overland Ay/ Freshman Dr 17 367 f117 115 1 232 767 341 1 108 575 256 831 Totals 46 738 3 029 673 3 702 2 308 2 402 4 710 1 421 959 2 383 ffStsL (aj Tnp Generation Estimates were provided by LADOT staff (including daily taps and total peak hour taps) Directional Distnbution is based on ITE Trip Generation 7th Edition 2003 Ebj Source Kaku Associates Traffic Study for the West Los Angeles College September 2004 (c)Sou ce Kaku Associates Traffic Study fo the Symantec Office Development Project July 2004 (d)Weekday m dday peak hou tnps assumed a pe centage of PM peak hour tnps reta I 75% reside t al 65% off ce 10 / Sources on these pe centages were from the following Hourly Vanat on n Shopp ng Center Traffic ITE Tap Generation 7th Edition and Traffic Analysis for 8601 Wilshire Boulevard Involving 24-hour count distnbutionKAKU ASSOCIATES FIGURE 4 LOCATION OF RELATED PROJECTSTrip Generation Trip generation estimates were developed using trip generation rates contained in Tnp Generation 7Th Edition (Institute of Transportation Engineers 2003) The relevant trip generation estimates are summarized in Table 5 A shown in Table 5 the related projects are projected to generate a total of 46 738 daily trips of which approximately 3 702 tnps occur during the morning peak hour 2 383 during the midday peak hour and 4 710 during the afternoon peak hour Trip Distribution The geographic distribution of the traffic generated by the cumulative projects depends on several factors These factors included the type and density of the proposed land uses the geographic distribution of population from which the employees and potential patrons of the proposed developments are drawn and the location of these related projects in relation to the surrounding street system Using the factors mentioned the distnbution patterns were developed and used for the related projects Trip Assignment Using the trip generation estimates and trip distribution patterns described above traffic generated by the related projects was assigned to the street network Future base traffic volumes were then added to the existing traffic volumes after the adjustment for areawide growth to represent cumulative base conditions (i e future conditions without the proposed reconfiguration project) which are illustrated in Figure 5 PROJECT TRAFFIC VOLUMES The development of traffic generation estimates for the proposed project involves the use of a three-step process similar to that discussed above for the cumulative projects including traffic generation trip distribution trip distribution and traffic assignment Protect Trip Generation To develop existing school traffic volumes manual turning movements counts were collected at the existing school driveways on Stoner Avenue during the morning drop offs from 8 to 9 a m and on Friday during the one-time midday dismissal hour from 2 to 3 p m (which is the only weekday when the entire school is dismissed at the same time) Both counts were conducted in cH 19LEGEND r-1 Project Site #(#)(#] AM(MID)(PM] Peak Hour Traffic Volumes (Rounded to the Nearest Five Vehicles) NOT TO SCALE " cacA.V‘ cP"44* A431,4(' C-20(44,71 Land mark St (*StNp n /.% 4 )(3$ ' 38 t+43 14ss 6;:e19,-66. °(‘' (67ol|1010|KAKU ASSOCIATES } National BI FIGURE 5 CUMULATIVE BASE PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMESJune 2004 With the current enrollment of 60 students and 36 staff members (33 on-site), the school generated 124 morning peak hour trips (74 inbound 50 outbound) from 8 to 9 a m and 92 midday peak hour trips (42 inbound 50 outbound) Future school trip generation during the afternoon peak hour (4 to 5 p m) was estimated based on the trip generation rates/equations for a 120-student private school from ITE s Trip Generation 7th Edition The existing school tnp generation was then factored proportionally to reflect future trip generation for the 120 students and 47 staff estimated to be present by year 2008 without any consideration of an offset in the arrival and dismissal schedule This resulted in 625 daily tnps, including approximately 225 morning peak hour trips (127 inbound 98 outbound) and 180 midday peak hour trips (84 inbound 96 outbound) When the school enrollment exceeds 80 students a proposed offset school schedule would be introduced to students and staff to divide them Into three groups Group 1 with 47 staff only Group 2 with 72 students and Group 3 with 48 students Due to the changes in school traffic arrival patterns, future school trip generation during the morning peak periods would be greatly reduced as described below School hours are currently from 8 30 a m to 2 p m from Monday to Thursday and 9 a m to 2 30 p m on Friday The current school arnval pattern (with 60 students and 36 staff) during the morning peak hour was developed based on the five-minute counts from 7 30 to 9 30 a m at the existing school site at 2040 Stoner Avenue on Wednesday June 2 2004 As shown in Table 6A a total of 74 inbound and 50 outbound vehicles were observed to access the school site dunng the school s morning peak hour from 8 to 9 a m With scheduled school start time at 8 30 a m approximately 58% of the 74 peak hour inbound trips arrived before the start time and 42% arnved later than 8 30 a m Approximately 52% of the 50 peak hour outbound vehicles dropped off their students and left before 8 30 a m and 48% left later than 8 30 a m The existing school inbound and outbound trip estimates during the morning peak hour were then factored proportionally to develop future school traffic arrival patterns for the 120 students and 47 staff estimated to be present by year 2008 as shown in Table 6B (for future conditions without the staggered schedule) The resulting school trip generation without the offset start and stop schedule was estimated to be 129 inbound and 98 outbound trips during the morning peak hour from 8 to 9 a m CoL 21With the implementation of the staggered school schedule 47 staff members (Group 1) would start at one time (8 a m) during the morning peak hour and students would be divided into two groups with scheduled start times for 72 students at 8 15 a m (Group 2) and for the other 28 students at 8 45 a m (Group 3) As shown in Table 6C with the application of the existing school arrival pattern (arnval percentages based on five-minute counts indicated in Table 6B) individually to each group future school arrival patterns were developed for Group 1 Group 2 and Group 3 Similarly existing school departure patterns (departure percentages) shown in Table 6B for school outbound vehicles after drop offs were applied individually to the two student groups Future outbound traffic generated by the staff members dunng the morning peak period would be minimal The sum of the school inbound and outbound trips from all three groups during the morning peak hour represents new school peak hour trip generation estimates As indicated in Table 6C the school would generate an estimated 101 peak hour inbound trips and 89 peak hour outbound trips dunng the typical morning peak periods from 7 to 9 a m The new school trip generation for the three school peak periods with the schedule offset is summanzed in Table 7 As indicated under future conditions in year 2008 with the ultimate enrollment of 120 students and 47 staff the school is projected to generate approximately 625 daily trips including approximately 190 trips during the a m peak hour (101 inbound 89 outbound) from 7 50 to 8 50 a m Under these same conditions the school is projected to generate approximately 180 trips during the midday school dismissal hour from 2 00 to 3 00 p m (84 inbound 96 outbound) and 20 trips during the p m peak hour (nine inbound 11 outbound) Credit was taken for the existing land use on the project site currently in operation that would be replaced by the proposed project The existing land use is a studio production and office building with an area of 37 000 square feet Data collection to develop the peak period traffic volumes for this office building was conducted at the building access driveway on Landmark Street in June 2004 As shown in Table 7 the land use to be removed currently generates approximately 28 morning peak hour trips (21 inbound seven outbound) 28 midday peak hour trips (14 inbound 14 outbound) and 45 afternoon peak hour trips (17 inbound 28 outbound) 22 67TABLE 6 SCHOOL MORNING PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC PATTERNS a EXISTING SCHOOL TRAFFIC PATTERN With 60 students and 36 staff Period Inbound / Inbound Outbound / Outbound 8 00 8 05 5 7/ 2 4/ 8 05 8 10 4 5/ 3 6/ 8 10 8 15 5 7/ 3 6/ 8 15 8 20 9 12/ 3 6/ 8 20-8 25 7 9/ 4 8/ 8 25 8 30 13 18/ 10 20/ 8 30 8 35 12 16/ 14 28/ 8 35 8 40 a 11/ 7 14/ 8 40 8 45 2 3/ 1 2/ 8 45-8 50 1 1/ 1 2/ 8 50 8 55 2 3/ 0 0/ 8 55 9 00 6 8/ 1 2/ SUM 74 100/ 50 100/ T RE SCHOOL TRAFFIC PATTERN WITHOUT STAGGERED SCHEDULE With 120 students and 47 staff Penod Inbound / Inbound Outbound / Outbound 8 00 8 05 9 7/ 4 4/ 8 05 8 10 7 5/ 6 6/ 8 10 8 15 9 7/ 6 6 /9 8 15 8 20 16 12/ 6 6/ 8 20 8 25 12 9/ 8 8/ 8 25 8 30 23 18/ 20 20/ 8 30 8 35 21 16/ 28 29/ 8 35 8 40 14 11/ 14 14/ 8 40-8 45 3 3/ 2 2/ 8 45 8 50 2 1 / 2 2/ 8 50-8 55 3 3/ 0 0/ 8 55 9 00 10 8/ 2 2/ SUM 129 174/ 98 196/ Source Sleob erv lion from 7 30 a m to 30a m o Jun 2 2004at2040510 e Ac Los A gales cI FUTURE SCHOOL TRAFFIC PATTERN WITH PROPOSED STAGGERED SCHEDULE Group One 47 staff Group Two 72 students Group Threu 48 students Sum of Three Groups I Period Inbound Outbound Inbound Outbound Inbound Outbound Inbound Outbound 7 30 7 35 2 0 2 0 7 35 7 40 2 0 2 0 7 40 7 45 2 0 2 0 7 45 7 50 4 0 4 2 8 2 7 50 7 55 3 0 3 4 6 4 7 55 8 00 6 0 4 4 10 4 8 00 8 05 6 0 7 4 12 4 8 05 8 10 4 0 5 5 9 5 810-8 15 1 0 9 12 10 12 '8 15-8 20 0 0 9 17 3 2 12 19 8 20 8 25 1 0 6 8 2 2 9 11 8 25 8 30 3 0 1 1 3 2 6 4 8 30 8 35 1 1 5 2 5 4 8 35 8 40 1 o 4 3 5 3 8 40 8 45 4 1 7 a 11 9 8 45-8 50 a 11 6 11 8 50 8 55 4 6 4 6 8 55 9 00 1 1 1 1 9 00 9 05 1 1 1 1 9 05 9 10 1 0 1 0 9 10 9 15 3 1 3 1 School-only Peak Hour Trip Generation Estimates Period Inbound Outbound Total 7 30 8 30 69 64 153 7 35 8 35 92 68 160 7 40 8 40 95 71 166 7 45-8 45 103 80 183 7 50 8 50** 101 89 190 7 55 8 55 99 91 190 8 00 9 00 90 88 176TABLE 7 PROJECT TRIP GENERATION Land Use Size Daily AM Peak Hour (7 50 8 50 a m ) Midday Peak Hour (2 00 3 00 p m ) P M Peak Hour (4 15 5 15 p m ) IN OUT TOTAL IN OUT TOTAL IN OUT TOTAL PROPOSED PROJECT Protect condition Park Century School [1] 47 staff @ 8 00 a m Start 625 101 89 190 84 96 180 9 11 20 72 students @ 8 15 a m Start 48 students @ 845 a m Start Total New Uses 625 101 89 190 84 96 180 9 11 20 EXISTING USE TO BE REMOVED 37 KSF 260 21 7 28 14 14 28 17 28 45 studio production and office space [2] Total Existing Uses 260 21 7 28 14 14 28 17 28 45 TOTAL NET PEAK HOUR TRIPS 365 80 82 162 70 82 152 8 17 25 Note [1] Project trip generation for A M peak was developed based on the site observation from 7 30 a m to 9 30 a m on June 2 2004 and required project condition with staggered school start time for 47 staff at 8 00 a m 72 students at 8 15 a m and 48 students at 8 45 a m Project trip generation for midday peak hour was developed based on the counts obtained from the equivalent one time dismissal at noon on June 11 2004 (which represents the worst scenario under future conditions) Project trip generation for P M peak hour was obtained based on ITE 7th Edition (Land use code 536 Private School (K 12)) [2] A M and P M peak hour trip generation for existing land use was obtained from site observation from 7 a m to 9 a m and from 2 p m to 6 p m on July 26 2004The proposed Park Century School conversion project would generate 365 net daily trips which includes approximately 162 morning peak hour trips (80 inbound 82 outbound) and 152 midday peak hour trips (70 inbound 82 outbound) The proposed conversion project would also improve the afternoon peak hour traffic conditions at the study intersections as the school would produce eight inbound trips and 17 outbound trips fewer than the existing office use Project Traffic Distnbution/Assiqnment The distribution of net trips generated by the proposed Park Century School project was first developed based on the zip code list of the current student and staff provided by the school The previously developed school traffic pattern was then adjusted with the consideration of potential new enrollments given the geographical distnbution of employment business and shopping opportunities in which the parents might participate after dropping off/picking up their students at school and the location of the project in relation to the surrounding street system The overall distribution pattern used for this project was • 25% to/from the north • 25% to/from the east • 20% to/from the south • 30% to/from the west Figures 6 and 7 illustrate the proposed project tnp inbound and outbound distribution respectively The net trips generated by the proposed project were assigned to the street system and Figure 8 illustrates the traffic generated by the proposed project during the morning and afternoon peak hour at the seven analyzed intersections CUMULATIVE BASE TRAFFIC CONDITIONS (Future without Project) The year 2008 cumulative base peak hour traffic volumes illustrated in Figure 5 were analyzed to determine the V/C ratio and LOS at the seven analyzed intersections for without-project conditions The results are summarized in Table 8 Based on the criteria established by the 25,j *a Project Site XX% Percentage of Inbound Trips KAKU ASSOCIATES -} FIGURE 6 PROJECT TRIP DISTRIBUTION (INBOUND)I ca I Dts a i of 0,0gtoIN' 10 %----n Landmark St cyo 94, N s, LEGEND 0 Project Site XX% Percentage of Outbound Tnps KAKU ASSOCIATES -j National BI cr .4_5 0 70 0 0:7 c el() 4>ce FIGURE 7 PROJECT TRIP DISTRIBUTION (OUTBOUND)4?) NOT TO SCALE Ncsb:01* Yir 494?, Nc5e.z,*. \93 t- 41(444j r• IN iz41 Landmark St (F.EGEND F7-1 Project Site #(#)[#] AM(MID)[PM] Peak Hour Traffic Volumes KAKU ASSOCIATES Nabonal BI FIGURE 8 PROJECT ONLY PEAK HOUR VOLUMESTABLE 8 PARK CENTURY SCHOOL PROJECT INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE ANALYSIS FUTURE CONDITIONS CUMULATIVE CUMULA11VE PLUS Project JURIS PEAK BASE (2008) PROJECT VIC Significant No INTERSECTION DICTION HOUR V/C LOS V/C LOS Change Impact? 1 Robertson SI& National BI Los Angeles [a] AM 0 925 E 0 931 E 0 006 NO MID 0 901 E 0 905 E 0 004 NO|1010|PM 0 988 E 0 987 E 0 001 NO 2 Exposition BI/Robertson BI & Venice BI Los Angeles [a] AM 1 163 F 1 170 F 0 007 NO MID 0 982 E 0 990 E 0 008 NO P M 1 249 F 1 249 F 0 000 NO 3 Robertson BI/Higuera St & Washington Bi Culver [b] AM 0 820 o 0 833 D 0 013 NO MID 0 586 A 0 615 B 0 029 NO PM 0 694 B 0 688 B 0 006 NO 4 National BI & Venice BI Los Angeles [a] AM 1 213 F 1 219 F 0 006 NO MID 1 066 F 1 070 F 0 004 NO PM 1 193 F 1 192 F 0 001 NO 5 National BI & Washington BI Culver [b] AM 0 938 E 0 957 E 0 019 NO MID 0 640 B 0 653 B 0 013 NO PM 0 860 D 0 858 D 0 002 NO 6 Landmark St & Washington 81 [b] Culver [b] A M F F MID F F PM F F AM 0 729 0 790 0 061 YES MID 0 514 0 596 0 082 YES P M 0 586 0 575 0 011 NO 7 Culver BI & Washington BVMain St [c] Culver [b] AM 0 823 D 0 828 D 0 005 NO MID 0 643 B 0 647 B 0 004 NO PM 0 839 D 0 839 D 0 000 NO Note [a] According to LADOT's cntena a project impact would be considered significant If the following conditions are met Conditions with Protect Traffic proiect related Increase in V/C Ratio LOS V/C ratio 0 701 to 0 800 Equal to or greater than 0 040 0 801 to 0 900 Equal to or greater than 0 020 E F 0 901 or more Equal to or greater than 0 010 [b] According to Culver City s criteria a project impact would be considered significant if the following conditions are met Conditions with Protect Traffic Prolect related Increase in V/C Ratio LO V/C ratio 0 801 to 0 900 Equal to or greater than 0 040 E F 0 901 or more Equal to or greater than 0 020 [c] Field observation at this location has indicated worse traffic condffons than the projected LOS C or better during the three analyzed peak periods The projected good level of servies were resulted from the undercounted traffic volumes at this intersection when the majority of the cars were caught in the downstream or the upstream bottlenecks at Culver Boulevrad Washington Boulevard Watseka and Irving Place However this projected good level of service would not affect the determination of whether this intersection is significantly impacted As the incremental change in the V/C ratios due to the project traffic is 0 005 or less so the intersecion would not be impacted even if the projected level of service were E or F Intersections are controlled by ATSAC system A credit of 0 07 in v/c ratio was included In the above analysis Overflow condition indicating oversaturated conditions for long penods Average vehicle delay cannot be calculatedCities of Los Angeles and Culver City two of the seven intersections are projected to operate at acceptable level of service (LOS D or better) under future conditions before the addition of the proposed project traffic CUMULATIVE PLUS PROJECT TRAFFIC PROJECTIONS The proposed project traffic volumes were then added to the cumulative base traffic projections to develop the cumulative plus project traffic forecasts The resultant cumulative plus project morning and afternoon peak hour traffic volumes are illustrated on Figure 9 Based on the criteria established by the City of Los Angeles and Culver City two of the seven intersections are projected to operate at acceptable level of service (LOS D or better) under future conditions after the addition of the proposed project traffic 30n6o L 0'3'7 <1- Land mark St " 641-4-roe, Oa>. Ls> (-LEGEND Project Site AM(MID)[PM] Peak Hour Traffic Volumes (Rounded to the Nearest Five Vehicles) KAKU ASSOCIATES NOT TO SCALE National BI V' V) 1.0 0 0 .41 N N CO CO CO CO CO CO CO Time (5 mn Interval) C3 CO CO 0) 0) co 5 5 5 5 5 5 a. a- a- a. a. a. O. o co 0) CV WI|1010| CV N CV CV CV CV N CV 0 Future Queue of Pickup Vehicles :ft II r 5 5 5 5 a. a. a. a. 0 0 CV 11) N|1010|a 00 2 5 5 5 5 5 Q_ a 0_ a. 0- 7) C.• CV CI 0 ("1 5 5 a a. 10 - 5 5 5 5 5 5 0. 0- O. a- a. CI. .- •ct r- ? en co en en In .er V N CV CV CA CV CV a. Year 2008 School Traffic Queue Diagram Alternative 1 Morning dropoffs for 67 students at 8 15 a m Start And 53 students at 8 45 a m Start - Year 2008 School Traffic Queue Diagram Alternative 1 Dismissal at for 67 students at 1 45 p m And 53 students 2 15 p m 25 ( 7 ) 20 E2 15 75 10 .o|1010|Time (1 min Interval) KAKU ASSOCIATES FIGURE 13C YEAR 2008 SCHOOL TRAFFIC QUEUE DIAGRAM - ALTERNATIVE 1 WITH 67/53 SPLIT AND 30 MIN SEPARATION BETWEEN STUDENT GROUPSYear 2008 School Traffic Queue Diagram Alternative 2 Morning dropoffs for 70 students at 8 15 a m Start And 50 students at 8 50 a m Start -- - - c 5 -- - -- — -- -- - - — - - -- _ L i- 4|1010|ki E2 2 i --|1010|4, 7 ___ _ m 6 _-- -- ':_ -- o- — - IV Future Queue of Dropoff Vehicles) . z o - - li-li 222222222222222222222222 < ITT < < < o 0 til 0 IC) 0 N N CO el .0 CO CO CO Oa CO CO Tine (5 min Interval) < < < < < < < < < < In .(I. CO|1010|U, CO In MI c0|101010|Of Lr,|1010|CO|1010|01 ts, 0,|1010|N|1010|I1 N 0)|1010|CO cn < < < 4 < d < < til 0 n fr) 4`-' , . o o CO Tt 0 0 — r- t•-• I's /- ts CO CO CO _ Year 2008 School Traffic Queue Diagram Alternative 2 Dismissal at for 70 students at 1 45 p m And 50 students 2 20 p m 25 10|101010|2 2 2 2 2 0.0.0.0 O. a. a. D. COO) NV) CO N 0 Future Queue of Pickup Vehicles _ 222 22222222222222222222 a a. a a a a. a. a CI. 0. 0- 0- 0. 0. 0_ CI. 0- 0- a. a_ a_ a. a a- a. 1*-- . 0e) (D O N LO CO 1` 0 CO CD 0, N Li, CO h. 0 CO CO V' 'I' •ct •cl• 0 0 Z) CO CO ‘1. •cr NN CNN CNN N NIN NN NN NN Time (1 min Interval) KAKU ASSOCIATES FIGURE 13D YEAR 2008 SCHOOL TRAFFIC QUEUE DIAGRAM - ALTERNATIVE 2 WITH 70/50 SPLIT AND 35 MIN SEPARATION BETWEEN STUDENT GROUPSThe proposed 72/48 split with the proposed mitigation measures at the Washington/Landmark intersection would mitigate the project traffic to insignificant levels at all seven study intersections The grouping of 72 students in one start/dismissal time however could exceed the on-site capacity for queue length storage and therefore it is recommended that either Alternative 1 (67/53 split and 30 minute separation between student groups) or Alternative 2 (70/50 split and 35 minutes separation between student groups) be implemented when the school enrollment exceeds 70 students The two alternative staggered schedules with the proposed mitigation measures at the Washington/Landmark intersection would ensure that future school pick-up and drop-off traffic create minimal disruption for traffic operations on the neighborhood s street system Additionally it is recommend that a traffic monitor be implemented to facilitate the loading/unloading of students to/from vehicles The school should continue the school traffic supervision to ensure the inbound line or cars moving all the way forward in the queue The monitor and staff deployment should alleviate the peak period congestion on campus with minimal impact on the neighborhood street system and safely and adequately facilitate future pick-up and drop-off operations 49 73VI REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM IMPACT ANALYSIS This section presents an analysis of potential project impacts on the regional transportation system This analysis was conducted in accordance with the transportation impact analysis (TIA) procedures outlined in the 2004 Congestion Management Program for Los Angeles County (Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority July 2004) The Congestion Management Program (CMP) requires that when an environmental impact report is prepared for a project traffic impact analyses be conducted for select regional facilities based on the quantity of project traffic expected to use these facilities CMP SIGNIFICANT TRAFFIC IMPACT CRITERIA The CMP TIA guidelines indicate that if a proposed development project would add 150 or more trips in either direction during either the morning or evening peak hour to the mainline freeway monitoring location then a CMP freeway analysis must be conducted If a proposed project would add 50 or more peak hour trips (of adjacent street traffic) to a CMP arterial intersection then a CMP arterial intersection analysis must be conducted For the purpose of a CMP TIA a project impact is considered to be significant if the proposed project increases traffic demand on a CMP facility by 2% of capacity (V/C > 0 02) causing or worsening LOS F (V/C > 1 00) Under this criteria a project would not be considered to have a regionally significant impact if the analyzed facility is operating at LOS is E or better after the addition of project traffic regardless of the increase in V/C ratio caused by the project If the facility is operating at LOS F with project traffic and the incremental change in the V/C ratio caused by the project is 0 02 or greater however the project would be considered to have a significant impact atc( 50Selection of Arterial Monitonnq Intersections for Analysis The nearest CMP arterial monitoring intersections to the project site are at • Overland Avenue & Venice Boulevard (Culver City) • La Cienega Boulevard & Jefferson Boulevard (City of Los Angeles) • La Cienega Boulevard & Centinela Avenue (City of Los Angeles) • La Cienega Boulevard & Stocker Street (County of Los Angeles) The 50-trip CMP analysis intersection threshold represents approximately 31% of the 162 morning peak hour trips projected to be generated by the project The proposed project would also result in trip reductions of 25 afternoon peak hour trips (eight inbound 17 outbound) Based on the project tnp distribution patterns shown in Figures 6 and 7 the project would not add more than 50 morning or afternoon peak hour trips at any of the CMP analysis arterial monitoring stations listed above Thus no further analysis was required for the CMP artenal monitoring stations Selection of Freeway Segments for Analysts The nearest mainline freeway monitoring locations to the project site are as follows • 1-10 east of Overland Avenue • 1-10 east of La Brea Avenue • 1-405 north of La Tijera Boulevard • 1-405 north of Venice Boulevard As the project is estimated to generate only 162 morning peak hour trips (80 inbound 82 outbound) and to reduce 25 afternoon peak hour trips (eight inbound 17 outbound) the project would not add more than 150 morning or afternoon peak hour trips in either direction on the section of any of the CMP analysis segments listed above Thus no further analysis was required for the CMP mainline freeway monitoring locations 51 q.5VII SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS This study was undertaken to analyze potential traffic and parking impacts of the proposed Park Century School Project at 3939 Landmark Street in Culver City California The following summarizes the key findings of the study • The proposed project involves the conversion of an existing industrial warehouse building to a private elementary school The industrial building is now being used as studio production and office space The school is currently located at 2040 Stoner Avenue in the City of Los Angeles It serves an enrollment of 60 students with learning disabilities The school would open with an enrollment of 80 and ultimately serve a student population of 120 When the school enrollment exceeds 80 students an offset start and dismissal time schedule would be required The staggered schedule for the students and the staff would minimize the effect of project traffic on the local traffic conditions during the morning peak hour as well as improve the on site queuing conditions during the afternoon school dismissal hour It is expected that the maximum enrollment of 120 students would not be reached until 2008 • With an offset start and dismissal time schedule for 47 staff 72 students and 48 students the proposed conversion project is projected to generate approximately 365 net daily trips including about 162 morning peak hour trips (80 inbound 82 outbound) and 152 midday peak hour trips (70 inbound 82 outbound) The proposed project would also improve the afternoon peak hour traffic conditions at the study intersections as the school would produce eight inbound trips and 17 outbound tnps fewer than the existing office and studio production use • Seven intersections were analyzed for this project Robertson Boulevard & National Boulevard Exposition Boulevard/Robertson Boulevard & Venice Boulevard Robertson Boulevard/Higuera Street & Washington Boulevard National Boulevard & Venice Boulevard National Boulevard & Washington Boulevard Landmark Street & Washington Boulevard and Culver Boulevard & Washington Boulevard/Main Street Three of these intersections in the vicinity of the project site currently operate at LOS D or better during the weekday morning midday and afternoon peak periods • Based on impact cntena determined by City of Culver City and City of Los Angeles analysis of projected year 2008 cumulative plus project conditions representing future conditions with the proposed project indicates that the proposed project would have significant impact on the intersection of Landmark Street and Washington Boulevard To mitigate the impact of project traffic at this location the project would be responsible for the cost of the proposed traffic signal at Washington/Landmark intersection and a restriping of Landmark Street south of Washington Boulevard to provide two northbound lanes (one right turn only lane and one left-turn only lane) The City has requested an aro 52additional improvement to restnpe Washington Boulevard to provide a westbound left- turn lane at the Washington/Landmark intersection • Future pick up and drop-off operations were evaluated with an offset start and dismissal time schedule for 47 staff 72 students and 48 students (72/48 split) Queuing analysis was conducted for the proposed 72/48 split schedule with a 30-minute separation between two student groups during the afternoon dismissal hour The analysis indicated that the proposed 72/48 split for student groups would generate a maximum queue length of 24 vehicles on site which would exceed the 23-vehicle limit from the proposed site plan Therefore a queuing analysis was conducted to develop two alternative staggered schedule options for 120 students Alternative 1 - 67/53 split and a 30-minute separation between student groups and Alternative 2 - 70/50 split and a 35-minute separation between student groups From the traffic operation standpoint neither the proposed 72/48 and nor the two alternative split schedules would create any significant impact at the seven study intersections except the Washington/Landmark Intersection It is recommended however that either Alternative 1 or Alternative 2 be implemented when the school enrollment exceeds 70 students The two alternative staggered schedules with the proposed mitigation measures at Washington/Landmark intersection would ensure that future school pick-up and drop-off traffic create minimal disruption on traffic operations on the neighborhood s street system • The proposed parking supply of 47 spaces was found to meet the City Zoning Code requirement for expected staff numbers of 47 members by year 2008 The proposed project parking supply would be adequate to meet the projected peak demand • Analysis of potential impacts on the regional transportation system conducted in accordance with CMP requirements determined that the project would not have a significant impact on either the CMP arterial highway network or the mainline freeway system 53 T7APPENDIX A INTERSECTION CONFIGURATIONSfrilcc \__ ..e—F- National BI Same As Existing 1 Robertson BI & National BI __,i )11' ---- - — )11x 3 Robertson BI/Higuera St & Washington BI Washington BI Same As Existing #11L -„-- ,-- 4 National BI & Venice BI Venice Si Same As Existing __11 -- -- -r - )11/ Same As Existing IP Jr- Washington B1 5 National BI & Washington BI INTERSECTION LANE CONFIGURATIONS EXISTING FUTURE CONDITIONS CONDITIONS WITH MITIGATION 2 Exposition 131/Robertson BI & Venice BI Robertson BI Exposition BI ( e-way movement) \— - -4--- Ar- --w- --/ —/e )II( Robertson BI Venice BI Same As Existing Robertson 51 Higuera St National BI National Bl LEGEND |1010|1, Stop Controlled * Yield Sign KAKU AS SOCI ATES ---‘-'1.- -47— Washington BI -- - V- Y 6 Landmark St & Washington BI Washington BI Y 7 Culver BI & Washington BI/Main St Main St Thn , __. AC— Washington BI v ) I I « Same As Existing INTERSECTION LANE CONFIGURATIONS EXISTING FUTURE CONDITIONS CONDITIONS WITH MITIGATION Landmark St Landmark St (Signalized) Culver 131 ) ___ KAKU AS SOC I ATES -} LEGEND ID Stop Controlled ( 0 ()APPENDIX B TRAFFIC COUNT SHEETS 1 0 1WILTEC Phone (626) 564 1944 Fax (626) 564 0969 INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT SUMMARY CLIENT KAKU ASSOCIATES PROJECT CUVER CITY TRAFFIC COUNTS DATE THURSDAY OCTOBER 7TH 2004 PERIOD 700AMT0900 AM INTERSECTION N/S ROBERTSON BOULEVARD ENV NATIONAL BOULEVARD 15 MIN COUNTS - e ,F PERIOD|1010|SBRT 1. 2 SBTH --- 3 SBLT i 4 YVBRT|1010|WBTH|1010|WBLT NBRT ' 8 NBTH|10 10|NBLT 10 f EBRT 11 EBTH 12 EBLT j|1010|TOTAL 700-715 34 133 93 80 95 32 16 87 11 53 83 31 748 715-730 47 174 92 98 102 31 8 121 13 51 119 39 895 730 745 49 218 143 154 133 30 12 153 19 79 136 52 1178 745-800 75 170 136 124 97 20 14 122 15 44 178 46 1041 800-815 57 168 123 112 115 29 13 144 16 49 147 42 1015 815-830 46 164 101 105 110 26 14 168 17 59 192 44 1046 830-845 51 190 110 134 119 31 13 198 20 64 146 49 1125 845-900 54 197 114 125 132 26 17 194 18 50 147 45 1119 HOUR TOTALS t je 4. * E I PERIOD -|1010|SBRT f ' " 2 SBTFi 3' SBLT 41 WBRT|1010|" WBTH|1010|,,, WBLT|1010|NBRT|1010|NBTH .,, 9 NBLT 10 EBR-T ' 11 -EBTH I --' 12 --.'' EMT|1010|TOTAL 700-800 205 695 464 456 427 113 50 483 58 227 516 168 3862 715-815 228 730 494 488 447 110 47 540 63 223 580 179 4129 730-830 227 720 503 495 455 105 53 587 67 231 653 184 4280 745-845 229 692 470 475 441 106 54 632 68 216 663 181 4227 800-900 208 719 448 476 476 112 57 704 71 222 632 180 4305 AM PEAK HOUR 800 900 NATIONAL BOULEVARD 208 719 4--I 448 L AL__ 476 476 112 'fir .--- 180 632 222 41 71 704 ROBERTSON|109| FPI' 57 BOULEVARD -II" ---4,tr 599 108 A-1 58 as o WILTEC Phone (626) 564 1944 Fax (626) 564 0969 INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT SUMMARY CLIENT KAKU ASSOCIATES PROJECT CUVER CITY TRAFFIC COUNTS DATE THURSDAY OCTOBER 7TH 2004 PERIOD 2 00 PM TO 6 00 PM INTERSECTION N/S ROBERTSON BOULEVARD E/VV NATIONAL BOULEVARD 15 MIN COUNTS PERIOD 1 1 SBRT — , 2. , SBTH|1010|4 1 SBLT|1010|WBRT t 5 WBTH " 6 1 WELT|1010|NBRT|1010|NBTH|10 10|NBLT 10 EBRT 11 EBTH 12 EBLT TOTAL 200-215 47 217 131 40 70 34 24 160 23 30 115 36 927 215-230 63 182 162 48 60 30 33 167 15 37 143 43 983 230-245 48 216 161 63 80 33 50 182 13 28 133 38 1045 245-300 61 205 186 53 52 25 25 126 23 33 182 44 1015 300-315 49 223 163 73 84 26 25 166 10 22 174 41 1056 315-330 74 256 186 78 92 34 20 146 12 21 170 32 1121 330-345 50 209 135 52 85 18 21 156 13 44 238 53 1074 345-400 67 196 137 48 54 29 23 165 19 26 196 44 1004 400-415 61 199 143 52 81 33 17 129 19 23 199 44 1000 415-430 68 228 178 49 76 25 27 112 18 27 212 42 1062 430-445 57 195 165 46 62 19 18 129 22 21 179 37 950 445-500 50 211 179 54 60 23 17 141 17 30 203 41 1026 500-5.15 63 215 151 68 102 32 30 121 15 26 217 44 1084 515-530 70 248 170 54 81 30 31 146 17 20 253 46 1166 530 545 74 205 164 60 83 25 22 172 8 25 240 46 1124 545-606 72 251 169 54 92 31 25 160 18 34 227 45 1178 HOUR TOTALS 1., TIME|1010|SBRT 1-2 SBTH|1010|SBLT|1010|WBRT|1010|WBTH , 6 WBLT|1010|NBRT _|1010|NBTH|10 10|NBLT 10 EBRT 11 EBTH ' 12 EBLT TOTAL 200-300 219 820 640 204 262 122 132 635 74 128 573 161 3970 215-315 221 826 672 237 276 114 133 641 61 120 632 166 4099 230-330 232 900 696 267 308 118 120 620 58 104 659 155 4237 245-345 t 234 893 670 256 313 103 91 594 58 120 764 170 4266 300-400 240 884 621 251 315 107 89 633 54 113 778 170 4255 315-415 252 860 601 230 312 114 81 596 63 114 803 173 4199 330-430 246 832 593 201 296 105 88 562 69 120 845 183 4140 345-445 253 818 623 195 273 106 85 535 78 97 786 167 4016 400-500 236 833 665 201 279 100 79 511 76 101 793 164 4038 415-515 238 849 673 217 300 99 _ 92, 503 72 104 811 164 4122 430-530 240 869 665 222 305 104 96 537 71 97 852 168 4226 445-545 257 879 664 236 326 110 100 580 57 101 913 177 4400 500-600 279 919 654 236 358 118 108 599 58 105 937 181 4552|1010|4.1 7 "I .0'11 181 NATIONAL BOULEVARD 937 • 105 P M PEAK HOUR 500-600 279 919 654 236 1-- 358 118 ROBERTSON BOULEVARD|1010|()3WILTEC Phone (626) 564 1944 Fax (626) 564-0969 INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT SUMMARY CLIENT KAKU ASSOCIATES PROJECT CUVER CITY TRAFFIC COUNTS DATE THURSDAY OCTOBER 7TH 2004 PERIOD 700 AMT0900 AM INTERSECTION N/S ROBERTSON BOULEVARD/HIGUERA STREET E/W WASHINGTON BOULEVARD 15 MIN COUNTS PERIOD 4 1 SBRT _ 2 SBTH|1010|SBLT 4 ' 4 WBRT|1010|WBTH ' 6 ALT I 7 NBRT|1010|NBTH|10 10|NBLT . 10 EBRT 11 EBTH 12 EBLT TOTAL 700-715 27 37 13 53 256 14 11 36 4 9 86 7 553 715-730 25 28 14 93 308 10 9 60 7 8 121 13 696 730-745- 15 23 15 79 334 11 15 72 18 11 158 12 763 745-800 23 41 22 82 372 14 17 62 15 19 189 15 871 806-815 20 63 36 94 347 29 19 48 13 19 205 7 900 815-830 30 61 41 66 333 10 16 67 10 20 248 14 916 830-845 22 47 16 90 283 10 17 44 15 24 188 11 767 845-900 35 60 42 81 285 27 12 51 8 20 214 21 856 HOUR TOTALS , PERIOD fi SBRT r 2 SBTH|1010|SBLT ' t 4i/ WBRT|1010|WBTH|1010|WELT|1010|NBRT|1010|NBTH|10 10|NBLT f 10 , EBRT J 11 EBTH 12 EBLT TOTAL 700-800 90 129 64 307 1270 49 52 230 44 47 554 47 2883 715-815 83 155 87 348 1361 64 60 242 53 57 673 47 3230 730-830 88 188 114 321 1386 64 67 249 56 69 800 48 3450 745-845 95 212 115 332 1335 63 69 221 53 82 830 47 3454 800 900 107 231 135 331 1248 76 64 210 46 83 855 53 3439 AM PEAK HOUR 745-845 WASHINGTON BOULEVARD 95 212 -4-1 / 115 L t 332 1335 63 lir ,____ c---- 47 830 41 53 221 BOULEVARD/HIGUERA|109| r 69 STREET 82 -----4r ROBERTSONWILTEC Phone (626) 564 1944 Fax (626) 564 0969 INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT SUMMARY CLIENT KAKU ASSOCIATES PROJECT CUVER CITY TRAFFIC COUNTS DATE THURSDAY OCTOBER 7TH 2004 PERIOD 200 PMT0600 PM INTERSECTION N/S ROBERTSON BOULEVARD/HIGUERA STREET E/W WASHINGTON BOULEVARD 15 MIN COUNTS' * r. PERIOD|1010|SBRT|1010|SBTH I 3 Y SBLT 4 WBRT|1010|WBTH|1010|WBLT|1010|NBRT ,-,|1010|NBTH|10 10|NBLT ' 10 EBRT 11 t EBTH 12 EBLT TOTAL 200-215 37 55 44 26 172 14 16 33 9 15 128 15 564 21'5-230 42 63 32 30 166 11 12 36 10 20 147 14 583 230-245 46 66 44 24 177 13 11 35 12 23 151 12 614 245-300 20 28 38 21 140 10 10 23 8 20 163 9 490 300-315 41 58 73 54 237 15 19 36 14 16 201 19 783 315-330 24 47 31 23 151 18 6 31 3 16 214 19 583 330-34 30 55 45 50 162 17 19 30 9 24 206 14 661 345-400, t 29 61 51 31 201 12 13 24 9 25 211 10 677 400-415 38 47 56 28 189 13 15 26 12 24 227 27 702 415430, ,1 27 62 43 33 177 14 15 39 11 12 230 17 680 430-445 34 69 53 40 193 32 14 51 13 11 245 23 778 445-500 31 61 34 40 205 19 11 28 10 14 256 21 730 500-515 32 61 34 56 216 32 9 40 17 16 249 22 784 515 530;3/4 15 46 37 38 198 18 18 45 14 16 285 24 754 530 545 33 50 53 37 220 16 15 46 15 23 261 29 798 545-600 39 65 58 43 218 26 18 50 8 18 261 38 842 HOUR TOTALS S TIME|1010|SBRT|1010|SBTH SBLT 34|1010|-WBRT|1010|WBTH|1010|WBLT|1010|NBRT|109| 8 NBTH|10 10|NBLT 10 EBRT 11 EBTH 12 EBLT TOTAL 200-300 145 212 158 101 655 48 49 127 39 78 589 50 2251 215-315-- 149 215 187 129 720 49 52 130 44 79 662 54 2470 230-330 131 199 186 122 705 56 46 125 37 75 729 59 2470 245-345 115 188 187 148 690 60 54 120 34 76 784 61 2517 300-400 - 124 221 200 158 751 62 57 121 35 81 832 62 2704 315-415 121 210 183 132 703 60 53 111 33 89 858 70 2623 330-430 124 225 195 142 729 56 62 119 41 85 874 68 2720 345-445 128 239 203 132 760 71 57 140 45 72 913 77 2837 400-500 130 239 186 141 764 78 55 144 46 61 958 88 2890 415-515 i 124 253 164 169 791 97 49 158 51 53 980 83 2972 430-530 112 237 158 174 812 101 52 164 54 57 1035 90 3046 445-545 111 218 158 171 839 85 53 159 56 69 1051 96 3066 500 600 119 222 182 174 852 92 60 181 54 73 1056 113 3178 PM PEAK HOUR 500 600 119 222 182 174 852 4. 92 113 WASHINGTON BOULEVARD 1056 73 54 181 60 ROBERTSON BOULEVARD/HIGUERA STREETW1LTEC Phone (626) 564 1944 Fax (626) 564 0969 INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT SUMMARY CLIENT KAKU ASSOCIATES PROJECT CUVER CITY TRAFFIC COUNTS DATE THURSDAY OCTOBER 7TH 2004 PERIOD 700 AM TO 900 AM INTERSECTION N/S NATIONAL BOULEVARD EM WASHINGTON BOULEVARD 15 MIN COUNTS i, 1 L c PERIOD|1010|SBRT|1010|SBTFI|1010|SBLT ' 4l WBR'T|1010|i WBTH|1010|WBLT|1010|NBRT|1010|NBTH|10 10|NBLT 10 EBRT 11-. EBTH -12 .P1 EBLT TOTAL 700-715 7 50 8 33 212 13 4 206 77 14 76 2 702 715-730 14 91 16 41 299 11 10 235 97 21 123 0 958 730 745 13 119 20 39 304 8 12 245 116 41 135 3 1055 745-800 16 228 29 38 360 18 21 255 126 57 161 6 1315 800-815 19 179 41 36 264 11 25 234 148 76 181 5 1219 815-830 1 11 200 36 43 276 22 27 205 103 61 204 8 1196 830 845 23 158 20 41 283 22 10 175 87 27 195 8 1049 845-900 20 167 33 55 326 23 22 210 86 59 199 7 1207 HOUR TOTALS - - .0 . PERIOD|1010|f SBRT|1010|SBTH e 3 SSLT 4i4 WBRT 1 '' 5 WBTH|1010|WBLT|1010|NBRT|1010|NBTH 0 p 9 NBLT 10 EBRT 11 i EBTH 12 EBLT - t TOTL 700 800 50 488 73 151 1175 50 47 941 416 133 495 11 4030 715-815 62 617 106 154 1227 48 68 969 487 195 600 14 4547 730-830 59 726 126 156 1204 59 85 939 493 235 681 22 4785 745-845 69 765 126 158 1183 73 83 869 464 221 741 27 4779 800 900 73 704 130 175 1149 78 84 824 424 223 779 28 4671 AM PEAK HOUR 730 830 WASHINGTON BOULEVARD 59 726 J i 126 L 156 1204 59 •Iv 22 681 235 41 493 939 NATIONAL i r 85 BOULEVARD Or 4, ci125 PM PEAK HOUR 500-600 747 958 180 80 45 WASHINGTON BOULEVARD 995 282 231 574 93 NATIONAL BOULEVARD WI LTEC Phone (626) 564 1944 Fax (626) 564 0969 INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT SUMMARY CLIENT KAKU ASSOCIATES PROJECT CUVER CITY TRAFFIC COUNTS DATE THURSDAY OCTOBER 7TH 2004 PERIOD 200 PM TO 600 PM INTERSECTION N/S NATIONAL BOULEVARD EM WASHINGTON BOULEVARD 15 MIN COUNTS PERIOD|1010|SBRT|1010|SBTH|1010|SBLT f 1, 4 WBRT ' 5 WBTH|1010|' ' WBLT 4,,. 7 NBRT|1010|NBTH I *|10 10|NBLT 4c, 10 EBRT 11 EBTH 12 EBLT ' TOTAL 200-215 10 110 21 23 124 10 5 95 41 43 107 17 606 215-230 11 138 32 31 119 11 15 119 31 50 141 11 709 230-245 18 100 21 27 141 17 13 135 39 57 133 7 708 245-300 12 128 15 27 156 19 11 119 51 70 143 8 759 300-315 33 100 27 29 155 16 16 165 66 80 205 16 908 315-330 17 104 43 35 145 20 23 156 55 84 159 12 853 330-345 19 195 47 30 120 14 17 123 62 70 199 13 909 345-400 11 201 33 23 157 18 23 122 50 61 177 6 882 400-415 14 224 34 32 143 17 11 117 47 78 220 15 952 415-430 6 204 40 23 205 11 19 137 55 83 204 11 998 430-445 15 205 37 33 149 19 29 125 38 70 215 16 951 445-500 11 246 43 27 178 12 19 114 57 73 239 11 1030 500-515 12 245 32 39 159 16 23 152 77 62 234 12 1063 515-530 14 214 43 28 194 30 24 150 55 60 240 7 1059 530-545 17 266 54 28 217 21 17 134 51 82 265 12 1164 545-600 15 233 51 30 177 13 29 138 48 78 256 14 1082 HOUR TOTALS , - - TIME|1010|SBRT|1010|SBTH|1010|SBLT|1010|h WBRT|1010|WBTH|1010|WBLT|1010|NBRT|1010|NBTH|10 10|NBLI 10 EBRT 11 EBTH 12 EBLT TOTAL 200-300 51 476 89 108 540 57 44 468 162 220 524 43 2782 215-315 74 466 95 114 571 63 55 538 187 257 622 42 3084 230-330 80 432 106 118 597 72 63 575 211 291 640 43 3228 245-345 81 527 132 121 576 69 67 563 234 304 706 49 3429 300-400 80 600 150 117 577 68 79 566 233 295 740 47 3552 315-415 61 724 157 120 565 69 74 518 214 293 755 46 3596 330-430 50 824 154 108 625 60 70 499 214 292 800 45 3741 345-445 46 834 144 111 654 65 82 501 190 292 816 48 3783 400-500- 46 879 154 115 675 59 78 493 197 304 878 53 3931 415-515 44 900 152 122 691 58 90 528 227 288 892 50 4042 430-530 52 910 155 127 680 77 95 541 227 265 928 46 4103 445-545 54 971 172 122 748 79 83 550 240 277 978 42 4316 500 600 58 958 180 125 747 80 93 574 231 282 995 45 4368|1010|/ 0WILTEC Phone (626) 564 1944 Fax (626) 564 0969 INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT SUMMARY CLIENT KAKU ASSOCIATES PROJECT CUVER CITY TRAFFIC COUNTS DATE THURSDAY OCTOBER 7TH 2004 PERIOD 700 AMT0900 AM INTERSECTION N/S CULVER BOULEVARD ENV WASHINGTON BOULEVARD 15 MIN COUNTSt, PERIOD '1 SBRT|1010|I SBTH|1010|1- SBLT|101010|WBRT|1010|WBTH|1010|WBLT|1010|NBRT|1010|NBTH|10 10|1NBLT 10 EBRT 11 EBTH 12 EBLT c TOTAL 700-715 2 38 9 3 17 187 87 87 7 4 10 2 453 715-73d q 4 54 11 6 41 259 120 97 15 20 12 0 639 730-745- 3 69 7 0 42 298 155 139 29 18 20 3 783 745-800 8 94 6 1 45 296 150 152 44 28 35 2 861 800-815 8 69 9 4 35 291 201 154 20 27 28 4 850 815-830 13 90 5 2 35 283 238 172 25 20 40 2 925 830-845 11 63 8 3 34 252 229 173 37 28 37 3 878 845-900 2 83 7 2 37 235 185 158 27 25 31 5 797 HOUR TOTALS PERIOD _ 1 SBRT - 2 SBTH|101010|SBLT|1010|WBRT|1010|WBTH i 141 6 •af - WBLT|1010|), NBRT|1010|NBTH|1010|i9 NBLT 10 :' EBRT 11 EBTH 12 EBLT 11 TOTAL 700-800 17 255 33 10 145 1040 512 475 95 70 77 7 2736 715-815 23 286 33 11 163 1144 626 542 108 93 95 9 3133 730 830 ?' 32 322 27 7 157 1168 744 617 118 93 123 11 3419 745-845 40 316 28 10 149 1122 818 651 126 103 140 11 3514 800-900 34 305 29 11 141 1061 853 657 109 100 136 14 3450 AM PEAK HOUR 745-845 WASHINGTON BOULEVARD 40 316 1—/ i 28 L AL___ 10 149 1122 irt , 4Y 11 140 103 _IL 41 1 126 651 CULVER BOULEVARD r* 818 ----0" —I, I"WILTEC Phone (626) 564 1944 Fax (626) 564 0969 INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT SUMMARY CLIENT KAKU ASSOCIATES PROJECT CUVER CITY TRAFFIC COUNTS DATE THURSDAY OCTOBER 7TH 2004 PERIOD 200 PMT0600PM INTERSECTION N/S CULVER BOULEVARD EM WASHINGTON BOULEVARD 15 MIN COUNTS PERIOD|1010|SBRT|1010|SBTH|1010|SBLT|1010|WBRT|1010|WBTH|1010|WBLT|1010|NBRT a P NBTH|10 10|NBLT 10 v EBRT 11 EBTH - 12 i EBLT TOTAL 200 215 4 81 13 3 17 199 116 96 14 31 34 6 614 215-230 6 76 19 7 12 147 163 114 10 27 20 3 604 230 245 - 5 79 9 1 19 175 192 155 20 29 38 8 730 245-300 14 83 14 4 16 188 157 102 10 25 21 5 639 300 315 3 92 9 3 20 190 180 116 18 33 39 4 707 315-330 3 93 9 1 16 179 164 98 18 30 30 3 644 330-345 5 84 9 3 21 163 184 115 15 27 43 6 675 345-400 7 85 12 0 14 191 201 141 13 25 33 2 724 400-415 6 90 12 3 16 212 187 129 16 17 37 5 730 415-430 7 103 6 3 10 201 203 152 13 27 41 5 771 430-445 9 129 11 1 20 194 211 134 13 24 38 5 789 445-500 4 110 4 2 19 192 249 161 13 25 42 3 824 500-515 7 115 17 1 18 215 211 153 24 34 51 7 853 515-530 4 131 10 3 23 239 240 150 15 31 52 4 902 530-545 9 126 8 4 19 228 220 143 23 24 43 10 857 545-600 11 126 11 4 17 225 224 144 11 36 37 18 864 HOUR TOTALS - ,ri, i _|1010|TIME|1010|SBRT|1010|SBTH|1010|SBLT , 4 ' WBRT|1010|WBTH '|1010|WI3LT ,7 NBRT|1010|NBTH i 9 NBLT 10 EBRT|109| 11 EBTH 12 EBLT TOTAL 200 300 29 319 55 15 64 709 628 467 54 112 113 22 2587 215-315 28 330 51 15 67 700 692 487 58 114 118 20 2680 230 330 25 347 41 9 71 732 693 471 66 117 128 20 2720 245-S45 25 352 41 11 73 720 685 431 61 115 133 18 2665 300-400 18 354 39 7 71 723 729 470 64 115 145 15 2750 315-415 21 352 42 7 67 745 736 483 62 99 143 16 2773 330-430 25 362 39 9 61 767 775 537 57 96 154 18 2900 345-445 29 407 41 7 60 798 802 556 55 93 149 17 3014 400 500 26 432 33 9 65 799 850 576 55 93 158 18 3114 415-515 27 457 38 7 67 802 874 600 63 110 172 20 3237 430 530 24 485 42 7 80 840 911 598 65 114 183 19 3368 445-545 24 482 39 10 79 874 920 607 75 114 188 24 3436 500-600 31 498 46 12 77 907 895 590 73 125 183 39 3476 39 WASHINGTON BOULEVARD 183 125 PM PEAK HOUR 500-600 31 498 46 J 12 77 907 r 73 590 895 CULVER BOULEVARD OciWI LTEC Phone (626) 564 1944 Fax (626) 564-0969 INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT SUMMARY CLIENT KAKU ASSOCIATES PROJECT CUVER CITY TRAFFIC COUNTS DATE WEDNESDAY SEPTEMBER 22ND 2004 PERIOD 7 00 AMT09 00 AM INTERSECTION N/S ROBERTSON BOULEVARD EM VENICE BOULEVARD 15 MIN COUNTS i PERIOD .r|1010|SBRT|1010|SBTH 4' 3 SBLT|1010|. WBRT|1010|WBTH|1010|WBLT '7 NBRT|1010|NBTH|10 10|NBLT 10 EBRT 1- 11 EBTH 41. 12 EBLT TOTAL 706 715 62 43 28 89 380 15 5 91 22 11 321 43 1110 715-730 71 42 40 90 450 21 7 85 33 12 413 56 1320 730-7454 88 63 65 121 478 13 14 96 37 15 544 94 1628 145-800t l' 112 76 78 110 523 21 15 119 45 18 582 90 1789 800-815 &- 102 96 106 83 550 13 15 103 48 22 571 99 1808 815-830! 92 58 83 98 528 19 17 101 40 23 576 103 1738 830-845f A 90 46 53 94 505 20 17 132 53 23 624 115 1772 845-900' 1 83 65 66 82 533 36 20 112 45 22 638 117 1819 HOUR TOTALS 4% PERIOD SBRT 1- 2 SBTH|1010|SBLT ?1 4' WBRT|1010|WBTH|1010|WBLT ' 7 NBRT|1010|NBTH|10 10|NBLT 10 EBRT f ',' 11 EBTH I 12 EBLT TOTAL 700-800 333 224 211 410 1831 70 41 391 137 56 1860 283 5847 715-615 373 277 289 404 2001 68 51 403 163 67 2110 339 6545 730-830" 394 293 332 412 2079 66 61 419 170 78 2273 386 6963 745-845 396 276 320 385 2106 73 64 455 186 86 2353 407 7107 800-900 367 265 308 357 2116 88 69 448 186 90 2409 434 7137 AM PEAK HOUR 800 900 VENICE BOULEVARD 367 265 4-1|109| 308 L t 357 2116 88 91te .______ ,r---- 434 2409 90 t 41 I 186 448 ROBERTSON r 69 BOULEVARD —1°' 4`WI LTEC Phone (626) 564 1944 Fax (626) 564 0969 INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT SUMMARY CLIENT KAKU ASSOCIATES PROJECT CUVER CITY TRAFFIC COUNTS DATE WEDNESDAY SEPTEMBER 22ND 2004 PERIOD 200PMT0600 PM INTERSECTION N/S ROBERTSON BOULEVARD ENV VENICE BOULEVARD 15 MIN COUNTS PERIOD|1010|SBRT|1010|SBTH|1010|SBLT|1010|WBRT|1010|WBTH|1010|WBLT|1010|NBRT|1010|NBTH|10 10|NBLT 'i 10 t EBRT 11 EBTH '` 12 EBLT TOTAL 200-215 129 74 72 43 368 13 12 43 20 42 454 90 1360 215-230 118 61 58 20 345 24 21 50 31 34 428 63 1253 230 245 109 82 67 42 390 23 14 45 21 24 451 87 1355 245-300 108 68 76 25 372 33 17 43 19 34 456 74 1325 300-315 104 75 59 25 353 17 18 58 25 25 471 93 1323 315-330 115 78 64 35 408 29 19 60 20 24 528 94 1474 330-345 95 79 67 30 450 22 20 45 25 26 491 80 1430 345-400 124 109 88 22 450 19 20 66 22 39 516 80 1555 400-415 100 65 64 34 359 17 15 74 12 27 510 89 1366 415-430 102 96 74 45 446 29 13 77 26 34 510 94 1546 430-445 112 82 94 41 431 13 29 78 24 44 568 99 1615 445-500 110 88 79 20 483 21 19 59 37 39 529 90 1574 500 515 140 85 87 36 483 22 19 66 38 40 544 93 1653 515-530 144 55 59 27 460 23 18 56 24 37 521 111 1535 530-545 134 82 57 33 549 25 24 77 28 24 535 108 1676 545-600 147 73 74 25 511 38 16 62 32 27 532 72 1609 HOUR TOTALS I' TIME|1010|SBRT|1010|SBTH|1010|SBLT|1010|WBRT|1010|WBTH 1. 6 WBLT|1010|NBRT a|109| NBTH|10 10|NBLT 10 EBRT 11 EBTH 12 EBLT 'It TOTAL 200-300 464 285 273 130 1475 93 64 181 91 134 1789 314 5293 215-315 439 286 260 112 1460 97 70 196 96 117 1806 317 5256 230-330 436 303 266 127 1523 102 68 _ 206 85 107 1906 348 5477 245-345 422 300 266 115 1583 101 74 206 89 109 1946 341 5552 300400 438 341 278 112 1661 87 77 229 92 114 2006 347 5782 315-415 434 331 283 121 1667 87 74 245 79 116 2045 343 5825 330-430 421 349 293 131 1705 87 68 262 85 126 2027 343 5897 345-445 438 352 320 142 1686 78 77 295 84 144 2104 362 6082 400-500 424 331 311 140 1719 80 76 288 99 144 2117 372 6101 415-515 464 351 334 142 1843 85 80 280 125 157 2151 376 6388 430-530 506 310 319 124 1857 79 85 259 123 160 2162 393 6377 445-545 528 310 282 116 1975 91 80 258 127 140 2129 402 6438 500-600 565 295 277 121 2003 108 77 261 122 128 2132 384 6473 384 VENICE BOULEVARD 2132 128 PM PEAK HOUR 500 600 565 295 277 1-1 121 4------ 2003 108 r". 122 261 77 ROBERTSON BOULEVARDWI LTEC Phone (626) 564 1944 Fax (626) 564 0969 INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT SUMMARY CLIENT KAKU ASSOCIATES PROJECT CUVER CITY TRAFFIC COUNTS DATE WEDNESDAY SEPTEMBER 22ND 2004 PERIOD 700 AMT0900AM INTERSECTION NIS ROBERTSON BOULEVARD ENV VENICE BOULEVARD 15 MIN COUNTS ) -~-,,, --|1010|PERIOD|1010|SBRT|1010|- SBTH|1010|. ' SBUT 3' 4 WBRT|1010|WBTH|1010|WBLT|1010|NBRT|1010|NBTH Y 9 A NBLT 10 EBRT 11 EBTH 12 EBLT -` - , TOTAL 700-715' 0 0 98 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 98 715-730' 0 0 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 100 730745- 0 123 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 123 745-800 ' 0 0 199 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 199 800-815 ''. 0 0 124 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 124 815-830 0 0 158 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 158 830-845 0 0 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 100 845-900 0 0 101 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 101 HOUR TOTALS ,4 c PERIOD 1 -. 1 SBRT|1010|SBTH|109| 3 SBUT|1010|WBRT r 5 WBTH|1010|F WBLT|1010|NBRT|1010|NBTH c. -4' 91 4 *4 NBLT 10 EBRT t 11 EBTH ' 12 EBLT ',, TOTAL 700-800 0 0 520 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 520 715 815 0 0 546 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 546 730 830 `'' 0 0 604 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 604 745-845 0 0 581 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 581 800-900 0 0 483 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 483 AM PEAK HOUR 730 830 VENICE BOULEVARD 0 0 / 604 1-10. t|10101010|42) 1E-------- ilr|10101010|t 41|1010|ROBERTSON|109| r|109| 0 BOULEVARD 0- —4y0|1010|W1LTEC Phone (626) 564 1944 Fax (626) 564 0969 INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT SUMMARY CLIENT KAKU ASSOCIATES PROJECT CUVER CITY TRAFFIC COUNTS DATE WEDNESDAY SEPTEMBER 22ND 2004 PERIOD 2 00 PM TO 6 00 PM INTERSECTION N/S ROBERTSON BOULEVARD F_/W VENICE BOULEVARD 15 MIN COUNTS ., PERIOD|1010|SBRT|1010|SBTH|1010|SBUT|1010|WBRT|1010|WBTH|1010|WBLT|1010|NBRT|1010|, NBTH|10 10|NBLT 10 EBRT|109| 11 'EBTH 12 ''' EBLT ' 14 TOTAL 200-215 0 0 177 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 177 215-230 0 0 197 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 197 230-245 f 0 0 193 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 193 245-300 0 0 204 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 204 300 315 0 0 132 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 132 315-330 0 0 164 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 164 330-345 0 0 126 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 126 345-400 ; 0 0 182 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 182 400-415 0 0 120 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 120 415-430 0 0 149 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 149 430-445 0 0 119 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 119 445 500 0 0 142 0 0 0 • 0 0 0 0 0 0 142 500-515 0 0 165 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 165 515-530 0 0 142 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 142 530-545 0 0 135 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 135 545-600 0 0 168 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 168 HOUR TOTALS 1 TIME|1010|SBRT|1010|SBTH|1010|SBUT|1010|WBRT|1010|WBTH|1010|WBLT|1010|NBRT - 8 NBTH|10 10|NBLT 10 EBRT 11 EBT14 12 — EBLT TOTAL 200-300 0 0 771 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 771 215 315 0 0 726 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 726 230 330 0 0 693 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 693 245-345 0 0 626 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 626 300-400 0 0 604 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 604 315-415 0 0 592 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 592 330-430 0 0 577 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 577 345-445 0 0 570 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 570 400-500 0 0 530 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 530 415-515 0 0 575 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 575 430 530 0 0 568 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 568 445-545 0 0 584 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 584 500 600 0 0 610 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 610|1010|VENICE BOULEVARD 0|1010| 1, PM PEAK HOUR 200 300 L 771 ROBERTSON BOULEVARDWILTEC Phone (626) 564 1944 Fax (626) 564 0969 INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT SUMMARY CLIENT KAKU ASSOCIATES PROJECT CUVER CITY TRAFFIC COUNTS DATE WEDNESDAY SEPTEMBER 22ND 2004 PERIOD 700 AMT0900 AM INTERSECTION N/S NATIONAL BOULEVARD E/VV VENICE BOULEVARD 15 MIN COUNTS" PERIOD|1010|t, ' SBRT|1010|SBTH|1010|SBLT|1010|WBRT|1010|WBTH|1010|WBLT|1010|NBRT I 8 NBTH|10 10|NBLT ' 10 EBRT 11 s EBTH 12 EBLT - TOTAL 700-715 11 48 13 26 363 9 4 168 60 73 280 58 1113 715-730 16 71 20 22 486 13 6 177 64 68 345 44 1332 730-745 20 123 36 36 531 17 2 217 57 77 472 51 1639 745-800 25 144 44 38 559 28 7 207 30 81 478 39 1680 800-815 16 160 39 23 579 20 7 242 38 87 573 39 1823 815-830 25 154 48 29 578 20 2 210 31 82 583 53 1815 830-845 18 138 47 30 577 18 2 238 40 65 559 45 1777 845-900 28 110 38 33 545 21 7 218 41 77 509 53 1680 HOUR TOTALS — : f PERIOD|109| 1 SBRT *, 2 Sl3TH|1010|SBLT|1010|WBRT|1010|WBTH|1010|WBLT , 7 j1 NBRT|109| 8 NBTH A 9 NBLT 10 EBR'T 11 EBTH " 12 EBLT TOTAL 700-800 72 386 113 122 1939 67 19 769 211 299 1575 192 5764 715-815 77 498 139 119 2155 78 22 843 189 313 1868 173 6474 730-830 3" 86 581 167 126 2247 85 18 876 156 327 2106 182 6957 745-845 84 596 178 120 2293 86 18 897 139 315 2193 176 7095 800-900 87 562 172 115 2279 79 18 908 150 311 2224 190 7095 AM PEAK HOUR 745 845 VENICE BOULEVARD 84 596 .11-1 lir 178 L t 120 2293 86 , 11r 176 2193 315 t 41 139 897 i NATIONAL BOULEVARD FP. 18 ----11' IIIWILTEC Phone (626) 564 1944 Fax (626) 564 0969 INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT SUMMARY CLIENT KAKU ASSOCIATES PROJECT CUVER CITY TRAFFIC COUNTS DATE * WEDNESDAY SEPTEMBER 22ND 2004 PERIOD 2 00 PM TO 6 00 PM INTERSECTION N/S NATIONAL BOULEVARD VENICE BOULEVARD 15 MIN COUNTS 1 t PERIOD|1010|SBRT|1010|SBTH ) 3 - SBLT|1010|WBRT|1010|WBTH|1010|WBLT|1010|NBRT|1010|NBT1-I|10 10|NBLT 10 EBRT 11 E 13- TH 12 EBLT TOTAL 200-215 17 128 19 12 316 21 16 125 48 111 303 77 1193 215-230 ' 27 148 23 18 340 24 25 135 50 93 326 58 1267 230 245! 26 153 36 23 355 26 26 145 52 106 367 92 1407 246-300 15 148 27 21 353 25 24 118 47 92 347 73 1290 300-315 27 151 36 18 353 26 23 117 36 90 432 70 1379 315-330 15 177 47 18 422 30 19 150 36 123 411 85 1533 330-345 23 185 35 18 421 18 21 119 46 93 414 56 1449 345-400 25 211 30 18 397 28 14 148 51 98 410 72 1502 400-415 22 206 35 21 364 20 16 140 32 113 374 67 1410 416-436 21 192 41 18 399 24 19 136 47 116 445 72 1530 430-445 26 215 39 17 450 18 26 144 37 102 480 62 1616 445-50a 19 207 31 13 432 20 15 143 33 90 501 48 1552 500-616 22 216 40 14 481 23 20 145 24 91 491 40 1607 515-536 25 240 41 23 469 25 21 165 43 97 463 48 1660 530 545 23 217 45 23 531 24 18 127 38 99 471 44 1660 545-600 , 23 218 26 18 511 15 20 140 37 72 491 40 1611 HOUR TOTALS ., n 1 j r TIME|1010|SBRT|1010|SBTH|1010|SBLT|1010|WBRT|1010|WBTH|1010|WBLT|1010|NBRT 4 8- NBT14|10 10|NBLT f 10 EBRT 11 EBTH 12- - EBLT y- TOTAL 200-300 85 577 105 74 1364 96 91 523 197 402 1343 300 5157 215-315 95 600 122 80 1401 101 98 515 185 381 1472 293 5343 230-330 83 629 146 80 1483 107 92 530 171 411 1557 320 5609 245-345 80 661 145 75 1549 99 87 504 165 398 1604 284 5651 300-400 90 724 148 72 1593 102 77 534 169 404 1667 283 5863 315-415 85 779 147 75 1604 96 70 557 165 427 1609 280 5894 330-430 91 794 141 75 1581 90 70 543 176 420 1643 267 5891 345-445 94 824 145 74 1610 90 75 568 167 429 1709 273 6058 40O500 88 820 146 69 1645 82 76 563 149 421 1800 249 6108, 41 g-515 88 830 151 62 1762 85 80 568 141 399 1917 222 6305 430-530 92 878 151 67 1832 86 82 597 137 380 1935 198 6435 446-545 89 880 157 73 1913 92 74 580 138 377 1926 180 6479 500-600 ' 93 891 152 78 1992 87 79 577 142 359 1916 172 6538 172 VENICE BOULEVARD 1916 359 PM PEAK HOUR 500 600 93 891 152 L. 78 1992 87 Fl" 142 577 79 NATIONAL BOULEVARD a-WILTEC Phone (626) 564 1944 Fax_ (626) 564-0969 INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT SUMMARY CLIENT PROJECT DATE PERIOD INTERSECTION KAKU ASSOCIATES CUVER CITY TRAFFIC COUNTS WEDNESDAY SEPTEMBER 22ND 2004 7 00 AM TO 9 00 AM N/S LANDMARK STREET ENV WASHINGTON BOULEVARD 15 MIN COUNT 4 7 PERIOD- SBRT|1010|SBTH ' 1., 3 SBLT x 4 WBRT|1010|WBTH 6— WBLT|1010|NBRT|1010|NBTH|10 10|NBLT 10 EBRT 11 EBTH 12 EBLT|1010|TOTAL 700-715 0 0 0 0 306 17 4 0 1 6 92 0 426 715-730 0 0 0 0 406 5 0 0 0 4 114 0 529 730-745 0 0 0 0 420 7 2 0 1 4 180 0 614 745-860 0 0 0 0 432 7 3 0 2 16 204 0 664 800 815 0 0 0 0 456 8 1 0 6 17 296 0 784 815-830 0 0 0 0 423 11 2 0 4 11 270 0 721 830 845 0 0 0 0 476 11 6 0 3 16 268 0 780 845-900 0 0 0 0 425 19 7 0 5 10 205 0 671 HOUR TOTALS - s, PERIOD|1010|SBRT " 2 SB1-1-1|1010|'SBLT|1010|WBRT|1010|WBTH * 6 WRIT i 7 NBRT|1010|NBTH|10 10|NBLT 10 EBRT 11 EBTH 12 Elif|1010|TOTAL 700 800 0 0 0 0 1564 36 9 0 4 30 590 0 2233 715-815 0 0 0 0 1714 27 6 0 9 41 794 0 2591 730-8306 0 0 0 0 1731 33 8 0 13 48 950 0 2783 745-845 0 0 0 0 1787 37 12 0 15 60 1038 0 2949 800-900 0 0 0 0 1780 49 16 0 18 54 1039 0 2956 AM PEAK HOUR 800 900 WASHINGTON BOULEVARD|1010|4-1|109| a / L. t|1010|1780 49 9.1r ii______ Ilr|1010|1039 54 t 41 18 LANDMARK i r|109| 16 STREET • 4T C6WILTEC Phone (626) 564 1944 Fax (626) 564 0969 INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT SUMMARY CLIENT KAKU ASSOCIATES PROJECT CUVER CITY TRAFFIC COUNTS DATE WEDNESDAY SEPTEMBER 22ND 2004 PERIOD 2 00 PM TO 6 00 PM INTERSECTION N/S LANDMARK STREET ENV WASHINGTON BOULEVARD 15 MIN COUNTS PERIOD|1010|SBIRT|109| 2 SBTH 2, c i 3 SBIT|1010|WBRT|1010|WBTH ÷ 6 WBLT|1010|NBRT|1010|NBTH|10 10|NBLT -1 .0 0 t EEiRT 11 EBTH f 12 ' EBLT|1010|TOTAL 200 215 0 0 0 0 118 11 6 0 2 7 120 0 264 215-230 1 0 0 0 0 171 3 10 0 6 9 174 0 373 2301245 0 0 0 0 181 12 19 0 11 6 213 0 442 245-30O)' 0 0 0 0 167 16 8 0 11 7 220 0 429 300-315 0 0 0 0 236 10 17 0 20 13 255 0 551 315-330 0 0 0 0 176 9 8 0 5 12 220 0 430 330-345 0 0 0 0 240 11 10 0 5 4 245 0 515 345-400 0 0 0 0 193 15 18 0 14 11 211 0 462 40d-415 0 0 0 0 206 8 36 0 20 11 228 0 509 415-430 0 0 0 0 191 9 14 0 11 6 294 0 525 430-445 0 0 0 0 197 6 14 0 5 4 255 0 481 445-500 0 0 0 0 230 14 12 0 6 6 304 0 572 500-515 0 0 0 0 256 5 14 0 12 8 309 0 604 515-530 0 0 0 0 241 12 12 0 9 8 296 0 578 530-545 0 0 0 0 248 5 17 0 6 2 265 0 543 545-600 0 0 0 0 245 5 5 0 4 4 266 0 529 HOUR TOTALS TIME|1010|SBRT|1010|SBTH|1010|SBLT|1010|WBRT|1010|WBTH|1010|WI3LT|1010|NBRT , 8 - NBTH|10 10|NBLT 10 •--, EBRT 11 EBTH 12 EBLT A. TOTAL 200-300 'il 0 0 0 0 637 42 43 0 30 29 727 0 1508 215-315 0 0 0 0 755 41 54 0 48 35 862 0 1795 230-330. 0 0 0 0 760 47 52 0 47 38 908 0 1852 245-345 0 0 0 0 819 46 43 0 41 36 940 0 1925 300-400 0 0 0 0 845 45 53 0 44 40 931 0 1958 315-415 0 0 0 0 815 43 72 0 44 38 904 d 1916 330-430 0 0 0 0 830 43 78 0 50 32 978 0 2011 345-445 0 0 0 0 787 38 82 0 50 32 988 0 1977 400-500 0 0 0 0 824 37 76 0 42 27 1081 0 2087 415-515 0 0 0 0 874 34 54 0 34 24 1162 0 2182 430-530 0 0 0 0 924 37 52 0 32 26 1164 0 2235 445-545 0 0 0 0 975 36 55 0 33 24 1174 0 2297 500-60G 0 0 0 0 990 27 48 0 31 22 1136 0 2254|1010| t WASHINGTON BOULEVARD 1174 ---10. 24 4. PM PEAK HOUR 445-545 i i L 4-1 i r 33 0 55 t 0 • 975 ,---- 36 LANDMARK STREET P3939 Landmark Street Driveway Count Monday July 26 2004 AM CARS BIKES PEDESTRIANS Peak In Out In Out In Out 7 00 7 15 5 1 1 2 0 0 7 16 7 30 4 2 4 3 4 7 31 7 45 3 3 4 2 0 4 7 46 8 00 3 1 1 0 3 2 8 01 8 15 5 1 2 2 6 2 8 16 8 30 3 2 3 3 4 7 8 31 8 45 6 2 5 4 2 2 8 46 9 00 7 2 2 2 2 1 I I Midday Peak CARS BIKES PEDESTRIANS In Out In Out In Out 2 00 2 15 1 3 4 3 2 3 2 16 2 30 4 3 0 2 2 1 2 31 2 45 2 5 2 1 3 2 2 46 3 00 1 3 4 0 0 1 3 01 3 15 4 3 2 8 1 1 3 16 3 30 2 4 5 3 3 2 3 31 3 45 3 1 2 1 1 2 3 46-4 00 5 6_ 3 3 3 0 I I P M Peak CARS BIKES PEDESTRIANS In Out In Out In Out 4 01 4 15 1 2 4 3 2 2 4 16 4 30 5 11 1 1 2 4 4 31-4 45 7 4 4 4 0 2 4 46 5 00 2 5 2 3 0 2 5 01 5 15 3 8 5 4 3 1 5 16 5 30 2 4 3 3 0 0 5 31 5 45 6 5 2 3 4 5 5 46 6 00 3 12 0 0 1 1 Cars parked in Lot Cars parked in Lot Cars parked in Lot Pre 7 00 16 Pre-2 00 52 4 00 46 7 00 7 15 20 2 00 2 15 50 4 01-4 15 45 7 16 7 30 22 2 16 2 30 51 4 16 4 30 39 7 31 7 45 22 2 31 2 45 48 4 31 4 45 42 7 46-8 00 24 2 46 3 00 46 4 46-5 00 39 801 815 28 301 315 47 501-5 15 34 8 16 8 30 29 3 16 3 30 45 5 16 5 30 32 831 845 33 331 345 47 531 545 33 8 46 9 00 38 3 46 4 00 46 5 46-6 00 24APPENDIX C INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE WORKSHEETS AND SIGNAL WARRANT ANALYSISExisting Conditions — Year 2004 c 1-N/S AM/PM fa COUNT DATE Comments Existing Conditions GROWTH FACTOR STUDY DATE Robertson BI W/E National BI I/S No RTOR RTOR Phasing RTOR RTOR Phasing Phasing Phasing Volume/Lane/Signal Configurations 41 (P' g ED ofro o ri g it, Gri' p g o, or* p 4-rt) Perm Auto Prot Fix Auto Perm Auto Prot-Fix Auto SIGNAL 1 1 I I I i l l I I I LANE II MEI r.T61111111111111 11111110noarntrcioi.1111111 WFSTROI iNn FASTROUNI1 LT TH RT LT TH RT 112 I 476 I 476 180 632 I 222 112 476 476 180 632 222 RI TH LT LT RT TH 448 I 719 I 208 57 71 I 704 EXISTING AMBIENT RELATED PROJECT 448 I 719 I 208 TOTAL 71 I 704 I 57 *1375 V/C - Critical Movements Diagram North/South Critical Movements = A(NIB) B(SIB) West/East Critical Movements = A(W/B) + B(E/B) 381 + 246 + 476 + 180 = 0 863 LOS= D 71 A = Adjusted Through/Right Volume B = Adjusted Left Volume *= ATSAC Benefit Results WestBound 476. 112 V/C RATIO LOS 0 00 - 0 60 A 061 070 071 080 0 81 - 0 90 091 100 464 —SouthBound A 246. 180 EastBound A 427 EX_AM CalcaDB November 16 2004 Tuesday 01 05 16 PM INTERSECTION DATA SUMMARY SHEET Developed by Chun Wong 12194W/E National BI MD N/S AM/PM COUNT DATE Comments Existing Conditions STUDY DATE GROWTH FACTOR Robertson BI I/S No Volume/Lane/Signal Configurations IMO r•ki r.1:foleizi.1111111 L SOIITHROIINI) WFSTROUNn 4A. -11:Tif111:1 v=11 LANE SIGNAL TH RI LT TH RI LT TH RT LT TH RI IT 58 I 594 91 670 I 893 I 234 103 58 I 594 I 91 670 I 893 I 234 103 EXISTING AMBIENT RELATED PROJECT TOTAL I 313 I 256 170 764 I 120 I 313 256 170 764 120 RTOR Phasing Phasing RTOR Phasing RTOR Phasing RTOR g ft' 4{0 p g ft> 41° 41 p g ft) Perm Auto Prot-Fix Auto Perm Auto Prot Fix Auto 21 III III 1 I EI Critical Movements Diagram Results North/South Critical Movements = A(N/B) + B(S/B) West/East Critical Movements = B(W/B) + A(E/B) 343 + 369 + 103 + 442 - LOS = D = 0 844 *1375 313 EastBound rA B 170 103 061 071 081 091 070 080 090 100 442 A = Adjusted Through/Right Volume B = Adjusted Left Volume * = ATSAC Benefit V/C RATIO LOS 000 060 A 564 —SouthBound A 369 58 INTERSECTION DATA SUMMARY SHEET EX_MD CalcaDB November 16 2004 Tuesday 01 05 33 PM Developed by Chun Wong 12/94 I 1)s.3.......„W/E National 81 Comments Existing Conditions GROWTH FACTOR STUDY DATE N/S AM/PM COUNT DATE Robertson BI US No Phasing RTOR Phasing RTOR RTOR Phasing RTOR = Volume/Lane/Signal Configurations MIN 0117111:TO111 IML-SluIltSiIL le111101 WFSTROUNI1 0 41.11:Tolii n id111/ Phasing Perm Auto Prot Fix Auto Perm Auto Prot Fix Auto EXISTING AMBIENT RELATED PROJECT TOTAL LANE SIGNAL 441'giii) 4rt, 41pl'gzot)4Tt, IILIE 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1|101010| 1 1 1 II 1_ II HI I 111 LT TH LT LT 181 58 181 105 236 358 118 58 TH RT 937 1 105 937 RI 118 1 358 1 236 TH RT LT Tli RT I 599 108 654 I 919 I 279 599 108 654 1 919 I 279 EX_PM CalcaDB November 16 2004 Tuesday 01 05 49 PM INTERSECTION DATA SUMMARY SHEET Critical Movements Diagram —SouthBound A 599 360 V/C RATIO LOS EastBound WestBound A. 521 A 358 000 060 A 181 its 061 070 NorthBound 071 080 A 354 A = Adjusted 'Through/Right Volume B = Adjusted Left Volume 58 081 090 *= ATSAC Benefit 091 100 Results North/South Critical Movements = A(N/B) + B(S/B) West/East Critical Movements B(W/B) + A(E/B) V/C - 354 360 + 118 + 521 = 0 914 LOS= E *1375 Developed by Chun Wong 12/94 Y1_388 I 2116 I 357 2409 I 90 434 EXISTING AMBIENT RELATED PROJECT 186 I 448 69 308 I 265 I 367 TOTAL 186 I 448 308 I 265 I 367 69 —SouthBound A 265 WestBound A 705 1 88|109| 224 186 November 16 2004 Tuesday 01 05 20 PM EX_AM CalcaDB INTERSECTION DATA SUMMARY SHEET N/S Exposition BI/Roberstson BI W/E Venice BI I/S No|1010|AM/PM Ca Comments Existing Conditions COUNT DATE STUDY DATE GROWTH FACTOR Volume/Lane/Signal Configurations mc 4111 .1.-46111 i, OO SOI ITHROI iNn 4 WFSTROHNn 4 a:A.1 1,4111111111 LT TH RT LT TH RI LT TH RI LT TH RT 88 2116 357 434 2409 90 p g 40' e' g Fr' 41* 41 p g vv. 41 p g II, 410 1 1 0 1 2 1 0 1 0 011 111 010111 0|1010|1 0 1 3 1 0 1 0 1 1 101 2 0 3 0 — 01 —1— o LANE Phasing RTOR Phasing RTOR Phasing RTOR Phasing RTOR SIGNAL Split Auto I Split Auto Prot Var Auto Prot-Var Auto Critical Movements Diagram 308 EastBound A 803 239 A = Adjusted Through/Right Volume B = Adjusted Left Volume *= ATSAC Benefit Results r NorthBound A B V/C RATIO LOS 000 060 A 061 070 071 080 081 090 091 100 North/South Critical Movements = A(N/B) + B(S/B) West/East Critical Movements = A(W/B) + B(E/B) 224 + 308 + 705 + 239 V/C - *1375 = 1 003 LOS = F Developed by Chun Wong 12194EXISTING AMBIENT RELATED PROJ ECT 92 I 229 77 87 1 1661 1 112 2006 I 114 347 278 f 341 1 438 TOTAL 92 I 229 J 77 341 1 438 278 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 10 1 1 0 1 3 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 115 + 438 + 87 + 669 = 0 882 LOS= D V/C – Developed by Chun Wong 12/94 November 16 2004 Tuesday 01 05 36 PM EX_MD CalcaDB INTERSECTION DATA SUMMARY SHEET N/S Exposition BI/Roberstson B1 W/E Venice B1 I/S No|1010|AM/PM MD Comments Existing Conditions COUNT DATE STUDY DATE GROWTH FACTOR = Volume/Lane/Signal Configurations tol:111:1:TeliziallIM SOI ITHROHNO WFSTROI min .1111111 IT TH RI IT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT 87 1661 I 112 41 40) ft,y r'? Grp 41 if' 4 ,, ,v4, it' 40 347 2006 114 LANE 1 1 0 1 2 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 2 0 3 0 0 o Phasing RTOR Phasing RTOR Phasing RTOR Phasing RTOR SIGNAL Split Auto Split Auto Prot-Var Auto Prot-Var Auto Critical Movements Diagram —SouthBound A -438 278 V/C RATIO LOS EastBound WestBound A 669 A 554 000 060 A 191 87 061 070 NorthBound A I 11 071 080 A = Adjusted Through/Right Volume B = Adjusted Left Volume 92 081 090 *= ATSAC Benefit 091 100 Results North/South Critical Movements = A(N/B) + A(SIB) West/East Critical Movements = B(W/B) + A(E/B) *1375 N/S AM/PM COUNT DATE Comments Existing Conditions GROWTH FACTOR STUDY DATE Roberstson BI W/E Venice BI US No|1010|Phasing RTOR RTOR Phasing RTOR Phasing RTOR = Volume/Lane/Signal Configurations INIII.re11rmn1miziD=1 sot ITHRMIND WFSTROlmn olv.--41a1siziM1111 v?, gi 41, v?, ri"Irt pl,gi ro 40 41 p9, ro Gro 2101 3 1 0 I 0 1 0 1101210101110 011111010[ 110 1 1 0 1 3 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 Phasing Split Auto Split Auto Prot-Var Auto Prot-Var Auto LT LT LT LT TH RT TH RT RT TH TH RT 122 I 261 I 77 277 I 295 I 565 108 I 2003 I 121 384 1 2132 1 128 EXISTING AMBIENT RELATED PROJECT TOTAL LANE SIGNAL 122 I 261 I 77 295 I 565 384 I 2132 128 277 121 2003 108 = Critical Movements Diagram SouthBound A 459 [ B 277 EastBound 711 rk I3 211 NorthBound A /31 A = Adjusted Through/Right Volume B = Adjusted Left Volume 122 *= ATSAC Benefit Results North/South Critical Movements = A(N/B) + West/East Critical Movements = A(VV/B) + A(SIB) B(E/B) 131 + 459 + 668 + 211 = 0 998 LOS = E V/C — *1375 V/C RATIO LOS WestBound A 668 0 00 - 0 60 061 070 0 71 - 0 80 081 090 091 100 A 108|1010|EX_PM CalcaDB November 16 2004 Tuesday 01 05 51 PM IINTERSECTION DATA SUMMARY SHEET Developed by Chun Wong 12/94LT TH RT LT TH RT I I 1 2 1 1 1 — Volume/Lane/Signal Configurations g 4 0).41' (iive?,,giii)*Giv;s•giii)4it, Prot-Fix Auto Perm Auto Prot Fix Auto Perm Auto SIGNAL =aZie1Nii:1:To1lit Id= 150 I 908 I 18 SO1 ITHROI INF) 172 I 562 I 87 172 I 562 I 87 WFSTROIIND alv1rae1 I di= LT TH RI LT TH RT 79 I 2279 I 115 190 2224 I 311 79 2279 I 115 190 2224 I 311 TOTAL Phasing RTOR Phasing RTOR Phasing RTOR IIIWi Phasing RTOR LANE EXISTING AMBIENT RELATED PROJECT 150 I 908 18 I Ill Ill I Critical Movements Diagram —SouthBound A A = Adjusted Through/Right Volume B = Adjusted Left Volume *= ATSAC Benefit EastBound A. t90 845 RATIO LOS WestBound A r798 0 00 - 0 60 A 79 061 070 071 080 081 090 0 91 - 1 00 Results North/South Critical Movements = A(N/B) + B(SIB) West/East Critical Movements = A(W/13) + B(E/B) 463 + 172 + 798 + 190 V/C - *1375 - 1 110 LOS = F 325 172 150 NorthBound A 463 EX_AM CalcaDB November 16 2004 Tuesday 01 05 23 PM a INTERSECTION DATA SUMMARY SHEET F N/S National BI W/E Venice BI I/S No|1010|AM/PM gzi Comments Existing Conditions COUNT DATE STUDY DATE GROWTH FACTOR Developed by Chun Wong 12/9 q \f)(102 1 1593 1 72 1 283 1667 404 148 724 I 90 EXISTING AMBIENT RELATED PROJECT 169 I 534 77 TOTAL 169 534 I 77 = 0 958 V/C — *1375 V/C RATIO LOS WestBound A 555 0 00 - 0 60 061 070 071 080 081 090 091 100 A 102 LOS= E A = Adjusted Through/Right Volume B = Adjusted Left Volume *= ATSAC Benefit A NorthBound 306 Results North/South Critical Movements = West/East Critical Movements = B(NIB) A(W/B) + + A(S/B) B(E/B) 169 + 407 + 555 + 283 r SouthBound A B 283 1 407 148 EastBound A 690 Developed by Chun Wong, 12/94 November 16 2004 Tuesday 01 05 40 PM EX_MD CalcaDB INTERSECTION DATA SUMMARY SHEET N/S National BI W/E Venice US No|1010|AM/PM MD Comments Existing Conditions COUNT DATE STUDY DATE GROWTH FACTOR = Volume/Lane/Signal Configurations iskir:Iginli '411111 Elliac r 1:I•111.1 van/ WFSTRO1 MIN alui Its1Ih elM11111 LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT 148 724 I 90 102 1593 72 283 1667 404 441'gioArt, v;sHaii* 40. p z?' it) (tro Go. LANE 111111111 II HI III I 11121 Ill I Phasing RTOR Phasing RTOR Phasing RTOR Phasing RTOR SIGNAL Prot Fix Auto Perm Auto Prot Fix Auto Perm Auto Cnbcal Movements DiagramW/E Venice I/S No|1010|N/S AM/PM ra COUNT DATE Existing Conditions GROWTH FACTOR STUDY DATE National BI Comments|1010|WESTROI INn IT TH RT LT TH RT 87 1992 78 172 1916 359 I 121 HI I itivis, gift, 4i0 41v?,givIrt. 121___=E Phasing RTOR Phasing RTOR Volume/Lane/Signal Configurations 11111.10:11:1;T•111.1111= FASTRM INn SOI ITHROI EXISTING AMBIENT RELATED PROJECT TOTAL LANE SIGNAL IT TH RT LT TH RT 142 I 577 79 152 I 891 I 93 142 1 577 I 79 152 I 891 I 93 41pl'giro v) 41p1, g ,4rov)|109| 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I Phasing RTOR Phasing RTOR Prot-Fix Auto Perm Auto 87 1 1992 1 78 172 11916 1 359 Prot-Fix Auto Perm Auto 142 + 492 + 690 + 172 = 1 018 LOS = F - EX_PM CalcaDB November 16 2004 Tuesday 01 05 55 PM I INTERSECTION DATA SUMMARY SHEET Critical Movements Diagram —SouthBound A 492 152 V/C RATIO LOS EastBound WestBound A 758 A 690 000 060 A ln 87 061 070 NorthBound A 328 071 080 A = Adjusted Through/Right Volume B = Adjusted Left Volume 142 081 090 *= ATSAC Benefit 091 100 Results North/South Critical Movements = B(NIB) + A(SIB) West/East Critical Movements = A(W/B) + B(E/B) *1375 Developed by Chun Wong 12/94 V1)Pnnted 11/1112004 KICU ex xis Revised 2/4/00 Project Title Intersection Description , PARK CENTURY SCHOOL CULVER CITY 5 NATIONAL BL & WASHINGTON BL EXISTING CONDITIONS Date/Time AM PEAK HOUR (7 30 8 30) Thru Lane 1600 vph N S Split Phase N Left Lane 1600 vph E W Split Phase N Double Lt Penalty 20 ok Lost Time (To of cycle) 10 ITS 0 /0 V/C Round Off (decs ) 3 APPROACH MVMT LANES VOLUME CAPACITY V/C ICU ANALYSIS Southbound RT 0 00 59 0 0 000 N S(1) 0 369 TH 2 00 726 3 200 0 245 N S(2) 0 438 IT 200 126 2 560 0 049 E W(1) 0 250 Westbound RT 1 00 156 1 600 0 058 E W(2) 0 390 TH 200 1 204 3 200 0 376 LT 1 00 59 1 600 0 037 V/C 0 828 Northbound RI 000 85 0 0 000 Lost Time 0 100 TH 200 939 3 200 0 320 LT 200 493 2 560 0 193 ATSAC 0 070 Eastbound RI 1 00 235 1 600 0 000 ICU 0 858 TH 200 681 3 200 0 213 LT 100 22 1 600 0 014 LOS D Date/Time PM PEAK HOUR (5 00 6 00) APPROACH MVMT LANES VOLUME CAPACITY V/C ICU ANALYSIS Southbound RT 000 58 0 0 000 N 5(1) 0 278 TH 200 958 3 200 0 318 N S(2) 0 408 LT 200 180 2 560 0 070 E W(1) 0 361 Westbound RI 1 00 125 1 600 0 022 E W(2) 0 261 TH 2 00 747 3 200 0 233 LT 1 00 80 1 600 0 050 V/C 0 769 Northbound RT 0 00 93 0 0 000 Lost Time 0 100 TH 2 00 574 3 200 0 208 IT 2 00 231 2 560 0 090 ATSAC 0 070 Eastbound RT 1 00 282 1 600 0 104 ICU 0 799 TH 2 00 995 3 200 0 311 LT 1 00 45 1 600 0 028 LOS C DateMme Mid Day PEAK HOUR (3 00-4 00) APPROACH MVMT LANES VOLUME CAPACITY V/C ICU ANALYSIS Southbound RI 0 00 80 0 0 000 N S(1) 0 261 TH 200 600 3 200 0 213 N S(2) 0 304 IT 200 150 2 560 0 059 E W(1) 0 274 Westbound RI 1 00 117 1 600 0 026 E W(2) 0 209 TH 200 577 3 200 0 180 IT 1 00 68 1 600 0 043 V/C 0 578 Northbound RI 000 79 0 0 000 Lost Time 0 100 TH 200 566 3 200 0 202 LT 200 233 2 560 0 091 ATSAC 0 070 Eastbound RI 1 00 295 1 600 0 112 ICU 0 608 TH 200 740 3 200 0 231 LT 1 00 47 1 600 0 029 LOS 8 Denotes critical movementO 0 1 00 1 00 1 0 O 0 1 00 1 00 1 0 0 94 0 94 0 9|109| 0 O 0 O 0 II - - O 0 1039 O 1 00 1 00 O 0 1039 O 1 00 1 00 4 0 94 0 94 O 0 1105 O 0 0 O 0 1105 II 54 1 00 54 1 00 0 94 57 o 57 49 1780 o 1 00 1 00 1 00 49 1780 0 1 00 1 00 1 00 0 94 0 94 0 94 52 1894 0 0 0 0 52 1894 0 II I II 608 xxxx xxxxx 0 09 xxxx xxxx I EXAM Thu Sep 30, 2004 12 15 57 Page 3 1 _ _ - Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Base Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #6 Landmark St & Washington 81 [2 way stop controlled] ******************************************************************************** Average Delay (sec/veh) 1 5 Worst Case Level Of Service F[112 8] ******************************************************************************** Street Name Landmark St Washington Bl Approach North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement L T R L T - R L T R L T R II- - H- H- - 1 Control Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Rights Include Include Include Include Lanes 00 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 -- - 1 - - 11 - 11 11-- 1 Volume Module Base Vol 18 0 16 Growth Ad) 1 00 1 00 1 00 Initial Bse 18 0 16 User Ad) 1 00 1 00 1 00 PHF Ad] 0 94 0 94 094 P1-IF Volume 19 0 17 Reduct Vol 0 0 o Final Vol 19 0 17 - 1 Critical Gap Module Critical Gp 6 8 xxxx FollowUpTim 3 5 xxxx 6 9 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 4 1 xxxx xxxxx 3 3 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 2 2 xxxx xxxxx I - - - Capacity Module Cnflict Vol 2185 xxxx Potent Cap 40 xxxx II-- 581 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 1163 xxxx xxxxx 462 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 608 xxxx xxxxx Move Cap 37 xxxx 462 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Volume/Cap 0 51 xxxx 0 04 xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx - 1 - 11-- - 11- - - 11 Level Of Service Module Queue xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Stopped Del xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move * * * * * * * * * Movement LT LTR RI LT - LTR - RI LT - LTR RT Shared Cap xxxx 66 xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx SharedQueue xxxxx 2 3 xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shrd StpDel xxxxx 113 xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS * F * * ApproachDel 112 8 xxxxxx xxxxxx ApproachLOS F * *-I -- -11 - 11 Critical Gap Module Critical Gp 6 8 xxxx FollowUpTim 3 5 xxxx 6 9 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 4 1 xxxx xxxxx 3 3 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 2 2 xxxx xxxxx Traffix 7 6 0715 (c) 2003 Dowling Assoc Licensed to KAKU, SANTA MONICA, CAO EX MID Tue Nov 16, 2004 12 58 05 Page 2 1 Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Base Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #6 Landmark St & Washington 81 [2 way stop controlled] ******************************************************************************** Average Delay (sec/veh) 3 7 Worst Case Level Of Service F[ 68 9] ******************************************************************************** Street Name Approach Landmark St North Bound South Bound Movement L T R L T R L 1 II - - II- Control Stop Sign Stop Sign Rights Include Include Lanes 0 0 1 1|99| 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - I II II Volume Module Base Vol 44 0 53 0 0 0 Growth Ad] 1 00 1 00 100 1 00 1 00 100 1 Initial Bse 44 0 53 0 0 0 User Ad] 1 00 1 00 100 1 00 1 00 100 1 PHF Ad] 0 89 0 89 089 0 89 0 89 089 0 PHF Volume 50 0 60 0 0 0 Reduct Vol 0 0 0 0 0 0 Final Vol 50 0 60 0 0 0 Washington 81 East Bound West Bound T R L T R II - -- 1 Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Include Include 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 - - I I 0 931 40 00 1 00 100 1 0 931 40 00 1 00 100 1 89 0 89 089 0 0 1048 45 0 0 0 0 1048 45 45 845 0 00 1 00 100 45 845 0 00 1 00 100 89 0 89 089 51 952 0|109| 0 0 51 952 0 - 1 - II - II - 1 Capacity Module Cnflict Vol 1648 xxxx 547 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 1093 xxxx xxxxx - 11 Potent Cap 92 xxxx 486 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Move Cap 86 xxxx 486 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Volume/Cap 0 58 xxxx 0 12 xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx - 1 - -H - II- - Level Of Service Module Queue xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Stopped Del xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move Movement LT LTR RI LT LTR - RI LT LTR RT Shared Cap xxxx 156 xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx SharedQueue xxxxx 4 1 xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shrd StpDel xxxxx 68 9 xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 646 xxxx xxxxx 646 xxxx xxxxx 0 08 xxxx xxxx 11- - 1 0 3 xxxx xxxxx 11 0 xxxx xxxxx LT LTR RI xxxx xxxx xxxxx 0 3 xxxx xxxxx 11 0 xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS ApproachDel 68 9 xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx ApproachLOSTraffix 7 6 0715 (c) 2003 Dowling Assoc Licensed to KAKU, SANTA MONICA, CAO EX PM Tue Nov 16, 2004 12 58 09 Page 2 1 Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Base Volume Alternative) ******************** ************************** ********************************** Intersection #6 Landmark St & Washington Bl [2 way stop controlled] ******************************************************************************** Average Delay (sec/veh) 2 9 Worst Case Level Of Service F[ 71 91 ******************************************************************************** Landmark St Washington Bl North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Street Name Approach Movement - Control Rights Lanes Volume Module Base Vol Growth Ad] 1 Initial Bse User Ad) 1 PHF Adj 0 PHF Volume Reduct Vol Final Vol|1010|Critical Gap Module Critical Gp 6 8 xxxx FollowUpTim 3 5 xxxx|109| - Capacity Module Cnflict Vol 1836 xxxx Potent Cap 69 xxxx Move Cap 65 xxxx Volume/Cap 0 53 xxxx T R - -I Uncontrolled Include 1 1 0 0 - 1 36 975 0 00 1 00 100 36 975 0 00 1 00 100 95 0 95 095 38 1026 0|109| 0 0 38 1026 o II - - - II -- -- - II- - - I 6 9 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 4 1 xxxx xxxxx 3 3 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 2 2 xxxx xxxxx 11 - II--- - II- - 630 xxxx xxxx xxxxx XXXX XXXX XXXXX 1260 xxxx xxxxx 429 xxxx xxxx xxxxx XXX X XXXX XXXXX 559 xxxx xxxxx 429 xxxx xxxx xxxxx XXXX XXXX XXXXX 559 xxxx xxxxx 0 13 xxxx xxxx xxxx XXXX XXXX XXXX 0 07 xxxx xxxx|1010|1- L I R Stop Sign Include|109| 0 1 ,|99| 0 33 0 55 00 1 00 100 33 0 55 00 1 00 100 95 0 95 095 35 0 58|109| 0 0 35 0 58 II 11 L|1010101010|T R L -- -II Stop Sign Include|109| 0 0 0 0 - - 11--|109| 0 0 00 1 00 100 1|109| 0 0 00 1 00 100 1 95 0 95 095 0|109| 0 0|109| 0 0|109| 0 0 T R -- --II- Uncontrolled Include|109| 1 1 0 - - 0 1174 24 00 1 00 100 0 1174 24 00 1 00 100 95 0 95 095 0 1235 25|109| 0 0 0 1235 25 L|1010 10101010|- I- -- II- -H --II-- Level Of Service Module Queue xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Stopped Del xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx * * * * * * * * * LT LTR RI LT LTR RT LT LTR RI xxxx 139 xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 3 7 xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 71 9 xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 71 9 xxxxxx xxxxxx LOS by Move Movement Shared Cap SharedQueue Shrd StpDel Shared LOS ApproachDel ApproachLOSPrinted 11/11/2004 KICU ex xis Revised 214/00 Project Title Intersection Description PARK CENTURY SCHOOL CULVER CITY 7 WASHINGTON BL & CULVER BL/MAIN ST EXISTING CONDITIONS (YEAR 2004) Date/Time AM PEAK HOUR (7 45 8 45) Thru Lane 1600 vph N S Split Phase N Left Lane 1600 vph E W Split Phase N Double Lt Penalty 20 % Lost Time (°/ of cycle) 10 ITS 0 % V/C Round Off (decs ) 3 APPROACH MVMT LANES VOLUME CAPACITY V/C ICU ANALYSIS Southbound RT 000 40 0 0 000 N 5(1) 0 221 TH 200 316 3 200 0 111 N S(2) 0 190 LT 1 00 28 1 600 0 018 E W(1) 0 532 Westbound RT 0 00 10 0 0 000 E W(2) 0 106 TH 1 00 149 1 600 0 099 LT 200 1 122 2 560 0 438 V/C 0 753 Northbound RT 200 818 3 200 0 080 Lost Time 0 100 TH 200 651 3 200 0 203 LT 1 00 126 1 600 0 079 ATSAC 0 070 Eastbound RT 1 00 103 1 600 0 000 ICU 0 783 TH 1 00 140 1 600 0 094 LT 000 11 1 600 0 007 LOS C Date/Time PM PEAK HOUR (5 00-6 00) APPROACH MVMT LANES VOLUME CAPACITY V/C ICU ANALYSIS Southbound RI 000 31 0 0 000 N S(1) 0 213 TH 200 498 3 200 0 165 N S(2) 0 211 LT 100 46 1 600 0 029 E W(1) 0 493 Westbound RT 000 12 0 0 000 E W(2) 0 080 TH 100 77 1 600 0 056 LT 2 00 907 2 560 0 354 V/C 0 706 Northbound RT 2 00 895 3 200 0 138 Lost Time 0 100 TH 200 590 3 200 0 184 LT 1 00 73 1 600 0 046 ATSAC 0 070 Eastbound RT 1 00 125 1 600 0 033 ICU 0 736 TH 1 00 183 1 600 0 139 LT 0 00 39 1 600 0 024 LOS C Date/Time Mid Day PEAK HOUR (3 00-4 00) APPROACH MVMT LANES VOLUME CAPACITY V/C ICU ANALYSIS Southbound RT 000 18 0 0 000 N S(1) 0 171 TH 200 354 3 200 0 116 N S(2) 0 156 LT 100 39 1 600 0 024 E W(1) 0 382 Westbound RI 0 00 7 0 0 000 E W(2) 0 058 TH 100 71 1 600 0 049 LT 2 00 723 2 560 0 282 V/C 0 553 Northbound RT 200 729 3 200 0 115 Lost Time 0 100 TH 200 470 3 200 0 147 LT 1 00 64 1 600 0 040 ATSAC 0 070 Eastbound RT 100 115 1 600 0 032 ICU 0 583 TH 1 00 145 1 600 0 100 LT 000 15 1 600 0 009 LOS A Denotes critical movement i CN/S AM/PM iga COUNT DATE Comments Cumulative Base GROWTH FACTOR STUDY DATE Robertson BI VV/E National BI VS No 112 60 I 698 Phasing RTOR Phasing RTOR RTOR Phasing RTOR = Volume/Lane/Signal Configurations 111111111.1•1.1:1•1111111111 •11111L-rcirr.I:rcluirill1111 WFSTROUND azizir:Tirlsi IMES Phasing Perm Auto Prot Fix Auto Perm Auto Prot-Fix Auto 123 I 372 281 188 974 a 109 700 j1114 I 290|1010|372 I 281 123 (1) p f* 40 41 p ro 4To p roGr* I Li __I:LOD EXISTING AMBIENT RELATED PROJECT TOTAL LANE SIGNAL LT TH RI LT TH RT LT TH RI LT TH RT 109 974 188 60 698 I 112 1114f 290 700|1010|I I Critical Movements Diagram —SouthBound A 702 385 V/C RATIO LOS — EastBound WestBound A 642 A 372 000 060 A 188 423 061 070 North Bound 071 080 A -405 A = Adjusted Through/Right Volume [ B = Adjusted Left Volume B 60 081 090 *= ATSAC Benefit 0 91 - 1 00 Results North/South Critical Movements = A(N/B) + B(S/B) West/East Critical Movements = B(W/B) + A(E/B) 405 + 385 + 123 + 542 - 0 988 LOS= E V/C - *1375 CUM_PM CalcaDB November 16 2004 Tuesday 01 30 47 PM INTERSECTION DATA SUMMARY SHEET Developed by Chun Wong 12/W/E Venice BI I/S No|1010|Comments Cumulative Base STUDY DATE GROWTH FACTOR N/S AM/PM COUNT DATE Roberstson BI LT TH RI 201 479 72 TH IT RI LT TH 93 2373 I 385 Phasing RTOR Phasing RTOR RTOR Phasing RTOR Phasing = Volume/Lane/Signal Configurations 11.01,19mIlla.111.4111111 SO! 1THROI IND1‘ WFSTROLINII Split Auto Split Auto Prot Var Auto Prot-Var Auto SIGNAL EXISTING AMBIENT RELATED PROJECT TOTAL LANE 402 1 344 1 460 402 1 344 1 460 o I l 1 1 1 o 1 o 1 1 1 RI 93 1 2373 1 385 1 1 0 1 3 1 o 10 1110 LT TH RI 477 2597 1 101 477 2597 101 +1 11> 4FP|109| 0 3 0 0 1 110 12101 01110 201 1 479 1 72 GO' fP 4TO GI GEO CUM_AM CalcaDB November 16 2004 Tuesday 01 06 12 PM INTERSECTION DATA SUMMARY SHEET Critical Movements Diagram —SouthBound A 344 402 V/C RATIO LOS EastBound WestBound A 866 A 791 000 060 A 262 93 061 070 NorthBound A. 240 071 080 A = Adjusted Through/Right Volume B = Adjusted Left Volume 201 081 090 *= ATSAC Benefit 091 100 Results North/South Critical Movements = A(NIB) + B(S/B) West/East Critical Movements A(W/B) + B(E/B) V/C - 240 402 + 791 + 262 = 1 163 LOS = F *1375 Developed by Chun Wong 12/94 (37I/S No|1010|N/S AM/PM gm COUNT DATE 'Cumulative Base GROWTH FACTOR STUDY DATE Robertson BI National BI Comments Volume/Lane/Signal Configurations 111111orcaumacc,11.111111 11111111ace1g.lai1lli4IDIMI WFSTROlinin ir:r.111.1.1111111•1 41 41, f*lT 1 i IL ? * 14) (Iri) 4p rot* Ii oGro 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 I I I i l l 1 LANE Phasing Perm Auto Prot-Fix Auto Perm Auto Prot-Fix Auto RTOR Phasing RTOR Phasing RTOR Phasing RTOR SIGNAL TH RI LT 59 74 1 759 TH LT RT 504 I 874 I 216 504 1 874 I 216 TH RI IT TH RI I 495 I 511 187 657 231 495 511 187 657 231 EXISTING AMBIENT RELATED PROJECT TOTAL 74 I 759 1 59 116 IT 116 409 + 277 + 495 + 187 - 0 925 LOS= E V/C - *1375 CUM_AM CalcaDB November 16 2004 Tuesday 01 06 08 PM INTERSECTION DATA SUMMARY SHEET Critical Movements Diagram —SouthBound A 545 277 V/C RATIO LOS EastBound WestBound A 444 A 495 000 060 A itt7 116 061 070 NorthBound 071 080 A. 409 A = Adjusted Through/Right Volume B = Adjusted Left Volume 74 0 81 - 0 90 *= ATSAC Benefit 091 100 Results North/South Critical Movements = A(N/B) + B(SIB) West/East Critical Movements = A(W/B) + B(E/B) Developed by Chun Wong 12194 etiIT LT RT TH TH RT 177 107 I 326 I 283 795 I 125 LT TH RI EXISTING AMBIENT RELATED PROJECT 60 I 658 95 710 I 1042 243 795 I 125 107 326 283 177 TOTAL 60 I 658 I 95 i3q Developed by Chun Wong 12/94 November 16 2004 Tuesday 01 30 31 PM 1 CUM_MD CalcaDB INTERSECTION DATA SUMMARY SHEET N/S Robertson BI W/E National BI I/S No AM/PM MD Comments Cumulative Base COUNT DATE STUDY DATE GROWTH FACTOR = Volume/Lane/Signal Configurations MIL , to :41 i mreil .1 NMI SCHITHROlir WFSTROIIND .1ITI IJiI LT TH RI 710 1 1042 243 p 41 p z?, g 0' V'|1010| 1 II I I I Ill LANE Phasing RTOR Phasing RTOR Phasing RTOR Phasing RTOR SIGNAL Perm Auto Prot Fix Auto Perm Auto Prot-Fix Auto Critical Movements Diagram SouthBound A 643 391 V/C RATIO LOS EestBound WestBound A 466-- A 326 000 060 A 177 437 061 070 NorthBound 071 080 A 377 A = Adjusted Through/Right Volume B = Adjusted Left Volume 081 090 60 *= ATSAC Benefit 091 100 Results North/South Critical Movements = A(NIB) + B(SIB) West/East Critical Movements = B(W/B) + A(E/B) 377 + 391 + 107 + 460 V/C - *1375 = 0 901 LOS = EW/E Venice BI 1/S No|1010|Comments Cumulative Base STUDY DATE GROWTH FACTOR N/S AM/PM COUNT DATE Roberstson BI Volume/Lane/Signal Configurations L SOIITHROHND WFRTROIltsm oe4traili sizi•11111111 Phasing RTOR Phasing RTOR Phasing RTOR Phasing RTOR Auto Split Auto I Prot Var Auto Prot-Var Auto SIGNAL Split EXISTING AMBIENT RELATED PROJECT TOTAL LANE 112 I 254 I 80 lifol2Iolol lo 297 379 I 581 297 I 379 581 0111110 01 110 LT TH RT 91 1 1867 I 144 91 1867 144 1101310101110 LT TH RI 425 2180 I 135 425 2180 135 41 opt) 41 tl'gi rto4ro Alli_9_ 110121010 1110 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 [ o 1 1 0 1 3 1 0 I 0 1 1 1 0 2 0 3 0 Phasing RTOR Phasing RTOR Phasing RTOR Phasing RTOR SIGNAL Split Auto Split Auto Prot-Var Auto Prot-Var Auto = Critical Movements Diagram —SouthBound A 464 B 297 A = Adjusted Through/Right Volume B = Adjusted Left Volume *= ATSAC Benefit —EastBound A B 234 727 WestBound A B 622 |910|91 V/C RATIO LOS 000 060 061 070 071 080 081 090 091 100 A B C D E B 116 Results North/South Critical Movements = A(N/B) + A(SIB) West/East Critical Movements = A(W/B) + B(E/B) 138 + 464 + 622 + 234 V/C - *1375 Developed by Chun Wong 12/94 = 0 990 LOS= EUS No W/E Venice BI N/S AM/PM la COUNT DATE Cumulative + Project GROWTH FACTOR STUDY DATE Roberstson BI|1010|Comments IT TH RT RT TH 153 2374 RTOR Phasing RTOR Phasing RTOR = Volume/Lane/Signal Configurations I 4T l 4 pi\g,i, [0 40 ro4Tt Split Auto Split Auto Prot Var Auto Prot-Var Auto SIGNAL snt ITHR011Nn WFSTROUNn IT TH RI IT TH RT IT 305 I 337 I 758 113 I 2294 j 204 I 490 305 J 337 I 758 113 2294 204 490 1 10 12 101 011 10 Phasing 0111110101i jo 1 1 0 I 3 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 3 Phasing LANE NIA . I ;T:111 I ; 41 on/ EXISTING AMBIENT RELATED PROJECT 148 309 82 TOTAL 148 I 309 I 82 ir:telehill11•11 2374 I 153 0 I RTOR 305 A(SIB) B(E/B) 155 + 623 + 765 + 270 EastBound —WestBound V/C RATIO LOS A 765 000 060 A 113 061 070 071 080 081 090 091 100 V/C - A = Adjusted Through/Right B = Adjusted Left Volume * = ATSAC Benefit A 791 270 Volume A NorthBound 155 148 Results North/South Critical Movements = West/East Critical Movements = A(NIB) + A(W/B) + - 1 249 LOS = F Developed by Chun Wong 12/94 THREE---1 CalcaDB November 16 2004 Tuesday 12 47 50 PM INTERSECTION DATA SUMMARY SHEET Critical Movements Diagram —SouthBound A 623 1375Printed 11/16/2004 KICU cp three-group stagger xis Revised 2/4/00 Project Title Intersection Description PARK CENTURY SCHOOL CULVER CITY 3 ROBERTSON BL/HIGUEFtA ST & WASHINGTON BL CUMBASE PLUS PROJECT CONDITIONS (YEAR 2008) Date/Time AM PEAK HOUR (7 45 8 45) Thru Lane 1600 vph N S Split Phase N Left Lane 1600 vph E W Split Phase N Double Lt Penalty 20 % Lost Time (% of cycle) 10 ITS 0 % V/C Round Off (decs ) 3 APPROACH MVMT LANES VOLUME CAPACITY V/C ICU ANALYSIS Southbound RT 1 00 110 1 600 0 038 N S(1) 0 197 TH 1 00 281 1 600 0 176 N S(2) 0 211 LT 100 157 1 600 0 098 E W(1) 0 365 Westbound RT 0 00 375 0 0 000 E W(2) 0 592 TH 200 1 419 3 200 0 561 LT 1 00 85 1 600 0 053 V/C 0 803 Northbound RT 0 00 74 0 0 000 Lost Time 0 100 TH 2 00 244 3 200 0 099 LT 1 00 56 1 600 0 035 ATSAC 0 070 Eastbound RT 0 00 86 0 0 000 ICU 0 833 TH 200 911 3 200 0 312 LT 100 50 1 600 0 031 LOS D Date/Time PM PEAK HOUR (5 00 6 00) APPROACH MVMT LANES VOLUME CAPACITY V/C ICU ANALYSIS Southbound RT 1 00 126 1 600 0 001 N 5(1) 0 220 TH 1 00 272 1 600 0 170 N S(2) 0 220 LT 100 196 1 600 0 123 E W(1) 0 436 Westbound RT 0 00 192 0 0 000 E W(2) 0 438 TH 200 961 3 200 0 360 LT 1 00 99 1 600 0 062 V/C 0 658 Northbound RT 0 00 80 0 0 000 Lost Time 0 100 TH 2 00 230 3 200 0 097 LT 1 00 80 1 600 0 050 ATSAC 0 070 Eastbound RT 0 00 79 0 0 000 ICU 0 688 TH 200 1 118 3 200 0 374 LT 1 00 124 1 600 0 078 LOS B Date/Time Mid Day PEAK HOUR (3 00-4 00) APPROACH MVMT LANES VOLUME CAPACITY V/C ICU ANALYSIS Southbound RI 100 130 1 600 0 041 N S(1) 0 219 TH 1 00 260 1 600 0 163 N S(2) 0 197 LT 1 00 246 1 600 0 154 E W(1) 0 345 Westbound RT 0 00 199 0 0 000 E W(2) 0 366 TH 200 841 3 200 0 325 LT 100 65 1 600 0 041 V/C 0S85 Northbound RT 000 61 0 0 000 Lost Time 0 100 TH 200 147 3 200 0 065 LT 1 00 54 1 600 0 034 ATSAC 0 070 Eastbound RT 000 86 0 0 000 ICU 0 615 TH 2 00 888 3 200 0 304 LT 1 00 65 1 600 0 041 LOS B enotes critical movement [ 0National B1 W/E Venice B1 US No 4 AM/PM 1101 COUNT DATE Comments Cumulative + Project STUDY DATE GROWTH FACTOR 11.11171 LT TH RI L, sot ITHROIINII WFSTROI1Nr) LT TH RT o/ LT TH RI LT TH RT 171 I 965 25 179 I 631 I 90 89 I 2544 I 120 210 2398 I 400 171 I 965 I 25 179 I 631 I 90 89 2544 120 210 2398 1 400 EXISTING AMBIENT RELATED PROJ ECT TOTAL 41.4 ,gi roGio , ; , ,g ,111)(10 rov p z?, gi it' Phasing Prot Fix Auto Perm Auto Prot-Fix Auto 1 I I 2 Perm Auto SIGNAL RTOR Phasing RTOR Phasing RTOR Phasing RTOR|1010| 1 1 2 1 I I LANE 1 1 1 Critical Movements Diagram Results North/South Critical Movements = A(N/B) + B(SIB) West/East Critical Movements = A(W/B) + B(E/B) 495 + 179 + 888 + 210 V/C - LOS = F - 1 219 *1375 V/C RATIO LOS WestBound A 888 000 061 071 081 091 060 070 080 090 100 A 89 361 j —SouthBound A A = Adjusted Through/Right Volume B = Adjusted Left Volume * = ATSAC Benefit 21D EastBound A 933 179 North Bound A 171 THREE -3 CalcaDB November 16 2004 Tuesday 12 48 21 PM INTERSECTION DATA SUMMARY SHEET = Volume/Lane/Signal Configurations 4.4|1010|Developed by Chun Wong 12194 )5-g 1EXISTING AMBIENT RELATED PROJECT 189 I 584 87 112 1 1810 I 75 1808 1 425 318 154 I 772 I 94 11 I I 1 2 1 I I A 744 31S 1 V/C RATIO LOS A 000 060 061 070 071 080 081 090 091 100 A = Adjusted Through/Right Volume B = Adjusted Left Volume *= ATSAC Benefit [North Bound A. B 336 18$. November 16 2004 Tuesday 12 48 08 PM THREE-2 CalcaDB INTERSECTION DATA SUMMARY SHEET N/S National BI W/E Venice BI I/S No|1010|AM/PM MD Comments Cumulative + Project COUNT DATE STUDY DATE GROWTH FACTOR = Volume/Lane/Signal Configurations 1_, SOUTHROI min 4 WFSTROUNn 4 FASTROUNn IT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RI LT TH RT 154 I 772 I 94 TOTAL 189 584 I 87 112 1810 75 318 1808 425 p g fo 41* g rt. V' p g ft' 4it' 41 z?, ft) Phasing RTOR Phasing RTOR Phasing RTOR i "1 Phasing RTOR LANE SIGNAL Prot-Fix Auto Perm Auto Prot Fix Auto Perm Auto Critical Movements Diagram —SouthBound A 1 433 154 EastBound --WestBound A 628 112 Results North/South Critical Movements = B(N/B) + A(SIB) West/East Critical Movements = A(W/B) + B(E/B) V/C - 189 + 433 + 628 + 318 = 1 070 LOS= F *1375 Developed by Chun Wong 12/94I/S No W/E Venice BI N/S AM/PM GU COUNT DATE Cumulative + Project GROWTH FACTOR STUDY DATE National BI 4 Comments Phasing RTOR RTOR Phasing RTOR RTOR Phasing Volume/Lane/Signal Configurations [e] r:1:141 SOUTHROUND WFSTROIINn alutiaol 111111111111 211 2114 395 Phasing Prot Fix Auto Perm Auto Prot-Fix Auto Perm Auto SIGNAL EXISTING AMBIENT RELATED PROJECT 214 I 633 82 158 I 938 I 97 LT TH RI IT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT ro410 rtfr p Ft' (trt ) p9,Ai -7 11 1 2 '_1±1_ LANE 89 1 2295 1 81 2114 I 395 211 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 214 I 633 82 TOTAL 158 I 938 I 97 2295 81 89 THREE -1 CalcaDB November 16 2004 Tuesday 12 47 53 PM INTERSECTION DATA SUMMARY SHEET Critical Movements Diagram A = Adjusted Through/Right B = Adjusted Left Volume *= ATSAC Benefit South Bound V/C RATIO LOS A 518 [ B 158 EastBound WestBound A 836 A 792 000 060 061 070 071 080 081 090 091 100 A 211 89 Volume NorthBound A 358 Results North/South Critical Movements = B(N/B) + A(S/B) West/East Critical Movements = A(W/B) + B(E/B) V/C - 214 + 518 + 792 + 211 - 1 192 LOS = F *1375 Developed by Chun Wong 12194 161 Printed 11/16/2004 KICU-cp three-group stagger xis Revised 2/4/00 Project Title Intersection Description PARK CENTURY SCHOOL CULVER CITY 5 NATIONAL BL & WASHINGTON BL CUMBASE PLUS PROJECT CONDITIONS (YEAR 2008) Date/Time AM PEAK HOUR (7 30-8 30) Thru Lane 1600 vph N S Split Phase N Left Lane 1600 vph E W Split Phase N Double Lt Penalty 20 0/ Lost Time (% of cycle) 10 ITS 0 % V/C Round Off (decs ) 3 APPROACH MVMT LANES VOLUME CAPACITY V/C ICU ANALYSIS Southbound RI 000 81 0 0 000 N S(1) 0 393 TH 200 861 3 200 0 294 N S(2) 0 498 LT 200 135 2 560 0 053 E W(1) 0 271 Westbound RI 1 00 163 1 600 0 060 E W(2) 0 429 TH 200 1 292 3 200 0 404 LT 1 00 61 1 600 0 038 V/C 0 927 Northbound RT 0 00 88 0 0 000 Lost Time 0 100 TH 2 09 1 000 3 200 0 340 LT 2 00 522 2 560 0 204 ATSAC 0 070 Eastbound RT 1 00 271 1 600 0 006 ICU 0 957 TH 2 00 747 3 200 0 233 LT 1 00 40 1 600 0 025 LOS E Date/Time PM PEAK HOUR (5 00-6 00) APPROACH MVMT LANES VOLUME CAPACITY V/C ICU ANALYSIS Southbound RT 000 56 0 0 000 N S(1) 0 319 TH 2 00 1 032 3 200 0 340 N S(2) 0 440 LT 200 188 2 560 0 073 E W(1) 0 388 Westbound RI 1 00 135 1 600 0 026 E W(2) 0 297 TH 200 853 3 200 0 267 LT 1 00 83 1 600 0 052 V/C 0 828 Northbound RT 0 00 97 0 0 000 Lost Time 0 100 TH 200 690 3 200 0 246 IT 200 255 2 560 0 100 ATSAC 0 070 Eastbound RT 1 00 301 1 600 0 108 ICU 0 858 TH 2 00 1 076 3 200 0 336 LT 1 00 48 1 600 0 030 LOS D Date/Time Mid Day PEAK HOUR (3 00-4 00) APPROACH MVMT LANES VOLUME CAPACITY V/C ICU ANALYSIS Southbound RT 000 101 0 0 000 N S(1) 0 277 TH 2 00 635 3 200 0 230 N S(2) 0 327 LT 2 00 157 2 560 0 061 E W(1) 0 296 Westbound RI 1 00 126 1 600 0 030 E W(2) 0 252 TH 2 00 662 3 200 0 207 LT 1 00 71 1 600 0 044 V/C 0 623 Northbound RT 000 82 0 0 000 Lost Time 0 100 TH 200 609 3 200 0 216 LT 2 00 249 2 560 0 097 ATSAC 0 070 Eastbound RI 1 00 315 1 600 0 119 ICU 0 653 TH 2 00 805 3 200 0 252 LT 1 00 72 1 600 0 045 LOS B Denotes critical movementShared LOS * F B * * Traffix 7 6 0715 (c) 2003 Dowling Assoc Licensed to KAKU, SANTA MONICA, CAO CP AM Tue Nov 16, 2004 12 58 28 Page 2 1 - Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Base Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #6 Landmark St & Washington Bl [2 way stop controlled] ******************************************************************************** Average Delay (sec/veh) 36 9 Worst Case Level Of Service F[1026 3] ******************************************************************************** Street Name Landmark St Washington Bl Approach North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement L - T R L T R L T -R L- T R - -1 -I II II - - 1 Control Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Rights Include Include Include Include Lanes 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 I - _ _ - 11 II 11 0 1 1 0 0 - - -- --I Volume Module Base Vol 60 0 58 0 0 0 0 1120 104 83 1889 o Growth Ad] 1 00 1 00 100 1 00 1 00 100 1 00 1 00 100 1 00 1 00 100 Initial Bse 60 0 58 0 0 o 0 1120 104 83 1889 o User Ad] 1 00 1 00 100 1 00 1 00 100 1 00 1 00 100 1 00 1 00 100 PHF Ad] 0 94 0 94 094 0 94 0 94 094 0 94 0 94 094 0 94 0 94 094 PHF Volume 64 0 62 0 0 o 0 1191 111 88 2010 0 Reduct Vol 0 0 o 0 0 o 0 0 o 0 0 o Final Vol 64 0 62 0 0 o 0 1191 111 88 2010 o - I- - - H 11 II- - - I Critical Gap Module Critical Gp 6 8 xxxx 6 9 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 4 1 xxxx xxxxx FollowUpTim 3 5 xxxx 3 3 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 2 2 xxxx xxxxx I - Capacity Module Cnflict Vol 2428 xxxx Potent Cap 27 xxxx Move Cap 24 xxxx Volume/Cap 2 69 xxxx - I - - - Level Of Service Module - H -- 11 651 xxxx xxxx xxxxx 416 xxxx xxxx xxxxx 416 xxxx xxxx xxxxx 0 15 xxxx xxxx xxxx - 11 XXXX XXXX XXXXX 1302 xxxx xxxxx XXXX XXXX XXXXX 539 xxxx xxxxx XXXX XXXX XXXXX 539 xxxx xxxxx XXXX XXXX XXXX 0 16 xxxx xxxx 11 - 1 1 -- -- - I Queue xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 0 6 xxxx xxxxx Stopped Del xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 13 0 xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move * * * * * * * * * B * * Movement LT LTR RT LT - LTR - RI LT LTR - RT LT - LTR RT Shared Cap xxxx 44 xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx SharedQueue xxxxx 13 6 xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 0 6 xxxx xxxxx Shrd StpDel xxxxx 1026 xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 13 0 xxxx xxxxx ApproachDel 1026 3 xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx ApproachLOS F * * * fh 3Washington Bl East Bound West Bound L T R L T R - II I Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Include Include 0 0 1 1 0 - II 0 989 84 1 00 1 00 1 00 0 989 84 1 00 1 00 1 00 0 89 0 89 089 0 1114 95 0 1 1 0 0 75 937 0 1 00 1 00 1 00 75 937 0 1 00 1 00 1 00 0 89 0 89 089 84 1055 0 Traffix 7 6 0715 (c) 2003 Dowling Assoc Licensed to KAKU, SANTA MONICA, CAO CP MID Tue Nov 16, 2004 12 58 33 Page 2-1 _ _ _ Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Base Volume Alternative) ************************************************ ** ****************************** Intersection #6 Landmark St & Washington 81 [2 way stop controlled] ****************** ************************* ************************************* Average Delay (sec/veh) 41 4 Worst Case Level Of Service _ F[508 1] ******************************************************************************** o o 0 o o o 0 1114 95 84 1055 0 I II- - II II I Critical Gap Module Critical Gp 6 8 xxxx 6 9 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 4 1 xxxx xxxxx FollowUpTim 3 5 xxxx 3 3 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 2 2 xxxx xxxxx - I- II - II - - II - I Capacity Module Cnflict Vol 1858 xxxx 604 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 1208 xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap 67 xxxx 446 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 584 xxxk xxxxx Move Cap 59 xxxx 446 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 584 xxxx xxxxx Volume/Cap 1 67 xxxx 0 24 xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx 0 14 xxxx xxxx - 1 - - - II II - II I Street Name Landmark St Approach North Bound South Bound Movement L T R L T R -I II II Control Stop Sign Stop Sign Rights Include Include Lanes 0 0 1 1|99| 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - 1 - II - - II Volume Module Base Vol 87 0 96 0 0 0 Growth Ad) 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 Initial Bse 87 0 96 0 0 0 User Ad) 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 PHF Ad) 0 89 0 89 089 0 89 0 89 089 PHF Volume 98 0 108 0 0 0 Reduct Vol 0 0 o o o o Final Vol 98 0 108 0 0 0 Level Of Service Module Queue xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Stopped Del xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move * * * * * * * * * Movement LT LTR RT LT LTR RT LT LTR RT Shared Cap xxxx 108 xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx SharedQueue xxxxx 16 8 xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shrd StpDel xxxxx 508 xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx ApproachDel 508 1 xxxxxx xxxxxx Shared LOS * F ApproachLOS F * * * C H* *|1010|0 2 xxxx xxxxx 12 5 xxxx xxxxx Traffix 7 6 0715 (c) 2003 Dowling Assoc Licensed to KAKU, SANTA MONICA, CAD CP PM Tue Nov 16, 2004 12 58 37 Page 2 1 _ _ 0 t i Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Base Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #6 Landmark St & Washington BI [2 way stop controlled] ******************************************************************************** Average Delay (sec/veh) 3 4 Worst Case Level Of Service F[ 98 6] ******************************************************************************** Street Name Landmark St Washington Bl East Bound West Bound T R L - T R - - - II - 1 Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Include Include 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1275 15 31 1107 0 00 1 00 100 1 00 1 00 100 0 1275 15 31 1107 0 00 1 00 100 1 00 1 00 100 95 0 95 095 0 95 0 95 095 0 1341 16 33 1164 0|109| 0 0 0 0 0 0 1341 16 33 1164 0 Approach North Bound South Bound Movement L I R L T R L - -I II- II Control Stop Sign Stop Sign Rights Include Include Lanes 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - 1 II-- -- II Volume Module Base Vol 30 0 53 0 0 0 Growth Ad] 1 00 1 00 100 1 00 1 00 100 1 Initial Bse 30 0 53 0 0 0 User Ad] 1 00 1 00 100 1 00 1 00 100 1 PHF Ad] 0 95 0 95 095 0 95 0 95 095 0 PHF Volume 32 0 56 0 0 0 Reduct Vol 0 0 0 0 0 0 Final Vol 32 0 56 0 0 0 4- e|1010|Critical Gap Module Critical Gp 6 8 xxxx FollowUpTlm 3 5 xxxx - --I Capacity Module Cnflict Vol 1996 xxxx Potent Cap 54 xxxx Move Cap 51 xxxx Volume/Cap 0 62 xxxx -11- II - II - -1 6 9 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 4 1 xxxx xxxxx 3 3 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 2 2 xxxx xxxxx -II-- - I I - II I 678 xxxx xxxx xxxxx XXXX XXXX XXXXX 1357 xxxx xxxxx 399 xxxx xxxx xxxxx XXXX XXXX XXXXX 513 xxxx xxxxx 399 xxxx xxxx xxxxx XXXX XXXX XXXXX 513 xxxx xxxxx 0 14 xxxx xxxx xxxx XXXX XXXX XXXX 0 06 xxxx xxxx - I - - II 11 - - 11 Level Of Service Module Queue xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Stopped Del xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move * * * * * * * * * Movement LT LTR RI LT LTR RI LT LTR RI Shared Cap xxxx 115 xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx SharedQueue xxxxx 4 2 xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shrd StpDel xxxxx 98 6 xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS * F * * * * * * * ApproachDel 98 6 xxxxxx xxxxxx ApproachLOS F * *Project Title Intersection Description Date/Time PARK CENTURY SCHOOL CULVER CITY 6 LANDMARK ST & WASHINGTON BL CUMBASE PLUS PROJECT CONDITIONS (YEAR 2008) AM PEAK HOUR (8 00 9 00) Thru Lane 1600 vph N S Split Phase N Left Lane 1600 vph E W Split Phase N Double Lt Penalty 20 % Lost Time (% of cycle) 10 ITS 0 % V/C Round Off (decs ) 3 APPROACH MVMT LANES VOLUME CAPACITY V/C ICU ANALYSIS Southbound RT 0 00 0 0 0 000 N 5(1) 0 000 TH 0 00 0 0 0 000 N S(2) 0 074 LT 000 0 0 0 000 E W(1) 0 435 Westbound RT 0 00 0 0 0 000 E W(2) 0 616 TH 2 00 1 889 3 200 0 616 LT 0 00 83 1 600 0 052 V/C 0 690 Northbound RI 0 49 58 786 0 000 Lost Time 0 100 TH 000 0 0 0 000 LT 051 60 814 0 074 Eastbound RI 0 00 104 0 0 000 ICU 0 790 TH 200 1 120 3 200 0 383 LT 000 0 0 0 000 LOS C Date/Time PM PEAK HOUR (4 45 5 45) APPROACH MVMT LANES VOLUME CAPACITY V/C ICU ANALYSIS Southbound RT 0 00 0 0 0 000 N 5(1) 0 022 TH 0 00 0 0 0 000 N S(2) 0 053 LT 000 0 0 0 000 E W(1) 0 422 Westbound RI 0 00 0 0 0 000 E W(2) 0 356 TH 2 00 1 107 3 200 0 356 LT 000 31 1 600 0 019 V/C 0 475 Northbound RT 063 53 1 010 0 022 Lost Time 0 100 TH 000 0 0 0 000 LT 037 31 590 0 053 Eastbound RI 0 00 15 0 0 000 ICU 0 575 TH 200 1 275 3 200 0 403 LT 000 0 0 0 000 LOS A Date/Time Mid Day PEAK HOUR (3 00-4 00) APPROACH MVMT LANES VOLUME CAPACITY V/C ICU ANALYSIS Southbound RT 0 00 0 0 0 000 N S(1) 0 029 TH 000 0 0 0 000 N S(2) 0 114 LT 000 0 0 0 000 E W(1) 0 382 Westbound RT 0 00 0 0 0 000 E W(2) 0 316 TH 200 937 3 200 0 316 LT 0 00 75 1 600 0 047 V/C 0 496 Northbound RT 0 55 100 874 0 029 Lost Time 0 100 TH 000 0 0 0 000 LT 045 83 726 0 114 Eastbound RT 000 84 0 0 000 ICU 0 596 TFI 200 989 3 200 0 335 LT 000 0 0 0 000 LOS A Denotes cntical movement 00Printed 11/16/2004 KICU cp-three group stagger xis Revised 2/4/00 Project Title Intersection Description PARK CENTURY SCHOOL CULVER CITY 7 WASHINGTON BL & CULVER BL/MAIN ST CUMBASE PLUS PROJECT CONDITIONS (YEAR 2008) Date/Time AM PEAK HOUR (7 45 8 45) Thru Lane 1600 vph N-S Split Phase N Left Lane 1600 vph E W Split Phase N Double It Penalty. 20 % Lost Time (')/0 of cycle) 10 ITS 0 % V/C Round Off (decs ) 3 APPROACH MVMT LANES VOLUME CAPACITY V/C ICU ANALYSIS Southbound RT 000 42 0 0 000 N S(1) 0 236 TH 200 387 3 200 0 134 N S(2) 0 216 LT 100 29 1 600 0 018 E W(1) 0 562 Westbound RI 000 10 0 0 000 E W(2) 0 110 TN 1 00 155 1 600 0 103 LT 200 1 189 2 560 0 464 V/C 0 798 Northbound RT 2 00 894 3 200 0 094 Lost Time 0 100 TH 200 696 3 200 0 218 LT 1 00 131 1 600 0 082 ATSAC 0 070 Eastbound RT 1 00 107 1 600 0 000 ICU 0 828 TH 1 00 146 1 600 0 098 * LT 000 11 1 600 0 007 LOS D Date/Time PM PEAK HOUR (5 00-6 00) APPROACH MVMT LANES VOLUME CAPACITY V/C ICU ANALYSIS Southbound RT 000 32 0 0 000 N S(1) 0 237 TH 200 639 3 200 0 210 N S(2) 0 258 LT 100 48 ) 1 600 0 030 E W(1) 0 551 Westbound RT 000 12 0 0 000 E W(2) 0 084 TH 100 80 1 600 0 058 LT 200 1 042 2 560 0 407 V/C 0 809 Northbound RT 200 946 3 200 0 133 Lost Time 0 100 TN 200 661 3 200 0 207 LT 1 00 76 1 600 0 048 ATSAC 0 070 Eastbound RI 1 00 130 1 600 0 034 ICU 0 839 TH 1 00 190 1 600 0 144 LT 000 41 1 600 0 026 LOS D Date/Time Mid Day PEAK HOUR (3 00-4 00) APPROACH MVMT LANES VOLUME CAPACITY V/C ICU ANALYSIS Southbound RT 000 19 0 0 000 N S(1) 0 187 TH 200 454 3 200 0 148 N S(2) 0 190 LT 100 41 1 600 0 026 E VV(1) 0 427 Westbound RT 000 7 0 0 000 E W(2) 0 061 TH 100 74 1 600 0 051 LT 200 826 2 560 0 323 V/C 0 617 Northbound RI 200 779 3 200 0 114 Lost Time 0 100 TH 200 514 3 200 0 161 LT 1 00 67 1 600 0 042 ATSAC 0 070 Eastbound RI 1 00 120 1 600 0 033 ICU 0 647 TH 1 00 151 1 600 0 104 LT 000 16 1 600 0 010 LOS B Denotes critical movementMitigation for Year 2008 Cumulative Plus Project 0Mitigation for Year 2008 Cumulative Plus Project [ 6 gt Project Title Intersection Description Date/Time PARK CENTURY SCHOOL CULVER CITY 6 LANDMARK ST & WASHINGTON BL CUMBASE PLUS PROJECT CONDITIONS (YEAR 2008) WITH MITIGATION AM PEAK HOUR (8 00 9 00) Thru Lane 1600 vph N S Split Phase N Left Lane 1600 vph E W Split Phase N Double Lt Penalty 20 °/ Lost Time (k of cycle) 10 ITS 0 / V/C Round Off (decs ) 3 APPROACH MVMT LANES VOLUME CAPACITY V/C ICU ANALYSIS Southbound RT 0 00 0 0 0 000 N S(1) 0 000 TH 0 00 0 0 0 000 N S(2) 0 038 LT 000 0 0 0 000 E W(1) 0 435 Westbound RT 0 00 0 0 0 000 E W(2) 0 616 TH 2 00 1 889 3 200 0 616 LT 0 00 83 1 600 0 052 V/C 0 654 Northbound RT 1 00 58 1 600 0 000 Lost Time 0 100 TH 000 0 0 0 000 LT 1 00 60 1 600 0 038 Eastbound RT 0 00 104 0 0 000 ICU 0 754 TH 2 00 1 120 3 200 0 383 LT 000 0 0 0 000 LOS C Date/Time PM PEAK HOUR (4 45 5 45) APPROACH MVMT LANES VOLUME CAPACITY V/C ICU ANALYSIS Southbound RT 000 0 0 0 000 N S(1) 0 014 TH 000 0 0 0 000 N S(2) 0 019 LT 000 0 0 0 000 E W(1) 0 422 Westbound RT 0 00 0 0 0 000 E W(2) 0 356 TH 2 00 1 107 3 200 0 356 LT0 00 31_ 1 600 0 019 V/C 0 441 Northbound _ RI 100 53 1 600 0 014 Lost Time 0 100 TH 000 0 0 0 000 LT 1 00 31 1 600 0 019 Eastbound RI 0 00 15 0 0 000 ICU 0 541 TH 2 00 1 275 3 200 0 403 LT 000 0 0 0 000 LOS A Date/Time Mid Day PEAK HOUR (3 00-4 00) APPROACH MVMT LANES VOLUME CAPACITY V/C ICU ANALYSIS Southbound RI 0 00 0 0 0 000 N S(1) 0 016 TH 0 00 0 0 0 000 N S(2) 0 052 LT 000 0 0 0 000 E W(1) 0 382 Westbound RI 0 00 0 0 0 000 E W(2) 0 316 TH 200 937 3 200 0 316 LT 0 00 75 1 600 0 047 V/C 0 434 _ 100 Lost Time 0 100 Northbound RI 1 00 1 600 0 016 TH 000 0 0 0 000 LT 1 00 83 1 600 0 052 Eastbound RI 0 00 84 0 0 000 ICU 0 534 TH 2 00 989 3 200 0 335 LT 000 0 0 0 000 LOS A Denotes critical movementKaku Associates Inc 11/16/2004 SUMMARY OF TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANT ANALYSIS Major Street Washington Boulevard Minor Street Landmark Street Scenario Cumulative Plus Project AM Peak Hour SUMMARY OF RESULTS Warrant MUTCD Warrant Number Ca!trans Warrant Number Requested for Analysis? Volumes Satisfy Warrant? Applicable Time Period Fillmore St Eight Hour Vehicular Volume 1 Minimum Vehicular Volume 1A 1 YES NO 8th Highest Hour Interruption of Continuous Traffic 1B 2 YES NO 8th Highest Hour 80% Combination 1C 8 YES NO 8th Highest Hour Four Hour Volume 2 9 YES YES 4th Highest Hour Peak Hour Volume 3 11 YES YES Peak Hour Estimated Average Daily Traffic n/a n/a Minimum Vehicular Volume NO nia Daily Interruption of Continuous Traffic NO n/a Daily 80% Combination NO n/a Daily 180 263 27 p IKaku Associates Inc 11/16/2004 SUMMARY OF TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANT ANALYSIS Major Street Washington Boulevard Minor Street Landmark Street Scenario Cumulative Plus Project MIDDAY Peak Hour SUMMARY OF RESULTS Warrant MUTCD Warrant Number Caftans Warrant Number Requested for Analysis? Volumes Satisfy Warrant? Applicable Time Penod Fillmore St Eight Hour Vehicular Volume 1 Minimum Vehicular Volume 1A 1 YES NO 8th Highest Hour Interruption of Continuous Traffic 1B 2 YES NO 8th Highest Hour 80% Combination 1C 8 YES NO 8th Highest Hour Four Hour Volume 2 9 YES YES 4th Highest Hour Peak Hour Volume 3 11 YES YES Peak Hour Estimated Average Daily Traffic n/a n/a Minimum Vehicular Volume NO n/a Daily Interruption of Continuous Traffic NO n/a Daily 80% Combination NO n/a Daily 376 44Kaku Associates Inc 11/16/2004 SUMMARY OF TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANT ANALYSIS Major Street Washington Boulevard Minor Street Landmark Street Scenario Cumulative Plus Project PM Peak Hour SUMMARY OF RESULTS Warrant MUTCD Warrant Number Caltrans Warrant Number Requested for Analysis? Volumes Satisfy Warrant? Applicable Time Period Fillmore St Eight Hour Vehicular Volume 1 Minimum Vehicular Volume 1A 1 YES NO 8th Highest Hour Interruption of Continuous Traffic 1B 2 YES NO 8th Highest Hour 80% Combination 1C 8 YES NO 8th Highest Hour Four Hour Volume 2 9 YES NO 4th Highest Hour Peak Hour Volume 3 11 YES NO Peak Hour Estimated Average Daily Traffic n/a n/a Minimum Vehicular Volume NO n/a Daily Interruption of Continuous Traffic NO n/a Daily 80% Combination NO n/a Daily 376 327 44Kaku Associates Inc 11/16/2004 SUMMARY OF TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANT ANALYSIS Major Street Washington Boulevard Minor Street Landmark Street Scenano Cumulative Base AM Peak Hour SUMMARY OF RESULTS Warrant MUTCD Warrant Number Ca!trans Warrant Number Requested for Analysis'? Volumes Satisfy Warrant'? Applicable Time Period Eight Hour Vehicular Volume 1 Minimum Vehicular Volume 1A 1 YES NO 8th Highest Hour Interruption of Continuous Traffic 1B 2 YES NO 8th Highest Hour 80% Combination 1C 8 YES NO 8th Highest Hour Four Hour Volume 2 9 YES NO 4th Highest Hour Peak Hour Volume 3 11 YES NO Peak Hour Estimated Average Daily Traffic n/a n/a Minimum Vehicular Volume NO n/a Daily Interruption of Continuous Traffic NO n/a Daily 80% Combination NO n/a Daily HKaku Associates Inc 11/16/2004 SUMMARY OF TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANT ANALYSIS Major Street Washington Boulevard Minor Street Landmark Street Scenario Cumulative Base MIDDAY Peak Hour SUMMARY OF RESULTS Warrant MUTCD Warrant Number Caltrans Warrant Number Requested for Analysis? Volumes Satisfy Warrant? Applicable Time Period Eight Hour Vehicular Volume 1 Minimum Vehicular Volume 1A 1 YES NO 8th Highest Hour Interruption of Continuous Traffic 1B 2 YES NO 8th Highest Hour 80% Combination 1C 8 YES NO 8th Highest Hour Four Hour Volume 2 9 YES YES 4th Highest Hour Peak Hour Volume 3 11 YES YES Peak Hour Estimated Average Daily Traffic n/a n/a Minimum Vehicular Volume NO n/a Daily Interruption of Continuous Traffic NO n/a Daily 80% Combination NO n/a Daily [ 7Kaku Associates Inc 11/16/2004 SUMMARY OF TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANT ANALYSIS Major Street Washington Boulevard Minor Street Landmark Street Scenario Cumulative Base PM Peak Hour SUMMARY OF RESULTS Warrant MUTCD Warrant Number Caltrans Warrant Number Requested for Analysis'? Volumes Satisfy Warrant? Applicable Time Period Eight Hour Vehicular Volume 1 Minimum Vehicular Volume 1A i 1 YES NO 8th Highest Hour Interruption of Continuous Traffic 1B 2 YES NO 8th Highest Hour 80% Combination 1C 8 YES NO 8th Highest Hour Four Hour Volume 2 9 YES NO 4th Highest Hour Peak Hour Volume Estimated Average Daily Traffic|1010|n/a 11 n/a YES NO Peak Hour Minimum Vehicular Volume NO n/a Daily Interruption of Continuous Traffic NO n/a Daily 80% Combination NO n/a Daily LAKaku Associates Inc 11/16/2004 SUMMARY OF TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANT ANALYSIS Major Street Washington Boulevard Minor Street Landmark Street Scenario Existing AM Peak Hour SUMMARY OF RESULTS Warrant MUTCD Warrant Number Caltrans Warrant Number Requested for Analysis'? Volumes Satisfy Warrant? Applicable Time Period Eight Hour Vehicular Volume 1 Minimum Vehicular Volume 1A 1 YES NO 8th Highest Hour Interruption of Continuous Traffic 1B 2 YES NO 8th Highest Hour 80% Combination 1C 8 YES NO 8th Highest Hour Four Hour Volume 2 9 YES NO 4th Highest Hour Peak Hour Volume 3 11 YES NO Peak Hour Estimated Average Daily Traffic n/a n/a Minimum Vehicular Volume NO n/a Daily Interruption of Continuous Traffic NO n/a Daily 80% Combination NO n/a Daily 1 7 7Kaku Associates Inc /1/16/2004 SUMMARY OF TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANT ANALYSIS Major Street Washington Boulevard Minor Street Landmark Street Scenario Existing MIDDAY Peak Hour SUMMARY OF RESULTS Warrant MUTCD Warrant Number Ca!trans Warrant Number Requested for Analysis'? Volumes Satisfy Warrant'? Applicable Time Period Eight Hour Vehicular Volume 1 Minimum Vehicular Volume 1A 1 YES NO 8th Highest Hour Interruption of Continuous Traffic 1B 2 YES NO 8th Highest Hour 80% Combination 1C 8 YES NO 8th Highest Hour Four Hour Volume 2 9 YES YES 4th Highest Hour Peak Hour Volume 3 11 YES NO Peak Hour Estimated Average Daily Traffic n/a n/a Minimum Vehicular Volume NO n/a Daily Interruption of Continuous Traffic NO n/a Daily 80% Combination NO n/a Daily LAKaku Associates Inc 11/16/2004 SUMMARY OF TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANT ANALYSIS Major Street Washington Boulevard Minor Street Landmark Street Scenario Existing PM Peak Hour SUMMARY OF RESULTS Warrant MUTCD Warrant Number Ca!trans Warrant Number Requested for Analysis'? Volumes Satisfy Warrant? Applicable Time Period Eight Hour Vehicular Volume 1 Minimum Vehicular Volume 1A 1 YES NO 8th Highest Hour Interruption of Continuous Traffic 1B 2 YES NO 8th Highest Hour 80% Combination 1C 8 YES NO 8th Highest Hour Four Hour Volume 2 9 YES NO 4th Highest Hour Peak Hour Volume 3 11 YES NO Peak Hour Estimated Average Daily Traffic n/a n/a Minimum Vehicular Volume NO n/a Daily Interruption of Continuous Traffic NO n/a Daily 80% Combination NO n/a Daily 17qAPPENDIX D EXISTING PARKING UTILIZATION BY LOT WASHINGTON/LANDMARK INTERSECTIONTABLE D 1 EXISTING PARKING UTILIZATION BY LOT Park ng Zone 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 a 9 Hyundai Show Lot Mazda Show Lot, South Metered Space on On-Street Parking On-Street Parking Auto body shop South South West corner of East corner of Mazda Show Lot, East Northbound Landmark South West of South East of On-Street Parking Howard industries North of Location West of Intersection intersection Intersection of Zone 3 St intersection Intersection North of intersection intersection Capacity 30 spaces 5 spaces 0 spaces 8 spaces 1 spaces 12 spaces 4 spaces 21 spaces Capacity 89 spaces Period Occupied / Occupied / Occupied / Occupied / Occupied / Occupied / Occupied / Occupied / Occupied / 12 00 27 90/ 4 BO/ _L 0 0 /_ 8_ _100/ 1 100! 9 75/ 4 100/ 1 5/ _ 4__ 47 /__ __ 12 30 27 _ 90/ 3 60 / _|1010|_ _ 07 a loo/ 1 loo/ a 67/ 4 100/ 2 10/ 42 47/ 100 26 _ 87/ 3 60/ 0 0 / 8 loo/ 1 loo/ 8 67/ 4 100/ 3 14/ 34 38/ 130 24 _80/ 2 40/ 0_ I__ _ 0/ 6 75 / _L__ 1 100! 8 67/ 4 100/ 1 5/ 33 1 37 / _ 200 24 80/ 3 60/ _|1010|_ 0/ 8 [ 100/ 1 100 / 9 75 / 4 100 / 1 5/ _ 37 _ 4L __ 2 30 27 1 90 / 2 40/ 0 0/ _ 7 88/ 1 1007 10 83/ 4 100/ 1 5/ 32 36/ 300 24 80/ 3 60/ _ 0 _ 0/ _8_ 100/ 1_ _ 100/ 9 75/ 4 100/ 0 I 0/ _ 38 43 / __ 9 75/ _ 3 _ 75/ _ _0_ 1 _ 330 27 90/ 4_ 80/ 0 0! 7 88/ 1 100/ 0/ 34 38/ 400 30 100/ 3_ _ _ 60/ 0 0/ 6 75/ _ 1 100 / a 67/ 2 50/ o o/ _ 39 -4 44/ 4 30 28 93/ 5 / _100 _ _ _ 0 0/ _ 75/ 1 100/ 10 83/ 0 0/ 0 0/ 41 [_ 500 30 100/ 4 _ 80/ _ 0 0/ 5 63/ _ 1 100/ 9 75/ 0 0/ _ _0 0/ 31 35/ 0/ 100/ 87/ 0 0/ 0 0/ 530 27 90/ 3 I 60/ 0 7 88/ 1 8 __ 15 17/ 630 27 _ 90/ 2 40/ 0 0/ 6 75/ 1 100/ 6 50/ 0 0/ 0 0/ 7 8/ A erage 27 89/ 3 63/ 0 0/ 7 87/ 1 100/ 9 71/ 3 63/ 1 3/ 33 37/ Utilizatio j flgAg_ Pa k g Utl at was obi ed f in I eld ob erv to f am o n to 6 p m a TO rsday Decembe 2 2004 0 iy the mber of c sto er park g spaces w co ted e Id g the paces for eh cies sales The 89 pa kng spac a do employ ea dc stome ses1|10101010101010|Attachment No 10 RESOLUTION NO 2005-P013 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CULVER CITY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT, CUP P-2005019 AND ADMINISTRATIVE USE PERMIT, AUP P-2005018 FOR THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A PRIVATE SCHOOL WITH TANDEM PARKING AT 3939 LANDMARK STREET IN THE LIGHT MANUFACTURING (M-1) ZONE (Conditional Use Permit, CUP P-2005019 Administrative Use Permit, AUP P-2005018) WHEREAS on March 10, 2005, an application was filed for a Conditional Use Permit and an Administrative Use Permit for the establishment of a private school with tandem parking at 3939 Landmark Street, being Lot 12 and_a portion of Lot 13 of Tract 29708 in the Light Manufacturing (M-1) Zone, and, WHEREAS, on July 13, 2005, the Planning Commission conducted a duly noticed public hearing on these applications, considering the applications, plans staff report, environmental information, and all testimony presented, and, WHEREAS, in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act, the City provided public notice of the intent to adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration for this project and based upon the initial study, public comments and the record before the Planning Commission the project was determined to not have a significant adverse impact on the environment provided certain mitigations are required and the Planning Commission hereby adopted a Mitigated Negative Declaration, and, WHEREAS, following conclusion of the public discussion and thorough deliberation of the subject matter, the Planning Commission determined by a vote of 3 to 1 that Conditional Use Permit, CUP P-2005019 and Administrative Use Permit, AUP P-2005018 should be conditionally approved as set forth herein below|1010 10 10|11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CULVER 1 CITY, CALIFORNIA, RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS|1010|SECTION 1 Pursuant to the foregoing recitations and the provisions of Culver City|1010|Municipal Code (CCMC) Title 17 Section 109, Conditional Use Permit Required Findings,|1010|5 and subject to the Conditions of Approval herein the following findings are hereby made 6 1 The site for the proposed use is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the|1010| use and all yards, open spaces, walls and fences, parking, loading, landscaping and other features required by this Article, and those features determined to be|1010| reasonably necessary by the Planning Commission or the City Council to make the use compatible with land and uses in the vicinity|10 10| 10 The 53,838 square foot site is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the proposed school with up to 120 students and 47 staff members The site contains all required walls 11 and fences, parking, loading, landscaping and other features required by the CCMC and 12 those features determined to be reasonably necessary by the Planning Commission or the City Council to make the school compatible with the surrounding industrial and 13 residential area The staggered drop-off and pick-up times for students discussed in the 14 traffic study for the project will ensure that the project will create minimal traffic disruption of traffic operations on the neighborhood s street system 15 2 The site for the proposed use is related properly to streets and highways of 16 adequate width and pavement type to carry the quantity and kind of traffic 17 generated by the proposed use 18 Subject to the recommended Conditions of Approval, the school will be related properly to streets of adequate width and pavement type to carry the quantity and kind of traffic 19 generated by the school With the installation of a traffic signal at the intersection of 20 Washington Boulevard and Landmark Street, the restnping of Landmark Street to provide a left turn lane and the staggered pick-up and drop-off time for the students Washington 21 Boulevard and Landmark Street will be adequate to carry the quantity of traffic generated 22 by this project The installation of the signal and restnping will improve the existing traffic situation surrounding the intersection 23 There is an adequate drive approach from Landmark Street into and out of the site Also 24 conditions of approval that will address traffic/circulation will work to ensure that the 25 current level of service for these streets is not decreased because of the expansion 26 3 The proposed use will not adversely affect abutting property or the permitted use 27 thereof 28 The school will not adversely affect abutting properties or the permitted uses thereof because traffic and circulation can be mitigated through the various measures shown in 29 I g-3 Pnr1P 9 2005-P013the development plans and the conditions of approval required herein The proposed design of the school and the recommended conditions of approval will mitigate potential noise and aesthetic impacts There are no outdoor play areas and all staff, visitor, and pick-up and drop-off of students can occur without impacting adjacent streets because all drop-off/pick-up will occur on-site The school would also be compatible with the vast majority of potential future uses permitted in the M-1 Zone and the adjacent commercial and residential uses As a portion of the west side of Landmark Street is directly adjacent to residentially zoned property, it would not be possible to locate industrial uses at this location with the potential to cause adverse impacts upon the residential properties The school with the recommended conditions of approval will be compatible with the adjacent residential, commercial and industrial properties 4 The applicant did not commence the proposed use without first obtaining the required conditional use permit The school has not commenced operations without first obtaining the required conditional use permit SECTION 2 Pursuant to the foregoing recitations and the provisions of Culver City Municipal Code (CCMC) Title 17, Section 37-91, Tandem Parking and subject to the Conditions of Approval herein, the following findings are hereby made 1 The project is consistent with the objectives of the General Plan in that the tandem parking arrangement optimizes parking availability by reducing the pressure on on-street parking through the provision of private parking facilities and reducing the intrusion of spillover parking onto the streets 2 The property is located in the Light Manufacturing (M-1) Zone in which blocked access parking is permitted 3 The location design, layout, and standard and compact stall composition shall be consistent with the plans file dated April 27 2005 that comply with the CCMC regulations for tandem parking for nonresidential uses SECTION 3 Pursuant to the foregoing recitations and findings, the Planning Commission of the City of Culver City California, hereby approves Conditional Use Permit, CUP P-2005019 and Administrative Use Permit, AUP P-2005018, subject to the following conditions i 0 D.-at-gel '1 nnt-tc r1114 ,)|101010101010101010 10 10|11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 291|1010101010101010 10 10|11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 29 1 The final working drawings shall conform to the preliminary development plans file dated April 27 2005, except as noted below and otherwise noted during the building permit review process|109| The Conditions of Approval stated herein shall be referenced on the cover sheet, and repeated in full on the cover sheet of the final working drawings 3 The project and its operations shall comply with all applicable codes, standards and regulations, including, but not limited to, Building Safety, Fire, Planning, and Public Works code requirements and it shall comply with all applicable comments and code requirements as determined during the City's internal review process 4 Except as otherwise required herein, all applicable development standards and requirements in Planning Commission Resolution No 92-P001, Comprehensive Site Plan Review Development Standards and Conditions of Approval shall be met These standards as well as other conditions required in this approval shall be reflected on the plans submitted for building plan check The exterior lighting at the rear of the building shall not adversely affect the adjacent residential parcel as required in Planning Commission Resolution No 92-P001 5 The applicant shall actively advertise all opportunities for employment, contract services, and purchasing of materials to Culver City businesses and residents The applicant shall use reasonable best efforts to solicit and utilize economical and qualified services from Culver City-based employees and businesses The applicant shall also require the construction contractor(s) and subcontractors related to the project to advertise all construction opportunities to Culver City businesses and residents 6 The applicant shall provide the construction contractor(s) and each subcontractor related to the project a copy of the final project Conditions of Approval The applicant and the City agree that these conditions shall be enforceable through all legal and equitable remedies, including the imposition of fines against each and every person who conducts any activity on behalf of the applicant on or near the project site The applicant property owner and general construction contractor are ultimately responsible for all actions or omissions of a subcontractor 7 The applicant and contractors shall use all reasonable efforts to reuse and recycle 23 construction and demolition debris, to use environmentally friendly materials, and to provide energy efficient buildings, equipment and systems 24 25 |109| The City reserves the right to periodically inspect the premises without prior notification, to ensure ongoing compliance with all conditions of approval 26 9 Minor modifications to building siting or design may be approved by the Planning 27 Manager in keeping with the general design and content of the project approval 28 f ri Pane 4 2005-P01310 The Conditional Use Permit and Administrative Use Permit will expire if Building Safety permits have not been issued and work has not commenced to complete the Conditions of Approval, within one year after the date they becomes effective, unless a written extension request with fee is submitted to the Planning Division by the applicant prior to the expiration date and the Planning Division or the Planning Commission grant that extension request 11 Should the school use discontinue for a period of more than one year after building permits have been finalized, the Conditional Use Permit for operation of a school shall be null and void and no private school shall be allowed to take advantage of the Conditional Use Permit to operate a school at this location 12 A certificate of occupancy for the approved project will be issued only upon completion of all applicable conditions of approval and required site improvements If no Certificate of Occupancy is required, building permits will not be finaled until all conditions of approval and required site improvements have been completed This condition shall be completed prior to commencement of classes 13 Conditions of approval herein shall apply to the applicant, the operator of the school, and any successor business that may legally assume benefit of these entitlements 14 The maximum number of staff shall be 47 and no more than 120 students with a maximum age of 14 shall be enrolled at any one time Students who turn 15 during their last year at the school may finish the school year The number of staff may exceed 47 if additional parking is approved by the Planning Manager and subject to Culver City Municipal Code Section 37-91 5, Shared Parking Facilities or Section 37-91 7, Alternative Parking Provisions 15 Every year the school shall submit to the Planning Division, an enrollment schedule indicating total pre-school elementary school, after school day care enrollment and the total number of staff for that academic year 16 The applicant shall enter into a covenant and agreement with the City that shall govern the operation of the tandem parking The content of the covenant and agreement shall be approved by the Planning Manager and contain provisions satisfactory to the City to enforce all conditions of approval including liquidated damages and parking attendants, if required 17 The tandem parking pairs of parking spaces shall be assigned to staff members and all school employees shall park on-site and not on nearby streets 18 The number of evening school events that would necessitate off-site parking shall be limited to nine per year 19 The on-site circulation plan for student drop-off/pick-up shall be consistent with the preliminary development plans file dated April 27, 2005 The parking lot gates shall be V c) Pace 5_ 2005-P013|101010101010101010 10 10|11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29open at least one-half hour before the first staggered drop-off and at least one-half hour before school dismissal Monday through Friday, to allow parents who arrive early to queue onsite 20 The school shall submit a Transportation Management Plan to the Planning Manager and City Engineer for approval prior to the finalizing of building permits The plan shall include, (i) an on-site circulation plan for student drop-off and pick-up, (ii) a staggered drop-off and pick-up schedule for students as described in the Revised April 27, 2005 Traffic Study (this is a mitigation measure) which shall include at least one arrival and departure time for employees and three drop-off and pick-up times for students that at minimum, achieves the ratios and time separations between drop-offs and pick-ups as described in Alternative 1 or Alternative 2 of the Revised April 27, 2005 Traffic Study (iii) an aggressive program to encourage and implement carpools among students and staff members with incentives for forming carpools, (iv) methods to discourage parents parking and walking their children to and from the school, and (v) an on-site traffic monitoring program to facilitate the loading/unloading of students and proper vehicle circulation to alleviate the peak period congestion on-site with minimal impact to the neighborhood street system As a condition of approval of the Transportation Management Plan, the Planning Manager and/or City Engineer may require that the staggered drop-off and pick-up be implemented as of the first day the applicant opens the school for class, even if enrollment is below 70 students 21 The school shall not allow the queuing of vehicles to extend beyond the school's property line and onto Landmark Street 22 Times for general school operations and administrative functions shall be limited to 7 00 A M to 6 30 P M, Mondays through Fridays 23 The project will be subject to the City's Art in Public Places Program only if the valuation of the development exceeds the required threshold for the program The valuation will be calculated at the time of the building permit application submission 20 24 Prior to installation of landscaping the applicant shall provide the Planning Division with 21 three sets of detailed landscape and irrigation plans for review The Planning Manager and the Environmental Maintenance Manager shall approve the plans prior to the installation of any landscaping and irrigation 23 25 Prior to issuance of building permits, a noise study shall be submitted to the Building 24 Official that demonstrates the methods by which standards for interior and exterior noise 25 levels set in the General Plan will be attained If deemed necessary by the City the school shall undertake additional noise attenuation measures to be approved by the 26 City (this is a mitigation measure) 27 26 During all phases of construction information that includes contact names and 28 telephone numbers for the applicant construction contractor(s) and City, shall be ( s7 Paae 6 2005-P013|101010101010101010 10 10|11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 22 29-1|1010101010101010 10 10|11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 posted at the project site so as to be visible to the public These names and telephone numbers shall also be made available to adjacent homeowners 27 During all phases of construction, the applicant shall, to the best of their ability, assure that all construction workers and contractors have the ability to park on-site or at designated off-site locations and not in surrounding areas 28 The gate along the rear property line leading to Lindblade Street shall remain locked and shall only be used for ingress and egress of emergency vehicles No pedestrian gate leading to Lindblade Street shall be installed 29 The building setback area at the rear of the site adjacent to residentially zoned property shall not be used as a play/recreation area 30 During all phases of construction and once the development becomes operational, all graffiti shall be removed within 48 hours of its application 31 The school acknowledges that it is located in a Light Manufacturing (M-1) Zone and recognizes that other permitted uses compatible with uses in the M-1 Zone have the right to and can locate in proximity to the school The school further acknowledges that the City shall have the right to allow such compatible uses to locate within proximity to the school regardless of any complaints or objections to such uses raised by the school 32 A site improvement plan prepared by a civil engineer licensed in the State of California, or the architect of record, shall be submitted to the Engineering Division for review, approval and permitting This plan shall show drainage of the site indicated by contours or spot elevations, building pad elevations, and the design of on-site and off-site improvements with sufficient dimensions and details to allow for proper construction 33 The applicant shall install a trash enclosure to the satisfaction of the City's Sanitation Division Manager The walls of the trash enclosure shall be finished or painted to match the walls of the proposed building 21 34 The parking area shall be designed in accordance with City Council Resolution No 87- R100 Parking Design and Layout Guidelines and City Council Resolution No CS- 6486, Adopted Standards and Specifications for Off-Street Parking Areas 23 35 All drainage within the parking lot area shall be collected by an approved catch basin 24 system and filtered prior to being discharged from the site Drainage will not be allowed 25 to drain over drive approaches 26 36 Parking lot drainage devices, concrete curb, sidewalk, and driveway shall be designed 27 to the latest edition of the American Public Works Association (APWA) Standard Plans 28 37 All existing public improvements, to include but not be limited to curb gutter and A C paving along the project's frontage, shall be brought up to current code 29 1 C6 2005-P013 2238 The applicant shall be responsible for the expense to repair or replace any damage to the public right-of-way caused by the construction of the proposed project Such repair or replacement shall be completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer 39 During construction, dust shall be controlled by regular watering and as directed by the City inspector 40 All staging and storage of construction equipment and materials, including the construction dumpster, shall be on-site only The applicant shall obtain written permission from adjacent property owners for any construction staging occurring on adjacent property 41 The construction contractor shall advise the Public Works inspector of the schedule and shall meet with the inspector prior to commencement of work 42 Due to the change of use and increased density, this project is subject to the City's Sewer Facility Charge This charge shall be paid prior to the issuance of any permit 43 The applicant shall install a traffic signal at the intersection of Washington Boulevard and Landmark Street The new traffic signal shall be connected to the City's ATSAC system, contain a battery backup system and shall be installed with a Transit Priority System (this is a mitigation measure) The applicant shall install a left turn pocket along westbound Washington Boulevard at the intersection City staff, including Planning staff and the City's Traffic Engineer, shall work with the applicant and affected property owners, to minimize impacts to the extent possible that may occur with the installation of the westbound left turn pocket 44 The applicant shall indicate on the building permit plans, the existing location of the double detector check assembly (DDCA) fire department connection and the closest public fire hydrant (If this property does not have a DDCA, one will be required per LA County Health Dept and SCW Co) 45 The applicant shall indicate on the building permit plans any access control points such as gates and barriers 46 The applicant shall indicate on building permit plans if special equipment or landscaping 23 (such as an emergency generator, etc ) will be installed and their location on the property 24 25 47 On the building permit plans, the applicant shall provide a note under "FIRE DEPARTMENT NOTES" that states the property and structures thereon will comply 26 with all Culver City codes and ordinances 48 To alleviate the financial impact on the City and Redevelopment Agency resources and 28 to help assure the public welfare and safety is provided, because of its non-profit status the applicant, on behalf of itself and each of its successors and assigns, whether 27|101010101010101010 10 10|11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 i c. . Page 8 2005-P013 29voluntary or involuntary, shall agree for as long as the applicant or its successors or assigns takes benefit of this Conditional Use Permit, the applicant and any non-profit successor or assign shall make an annual payment to the City s General Fund and Redevelopment Agency Tax Increment Fund, on or before June 30 of each year, of an amount equal to the City s and Redevelopment Agency s share of the property tax that would be paid at 3939 Landmark Street for fiscal year 2005-2006 The City Treasurer s office shall determine the amount based on the property tax bill for the property for fiscal year 2005-2006 The annual payment shall be increased annually (i) based on an inflationary rate not-to-exceed 2% of the full cash value base of 3939 Landmark Street and (ii) in the same manner as the Los Angeles County Assessor is authorized to increase real property taxes as a result of any sale of the site 49 This Conditional Use Permit and Administrative Use Permit shall become effective only after the applicant has signed an acknowledgement and acceptance of the final Conditions of Approval as approved by the Planning Commission, or City Council after an appeal, if any 50 The applicant, on behalf of itself and each successor-in-interest taking any benefit from this CUP, agrees to indemnify, defend and hold harmless the City of Culver City, the Culver City Redevelopment Agency, and each of their respective elected and appointed officials officers, employees, agents, contractors and consultants from and against any and all claims, lawsuits, judgments, liability injury or damage, including reasonable attorneys fees and court costs, which may arise from each and every third party challenge to the City's or Agency's final approval of the subject project The applicant shall add the City and Agency as additional insureds on their general liability insurance policies provided, that the insurance will not limit the applicant's obligations under this condition In addition, the applicant, on behalf of itself and any successor-in-interest taking any benefit from this CUP, agrees to release and waive any and all claims, causes of action or legal or equitable remedies, it may have against the City of Culver City the Culver City Redevelopment Agency and each of their respective elected and appointed officials, officers, employees, agents, contractors and consultants which may anse from final approval of the subject project APPROVED and ADOPTED this 13 th day of July 2005 MAUREEN M MURANAKA, VICE CHAIR PLANNING COMMISSION CITY OF CULVER CITY, CALIFORNIA Attested by V b. 4/ Sherry *kJ- - Senior Planner c‘, 0|101010101010101010 10 10|11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29City of Culver City, California Planning Commission Agenda Item Report Meeting Date June 8, 2005 Item Number PH-1 AGENDA ITEM Conditional Use Permit, CUP P-2005019 and Administrative Use Permit, AUP P-2005018 ' to Allow the Establishment of a Private School with Tandem Parking at 3939 Landmark Street in the Light Manufacturing (M-1) Zone Contact Person/Dept 'Jose Mendivil, Phone Number ' (310) 253-5757 Associate Planner: Public Hearing IX] i:Action'Item 0 , Atfechinents , [X] Public Notification: Notice's were mailed ,on May,17; 2005,to all property owners No occupants within a 300 radius of 4 the , site extended to end of pity block, . courtesy , Affairs and , notices were mailed to the Downtown Business Association, Culver City Homeowner Association, Tom Camarella, Miria . Zaragoza;- Sandi Levin, the Cultural Commissioners, and the Culver City Unified School District on May 17, 2005, &nailed to the Master Notification List on May 18, 2005 Planning Approval. Sherry Jordan, Senior Planner June 2, 2005 RECOMMENDATION a Use with of has That the Planning Commission|109| Adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration finding that the project will not have significant adverse impact on the environment provided certain mitigations are required (Attachment No 6), and,|109| Approve Conditional Use Permit, CUP P-2005019 and Administrative Permit, AUP P-2005018 to allow the establishment of a private school tandem parking at 3939 Landmark Street, subject to Conditions of Approval as stated in Resolution No 2005-P013 (Attachment No 7) PROCEDURES|109| Chair seeks motion to receive and file affidavit of mailing and posting notices|109| Chair calls on staff for a brief staff report and Commission poses questions to staff as desired|109| Chair opens the public hearing and receives public testimony|109| Chair seeks a motion to close the public hearing after all testimony been presented|109| Commission discusses the matter and arrives at its decision ATTACHMENT 11 I q/City of Culver City, California Planning Commission Agenda Item Report BACKGROUND General Information See Attachment No 1, Project Summary Existing Conditions and Proiect Description The 53,838 sq ft site for the proposed school contains a 37,200 sq ft two-story industrial building with offices The applicant has purchased the site and is currently leasing out the building to entertainment production companies on an as needed basis Park Century School is a private school designed to meet specific educational needs of children 7-14 years of age who have learning disabilities They have outgrown their current location in Los Angeles and wish to relocate to 3939 Landmark Street They propose to remodel the existing industrial building and add 6,750 additional square feet within the existing building foot print The school would open with 80 students and ultimately serve a student population of 120 with 47 staff members A Conditional Use Permit (CUP) is required for a private educational institution and an Administration Use Permit (AUP) is required for the use of tandem parking As this project required Planning Commission review, it was determined that both applications should be considered together Art in Pubhc Places Program The applicant is proposing to meet their Art in Public Places requirement by creating a new façade and entry for the school They would enclose the area defined by the existing colonnade with a new glass curtain wall creating a gallery or loggia for the building In front of the curtain wall four 18 feet green glass tree sculptures would be applied Additionally, yellow glass sculptures in the shape of stars would be applied to the curtain wall above the entry The existing concrete façade would be sheathed with plywood to present a warmer exterior to the building The roof of the façade would be capped with corrugated stainless steel The loggia will be illuminated by interior light sources that will back light the glass façade and sculptures While the Planning Commission will not be taking any action on the proposed art, it is shown for your information on the plans, and along with photographs of the Page 2 of 8 e‘')City of Culver City, California Planning Commission Agenda Item Report existing building, in Attachment No 5 as this will significantly change the front façade of the building ANAYLSIS 1 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT Parking and Circulation The parking requirement for an educational institution with nondnving age students is to be determined with the approval of the Conditional Use Permit The Zoning Code states that as a general rule one parking space should be provided for each full-time and part-time staff member along with adequate passenger loading facilities The school proposes to provide one space for each full and part-time staff member they anticipate having (for a total of 47 parking spaces) at the maximum enrollment of 120 students Eight of the 47 parking spaces would be blocked access spaces (16 tandem pairs - six standard pairs and two compact pairs) A condition of approval is recommended to require that staff members be assigned the tandem parking spaces Student loading and unloading would take place on-site adjacent to the building The proposed vehicular queuing plan is shown on Sheet A-1 1 of the plans It calls for a one-way circulation pattern using the one driveway serving the property off of Landmark Street The plans show that 23 vehicles can be queued on-site There is a gate along the rear property line that will be an emergency-only exit on to Lindblade Street The school would like the option of providing a pedestrian opening in the gate A recommended Condition of Approval is included that would require that the pedestrian gate be locked during the drop-off and pick-up times for the students to prevent parents from using Lindblade Street to pick-up or drop-off children Traffic A traffic study was completed and is included in your packet materials The study determined that the intersection of Washington Boulevard and Landmark Street would be impacted by the project All traffic for the project must use this intersection Landmark Street is a two-way street with one travel lane in each direction Washington Boulevard is a major arterial with two lanes in each Page 3 of 8City of Culver City, California Planning Commission Agenda Item Report direction There is a stop sign when exiting Landmark Street onto Washington Boulevard The Washington/Landmark intersection is currently functioning at Level of Service (LOS) F LOS is a qualitative measure used to describe the condition of traffic flow A description of the LOS standards and methodology is explained beginning on Page 8 of the traffic study To enhance the intersection capacity and accommodate the existing industrial traffic as will as the school traffic, the study suggests that a traffic signal be installed at the Washington/Landmark intersection and Landmark Street south of Washington Boulevard be restnped to provide two northbound lanes (one right- turn only land and one left-turn only lane) The new signal would mitigate the impacts of the school, especially for the outbound traffic for the morning drop-off and for the afternoon pick-up The new signal would also be required to connect to the Automated Traffic Surveillance and Control (ATSAC) coordinated signal system operated by the City of Los Angeles, as a way to reduce the interruption of traffic flow along Washington Boulevard Staff agrees with these mitigation measures The traffic study also discusses the City's request to restnpe Washington Boulevard to provide a left turn lane from westbound Washington Boulevard onto Landmark Street Upon further review staff decided not to require the restnping of Washington Boulevard as it would result in the loss of the parking lane on the north side of Washington Boulevard in front of Howard Industries Customers of Howard Industries use the street parking lane to queue their trucks awaiting access to Howard Industries loading facility The traffic study states that the restnping of Washington Boulevard is not required to mitigate the impacts of the project Additionally, the traffic study conducted an analysis concerning the times that the students are dropped-off and picked-up (Page 40 of the traffic study) The study first analyzed the students arriving in two shifts with a 72/48 split with a 30 minute separation between the two student groups However this could potentially affect the access to the neighboring light industrial use or car dealerships as the future on-site circulation plan for the school can only accommodate 23 queued vehicles Therefore, two staggered alternatives that would not generate more than 23 vehicles on-site were developed The study recommended that either Alternative 1 (67/53 split and 30 minute separation between student groups) or Alternate 2 (70/50 split and 35 minute separation between student groups) be implemented when the school enrollment exceeds 70 students The two alternative staggered schedules would create minimal disruption for traffic operations on the neighborhood street system Page 4 of 8City of Culver City, California Planning Commission Agenda Item Report The requirement for a staggered student arrival and departure schedule and for a traffic monitoring plan is a recommended Condition of Approval and will be part of the Transportation Management Plan to be submitted to the Planning Manager and City Engineer for approval The traffic monitor(s) would be on-site during the drop-off and pick-up periods to facilitate the loading/unloading of students to/from vehicles and to ensure the inbound line of vehicles are moving all the way forward in the queue Noise Because the site is located in an industrial area near a major artery, there is a potential for children to be exposed to excessive noise levels A recommended Condition of Approval is included that would require a noise study be submitted to the Building Official that demonstrates the methods by which standards for interior and exterior noise levels (set in the General Plan) will be attained If deemed necessary by the City, the school shall undertake additional noise attenuation measures to be approved by the Building Official There will not be any outdoor play areas Recreational activities will occur in the proposed interior gymnasium thereby reducing the potential for noise impacts on the adjacent residential neighborhood Compatibility with Surrounding Uses The General Plan Land Use Designation for the northern portion of the school site is General Corridor (a portion of the parking lot) with the remaining portion being designated as Industrial (Attachment No 4) The Zoning is Light Manufacturing The proposed use is consistent with the Industrial and General Corridor General Plan Land Use designations and is permitted in the Light Manufacturing (M-1) Zone The Industrial General Plan designation as described in the Land Use Element allows a variety of manufacturing and industrial uses, but precludes heavy industry Outdoor activities would be limited to those that conform to standards for noise and odors as identified by the Noise Element and air quality guidelines This designation is designed and intended to support and encourage industrial businesses as a valuable component of the City s economic base There is a potential for limiting the full range of allowed uses within the Light Manufacturing (M-1) Zone should a school (a sensitive receptor) locate at this site However, there are many industrial uses that would be permitted in the area that would not be considered to have an impact on sensitive receptors such as a Page 5 of 8 tqcCity of Culver City, California Planning Commission Agenda Item Report school There are no existing industries on Landmark Street that would appear to create a hazard to the school The school would also be compatible with many potential future uses permitted in the M-1 Zone and Industrial General Plan Land Use Element designation and the adjacent commercial and residential uses As a portion of the site is directly adjacent to residentially zoned property, it would not be possible to establish industrial uses at this location with the potential to cause adverse impacts upon the residential properties Additionally, to the west of the site, a portion of Lindblade Street is designated, per the General Plan, as Light Industrial The General Plan Light Industrial designation calls clean, quiet industrial uses which could potentially be compatible with an adjacent school use Attachment No 8 is a report from the applicant's consultant, Geomatnx, which describes the potential affects of surrounding industrial uses on the proposed school The report concludes that industrial uses in the vicinity of the school could represent a source of potentially significant toxic air contaminants but due to emission limits imposed by South Coast Air Quality Management District permits, their operations do not pose potential health impacts at the school site 2 ADMINISTRATIVE USE PERMIT FOR TANDEM PARKING As described above, tandem parking is proposed in order to provide the 47 parking spaces within the parking area The Administrative Use Permit would establish the maximum number of blocked access parking spaces to be permitted, approval of the location, the standard and compact stall composition of the parking spaces, and any site specific provisions to enforce all conditions of approval The attached plans illustrate the number, location, and size of the proposed tandem parking spaces DISCUSSION Comments Received Dunnq Public Comment Period As of the writing of this report, staff had received four telephone calls concerning the following • A resident adjacent to the rear of the project site expressed concern about children climbing over the rear fence into his yard (q(2 Page 6 of 8City of Culver City, California Planning Commission Agenda Item Report • A teacher interested in applying for a job • An employee of Sony inquiring about the project • Howard Industries expressing concern about the possibility of losing the street parking in front of his business that is used for truck queuing • A property owner on Lindblade Street inquiring about the use of the gate along the rear property line exiting onto Lindblade Street Additionally, the Culver City Unified School District commented that they are opposed to the school because if Culver City students with learning disabilities choose to attend this private school it will have a significant negative fiscal impact on the District Legal Standard for Decision/Prolect Findings CCMC Title 17, Zoning, Section 37-109 requires that certain findings must be made before an application for a conditional use permit can be approved Staff believes the criteria and findings can be made for Conditional Use Permit, CUP P-2005019 if approved subject to the recommended Conditions of Approval found in proposed Resolution No 2005-P013 (Attachment No 7) This resolution contains the Conditional Use Permit findings There are no required findings for Administrative Use Permits established in the Culver City Municipal Code ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) guidelines this project has been determined to have less than significant impacts on the community provided certain mitigations are incorporated, a Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared Specifically, the increased number of vehicle trips for the school and the exposure of persons to noise levels in excess of standards established in the General Plan were identified as potentially significant unless mitigated Several mitigations have been proposed as conditions of approval, Attachment No 6 identifies the specific mitigation measures FISCAL IMPACT As an industrial use, the site generates property taxes for the City, the Redevelopment Agency, and other non-city agencies Normally, this revenue source would be eliminated because the applicant, Park Century School, is a not- Page 7 of 8 tf7City of Culver City, California Planning Commission Agenda Item Report for-profit entity However, the applicant has agreed to pay annually, the property taxes that would normally be generated for the City and the Redevelopment Agency had an industrial use continued on the site The applicant has agreed to pay all property taxes due to the City and the Redevelopment Agency This condition is included in Resolution No 2005-P013 ALTERNATIVE OPTIONS The following alternative actions may be considered by the Planning Commission 1 Adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration finding and approve the applications with the recommended conditions of approval if the application is deemed to meet the required findings 2 Adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration finding and approve the applications with additional or different conditions of approval, if deemed necessary to meet the required findings and mitigate any new project impacts identified at the meeting 3 Disapprove the applications if they do not meet the required findings and not adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration finding ATTACHMENTS 1 Project Summary 2 Area Map 3 Aerial Photo of Area 4 General Plan Land Use Designation Map 5 Photographs of Existing Building and Proposed Art 6 Mitigated Negative Declaration 7 Draft Planning Commission Resolution No 2005-P013 8 Letter to Sean T Matsler, Esq from Geomatnx Consultants, Inc, received March 10, 2005 9 Traffic Study for the Park Century School — Revised April 27, 2005 10 Plans dated April 27, 2005 (Date received) 1 0 Page 8 of 8 City of Culver City, California Planning Commission Supplemental Agenda Item Report , Meeting Date July 13, 2005 Item Number PH-1 AGENDA ITEM Continuance of Conditional Use Permit, CUP P-2005019 and Administrative Use Permit, AUP P-2005018 Public Hearing to Allow the Establishment of a Private School with Tandem Parking at 3939 Landmark Street in the Light Manufacturing (M-1) Zone Contact Person/Dept Jose Mendivil, Phone Number (310) 253-5757 Associate Planner Public Hearing [X] Action Item [] Attachments [X] Public Notification Notices were mailed on May 17, 2005 to all property owners and occupants within a 300 radius of the site, extended to end of city block, courtesy notices were mailed to the Downtown Business Association, Culver City Homeowner Association, Tom Camarella, Marta Zaragoza, Sandi Levin, the Cultural Affairs Commissioners, and the Culver City Unified School District on May 17, 2005, and emailed to the Master Notification List on May 18, 2005 Planning Approval Sherry Jordan, Senior Planner June 20, 2005 RECOMMENDATION That the Planning Commission|109| Adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration finding that the project will not have a significant adverse impact on the environment provided certain mitigations are required (Attachment No 6 of June 8, 2005, Agenda Packet), and,|109| Approve Conditional Use Permit, CUP P-2005019 and Administrative Use Permit, AUP P-2005018 to allow the establishment of a private school with tandem parking at 3939 Landmark Street, subject to Conditions of Approval as stated in Revised Resolution No 2005-P013 (Attachment No 2 of this Supplemental Agenda Report) PROCEDURES|109| Chair continues the public hearing and receives public testimony|109| Chair seeks a motion to close the public hearing after all testimony has been presented|109| Commission discusses the matter and arrives at its decision BACKGROUND At the June 8, 2005, Planning Commission meeting, the Planning Commission opened the public hearing for Conditional Use Permit, CUP P-2005019 and Administrative Use Permit, AUP P-2005018 The California Environmental Page 1 of 3 (q/City of Culver City, California Planning Commission Supplemental Agenda Item Report Quality Act (CEQA) mandated public review period for the project s Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) was set to expire on June 15, 2005 One of the project's conditions of approval set the effective date of the CUP and AUP to be after the CEQA review period (June 15, 2005) The Commission felt it was inappropriate to act on the project before June 15, 2005 However, they heard testimony from the applicant several parents of children attending the school, a neighboring business, and a Culver City resident After this testimony and some brief discussion on how the site would operate as a school, the hearing was continued and the Commission did not provide any further comments The testimony by the applicant generally expressed their enthusiasm in relocating to Culver City, their willingness to work with the City and the merits of having the school in the City They also did not object to the conditions of approval as presented that evening The parents stated the uniqueness of the school s ability to nurture the learning potential of children with learning disabilities Several parents noted that their children were failing school until they were enrolled at Park Century School, they also stated that the majority of Park Century School students do well in high school and eventually pursue higher education A representative of a neighboring business expressed general support for the project but also asked that the Commission prohibit the installation of a pedestrian gate at the rear of the property She expressed concern over the potential hazardous conflicts that could arise between their delivery trucks and parents walking with their children The applicant stated that they would not object to an amendment that would prohibit a pedestrian gate at the rear The Culver City resident expressed opposition to the project noting the private school s potential for affecting the City s public schools and the number of private schools that are already in the City FURTHER COMMENTS ON THE MND No one submitted comments on the MND between the period beginning after the meeting and up to June 15 2005 RECOMMENDED AMENDMENTS TO CONDITIONS On the day of the public hearing, Commissioner Muranaka provided suggested amendments to recommended Condition of Approval Nos 28 31 and 48 Staff 2,0 0 Page 2 of 3Page 3 of 3 City of Culver City, California Planning Commission Supplemental Agenda Item Report agrees with Commissioner Muranaka s suggested amendments to Condition Nos 28 and 31 Below IS Commissioner Muranaka s suggested revision to the first part of the third sentence of Condition No 48 The annual payment shall be increased (i) at a rate of 2% of the full cash base value of 3939 Landmark Street (as the same may be increased from time to time by (ii) herein) and (ii) The first part of the third sentence was originally written as follows The annual payment shall be increased annually (i) based on an inflationary rate not-to- exceed 2% of the full cash value base of 3939 Landmark Street and (ii) The Commission may wish to discuss this suggested revision to the proposed Conditions of Approval Staff agrees with Commissioner Muranaka's revision to the second part of the third sentence and has added a new paragraph to Condition No 48 This new paragraph gives the City the authority to require the applicant to perform an assessment of the property at the applicant's expense, should substantial improvements be done on the site Commissioner Muranaka also asked that a condition be added that holds the City harmless should a lawsuit be filed as a result of the project A new Condition No 50 addresses the hold harmless concern Condition No 49 had to be revised to take into account the elimination of the CEQA review period reference Attachment No 1 is a strike-out/underline version of the original proposed resolution that incorporates the above suggested amendments except for Commissioner Muranaka s suggestion for the first part of the third sentence in Condition No 48 Attachment No 2 contains the same proposed amended resolution without the strike-outs and underlines Please refer to the June 8, 2005 Agenda Item Report for a full discussion on the project and for reference to all attachments ATTACHMENTS 1 Draft Revised Planning Commission Resolution No 2005-P013 in Strike- Out/Underline Form 2 Draft Revised Planning Commission Resolution No 2005-P013 without Strike-Outs and UnderlinesCITY OF CULVER CITY Planning Division A ttachment No 12 "We Keep the Heart of Screenland Beating" PLANNING COMMISSION MEMORANDUM Date August 10 2005 To Honorable Chair and Members of the Planning Commission f From Jose Mendivil, Associate Planner Planning Division nsti' Re Clarification of Condition No 43 of Resolution No 2005-P013 (CUP P- 2005019 & AUP P-2005018 for 3939 Landmark Street — Park Century School) On July 13, 2005, the Planning Commission approved the Conditional Use Permit and Administrative Use Permit applications for Park Century School, allowing the applicant to convert an existing industrial building into a private elementary school At the July 13 2005, public hearing, the Commission discussed their desire to require a left turn pocket on westbound Washington Boulevard at the intersection of Washington Boulevard and Landmark Street The Commission decided to amend proposed Condition No 43 of the CUP/AUP resolution to require the installation of the left-turn pocket The Commission was informed that a parking lane would have to be eliminated in order to accommodate the left-turn pocket and that Howard Industries on the north side of Washington Boulevard asked that westbound parking spaces along the north side of Washington Boulevard not be taken out Delivery trucks use the parking spaces early in the morning for queuing for Howard Industries Commissioner Maim asked if the eastbound parking spaces on the south side of Washington Boulevard could be eliminated instead of the parking spaces on the north side Reasons given for the elimination of parking spaces on the south side included the Howard Industries use of the parking spaces on the north side, the lack of metered parking on the south side, and the vacancy of the properties on the south side All Commissioners agreed that a left turn pocket should be required and no one objected to the elimination of the spaces on the south side of Washington Boulevard It is staffs understanding that the Commission s intent was to require a left turn pocket with the elimination of parking spaces on the south side Below is Condition No 43, worded in a manner that staff believes, complies with the wishes of the Commission The applicant shall install a traffic signal at the intersection of Washington Boulevard and Landmark Street The new traffic signal shall be connected to the City's ATSAC system, contain a battery backup system, and shall be installed with a Transit Priority System (this is a mitigation measure) The applicant shall install a left turn pocket along westbound Washington Boulevard If elimination of a parking lane is required in order to accommodate the left turn pocket, then the Culver City Employees take pride in effectively providing the highest levels of service to enrich the quality of life for the community by building on our tradition of more than seventy five years of public service by our present commitment and by our dedication to meet the challenges of the future PRINTED ON RECYCLED P PERAugust 10 2005 Condition No 43 CUP for Park Century School Page 2 eastbound parking spaces on the south side of Washington Boulevard shall be removed However the new property owner of the properties on the south side of Washington Boulevard objects to the elimination of parking spaces adjacent to the south side properties They are interested in potentially developing the south side properties with street level commercial uses In their estimation, street level commercial uses will be at a disadvantage if adjacent street parking is not available Additionally, upon further inspection of the Washington Boulevard/Landmark Street intersection, parking on the south side of Washington Boulevard is metered The Park Century School Traffic Study erroneously indicated that south side parking spaces are not metered The only method of securing parking lanes on both sides of the street while maintaining two lanes of travel in both directions (and installing a new left turn pocket), would be for the City to require a dedication of land to widen Washington Boulevard Dedication would normally be required at the time a discretionary application has been submitted (and staff had determined approval of the request will create sufficient impacts to the public right-of-way that street widening is necessary to lessen those impacts) There are no current discretionary requests from property owners on either side of Washington Boulevard at the intersection of Landmark Street Staff is asking for consensus in clarifying Condition No 43 The Commission could decide a final outcome based on four possibilities they are|109| Require a left turn pocket with elimination of eastbound parking on the south side of Washington Boulevard,|109| Require a left turn pocket with elimination of westbound parking on the north side of Washington Boulevard, 3 Require a left turn pocket without language that states which parking lane should be eliminated (essentially letting staff decide which parking lane should be taken out at the permit review phase) and|109| Eliminate the requirement for a left turn pocket Attached to this memo is draft Resolution No 2005-P013, as staff understands it to be amended by the Planning Commission If you have any questions please call me Jose Mendivil Associate Planner (310) 253-5757 Resolution attachment enclosed with memo 2c7?- RECEIVED APPEAL TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF CULVER CITY SP 1 a ?"1.15 Culver City This Appeal is from Resolution No 2005-P013 as amended by clarification of the ogghiwg Division condition of approval for CUP-2005019 and AUP-2005018-Park Century School located at 3939 Landmark Street and the Light Manufacturing (M-1) zone Condition No 43 of the Resolution requires the applicant to install a traffic signal at the intersection of Washington Boulevard and Landmark Street The purpose of installing the traffic signal was to provide a mitigation measure for the intensification of use and traffic that was being created on Washington Boulevard Further, the city staff was instructed to work with the city's traffic engineer so as to minimize any impacts to the extent possible that may occur by the installation as to the west bound left turn traffic from Washington Boulevard onto Landmark This condition and the following clarification which will be discussed below fails to analyze the impacts and m fact creates a greater impact to the surrounding properties on both the north side and south side of Washington Boulevard, within the immediate vicnuty of Landmark Street The clarification of Condition No 43 failed to resolve the issue, as there was no determination as to whether or not the parking lane should be eliminated when the left turn pocket is in fact striped even though discussion at the Planning Commission and the subsequent meeting lead one in that direction The commission further instructed the staff to work with the applicants and the effective property owners in order to minimize the impacts A meeting took place on September 6, 2005 m order to address the issue at hand At the meeting, alternatives were presented with respect to examining the impacts but no decisive decisions were made, nor studies ordered to determine the extent the impact would in fact import upon the adjacent owners Therefore, as of the date of this Appeal, there has been no Resolution as to the mitigation of the impacts and thus based upon the failure of the city to properly analyze, study or further investigate the matter it has become necessary for the owners, Abraham and Ester Winter of the property located at 8855 Washington Boulevard, Culver City, Cahfonua to file this Appeal The Appellants are the owners of the property located at 8855 West Washington Boulevard and the property is adjacent to the left-hand turn lane pocket If the Commission's condition is imposed and the left-hand turn pocket is provided, the parking on the north side of Washington Boulevard adjacent to the Appellant's property will be eliminated for some 200,300 feet in order to allow a pass-through lane to be constructed The Commission realized the impact and made the determination that the traffic will be backed up to Washington and National Boulevard Increasing the level of service at that intersection would further impact the traffic flow both as to the south bound direction at the Landmark intersection, as well as the westbound traffic on Washington Boulevard Based upon the projection of the number of cars entering, the left-hand pocket, the sequencing of the light at that intersection, and the number of cars arriving to turn left at that intersection, along with the cars entering the new proposed development on the south side of the street, this will create not only a significant back-up to the westerly direction but also would impact the eastbound traffic What the Commission did not do is study or analyze the 3101 6 APPEAL TO CITY COUNCIUCULVER CITY 1 ATTACHMENT NO 13 2oLfimpact by a qualified traffic engineer to determine the impacts on the surrounding property owners and their property Further, by eliminating the parking on the northbound side of Washington Boulevard m that area, in the early morning hours, i e 7 30 to 10 30 it would matenally deprive the Appellant and others from being able to use the much needed city parking meters for their respective customers as well as the ability to queue its trucks for entry into the Appellant's property site It should be noted that the Appellant occupies the property which was ongmally part of a redevelopment area in the city of Culver City as its main distribution center for all of Southern California Part of its operation not only receives substantial inventory but also distributes substantial inventory, which needs to be dispersed before the hours of 10 00 a m In order to handle the distribution, the Appellant receive approximately 12 trucks between those hours, plus customers who pick-up parts and inventory Further, it should be understood that the business of the Appellant was induced to come to this area, as it was a blighted area, for which the Appellant has invested substantial dollars The Appellant has moved its main plant as indicated above to this area in order to disperse the Appellant's merchandise to other areas of Southern Califorma To deprive this Appellant of the ability to conduct its busmess for the benefit of a school within an mdustnal area, is no longer a proper land use and as such is not compatible with other uses within the area Proper land use requires findmgs to be made showing compatible uses especially if a CUP is required This school while it may be a worthy institution is not compatible with the uses of an M-1 zone as evidence by the limitation on number of students and staff Further, while there is another school within the area, that school has totally different ingress and egress patterns, which do not m any way impact traffic or the uses and others within the neighborhood It should be noted that this school because it's m a cul-de-sac area, only has one- way in and out and as such, creates its own substantial impacts which are urumtigable without creating substantial adverse impacts for adjacent property owners The purpose of mitigation is not only to lessen the use but to also mitigate any subsequent adverse impact that the use causes on other conforming uses within the zone The Commission could have without creating additional impacts create a different route that did not in any way impact the streets or the intersection by requiring right turn entry onto Landmark for the school use While this may have required the school parents or school buses, to use a different route into the street this would not in any way impact or impair the traffic flow There are other and better streets that already have left-hand turn pockets on them that the school buses and parents of the school could transverse Further, other streets already have the width and capacity to handle the increased traffic and would not require either widernng of the street, creation of a left-hand turn pocket and/or elimination of valuable parking and queuing area Further, in reviewing the traffic analysis that were presented on behalf of the desire to put the school in this area, at no time was there ever a suggestion by any traffic engineer that a left-hand turn pocket be created at this location This was done as an after thought 3101 6 APPEAL TO CITY COUNCIUCULVER CITY - 2By 7/ — Murray D Fischei:\- Dated V 3101 6 APPEAL TO CITY COUNCIL/CULVER CITY 3 In talking to different traffic engineers, they have indicated that even with a left-hand turn traffic lane, there will be significant traffic delays and back-ups on West Washmgton Boulevard as it will interfere with the flow pattern This lane would not lessen the impact but most likely mcrease the impact by the significant number of cars and buses, which will be entering Landmark m the mornmg hours One of the alternatives that were discussed at the September 6th meeting was the potential of widening the street on the south side of the property While widening would materially help with the creation of the left-hand turn pocket, it would still not resolve the pass-through and parking requirements on the north side of the property Land use planning does not make sense when in order to lessen the impact, created by a potential user, a condition is created that will matenally impose greater impacts in the area as a whole This Appeal is respectfully submitted by the Law Offices of Murray D Fischer, a Professional Corporation on behalf of Abraham and Ester Winter LAW OFFICES OF MURRAY D FISCHER A Professional Corporation Fri C=P 4"11 C"3 r-r4 tv4' rn •"1::1 rri 9:7 C""r COBoston Brussels Chicago Frankfurt Hamburg Hong Kong London Los Angeles Milan Moscow New Jersey New York Northern Virginia Orange County Pans San Diego San Francisco Shanghai Silicon Valley Singapore Tokyo Washington D C RECEIVED NOV 04 2005 Culver City Plonning Division File No 035155 0001 George J Mal!sten 633 West Fifth Street Suite 4000 Direct Dial (213) 891-8196 ATTACHMENT NO 14 Los Angeles California 90071 2007 george mihIsten@lw corn Tel (213) 485 1234 Fax (213) 891 8763 www lw corn LATH AM&WATK IN 5 up FIRM /AFFILIATE OFFICES November 4 2005 VIA MESSENGER Mr Thomas Gorham Mr Jose Mendivil Planning Division City of Culver City 9770 Culver Blvd, 2nd Floor Culver City CA 90232 Re Park Century School (CUP P 2005019 & AUP P-2005018) Dear Mr Gorham & Mr Mendivil Thank you for meeting with me, Sean Matsler and Murray Fischer on September 28 and October 31 2005 to discuss Howard Industries and Park Century School s options in connection with Howard Industries appeal of Conditional Use Permit P-2005019 and Administrative Use Permit P-2005018 We were encouraged by our productive meetings and look forward to reaching a speedy resolution This letter, signed by representatives from both Park Century School and Howard Industries Inc , memorializes the understandings reached by Howard Industries and the Park Century School It is our understanding that staff concurs in this approach The sole issue raised by the appeal is the imposition by the Planning Commission of a requirement that Park Century School implement a left turn lane from westbound Washington Boulevard to Landmark Street The proposed improvement is not necessary to mitigate any impact identified in the traffic study for Park Century School and was not recommended by Transportation or Planning staff Based on our discussions, Park Century School and Howard Industries jointly support the following revision of Condition 43 CONDITION 43 (REVISED) 1 The applicant shall install a traffic signal at the intersection of Washington Boulevard and Landmark Street The new traffic signal shall be connected to the City s ATSAC system contain a battery backup system, and shall be installed with a Transit Priority System (this is a mitigation measure) The applicant shall install a left turn poelcct along westbound Washington Boulevard at thc intersection City Staff, including Planning staff and the City s Traffic applicant shall conduct and complete a traffic study ("Traffic Study") within 12 months I Deleted language is noted in strikeout and new language is noted in bold underline Lo? LA\1490958 7 035155 0001Mr Thomas Gorham & Mr Jose Menchvil November 4 2005 Page 2 CIFIAM&WATKINSUP following the commencement of school operations (considered to be the first day of classes) or at an earlier date as determined by the Planning Manager The scope of the Traffic Study shall be determined by the City's Traffic Engineer and the Planning Manager The Traffic Study shall examine the need for a left turn lane on Washington Boulevard at Landmark Street, shall make a recommendation as to whether a left turn lane is required and, if required, shall recommend a configuration for the left turn lane The Traffic Study shall be subiect to review and approval by the Planning Division and the Public Works/Engineering Department Prior to issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall post a bond with the City, in a form satisfactory to the Public Works/Engineering Department, in the amount of twenty five thousand dollars ($25,000 00) to pay the cost of implementing a left turn lane on Washington Boulevard at Landmark Street should the City decide to implement such a left turn lane within a four (4) year period following the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy The bond shall be returned to the applicant if no such left turn lane is deemed necessary by the City within four (4) years followin g the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy We believe that the Revised Condition 43 is consistent with the discussions we all had on September 28 and October 31 By signmg below both Park Century School and Howard Industries demonstrate their willingness to proceed under the terms outlined above Please do not hesitate to contact me at (213) 891-8196 with any questions or comments Very truly yours, George J Mthlsten of LATHAM & WATKINS LLP Murray Fischer, Esq Counsel for Howard Industries cc Ms Susan Evans Sean Matsler Esq Park Century School LA\1490958 7 035155 000110:1 BATHROOM ROOM BARON NUMBER ow Attachment No 15 PARK CENTURY SCHOOL Landmark Campus 3939 Landmark St Culver City, CA LEGEND (SYMBOLS EXISTING GORE ANDIOR WALL TO REMAIN NEW HALL EXLSTWO PARTITION TO BE DEMOLISHED REVISION REFERENCE SECTION 14,ER SECTION REFER.CE SHEET NUMBER sDET H.T A/L,,NuUMB mBEEAR DETAIL REFERENCE o,Cw— KLEMM., NUMBER SHEET N., ELEVATOR REFERENCE C - ELEVATION REFERENCE - INUIC,E3 DOOR NUMBER sej ---- INDICATES IMNDOW NUMBER Eli ORE BOINGUISHER PARTITKIN TYPE (SEE SHEETS FOR DETAILS) r — FINISH HEIGHT F J — FINISH NUMBER 88153Yr / FURNITURE POORE AMOR ECUPD5NT NUMB. CENTERLINE ALIGN START POINT OF CEILING FLOOR DRAIN C IA HG E IA CELlAR HE IA NT (ORI FLOOR FIERY /04000 FLOOR HEIGHT HEIGHT NARK (DATUM POINT NIT SI N T 1 TITLE SHEET G 1 _ SURVEY LI PRELIMINARY PLANTING PLAN SITE PLAN AT 1_ - PARKING PLAN/ QUEUING PLAN A e GROUND FLOOR PIAN12ND FLOOR PLAN 03 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS AS ROOF PLAN AS GROUND FLOOR EX/T PLAN 07 2ND FLOOR EMT PLAN ASSESSORS PARCEL NUMBER 4206 013 OVA SHEET INDEX kOLS A50E000R PARCEL NUMBER 4203 013 012 LEGAL DESCRIPTION JUS11FICAT/CIN OF AREA SY OCUPANCY CLASSIFICATION RATIO ARCH TECTURAL ENTIRE BUILDING RATIO E 1 (37379 S F 'BO 80B (ALLOWABLE) 46 A 2 063/ DEL 54 000 (ALLOWABLE) 12 FIRST FLOOR El 03074 S F 700 600 (ALLOWABLE) 33 R2R6DTAF 1 40 500 (ALLOWABLE) IL SITE PLAN ISCULE (F, —r J • - COLUMN SSE E2-'1 ,1TA —GAROTH CONCRETE SYMBOLS SCOPE OF WORK CONVERSION SPAN EXISTING IT DUSTRIAL USE BUILDING RICA NEW SCHOOL GRADES 2 B SCOPE OF WORK ARCHITECT CHRETADHERE IMO AIR ARCHTECTS 60806IELRDSE AVE SUITE 130 005 SNORES CA 30046 PH329 655 MO EX 323 6553975 ARCHITECTURAL ADVISOR RANK° GERRY FAH LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT TAEL UR 30 NORTH RAYMOND ME SURE 814 PASADENA, CA 51103 H 6n 798 311S EX 628 70 2035 PROJECT TEAM 3979 LANDMARK ST 1|1010|VICINITY MAP 4/27(0 oled US TITLE SHEET T-1 BUILDING DATA BUILDING TYPE TYPE III ORE RATED FULLY SPRINKLERED !ALLOWABLE FLOOR AREA 60 550 S F OCCUPANCY El GROIN:7E800FL 260050 F SECOND FLOOR 17 245 S F TO A PT- . 43650S F _1 TOTAL SITE AREA 53 838 24 S F BUILDING ABEAM 705 S F GDOUETAOE BASS OI L - PARKING SPACES PROHDED 47 STANDARD HANDICAPPED PARKING SPACES 2 COMPACT PARMNG SPACES 13 TANDEM PARKING SPACES 16 PARKING SUMMARY PARKING SPACES REQUIRED 47 TOTAL PARKING AREA 17554 STOP 5 5! =_CQ KI A_g_an.-__i LANDSCAPING SUMMARY TOTAL LANDSCAPING AREA 2485 275 F PLI — DSCAPIND COVERAGE ANN E7 LalING BUILDING FLOOR AREA 37 200S F RECEIVED APR 2 7 2005 Culver City --Pla Chri 10P/la Ar BODO Mel use A e S Los Angeles Cr 323 655 B8DD 12205 ABBREVIATIONS BUILDING INFORMATION FOE MORE WMPLETE OCT r INFORMATIOITI OFF SHEETS A I/A 1 / ALLOWABLE CALC AS ENTIRE BUILDING El 55,200 04 80 500 FIRST FLOOR El 20 21100 3 60 600 ENTIRE BUILDING 52 13 500 X 4 54 000 FIRST FLOOR 02 13 500 X 3 40 5003 (N) LIGHT FIXTURE ,C), ACCESSIBLE H7 12 10 enram TYP MDR (9) 40 20 203 7 205 3 WALL POINTED IVORY (RIBS 0 HI COME ELK ST it (N) LIGHT FIX HT 1 0 NEW LOGGIA /S PROPOSED AS ART IN PUBLIC PLACES 2E c) 1; N. PARCEL A 2 STORY CONCRETE BUILDING (PARK CENTURY SCHOOL) El LOT 12 NEW RACE AREA 43 DSOS F (IV) 12 0 DIR Al CORRUGATED STAINLESS STEEL GATES RC RANDOM PERFORATIONS PROVIDE FIRE DEPT 4"/ LOCK BOX CARVE 0 HI CONE ELK_„/ (E) GONG SWALE VVALL PAINTED IVORY try/ (N) 5 x 5 0 HI CORRUGATED STAINLESS sTEET GATES PROPOSED LOCATION FOR NEW BACKFLOw --- PREVENRDN DEVICE FOR FIRE SPRINKLERS )S( LIGHT FIXTURE HT 8 0 (N) WORD CANOPY RE HT 12 (N) LIGHT FIXTURE HT 0 0 STANDARD HAND/CAPPED PARMNG STALLS NOTE FOR MORE DETAILED SITE AND SURROUNDING INFORMATION n-_,,,t, 1....,,,_ .74 / . r 7 PARCEL ES '-',---- , , 1 5 ,, POR LOT 12 n - , --• --.7.„_ ' --K r-• - / "\/, i'--- •--- • 'P - ---/ — j ,,,,, MEV wiDE LANDSCAPE OVERHANG CONTINUOUS (E)8 0 HI CONE MK WALL PAINTED IVORY (N) LIGHT FIXTURE HT 5 01 -/C NILE@ ,o HT 00 14 =4.7( m_ ro.rweerm LINE OF EXISTING WATER EASEMENT (N) LIGHT FIXTURE AT 2 0 (N) LIGHT FIXTURE HT 2 0 (N) LIGHT FIXTURE PROVIDE FIRE DEPT LOCK BOX EXISTING FIRE ACCESS/ CHAIN LINK GATE T R (N) LIGHT FIXTURE HT L70|109| 20 ( 1)2 _,/ (E) 6 X a 2400 GI DOWN SPOUT IATI CONE SPLASH ELK 0 Al CONC LL PAINTED (S) CONE TWO PROPERTY LINE SITE PLAN SCALE dy114,:m aer (N) LIGHT FIX HT O. OHO FIX CW, Chnstopher V W A 8060 Melrose A e Sr Los AngeleS CP 323 655 IMO t323 65 N) TRANSFO ER LOCATION N) HT FMTURE 7 8 3 WOE LANDSCAPE OVERHANG CONTINUOUS (N) LIGHT FIXTURE HT 3 0 TYP (E) CONC SWALE n PARKING SUMMARY PARKING SPACES REQUIRED 47 PARKING SPACES PROVIDED 47 STANDARD HANDICAPPED PARKING SPACES 2 COMPACT PARKING SPACES 13 TANDEM PARKING SPACES 16 TOTAL PARKING AREA 1705431 S F PARKING LOT COVERAGE 013/ LANDSCAPING SUMMARY TOTAL LANDSCAPING AREA 246627 SF LANDSCAPING COVERAGE ASS4/2 /65 AS NOTED NP PARKING AND QUEUING PLAN SCrO ) PARKING PLAN 23 CAR QUEUING A- 1 1 ow' arstopher v W Arc BM Mel ose Ave Su Los Angele6 GA NOTE SEE SURVEY FOR MORE DETAILED SITE AND SURROUNDING INFORMATION PROPERTY LJNE 2 STO RY CONCRETE BUILDING (PARK CENTURY SCHOOL) E (E) GONG SWALE PARCEL A LOT 12 NEW FLo011 AREA 43 NES 11111. '171 .1 04,11 (E) CONC SWALE NOTE SEE SITE PLAN FOR FIRE LANE DIMENSIONS ACCESSIBLE ENLLAff Ni Ii|1010|PARKING SUMMARY PARKING SPACES REOUIRED 47 PARKING SPACES PROVIDED 47 STANDARD HANDICAPPED PARKING SPACES 2 COMPACT PARKING SPACES 13 TANDEM PARKING SPACES 15 TOTAL PARKING AREA 17954 37 S F PARKING LOT COVERAGE 33 3 A 323 655 BB90 f323 65MOO LEGEND I - INDEPENDENT STUDIES SP SPECIALIST PD - PHONE BOOTH M MAINTENANCE MECHANICAL ELEC. ELECTRICAL RM MC 0 MECNANICAL CHASE SECOND FLOOR PLAN SCALE 18 1-0 @- 0- - GROUND FLOOR PLAN MB 1 LEGEND IS = INDEPENDENT STUDIES SP SPECIAUST P 9 PHONE BOOTH M MAINTENANCE MECHANICAL ELEC ELECTFUCAL NM CWA Chtlaphar V Ward NA Mite. BOBO Melina An Dulls Es0 Los kolas CA (M46 3238568860 fan 0E62875 —I|101010|M CV C.) CO CO CO 0, >— Y < CC C.) 1= < D M 0 I- I— Z C_) z CC ILI0) LLI > C., VI {7) —I c+, D|1010|Ct < a - A A MAR 00 2005 AS NOTED NP NEW FLOOR PLANS A-2NEW CORRUGATED STAINLESS STEEL PATIOS Christaphm V Wad ALIA ArctliMas 0080 Melrose Ave 5908 230 Los Angeles 00 00046 323 655 31390 f323 665 OATS NEW GLASS SCULPTURE (YELLOW) SECOND FL FF ARSTFL. -GS CWA NEw coRRITGATED STAINLESS STEEL PANELS NEW WOOD PANEL BEHIND LOGGIA NEW CPRRUGATED STAINLESS STEEL GATE w/ RANDOM m PERFORATIONS EW ADDRESS NLINI5PALs ABOVE ENTRY ExisTING ENTRY DOOM STOREFRONT BEYOND NEW NORTH ELEVATION NEW WEST ELEVATION Bo NEW CURTAIN WAS StSTEM IN FRONT OF SCOUT SCALE 1/10,1-0 SCALE 1/1 B 1 0 NEW CURTAIN WALL LOGGIA (III SKYLIGHT 15 SKYUCRIT Or? FOR (3) NEW ROOF EQUIPMENT MESH SCREEN NEW ROOFING TA? THROUGHOUT Es sECOND FL F F -0• f7RS, FF NEW CORRUGATED STAINLESS STEEL PANELS NEW OPENINGS IN CONC WALL. TYP 11111111MRS NEW CORRUGATED STAINLESS STEEL PANELS ROOF EatpPmENT MEAT SCREEN EXISTING CONC WALL TOTE FAINTED (IVORY) NEW TRASH AREA WILL AROUND NEW DOORSAYINDOWS i -4.1itmmummenimmeeminin.commi 11115-MERIEMPERSIIIMILIPMM.111. IllitiMalintilMillilittltillit011- nt riMM 1111111 ItliniLi rlii,t....w 1.6.1. n hl---=-=- IIM0,1111111 tint riallir NEW GLASS SCULPTURE (GREEN) 05 2005 •ee AS NOIED rvp NEW EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS MAR - A-3